Letter Sequence Acceptance Review |
|---|
|
|
|
|
|---|
Category:Acceptance Review Letter
MONTHYEARML23073A2282023-03-13013 March 2023
Duke Fleet- Adoption of TSTF-554, Revision 1, Revise Reactor Coolant Leakage Requirements - Acceptance Review
ML23058A0562023-02-27027 February 2023
Acceptance of Amendment to Revise Surveillance Frequencies for RCS Pressure Isolation Valve Operational Leakage Testing and Reactor Trip System Instrumentation
ML23048A1512023-02-16016 February 2023
Acceptance Review - Proposed Alternative for Steam Generator Welds (L-2023-LLR-0003)
ML21006A4302021-01-0606 January 2021
Acceptance Review - Duke Fleet RA-20-0207 Request to Revise the Technical Specification for Engineered Safety Feature Actuation System (ESFAS) Instrumentation
ML20157A1062020-06-24024 June 2020
Review of the Fall 2019 Steam Generator Tube Inspections During Refueling Outage No. 22
ML20133K0722020-05-12012 May 2020
Acceptance of Requested Licensing Action Technical Specifications Related to Reducing the Minimum Required Reactor Coolant System Flow Rate and Update the List of Analytical Methods Used in the Determination of Core Operating Limits
ML19311C3412019-11-0707 November 2019
Acceptance Review: Shearon Harris License Amendment Request for TSTF-505
ML18270A1292018-10-0404 October 2018
Acceptance of Requested Licensing Action
ML17319A5012017-11-21021 November 2017
Acceptance Review Letter, License Amendment Request to Revise Updated Final Safety Analysis Report to Incorporate Tornado Missile Risk Evaluator Methodology Into Licensing Basis
ML17261A7272017-09-20020 September 2017
Shearon Harris Nuclear Power Plant, Unit 1 - Acceptance of Requested Licensing Action Regarding Spent Fuel Storage Pool Criticality Analyses (CAC No. MF9996)
ML16308A3702016-11-0707 November 2016
Results of Acceptance Review of Requested Licensing Action Application to Revise Technical Specifications to Adopt TSTF-522, Revision 0 (CAC Nos. MF8422-MF8429)
ML16152A5962016-06-0303 June 2016
NRC Acceptance of Requested Licensing Action Amendment Request
ML15309A7282015-12-0101 December 2015
Acceptance of Requested Licensing Action Regarding Duke Energy Progress, Inc. Application to Revise Technical Specifications to Adopt Methodology Report
ML14157A0552014-06-13013 June 2014
Acceptance of Requested Relief Request I3R-14-Deferral of Reactor Vessel Inspections Inservice Inspection Program-Third 10-Year Interval
ML13329A4572013-11-25025 November 2013
Accepted for Review Shearon Harris--Acceptance Review for Relief Request I3R-13 Reactor Vessel Closure Head Nozzle 37
ML13324B0812013-11-20020 November 2013
E-mail Re. Acceptance Review for Relief Request I3R-12 Repair of Accumulator Fill Valve Piping Weld
ML11181A0162011-07-0101 July 2011
Acceptance for Review of Measurement Uncertainty Recapture Power Uprate License Amendment Request
ML1105300792011-02-18018 February 2011
E-mail, Acceptance Review of ME5410, Application for Exemption for M5 Cladding: 1/19/11
ML1018707202010-07-0909 July 2010
Acceptance Review Regarding a Relief Request for Approval of an Alternative Inservice Inspection Method for Six Pressure Retaining Dissimilar Metal Welds in the Reactor Pressure Vessel Nozzles
ML0935801382009-12-30030 December 2009
Acceptance Review Regarding Request for Exemption from the Requirements of 10 CFR Part 73, Section 73.55
ML0912705692009-05-15015 May 2009
Acceptance Review Re Amendment to Adopt Tech Spec Task Force (TSTF) Standard Tech Spec Change Traveler, TSTF-447, Elimination of Hydrogen Recombiners and Change to Hydrogen and Oxygen Monitors
ML0903603132009-02-0606 February 2009
Acceptance Review Regarding Amendment to Remove Credit for Boraflex in Boiling Water Reactor Spent Fuel Pool Storage Racks
ML0903000302009-01-30030 January 2009
Acceptance Review Regarding Amendment to Adopt National Fire Protection Association 805 Performance-Based Standard for Fire Protection for Light Water Reactor Generating Plants, 2001 Edition
ML0902100672009-01-29029 January 2009
Acceptance Review Regarding Relief Request to Defer an ASME Code Repair of an Emergency Service Water System Weld Until the Next Refueling Outage
ML0902100112009-01-27027 January 2009
Acceptance Review Regarding Amendment to Remove Credit for Boraflex in BWR Spent Fuel Pool Storage Racks
ML0827011582008-09-26026 September 2008
Acceptance Review Regarding the License Amendment Request to Transition to NFPA 805, Performance-Based Standard for Fire Protection for Light Water Reactor Generating Plants.
2023-03-13
[Table view] |
Text
UNITED STATES NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION WASHINGTON, D.C. 20555-0001 June 13, 2014 Mr. Ernest Kapopolous Vice President Shearon Harris Nuclear Power Plant Duke Energy Progress, Inc.
5413 Shearon Harris Road New Hill, NC 27562
SUBJECT:
SHEARON HARRIS NUCLEAR POWER PLANT, UNIT 1- ACCEPTANCE OF REQUESTED LICENSING ACTION REGARDING RELIEF REQUEST 13R-14, DEFERRAL OF REACTOR VESSEL INSPECTIONS, INSERVICE INSPECTION PROGRAM- THIRD 10-YEAR INTERVAL (TAG NO. MF4113)
Dear Mr. Kapopolous:
By letter dated April 25, 2014, Duke Energy Progress, Inc., submitted a relief request for Shearon Harris Nuclear Power Plant, Unit 1 (HNP). The proposed relief request would defer the American Society of Mechanical Engineers Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code Section XI required volumetric examination of the HNP reactor vessel full penetration pressure retaining Category B-A and B-D welds for the third lnservice Inspection (lSI) interval, currently scheduled for 2015, until the fourth lSI interval, and to perform the required examinations in 2024, plus or minus one refueling outage.
The purpose of this letter is to provide the results of the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) staff's acceptance review of this relief request. The acceptance review was performed to determine if there is sufficient technical information in scope and depth to allow the NRC staff to complete its detailed technical review. The acceptance review is also intended to identify whether the application has any readily apparent information insufficiencies in its characterization of the regulatory requirements or the licensing basis of the plant.
Pursuant to Sections 50.55a(a)(3}(i) and 50.55a(a)(3)(ii) of Title 10 of the Code of Federal Regulations, the applicant shall demonstrate that the proposed alternatives would provide an acceptable level of quality and safety, or that compliance with the specified requirements of Section 50.55a would result in hardship or unusual difficulty without a compensating increase in the level of quality or safety.
The NRC staff has reviewed your application and concluded that it does provide technical information in sufficient detail to enable the NRC staff to complete its detailed technical review and make an independent assessment regarding the acceptability of the proposed amendment in terms of regulatory requirements and the protection of public health and safety and the environment. Given the lesser scope and depth of the acceptance review as compared to the detailed technical review, there may be instances in which issues that impact the NRC staff's
E. Kapopolous ability to complete the detailed technical review are identified despite completion of an adequate acceptance review. You will be advised of any further information needed to support the NRC staff's detailed technical review by separate correspondence.
If you have any questions, please contact me at (301) 415-2760.
Sincerely, IRA/
Martha Barillas, Project Manager Plant Licensing Branch 2-11 Division of Operating Reactor Licensing Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation Docket No. 50-400 cc: Distribution via Listserv
ML14157A055 *Via E-mail OFFICE DORULPL2-2/PM DORULPL2-2/LA NRR/DE/EVIB
- DORULPL2-2/BC (A) DORULPL2-2/PM SRosenburg LRegner NAME MBarillas BCiayton (DWidrevitz for) (FSaba for) MBarillas DATE 6/11/14 6/11/14 5/22/14 6/12/14 6/13/14
