ML12102A246

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
E-mail from R. Conte, Region I to M. Galloway, NRR; Subject: TIA - Status Brief Summary of Seabrook ASR Call Today
ML12102A246
Person / Time
Site: Seabrook NextEra Energy icon.png
Issue date: 08/26/2011
From: Conte R
NRC Region 1
To: Rajender Auluck, Chaudhary S, Galloway M
Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation, NRC Region 1
References
FOIA/PA-2012-0119
Download: ML12102A246 (2)


Text

4, Lehman, Bryce From: Conte, Richard Sent: Friday, August 26, 2011 1:41 PM To: Galloway, Melanie; Auluck, Rajender; Chaudhary, Suresh; Khanna, Meena; Sheikh, Abdul; Thomas, George; Manoly, Kamal; Modes, Michael Cc: Miller, Barry; Miller, Ed; Cruz, Holly; Burritt, Arthur; Raymond, William

Subject:

TIA - Status RE: Brief Summary of Seabrook ASR Call Today The latest version of the TIA is at ml 111610530, minor changes since the agreement conference call from Aug. 18. It is through concurrence and Darrell Roberts, after he digests it more, may send it to Nelson who may come to you guys before he signs it. I expect issue next week.

This is just a heads up.

From: Conte, Richard Sent: Thursday, August 2ý, 2011 12:33 PM To: Galloway, Melanie; Holian, Brian Cc: Auluck, Rajender; Khanna, Meena; Chaudhary, Suresh; Thomas, George; Sheikh, Abdul; Manoly, Kamal; Modes, Michael; Miller, Chris; Wilson, Peter; Roberts, Darrell

Subject:

RE: Brief Summary of Seabrook ASR Call Today Melanie, Raj reported they your were curious about the next Division Executive Level brief. At the end of the NRR brief two weeks ago, I thought I heard you say that we should NOT go back to "them" unless we have better information on operability and when it will be done.

From the below we initiated action to schedule an inspection to get a better understanding of their status and plans.

This is primarily related to operability (last RAI response did not say much on a comprehensive plan). DLR folks are invited but the TIA is focused on the control building and what issues need to be addressed in the final OD by when. I hope the TIA will be signed out early next week (NRR staff agreed with it, and it is at the final stage of concurrence).

Perhaps a debrief with Division Executives would be best a week or two after the inspection for which we are homing in on the Week of 9/26/11.

From: Modes, Michael Sent: Wednesday, August 2A, 2011 1:25 PM To: Conte, Richard Cc: Auluck, Rajender; Khanna, Meena; Chaudhary, Suresh; Thomas, George; Sheikh, Abdul; Manoly, Kamal

Subject:

Brief Summary of Seabrook ASR Call Today Seabrook reported forward movement,

1. Release of engineering.work order to take additional core samples for
a. Confirmatory compressive strength samples interrogating scatter in prior data
b. Compressive strength in additional suspect areas
c. Tensile strength determination
2. Finalized 5 condition reports supporting two operability determination
3. Final draft of 50.59 evaluation for unresolved issue
4. Final plan in concurrence to address issue including
a. Walk down scoping document
b. Walk down procedure
c. Crack mapping plan
d. Trending/tracking plan Information in this record was deleted in accordance with the Feedom of Information Act, exemptions

-/

e. State of ASR depletion
f. Schedule of completion
g. Final operability determination
5. Walk downs are in progress
6. Crack mapping in progress
7. SGH has preliminary modeling results of Containment Enclosure Bldg they are bench marking against actual conditions
8. Root cause team formally kicked off today 9.M he oriainal construction documentation (Sulertes*hl:

.. Chauh will cll TedVassallo (b) (6) 10 Completed ASR ntreach

a. Consultation with academic experts
b. Scientific literature search Note to:Rich: Co~nte ... Paul Willougby appreciates Monday calls.

Discussed logistics of PI&R sample inspection originally proposed week of 9/12.

Notet*: Adbul and Geore* ... can you delay visit to Seabrook to week of 9/19? Week of 2 6 h would be perfect.

Call or email Michael Modes (610.337.5198)

This e- ail, and its achment is anofficial r ord oftheNucl r RegulatoryCo ission. This e , its attachme and ny respon s to this ei 1ifrom perso working for a rensee of the NR ay be subject t Freedom of In rrnation quest and y e mad ical availa Tis e-mail is in ded s r t use of the mdiv ual or ntity to ich it is add ssed Ifyou not tinted recipi IOU are pr distri ing, or copyi , this email d its attach ts. Ifyou have r eived this e-mili eror. please y the s er im diately and rmanently d tetthe origi . any copy of thi -mail, and any pd lut.

2