ML15265A320

2015-09 - Draft - Operating Test Comments

ML15265A320
Person / Time
Site:	Arkansas Nuclear
Issue date:	09/09/2015
From:	Vincent Gaddy Operations Branch IV
To:	Entergy Operations
References
Download: ML15265A320 (6)

Text

AN2 - 2015 - 08 DRAFT OPERATING TEST COMMENTS ADMIN JPMS

4. Job Content

1. 2. 3. Attributes 6.

Errors 5.

JPM# Dyn LOD Explanation U/E/S (D/S) (1-5) IC Cues Critical Scope Over- Job- Minutia (See below for instructions)

Focus Steps (N/B) lap Link RO (A1) 3 S No Comments RO (A2) 3 S No Comments RO (A3) 3 S No Comments RO (A4) 3 E E Values selected from Table 1 and 2 are for 600CPM not 700 CPM as stated in Step 1 of the S performance checklist. Background was given as 375 CPM on the CBO log, The JPM needs to be corrected to be consistent with the desired values.

These will be revised.

Revised the values JPM Sat SRO (A5) 3 E E Critical Steps need to be edited to address the appropriate Operator. Step 2 and 3 correctly S evaluates operators A and B. Step 4 needs to have the first paragraph in the standards section changed to operator C. Step 5 need to be changed to operator D. The key needs to be corrected to reflect the appropriate answers for operator C and D.

These will be revised.

Comments revised JPM Sat SRO (A6) 3 S No Comments Added statement for student to provide reason for why conditions are met?

JPM Sat SRO (A7) 3 S No Comments SRO (A8) 3 S No Comments SRO (A9) 3 S No Comments Instructions for Completing Matrix This form is not contained in or required by NUREG-1021. Utilities are not required or encouraged to use it. The purpose of this form is to enhance regional consistency in reviewing operating tests. Additional information on these areas may be found in Examination Good Practices Appendix D. Check or mark any item(s) requiring comment and explain the issue in the space provided.

1. Determine whether the task is dynamic (D) or static (S). A dynamic task is one that involves continuous monitoring and response to varying parameters. A static task is basically a system reconfiguration or realignment.

2. Determine level of difficulty (LOD) using established 1-5 rating scale. Levels 1 and 5 represent inappropriate (low or high) discriminatory level for the license being tested.

3. Check the appropriate box when an attribute weakness is identified:

The initiating cue is not sufficiently clear to ensure the operator understands the task and how to begin.

The JPM does not contain sufficient cues that are objective (not leading).

All critical steps (elements) have not been properly identified.

Scope of the task is either too narrow (N) or too broad (B).

Excessive overlap with other part of operating test or written examination.

4. Check the appropriate box when a job content error is identified:

Topics not linked to job content (e.g., disguised task, not required in real job).

Task is trivial and without safety significance. 0 Page 1 of 6 OBDI 202 - IOLE Process

AN2 - 2015 - 08 DRAFT OPERATING TEST COMMENTS ADMIN JPMS

4. Job Content

1. 2. 3. Attributes 6.

Errors 5.

JPM# Dyn LOD Explanation U/E/S (D/S) (1-5) IC Cues Critical Scope Over- Job- Minutia (See below for instructions)

Focus Steps (N/B) lap Link

5. Based on the reviewer=s judgment, is the JPM as written (U)nacceptable (requiring repair or replacement), in need of (E)ditorial enhancement, or (S)atisfactory?

6. Provide a brief description of any U or E rating in the explanation column 0 Page 2 of 6 OBDI 202 - IOLE Process

AN2 - 2015 - 08 DRAFT OPERATING TEST COMMENTS CONTROL ROOM/IN-PLANT SYSTEMS JPMS

4. Job Content

1. 2. 3. Attributes 6.

Errors 5.

JPM# Dyn LOD Explanation (D/S) (1-5) IC Cues Critical Scope Over- Job- Minutia U/E/S (See below for instructions)

Focus Steps (N/B) lap Link S1 3 E E JPM Step 2 - If 2CV-5104-2 does not need to be shut is this step critical?

S These will be revised.

Annotated the critical component in Step 2.

Modified the examiner cue to incorporate valve position.

JPM Sat S2 3 S No Comments S3 3 E E JPM Step 8 is not critical S These will be revised.

JPM Revised JPM Sat S4 3 S No Comments Added examiner note after Step 1 for method of establishing steam generator feed flow during validation.

JPM Sat S5 3 E E JPM Step 1 is not critical if there is not a required action.

S Add in critical step that step 6 valves must be opened prior to lifting the PZR code safety as stated in the standard.

These will be revised.

Added examiner cue in Step 10.

JPM Sat S6 3 S No Comments Added Examiner note after step 8 for information JPM Sat S7 3 S No Comments S8 3 S No Comments P1 3 S Task standard needs the word performing removed.

JPM Step 1 - State the expected indication after taking the pump to off.

These will be revised.

JPM Sat P2 3 S No Comments P3 3 E E JPM Step 5 is the valve already closed? If so, step is not critical.

S These will be revised.

JPM revised JPM Sat Instructions for Completing Matrix This form is not contained in or required by NUREG-1021. Utilities are not required or encouraged to use it. The purpose of this form is to enhance regional consistency in reviewing operating tests. Additional information on these areas may be found in Examination Good Practices Appendix D. Check or mark any item(s) requiring comment and explain the issue in the space provided. 0 Page 3 of 6 OBDI 202 - IOLE Process

AN2 - 2015 - 08 DRAFT OPERATING TEST COMMENTS CONTROL ROOM/IN-PLANT SYSTEMS JPMS

4. Job Content

1. 2. 3. Attributes 6.

Errors 5.

JPM# Dyn LOD Explanation (D/S) (1-5) IC Cues Critical Scope Over- Job- Minutia U/E/S (See below for instructions)

Focus Steps (N/B) lap Link

1. Determine whether the task is dynamic (D) or static (S). A dynamic task is one that involves continuous monitoring and response to varying parameters. A static task is basically a system reconfiguration or realignment.

2. Determine level of difficulty (LOD) using established 1-5 rating scale. Levels 1 and 5 represent inappropriate (low or high) discriminatory level for the license being tested.

3. Check the appropriate box when an attribute weakness is identified:

$ The initiating cue is not sufficiently clear to ensure the operator understands the task and how to begin.

$ The JPM does not contain sufficient cues that are objective (not leading).

$ All critical steps (elements) have not been properly identified.

$ Scope of the task is either too narrow (N) or too broad (B).

$ Excessive overlap with other part of operating test or written examination.

4. Check the appropriate box when a job content error is identified:

Topics not linked to job content (e.g., disguised task, not required in real job).

Task is trivial and without safety significance.

5. Based on the reviewer=s judgment, is the JPM as written (U)nacceptable (requiring repair or replacement), in need of (E)ditorial enhancement, or (S)atisfactory?

6. Provide a brief description of any U or E rating in the explanation column.

7. Save initial review comments as normal black text; indicate how comments were resolved using blue text so that each JPM used on the exam is reflected by a (S)atisfactory resolution on this form. 0 Page 4 of 6 OBDI 202 - IOLE Process

AN2 - 2015 - 08 DRAFT OPERATING TEST COMMENTS SCENARIOS Scenario 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9.

10. Explanation (See below for instructions)

Set ES TS Crit IC Pred TL L/C Eff U/E/S 1 S S S S S S S S S No Comments Event 1 added examiner note for SIT pressure Limits Added procedure note to step 1 on page 17 Modified procedure notes on page 21 Modified examiner note for Event 6,7&8 Scenario Sat 2 S S S S S S S S S No Comments Event 1 Added cue for Unit 1 EDG inoperability Added examiner cue for NLO report Event 3 - Corrected termination criteria Event 4 Added NLO investigate cue for CCP trip Added steps for system alignment following pump trip Event 6 - modified termination criteria Scenario Sat 3 S S S S S S S S S No Comments Modified initial conditions and cues to place A MFP out of service Event 3 - Added steps for shifting letdown flow controllers Event 5 - modified required TS entries Event 8,9 - Modified cues for loss of EDGs Event 8,9 - Added breaker identifiers for energizing 2A4 Scenario Sat Instructions for Completing Matrix This form is not contained in or required by NUREG-1021. Utilities are not required or encouraged to use it. The purpose of this form is to enhance regional consistency in reviewing operating test scenario sets. Additional information on these areas may be found in Examination Good Practices Appendix D. Check or mark any item(s) requiring comment and explain the issue in the space provided.

1. ES: ES-301 checklists 4, 5, & 6 satisfied.

2. TS: Set includes SRO TS actions for each SRO, with required actions explicitly detailed.

3. Crit: Each manipulation or evolution has explicit success criteria documented in Form ES-D-2.

4. IC: Out of service equipment and other initial conditions reasonably consistent between scenarios and not predictive of scenario events and actions.

5. Pred: Scenario sequence and other factors avoid predictability issues.

6. TL: Time line constructed, including event and process triggered conditions, such that scenario can run without routine examiner cuing.

7. L/C: Length and complexity for each scenario in the set is reasonable for the crew mix being examined, such that all applicants have reasonably similar exposure and events are needed for evaluation purposes.

8. Eff: Sequence of events is reasonably efficient for examination purposes, especially with respect to long delays or interactions. 0 Page 5 of 6 OBDI 202 - IOLE Process

AN2 - 2015 - 08 DRAFT OPERATING TEST COMMENTS SCENARIOS

9. Based on the reviewer=s judgment, rate the scenario set as (U)nacceptable (requiring repair or replacement), in need of (E)ditorial enhancement, or (S)atisfactory.

10. Provide a brief description of problem in the explanation column.

11. Save initial review comments as normal black text; indicate how comments were resolved using blue text so that each JPM used on the exam is reflected by a (S)atisfactory resolution on this form. 0 Page 6 of 6 OBDI 202 - IOLE Process