ML14162A371

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search

5/22/2014 Summary of Meeting with Entergy Operations, Inc. to Discuss Flooding Hazard Reevaluation Extension Request for Arkansas Nuclear One, Units 1 and 2; Near-Term Task Force Recommendation 2.1
ML14162A371
Person / Time
Site: Arkansas Nuclear  Entergy icon.png
Issue date: 06/26/2014
From: Peter Bamford
Plant Licensing Branch IV
To:
Bamford P
References
TAC MF3659, TAC MF3660
Download: ML14162A371 (4)


Text

UNITED STATES NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION WASHINGTON, D.C. 20555-0001 June 26, 2014 LICENSEE: Entergy Operations, Inc.

FACILITY: Arkansas Nuclear One, Units 1 and 2

SUBJECT:

SUMMARY

OF MAY 22,2014, TELECONFERENCE MEETING WITH ENTERGY OPERATIONS, INC., REGARDING NEAR-TERM TASK FORCE RECOMMENDATION 2.1 FLOOD HAZARD REEVALUATION SCHEDULE EXTENSION REQUEST, ARKANSAS NUCLEAR ONE, UNITS 1 AND 2 (TAC NOS. MF3659 AND MF3660)

On May 22, 2014, a Category 1 teleconference public meeting was held between the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) and representatives of Entergy Operations, Inc.

(Entergy, the licensee), at NRC Headquarters, One White Flint North, 11555 Rockville Pike, Rockville, Maryland. The purpose of the teleconference meeting was to discuss the licensee's proposed schedule extension for completion of a flood hazard reevaluation at Arkansas Nuclear One, Units 1 and 2, requested by the NRC, by letter dated March 12, 2012 (Agencywide Documents Access and Management System (ADAMS) Accession No. ML12053A340). The extension request was submitted on March 12, 2014 (ADAMS Accession No. ML14071A459),

and was supplemented by letter dated April14, 2014 (ADAMS Accession No. ML14105A366).

The proposed extension for completion of the flood hazard reevaluation would be from an original date of March 12, 2014, to a date 6 months after receipt of certain input data from the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (USACE). A list of attendees is provided in the enclosure.

Highlights from this meeting on May 22, 2014, include the following:

  • The NRC staff stated that the purpose for the call was for gathering information on the proposed extension only. The NRC staff stated that holding the meeting did not imply approval or disapproval of any of the methods used by the licensee, nor would a decision regarding the proposed extension be made during the meeting.
  • To date, the licensee has evaluated all hazard mechanisms except for flooding from upstream dam failure. Results of the re-evaluation performed to date indicate that flooding height is below the current licensing basis (CLB). In other words, according to the licensee, local intense precipitation results do not trigger an Integrated Assessment, and interim actions are not needed at this time.
  • The NRC staff noted that over one-half of the extension period (3.5 months) is for report evaluation, review, and approval. The licensee stated that it might be possible to shorten this time by performing some steps in parallel versus in series; however, it would be difficult to determine if that is feasible at this time.
  • The licensee proposed determining the hydrostatic/hydrodynamic forces on its inundated structures using results from a one-dimensional (1-D) model. The NRC staff questioned this approach and asked if conservative velocities, such as river centerline velocities, would be used. The licensee stated that it would use a conservative result from its model(s).
  • The NRC staff asked about the potential need for a 2-D model. The licensee expressed the view that this level of model is not necessary given the results and that use of bounding modeling results and standard guidelines like American Society of Civil Engineers (ASCE) 7-1 0 should be sufficient to conservatively analyze the building loads during the flooding event.
  • The licensee stated that its schedule assumes results from the USAGE that are approximately the same as the water depths and velocities it has generated to date. The licensee also stated it expects the final water height result to be within its CLB.

One member of the public was in attendance for the teleconference meeting and no public meeting feedback forms were submitted.

Please direct any inquiries to me at 301-415-2833 or at Peter. Bamford@nrc.gov.

fl?C:c~~~

Peter Bamford, Proj t Manager Plant Licensing Branch IV-1 Division of Operating Reactor Licensing Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation Docket Nos. 50-313 and 50-368

Enclosure:

List of Attendees cc w/encls: Distribution via Listserv

LIST OF ATTENDEES MAY 22. 2014. TELECONFERENCE MEETING WITH ENTERGY OPERATIONS. INC.

NEAR-TERM TASK FORCE RECOMMENDATION 2.1 FLOOD HAZARD REEVALUATION SCHEDULE EXTENSION REQUEST ARKANSAS NUCLEAR ONE. UNITS 1 AND 2 DOCKET NOS. 50-313 AND 50-368 NAME ORGANIZATION Peter Bamford Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC)

Chris Cook NRC Ken See NRC Ed Miller NRC Rob Kuntz NRC Fernando Ferrante NRC Natalie Mosher Entergy Don Bentley Entergy Dale James Entergy Stephenie Pyle Entergy Bryan Ford Entergy Steve Saunders Entergy Dan Brown AREVA Cindy Fasano AREVA Carrington Dillon AREVA David Leone Goldberg-Zoino & Associates (GZA)

Christine Stonier GZA Steve Osting Public Enclosure

  • The licensee proposed determining the hydrostatic/hydrodynamic forces on its inundated structures using results from a one-dimensional (1-D) model. The NRC staff questioned this approach and asked if conservative velocities, such as river centerline velocities, would be used. The licensee stated that it would use a conservative result from its model(s).
  • The NRC staff asked about the potential need for a 2-D model. The licensee expressed the view that this level of model is not necessary given the results and that use of bounding modeling results and standard guidelines like American Society of Civil Engineers (ASCE) 7-10 should be sufficient to conservatively analyze the building loads during the flooding event.
  • The licensee stated that its schedule assumes results from the USAGE that are approximately the same as the water depths and velocities it has generated to date. The licensee also stated it expects the final water height result to be within its CLB.

One member of the public was in attendance for the teleconference meeting and no public meeting feedback forms were submitted.

Please direct any inquiries to me at 301-415-2833 or at Peter.Bamford@nrc.gov.

IRA/

Peter Bamford, Project Manager Plant Licensing Branch IV-1 Division of Operating Reactor Licensing Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation Docket Nos. 50-313 and 50-368

Enclosure:

List of Attendees cc w/encls: Distribution via Listserv DISTRIBUTION:

PUBLIC RidsNrrLAJBurkhardt Resource TWertz, NRR LPL4-1 Reading RidsNrrPMANO Resource EMiller, NRR RidsAcrsAcnw_MaiiCTR Resource RidsNroDsea Resource RKuntz, NRR RidsNrrDorl Resource RidsRgn4MaiiCenter Resource RidsNrrDorllp14-1 Resource JNick, EDO RIV ADAMS A ccess1on NOS. M eef mg N0 f ICe ML14120A306 M eetmg s ummary ML14162A371 *v1a. ema1"I OFFICE NRRIDORULPL4-1/PM NRR/DORULPL4-1/LA NRO/DSEAIRHM1/BC* NRR/DORULPL4-1/BC NRRIDORULPL4-1/PM CCook MMarkley PBamford NAME PBamford JBurkhardt* {KErwin for)

DATE 06/10/14 6/12/14 6/25/14 6/26/14 6/26/14 OFFICIAL RECORD COPY