ML103360326

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Attachment 2, Vol. 6, to SBK-L-10185, Seabrook Station Response to Request for Additional Information NextEra Energy Seabrook License Renewal Environmental Report, References Requested for Docketing at the Seabrook Station Environmental Sit
ML103360326
Person / Time
Site: Seabrook NextEra Energy icon.png
Issue date: 11/23/2010
From:
NextEra Energy Seabrook
To:
Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
References
SBK-L-10185
Download: ML103360326 (662)


Text

{{#Wiki_filter:SNEXTera1 E NSEBR-C -1018 Attachment 2 Vol. 6 'I'4 A 4~4 ,tj\* 2 K'4<r, \~Fnvyirout-o 4the 32 ,Acre-sb~eh$ud the tIOMficqftoilding1- ~ 4 4 SITE --7 Ne 0 0 11.I 44 44.. Environmental Reclamation of the 32 Acres behind the General Office Building March. 23, 2010 Rev-I Environmental Reclamation of 32 Acres behind General Office Building IS Introduction This paper discusses the project plan of removing excavation spoils from the 32 acres behind the General Office Building and contains a specific environmental plan for the initial phases of this project. The project plan, environment plan, and the contract for services have been reviewed in whole or in part by representatives of the Legal, Environmental, Budget and Radiation Protection Departments from Seabrook and our corporate offices (see attachment 1).Summary During the construction of Seabrook Station and a few projects since (i.e. Dry Fuel Storage), excavation spoils have been stock piled on the 32 acres behind the General Office Building (GOB). This, approximately 3 million tons of excavation, has disturbed the land from its original and natural environment. The fill is comprised of soils, different sized bedrock spoils, and boulders to large to crush and some amount of construction spoils of varying types (i.e. asphalt, concrete, etc...). The vendor is removing all material encountered including construction spoils.If at anytime time during the project unexpected materials are unearthed the project will be halted.Maintenance Services will be contacted and appropriate measures will be taken to determine if environmental or personnel hazards are present The effort to reclaim this land will be a 3 phase project. The 32 acres will be split in half by a north/south line. The first phase is to remove the fill to approximately a 15 foot depth on the westerly 16 acres.Phase 2 will be to remove fill to a depth of approximately 15 feet on the easterly 16 acres. This process O will continue until the area is returned to its original elevation. Phase 3 would be to add topsoil, grade and contour the area, and establish natural flora to the area by seeding and planting as required.This paper is to discuss the first and second phases of the project. The third phase will require a formal reclamation plan and would not be started until at least 2013.Radiological Considerations The Radiological Protection (RP) Department has taken several soil samples from the area identified as Phase 1 and analyzed these samples for radioactivity. In addition, direct survey measurements were taken at the site where Phase 1 of excavation removal will occur. The results are documented in Health Physics Study/Technical Information Document (HPSTID) 10-003 (see attached), Assessment of Soil Removal from Rock Pile Area South of General -Office Building (Phase One). .A review of these samples and surveys indicates no presence of radioactive material other than natural.background radioactivity and in conjunction with Seabrook Station Radiation Protection (SSRP) Manual procedure RP 13.1, Radiological Controls for Material, it is reasonable and a business case exists to remove this material in an effort to reclaim the land.Once the project commences the RP department shall be notified of any new materials that are brought into the project area that could potentially be removed from site. Additionally, RP shall be notified prior to the commencement of Phase 2 of excavation spoil removal.2 Environmental Reclamation of 32 Acres behind General Office Building Security Increased and steady truck traffic at the south gate and in and out of the GOB parking lot presents a number of safety concerns. Some of these safety concerns include increased opportunities for falling debris to hit someone and debris falling onto the road way and/or the GOB parking lot entrance causing pedestrian and traffic hazards.In an effort to have this increased traffic avoid the south gate and the GOB parking lot altogether, Security suggests the vehicles enter the fill site via F lot. The trucks would drive up the south access road, turn right onto the Hannah Foods road and left into F lot. A second, active gate will be installed at the rear of F lot allowing the trucks to access the fill area. The trucks would then leave the fill area the same way they entered, through F lot..By utilizing this traffic pattern the trucks will avoid all contact with the south gate and the GOB parking lot thus eliminating many of the safety concerns for site employees and their vehicles. At the end of the work day the driver of the last truck leaving will be required to close and lock both F-lot gates thus closing off the fill area from public access.Prerequisites to use the F lot for access: 1) Construction of active gate at the rear of F lot to facilitate access to the pit area.2) Locks installed on the gates. (Keyed or combination locks are acceptable with the necessary access provided to security).

3) Installation of appropriate number of jersey barriers placed at the back of the dirt road connecting the pit area and the GOB parking lot. These barriers will block access at the pit side of the dirt road and not allow anyone to drive down the dirt road toward the GOB parking lot.4) Instructions and expectations to vendor requiring the gates be opened and closed and locked as appropriate.

Licensing/Environmental See the Environmental Plan for the Removal of Excavation Material Stock Piled on 32 Acres behind the General Office Building during Construction of the Site attached to the end of this document.Financial Contract for this project is 02218558.The contract with Seabrook Trucking Center calls for $1.35 per cubic yard.The contract ends on August 17, 2012.Seabrook Truck is responsible for all taxes on the removal of gravel and permits required for this project.Cost for environmental sampling will be shared by Nextera Energy-Seabrook and Seabrook Truck Profit realized by Nextera Energy-Seabrook will be shared accordingly with Joint Owners Legal The contract agreement between Nextera Energy-Seabrook and Seabrook Truck has been reviewed by General Counsel Legal and found to be satisfactory. A review of zoning in the area of the project has been reviewed and found to have no issues (see Attachment 7).General Counsel deferred to on the Juno Environmental Services (JES) part of the Business Strategy and Policy Group for review and approval of the Environmental Sampling Plan. JES has reviewed the contract from Golder Associates (Attachment

2) for sampling and found it to be satisfactory.

3 Environmental Plan For the Removal of Excavation Material Stock Piled on 32 Acres behind the General Office Building during Construction of the Site March 23, 2010 Rev-1 Environmental Reclamation of 32 Acres behind General Office Building 1.0 Introduction During construction of Seabrook Station (SBK) excavation spoils was stock piled on the 32 Acres behind the General Office Building (see attachment 5). There are approximately 3 million tons of fill in this area.At some point in the life span of SBK this area would need to be reclaimed and returned to its natural state as it existed prior to the erection of this facility.The SBK site is bordered on the east by an extensive salt marsh and is located on a point called "The Rocks" between two small tidal estuaries, the Brown's River and the Hunt's Island Creek. Adjoining the site is abroad, flat marsh zone in the north east and south identified as Hampton Flats with an elevation of approximately +4 feet mean sea level (msl). The normal high tide water level at Hampton Harbor estuary is approximately'+4.6 feet msl while site grade is +20 feet msl; therefore the estuary will accept the surface drainage from the site.1.1 Background-The Removal of Excavation Environmental Plan will address; Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan, Control of dust from digging and crushing of excavation, and Spill Counter Measures. The purpose is to include provisions to maximize the potential benefits of pollution prevention, sediment control measures, spill prevention, and environmental sampling at the excavation spoils removal site.The project site as well as the scope of the project was walked down and discussed with New Hampshire Department of Environmental Services (NH DES) on November 20, 2009. Senior Wetlands Inspector, Dr. Frank D. Richardson (see Attachment 7). Dr. Richardson agreed with the steps in place for phase 1 and 2 of the project to protect the wetlands. He also provided positive comments on the vendor knowledge and record working with DES Wetland Bureau permitting.

2.0 Overall

Project Phasing The project will be performed in 3 phases. The 32 acres will be divided in half with a north/south line, each half being approximately 16 acres. Phase 1 will be the Western most half and will be to remove the excavation in this area to a depth of approximately 15 feet. Phase 2 will be to do the same to the second half of the 32 acres. These phases will trade back and forth until we are at or near our preconstruction ground level.Phase 3 of the project is for the contouring and reseeding of the land to return to its' natural state; pre-.construction. This project will require aformal reclamation plan that will be developed in the future as the initial phases are estimated to be > 3 years in duration.3.0 Environmental

3.1 Control

of Storm Water Purpose of our control of storm, water run-off is to prevent storm water pollution to the marsh area.During the dumping of the excavation materials in this location a 25 foot high berm was built on the* south easterly end of the acreage separating the excavation material from the wetlands.During the first two phases of this project we will not excavate within 100 feet of the toe of this berm.This will prevent runoff from affecting the wetlands. During phase three the formal reclamation plan Will include silt fencing and other measures to protect the wetlands from potential run-off.5 Environmental Reclamation of 32 Acres behind General Office Building 3.2 Control of Dust from crushing stone and movement of the excavation materials Water will be used to keep dust down to a controllable level. The water will be sprayed over the work area as a fine mist. The water will come from a water truck kept at the site.No ground water withdrawals will be made for any purpose as part of this project: 3.3 Control of Noise The excavation of the spoils and the use of a rock crusher will produce a significant amount of construction noise. In consideration of our neighbors that abut our property we will control the hours of operation for this work site. Excavation and rock crushing will take place between the hours of 0630 to 1600 (6:30AM to 4:00 PM)'Monday through Friday.3.4 Spill Counter Measures The purpose is to prevent spills of fuels and other man-made products to this area and to mitigate the impact of any spill that should occur.3.4.1 Prevention Only plant approved expendable products will be used in this area. Anytime the site is not in use these materials will be locked in a Combustible storage container at the site.Any tanks for fueling of vehicles and machinery at the site will be Above Ground EPA Certified Self-Contained Tanks. This means at a minimum they will be double walled and located in a concrete vat. The vendor will be responsible for periodic inspection of concrete vat to ensure integrity and that rain water is not affecting its ability to contain fuel if a spill should occur.3.4.2 Mitigation A spill kit will be kept at the site and in good repair in the event of a spill. All spills will be reported to the Maintenance Services Department who will make the proper site notifications.

3.5 Sampling

The excavation material primarily comes from two sources; tunnel excavation spoils and, to a smaller amount, from the dry fuel storage excavation. Neither area has a history of oil or chemical contamination (ref Attachment 4). In 2001 during the sale of the station to FPL an Environmental Assessment was performed by consultant Hailey &Aldrich. In the Phase 1 Environmental Site Assessment Report, Hailey & Aldrich stated there'was no significant environmental concerns' with this area. Some solid waste was noted in the area and this was cleaned up' prior to the closing as a sale condition mandated by FPL (Summer 2002).Haley & Aldrich had no recommendations for further Phase II environmental. sampling in this area.Approximately 3 million tons of excavation spoils occupies these 32 acres and creates a mound approximately 25 feet high.. Phase 1 of the reclamation plan is to remove spoils to a depth of 15 feet from the westerly 16 acres. Due to the history of this area, the assessment performed by Hailey &Aldritch in 2001-2002, and the known source of the excavation spoils we will pull 16 composite samples from the Phase 1 area (see attachment 5). One sample from each acre, which will be a composite of spoils from 0 to 15 feet in depth (see attachment 3). These samples will be analyzed for: Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) metals, Polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs), Extractable petroleum hydrocarbons (EPH) with polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAW) and Volatile petroleum hydrocarbons (VPH) (see attached). The specifics of sampling, cost and responsibilities is contained.in Attachment 2 'Golder Associates Re: Request for Proposal' and Attachment 3 'Sample Tracking of Excavation Spoils Form'6 Environmental Reclamation of 32 Acres behind General Office Building Sampling requirements for Phase 2 of this project will be determined with the Seabrook Licensing Group and Juno Environmental Services of the Business Strategy and Policy Group based on the results of Phase 1 sampling.If at anytime time during the project unexpected materials are unearthed the project will be halted.Maintenance Services will be contacted and appropriate measures will be taken to determine if environmental or personnel hazards are present.4.0 Protection of Potential Archeological Sensitive Areas Along the edges of the toe of the berm are potential archeological sensitive areas (see Attachment 8).These areas have been walked down with the contractor performing the excavation work and the Maintenance Services Department. No work will be performed in these areas during Phase 1 and 2 (removal of excavation spoils from a distance of 100 feet from toe of berm). At the time when the berm is removed there will be a more formal reclamation plan and specifics for protection of these important sites will be laid out in detail.5.0 Oversight Maintenance Services will conduct periodic walk downs/observations of the site to ensure compliance with this plan and station standards. The walk downs will be on a weekly basis. If the environmental control measuresare ineffective the plan will be amended and any changes implemented within 7 calendar days of the inspection. Pictures should be taken occasionally during these walk downs to maintain a visual record of the project Inspection frequencies can be reduced to monthly if the jobsite is stabilized or runoff is unlikely due to winter conditions or seasonally arid conditions. These walk downs and observations will be documented on human performance walk down forms for retention. 7 Environmental Reclamation of 32 Acres behind General Office Building Attachment 1 List of Individuals Who Have Reviewed this Document either in whole or Part Mitchell S. Ross VP & General Counsel Nuclear Associate General Counsel -Nuclear Alan Smith, CFA, PE Business Director, Seabrook Business Management-Northeast Patricia Ermel Lakhia Senior Attorney Real Estate, Environmental & Land Use Group Pat Maher Environmental Services Project Manager Environmental Services Edward T. Metcalf.Nuclear Plant General Manager Station Management Seabrook Station Robert Boyd.Business Management -Manager Seabrook Station Fred Haniffy.Health Physics Specialist-Nuclear Radiation Protection Technical Seabrook Station Sabre A. Gagnon*Nuclear Engineering Analyst Lic ensing Seabrook Station Edward J. Carley Nuclear Engineer Sr Seabrook License Renewal Marian Marshhadi Sr. Attorney Nuclear- Project Management Alene S. Egol, Esq.Senior Attorney Rea! Estate, Environmental and Land Use Group Marge Portoro Principal Analyst Risk Management Florida Power & Light.Company Barry Street Business Integration and Systems Supervisor Investment Recovery Mike O'Keefe Licensing Manager.Licensing. Seabrook Station Donald T. Flahardy Nuclear Rad Protection Supervisor Radiation Protection Seabrook Station Allen L. Legendre Nuclear Principal Engineer Licensing Seabrook Station Richard R.. Cliche -Seabrook License Renewal Manager Seabrook License Renewal Richard C. Bragel Sourcing Leader Internal Supply Chain -Nuclear.Seabrook Station.8 Environmental Reclamation of 32 Acres behind General Office Building Attachment 2 Golder Associates RE: REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL March 22.20.10 ProposalNo.; P03-87221 Mr. Danlel'Kelsey,'Facilites Manager lNextEra Energy Resources P.O. Box360"Seabriok New Hampshire 03874-0300 RE: REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL SEABROOK STATlON--SEABROOK, NEW HAMPSHIRE DePar Mr.' Kaiser Golder Associates Inc. (Goder) Is providing this proposal for professional services at.Flodda Power 9and Ughs (FPL) site In Seabrook, New Hampshire (Seabrook Station, Site). FPL rquested a proposal for assistance with sampling and analysis of land-applied materials 'at Seabrook Station from.historIc sub-6oanic tunneling activities. BACKGRouND Golder understands that approximately three million tons of materal genierated during sub-oceanic tun1eling was pieced over approxmately 32 acres of land at Seabrook Station. FPL wod' lke.to reclaim the origInal ground surface, and, In doing so. excavate and sell the ltnd-appiled matnerils for.remse. Golder understands that the material will be excavated In tIo ptases of apprximately 18 acres each and sold to a vendor for reuse In the New England area as fill and road base. FPL. has requeste a proposal from oidde to collect and chemically ainalyze samples of Ihemauterial 'rprior to ecavt.on and sale. FPL intends to collect 16 samples (approximately one sample per.acre) during the first phase of the excavation. The number of samples collected for the secoid phase of wil be based on the results of the first phase of sanpling.SCOPE OF SERVICES.Iased upon our discussions with FPI. we understand the soeof services to include the activties summaried below, wich we have broken down Into two tasks: Task 1: CoordanatIon and Golder Wit o.bserve the excavation of 160. test trenches 'to appdroimately 15 feet by an operator sUpplied by FPL and collect one composite sample per tench. Golder observe the soil visual]and screen the samples using a phdolozation detector (PID) prior to sample. collection. GOder will submit the samples to Eastern Analytical Inc.:(EAI) of Concord. New Hampshire for analysis. At a minlnurnGolder recommends the following analyses: N Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA)-8 Metals (arsenic, :arim.cadmium, chromum,.ltead, mercury, selenium, arnd sliVer) via EPAMethod 200/7000, II Via EPA Method 8082 i Extractable petroleum hydrocarbons (EPH) With polqyc11c aromiatic hydrocarbois (PýH) th Massachusetts EPH Method... N. ComfJl S_ý. us5103 Ilnlelr ~l03101 USA Tat (603)5U-00 Fox(53)66845 w- 4owl: w.ow.m Gowe ioldMas: Ooriallohm k A Af Ambtfasta. Z E *u rth America and Saith Aka-T : .... .. : ;. +: .. .. :,r .,7 .. .. .: +. .... .:;: :;: ., ... .: : .7-, .......9 Environmental Reclamation of 32 Acres behind General Office Building Mr. D" iel Kec IS" y2.,2010 Scalook Station 2 Proposal No.: P034"7221 aIq Vlatile petroleum hydrocarbons (VPHI) via the Massachusetts VPH method This suite of analyses was selected solely for screening purposes as the compounds Included tend to be persistent In the ehvlronment. This is not an exhaustive llist of analyses or compounds. At.FPL'a Adscon, additlonal ,analyses for.. volatile organic compounds ($199.00 per sample), pesticides ($105.00 per sample), or herbicides ($180.00 pr samite) may be Included t 'en aiddlton cdit persOmple. It Is anticipated that a Golder. representative wi.be on-Site for up to 16 hours for sample collection. Golder will prepare a Site-specific health and safety plan4or Golder's field activties priorto the star of. sampling.fel sliitesd ory p,0 -~ot tr Task2;, Repartln6 Within one week of receipt of analytical data. Golder will prepare.mand submit a letter report summari.ing the analyI results. The letter report Will containth followong infrmalion:

  • A description of the sampling methods and procedures 2 A table summarizing analytcal results With a listing of New Hampshire and Massachusetts soil standards as available IN A. figure showing the sampling locations COSTAND SCHEDULE Golder's estimated lump sum fee for Tasks and .,2 Is $11,500.00.

This fee Is comprised of labor (3.760..00), laboratory ($7,370.90),.and expenses ($370.00). Goldr proposes to priovde these services in accordance with the Purchase Contract, dated Septemiber 20, 2009 between Golder and FPL, and with Golder and EAris standard rates. Our proposal includes subcontractor.costs for laboratory anarlsis.This cost estimateIs. based on fte following assumptions: " FP.wi designate tfh number and locationof soD samples to collect.* All of the samples collected will bedl(net rcmc0rok chilp).is Golder Is not irsponslble for coordination and contracIngof. a contractor to excavate the toe enches.a, Composite soil samples Will be collected from the bucket of the excavator and, analyzed for RCRA-8,metals, SVOCs With PAHs, PICBs,'and.TP, .N The. activilties described above will reuire ujp toý sixteen hours o-n-Site Within no ,more than two mobilizatlons. Any field ctivity beyond this will be billed on a time and materdals basis based on the rates I ded :In th Purchase Contract referenced above..* Fieldwork Will be conducted during daylight hours and on weekdays.I Field.work will be performed In modified level D PPE, consisting of hard-hat. safety ,vest steel-toed footear,. -. or ANSi-approved safety glasses, and heing proction, asneeded, to miltgate She hazar"d"s. 0 FPLwll provide a base map ofthe Me in anelectronicformattfor usinthe report a FPL will provide northing and easting coordinates for'thesample locations using a handheld GPS unit for Golder's use In the report prparation.,..... ...... .' .A.. ... .* " s 10 Environmental Reclamation of 32 Acres behind General Office Building.Daiel Kelsey Seabrook Station 3 Maith22, 2010 Proposal No.- P03-87221 Golder will be able to mobflize to.the Site with at least two days noUtce.CLOSING" Golder appreciates the opportunity to provide FPL with this proposal. Should. you have any questions rteardlng this proposal, please call either of the'undersigned at (603) 668-0880.Sincerely, S,,iR ASSOCIATES INC.Err JeýnnIf her 'rrRobert H. Clemens, P rOject Engineer , Program Leader Attachmerit: Cost Estimate Summary J'LF/drb *0 (066s=t.11 Environmental Reclamation of 32 Acres behind General Office Building Attachment 3 Sample Tracking of Excavation Spoils Sample GPS Coordinates Cell or Total Sample Sample Designation Trench # Depth "Depth "Type TT-CI* " 15 ft 0- 15 ft bls** Composite TT-C2 2 15 ft 0- 15 ftbls Composite TT-C3 3 15 ff 0- 15 ft bls Composite TT-C4 4 15 ft 0- 15 ftbls Composite TT-C5 .5 15 ft 0- 15 ftibs Composite. TT-C6 6 15 ft 0- 15 ft bls Composite TT-C7 7 15 ft 0 -15 ft bls Composite TT-C8 8 15 ft 0- 15 ftbls Composite TT-C9 9 15 ft 0- 15 ftbls Composite TT-C1o 10 15 ft 0-- 15 ft bls Composite TT-Cl 11 15 ft 0 15 ftbls' Composite TT-C12 12 15 ft 0- 15 ftbls Composite, TT-C13

  • 13 15 ff 0- 15 ftbls- Composite TT-C14 14 15 ft 0 -15 ft bls Composite TT-C15 15 15ft 0 -15 ft bls Composite TT-C16 .16 15 ft 0- 15 ftbls Composite* TT Test Trench f
  • ft bis feet below land surface 12 Environmental Reclamation of 32 Acres behind General Office Building Attachment 4 E-Mail from Licensing (Environmental)

-From: Legendre, Al Sent: Thursday, March 18, 2010 1:55 PM.To: Robinson, David; Kelsey, Daniel Cc: Haniffy, Fred; Souther, Thomas; OKeefe, Michael; GAGNON, SABRE

Subject:

, RE: Reclamation project at Seabrook Station All, The environmental conditions at the South 40 Tunnel Muck Disposal Area were reviewed by our consultant Haley& Aldrich in the Phase I Environmental. Site Assessment performed in support.of the sale (March 200 1). There were no significant environmental concerns noted in the South 40 area which functioned as the disposal area for bedrock spoils (ref: p. 43 of report). Haley & Aldrich observed some solid waste disposed in the area however,.subsequently there was an extensive cleanup (Seabrook Trucking) of the South 40 and other areas just prior to the closing (Summer 2002) as a sale condition mandated by FPL. Haley & Aldrich did not identify anything in the South 40 as a "Recognized Environmental Concern" (ref pp 46 -49 of report for RECs) nor were there any recommendations for further Phase II environmental sampling in thatarea.Also, the majority of the bedrock in the South 40 area was removed well before the Haley-& Aldrich investigations in the early 1990s by a contractor for road construction work. I do not recollect any environmental sampling being done in conjunction with that contract or any issues arising during the course of rock removal or thereafter. The excavated soil from the dry fuel storage area in 2007/2008 and now deposited in the South 40 area also pose little or no environmental risk. The area where the soils were excavated did not have any history, of oil or chemical contamination and there are no. concerns stated for this area in the Haley & Aldrich report. See p. 34 for a discussion of the Carpentry Shop and Mixed Solid Waste Area.I think we have a good documented basis for concluding that the environmental conditions in the South 40 disposal area are satisfactory and there is little risk of oil or chemical contamination in the remaining tunnel rock or stockpiled soils. If any environmental sampling is done in this area I would recommend that it take into consideration the low risk of contaminated rock or soil in the area.Al Legendre.Principal Engineer NextEra Energy Seabrook, LLC 603 773-7773 13 Environmental Reclamation of 32 Acres behind General Office Building Attachment 5 14 Environmental Reclamation of 32 Acres behind General Office Building Attachment 6, E-mail from NUDES Senior Inspector regarding the Project and Environmental Plan Hello Dan, I conducted a field inspection of the proposed 32 acre reclamation site at Seabrook Station on November 20, 2009 with Arleigh Greene and Rusty Lavin of the Seabrook Truck Center.The primary concern at this location is the protection of the nearby tidal wetlands and the maintenance of a minimum of a 100 foot tidal buffer zone in natural, undisturbed vegetation adjacent to the salt marsh.* The berms that are present on site will help accomplish the separation of construction activities associated With the materials removal and the-salt marsh needed to assure that the ecological integrity of the tidal wetlands and buffer zone are preserved. In a recent email, Arleigh Greene has assured me that: "No excavation will take place within 100 feet of the easterly and southerly toe of the berms" All storm water runoff must be detained and treated before leaving the site in the direction of the adjacent tidal wetlands. The NH DES Alteration of Terrain program would be the agency charged with the review and approval of- final site plans for storm water controls.Arleigh Greene and Rusty Lavin are both familiar with DES Wetlands Bureau permitting requirements and protocol from previous projects they have been involved With., There is no Wetlands Permit required for the work proposed at this site given the provisions cited above.t Yours truly, (Frank Frank D. Richardson, Ph.D.Senior Wetlands Inspector Southeast Region Supervisor NH DES Wetlands Bureau Pease Field Office 222 International Drive, Suite 175 Portsmouth, Ni 03801 7 Tel. (603) 559-1513. .Fax (603) 559-1510 15 Environmental Reclamation of 32 Acres behind General Office Building Attachment 7 Letter from the Town of Seabrook Regarding Zoning TOWN OF SEABROOK CODE ENFORCEMENT OFFICE 99 LAFAYETTE ROAD.-PO BOX456 SEABROOK, NH 03874-0456 (603) 474-3871 March 24, 2010 Florida Light and Power PO Box 300 Seabrook NH 03874-0300 CIO: Dan Kelsey Hard Rock Development, LLC PO Box2750 Seabrook, NH 03874-2750. RE: Zoning Compliance, Property ID: 1111 & 2 To Whom It May Concern: The above referenced property located In Zone 3, Industrial, has no known zoning or building code violations, and is presently in full compliance with all issues with respect to the Town of Seabrook.FLP/Nextera Energy currently holds a valid Notice of Intent To Excavate for the above referenced property; said Intent was approved on December 16, 2009,by the Board of Selectmen, during their public hearing.If you have any questions regarding this property please do not hesitate In contacting me.Respectfully, Paul Town of Seabrook;- Code Enorcement Officer 16 Environmental Reclamation of 32 Acres behind General Office Building.0 (Attachment 8 (.\17 -Assocdate April 20, 2010 Project No.: 103-87221 Mr. Daniel Kelsey, Facilities Manager NextEra Energy Resources P.O. Box 300 Seabrook, New Hampshire 03874-0300 RE: SOIL SAMPLING AND ANALYSIS REPORT SEABROOK STATION SEABROOK, NEW HAMPSHIRE

Dear Mr. Kelsey:

Golder Associates Inc. (Golder) is pleased to present this Soil Sampling and Analysis Report for activities conducted at Florida Power and Light's (FPL) site in Seabrook, New Hampshire (Seabrook Station, Site).Figure 1 shows the Site and general vicinity. This report presents Golder's findings from soil sampling activities conducted between March 31, 2010 and April 2, 2010 and presents the results of the analytical testing.BACKGROUND During construction of the Seabrook Nuclear Power Plant in the 1970s, two sub-ocean water-cooling tunnels were constructed. Golder understands that approximately three million tons of the material generated during the tunneling was placed over approximately 32 acres of land at the Site. FPL plans to reclaim the original ground surface, and; in doing so, excavate and sell the land-applied materials for reuse. Golder understands that the material will be excavated in two phases of approximately 16 acres each and sold to a vendor for reuse in the New England area as fill and road base. Golder observed the excavation of 16 test trenches at the Site (see Figure 2) and collected samples of soil (approximately one sample per acre) from each trench for chemical analysis.FIELD ACTIVITIES Golder observed the excavation of 16 test trenches at locations designated by Mr. Mark Leavitt of FPL.The test trenches were excavated to a depth between approximately 7.5 and 15 feet below ground surface (ft bgs) by an FPL-supplied operator. Golder visually observed the soil and screened samples using a photoionization detector (PID) with a 10.6 eV lamp calibrated to a 100 parts per million (ppm)isobutylene reference gas prior to sample collection. Golder collected one composite sample per trench and submitted the samples to Eastern Analytical Inc. (EAI) of Concord, New Hampshire for the following analyses: 1 Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA)-8 metals (arsenic, barium, cadmium, chromium, lead, mercury, selenium, and silver) via EPA Method 200/7000 series ED Polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs) via EPA Method 8082 0 Extractable petroleum hydrocarbons (EPH) with polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAH)via the Massachusetts (MA) EPH Method Golder also collected one discrete (i.e. non-composited) sample per trench and submitted the samples to EAI for volatile petroleum hydrocarbons (VPH) analysis via the Massachusetts VPH method. The VPH analytical method does not allow compositing of samples. The suite of analyses was selected for screening purposes andwas not intended to be an exhaustive list of analyses or compounds. p:\proijcts\2010\103-87221 seabrook otaton\report~naltsoil sampinr report 4-2010.docx Golder Associates Inc.670 N. Commercial St., Suite 103 Manchester, NH 03101 USA Tel: (603) 668-0880 Fax: (603) 668-1199 www.golder.com Golder Associates: Operations in Africa, Asia, Australasia, Europe, North America and South America Mr. Daniel Kelsey April 20, 2010 Seabrook Station 2 Project No.: 103-87221 RESULTS AND DISCUSSION Analytical results for the samples collected during the field program are summarized in Table 1. No PCB, VPH, or EPH compounds (except for EPH C19-C36 aliphatic hydrocarbons) were detected at a concentration above the laboratory reporting limit. Therefore, analytical results for these compounds are not presented in Table 1. The laboratory analytical reports, which provide all analytical results, are provided in Appendix A. EAI detected the following analytes in the soil samples at concentrations above the laboratory reporting limit: 0l Arsenic, barium, chromium, and lead in all of the samples El Silver in sample TT-C4 19 C19-C36 aliphatic hydrocarbons in samples TT-C9 and TT-C14 For comparison purposes, typical New Hampshire and Massachusetts soil regulatory standards are provided in Table 1. Detected parameter concentrations that exceed one or more of the comparative regulatory standards are highlighted in bold in Table 1. As noted previously, these analytical results and comparative state standards are provided for screening purposes only. The location and end use of the materials will determine, which, if any, regulatory standards may apply.CLOSING The results presented in this report are based upon analytical data collected as described in the report.Golder does not and cannot represent that the site contains no hazardous material, oil, or other condition beyond that observed by Golder during its activities. This report does not reflect: 1) undetected variations in soil characteristics or chemical concentrations which may occur between the sampling locations;, or 2)the potential presence of chemical compounds or analytes which were not analyzed for, or which may be present below the minimum reportable concentrations for the methods used.The information contained in this report may not be suitable for any further use without adaptation for the specific purpose intended. As such, any reuse of or reliance upon the information, assessments, or conclusions in this report without adaptation shall be at the sole risk and liability of the party undertaking this reuse.Golder appreciates the opportunity to provide professional services to FPL. Should you have any questions regarding this report, please call either of the undersigned at (603) 668-0880.Sincerely, GOLDER ASSOCIATES INC.Jennifer L. Fisher, EIT Alistair P. T. Macdonald, CPG, LSP Project Engineer Program Leader and Principal Attachments: Table 1 Summary of Analytical Results Figure 1 Site Location Map Figure 2 Test Trench Location Map Appendix A Laboratory Analytical Report Golder p:sprojectsX201MI03-872 2 1 Seabrook s r o sampling report 4-201Odoc A isociates TABLE April 2010 Project No. 103-87221 TABLE 1 Summary of Laboratory Detections Seabrook Station Seabrook, New Hampshire TestTrenchlD Massachusetts Contingency Plan New Hampshire DES i--cl TT-C2 T-C3 TFT-C4 TT-C5 05 -CO I -Cy 11-CS 1-CS 0-C 0-C 7-C12 I -C13 TTCi -10C TT-Ci Sample Date Method 1 Soil Standards Method 1 Soil Standards 4/1/2010 4W2t2010 4/2201 4112010 4112010 41201 41201 3/3112010 4112010 3/2010 313112010 Sample Depth (9 bgs) GW-1/S-1 I GW-1/S-2 T GW-1/S-3 S-1 I S-2 I S-3 0-12 0-13 0-10 a-id 0-12 0-15 0-9.5 1 0-15 0-0 0-8 o-9.5 0-15 0-7.5 0-0.5 0-1 0-12 MA EPH IUnit C19-C36Aphacs Unadjusted) mg/kg 3,000 5,000 5,000 NS INIS NS 20 020 020 < 20 020 20 <020 <20 40 20 < 20 20 <020 30 020 20 Metals Arsenic mgmkg 20 20 20 11 11 29 16 23 13 8.5 7.4 19 16 19 65 13 27 20 15 17 13 017 Barium mg/kg 1,000 3,000 5,000 1,000 2,500 5,000 170 37 52 84 84 40 85 46 56 71 67 35 65 83 78 87 Cadmium mgfkg 2 30 30 33 280 280 0 0.5 < 0.5 < 0.5 < 0.5 0.5 < 0.5 < 0.5 < 0.5 0.5 < 0.5 < 0.5 0.5 < 0.5 < 0.5 < 0.5 < 0.5 Chromium 1 1) mg/kg 30 200 200 130 990 990 37 27 24 32 41 23 23 22 26 25 41 19 31 31 25 30 Lead mg/kg 300 300 300 400 400 400 15 5.8 6.8 9.5 5.9 7.5 7.7 7 10 9.2 9.2 5.9 8.8 41 8.8 60 Mercury mg/kg 20 30 30 6 52 52 <0.1 00.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 Selenium mg/kg 400 800 o00 180 1,600 1,600 < 0.5 00.5 0 0.5 < 00.5 < 0.5 < 005 < 0.5 < 005 < 0.5 < 0.5 < 0.5 < 0.5 < 0.5 < 0.5 < 0.5 < 0.5 Silver mg/kg 100 200 200 89 600 680 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 0.6 <0.5 <sU5 00.5 <0.5 00.5 <0.5 <005 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 00.5 Notes: 1. ft bgs = feet below ground surface 2. mg/kg = milligrams per kilogram 3. < = analyte was not detected at a concentration above the identified laboratory reporting limit.4. GW-I/S-1 standards are applicable to areas where groundwater is identified as a future potential drinking water supply and for sensitive uses of the property and accessible soils, either currently or in the foreseeable future.4. GW-1/S-2 standards are applicable to areas where groundwater is identified as a future potential drinking water supply and for moderate exposure and accessible soils, either currently or in the foreseeable future.6. GW-1/S-3 standards are applicable to areas where groundwater is identified as a future potential drinking water supply and for restricted access and property with limited potential for exposure to soil, either currently or in the foreseeable future.7. MA MCP standards all take into account additional criteria for the protection of groundwater, based on the leaching potential of the contaminated soils.8. S-1 standards are applicable to areas where receptors of all ages may be exposed as a result of normal everyday activities.

9. S-2 standards are applicable to areas where exposure may occur to a receptor that comes in contact with the soil in a work environment or in a passive recreational setting.10. S-3 standards are applicable to areas where an adult receptor may come in contact with the soil during a short but i/tense exposure, such as during excavation work.11. NHDES standards for chromium are listed as chromium (VI) as total chromium is not listed.12. NHDES standards for lead are based on EPA's "Revised Interim Soil Lead Guidance for CERCLA Sites and RCRA Corrective Action Facilities" (EPA, 1984).13. Bold indicates the sample exceeds one or more potentially applicable regulatory standards.

Prepared by: JLF Checked by: JGN Reviewed by: APTM Golwdr Associates P:%ProheJn, 101103-87221 Seabrook SaalionWRepoIxinoTabet. IAN. FIGURES it CL 75 E)0~2,500 0 2,500 NOTES ,I I 1 inch = 2,000 feet I I 1. SITE LOCATION IS APPROXIMATE 1 D s 1 1 : V REV. DATE DES REVISION DESCRIPTION GISI Cl-OS RVWN PROJECT FLORIDA POWER AND LIGHT SEABROOK STATION SEABROOK, NH REFERENCES TITLE BASE MAP TAKEN FROM DIGITAL RASTER GRAPHIC SCANNED SITE LOCATION MAP IMAGE OF USGS TOPOGRAPHIC QUADRANGLE, TITLED HAMPTON, NH-MA, DATED 02/01/1998 PROJECT N.. 103,87221 FILE No. FIGURE 1 DESIGN JLF 1411612010 SCALE- AS SHOWN REV. S Spatial

Reference:

] Ge 01 CDS 4/2SC0D 0 AD 1983 StatePlane New Hampshire FIPS 2800 Feet ssociates CHECK JFL 4,160010 FIGURE 1 Manhes~ter. NH REVIEW APTM 4/1012010 n LEGEND 0 Trench / Sample Locations NOTES 1. GOLDER HAS ATTEMPTED TO IDENTIFY TEST TRENCH LOCATIONS BASED ON GPS COORDINATES PROVIDED BY FPL AND GOLDER'S FIELD NOTES. HOWEVER. ALL LOCATIONS IDENTIFIED ON THIS FIGURE ARE CONSIDERED APPROXIMATE. REFERENCES BASE OTHO PHOTOGRAPHY TAKEN FROM THE USGS NATIONAL MAP OF THE "NEW HAMPSHIRE DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION IMAGERY PROJECT" DATED MAY, 2005.Spatial

Reference:

CS WGS 1984 I Inll = IO5U lbl. i i i FLORIDA POWER AND LIGHT SEABROOK STATION SEABROOK, NH TRENCH I SAMPLE LOCATION MAP Vcsol,,o.oo~nomo. GolVr RE 9Associates 0400FIGURE 2-i I I I APPENDIX A LABORATORY ANALYTICAL REPORT Jennifer Fisher Golder Associates, Inc.670 N. Commercial St, Suite 103 Manchester, NH 03101 eastern analytical C 0'(,4

Subject:

Laboratory Report Eastern Analytical, Inc. ID: 87753 Client Identification: Seabrook Station 1103-87221 Date Received: 4/212010

Dear Ms. Fisher:

Enclosed please find the laboratory report for the above identified project. All analyses were performed in accordance with our QA"QC Program. Unless otherwise stated, holding times, preservation techniques, container types, and sample conditions adhered to EPA Protocol. Samples which were collected by Eastern Analytical, Inc. (EAI) were collected in accordance with approved EPA procedures. Eastern Analytical, Inc.certifies that the enclosed test results meet all requirements of NELAP and other applicable state certifications. Please refer to our website at www.eailabs.com for a copy of our NELAP certificate and.accredited parameters. The following standard abbreviations and conventions apply to all EAI reports: Solid samples are reported on a dry weight basis, unless'otherwise noted< "less than" followed by the reporting limit> "greater than" followed by the reporting limit%R:% Recovery Eastern Analytical Inc. maintains certification in the following states: Connecticut (PH-0492), Maine (NH005), Massachusetts (M-NHO05), New Hampshire/NELAP (1012), Rhode Island (269) and Vermont (VT1012).The following information is contained within this report: Sample Conditions summaiy, Analytical Results/Data, Quality *Control data (if requested) and copies of the Chain of Custody. This report may not be reproduced except in full, without the the written approval of the laboratory. If you have any questions regarding the results contained within, please feel free to directly contact me or the chemist(s) who performed the testing in question. Unless otherwise requested, we will dispose of the sample(s) 30 days from the sample receipt date.We appreciate this opportunity to be of service and look forward to your continued patronage. Sincerely, Lorraine Olashaw, Lab Director L4 l2.- I1 Date# of pages (excluding cover letter).~ .J~.**'~ www.eailabs.comn SAMPLE CONDITIONS PAGE Eastern Analytical, Inc. ID#: 87753 ates, Inc. Client Designation: Seabrook Station 1 103-87221 Client: Golder Associ.Temperature upon receipt (°C): 2 Received on ice or cold packs (YesiNo): y Lab ID 87753.01 87753.02 87753.03 87753.04 87753.05 87753.06 87753.07 87753.08 87753.09 87753.1 O87753,11 87753.12 87753.13 87753.14 87753.15 87753.16 Sample ID TT-C12 TT-C 13 TT-C 16 TT-C15 TT-C11 TT-C9 TT-C10 TT-C4 TT-c5 TT-C1 TT-C14 TT-C3 TT-C6 TT-C7 TT-C8 TT-C2 Date Date Received Sampled 4/2/10 3/31/10 4/2/10 3/31/10 412/10 3/31/10 4/2/10 3131/10 4/2/10 3131/10 412/10 411/10 412/10 4/1/10 4/2110 411/10 4/2/10 4/1/10 4/2110 4/1/10 4/2/10 411/10 4/2/10 4/2110 4/2/10 4/1/10 4/2/10 .411/10 4/2110 4/1/10 4/2/10 4/2/10 Sample % Dry Matrix Weight soil soil soil soil soil soil soil soil soil soil soil soil soil soil soil soil 90.8 88.2 88.7 90.7 91.5 91.1 89.4 90.0 90.7 92.0 86.4 89.7 89.0.90.9 90.3 90.6 Exceptions/Comments (other than' thermal preservation) Adheres to Sample Acceptance Policy.Adheres to'Sample Acceptance Policy Adheres to Sample Acceptance Policy Adheres to Sample Acceptance Policy Adheres to Sample Acceptance Policy Adheres to Sample Acceptance Policy Adheres to Sample Acceptance Policy Adheres to Sample Acceptance Policy Adheres to Sample Acceptance Policy Adheres to Sample Acceptance Policy Adheres to Sample Acceptance Policy Adheres to Sample Acceptance Policy Adheres to Sample Acceptance Policy Adheres to Sample Acceptance Policy Adheres to Sample Acceptance Policy Adheres to Sample Acceptance Policy (..87753.17 .Trip Blank 4/2/10 3/31/10 soil .100.0 Adheres to Sample Acceptance Policy Samples were properly preserved and the pH measured when applicable unless otherwise noted. Analysis-of solids for pH, Flashpoint, Ignitibility, Paint Filter, Corrosivity, Conductivity and Specific Gravity are reported on an "as received" basis.All results contained in this report relate only to the above listed samples.References include: 1) EPA 600/4-79-020, 1983 2) Standard Methods for Examination of Water and Wastewater: Inorganics, 19th Edition, 1995; Microbiology, 20th Edition, 1998 3) Test Methods for Evaluating Solid Waste SW 846 3rd Edition including updates/VA and IVB 4) Hach Water Analysis Handbook, 2nd edition, 1992 eastern analytical, inc. www.eailabs.com Phone: (603) 228-0525 ( 0 -El LABORATORY REPORT Case Narrative Report for EAI ID: 87753 SAMPLE RECEIPT Samples were received on 87753. This sample delivery groupwas uniquely identified as EA1 ID# 87753. All samples were stored and analyzed in accordance with all quality control and method requirements unless otherwise noted below.No field QC was designated for this sample delivery group.QUALITY CONTROL All samples were analyzed as part of an analytical QC batch consisting of a method blank, a laboratory control sample (LCS), a matrix duplicate, a matrix spike (MS) and a matrix spike duplicate(MSD), where applicable. Any deviations from QC acceptance criteria are noted below, this includes sample preservation and holding time requirements. Method

References:

EPASW-846 Update III Mass. Dept. of Environmental Protection Bureau of Waste Site Cleanup -Compendium of Analytical Methods (CAM)MAVPH All QC acceptance criteria were met.MEOH VIALS All samples: Sample mass deviated from the method specified methanol-to-soil 1:1 ratio, +1- 25%.MA EPH GCIMS is employed for the determination of all target analytes and ranges. Quality control requirements for method 8270C and MA EPH Section 9.10 are followed.Fractionation check: The Laboratory Control Sample (LCS) serves~as the fractionation check and is evaluated against the same acceptance criteria.All QC acceptance criteria were met.ICAL Quadratic calibration was used for Indeno[1,2,3-cd]Pyrene. eastern analytical. inc. www.eailabs.com Phone: (603)228-0525........... j --- -I 2 .LABORATORY REPORT (Eastern Analytical, Inc. ID#: 87753 Client: Golder Associates, Inc.Client Designation-Seabrook Station 1103-87221 Client Sample ID: Lab Sample ID: Matrix: Date Sampled: Date Received: Date Prepared: TT-C12 87753.01 soil 3131110-412/10 4/5/10 Reporting Dilution,' Date Analytical Limit Factor Units Analyzed Method. Analyst Methyl-t-butyl ether(MTBE) Benzene Toluene Ethylbenzene mp-Xylene o-Xylene Naphthalene Unadjusted C5-C8 Aliphatics 1 Unadjusted C9-C12 Aliphatics 1 C5-CS Aliphatics Hydrocarbons 1,2 C9-C12 Aliphatic Hydrocarbons 1,3 C9-C10 Aromatic Hydrocarbons 1 PID 2,5-Dibromotoluene (surr)FID 2.5-Dibromotoluene (surr)<0.1<0 .05< 0.05< 0.05< 0.05< 0.05<0.3<5<5<5<5<5 96 %R 105 %R 0.1 0.7 mg/kg 4/6/10 MA VPH VG b0.05 0.7 mglkg 416/10 MA VPH VG 0.05 0.7 mg/kg 416/10 MAVPH VG 0.05 0.7 mglkg 4/6/10 MA VPH VG 0.05 0.7 mg/kg 4/6/10 MAVPHI VG 0.05 0.7 mg/kg 4/6/10 MA VPH VG 0.3 -0.7 mg/kg 4/6/10 MAVPH VG 5 0.7 mg/kg 4/6/10 MA VPH VG 5 0.7 mg/kg 4/6/10 MA VPH VG 5 0.7 mg/kg -4/6/10 MA VPH *VG 5 0.7 mglkg 416/10 MAVPH VG 5 0.7 mglkg 416110 MA VPH VG% 4/6/10 MAVPH- VG% 416/10 MAVPH VG I Hydrocarbon Range data exclude concentrations of any surrogate(s) and/or internal standards eluting in that range.2 C5-C8 Aliphatic Hydrocarbons exclude the concentration of MTBE, benzene and toluene eluting in that range.3 C9-C12 Aliphatic Hydrocarbons exclude the concentration of ethylbenzene and xylenes eluting in that range and the concentration of C9-C10 Aromatic Hydrocarbons. eastern analytical, inc.www.eailabs.com Phone: (603) 228-0525 3 _____LABORATORY REPORT Eastern Analytical, Inc. ID#: 87753 Client Golder Associates, Inc.Client Designation: Seabrook Station (103-87221 Client Sample ID: Lab Sample ID: Matrix: Date Sampled: Date Received: Date Prepared: TT-C13 87753.02 soil 3/31/10 4/2/10 4/5/10 Reporting Dilution Limit Factor Date Analytical Analyzed Method Analyst Methyl-t-butyl ether(MTBE) Benzene Toluene Ethylbenzene mp-Xylene o-Xylene Naphthalene Unadjusted C5-C8 Aliphatics I Unadjusted C9-C12 Aliphatics 1 C5-C8 Aliphatics Hydrocarbons-1,2 C9-C12 Aliphatic Hydrocarbons 1,3 C9-C10 Aromatic Hydrocarbons 1 PID 2,5-Dibromotoluene (surr)FID 2.5-Dibromotoluene (surrf<0.1< 0.05< 0.05< 0.05< 0.05< 0,05<0.3<5<5<5<.5 101 %R 115 %R 0.1 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.3 5 5 5 5 5 0.7 0.7'0.7 0.7 0.7 0.7 0.7 0.7 0.7 0.7 0.7 0.7 Units mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg-4/6/10 4/6/10 4/6/10 416/10 4/6110 4/6/10 4/6/10 4/6110 4/6/10 416/10 416110 416110 4/6/10 416/10 MA VPH MA VPH MA VPH MA VPH MA VPH MA VPH MA VPH MAVPH MA VPH MA VPH MA VPH MA VPH MA VPH MA VPH VG VG VG VG VG VG VG VG VG VG VG VG VG VG 1 Hydrocarbon Range data exclude concentrations of any surrogate(s) and/or internal standards eluting in that range.2 C5-C8 Aliphatic Hydrocarbons exclude the concentration. of MTBE, benzene and toluene eluting in that range.3 C9-C12 Aliphatic Hydrocarbons exclude the concentration of ethylbenzene and xylenes eluting in that range and the concentration of C9-C10 Aromatic Hydrocarbons. eastern analytical, inc.www.eailabs.com Phone: (603) 228-0525 4 LABORATORY REPORT I, Eastern Analytical, Inc. ID#: 87753 Client: Golder Associates, Inc.Client Designation: Seabrook Station I 103-87221.V Client Sample ID: Lab Sample ID: Matrix:* Date Sampled: Date Received: , Date Prepared: 'TT-C16 87753.03 soil 3/31/10 4/2/10 415110 Reporting Dilution Date Limit Factor Units Analyzed Analytical Method Analyst Methyl-t-butyl ether(MTBE) Benzene Toluene Ethylbenzene mp-Xylene o-Xylene Naphthalene Unadjusted C5-C8 Aliphatics 1 Unadjusted C9-C12 Aliphatics I C5-C8 Aliphatics Hydrocarbons 1,2 C9-C1 2 Aliphatic Hydrocarbons 1,3 C9-C10 Aromatic Hydrocarbons 1 PID 2,5-Dibromotoluene (surr)FID 2.5-Dibromotoluene (surr)<0.1 0.1< 0.05 0.05< 0.05 0.05< 0.05 0.05< 0.05 0.05< 0.05 0.05< 0.3 0.3<5 5<5 5<5 5<5 5<5. 5 100 %R 110 %R 0.9. mg/kg 416110 0.9 mg/kg 416/10 0.9 mg/kg 416/10 0.9 mg/kg 4/6/10 0.9 mg/kg 416/10 0.9 mg/kg 4/6/10 0.9 mg/kg 4/6/10 0.9 mg/kg 4/6/10 0.9 mg/kg 416/10 0.9 mg/kg. 416110 0.9 mg/kg 416/10 0.9. mg/kg 416/10% 4/6110% 4/6/10 MA VPH VG MA VPH VG MA VPH VG MA VPH VG'MA VPH VG MA VPH VG MA VPH. VG MA VPH VG MA VPH VG MA VPH VG MA VPH VG MA VPH VG MA VPH VG MA VPH VG ., 1 Hydrocarbon Range data exclude concentrations of any surrogate(s) and/or internal standards eluting in that range.2 C5-C8 Aliphatic Hydrocarbons exclude the concentration of MTBE, benzene and toluene eluting in that range.3 C9-C12 Aliphatic Hydrocarbons exclude the concentration of ethylbenzene and xylenes eluting inthat range and the.concentration of C9-C 10 Aromatic Hydrocarbons. 0 eastern analytical, inc.www.eailabs.com Phone: (603) 228-0525 5 LABORATORY REPORT Eastern Analytical, Inc. ID#: 87753 Client; Golder Associates, Inc..Client Designation: -Seabrook Station 1103-87221 Client Sample ID: Lab Sample ID: Matrix: DateSampled: Date Received:-Date Prepared: T1-C15 87753.04 S soil 3/31110 4/2/10 4/5/10 Reporting Dilution Limit Factor Date Analytical Analyzed Method Analyst Methyl-t-butyl ether(MTBE) Benzene Toluene Ethylbenzene mp-Xylene o-Xylene Naphthalene Unadjusted C5-C8 Aliphatics 1 Unadjusted C9-C12 Aliphatics 1 C5-C8 Aliphatics Hydrocarbons 1,2 C9-C12 Aliphatic Hydrocarbons 1,3 C9-C10 Aromatic Hydrocarbons 1 PID 2,5-Dibromotoluene (surr)FID 2.5-Dibromotoluene (surrl<0.1,< 0.05< 0.05<0.05< 0.05< 0.05< 0.3<5<5<5<5<5 95 %R 108 '/R 0.1 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.3.5 5 5 5 5 0.7 0.7 0.7 0.7 0.7 0.7 0.7 0.7 0.7 0.7 0.7 0.7 Units mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mglkg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mglkg mg/kg 4/6/10 4/6/10 4/6/10 4/6/10 4/6/10 4/6/10 4/6/10 416/10 4/6/10 4/6/10 4/6/10 4/6/10 4/6/10 4/6/10 MA VPH MA VPH MA VPH MA VPH MA VPH-MAVPH MA VPH MA VPH MA VPH MA VPH MA VPH MA VPH MA VPH MA VPH VG VG VG VG VG VG VG VG VG VG VG VG VG VG 1 Hydrocarbon Range data exclude concentrations of any surrogate(s) and/or internal standards eluting in that range.2 C5-C8 Aliphatic Hydrocarbons exclude the concentration of MTBE, benzene and toluene eluting in that range.3 C9-C12 Aliphatic Hydrocarbons exclude the concentration of ethylbenzene and xylenes eluting in that range and.the concentration of C9-C10 Aromatic Hydrocarbons. eastern analytical, inc.www.eailabs.com Phone: (603) 228-0525 6 ~* IA~~I LABORATORY REPORT.v Eastern Analytical, Inc. ID#: 87753 Client: Golder Associates, Inc.Client Designation: Seabrook Station 1 1.03-87221 Client Sample ID: Lab Sample ID: Matrix:, Date Sampled: Date Received: Date Prepared: Tr-CI1 87753.05 soil 3/31/10 412110 415/10 Reporting Dilution *Limit Factor Units Date Analytical Analyzed. Method Analyst Methyl-t-butyl ether(MTBE) Benzene Toluene Ethylbenzene mp-Xylene o-Xylene Naphthalene Unadjusted C5-C8 Aliphatics 1 Unadjusted C9-C12 Aliphatics 1 C5-C8 Aliphatics Hydrocarbons 1,2 C9-C12 Aliphatic Hydrocarbons 1,3 C9-C10 Aromatic Hydrocarbons 1 PID 2,5-Dibromotoluene (surr)FID 2,5-Dibromotoluene (surr)<0.1< 0.05< 0.05< 0.05< 0.05< 0.05< 0.3<5<5<5<5<5 106 %R.125%R 0.1 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.3 5 5 5 5 5, 0.8 0.8 0.8 0:8 0.8 0.8 0.8 0.8 0.8 0.8 0.8 0.8 mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mglkg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg* mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg 4/6/10 4/6/10 416110 4/6/10 4/6110 4/6/10 416/10 4/6/10 4/6/10 416/10 4/6/10 4/6/10 416110 4/6110 416/10 4/6/10 MA VPH MA VPH MA VPH MA VPH MAVPH MA VPH MA VPH MA VPH MA VPH MA VPH MA VPH MA VPH MA VPH MA VPH VG VG VG VG VG VG VG VG VG VG VG VG VG VG (1 Hydrocarbon Range data exclude concentrations of any surrogate(s) and/or internal standards eluting in that range.2 C5-CB Aliphatic Hydrocarbons exclude the concentration of MTBE, benzene and toluene eluting in that range.3 C9-C12 Aliphatic Hydrocarbons exclude the concentration of ethý,lbenzene and xylenes eluting in that range and the concentration of C97C10 Aromatic Hydrocarbons. i eastern analytical, inc.www.eailabs. corn Phone: (603) 228-0525 7 LABORATORY REPORT Eastern Analytical, Inc. ID#: 87753 Client: Golder Associates, Inc.Client Designation: Seabrook Station 1 103-87221 Client Sample ID: Lab Sample ID: Matrix: Date Sampled: Date Received: Date Prepared: TT-C9 87753.06 soil.411110 4/2/10 415110 Reporting Dilution Limit .Factor Units Date Analytical ,Analyzed Method Analyst Methyl-t-butyl ether(MTBE) Benzene Toluene Ethylbenzene mp-Xylene o-Xylene Naphthalene Unadjusted C5-C8 Aliphatics 1 Unadjusted C9-C12 Aliphatics 1 C5-C8 Aliphatics Hydrocarbons 1,2 C9-C12 Aliphatic Hydrocarbons 1,3 C9-C1 0 Aromatic Hydrocarbons 1 PID 2,5-Dibromotoluene (surr)FID 2.5-Dibromotoluene (surr)<0.1< 0.05< 0.05< 0.05< 0.05 ,< 0.05<0.3<5<5<5<5< 5 106 %R 125 %R 0.1 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.3 5 5 5 5 5 0.8 0.8 0.8 0.8 0,8 0.8 0,8 0.8 0,8 0.8 0.8 0.8 mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg 416/10 4/6/10 416/10 4/6/10 4/6/10.416110 4/6/10 4/6110 4/6/10 416110 4/6/10 416/10 4/6110 4/6/10 416110 MA VPH MA VPH MA VPH MA VPH MA VPH MA VPH MA VPH MA VPH MAVPH MAVPH MA VPH MA VPH MA VPH MA VPH VG VG VG VG VG VG VG VG VG VG VG VG VG VG I Hydrocarbon Range data exclude concentrations of any surrogate(s) and/or internal standards eluting in that range.2. C5-C8 Aliphatic Hydrocarbons exclude the concentration of MTBE, benzene and toluene eluting in that range.3 C9-C12 Aliphatic Hydrocarbons exclude the concentration of ethylbenzene and xylenes eluting in that range and the concentration of C9-C10 Aromatic Hydrocarbons. eastern analytical, inc.www. eailabs. com Phone: (603) 228-0525 8 I-Ail Al'LABORATORY REPORT/Eastern Analytical, Inc. ID#: 87753 Client: Golder Associates, Inc.Client Designation: Seabrook Station 1103-87221 Client Sample ID: Lab.Sample ID: Matrix: Date Sampled: Date Received: Date Prepared: Tr-C10 87753.07 soil 4/1/10 4/2/10 45/510 Reporting .Dilution Limit Factor.Date Analytical Analyzed Method Methyl-t-butyl ether(MTBE) Benzene Toluene Ethylbenzene mp-Xylene o-Xylene Naphthalene Unadjusted C5-C8 Aliphatics 1 Unadjusted C9-C12 Aliphatics I C5-C8 Aliphatics Hydrocarbons 1,2 C9-C12 Aliphatic Hydrocarbons 1,3 C9-C 10 Aromatic Hydrocarbons 1 PID 2,5-Dibromotoluene (surr)FID 2.5-Dibromotoluene (surr)<0.1< 0.05< 0.05< 0.05< 0.05< 0.05< 0.3<5.<5<5<5<5 97 %R 113 %R 0.1 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.3 5 5 5 5 5 0.9 0.9 0.9 0.9 0.9 0.9 0.9 0.9 0.9 0.9 0.9 0.9 Units mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mglkg mg/kg mg/kg Analyst 4/6110 416110 416110 4/6/10 4/6/10 4/6110 4/6110 4/6110 4/6/10 416/10 416110 4/6110 416/10 4/6/10 MA VPH MA VPH MA VPH MA VPH MA VPH MA VPH MA VPH MA VPH MA VPH MA VPH MA VPH MA VPH MA VPH MA VPH VG VG VG VG VG VG VG VG VG VG VG VG VG VG (1 Hydrocarbon Range data exclude concentrations of any surrogate(s) and/or internal standards eluting in that range.2 C5-C8 Aliphatic Hydrocarbons exclude the concentration of MTBE, benzene and toluene eluting in that range.3 C9-C12 Aliphatic Hydrocarbons exclude the concentration of ethylbenzene and xylenes eluting in that range and the concentration of C9-C10 Aromatic Hydrocarbons. !eastern analytical, inc.www. eaflabs.com Phone: (603) 228-0525 9 LABORATORY REPORT Eastern Analytical, Inc. ID#: -87753 Client: Golder Associates, Inc.Client Designation: Seabrook Station 1103-87221 Client Sample ID: Lab Sample ID: Matrix: Date Sampled: Date Received: Date Prepared: TT-C4 87753.08 soil 4/1110 4/2/10 4/5/10 Reporting Dilution Limit .Factor Methyl-t-butyl ether(MTBE) Benzene Toluene Ethylbenzene mp-Xylene o-Xylene Naphthalene Unadjusted C5-C8 Aliphatics 1 Unadjusted C9-C12 Aliphatics 1 C5-C8 Aliphatics Hydrocarbons 1,2 C9-C 12 Aliphatic Hydrocarbons 1,3 C9-C10 Aromatic Hydrocarbons I PID 2,5-Dibromotoluene (surr)FID 2.5-Dibromotoluene (surr)<0..1< 0.05< 0.05< 0.05< 0.05< 0.05<0.3<5<5<5<5<5 100 %R 117 %R 0.1 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.3 5 5 5 5 5 0.8 0.8 0.8 0.8 0.8 0.8 0.8 0.8 0,8 0.8 0.8 0.8 Units mg/kg mg/kg mglkg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg* Date Analyzed 4/7/10 4/7/10 417110 417110 4/7/10 4/7/10 4/7/10 4/7110 4/7/10" 4/7/10 4/7/10 417/10 4/7/10 417110 Analytical Method MA VPH MA VPH MA VPH MA VPH MA VPH MA VPH MA VPH MA.VPkH MA VPH MA VPH MA VPH MA VPH MA VPH MA VPH Analyst VG VG VG VG VG VG* VG VG VG VG VG VG VG VG I Hydrocarbon Range data exclude concentrations of any surrogate(s) and/or internal standards eluting in that range.2 C5-C8 Aliphatic Hydrocarbons exclude the concentration of MTBE, benzene and toluene eluting in that range.3 C9-C12 Aliphatic Hydrocarbons exclude the concentration of ethylbenzene and xylenes eluting in that range and the concentration of C9-C10 Aromatic Hydrocarbons. eastern analytical, inc.www. eailabs. com Phone: (603) 228-0525 10

  • IAAAILABORATORY REPORT-.(7 Eastern Analytical, Inc. ID#: 87753 Client: Golder Associates, Inc.Client Designation:

Seabrook Station I 103-87221 Client Sample ID: Lab Sample ID: Matrix: Date Sampled: Date Received: Date Prepared: TT-C5 87753.09 soil 411/10 412/10 4/5110 Methyl-t-butyl ether(MTBE) Benzene Toluene Ethylbenzene mp-Xylene , o-Xylene Naphthalene Unadjusted C5-C8 Aliphatics 1 Unadjusted C9-C12 Aliphatics 1 C5-C8 Aliphatics Hydrocarbons 1,2 C9-C12 Aliphatic Hydrocarbons 1,3 C9-C10 Aromatic Hydrocarbons 1 PID 2.5-Dibromotoluene (surr)FID 2.5-Dibromotoluene (surr)'<0.1<0.05< 0.05< 0.05< 0.05< 0,05< 0.3<5.<5 S<5<5<5 101 %R 112 %R Reporting Dilution Date Analytical Limit Factor Units Analyzed Method Analyst 0.1 0.7 mg/kg 4/7/10 MAVPH VG 0.05 0.7 mglkg 4/7/10 MA VPH VG 0.05 0.7 mg/kg 4/7/10 MA VPH VG 0.05 0.7 mg/kg 4/7110 MAVPH VG 0.05 0.7 mg/kg 4/7110 MAVPH VG 0.05 0.7 mg/kg 4/7/10 MA VPH VG 0.3 0.7 mg/kg 417/10 MAVPH VG 5 0.7 mg/kg 47/10. MAVPH VG.5 0.7 mg/kg 4/7110 MA VPH VG 5 0.7 mg/kg 4/7110 MA VPH VG 5 0.7 mg/kg 4/7/10 MAVPH VG 5 0.7 mg/kg 4/7/10 MAVPH VG% 4/7/10 MAVPH VG% 4/7110 MAVPH VG 1 Hydrocarbon Range data exclude concentrations of any surrogate(s) and/or internal standards eluting in that range.2 C5-C8 Aliphatic Hydrocarbons exclude the concentration of MTBE, benzene and toluene eluting in that range.3 C9-C02 Aliphatic Hydrocarbons exclude the concentration of ethylbenzene and xylenes eluting in that range and the concentration of C9-C10 Aromatic Hydrocarbons. K.eastern analytical, inc.www.eailabs.com Phone: (603) 228-0525 11 I LABORATORY REPORT Eastern Analytical, Inc. ID#: 87753 Client: Golder Associates, Inc.Client Designation: Seabrook Station J 103-87221. Client Sample ID: Lab Sample ID: ,Matrix: Date Sampled: Date Received: Date Prepared: ITT-C1 87753.10 soil 4/1/10 412/10 4/5110 Reporting Dilution Limit Factor Date Analytical Analyzed Method Analyst Methyl-t-butyl ether(MTBE) Benzene Toluene Ethylbenzene mp-Xylene o-Xylene Naphthalene Unadjusted C5-C8 Aliphatics.1 Unadjusted C9-C12 Aliphatics 1 C5-C8 Aliphatics Hydrocarbons 1,2 C9-C12 Aliphatic Hydrocarbons 1,3 C9-C10 Aromatic Hydrocarbons 1 PID 2,5-Dibromotoluene (surr)FID 2.5-Dibromotoluene (surrn<0.1< 0.05< 0.05< 0.05< 0.05< 0.05<0.3<5<5<5<5<5 93 %R 109 %R* 0.1 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.3 5 5 5 5 5 0.7 0.7 0.7 0.7 0.7 0.7 0.7 0.7 0.7 0.7 0.7 0.7 Units mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mglkg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg 4/7/10 4/7/10 4/7110 417/10 4/7/10 4/7/10 4/7/10 4/7/10 4/7/10 4/7/10 4/7/10 417110 417/10 4/7110 MA VPH MA VPH MA VPH MAVPH MA VPH MA VPH MA VPH MA VPH MA VPH MA VPH MA VPH MA VPH MA VPH MA VPH VG VG VG VG VG VG VG VG VG VG VG VG VG VG 1 Hydrocarbon Range data exclude concentrations of any surrogate(s) and/or internal standards eluting in that range.2 C5-C8 Aliphatic Hydrocarbons exclude the concentration of MTBE, benzene and toluene eluting in that range.3 C9-C12 Aliphatic Hydrocarbons exclude the concentration of ethylbenzene and xylenes eluting in that range and the concentration of C9-C1 0 Aromatic Hydrocarbons. eastern analytical, inc.www. eailabs.corn Phone: (603) 228-0525 12

  • IAIý LABORATORY REPORT (Eastern Analytical, Inc. ID#: 87753 Client: Golder Associates, Inc.Client Designation:

Seabrook Station 1103-87221.Client Sample ID: Lab Sample ID: Matrix: Date Sampled: Date Received: Date Prepared: TT-C14 87753.11'soil 4/11/10 4/2/10 415110 Methyl-t-butyl ether(MTBE) Benzene Toluene Ethylbenzene mp-Xylene o-Xylene Naphthalene -Unadjusted C5-C8 Aliphatics 1 Unadjusted C9-Ci2 Aliphatics 1 C5-C8 Aliphatics Hydrocarbons 1,2 C9-C12 Aliphatic Hydrocarbons 1,3 C9-C10 Aromatic Hydrocarbons 1:O PID 2,5-Dibromotoluene (surf)FID 2.5-Dibromotoluene (surr)<0,1< 0.05< 0.05< 0.05< 0.05< 0.05< 0.3<5<5<5<5<5 94 %R 106 %R Reporting Dilution Date Analytical Limit Factor Units Analyzed Method Analyst 0.1 0.9 mg/kg 4/7/10. MA VPH VG 0.05 0.9 mg/kg 4/7/10 MA VPH VG 0.05 0.9 mg/kg 4/7/10 .MA VPH VG 0.05 0.9 mg/kg 4/7/10 MA VPH VG 0.05 0.9 mg/kg 4/7/10 MA VPH VG 0.05 0.9 mg/kg 4/7/10 MA VPH VG 0.3 0.9 mg/kg 4/7110 MA VPH VG 5 0.9 mg/kg 4/7110. MA VPH VG 5 0.9 mg/kg 4/7/10 MA VPH VG 5 0.9 mg/kg 4/7110 MA VPH VG.5 0M9 mg/kg 4/7/10 MA VPH VG 5 0.9 mg/kg 4/7/10 MA VPH 'VG% 47/10 MA VPH VG% 4/7/10 MA VPH VG I Hydrocarbon Range data exclude concentrations of any surrogate(s) and/or internal standards eluting in that range.2 C5-C8 Aliphatic Hydrocarbons exclude the concentration of MTBE, benzeneand toluene eluting in that range.3 C9-C12 Aliphatic Hydrocarbons exclude the concentration of ethylbenzene and xylenes eluting in that range and the concentration of C9-C10 Aromatic Hydrocarbons. eastern analytical, inc./\www.eailabs.com Phone: (603) 228-0525 13 LABORATORY REPORT Eastern Analytical, Inc. ID#: 87753 Client: Golder Associates, Inc.Client Designation: Seabrook station 1103-87221 Client Sample ID: Lab Sample 1D: Matrix: Date Sampled: Date Received: Date Prepared:-TT-C3 87753.12 soil*412/la 412/10 415110 Reporting Dilution Date Limit Factor Units Analyzed Methyl-t-butyl ether(MTBE) Benzene Toluene Ethylbenzene mp-Xylene o-Xylene Naphthalene. Unadjusted C5-C8.Aliphatics 1 Unadjusted C9-C.12 Aliphatics 1 C5-C8 Aliphatics Hydrocarbons 1,2 C9-C12 Aliphatic Hydrocarbons 1,3 C9-C 10 Aromatic Hydrocarbons 1 PID 2,5-Dibromotoluene (surr)FID 2.5-Dibromotoluene (surn<0.1< 0.05< 0.05< 0.05< 0.05< 0.05<0.3<5<5<5<5<5 94 %R 109 %R 0.1 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.3 5 5 5 5 5 0.7 mg/kg 4/7/10 0.7 mg/kg 4/7/10 0.7 mg/kg 417110 0.7 mg/kg 4/7110 0.7 mg/kg 4/7/10 0.7 mg/kg 4/7/10 0.7 mg/kg 4/7/10 0.7 mg/kg 4/7/10 0.7 mg/kg 4/7/10 0.7 mg/kg 4/7/10 0.7 mglkg 4/7/10 0.7 mg/kg 417/10% 4/7110% 4/7110 Analytical Method Analyst MA VPH VG MA VPH VG MA VPH VG MA VPH VG MA VPH VG MA VPH VG-MA VPH VG MA VPH VG MA VPH VG MA VPH VG MA VPH VG MA VPH VG MAVPH VG MA VPH VG 1 Hydrocarbon Range data exclude concentrations of any surrogate(s) and/or internal standards efuting in that range.2 C5-C8 Aliphatic Hydrocarbons exclude the concentration of MTBE, benzene and toluene eluting in that range.3 C9-c12 Aliphatic Hydrocarbons exclude the concentration of ethylbenzene and xylenes eluting in that range and the concentration of C9-C10 Aromatic Hydrocarbons. eastern analytical, inc.www.eailabs.com Phone: (603) 228-0525 14 LABORATORY REPORT.(Eastern Analytical, Inc. ID#: 87753 Client: Golder Associates, Inc.Client Designation:. Seabrook Station 1103-87221 Client Sample ID: Lab Sample ID: Matrix: 'Date Sampled: Date Received: Date Prepared;: TT-C6 87753.13 soil 411110..412/10*415/10.Reporting Dilution.Limit Factor Units Date Analytical Analyzed Method Analyst Methyl-t-butyl .ether(MTBE) Benzene Toluene Ethylbenzene mp-Xylene o-Xylene Naphthalene Unadjusted C5-C8 Aliphatics 1 Unadjusted C9-C12 Aliphatics 1 C5-C8 Aliphatics Hydrocarbons 1,2 C9-C12 Aliphatic Hydrocarbons 1,3 C9-C10 Aromatic Hydrocarbons 1 PID 2,5-Dibromotoluene (surr)FID 2.5-Dibromotoluene (surr)< 0.1*< 0.05< 0.05< 0.05< 0.05< 0.05'< 0.3<5<5<5<5<5 98 %R 116 %R 0.1 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.3 5 5 5 5 5 0.7 0.7 0.7 0.7 0.7 0.7 0.7-0.7 0.7 0.7 0.7 0.7 mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg 4/7/10 417/10.4/7/10, 4/7/10 4/7/10 4/7/110 41711 6 4/7/10 417/10 417110 41711 0 417110 4/7/10 4/7/10 MA VPH MA VPH MA VPH MAVPH MA VPH MA VPH MA VPH MA VPH MA VPH MA VPH MA VPH MA VPH MA VPH MAVPH VG VG VG.VG VG VG VG VG VG VG VG VG VG VG C I Hydrocarbon Range data exclude concentrations of any surrogate(s) and/or internal standards eluting in that range.2 C5-C8 Aliphatic Hydrocarbons exclude the concentration of MTBE, benzene and toluene eluting in that range.3 C9-C12 Aliphatic Hydrocarbons exclude the concentration of ethylbenzene and xylenes eluting in that range and the concentration of C9-C 10 Aromatic Hydrocarbons. eastern analytical, inc.www.ea/labs.com r (Phone: (603) 228-0525 15 LABORATORY REPORT Eastern Analytical, Inc. ID#: 87753 Client: Golder Associates, Inc.Client Designation: Seabrook Station 1103-87221 Client Sample ID: Lab Sample ID: Matrix: Date Sampled: Date Received: Date Prepared: TT-C7 87753.14 soil 411/10 415110 Reporting Dilution Limit Factor Methyl-t-butyl ether(MTBE) Benzene Toluene Ethylbenzene mp-Xylene o-Xylene Naphthalene Unadjusted C5-C8 Aliphatics 1 Unadjusted C9-C12 Aliphatics 1 C5-C8 Aliphatics Hydrocarbons 1,2 C9-C12 Aliphatic Hydrocarbons 1,3 C9-C10 Aromatic Hydrocarbons 1 PID 2,5-Dibromotoluene (surr)FID 2.5-Dibromotoluene (surr)<0.1< 0.05< 0.05< 0.05.< 0.05< 0.05< 0.3<5<5<5<5<5 99 %R 116 %R 0.1 0.05 0.05.0.05 0.05 0.05 0.3 5 5 5 5.5 0.7 0.7 0.7 0.7 0.7 0.7 0.7 0.7 0.7 0.7 0.7 0.7 Units mg/kg mglkg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg Date Analyzed 4/7/10 4/7110 4/7/10 4/7/10 4/7/10 4/7/10 4/7110 417/10 4/7/10 4/7110 4/7/10 417/10 4/7/10 4/7/10 Analytical Method Analyst MA VPH MA VPH MA VPH MA VPH MA VPH MA VPH MA VPH MA VPH MA VPH MA VPH MA VPH MA VPH MA VPH MA VPH VG VG VG VG VG VG VG VG VG VG VG VG VG VG I Hydrocarbon Range data exclude concentrations of any surrogate(s) and/or internal standards eluting in that range.2 C5-C8 Aliphatic Hydrocarbons exclude the concentration of MTBE, benzene and toluene eluting in that range.3 C9-C12 Aliphatic Hydrocarbons exclude the concentration of ethylbenzene and xylenes eluting in that range and the concentration of C9-C10 Aromatic Hydrocarbons. eastern analytical, inc.vwww.eailabs.com Phone: (603) 228-0525 16 LABORATORY REPORT I (Eastern Analytical, Inc. ID#: 87753 Client: Golder Associates, Inc.Client Designation: Seabrook Station 1 103:87221 Client Sample ID: Lab Sample ID: Matrix: Date Sampled: Date Received: Date Prepared: TT-C8 87753.15.soil* 411/10 412/10* 4/5/10 Reporting. Dilution Limit Factor Date Analytical Analyzed Method Analyst Methyl-t-butyl ether(MTBE) Benzene Toluene Ethylbenzene mp-Xylene o-Xylene Naphthalene Unadjusted C5-C8 Aliphatics 1 Unadjusted C9-C12 Aliphatics 1 C5-C8 Aliphatics Hydrocarbons 1,2 C9-C12 Aliphatic Hydrocarbons 1,3 C9-C10 Aromatic Hydrocarbons 1 PID2,5-Dibromotoluene (surr)FID 2.5-Dibromotoluene (surr)<0.1< 0.05< 0.05< 0.05< 0.05< 0.05<0.3<5<5<5<5< 5 96 %R 112 %R 0.1 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.3 5-5 5 5 5 0.8 0.8 0.8 0.8 0.8 0.8 0.8 0.8 0.8 0.8 0.8 0.8 Units mg/kg mgikg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg rmg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg 4[7/10 4/7/10 4/7/10 4/7/10 4/7/10 4/7/10 4/7/10 417110 4/7/10 417110 4/7/10 4/7110 4/7/10 4/7/10 4/7/10 MAVPH MA VPH MA VPH MA VPH MA VPH MAVPH MA VPH MA VPH-MA VPH MA VPH MAVpH MA VPH MAVPH MAVPH VG VG VG VG VG VG VG VG VG VG VG VG VG VG/\1 Hydrocarbon Range data exclude concentrations of any surrogate(s) and/or internal standards eluting in that range.2 C5-C8 Aliphatic Hydrocarbons exclude the concentration of MTBE, benzene and toluene eluting in that range.3 C9-C12 Aliphatic Hydrocarbons exclude the concentration of ethylbenzene and xylenes eluting in that range and the concentration of C9-C10 Aromatic Hydrocarbons. -l eastern analytical, inc.www. eailabs.com Phone: (603) 228-0525 17 (0 LABORATORY REPORT Eastern Analytical, Inc. ID#: 87753 Client: GolderAssociates, Inc.Client Designation: Seabrook Station 1103-87221 Client Sample 1I:.Lab Sample ID: Matrix: Date.Sampled: Date Received: Date Prepared: Methyl-t-butyl ether(MTBE) Benzene Toluene Ethylbenzene mp-Xylene o-Xylene Naphthalene Unadjusted C5-C8 Aliphatics 1 Unadjusted C9-C12.Aliphatics 1 C5-C8 Aliphatics Hydrocarbons 1,2 C9-C12 Aliphatic Hydrocarbons 1,3 C9-CIO Aromatic Hydrocarbons 1 PID 2,5-Dibromotoluene (surr)FID 2.5-Dibromotoluene (surr)TT-C2 87753.16 soil 4/2/10 4/2/10 415/10 Reporting Dilution Limit Factor<0.1< 0.05< 0.05< 0.05< 0.05< 0.05<0.3<5< 5<5< 5<5 101 %R 118 %R 0.1 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.3 5 5 5 5 5 0.7 0.7 0.7 0.7 0.7 0.7.0.7 0.7 0.7 0.7.0.7 0.7 Units mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg Date Analyzed 4/7/10 4/7/10 4/7/10 4/7/10 4/7/10 4/7/10 4/7/10 417110 4/7/10 4/7/10 4/7/10 4/7/10 4/7/10 4/7/10 Analytical Method MAVPH MA VPH MA VPH MA VPH MA VPH MAVPH MA VPH MA VPH MA VPH MAVPH MA VPH MA VPH MA VPH MA VPH Analyst VG VG VG VG VG VG VG VG VG VG VG VG VG VG 1 Hydrocarbon Range data exclude concentrations of any surrogate(s) and/or internal standards eluting in that range.2 C5-C8 Aliphatic Hydrocarbons exclude the concentration of MTBE, benzene and toluene eluting in that range.3 C9-C12 Aliphatic Hydrocarbons exclude the concentration of ethylbenzene and xylenes eluting in that range and the concentration of C9-C10 Aromatic-Hydrocarbons. eastern analytical, inc.www. eailabs. corn Phone: (603) 228-0525 18 .A .1 LABORATORY REPORT Eastern Analytical, Inc.- ID#: 87753 Client: Golder Associates, Inc. Client Designation:. Seabrook Station 1103-87221 (Client Sample ID: Lab Sample ID: Matrix: Date Sampled:* Date Received:* Date Prepared: Trip Blank 87753.17 soil 3/31/10 4/2/10 4/5/10 Reporting Dilution Limit Factor Date Analytical Analyzed Method Methyl-t-butyl ether(MTBE) Benzene Toluene Eihylbenzene mp-Xylene o-Xylene Naphthalene Unadjusted C5-C8 Aliphatics 1 Unadjusted C9-C12 Aliphatics 1 C5-C8 Aliphatics Hydrocarbons 1,2 C9-C12 Aliphatic Hydrocarbons 1,3 C9-C10 Aromatic Hydrocarbons 1 PID 2,5-Dibromotoluene (surr)FID 2.5-Dibromotoluene (surr)< 0.1< 0.05.< 0.05< 0.05< 0.05< 0.05<0.3<5<5<5<5<5 106 %R 125 %R 0.1 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05.0.05 0.3 5 5 5 5 5 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 Units, mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg.mg/kg mg/kg Analyst 4/7110 4)7/10 4/7/10 4/7/10 4/7/10 4/7/10 4/7110 4/7/10 4r7110 4/7/10 4/7/10 4/7/10 4/7/10 4/7/10 MA VPH.MA VPH MA VPH MAVPH MA VPH MA VPH MA VPH MA VPH MA VPH MA VPH MA VPH MA VPH MA VPH MA VPH VG VG VG VG VG VG VG VG VG VG VG VG VG VG!.I Hydrocarbon Range data exclude concentrations of any surrogate(s) and/or internal standards eluting in that range.2 C5-C8 Aliphatic Hydrocarbons exclude the concentration of MTBE, benzene and toluene eluting in that range.3 C9-C12 Aliphatic Hydrocarbons exclude the concentration of ethylbenzene and xylenes eluting in that range and the concentration of C9-C10 Aromatic Hydrocarbons. eastern analytical, inc.www.eailabs.com Phone: (603) 228-0525 19 <0A QCREPORT Eastern Analytical, Inc. ID#: 87753 Client: Golder Associates, Inc.Client Designation.: Seabrook Station 1103-87221 Parameter Name Blank LCS LCSD Analysis Date Units Limits RPD. Method Methyl-t-butyl ether(MTBE) Benzene Toldene Ethylbenzene mp-Xylene o-Xylene Naphthalene Unadjusted C5-C8 Aliphatics 1 Unadjusted C9-C12 Aliphatics 1 C5ýC8 Aliphatics Hydrocarbons C9-C12 Aliphatic Hydrocarbons C9-C10 Aromatic Hydrocarbons 1 PID 2,5-Dibromotoluene (surr)FID 2,5-Dibromotoluene (surr)<0.1< 0.05< 0.05< 0.05< 0.05< 0.05<0.3<5<5<5<5<5 107 %R 125 %R 2.0 (98 %R)2.3 (116 %R)2.4 (120 %R)2.4 (122 %R)4.8 (120 %R)2.4 (118 %R)2.0 (101 %R)6 (101 %R)< 5 (84 %R)< 5 (%R N/A)< 5 (%R N/A)< 5 (118 %R)105 %R 111 %R 1.8 (88 %R) (11 RPD)1.9 (95 %R) (20 RPD)2.0 (98 %R) (20 RPD).2.0 (98 %R) (22 RPD)3.9 (97 %R) (21 RPD)1.9 (95 %R) (22 RPD)1.7 (84 %R) (18 RPD)< 5 (82 %R) (21 RPD)< 5 (76 %R) (10 RPD)< 5 (%R N/A) (RPD N/A)< 5 (%R N/A) (RPD N/A)<5 (96 %R) (21 RPD)88 %R 93 %R 4/7/2010 4/7/2010 4/7/2010 41712010 4/7/2010 41712010 4/7/2010 41712010 4/7/2010 4/7/2010 4/712010 4/7/2010 4/712010 mg/kg mglkg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mglkg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg 70--130 70- 130 70- 130 70- 130 70-130 70-130 70-130 70 -130 70- 130 70- 130 70- 130 70- 130 70-130 70- 130 25 25 25 25 25 25 25 25 25 25 25 25 25 25 MA VPH MA VPH ,MAVPH MA VPH MA VPH MA VPH MA VPH MA VPH MA VPH MA VPH MA VPH MA VPH MA VPH MA VPH Samples were extracted and analyzed within holding time limits.Instrumentation was.calibrated in accordance with the method requirements. The method blanks were free of contamination at the reporting limits.Sample surrogate recoveries met the above stated criteria., The associated matrix spikes andlor Laboratory Control Samples met acceptance criteria.There were no exceptions in the analyses, unless noted.'Flagged analyte recoveries deviated from the QA/QC limits.eastern analytical, inc.www.eailabs.com Phone: (603) 228-0525 20 LABORATORY REPORT Eastern Analytical, Inc. ID#: 87753 1f Client: Golder Associates, Inc.Client Designation: Seabrook Station I 103-87221 Client Sample ID: Lab Sample ID: Matrix: Date Sampled: Date Received: Date Prepared Naphthalene 2-Methylnaphthalene Acenaphthylene Acenaphthene Fluorene Phenanthrene Anthracene Fluoranthene Pyrene Benzo[a]anthracene Chrysene .Benzo[b]fluoranthene Benzo[klfluoranthene Benzo[a]pyrene Indeno[1,2,3-cd]pyrene Dibenz[a,h]anthracene Benzo[gh,ijperylene C9-C18 Aliphatic Hydrocarbons C19-C36 Aliphatic Hydrocarbons C1 1-C22 Aromatic Hydrocarbons C1 1-C22 Aromatic (Unadjusted) 1-Chlorooctadecane (surf)o-Terphenyl (surr)* 2-Fluorobiphenyl (surr)2-Bromonaphthalene (surr)TT-C 12 87753.01 soil 3/31110 412/10 415110 Reporting Dilution Date Limit Factor *Units Analyzed Method Analyst< 0.2ý< 0.2< 0.2< 0.2< 0.2< 0.2-< 0.2<0.2< 0.2<0.2< 0.2< 0.2< 0.2< 0.2< 0.2< 0.2< 0.2< 20< 20< 20< 20 88 %R 93 %R 108 %R 83 %R 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 20 20 20 20 1 mg/kg 4/7/10 MA EPH JMR 1 mg/kg 417110 MA EPH JMR 1 mg/kg 4/7110 MA EPH JMR 1 mg/kg 417/10 MAEPH JMR-1 mg/kg 4/7/10 MA EPH JMR 1 mg/kg 4/7/10 MA EPH JMR 1 mg/kg 4/7/10 MA EPH JMR 1 mg/kg 417110 MA EPH JMR 1 mg/kg 4/7/10 MA EPH JMR 1 mg/kg 4/7110 MA EPH JMR -1 mg/kg 4/7/10 MA EPH JMR 1 mg/kg 417110 MA EPH JMR 1 mg/kg 417110 MA EPH JMR 1 mg/kg 4/7/10 .MA EPH JMR 1 mg/kg 4/7/10 MA EPH JMR ,.1 mg/kg 4/7/10 MA EPH JMR 1 mg/kg 4/7/10 MA EPH JMR 1 mg/kg 4/6/10 MA EPH JMR 1 mg/kg 4/6/10 MA EPH JMR1 1 mg/kg .4/7/10 MA EPH JMR 1 mg/kg 4/7/10 MA EPH JMR% 416/10 MAEPH JMR% .4/7/10 MA EPH JMR% 4/7/10 MA EPH JMR-% 4/7/10 MA EPH JMR EPH Surrogate Acceptance Range: 40-140%Hydrocarbon range data exclude concentrations of any surrogate(s) and. internal standards eluting in that range.C1 1-C22 Aromatic Hydrocarbons exclude the concentration of Target PAH analytes.Solids prepared in accordance with EPA Method 3540C, Soxhlet Extraction. eastern analytical, inc.www.eailabs.com Phone: (603) 228-Q525 21 Ea.Client: Golder Associates LABORATORY REPORT stern Analytical, Inc. ID#: 87753 , Inc. Client Designation: Seabrook Station 1103-87221

  • Client Sample ID: Lab Sample ID: Matrix: Date Sampled:.Date Received: Date Prepared Naphthalene 2-Methylnaphthalene Acenaphthylene Acenaphthene Fluorene Phenanthrene Anthracene Fluoranthene Pyrene iT-C13 87753.02 soil 3/31/10 4/2/10 4/5/10 Reporting Dilution Limit Factor Date ,Units Analyzed Method Analyst< 0.2< 0.2< 0.2< 0.2< 0.2< 0.2< 0.2< b0.2< 0.2< 0.2 0.2 ,0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mglkg mg/kg mg/kg 4/7/10 4/7/10 4/7/10 4/7/10 4/7/10 4/7/10 4/7/10 4/7/10 4/7/10 417110 MA MA MA MA MA MA MA MA MA MA Chrysene < 0.2 0.2 .1 mglkg 4/7/10 MA Benzo[b]fluoranthene

< 0.2 .0.2 1 mg/kg 4/7/10 MA Benzolk]fluoranthene < 0.2 0.2 1 mg/kg 4/7/10 MA Benzola]pyrene < 0.2 0.2 1 mg/kg 4/7/10 MA'lndeno[1,2,3-cd]pyrene < 0.2' 0.2 1 mg/kg 4/7/10 MA Dibenz[a,h]anthracene < 0.2 0.2 1 mg/kg 4/7/10 MA Benzo[g,h,i]perylene < 0.2 0.2 1 mg/kg 4/7/10 MA C,-C18 Aliphatic Hydrocarbons < 20 20 1 mg/kg 4/6/10 MA C19-C36 Aliphatic Hydrocarbons < 20 20 1 mg/kg 4/6/10 MA CI 1-C22 Aromatic Hydrocarbons < 20 20 1 mg/kg 4/7/10 MA Cl -C22 Aromatic (Unadjusted) .<20 20 1 mg/kg .4/7/10 MA 1-Chlorooctadecane (surr) 98 %R % 4/6/10 MA oýTerphenyl (surr) 94 %R % 4/7/10 MA 2-Fluorobiphenyl (surr) 113 %R % ' 4/7/10 MA 2-Bromonaphthalene (surr) 82 %R % 4/7110 MA EPH Surrogate Acceptance Range: 40-140%Hydrocarbon range data exclude concentrations of any surrogate(s) and internal standards eluting in that range.C11 -C22 Aromatic Hydrocarbons exclude the concentration of Target PAH analytes.Solids prepared in accordance with EPA Method 3540C,.Soxhlet Extraction. EPH EPH EPH EPH, EPH EPH EPH EPH EPH EPH EPH EPH EPH EPH*EPH EPH EPH EPH EPH EPH EPH EPH EPH EPH EPH JMR JMR JMR JMR JMR JMR JMR JMR JMR JMR JMR JMR JMR JMR JMR JMR JMR JMR JMR JMR JMR JMR'JMR JMR JMR (0 eastern analytical, inc.www.eailabs.com Phone: (603) 228-0525 22 LABORATORY REPORT (Eastern Analytical, Inc. ID#: 87753 Client: Golder Associates, Inc. Client Designation: Seabrook Station. 1103-87221 Client Sample ID: Lab Sample ID: Matrix: Date Sampled: Gate Received: Date Prepared TT-C16 87753.03 soil 3/31110 412/10"415/10 Reporting Dilution Limit Factor Date Units Analyzed Method Analyst Naphthalene 2-Methylnaphthalene Acenaphthylene Acenaphthene Fluorene*Phenanthrene Anthracene Fluoranthene Pyrene Benzofa]anthracene Chrysene Benzo[b]fluoranthene Benzolk]fluoranthene Benzo[a]pyrene Indeno[1,2,3-cdlpyrene Dibenz[ah]anthracene Benzo[g,h,i]perylene C9-C18 Aliphatic Hydrocarbons C19-C36 Aliphatic Hydrocarbons C 11-C22 Aromatic Hydrocarbons C 11-C22 Aromatic (Unadjusted) 1-Chlorooctadecane (surr)o-Terphenyl (surr)2-Fluorobiphenyl (surr)2-Bromonaphthalene (surr)< 0.2< 0.2< 0.2< 0.2< 0.2< 0.2< 0.2<0.2< 0.2<0.2<0.2< 0.2< 0.2< 0.2<0.2 40.2< 0.2< 20< 20< 20< 20 91 %R.91 %R 104 %R.82 %R 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2.0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 20 20 20 20 1 I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mglkg mglkg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mglkg mglkg mg/kg mg/kg mglkg mg/kg mg/kg mglkg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg 4/7110 417/10 4/7/10 4/7110 4/7/10 4/7110 4/7110 4/7/10 4/7110 4/7/10 4/7/10 4/7/10 417110 4/7/10 4/7/10 417110 4/7/10 416/10 4/6110 4/7/10 4/7/10 4/6/10 4/7/10 4/7/10" 4/7/10 MA EPH MA EPH MA EPH MA EPH MA EPH MA EPH MA EPH MA EPH MA EPH MA EPH MA EPH MA EPH MA EPH MA EPH MA EPH MA EPH MA EPH MA EPH MA EPH-MA EPH MA EPH MA EPH MA EPH MA EPH MA EPH JMR JMR JMR JMR JMR JMR JMR JMR JMR JMR JMR JMR JMR JMR JMR JMR-JMR JMR JMR JMR JMR JMR JMR JMR JMR EPH Surrogate Acceptance Range: 40-140%Hydrocarbon range data exclude concentrations of any surrogate(s) and internal standards eluting in that range.Cl 1-C22 Aromatic Hydrocarbons exclude the concentration of Target PAH analytes.Solids prepared in accordance with EPA Method 3540C, Soxhlet Extraction. 0/ .eastern analytical, inc.www.eailabs.com Phone:,(603) 228-0525 23 .Client: Golder Associ LABORATORY REPORT Eastern Analytical, Inc. ID#: 87753 ates, Inc. Client Designation: Seabrook Station 103-87221 Client Sample ID: Lab Sample ID: Matrix: Date Sampled: Date Received: Pate Prepared TT-C15 87753.04 soil 3/31110.412/10 4/5/10 Reporting Dilution'Limit Factor Date Units Analyzed Method Analyst Naphthalene 2-Methylnaphthalene Acenaphthylene Acenaphthene Fluorenel Phenanthrerie Anthracene Fluoranthene Pyrene Benzola]anthracene Chrysene'Benzo[b]fluoranthene Benzo(k]fluoranthene Benzo[a]pyrene Indeno[1,2,3-cdjpyrene Dibenz[a,h]anthracene Benzo[g,hi]perylene C9-C18 Aliphatic Hydrocarbons C19-C36 Aliphatic Hydrocarbons Cl 1-C22 Aromatic Hydrocarbons Cl 1-C22 Aromatic (Unadjusted) 1 -Chlorooctadecane (surr)o-Terphe'nyl (surr)2-Fluorobiphenyl (surr)2-Bromonaphthalene (surr)<0.2< 0.2<0.2< 0.2< 0.2< 0.2< 0.2<0.2< 0.2< 0.2< 0.2< 0.2< 0.2< 0.2<0.2< 0.2< 0.2<20< 20< 20< 20 98 %R 95 %R 106 %R 81%R 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 20 20 20 20 mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg 4/7/10 4/7110 4/7/10 4/7/10 4/7/10'4/7110 4/7/10 4/7/10 4/7/10 4/7/10 4/7/10 4/7/10 4/7110 4/7/10 4/7/10 4/7/10 4/7/10 4/6110 4/6/10 4/7/10 4/7110 416110 4/7/10 4/7/10 ,4/7/10 MA EPH MA EPH IVAAE'PH MA EPH MA EPH MA EPH MA EPH MA EPH MA EPH MA EPH MA EPH MA EPH MA EPH MA EPH MA EPH MA EPH MA EPH MA EPH MA EPH MA EPH MA EPH MA EPH MA EPH MA EPH MA EPH JMR JMR JMR JMR JMR JMR JMR JMR JMR JMR JMR JMR JMR JMR JMR JMR JMR JMR JMR JMR JMR JMR JMR JMR JMR EPH Surrogate Acceptance Range: 40-140%Hydrocarbon range data exclude concentrations of any surrogate(s) and internal standards eluting in that range.C11-C22 Aromatic Hydrocarbons exclude the concentration of Target PAH analytes.Solids prepared in accordance with EPA Method 3540C, Soxhlet Extraction. eastern analytical, inc.www.eailabs.com Phone: (603) 228-0525 24

  • "AAAI LABORATORY REPORT: Eastern Analytical, Inc. ID#: 87753 Client: Golder Associates, Inc.Client Designation:

Seabrook Station I 103-87221 Client Sample ID: Lab Sample4ID: Matrix:*Date Sampled: Date Received: Date Prepared Naphthalene 2-Methylnaphthalene Acenaphthylene Acenaphthene Fluorene Phenanthrene Anthracene Fluoranthene Pyrehe Benzo[alanthracene Chrysene Benzo[b]fluoranthene Benzo[k]fluoranthene Benzo[a]pyrene Indeno[1,2,3-cd]pyrene Dibenz[a,h]anthracene Benzo[g,h,i]perylene c9-c1 8 Aliphatic Hydrocarbons C19-C36 Aliphatic Hydrocarbons C1 1-C22 Aromatic Hydrocarbons Cl 1-022 Aromatic (Unadjusted) 1-Chlorooctadecane (surr)o-Terphenyl (surr)2-Fluorobiphenyl (surr).2-Bromonaphthalene (surr)TT-CQ11 87753.05 soil 3/31/10 412/110 45/10.< 0.2<0.2< 0.2* <0.2<0.2< 0.2< 0.2< 0.2< 0.2< 0.2< 0.2<0.2< 0.2< 0.2< 0.2<0.2< 0.2<20<20< 20< 20 108 %R*86 %R 97 %R 73 %R Reporting Dilution Date Limit Factor Units Analyzed Method Analyst 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 20 20 20 20 1 mg/kg 4/7110 MA EPH JMR 1 mglkg 4/7/10 MA EPH JMR 1 mg/kg 4/7110 MA EPH JMR 1 mg/kg 4/7/10 MA EPH JMR 1 mg/kg 417/10 MA EPH JMR 1 mglkg 4/7/10 MA EPH JMR 1 mg/kg 4/7/10 MA EPH JMR 1 mg/kg .4/7/10 MA EPH JMR 1 mg/kg 4/7/10 MA EPH JMR 1 mg/kg 4/7/10 MA EPH JMR 1 mg/kg 417/10 MA EPH JMR 1 mg/kg 4/7/10 MAEPH JMR 1 mg/kg 4/7/10 MA EPH JMR 1 mg/kg 407/10 MA EPH JMR 1 mg/kg 4/7/10 MA EPH JMR 1 mg/kg 4/7/10 MA EPH JMR 1 mg/kg 4/7/10 MA EPH JMR 1 mg/kg 4/6/10 MA EPH JMR 1 mg/kg 4/6/10 MA EPH JMR I mg/kg 4/7/10 MA EPH JMR 1 mg/kg 4/7/10 MA EPH JMR% 4/6/10 MA EPH JMR% 4/7/10 MA EPH JMR% 4/7110 MA EPH JMR% 4/7/10 MA EPH JMR EPH Surrogate Acceptance Range: 40-140%Hydrocarbon range data exclude concentrations of any surrogate(s) and internal standards eluting in that range.Cl i-C22 Aromatic Hydrocarbons exclude the concentration of Target PAH analytes.Solids prepared in accordance with EPA Method 3540C, Soxhlet Extraction. L eastern analytical, inc.www.eaflabs, com Phone: (603) 228-0525 25 <0A LABORATORY REPORT Eastern Analytical, Inc. ID#: 87753 Client: Golder Associates, inc.Client Designation: Seabrook Station 1103-87221 Client Sample ID: Lab Sample ID: Matrix: Date Sampled:.Date Received: Date Prepared TF-C9 87753.06 soil 411/10 412/10 4/5/10 Reporting Dilution Date Limit. Factor Units Analyzed Naphthalene 2-Methylnaphthalene Acenaphthylene Acenaphthene Fluorene Phenanthrene Anthracene Fluoranthene Pyrene Benzo[a]anthracene Chrysene Benzo[b]fluoranthene Benzo[k]fluoranthene Benzo[alpyrene Indeno[1,2,3-cdJpyrene Dibenz[a,h]anthracene Benzo~g,h,f]perylene C9-C18 Aliphatic Hydrocarbons C19-C36 Aliphatic Hydrocarbons C1 1-C22 Aromatic Hydrocarbons C1.I-C22 Aromatic (Unadjusted) 1-Chlorooctadecane (surr)o-Terphenyl (surr)2-Fluorobiphenyl (surr)2-Bromonaphthalene (surr)< 0.2< 0.2<0.2< 0.2< 0.2< 0.2< 0.2< 0.2< 0.2< 0.2< 0.2<0.2< 0.2< 0.2<0.2<0.2<0.2< 20 40< 20< 20 102 %R 93 %R 100 %R 74 %R 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 20 20 20 20 1 mg/kg 4/7/10 1 mg/kg 4/7/10 1 mg/kg 4/7/10.1 mg/kg 4/7110 1 mg/kg 4/7110 1 mg/kg 4/7/10 1 mg/kg 4/7/10 1 mg/kg 4/7/10.1 mg/kg 4/7110 1 mg/kg 4/7/10 1 mg/kg 4/7/10 1 mg/kg 4/7/10 1 mg/kg 4/7/10 1 mg/kg f4/7/10 1 mg/kg 4/7110 1 mg/kg 4/7110 1 mg/kg 4/7/10 1 mg/kg '4/6/10 1 mg/kg 4/6/10 1 mg/kg 417/10 1 mg/kg 4/7/10% .4/6110% 4/7/10% 4/7/10% 4/7/10 Method Analyst MA EPH JMR MA EPH JMR MA EPH JMR MA EPH JMR MA EPH JMR MA EPH JMR MA EPH 'JMR MA EPH JMR MA EPH JMR MA EPH JMR MA EPH JMR MA EPH JMR MA EPH JMR MA EPH JMR MA EPH. JMR MA EPH JMR MA EPH JMR MA EPH JMR MA EPH JMR MA EPH JMR MA EPH JMR MA EPH JMR MA EPH JMR MA EPH JMR MA EPH, JMR EPH Surrogate Acceptance Range: 40-140%Hydrocarbon range data exclude concentrations of any surrogate(s) and internal standards eluting in that range.C11 -C22 Aromatic Hydrocarbons exclude the concentration of Target PAH analytes.Solids prepared in accordance with EPA Method 3540C, Soxhlet Extraction. eastern analytical, inc.wwwý.eailabs.com Phone: (603) 228-0525 26

  • .AA I LABORATORY REPORT Eastern Analytical, Inc. ID#: 87753 Client: Golder Associates, Inc. Client Designation:

Seabrook Station 110.3-87221 Cljient Sample ID: TT-C10 Lab Sarriple ID: 87753.07, Matrix: soil Date Sampled: 4/1/10 Date Received: 412/10 Date Prepared' 4/5/10 Reporting Dilution Date Limit Factor Units Analyzed Method Analyst Naphthalene < 0.2 0.2 1 mg/kg 4/7/10 MA EPH JMR 2-Methylnaphthalene < 0.2 0.2 1' mglkg 4/7/10 MA EPH .JMR" Acenaphthylene < 0.2 0.2 1 mg/kg 4/7/10 MA EPH JMR.Acenaphthene < 0.2 0.2 1 mg/kg 4/7110 MA EPH JMR Fluorene < 0.2 .0.2 1 mg/kg 4/7/10 MA EPH JMR Phenanthrene

  • < 0.2 0.2 1 mg/kg 4/7/10 MA EPH -JMR Anthracene

< 0.2 0.2 1 mg/kg .417/10 MA EPH JMR Fluoranthene <0.2 0.2 1 mg/kg. 4/7/10 MA EPH JMR Pyrene < 0.2 0.2 1 mg/kg 4/7/10 MA EPH JMR Benzb[a]anthracene < 0.2 0.2 1 mg/kg 4/7/10 MA EPH JMR Chrysene < 0.2 0.2 1 mg/kg 4/7/10 MA EPH. JMR Benzo[befluoranthene < 0.2 0.2 1 mg/kg 4/7/10 MA EPH JMR Benzo[k]fluoranthene < 0.2 0.2 1 mg/kg 4/7/10 MA EPH JMR Benzo[ajpyrene < 0.2 0.2 1 mg/kg 4/7/10 MA EPH JMR Indeno[1,2,3-cd]pyrene < 0.2 0.2 1 mg/kg 4/7110 MA EPH JMR Dibenz[a,h]anthracene < 0.2 0.2 1 mg/kg 4/7/10 MA EPH JMR Benzo[g,h,i]perylene .<0.2 0.2 <1 mg/kg 4)7/10 MA EPH JMR* C9-C18 Aliphatic Hydrocarbons < 20 20 .1 mg/kg 4/6/10 MA EPH JMR C19-C36 Aliphatic Hydrocarbons .< 20 20 1 mg/kg 4/6110 MA EPH JMR C11-C22 Aromatic Hydrocarbons .< 20 20 .1 mg/kg 417/10 MA EPH JMR C1 1-C22 Aromatic (Unadjusted) < 20 20 1 mg/kg 4/7110 MA EPH JMR 1-Chlorooctadecane (surr) 106 %R % 416/10 MA EPH JMR o-Terphenyl (surr) 87 %R * %' 4/7/10 MA EPH JMR 2-Fluorobiphenyl (surr) 98 %R % 4/7/10 MA EPH JMR 2-Bromonaphthalene (surr) 75 %R % 417/10 MA EPH JMR* EPH Surrogate Acceptance Range: 40-140%Hydrocarbon range data exclude concentrations of any surrogate(s) and internal standards eluting in that range.C1 1-C22 Aromatic Hydrocarbons exclude the concentration of Target PAH analytes.Solids prepared in accordance with EPA Method 3540C, Soxhlet Extraction. -. eastern analytical, inc.www.eailabs.com Phone: (603) 228-6525 27 LABORATORY REPORT Eastern Analytical, Inc. ID#: 87753 Client- GolderAss~ociates, Inc.Client Designation: Seabrook Station I 103-87221 Client Sample ID: Lab Sample ID: Matrix: Date Sampled: Date'Received: Date Prepared Naphthalene 2-Methylnaphthalene Acenaphthylene Acenaphthene Fluorene Phenanthrene Anthracene Fluoranthene Pyrene Benzo[a]anthracene Chrysehe.Benzo[b]fluoranthene Benzo[k]fluoranthene Benz.o[a]pyrene Indeno[1,2,3-cd]pyrene Dibenz[a'h]anthracene Benzo[g,h,i]perylene C9-C18 Aliphatic Hydrocarbons C19-C36,Aliphatic Hydrocarbons C11-C22 Aromatic Hydrocarbons 011-C22 Aromatic (Unadjusted) 1-Chlorooctadecane (surr)o-Terphenyl (surr)2-Fluorobiphenyl (surr)2-Bromonaphthalene (surr)TT-C4 87753.08 soil 4/1/10 412/1 0 412110 4/5/ 10< 0.2< 0.2< 0.2< 0.2< 0.2< 0.2< 0.2< 0.2< 0.2<0.2< 0.2< 0.2< 0.2< 0.2<0.2< 0.2< 0.2< 20< 20< 20< 20 78 %R 91 %R 112 %R 91%R Reporting Dilution Date Limit Factor Units Analyzed Method Analyst 0;2 -1 mg/kg 4/7110 MA EPH JMR 0.2 1 mg/kg 4/7110 MA EPH JMR-0.2 1 mg/kg 4/7/10 MA EPH JMR 0.2 1 mg/kg 4/7/10 MA EPH JMR 0.2 1 mg/kg 417/10 MA EPH JMR 0.2 1 mg/kg 4/7/10 MA EPH JMR 0.2 1 mg/kg 4/7/110 MA EPH JMR 0.2 1. mg/kg 417/10 MA EPH JMR 0.2 1 mg/kg 4/7/10 MA EPH JMR 0.2 1 mg/kg 4/7/10 MA EPH JMR 0.2 1 mg/kg 4/7/10 MA EPH JMR 0.2 1 mg/kg 4/7/10 MA EPH JMR 0.2 1 mg/kg 4/7/10 MA EPH JMR 0.2 1 mg/kg 4/7/10 MA EPH JMR 0.2 1 mg/kg 417/10 MA EPH JMR 0.2 1 mg/kg 4/7/10 MAEPH JMR 0.2 1 mg/kg 4/7/10 MA EPH JMR 20 .1 mg/kg 4/6/10 MA EPH JMR 20 1 mg/kg 4/6110 MA EPH JMR 20 1 mg/kg 4/7/10 MAEPH JMR 20 1 mg/kg 4/7/10 MA EPH JMR% 4/6/10 MA EPH JMR* 4/7/10 MAEPH JMR% 4/7/10 MA EPH JMR% 4/7/10 b MAEPH JMR EPH Surrogate Acceptance Range: 40-140%Hydrocarbon range data exclude concentrations of any surrogate(s) and internal standards eluting in that range.Cl 1-C22 Aromatic Hydrocarbons exclude the concentration of Target PAH analytes.Solids prepared in accordance with EPA Method 3540C, Soxhlet Extraction. .eastern analytical, inc.www.eailabs.com Phone: (603) 228-0525 -28 LABORATORY REPORT Eastern Analytical, Inc. ID#: 87753 Client: Golder Associates, Inc.Client Designation: Seabrook Station I 103-87221 Client Sample ID: Lab Sample ID: Matrix: Date Sampled: Date Received: Date Prepared TT-C5 87753.09 soil 411110 4/2110 415110 Reporting Dilution Date* Limit Factor Units Analyzed Naphthalene 2-Methylnaphthalene Acenaphthylene Acenaphthene Fluorene Phenanthrene Anthracene Fluoranthene Pyrene Benzo[alanthracene Chrysene Benzolbjfluoranthene O Benzotk]fluoranthene Benzo[a]pyrene lndeno[1,2, 3-cdJpyrene Dibenz~a,hlanthracene Benzo~g,h,i]perylene C9-Ci 8 Aliphatic Hydrocarbons C19-C36 Aliphatic Hydrocarbons C1 iC22 Aromatic Hydrocarbons Cl 1-C22,Aromatic (Unadjusted) 1-Chlorooctadecane (surr)o-Terphenyl (surr)2-Fluorobiphenyl (surr)2-Bromonaphthalene (surr)< 0.2< 0.2< 0.2< 0.2<0.2< 0.2<0.2< 0.2< 0.2< 0.2<0.2<0.2< 0.2<0.2<*0.2<0.2<0.2< 20< 20< 20<20 87 %R 77 %R 92 %R 69 %R 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 20 20 20 20 1 mg/kg. 4/7/10 1 mg/kg '4/7/10 1 mg/kg 4/7/10 1 mg/kg 4/7/10 1 mg/kg 4/7/10 1 mg/kg 4/7/10 1 mg/kg 4/7/10 1 mg/kg 4/7/10 1 mg/kg 4/7/10 1 mg/kg 4/7/10.1 mg/kg 4/7/10 1 mg/kg 4/7/10 1 mg/kg 4/7/10 1 mg/kg 4/7/10 1 mg/kg 4/7/10 1 mg/kg 4/7/10 1 mg/kg 4/7/10 1 mg/kg 4/6/10 1 mg/kg 4/6/10 1 mg/kg' 4/7/10 1 mg/kg 4/7/10% 4/6/10% 4/7110% 417/10% 4/7/10 Method Analyst MAEPH JMR MAEPH JMR MAEPH JMR MAEPH JMR MA EPH JMR MA EPH JMR MA EPH JMR MA EPH JMR MA EPH JMR MAEPH JMR MAEPH JMR MAEPH JMR MAEPH JMR MA EPH JMR MA EPH JMR MAEPH JMR MA EPH JMR MAEPH JMR MAEPH JMR MAEPH JMR MA EPH JMR MAEPH JMR MA EPH JMR MA EPH JMR MA EPH, JMR EPH Surrogate Acceptance Range: 40-140%Hydrocarbon range data exclude concentrations of any surrogate(s) and internal standards eluting in that range.C1 -C22 Aromatic Hydrocarbons exclude the concentration of Target PAH analytes.Solids prepared in accordance with EPA Method 3540C, Soxhlet Extraction. (eastern analytical, inc.www.eailabs.com Phone: (603) 228-0525 29 F" (9. -LABORATORY REPORT Eastern Analytical, Inc. ID#: 87753 Client: Golder Associates, Inc. .Client Designation: Seabrook Station 1103-87221 Client Sample ID: Lab Sample ID: Matrix: Date Sampled: Daf&-Received: Date Prepared TT-C1 87753.1 soil 411110 4/2/10 415110 ,Reporting Dilution Limit Factor Date Units Analyzed Method Analyst Naphthalene 2-Methylnaphthalene Acenaphthylene Acenaphthene Fluorene Phenanthrene Anthracene Fluoranthene Pyrene Benzo[a]anthracene Chrysene Benzo[b]fluoranthene Benzo[k]fluoranthene Benzo[a]pyrene I ndeno[1,2,3-cd]pyrene Dibenz[ajh]anthracene Benzo[g,hJperylene C9-C18 Aliphatic Hydrocarbons C19-C36 Aliphatic Hydrocarbons CI 1-C22 Aromatic Hydrocarbons C1 1-C22 Aromatic (Unadjusted) 1-Chlorooctadecane (surr)o-Terphenyl (surr)2-Fluorobiphenyl (surr)2-Bromonaphthalene (surr)50.2< 0.2< 0.2<0.2< 0.2< 0.2< 0.2<0.2< 0.2< 0.2<0.2< 0.2<0.2<0.2< 0.2< 0.2< 0.2< 20< 20< 20< 20 90 %R 82 %R 96 %R 76 %R 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 20 20.20 20 mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg, mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mgfkg mg/kg mg/kg 4/7/10 417110, 4/7110 417/10 4/7/10 4/7/10 417110 417110 4f711 0 417/10 4/7/10 4/7/10 4/7/10 4/7110 417/10 417/10 417110 4/7110 4/7/10 4/6/10 4/6/10 4f611 0 4/7/10 0/711 0 416/10.4/7/10 4/7/10 4/7/10 MA EPH MA EPH MA EPH MA EPH MA EPH MA EPH MA EPH MA EPH MA EPH MA EPH MA EPH MA EPH MA EPH MA EPH MA EPH MA EPH MA EPH MAEPH MA EPH MA EPH MA EPH MA EPH MA EPH MAEPH MA EPH JMR JMR JMR JMR JMR JMR JMR JMR JMR JMR JMR JMR JMR JMR JMR JMR JMR JMR JMR JMR JMR JMR JMR JMR JMR EPH Surrogate Acceptance Range: 40-140%Hydrocarbon range data exclude concentrations of any surrogate(s) and internal standards eluting in that range.C1 1.-.C22 Aromatic Hydrocarbons. exclude the concentration of Target PAH analytes.Solidi prepared in accordance with EPA Method 3540C, Soxhlet Extraction. eastern analytical, inc.'-N wwwmeailabs. ,com Phone: (603) 228-0525 30 LABORATORY REPORT Eastern Analytical, Inc. ID#: 87753 Client: Golder Associates, Inc.Client Designation: Seabrook Station 1103-87221 .Client Sample ID: Lab Sample ID:.Matrix: Date Sampled: Date Received: Date Prepared Naphthalene 2-Methylnaphthalene Acenaphthylene Acenaphthene Fluorene Phenanthrene Anthracene Fluoranthene Pyrene Benzo[a]anthracene Chrysene Benzo[b]fluoranthene Benzo[klt~uoranthene Benzo~a]pyrene Indeno[1,2,3-cd]pyrene Dibenz[ah]anthracene Benzo[g,h,i]perylene C9-C18 Aliphatic Hydrocarbons C1 9-C36 Aliphatic Hydrocarbons C11 iC22 Aromatic Hydrocarbons C1 1-C22,Aromatic (Unadjusted) 1-Chlorooctadecane (surr)o Terphenyl (surr)2-Fluorobiphenyl (surr)2-Bromonaphthalene (surr)TT-C14 87753.11 soil 4/1110 41/2/10 4/5/10< 0.2<0.2< 0.2<0.2< 0.2<0.2< 0.2< 0.2< 0.2< 0.2< 0.2<0.2< 0.2<0.2< 0.2< 0.2<0.2<20 30< 20< 20 86 %R 83 %R 100 %R 79 %R Reporting Dilution Date Limit Factor Units Analyzed Method Analyst 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 20 20 20 20 1 mg/kg 4/7/10 MA EPH 1 mg/kg 4/7/10 MA EPH 1 mg/kg 4/7/10 MAEPH 1 mg/kg 4/7/10 MA EPH 1 mg/kg 4/7110 MA EPH 1 mg/kg 4/7/10 MA EPH 1 mg/kg 4/7/10 MA EPH 1 mg/kg 417/10 MA EPH 1 mg/kg 4/7/10 MA EPH 1 mg/kg 4/7/10 MA EPH 1 mg/kg 4/7/10 MA EPH 1 mg/kg 4/7/10 MA EPH 1 mg/kg 417/110 MA EPH 1 mg/kg 4/7/10 MA EPH 1 mg/kg 4/7/10 MA EPH 1 mg/kg 4/7/10 MA EPH 1 mg/kg 417/10 MA EPH 1 mg/kg 416/10 MA EPH 1 mg/kg 4/6/10 MA EPH 1 mg/kg 417/10 MA EPH I mg/kg 417110 MA EPH% 416/10 MA EPH% 4/7/10 MA EPH% 4/7/10 MA EPH% 4/7110 MA EPH JMR JMR JMR JMR JMR JMR JMR JMR JMR JMR JMR JMR JMR JMR JMR , JMR JMR JMR JMR JMR JMR JMR JMR JMR JMR EPH Surrogate Acceptance Range: 40-140%Hydrocarbon range data exclude concentrations of any surrogate(s) and internal standards eluting in that range.C11-C22 Aromatic Hydrocarbons exclude the concentration of Target PAH analytes.Solids prepared in accordance with EPA Method 3540C, Soxhlet Extraction. (eastern analytical, inc.www.eailabs.com Phone: (603) 228-0525 -31 LABORATORY REPORT Eastern Analytical, Inc. ID#: 87753 Client: Golder Associates, Inc.Client Designation: Seabrook Station I 103-87221. Client Sample ID: Lab Sample ID: Matrix: Date Sampled: Date Received: Date Prepared TT-C3 87753.12 soil 412110 4/2/10 4/5110 Reporting Dilution Limit Factor Date Units Analyzed Method Analyst-Naphthalene 2-Methylnaphthalene Acenaphthylene Acenaphthene" Fluorene Phenanthrene Anthracene Fluoranthene.Pyrene 1 Benzo[a]anthracene Chrysene Benzo[b]fluoranthene Benzo[k]fluoranthene Benzo[a]pyrene Indeno[1,2,3-cd]pyrene Dibenz[ah]anthracene Benzo[g,h,i]perylene C9-C18 Aliphatic Hydrocarbons C19-C36 Aliphatic Hydrocarbons C11-C22 Aromatic Hydrocarbons Cl 1-C22 Aromatic (Unadjusted) 1-Chlorooctadecane (surr)o-Terphenyl (surr)2-Fluorobiphenyl (surr)2-Bromonaphthalene (surr)<0.2< 0.2< 0.2< 0.2< 0.2< 0.2< 0.2< 0.2< 0.2< 0.2< 0.2< 0.2<0.2<0.2< 0.2< 0.2< 0.2< 20< 20< 20< 20 79 %R 88 %R 103 %R 80 %R 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2* 0.2 0.2 20 20 20 20 mg/kg mglkg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg 4/7/10 4/7/10 4/7/10 4/7/10 4/7/10 4/7/10 4/7/10 4/7/10 4/7/10o 4/7110 4/7/10 4/7/10, 4/7/10 4/7110 4/7/10 4/7/10 4/7/10 416110 416/10 417/10 4/7110 4/6/10 4/7/10 4/7/10 4/7/10 MA EPH MA EPH MA EPH MA EPH MA EPH MA EPH MA EPH MA EPH MA EPH MA EPH MA EPH MA EPH MA EPH MA EPH MA EPH MA EPH MA EPH MA EPH MA EPH MA EPH MA EPH MA EPH MA EPH MA EPH MA EPH JMR JMR JMR JMR JMR JMR JMR JMR JMR JMR JMR JMR JMR JMR JMR JMR JMR JMR JMR JMR JMR JMR JMR JMR JMR EPH Surrogate Acceptance Range: 40-140%Hydrocarbon range data exclude concentrations of any surrogate(s) and internal standards eluting in that range.C11-C22 Aromatic Hydrocarbons exclude the concentration of Target PAH analytes.Solids prepared in accordance with EPA Method 3540C, Soxhlet Extraction. .,. ..eastern analytical, inc.www. eailabs.com Phone: (603) 228-0525 32 O*jAA,.--LABORATORY REPORT Eastern Analytical, Inc. ID#: 87753 Client: Golder Associates, Inc. Client Designation: Seabrook Station 1103-87221 (Client Sample ID: Lab Sample ID: Matrix: Date Sampled: Date Received: Date Prepared TT-C6 87753.13 soil 4/1/10 4/2110 415/10 Reporting Dilution Date Limit Factor Units Analyzed Method Analyst Napfithalene 2-Methylnaphthalene Acenaphthylene Acenaphthene Fluorene Phenanthrene Anthracene Fluoranthene Pyrene Benzo[a]anthracene Chrysene Benzo[b]fluoranthene Benzo[k]fluoranthene Benzo[a]pyrene Indeno[1,2,3-cd]pyrene Dibenz[a,h]anthracene Benzofg,h,iJ]perylene " C9-C18 Aliphatic Hydrocarbons C19-C36 Aliphatic Hydrocarbons Cl 1-C22 Aromatic Hydrocarbons Cl 1-C22 Aromatic (Unadjusted) 1-Chlorooctadecane (surr)o-Terphenyl (surr)2-Fluorobiphenyl (surr)2-Bromonaphthalene (surr)< 0.2< 0.2< 0.2< 0.2< 0.2<0.2< 0.2< 0.2< 0.2< 0.2.< 0.2<0.2< 0.2< 0.2< 0.2<0.2.< 0.2< 20< 20< 20< 20 84 %R 81 %R 97 %R 73 %R 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2Z 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 20.20 20 20 1 mg/kg 417/10 1 mg/kg 4/7110 1 mg/kg 4/7/10 1 mg/kg 417/10 1 mg/kg 417/10 1 mg/kg 4/7/10 1 mg/kg 4/7/10 1 mg/kg 4/7/10 1 mg/kg 4/7110 1 mg/kg 4/7110 1 mg/kg 4/7/10 1 mglkg 4/7/10 1 mg/kg 4/7/10 1 mg/kg 4/7/10 1 mg/kg 4/7/10 1 mg/kg 4/7/10 1 mg/kg 4/7/10 1 mg/kg 4/6110 1 mg/kg 4/6/10 1 mg/kg 417/10 1 mg/kg 4/7/10% 4/6/10% 4/7/10% .4/7/10% 4/7/10 MA EPH'MA EPH MA EPH MA EPH MA EPH MA EPH MA EPH MA EPH MA EPH ,MA EPH MA EPH MA EPH MA EPH MA EPH MA EPH MA EPH MA EPH MAEPH MA EPH MAEPH MA EPH MA EPH MA EPH MA EPH MA EPH JMR JMR JMR JMR JMR JMR JMR JMR JMR JMR JMR JMR JMR JMR (JMR JMR JMR JMR JMR JMR JMR JMR JMR JMR JMR EPH.Surrogate Acceptance Range: 40-140%Hydrocarbon range data exclude concentrations of any surrogate(s) and internal standards eluting in that range.C11-C22'Aromatic Hydrocarbons exclude the concentration of Target PAH analytes, Solids prepared in accordance with EPA Method 3540C, Soxhlet Extraction. eastern analytical, inc. ,wW.eai/abs.com Phone: (603) 228-0525 33 (0 LABORATORY REPORT Eastern Analytical, Inc. ID#: 87753 Client: Golder Associates, Inc. Client Designation: Seabrook Station 1103-87221 Client Sample ID: TT-C7 Lab Sample ID: 87753.1.4 Matrix: soil Date Sampled: 4/1/10.Date Received: 4/2/10 Date Prepared .45110 Reporting Dilution Date Limit Factor Units Analyzed Method Analyst Naphthalene <0.2 0.2 1 'mg/kg. 4/7/10 MA EPH JMR 2-Methylnaphthalene < 0.2 0.2 1 mg/kg 4/7/10 MA EPH JMR Acenaphthylene < 0.2 0.2 1 mg/kg 4/7/10 MA EPH. JMR Acenaphthene < 0.2 0.2 1 mg/kg 4/7/10 'MA EPH JMR Fluorene < 0.2 0.2 1 mg/kg 4/7/10 MA EPH JMR Phenanthrene < 0.2 0.2 1 mg/kg 4/7/10 MA EPH JMR Antýracene < 0.2 0.2 1 mg/kg 4/7/10 MA EPH JMR Fluor~anthene < 0.2 0.2 1 mg/kg 4/7/10 MA EPH JMR Pyrene < 0.2 0.2 1 mg/kg 4/7/10 MAEPH JMR Benzo[a]anthracene < 0.2. 0.2 1 mg/kg 417/10 MA EPH JMR Chrysene < 0.2 0.2 1 mg/kg 4/7/10 MA EPH JMR Benzo[b]fluoranthene < 0.2 0.2 1 mg/kg 4/7/10 MA EPH JMR Benzo[klfluoranthene < 0.2 0.2 1 mg/kg 4/7/10 MA EPH JMR Benzo[a]pyrene < 0.2 .0.2 1 mg/kg 4/7/10 MA EPH JMR lndeno[1,2,3-cd]pyrene < 0.2 0.2 1 mg/kg '4/7/10 MA EPH JMR Dibenz[a,h]anthracene < 0.2 0.2 1 mg/kg 4/7/10 MA EPH JMR Benzo[g,h,i]perylene < 0.2 0.2 1 mg/kg 4/7/10 MA EPH JMR C9-C18 Aliphatic Hydrocarbons < 20 20 1 mg/kg 4/6/10 MA EPH JMR C19-C36 Aliphatic Hydrocarbons < 20 20 1 mglkg 416/10 MA EPH JMR C11-C22 Aromatic Hydrocarbons < 20 20 1 mg/kg 4/7110 MA EPH JMR C11-C22 Aromatic (Unadjusted) < 20 20 1 mg/kg 4/7110 MA EPH JMR 1-Chlorooctadecane (surr) 92 %R % 4/6/10 MA EPH JMR o-Terphenyl (surr) 86 %R % 4/7/10 MA EPH JMR 2-Fluorobiphenyl (surr) 97 %R % 4/7110 MA EPH JMR 2-Bromonaphthalene (surr) 76 %R % 4/7/10 MA EPH JMR EPH Surrogate Acceptance Range: 40-140%Hydrocarbon range data exclude concentrations of any surrogate(s) and internal standards eluting in that range.Cl -C22 Aromatic Hydrocarbons exclude the concentration of Target PAH analytes.Solids Prepared in accordance with EPA Method 3540C, SoxhletExtraction. eastern analytical, inc.www.eailabs~corn .Phone: (603) 228-0525 34 O LABORATORY REPORT Eastern Analytical, Inc. lD#: 87753 Client: Golder Associates, Inc. Client Designation: Seabrook Station j 103-87221 Client Sample ID: TT-C8 Lab Sample ID: 87753.15 Matrix: soil Data Sampled: 4/1/10 Date Received: 4/2/10.Date Prepared 4/5110 Reporting Dilution Date Limit Factor Units Analyzed Method Analyst Naphthalene < 0.2 0.2 1 mg/kg 4/7110 MA EPH JMR 2-Methylnaphthalene < 0.2 0.2 1 mg/kg 4/7110 MA EPH JMR Acenaphthylene .< 0.2 0.2 1 mg/kg 4/7/10 MA EPH JMR Acenaphthene < 0.2 0.2 1 mglkg .417/10 MA EPH JMR Fluorene < 0.2 0.2 1 mglkg 4/7/10 MA EPH JMR Phenanthrene < 0.2 0.2 .1 mg/kg 4/7/10 MA EPH JMR Anthracene < 0.2 0.2 1 mg/kg .4/7/10 MA EPH JMR Fluoranthene < 0.2 0.2 1 mg/kg 4/7/10 MA EPH JMR Pyrene < 0.2 0.2 1 mg/kg 4/7/10 MA EPH JMR Benzo[a]anthracene < 0.2 0.2 1 mg/kg 4/7/10 MA EPH JMR Chrysene < 0.2 0.2 1 mg/kg 4/7/10 MA EPH JMR Benzolb]fluoranthene < 0.2 0.2 1 mg/kg 4/7/10 MA EPH JMR.Benzolk]fluoranthene "< 0.2 0.2 1 mg/kg 417/10 MA EPH JMR Benzo[a]pyrene < 0.2 0.2 1 mg/kg 417110 -MA EPH JMR /lndeno[1,2,3-cd]pyrene < 0.2 0.2 1 mg/kg 4/7/10 MA EPH JMR Dibenz[a,hlanthracene < 0.2 0.2 1 mg/kg 417/10 MA EPH JMR Benzo[g,hi]perylene < 0.2 0.2 1 mg/kg 4/7/10 MA EPH JMR C9-C18 Aliphatic Hydrocarbons < 20 20 1 mg/kg 4/6/10 MA EPH JMR C19-C36 Aliphatic Hydrocarbons < 20 20 1 mg/kg 416110 MA EPH JMR C1 1-C22 Aromatic Hydrocarbons < 20 .20 1 mg/kg 4/7/10 MA EPH JMR C11-C22 Aromatic (Unadjusted) < 20 20 1 mg/kg 4/7110. MA EPH JMR 1-Chlorooctadecane (sur) 86 %R % 4/6/10 MA EPH JMR o-Terphenyl (surr) .92 %R % 4/7110 MA EPH JMR 2-Fluorobiphenyl (surr) 104 %R % 417/10 MA EPH JMR 2-Bromonaphthalene (surr) 82 %R % 4/7/10 MA EPH JMR EPH Surrogate Acceptance Range: 40-140%Hydrocarbon range data exclude concentrations of any surrogate(s) and internal standards eluting in that range.C11 -C22 Aromatic Hydrocarbons exclude the concentration of Target PAH analytes.Solids prepared in accordance with EPA Method 3540C, Soxhlet Extraction. eastern analytical, inc.www.eeilabs.com Phone: (603) 228-0525 , 3 5 Clien..LABORATORY REPORT, Eastern Analytical, Inc. ID#: 87753 t: Golder Associates, Inc.Client Designation: Seabrook Station 1103-87221 Client Sample ID: Lab Sample ID: Matrix:, Date Sampled: Date Received: Date Prepared Naphthalene 2-Methylnaphthalene Acenaphthylene Acenaphthene Fluorene Phenanthrene Anthracene Fluoranthene Pyrene* Benzo[a]anthracene Chrysene Benzo[blfluoranthene Benzo[k]fluoranthene Benzo[a]pyrene lndeno[1,2,3-cd]pyrene Dibenz[a,h]anthracene Benzo[gh,i]perylene C9-C18 Aliphatic Hydrocarbons C19-C36 Aliphatic Hydrocarbons Cl 1-C22 Aromatic Hydrocarbons Cl 1-C22 Aromatic (Unadjusted) 1-Chlorooctadecane (surT)o-Terphenyl (surr)2-Fluorobiphenyl (surr)2-Bromonaphthalene (surr)Tr-C2 87753.16 soil* 4/2i1o 412110 4/2/10.415110< 0.2<0.2< 0.2<0.2< 0.2< 0.2< 0.2< 0.2< 0.2< 0.2< 0.2< 0.2<0.2< 0.2< 0.2< 0.2<0.2< 20< 20< 20< 20 83 %R 82 %R 96 %R 72 %R Reporting Dilution Date Limit Factor Units Analyzed 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 20 20 20 20 Method Analyst mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg 4/.7/10 4/7/10 4/7/10 4/7/10 41-7110 4/7110 4/7/10 4/7/10 4/7/10 4/7/10 4/7/10 4/7/10 4/7/10 4/7110 4/7/10 4/7/10 4/7/10 4/7110 4/6/10 4/6/10 4/7/10 4/7/10 416/10 4/7/10 4/7/10 417/10 MA EPH MA EPH MA EPH MA EPH MA EPH MA EPH MA EPH MA EPH MA EPH MA EPH MA EPH MA EPH MAEPH MA EPH MA EPH'MA EPH MA EPH MA EPH MA EPH MA EPH MA EPH MA EPH MA EPH MA EPH MA EPH JMR JMR JMR JMR JMR JMR JMR JMR JMR JMR JMR JMR JMR JMR, JMR JMR JMR JMR JMR JMR JMR JMR JMR JMR JMR EPH Surrogate Acceptance Range: 40-140%Hydrocarbon range data exclude concentrations of any surrogate(s) and internal standards eluting in that range.C11-C22 Aromatic Hyd-rocarbons exclude the concentration of Target PAH analytes.Solids prepared in accordance with EPA Method 3540C, Soxhlet Extraction. eastern analytical, inc.www~eailabs, corn Phone: (603) ý28-0525 .3 6 QC REPORT (Eastern Analytical, Inc. ID#: 8 Client: Golder Associates, Inc.7753 Batch ID: 733867-49609/S040510MAEPH1 Client Designation: Seabrook Station 1103487221 LCSD Analysis Date Units Limits -RPD Method Parameter Name Blank LCS Naphthalene < 0.2 2-Methylnaphthalene < 0.2 Acenaphthylene < 0.2 Acenaphthene <0.2 Fluorene < 0.2 Phenanthrene < 0.2 Anthracene < 0.2 Fluoranthene < 0.2 Pyrene < 0.2 Benzo[a]anthracene < 0.2 Chrysene < 0.2 Benzo[b]fluoranthene < 0.2 Benzo[k]fluoranthene < 0.2 Benzo[a]pyrene < 0.2 lndeno[1,2,3-cd]pyrene < 0.2 Dibenz[a,h]anthracene < 0.2 Benzo[gh,i]perylene , < 0.2 C9-C18 Aliphatic Hydrocarbons < 20 C 19-C36 Aliphatic Hydrocarbons < 20 C 11-C22 Aromatic Hydrocarbons < 20 Ci 1-C22 Aromatic (Unadjusted) <20 1-Chlorooctadecane (surr) 73 %R o-Terphenyl (surr) 100 %R 2-Fluorobiphenyl (surr) 110 %R 2-Bromonaphthalene (surr) 87 %R 2.7 (100 %R) 2.8 (103 %R) (3 RPD)2.4 (90 %R) 2.4 (89 %R) (1 RPD)2.6 (99 %R) 2.7 (100 %R) (1 RPD)2.7 (99 %R) 2.6 (97 %R) (2 RPD)2.7 (103 %R) 2.7 (101.%R) (2 RPD)2.7 (103 %R) 2.7 (103 %R) (0 RPD)2.7 (100 %R) 2.7 (100 %R) (0 RPD)2.7 (103 %R) 2.7 (100 %R) (3 RPD)2.6 (99 %R) 2.6 (99 %R),(0 RPD)2.9 (107 %R) 2.8 (105 %R) (2 RPD)2.5 (93 %R) 2.5 (92 %R) (1 RPD)*2.6 (98 %R) 2.5 (94 %R) (4RPD)2.6 (96 %R) 2.4 (91 %R) (5 RPD)2.5 (9-4 %R) 2.4 (91 %R) (3 RPD)2.9 (108 %R) 2.9 (108 %R) (0 RPD)2.7 (102 %R) 2.6 (98 %R) (4 RPD)2.7 (100 %R) 2.5 (96 %R) (4 RPD)< 20 (74 %R) < 20 (86 %R) (15 RPD)< 20 (85 %R) 20 (100 %R) (16 RPD)< 20 (%R N/A) < 20 (%R N/A) (RPD N/A)50 (103 %R) 50 (102 %R) (1 RPD)80 %R 95 %R 102 %R 96 %R 107 %R 109 %R 75 %R 76 %R 4/7/2010 4/7/2010 4/7/2010 4/7/2010 4/7/2010 4/7/2010 4/7/2010 4/7/2010 4/7/2010 4/7/2010 4/7/2010 4/7/2010 4/7/2010 4/7/2010 4/7/2010 4/7/2010 4/7/2010 416/2010 4/6/2010 4/7/2010 4/7/2010 4/6/2010 4/7/2010 4/7/2010 4/7/2010 mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mglkg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg% Rec% Rec% Rec% Rec 40-140 40-140 40-.140 40- 140 40-140 40-140 40-140 40-140 40-140 40-140 40-140 40-140 40-140 40-140 40-140 40-140 40-140 40-140 40-140 40-140 40-140 40-140 40-140 40-140 25 MA EPH 25 MA EPH 25. MA EPH 25 MAEPH 25 MA EPH 25 MA EPH 25 MA EPH 25 MA EPH 25 MA EPH 25 MA EPH 25 MA EPH 25 MA EPH 25. MA EPH 25 MA EPH 25 MA EPH 25- MA EPH 25 MA EPH 25 25 MA EPH MA EPH 25 MA EPH MA EPH MA EPH MAEPH MA EPH , Samples were extracted and analyzed within holding time limits. -Instrumentation was calibrated in accordance with the method requirements. The method blanks were free of contamination at the reporting limits.Sample surrogate recoveries met the above stated criteria.The associated matrix spikes and/or Laboratory Control Samples met acceptance criteria.There were no exceptions in the analyses, unless noted.Flagged analyte recoveries deviated from the QAIQC limits.Percent (%) breakthrough of Naphthalene in the LCS/LCSD: < 5/< 5%.Percent (%) breakthrough of 2-Methylnaphthalene in the LCS/LCSD: < 5/< 5%.eastern analytical, inc.www.eailabs.corn Phone: (603) 228-0525 37 LABORATORY REPORT-Eastern Analytical, Inc. ID#: 87753 Client: Golder Associates, Inc.Client Designation: Seabrook Station 103-87221 TT-C12 TT-C13 Sample ID: 1T-C 16 'iT-C15 TT-Cl11 TT-C91 Lab Sample ID: Matrix: Date Sampled: Date Received:% Solid: Units: Date. of. Extra cti on/Prep: Date of Analysis: Analyst: Extraction Method: Analysis Method: Dilution Factor:.87753.01 soil 3/31/10 4/2/10 90.8 mg/kg 4/5/10 4/6/10 JW 35508 8082 I 87753.02 soil 3/31/10 4/2/10 88.2 mglkg*4/5/10 4/6110 JW 3550B 8082 1<0.1<0.1<0.1< 0.1< 0.1<0.1.< 0.1, 87 %R 102 %R 87753.03 soil 3/31/10 4/2/10 88.7:mg/kg 4/5110 4/6110 JW 35508 8082 1<0.1<0.1<0.1<0.1<0.1<0.1<0.1 88 %R 89 %R 87753.04 soil 3/31/10 4/2/10 90.7 mg/kg 415/10 4/6/10 JW 3550B 8082 1<0.1<0.1<0.1<0.1<0.1<0.1<0.1 96 %R 103 %R 87753.05 soil 3/31/10 4/2/10 91.5 mg/kg 4/5/10 4/6/10 JW 35508 8082 0.1<0.1<0.1<0.1<0.1<0.1< 0.1 92 %R 101 %R 87753.06 soil 4/1/10 4/2/10 91.1 mg/kg 4/5110 4/6110 JW 3550B 8082 1<0.1<0.1<0.1-<0.1<0.1< 0.1<0.1 106 %R 102 %R PCB-1016 PCB-1221 PCB-1232 PCB-1242 PCB-1248 PC8-1254 PC8-1260 TMX (surr)DCB (surr)<0.1<0.1<0.1<0.1<0.1<0.1<0.1 93 %R 91 %R Acid cleanup was performed on the samples and associated Batch QC.eastern analytical, inc.www.eailabs.com Phone! (603) 228-0525 38 0_____LABORATORY REPORT Eastern Analytical, Inc. ID#: 87753 Client: Golder Associates, Inc.Client Designation: Seabrook Station I 103-87221 Sample ID: TT-C 10 TT-C4 TThC5 TT-C1 TT-C14 Lab Sample ID: Matrix: Date Sampled: Date Received:% Solid: Units: Date of Extraction/Prep: Date of Analysis: Analyst: Extraction Method: Analysis Method: Dilution Factor: 87753.07 soil'411110 4/2/10 89.4 mg/kg 4/5110 416110 JW 3550B 8082 1< 0.1<0.1<0.1< 0.1<0.1<0.1<0.1 96 %R 103 %R 87753.08-soil 4/1/10 4/2/10 90 mg/kg 415/10 41611 0 JW 3550B 8082 1<0.1<0.1<0.1< 0.1<0.1<0.1<0.1 95 %R 100 %R 87753.09 soil 411/10 4/2/110 90.7 mglkg 4/5110 416/10 JW 3550B 8082 1<0.1<0.1<0.1<0.1<0.1<0.1<0.1 90 %R 98 %R 87753.1 soil 411110 4/2/10 92 mg/kg 4/6/10 416/10 JW 3550B 8082 1<0.1<0.1<0.1<0.1<0.1<0.1<0.1 91 %R 95 %R 87753.11 soil 4/1/10 4/2110 86.4 mg/kg 4/6/10 4/6110 JW 3550B 8082 1<0.1<0.1<0.1<0.1<0.1 -<0.1<0.1 93 %R 93 %R TT-C3 87753.12 soil 412110 4/2/10 4/2110 89.7 mg/kg 4/6/10 416110 JW 3550B 8082 I PCB-1016 PCB-1221 O PCB-1232 PCB-1242 PCB-1248 PCB-1254 PCB-1260.TMX (surr)DGB (surr)<0.1<0.1<0.1<0.1<0.1<0.1<0.1 92 %R 101 %R Acid cleanup was performed on the samples and- associated Batch QC.eastern analytical, inc.www.eai.abs.com Phone: (603 228-0525 9 1AA 3 LABORATORY REPORTw*1 Eastern Analytical, Inc. ID#: 87753 Client Golder Associates, Inc.Client Designation: Seabrook Station 1103-87221 Sample ID: Lab Sample ID: Matrix: 'Date Sampled: Date Received:% Solid: Units: Date of Extraction/Prep: Date of Analysis: Analyst: Extraction Method: Analysis Method: Dilution Factor: TT-C6 TThC7 TT-c8 -TT-C2 87753.13* soil 4/1110 412/10 89 mg/kg 4/6/10 4/6/10 JW 3550B 8082 1 87753.14 soil 4/1/10 4/2/10 90.9 mg/kg 4/6/10 4/6/10 JW 3550B 8082 1*<0.1<0.1<0.1<0.1<0.1<0.1<0.1 97 %R 101 %R 87753.15 soil 4/1/10 4/2/10 90.3 mglkg 4/6/10 416/10 JW 3550B 8082 1<0.1<0.1<0.1<0.1<0.1<0.1<0.1 94 %R 98 %R 87753.16 soil 4/2/10 412110 90.6 mgikg 416/10 4/6/10.4/6110 JW 3550B 8082<0.1<0.1<0.1<0.1<0.1<0.1-<0.1 91 %R 99 %R PCB-1016 PCB-1221 PCB94232 PCB-1242 PCB-1248.PCB-1254 PCB-1260 TMX (surr)DCB (surr)<0.1<0.1<0.1<0.1<0.1<0.1<0.1 86 %R 89 %R Acid cleanup was performed on the samples and associated Batch QC..eastern analytical, inc.www. eailabs, corm Phone: (603) 228-05.25 40 QC REPORT Eastern Analytical, Inc. ID#: 8 Client: Golder Associates, Inc.7753 Batch ID: 733867-56964/SO40510PCB1 Client Designation: Seabrook Station 1103-87221 LCSD Analysis Date Units Limits RPD Method Parameter Name Blank LCS PCB-1016 PCB-1221 PCB-1232 PCB-1242 PCB-1248 PCB-1254 PCB2-1260 TMX (surr)DCB (surr)<0.1<0,1<0.1<0.1<0.1< 0.1<0.1 96 %R 105 %R 0.4 (107 %R)< 0.1 (%R NIA)< 0.1 (%R N/A)< 0.1 (%R N/A)< 0.1 (%R N/A)<0.1 (%R N/A)-0.4 (95 %R)95 %R 100 %R.0.4 (104 %R) (3 RPD)< 0.1 (%R N/A) (RPD N/A)< 0.1 (%R N/A) (RPD N/A)< 0.1 (%R N/A) (RPD N/A)< 0.1 (%R N/A) (RPD N/A)< 0.1(%R N/A) (RPD N/A)0.4 (95 %R) (0 RPD)94 %R 94 %R , 4/6/2010 4/6/2010 4/6/2010.1/612010 4/16/2010 4/6/2010 4/6/2010 416/2010 416/2010 mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg% Rec% Rec 40-140 40-140 40-140 40-140 40-140 40-140 40- 140 30-150 30-150 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 8082 8082 8082 8082 8082 8082 8082*8082 8082 (Samples were extracted and analyzed within holding time limits.Instrumentation was calibrated in accordance with the method requirements. The method blanks were free of contamination at the reporting limits.Sample surrogate recoveries met the above stated criteria: The associated matrix spikes and/or Laboratory Control Samples met acceptance criteria.There were no exceptions in the analyses, unless noted.* Flagged analyte recoveries deviated from the QA/OC limits.eastern analytical, inc.www.eailabs.com Phoýe: (603) 228-0525 41 Client: Golder Associates, Inc.LABORATORY REPORT astern Analytical, Inc. ID#: 87753 Client Designation: Seabrook Station 1103-87221 Sample ID: TT-C13 TT-C16 TT-C15 TT-C12 Lab Sample ID: Matrix: Date Sampled: Date Received: 87753.01. 87753.02 soil soil 3/31/10 3/31/10 4/2/10 412/10 87753.03 soil 3/31/10 4/2/10 87753.04 soil 3/31/10 Analytical Date of 41/2/10 Matrix Units Analysis Method Analyst Arsenic Barium Cadmium Chromium Lead Mercury Selenium Silver 20 35< 0.5 19 6.9<0.1<0.5<0.5 15 65 0..5 31 8.8<0.1<0.5<0.5 17 87<0.5 30 60<0.1<*0.5< 0.5 13 SolTotDry mg/kg 4/7/10 78 SolTotDry mg/kg 4/7110< 0.5 SolTotDry mg/kg 4/7/10 25 SolTotDry mg/kg 4/7/10 8.8 SolTotDry mg/kg 4/7/10< 0.1 SolTotDry mg/kg 4/8/10< 0.5 SolTotDry mg/kg 4/7/10< 0.5 SolTotDry mg/kg 4/8/10 6020 SFW 6020 SFW 6020 -SEW 6020 SFW 6020 SFW 6020 SFW 6020 SFW 6020 SFW Sample ID: TT-C11 TT-C9 TT-C10 TT-C4 Lab Sample ID: Matrix: Date Sampled: Date Received: 87753.05 soil 3/31/10 4/2/10 Arsenic Barium Cadmium Chromium Lead Mercury Selenium Silver 27 67<0.5 41 9.2<0.1<0.5< 0.5 877.53.06 soil 4/1/10 4/2/10 65 56<0.5 26 10<0.1<0.5<0.5 87753.07 soil 4/1/10 4/2110 13 71<0.5 25 9.2<0.1< 0.5<0.5 87753.08 soil 4/1/10 Analytical Date of Matrix Units Analysis Method Analyst 8.5 SolTotDry mg/kg 4/8/10 6020 SFW 84 SolTotDry mg/kg 4/8/10 6020. SFW< 0.5 SolTotDry mg/kg 4/8/10 6020 SFW 32 .SolTotDry mg/kg 4/8/10 .6020 SFW.9.5 SolTotDry mg/kg 4/8/10 6020 SFW< 0.1 SolTotDry mg/kg 418/10 6020 SFW< 0.5 SolTotDry mg/kg 4/8/10 6020 SFW 0.6 SolTotDry mg/kg 4/8/10. 6020 SFW eastern analytical, inc.www.eailabs.com Phone: (603) 228-0525 42 EI Client: Golder Associates, Inc.LABORATORY REPORT astern Analytical, Inc. ID#: 87753 Client Designation: Seabrook Station I 103-87221 Sample ID: TT-C5 TT-C1 TT-C14 TT-C3 Lab Sample ID: Matrix: Date Sampled: Date Received: 87753.09 soil.4/1/10 4/2110 87753.1 soil 411110 4/2110 87753.11 soil"411110 4/2/10 87753.12 soil 4/2/10 Analytical Date of 4/2/10 Matrix Units Analysis., Method Analyst Arsenic Barium Cadmium Chromium'Lead Mercury Selenium Silver 7.4 84<0.5 41 5.9<0.1< 0.5<0.5 16 170< 0.5 37 15<0.1< 0.5< 0.5 17 83< 0.5 31 41<0.1< 0.5< 0.5 13 SolTotDry mg/kg 418/10 52 .SolTotDry mg/kg 4/8/10<0,5 SolTotDry mg/kg 4/8110 24 SolTotDry mg/kg 4/8/10 6.8 SolTotDry mg/kg 4/8/10< 0.1 SolTotDry mg/kg 4/8/10<*0.5 SolTotDry mg/kg 4/8/10<0.5 SolTotDry mg/kg 4/8/10 6020 SFW 6020 SFW 6020 SFW 6020 SFW 6020 SFW 6020 SFW 6020 SFW 6020 SFW (Sample ID: TT-C6 TT-C7 TT-C8 TT-C2 Lab Sample ID: Matrix: Date Sampled: Date Received: 87753.13 soil 411/10 412/10 87753.14 soil 411/10 4/2/10 87753.15 soil 4/1/10 4/2/10 87753.16 soil 412110 -Analytical Date of 4/2/10 Matrix Units Analysis Method Analyst Arsenic Barium Cadmium Chromium Lead Mercury Selenium Silver 19 40< 0.5 23 7.5<0.1< 0.5< 0.5* 16 85< 0.5 23 7.7<0.1< 0.5< 0.5.19 46*< 0.5 22 7.0<0.1<0.5< 0.5 23 SolTotDry mg/kg 418/10 37 SolTotDry mg/kg. 4/8/10< 0.5 SolTotDry mg/kg .4/8/10 27 SolTotDry mg/kg 4/8110 5.8 SolTotDry mg/kg .4/8/10< 0.1 SolTotDry mg/kg 4/8/10< 0.5 SolTotDry mg/kg 4/8/10< 0.5 SolTotDry mg/kg 4/8/10 6020 SFW 6020 SFW 6020 SFW 6020 SFW 6020 SFW 6020 SFW 6020 SFW 6020 SFW eastern analytical, inc.www.eailabs.com Phone: (603) 228-0525 43 QC REPORT Eastern Analytical, Inc. ID#: 87753.Client: Golder Associates, Inc.Client Designation: Seabrook Station 103-87221 Date of.Units Analysis Parameter Name Blank LCS LCSD Limits RPD Method Arsenic Barium Cadmium Chromium Lead Mercury Selenium Silver< 0.5< 0.5< 0.5<0.5<0.5<0.1 38 (95 %R)370 (93 %R)38 (94 %R)380 (94 %R)40 (101 %R)4.4 (110 %R)mg/kg 4/8/10 mg/kg 418110 mg/kg 4/8110.mg/kg 4/8/10 mg/kg 418/10 mg/kg 418/10 mg/kg 418/10 mg/kg 4/8110 80-120 80- 120 80 -120 80- 120 80- 120 80- 120 80 -120 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20* 6020 6020 6020, 6020 6020 6020.6020 6020< 0.5 35 (90%R)< 0.5 9.6 (96 %R)MSIMSD MS/MSD: Parent ID Parent Matrix Spike Date of Units Analysis.Parameter Name MSD Limits RPD Method Arsenic Barium Cadmium Chromium Lead Mercury Selenium Silver 87753.08 87753.08 87753.08 87753.08 87753.08 87753.08 87753.08 87753.08 8.5 84<0.5 32 9.5< 0.1< 0.5.0.6 940 (93 %R)1000 (92 %R)970 (97 %R)1600 (77 %R)890 (89 %R)10 (102 %R)880 (88 %R)800 (80 %R)930 (93 %R) (0 RPD) mg/kg 1000 (91 %R) (1 RPD) mg/kg 950 (95 %R) (2 RPD) mglkg 780 (75 %R) (3 RPD) mg/kg 910 (90 %R) (1 RPD) mg/kg 11 (105 %R) (3 RPD) mg/kg 860 (86 %R) (2 RPD) mg/kg 810 (81 %R) (1 RPD) mg/kg 4/8/10 4/8/10 418/10 4/8/10 4/8/10 4/8/10 4/8/10 4/8/10 75-125 75-125 75-125 75-125 75-125 75-125 75-125 75-125 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 6020 6020 6020 6020 6020 6020 6020 6020 Samples were analyzed within holding times unless noted on the sample results page.Instrumentation was calibrated in accordance with the method requirements. The method blanks were free of contamination at the reporting limits.The associated matrix spikes and/or Laboratory Control Samples met the above stated criteria.Exceptions to the above statements are flagged or noted above or on the QC Narrative page.Flagged analyte recoveries deviated from the QNQC limits.eastern analytical, inc.www.eailabs.com Phone: (603) 228-0525 44 Page _.. of CHAIN-OF-CUSTODY RECORD BOLD, FIELDS REQUIRED. PLEASE, CIRCLE REQUESTED ANALYSIS.877 53 1£ý!, cl I h......SAMPLING* DATE/TIME-

  • IF.COMPOSITE, INDICATE BOTH START & FINISH m A-re I-TM 0-j wu uj"4 x I-"4 it o (L"40 -'-0-"4=0 -="4 0j y=t7 Ed'4 U-J:z: z z.,"4 A 0;2 NOTES MEOH VIAL #SAMPLE I.D... ..~~~ v ________________

., a \4 --c- --- ---- --------MATRIX; W S-S01-W WATER;: SW-SURFACE WATER; DW-DRIuNI ING WATER; :I PRESERVATIVE: H.HCL; N-HNOj; S-H2SO4; Na-NaOH; M-MEOH ,. ,;.I .'PROJECT MANAGER: ~'.-COMPANY: 0ý6w, F ~ '~. ¶ADDRESS: CITY: STATE: _ ZIP: PHONE: EXT.: FAX: E-MAIL: SITE NAME: 2 )4 A X.'PROJECT# 1 STATE: MA ME VT. OTHE R:__REGULATORY PROGRAM: NPDES: RGP POTW STORNWATER 0R GWP, OIL FUND, BROWNFIELD OR OTHER: DATE NEEDED: ~C.i2Th__________________ -I QAIQC REP REPORTINrA.4.EL PREUE A <) C IF YES OR ELE*MA MCP No F.PRESUMPTIVE CERTAINTY J~IJ.Cj O RTING OPTIONS MS:QOR NO: FAX OR DE CTRONIC OPTIONS x E-MAIL PDF TEMP. -L- c ICE? OYES~ NO METALS: "( CRA 13' PP FE, Mti PB ;CU'OTHER METALS:R DISSOLVED METALS FIELD FILTERED! YES ' No UISHED BY::. VTE: TIME: CEIVED RELINQUISHED BY: DATE TIME EIVED B NOTES: (IE: SPECIAL DETECTION LIMITS, BILUNG INFO, IF DIFFERENT) C-k\~c,\ Le .-, j^SITE NISTORY: SUSPECTED CONTAMINATION: ..QUOTE # PO #:. 'QOOO / .RELINQUISHED BY: .DATE: TIME: RECEIVED BY: FIELDREADINGS: eastern analytical, inc. 25 CHENELL DRIVE 'CONCORD. NH 03301 1 TEL: 603.22800525 I.800.287.0525 j FAX: 603.228.4591 E-MAIL: CUSTONERSERVICE@EAIIABS.COM WWW.E-AILABS.COtM.poftJiionaI labom/Ifory lSrVC. " (WHITE: ORIGINAL G*N: PROJECT MANAGER)Gl Page Of~~CHAIN-OF-CUSTODY RECORD BOLD FIELDS REQUIRED. PLEASE CIRCLE REQUESTED ANALYSIS.I AtlI. OnLy 87753 ,I =--: SAMPLING .DATE /TIME.*IP COMPOSITE, INDICATE BOTH START & FINISH rlA-r /TIMO F 0 w LI X 0.u U U'U' '4 0 5;R i::= c:J i 9 c3i-4.4 p.: ;2==i=====* NOTES MEOH VIAL #SAMPLE I.D.DAE/ M 1EO VIA 1,4GlI#Iý,-~ i i i iqi MATRIX: A-AIR: S-SOIL; GW-GAOUND WATER; SW-SURFACE WATER; DW-DRIXKING WATEA;WW-WASTE WATER PRESERVATIVE: H-HCL; N-HNO0; S-H,80S; Na-NaOH; M-MEOH ,T" T-__PROJECT MANAGER:..Z DATE NEEDED: A-*"/ ADDRESS: CITY: _______________________ STATE: _______ ZIP: _________PHONE: _________________________ ExT.: _______QAIQC REP REPORTINGjEVEL PAELI A B C I TYES 0R ELE MA MCP E No PRESUMPTIVE CERTAINTY TENS'. o ICE? O NoOPTIONS No FAX OhR)CTRONIC OPTIONS AX E-MAIL PDF METALS: 1(A 3 PP FE,.MN PB, CU OTHER METALS DISSOLVED METALS FIELD FILTERED? YES No NOTES: (SE: SPECIAL DETECTION LIMITS, BILUNG INFO, IF DIFFERENT) SITE HISTORY: E-MAIL SITE NAME: c PROJECT #:)r6ý-~.STATE: ( H MA ME VT OTHER: REGULATORY OGEAIM: NPDES: RGP POTW ST(RFmWATER OR GWP, OIL FUND, BROWNFIELD 0R OTHER: SAMPLE 5): J .'El, ED BY: DATE: TIME: BY;ECEIV T, E9LINQUISH-IED BY: DATE: TINE: RECE U PýQUOTE ~: ______________________ PO#:RELINQUISHED BY: DATE: TimE: RECEIVED BY:' FIELD READINGS: ________________ eastern analytical, in G.25 CHENELL DRIVE I -CONCORD, NH 033011 TEL: 603.228.0525 I 1.800.287.0525 [ FAX: 603.228.4591 E-MAIL: CUSTOMER-SERVICE@EAILABS.COM WWW.EAILABS.CON

  • rpro/fionai ,ti/ic ' s~)'Vice7

.(WHITE: ORIGINAL GREEN: PROJECT MANAGER).:.9 Page 1 of 70 Health Physics Study I Technical Information Document (HPSTID)Cover Page Number: HPSTID-10-003 Title: Assessment of Soil Removal from Rock Pile Area South of General Office Building (Phase One)Comments: (:: 14. a/ýýOriginator: Independent Reviewer:__.Date: 4__o Date:_______ Date:_________ 1M11'6Uz1-- Approver: HP Oeo(rtmeint lupervisor HPSTID-10-003 Page 2 of 70 OBJECTIVE To document the radio!ogical assessment of soil to be removed from the Rock Pile Area located south of the General Office Building (GOB).BACKGROUND During the construction of Seabrook Station the 32 acres of land located south of the GOB was used to relocate fill removed from various areas on site, primarily from -the excavation of the intake and discharge.tunnels. Since Station construction, fill removed from the excavation of the Dry Fuel Storage site has also been relocated to this area south of the GOB.In an effort to return the area south of the GOB to its original condition, the excavation spoils located there are to be removed and sold to a vendor for reuse in the New England area as fill and road base. The fill will be removed from site in two phases. In Phase 1, fill will be removed from the western half of the Rock Pile Area and in Phase 2 removal will be from the eastern half of the Rock Pile Area (see Attachment 1).This HPSTID documents the radiological assessment of the bulk soils to be removed from site in Phase 1 of the project, as required by the Station Radiation Protection Manual (SSRP) procedure RP.13.1, Radiological Controls for Material[1]. Additionally, the Radiation Protection department will be notified by the project prior to commencement of Phase 2 of soil removal in order to determine if additional assessment of materials is desired.ASSESSMENT Samples of soil were taken from various locations on 8/25/2009 and 3/8/2010.Table 1 lists the locations by GPS coordinates for samples taken.Table 1 Soil Sample GPS Coordinates Sample Date UTM GPS Coordinates Radiological Survey No.8/25/2009 19T 0348395 / 4750382 M-20090825-3 8/25/2009" 19T 0348409 / 4750449 M-20090825-3 3/8/2010 19T 0348467 /4750288 M-20100311-7 3/8/2010 19T 0348440 / 4750381 M-20100311-7 3/8/2010 19T 0348444 / 4750434 M-20100311-7 .3/8/2010 19T 0348348 / 4750414 M-20100311-7 3/8/2010 19T 0348372 / 4750342 M'-20100311-7 3/8/2010 19T 0348401./4750309 M-20100311-7 The isotopic content of the four-liter soil samples obtained were evaluated using routine count roorh analysis techniques found in procedure HD0958.32, Release (\ HPSTID-10-003 Page 3 of 70 of Material from Radiological Controls[2]. Counting parameters established in reference [2] for four-liter samples meet the environmental LLDs for sediment as per the Seabrook Station Offsite Dose Calculation Manual[3]. Results of isotopic analyses indicate no presence of radioactive material other than natural background radioactivity. Attachment 2 contains the results of isotopic analyses performed. Though no cesium -137 (Cs-137) was detected in soil samples taken, soil samples taken in the past from areas around site have had indications of trace quantities of Cs-1 37, attributable to man-made radioactive fallout from atmospheric weapons testing. This study is documented in HPSTID 00-007, Cesium-137 in Site Soil Samples [4].In addition, radiation surveys were performed on 8/25/09, 3/9/10 and 3/10/10 at the Rock Pile Area with a Ludlum Model 19 Micro R survey meter. Results of radiation surveys performed indicate no activity above background. Attachment 3 contains the results of radiation surveys performed. CONCLUSION A review of samples and surveys taken indicate no presence of radioactive material other than natural background radioactivity and in conjunction with Seabrook Station Radiation Protection (SSRP) Manual procedure RP13.1, Radiological Controls for Material, it is reasonable and a business case exists to remove material from the Rock Pile Area designated as Phase 1 in an effort to reclaim the land.REFERENCES

1. RP.13.1, Radiological Controls for Material 2. HD0958.32, Release of Material from Radiological Controls 3. ODCM, Seabrook Station Offsite Dose Calculation Manual 4. HPSTID 00-007, Cesium-137 in Site Soil Samples HPSTID-10-003 Page 4 of 70 Attachment 1 Map of Rock Pile Area located south of the General Office Building A Location of soil samples obtained on 05009 31 '.(see Radiological Survey No. M-20090825-3)

,! ,, t ;It 6 Il- 1 1 I1 //-9 Location of soil sarples obtained on 518(2010 * -I (see Radiological Survey No. M-20100311-7) J C, I XI Y~ ~uII HPSTID-10-003 Page 6 of 70 Attachment 2 Soil Sample Isotopic Analyses ................ SeabrookNSDS. Survey M-20090825-3 General Information Title: GOB Dirt Pile free release Survey Date/Time: 08/25/2009 12 :0 0 .Lead Surveyor: ComeauP .Survey Type: PreJob .-- -.- ._- i Work Order/Task

  1. F" .. -.. _-1.- -.... I Counted ty: b Rx % .Pwr:. .Lo RWP #:b-00 ---.---. KCN:: 'Pi. .Status: apro.ty3Rimbaud, D. 08/2612009

.. .~ .-I.Dose Rate (DR) Object Prefixes/Suffixes Dose Rates with Prefixes: Dose Rates with No Prefixes: Default Prefixes: Default Suffixes: HS= Hot Spot "n" = Neutron.* " ...."b" = Beta c" = Correctedr Postings Legend There are no postings in this survey.Instruments Used Instrument Instrument I I Calibration

  1. Model Serial # Type Model Serial # Type Date/Time I Gamma Spec n/a C internal Internal C 01/01/2099 I M Me Survey #: M-20090825-3

-PDF Generated On: 03/25/2010 14:17 Page 1 of 25 Seabrook VSDS HPSTID-10-003 Page 8 of 70 L Routine I HSYD-999 ASB-21-AB158 I Daily I Survey #: M-20090825-3 I Date/Time: 08/2512009 12:00 The sample(s) listed were counted on gamma spectroscopy detectors(s) Sample(s) were analyzed L.AW. HDO958-32 and JS0999.002 Sample Description Spectrum Number Outgoing soil GOB/DRY CASK Storage project site.S-A.DET

8. 0908252005.

Outgoing soil GOB/DRY CASK Storage project site S-B DET 9. 0908252004f I]Outgoing soil GOB Southside, 1 st site. S-A DET 8-1 ý ý M-lii Outgoing soil GOB Southside. 1st site. S-B DET 9.0908252007 0908252002 Gamma Spec Review List[.E Verify sample parameters correct: Sample Title Sample Date and Time Sample Identification Number Sample Geometry ElapsedTime Shelf Height Sample Size (including Units)Detector Number Aquisition Date and lime Dead Time (Should not exceed 15%)Investigate Dead Time >1%CirCle energyof unidentified peaks which have no potential ID listed on post NID QA Report WD Ensureall peaks are positively identified. Reasons to suspect: p Isotope not normally in mix Sample containeror detector cave contaminated Excessively wide peak (FWH-M >2.5)I,-n 6nnndfl;P6)&n

n. " I:tJLUIJ L %J a LU 1lIUIt Line out the isotopes on each report that are rejected based on evaluation W, Review unidentified I rejected peaks and determine probable isotope foreaeh peak Z-3 Circle probable isotope foreach peak Write in probable isotope on Post NID Search Report There is no indication of Licensed Radioactive Material RPTechnician Verification:

E,:.Corneaiu, RP Su pervis o r Verification: Comments: Summary of Highest Readings (All available values may not be listed)Smears. -Air Saiples &,Wipes.Type: PreJob *, Sy~ý m.ple only) j RWP #: 09-00001 Dose Rate HS50HotSpot Reactor Power = 100%" Contact Reding RCA Posting l+ 7l-S-30cýmReading nrnl LSmer __-Generil Dpip Bag 15Sm'ear q4IPAr Sample UJRM EflThipe Mess otherwise noted, dose rates in mR/hr.*1- +1i Surveyor: Comeau, P Status: Approved by: Rimbaud, D, 08/26/2009.cation Code: Routine 11BldgiArea Name: Daily ILocalion

== Description:==

HSYD-999 ASB-21 -AB1 58 1 _________________________________ Image File: HSYD999B-Page 2 of 25 Survey #: M-20090825-3 -PDF Generated On: 03/2512010 14:17 Seabrook VSDS HPSTID-10-003 Page 9of70 Comments: jlOB/dirt pile Free Release from Site.(1I se Recieved: 0 mr*.mma Spec Survey #: M-20090825-3 -PDF Generated On: 03725/2010 14:17 Page 3 of 25 SeabrookVSDS HPSTID-10-003 Page 10 of 70 SebokrSS Attachments I] er Filename Description Pages 1 M-20090825-3.pdf 21/Survey #: M-20090825-3 -PDF Generated On: 0312512010 14:17 Page 4 of 25 Seabrook VSDS HPSTID-10-003 Pagell of70 /70 cQ /Routne HSY-99 ASB21-BIS8I DilyS~rvey

  1. M-20090825-13 Datiime 78121009 12:00 The sample(s) listed were counted on gamma spectroscopy detectors(s)

Sample(s) were analyzed ILAW. HDF0958.32 and JS0999.002 Sam Ule Description Spectrum Number.CA SK Titora Deresite S le OPT K In 02022520t 4 uatoirleO thdg Ttsite S A Detet N _.V Sample parmete correct: Gamma Spe Revieorit Sample Title Sample Size (Including Units)Sample Date and Time Detector Number Sample Identification Number Muisition Date endeTime Sample Geometry Dead Time (Should not exceed 115%)ElapsedTime Invetigate DeadpTime >1%Shelf Height Circle enemy of uniontified peaks which hav no. potentil ID liStOe On poest NID QA Report Ensure all peaks are positively identified. Reasons to suspect: isotope niot normally in mix Sample onita inera r detector cave contaminated Excessively wide peak {FWHM >2.6)Isotope t1/2 too short XiLine outtlie isoitopes on each weportthatare rejected based onevaluadon 2S~Roview unidentified I rejectod peaks and dotermine probab~le iso)tope fo reach peak I X1Circle probable isotop~e foreach peak-); ; Write in probable isotope on Post Nil) Search Report There is no indication of Licensed Radioactive Material RPTechnicien Verification: ..... ....RP SupervisarVerification: Comments: Smayo ihs ~aifg Comm nts..(All,4 aailabl 'alei ay not.be listed)':Smears -i alpe ie Type: PreJob.'. i H " 'Reactor Power= 100%j+75 3QbRLI ,g ~20'Unless otherwise noted, dose rates in mR/hr.-ad Surveyor: Comeau, P Status: In Process ation Code: Routine Bldg/Area Name: Daily Location

Description:

HSYD-999 ASB-21-AB158 Image File: HSYO999B Survey #: M-20090825-3 -Printed On: 0812512009 15:16 Page 2 of 3 .Iý I..I ý..I -.,..ý .I I I ..I I ..-ý ..I I HPSTID-10-00 Page 12 of 70 1 .I -Sea ,,ý :.. I....ý...,;: :.,.. ý.:. -: -: ý .MO. :: ... ...*;ý, % " .--..ý:... .-.:..:.%ý-.w::---

.
:. t-% ý:, ....:::. -.:. -.- .*..*:-:.:.:.:.:

-. ..., * -ý .-t ... .. .t::*.ý'- !:!,-* .ý.'l-ý -,ý --,-'-`ý; ..ýý,!-..--ý,.:.-..:,::.,.:",*,.*,': .-.--!r-.`:-Z.:ý ..- ... .: .... .,: 1 -.,,-'-:ý:-.'.-- ýý..ý. .,..,..:-.,.-'.!:..-..ý;:ý.""".ý..-,ý.-.,.,. t,'.."'. -" " ". - .. ...: ... ... ý ..- ý -, ý :1 I : .. .. ...' ... .. ...t-- .ýýi4,.,,:!.".:,....ý...:..::.ý...ý-,ý.,ý.ý""......ýl'. .:::.. .. .i %-:ý-- ".. ý ....... ý.....i.... ` ' .... .-, ..:..... .:.,. .ý --.*.... % t,ý -.ý.:i'..:'..ý:;.........i,ýý..,....,-..2iýl:,'.--;,.ý-ý,ýi%..-.,ý"-...;.ý, .S u r v e y M -2 0 0 9 0 8 2 5 ...........ý- MISS :ý. ý.. -.... ý -: ý .;: ": ý'.'.- -, I -.. I ...... ... .. :- -- ... .. , -... .,;. : ":,ý'....--* , 'i, -jýt::-.--:t.-.--.-1,... .I ....6, -ý :- :: ."'.- ..'. %.- ',..ý ý:-,- ý ý,,, -'.ý:-..---- .-,.. ýr-% :.. ...-..... ., ...'ý- , :: .... ý- , %,:. .. : '.' ý' ---:.ý --.: .. ....ý!:-",.-..,ý,-!",.,ý;"','.-ý.ý'..ý...-.."'-!,"*.. -.. -".:.- .--.. -...:-., --ý-,.,-,--t. -- -*.,::::-'j.',:ý ..!. " '. ., .:.." ý:::t --t.... , -i .. --.. .ý:., .. _ ---it .:::t -.-::... ....... -- ... --iý-'7t--ýýJ.,.'..:%1-:-

-:ý -..... .....: ..,:- .. -.....--:,.ýý: .:",.,.."..,.*'t`..

%!,:t.,:-:1ý. 't ,.:,:4 '... ... -ý--,i..---.-.-.-.-.-.-...-.,-..- ........ , -' ... : % ý...-. """ t...".... -ý'. .:... %% , .... ý :: .. : : " : ý : .7 ý .. ..s ...-; .,. .., ..: .., ...., 7 -, .: S --ý Z ': :, ,:;ý ; .I I ý .- ... I ..... ..... .....; .I ..........I I ..--.eAiiiý0 4 ': ý ..i ;- -ý .,- .-:: , ý .:- ý :: -:.. .... ..... .... , ý ..., .: ., .ý :ý%, ý ;.ý ;-- .. ; ý .t ...:t. , .--. ,ý.: ..:- .....-ý:.. -.ýý .." :..Z, ... ..: ;: , .%. .. ,... -.. t .. .'. , , ý --4 .-* *`;ýtrý, .:,!ý-:. %. s ..., ..: ., ; ". -ý: ..1 , -ý,% : ý ,. ,:,.;: , ".1, : ..:..1 .- orqýM tqnt -, '-*ý,., " * -.ý ., : : ...: .: ., ý 1 *-, .: :,. t.ý. .--,:. ý% ... .:. ..:.. -:- , ... ..-.% ." , -: .....: -I .1 ý% :-4 .ý -; :.ý: -k:,-.:ýý : t .% .. ". ; .-:ý .t ... Cý ý ...: -.% .:: : :ý' : ., .ý :.."" , '. ..; : .-.. ý : .: M .ý ....1'. , : : .. .*. :: ..% , ý:. -, :. : ... -, t ': t ---.;-::- ý.-.: ::;ý .-'-.-.-.- : 1 ." :. -.: .,.:. -.. .. .I

  • t.'. ..... :ý:.".ý.,.,....,ýý:ý,,ý.-..ý.-.zý.---....ý..-;",:;ý:::.:-.,:.ý

-.,,ýt :... ..". .... .ý ....... .. .-,. : ......W --ý .... ... ...- ý:ý'66 ., f ý ", 'e: I .., .:....'... -B 0 He ree lease I -': t. I , , ....-: , ,. _.ýý,, --, -...:... -ý ..... .. , *,.,:.: ...:::.,.:.,..:: --.ý.-- ý .... ..,.1.7;ý..-ýý-.-t:-ý%s, ý-I-ý .-::,.-.: '..-tt_ ": --:ý!. z.:-.-ý -.: ý-,--ý-; l... ý t ': I...: ,....ý ..!. ...: t , -it:: ý,:; -,.;:ýý;:., F.ýi.* ý-'.ý-..-...ý.'.ý.",'..ý!::"..ý.. 1:,,'-'t.",.,.t-.--t.-w 1ý .-.. ..: -:--- ::, '. ... .*.%;:'1- z."...%: -:4.t!-, t, -,,. .. --ý , .16. .. .-: :, -I .:% -... .... :. .': ... .....ý7 !-ý-- .. .. .td,: ............ t:..: -.. .. --...: , ....ý :6 :- .'-',' ." .. ...-....., .. .ýOk 512009 12:60 .ý ...., , -----,.:ý ý',,;.'..ý!:-.",50ýv6ýý-D-ýton .i.ý4.-'ý.- .*ýý'.--..:-----,!ý.O .qý- .qrY0y4 -,-.-,-q.?TePý7 P ..:i: -ý.,.-:`- , ----:ý:-..t.- ,.- -.. ': ... ý'. :.:--:t-...--...-- .-, 1:- ,'t:ý ..-:ý.I:tý:-. -. -.-....... v!ýý,f-::.,:-,:-.ý.:.".-.` -. .I :"*,: 1- .ý... t- :!:%: .4ý:,.".";ý-ý,*,ýý:..,:.;:...ý.- -.- * .".'.ý : ;-..,::.:..ý%:.7.:..t,-,:ýý.iýý.ýýý:ý,ý.'ý,'.ý-,ý;ý:-,.,ý...'.ý,:.:ý-.*.,;:..":"ý"'...'%.*.ý"'ý.ý:ý::',ý.".'.ýý-,*:I.,t*-:. ", :: ., .. .% 1:.-ý' ..:- .-.I.:... -, :...... ' t ...... ...:--ý.: .......' .: :.-.----,ý t .' '- -.0 I ... fork iý'rderF-ra4 -`iv"t1 00 ý I ý .... .* -*,ý.,;ýý:;'.ýý: ..'ý`ýý"S w x py:-Ty J*dý:.-'-P rejoý V -: .:; ... .;,,-, --:*.'..t..

    • ,: *,. 'ý. , :.ýtý..--tý-

.-ý; ...:,ý:1.ý-'...,ýý!ý:....-,..."..,.:",:.-....ý.-:".'. ý- -1. ..:.:.,I:,!: ., %ý,ý,ýýýý.,*:ý,ý!:ýý.,ý::".".,-,ý,,,,.!,ý--'- ...: ;ýtý,.::`.,ý:,ý--'--.' 1'-.:..ý. .ý........:."-%:.ý.....;--.,ý'..*.:ý:ýý.:ý. ... ..,....ý. -': -:.,: :.:'ý. , ".* .::t:-,:ý

,. ý 1,.,.: " ý ,.., .:!-."::ý.-iý:%.;,.,.ýýý..'ýý,,..'ý.,ý..

... .;*.:ý-:;t1-:: ý4i. t.ý:':,-,:.-:ý't* .-;:".,.,.t:..ý.,ý -., -.- .1 .. !ý, -ý.%:*"-%ý ". ..ý , .. ...... ..... .-.-...1:.ý.;:-ý .".:.,* : : '.. ... -% :..r- .." .........-.. ....:,. -.ý: ., ý'- 0,:-,--.:.. ,.:`11 '....... ..... .-.:; .-., ....-,:- t..-ý-.::%'ýt`ý: ..Jýý'-`-Fkx F/,-P.w 1 000Y. -:ý , .A, bb6 t6ý`k :,-! dd/2,5/2009 12:01 ..!ý::;..'ýý.:-..': ý.... !-,;*,.":-:t.`ý:,::-

.. ..ý- , , ; .ýý **?;ýt. .ý*tý--.-,,-;%-%.ý:::-.ý-

,ý -.:,.1ý,'-.'-ý'..,--:----:t:-: --:--,.. -..'. .'..:, %-.ý'ý.'-.!ý' %:*..%.: -ý,:,.!. ...... ...., ..:,. ,..:.,.i::-.',::ý ... '. .. !.ý:, ,......:.:I... .j:ý-;.:-::..:-.-:-j;:-, .: '..:.:.:., .. " ;..,;,- .: --:--. :,-;**Ný.'ý'Tý -ý' .ý.... , -:,.ý ý:*:., :- .., -ý:-:, .:;. ý,% :..- -:-t'., t 11..:-,.ý-... ..:,:.: ý t.. .....I .----.. ... ..ý ..ý .,...:. , *ý., ý t;ý`-,::::ýý:ý:ý.,:*ý*.,!.-: ...: -:: .ý ..: ý"-.'.-.'. I....'.., z`ý-'. r":.....; --.I --I. ---ý -... :. ...... ...ý .. .. ..... .., ,-t ......'. -.--:6ý*-"""ýý!..:.".:,..,...ý,,'ý:!..,f;ý't-: `- R VVP-m'.# '.-'.- `09-00 00 1 .,ý, ý. ..,..,.. ... 4'i6 ý,.. --, .4 , : : ..: , : ...: ý ., ý,.. .--': tI.: ; : .: t .:: t.: .ý::,-.t :-., ... .... ...' ý :: .:: :'.: -.ýý ý. : .ý 7: .. " % .ý ' '-, .,; * , ,ý'. , .-. , ...., ..I -..ý. .. , , ...,:;ý:-ý'---ý`ý ..":'. .:::. t.13 ý-I)j;ý::,::

.%.,:, !-*ýý , :% ý, ý: '.. .. : .: ý' ý ý'.-ýý ý- ; :1 , t :ý , .:* " : " '.- -: ... .. -.. ..., ....r:, : %` ý ..,,:.. '. : ..... .... .: ` , .': ..: :.,ý .-: '.ý .: .I... .. , .ý .. .: .. .-: .'. ... .: .-.. ...., ;, %.. ... .-... .. ., .....I ... iý -.,% -ý .-.ý ..., ... " I .;, , -, ý:'.-`.--.*-'ýt;`t-i'-, .'. ...... ..-.. ,' ý .:, .., I ýý--. ý , -: :ýt ý ...., -': -ý' ,':;'ý---:*.

,:.ýý:..:."..::,..,ýý.'-.:.'.%.*.::,:, n rocess .: .*.' --.,,.,,,ý.ý,,', ýM w --,.-..-.*.:.--,ý!. -'. ,..!: -.":%ýý,-:ý! ý- .-, :- ".,ý,"t',::_*-', ,A ::-.`.-.:,:,- ,.,!,- -,.:ý-;, 1 ... , -ý. ý:1 ý ;1: : ... .!;-..-.ý.ý,.-ý..-'.ý.,.,*.ý.-.ý!ý ! '.-.,:;, .'ýý:`.:ý.:-- -" ... .i ... --_; "' : '7 ." .1, %.i,;t. ,,; 8 .ýý,.ý.,*.,::,..ý,'ý".'ýý.',"..:.'..-:'..'ý". -.I......... I' ..,..:ý ....-, _.:.,.,-,.

.f.. ý -..I -,'..---.'.'t

... .'... -... -, I -'ý:.- , .% -.% ...-i: ý. i ..-..:.:-::% -.1, -.`::ýj ý-',,-ý..,--ýý::%s -, , "... 7.. !'I 'ý,t ý.; -:1'......, , : ý .ý...., , ý ..1 .. :.. V ,. ,- .:z -.7 2 -:.- ...,.ýý::::, :;.t::.. .ý ...ý.-:-- -- ;.; * -.: ý;..--.-t. .... -..-'ý 4t., -ý .: -':-ý::ýý:ýt, , .....'..........t., .. --: -, -,.* , ý, tý;.': !,; ......: ! -.ý\.:- %. .ý..1-:-.1 ý. .., ý::ý....O ,ý-:;t, 7----:-ý ".. ...::...1,.1.1ý*--ýý'ýýý'-,'.-ý-,.-,'.ý;.....-."ý.ýi-ý!*ý'-"',"ý.-,.'-...',,-.ýr,;.":..,.ýýý.-.ý%1,..".,....,.,.,..,:ý-,.....ý*ýý-ýý-ýi'-l,.,.-ýi:,ý,..., --.-.-.----. ]Iý.'-.-:ý.,,,-. ..,iýýýý.ý i.:,'-..t..,;ý..' -;. .ý : ."'. , ý- .- .. -z ... -:.- :.'.. ----.. --.. ......ý.:.,.,%, ..-:: ... ..': ..... ..., ...... .ý` .,,.*,, ", --,ý.'r --ý'-,.... -ý -.. -----ý- .. ýý;rtýý.,'tt, ý .., .z .ý ... %o ----, .:,. -ý,-,.-... .-t, 41. :- , .. , ._ -ý .. ---i-,-*--.,.-ý. .. .. -. -,,ý:-... .. .7 t: ýq .,::*,:*-" ,.,-- ,1 .,.: .% .. -... ..ý, ,'ý ..4:1., .. %.:::t...,. .... " ... ... .. ,.- -.... .-,.. -.. -t -,::. .-ý .--..ý.....:., .-... .-..-- ..ý.. ..... .týite (d k f ., , .t., L.:. ... .. -, , .ý: .-6'616ý.tý0.*r.6iiý66!Suff!kL--ý,,*%:".,:..ý. ý .. .. ......"-D9.' -F -.... -, .-:ýý:! ... ---, -..ý;ý.'ý:ý..,'i;ýý,-ýýý-.ý.ý.;ý;ý,i:-ý ýý-ý. -.ý': -ý -... .%* , -` -'!ýýf ", -.I .ý....`-..-:::;ý-.`ýý'-.*;ý

  • ---:: .,..ý,- ý.ýý..,!-ý!, .- ý ._.. -,--.-ý --:,-. -.. -.. ... -.ý, -.,ý.*:-ý.ý:*ý-:.:..ý..

--... ýz:ý:,ý,.ý.*.-t.'. ýý, .-::t-j-,.--,'-ýj.ý: ,:.ý- ý. .--ý.., -`:ý'--`-ý-ý .-'.',* .- ýý, ..- .. ..-, ....,];h-----,:-ýý -, -------ý,,*ýý,-ý,,` ý .ý ýý.*,*. -.-:J%`-: ý.% -.7:..., ý*' i -ý%t-ý::ý: ý,.; -*- --:ýtt-*,:ý--, , -'-,'ý *ý:!:-,`.' ',.'ý- ý` -,,ý.ý:: ý-ý,.,. *ý' * :i*::.-.*::..*.,.;.,.ý::ý.,.*.'-..-.!.,'ý-.'.::..*,.:..,...,..-..."....ý.'.'*ý,.:..ýý'..,-.,.,.', -.* -:...... :.,': -.. -,-ý:- .-.'.. -.ýý,:,:, ',.* -*ý ý.ý,-";*.... .D-1 ý t. .I ......:: ,.., t -* Ose. a w trl' ' --- -' -Defa'tJ1t*ýP(6fik6 '... ý*:.%i!.".. .:. -ý D diO

  • A M "P iefl)(6st."..." gý--ý.ý.--,:;

ý:-,::ý!ýý,'i'ý:ý.. D 'f ' ffý'ý' 'ftiý6ý'-:;.-...'.-..--::ý:.-..ý .. -,ýý .ý. ý.: e aL --, ::.,ý.:* : *.':.. ý-oseýR at6s'W ith 'P ý6fiý6s','.'..':-:ý .,, :z-,,,,ý:* .ý'ý.'ý!-`ý- ... ..... .... .-1.:,-.-- -.'-ý`::;.:.. ---`--%t*1-`-*','- ..." -.-' ' R -t ý;'.ý,.:.;.ý,*-.'-i,*.ý'...-.%*,:"*,.,.ý-ý--ý r*. ý ., % 6' : -.. ., .ý .., ý , ..ý :.. .% * -:- w --:ýý ...;.....t.. W... ........ .. ...... ..; .---ý--:1 .. ... ei. ... ... .. ý,,,..Ii"ýý..-ý..,.,ý"',,,,-*.:."- -....... ...:ý*:'... , , .-..... ,ý.t.% -.. : .1 % ..... .-ý:.:!ý....,.ý.-.,....-.ý.ý-.ýýiýý.i.,ý....,.-,.. ... ý.::. ..., .:,; -...ý ,...... -: ... .ý=,... .t.-:7, .- , leu row .:,., 11,',!%ýý::,:%.; .,...... ., .. -..Ft -: ..1,ý ý..-.. ., -..-7... ..... i .. '. ,:; * ..... .:,; %. :: -*ý t : .* .-..ý !ýHc.(Roq*....,ý.ýý:ý.-iý"I.,Iý.'-!%.,.."-,; ..... ,. ..-.. ,ý ... ::.." I j.. ý .... ..1 .. ... ýt.. * ý-; ::. ý , " ý:, , -'. ý .%. -.',','!. -, -,.:;::.- .... ý.-ý:ý .%t ...::. % -'.----..1.ý. !...ý .-% ..:.f .1-1111, ,.;.-. .1. i :... :".,--: --ý.-, -: .,.-.....,,,.-,,ý!ýý.;,.-,.,!iý.:.-,%ý.,..ý- I --,---- I ,.;ý :; ..... -;:ýý :., ... ---1ý --- :-i;::..1:. -;, i I ....1. ý.. 1. :-- %. ..- ý ..,.,ý-.ýV.'ýi:it(lo -.:ý... -:: I ; .1. ý ..., , .,:-.; " ----; :"ýý ý;, ;:, .: .. ,,-.... % : ..........

, t, "' * ", -t::::: -.-.. .I ý-;:-:. .: Z. I :... :.ý ., : ...'..... :::.: ...7 .. -ý.. .. t--.- " ..........

.. .1 ..... .. -----:-, --, ----, -" .. '.1. I.. .. -- .", , -.. " " , -': % -...-. ý,ý, : : ...,.-,, ; o ,.ý. -...,,!, ". .. .... ý. -..*... '..- ,- ..... .-t:. -.. : , ,.. .-ý..ý., -"... ... -, , ---" .. , ": -...*:,:.ý;.-...., .I,, .1 -. -ý'..ý-.ý,-..! ý.. ;ft:-*-,---,-,- --!;.` .ý'.ý:'.,.,-;,ý:i: '! -.:. t.-ý-,-.-- ý--ýý,, --.---ýý;ý--.----ý- ý ...... .ýý,ý-.,-ý-!:oý-.'-- -ý. .-... .,! ..ýt:'--!ýZ.`--%'7ý` -.ý-'.ýý-. ý- ý.*!:ý.1.":ý.:t,:-...,;:ý'i.ýl-ýlý ... .-:,!:!.'.ý---:'.t.-.-'ý -:-ý,, ý:iý,:..%:..%: , ,.-ý-ý:ý,n-':. ,..,ý'..-..ý",..",ý.ý.-..".,*...-ý,ý.:ý!,i,:ý*...,...ý.,ý.%,.ý:: .- ..11ýt1...-'..,..- .ý .... .. -, , * ';ýý, -.t. .-ýý.....ýý,.,,.*:'.'ý.*.",....,:,ý,.ý,-'..- ...., ..--,-..,.- , , ý., --::ý;, .., ý -, --!!..,;:,.--, --.:*---ý:ý,ýý -.., it%:, -- ý --,,-ý-, -.-.- .ýýýý:*c...;ý-..-.,...-...,.',.!,.'.-.':',ýý:::*ý.*-..ý..- ,.-,.ý..ý...--..

ý.t.".":-

.., -.; ...., ... ..*.'i ,-Y-.'::;" --,iý ..-,::. ::ý:ý:, ýý -.'.,-`:-,-,:, ý':-ý.ý;Q '-.i-:.,: --ýý::ý-.: ý,ý:..ý: : -,.:.... -: .: .ý .ý:, -- ---.i:.-..:...t ........ ... ., .. I. ... ......: , '.. .. -.:. '*.', -." , t :,.: .. ...'.,.* .ýý* :t%%. , , ; t---,-. : i":ý.-.! :1;ý--::.-,' ý- :'*t--:f;-- "'ý ý : : .. .:ýt.;. , --,.. ý:"%.-' -...ý."..% .ý::ý:ý , .: ýj 'ý.'.-ý ..."'. .,:ý--ý;, --.';-* .'i 1. ...; '..ýzý .ýý*.--,., :..r-.. i,ýý,c -,:-.-.ý-*,ý:-,ýý-t-'-::ý. ý :::--- -ý.:t-_- 4-,-.ý-.*ý',,' ...'..-.,. -.ý: ': ý. ý ý, -'! I L,: -, :::..'. ..ý. ý:'.ý, .ý. 'ý` .ýý% ý ýý -.-- '.. ..I. *...-ý , ,:`ý.-* -,*',.'.ýý,ý ýý .. ..-.ýý:ý.:;- .--, ..ýý,;-,-'.%,5..::.!. ....... ,.,.,;:. ,-, .-.*, , .. .., 1J1-1-:-.-,:ý.,-.-:;,ý ':,:., ý :..4,:.! ý,-.- ,- ý*:: ý-., t,-:.. ý.-..::.: --, .. " ..... * -, '... --1* -"'. -,:-Zt,ý' ,ý-,ý-ý-,--"ýý,ý:ý;.:,.ý,ýý t .....- ..ý::;,:::*ýý-,,ý .. -...... , , , ý --,.- ý;,,. '.-'.'ý,*..-!ýi-.-..'.-ý.-',*':,',..:'..':ý'..,..:,ý.*.ý-'.:',:ý""*, * .. .. .. t, "' , "'*;ý.,*-ý,ý.I..'ý,.,.*.:.-ý.'.ý.:ý:--ý%.,ýý.?.."-,:ý-..*".-,ý*..ý.ýý...:ý.-.ýýý.',.ýý:,;.:ýl'ý'ý.'.,;!.ý

" ........f.:.ýg...ý-ý-ý-,.-:.--:.:.

0-t:... t.:. -:;.."-.:-.%-

1. '.'ýý:,..;..:........,iýýý:..:.;-

... :.......,...ý..:.%" ,.,!"....,..:.-,ýýý;.il.,.,ý:...

.. -.- i-, 1ý z4w--ý------,- , .. "::. :,%, ý-ý ý: ý :.,ýý .-%;t,-,%,.;ý:.,..

.-mi :,. ..*.': :* ý-,-.,-:.:*.Z!::"::ý- ,... .ý , ` ý'... .t:.,- ý-,. ý%, .:.,:t. -:... .. t,,.:..1-1'::-::-.ý:

.,.:.ý.-.ý::'-';.::..,.ý"..ý,z..ý,..."-:ý.,ýý:.,:-

., % ;t..ý. ...,ý-*-!:*--:,- '. ;. :;ýý --y.ý-,'-ý, -,,ý:tý.:.ýt: ý -.-ý :ý.ýý.....'ý.ý.ý.:'..'.*-.:',ý:ý..'ý:ý-..',I ýý ..... .I -ý :%:-.-ý-;:.ý.--:t.'t: t.ýt ý.: ': : -, -.:-., -ý , -.. ..ý: .. .. .::,;*,..:: .-,.,--.::t*.-ýt-.:-, ..... , -.-ý..- -;., ýý .ý.. ...ý:. ., :!!:,.:,:.ý.!." :,ýý,.',....ý,**,:,..ý. -:'...,-ý:..'.....ý.ý ....t;::.- .ý.ý.*,:.,;::,..,.:-:*;;,-.;:,::..:ýýriý":::.ý...,.ý: -.. ý:.. .. ",.ý, , -'*I* ...'.....-;:!.. ý ... ý t.,ý. ý t,ý.ý *. ... ..4 .. .." ." .... v -- ýý..:,:..ý,,% , , -, .. .. .- k -t --ý % ..-`:, -.... : ..a .... ..:,,;:ýt't ---ý.*ý-:::,tt:-..-,: ý ., ..*... t- ---" -.----.. .. .." .." ...,.t ._I. -----ýý :- ,ý ý, ý:,t,-ý'.ý't -ý- .. .. ... , '. .'. -ý:----ýý:.ý'.*,--- ..., ,,n,.,:. ". , .: -ý-. ý: -.ý.,ý ý-ý. ..: .:. t .::ý.:,ý i:t. ,.. :',ý, ý '.*: '. ý .,- -ýtý ; .* .- .-.. ..", t-1;,:ý 1. i ..t ý -:;* -*ý -., 1 ý *'..'ý: , ..--, -...: .; -, .._'ý Fý. , ...,.: '. ý -.ý.--- ,L-";, t ': -. ---ý .ý. .--.:.----*.:-).ý--- -* ., ..fl:ý .%.* : t* " 1'.::\,.! , ,;.ý. ., .,.ýt...:.ý;,.:.. --., , ."z ý : 1 .* .... .. --ýý1:: -,* -.. ... , .t :ý -:%.ý-,ý,'---.ýt-,k.,.,ý t; t,'ý:::*:--; ..ý.-%.: -::--*.,ý-::t:,:1.-

  • ý !- -..:.,ý,....".'j.ý'-_*,t-

..._ :.. ., --...I .--, ...* ..----.` ::.. .ýt.ý` ý, ý -.: !.*, -:!.":*-%.'.:.:. ...::, -.,. :,. -.:- ;ý:, .1. ý ;. .. " -t. 1 ý .-..: .'i , ..... -, :; '.-,,- ". %. tý:ý, -..%..*.-.'.,.--..*

ý ý--- -. ý , ., % , ..'.ý .:,:: *- : -;,-,-'. .. !-:-ý.ýt.

.". , ::.:ý ...*:, -% ::,ý.-.".:, , :: tý, t , , :--t- .:. ,.i .-: i .,:ý.-.*ý ýt.:, ;!. .-: ý ". ...:: .. , ,.ý.I.ý-:*,*!.ý-.,..;.,...,...ý:,.-;. ". ... -.... I ... , -.; ....t., .:-,vt-- p. -, 'ýý,ý:.Iý.ýýý:.ý.I.ý.::..ý,:::.*:.;:ýi.'.'-,'ýt , ... ,ýý-, %,:r-.ý,:*.:--ýý.:n .-_ -t-1. -t: `,.ý- , ,:.ý %, .`,* " ; --ý -1., ";.",ý: ,.,;. , -ý ý ý .: ý: .: " "... :. -, .*_ .....---.1... .-::,: ',-,ý', :.** ,::,:::;.ýi.**.,-;ý,':-`-ýý ,-:ý- :,. :1.. .-..ý:. .. ý .%:ý ::.-.. ý.*ý.:,*.-,%.'.ýý'..:!...ý,:;-,..- ý ý.`,'...%. .:: ý...::: .: , ... ; .-.:: .. .1: .% ., .. .t:..,! :. ý ; :ý. ... .... .. .. .:. ..ý.:ý. ... .ý ,*- ýý,i---: ::ý : ": "-f :-. ! :t :-:ý+: -. :%'-ý::ý-,ý

t,.,;.:.. .. %. .-.,".. ..... : .... .... ... :,I ý :j%-.ý. t -!.`,.:..,---,.-ý:::-, ý-:.:.'ý..:,:ýt

.. ., ; , -,* ýý ,t ....: '... _: , .. .ý ..:,-;-:..:.- '., : ." -`ý-.* ýVý. .--.".. .. ...:w, ., e, -.aw, -:. i.. ..: I \ ýt-ý.,,,- ...,:; ý: ... .".. ý:.`:- w'..-... ..ý: ý I ., ...ý -...., -1: ....' .. ....ý::...... ., ý *i ", ;.: tý-`,- : ;; ,-.: -: t. ý : :ý-,-:,-,.y .ý. ....:......:.::.,ý..,:,*.:.:"..,:.,ý.",.:ý.:ý.,'.ý.'.ý,.: ..-ý:ýý%,f::,.-":-.-,:--.--. .:.:!.,.: .i. t. .. .'_...: ... ....ý., ..-... .... , , ....; .I , ý:. :ý .j r .-w t., :::-ý ., ...ý , ý:ýý :.:,:.ý. ..ý ., -ý % t : , 1 : ý .*.-,:. , , .ý! :..,.. .-:: I Ir .;.. -.. .-....., -,--.',--..:.: .. ,"--,.--:-.! ýý..ý:ý.:".,:.,::.. ý -- ý.-:ý,.;.tý. ...: .: .;.,.; ; , .. ý. ,- .: , t. .ý , .- ý ,.ý : .1...:.. -r..ýtý- ...ý d'. .-.ýý' :.ý'-ý :::%: ý:!. 's -%-:ýt-:ý ":.ý 1 --"::.:%; .ý.ý. it ý--.ý. ..t;ý ý ý:: %..i ý .- .: .t i.:.., ...% t ...ýý .': .%.: ....:. ..: , .. ., 4." ; ; '.'. 1.,--t ý ý.-, .ý--,.- -:---.'-.:-` .. -..., ýý.: '. :. ': .: ! ;:...-ý 1 -ý,ý --'.'.* -ýr .,:.t;..',- -ý .--:.ý % ..:. ..-:. I .... --t:,... 1:.. .. .., .. ý.ý ý ý. :: -ý'-.' ::,-., ý ":.: i .... ý:ý::ý:- ý !,;ý ,,ýý. -: ý :. : ý- ." ý ý .1 .., 11. : i. .ý .:: ...; ., '. ". ý ý .ý ., %. -ý .: -,:- 'ý .. : ... ýr.-ý- .-.--, : ;t -:ý,, : .*:: ý:: .... ý.. -ý .....;' .%. ýý, .-:: .,. t: ...-.1;:,.:" .,..:.:,.

..ý .., .: -.t; -, .ý ý .:., ., ý ,... .. " ý .. I., : ... .ý .:.,ý., :,ý;ý':: ':... -ý. -:'ýý ; .:...:: .;,t:.::I:.

.%..'. .1 :%*ý -ý , !ý-.- -*::: -':..-.:ý'. ý,'..; '1!.%.: .... % t :`--, :,.: ti ý: ....-.ý ..ý. .ýý `--ý.:. .."... ...' -ýt, .., -,ý! '.... ý : '..','.--ý... ý, .. '- '. , '..'.'. , ;.. ,..:... -..:-..'-' % ,. ,,; -_ ..: , ..::ý'-77".. .,. :; : ... :.- .;. -t ..:. ... ... .ý.ý w .ý:t ,-,ý ::.: .- .:: : ... I ..... ý -..;. : % , --." .. -i ... .... .; I. .-...,. ::ý--ý'-ý:.

ýý ..ý.. .. ..:: :-ý'ýý.::

!; :,'.'..-t. j"..... ..% -, " .'- ': '. *. , -ý ý.,..* .. .. ': " * --::ýý :.::: .., , .. ý. ; .; ..2 : ... ý :ý. : , :, , t t, .ý ý t:... : :- ý ..ý , ý -, .: -, :- , --, ., ,... , , : tý,.;: -ý-.ý '.' .-:`.,-.ýý%, .-., , ---.a.... --, ý , ., '.ý .t::: .-., ; ! ::: ý .:, ... , ý ... -_ ..ý .:i :. ?:... ..:..... .-'. ...t. ý... ..-..ý , .t ...... ýý, .. ", : : ý ý- ? .;týt .t'. ,, , *- , , , , .: -i :z;:! : !ý.:!:., I ': :...... ý.-, , ..': .:. ., --" ... ....... I -.,:. % ... ., .. ! ..I...... .-ý ý ý ..` -* .. --I ...., .. t. 1 , .i.::.. .., ...-.-..ý. i ...: .-.:':. .. ..1 , ! , .... .; ..;. : .ý!.:. ý , .-, ....ý ....; .I .ý,.ý"..-."...:'n.".ý". -!--ý-'- -,-;- , !- ..ý ... , -1 :. I :t 1. '. 1 ý. :.... , -.1 : ý: -,... .ý.. -.*: , ;':.:-%-:*::::.,t,'ý.! ..:ý I ..... .. ., -:-. ; :ý :. .1.t I --------ý I -... 11 -.1 ý; :-.ý t :, .,-,' -..'.,*- , I ý-l -`." -- '. .%..: %. -: t ý ; .. ..: ..ý :: .'-!.. ý'- --. -...: , .. " -ý: , :'. -..ý -.. ,,*-.%,-'1. ... , ....- .*.'--.`ý .. ,.. --.1-i..., .- .1 ......" .. ...:."ý.,*"ý,,ý:*.ý:"...,;i...,ý'."'t ..... .-':%:::*ý'.-,t. -i ý. ....:ý,-'.: :.; -,ý,', , -.ý, i". ..".. .-, :i %-..", , t.. -.ý -ý:-. ; .,:t..: ý,-,:ý.'%'. s!:t. ý., .. ..ý .. ..., ., ... ... %. , -ý -% ý .-t t ..-.t,. %. .; -'. -.' ý. -:: .... , , .....t.. .. :. : .:. :, ý":;: ", "I. :'- , -ý- ý ,-- :ý-::- ý'-.- %. t'.::, * ý't.%;'..

.:t,-.-,,-.
'-..:; ,., :::::ý ... :: ýý. : -: ..... t. ý..., .. --.. ..': ý.:, ý.'.ý ,; ...m. :,:., i.-,ý,--:.

ý%,. , -:- ,- t!-.`-ý .:. ..-..ý.........ý.ý.ý.ý.ý.ý ýýýý, ... ... : , --ý....I ý -...::: ... :% ý ý. 11 I , :ý ...-, .. , ..ý .ý--' , ý: ý ý:ý .. ...; -.::ý....:'..ý,"" , '--.; ... f-, t , :. .. I t:: '.!................................................... .ý ... , ,.. -: ..: ... .. ý ..t .. .. ..- -,..-11 ý ý ... .6- ., ..ý.. ,. ., t.. ...-ýý: .. , , :ý.,;:ý .'ý:ý..% .. ý .ý. ... ... --.,ý-, 1%.---.1.,.*1.-,-.,::ý:i--1-- -1, .1 .:. ..... %, -- ... :ý-.t -Yz, -,.: .. 1 .%ý -'..... -.... ." ... .-:ý .: :, :...ý .. %,-.ý.... .. , : .--., I .........................ý :: ....... ... .t .ý -W.- ::-'-::,: , * .-ý .. ,:! -.- -ý ý.j ý. -, : '::- t. 1: %..,::. -.-ý :,..-. ..., -.ý. -....ý ..ý'. .....-: , -i-, ::::-':4:,ý %. ý :., .. ý- -o.--'ý ý-.ý.-,:;ý. -ý3 %t:ý-- ..:. .. ý .-....... , .: ::". ýj.t*:.ý -1. -'. "::".,-*., -.rt::ý:-.'--t.!ý.-.-:ý

--ý: , ... .ý..:ý .ý -ý-t .: ::. .2 --, : .'ý .t ý:,:; ...: .: '. .; -, ., .-... ý ..:.". ý ..,z.:. :- '. -ý ý!;!; ..ý ýý ... % ., --..., -.1 :... %:% ." : ý '.. -'. ... !ý ..........-w, : :'-:-.:-..-

,::...'.', ,. , ý, .ý .., I ,... .,.,;:.. .,.: -! -:.ý- ...,;. ...; -, ". ---.:,ýý i;- ý ý%-: % -,- % .. ý ý-, ,-w ý* , * , , ., ý ...... ý ýý, ..'-'.:ý ý i!- tý: ." ý ...-.--: .., .. ..., .--, --ý- , t: -.: :ý-.'ýý-ý..-. .--.ý:::. -,ý.':?::.ý%ý ..: ý --, -.-::j.t.-t.--ý: 1:t..::.. .....:-,, ; -ý. :t- *,: .ý .....". .'. .. , 1. t , ý, 5 --, .,ý---': ý"T*-., ý ",-:.,-..ý ý'.-:ý : * ý-i ..., -* ..... ,,, .-*I..-., -, .ý , -'. ý; , .. " ,:... .% .: .::-,..ý -.It. .ý:ý-' :.ý:.: .t..' , ý -ýý.-`:-.-%.

ý- .. -I :: ... -, 1, .I., .-,', :. -.ý-:, ,--, ý, -,4, ,<:ý -ý:. .. .ý. ... .. .* -, ;: ...-..-, .." -..,;. ý:' ýý ý ý*.`.-ý ':.-.-.-ý , 1...ýý .-ýl -, t ': .,.]ý .,: -..'.. -:: ..-.tt .--.:ý. -ý.'-:. .,.ý1ý M., _ ..:. _- .i ý.ýý*. ... i ý -ý'- ;,".", -:ý -ýiZ ý.: -ý' ý .-....; '. _:t, ý ý,,%.' t-:i -:Z' 1.','.': -;- , I :. --ý -. I ý ..-.. .ý " ,. -s. ..::. L:ý, : -F -, ; tt.; ..-, --ý ý: ý:i'. :-.---t-ýý

.ýý,-.:-% --,J ; ; -.'.-.t-"%::

,. ,' -;'ý. ýi.'... -'-. .ý:ý!, .: ý -.,-. -,,, -.,* .- -.ý.,:ý; -ý" " .ý '. : -, -,':.* ---:ý%ý .. --ý.'. t: .,: .;t,, ýý-ý ---'---.ýý**, :-ý!,'ýt,;::

.. .ý:ýýI-; ., .. 11 .. .... t. ý .. .. .. ..1: -, .:.:.... ýý ýý --ýý. --:.:.ý --ý .,.:., .. 4;: ., J.ý, ..-_,-;-t : .*: :ý, ý'it, ..: : t ý .t --ý -..%. -::--ý:.: t;:,% .." -. -, ---ý -:-J:;,:t ---:Z-,- ,ý ---ý -!-, , .,i-,.ý:ý ý ., ý !-.,.-ý,*:ý;: !ýý`., -.'ý.,-,z i-t'., ".-ý, t-'.-ý :t;.*.',"ý..!,.7,...:,.-.,..ý...,..*... ý 1 ý'.,ýt-:-: ý-:.t... .-.. -',:ýi tý-'. ,ý '. ýý;;ý. ...., ;.- ,.-. -:.-,. -; ... -: ! ... , .. --.1 -ý .ý.'- .'!,:': , -- -.., ...., 7..:. .. 4 : ------., .ý. .ý. ... .. ... ..-, -, : 4,ý: :. ..-ý r. ý .` ; --.I -.., -:.. ..-, -.-, .- ý ....... :. :t -.,.-. .. -ý ... :ý :.. , -: -;.. t, ý ., ---..* .t , .t. ; --, -:-.! -*: t :.-. ý`-',1'. .-, ., -ý. ý .... ..,..-... ._: -z , ..: .-.:ý-ý!*ý.-',:tý .. ,. , .-;,:t;,--ýý!ý:i.ý*.'ýt'.

.*.,--,..-,'i., -'-.'.-.-t!-
-,.-"--tý, --ý-,: -'ý .,,-, ;%. ýý:ýý-,.*-.

.ý %- : -ý.,: '! ý -...: .ý *ý " -ý .- -, -.: ,- '. -:.- :ý- ,ý '. 1, ý- -,;. ý '.*. , ...... 1 -z ', :"ý -*--.t:-.-;--" ',"t""'. -, ý-'-* 'tý,*., ý -.ý -ý-,..ýý-- --* -.-- i '.:; ,,ý. -::-ý... ý. .t .... ...ý , -ý ;t ..,. .ý ..-.. '. --.. --....t. ,.ý.. -----:ý ..,.: .--..% :; -,ý*., , -.1 ---ý -, .. '. *; ,ý --.'.. ,. ......,-ý!.*.ý-";!..,ý...,..-,..,..,....ýi-ý.ýý.'ý.,...,.. --..: ...-;.:. i .... ý " ;%t -, t .. --I.'. :ýý 1 ; : -kr,ý .. .. -'ý; .: ý '. --:ý -..*L t:: :- ,ý ::.'.--.t:ý .,..-. ý ý , ....",.. -,:ý*ý. , -.ý ...,- .,ýi,. -ýil:-,!. '. .-* , ý-*-.:--ý:,.t -, ,!ýý--.; `.,.ý,.ý, %*ý ,'.* t. .'ý ý%ý .-;.z, --.-4,.-:ý'ýý;-!.ý!ý:ýý' --.. '.. " .-.ý ..., : , ,.-.. -.t::tý*j:::j:ý.-.:.ý.,t-tý-.. ý:;.Y". --*..': ,.'ý .., ýj .. .., , .. 1. :ý%!:ýt ý. ......*, * , , .:. , .--.:ý;.-.. , ...--..., --i---t.,---, .: -:-ý: .... .... , I .... .--.-ý:. -.-..ý:-,.ý ::-, -.*-,...wt. .! :. .. -.,ý: ,'-.: !: -,*ý %,`-.*:ý t .." *.:,., ;::..'--.- -:.,... t; .,ý '.' ;. --,:,* , '.' ,'ý ý,-:,-ý%: -ý: !":. t: t% '. -". :-ý --.: ý'.-K:,.` ....'.. A : .- -ý -ý'ý I. * --:*-".:,.* ,:..* ý -:.". -.'ýý ..... ., ,ý., , .., t!.."..'ý! ,.,. --,,-ý, .. ,,ý ..: t. ...-...t. ....: , --, : 1:%!-:ý ý:ý-ý--,.ý.-*:!ý -,. ...,..,*: -.,-:t ý.ýiý"ý*-,' ýý'ý : .-. .... .:.. -,:;-1'.;i

!:i:ý',-,:%ýý::
--.'--;ý,ý-?-.:;--z.---, ýýý, , -..:.:t --ý.-.,:-... , .,:- : , , ý , : t,-,.,: ýt -.,:---.-t.

--ý;:.--. .. --i : :........... .-.. , : .::,.."-.:.",ý;.,.ý,ý--.'-:-ýý,:.ý,.ý.%-,;ýlliý:1 .:ý.::....".,...,-ý*...--..ýýý'i.ý:'..ý;'ý:.;,ý:. .. .:;Ci:ý'.iý,ý..,',..-,?:,..,.%.,:ýý-...':,'-'.:...'rý ., ... ý,.,. It..;'; ,ýý-. .%... , :?, : t-;.ý-'.'.'ý .. ...;.:,ýý, -'. ý1`v-., ý :ý... ... .....;- :.. .--.1. ... 1ý:.ý-.-*t1.:, .:,:- -.ti ..ý -ý, I : .. .. ... I.;.. .ý 1, *tý -'t. ,:. L., .,ýý ....ý it..: ý..::---:ý*;:-.-"ý.--,-

: , , ., .ý , :: .-, .. --:.-, ý. ...ý. ..:,*:,-ý-'..!-'.f, ..::.. .:Z.!-.,'t
y. .'.ý.... ----, .."ý.ý,.f.,:.,..!..,.-',ýý_,ýý,ý,.,.-,:-.:-ý:-..,.::

...::ý, ...!: , .ý ý -, ... .- I .----!ý -. .. .. .:Zý:`.:ýý--. ---.-ý.. t._ .. .-. .:; ,:;,:ý, ....: .. -ý:ý .. .ý- --.ýtýý ,ý,ýi-ý*::ý. .,.*t-t :.:,,t:.,ý.,.',ý,ý.,'.-.. .:-.ji,ý;.:i::::ý..'ý.",..,".,.*...ý.-"ý.*':;ý..-........ý,.. -'-t".ý;.,-f`."ý:.'.ý:. -... , : :. t.. .:. ..._.: , I :-:- -'-.ý;. ... % .ý -'.'ý ; '.-,ýý , t. ., -z !. : I ..*.,. : ý: -..ý-;:ý`.l ýý ý *%, .... 4. .-......-.-.,-ý:--ýý ý:' .ý. ý ..... .ý ... .-, .ý ..!,-;ý '. 1 --I --t. ý: -:...:. : .1 ., , ..: , ... -..M. ..... ----,ý-,-*---. ý- .:7. ý.'.ýý-ý` ..-:ýý'..:j.ý-ý:%ýi. ., , .- ..I ..i I .ý .I ý ." ..-ý ... ý--;. ot, '-.i ý:. ý, , ýt....-.:%,-t.,-%:-:!:,;-

, :.-,.-, -'. :'ý ý -, "... -* ,ý i,::: `- : :ý " .--" :1 ... ý. ; -ý ý -.".! ... .:. ....ý.. ..,.ý ., -ý : '. :ý-..-.::
1. ." :% : -: .. ..ý: .ý ý.. ..,,ý -ý.;: ir : ,,'ý-" n ý !.:i.-ýt:
z... tý4 ý`
ý -:: : ý.*.ý:, .... ..:.:; ..,:.,.. , : ! -.., .-tt ".,: ; ., ., .. ..ý .ý ,.ý ý I .. -;- : .. .,.,., ý:.: ,.:., t: ý: %, -ý., ý.,--. ., j, -..-, `-ý "'..... .:.ý ... ......!:..: ....:.. I..: """ .. ...ý ., ::ý::.:t:-.,;!!.

7, ý:ýý%'; .11. .ý .. .% ....: .. ...1. .. , , ., ; : .: ..." , -... 1 : .ý ... ."'t. ..., ., -ý -n1%. ý: ;,.. %ý ý:.-.-.ý, ý ý '.'.'..ý, ýt- i .ý *tý:,*;, '.*ý! ý : ,'.:%.'-, ý t.:ýý , , -:tý,.`, ýt %.- .".ý ". `ý --.%.--.-'..'. .: ý, , :";:: % vt::ý-:t, %.-t',,,ý ,'. ý-'.; *. '. 1ý -*.ý-.,.;'-,'.:-.'.'.* ...ý ., , ....-... ; .I -ý, *: -i I : 1 ,ý. -.. .: ... :, .. 't: :": ,..;.,.; ,.: --::- %ýý. ..: ... .. 1. .ý. .. : , t !t ý -, '. ... :.%' .ý , --r .", ý-. .-. ý: -- , .-t- , ý -:-;!-,:-.,ý ýý, ý ..ý -.ý: .. " .ý .-.ý : .". ...ýt'. !,: : '.ý :.::,.:,... .. :--, -, t, .: .. ý .-ý -.1ý. .. : ...r,: --',t-,ýtý::ý'ý.'.ý-'-ý,.', 1 .... -.-i-t.%:-.;.:,--:.t,ý.:: ý .. ý..ý :.. .-ý 1 .." .., .1 ý:ý .:,. : .., :1, , -,:,ý- , ..--:*.'- ..:. ..:.-.-ý ý. '---, !.: -:ý `ý -.!,*ý -,ý .ý --ý tý ý: : :,*.':.'- -: : .ý.. '%'--.: -:...ý'," : F :.:., .: :.-.;:t m::: ý:,....;.... ........: .. ...:.', ý ,ý-.: :- .-." .. .-..': *i !.' .... .. -...... ý: :t..-*t.-ý:ý. .ý. .. .. ,. : , -!ýi-- *: :: :.%,ý 'j_!ý: , .,..:.: .. .: : : ..t ! :t,. -ý,'--:- `.-, .; -: ': :-, , ý.*-: *-.Z.:..'.-ý,*i

'ý:.ý:. ýý.'.- '. .: ': ý!- ý, ,.,. " ., : :: % .; -4 : `:- -: ..: , -iý. .. ..'ý ',ý,*-*. ý ::,,:tý: -;ý:% -..'ýý :ý,ýj ý ý ---' 4 ': --1 .% ::.! .!; 1 ." , ý ::.:ý '..., .f ;:ý ý::%.: o: t:.-t..,:ý.-...

.:ý ý-.: -!, 't,--'-:;-:.-; I : ........ -..:- ý .-.. lil'.:-l .:.ý,,-J,:,-.:.,!-t 4 ý-:.ýt--ý.,-ý,:,- -'-:.ýý-. ý,.".;;ýýý:..*ýý"ýý:,ý;,...ý.!'.'.ý,ýý.ý.:ý*.:,.,..', ::,., t.::.ý ,:..::; ý-.,*:- :: ; ý:; t , , ;,. :.: ... ý .. .. .: : ,-',' : -, t. -t *ý ::. .:.: -. .;; I::. r -.: .:. -ý --ý-, ., :. -.-.-:-;.;: % ..". ý7--'. tý-. .., ...1.--.;...!:.,'.':ý` ";.- ":, ý-'! %.,-:-:.,.,.-:-:.ýý ., .. -.,...:. a .; t ý. :. , .V -... .'i .. .-.-.- '. ., -.:,." -.:--.:ý ,;z .!-*:ýý- --t.ýý..: --ý%-.;;- -.t. ý:-ý :,:%,-.ý :tt::. :%,:.. ý t , :..:*-.,.'-,:.t .. -'..t' !..: r ,--.',%.ý .. t. -', .ý t.. ...',., -,.i.: ; -', : -: t.-.; 'ý:,.-.. , ...: -:-, , .-t I il -.ý: " t. ýý ý:tý. ý.1, :: i .; ý:, ý-,.' ýý-`-,.,-.. ý -:.`,'ýý.ý.- , , ý -,' .ý : :- : ; ý- ý -...ý- ...... .... -... ý .. ?. I ; -; : :: .: ý --ý. '.. : ..%.t' ! .: :. : --: ý'ý;ý, :ý:ý ý -* ..Z -, , , -ý ý; ,Iýý-ý....ý:,....:.ý..ý..,ý,.!.ý...,,;,% .. ý ; 1 '. ý -%. ... :.i.i -"I -..ý ::ý:--;:t.-.-

'.,, .- ----:! i:'ý,ý.: .ý ý % -, : ý :.:.:. : " .., .'. ., ý 't. -.;7...:, ,ý , -'- .: , .ýt : -;- ::ý.,.":.'..ý.

ý ý-'..-.. -.... .....,... .'...ý.%:-, :ý-. ý.ý ..-,,, , , * , ., :: '. * , , , ,,, , ", -, ,-., ..y-ý:I. " % ---,ý-. ý,-:ý ".. ;:. , .. , .. .% ..-.,,-: : ,%.' .- ý--.'-: 12 *.,ý-f`,%,:"- --:- ,:..; , , .:,.,*., ... -:..-...,.:.;. --:, ý'.---ý-- '.!'..ý,". j-., ! ýý ý;-j. .ýj : I.- -"... 11. " ý: -,* .---ý :ý; : ---ý-'ii ': ": -,ý.'-- .., -%. ..... ." ý %. -.. .I', ... , :. : ....... .. , *--. -, -..- -, ...., .---, -, -ý, -, -... ... -..ý ... .-1 -... .ý. .: .t ..:.ýý , " !. :,!. .ý , ý .:.-, %--. , .I... ..-:::ý ý. ,..;,::: " --t, .ý , ., -ý '. .. ý; ý %%, ý .., .. .: ... ý, .ý ., 4. ...., -,,%. ý -,ý -i ': .: .. -: ! .:. ,:ý -.. ý.: .'..ý.ý :-..:`.ý..ýýýlýý.ý-.ýý.,.ý,ýý,.':'.-".'.ý.ý-'.'.',,,.-..ýýýý '.. .. .. ..... .-ý ,*1! 'ý .t , , .,-ý:-, j --ý- -ý t .:1 '-.' ., .`-.ý%; .'. *:ýý -...-. -ý. .-. -.... ... .... .. .. '. ........ ý-- ........ ý, ..,ý tý:,. .., -% .". ; t. ... .. , ý: .': %, .. , ..-,---..-:ýý;,- --.ý,ý ý .. -ý-ý:! :4Z3 --,: , .. -: ..-..,-:.,; ý. a.... .. I : --t -.--.-ý1---t.:. .., -ýý..'ý.*..'.:,!.:.ý::,::ý:i:.ý....::ý:%.":ýý. .",:1.;.'ý.,,ý ." ...ý , --, ....'.;t:`ý ;.*-ý-,,* ýý,"- -, ...;-, ,;!. ; , * , .i. .'-ý I .. --ý.ý,.;ýý ý*:::-::::-.,-.ý.': t -:--, :." ,,,:-.:.-- tt. ý ..; , , " ... ... ý:., :...ý tý*.--..ý,tý 1: , ý ;,-...-..;I .... .1 ., .:- .. ý .:,*.. ..ý .. .. ----.. -...'..., :., --.t. -.'.,'2 ". -, ,.. -t. , --',ý-ý:, ý:ý- -: .- ..;., .ý,::, .-!,t- 4.,'-- *.---*. " -,...-.:.. ýý.-f: :,-,ý'-..11,.'.`..ý:1J:. ,'.:,-:ýýý, ,%'.:.,:" ,* ý.ý! ---::::ý .*,..,:*" -ý_-ýý. ftt ,:ý:--, .,-.-.ý!:ý:'-.' .4.: .-'.:.:---,ý

t.ý,'!::'-'

"-ý:.,ý ::.t. ',:ý .ý.:ý.'..' -:.:. .-..'; : :- :, ,,ý,., -..L ::- ..L -.: ", L;t -:-.ý;.::: , ý -ý,:*:*. .... ý .ý-'ý.::7`

-, :.--.ý :,:,j:: .'I'.!:-.

ý'.ý.-,.,.,;:. ý:. " , ".". "' , , :. 't'."*;*-. ý ." ".". -" ::: -,,' ,-: '. -ý ... ý--.-,:-: -! % .. ý : --" : --, :: : :* : , ..: .'. ; .; :. '. ý ý ý, .-.,, .,ý ý%. t: .::.:-.:..ý -, ....... .. ...-- ý.' -.: ý :. .. ., .-,'-." : -:-:ý , , " , " " , -..-, ': , -ý ..,: -".:. .... 'ý.* ,.: .... ` ý ý` -.., ., .;, ý' ...: , ..t :.,:.:ý. .:4jt.: -.,:.! :.. ,- ..: -:, -, ; ý% --, -:-:.*.*--ý.:

"..;-.!,-.--ý:

-,%.ýý--,::.,:

-:% .'. .ý i .'.,ý.ý. , , * -., .., ', !" ..-.ý, " -ýý,% -.;., -, zt"%.ý:: , ;;;. -. :ý--.- t 't-., ..".. -, .... * ., ..;,ý.t.-..

., ,., t! ýj ; :, ,.,.--,:t--",- ": ." 7t-;,:`-t-,. .L. :... .. :. .:ý.'i:-:%:ý::,-,;ý

.!..ý:,ý-; , : ) , ý .%ý-,.:.ý:;:--*;-'-!;

-.:... , ýt-.'..-.t- -:----ý ... :ýl.-..-,Iýý*-.:ý!:.ý::.'.-ý.ýý.ý

...... ý,'%,ý:.:;.ý::;.ý.,jl.,.:.*....-.-,,...il.:.:.-

... , ,.:..,.: .... --:-'ý -.'::ý...ýý;..,..,::..,..*,.%:,.:.*,.,.::::.-:ý:ý:ýý.:...,-...-,-.ýýý:;ýý.,ýýý!,,ýz:.,.ý.ý:!..'.:-,.ý'..','.".:; ý %-!:`:;ý ý;.ý.'--,,'.ý:,--.t: .. t: tr,ý , .: ... :%: : ---,-- .. --.. -..... ------ý ...:: t! , %,ý-,.:!-J,ýý.. -..: :.-'...'ý'; .ý ý '. ,*-!ý*:.:--'.-

-,-;.ý..

.-------ý. ... ..... ...ý..:-.'-,ý..":;,.:.".,.ý..,k*ý.:ý*.,.'ý,ý*,....ý:..ý,ýýI , .^ .. , ý:.. , , .... -.. ..-.--...to, , -ý ..." !-:ý,ý.`.,:2* .-i-4.ý,:;`.!,ýý ,ý: .* ý ....ý -ýý :t -, ..! , t % ., ý ..." ý .,:: ýý'.ý- -,.,.:.t -: ý .,%::.,.,:..*; ý ý'-*ý7*-ý.' .. ',,'-;;.:, tý- : 1 `:ýý ýc` '%",':ý: ': t' : ý, ::*. .- '. :*:ý .. -:-`ý 1 -, ý:: :ý: ýý -% --ý:6--. -..ý :: -'.*:-.. ýý.70ý- -.*,* :tt ': *:ý .., ý-.`-ý, --.-.1 .ý. ..:.t. .... '. .-, --... ý ..t. , -ýý t t. -% : 1, .... ..:...ý,ý.'..,'ýý,:ý--*.ý."ýý.-.--".,'.ý- ,-ý--, ... .. -ý-,: : , ý :: ,:- :.: ý.:ý. .ý -r. .ý':-ý:.:ý'...ý,.,ý;'.-.'.-,.*.".*..".-.., --:-,- .. --*-------"--

ý:-., --.,-ýý::,.ý.*-t

'. ,.:ýý* !:ý-..: ýit ., -:., -, -* "..; -, ý- ý* t, , , ..... .. .... ý .;ý, ..---ý* ....ý. -, :'..'.!`.ý ": t, : -'. -ý,:ý;, ý-- -, -, ! -:-:.--.-:-'--..,--..-"*: ,......"..*lýý::;.'-.'.%..'--iýý.;f,..,ý*,ý...,:ý:.",.ý.*..". `,: -ý%-, `.'-'-'-'1' -'ý--`- ' ` -.." ." , .. '"', -, , , , -ý

  • M 1;--'..-`.'
    .t :...... , ...ý*,:i,:ýý,ý

!:!:-"`ý-'-.ý:ý -ý ...%-t--.ý ... .ý , *: -, ---ý -ý ý ., .-ý ., ;-, .1.:i.1-..--.:- .: .-! ..; ý-%..-.. -... , * :.;, ý :,-. "'i t%. -:,. , .. .. ----: ý ý : ,.1. ý:..!.ýt 1..ý:..--* 't , .. % -, , --, -, ...... ... ... --- --:ý* ý--: , .:: ... ý :t ..'ý -.-ý.' -*,"ýt. ý. .... ;.ý,ý. .:: ---t-.ý--,.: !ýý.:.!.!;.,.-:7-,:ýýý:,:ýý...'*..',-..'-. ý :ý 'ýý. ý;-ýý-. -,.ýý,-,ý,ýýiý.'.*.'.,ý,.."..ý, , : t:.,ý.,ýj ,ý. t : ., --: ...... :: ,-"-:t.-.-.*::. -:..',::-,::

-: ;: ., t:: ý% :;: 'ý .., -,ý ,-,:,ýý.:-

.ý: ., -%--.ý .-.:: " -.-.- .-` ý:,: ,-ý , ., % .. -ý*','ý"t:: '..' ýLt ...'.',% I :.....,- -i.- t ...1 ., --ý- .. : I ý ....1 ..:-* ... :':., ý, -..*':-* ý%i'::,:,': '. " ..: ... :. .': .'..1 ý , .., .ý ---::-' : -".-., ý-*. .... ýý.-*,i.t'-.

ý ý I ý t: , t.: ." ` -:' -:..., ý .,. '! ... ..... ! -, -, " -.. .ý .. .! , ., ...-;-' -: ,::ý %ý:-.t `t,ý::-* t ..ý .ý.ýý. , .I -.'.- --.; : -:, ý t.- -: --:- :- : .%. :., , ..... ... .ý ..ý- -; : :*.! *;..:.: : : .,ý.. ý.ý:ýý..... -r ..:ýý. -, ..: ::.:. ý , -:; % : ...I '! --ýý:ý.,ý.,..,ý,ýý..-....".,,.",%:ý,:,-
.:.;,ýý.*.."."..!:,:-.ý....*,!:ýý..

-, .,: --,-':.. -, , , ..: -...... ..... "F': !'ý ý' j.`- : : ý ýý. I t ,t:.,.--ý,.* .... ýý., ..ý .-`-rl , --., .- , :!, %. ý::,:. , ý..ý i:,.,:--..; %`11 .ý ..,..:: i ý.ý.*ý:.",.,.ý...',.:.-::!,ý.ýý..:.,*.-. .", ::ý'. ..ý,-;4::: , ..ý , , " * ; ., -.- ...., '... r ..-.-.... .. I 1. .- : :.. -.: I .ý:. ..... ... .- -." ...-.ý':ý.. ... , ..ýý:%"... -, ý ý -::.-' -:..:ýt ..:" " *.";".,!,ýl%.:.,.,:.,.:I -.-... ... :. .. .*":.:. ý ... .... ... .. ý, , I .... .. i ý-. .-.,-..; .- , ....:. ..-- -- --.. .: .ý .!;. -., ....,. , ý ý. ý -,*: --%,-:: ': ::. -i .: ... ý: : --%. -_-..ý ; 'ý.: ý'ý:.,:"i-: !, ,;.-. %..'ý. ,.,:ý-;ý. .:.. .... I ---.: :'. -'..ý-,ý-'ý.-ý .ý:.-% .1 .ý ý .'.--'-,ýý,-:'-`ý'-'. `ý,ý `-,-ý'%----' -ý:-,-, ý , .....f.::;ýý',% ýý',, , ý."-.;ý -.. 1ý ...-- -; "-'--'ý" 'ý."-..'- '. t'.." :,:., --.-..- -.; , --ýý-: t.n. , ...: ... '.. , .-.. .. -..... .,. : ...-". ". -* .... ..-, .., .-,..:... ..i, -.-;-::-:, .... -ý ý--. .t;.. ý -, -....., 1ý. ".: 7:ý` rý.'- :i ýý'. ,%. : .,: ",.. ., ---- ----...ý :. ý: .-, --* --, ----.; -- ,* -, -` , -..I. .... , .z .-:- .. .,ý, " .iý;'; ... ..." .ý. , --:.%.. .:,.-.-,ý ý4::*.-*;:ýý,, .- , .-,:i`.ý.,.:ý: -.,.ý,: ,.%.ý-ý ,.-. :ýt-ý-' ,ý -t,*--' ý .' -. --'.%: -ý ;-ý'.- -" " .-'I. ,' :". .. -.. --... -.... .. .. .ý ': :` -:) t,:%.,'-'! ., % .. ...".'.*'.ý.*...,..'ý.ý..'ý.,Z"...'.'.",-%. -'.*.,::`.-- '.t'.'-ý- 't" -, .. .. -, .. -:-ý .--, --,ý',*--,-ý. --..ý,.-ý.'--.'..-'..'.---'.,'.'.'..'.','.'.,..*-*-..,...'--.'.ý', -.-:.--.ý ý .. ..:ý!:;- wtt---'..'ýý:"ý:.',itýý;ý: %, ;t.-:%`..'ý

7 1 :' " ... ý ----,ý,. ý ...... .... .-,%... .. .... ... , -.-- ., -! .:-: .":* : ,ý,,: ...: -, !.% .ý':*..' t: ý , ..---..I ,ý : .. ý.: : tz- ". -jý.:: -.,.--:Z--.V

ý 1: ... : ... ..'s; ..... .ý.' ! .:ý ....-:, -:-ý .-I -...: `:, .:. , ..., .--.: ý ---.:. ., " .: .- ý ..... .%. : : .. ý.. .ý.:,:: -:, ., : .". ., ...., .. ý .--ýý .v :--,- .1, :- .... , : .; ý., .::,:,.11:--.:.:ý.

ý .,:!*ý:'.ý:

.ý' -.: -.. I..'. ': t , , ...ý.: :t r: ý: * :,%. .. :: ý`ý .'.'. ýý ,'..ýZ. '. -,ýý:". j.., :.:.: ,:: ý.!,ý.ý ,, ',.. , ': .ý-' : ..ý: -.,,.!: , .: ". 1, ý-- :.- !, ýý.:-%.!:

--:; t-ý ,,:'-* .. .. .. :,-",.":-i*'.-ý,;.:
.ý:..." %:ý. .ý -.. .-..-.-:ý;ý-.ýLi

-ý:,.ý:, .'.,-ýýý.:-,.:,,...ýý.ýý.,;:..,.ý:.;:,.,.,...ý*;.

.----.-,.ý..:

t:;:.-:ý* ..'ý...ýý,'..'ýý,:ýýý,.ý:*ý:."ý'....ýý:,:ý.".::ýl.'ý ,.:..i .%,ý,;ý -..-. ---...t .; ::--': .ý.-ý:7 -'.ý :t: ý '.':-. ..ý'.ý.-.-,- lp. .:ý.,:. -,.-.'. " ."... ., ,-.ý :ýýt!ý:-ýý, :t. t --.'.:,:.*:, -,-;ýý%:-:'% .-j.ý%.-ý .. ..ý, -..., '-, t % t I -:1 -:1 * -.**'-. ýý.;- :::. , .. .--! -ý -.. ý.: -, .:. -.. ., ,..-., : .1. .ý---:- -::ý* ý:, ::., ý:Z-ý 1. %:ý,:.. .., -:.. .: :.ý....;ý:..'ý.'.ý:...ý,..:..ý:ý:.. .. : ý :ý ý.:,t, ...:. --...... -%` ::- ..-.,i :,. ....; ;. : ; ý :, .", .: 1 ....... : -: .. ;- -:, : ; , .:,. " ý,*,:-`.,--.:

ý .ý;:-. '. " ý .:', .., .. %: ::ý ., .. ...., -,. 1:-ý.ttýý:ý%ý'.-,.-,,-,:
';ý-,ýý-..:ý%.'ý.-:;ý

ý,:ý :- , .,:ý ..ý ý .: .: -.--ý ,% --, .t ...... ., , ..i ý ý : ý: ;.-:t,. ý% .. :... ý. .. .. .ý :, ..%, ,,:-.. .tý';.`. .........-, , ." I ::;,.**;.:

;,: ý%t t.ý:% .ý..--it.!t-

.:.:, -: .. ..... .. : ý-%.i ,ý::. ý,-,.`., !"t. '.-::ý ..., ; , ---ý : ,:: :1, I -t : .." ..t, .. : ., .-ý- , * -ý.-- -.:.. , , I :ý. ý "", !,.- ., -.,: -.":;!: , -,'-',.-.:-,',-; !:ý-ý-,! '.."'..; .. :: , : tý .:ý :t .... ý,-:-ý,,..,. ,- ý-: -i , -.. , , ---.t !, :... ý ..-,, ::ý".ý-.ý-;ý*.ý..",...,ý:.'-,', *,,.ý,ý,ýý,`-t ..-;.t.-:.ý, %..ýtý,:, ...-ý .. ý'-. ý:',-- ,ý%. , *ý --, ý ` ý ý ... 3. ., : .....ý. , .-':.:.:,::-ý.:t.' ` -'ttý -. ý:, , , , -'ý -Y'.:,ý .-.,,,ý:ý*ý'-`. .-.. ... ....::.,. ., i ý, -.ý... ., .:.: .-,ý: '.. ýý-;.., L'.--. -, ý:::. : ý ,::ý .. :::-:...;.ý

:t ..ý-: !ý , , --% -.%;: ý- .::, .. -:. ... .1. ý., .tý ý -, .: ý -..:ý:-", !ý-,.-:ýý

ý'*.'.-,ý..-',:-,4,%ýý-..,:....- ý--"..----,.,`--- --.,ý --, , -,t-!.,.,.-,. t,.ý ..% 1-i..'.. -.:*;' :!.: -.ý ý .;,., -.,::.:,j :ý,:,'. ý;:-.ý, -'ý ..*ý:ý ,-,-.,.,ýt:- -,ý ,:.. ;. t, :, ý": .. ý-----t, -ý: r. ... !ý,.',;ý ý -.,ý ::: -z -'. ': ,ý --': .: -ý 2 4:.; ; -;. 3, *: -.. -:ý, .. -;ý :z .ý -. , `- --tý 5.ý..*.,; ,-.. .. '. 1 , 1. ::t..., -:::-.ý-. , : ý .:._* .,. ... t., ,ý .-ý..-!..- .: : , ý%%',-.; .- "; .., t'.ýý-; .. .. .... , : :..:-",::.

". " -, : ý-ý ...., ...:,ý,t 1.':.-:7.,::;'

ý ý;"' ýoý 1. -1. , .. ..!. ý',ý .,.'. : , , * * ý::ý-.!-ý;:-,.: ..". ..,.,. t. t:. ; ..::,. ...:. :ýý-.: .. .-..--.:..., 'It',".; .: " , .... ..ýý';'t-,%-.- ýý -... .I .1 .... .. ý. ..ý , ý ý-:,-t:' --::.-------1 ----- ---*: '1 -, -, , -..* -.-., j,: %:It -t, -, '. -.4 .', ....;... ...:.%,-. t.: ,ý.---*;.ý%ýý.,-:.- ý,ý, -.:,:., a". , , -'.ý : -ýý,. 3 -;!: -, .t: ý !I.,* , --!ýý .,'ý-. ý ...*.' ..',* ý.,*.-,.! A, ý: '. --.'ýý -ýý, , , -ý 1 ý.- .. %, :, --., % .. -.-ý .,..:: -.'ý':". .." ý::t : ".1t.". -.: .! .: -t t- , -........ .I : I .: , t " .--.-:tý !;.;'ýi*i, , -., !:.. , , , -%.. :.,:.* -, -ý. .ý -:,ýi" ýýt. t.-,-.% ,--c',: ý% : 'ý: t.l... t.:%. ;-;*.,---,--

ý!ýý,-ýý:;;ý.

-.-',..,*. -, .,-., -;-.,.-*.:.-.-:--,ýtý t.*.. ý-',`: ,*.: -tý'.','*.: Y -ý-:a ý' ..,. -,. , ý ý. .'t,:t-.ý:-'.*-týý-,t- ýý :,* -:.. ý ,:.::.. ý ---.--I , -- --tý:::-: .-...,ý :t % t.;.ý.---- ý.",:.:ý--::,-ý", ý ,1;: ý--,.! !-ý -ý ýý:ý.ý-..:.::ý.:..,..,.:.ý,'.:-.:k::::ý:.ý,.,%,:ýý.ý*!ý ý:-tý"-,-;ý,:, ý " %,.,ý ý:.- ..':.."ý:,:

I. .. .... ,% , ..--.-* -.------.:.t', .ý :%.'t-.,:":ý, ýý,,,-,ý-,ý

-,-----,ý'.,.-.',,*ý'..'ýý ý'?ý'i!ýý,.-',':',,,,.,ý;";.*-..'ý'-.,,ýý..ý'.-ýý.--...,ý.ý'..... , :. ý.-.-;*-,--,ýý:ý,'.'4, ýý!', ."-,.,-,;., ý%*,-,t-*-`-, , .-,,.*-,i--t-.,ni ý,-: " -ýi, t :. ". ý, ... --'.ý!*,,jý-'.ý -ý -, -..ý,iý:ýý:ý:ý.4ýý'-,'.'..'.,*ý.

  • ,ýý, .; -.--ý' -:,ý%,ý,--"ý

--%, v ý,!- ,' --:,%,.;ýt; .ý ý .:..':,ý, i ,."-*:.. -, ,7:; ý::::i. w'ýý:ý --:t:,*ý:t .,,._ -.'ý-ý.,'!,ýý--*,,',ýtr, :.--. , * .:.:.. ; ..!-Z-*1,- .:.ý- , ." !ý--,'--'-',,:.-.'.-,-' ".1, ,:-', :* .ý '. i -*,i-ýý:, .t ý:.; :.... ..... .,!;. --*ý: ----.:,;ý. , , -* ---tý- -.',- .: , -:ý.'. t Z:.!.7.: i :t! ýý '. ý -.::,.,-ýý'!7,'. ý .. , .:! %; :: t-':-,. -*- ,,ý, : ý*-, *-:',, : -tt -: ... ý ý:. 7 : :,., ,. ..... ..---11" s. , ... ..,. -.. -.1 -..: ...., : -is; -*ý.%::'.1 -.`-!-ý : -.t-. ý* ý t:"i.'..5,ýý,.-.:i:ý'.-ý., ',ý*,ýI.zý -'-, ý !,t..',-, ., -ýýrýitý.:.

ýý.ý.ý, -*.'.ý.ý -'. .. -.7..;L
tI.:.ýý...

ý----.-..:-...::;--*% w-.*:,..-.--- .,,-.-- ----;--.:--- ;- --.!: -:', I Seabrook VSDS lIPSTID-10-003, Page 13 of.70 3 S-e HSYA-011 Selected Areas outside the Protected Area Survey U: M.20090825-2 Date/Time:. 081/ 009 11:25 outsidete h:P g TRW Clean Area Soil Free Release.I~~NW " _N N W '- 'kN E WS. ......... ../ ...L I SHLECr.nARR.AS AND f'TR-I]IDNGS' I OUTSID TiLE ?PROTECTED ARA TNLI.DE TTIEFOLLOVNrNC:-RT667NC' I .OFV -RT.XI SHOlP -ITC A SI-TOPS 4',TE LA..B -VI-HI" ANNE .*MKfluillig SSW S Comments: Free release soil from OS Protected Area.Dose Received: 0'mr -Micro-R BKGD: 9-15 Micro-R/hr. Su~ajo igh-t Readingsl; .... Sm s~W:-" t .. .r a.... ..t Type: Other -Free Release oe-eQ o Spo Reactor Power = 100%1RA lI.7j-3 4~ Z -,'5. Unless otherwise noted, dose rates in mR/hr.,ad Surveyor Comeau, P P cation Code: Routine Status:*Ready for Review by: Comeau, P, 08/2512009 Bldg/Area Name: Annual Location

Description:

HSYA-01 1 Selected Areas outside the Prot Image File: HSYA01 M.002 S.,Page 2 of 2 Survey #: M-20090825-2 -Printed On: 08125/2009 13:12 HPSTID-10-003 Page 14 of 70 25-AUG-2009 11:28:53.71 FPL-ENERGY SEABROOK STATION SAMPLE:TITLE Ul -OUTGOING SOIL GOB FROM DRY CASK STORAGE SITE P >FILE IDENT : CAS$DISK: [SNS.SAMPLE.RP.NEW]0908252005.CNF;1I SAIMPLE ID 0908252005'

  • OPERATOR:.

CAS SAMPLE TIME : 25-AUG-2009 11:10

  • SAMPLE GEOMETRY 4LGM* SHELF HEIGHT :0* EFFICIENCY FILE : 4LGMO SAMPLE TYPE : SOLIDS
  • SAMPLE QUANTITY : 1.OOOOOE+00 ACQ DATE & TIME : 25-AUG-2009 11:11
  • DEADTIME (%) : 0 1%PRESET LIVE TIME : 0 00:16:40
  • SENSITIVITY
4.00000 ELASPED REAL TIME : 0 00-:16:40
  • GAUSSIAN SEN ,:10.00000 ELAPSED LIVE TIME : 0 00:16:40
  • NBR ITERATIONS
10*** ** ****** ******* ***** ** *** *** ** ****** ***** ** ***** *** ** **** *** * ***** *** **** **** ** DETECTOR : DETECTOR 8
  • LIBRARY .FREE RELEASE EFFIC CAL DATE : 26-JAN-2008 01:16
  • EFFIC-CERT DATE : 26-JAN-2008 01:16 DCAL DATE & TIME : 24-AUG-2009 16:24
  • ENERGY TOLER : 1.00 KEV/CHAN : 4.99341E-01
  • HALF LIFE RATIO 8.00000 OFFSET : -2.89613E-01 keV
  • ABUNDANCE LIMIT 70.0%0 COEFFICIENT
1.51253E-07
  • CORRECTION FACTOR : 1.OOOOOE+00 START CHAN :3
  • PEAK END CHAN :4096 .ANALYSES : PEAK V16.9 NID V3.4 MINACT V2.8 WTMEAN V1.8 INTERF V2.4**** ****** ** * ***** * ***** **** *** ** **** ******** **** **** * **** *** ****** *** **** ******COUNTED ON : NHY4 COLLECTED BY : P. COMEAU COUNTED BY : CAS****** **** ** ****** * ******* *** **** *** ******* **** *** *** **********
        • *** ******** **Post-NID Peak Search Report It Energy Area Bkgnd FWHM Channel Left Pw %Err Fit Nuclides 2 74.78 148 403 0.84 150.34 144 16 22.3 1.31E+00 PB-212 PB-214 2 77.02 257 408 0.85 154.82 144 16 13.5 PB-214 PB-212 0 87.21 107 417 1.31 175.23 173 5 30.5 PB-212" 0 89.93 100 421 1.09 180.66 179 5 32.4 BI-214 AC-228 0 92.68 615 1.49 -186.18 184 7 35.9 y 0 128.5$9 93 626 0.92 258.08 254 8 47.7 AC-228 0- 185.83 166 531 1.19 372.69 368 10 27.2 RA-226 0 209.02 75 -399 1.05 419.11 415 9 49i5 AC-228 2 230.64 764 224 1.05 478.42. -472 18 4.7 2.50E+00 PB-212 241.72 162 197 1.05 484.58 472 18 16.4 PB-214'W270.52 126 297 1.26 542.24 536 13 29.7 AC-228 HPSTIb-u-O03 P6st-NID Peak Search Report (continued)

.aple ýID It Energy 0908252005 Acquisition date :)age 15 of 70 Page 25-AUG-2009 11:11:06 Fit Nuclides Area Bkgnd FWHM Channel Left Pw %Err 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 295.32 327.15 338.06 351.91 410.23 462.95 510.81 583.23 609.22 727.69 769.97 795.25 860.61 911.07.933.51 964.57 968 .89 1014.07 1120.43 1378.17 1460.80.1764 .87 265 84 184 421 62 42 82 210 253 34 47 22 56 166 24 36 97 16 56 24 708 33 239 154 ,176 129 93 77 97 69 60 83 61 35 20 16 35 39 52 22 46 10 26 5 1. 07 1.37 1.27 1.20 2.86 0.74 2.26 1.21 1.30 1.01 4.70 1.28 1.32 1.66 0.86 1.71 T. 61 0.69 1.20 0.92.1.72 2.05 591.88 655 .62 677 .44 705. 17 821.91 927.44 1023.24 1168 .17 1220. 17.1457 .23 1541.83.1592.-41 1723.16 1824. 11 1869. 00 1931.13 1939.77 2030.15 2242 .87 2758 .24 2923 .44 3531.21 586.651 671.700 817 923 1017 1163 1215 1452 1535 1588 1717 1818 1862 1926 1936 2026 2236 2750 2917 35266'12 i1 13 11 1.0 10 12 12 i10 12 16 9 13 13 12 11 10 8 10 14 13 10 13.2 31.1 16. 6 7.1 32.1 42.2 26.3 0 5.8.5 55.3 39.3 53.5 21.2 9.3 54.9 37.8 17.1 55.6 26.0 35.2 4.0 21.4 PB-214 AC-228 AC-228 PB-214 AC-228 AC-228 ANN-511 AC-228 BI'214 AC-228 AC-228 91-214 AC-228 AC-228 BI-214 BI-214 K-40 BI-214 .HPSTID-10-003 Page 16 of 70 1.Interference between PB-212 and CD-109 ----**** PB-212 energy lines *Energy # Disint. % Error Comments 74.81 -----------


Line interferes with PB-214 77.11 ---------


Line interferes with PB-214 87.30 ---------


Line interferes with CD-109 238.63 1.867E+05 4.71 300.09 -------------------

Line not identified Average: 1.867E+05 4.71 Interfered energy lines Nuclide Energy Old Area New Area Critical Level New Activity % Error (uCi)NP-237 86.50 106.6 -9.7 50.6 0.E000E+00 0.00 86.50 Line invalidated: New Area less than critical level NP-237 has been rejected: Failed abundance Test PD-214 87.30 106.6 -9.7 50.6 0.OOOE+00 0.00 87.30 Line invalidated: New Area less than critical level CD-109 88.03 106.6 -9.7 50.6 0.OOOE+00

0. 00 88.03 Line invalidated:

New Area less than critical level CD-109 has been rejected: Failed abundance Test I, .'0 REPORT NAME : QACHECK (V9.1)-REPORT DATE : 25-AUG-2009 11:28 REQUESTOR

HPTECH HPSTID-10-003 Page 17, of 70 7 PAGE __-7 FPL-E SEABROOK STATION POST NID QA ANALYSIS TITLE Ul -OUTGOING SOIL GOB FROM DRY CASK STORAGE SITE SAMPLE No.SAMPLE TYPE COUNT TIME SAMPLE TIME LIBRARY: 0908252005 OPERATOR NAME : CAS: SOLIDS SAMPLE GEOMETRY 4LGM 25-AUG'2009 11:11:06 'SAMPLE QUANTITY : 1.00000E+00 25-AUG-2009 11:10:00 DETECTOR : DETECTOR 8 FREE RELEASE PEAK ENERGY ISOTOPE ENERGY DIFF (KEV)K-40 PB-212 BI-214 PB-214.RA-226 AC-228 ANN -511 1460.'80 238.63 609.31 351.92 186.21 105.00 511.01 0.00-0.01 0.09 0.01 0.38 0.00 0.20 0.10 DECAY CORR uCi/9.133E-02 5.085E-03 5.206E-03 4.864E-03 1.269E-02 5.953E-03 0.000E+00 COMMEWTS* QA Results OK QA Results OK QA Results OK QA Results OK QA Results OK* Key Line Not Found QA Results OK AVG ENERGY DIFF =1.251E-01

TOTAL GAMMA ACTIVITY 1.251E-01,

Total NP Activity 74.78 KeV Peak was used in identifying 2 isotopes 77.02 KeV Peak was used in identifying 2 isotopes 87.21 KeV Peak was usedin identifying 2 isotopes 89.93 KeV Peak was used in identifying 2 isotopes UNIDENTIFIED/REJECTED PEAKS GAMMA!/SEC POTENTIAL ENERGY NET AREA FWHM, GAMMA/SEC / % ERROR FLAG ID ACTIVITY_ _ = _ _ _ _- --------------.. ......-------........--......----------.. ...t 92.68 118. 1.49 1.383E+01 1.383E+01 35.9 R BR -r,7- U,27-BA131 5.842EB 81-* CR H-2 p 1.374E-02 727.69 34. 1.01 9.975E+00 9.975E+00 55.3 -1.7E0, T~-+/-5-12 2 -.56E cR_ BI7I21 2.542E-03 769.97 47. 4.70 1.462E+01 1.462E+01 39.3U * * '860.61 i56. 1.32 1.865E+01 1.865E+01 21.2 .R .TL-20 4 .501E'03 1014.-07 1'ý. 0.69 6.203--P+00 6.203E+00 55.6 8 9HE sm HPSTID-10-003 Page 18 of 70 PAGE REPORT NAME :'QACHECK (V9.1)'REPORT DATE : '25-AUG-2009 11:28 REQUESTOR

HPTECH.FPL-E SEABROOK STATION POST NID QA ANALYSIS Total Unidentified/Rejected Peaks = 5% Unidentified/Rejected Peaks 15.15 Flags: U S .R P-Unknown Line-Rejected During Analysis-Positively Identified (line not in analysis library)COMMENTS: TECH REVIEW SUPERVISOR REX 7/~/ I/Yi Ii*</11/TIEW: I z~~'~-IEW: End Of Report 2 es DATE ./ 2 DATE: /oJg/ O?(

HPSTID-10-003 Page 19of 70 25-AUG-2009 11:58:32.43 FPL-ENERGY SEABROOK STATION;yC9 SAMPLE TITLE : Ul -FREE RELEASE SOIL SMPL-A GOB SOUTH DIRT PILE O/SPA FILE IDENT : CAS$DISK: [SNS.SAMPLE.RP.NEW]0908252007.CNF;I SAMPLE ID : .0908252007 .-OPERATOR .: CAS SAMPLE TIME :.25-AUG-2009 11:38 -* SAMPLE GEOMETRY : 4LGM* SHELF-HEIGHT

0* EFFICIENCY FILE : 4LGM0 SAMPLE TYPE : SOLIDS
  • SAMPLE QUANTITY : 1.00000E+00 ACQ DATE & TIME : 25-AUG-2009 11:40 *-DEADTIME

(%) : 0.0%..PRESET LIVE TIME : 0 00:16:40

  • SENSITIVITY
4.00000 ELASPED REAL TIME : 0 00:16:40.
  • GAUSSIAN SEN : 10.00000 ELAPSED LIVE TIME : 0 00:16:40
  • NBRITERATIONS
10*******************
          • *******************************************

DETECTOR DETECTOR 8

  • LIBRARY : FREE RELEASE EFFIC CAL DATE- 26-JAN-2008 01:16
  • EFFIC CERT DATE : 26-JAN-2008 01:16 DCAL DATE & TIME 24-AUG-2009 16:24
  • ENERGY TOLER : 1.00 KEV/CHAN 4.99341E-01
  • HALF LIFE RATIO : 8.00000 OFFSET -2.89613E-01 keV , ABUNDANCE LIMIT : 70.0%COEFFICIENT
1.51253E-07
  • CORRECTION FACTOR : 1.00000E+00
  • WAK START CHAN : 3
  • PEAK END CHAN : 4096 ANALYSES : PEAK V16.9 NID V3.4 MINACT V2.8 WTMEAN V1.8 INTERF V2.4 COUNTED ON : NHY4 COLLECTED BY : P. COMEAU COUNTED BY : CAS*********
    • ** *******************************************

Post-MID Peak Search Report.It Energy Area Bkgnd FWHM Channel Left Pw %Err Fit Nuclides 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 0 1 1 0 0 77.00 87.40 93.20 185.91 209.59 238.58 241.45 270.85 2.95.26 299.96 328.37 338.39 352.01 463.45 157 86 125 148 99 582 124 62 205 79 55 125 329 29 325 453 491 271 262 129 147 150 87 73 74 104 125 30 0.96 1.07 1.17 1.62 1.31 1.05 1.05 1.65 1.10 1 10 1 .13 0.87 1.16 1 .19 154.77 175 .59 187.22 372.84 42.0 .26 478.30 484 .05 542 .90 591 .78 601.19 658 .06 678.11 705.38 928.44 153 172 183 368.416 472 472 536 585 585 654 674 700 924 6 8 10 9 11 19 11 37 37 8 9 11 8-19.8 44 .1 34.5 21.9 33.2 5.2 17.7 40.4 10.1 21.0.30.2 17.3*8.6 37.5 3.35E+/-00 1. 83E+00 PB -212 PB-212-111 ?3'y RA-226.AC-228 PB-212 AC-228 PB-212 AC-228 AC_-228 Pb-- ai AC-228 POst-NID Peak Search Report (continued)

  • pW e TD : 0908252007 HPSTID-107003 Page 20 of 70 Acquisition date :25-AUG-2009 11:40:44 (It Energy Area Bkgnd FWHM Channel Left Pw %Err 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 2 0 0 0 0 0 510.96 583.37 609.21 665.41 727.61 733.51 861.18 911 *09 964.53 968.79 1114'.15 1120.59 1239.47 1460.78 1764.37 109 213 264 19 43 14 34 114 32 72 19.65 47 676 44 72 42 54 32 26 18 30 20 17 15 39 49 0 0 1.59 1.40 1.22 1.34 0 .75 0.89 0 .90 1.42 1 .52 1 .52 0 .98 1 .78 4.49 1 .79 2.11-1023.52.1168.45 1220.15 1332.63 1457.07 1468.88 1724.31 1824.15 1931.06 1939.5.7 2230.30 2243.20 2480.93 2923.40 3530.20 1017 1163 1216 1327 1451 1465 1718 1819 1925.1925 2226 2237 2473 2918 3523 16 13 1i.9 13 6 12 13 24 24 8 15 16 12 14 19.9:9.4 8.1 58.0 28.8 54.6 36.5 12.3 29.6 16.1 38.5 25.4 36.0 3.8 15. 1 Fit Nuclides ANN- 511 AC -228 Itr- 2c)1 AC-228 9.60E-01 AC-228 AC-228 K?-40 K-40 HPSTID-1O-003 Page 21 of 70 ti---- Interference between PB-212 and CD-109** PB-212 energy lines *Energy # Disint. % Error Comments -74.81 -----------

---Line not identified 77.11 -------- Line interferes with PB-214 87.30 Line interferes with CD-109 238.63 1.423E+05 5.20 300.09 3.07,2E+05 21.01 Average: 1.444E+05 .5.09.Interfered energy lines Nuclide Energy Old Area New Area Critical Level New Activity % Error (uCi)NP-237 86.50 86.1 -3.8 60.6 0.000E400 0.00 86.50 Line invalidated: New Area less than critical level NP-237 has been rejected: Failed abundance Test PB-214 87.30. 86.1 -3.8 60.6 0.OOE+00 0.00 87.30 Line invalidated: New Area less than critical level PB-214 has been rejected: Failed abundance Test CD-109 88.03 86.1 -3.8 60.6 0.OOOE+00 0.00 88.03 Line invalidated: New Area less than critical level CD-109 has been rejected: Failed abundance Test HPSTID-1O-003 Page 22 of 70 REPORT NAIME : QACHECK (V9.1) PAGE REPORT DATE : 25-AUG-2009 11:58 REQUESTOR

HPTECH FPL-E SEABROOK STATIONýPOST NID QA ANALYSIS TITLE Ul -FREE RELEASE SOIL SMPL-A GOB SOUTH DIRT. PILE O/SPA ZT&_-_7 8 SAMPLE No.SAMPLE TYPE COUNT TIME SAMPLE TIME LIBRARY 0908252007 OPERATOR NAME : CAS SOLIDS SAMPLE GEOMETRY : 4LGM 25-AUG-2009 1140:44 SAMPLE-QUANTITY
1.00000E+00 25-AUG-2009 11:38:00 DETECTOR DETECTOR 8*FREE RELEASE PEAK ENERGY ENERGY DIFF (KEV),ISOTOPE K-40 PB-212 RA-226 AC-228 ANN-511 1460.80 238.63 186.21 105.00 511.01 0.02 0.05 0.31 0.00 0.05 DECAY CORR uCi/8.720E-02 3.948E-03 1.132E-02 4.275E-03 0. 000E+00 COMMENTS QA Results OK QA Results OK QA Results OK* Key Line Not Found QA Results OK AVG ENERGY DIFF =0.09 1.067E-01

= TOTAL GAMMA ACTIVITY 1.067E-01 = Total NP Activity A (.UNIDENTIFIED/REJECTED PEAKS GAMMA/SEC ENERGY NET AREA FWHM GAMMA/SEC /POTENTIAL ID% ERROR FLAG ACTIVITY 93.20 125. 1.17 1.447E+0! 1.447E+01 34.5 "R BA-131 6.114 E-02 R TH-234, 1.438E-02 241.45 124. 1.05 1.369E+01 1.369E+01 17.7 R SR-92 1.293E-02 R TE-131M 4.897E-03 S14.941E-03 295.26 205. 1.10 2.672E+01 2.672E+01 10.1 R --14 3.761E-03 352.01 329. 1.16 5.060E+01 5.060E+01 8.60 R PB-214 3.676E-03 609.21 264. 1.22 6.706E+01 6.706E+01 8.08-. R BI-214 5 5.678E-03 665.41 19. 1.34 5.317E+00 5.317E+00 58.0 R SB-126 1.443E-04 R TE-131M 3.325E-03 R: TE-134 1.434E-02 R CE-143 2.774E-03 R I 1.328E-02 727.61 43. 0.75 1.2675+01 1.267E+01 28.8 R 1"132' 6.701E-03 R 1-132 3.2905-02 R BI-212 3.289E-03 733'.51 14. 0.89 4.170E+00.4.170E+00 .54.6 R PA- 34 1.281E-03 861.18 34. 0.90 1.143E+01 1.143E+/-01 36.5 .R TL-208 9E HPSTID-10-003 REPORT NAME QACHECK (V9.1)REPORT DATE : 25-AUG-2009 11:58 REQUESTOR

HPTECH FPL-E SEABROOK STATION POST NID QA ANALYSIS UNIDENTIFIED/REJECTED PEAKS Page 23 of 70 e PAGE GAMMA/SEC ENERGY NET AREA FW}IM GAMMA/SEC

/% ERROR FLAG POTENTIAL ID ACTIVITY 1120.59 65. 1.78 2.669E+/-0l 2.669E+61 25.4 R 4-4-RT1 -;4 (RBI-214)36.0 15.1 7.214E-04 2. 061E-03 6.929E-03 6.410E-02 6. 652E-03 1239.47 1764.37 47. 4.49 2.094E+01 2.094E+01 44. 2.11 2.681E+01 2.68iE+01 Total Unidentified/Rejected Peaks = 13%Unidentified/Rejected Peaks = 44.83 Flags: U -Unknown Line*R -Rejected During Analysis P Positively Identified (line not in analysis library)C/ ./ / ;TECH REVIEW : -< i SUPERVISOR REVIEW: DATE

  • JiJ"i (2 DATE: /,26**** End Of Report (.WWW*

HPSTID-1O-003 Page 24 of 70***********

25-AUG-2009 12:00:24.86 , FPL-ENERGY SEABROOK STATION SAMPLE. TITLE : U -FREE RELEASE SOIL SMPL-B GOB SOUTH 0/S PA! ( J FILE IDENT : CAS$DISK: [SNS.SAMPLE.RP.NEW]0908252008.CNF;I SAMPLE ID : 0908252008

  • OPERATOR : CAS SAMPLE TIME 25-AUG-2009.

11:42

  • SAMPLE GEOMETRY : 4LGM SHELF HEIGHT 40.*EFFICIENCY FILE :4LGM0 SAMPLE TYPE SOLIDS
  • SAMPLE QUANTITY 1.oooo0E+00

,.*,** ** * ** ** **** * ** *.** * ******* *** * *** *** ** ** *** ** ** ** * **** ** ** ** * * **** * ***ACQ DATE & TIME : 25-AUG-2009 11:42

  • DEADTIME (%) : 0.1%PRESET LIVE TIME : 0 00:16:40
  • SENSITIVITY
  • 4.00000 ELASPED REAL TIME : 0 00:16:40
  • GAUSSIAN'SEN
10.00000 ELAPSED LIVE TIME : 0 00:16:40
  • NBR ITERATIONS
10.DETECTOR : DETECTOR 9
  • LIBRARY : FREE RELEASE'EFFIC CAL DATE : 18-SEP-2001 13:07
  • EFFIC CERT DATE : 18-SEP-2001 13:07 DCAL DATE & TIME : 24-AUG-2009 16:00-
  • ENERGY TOLER : 1.00 KEV/CFIAN
4.99045E-01
  • HALF LIFE RATIO 8.00000.OFFSET : -4.79887E-01 keV *.ABUNDANCE LIMIT .: 70.0%Q COEFFICIENT

.: 3.30795E-07, * .CORRECTION FACTOR : 1.00000E+00 START CHAN : 3

  • PEAK-END CHAN : 4096_*** ****************
                • *********************************

ANALYSES : PEAK V16.9 NID V3.4 MINACT V2.8 WTMEAN V1.8 COUNTED ON : NHY4 COLLECTED BY : P. COMEAU COUNTED BY : CAS* * ***** ************************************************************************"Post-NID Peak Search Report (It Energy 2 74.74 2 76.93 0 .86.98 Area Bkgnd FWHM Channel Left Pw %Err Fit Nuclides 327 594 201 192 301 113 864 -1.02 150.72 850 1.03 155.09 891 1.22 175.23 0 0 0 92.62 185.74 209.67 1234 893.668 1.52 186.54 1.60 .373.05 0.94 .420.98 143 17 15.5 2.82E+00 PB-212.PB--214 143 17 9.0 ,B-2...2 PB-.212.V 173 6 24.5 .183 8 32.5 z3q 368 11 20.1 RA-226 416 9 42.5 A2-- 2S-', 4 74i 9 15.8- rl1 rnn171A 474 9 ' 4.4 PB-212 483 7 20.8 PB-214 537 11 29.1 RA-223/_-2 238.39~ 241.82 W270.26 1159 187 142 526 464 417.1.23 478.49 1.47 485.38 2.01 542.32-- uDcTI -In Alfl '. Pano e nf270 llr+ i i+- ig-v++ i Post-NTID Peak Search Report (continued) Page 25-AUG-2009 11:42:38 W mple ID It Energy 0908252008 Acquisition date : Area Bkgnd FWHM Channel Left Pw %Err Fit Nuclides 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4.4 0 0 295.02 299.85 338 *1 351.65 408.23 462.37 510. 59 582.81 608.79 719 .68 726.79 767.01 794.13 860.11 910.35 933.31 967. 98 1119.35 1237 .27 1376.29 1441.46 1459.70 1542. 54 1586.88 1591. 63 1619.52 1623 .13 1729.25 1763 .73 469 72 291 883 81 82 204 464 730 34 ill 90 61 52 344 66 164 203 86 48 11 1941 12 40 22 11 14 22 126 494 296 345 285.224 165 174 147-105 60 85 89 87 89 54 76 189 83 75 20 13 19 4 10 7.0 3 14 19 1.47 0.73 1.46 1.50 3.30 1.03 1.55 1 45 1.53 1 .77 2 .04 1.28 0.81 2 .05 1.80 1 .47 0 .97 1 .98.1. 97 2 .34 1.81 1. 97 1. 16 2.22 1.15 1. 99 1.99 1.25 1.81 591.91 601.58 678 .17 705.27 818.54 926.90 1023.39 1167. 90 1219.89 1441.69 1455.92 1536.35 1590 .57 1722.51 1822 .95 1868. 83 1938.13 2240.62 2476.16 2753 .78 2883.88 2920.29 3085.63 3174.12 3183.58 3239.25 3246.45 3458.15 3526.93 584 598 673 699 812 921 S101&.1161 1213 143ý7 1451 1530 1583 1717 1817 1863 1928 2234.2471 2747 2877 2911 3081 3167 3180 3237 3237 3452 3519 14 8 13 12 13 12 13 14 14 9 9 12 12 11 13 14 17 15 12 13.9 20 8 13 9 14 14 10 15 11.1 43 .1 14.4 5.1 39.9 33.3 15. 2 7.3 4.8 44. 8 17. 8 23. 6 33.3 37.8 7.0 30.6 21. 2 12. 0 22. 9 24. 0 66. 5 2.3 40.8 22.5 30.5 26.3 32.2 38. 5 11. 6 PB-214 PB-212 qC- zz&/PB-214 T-'lr- ANN-511 DI-214 B1-214 D1-214 7.21R-Ol qiz"NJ 7.2214-0 BI-214 BI-214 REPORT NAME: QA CHECK (V9.1)REPORT DATE : 25-AUG-2009 12:00 REQUESTOR

HPTECH H PSTID-'1O-003 Page 26 of 70 PAGE _Cý-- -78 (FPL-E SEABROOK.STATION POST NID QA ANALYSIS TITLE : U1 -FREE RELEASE SOIL SMPL-B GOB SOUTH 0/S PA SAMPLE No.SAMPLE TYPE COUNT TIME SAMPLE TIME LIBRARY 0908252008 OPERATOR NAME SOLIDS SAMPLE GEOMETRY 25-AUG-2009 11:42:38 SAMPLE QUANTITY 25-AUG-2009 11:42:00 DETECTOR FREE RELEASE.CAS 4LGM: 1.00000E+00
DETECTOR 9 PEAK ENERGY ISOTOPE ENERGY DIFF (KEV)DECAY CORR uCi/COMMENTS PB-212 238.63 0.24 4.686E-03 QA Results OK BI-214 609.31 0.52 7.395E-03 QA Results OK PB-214 351.92 0.27 5.228E-03 QA Results OK RA-223 98.23 0.00 1.998E-03
  • Key Line Not Found RA-226 186-.21 0.48 1.459E-02 QA Results OK ANN-511 511.01 0.42 0.OOOE+00 QA Results OK AVG ENERGY DIFF =0.07 3.703E-02

= TOTAL GAMMA ACTIVITY 3.390E-02 = Total NP Activity 3.139E-03 = Total AP Activity (74.74 KeV Peak was used in identifying 2 isotopes 76.93 KeV Peak was used in identifying 2 isotopes 86.98 KeV Peak was used in identifying 3 isotopes UNIDENTIFIED/REJECTED PEAKS GAMMA/SEC ENERGY NET AREA ,FWH-M GAMMA/SEC /POTENTIAL ID% ERROR FLAG ACTIVITY 92.62 192. 1.52 .183E+0 1.183E1 32.5 .. BR- 2 .E2 R2 3A19 4.99712 02 6 TH-34 1.175B-02. 209.67 113. 0.94 6.987E+00 6-.987E+00 42.5 -r--C V-- .-4Q A 4.292E-03---R- N23 5.-3~-9E--0-3-- 338.11 291. 1.46 2.367E+01 2.367E+01 14.4 R AC22 5613E-03 , 408.23 81. 3.30 7.441E+00 '7.441E+00 39.9 _ T _ E 3 0.OOOE+00 R xE-135 --&E-R-e p 462.37 0 82. 1.03 8.276E+0 .8.276E+00 33.3 IZ es IBBh a.233E~~2 I., REPORT NAME : QACHECK (V9.1)REPORT DATE 25-AUG-2009 12:00 REQUESTOR .HPTECH-HPSTID-10-003 .Page 27 of 70 E2 PAGE 2 _-78 FPL-E SEABROOK STATION POST NID QA ANALYSIS UNIDENTIFIED/REJECTED PEAKS ENERGY NET AREA 582.81 464.719.68 34..726.79 1il.767.01 90.794.13 61.860.11 52.910.35 344.(3967.98 164.j76.29 48.-441.46 I!.1459.70 1941..1542.54 12.1586.88 40.1591.63 22.1619.52 11.1623.13 14.GAMMA/SEC FWHM GAMMA/SEC /.1.45 5.521E+01 5.521E+01 1.77 4.726E+00 4.726E+00 2.04 1.554E÷.01 1.554E+01 1.28 1.310E+01 1.310E+01 0.81 9.129E+00 9.129E+00 2.05 8.341E+00 8.341E+00 1.80 5.732E+01 5.732E+01 POTENTIAL ID% ERROR FLAG ACTIVITY S.5.084E-03 7.27 -R TL 208 1.961E-03 R 1.066E+00 44.8 R SB-126 2.375E-04 Ti'17.8 2-2 @.1E 0A3n BI-212- 3.938E-03 23.6 R -9.703E-03 >V x 0 .97 2.34 1.81 1.97 1.16 2 .22 1.15 1 .99 1.99 2.864E+01 2.864E+01 1. 081E+01 2. 605E+00 4.600E+02 4 2.950E+00 1.006E+01 5.461E+00 2. 724E +00 3. 457E+00 1.081E+01 2. 605E+00 600E+02 2. 950E+00 1. 006E+01 5.461E+00 2.724E+00 3.457E+001%nl fl-EL Circle energy of unidentified peaks which have no potential ID listed on post NID QA Report Ensure all peaks are positively identified. Reasons to suspect: Isotope not normally in mix Sample containeror detector cave contaminated Excessively wide peak (FWHM >2.5)Isotope t/12 too short Line out the isotopes on each report that are rejected based on evaluation Review unidentifiod I rejlctod peaks and determine probable isotope foreach peak Circle probable Isotope foreach peak Write In probable isotope on Post NID Search Report There Is no indication of Licensed Radioactive Material RPTechniciain Verification: I Matt ScannellI I Dennis Hickeyl RP Supervisor Verification: Comments:

== Description:==

Free Release of Rock Pile Debris Dose received = Omrem MDA = N/A Summary of Highest Readings (All available values may not be listedi Smears I Air Samples & Wipes Type: Routine SmoLeend jfor examp oly~) RWP#: 10-001 I , s~fate HS-50 H ptReactor Power= 100%.15Oi Contact R~eading RICA Posting!+71 m0 r Reading 20 i. General Area Drip Bag O JmarA~r Samuple *RM g3Wip e Type: Routine Unless otherwise noted, dose rates in mR/hr.-+ 4 F id Surveyor: Bird. Ammie Status: ADncroved by: Rimbaud. D. 03/15/2010 ,cation Code: Routine Bldo/Area Name: Daily Location

Description:

HSYD-999 ASB-21-AB158 Image File: HSYD999B Page 2 of 33 Survey #: M-20100311-7 -PDF Generated On: 03/24/2010 12:39 Seab rookVSDS HPSTID-10-003 Page 34 of 70 Comments: ple Desc.Pile Sample 1 k Pile Sample 2 Rock Pile Sample 3 Rock Pile Sample 4 Rock Pile Sample.5 Rock Pile Sample 6 Location (GPS Coord)19T 0348467 / 4750288 19T 0348440/4750381 19T 0348444 /4750434 19T 0348348/4750414 19T 0348372 / 4750342 19T 0348401 /4750309//K Survey #: M-20100311-7 -PDF Generated On: 03124/2010,12:39 Page.3 of 33 4.a HPSTID-10-'003 Page 35 of 70 SeabrooktVSDS Attachments der Filename iDescription Pages 1 M-20100311-7.pdf 29.Survey #: M-20100311-7 -PDF Generated On: 03/2412010 12:39 Page 4 of 33 Seabrook VSDS HPSTID-10-003 Page 36 of 70 I ý '-ý- ýRoutine I HSYD-999 AS8-21-AB158 I Daily Survey#: M-20100311-7 DatelTime: 03/11Y2010 11:27 The sample(s) listed were counted on gamma spectroscopy detectors(s) Sample(s) were analyzed I.AW. HD0958.32 and J80999.002 Sampl1e Descrilfotio Sp~ectrum Number 1. jq~ -pii amplI f~OfD R~ock Pile Sape 5 ~-1 f0OD ,JOctk Pile SWmple"G 6 0-2 4000-202 Gamma Spec Review List l Verify sample parameters correct: Sample Title Sample Date and Time Sample Identification Number Sample Geometry Elapsed Time Shelf Height Sample Size (Including Unifa)Detector Number Aquisition Date and Time Dead Time (Should not exceed 15%)Investigate Dead Time >1 %El El so Circle energy of vrirdentified peaks which have no potential ID listed on poet NID OQA Report Ensure all peaks are positively Identified. Reasons to suspect: Isotope not normally in mix Sample confaineror detector cave conta minated Excessively wide peak (FWHM >2.5)Isotope t112 too short Line out the Isotopes on each repoit that are rejected based on evaluation Review unidentifled I roeoctod peaks and determine probable Isotope foreaeh peak Circle probable Isotope foreach peak Write in probable Isotope on Post NID Search Report El-EL1 There is no indication of Licensed Radioactive Material RPTechnlioin Verification: Matt S Icannell.IDannis Hickeyj RP SupervIsorVerification: Comments:

== Description:==

Free Release of Rock Pile Debris Dose received = Omrem MDA = NIA.SurW6f~Hlg Type: Routine ni) RWP #: 10-001-i Reactor Power = 100%+7 4-eg A ..vk Wss otherwise noted, dose rates In mR/hr.' Surveyor: Bird, Ammie Status: Ready for Review by: Bird, Ammie, 03/111/2010 Location Code: Routine Bldg/Area Name: Daily Location

Description:

HSYD-999 ASB-21-AB158.Image File: HSYD999B Page 2 of 3 Survey,#: M-20100311-7 -Printed On: 0311.1/2010 14:38 SearokVDSHPSTID-10-003 Page 37 of 70,..General Information Survey M-20100311-7 Til Free Release of Rock Pile Debris SuvyDoeTme0/f10011:27 d SuveyrBd, Amie.... .. ..... .... .... ............. ....... .-rvey; Jype 'ýRoutineWokOdrhs#101 R... .1001...... eady for Review by: Bird, Amimie, 0311112010 eDatsose rfie Rates__________ ___________ Prefiult ;Suf H Hot~b'6bC' Neutron FPostings Legen There 1re nopstinsi thsws rIn's t*ruments: sed Instrument Instrument Inst Probe Probe Probe Calibration 7#.Serial # Type Model Serial # Type Date/Time 1 Gamma Spec n/a C internal Internal C 101101/2099 .............. ...0..0 .... ... ..... ... ...... ...'. .Survey ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ .........7 rntdO: 31/21 1:6PgeIo HPSTID-O0-003 Page 38.f0 3 of 8-MAR72010 21:00:22.46 FPL- ENERGY SEABROOK STATION.******W********W****W***************

          • SAMPLE TITLE Ul -ROCK PILE SAMPLE: 1 FILE IDENT : CAS$DISK:

[SNS.SAMPLE.RP.NEW]1003082007.CNF;.1 SAMPLE ID : 1003082007

  • OPERATOR : CAS SAMPLE TIME 8-MAR-2010 13:45:
  • SAMPLE GEOMETRY 4LGM* SHELF HEIGHT : 0* EFFICIENCY FILE.: 4LGM0 SAMPLE TYPE :SOLIDS
  • SAMPLE QUANTITY:

1.00000E+00 ACQ DATE & TIME : 8-MAR'2010 20:42:

  • DEADTIME*(%)
0.1%PRESET LIVE TIME : 0 00:16:40
  • SENSITIVITY
4.00000 ELASPED REAL TIME : 0 00:16:40
  • GAUSSIAN SEN 1: 0.00000 ELAPSED LIVE TIME : 0 00:16:40
  • NBR ITERATIONS
10 DETECTOR : DETECTOR 9
  • LIBRARY .FREE RELEASE EFFIC CAL DATE : 18-SEP-2001 13:07
  • EFFIC CERT DATE : 18-SEP-20(01 13:07 DCAL DATE & TIME : 8-MAR-2010 17:40:
  • ENERGY TOLER : 1.00 KEV/CHAN : 5.00070E701
  • HALF LIFE RATIO : 8.00000 OFFSET : -3.46041E--01 keV
  • ABUNDANCE LIMIT : 70.0%O. EFFICIENT
7.67799E-08
  • -CORRECTION FACTOR : 1.OOOOOE+00 START CHAN : 3
  • PEAK END CHAN : 4096 ANALYSES PEAK V16.9 NID V3.4 MINACT V2.8 WTMEAN V1.8** ***************************
  • COUNTED ON : NHY4 COLLECTED BY : F HANNIFY COUNTED BY : CAS
    • .******Post-NID Peak Search Report It Energy Area Bkgnd FWHM Channel Left Pw %Err Fit Nuclides 3 74.86 308 642 1.04 150.38' 145 14 14.1 1.74E800 PB-212 PB-214 3 77.24 381 607 1.04 155.14 145 14 11.6 PB-214 PB-212 4 89.91 134 392 1.06 180.48 178 -12 22.4 3.45E+00 AC-228 4 92.60 211 583 1.07 185.85 178 12 19.5 r-/ -L3 0 186.00 216 650 1.03 372.61 367 12 24.6 RA-226 0 209.31 139 471 1.61 419.22 414 11 31.7 AC-228 01 3 236.58 76 181 1.24 473.74 471 23 28.6 1. 79E+00 NB"95M-- I0V 3 238.68 1083 240 1.24 477.95 471 23 3.9 PB-212 ' 5P'a" 3 241.83 231 221 1.25 484.25 471 23 13.0 PB-214 0 270.51 107 263 0.99 541.59 537 9.29.1 AC-228 295.24 381 205 1.14 591.03 586 11 8.9 PB-214 299.94 114 20.5 1.47 .600.44 597 11 26.1 PB-212 A /,,Y,° HPSTID-10-003 Page 39 of 70 Page : ---Post-NID Peak Search Report (continued)

(0 ample ID It Energy 1003082007 Acquisition date :.8-MAR-2010 20:42:17 Area Bkgnd FWHM Channel Left Pw %Err Fit Nuclides 0.0" 0 0 0 0 0 2 2 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 00.338..71 352.05 463 .23 510.82 583 .22 609.11 727. 30 768 .12 772 .08.795.10 911 .08 964 6560 1028.86 1120.91 1239.01 1351.07 1377.41 1460,85 1509.82 1587 .63 1630.68 1729.72 1764.62 250 557 69 153 393 524 91 42 37 70 329 61 162 23 92 51 23 34 153.4 14 20 18 21 85 270 251 104 146 143 65 58 52 A 2 47 24 28 37 24 90 48 22 13 17 11 7 7 2 9 1.23 1.27 1.16 1.93 1.52 1 .65 1 .54 1.62 1 .62 2.31 1.53 1.72 1 .72 3 .34 1 .75 1 .22 1 .58 1.27 2.19 0 .62 0 .92 0. 78 0.67 2.06 677.94 704.63 926.89 1.022.04 1166 .76 1218.52 1454.76 1536.35 1544.27 1590.29 1822 .08 1929.14 1937. 04 2057.48 2241.43 2477.41 2701,32 2753.97 2920.67 3018.50 3173.95 3259.96'3457. 82-3527.53 671 699 923 1014 1159 1210 1449 1530 1530 1585 1814 1922 192.2 2051 2232 2471 2694 2748 2912 3012 3168 3252 3451 3519 14 13 9 i7 17 14 22 22 22 12 14 22 22 12 19 13 13 13 18 11 11 13 11 17 15.5 7.2 29.4 19.8 8.6 5.5 19 2 36.7 39.5 23. 1 6.4 22.7 10.9 47.4 27.3 32. 0 47. 6 27. 9 2.6 53. 1 35 7 36.8 26.5 13.4 AC-228 PB-214 AC-228 *ANN-511 AC-228 1.41E+00.AC-228 AC-228 AC-228 1.21E+00 AC-228 AC -228 :eF qi?- a/(-/4 --,, ,,I)K-40 AC-228 AC-228 AC-228~zf'C2 HPSTID-10-003 Page 40 of 70 PAGE .1 F REPORT NAME QACHECK (V9.1)REPQRT DATE 8-MAR-2010 21:00 REQUESTOR HPTECH/(FPL-E SEABROOK STATION POST NIb QA ANALYSIS TITLE UT -. ROCK PILE SAMPLE I SAMPLE No..-SAMPLE TYPE COUNT TIME SAMPLE TIME LIBRARY 1003082007 SOLIDS 8-MAR-2010 20:42:17.8-MAR-2010 13:45:00.FREE RELEASE OPERATOR NAME CAS SAMPLE GEOMETRY 4LGM SAMPLE QUANTITY 1.00000Et00 DETECTOR DETECTOR 9 PEAK ENERGY ISOTOPE ENERGY DIFF (KEV)DECAY CORR uCi/COMMENTS K-40 1460.80 -0.05 -9.213E-02 QAResults OKpt'95M-5_ -0.9 PB-212 238.63 -0.06 6.924E-03 QA Results OK PB-214 351.92 -0.13 3.728E-03 QA Results OK RA-226 186.21 0.22 1.046E-02 QA Results OK AC-228 105.00 0.00 5.165E-03

  • Key Line No t Found ANN-511 511.01 0.19 0.OOOE+00 QA Results OK AVG ENERGY DIFF = -0.10 1.190E-01

= TOTAL GAMMA ACTIVITY 1.184E-01 = Total NP Activity 5,678E-04 = Total AP Activity 74.86 KeV Peak was used in-identifying 2 isotopes 77.24 KeV Peak was used in identifying 2 isotopes UNIDENTIFIED/REJECTED PEAKS GAMMA/SEC ENERGY NET AREA FWHM GAMMA/SEC-/ POTENTIAL ID% ERROR FLAG ACTIVITY 92.60-609.11 727,.30 768.12 1028.86 1120.91.9.01 211. 1.07 1.298E+01 1.298E+01 524. 1.65 6.443E+01 6.443E+01 91. 1.54 1.279E+01 1.279E+01 42. 1.62 6.099E+00 6.099E+00 19.5 R BR-82 5.599E-02 R BAý131 5.576E-02 R TH-23 30-2 5 .'4 7 wm- 1t- Z --1 ! £ 0 3.761E-03" 19.2 R 1-132 5.429E-02-3..822E-:01 36.,7 .B. TE-134 -6 365E-01.I. -3.271E-03 -47.4 R PA-234 '1.437E-02 27.3 R SC-46 4.890E-04-R TA-182 1.396E-03 214 3.230E".03 32.0 R _.C0-4.367E-04 23. 3.34 92. 1.75 4.216E+00 4.216E+00 1.805E+01 1.805E+01 51. 1.22 1.080E+01 1.080E+01 HPSTID-10-003 Page 41 of 70 PAGE F'__F REPORT NAME REPORT'DATE REQUESTOR QACHECK (V9.1)8-MAR-2010 21:00 HPTECH"FPL-E SEABROOK STATION POST NID. QA ANALYSIS UNIDENTIFIED/REJECTED PEAKS ENERGY 1351.07 1377.41 1509.82 1729.72 1764.62 GA-IRRA/SEC I % ERROR FLAG POTENTIAL ID NET AREA FWHM GAMMA/SEC ACTIVITY 23..34.14.21.85.1.58 1.27 0.62 0.67 2.06 5.151E+00 5.151E+00 7.706E+00 7.706E+00 3.394E+00 3.394E+00 5.494E+00 5.494E+00 2.252E+01 2.252E+01 47.6 27.9 53.1 ,26.15.[13.4 R2:1-24-- .4.913E-03* 1lV 1 d~119 2-01 R BI-21 ,'5.067E-03 ./ BI-214 4.132E-03 R BI-214 5.000E-03" BI-214 3.852E-03 Total Unidentified/Rejected Peaks.= 12% Unidentified/Rejected Peaks = 33.33 Flags: U -Unknown Line*R -Rejected During Analysis P -Positively Identified (line not in analysis library)COMMENTS: Aj5i /'-V li *. /4-, I4tC -tX/-C,- if , 0 V TECH REVIEW DATE : j // //SUPERVISOR REVIEW: DATE .:__/ /__**** End Of Report ( 2 Pages ) .***-* HPSTID-1O-003. Page42of 70 ' i -/9 ' 8-MAR-2010 21:01:36.29 FPL-ENERGY SEABROOK STATION SAMPLE TITLE : Ul -ROCK PILE SAMPLE 2 FILE IDENT : CAS$DISK: [SNS.SAMPLE.RP.NEW]1003082008.CNF;I SAMPLE ID : 1003082008

  • OPERATOR : CAS SAMPLE TIME : 8-MAR-2010 13:49.:
  • SAMPLE GEOMETRY : 4LGM* SHELF HEIGHT : 0* EFFICIENCY FILE : 4LGMO SAMPLE TYPE : SOLIDS
  • SAMPLE QUANTITY : i.00000E+00 ACQ DATE &.TIME :.8-MAR-2010 20:43:
  • DEADTIME M(%) 0.0%PRESET LIVE TIME : 0 00:16:40
  • SENSITIVITY
4.00000 ELASPED REAL TIME 0 00:16:40
  • GAUSSIAN SEN : 10,00000 ELAPSED LIVE TIME : 0 00:16:40
  • NBR ITERATIONS, : 10*********

DETECTOR DETECTOR 8

  • LIBRARY .FREE RELEASE EFFIC CAL DATE : 26-JAN-2008 01:16
  • EFFIC CERT DATE : 26-JTAN-2008 01:16 DCAL DATE & TIME : 8-MAR-2010 17:03:
  • ENERGY TOLER : 1.00 KEV/CHAN ' 4.99793E-01
  • HALF LIFE RATIO : 8.00000 OFFSET : -3.10638E-01 keV
  • ABUNDANCE LIMIT : 70.0%0OEFFICIENT
9.34095E-08
  • CORRECTION FACTOR :1.OOOOOE+00 K START CHAN : 3
  • PEAK END CHAN .4096 ANALYSES : PEAK V16.9 NID V3.4 MINACT V2.8 WTMEAN V1.8*** ***** ************
          • ** **********
    • ****** * *********
  • ***********

COUNTED ON NHY4 COLLECTED BY : F. HANIFFY COUNTED BY : CAS Post-NID Peak Search Report.It Energy 2 74.78 2 77.16 Area Bkgnd FWHM Channel Left Pw %Err Fit Nuclides 0 0 0 2 2 2 0 0 93.93 185.94 209.02 238.63 240.82 241.96 270.06 295.34 300.28 328.23 120.234 149 135 92 798 107 135 127 185 39 30 889 332 362 152 119 109 187 129 118 93.309 0.89 150.23 289 0.90 155.00 147 13 23.8 1.21E+00 PB-212 PB-214 147 13 12-.9' PB-214 PB-212 11 182 14 43.5 -?-/ý-, -kýxo.1.34 1.40 2.57 1.04 1.05 1.05 1.42, 1.08 1.09 1.57 188.54 372.62 418.80 478.03 482.42 484.70 540.91 591.47 601.37T 657.26 414 474 474'474 536 587 587 654 11 16 16 16 13 18 18 7 41.6 4.3 24.8 17.1 23.7 12.4 48.3 56.5 AC-228 2.40E+00 PB-212 PB -214 AC-228 1.74E+00 PB-214 PB-212 AC-228 HPSTID-10-003 Page 43 of 70 age: 20:43:38 Post-NID,,Peak Search Report (continued) ,(ample ID : 1003082008 8-MAR-2010 Acquisition date :.It Energy Area, Bkgnd FWHM Channel Left Pw %Err 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 338.34 351 .93 464 .13 510.94 583 .13 609.28'727. 42 795. 13 860.91 911.23 964.39 969.00 1120.58 1460.71 1764.25 136 342 24 117 250 227 46 38 43 151 1 43 106 49 619 37 103 1.01 64 77 53 39 23 21 16 41 20 18 33 9 3 1 .02 1.14 1 .22.1.23 1 .43 1.27 1.09 1.25 2 .59 1.78 1.73 1.32 1.24 1.55 0.67 677.49 704 .69 929.09 1022 .74 1167 .12 1219 .40 1455.68 1591 .06 1722. 59 1823 .22 1929.51 1938.7-3 2241.76 2921.65 3528.26 674 699 923 1017 1161 1216 1451 1586 1717 1816'1925 1934 2235 2913 3523 9 15.9 13 8.2 8 61.6 13 18.1 11 8.4 9 8.2 11 24.5 12 29.3 12 24.7 17 12.8 10 24.7 10 12.2 13 28.2 18 4.2 11 18.4 Fit Nuclides AC-228 PB-214 ANN-511 AC-228 AC-228 AC-228 AC-228 AC-228 K- 4'.0 PSTID-10-003 Page 44 of 70.PAGE 1A __REPORT NAME QACHECK (V9.1)REPORT DATE 8-MAR-2010 21:01 REQUESTOR

HPTECH/FPL-E SEABROOK STATION POST NID QA ANALYSIS TITLE Ul ROCK PILESAMPLE 2 SAMPLE No. : 1003082008 SAMPLE TYPE-: SOLIDS COUNT TIME 8-MAR-2010 20:43:38.SAMPLE TIME : 8-MAR-2010 13:49:00.LIBRARY : FREE RELEASE*OPERATOR NAME SAMPLE GEOMETRY SAMPLE QUANTITY DETECTOR: CAS:4LGM* 1.00000E+00
  • DETECTOR 8 PEAK ENERGY DECAY CORR ISOTOPE ENERGY DIFF (KEV) uCi/COMMENTS K-40 PB-212 PB-214 RA-226 AC-228 ANN-511 1460.80 238. 63 351. 92 186.21 105.00'511. 01 0.09 0.00-0.01 0.27 0.00 0.07 0.07 7.990E-02 QA Results OK 8.318E-03 QA Results OK 3.785E-03 QA Results OK 1.036E-02 QA Results OK 5.506E-03
  • Key Line Not Found 0.OOOE+00 QA Results OK.1.079E-01

= TOTAL GAMMA ACTIVITY 1.079E-01 = Total NP Activity AVG ENERGY DIFF =74.78 KeV Peak was used in identifying 2 isotopes 77.16 KeV Peak was used in identifying 2 isotopes UNIDENTIFIED/REJECTED PEAKS GAMMA/SEC/.ENERGY NET AREA FWHM GAMMA/SEC POTENTIAL ID ACTIVITY% ERROR FLAG.93.93 .149. 1.34 1.711E+01 1.711E+01 43.5 R =-RA-2-341 ('10 3.454E-03 4z / -R 2 970E-03 240.82 107. 1.05 1.101 1. 1 74E+0 24.8 R S*R M, 417E-02"" PEA-14-_R. TIEB-rn M3"IM4 .920E-03 464.13 24. 1.22 4.806E+00 4.806E+00 61.6 R 4-B-4-2-59-) l.255E-03R T-3-4(P 2.824E+00 R 1.-L--6-9 9 1.345E-04 609.28 227 1.27 5.768E+01 5.768E+01 8.21 R 2 T 4-3,367E-03 727.42 46. 1.09 1.367E+01 1.367E+01 24.5 R 1-132 5.725E-02 R B 3..962E-01 860.91 43. 2.59 1.448E+01 1.448E+01 24.7 R ý-20 3.974E-01 1120.58 49. 1.24 1.993E+01 1.993E+01 28.2 R SC-46 5.400E-04 R TA-182 1.542E-03'

  • -R 3.567E-03 ii4.25 37. 0.67 2.282E+01 2.282E+01.

18.4 R rhI-2i4"3.904E-03 W 3) h/10 HPSTID-10-003 Page 45 of 70 C REPORT NAME : QACHECK (V9.1)REPORT DATE : 8-MAR-2010 21:01 REQUESTOR

HPTECH PAGE FPL-E SEABROOK STATION POST NID QA ANALYSIS Total Unidentified/Rejected Peaks =. 8% Unidentified/Rejected Peaks = 29.63 Flags: U -Unknown Line R- Rejected During Analysis.P -Positively Identified-(line not in analysis library)7O M M EN T S : ,.k,. t ,-1l"T0.C TECH REVIEW " SUPERVISOR REVIEW:*** End Of Report D ATE D.ATE : 3 / it / /-2,Pes ) s HPSTID-10-003 Page 46 of 70 8-MAR-2010 22:02:58.53 FPL-ENERGY SEABROOK STATION SAMPLE TITLE : Ul ROCK PILE SASMPLE 3 FILE IDENT : CAS$DISK:

[SNS.SAMPLE.RP.NEW]1003082009.CNF;1. SAMPLE ID : 1003082009

  • OPERATOR : CAS SAMPLE TIME : 8-MAR-2010 13:56:
  • SAMPLE GEOMETRY : 4LGM*SHELF HEIGHT :0* EFFICIENCY FILE : 4LGM0 SAMPLE TYPE : SOLIDS
  • SAMPLE QUANTITY : 1.00000E+00 ACQ DATE & TIME : 8-MAR-2010 21:44:
  • DEADTIME (%) : 0.1%PRESET LIVE TIME : 0 00:16:40
  • SENSITIVITY
.4.00000 ELASPED.REAL TIME : 0 00:16:40
  • GAUSSIAN SEN : 10.00000 ELAPSED LIVE TIME : 0 00:16:40
  • NBR ITERATIONS
10****WWWWW**************W**********************WWW*W*W*WW*
      • WWWW*W*W*W*********

DETECTOR : DETECTOR 8

  • LIBRARY .FREE RELEASE EFFIC CAL DATE : 26-JAN-2008 01:16
  • EFFIC CERT DATE : 26-JAN-2008 01:16 DCAL DATE & TIME : 8-MAR-2010 17:03:
  • ENERGY TOLER : 1.00 -KEV/CHAN : 4.99793E-01
  • HALF LIFE RATIO : 8.00000 OFFSET *-3. 10638E-01 keV
  • ABUNDANCE LIMIT : 70.0%COEFFICIENT
9.34095E-08
  • CORRECTION FACTOR 1.OOOOOE+00 K START CHAN : 3
  • PEAK END CHAN : 4096.ANALYSES : PEAK V16.9 NID V3.4 MINACT V2.8 WTMEAN V1.8 INTERF V2.4 COUNTED ON : NHY4 COLLECTED BY : F HANIFFY COUNTED BY : CAS Post-NID Peak Search Report It Energy 2 74.84 2 ,77.,05 Area Bkgnd FWHM Channel Left Pw %Err Fit Nuclides 3 3 0 0 0 0 5 0 87.33 89.79 92.94 128.78 186.00 209.14 238.66 241.56 270.42 277.34 290 435 197 68 194 82 353 107 1273 227.109 57 595 0.89 .150.36 608 0.90 154.78 641 624 1024 818 932 512 318 270 319 230 0.91 0.91 1.47 0.79 1.11.1.20 1.004;1. 05 1.20 0. 72 175.34 180.26 186.58 258.28 372.74 419.04 478.09 483.90 541.63 555.48.146 13 14.0 1.27E+00 PB-212 PB-214 146 13 9.8 PB-214 PB-212 172 11 20.5 8.89E-01 PB-212 172 11 56.5 AC-228 183 8 29.4 .r4 )L(256 7 59.4 AC-228 367 13-18.6 RA-226 416 -8 38.0 AC-228 473 17 3.5 3.46E+00 PB-212 473 17 14.0 PB-214 538 9 31.i AC-228 554 6 44.0 TL-208 HPSTID-10-063 Page 47ofMOy Page Acquisition date -.8-MAR-2010 21-44:56 Poi.t-NID Peak Search Report (continued)

(, mple ID It Energy 1003082009 Area Bkgnd FWHM Channel Left Pw .%Err Fit Nuclides 3 3 0 0 0 0 0 295.27 299.92 327.96 338.54 352.00 463.25 510.17 0 583.29 0.0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 609.28 680 .90 727 .30 768.59 795.27*861 .07 899.68 911.20 964 .58 969.05 1120.30 1238.96 1460. 68 1501.32 1588.09 1592.69 1661.58 1729.94 1764.46 1848.38.421 99 67 283 741 79 126 362 478 23 63 47 76 64 23 282 57 137 93 132 1128 13 20 20 13 10 76 13 201 193 165 318 223 100 156 1.08 1.,09 1.72 1.30 1.09 1.31 1.10 591.35 600.65 656.73 677.90 704.81 927.34 1021.18 587 587 653 671 700 922 1015 22 22 7 14 11 9 12 105 1.46 1167.42 1163 12 7,8 7. 4 25.5 3.4 .1 14.7 5. 4 25.6 21.7 1.48E+00 101 40 7.9 79 69 59 37 52 37 38 73 8.8 19 5 4 11 2 9 7 6 1.30 0.97 1.56 1.29 1.89 1 .46 2.34 1.44 1.39 1.40 1.21 2 .47 1 .83 1. 39'1.85 0.96 1.32 1.44 2.48 1.82 1219.42 1362.63 1455.43 1538.00 1591.36 1722.92 1800. 12 1823..16 1929.88 1938 .81 2241.21 2478 .42 2921 .60 3002.82 3176.23 3185 .42 3323.10 3459.69 3528.68 3696.35 1213 1360 1451 1533 1586 1717 1796 1816 1924 1924 2235 2469 2914 2997 3172 3181 3320 3454 3522 3689 13.7 9 10 13 14 8 14 40 40 11 21 15 10 8.9 6 8 13 11 6.3 48.7 28.2 38.7 25.7 28.9 50. 0 8.1 22. 9 12. 0 20.7 20.2 3.1 41.6 28.0 37.4 32. 2 65.4 13. 5 44. 0 PB-214 PB-212 AC-228 AC-228 PB -2 14 AC -228 TL-208 " ANN-511 TIL-208 AC-228 AC-228 TL-208 AC-si 228&AC-228 AC-228 AC -228 K-40 AC-228 AC-228 TL-208 13, -ý04 1.86E+00 HPSTID-10-003 Page 48 of 70 Interference between PB-212 and CD-109**** PB-212 energy lines****Energy # Disint. % Error Comments 74.81 -------------- Line interferes with PB-214 77.11 -------------- Line interferes with PB-214.87.30 ---------------- Line interferes with CD-109 238.63 3.112E+05 3.54 300.09 3.856E+05 25.48-------------------------------- Average: 3.121E+05 3.51 Interfered energy lines Nuclide Energy Old Area New Area Critical Level New Activity % Error (uCi)NP-237 86.50 197.1 2.7 110.2 0.000E+00 0.00 86.50 Line invalidated: New Area less than critical level NP-237 has been rejected: Failed abundance Test PB-214 87.30 197.1 2.7 110.2 0.000E+00 0.00 87.30 Line invalidated: New Area less than critical level CD-109 88.03 197.1 2.7 110.2 0.000E+00 0.00 88.03 Line invalidated: New Area less than critical level CD-109 has been rejected: Failed abundahce Test ( HPSTID-10-003 Page 49 of 70 PAGE *REPORT NAME : QA CHECK (V9.1)REPORT DATE : 8-MAR-2010 22:03 REQUESTOR HPTECH FPL-E.SEABROOK STATION POST NID QA ANALYSIS TITLE :.U! -ROCK PILE SASMPLE 3, SAMPLE No.SAMPLE TYPE COUNT TIME SAMPLE TIME LIBRARY:.1003082009 SOLIDS 8-MAR-2010 21:44:56.8-MAR-20i0 13:56:00.FREE RELEASE OPERATOR NAME : CAS SAMPLE GEOMETRY : 4LGM'SAMPLE QUANTITY : 1.00000E+00 DETECTOR : DETECTOR 8 PEAK *ENERGY ISOTOPE ENERGY DIFF (KEV)K-40 TL-208 PB-212'PB-214 RA-226 AC-228 ANN-511 1460.80 583 .14 238.63 351.92 186.21 105.00 511.01 0 .12-0.15-0.03-0.08 0.21 0.00 0.84 DECAY CORR uCi/1.455E-01 7.540E-02 1.417E-02 8,135E-03 2.705E-02 9.231E-03 0.OOOE+00 QA Results OK QA Results OK QA Results OK QA Results OK QA Results OK*, Key Line Not Found QA Results OK COMMENTS AVG ENERGY DIFF =0.13 2.795E-01 = TOTAL GAMMA ACTIVITY 2.795E-01 = Total NP Activity 74.84 KeV Peak was used in identifying 77.05 KeV Peak was used in identifying 87.33 KeV Peak was used in identifying 510.17 KeV Peak was used in identifying 583.29 KeV Peak was used in identifying UNIDENTIFIED/REJECTED PEAKS 2 isotopes 2 isotopes 2 isotopes 2 isotopes 2 isotopes GAMMA/SEC ENERGY NET AREA FWHM GAMMA/SEC/ POTENTIAL ID ACTIVITY% ERROR FLAG 92.94 194. 1.47 2.262E+01 2.262E+01 609.28 680.90 727.30 768.59 899.68 1120.30 4.78.23.63.1.30 1.216E+02 1.216E+02 0.97 6.542E+'00 6.542E+00 1.56 1.869E+01 1.869E+01 29.4 R BR-82 9.925E-02 R BA-131 9.739E-02 R <T24 2 .269E-02*6.30 R fII-2 14) 7.099E-03 48.7 R 3 -546E-02 28.2 R 1-132 ' i.028E-01 R ci-2I1-2 1.00.9E+00 38.7 R c -2 1 7.698E-03R _A--3.4L 5 196E-03 20.7 R. SC-46 1.036E-03 R TA-182'. 2.956E-03 R 6.838E-03 47. 1.29 1.436E+01 1.436E+01 23. 2.34 7.998E+00 7.998E+00 93. .1.21 3.821E+01 3.821E+01 REPORT NAME : QACHECK (V9.1)* REPORT DATE : 8-MAR-2010 22:03 REQUESTOR HPTECH HPSTID-10-003 Page 50 of 70 i 7 PAGE FPL-E SEABROOK STATION POST. NID QA ANALYSIS UNIDENTIFIED/REJECTED PEAKS GAMMA/SEC ENERGY NET AREA FWHM GAMMA/SEC-/ POTENTIAL ID% ERROR FLAG 1238.96 1661.58 1729.94 1764.46 1848.38 132. 2.47 5.886E+01 5.886E+01 20.2 13.10.76.13.1.32 7.168E+00 7.168E+00 1.44 5.703E+00 5.703E+00 2.48 4.600E+01 4.600E+01 1.82 8.492E+00 8.492E+00 32.2 65.4 13 .5 44.0*R R BI-214 R 21- 2 14 R R B -24j ACTIVITY 2_.381E-03 2.678E-02 1.685E-02 5.190E-03 7.869E-03 1.098E-02 Total Unidentified/Rejected Peaks = 12% Unidentified/Rejected Peaks = 30.00.Flags: U -Unknown Line R -Rejected During Analysis P -Positively Identified (line not in analysis library)C TECH REVIEW DATE : 3' /_/ / 0'.DATE >: 5 /./( / /0 SUPERVISOR REVIEW:)WW i, HPSTID-10-003 Page 51 of 70 8-MAR-2010 22:04:12.39 (0 FPL- ENERGY SEABROOK STATION.**** **** ********************************* SAMPLE TITLE : Ul -ROCK PILE SAMPLE 4 FILE IDENT CAS$DISK: [SNS.SAMPLE.RP.NEW]1003082010.CNF;1 SAMPLE ID : 1003082010

  • OPERATOR : CAS SAMPLE TIME : 8-MAR*-2010 14:00:-
  • SAMPLE GEOMETRY : 4LGM* SHELF HEIGHT 0-* EFFICIENCY FILE-: 4LGMO SAMPLE TYPE : SOLIDS
  • SAMPLE QUANTITY : 1.00000E+00'
    • ***** ** *** *.** *** ****************
      • *** ******** *** *** *** ******* ** **** * **** ******ACQ DATE & TIME
  • 8-MAR-2010 21:46:
  • DEADTIME (%) : 0.1%PRESET LIVE TIME 0 00:16:40
  • SENSITIVITY 4.00000 ELASPED REAL TIME :'0 00:16:40
  • GAUSSIAN SEN 10.00000 ELAPSED:-LIVE'TIME
0 00:16:40
  • NBR ITERATIONS 10 DETECTOR : DETECTOR 9
  • LIBRARY FREE RELEASE EFFIC CAL DATE : 18-SEP-2001 13:07 *.EFFIC CERT DATE 18-SEP-2001 13:07 DCAL DATE &.TIME : 8-MAR-2010 17:40:
  • ENERGY TOLER : 1.00 KEV/CHAN : 5.00070E-01
  • HALF LIFE RATIO : 8.00000 OFFSET : -3.46041E-01 keV
  • ABUNDANCE LIMIT : 70.0%I COEFFICIENT
7.67799E-08
  • CORRECTION FACTOR : 1.OOOOOE+00START CHAN :3
  • PEAK END CHAN : 4096 ANALYSES : PEAK V16.9 NID V3.4 MINACT V2.8 WTMEAN V1.8 INTERF V2.4 COUNTED ON NHY4 COLLECTED BY : F. HANIFFY COUNTED BY : CAS*********************************************************************

Post-NID Peak Search Report 'it Energy 1 74.64 1 77.10 Area Bkgnd FWHM Channel Left Pw %Err Fit Nuclides 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 87 53 90. 07.93 .02 186.22 209.39 238 .68 241.58 270. 47: 277.05 303 416 80 92 174 196 89 1026 190 101 77 495' 1.04 149.94 495 1.04 154.86 688 473 741 459 371 247 204 243 228 1.48 1.23 2.09 1.56 1 .-27 1 .24 1.25 1.22 1.05 175.73.180.80 186.69 373.05 419.39 477.95 483.75 541.51 554.67 143 24 13.1 2.66E+00 PB-212 PB-214 143 24 10.0 PB-214 PB-212 171 8 57.9 PB-212 178 6 39.0 AC-228 184 10 30.2 "7" -;L3 368 10 21.7 RA-226 415 9 40.5 AC-228 472 26 3.9 2.44E+00 PB-212 472 26 15.6 PB-214 537 11 31.8 AC-228 549 11 39.9 HPSTID-I0-003 Page 52 of 70 Page Post-NID Peak Search Report (continued) O-Ple ID 1003082010 It Energy Area Bkgnd FWHM Chanr Acquisition date : 8-MAR-2010 21:46:11*0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 295.18 299.96 328.12 338.20 351.97 409.30 462.92 510.40 0 583.23 0 609.12 0 689.67 0 727.47 0 768.59 0 861.39 0 911.23 0 933.87 2 964.57 2' 968.99 0 1120 28 , 123 9 48 1378. 82 1407. 91 0 1460.77 0 1588.68 8 1592.64 8 1595.73 0 1764.47 299 84 40 199 518 49 118 161 391 451 33 95 45 33 281 37.61 157 106 41 27 24 1371.17 16 19 10 69 240 117 171 151 188 94 69 123 1.49 1.35 0.93.1.27 1.19 1.56 1 .43 1.53 590..92*600.48 656.78.676.94.704.46 819.07 926.27 1021.20 Left Pw %Err 585. 12 11.9 597 7-24.1 653 9 61.0* 673 698 815 920 1013 10 13 9.12 17 13.4.7.0.38.3 16.8 17.7 128 1.44 1166.77 1159 16 8.2 65 68 70 77 36 64 30 33 26 47 60 26 14 14 8 15'9 5 0 Fit Nuclides 1 .59 3.42 1.83 1.79 1.33 1.54 1.52 1.72 1.72 1.79 4.75 1.42 1.52 2.15 2.72 1.68 1.99 1.99 1.44 1218.54 1379.55 1455.11 1537.29 1722.77 1822.38 1867.64 1928.98 1937.83 2240.16.2478.37 2756.77 2814.89 2920.51 3020.53.3176.05 3183.98 3190 .14 3527 .22 1211 1373 1449 1530 1718 1817 1862 1923 1923 2234 2472 2750 2806 2911 3015 3168 3180 3180 3520 12.13 14 16 10 14 10 35 35 15 15 15 14 18 11 12 14 14 13 5.9 54.3 21.3 45.7 34.7 8.6 31.9 20..8 10. 5 16. 9 44. 0 45.0 39.4 2.8 40.2 53. 6 32. 6 56.4 12. 0 PB-214 PB-212.* ~~AC-228 )'J AC-228 PB-214 AC-228 AC-228 TL-208 ANN-511 TL-208 AC-228 AC-228 9.36E-01 AC-228 AC-228 K-40 AC-228 4.81E+00 TL-208 HPSTID-10-003 Page 53 of 70---- Interference between PB-212 and CD-109 -**** PB-212 energy lines ***Energy # Disint., % Error Comments 74.81 ------------


Line interferes with PB-214 77.11 ------ Line interferes with PB-214 87.30 ---------Line interferes with CD-109 238.63 1.521E+05 3.94 -300.09' .1.862E+05 24.06 Average: 1.527E+05 3.89 Interfered energy lines Nuclide Energy Old Area New Area Critical Level *New Activity % Error (uCi)PE-214 .87.30 80.0 -109.0 74.7 0.000E+00 0.00 87.30 Line invalidated:

New Area less than critical level CD-109 88.03 80.0 -109.0 74.7 0.000E+00 0.00 88.03 Line invalidated: New Area less than critical level CD-109 has been rejected: Failed abundance Test HPSTID-10-003 Page REPORT NAME.: QACHECK (V9.1)REPORT DATE :8:MAR-2010 22:04 REQUESTOR HPTECH 4Aof70 PAGE CH 7,a FPL-E SEABROOK STATION POST NID QA ANALYSIS TITLE : Ul ROCK PILE SAMPLE 4 SAMPLE No.SAMPLE TYPE COUNT TIME SAMPLE TIME LIBRARY.1003082010

SOLIDS 8-MAR-2010 21:46:11.8-MAR-2010 14:00:00.FREE RELEASE.OPERATOR NAME : CAS SAMPLE GEOMETRY : 4LGM SAMPLE QUANTITY 1.00000E+00 DETECTOR DETECTOR 9 PEAK ENERGY ISOTOPE ENERGY DIFF (KEV)K-40-BA-133M--LA-140 TL-208 PB1-212 PS-214 RA -226 AC-228 A-NN -511 1460.80 276.09 1596.49 583.14 238.63 351.92 186.21 105.00 511.01 0.03-0.96 0.76-0.09-0.06-0.05-0.01 0.00 0.61 DECAY CORR uCi/8 .234E-02 9.510E-04 8.045E-05 3.010E-02 6.811E-03 3.240E-03 9:512E-03 4.523E-03 0.OOOE+00 COMMENTS QA Results OK* Count Rate Error 40.* Count Rate Error = 56.QA Results OK QA Results OK QA Results OK QA Results OK*Key Line Not Found QA Results OK TOTAL GAMMA ACTIVITY Total NP Activity Total FP Activity (.AVG ENERGY DIFF =0.03 1.376E-01 1:365E-01 1. 031E-03 identifying identifying identifying identifying identifying identifying identifying 74.64 KeV Peak was used in 77.10 KeV Peak was used in 87.53 KeV Peak was used in 277.05 KeV Peak was used in 328.12 KeV Peak was used in 510.40 KeV-Peak was used in 583.23 KeV Peak was used in.2 isotopes 2 isotopes 2 isotopes 2 2 2 2 isotopes isotopes isotopes isotopes UNIDENTIFIED/REJECTED PEAKS GAMMAISEC ENERGY NET AREA FWHM. GAMMA/SEC

/POTENTIAL ID ACTIVITY% ERROR FLAG 93.02 174. 2.09 1.068E+01 1.068E+01 609.12 89.67*67.47 451. 1.59 5,544E+01 5.544E+01 33. 3.42 4.464E+00 4.464E,+00

95. 1.83 1.334E+01 1.334E+01 30.2 R BR-82 R BA-131 R -3 5.92 R XE-135 R -B- -14L 54.3 R .Z .9 .21.3 R ,4. 683E-02 4. 599E- 02 1 .071E-02.9,464E-02
3. 236E-03 6.675E-02 7. 236E-02 (

.HPSTID-10-003 Page 55 of 70 PAGE REPORT NAME QA CHECK (V9.1)REPORT DATE 8-MAR-2010 22:04 REQUESTOR HPTECH FPL-E SEABROOK STATION, POST NID QA ANALYSIS UNIDENTIFIED/REJECTED PEAKS ENERGY NET AREA FWHM GAMMA/SEC GAMMA/SEC/POTENTIAL% ERROR FLAG ID ACTIVITY 768.59 861.39 933.87 1120.28 1239.48 1378.82 1407.91 1510.83 1764.47 45... 1.79 33.. 1.33 37. 1.52 106. 1.-79 41. 4.75 27. 1.42 24. 1.52 6.616E+00 6.616E+00 5.282E+00 5.282E+00 6..350E+00 6.350E+00 2.073E+01 2.073E+01 8.652E+00 8.652E+00 6.230E+00 6.230E+00 5.476E+00 5.476E+00 R -;-,- 6.974E-01 45.7 R .fl1-2i4 3. 548E-03 34.7 R.]j K/ il'l.468E-01 31.9 R Y- 5.808E-03 R 81I-2!4 5.347E-.03 16.9 R S C-A4 5.619E-04 R (tTJ)3.711E-03 44.0 U 5 .954E- 02 45 .OU. of -A' " 39.4 R EU:-L 7.150E-04 R, 2C:ýFL-214ý 5.944E-03 40.2U0 -1 3"145E-03 12.0 R 4 3. 145E-03 17. 2.72 4.167E+00 4.167E+00 69. 1.44 1.839E+01 1.839E+01 Total Unidentified/Rejected Peaks = 13% Unidentified/Rejected Peaks = 33.33 Flags: U -R-COMMENTS: TECH REVIEW Unknown Line Rejected During Analysis Positively Identified (line not in analysis library)_________ " DATE: /L /t 03 SUPERVISOR REVIEW: DATE: *.I /_ /0End Of Report (' 2 Pag** HPSTID-10-003 Page 56 of 70 9-MAR-2010 01:55:43.57 W FPL-ENERGY SEABROOK STATION SAMPLE TITLE : ROCKPILE DIRT SAMPLE #5 FILE IDENT : CAS$DISK: [SNS.SAMPLE.RP.NEW]1003092001.CNF;1 SAMPLE ID : 1003092001

  • OPERATOR : CAS SAMPLE TIME : 8-MAR-2010 14:05:
  • SAMPLE GEOMETRY : 4LGM* SHELF HEIGHT : 0* EFFICIENCY FILE : 4LGMO SAMPLE TYPE : SOLIDS
  • SAMPLE QUANTITY,:

1.00000E+00

          • **********
        • *********
          • ***** ****** ****** ***** *** ********ACQ DATE & TIME : 9-MAR-2010 01:37:
  • DEADTIME (%) : 0.0%PRESET LIVE TIME : 0 00:16:40
  • SENSITIVITY
4.00000 ELASPED REAL TIME : 0 00:16:40
  • GAUSSIAN SEN : 10.00000 ELAPSED LIVE TIME: 0 00:16:40
  • NBR ITERATIONS
10**** *** *** ******* *** ** ** **** *** ** **** ***********
      • * ****DETECTOR : DETECTOR 8
  • LIBRARY : FREE RELEASE EFFIC CAL DATE : 26-JAN-2008 01:16
  • EFFIC CERT.DATE
26-JAN-2008 01:16 DCAL DATE & TIME : 8-MAR-2010 17:03:
  • ENERGY TOLER : 1.00 KEV/CHAN V 4.99793E-01
  • HALF LIFE RATIO : 8.00000 OFFSET : -3.10638E-01 keV.
  • ABUNDANCE LIMIT : 70.0%OEFFICIENT
9.34095E-08
  • CORRECTION FACTOR : 1.OOOOOE+00 START CHAN : 3
  • PEAK END CHAN : 4096 ANALYSES:

PEAK V16.9 NID V3.4 MINACT V2.8 WTMEAN V1.8***WW********

  • W***W***W**
                                                  • WW*****

COUNTED ON : NHY4 COLLECTED BY : F HANIFFY COUNTED BY : CAS** ***************************************************************************** Post-NID Peak Search Report It Energy 2 74.66 2 77.09 Area Bkgnd FWHM Channel Left Pw %Err Fit Nuclides 0 0 0 0 0 0 93.25 186.44 209.29 238.70 241.75 270.07 295.25 299.99 328.37 338.55 154 191 73 68 102 S13 93 54 193 32 70 107 233 0.89 150.01 259 0.90 154.86 478 333 182 248 176 148 120 81 119 87 1.76 1 .23 1. 05 1.08 1 .37 1 .50 1.09 1.09 1 .62 1.10 187.19 373.62 419.33 478.17 484.29 540.93 591 .30 600.78 657.55 677.91 147 12 17.3 3.58E+00 PB-212 PB-214 147 12 14.2 PB-214 PB-212 183 8 53.6 368 9 50.0 RA-226 416 7 24.3 AC-228.474 8 6.9 PB-212 482 7 26.2 PB-214 5.37 9 42.8 AC-228 586-. 9 12.5 PB-214 598 6 48.6 PB-212 651 13 34.2 .AC-228 674 8 18.1 AC-228./ HPSTID-10-003 Page 57 of 70 Page,:*Acquisition date 9-MAR-2010 01:37:45 Post-N! ) Peak Search Report (continued)( ample;ID : 1003092001 It Energy Area Bkgnd FWHM Channel Left Pw%Err Fit Nuclides 0 0 0 0 0 2 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 352.09 409.45 462.80 496.67 510.42 583.17 609.36 727.62 794.83 861. 12 911.25 968.96 1120 .76 1281.29 1377.47 1460 .72 1592 83 1764.25 318 40 63 22 92 160 21 241 30 21 16 35 20 117 91 19 19 31 666 10 31 113 38 51 42 52 52 24 39 40 36 15 24 25 42 25 33 7 3 6 4 3 1.09 1.10 2.00 1.67 1.65 1.24 1.24 1.18 1.88 2.28 0 .77 0 .71 1. 59 1.30 1.07 1.29 2.65 3.61 2.06 0.59 1.99 705.00*819.73* 926.45 994.18.1021.69 1167.18 1175.51 12i9,.57 1456.07 1540.05 1545.10 1590.47 1723. 03 1823 .25 1938.64 2242 .13 2563 .04 2755.28 2921.67 3185.70 3528 .26 699 816 922 988 1016 1162 1162 1213 1450 1533 1543 1585 1718 1817 1933 2237 2558 2749.2916 3181 3522 12 1.0 11 17 117 17 13 12.10 6 11.9 14 11 9 9 12 12 7 12 8.8 30.4 25.1 60.5.18.4 10 .1 52. 8 8 4 44. 9 58.8 43.6 31.8 49.1 15. 0 15. 2 58. 2 33. 2 21 2 3.9 432. 9 21. 1 PB-214 AC-228 AC-228 ANNN-511 2.29E+00 AC-228 AC-228 AC-228 AC-228 AC-228 AC-228 2 -K-40.01- o " HPSTID-10-003 Page 58 of. 70 PAGE 1-op C 78.REPORT NAME : QACHECK (V9.1)REPORT DATE 9-MAR-2010 01:55 REQUESTOR HPTECH FPL-E SEABROOK STATION POST NID QA ANALYSIS TITLE : ROCKPILE DIRT SAMPLE #5 SAMPLE No.SAMPLE TYPE COUNT TIME SAMPLE TIME LIBRARY 1003092001 SOLIDS .9-MAR-2010 01:37:45.8-MAR-2010 14:05:00.FREERELEASE OPERATOR NAME : CAS " SAMPLE GEOMETRY : 4LGM SAMPLE QUANTITY : 1.000,OOE+00 DETECTOR : DETECTOR 8'PEAK ENERGY ISOTOPE ENERGY DIFF (KEV)DECAY CORR uCi/COMMENTS p6A\I K-40 1460.80 0.08 8.591E-02 QA Results OK--0 4 4-0 B-04--- ount-R-ate--E=OY = 61.PB-212 238.63 .-0.07 7.254E-03 QA Results OK PB-214 351.92' -0.17 3.557E-03 QA Results OK RA-2/26 186.21 -0.23 5.230E-03

  • Count Rate Error = 50.AC-228 105.00 0.00 4.746E-03
  • Key Line Not Found ANN-511 511.01 0.59 0.OOOE+00 QA Results OK AVG ENERGY DIFF =0.09 1.068E-01

= TOTAL GAMMA ACTIVITY 1.067E-01 = Total NP Activity 1.402E-04 = Total FP Activity (.74.66 KeV Peak was used in identifying 2 isotopes 77.09 KeV Peak was used in identifying 2 isotopes UNIDENTIFIED/REJECTED PEAKS ENERGY NET AREA FWHM GAMMA/SEC GAMMA/SEC/% ERROR*FLAG POTENTIAL ID ACTIVITY 93.25 727.62 861.12 1120.76.1281.29 1377.47 2.83 73. 1.76 8.411E+00 8.411E+00 21. 1.24 30. 1.88 21. 2.28 20. 1.59 19. 1.29 19. 2.65 31. 3.61 10. 0.59 5.146E+00 5.146E+00 8.982E+00 8.982E+00, 44.9 6.562E+00 6.562E+00 6.875E+00 6.875E+00. 49.1 7.986E+00 7.986E+00. 58.2 8.812E+00 8.812E+00 33.2 1.501E+01 1.5.01E+01 21.2 5.625E+00 5.625E+00 43.9 R BA=131 3.655E-02 R 8.475E-03 52.8U /lo I1/4c R 1-132 1.520E-01 R I-_13-- 7,464E-01 R 212 6.283E+00 5 8.8U R (a-O 26-7 4.554E+00 R SC-46 2.167E-04.R TA-182 6,185E-04 R 1.429E-03 R Ii 1.609E-02 R 9.873E-03 R -4.652E-01 HPSTID-10-003 Page 59 of 70 ;~PACE 2e-ýREPORT NAME.REPORT DATE REQUESTOR QACHECK (V9.1)9-MAR-2010 01:55 HPTECH FPL-E SEABROOK STATION.POST NID QA ANALYSIS UNIDENTIFIED/REJECTED PEAKS GAMMA/SEC .,POTENTIAL / % ERROR FLAG ID ENERGY NET AREA FWHM GAMMA/SEC ACTIVITY 1764.25 31. 1,99- 1.897E+01 1.897E+01 21.1 R PA-234 2.527E-02 R 4 3.244E-03 Total Unidentified/Rejected Peaks 10%. Unidentified/Rejected Peaks = 30.30 Flags: U -Unknown. Line-R Rejected During Analysis P -Positively Identified (line not, in analysis library)COMMENTS:.nLk 4'0-Y-1% 7 -ý- 5-'f7-'7AcV &"ý CLH -/0 8 13aie lftýic TECH REVIEW I ý -/- ý ý-. -'- -" SUPERVISOR REVIEW: 2 Pa se ) *.DATE S / / 0/o DATE : / /_// 0**** End Of Report ( HPSTID-10-003 Page 60 of 70 , * , *'A *1 * ***05 **5* *9* -************.

  • *-*,*9-MAR-2010 01:57:59.63

&$ Q~FPL-ENERGY SEABROOK STATION SAMPLE TITLE : ROCKPILE'DIRT SAMPLE #6 FILE IDENT CAS$DISK:[SNS.SAMPLE.RP.NEW]1003092002.CNF;I SAMPLE ID : 1003092002

  • OPERATOR -CAS SAMPLE TIME : 8-MAR-2010 14:10:
  • SAMPLE GEOMETRY : 4LGM* SHELF HEIGHT 0* EFFICIENCY FILE 4LGMO SAMPLE TYPE SOLIDS * * * *
  • SAMPLE QUANTITY : 1.00000E+00
  • ** ** * ******** ** * *** *********
  • ** ** ***** ** * ** ** ** * ** ** **********

ACQ DATE & TIME : 9-MAR-2010 01:40:

  • DEADTIME (%) : 0.1%PRESET LIVE TIME': 0 00:16:40
  • SENSITIVITY

,: 4.00000 ELASPED REAL TIME : 0 00:16:40

  • GAUSSIAN SEN : 10.00000 ELAPSED LIVE TIME 0 00:16:40
  • NBR ITERATIONS
10**** ** *** ** * ** ** ** * *** * * *** * *** * ** * ** ** ** ** *** *** ** **************
    • * **** ** ******DETECTOR : DETECTOR 9
  • LIBRARY .FREE RELEASE EFFIC CAL DATE : 18-SEP-2001 13:07
  • EFFIC CERTDATE : 18-SEP-2001 13:07 DCAL DATE & TIME : 8-MAR-2010 17:40:
  • ENERGY TOLER : 1.00 KEV/CHAN : 5.00070E-01
  • HALF LIFE RATIO : 8.00000 OFFSET .-3.46041E-01 keV
  • ABUNDANCE'LIMIT
70.0%Q COEFFICIENT
7.67799E-08
  • CORRECTION FACTOR : 1.00000E+00 START CHAN : 3 *-PEAK END CHAN : 4096 ANALYSES : PEAK V16.9 NID V3.4 MINACT V2.8 WTMEAN V1.8 INTERF V2.4 COUNTED ON : NHY4 COLLECTED BY HANIFFY COUNTED BY : CAS Post-NID Peak Search Report It Energy 1 74.62 1 77.06 Area Bkgnd FWHM Channel Left Pw %Err Fit Nuclides 0 0 0 0 7 7 0 87.20 93.06 185 , 73 209.22 238.65 241.58 270.10 295.24 300.11 338.47 354 526 148 181 203 92 1108 199 68 369 92 286 534 1.04 149.90 507 1.04 154.79 756 708 554 302 282 257 312 156 143 191 1.77 1.74 1.46 1.45 1.24 1.25 1.43 1.30 1.30 1.41 175.07 186.78 372.08 419 05 477.90 483.74 540.77 591 .03 600 .77 677.47 143 17 11.6 4.47E+00 PB-212 PB-214 143 17 8.1 .PB-214 PB -212 171 8 33.2 PB-212 183 8 2 6 .X 7 367 11 23.5 RA-226 416. 7 32.8 .AC-228 470 19 3.9 2.08E+00 PB-212-470 19 15.9 PB-214 53"6 10 '50.3 AC-228-586 20 7.8 7.06E-01 PB-214 586 20 25.1 PB-212 671 14 11.9 AC-228.(

HPSTID-19-003 Page 61 of 70 Page : Post-NID Peak Search Report (continued)

  • ;ample ID : 1003092002 Acquisition date 9-MAR-2010 01:40:17 it Energy Area Bkgnd FWHM Channel Left Pw %Err Fit Nuclides 351.97 410.15 463.24 510.86 583.17 609.28 727.31 768 32 795.32 860 .78 911.02 934.71 964 .89 968 .91 1120 .36 1236. 98 1378 .33 1460.82 1509.73 1588.53 1764.54 1847 .06 593 32'72 166 397 435 93 39 56 53 297 30 70 177 113 24 40 1466 13 17 83 18 183 113 136 96 101 116 65.71 78 45 32 42 25 25 65 63 33 23 2 11 10 3 1.28 0.87 1.54 1.56 1.48 1.38 1.20 2.32 1.52 2.09 1.85 1 .58 1.72 1 .72 0.88 0.73 1. 77 2.15 1.36 1.77 1.59 0.97 704.46 8200.78 926.91 1022.11 1166.66 12181.85 1454.79 1536.75 1590.72 1721.56 18.21.96 1869.31 1929.63 1937.65 2240.33 2473.36 2755.80 2920.61 3018.33 3175.76 3527.36 3692.20"699 816 918 1016 1160 1213 1449 1532 1584 1714 1813 1862 1920 1920 2235 2.470 2747 2913 3014 3170 3520 3685 12 8 14 14 15 14 13 11.15.13 15 12 30 30 Ii 8 19 16 7 11 14 13 6.1 59.8 36.3 14.7 7.5 7.1 20.9 44.6 36.5 29.8 7.1 47.5 17.3 9.2 16.9 60.1'37. 7 2.7 32.6 45.7 13. 8 31.7 PB-214 AC-228 AC-228 ANN-5 11 AC-228 F6i ""2-1(A'C-228 AC-228 AC-228 AC-228 AC-228 K-40 g , ., jL'q AC-228 9.99E-01 HPSTID-10-003 Page 62 of 70 Interference between PB-212 and CD-109-***PB-212 energy lines *-Energy. # Disint. % Error Comments 74.81 --------------

Line interferes with PB-214 77.11 -----------


Line interferes with PB-214 87.30 ----------

Line interferes with CD-1.09 238.63 1.643E-05 3.90 300.09. 2.039E+05 25.13 Average:. 1.649E+05 3.886 Interfered energy lines Nuclide Energy. Old Area New Area Critical Level New Activity % Error*(uCi)NP-237 86.50 86.50 NP-237 has been PB-214 87.30 87.30 CD-109 88.03 88.03 CD-109 has been 148.0 -56.0 78.4 0.OOOE+00 0.00 Line invalidated: New Area less than critical level rejected: Failed abundance Test 148.0 -56.0 78.4 0.OOOE+00 0.00 Line invalidated: New Area less than critical level 148.0 -56.0

  • 78.4
  • 0.OOOE+00 0.00 Line invalidated:

New Area less than critical level rejected: Failed abundance Test HPSTID-10-003 Page 63 of 70-PAGE__REPORT NAME QACHECK (V9.1).REPORT DATE 9-MAR-2010. 01:58 REQUESTOR

HPTECH FPL-E SEABROOK STATION POST NID QA ANALYSIS TITLE : ROCKPILE DIRT SAMPLE #6 SAMPLE No. 1003092002 SAMPLE TYPE SOLIDS COUNT TIME : 9-MAR-2010 01:40:17.SAMPLE TIME : 8-MAR-2010 14:10:00.LIBRARY : FREE RELEASE OPERATOR NAME CAS SAMPLE GEOMETRY 4LGM SAMPLE QUANTITY : 1.00000E+00 DETECTOR : DETECTOR 9 PEAK ENERGY ISOTOPE ENERGY DIFF (KEV)K-40 PB-212 PB-214 RA-226 AC-228 ANN-511 1460 .80 238.63 351 .92 186 .21 105. 00 511 .01-0.02-0.03-0,05 0.48 0.00 0 15 0.09 DECAY CORR uCi/8. 805E-02 9.447E-03 3. 754E-03 9. 849E-03 4. 931E-03 0.OOOE+00 COMMENTS QA Results OK QA Results OK QA Results OK* QA Results OK* Key Line Not Found QA Results OK AVG ENERGY DIFF =1.160E-01

= TOTAL GAMMA ACTIVITY 1.160E-01 = Total NP Activity 74.62 KeV Peak was used in identifying 2 isotopes 77.06 KeV Peak was used in identifying 2 isotopes 87.20 KeV Peak was used in identifying 2 isotopes UNIDENTIFIED/REJECTED PEAKS GAMMA/SEC ENERGY NET AREA FWHM GAMMA/SEC /POTENTIAL ID% ERROR FLAG ACTIVITY 93.06 609.28 727.31 768.32 860.78 934.71 1120.36 1236.98 ( 378.33 181. 1.74 1.109E+01 1.109E+01 435. 1.38 5.344E+01 5.344E+01 93. 1.20 1.310E+01 1.310E+01 39. 2.32 5.748E+00 5.748E+00 53. 2.09 8.406E+00 8.406E+00 30. 1.58 5.043E+00 5.043E+00 113. 0.88 2.201E+01 2.201E-01 24. 0.73 5.095E+00 5.095E+00 40. 1.77 9.180E+00 9.180E+00 26.7 R BR-82 5,230E-02 R BA-131 4.817E-02 R .3H4- 1.117E-02 7.11 R 3.120E-03 20.9 R '132 2.190E-01 4 "R 8.909E+00 44.6 R 21D 3 083E-03 29.8 R L-208 5.414E+00 47.5 R Y-92 9.585E-03 R ý4) 4.246E-03 16.9 R SC-46 5.974E-04 R TA-182 *1.705E-03 3 .940E-03 60.1 R- -- *62E-02 37.7 R<m- .6.037E-03 REPORT NAME QACHECK (V9.1)'REPORT DATE 9-MAR-2010 01:58 REQUESTOR HPTECH HPSTID-10-003 Page 64 of 70 PAGE 2 CHL -(FPL-E SEABROOK STATION POST NID QA ANALYSIS UNIDENTIFIED/REJECTED PEAKS GAMMA/SEC ENERGY NET AREA FWHM GAMMA/SEC /POTENTIAL ID% ERROR FLAG ACTIVITY 1509.73 1764.54 1847.06 13. 1.36 3.159E+00 3.159E+00 83. 1.59 2.202E+01 2.202E+01 18. 0.97 4.836E+00 4.836E+00 32.6 13A8 31.7-R 2 > 3,846E-03 R B DOI- 3 .766E-03 R IB-214- 6.253E-03 Total Unidentified/Rejected Peaks = 12% Unidentified/Rejected Peaks = 35.29 Flags: U -Unknown Line R -Rejected During Analysis P -Positively Identified (line not in analysis library)COMMENTS:/ DATE: I / /(./ 10 TECH REVIEW SUPERVISOR I DATE : ]_/ /. ,o DATE __ / //0**** End Of Report (* ) WW*W ( HPSTID-10-003 Page 65 of 70 Attachment 3 Rock Pile Area Radiation Surveys Seabrook _VSDS Survey M-20090825-2 General Information Title: Free Release of Soil:- behind-GOB ........ }Survey Date/Time: 08/25/2009 11:25 .Lead Surveyor: 160m, Survey Type: ther:_Eree Rqlease Work: Order/Task O..0 Counted By: P. Comeau 08/25/2009 11:25 Rx % Pwr: 06ý.RWP#: 09-00001 .. ., KCN: 10416 ..Status: -A p proved ~y Ki 7,au, D, 02/1/2010 dyF y Comeau, P_ 08/25/2009 Dose Rate (DR) Object Prefixes/Suffixes Dose Rates with Prefixes: Dose Rates with No Prefixes: Default Prefixes: -Default Suffixes: HS Hot Spot "n" = Neutron"b" = Beta S '.c" ='Corrected -Postings Legend 4 There are no postings in this survey., '--Instruments Used' "" Instrument Instrument Inst Probe Probe Probe Calibration

  1. Model Serial # Type Model Serial # Type Date/Time 1 Mr 9 73520 C Internal Internal C 02/03/2010 2 Gamma Spec n/a C Internal Internal C 01/01/2099 00 Survey #: M-20090825-2

-PDF Generated On: 03/25/2010 14:24 Page 1 f 24 HPSTID-10-003 Page 67 of 70 HSYA-011 Selected Areas outside the Protected Area Survey #: M-20090825-2 I DatelTime: 08126/2009 11:25 Off site sal/dirt shipment from outside the PA. No history of dirt coming from VS PA.I Clean Area Soil Free Release.NW NNW NNE W-NW PARKING Micro-R survey of soil indicatedi no activty above background. Contact Dose Rates on soil, 9 -15 micro-R/hr. (BKGD 9-15 micro-R~hr) For Gamma Spec ResuJlts see HSYD 999 #M2090825-3. 3Taken from two different locations south side. Dirt to be sold and sent les were from area just sou~th of (GOB tim Dry Cask Storage const. south of other samples..-WlITTf SHOP-I'IRK ANNFIX4-TTr & %FTOPS 41vK Buiking-MTE LAB Free release soil from O/S Protected Area.Dose Received: 0 mr Micro-R BKGD: 9-15 Micro-R/hr. GPS Coordinates 19T-0348395 / 4750382; 19T-0348409 /4750449; 19T-0348420 / 4750459): Other -Free Release II +71 IN91 Image File: HSYA011_002 Page 2 of 24 Survey #: M-20090825-2 -PDF Generated On: 03/2512010 14:24 W General Information Seabrooke-SDS0-Survey M-2010031 1-9 Title: Survey for Offsite Release of Rock Pile Debris Survey Date/Time: 103/09/2010 12:54 .Survey Type: -Other -Surveys for Release Counted By: FA BirdlL. J.ohnsosn _03/10/2010 16:54-RWP#: N/A Status: Aproe ýjy aniffy,FE, 03/25/2-010 Le6ad Surveyor: Bjnro,6mmie Date Todd Johnson, Larry] Work OrderITask

  1. EN A ............. ] Rx % Pwr:liOO-

-- ..KCN:.-- RqaoyEqr eview~ by: Bird, Amnmie,.03/11./2010. pDose Rate (DR) Object Prefixes/Suffixes Dose Rates with Prefixes: Dose Rates with NoPrefixes: Default Prefixes: Default Suffixes:* = Contact Gen Area ýHS = Hot Spot "",- Neutron*+ 30 cm.. "b" Beta i I0 ,"c"= Corrected Postings Legend There are no postings in this survey.Instrument Used -.Instrument Instrument Inst Probe Probe Probe Calibration inr nModel Serial # Type Model Serial # Type DatelTime 1 M19 73457 C Internal Internal C 03/29/2010 Page I of 3 Survey M-20100311-9 -PDF Generated On: 03/2512010 14:28 HPSTID-10-003 Page 69 of 70 Survey #: M-20100311-9 I Date/Time: 03/09/2010 12:54 All dose rates taken around the rock piles = 10-r1ý2/hr 4 N I This area was surveyed on This area was surveyed on 3/10/10 I

Description:

Survey of Rock Pile area for Offsite Release (Two Days)Dose received = N/A MDA= N/A Background was 10-12 uR/hr.I J02 VateHS-50 Hot Spot V11O0 Contact Reading FrA Posting I+75I' 30 cm Reading 20 4i-0eneral Area D~Pip Bag S~mear ,ýA~ir Samiple ERM DE~pe Image File: Rockpile_001 Page 2 of 3 Survey #: M-20100311-9 -PDF Generated On: 03/25/2010 14:28 I r Seabrook VSDS HPSTID-10-003 Page 70 of 70 Data Point Details Survey #: M-20100311-9 Map: YRD I OCA Rockpile 121# Type Inst. Value Units Position Notes S DR y N/A 10-12 uR/hr Image File: Rockpile_001 Page 3 of 3 Survey #: M-20100311-9 -PDF Generated On: 03/25/2010 14:28 NextEra Energy Seabrook, LLC PO Box 300 Seabrook, NH 03874 April 6,2010 Christopher Morgan, Administrator New Hampshire Department of Transportation Bureau of Rail and Transit PO BOX 483 Concord, NH 03302-0483 Mr. Morgan: NextEra Energy Seabrook, LLC ("NextEra") is requesting a Temporary Use Agreement to provide an access across State owned railroad property on a short-term basis.The attachments to this letter provide the requested documentation. I appreciate your assistance with this item. Please feel free to contact Mike O'Keefe at (603) 773-7745 should you have any questions or need additional information related to this matter.Sincerely, Paul Freeman Site Vice President Attachments NextEra Energy Seabrook, LLC Temporary Use Agreement Attachment

1. Description and Need 1) a description of your intended use of the railroad land, the length of time that the work will take and an explanation of the need for the crossing at the location identified. (e.g.construction access)The railroad land will be used to provide an access road. It is estimated that this access road will be in place for three to five years. The crossing will provide access to remove excavation' material from approximately 32 acres on the south easterly portion of the NextEra property and facilitate the environmental reclamation of this property.

-Currently the only access is through the South Access Road Security Gate which was constructed as a result of NHDOT Bureau of Rail and Transit approval dated February 22, 2002 to North Atlantic Energy"Seabrook Station Corridor Crossing Agreement." This agreement was assigned to NextEra in November 2002.This alternate crossing will alleviate unnecessary traffic coming through the only security checkpoint for the power plant that, operates full time, providing a relief of an unnecessary burden on security and site personnel. In addition, the access road will improve traffic flow and safety during the project to site personnel. NextEra understands that NHDOT prefers a Temporary Use Agreement which is valid for a one year term should be utilized for this access road. Each year, NextEra will be required to renew the Temporary Use Agreement. As previously noted, it is anticipated that this access road will be in place for three to five years. .2) a photograph, a location map and a plan or sketch of the area showing the property lines and the area of the railroad corridor to be entered onto.Attachment 2 provides photographs and the location map.3) documentation of your ownership (i.e. deed and/or assessor's card) of your property adjacent to the State-owned railroad property, if applicable. Attachment 3 provides the NextEra deed for the property. Please note NextEra Energy Seabrook, LLC was formerly named FPL Energy Seabrook, LLC. NextEra Energy Seabrook, LLC Temporary Use Agreement Attachment

2. Photos and Location Map 21 Chevy Chase road seabrook NH 03874 -Google Maps Page I of I Google maps "'res screen, use the "Print' link next to the map.Get Directions Mv Maps Print Send Link 21 Chevy Chase road 03874 (.0 http://maps.google.conmmaps?f=q&hl=en&q-&layer--c&cbll=40.758437,-73.985164&cbp...

3/24/2010 0'.. 7~ I .-l.* .*....ll / w w(om oP /72~ -~ 7~cffi kp-J j74cL (~- ~ NextEra Energy Seabrook, LLC Temporary Use Agreement Attachment

3. Deed Book 3875 Page 2231 This Image for at copyrml at Rockingham County on 07/04/18* ID AtMO*G ~,~t~Rix 1 ~ t& W U5WAS so~~s K3 8*75 PS2'23 1 DEED Know All Persons ByThese Prc.ents, That NORTH ATLAxnC EERGy CORPORA.i.N; a.New co-poration having its prioci.al pla, ofbusiness at", -" LafayetteRo"d, Seabibolo Neýwlar.sb¢ 03S74 to s "Grantor"), for), ~ consiacrati~on piaid, grantsý to.F LENM~GY LWBR i...,Delaware limited liability poiairpany..havlng it principai place ofh~ns n mail~ing aldres at70.hies ouleyard, SJuho Beach, Florida 33408 (jhereinlr ifenred to as .Granted:), and its sdccessors and assigns,~4 0 aliight itle;=d in'tefcdtof he 9~itii idto the p~opety heienfe 'described lo'aedi the :Tons :--impt~ih'Fa.ls Seabrook, in the o Rockingham and State of New. H" psi.ire.I. The land nd~right n ad (exceptfeth nd-described asthe "First and Second Unit Sites' in Sectioi I of the! Ned of the. Grantor add; certain o.the'rutilities to the .Grantee, dated as of November 1, 2002, recorddd or to be recor&de hý-wt inthi Roeldnghar Cotnty Registry&'(2.1 of Dee4 , -. Tgeth er' wi'th a ll of '&"1'bin'*s,, e ncd .pe emeats facilit es and installations

..' genthefra situated ioni the easterly dide of U.S.- aote1, .clld o Lafaye'ttRoad, (in the Towns of Seab4ýook and Hzniýýto~n tals', inx the Counpty o(Ro g dai~ilstate of Ikew Hrpbr~mr describd in, s.cdule -A attached hereto and m Fdr a par t pailte, docý e&c.11Mf Ajaceqi Property").. eef(eenfe IL. -Together-with sl.jhs,,privileges' and easements appurtenat to the land genierally.or specifcl5,ly idesrbed n:SectionIaboie inldng ~ittlimita~tion, (a) theright to des gzute on saidd prprytelcatioi of. (i)) )hrpaeetcesrads leading -from the pui* hi&hwa kdiio' ' as-US. Rbitd 1 to. the aforemeo ntoiFirst and Second Unit Site, (Hi)undeiound and phd~rwata cooling.watet, tnls,* and Oii).e'ec'tric utility lines (but excluding high volta1ge elcrc r1smsin ie) and pipes'nd xialins for 'Water, sewerage, drainage and ow' essaiy utrility se'ce, which' ieds. cooling water tunýels and utility lines, pipes and , maini '.are appurtenan=f'to tfe First and Second Unii SitS and (b) the right to establish reasonable conditions, reids and kegulafiO with, respect to the use of thý South Access Road and any ,'*. .replacement access roads, said rights having been reseredzto PSNH and its successors and Book 3875 .Page 2232 This image for at copyrmi at Rockingham'County on 07/04/18 BK3875PG2232 assigns. or otheri-se riferred to, in' the deed oCfSN'H and'Pro~pertIes,,In. to-Bangor Hydro-'- lectic Corn py,et al., datel Septembr. 12; 1979,. and of PSNH to Bangor.Hydro-Electric Company,et al., dated October 16,.1981, :reorded mi the Rockingham Rcgist at Book M23.4SPýa 287. and at B .24.00,:P-age 117, r.pectively,* "dThe cbnvc~uce of the Adjacet Prpey described above is made'SUBJECT TO the followig:.

1. The comman rights and-easements of the ?tmipts" and as defined in that'certain for-Joit C,,onsticdon and f .ewi met o eiintrolti'`

hi

  • Hampshire Nuclear Units dated'asci ofMay~ 1,03, as" from 'tidie'o tftine.amen-dedrCIat~izii to 9 eabrook N~uclear Generating StationUnits ,and : (hedeinaile the ýSeabrook Agreemenf), and the Partic ipnts s.p."."e .su~ccessors an .d assignshfich dg-. wer grantedpu t to the grants of easements sctAbt' in aor ern ioneddeeds dated Seýtember 12, and October 16, 1981, and recorded in the RockngAn gisty at Book 2438,'Page287,and Book 2400, Page 117, respectively,:(a) to pass add repass to and ,m the 1. a Scond Juit Site with vehicles and and on.foot over id cross Soith so-wIled, on the Adjacent Pro ýrty, or such otherrepiac nefacess rad as' have bcexi or may be located or designiated onl theAdjacentPropea~ty leding fom the pUblic highway know as U.S. Route I to the First and Second Unit Site, (b) to ioISfrupt, repair,-rbuild, operate, miii ta4l patrol and remove underground and umdeivter.coling Water tuimls:lnder.

and icrossthe Adja=ct Property as have been or may1be lced or daesigtedý for..uc purposes in accordance with the Seabrook Agreement, (c) to:constrz4c install, feconstruct; replace, re 4r, maintain, ,use and operate in and.over the Adjacent Property, above or below the suifý. of th iarth, electric utility lines (but-excluding hiAf v6ltigp electric transmission lires) =qd-pipes:eo mains for water, sewerage, drainae and ther drayaige an other ncessary utility service.as.have beed or'm0y be located or designated for such purposesin accordance with the Seabrook Agicement. 2.. The common right privilege and easement ofthe.Participants under the Seabrook Agre~zemet, and thir rpetv ucso and issigns, touisead operate 'the btridings, structur, improvements, Pfazl.fies and installgions her. oi' stre ucte, now under co0itruction or istrý ovW owndin- oC onbyMthe j .rtihcipant in accordance with* (e.rr.. of the Sea.brook A greement, and located orto bje locatd upon the Adjacent Propeity, bcwdlng without Ifnitationthe buildings, structures, improviments, faciliiies and installatiins idernified in Schedale Aor the a'foremertionmd deed dated Sept6mber 12, 1979, recorded in the Rockingham Registiy at Book 2348, page 287.* .3. All rights in and title to all buildings, tructurci, improvementsfacilities and instaillations heriqWforý now unde- c.-tmuctionor beieaft- con ted, owned in c on f tuto heitf~ Sebrok Agremetd, owned i.commoni by the Participants in kcdordance with' ter f nthe Searok Ag t and used and operated unider any of the abdve~described rfighs 'eascmpeiis a~dprnd sio 4. All easements; covenits, agreement;, restrictions, and -other interests, to the extent that the same are now in force and applicable to *te AdjacentProperty, including but-noi linmited to the followingasem.nts -and ise restric..ons .'.tiug .the Adjacent Propert.y* I3,E..O Book3875 Page2233 This image for atcopyrml at Rockingham County on 07104/18 P6223 3 (a), Easements.to New England.Teleplone and t..ekl 4h Companyrecorded in the RocinhamReisiya Bok )29 Pgd 6;n ~tBook 719, Pages 3'19' 404, 426:ind 429. M s : 'an (b) . andreservations set forth in deed ofRobert.W. Meservedand flnjtc~ashst, orh roptO f theBoston.and Maine* ~ aQ CNi&ý 1974 re dd in he ocinghbam Regiýt at Book'"2222,. 'g643;(c) Easem.ents to Exeter &.1ampt6nElectric. Cmpan y.fo ovea.icad and underground eletri poer ins rcie in.the Rýocdnghanii istry at Book 859,-Page 153;Book 862, Pagds.21-25,`3i, 33,44,47, 48,:51, .55;57,58 and 66; Bobk872, Page S 205; Book l71O,.Pagei30d.(a aff.ect.'.d Book.2321, Page 592);* 2321, Pnge 592);Boo'k 1.861, Page 43; Book 2321, .Pag 590; and. at.Book 2927, Page2505. '(d). Restrictions; easements andagroements Aet forth in deeds from the Societ for t* .Protectibn o0Ne, Ham.slure Foresti and from.Th6. Audob.n Society o.fNew Hampshhre, ait datc'Aiu~st 30,1979,1d rec~i~didin th~ Eokn.Rgitxigyat6obk,;2347,Ya.g 335 anid 342,reAs vely " (e) Conservation easements and iestrictions reserved in deeds fr-om the State of New Eamntpsbrý~ an'd Game: D' artmin- -each daited January 26, 1984, and rordeýdi-n the Rockingbam, Rekistryat Book 2.481 Pakes i75 and 176,-respecdvely. .* Covenantswith resp.ct to-R.ck .Road contained in agre-ment with the Town of"'. Augs. 9; 1975, in the, Rckinghan Registry at Book* 2243, Page 16d9, set for as 4 condiiiijd in de*"d fro the ToinofSeaý.rook 'dated August 13, 1975Ir;d drecorded in id RegIMtry at Book 2243, Page 169 1.(g) Egaseient'for utility lines and mains to the Town of Seabrook dated September 25,"995,rcorded in the Rock igham'Registryat Book 3147 Page .2755.(h) Easement foi: railroad side..traek and aciess roadwayreseryod in deed from USM Corjoration da..d Aiugust 7, 1974.tecoided in.the R0ofid ngham Registry at Book 2227,:Page 1049. .las pd easements res ed ii.i".-.m USM Corporation dated August31, 1976, recoided .' ..at B6ok.2265,Page 114 (as affected by partal re'lease Book 235S, Page 573)..3 'Book 3875 Page 2234 This image for at copyrml at Rockingham County on 07104/18", * ~~~ ~~~~~..............."- o.. *..:..-.-:**-.. -'........,...... ...*' .-,BK3875PG223 4 (I) Act.yv4it d U.se Restrictions ,o-i Area '.A", "AUR Area B" and* ".AUTR'Ar ea'C", ýs idore filly descrbed .i cta~t crt Notice of Activity and Use*Restriction for Sitbrooqc Stationý,! ted.`Ma 1062002 hd forecred ia the*R.ckinjbA, n . al Book 3772,"Page2.765 as shown on a plan enilehd U AIAMLreas Former L1Adfili Sea.broolcT icaower Station", dated.May 7, .0)02 by UR COrP drtiiý ABS and reCored.as Plan # D-29834.(k) Notification of Existence ofl~adfifl, dated February 2, 1995 arid recorded in the Book3089iPage 1387.s.. The rights and easements gr'anted to PSN. under, and the terms, covenants, conditions and reýctions -setforth in, that certain EýsementAgreement between.the.Grantor The United' flgmiratin Compiny; Grea.Bgay Power Corporatibn, Nýw Enklafnd Power Companiy, The Cdonncticut Light and -ower C-aal Electric Cropiy, Litte B.y Power Corportio 140w'ha:6jp hE~lectric0qoprtidve, nc., and PSH dat dasfOctobd&31, 2002, and* ~~rcdor~de id & be recorded hierewth ini theRocldnghanr toantyr Reistry of]Deeds...A4l rights and aiithority ofiNorth Atlantic E q gyServic Coarporation, as successor Sm~aa.g .age.n.t to ,SNH ani.d PSNHa New Hmpshir"Yan "e divisioi, on behalf of all of the P artcipants under the SeAbokAgrereeit,-to determine i ctiv"ties(inc.uding exclusion and re'moval if pconnl aid pc ) as .rqured to 4ui,. land ."ithin the First:and Second Unit Site and the Adjabent Propty ('mcluding. .thout limitiition the 1aýnd encumbered by the rights and' ea.iments.fbo linis, suist.ation and assets &gr to PSN.in the B ent Agrecment referred to herei.above), U an "exclusion arta" as-defind in the regulations of the Nu6lar.PRegulatdry Commi~ssion with resect to Seabrook Station, aiid to exercise control over and t. exclude'any and all .p'so.ns and property from such exclsion'.area, if so reqUired, pursuant to the Atomic En.ejy Act 6f 1954, as amended (or other .omparable legislation) and of the Nuclear .Reulatory Commission (or other comparable reg ulations) to protect the health and safety rhereunder. SATURES AND ACKNOWLEDGMENTS BEGIN ON FOLLOWING PAGE 41364M Book 3875 Page 2235. This image for at copyrmi at Rockingham, County on 07/04/18..K38'75PG2235

  • EXEMCUTED by theundersigned duly aithorized epresetative of the Grintbr as of the 6day 6fNovembef, 2002... ý4O A C ENERGY CORPORATION
  • ~6 ..e 6ery. .Butler c. Vire Presi~qdenScreta~ry and Geeral'.Counsel ofNorthest Utilities Service Company,.As
e. for Noith Atlantic.* .rigy Corpoaton STATE.OF CONNMECTCUT

.. Bein,-4 as. -" : Octber,ý-2002

  • -On this :day of October, 200j2 &bere miep~op nally appeared Piegory B. Butler~,-whc~o ng by me duly sidin ia -aythit he* is the V6Vicde P~idit,.Secretary aind Gen~ral-Counse -bf 14ortheast Utilities Service Copay YAs Agent for NorthAtlan~tic'Fnergy
  • Corp oraioni'llihaje exeute th- -nt n 9under seal p~ursu t toauthority duly confered a nowl~ed sad isrimentto bo his fie&actanddeed as such Vice President.

..S

  • S~ecret ar nAI GenteriffCounsel a~d tle free act and deed'of said corporadtiou

'IN wriTESS WHEREOF, I havie heieunto *e m ha dadaffixed my of ficial sea] the 4y .anyealast: .bove written.* ... .* .* .. .:Myc~nn~issign .expires: A3l~00* ...Ba; , MON. h - "Book 3875 Page 2236 This image for at copyrml at Rockingham County on 07/04/18......---°. .-."'" " l " BK18"/SPG2236

  • . .MX 3. I ."fP': ADJA:CENTPROPERTY DESCRIION Land and rights in land except-ttheland describe as the 4".rst and Second Unit Si"), hcreinaflersbeie refrre ib the "Adjacen Prprytgther with alloftebiins structi-es,*

inbiovemtnt,ýfiditks .nd ins.tatioiis thereon .ituated on fth easterly side of U.S, Route'I, also clled. ..tte I Rad, in the s of Scabrook aidHamptun Falls, in the County of Rocliga and Stated of New, Hampshire, withiri ftat ei 'bouiided as follows.-* Westerly by said U.S. Route 1; northeily by a line of lafitude passing through a poiýt 1,000 feet due north of ihe intersecdton of U.S. Route I vwith Brin'iner*Lzie, also kniown as Brimers Lane, in*Hampton Fals; casteily b'y the Hamýpton Falli-fHaipton town line, thei Seabook-Hax-pito to"n line; -nd the Seabrook to the. nout of the latter town lifi,; and southerly by a* line of lItitudi passinj throigh a point; .1 .000 feet:due South of the intersection of U.S. Route 1 with Railroad Aru 'j also know as Deot 1 ~ad, in Seabrook incIudin& without limitati all rigbt;title and. interest In and to: O, A'. A c"itain piece, .parel or 'fiat of land situated ohnthe easterly side of U.S. Route 1, Lafy.te.?.y oa so-cal,: n sad Sea Qk, and ho.asLol2 on thepla etild*"Subd~iwsion Plan ofLand, Prýpcrties Inc. & Public.Service Co. ofN.IL, Seabroki N .", Pub ic 0 0 r;Division, Scale 1"= 200', datedDemernber 5, 1978, R 700-i7.-1:17.A, R 7.0-'1751.17B MaidR 700-17-51.17C, Sheets 1, 2 #nd 3 of 3, rýecd in th Rclkongham Cofinty.Registry of Deds as Plan No.t-85 60, and all iarcels 1Wrig eiitirelly within ai Lot2, but excepting.Lot 1Las shown on said plan and'also excepling the lanid .nv..eyeby iop.".tis, Inc. and Public Service-.Company ofNew Haimp hite (hereinafter "PSNHn').t the Town of Seabrook by deed dated F ebruary 8, 1980 x in saidlRgistryst:b .k 2358, Page 590;-B. A certain piece, ý,arcl or tract of lnd uituated in said Seabrook,.as descr'bed and conveyed in a deedfrmAnt.ri.o and Loutis td:PSNH dated March 27, 1983, rec6fdid in.said 1ockinb Reirsy aiBook 2439, SC. Those c or tracts ofland si.tuted in said Hamptn Falls and Sehbiobk' and'ihowii as Parte)s 1-53 through *156 6A .A' ian ?enhtleda "Bixhbit D, Seabrook Nuclear Station Area of.fpoposed Intake & Disoha1ge:Cooling Tunns, Seabrook, -' ."Hamptonandantonalls New .Hainp T4e"Scale: Asishwn, dated March 26, 1974,*preparid .for PS jbyio ina .Moi~i lii, Civil hnp-iciers & Surveyrs, Bedford, N.H., recorded in sad B."ckýi Rdgistry.as D-5064; .aud* D. All certain pýeces, parcels ortracts oflandsituated easterlyofbut not adjacent to-said U.S. oute I. in said arid shoiwn ýskcel 101 through 103. 105 f t6r#gh 11-2,-115 thiough 132, 134, 1354 though 38, 140,"and 143:through 145 on a plan entitled "Exhibit C, Seabro6k Nuclear StionProposed Exclusion Area, Seabrook and Hapton .Falls, NewHampshirW.', Scale: As Shown, dited.March 30, 1974,prepared for' Book 3875 Page2237 This image for atcopyrml at Rockingham County on 07/04118 8K3875PG2237 PSN by Thomwa F. Moran Inc., Civil ngineers& Su rý, Bedor N.B, rejý*i" .aid Roci sistry as P!an No. D-4494.:'For Gszntor's title to the Adj ac6mt Property e aboe, .se deed and bill of sale of PSNH to Graritoi datd 3. 1992,frdi in m R':gist'r, at Book 2928, Page 1003.reoddaBoo k332. kc. .t ar.l~cyManufao-turig C oiora. ion,;.4ated 26, 1997, recrde a'iA .3.243, PaT:lI ;; d t ..Roert ý'rnaoprt sid Ruth slan.gan, d ated Als.", ceta." piees or.parc .. ofland l.cated in the, Towns of.S.'.abrgo. &d Hampton falls,.* "Propek Sdrtey Seabrook; N.5jiý6idea PwrSation 2 ý SearoBptoFDlsHKn~owles.Hax~ips.hireSt'v.yiig .ngby.I URS S ,,, Scale 1in-=Ib00' Date: October 200.2..,..!Pro.ject

  1. 369126.93'.-Sht e 'it f 16 toi.ought

.16 qf. l 'which map to be recorded wih imo .ni , fac~iites on,'t the eLrtont not decrSite above, which* recoisesateBo-23 ?ar patciirb;udeed;and describmasa~a follmigws:ic Beginningnat a od on the westein.e oflndw*fo .nerbl;',of the.State ~of Ne.w~apshi.'., D.O.T., said pdnt *beig on .the divisio, line.bebtween land nw or ~rniery of orth Alanti edeg Coprti on Bt bl, bn th5.s mdScn*Unit Site," an the sou~ih. and thehein Par.ce.l on the n orth" Thence ran ig N. orth 75-10' 15" West, 752.18 feet along said land now or formerly of North Thence running Noth 150 z 02. 1" Wes't, 223.46 feet ualong said.land nbw or Ibrerly of North (2653/623), p"tb each;2 Thence 'n' .orth 63 .19.'55" Iast,'222.50.fI..and Nofth73:I" 45"wst, 52320' feret.ruste md .PS6ton3 Trustee (-:28/2);41344,2 Book 3875 Page 2238 This image for at copyrml at Rockingham County on 07/04/18 w .--'Ki38 75PG2238 Theniceý wI a n* N6rth.6*35'2 25" East, 598.85:fbetalong land now or fdbnrmry of`Kenneth S., peltd stee.d- R, 1. .t.PeFlton,:Trustei (34281892) to lind now orfrmerly ofJay M.&Piscilla'-S. Lrd (2893/1982). Thenc running South 830.24g. 35" East, 520.36 -feet along land noiw or forzixerly of Jay*M &: Prilla S.;I-ord.(:2893/1982) in"landow' or nlyofHuiet R.& Betty-L.Brown (2l59/iS.), paily-bye,,,b;""'" '- .".: .-BtL Brown*Thence'runing South .82 07'-50"Vast, 27821 feet along lInd now' or formerly of Hubert I.L &BettyL. Brown (2.159/37) aid limna'dnOv or fonn&ly-ofAn .& Alie B, Brown (3098/1868, 21/8.382),.pdrtlyby-ea. Thence. nnzing South 82001 '0I" East, 483.64 ft along land' ow or formerly of Alan IL &Alic.Z BroiWn (OS./l S 6 S 2..S/3 S 2), land now or fo.r...ly o~f olik & Gýorgianan Swain (224.i1089), and lanidmnow-o i of aul T. Ay .40/3, 1 Thece. rnmning South 82 P21' 22" East, 125.02 feet along .land now or f onperlyof Paul T. &*.Amy .;Mcavoy (3490/321) to land now or forey ' f th0zStte .f New H.ipsbe, D.O.T.(3449/335); .Thence.running South 170 41- 55" West, .54.57 feet, Nomi59o 42' I0? Wqst, 33.81 fee, sad South 17*.41'-55" West, 'M 38!.eet along 'nd now or ,foimeFli'of the State of Nw Hampshir, D,O,T, tbthdple nd'poinO irb g. ' ..Beginning at a m.numentlocated on the nottherly.trt -line of Rocks Roakc:said being on 9ithe division .ane betw..enether ..ad now orfonermyo f4ortlfAtla.itic En&gy. Corporation on the east i.land now:or foi .erilyo6fRoiiald Mnýy (31.25/2i07) &i the w~st;-Thence runnig North 000 473 45" East, 615.19 feet along land now or forimerly of Ronald rM.ra(. 2 '511207),'aid latd now or fmly of Edmýd .&C harlotte M.rshal (1778/218), to lidl 'oW or fom&fy 6fNloth At-lntfi EnigyCorpbratlon, et al, being the Mi'i and Sicord u Si,(Lt tii; -L .1'...1 Thence running Nqrth .S2 02' 02" East, 1,994.30 feet, along lanad now or formerly of North Aflantic Teg el A being the First ad.Sicond.U nit- Site toland now or formerly*oflthe.Stateodf Newa pshi.', D.O.T..Thene ranning South 17'041' 55" Wet, 369.63f14t, South 83' 37' 05" West, 36.15 feet, South 17.*.41' 55".West, .165.00 feett South 830,37l. 05" W.stý. 12.3-53 feet; South 870 42'" 00' East, 219.67 feet ýa No4rtri17. 41'"-55""East,; 73..74'feei land w-6r' oniierty of the State of* New -IH.shirO, D.O.T. to lod now or formerly o fNo.. Atlntic Encigy.Corporation, Ct a,: ~~~being ihe Fir~t and Soiond Unit'Site;

  • ..-It?"=

Book 3875 Page 2239 This image for atcopyrml at Rockingham County on 07/04/18.. ....... .. .- -' .' ,, '......." SB387 5 PG22239 Thence ru N = .o.th .1.37'. 45" .astý 602.58 fýe thence, on a curve to the right having a radius o$9;9.25fieet rnd an ýf 687:58 feet, ihcnc .oVt '58° 32T 50" Ei~t 90.63feet, South S 4. West, 33.70 f-,'Soth 55ý.59' 15" .W e,- feet, .Soith 346 00,45" East,-I.3 -fet, Nort 63 0!45 East, 414.01 feet Ait `42710 Eat 1;190.67 feet, North* 1700 D. es, 53.7 fet; h .824' -We.t, 538. feet, North7103 04 ,'374.64 10t,.South 6-90 13i'O ~!wtst;, 5 I.9 ccet%1oib $ýw3 50" Werst l00AO feet, theiice on" a -ye ~t~heRt .havring of 1 j14.25 r en.gth of 774.46 feet, and thence Sout 8 i 37"45" West,.5 4tf, iall couries along laind nOw or formerly ofNorth Atlantic Erndri Cor oration2 etal First and Second U.a.t Wits, to land nowor formerly of the Stae ofl~ Hsrnpshie; D.O.T.; -' ; ..Thencec ru~nning North 170 41' 55t East, 824.6 feet, SOuth. 81? 24` 05" East, 16.69 feet, North.17. .5,5". East, 797.95 fet,'South5. 59042' 10' East, 16.9'. feit, North 17 55".East, 794.25 feet North 820.21' 22'" Wost 33,A0 feetQ.nd*Nrth:17?: I* 155" &4t, 562.49 fedt.along land now or formnerly of the State ofNewv Hiam.pshe, D.bOT. to. in the Town of'Ham" pton Falls;'Then.opemigNorth 850.09' 00".East. 146.39.feet, South-86.:51'.30.ast,243.82 feet thence-'on.a curve to rt lt rigt having .d'iuis of 275.00 fedt and @narc length of 105.62 feet, and thence-Sothi 640 5V' !10" Eak .55 eA leas.a "urs.s alcng.rier Lane to the easterly teninu o Brnuer adenet Pin A n he'an Fihoihi A:Is'located North 180 56' 49" Wet 2696.00 'feet fm Point 'B n the Plan at the noftheastriy .cr.er of L~bt 1;.Thence rpnng northerlyalong.te terninus of B.immer Lahe and land now or formerly of W.llifb .& Fiye pirtl}, ,y each,:to land niow or fboi erlypofHuldah & Grace Fog.(2638/2-55);. Theqne rnig generally.easterly and ýoutherly along-various cour.es thr9ugh the salt marsh all-as nb.o ."te~pan to theth dfthcek " Thence running southerly along the thread of the creek as"ihown on the Plan;-Thence runimng generall~Yw.tcrjy,-.so.uterjy, cis'.rly and southerly through the salt marsh to the thread bf-Brdwns River all as sh'n on the.Plan;

  • Thence southerly and Osterly along the thread of River and the'nce from a point easterly Sfro.i thread :ofBros m' Rivr t salt maC.8 tbt t Hairi all as shown on the Plan;Thence'southerly along HaamptonHarbor-and ai pint westerly through the salt marsh to the thriad ofBfo...w Rtvr'all shown onlthe Plan;Thence .southerly mnd teqrly all as shown. ion the Plan the thread in parts and through the salt-marsh in partso4f.Hunt's Isla ndC-4ek .nd':trbitaies thereo to a-poitit.4t3MIiQ 4.

(0 Book 3875 Page 2240 This image for at copyrml at Roclingham County on 07104118 ( .... ... ~ ...... ..z : i i' .'BK 3 8 75PG2240 Ssouthwesterly Of rittlifiqld Island.*Thenice generally westerly throgh the -sat marsh as sho"i on the-Planto a nonurnent it Point D* on th6 ma~n ai land rowor fomierly'bf-Ronald H uiýd, Si.- & Tgsesa. L. Perins-Lud, Tnqsee (35301 ROWmD.-bso id 9uth .6."9' 03"..Et 3088:q2 feet.rom Point c on the* Thence running South- 736 30 131! WPAt 359.46'feet' alonighlnd now 6r forxiierly of Ronald IL Lmid, Si..& Tisesa L ,ir.id;ns-tL n (3p3.0/1.6) ,ld Jtow or.formerly-ofEmerald N. Eat.on 1219/146) .".' *Thiene Mmning South 7.9" 09' .54!' West; 216.11 Ifeet along and nowcw for a4Y f neloEnie r Ald N.Eatdn.(12l8i146) to lad" noor nl,. (3452/1429);.The~.~.$amingouth .3h .00;48" W.est, 1t.6.84feet along land now or foimerly of Warner B.Knovvles(3512*/142) to la'nd ofRichardýJ. &CoraMY.F. Cihooi(3123/2i7.3), Thene r t, 291.19 .eet North 8 58' 47" Wst 442.60et and South 07013'Y 02".West, 376.88 feet, all courses aloi~ lad f Rcad1 onM.Cho (3123/2173) lto'andnow or formerly ofEllen M.:&Franci s 3G. ase(855/1052);( 0 ." ... ."' .... .. .' ...Thlence. ng North. 83035' 00" West, 161.31 feet along land n bw or formerly of Ellen M. &Franc6is G.. Chase (3855/l052):and bai~d ow oifkwaiql'O( nthbny'J._& Kare~xn ME Richards 3479/630), partly y each t a d now or. foreof .ii-B Idpmeilt Lot #4 (3256/2165); Tence.-punli North 09. 2b.' 38" East, -3.97.98 feet-along land lnow or-formerly of Kim-E-D6*Iopmi-mat Lot #4 j a nid l owor formerly f:.-E C6ndominlum

  1. 5 S(3319/269?7ý), payrt ochi'"hen. 'cbinn g North 77°-2S'.2. .West, 170.92 f.et, th6ne and southerly on, anr "rr.gu.I" l.ie .260 f..t, n. or less, longind.'ob'.r Condoinmium
  2. 5 (331/2697 to or fom&1lf ninham#6"(.30911.69);

Thence runn westerly on an ir.gular line, 232fee.t, moie or Iess,..and thence South 050 491 37" Vast, 44.9§ ýfet' a.6xg..laidiw .orforimTery pDj Con-,E 6m6 minW #6 '(3091/969) to aind now bi formerly.of iiyH. Boyd, iJr. (3233/1197);" Thence running Sothf 68O. 17' 58" West, 56.42 feet aofig land now or forimerly ofHe-yH,'tPyd, Jr. (3233/1197); Souh 020-06'33" West, 65Z92 feet along land fiow or foix'erly.ofHenry H.Boyd, .r.; land n6w. or foir.tily of Artkift. & AntriiittL. AdA', i (3226/i13 0)M lnd now or'formerly (3.1L222T) land n-&.. 6rfrinerf3bf Steven C. &Deie~.~ia(333111958) ýnd -land no:F~ oprfo7ý.4Mni D s' '

  • a.rorl of Montgom.eryM.U

& MalisaSmith (3368/t! par.ybkeadio landrio forrnel oArknld D. &Joant. Knowles, T.ustees (S Book 3875 Page 2241 This image for atcopyrml at Rockingham County on 07/04/18". 387SPG22t4 i (3225/2403); Thie4n runringNorth 86" 47' 27-" West, 134.00 feet, and South 020 06 .33".West, .190.83 feet along Iand nv or fri erly of Arnold D. & Ruotn.: knowies, Trustees.(3225.2413) to Farm Lane;'Thenc nng.North'865"6'1"ý West, n15.529 fet along FarmW. Lanse tb' land now or formerly of Tracy.A..Ro0e'ts.O3l0/b06j;. ... .Thence rmin01-7 Nr h -O1 i 5 '64" 5t 952:.24 feiet along laridno or formerly of Tracy A. Thenýc. nmning North 810 .26' 33" We-t, 36Z93. eet. lohiý ad* Tracy A.k er and lad .now or & Ruth F3.42$ 28 artl0) y by -eab, .to land now or foiinerly-ýf ~ pd.'O B ,:*FeA.4 ." "..Thence " nmig North 02 0 1 35 Afet,,mbre br,-Ie, aid .thence westerly on an irregular,464 fe, or.les,. ao6ng .. B. Felch (3495/707) to land now;,or fq rly of Y l i .uc sr Tustee sT. AL. (3183/253); Thenic runmningNoith ,04. 13' 41'. Wesl,.616 feet; moreor les,.al6ng ldnow or fo.nerly of KatIhry S.' Wili~ams, SuebssorTrustee, et a!. (318:3/2-53), laud, now or formerly oftori Kelleber&Danie. Calderwo9d (27861829), land now oirf6rianýly of Salyatore .. & Elle6n D. Anzilone (3272ý4Z5) 4nd Iihid now ori.nly of Miehae1 A4 St. & K.-lly 3. O'Connor.(320311341), o't f to 1a no b~tlM.Bowden(2038189); pafly by each,6 aiid now 'i yojaye Thence running North 23? 07' 56" WeSt, 1.87.17 feet, and North 780 32' 36".West, 353.25 feet along land nowv'or~formierly ofWayne D, & .Mibel M, ,owden (20381189,2408/1358) to land noworfoqrmetiyof ibStd eoflewHampshire. D.O.T.; .Thence ruinning North 170 37'40" E2st, 1,5.5feet; Noilh.17 41"..55"aS4,365.81 feet, Noi.t 860 2P' 35.'East, 139.74 feet, N.rtoh87 0 42 6, .W 3.26,46 'feet .Suth 80"o 46' 15" East. 119,89 feet, South 17* 41" 5.5 W6at,347,.49 feet.ad South f17-137- " West, 1,696.13b feet, :i~i along land now cr orrmrlytc State .f Ne '"shire, D.O.T., to land now oi fipbirij of Iaes W. Snbor .(302/1905); Thence runningNorth 660 37! 38" West,95r66 36' 14" West, 349.91 feet along lahn no* or fornrnreiy.of Janes W. Sanborn (39290.) to land now or roinerly of Mervin A. Lo&k'& Ama May,.al:ons(2435/1499); Thence ;uning .North *64 .07!.41' 194.26 feet and So.th 17. 36 14" West, 385.75 feet along land now or f"okr "e' yofM.ervi A.A ..ke & na Miy. B .ukonzs (2435/1499) to land nowv r:.formb ly .ofciorgeLnL Hi* Trustee (3442/2321). Thence-.rning North 72"- 22' 46" West, 168.19 teet,-South 02*0.52.4W West 468.88 feet, North 406= *0 Book 3875 Page 2242 This image for at copyrml at Rockingham County on 07104118-.3. ..PG. Z ...* .....8K3 .87I.820.. 18' 55"."Wc.st, 106.57 feet and Norh.020.49'. 53" We"5 03.84. fret now or-fonely~~or~geL

...Thence running North 57.0 04' 45",.West 346.93 fes .along land. now or formerly.

of G.orge L Haf-na, T. rasee arid ibd nhw.6r for.erly of th 'state opfd oowHaj Ch-s. (1456/224), partly by each; .." Thence South 63°28'553' Wdst, 153.19 feet.long lind now br formerly ofE~state of Ha-ry E.Chase (1456/224) to land jow or formerly of thes~abrok H ousing (2.805/1 087);Thence runng North 100 30'40." 4 ast,42.91 feet and thence on" a .,- 1fio right ng raýius o6f73271 .fret and an ar6 l.ngth of 650.38 feet along land nmo. or formerly of the Seabook Hosing Auth.rity (2805/1087) to bla now or formerlyof GBt." Reltate Holings, LLC (302.7/2643); Theice rnningNor'th 090 20.'.37r' East 3.50 feet along land now or ornrerly of GRA Real EstatI Hoidings, L (3027/2643); .-.T.hence North68c 41' 25" West, 138.83;feetalong land now or fornerly of GRA Real Estate Hold IIG,'L (3027"/2$43) a .i!rl sft ,in" 6f.Chevy.Che a d, patly by each to aInd now or kier* y of the Stte~ofNe.nb (3555/2331); Thenc" ra nig-N orth 21? 46' 11".East, 60.01-feet. along" "nd now or.formerly of the State of New Hmhire(355..233 I) to lra. d now orformerly of iley Cpor'tioi'(242 1/269);Therce running.South:680.41' 24.":Eaýt, 1.07.24 feet, South 84 12'V 50" East, 18.68 fect, South 680 41. 25" Eat 565.85 feet, .thenc on. ,ume to the leftlA'In

a. 'aiiof627 feet and an arc lenith of 702.61 feet, rd hnNor 10028'.31" landnow orf fonrer1-y.f Biley. Corlomtricn(2421/269) to land ndw or-friýdlyofth Twn of Se~brook:(2358/590,3096/2201);

'.Thence running N-oh 73001 20 East, 725.0 fee North 14.014' 00" Wet, 148.20 e, Nort 280 '50' '05"ast, -72.28fet, N~rt.4. 35'45" We0t, [47.90 feet,.bxth 47.40' 40" West87.20 feet, North 46! 22'"43" West,*66.09fee, North04..13' 09" West, ý99.69 feet, South 89* 28' 50" 19.60 feet,-hec ort 840.45o. 18" Ena,s 115 feet, the..e on a curve to th left hevixi a radiUs of.563.97 feet ad. an ar egth feet,-andthence North 62 45' 20" East,.213S0 feet aloand Rock .R0adI. " ; -"' .; ' " ." * " " Thence running North 270 14' 407 Wes, 49.50 feet. .ron$ the .iastqriy terminus of Rock.s Road;.3.7.

  • Book 3875 Page 2243 This image for at copyrml at Rockingham County on 07/04118............

.... ......... .. .........' " PG 2 -.......... ..... ...t* " .. ; ..Vo ..-S .. *7 **- ., -...... ..- BK3:-8 Th.,P G2 -lbnc unng South 62"* 45v 20".Wast213:50 fiet thence on a curvetoc r = the right having a radiu *- " 4.- -' "d a "'r- k o17 f*664 theC. Sdu-li"840 45! 18""Ws, 1"15.95 feet~~ tnce.on, :. curve, to the baiF~ing gad'uis of 407-29 feet and an ,am length of 170.99*tan ,i Road tohe place *ind i'.oto.fiegmn." parc l ....-*The cneyed in dcedfrom the Towvn:of S&abrooýkt Pro -rties, -Inc. dated Febýruary 27, 1976 mh. 'Roc hi C.mO..t -.eg-.trg,.of)ee. thn Book 2254, Page 404, being a portion of Co M-Mon' TsUland ink he Town o.f Sei;Abrokrnc 6ssown on the Plan.A-41164i22 AHiv kt THE STATE OFNEWHAMPSHIRE (0 J ! "DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION Department of Transportation GEORGE N. CAMPBELL, JR. JEFF BRILLHAR COMMISSIONER ASSISTANT COMU4f May 6, 2010 Paul Freeman, Vice-President NextEra Energy Seabrook, LLC PO Box 300 Seabrook, NH 03874 Re: State-owned Hampton Branch Railroad Corridor, Seabrook, NH Temporary Use Agreement -NextEra Energy

Dear Mr. Freeman:

Attached are two (2) copies of the Temporary Use Agreement between the State of New Hampshire and NextEra Energy Seabrook, LLC for the use of a parcel of the State-owned Hampton Branch Railroad Corridor in Seabrook, NH. Please have an Officer of the Company sign both of the Agreements and have their signature witnessed. Then return both signed Agreements to the Bureau of Rail and Transit along with the following:

1. Certificate of Vote, authorizing signatory (Notarized)
2. Certificate of Good Standing, from the Office of the Secretary of State 2. The required Insurance Certificate
3. Also include a check made payable to: Treasurer, State of New Hampshire" in the amount of $400.00 to cover the preparation and first yearly administrative fee.Upon receipt of the signed Agreements and other required forms, I will have the Temporary Agreements executed and forward a copy to you.If you have any questions, I can be reached at (603) 271-2425 or by email at lbarker@dot.state.nh.us.

Sincerely, -, Louis A. Barker Railroad Planner O Einc (2)BUREAU OF RAIL & TRANSIT JOHN 0. MORTON BUILDING

  • 7 HAZEN DRIVE e P.O. BOX 483 e CONCORD, NEW HAMPSHIRE 03302-0483 TELEPHONE:

603-271-2468

  • .FAX: 603-271-6767 e TDD ACCESS: RELAY NH 1-800-735-2964 e INTERNET:

WWW.NHDOT.COM T, P.E.SSIONER Regulatory Correspondence Review & Approval Record LETTER REVIEW IS EXPECTED TO BE COMPLETE WITHIN 2 WORKING DAYS OF RECEIPT BY THE REVIEWER Title: -C'Agency: .Letter Number': Seek-' L- /0 0 Due Date: LicensinggLead _ _ _ _ __ _ _Phpne No.. _"_..___.... Mana Vr Rsponsiole for Technical Accuracy Date Reviewb Due Date: _"_- ___" iReiewer -! inature Date Reviewer .i.n.ture Scensing Reg Programs" 7 Manager f/i *,o .-()Manager. S Operatins Legal.. .:w. .o., ngineering T raining: _ _ ______ _____ 1,Z () PGM ._____ ____S.() AstPGM :__" ___._:..Maintenance .L_.__-_.." __..(4Corporate A.A :5 !!LSteVk_____ ()-SORC Meeting No: __"_." __- SORC Signature:......... CLONED LETTER: (")Yes (Cloned letters a peer review) Peer Review: Validation Review Yes ()BY: __________________ No() Date: Method .Doesi: letter. co nrtain commitments? Yes {) No (,'. .( ) Confidential, Proprietary, or Tra.c.king C r nitiated ) CR Number "_."_ Safeguards letters are properly Commitment.Database Updated? ( ) stamp.ed:l. or.Widentified. Admin Rev'iew " _____."____.___" I :_"__:_:_"* Letter Format Correct , Signature and Date on Original Letter* Letter Distribution Correct"Oath.or Affirmation Signature I Notarized on Original* Date of letter & Notary are consistent Mailed to Agency (By/Date): US Mail UPS Registered Other Date KNErHYSEABROOK May 14, 2010 SBK-L-10096 New Hampshire Department of Transportation Bureau of Rail and Transit PO BOX 483 Concord, NH 03302-0483 Attn: Christopher Morgan, Administrator Seabrook Station Temporary Use Agreement Thank you for your response related to NextEra's request dated April 6, 2010.o Attachment 1 provides the executed Temporary Use Agreement provided by N-DOT.o Attachment 2 provides a Certificate of Insurance showing general liability coverage in the amount of $1,000,000 each occurrence and $2,000,000 in the aggregate. The Certificate of Insurance designates the State of New Hampshire as additional insured. An operating railroad does not apply to this Temporary Use Agreement. Additionally, a Railroad Protective Public Property Damage Insurance has not been provided since this access is not located on an active railroad corridor.o Attachment 3 provides a bond in the amount of $2,5000 as determined by NHDOT.o Attachment 4 provides the record of decision providing confirmation of the authorized signatory. o Attachment 5 provides a NextEra Energy Seabrook, LLC Certificate of Good Standing from the New Hampshire Secretary of State.A check totaling $400 is enclosed which provides the one-time preparation fee of $350 plus a fee of $50 for the Agreement for a one-year term.I appreciate your assistance with this item. Please feel free to contact Mike O'Keefe at (603)773-7745 should you have any questions or need additional information related to this matter.Sincerely, NextEra Energy Seabrook, LLC Paul Freeman Site Vice President NextEra Energy Seabrook, LLC, P.O. Box 300, Lafayette Road, Seabrook, NH 03874 NextEra Energy Seabrook, LLC Temporary Use Agreement Attachment

1. Executed Temporary Use Agreement SEABROOK -Haul Road Crossing April 1, 2010 PROSECUTION OF WORK ON Nil DOT RAILROAD PROPERTY DESCRIPTION OF WORK The work on this project entails the installation of a temporary crossing and gate to allow excavation equipment and rock trucks to cross the railroad tracks. The use of the crossing shall be limited to authorized rock trucks and equipment by keeping the gate locked at all times it is not in use. The crossing shall consist of fill with drainage facilities to maintain existing drainage after removal and temporary storage of track materials.

The State of New Hampshire Bureau of Rail & Transit must meet with the Contractor on site to determine the exact location of the temporary crossing, drainage facilities and gate.RAILROAD OWNER AND OPERATOR The Contractor shall coordinate their work on this project with the Railroad Owner and the Railroad Operator. The railroad corridor is owned by the State of New Hampshire. State of New Hampshire Department of Transportation (Railroad Owner)Mr. Louis A. Barker Bureau of Rail & Transit PO Box 483 Concord, New Hampshire 03302 Tel. (603) 271-2468 RAILROAD COORDINATION All work performed by the Permittee on NH DOT Railroad property directly or indirectly affecting the Railroad Owner and shall be coordinated with the State of New Hampshire Bureau of Rail & Transit. The Permittee shall furnish to the Bureau of Rail & Transit the name of a designated contact person responsible for handling this project and Railroad related issues. The Permittee must contact the Railroad Owner a minimum of one (1) week before entering onto or crossing over railroad property.This project is located on an inactive railroad line that has restricted access. All work performed within the railroad corridor shall be coordinated with the State of New Hampshire Bureau of Rail & Transit.RIGHT-OF-WAY AND PROTECTION OF PROPERTY'The Contractor shall not modify the Railroad property in any way other than described in this Prosecution of Work and authorized by the State of NH DOT Bureau of Rail & Transit. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this Agreement in duplicate, the day and year first written a__PERMITTEE: ______-_____ -_________ /~~jt/D~~t.e tV Ur e. e.~3U WINSSDTE (print name & title) W D STAýTE: Christopher Morgan, Administrator WITNESS DATE for the Director of Administration This is to certify that the above-Agreement has been reviewed by this office, and is approved as to form and execution. OFFICE OF ATTORNEY GENERAL DATE 4

2. Indemnification and Insurance 2.1 The Permittee acknowledges that the use of the property is requested for the Permittee's advantage and does not involve the State's performance of their duties to the public. The Permittee further acknowledges that the use of the Property by the Permittee will expose the State to additional liability to which they would not otherwise be exposed. Accordingly, the Permittee agrees that State shall not be-liable for injury or death of the Permittee or agent of Permittee or for loss or destruction of or damage to any property of the Permittee or any agent of the Permittee while upon or about, the Railroad property.

The Permittee and -its employees, contractors and agents agree to defend, indemnify, and hold harmless the State, its officers, agents and employees, from and against any and all losses suffered by the State, its successors and assigns, officers, agents, employees from any and all claims, liabilities or penalties asserted against the'State, its successors and assigns, officers, agents and employees, by or on behalf of any person on account of, based or resulting from, arising out of (or which may be claimed to arise out of) the acts or omissions of the Permittee. Without limiting the foregoing, it is agreed that this covenant of indemnification shall apply to all cases of loss, damage, injury, death, cost or expense for which any party to this agreement may or shall be liable. For the purpose of this agreement, all persons using the Property shall be deemed agents of the Permittee. Notwithstanding the foregoing, nothing herein contained-shall be deemed to constitute a waiver of sovereign immunity of the State, which immunity is hereby reserved to the State. This covenant shall survive the termination of this Agreement. In addition the Permittee shall pay the premiums on a policy or policies of insurance covering the use of the Property designating the State of New'Hampshire as additional named insured.2.1.1 Commercial General Liability: $1,000,000.00 each occurrence/$2,000,000.00 in the aggregate 2.1.2 Comprehensive Automobile Liability: $500,00.0.00 combined single limit 2.1.3 Worker's Compensation Insurance In the amount as required by current State Statute 2.2 The Permittee shall provide to the State and maintain in force a certificate of insurance demonstrating that the required coverage has been obtained and containing the following wording. "The State of New Hampshire is named as additional insured with respect to liability arising from the use and/or occupation of State-owned premises under this Temporary Use Agreement between the State and the Named Insured." Nothing contained herein shall be construed as a waiver of sovereign immunity.3. Fees and Property Taxes 3.1 In consideration of this Agreement, the Permittee shall pay to the State, a preparation fee of three hundred fifty ($350.00) dollars and a fifty ($50.00) dollar administrative fee due on the date first-written above.3.2 The Grantee acknowledges that this Temporary Use Agreement does not vest any rights to a Lease Agreement. 2 5LA 8,Zooti 7, -<rd / ,lv ( SEABROOK -Haul Road Crossing (W April 1, 2010 PROSECUTION OF WORK ON NiH DOT RAILROAD PROPERTY DESCRIPTION OF WORK The work on this project entails the installation of a temporary crossing and gate to allow excavation equipment and rock trucks to cross the railroad tracks. The use of the crossing shall be limited to authorized rock trucks and equipment by keeping the gate locked at all times it is not in use. The crossing shall consist of fill with drainage facilities to maintain existing drainage after removal and temporary storage of track materials. The State of New Hampshire Bureau of Rail & Transit must meet with the Contractor on site to determine the exact location of the temporary crossing, drainage facilities and gate.RAILROAD OWNER AND OPERATOR The Contractor shall coordinate their work on this project with the Railroad Owner and the Railroad Operator. The railroad corridor is owned by the State of New Hampshire. State of New Hampshire Department of Transportation (Railroad Owner)Mr. Louis A. Barker Bureau of Rail & Transit PO Box 483 Concord, New Hampshire 03302 Tel. (603) 271-2468 RAILROAD COORDINATION All work performed by the Permittee on NH DOT Railroad property directly or indirectly affecting the Railroad Owner and shall be coordinated with the State of New Hampshire Bureau of Rail & Transit. The Permittee shall furnish to the Bureau of Rail & Transit the name of a designated contact person responsible for handling this project and Railroad related issues. The Permittee must contact the Railroad Owner a minimum of one (1) week before entering onto or crossing over railroad property.This project is located on an inactive railroad line that has restricted access. All work performed within the railroad corridor shall be coordinated with the State of New Hampshire Bureau of Rail & Transit.RIGHT-OF-WAY AND PROTECTION OF PROPERTY The Contractor shall not modify the Railroad property in any way other than described in this Prosecution of Work and authorized by the State of NH DOT Bureau of Rail & Transit. TEMPORARY USE AGREEMENT This Agreement made this J*) day of 2010 between the State of New Hampshire, by and through the New HampshirV Department of Transportation, Bureau of Rail and Transit, PO Box 483, Concord, NH 03302-0483, hereinafter referred to as"State" and NextEra Energy Seabrook, LLC, PO Box 300, Seabrook, NH 03874, thereinafter referred to as "Permittee". WHEREAS, the State is the owner of a railroad corridor in the Town of Seabrook, County of Rockingham, State of New Hampshire. WHEREAS, the Permittee is desirous .of obtaining permission to enter onto a portion of the State-owfied Hampton Branch Railroad corridor to install a temporary crossing and gate for hauling excavated material at approximate Engineering Station 2269+00+/-, Map V 3NH141, hereinafter referred to as the Property, as per the attached plan provided by Seabrook Trucking, Inc. are hereby incorporated in the Agreement. NOW THEREFORE, subject to and conditioned upon the performance by the Permittee of all the covenants set forth below, the State grants to the Permittee, permission to enter onto the above-described portion of railroad corridor to install a temporary crossing for logging.1. Use of Railroad Property 1.1 The Permittee agrees that it is liable for the cost of all work performed on NHDOT Railroad Property and that any such work shall be performed according to the attached Prosecution of Work dated April 1, 2010, and at a time and under conditions acceptable to State. Such liability shall include the cost of all on-site inspectors or other representatives of the State, if such individuals are necessary in the sole judgment of the State. At no time shall any work interfere with the use of the Railroad Property by the State, its lessees or assigns. The Permittee is solely responsible for the presence of its equipment along the State-owned railroad corridor.1.2 The Permittee is required to obtain and keep in force before their work begins, any and all other permissions, permits, and easements required for the project by federal, state, county, or town governments; and their agencies or boards; or any other political subdivision thereof. The Permittee shall be responsible for investigating and determining the need for and applying for all relevant permits and approvals. 1.3 The Permittee shall coordinate any and all work within the railroad corridor with the State by contacting the NHDOT's Rail and Transit Bureau at (603)271-2468. The Permittee shall contact the State a minimum of one week prior to beginning their work to obtain approval from the Railroad Operator to enter the railroad property.1.4 The NH DOT Railroad personnel may inspect the site during and after the work is being performed. 1.5 The Permittee is required to install a gate between South Access road and the State-owned Railroad corridor. The gate must be a minimum 15' from the centerline of the track and be closed and locked during non-working hours.I IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this Agreement in duplicate, the day and year first writtena PERMITTEE

j~r 5, Date-lauMWLA W FIN E 5W'DATE (print name & title)STATE: Christopher Morgan, Administrator for the Director of Administration WITNESS DATE This is to certify that the above-Agreement has been reviewed by this office, and is approved as to form and execution.

OFFICE OF ATTORNEY GENERAL DATE 4 56,A P:))900K-7-ýeIYCKIA2ý, /Wr.rN NextEra Energy Seabrook, LLC Temporary Use Agreement Attachment

2. Certificate of Insurance Please note the Nil DOT suggested language for the Insurance Certificate has been utilized.

The name of a railroad company has not been included as it does not apply for this situation."The State of New Hampshire is named as additional insured with respect to liability arising from the use and/or occupation of State-owned premise under this Crossing Agreement between the State and the Named Insured." ..,NExT~era.... " H* t .. .1C .. ...May02010.Christopher Morgan New Hampshire DOT Bureau of Rail and Transit P.O. Box 483 Concord, NH 03302 Rt: Self-Insurance Docuimentation Please be advised that NextEraEnergy Seabrook, LLC is self-insuired for the following coverage's: General Liability: $.1,000,000.00 -Any One Occurrence NextEra Energy Seabrook, LLC agreesto be responsible for risk of lolss, or damage to the equipment or liatbility coverage described per the .terms offthe SeabrookTruck Center Contract -02218558.Sincereiy, Stmbcy.Wckasiub Stacy Winnubst ,Risk Management .0.Un .verse....... ... ..Ju.o..each.... .... 3340..70.0 Un.flvers~e Boulevard, Juno Beach., Flol[d~a 33408 Form B (Additional Insured)CeIrlific.'ate No. 1180..ASSOCIATED ELECTRIC &-GAS INSURANCE SERVICES LIMITED Hamilton, Bermuda CERTIFICATE OF INSURANCE (Excess Liability) This Certificate is furnished to the Certificate Holder named below as a matter of information only. Neither this Certificate nor the issuance hereof modifies the policy of insurance identified below(the "Policy") In any manner. The Policy terms are solely as stated In the Poi1cy or In any endorsement thereto. Any amendment, change or extension of the Policy can only be effected by a specific endorsement issued by the Company and attached to the Policy.The undersigned hereby certifIes tIhat the Policy has been Issued by Associated Electric & Gas Iisurance Services Limited (the-Company") to the Named Insured Identified below for the coverage described andlforthe policy period specified.. Notwithstanding any requirements, terms or conditions of any contract or other document with respect to which this Certificate rnay be issuedor to which It may pertain, the insurance afforded by the Policy is subject to all of the terms of le-Policy. NAME OF INSURED: NexEra -Energy Sepabro6k,. LLC PRINCIPAL ADDRESS: 700 Universe Blvd., Juno Beach FL, 33408 POLICY NUMBER: XO.lSA1AO9 POLICY From: .12/0112009. PERIOD: To: 12101/2010 RETROACTIVE DATE: 03/31/1986 DESCRIPTION OF COVERAGE: Claims-First-Made Excess Liability Policy covering claims for Bodily Injury, Property Damage and Personal Inju ry arising fromthe operatlons described below.LIMITS OF LIABILITY: Excess Llability: $2,000,000.00 -Aggregate ADDITIONAL The Certificate Holder is an additional Insured under thePolicy but only: INSURED: (i) to such extent a.nd for such Limits of Liability (subject always to the terms and Limits of Liability of the Policy)as the Named Insured has agreed to provide insurance for the CertificateHolder under the following contract: Seabrook Truck Center Contract.- 02218558 and (11) with respect to the following operations; Evacuate and remove from lhe General Office Building (GOB) rear dirt/stone area(s).Should the Policy be cancelled, assigned or changed in a manner that is mateilal[y adverse to the Insured(s) under the Policy, the undersigned will endeavor to give 60 days advance Written notice thereof to the Certificate Holder, but failure to give such notice will Impose no obligation or liability of any kind upon the Company, the undersigned or any agent or representative of either.DATE-_ May20, 2010 CERTIFICATE HOLDER: Chri stoher Mo rgan New Hampshire DOT Bureau of Rail and Transit PD.o Box483.Concord, NH 03302 ("Per ificate Holder"')AEGIS INSURANCE SERVICES, INC..At Jersey City, New Jersey NExTera ENERH G.... ... ...... ...... U RICES .: May 20, 2.010 Christopher Morgan New Hampshire DOT Bureau of Rail and Transit P.O. Box 483 Concord, NH 03302 RE: Self-wInsurance Dotcumentati.on Please be advised that NextEra Energy Seabrook, LLC is self-insured for the following coverage: General Liability: $1,000,000.00-Any One Occurrence Nexttra Energy Seabrook,.LLC agrees "to be reSponsible for risk of loss, or damage. to the equipment or liability coverage described per the terms of the Seabrook Truck Center Contractý-02218558. Sincerely, Sta*cy Vwtcvvvtbcrt Staey:WinnubSt Risk.Management 700 Universe Boulevard, Juno Beach, FlOrda 33408 Form B (AddWon6l insured)Cerfficate No..1789 ASSOCIATED ELECTRIC & GAS INSURANCE SERVICES LIMITED Hamiltorn, Bermuda CERTIFICATE OF INSURANCE (Excess Liability) This certificate is furnished to the Certificate Holder named below as a matter of information only. Neither this Certificate hot the Issuance hereof modifies the policy of insurance identified below (the*"Poicy'!) in any me-inner. The Policy terms are solely as stated In the Policy or in any endorsement thereto. Any amendment, change or extension of the Policy can ohly be effected by a specific endoisement issued by the Company and attached to the Policy.The undersigned hereby -certifies that the Policy has beeni Issued by Associated ElectriC & Gas Insurance Services Limited (the"C ompany") to the Named Insured Identified below for the coverage described and for the policy period specified.. Notwithstanding anyrequirements, terms or conditions of any bontract ora ther document with respect to which this Cer tificate may be issued or to which it may pertain, the insurance afforded bythe Policy is Subject to all of the terms of the Policy.NAME OF INSURED: NextEra Energy Seabrook, LLC PRINCIPAL ADDRESS; 700 Universe Blvd.. Jurno Beach Fl-, 33408 POLICY NUMBER: X01 BAA09 POLICY From: 12/0112009 PERIOD: To: 12/01i2010 RETROACTIVE DATE: 03/31/1986 DESCRIPTION OF COVERAGE: Claims-First-Made Excess Liability Policy covering claims for Bodily-injury, Property Damage and Personal Injury arising from the operations described below.LIMITS OF LIABILITY: Excess Liability: .$2,000,000.00-Aggregat6 ADDITIONAL The Certificate Holder is an additional Insured under the Policy but only: INSURED: (i) to such extent and for such Limits of Liability (subject always to the terms and Limits of Liability of the Policy)as the'Named Insured has agreed to provide insurance for the Certificate H0Ader.under the following contract: Seabrook Truck Center Contract-02285-58 and (11) With respect to the following operations: Evacuate and remove from the General Office Building (GOB) rear dirt/stone area(s).Should the Policy be cancelled, assigned or changed In a manner that is materially adverse to the insured(s) under the Policy, the undersigned Will endeavor to give 60 days advance written notice thereof to the Certificate Holder, but failure to give sUch notice will impose no obligation or !lability of any kind upon the Company, the undersigned or any agent or representatIve of either-DATE: May20, 2010 CERTIFICATE HOLDER:.Christopher Morgan New Hairpshire DOT Bureau of Rail and TransitýP.O; Box 483 C*oncord, NH 03302 ("Certificate Holder'.AEGIS INSURANCE SERVICES, INC.BY: 1 At Jersey City, New Jersey NextEra Energy Seabrook, LLC Temporary Use Agreement Attachment

3. Bond Requirement waived per discuss with State of New Hampshire Department of Transportation Louis A. Barker, Bureau of Rail and Transit NextEra Energy Seabrook, LLC Temporary Use Agreement Attachment
4. Record of Decision May 12, 2010 Paul Freeman, Vice President, NextEra Energy Seabrook, LLC, is. an authorized Signatory to enter into all contracts on behalf of the NextEra Energy Seabrook, LLC with the State of New Hampshire Department of Transportation

("NH DOT") for a crossing of, or temporary access to, NH DOT railroad property.This record of decision provides documentation that the authority granted to the Signatory has not been modified or withdrawn as of the date of execution of the Temporary Use Agreement executed on May 12, 2010.Rita W. Costantino Assistant Secretary NextEra Energy Seabrook, LLC State of Florida County of Palm Beach Before me personally appeared e1 UiJ C 0Stk~j'Vlc) to me well known and known to me to be the person described in and who executed the foregoing instrument, and acknowledged to and before me that she executed said instrument for the purposes therein expressed. WITNESS MY HAND AND OFFICIAL SEAL, THIS /24k day of $ .\/2010. Public State of Florida NextEra Energy Seabrook, LLC Temporary Use Agreement Attachment

5. NextEra Energy Seabrook, LLC Certificate of Good Standing

'ýtatit of Xefur PampsJhire, SPrartlrtrt of Statr CERTIFICATE I, William M. Gardner, Secretary of State of the State of New Hampshire, do hereby certify that NextEra Energy Seabrook, LLC, a(n) Delaware limited liability company registered to do business in New Hampshire on March 8, 2002. I further certify that it is in good standing as far as this office is cohcerned, having filed the annual report(s) and paid the fees required by law.In TESTIMONY WHEREOF, I hereto set my hand and cause to be affixed the Seal of the State of New Hampshire,.. this 1 8 th day of May, A.D. 2010 William M. Gardner Secretary of State

THE S T DEPA GERG N. CAPB-L-, NextEra En LLC Paul Freeman, Vice President P0 Box 300:Seabrook,;NH 03874 4TE OF NEW R F ....T OF TRAt..SPORTA PSHIRE JEFFBRILLIIARTAP.E. ASISTANT COMISSIONER July' 22, 2010 E Re: 'State-owned fHamptonI Blanch Railroad Corridor Temporary Use' a Igreement recjuireiiients'

Dear Mr. Freeman:

Enclosed For your records attached is the executed copy of the Temnporary Us Agreement for the accssi to a po~rtion f otthe State-owned&Hamfpton Branch Railrad Corridorifor thepurpose of installation of a proposed w~ater line in the Townh bf Seabrook.You must contact our Bureaui (2271 -2425)4rior to entering NH DOT Railroad ,roperty ahd beginning any work.If you have' any questions I mflay be contacted at the rnumber listed below., Sincenr Railroad Planner Enclosure e-CC Michael Nolin BUREAU OF RAIL & TRANSIT JOHN 0.MORTON BUILDING -7 HAZEN DRIVE

  • P.O. BOX 4-83.* CONCORD, NEW HAMPSHIRE 03302-0483 TELEPHONE:

603-271-2468 .FAX: 603-271-6767 -TDD ACCESS: RELAY NH 1-800-735-2964

  • INTERNET:

WWAW.NHDOT.COM ~.II TEMPORARY USE AGREEMENT i This Agreement made this .' day ofiý ~ .2010 between the State of New Hampshire, by and through the Newv Hamfpshir' ~D~partnient-o~ffransj56rtation, Bureau of Rail and Transit,, P~O Box 483, C&nc'ord, NH 03302-0483, hereinafter referred to as-"'~State" and NectEra Energy Seabrook, LLC, P0 Box 300, Seabrook, NI-I 03874,' thereinafter referred to as "Permittee'1/2-WHEREAS, the S$tate is the. owner of a railroad corridor in the Town o~f Seabrook, County of Rockingham. State of New Hampshire' --WHEREAS, the Permittee is desirous of obtaining permission to enter ontoa portion of the ~State-owned Hamipton 'Branch Railroad corridor to install a 'temporary crossing and gate for.hauling excavated miaterial 'at approximate Engineering -Station 2269+00+/-, ~Map V ~3NIHI41,~he'reinafter referred to as the Property, as per the attached plan provrided by Seabr~ook 'Trucking, ffic are hereby incorporated ini the Agreement. '~NO W THEREFORE, ~subject to and con-rditioned upon the performa'nce by the Permittee of all the covenants set forth below, 'th'e State grants'to the Permittee, perm 3ission to'enter onto the above-described pofrtioni of railroad cojdor toinstall a"' '.£r rycossin cT-f i logging.1. Use of Railroad Property ~ -1.1 ThePermnittee aggrees that it is liable for the cost of all work performed on NHDOT Railroad Property and that any such work shall be performned according to the.attached Pro'secution 'of Work'dat~ed. Apri~l 1, '2Q10, and at a 'time and ~under coniditions' acceptable to State. Such liblbiiykshiall -include the"cost of afllon-site inpectors or other" representatives of the State, if stich individuals are. nece'ssary in the sole judgmient of the State.':At no. time shlxl aiy w~rk int6 rf:er w'ith the use 6f the Railroad Propertyby~ the State" its lessees or'assigns. The ,Pe~rmittce is solely resp'oisibiefor the-presence of its equipment along 'the State-owned raikoabd corridor.1.2 The Priteis requiired to obtaiii and keep in force before their work begis 'any and all other permissions, permits, and easement's ecu iied'fo'r the project-.by federal, stat'ecounty, or town governnients-and thir agejncies o 6boards; or any-other political Jsubdivision thereof. " The 'Penuittiee shall beresp'onsible for Sinvestigating and deemnn h edfradapyn o l eeatemt n~a~pprovals.- 'eeninthnedfradapynfo llrlvnprmsad 1.3 The Perniittee -ýshall 'co'ordinate§ any and all w~ork wVithin':zthe: railroad corridor with the State by? dntactii g the' 1N.ED0T's Rail iand -Transit.BureaI uat (603)'271-2468.T:h IPeri-contact a .minimu f "'on6ie < weekp pior to beinn -terwok o obtaini 'prvlfrom the Railrad Oper5atorr to' enter 'the railroad property.1.4 The N DOT Railroad persoxriiel may inspect the site durin and afe tewok iseig perored 1.5 -The.Permittee is require d to install a gate between South Access road and the State'-owned iRailroad co'rridor. "The g~ate must be a minimum 15' from the centerlinie 'f the track and 'be closed arid locked during non-wbrking hours.I

2. Indemnification t andInsurance I 2.1 "The Permrttee acknowledges that ;the use of the property is requested for the Perhiitiee's zadvantag-e andK'does not involve the State's performnface of their dAuties to, the public. Th& Pelinittee further ackn~ow1ledges that the use of the Property by the Perihittee will expose the State to additidnal liftbihity to which they. would not'otherwise be exposed. <AIo&'ddnaly, the Pernjitte&Ya-rees that State 'shall not be liable, for ijr or death ~of the Permirttee or~h actOf Pennitte'e or for, loss or destructioni of or damage to any property of the 'Perinittee tor any ~agent ,of the Perinpoees vhi-le upon or about,: the, Railro'ad property.

The Permittee 'and its'emploees'contractors and agent{~agi& t defend,'indemnify, and hold harmless the State, its officers, agents and employee's; 'froth aind again'st any and all losses ~suiffere&d' Thy~the State, its successodrs .and assigns, officers, age~nts,, ?diplb ees fromh any9 and allf claims, 'lidbilities-or penalfties a~ss~erted.agains~t th& Stalte, ifs succes'sors and alss igns,~officers., agents anfd.,emnployees, by ~or on belalf of any person on account obf, based or resultin, from, a .ns ing 'out~ of (or which miay be 'claimed to anise out of) ~the acts or omissions of the: Permittee. Without 'linmitinig the iforegoing, it is agree~d Ahat this covecnant of indemmification shall apply toi'all cases 'of loss, damage6, injulry, death, cost or ~expense for which any partyjto this agr~eement may or shali be liable. ;For the purpose 'of ~this ag'reeme~nt. 'all personts using the 'Property shall be' deem'ed agents of the Permittee. Notwithastanding ký he'4ore'goig, "nothing herein coniaine&Lshall be deemed to consttitutie a'waiver of 'soveie'ign immu'=' ty of the State, which' immunuity is.' hereby reserved to the "State. This toveanat'I 'shall suirvive, the terminationh-of this ,Agreemfent. In addifjbon'the Permittee shafi pay the premiums -on a pdlicy or policie's' of insurance 'covering the use of 'the Property 'designating the. State Sof 'New Hampshire as adiinlnanmed inisured. ~2. 1.1,. Compmercial General Liability: $1,000,000.00'each'&ccunenc~eI$2,000,000.00 mn the aggregate 2.1.2 .Comprehensive Automobile Liability: $500,000.00 combined single limit'1 12 flTnrIrýoln 0 fcn,a.T.,c In the amount as required by current State Statute§2.2 'The Perimittee' shall provide to'the State and' mainiain in force a ce'rtificate ,f -_insuranc Ie 'deri~Onstrating that the re -qiii ired -coverage&'has been o'btained and contaminig the: f6llowinh-wording. 'State 'of >New Hampshire i's 'named as'K iioa inuedwt respect to liability Larising from the~s an~ ad/or occupation of a.2te-,wAned premises undeir this Temporary Use Agreemo ent, beween temState' and the Named Insured." Nothing contained herein shall be construed as a waiver of sovereign immunity.. 3/43." Fees and Property Taxes'. ..3.1 In consideration of this Agyreement, the Permittee shall pay to the State, a preparationi fee of three hundred 'fifty' ($350.00) dollars and a fifty ($50.00) dollar administrative fee' due onithe date first4#vi'tten'above. '3. 2' The G'rantee'acknowvledges that this Temporary.Use Agreement does not ve'st any fights to a Lease Agreem~ent. 2~!;!lii 9 4. Term.t4.1 This Agreement shall be effective for aypenod of one (1) year from the date first-written above at whichltime itishall terminate if not terminated soonerbyy paragraph 5 or paragraph

7. At the request of the Permittee, this Aagreement may be extended'for an additional one (1) year upon the approval by the State.75 6.* Termination 5.1 This Temporary Use A~greem~ent.will terminate wh~en the term listed in Item 4 anid any additional extension has expired. This Temiporjary Use Agreemient may also be terniinated by the State upon written notice to the Pentnittee for ahyjust causd as described in' Item 7. .'U-<Bond .6.1 .A -performiance bond in the amount of one thoushand

($2,500.00) dollars'subiect to all the above-specified' covenants shall ibe pdsed'with the State, prior to.the issuiance of this Agreement. The bond or letter of credit 'Shall be niaintained for.one (1) year beyond the finial inspection and~ acceptanice byltheState. UDefauilt. and R~enbval 7.1 Should the Permittee fail to perform any of the above specifiedI cove'nants, the State shall, after fourteenl (14) calendar ~days w#ritten notice to Pefrmitte'e, deny acesto the Permittee and require the Perniittee totrepair any damage to the facility.7.2 The' State miay revoke this Agreement for, ny reason at aniy tim.e upon thirty (30) calendar days, 1'written notice to the Perm ittee' v4iithout comfpensation to the Permittee. -7. 3 In the 'event of the Pennittee's breachtof any of the provisions lof the Agreemenit, the State shall ,be comfpensated '~forU its ;'daimacres including "all consequential damages which anise out of the, breachanid attorneys' feesand costs incurred inlconnection with underiaking such anl action.8. Non-As sianment and Amendment 8.1 , This Agreement may not be assigned ortransferred. Until terminated, this Agreement shall inure to the sole -benefit of and be binding upon the parties hereto.8.2 This Agreement may b aeiidedonly by an instrument in writiing, signed<by the parties hereto, and only after approval of such amenidmnit by the' State.3 i IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have :executed thiýs Agreement in dulcae the day~and year first written ajQt PER-MIT TE 6%V'E:r sl/I Iate WITNEIDATE~(print name & title)STATE:-hrist phey Norgan, Administrator for the Director of Administration DATE This is to certify that the above-Agreement has been reviiewed by this office, and is a~pp as flo and 1 e ecution.OFFICEO AflRE YGENERAL -c 'DATEy~~~~~~... ........1~..4!ii!iii!~ii

0 SEABROOK -Haul R6ad Crossing PROSECUTION OF WVORK ON NIH DOT RAILROAD PROPERTYýApril 1, 2010 DESCRIPTION OF WORK The'work on this project entails the installation of a temporary crossineg and grdte to allow excavation equipment and rock trucks to cross the railroadltracks. Th~e useof the cros sinhg hall be limited to auithorized rock trucks anxd equipmneit by keeping the gate locked at all times it is not in use., The crsinhall consist of fill with drainagefacilities 'to maintain existin- drainage after fremoal and temporary storage of track materials. The Stateof New Hamp'shire Bureau of Rail &Transit must mheet with the Contractor on site to determiine the exact location of the temporary crssn,dringefaciities~ and gate.K RAILROAD OWNER AN]) OPERATOR.The Contractor, shall -coordinate their work on this project with the Railro ad .Owner..and the Railroac Operator. The railroad corridor is owned by the State of New Hampshire. State of New Hampshire D Iepartmnait oTr ptain(ilowdn0er) Mr. Louis A. Barker.Bureau of Rail & Transit~PO Box 483~-Concord, New Hampshire 03302 Tel:(603) 271-2468> -RAILROAD COORDINATION ..Allfwork performed by the Peirnittee on Nil DOT Railroad property direc tly -or indirectly affecting the'Railroad Owner and shall be coordinated with the State of New' Hampishire Bureau of Rail & Transit.- The....rmittee shall furnish to the Bureau of Rail & Transit the namje of a designated contfact person responsible for handling this project and Railroa~d related issues. The Pennittee musit contact the Ra~ilroad Owner a miinimhum of one (1) week before entering onto or crossing ver railroad property.This project is locatecL&on, aniatv alodline that has .restricted access. ýAll work p~erformed within the railroad &5lfr'dor. shall becoordina~ted with the State of New Hampshire Bureau of Rail.& Transit.RIGHT-OF-WAY AND PROTECTION OF PROPERTY --7 aThd Cotaco shal not modify the Railroad property in any way other than described in this Prosecution of Work and athorized by the State of NHl DOT Bureau of Rail & Transit.0 I CONSTRUCTION REQUIREMENTS .The c xstruction of this crossing-shall be)perform~ed by a Contra'ctor hti prvdb h tt of New Hampshire Bureau of Rail & Transit. Prior to be- =','n wrk on ePprojeci, by Prit shal ntif ýte Rilrad wnr (el.271246) o thirproposed scheduile cf work on the railroad Specifi ca'll'y, the following shall apply: The Permnittee shall s'chedule a .meeting with the Bureau of Rail & Transit to inspect the site and determ-ine'the exact location of the proposed crossing. The Bur.eau of Rail & Transit may modify the Plan and these Specifications to me~et the exsigsite conditi'onis. .. ....Duringr the site inspection with the Contractor, the Bureau~ of Rail. -Trans .it will 'deteixnine if 'ditchline culv~erts will be required. ~3. An access gate has been installed "by the Perm-ittee prior to the'proposded haul road crossing and maintenan~ce of the. gate if r~equire'dwill be per-formed by the ~Permtee. .4. The rails, minimum 3 sections each rail shall be removed, railsjoint bars and ie plates. salvaged to the State of New Hamrpshire prior to construction of the crossing.'~, < 5. Nuts an.dbots shal binechanicall..removed, joint bars l be removed d ian the Bureau of Rail &Transit contactedito arrange pickup. .6. Rail sections shall be placed neatly within the giiage of the existin minln rc medaeynrho the proposed woirk. ..n ... mainl i a norho 7. The tie plates sha~ll be collected and the Bureau of Rail & Transit contacted to arrange pickup.8. The old ties and other non-salvaged materials shall be removed fr~om ithe property and disposed of by the W ~Permnittee. The cost of rac reovl il be paid by the Permitt ee.9. The new crossing will be 16' wide and will be constrcted above the ,current alignment. This crossing is approved for haulage operations and4 ocaional access to. thue property.10.' Gravel approaches wvill be constructed up to the tempo'rary crossing.11~. The Contractor shall clean up the wo'rk area and return it to its original alignment, with the exception of the track, including all necessary seeding and ground restoration, upon completion of their ,work., 12. .At no time shall the Contractor's equipment ente~r onto or cross the railroad tracks, ties or ballast a n location along the corpidor oher thanthe temorarycrossingaan ......... 13. The New Hampshire Bureau of Rail & Transit will inspect the work during'the infstallation and upon'cb'mpletiono~f the wvork. 'The'Cdntractor shall be responisible for all costs' to r-epair damacge'ca.used by them to the' railroad tracks, ties, ballast, slopes or other46rtions of the State property..~ta rs 14. It will be the Permittee's responsibility to ensure that all security issues are addressed ta rs or may arise as a result of this agreement. 4 NEXTERA ENERGY SEABROOK, LLC WRITTEN CONSENT OF MEMBER IN LIEU OF MEETING The undersigned, being the sole Member of NextEra Energy Seabrook, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company (the "Company"), hereby consents to and adopts the following resolution, effective on and as of the date set forth below: RESOLVED, that Paul Freeman be, and he hereby is, appointed to the office of Vice President of the Company, to serve, as such until his resignation or removal.IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has executed this Written Consent as of January 8, 2010.ESI ENERGY, LLC Its Sole Member By: I1( _ _~ L A Name:tharles S. Sch'ultz'Title: Secretary AMENDED AND RESTATED LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY AGREEMENT OF NEXTERA ENERGY SEABROOK, LLC This Amended and Restated Limited'Liability Company Agreement (this "Agreement") of NextEra Energy Seabrook, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company (the "Company") is made and entered into by ESI Energy, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company, as the member thereof (the "Member"). Pursuant to that certain Limited Liability Company Agreement of the Company, dated February 27, 2002 (the "Prior Agreement"), the Member, as the initial member, authorized the execution of a Certificate of Formation of the Company with the company name FPL Energy Seabrook, LLC, and the filing thereof with the Secretary of State of the State of Delaware for the purpose of forming the Company as a limited liability company pursuant to and in accordance with the Delaware Limited Liability Company Act (6 Del.C. section 18-101, et seq.), as amended from time to time (the "Act").On April i", 2009, the Member authorized the execution of an Amendment to the Certificate of Formation of the Company changing the name of the Company to NextEra Energy Seabrook, LLC, and the filing thereof with the Secretary of State of the State of Delaware for the purpose of changing the name of the Company to NextEra Energy Seabrook, LLC pursuant to and in accordance with the Act.Accordingly, the Member wishes to amend and restate the Prior Agreement in its entirety as follows: 1. Name. The name of the limited liability company is NextEra Energy Seabrook, LLC (the"Company").

2. Certificate of Formation.

Aimee G. Cernicharo was previously authorized by the Member to execute and cause the Certificate of Formation to be filed and is an authorized person within the meaning of the Act. Aimee G. Cernicharo executed the Certificate of Formation and caused the certificate to be filed with the Secretary of State of the State of Delaware and, upon the filing thereof, the Company was formed. Upon the formation of the Company, the powers of Aimee G. Cernicharo as an authorized person ceased, and the Member thereupon became and is hereby designated as an authorized person within the meaning of the Act. The Member, acting on its own behalf or acting through any of its duly authorized Officers (as defined in Section 13(b) of this Agreement), shall execute, deliver and file any other certificates (and any amendments and/or restatements thereof) necessary for the Company to qualify to do business in any and all jurisdictions in which the Company may wish to conduct business.3. Purpose and Powers. The purpose for which the Company was formed is the transaction of any or all lawful business for which a limited liability company may be formed under the Act. The Company shall have all powers which are provided to a limited liability company under the Act which are related to such purpose and necessary, or advisable to accomplish such purpose.1

4. Term. The term of the Company commenced on the date of filing of the Certificate, and shall continue until terminated in accordance with the terms hereof.5. Principal Business Office. The principal business office and chief executive office of the Company shall be located at 700 Universe Boulevard, Juno Beach, Florida 33408 or at such other location as may hereafter be determined by the Member.6. Registered Office. The address of the registered office of the Company in the State of Delaware is c/o The Corporation Trust Company, 1209 Orange Street, Wilmington, New Castle County, Delaware 19801.7. Registered Agent. The name and address of the registered agent of the Company for service of process on the Company in the State of Delaware is The Corporation Trust Company, 1209 Orange Street, Wilmington, New Castle County, Delaware 19801.8. Member. The name and the mailing address of the member ("Member")

is as follows: Name Address ESI Energy, LLC 700 Universe Boulevard Juno Beach, Florida 33408 9. Limited Liability. Except as otherwise provided by the Act, the debts, obligations and liabilities of the Company, whether arising in contract, tort or otherwise, shall be solely the debts, obligations and liabilities of the Company, and the Member shall not be obligated personally for any such debt, obligation or liability of the Company solely by reason of being a Member of the Conpany.10. Capital Contributions. The Member is deemed admitted as the Member of the Company upon its execution and delivery of this Agreement. The Member has contributed $100 in cash to the Company.11. Additional Contributions. The Member is not required to make any additional capital contribution to the Company. However, the Member may make additional capital contributions to the Company in its discretion.

12. Distributions.

Distributions shall be made to the Member at the times and in the aggregate amounts determined by the Member. Notwithstanding the preceding sentence or any other provision to the contrary contained in this Agreement, the Company shall not make a distribution to the Member on account of its interest in the Company if such distribution would violate Section 18-607 of the Act or other applicable law.13. Management.(a) By Member. In accordance with Section 18-402 of the Act, management of the Company is vested in the Member. The Member shall have the power to do any and all acts necessary, 2 convenient or incidental to or for the furtherance of the purposes described herein, including all powers, statutory or otherwise, possessed by members of a limited liability company under the laws of the State of Delaware to the extent such powers are consistent with the terms of this Agreement and are appropriate or useful in carrying out the purposes of the Company as set forth in this Agreement, including, without limitation, the power: (i) To borrow money and, as security therefor, to mortgage, pledge or otherwise encumber any and all assets of the Company, including the rights of the Company under any agreements;(ii) To cause to be paid all amounts due and payable by the Company to any Person and to collect all amounts due to the Company;: and to make contributions to subsidiaries of the Company to be used to pay amounts due or to become. due and payable by the subsidiaries;(iii) To employ or cause a subsidiary of Company to employ such agents, employees, managers, accountants, attorneys, consultants and other persons, necessary or appropriate to carry out the business and affairs of the Company or subsidiary, and to pay'such fees, expenses, salaries, wages and other compensation to such persons as the Member shall determine;(iv) To pay, extend, renew, modify, adjust, submit to arbitration, prosecute, defend or compromise, upon such terms as the Member may determine and uipon such evidence as it may deem sufficient, any obligation, suit, liability, cause of action or claim, including taxes, either in favor of or against the Company or any subsidiary thereof;(v) To pay any and all fees and to make any and all expenditures which the Member deems necessary or appropriate in connection with the organization of the Company and subsidiaries, the management of the affairs of the Company and subsidiaries and the carrying out of its obligations and responsibilities under this Agreement and the Act, and to enforce all rights of the Company;(vi) To take all actions, undertake all obligations and responsibilities and exercise all rights and privileges which the Company, as the member of any subsidiary, has under its organizational documents and the law under which such subsidiary is organized, including, but not limited to, making, on behalf of the Company, contributions to and accepting on. behalf of the Company, distributions from subsidiaries;(vii) To prosecute, protect and defend or cause to be protected and defended'all patents, patent rights, trade names, trademarks and service marks, and all applications with respect thereto, which may be held by the Company or a subsidiary thereof and to 3 take all reasonable and necessary actions to protect the secrecy of and the proprietary rights with respect to any trade secrets, know-how, secret processes or other proprietary information and to prosecute and defend all rights of the Company or a subsidiary in connection therewith;(viii) To enter into, execute, acknowledge and deliver any and all contracts, agreements or other instruments necessary or appropriate to carry on the business of the Company as set forth herein;(ix) To cause to be paid any and all taxes, charges and assessments that may be levied, assessed or imposed upon any of the assets of the Company, or that arise as a result of the activities of the company, unless the same are contested by the Company in good faith;(x) To file all applications by the Company for, or accept, necessary permits, licenses and other governmental approvals, or any amendment to or withdrawal or termination of such applications or governmental approvals;(xi) To establish and maintain one or more accounts for the Company in such financial institutions as the Member may from time to time designate;(xii) To make distributions to the Member;(xiii) To cause the Company to make or revoke any of the elections under the United States Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended, that are made at the Company level and to cause the Company to request and obtain interpretative or exemptive advice and orders from federal and state regulatory authorities;(xiv) To maintain liability and casualty insurance in amounts and with coverages consistent .with prudent commercial standards and with insurers of recognized responsibility;(xv) To invest funds not immediately needed in the operation of the business;(xvi) To borrow funds from the Member or any of its affiliates;(xyii) To acquire and dispose of real, personal, intangible and mixed property and interests herein; and (xviii) To delegate the foregoing power and authority to any of its authorized officers: (b) Officers. The Member may, from time to time as it deems advisable, appoint officers of the Company (the "Officers") and assign in writing titles (including, without lirnitation, President, Vice President, Secretary, and Treasurer) to any such person. Unless the Member decides otherwise, if 4 the title is one commonly used for officers of a business corporation formed under the Delaware General Corporation Law, the assignment of such title shall constitute the delegation to such person of the authorities and duties that are normally associated with that office. Any delegation pursuant to this Section 13 (b) may be amended or revoked at any time by the Member. The Officers of the Company shall be the persons listed below opposite the offices to which they are hereby appointed until each resigns or is removed: Name: TJ Tuscai Title: President Manoochehr K. Nazar Matthew S. Handel John W. Ketchum Rajiv S. Kundalkar Michael O'Sullivan Mark R. Sorensen Gene F. St. Pierre Charles S. Schultz Michael D. Bryce Rita W. Costantino Judith J. Kahn Claude A. Villard Senior Vice President and Nuclear Chief Operating Officer C-Vice President Vice President Vice President Vice President Vice President and Treasurer Vice President Secretary Assistant Secretary Assistant Secretary Assistant Treasurer Assistant Secretary 14. Officers Not To Engage in Activities Detrimental to the Company. The Officers, either individually or with others, shall have the right to participate in other business ventures of every kind, whether or not such other business ventures compete with the Company; provided, however, that the Officers shall not engage in any activity that is detrimental to the interest of the Company. The Officers, acting in the capacity of officers, shall not be obligated to offer to the Company or to the Member any opportunity to participate in any such other business venture. Neither the Company nor the Member shall have any right to any income or profit derived from any such other business venture of the Officers. The 5 Member acknowledges that the Officers may, from time to time, be an employee of third parties unconnected with the Company and shall only be required to dedicate such time to the affairs of the Company as the Officers, in their sole discretion, deem necessary.

15. Other Business.

The Member may engage in or possess an interest in other business ventures (unconnected with the Company) of every kind and description, independently or with others.The Company shall not have any rights to any income or profit derived from any such other business venture of the Member.16. Exculpation and Indemnification. Neither the Member nor any Officer shall be liable to the Company, any other person or entity who has an interest in the Company for any loss, damage or claim incurred by reason of any act or omission performed or omitted by the Member or Officer in good faith on behalf of the Company and in a manner reasonably believed to be within the scope of the authority conferred on the Member or Officer by this Agreement, except that the Member or Officer shall be liable for any such loss, damage or claim incurred by reason of its willful misconduct. To the full extent permitted by applicable law, the Member or Officer shall be entitled to indemnification from the Company for any loss, damage or claim incurred by the Member or Officer by reason of any act or omission performed or omitted by such Member or Officer in good faith on behalf of the Company and in a manner reasonably believed to be within the scope of the authority conferred on the Member or Officer by this Agreement, except that neither the Member nor Officer shall be entitled to be indemnified inrespect of any loss, damage or claim incurred by it by reason of willful misconduct with respect to such acts or omissions; provided, however, that any indemnity under this Section shall be provided out of and to the extent of Company assets only, and the Member shall have no personal liability on account thereof.17. Assignments.(a) The Member may assign its membership interest in the Company in whole or in part so long as such assignment does not cause dissolution of the Company.(b) If the Member transfers all of its interest in the Company pursuant to this Section, the transferee shall be admitted to the Company as the Member and shall exercise all the rights and powers of the transferor Member (the "Transferor") upon the execution by the transferee of an instrument signifying its agreement to be bound by the terms and conditions of this Agreement. Such admission shall be deemed effective immediately prior to the transfer, and, immediately following such admission, the Transferor shall cease to be the Member.18. Resignation. The Member may resign from the Company as provided in this Section and upon satisfaction of the provisions of this Section and provided that such resignation will not result in dissolution of the Company. Ifthe Member is permitted to resign pursuant to this Section such resignation shall not be effective until a new Member shall be admitted to the Company in the place and stead of the resigning Member and such new Member shall have executed an instrument signifying its agreement to be bound by the terms and conditions of this Agreement. Such admission shall be deemed effective 6 immediately prior to the resignation, and, immediately following such admission, the resigning Member shall cease to be a member of the Company.19. Status under Uniform Commercial Code. It is the intention of the Member and the Company that the interest of the Member in the Company shall not be treated as a "security" subject to the provisions of Article 8 of the Uniform Commercial Code as in effect in any relevant jurisdiction.

20. Dissolution.(a) The existence of the Company shall terminate upon the occurrence of an event described in the following subsections: (b) The Company shall dissolve, and its affairs shall be wound up upon the first to occur of the following: (i) the written consent of the Member, (ii) the-retirement, resignation or dissolution of the Member or the occurrence of any other event which involuntarily terminates the continued membership of the Member in the Company unless the business of the Company is continued in a manner permitted by the Act or (iii) the entry of a decree of judicial dissolution under Section 18-802 of the Act.(c) The bankruptcy or other event described in Section 18-304 of the Act with respect to the Member will not cause such Member to cease to be a member of the Company and upon the occurrence of such an event, the business of the Company shall continue without dissolution.(d) In the event of dissolution, the Company shall conduct only such activities as are necessary to wind up its affairs (including the sale of the assets of the Company in an orderly manner), and the assets of the Company shall be applied in the manner, and in the order or priority, set forth in Section 18-804 of the Act.21. Separability of Provisions.

Each provision of this Agreement shall be considered separable and if for any reason any provision or provisions herein are determined to be invalid, unenforceable or illegal under any existing or future law, such invalidity, unenforceability or illegality shall not impair the operation of or affect those portions of this Agreement which are valid, enforceable and legal.22. , Entire Agreement. This Agreement constitutes the entire agreement of the Member with respect to the subject matter hereof.23. Governing Law. This Agreement shall be governed by, and construed under, the laws of the State of Delaware (without regard to conflict of laws principles), all rights and remedies being governed by said laws.24. Amendments. This Agreement may not be modified, altered, supplemented or amended except pursuant to a written agreement executed 'and delivered by the Member.7 I[Remainder of this page intentionally left blank. Next page is signature page.]8 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned, intending to be legally bound hereby, has duly executed this Agreement as of April- 4o"i 2009.ESI ENERGY, LLC the Sole Member By: ~lt -I A0 Name: Charles S. Schultz Title: Secretary 9 4Dep-11nntnL )f Trwaspz-oul0lon GEORGE N. CAMPBELL, JR.COMMISSIONER[i!iii i i ii i i i i ii! ¸ -.

.
: THlE STATE OFNEWIIAMPSHIRE DEPARTMIVENT OF TRANSPORTATION:44 JEFFBRILLFIART, P.E.4 4- ASSIS TANT COMMISSIONER
:: : :: : ::: ::::: .: :i : : ::: :: : : : : :: : : : : : :: ; .: -:i ::i,; i:i:K :; ,i- H;ii ~l:: : : :: ::: : ::i! I ; ::,:: :!: : ':i:IL :< : ;:;:: ::i:I i: !: :t : :ii :::'!::!:i
i'!~ :::i : :: : : f : :!!.< ,:i i::S :i) i:::i: i : :: il?:4 4 ]];! :. : : : ' ...: 2. ? < ..., ;:: ::::ii:: ]:::K i !,: :: : i:. :i ~i .! > 1! i!- f !! ::4 4':.' ]i~ ¢, ....... .* .... .... .June 2 3, 2 0 10 ..41NextEra Energy Seabrook..

LLG C 4 .'Imil Freeninn, Vic'e President44 .. Seabrok-NHfl 03874.-:- 44 ..44: ..-* .-~4 44 -4 ;r 4 r .:.-4 ';:,2 : ,% -Re: State-owned Hampton Branich Railroad Cotridor -ý-1/24:;.i v, II 44 -,.Temporary Uselagreementreequirements' 411] -1' ...1."> 4 4 4i 4 ear.Mr iFreeman:- .4.: ' , .:. .Enclosed please find the documents that the Bureau.of Rail & Transit received Nvith'the 4 nF},N- Temporary Use Agreement on the above referenced corridor. Untdttunately, the~r do not meet'>the requirements ofthe Attorney Generas Office. * .a They are being returmed to you fo the reasonsstated 'below and for corrections. 4444Please: W..make thl co-rrel:tions and return as soon as possible. " : 44.1) 4 Ceitificate of Vote is doesn't refe rence ainmeeting consent in lieu of meeting or some : 4.. .. '~44 4by-law that authorizes the -rsdn 43 sign.4 2) Certificate of Insurance does hot 'reference the' agreement with the State (Instead :'references the Seabrook1 "Tt:kihCdiif r %.i.-ith.NeitEra). -4 74 14 4 ::I .i,.. ) Cert ficate of Insurance does not languageas stated in Section i 2.2. 44 4 I "4 ii Upo~n receipt of dile corrected suipporting documentation lxxiii then resubmit the documnents' _ ii to the Office of the Attorney GGeneral for approval of the agree Ifent If you have 4 any questions,- 44 p~lease call me at 271-2425. "'444- 4 I Sincerely.4 Louis Barker --.--: 4 4 ~Railroad Planner-En'closure (2) 4.4 4 CC: David Hilts-4 .4BUREAU OF RAIL &TRANSIT JOHN 0. MORTON BUILDING .7 HAZEN DRIVE

  • P-0 4 BOX 483.- CONCORD, NEW HAMPSHIRE 03302-0483 TELEPHONE.

603-2711-2468 .. FAX: 6D3-2711-6767 -4T6-4ACCESS: RELJAY NH 1-800-735-2964 -INTERNET: WWVW.NHDOT.COM ' 4 ¶Example's of supporting documentation. I Suggested lancyuaocfor Insurance CertificaW"th: State of New Hampshire is name~d as additional insured w9ith~t respect ~ ~ ~ ~ 1 fro th s n/rocuio f Sfte-owned premises under this Term7po ry-lse Agrheemet bt-wekn the State and the Name~d Insure'd."- -I Certificate of Vote: "Record of decision of govemning body of Company, legal entity (Corporation, Trust, LLIC Partnership) or a statement attesting to the decision of the governing body, to authorize Signatory to enter into all contracts on: behalf of the Company with the State of New H-ampshire Department of Transportation fora c~rossing ofor temporary access to, NH DOT railroad property. This document must reference the date of decision and that the authority granted to the Signatory has not been modified or withdrawn as of the date of execution of the do~cum~ent." 1 : -Contact information for obtaining a Certificate of Good Standing: -3 Corporate Division-4 P6epartmeiit ýof State444F 107 North Main Street Concord, NH- 033U0[-49894+ Phone: (603) 271-32461 Email:' comporatecctsds. state. n 1.tu s As of June 2010, fee is $5.00/-Specification references.:-: +..... ... .. -- F 44 w i {4 -............ .'Typical Construction D etails '4 -...,%-: -.F..ýa' At grade crossings, active.: 4 4ii. Typical planked crossing'iii. Signs for Private Grade Crossings4 4 4 .ý At-grade, inactiv&-i. Recreation Trail Gate a. Undeirground utilities F ..i. Coopers E-80 Load Rating44 i.. Veritical clearance 22', from top of rail, minimum ii.Horizontal clearance 4 15', from centerline neatest track, minimum (if desigi.considerations requ ire pole within State-owned propierty). F--t- -4 : ='[' 44':i 4 1 4 i[' ' :i:i'::i P.. o 483 TO:f ofk NewHam shie, Dept: ofn Trnsorato 2010~72%Please ftind enclosed-a copy letter ..Paul Freeman of Energy..................... ......... ,es in the support ing documentation4th

t '4" :iscus -ed. ':.'ortu :-t ..y -h :..-:u ':: :.:e : ".t:rned.by:"h:

At*:rn:y Geeras office have not arr-: ived at: thi s tim:e.: Therefore I- ;:'- : included the: excerpts f:ro:m t D procedure guidelines for yourreference.- (271(6032271246 'KLFAX(603)271 6767 i!iiiiii -::': i;-s ,i? 'ii~ " '. .. : ' ; , " ..' " " ':... ..' ' : ...I ' " ..."4 4 ..... .. .". ... ..-i,~ i: '!" ' -:: i < ,i i b " !i;'il;i .: ; : i!i: h iidi; ;; i!~ l;:H -, .. ii ..'" i{....... ..Mi k e N o.ia n :. I'i!i;! : !' ,'! ::; : ': : i i :' .., -4 4 .:-r -44 ...... .¸ ....... ... .. ..... ..... .. ..... ... ....... .. .... ..FRO M 5 I Lou is :::;: .Barker £:.. ........, ... 44:4:" 1i:;! ,.:::: :: : ::: ,:, .' , : , : ... .' :,' 'd i:: q i " :!?: ', ::! 7 :1 / i: : 5 5 7::= f : ,,: :7 : : :: :::j j.;'I 4.. I 44 -.. .: 'I::, : Pl as fn &ric16 ::' "" i!&ii: 1& iid :1' ddficiencies:,i 44 ..:Tpbte alFeeao,.tr:nrg eboo urn ihth spprtngdou:thatontht e isused rethrned.bj

i'i:'-

Ii :12 5 4 4.4 I wil b;, ene ou-, oofic thae ofiuntil Tuvesday, 'June t 29e,: 2010.r Ifclyoeiha e anycqueti'rom pleae Do'hep ithtmeto..- call::. ::.:::,::,:

:: Y" ': " ' ...... ',J h ' !': :, = ;: ¢ .....' ;Ltz : ,] : ;': : i! .7!:: :: : : [ i ::q .2.;:- :' 'i " ,".,. ... ! :; .:: :..I '" : , : ( , : :: ., .: .: ' : .-, .II.:' : : : : i ,. , ,. ,1 : : : .! ' ..:: ! .: : : :.< '; : ; : "  : " : :!. .i 4 I I 4 4 eu f~tefieutfu~avJue2;i21..

fyt'av ocal , :! .i :.i~ l~ :i ~ i,: !(::i b! ;;: ! ,i : ! .: ,;, ,} j : ! : ,: :j : t'. ,I ) ! : , : :: : 7 : i: ; ,:i : ' ;: : !:! : :: } , S i 1 : : S ! :.4: 4 4:' .:: 4. ' b;, :., .. :: : : : , ,,: ' % -: ::' ,,' : :: ,. ? .,';'

* : : , I, 4 , : :.-L -::" .-'.' ' : :4 4 " "4 41 i : " :-' :: ;" " .. ; : ; :,' ': :: : .' I : " , ' ' ,::' ' ? : i , ., ' ; : : :: ', : , :' : : i: : ., ' :: :: , : : ' :: :" ' ", , , :: -:.4' ' 1-4.: .: .., : ., ., .: , h * : ' : " " " :: : ' : " ' 2 ' " ,: : r , : : : : : : .: :. , , : , : ...... ... -.* ,:4. ,44 ."2 :. .::' : ., , , 2 ' :: : " ",: : : :,'::: :: ?: 5:. "2 ' : :. ' : : :~ i: : : : : :: : :; :i [ : : : ] "; :' : ' ' ::" -[;: "?,: : 4 :4 Environmental Reclamation of the 32 Acres behind the General Office Building March 23,2010 Rev-1 Environmental Reclamation of the 32 Acres behind the General Office Building Introduction This paper discusses the project plan of removing excavation spoils from the 32 acres behind the General Office Building and contains a specific environmental plan for the initial phases of this project. The project plan and environment plan have been reviewed in whole or in part by representatives of the Legal, Environmental, Budget and Radiation Protection Departments from Seabrook and our corporate offices (see attachment 1).Summary During the construction of Seabrook Station and a few projects since (i.e. Dry Fuel Storage), excavation spoils have been stock piled on the 32 acres behind the General Office Building (GOB). This, approximately 3 million tons of excavation, has disturbed the land from its original and natural environment.

The fill is comprised of soils, different sized bedrock spoils, and boulders to large to crush and a minor amount of construction spoils of varying types (i.e. asphalt, concrete, etc...).The effort to reclaim this land will be a 3 phase project. The 32 acres will be split in half by a north/south line. The first phase is to remove the fill to approximately a 15 foot depth on the westerly 16 acres.Phase 2 will be to remove fill to a depth of approximately 15 feet on the easterly 16 acres. This process will continue until the area is returned to its original elevation. Phase 3 would be to add topsoil, grade and contour the area, and establish natural flora to the area by seeding and planting as required.This paper is to discuss the first and second phases of the project. The third phase will require a formal reclamation plan and would not be started until at least 2013.Radiological Considerations The Radiological Protection (RP) Department has taken several soil samples from the area identified as Phase 1 and analyzed these samples for radioactivity. In addition, direct survey measurements were taken at the site where Phase 1 of excavation removal will occur. The results will be documented in Health Physics Study/Technical Information Document (HPISTID) 10-003, Assessment of Soil Removal from Rock Pile Area South of General Office Building (Phase One).A review of these samples and surveys indicates no presence of radioactive material other than natural background radioactivity and in conjunction with'Seabrook Station Radiation Protection (SSRP) Manual procedure RP13.1, Radiological Controls for Material, it is reasonable and a business case exists to remove this material in an effort to reclaim the land.Once the project commences the RP department shall be notified of any new materials, that are brought into theproject area that could potentially be removed from site. Additionally, RP shall be notified prior to the commencement of Phase 2 of excavation spoil removal.Security Increased and steady truck traffic at the south gate and in and out of the GOB parking lot presents a number of safety concerns. Some of these safety concerns include increased opportunities for falling debris to hit someone and debris falling onto the road way and/or the GOB parking lot entrance causing pedestrian and traffic hazards.2 Environmental Reclamation of the 32 Acres behind the General Office Building In an effort to have this increased traffic avoid the south gate and the GOB parking lot altogether, Security suggests the vehicles enter the fill site via F lot. The trucks would drive up the south access road, turn right onto the Hannah Foods road and left into F lot. A second, active gate will be installed at the rear of F lot allowing the trucks to access the fill area. The trucks would then. leave the fill area the same way they entered, through F lot.By utilizing this traffic pattern the trucks will avoid all contact with the south gate and the GOB parking lot thus eliminating many of the safety concerns for site employees andtheir vehicles. At the end of the work day the driver of the last truck leaving will be required to close and lock both F-lot gates thus closing off the fill area from public access.Prerequisites to use the F lot for access: 1) Construction of active gate at the rear of F lot to facilitate access to the pit area.2) Locks installed on the gates. (Keyed or combination locks are acceptable with the necessary access provided to security).

3) Installation of appropriate number ofjersey barriers placed at the back of the dirt road connecting the pit area and the GOB parking lot. These barriers will block access at the pit side of the dirt road and not allow anyone to drive down the dirt road toward the GOB parking lot.4) Instructions and expectations to vendor requiring the gates be opened and closed and locked as appropriate.

Licensing/Environmental See the Environmental Plan for the Removal of Excavation Material Stock Piled on 32 Acres behind the General Office Building during Construction of the Site attached to the end of this document.Financial Contract for this project is 02218558.The contract with Seabrook Trucking Center calls for $1.35 per cubic yard.The contract ends on August 17, 2012.Seabrook Truck is responsible for all taxes on the removal of gravel and permits required for this project.Cost for environmental sampling will be shared by Nextera Energy-Seabrook and Seabrook Truck Profit realized by Nextera Energy-Seabrook will be shared accordingly with Joint Owners Legal The contract agreement between Nextera Energy-Seabrook and Seabrook Truck has been reviewed by General Counsel Legal and found to be satisfactory. A review of zoning in the area of the project has been reviewed and found to have no issues (see attachment 6).General Counsel deferred to on the Juno Environmental Services (YES) part of the Business Strategy and Policy Group for review and approval of the Environmental Sampling Plan'. JES has reviewed the contract from Golder Associates (Attachment

2) for sampling and found it to be satisfactory.

3 Environmental Plan For the Removal of Excavation Material Stock Piled on 32 Acres behind the General Office Building during Construction of the Site March 23, 2010 Rev-I Environmental Reclamation of the 32 Acres behind the General Office Building 1.0 Introduction During construction of Seabrook Station (SBK) excavation spoils was stock piled on the 32 Acres behind the General Office Building (see attachment 5). There are approximately 3 million tons of fill in this area..At some point in the life span of SBK this area would need to be reclaimed and returned to its natural state as it existed prior to the erection of this facility.The SBK site is bordered on the east by an extensive salt marsh and is located on a point called "The Rocks" between two small tidal estuaries, the Brown'sRiver'and the Hunt's Island Creek. Adjoining the site is a broad, flat marsh zone in the north east and south identified as Hampton Flats with an elevation of approximately +4 feet mean sea level (msl). The normal high tide water level at Hampton Harbor estuary is approximately +4.6 feet msl while site grade is +20 feet msl; therefore the estuary will accept the surface drainage from the site.1.1 Background The Removal of Excavation Environmental Plan will address; Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan, Control of dust from digging and crushing of excavation, and Spill Counter Measures. The purpose is to include provisions to maximize the potential benefits of pollution prevention, sediment control measures, spill prevention, and environmental sampling at the excavation spoils removal site.2.0 Overall Project Phasing The project will be performed in 3 phases. The 32 acres will be divided in half with a north/south line, each half being approximately 16 acres. Phase 1 will be the Western most half and will be to remove the excavation in this area to a depth of approximately 15 feet. Phase 2 will be to do the same to the second half of the 32 acres. These phases will trade back and forth until we are at or near our preconstruction ground level.Phase 3 of the project is for the contouring and reseeding of the land to return to its' natural state;pre-construction. This project will require a formal reclamation plan that will be developed in the future as the initial phases are estimated to be > 3 years in duration.3.0 Environmental

3.1 Control

of Storm Water Purpose of our control of storm water run-off is to prevent storm water pollution to the marsh area.During the dumping of the excavation materials in this location a 25 foot high berm was built on the south easterly end of the acreage separating the excavation material from the wetlands.During the first two phases of this project we will not excavate within 100 feet of the toe of this berm. This will prevent runoff from affecting the wetlands. During phase three the formal reclamation plan Will include silt fencing and other measures to protect the wetlands from potential run-off.5 Environmental Reclamation of the 32 Acres behind the General Office Building 3.2 Control of Dust from crushing stone and movement of the excavation materials Water will be used to keep dust down to a controllable level. The water will be sprayed over the work area as a fine mist. The water will come from a water truck kept at the site.No ground water withdrawals will be made for any purpose as part of this project.3.3 Spill Counter Measures The purpose is to prevent spills of fuels and other man-made products to this area and to mitigate the impact of any spill that should occur.3.3.1 Prevention Only plant approved expendable products will be used in this area. Anytime the site is not in use these, materials will be locked in a Combustible storage container at the site.Any tanks for fueling of vehicles and machinery at the site will be Above Ground EPA Certified Self-Contained Tanks. This means at a minimum they will be double walled and located in a concrete vat. The vendor will be responsible for periodic inspection of concrete vat to ensure integrity and that rain water is not affecting its ability to contain fuel if a spill should occur.3.3.2 Mitigation A spill kit will be kept at the site and in good repair in the event of a spill. All spills will be reported to the Maintenance Services Department who will make the proper site notifications.

3.4 Sampling

The excavation material primarily comes from two sources; tunnel excavation spoils and, to a smaller amount, from the dry fuel storage excavation. Neither area has a history of oil or chemical contamination (ref Attachment 4). In 2001 during the sale of the station to FPL an Environmental Assessment was performed by consultant Hailey& Aldrich. In the Phase 1 Environmental Site Assessment Report, Hailey & Aldrich stated there'was no significant environmental concerns' with this area. Some solid waste was noted in the area and this was cleaned up prior to the closing as a sale condition mandated by FPL (Summer 2002). Haley & Aldrich had no recommendations for further Phase II environmental sampling in this area.Approximately 3 million tons of excavation spoils occupies these 32 acres and creates a mound approximately 25 feet high. Phase 1 of the reclamation plan is to remove spoils to a depth of 15 feet from the westerly 16 acres. Due to the history of this area, the assessment performed by.Hailey & Aldritch in 2001-2002, and the known source of the excavation spoils we will pull 16 composite samples from the Phase 1 area (see attachment 5). One sample from each acre, which will be a composite of spoils from 0 to 15 feet in depth (see attachment 3). These samples will be analyzed for: Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) metals, Polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs), Extractable petroleum hydrocarbons (EPH) with polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAH)and Volatile petroleum hydrocarbons (VPH).6 Environmental Reclamation of the 32 Acres behind the General Office Building The specifics of sampling, cost and responsibilities is contained in Attachment 2 'Golder Associates Re: Request for Proposal' and Attachment 3 'Sample Tracking of Excavation Spoils Form'Sampling requirements for Phase 2 of this project will be determined with the Seabrook Licensing Group and Juno Environmental Services of the Business Strategy and Policy Group based on theresults of Phase 1 sampling.4.0 Protection of Potential Archeological Sensitive Areas Along the edges of the toe of the berm are potential archeological se-n-itive areas (see attachment 7).These areas have been walked down with the contractor performing the excavation work and the Maintenance Services Department. No work will be performed in these areas during Phase 1 and 2 (removal of excavation spoils from a distance of 100 feet from toe of berm). At the time when the berm is removed there will be a more formal reclamation plan and specifics for protection of these important sites will be laid out in detail.5.0 Oversight Maintenance Services will conduct periodic walk downs/observations of the site to ensure compliance with this plan and station standards. The walk downs will be on a weekly basis. If the environmental control measures are ineffective the plan will be amended and any changes implemented within 7 calendar days of the inspection. Pictures should be taken occasionally during these walk downs to maintain a visual record of the project Inspection frequencies can be reduced to monthly if the j obsite is stabilized or runoff is unlikely due to winter conditions or seasonally arid conditions. These walk downs and observations will be documented on human performance walk down forms for retention. Maintenance Services Superintendent/Date Seabrook Trucking Center Owner/Date 7 Environmental Reclamation of the 32 Acres behind the General Office Building Attachment 1 List of Individuals Who Have Reviewed this Document either in whole or Part Mitchell S. Ross VP & General Counsel Nuclear Associate. General Counsel -Nuclear Alan Smith, CFA, PE Business Director,. Seabrook Business Management -Northeast Marjan Marshhadi Sr. Attorney Nuclear- Project Management Alene S. Egol, Esq.Senior Attorney Real Estate, Environmental and Land Use Group Pat Maher Environmental Services Project Manager Environmental Services Edward T. Metcalf Nuclear Plant General Manager Station Management Seabrook Station Robert Boyd Business Management -Manager Seabrook Station Fred Haniffy x Health Physics Specialist-Nuclear Radiation Protection Technical Seabrook Station Sabre A. Hyland ,-"g Nuclear Engineering Analyst Licensing Seabrook Station Mike O'Keefe Licensing Manager Licensing Seabrook Station Donald T. Flahardy Nuclear Rad Protection Supervisor Radiation Protection Seabrook Station Allen L. Legendre Nuclear Principal Engineer Licensing Seabrook Station Richard R. Cliche Seabrook License Renewal Manager Seabrook License Renewal Edward J. Carley Nuclear Engineer Sr Seabrook License Renewal 8 Environmental Reclamation of the 32 Acres behind the General Office Building Attachment 2 Golder Associates RE: REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL SGolder S,7:tkoclates.. March 22, 2010 Proposal No.: P03-87221 Mr. Daniel Kelsey, Facilities Manager NextEra Energy Resources P.O. Box 300 Sesbrook, New Hampshire 03874-0300 RE: REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL SEABROOK STATION SEABROOK, NEW HAMPSHIRE Dear Mr. Kelsey.Golder Associates Inc. (Golder) Is providing this proposal for professional services at. Florida Power and Ught's (FPL) site In Seabrook, New Hampshire (Seabrook Station, Site). FPL requested a proposal for assistance with sampling and analysis of land-applied materials at Seabrook Station from historic sub-oceanic tunneling activites. BACKGROUND Golder understands that approximately three million tons of material generated during sub-oceanic tunneling was placed over approximately 32 acres of land at Seabrook Station. FPL would Ike to reclaim the original ground surface, and, In doing so, excavate and sell the land-applied materials for reuse. Golder understands that the material will be excavated In two phases.of approximately 16 acres each and sold to a vendor for reuse In the New England area as fill nd road base. FPL has requested a proposal from Golder to collect and chemically analyze samples of the material prior to excavation and sale. FPL Intends to collect 16 samples (approximately one sample per acre) during the first phase of the excavation. The number of samples collected for the second phase of excavation will be based on the results of the rWt phase of sampling.SCOPE OF SERVICES Based upon our discussions with FPL, we understand the scope of services to Include the activities summarized below which we have broken down Into two tasks: Task 1: Coordination and Samoilno Golder will observe the excavation of 18 test trenches to approximately 15 feet by an operator supplied by FPL and collect one composite sample per trench. Golder will observe the soil visually and screen the samples using a photoionIzation detector (PID) prior to sample collection. Golderwill submit the samples to Eastern Analytical Inc. (E) of Concord. New Hampshire for analysis. At a minimum, Golder recommends the following analyses: N Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA)-8 metals (arsenic, barium, cadmium, chromium, lead, mercury, selenium, and silver) via EPA Method 20017000 series 0 Polychlorlnated biphenyls (PCBs) via EPA Method 8082 E Extractable petroleum hydrocarbons (EPH) with polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAH) via the Massachusetts EPH Method Golder Assaclates bic.570 N. cWMuMWa 3L. SURA 103 Menchesta. NH 03101 USA Ta,(6013)668-QUO Fax. (1103)1188-I1699 wwanevoddr.ccm Golder Assocdate: opeamtions InAfrica. Asza, Ausalnlasta, EuroMe Mafta Amites aNW Sauth Ameicae 9 Environmental Reclamation of the 32 Acres behind the General Office Building Mr. Daniel Kelsey March 22, 2010 Seabrook Station 2 Proposal No.: P03-87221 a Volatile petroleum hydrocarbons (VPA) via the Massachusetts VPH method This suite of analyses was selected solely for screening purposes as the compounds Included tend to be persistent In the environment. This Is not an exhaustive list of analyses or compounds. At FPL's discretion, additional analyses for volatile organic compounds ($199.00 per sample), pesticides ($105.00 per sample), or herbicides ($180.00 per sample) may be Included at an additional cost per sample.It Is anticipated that a Golder representative will be on-Site for up to 10 hours for sample collection. Golder will prepare a Site-specific health and safety plan for Golder's field activities prior to the start of sampling.Task 2: Remrtino Within one week of receipt of analytical data,. Golder will prepare and submit a letter report summarizing the analytical results. The letter report will contain the following Information: 0 A description of the sampling methods and procedures

  • A table summarizing analytical results with a listing of New Hampshire and Massachusetts soil standards, as available m A figure showing the sampling locations COST AND SCHEDULE Golder's estimated lump sum fee for Tasks 1 end .2 Is $11,500.00.

This fee Is comprised of labor ($3,760.00), laboratory ($7,370.00), and expenses ($370.00). Golder proposes to provide these services In accordance with the Purchase Contract, dated September 29,,2009 between Golder and FPL, and with Golder end EAI's standard rates. Our proposal Includes subcontractor costs for laboratory analysis.This cost estimate Is based on the following assumptions:

  • FPI. will designate the number and location of soil samples to collect 0 All of the samples collected will be soil (not roclfock chips).E Golder Is not responsible for coordination and contracting of a contractor to excavate the test trenches.N Composite soil samples will be collected from the bucket of the excavator and analyzed for RCRA-8 metals, SVOCs with PAHs, PCBs, and TPH.N The activities described above wilt require up to sixteen hours on-Site within no more than two mobilizations.

Any field activity beyond this will be billed on a time and materials basis based on the rates Included In thi Purchase Contract referenced above.a] Reid work will be conducted during daylight hours and on weekdays.0 Field work will be performed In modified level D PPE, consisting of hard-hat, safety vest, steel-toed footwear, OSHA or ANSI-approved safety glasses, and hearing protection, as needed, to mitigate Site hazards.N FPL will provide a base map of the Site In an electronic format for use In the report.* FPL will provide northing and easting coordinates for the sample locations using a handheld GPS unit for Golder's use In the report preparation. 10 Environmental Reclamation of 32 Acres behind General Office Building Mr. Daniel Kelsey ScAbwok Statlon 3 z March 22, 2010 Progosel No.: P03-87221 Golder will be able to mobilze to the Site with at least two days notice.CLOSING Golder appreciates the opporunlty to provide FPL with this propoeal. Should. you hbae any tiuestlonsw egarding this proposal, please cell either of the underslOtkd at (603) 668-0880.Sinoerely, GOL. ýR1A OCIATES INC.Prct Engineer Robert H, Clemene, CPG Program Leader AtlaghmenL~ JLF/drb Cost Eslimate Summary.99--G Wssýratcs 11 Environmental Reclamation of the 32 Acres behind the General Office Building Attachment 3 Sample Tracking of Excavation Spoils Sample GPS Coordinates Cell or Total Sample Sample Designation Trench # Depth Depth Type TT-CI* 1 15 ft 0 -15 ft bls** Composite TT-C2 2 15ft 0-15Itbls Composite TT-C3 3 15 ft 0 -15 ftbls Composite TT-C4 4 15 ft 0 -15 ft bls Composite TT-C5 5 15 ft 0 -15 ftbls Composite TT-C6 6 15 ft 0- 15 ft bls Composite TT-C7 7 15 ft 0 -15 ftbls Composite TT-C8 8 15 ft 0 -15 ft bls Composite TT-C9 9 15 ft 0- 15 ft bls Composite TT-C1o 10 15 ft 0 -15 ft bls Composite TT-C11 11 15 ft 0-15 ftbls Composite.. TT-C12 12 15 ft 0- 15 ftbls Composite TT-C13 13 15 ft 0- 15 ftbls Composite TT-C14 14 15 ft 0- 15 ft bls Composite TT-C15 15 15 ft 0- 15 ftbls Composite TT-C16 16 15 ft 0- 15 ftbls Composite* TT = Test Trench** ft bls = feet below land surface 12 Environmental Reclamation of the 32 Acres behind the General Office Building Attachment 4 E-Mail from Licensing (Environmental)' From: Legendre, Al Sent: Thursday, March 18, 2010 1:55 PM To: Robinson, David; Kelsey, Daniel Cc: Haniffy, Fred; Souther, Thomas; OKeefe, Michael; GAGNON, SABRE

Subject:

RE: Reclamation project at Seabrook Station All, The environmental conditions at the South 40 Tunnel. Muck Disposal Area were reviewed by our consultant Haley& Aldrich in the Phase I Environmental Site Assessment performed in support of the sale (March 2001). There were no significant environmental concerns noted in the South 40 area which functioned as the disposal area for bedrock spoils (ref. p. 43 of report). Haley & Aldrich observed some solid waste disposed in the'area however subsequently there was an extensive cleanup (Seabrook Trucking) of the South 40 and other areas just prior to the closing (Summer 2002) as a sale condition mandated by FPL. Haley & Aldrich didnot identify anything in the South 40 as a "Recognized Environmental Concern" (ref pp 46 -49 of report for RECs) nor were there any recommendations for further Phase II environmental sampling in that area.Also, the majority of the bedrock in the South 40 area was removed well before the Haley & Aldrich investigations in the early 1990s by a contractor for road construction work. I do not recollect any environmental sampling being done in conjunction with that contract or any issues arising during the course of rock removal or thereafter. The excavated soil from the dry fuel storage area in 2007/2008 and now deposited in the South 40 area also pose little or no environmental risk. The area where the soils were excavated did not have any history of oil or chemical contamination and there are no concerns stated for this area in the Haley &.Aldrich report. See p. 34 for a discussion of the Carpentry Shop and Mixed Solid Waste Area.I think we have a good documented basis for concluding that the environmental conditions in the South 40 disposal area are satisfactory and there is little risk of oil or chemical contamination in the remaining tunnel rock or stockpiled soils. If any environmental sampling is done in this area I would recommend that it take into consideration the low risk of contaminated rock or soil in the area.Al Legendre Principal Engineer NextEra Energy Seabrook, LLC 603 773-7773 13 Environmental Reclamation of the 32 Acres behind the General Office Building Y% ýjd ýniVfe 5 Q@(Attachment 5 of Project and Propose(i~;-H/ -V;F,)-7)5-. 10 7-IL;'16 14 Environmental Reclamation of the 32 Acres behind the General Office Building Attachment 6 Letter from the Town of Seabrook Regarding Zoning TOWN OF SEABROOK CODE ENFORCEMENT OFFICE 99 LAFAYETTE ROAD PO BOX 456 SEABROOK, NH 03874-0456 (603) 474-3871 code(,seabrooknh.orq March 24, 2010 Florida Light and Power PO Box 300 Seabrook, NH 03874-0300 CIO: Dan Kelsey Hard Rock Development, LLC PO Box 2750 Seabrook, NH 03874-2750 RE: Zoning Compliance, Property ID: 1111 & 2 To Whom It May Concern: The above referenced property located in Zone 3, Industrial, has no known zoning or building code violations, and is presently in full compliance with all issues with respect to the Town of Seabrook.FLP/Nextera Energy currently holds a valid Notice of Intent To Excavate for the above referenced property; said Intent was approved on December 16, 2009 by the Board of Selectmen, during their public hearing.:(If you have any questions regarding this property please do not hesitate in contacting me.Respectfully, Paul Town of Seabrook Code Enforcement Officer ogarande.seabrooknh.ora 15 Environmental Reclamation of the 32 Acres behind the General Office Building Attachment 7 Map of Potential Figure 5-K -Amhaeological Site Potential PROPERTY SURVEY SEABROOK NUCLEAR POWER STATION SEABROOK, HAMPTON FALLS & H.MPTON. NEW HAMPSHWRE 16 ý25C5.aonRlý-RADIATION SAFETY & CONTROL SERVICES, INC.Technical Support Document Pchw B 1&CI mL TSD # 09-019 2009 SITE CONCEPTUAL GROUND WATER MODEL FOR SEABROOK STATION Revision 01 Originator Reviewer: Melville P. Dlckenson Iii, Ph.D.Matthew Iar~ois Data: June 19,2009 o01 Date; /// f\SEABROOK STATION SITE CONCEPTUAL MODEL REPORT TABLE OF CONTENTS SectiOn Page

1.0 INTRODUCTION

.............................................. 4 2.0 STATION DESCRIPTION....................................................................................... 5 2 .1 S T A T IO N LO C A T IO N ......... I ........................................................................................ 5 2.3 SETTING AND SURFACE WATER FEATURES ............................................... 5 2.4 AREA GROUND WATER USE .................................. 6 2.5 G E O LO G Y ......................................................................................................... ....6 2 .6 H Y D R O G E O LO G Y .................................................................................................. 8 2.7 EX ISTIN G W ELL N ETW O R K ..................................................................................... 8 3.0 GROUND WATER FLOW AND FATE AND TRANSPORT................................... 9 3 .1 D A T A C O LLE C T IO N ................................................................................................... 9 3.2 G RO UND W ATER FLO W ....................................................................................... 9 3 .2 .1 S urficial A q uifer ............................................................................................ ..10 3 .2 .2 B ed rock A q uifer ............................................................................................ ..11 3.2.3 Vertical Ground Water Migration .............................. ................................. 11 3.2.4 Impact of Man-Made Structures ................................................................ 12 3 .2 .5 T ida l Influences .................................................... ......................................... ..12 3.2.6 Effects of Ground Water Withdrawal ......................................................... 13 3.3 TRITIUM DISTRIBUTION IN GROUND WATER ............................................. 14 4.0 SITE. CONCEPTUAL MODEL .................................................................................. 17 5.0 RECOMMENDATIONS ........................................ 19 6.0 REFERENC ES .......................................................................................................... 20 LIST OF TABLES Table 1: Monitoring Well Installation Details.............................. ............................... 21 Table 2: Tritium Ground Water Laboratory Analytical Results, pCi/L .......... 22 Table 3: Synoptic Ground Water Elevations ................................................................ 26 Table 4: Ground Water Elevations in Paired Monitoring Wells ............... 7.....Table 5: General Water Quality Parameters ................................................................. 27 Table 6: Tritium In Pumping Wells ............................................................................... 28 LIST OF FIGURES Figure 1: Site Location Map ..... ................................. .... ..................................... 29 Figure 2: Monitoring Well Locations ........................................................................... 30 Figure 3: Surficial Aquifer Inferred Ground Water Contours................................. 31 Figure 4: SD-I Hydrograph ................................... ............................... 32 Figure 5: SW -I Hydrograph .............................................................................................. 33 Figure 6: SD-1 Hydrograph with Precipitation ........................................................... 34 Figure 7: SW-1 Hydrograph with Precipitation ................................................................ 35 Figure 8: Bedrock Aquifer Inferred Ground Water Contours ................................. 36 Figure 9: Excavation Detail and Pumping Location in Unit I Area ....................... 37 Figure 10: Tidal Impacts in Surficial and Bedrock Aquifers ................................... 38 Figure 11: Conceptual Ground Water Flow in the Surficial Aquifer ...................... 39 Figure 12: Ground Water Elevations in the Surficial and Bedrock Aquifers ..... 40 Figure 13: CEVA Tritium Ground Water Withdrawal Data ...................................... 41 Figure 14: PAB Tritium Ground Water Withdrawal Data .................... 42 Figure 15: RHR and B Electrical Tunnel Tritium Ground Water Withdrawal Data.. 43 Figure 16: EFW Tritium Ground Water Withdrawal Data ............................ 44 Figure 17: Tritium in Monitoring Well SW-I 2004-2009 ..................... 45 Figure 18: Fall 2004 Tritium in Surficial Aquifer .............................................................. 46 Figure 19: Fall 2004 Tritium in Bedrock Aquifer .......................................................... 47 Figure 20: March 2006 Tritium in Surficial Aquifer ............................ ....................... 48 Figure 21: March 2006 Tritium in Bedrock Aquifer ........................ 49 Figure 22: June 2008 Tritium in Surficial Aquifer .................................. 50 Figure 23: June 2008 Tritium in Bedrock Aquifer ..................................... 51 TSD#09-19 Rev 01 Page 4 of 51.

1.0 INTRODUCTION

Radiation Safety and Control Services (RSCS) has prepared this Site Conceptual Model (SCM) report to identify and characterize ground water flow and tritium distribution at, the NEXTera Energy Seabrook Station facility (Site). The development of the SCM is consistent with the Nuclear Energy Institute (NEI) Industry Ground Water Protection Initiative. The Ground Water Protection Initiative identifies actions to improve utilities'.management and response to instances where the inadvertent release of radioactive substances may result in low but detectible levels of plant-related materials in subsurface soils and water.A preliminary SCM was developed for the Site in September 2008 (RSCS, 2008). At that time no synoptic ground water elevation measurements had been completed for ground water at the Site, and no long-term monitoring of water levels had been completed at selected monitoring wells. The preliminary SCM report recommended that these ground water measurements be completed to support SCM for the Site.The specific objectives of this SCM are the following: Characterize the geologic and hydrogeologic conditions at the Site;* Evaluate the ground water elevation data collected at the Site;* Evaluate ground water quality at the Site including the vertical and horizontal extent, quantity, concentrations, and potential source(s) of tritium in ground water; and* Define'the probable source(s) of tritium at the Site.2009 Site Conceptual Model -Seabrook Station RSCS, Inc., June 2009 TSD#09-19 Rev 01 Page 5 of 51_2.0 STATION DESCRIPTION The following section presents a general summary of the Site location, a summary of surrounding land use and ground water use, and an overview of site-specific topography, surface water features, geology, hydrogeology, and ground water flow conditions.

2.1 STATION

LOCATION The Site is located in the northern part of Seabrook, New Hampshire, approximately one mile from the western shore of Hampton Harbor (Figure 1). Hampton Harbor is situated at the confluence of the Hampton, Browns, and Blackwater Rivers, and is located on the coast of New Hampshire, about 1.5 miles north of the Massachusetts state line and 13 miles south of Portsmouth Harbor. The towns of Hampton, Hampton Falls, and Seabrook abut Hampton Harbor on the north, west, and south respectively. The villages of Hampton Beach, north of the harbor entrance, and Seabrook Beach, south of the entrance, border the navigable waters of the harbor.Seabrook Station is a nuclear power plant located on a 900-acre site in the towns of Seabrook, Hampton and Hampton Falls in New Hampshire, approximately 40 miles north of Boston, Massachusetts.

2.3 SETTING

AND SURFACE WATER FEATURES The station site is situated on a point of land the terminus of which is called "The Rocks," located between the Browns River to the north, and Hunts Island Creek to the southeast (Figure 1). Adjoining the site is a broad, flat tidal marsh located to the north, east and south, identified as Hampton Flats, with an elevation of approximately +4,feet MSL. The normal high tide water level at Hampton Harbor estuary is approximately +4.6 feet MSL, while Site grade is approximately +20 feet MSL. Basled on these relationships, the natural grade and surface water flow from the plant site will be towards the tidal 'marsh. The natural drainage features of the area surrounding the site have been left unchanged, however surface water drainage within the Site is managed via a catch basin network. Some of the existing ground elevations of.the Site beyond the plant limits ind bordering on the tidal marsh are below the nominal +20 foot msl grade. These locations adjoining the tidal marsh (northeast, east, southeast and south sides) are protected by a riprap revetment or a sheetpile seawall at the edges of the embankment. 2009 Site Conceptual Model -Seabrook Station RSCS, Inc., June 2009 (I TSD#09-19 Rev 01 Page 6 of S1 2.4 AREA GROUND WATER USE Most drinking water supplies in the Seabrook area are dependent on ground water sources. Public drinking water supplies in the towns of Seabrook and Salisbury are taken from wells, which tap aquifers in ice contact deposits. These wells yield from about 300 to 700 gallons per minute (gpm), and range from 22 to 54 feet deep (Weston Geophysical Research Inc., 1969). At present, the town of Seabrook uses five wells for its public water supply, and all of these are located at least two'miles due West from the Site. Most homes, as well as commercial and industrial users in Seabrook, are supplied by the town's municipal water system (Weston Geophysical Research Inc., 1969). The town of Seabrook supplies approximately 50,000 gallons per day to Seabrook Station from the Seabrook municipal water supply system.Other wells supplying mostly domestic and farm needs are scattered throughout the area, including the towns of Hampton Falls and Kensington, which are both without public water supply systems. In the Site vicinity, a few private wells supply homes to the north of Seabrook Station, north of the Browns River. The two nearest well fields are located approximately 2,000 and 3,000 feet to the west and north of the Site, respectively (State of New Hampshire Water Resources Board, 1962).2.5 GEOLOGY The subsurface geology in the area of Seabrook Station includes up to 70 feet of unconsolidated glacial till and post-glacial marine deposits above bedrock. The bedrock in the site area includes metasedimentary quartzites, phyllites, and schists, and metavolcanic gneisses of the Merrimack Group of probable Early Paleozoic age, that are intruded by dioritic rocks of the Newburyport and Exeter plutons of possible Early to Middle Paleozoic age. Diabase dikes of Triassic/Cretaceous age locally intrude both the Newburyport and Merrimack Group Formations. (Weston Geophysical, undated).While most of the glacial deposits are comprised of till, coarser grained glacial and/or recent deposits are present to the northwest and under the tidal marshes east of the Site (Weston Geophysical, 1969). These deposits typically contain either brackish or salty water, or would be subject to salt-water intrusion under pumping conditions because of their proximity to salt water bodies.A sequence of marine and recent marsh deposits normally rests on the till along or just north of the Browns River near the northern site boundary, and also in adjoining areas to the south. West of the site, ,thin outwash deposits overlie either till or marine silts and clays. To the east, toward Hampton Beach, medium to fine sands, 50 feet or more in 2009 Site Conceptual Model -Seabrook Station RSCS, Inc., June 2009 TSD#09-19 Rev 01 Page 7 of 51 thickness, occur, and are essentially saturated with salt water (Seabrook Station UFSAR).Bedrock beneath the Site includes the Newburyport Quartz Diorite and the Kittery Formation of the Merrimack Group. A large portion of the site is underlain by the Newburyport quartz diorite intrusive, a hard, durable crystalline igneous rock consisting of medium to coarse-grained quartz diorite matrix intimately enclosing inclusions of dark gray, fine-grained diorite. A portion of the southeastern area of the Site, including much of Unit 11, is underlain by the Kittery Formation metaquartzite and granulite, which occurs as a large relict inclusion welded into the enclosing Newburyport quartz diorite along a broad, transitional-intrusive contact zone. On the Site property, the bedrock surface ranges from 0 msl to +20 msl (Weston Geophysical, undated).Foliation in the Newburyport quartz diorite ranges from N70W to N7OE in strike and averages about east-west. The dip of the foliation in the quartz diorite ranges from 700 to 800 to the south (Weston Geophysical, undated). The foliation in the Kittery formation is similar with a strike of N80E and dipping 500 to the south. The most common joint orientations in the Newburyport quartz diorite strike N35-45E and N30-50W (Weston Geophysical, undated). The diabase dikes also have a strong east-northeast orientation, consistent with the orientation of the foliation and joints in the Newburyport quartz diorite and Kittery formation (Weston Geophysical, undated).Prior to plant construction, the bedrock at the Site was locally overlain by glacial lodgment till and postglacial -marine clay-silt, outwash sands, and occasional sandy beach deposits. During the construction phase at the station, all unconsolidated material was removed and replaced with up to 25 feet of engineered fill consisting of sand and gravel.Local occurrences of coarser grained glacial and/or recent deposits are evident both to the northwest and under the tidal marshes east of the Site (Weston Geophysical, 1969).These deposits typically contain either brackish or salty water, or would be subject to salt-water intrusion under pumping conditions because of their proximity to salt water bodies. On the Site property, bedrock occurs at or near the surface, becoming deeper under the tidal marshes to the south and north Where it is as much as 70 feet or more below sea level. On the site, the bedrock forms a partially buried ridge trending in an.approximately easterly direction (Weston Geophysical, undated). It is overlain by a sandy textured, but well compacted, till up to 62 feet thick. A sequence of marine and recent marsh deposits normally rests on the till along or just north of the Browns River near the northern site boundary and also in adjoining areas to the south. West of the site, thin outwash deposits overlie either till or marine silts and clays. To the east, toward Hampton Beach, medium to fine sands, 50 feet or more in thickness, occur just 2009 Site Conceptual Model -Seabrook Station RSCS, Inc., June 2009 TSD#09-19 Rev 01 Page 8 of 51 below ground level on recent marsh deposits. The sands, which appear permeable, are essentially saturated with salt water (Seabrook Station U SAR).2.6 HYDROGEOLOGY The hydrogeololgy in the general vicinity of the Site consists of a surficial aquifer that occurs in glacial and post-glacial unconsolidated deposits and a bedrock aquifer. The surficial aquifer soils include beach deposits, swamp deposits and glacial drift. The glacial drift is comprised of till, ice contact, marine and outwash deposits and is up to 70 feet thick.The bedrock aquifer, which underlies the unconsolidated materials, is composed of the Newburyport quartz diorite and the metamorphosed sediments of the Merrimack group (Weston Geophysical, 1969). There is little apparent difference in the water-bearing properties of the different types of rock. Most bedrock wells yield less than 10 gpm from depths up to 300 feet (New Hampshire. Department of Resources and Economic Development, 1964).Noý major aquifers underlie the Site or are located within the adjacent area. Locally, the most productive aquifers are in the glacial outwash deposits, which are widely distributed west, and southwest of the Site (Weston Geophysical, 1969). The outwash is made up of predominantly fine, silty sand of low permeability. In the site area, it is up to 35 feet thick, and, generally, overlies marine sediments. Ground water movement in the site area is toward adjoining tidal areas located northeast, east and southeast of the Seabrook Station. Local modifications in flow direction are the result of variations in permeability of water-bearing materials and local topography. Rates of ground water movement in the Site area do not exceed 100 feet per year (Weston Geophysical Research Inc., 1969). This is based on a water table gradient of 0.06 feet per foot, as observed during high water table conditions, and a hydraulic conductivity of 104 to 105 cm/sec, Consistent with the till and bedrock, respectively.

2.7 EXISTING

WELL NETWORK A total of 19 monitoring wells have been installed at Seabrook Station. Monitoring well details including surveyed locations are presented irl Table 1, and the location of the each monitoring well is presented in Figure 2. Fifteen of the monitoring wells were installed in 2004 and the final four wells were added in 2007/2008. Monitoring wells are screened in both the surficial and bedrock aquifers, and are located to characterize both upgradient and downgradient ground water quality in each aquifer. The monitoring well network also includes several well pairs that are screened in the surficial and 2009 Site Conceptual Model -Seabrook Station RSCS, Inc., June 2009 TSD#09-19 Rev 01 Page 9 of 51 bedrock aquifers. The well pairs will provide an understanding of vertical gradients across the Site.3.0 GROUND WATER FLOW AND FATE AND TRANSPORT This section describes the current understanding regarding ground water flow and tritium distribution at the Site. Previous ground water studies completed by Areva and the Seabrook Station Updated Final Safety Analysis Report (UFSAR) were reviewed to develop an understanding of ground water flow at the Site and recently collected ground water elevation data ground water were interpreted to develop ground water flow characteristics for both the surficial and bedrock aquifers. The tritium distribution at the Site was also evaluated using ground water samples collected from existing monitoring wells and on-site ground water extraction wells.3.1 DATA COLLECTION To characterize ground water flow and tritium distribution at the Site, data collected from the 19 installed wells are evaluated. Thermonitoring wells are locatedin upgradient, downgradient and biased locations, and are screened in both the surficial and bedrock aquifers. Several paired monitoring wells that are screened in both aquifers are also included in the monitoring well network. These paired monitoring wells are used to evaluate vertical hydraulic behavior between the two aquifers. A summary of the monitoring well details is included in Table 1. Since installation in 2004, the monitoring wells have been sampled on a periodic basis and ground water samples have been analyzed for tritium and general water quality parameters. A summary of tritium ground water concentrations for the 19 monitoring wells is included in Table 2.To evaluate ground water flow at the Site, synoptic ground water elevation measurements were taken in all 19 monitoring wells on April 6. 2009. These measurements were taken under "normal, ambient" site conditions while dewatering operations were in progress (see Section 3.2.6). The results of the synoptic ground water measurements are shown in Table 3. Additionally, water levels in four of the monitoring wells (SD-1, SW-1, BD-1 and BD-2) located in both the surficial and bedrock aquifers were continuously monitored from February through early April using transducers and data loggers. These measurements were used to characterize ground water flow, evaluate vertjcal groundwater movement, assess tidal influences, and evaluate ground waterremoval activity at the Site.3.2 GROUND WATER FLOW Ground water flow in the surficial and bedrock aquifers is inferred from synoptic ground water elevations measured in the 19 on-site monitoring wells. The following sections 2009 Site Conceptual Model -Seabrook Station RSCS, Inc., June 2009 TSD#09-19 Rev 01 Page 10 of 51 describe ground water flow in both aquifers and vertical ground water movement between the two aquifers. The impacts of tidal variations, subsurface structures and ground water pumping activities are also discussed.

3.2.1 Surficial

Aquifer Inferred ground water contours for the surficial aquifer are shown in Figure 3. Ground water contours were developed using Golden Software SurferTM version 8.04. In, general, ground water flows in an easterly direction in the surficial aquifer discharging to the tidal mash east of the Site (Figure 3). Ground water elevations range from 17.45 feet mean sea level (msl) in the northwestern portion of the Site (SU-1).to 7.87 feet msl along the eastern side of the Site (SD-3) (Figure 3). The easterly flow direction is consistent with the presence of the adjacent tidal marsh and the presence of Browns River to the north and east.The ground water gradient is much steeper in the western portion of the Site, relative to the eastern portion of the facility where the gradient is very low (Figure 3). The significant change in gradient across the facility is most likely related to the presence of subsurface structures (see Section 3.2.5). A ground water depression is inferred near SW-3, as the ground water elevation is low in SW-3 relative to nearby monitoring wells located to the southeast (Figure 3). The low ground water elevation observed in SW-3 is related to ground water withdrawal that is occurring in the Unit 2 containment area (See Section 3.2.6). Approximately 32,000 gallons per day are pumped from Unit 2, and this significant ground water withdrawal reverses the hydraulic gradient along the southern boundary of the Site and appears to draw ground water onto the Site from the tidal marsh to the south (Figure 3).Hydrographs for SD-1 and SW-1 were developed from the long-term transducer and data logger measurements (Figures 4 and 5). Monitoring well SW-1 was logged from December 18 through April 8, 2009, while SD-1 was measured from February 5 through April 8, 2009. During the December through early February time period ground water elevations decreased in SW-1 from approximately 9 feet msl to values less than 8.5 ft msl (Figure 4). Both-wells experienced a 1 to 2-foot increase in water elevation from the early February time period through April 8, 2009 (Figures 4 and 5). These ground water.elevation variations are consistent with seasonal changes. Lower ground water elevations are typically observed in the winter months with increasing levels observed in spring related to rain and snow melt.The impact of precipitation on ground water levels in the surficial aquifer is shown in Figures 6 and 7 for SD-1 and SW-1, respectively.. Since the precipitation is most likely snow during the December through April time period, little impacts in ground water-levels are observed, even for the most significant precipitation events (Figures 6 and 7).2009 Site Conceptual Model -Seabrook Station RSCS, Inc., June 2009 TSD#09-19 Rev 01 Page 11 of 51 Similarly, much of the surface area in the eastern and southern portions of the facility is paved or part of a building footprint. Surface water is collected at the Site at numerous catch basin locations and discharged at the EPA NPDES permitted outfall 001 .The off-site discharge of surface water minimizes on-site recharge to the surficial aquifer.Superimposed on the long-term, seasonal variations in ground water elevation are numerous short-term fluctuations (Figures 4 and 5). These short-term fluctuations are not related to tidal variations or precipitation events, but are believed to be a function of ground water pumping activity (see Sections 3.2.5 and 3.2.6).3.2.2 Bedrock Aquifer Inferred ground water contours for the bedrock aquifer are shown in Figure 8, and were developed using Golden Software SurferTM version 8.04. Similar to the surficial aquifer, ground water in the bedrock also flows to the east (Figure 8). Ground water elevations range from 17.63 feet mean sea level (msl) in the northwestern portion of the Site (BU-1) to 8.90 feet msl along the southeastern side of the Site (BD-2) (Figure 8).The easterly ground water flow direction is consistent with the regional setting with Hampton Harbor and the tidal flats located to the east. The flow direction is also consistent with the structural characteristics of the bedrock. The orientation of the foliation in both the Newburyport quartz diorite and Kittery formation is generally east west, and joints in the Newburyport quartz diorite are commonly oriented to the northeast.

3.2.3 Vertical

Ground Water Migration Vertical ground water movement between the surficial and bedrock aquifers is evaluated with monitoring well pairs that are screened in each aquifer. Eight monitoring well pairs are located at the Site, and ground water elevation differences for the eight well pairs are shown in Table 4. Five of the monitoring well pairs (SD-1/BD-2, SD-2/BD-3, SU-1 1/BU-1 1, SU-1/BU-1, and SD-4/BD-5) exhibit downward migration, with three monitoring well pairs (SC-1/BD-1, SD-3/BD-4, and SU-10/BU-10) showing upward migration. Typically, downward gradients are representative of recharge areas, while upward gradients are indicative of discharge areas. Upward vertical gradients can also be related to confining layers between the aquifers, however no confining layers are present at the Site. The regional setting for Seabrook Station is consistent with a discharge area, due to the presence of the tidal flats and harbor located nearby and to the east, and upward ground water gradients would be expected. The downward gradients indicated in SU-1/BU-1 and SD-4/BD-5 are most likely indicative of recharge as these monitoring wells are located in gravel covered area where infiltration will occur.2009 Site Conceptual Model -Seabrook Station RSCS,' Inc., June 2009 TSD#09-19 Rev 01 Page 12 of 51 The downward gradient observed in SD-1/BD-2 is likely related to ground water pumping activities, as SD-1 is located within the area of influence of ongoing ground water dewatering activities (Figure 3) (see Section 3.2.6). The small downward gradients in SU-1 1/BU-1 1 and SD-2/BD-3 are potentially related to subsurface structures (see Section 3.2.4). Additional synoptic water level measurements will confirm the presence of downward gradients in these well pairs. Most of the other monitoring well pairs have upward gradients consistent with the regional setting.3.2.4 Impact of Man-Made Structures The presence of man-made structures can have a potential impact on ground water flow. At Seabrook Station these structures include concrete building foundations that were poured directly on the bedrock surface, sumps/excavations within the bedrock, and the sheetpile seawall along the northeast side of the Site. Prior to foundation/building construction, the site construction activities included a complete removal of all soils across the Site. Many of the concrete building foundations were directly sealed to the bedrock surface prior to the placement of engineered fill that now comprises the surficial aquifer at the Site. Areas of the Site with foundation walls set directly on bedrock include the Unit 1 and Unit 2 containment areas, and a large pedestal in the Turbine building that supports the turbine. These deep structures have (a rubberized membrane (EPDM) that coats the concrete and limits direct migration to the surrounding aquifer. An example of the subsurface structures in the Unit 1 containment area is shown in Figure 9. The area around Unit 1 has numerous foundations set directly on the bedrock surface and deep excavations into the bedrock beneath the containment building (Figure 9). These deep foundation structures will impede ground water flow in those areas. The flat hydraulic gradients in the Unit 1 and Turbine Building areas are consistent with the presence of subsurface impediments to ground water flow (Figure 3).The sheetpile structure on the northern side of the facility located between SU-1 0 and SU-1 1 also appears to impact ground water flow in the surficial aquifer. The ground water surface is relatively flat in the portion of the Site, as there is little ground water elevation change observed between SU-1 1 (10.04 ft msl) and SU-10 (9.9 ft msl) located along the sheetpile structure. The sheetpile wall appears to limit ground water flow and discharge to the northeast, and directs ground water discharge to the eastern end of the Site.3.2.5 Tidal Influences Tidal variations can readily affect ground water flow in near-tidal environments. Tidal variations in nearby-Hampton Harbor are significant (approximately eight feet from low to high tide), and can potentially impact ground water flow in both the surficial and bedrock aquifers. The potential tidal impacts were evaluated using the long-term water 2009 Site Conceptual Model -Seabrook Station RSCS, Inc., June 2009 TSD#09-19 Rev 01 Page 13 of 51 levels collected by the transducers and data loggers. Figure 10 shows hydrographs for SD- SW, BD-1, and BD-2 for the two-day period of March 1 through March 3, 2009.Also included in the figure are tidal variations in Hampton Harbor located approximately one mile to the east. No significant tidal effects are observed in any of the four monitoring wells (Figure 10). The lack of tidal impacts is consistent with the dampening effect of the tidal marsh and the low hydraulic conductivity of the tidal marsh soils.3.2.6 Effects of Ground Water Withdrawal Ground water pumping/withdrawal activities are ongoing-at several locations at the Site.Approximately 32,000 gallons per day (gpd) of ground water is pumped from the Unit 2 containment building to control inflow of ground water. This ground water removal in Unit 2 gives rise to a ground water depression near SW-3 (Figure 3). The lack of monitoring wells on the western side of the Unit 2 containment building acts to minimize the size of the inferred ground water depression shown in Figure 3, as ground water levels on the western side of Unit 2 are most likely lower than that inferred on Figure 3.The ground water flow map also indicates that off-site ground water from the tidal marsh is potentially being drawn onto the Site in the area south of Unit 1 and 2. The elevated chloride levels detected in selected wells, along with synoptic GW level measurements suggest that marsh water is being drawn towards the plant effectively reversing GW flow in the region along the southern edge of the Site (Figure 3 and Table 5).Based on the significant pumping rate in the Unit 2 containment area the actual ground water depression near SW-3 is likely broader than that shown in Figure 3. An estimation of the ground flow contours assuming a larger area of ground water depression associated with Unit 2 is shown in Figure 11. These revised ground water contours emphasizes the reversal of ground water gradient along the southern side of the Site and the potential for ground water from the tidal marsh to be drawn onto the Seabrook Site.Ground water withdrawal activities are focused on the Unit I containment area to minimize ground water inflow to the buildings. A total of five locations regularly withdraw ground water under hydrostatic conditions in the Unit 1 area at a combined rate of approximately 3,000 gpd (Figure 9). No significant ground water depression in the surficial aquifer is observed in the Unit 1 area, however ground water also appears to flow onto the Site south of Unit 1 as a function of the Unit 1 withdrawal and/or Unit 2 pumping activity (Figure 3). Elevated levels of chloride are also present in SW-1 (640-2400 ppm) and SW-2 (480 ppm) and are consistent with mixing with the tidal marsh ground water (Table 5).Review of the hydrographs for SD-1, SW-1, BD-1, and BD-2 does indicate the presence of small, abrupt variations in water levels that are observed in several of the monitoring wells at the same point in time (Figure 12). These perturbations appear to be consistent 2009 Site Conceptual Model -Seabrook Station RSCS, Inc., June 2009 TSD#09-19 Rev 01 Page 14 of 51 with the cycling of a pump or pumps that are removing ground water. At any given time ground water withdrawal may be ongoing at up to five site locations and it is hard to determine which dewatering system is operating "periodically" at any given time.3.3 TRITIUM. DISTRIBUTION IN GROUND WATER In September 1999, elevated tritium concentrations were identified in ground water that was seeping into the containment annulus. This was interpreted to indicate that tritium-contaminated ground water from an unspecified location was leaking from that location into the containment annulus. Seabrook Station personnel evaluated the leak and determined that the Cask Loading Area/Transfer canal adjacent to the Spent Fuel Pool was leaking approximately

0.1 gallons

per day (gpd) into the Spent Fuel Pool tell tale drain collection lines. This flow rate increased to 30 to 40 gpd after the leak off collection lines were hydrolazed. The Spent Fuel Pool leakage contaminated the surrounding concrete of the structure which resulted in diffusion of tritium contamination into ground water beneath and adjacent to the fuel building. This leak was not directly to ground water, but to the interstitial space between the stainless steel fuel pool liner and the concrete building foundation. The water that leaked into this space was initially at the same concentration as the fuel pool water. As part of the mitigation of this leak the interstitial space was drained and the leak in the stainless steel liner was. repaired.This tritium contamination is the only significant tritium release that has impacted ground water at the Site, and appropriate corrective actions were initiated to minimize and terminate the release. In addition to leak repair activities, the corrective actions include regular withdrawal of ground water in the area around the fuel building, PAB and containment. These activities included the use of dewatering systems already in place to mitigate ground water leakage into lower levels of site structures. Additionally, Unit 2 water withdrawal was maintained to dewater the structure. Another important part of the corrective actions was the initiation of a monitoring well network at the Site.Consistent with the corrective action for the tritium release, five dewatering locations have been established in the fuel building, PAB and containment area of Unit 1 and include (Figure 9): o A dewatering pump in the containment enclosure area (CEVA) located at -31 ft msl, A dewatering well located in the Primary Auxiliary Building_(PAB) adjacent to the fuel pool that cycles ground water between elevation -16 and -23 ft msl, o A dewatering point in the Emergency Feed Water (EFW) pump house located-north of containment at -31 ft msl, o A dewatering point located in the Residual Heat Removal (RHR) B-Equipment vault at elevation -61 on the northwest side of containment, and* .2009 Site Conceptual Model -Seabrook Station RSCS, Inc., June 2009 TSD#09-19 Rev 01 Page 15 of 51 Dewatering points in the B Electrical Tunnel at elevation -20 west of the EFW location that cycles ground water between -23 and -26 ft msl.The dewatering systems have been utilized since the early 2000's and samples of the extracted ground water have been periodically analyzed for tritium. The tritium concentrations in the withdrawn ground water since the dewatering was initiated are illustrated in Figures 13 through 16 for CEVA, PAB, EFW, RHR and B Electrical Tunnel dewatering locations. Initial tritium concentrations in the CEVA and PAB were elevated as tritium concentrations ranged up to 3,560,000 pCi/L in CEVA in early 2003 and 84,000 pCi/L in PAB in early 2000 (Figures 13 and14). Tritium concentrations have significantly decreased in both locations over the last three to five years as CEVA tritium concentrations have typically been below 50,000 pCi/L and PAB tritium levels have generally been below 5,000 pCi/L (Figures 13 and 14). The decrease in ground water tritium concentrations is related to the non-metallic liner that was added to the Cask Handling and Fuel Transfer Canal in the September 2004.Tritium concentrations in the ground water extracted from RHR and EFW have been much lower over the 2002 through 2009-time period. RHR tritium concentrations have generally ranged from 500 pCi/L to 1,800 pCi/L and EFW tritium levels have typically varied from 500 pCi/L to 2,640 pCi/L (Figures 15 and 16). The dewatering effort in the B Electrical Tunnel was recently initiated and tritium values are similar to those recorded in the RHR (Figure 15).RSCS has reviewed the tritium ground water concentrations from the dewatering systems as a function of the rate of ground water removal over time, and no correlation between the Withdrawal rates or tritium concentration was observed at any of the five locations. The five dewatering poi.nts are removing tritium-contaminated ground water that has migrated into subsurface adjacent to building foundations. These data suggest that tritium-contamination is present in site ground water at detectable concentrations proximal to these dewatering locations. The B Electrical Tunnel and EFW pumping locations are located on the northwest and northeast side of containment, respectively, while the CEVA and PAB pumping locations are on the southwest and southern side of containment. The RHR pumping well is located west of containment. The tritium concentrations are much higher for the CEVA and PAB pumping locations, indicating that the more significant tritium ground water concentrations are on the southwestern and southern side of the Unit 1 containment. Based on the~average daily withdrawal rates, the five dewatering locations in the Unit 1 containment area remove approximately 3,195 gallons of water per day (Table 6).Using the average tritium concentration measured in the withdrawn water during the January through April 2009 time period, the daily amount of tritium that is removed from Site dewatering activities is approximately 18,265,197 pCi/day (Table 6). r 2009 Site Conceptual Model -Seabrook Station RSCS, Inc., June 2009 TSD#09-19 Rev 01 Page 16 of 51 Tritium in ground water is potentially a function of diffusion of tritium from tritium-contaminated concrete that was impacted during the original r'elease associated with the Cask Loading Area/Transfer canal in 1999. This makes identification of specific locations where contamination from concrete enters site, water difficult to determine. However, changes in dewatering rates and dewatering locations since the mitigation of the "leak" was completed, in conjunction with the complexity of the subsurface structures proximal .to the area warrant ongoing, long term monitoring of site ground water to verify that tritium concentrations continue to show a decreasing trend over time. Figures 13 through 16 show the tritium concentrations associated with the five ground water withdrawal locations, and indicate relatively constant tritium ground water concentrations since the 2004-2005 time period.A monitoring network of 15 monitoring wells was established in 2004 with the addition of four monitoring wells in the 2007/2008-time period. These wells have been periodically sampled and analyzed for tritium from the 2004 to 2009-time period. The monitoring network includes wells screened in both the surficial and bedrock aquifers, and wells located in upgradient and downgradient locations relative to the tritium contaminated area adjacent to Unit 1 containment (Table 1 and Figure 2). Tritium concentrations in all bedrock monitoring wells and most surficial wells over the 2004 through 2009-time period are below the minimum detectable activity (MDA). One exception is monitoring well SW-1 where tritium has ranged from 601 pCi/L to 2,930 pCi/L over the 2004 through 2009 time period (Figure 17).The distribution of tritium in Site ground water for both the surficial and bedrock aquifers is shown in Figures 18 through 23 for the fall 2004, March 2006, and June 2008-time periods. As indicated in Figures 18, 20, and.22, tritium in the surficial aquifer is limited to the area around the Unit 1 containment where tritium is detected in SW-I. Tritium concentrations in all bedrock monitoring wells are below the MDA, indicating that no measurable tritium is present in the bedrock aquifer (Figures 19, 21, and 23).The current tritium ground water data in the vicinity of the Unit 1 containment and fuel storage area indicate that tritium is.present in ground water above background levels and is derived from an onsite source in the area of the fuel storage building, consistent with the known release area of tritium that was identified in 1999. The tritium ground water data for 2004 through 2009 indicate that tritium is limited to the Unit 1 containment area, and no offsite migration of tritium in ground water has been observed. The current ground water withdrawal activities in the Unit 1 containment area is providing hydraulic containment for tritium in ground water at the Site.2009 Site Conceptual Model -Seabrook Station RSCS, Inc., June 2009 TSD#09-19 Rev 01 Page 17 of 51 4.0 SITE CONCEPTUAL MODEL This section presents a Site Conceptual Model for ground water flow and tritium migration at Seabrook Station.The Site is bounded on the northern, eastern and southern sides by a tidal marsh. The tidal marsh and the adjacent Browns River just north and east of the Site, drain into Hampton Harbor located approximately one mile east of the Site. The surface elevation of the Site is approximately +20 feet msl, and the elevation of the tidal marsh less than+5 feet msl.The subsurface geology in the area of Seabrook Station includes unconsolidated glacial till and post-glacial marine deposits above bedrock. The bedrock in the Site area includes metasedimentary quartzites, phyllites, and schists, and metavolcanic gneisses that are intruded by dioritic rocks. The foliation and joints in the bedrock have a strong easterly component that will enhance the ground water flow in the bedrock in the easterly direction. During plant construction, the native, unconsolidated soils were excavated down to the bedrock, and many of the foundations were poured directly on the bedrock surface. Up to 25 feet of engineered fill was used to backfill the foundations and bring the Site to current grade.Two aquifers are present at the Site. A surficial aquifer occurs within the engineered fill and a bedrock aquifer is present in the bedrock below. Quantitative ground water flow has been characterized in both aquifers, as synoptic ground water levels have been collected at the Site. Ground water in both aquifers generally flows to the east, discharging to the tidal marsh on the east and southeast side of the Site. The easterly flow in the bedrock aquifer is consistent with east-west oriented foliation and fractures, and with discharge to the tidal marsh on the eastern side of the Site.Ground water in the surficial aquifer flows to the east across the western portion of the Site with a relatively steep gradient. As ground water in the surficial aquifer flows across the eastern portion of the Site it is impacted by deep foundation structures in the containment areas, the sheetpile wall on the northern side of the facility, and ground water pumping activities. 'The presence of the deep foundation structures acts to restrict ground water-flow and create a flat hydraulic gradient in the area of Unit 1 and the Turbine Building. The sheet pile structure minimizes discharge along the northern side of the Site and artificially elevates the water table in that area, also acting to reduce the hydraulic gradient in northeastern portion of the Site.Ground water is continuously pumped in the Unit 2 containment area to prevent ground water inflow and the pumping activity creates a ground water depression that reverses 2009 Site Conceptual Model -Seabrook Station RSCS, Inc., June 2009 TSD#09-'19 Rev 01 Page 18 of 51 the ground water flow direction along the southern portion of the Site south of Units 1 and 2. In this area, ground water from the tidal marsh flows onto the Site.A tritium release from the Unit 1 spent fuel system, refueling canal, and cask handling area liners was identified in 1999. The leak was characterized and appropriate corrective actions were initiated. As part of the corrective actions, ground water withdrawal was initiated and incorporated into the remedial program at five locations within and nearby the release area, and a monitoring well network was established in both the surficial and bedrock aquifers.Tritium has been detected at concentrations up to 3,000 pCi/L adjacent to the release area in the surficial aquifer. Tritium sampling results for the monitoring well network for the 2004 through 2009-time period indicate that tritium is restricted to the Unit 1 containment area in the surficial aquifer and is below the MDA in the bedrock aquifer.The sampling results indicate that the ground water withdrawal activities in the area around Unit 1 containment has minimized tritium migration in Site ground water.If tritium-contaminated ground water in the surficial aquifer migrated away from the Unit 1 area, it would flow in an east-northeasterly direction and discharge to the tidal marsh east of SU-1 1, SD-3, and SD-2 (Figure 3).Currently, tritium in ground water at the Site does not present an environmental or health risk to onsite or offsite receptors. Municipal drinking water is supplied to the Site and most of the surrounding area. Surface water at the site from direct precipitation and process water is conveyed off the site through a permitted outfall, which discharges to the Atlantic Ocean approximately one mile offshore. The ground water sampling results and the water level measurements indicate that the current hydraulic controls implemented at the Site are limiting tritium to the onsite locations in the Unit 1 containment area. Based on these current data, the low tritium concentrations in the surficial and bedrock aquifers do not present a risk to public health and the environment. 2009 Site Conceptual Model -Seabrook Station RSCS, Inc., June 2009 TSD#09-19 Rev 01 Page 19 of 51 5.0 RECOMMENDATIONS Based on this SCM, the following recommendations are developed by RSCS for Seabrook Station: Maintain a quarterly ground water sampling-program that integrates tritium monitoring with the license extension sampling program, which will include cation (calcium, sodium, potassium, and magnesium)-anion (chloride, sulfate, carbonate and bicarbonate) analysis for all monitoring and extraction wells. The cation- anion-data will characterize the site ground water, provide a basis for evaluating inflow of tidal marsh ground water, and identify any potential impacts associated with de-icing activities. The quarterly sampling program should be, conducted for at least one year to assess any seasonal variations and evaluate the hydraulic controls implemented to contain tritium in the Unit 1 area;o Conduct synoptic ground water level measurements on a quarterly basis for a minimum of 1 year following the currently proposed changes to the site dewatering system, and refine quantitative interpretation of ground water flow in surficial and bedrock aquifers;o Additional characterization of the Site downgradient of the fuel pool historic release area and potential sources in the PAB should be implemented as well as upgradient of the Unit 2 Containment. The new well locations should include downgradient surficial monitoring wells between existing well pairs SD-2/BD-3 and SD-3/BD-4 and downgradient of SW-1 near the Service Water pump house.A monitoring well located on the west side of Unit 2 should be included to provide a more complete understanding of the area that is influenced by Unit 2 pumping activities. The proposed monitoring wells would provide a better characterization of the downgradient ground water flow and tritium distribution at the Site; and o Re-evaluate SCM based on additional quarterly data.o Develop a three-dimensional numerical ground water flow model capable of evaluating site dewatering, ground water pumping, and tritium migration/containment. 2009 Site Conceptual Model -Seabrook Station RSCS, Inc., June 2009 TSD#09-19 Rev 01 Page 20 of 51

6.0 REFERENCES

Fenneman, N.M., 1938, Physiography of Eastern United States, McGraw-Hill Book Company, New York.New Hampshire Water Resources Board, 1962, New Hampshire Basic Data Report No.1 Ground water Series, Southeastern Area by Edward Bradley and Richard Peterson,. New Hampshire Department of Resources and Economic Development, 1964, Progress Report, Rock Well Survey in New Hampshire. U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, 1989, Offsite Dose Calculation Manual Guidance: Standard Radiological Effluent Controls for Pressurized Water Reactors, NUREG-1 301, Generic Letter 89-01, Supplement No. 1.Weston Geophysical Research Inc., 1969, Ground water Hydrology for the Proposed Nuclear Station -Unit No. 1".Weston Geophysical Research Inc., undated, Geological and Geophysical Investigations, Seabrook Nuclear Station, Seabrook, New Hampshire, Prepared for Yankee Atomic Electric Company.(*2009 Site Conceptual Model -Seabrook Station RSCS, Inc., June 2009 S Table 1: Monitoring Well Installation Details WELL ID SU-1 SD-I SD-4 SC-I SD-3 SD-2 SW-I SW-2 SW-3 BU-1 SHALLOW / DEEP SHALLOW SHALLOW SHALLOW SHALLOW SHALLOW SHALLOW SHALLOW SHALLOW SHALLOW DEEP NORTHING 10631.84 9949.08 9954.06 9816.79 10528.84 10130.12 10020.8 10034.47 10055.91 10632.05 EASTING 4602.61 5228.95 4547.25 4739.04 5724.32 5975.95 5253.01 5681.84 4964.14 4597.73 SURFACE ELEVATION 23.33 19.89 19.85 22.98 14.53 14.76 20.03 20.04 20.08 23.01 BEDROCK ELEVATION 5.0' 1.6' 8.01 5.4' 1' 1.6' -2 4.0' 0.4' 6.0'DEPTH TO BEDROCK* 15' 181/2Y' 12' 141/2' 10' 11' 22' 161/2' 20' 14'WELLSCREENED' 4'to15' 12'to181/2' 7'to12' 9'to 141/2' 5'to10' 6'to11' 12'to22' 9'to161/2' 10'to20' pa FIRST WATER* 4' 12 Y2' 9' 9", 5' 6' 12' 9' -12' 31'WELL DEPTH* 15' 18-1' 12' 141/2' 10' 11' 22' 161/2' 20! 46'STAND /.FLUSH CAP STAND FLUSH FLUSH STAND STAND STAND FLUSH FLUSH FLUSH STAND WELL ID BD-2 BD-5 BD-1 BD-4 BD-3 SU-10 SU-II BU-10 BU-11 SHALLOW / DEEP DEEP DEEP DEEP DEEP DEEP SHALLOW SHALLOW DEEP DEEP NORTHING 9953.8 9949.76 9816.56 10532.64 10135.38 10826.5 10687.05 10810.59 10682.63 EASTING 5229.11 4547.27 4743.651 5721.93 5975.42 4999.35 5539.53 5010.62 5541.83, SURFACE ELEVATION 19.88 19.69 23.24 14.39 15.05 20.03 19.9 20.44 19.9 BEDROCK ELEVATION -0.9 8.1' 4.9' 2.5' 1.6' na na -na na DEPTH TO BEDROCK* 21' 12' 15' 8/' 11' na na na na WELL SCREENED

  • na na na na na na na na na FIRST WATER* 26' 158' 39' 168' 151' na na na na WELL DEPTH* 100' 167' 101' 174' 171' na na na na STAND / FLUSH CAP FLUSH FLUSH STAND STAND -STAND na na na na Notes: All
  • depths are approximate (within inches), measu All deep wells are 4"dia, all shallow are 2" diameter ired in "feet down from surface elevation" unless -otherwise noted.2009 Site Conceptual Model -Seabrook Station RSCS, Inc., June 2009 Table 2: Tritium Ground Water Laboratory Analytical Results, pCi/L Sample Date BD-1 I BD-2 BD-3 BD-4 BD-5 BU SC-1I SD-1 SD-2 SD-3 SD-4] SU-1SU-10 SU-11 BU-1 0 BU-11~ ~ ( m m eri/,Fal I 2004 S

i, 09/07/04 < 554 09/08/04 < 549 09/14/04 < 546 " 09/17/04 < 554 09/22/04 < 550 09/22/04 < 547 09/23/04 < 607 09/29/04 1930 < 553 10/29/04 *< 547 11/03/04 < 547 11/05/04 584 11/05/04 < 511 11/05/04 < 513 11/08/04 < 524 728 11/18/04 880 < 560 1570 1140 < 557 11/23/04 < 560 11/23/04 < 559 < 560 < 560 11/23/04 < 559 11/08/04.12/22/04 2930 02/03/05 < 559 < 563 02/05/05 < 564 06/09/05 < 548 620 06/15/05 1160 691 06/22/05 < 538 < 534 07/07/05 < 549 < 548* 07/08/05 < 553 < 548 < 545 < 545 < 546 07/12/05 < 549 < 550, < 542 < 543 2009 Site Conceptual Model -Seabrook Station RSCS, Inc., June 2009 0 Sample Date IBD. BD.2 jID .3 BD-4 BD-5 RU-i SC-I SDI S.D-2 SD-3 SD-4 SU-o SWI SW-2 SW-3 SU-I0 SU-11 BU-10 .BU-1 10/03/05 < 549 1 _ 1 1 1 11/02/05 < 546_.11/17/05 < 569 < 590 617 11/18/05 < 569 < 565 < 586 617 11/19/05 < 574 < 565 -11/21/05 < 580 < 582 NW i< 574 03/11/06 < 577 < 579 1550 < 582 03/16/06 _ 610 03/18/06 < 592 < 587 < 588 03/25/06 < 562 < 670 < 554 < 555 < 557 03/27/06_ <592 < 586, 05/05/06 2020 06/14/06 < 589 1320 06/24/06 < 590 < 585 < 589 06/25/06 < 598 < 590 < 590 < 590 07/09/06 < 583 < 586 07/15/06 1280* 07/16/06 <607 <607 !<594 <591 08/12/06 < 570 < 571 1540 < 571 08/13/06 < 573 < 573 < 573 < 589 <573 09/17/06 < 604 < 600 < 601 < 600 < 600 < 598 09/24/06. 1660 10/17/06 1470 11/18/06 < 666 < 667 985 < 669 < 666 11/19/06 <580 < 587 < 584 < 580 < 594 12/09/06 < 597 1320 12/10/06 < 598 < 606 < 598 < 594; ~J>>~~Ki~ -%U>~ WfiMie-S'rV20)a in i <~g .2009 Site Conceptual Model -Seabrook Station RSCS,.Inc., June 2009 Sample Date 1D-1 BD-2 BD-3 BD-4 1D-5 BU-1 SC-I SD-I SD-2 SD-3 SD-4 SU-1 SW-1 SW-2 SW-3 SU-I0 SU-11 BU-10 BU-1I 01/28/07 < 574 < 596 742 02/19/07 1110 03/10/07 < 556 < 556 1360 < 574 03/11/07 < 557 < 556 < 556 < 558 <656 03/30/07 < 622 < 620 < 619 < 616 < 616 04/01/07 < 627 04/29/07 1190 05/12/07 < 557 < 573 853 592 05/13/07 < 614 < 561 < 555 < 554 < 555 05/26/07 < 618 < 607 05/27/07 <_564 < 607 < 607 < 604 06/28/07 __1_1 929---07/13/07 < 601 < 601 969 NW < 603 07/14/07 <610 <666 <620 <609 <623 NW <598 <603 NW <603 08/19/07 < 601 09/07/07 859 10/03/07 < 612 10/06/07 < 620 < 620 966 NW < 614 10/07/07 < 614 <574 < 583 < 611 11/10/07 <576 <617 <614 <614 <604 11/11/07 < 614 < 623 < 614 964 NW 12/17/07 < 590 < 554 12/27/07 < 555 12/27/07 "_< 554 12/29/07 < 554 12/29/07 1.. <554 03/27/08 _ T 1900 < 564 05/24/08 _2240 < 576 < 596 05/25/08 < 598 1_ < 5731 1 < 577 1_< 570 < 598 1 596 2009 Site Conceptual Model -Seabrook Station RSCS, Inc., June 2009 0 0 Sample Date BD-I BD-2 BD-3 BD-4 BD-5 BU-1 SC-I SD-I SD-2 SD-3 SD-4 SU-I SW-I SW-2 SW-3 SU-10 SU-11 BU-10 BU-11 05/26/08 < 574 < 596 < 598 < 597 06/14/08 < 584 < 580 < 592 < 579 06/15/08 635 849 2430 07/19/08 < 587 < 609 1680 < 586 08/23/08 < 570 < 570 1487 < 570 09/30/08 <572 <570 1500 < 576T 11/22/08 <600 1270 11/23/08 <610 <604 <617 <626 <604 <603 <603 <600 NW NW <624 12/04/08 <600 <606 < 590 12/05/08 <606 <606 _ < 596 03/14/09 < 550 1 < 5501 1380 <546 <544 <547 03/15/09 <546 <544 <544 1 <548 <552 <566 .<544 <546 2009 Site Conceptual Model -Seabrook Station RSCS, Inc., June2009 /Table 3: Synoptic Ground Water Elevations TOC Elevation. Depth to Water Table Well ID (ft MSL) Water (ft) Elevation (ft MSL)SC-1 22.98 13.59 9.39 SD-1 19.89 10.10 9.79 SD-2 14.76 5.30 9.46 SD-3 14.53 6.66 7.87 SD-4 19.85 5.65 14.20 SU-1 23.33 5.58 17.75 SU-10 20.03 9.99 10.04 SU-11 19.90 10.00 9.90 SW-1 20.03 10.17 9.86 SW-2 20.04 9.86 10.18 SW-3 20.08 -13.17 6.91 BD-1 23.24 12.60 10.64 BD-2 19.88 10.98 8.90 BD-3 15.05 5.71 9.34 BD-4 14.39 5.31 9.08 BD-5 19.69 8.02 11.67 BU-1 23.01 5.38 17.63 BU-10 20.44 5.74 14.70 BU-11 19.90 10.12 9.78 2009 Site Conceptual Model -Seabrook Station RSCS, Inc., June 2009 Table 4: Ground Water Elevations in Paired Monitoring Wells Monitoring Water Table Head Well Pair Elevation (ft MSL) Difference S& 1 9.39 1.25 BD-1 10.64 SD-1 9.79-0.89 BD-2 8.9 SD-2 9.46 -0.12 BD-3 9.34 SD-3 7.87* 1.21 BD-4 9.08 SU-11 9.9 -0.12 BU-11 9.78 SU-10 .10.04 4.66 BU-10 14.7 SU-1 17.75 -0.12 BU- 1 17.63 SD-4 14.2-2.53 BD-5 11.67 Table 5: General Water Quality Parameters Specific Sample Well ID Chloride, ppm Sulfate, ppm pH Conductivity Date _ (mS)11/22/2008 SW-1 2400 10 No Result 7.13 11/22/2008 SW-2 No Water No Water No Water No Water 11/22/2008 SW-3 3500 82 6.01 8.82 11/22/2008 SD-1 55 38 No Result 0.377 11/22/2008 BD-2 180 34 No Result 0.82 3/14/2009 SW-1 640 43 6.32 3.97 3/14/2009 SW-2 480 91 6.53 1.66 3/14/2009 SW-3 2600 10 6.4 8.43 3/.14/2009 SD-1 19 48 6.39 0.269 3/14/2009 BD-2 98 37 7.5 0.526 2009 Site Conceptual Model -Seabrook Station RSCS, Ind., June 2009 7, Table 6: Tritium In Pumping Wells PAB 7' EFW RHR B Elect CEVA Total 2009 Avg H3 (pCi/L) 4,525 2,645 602 1,154 4,745 13,671 2009 Avg H3 (pCi/gal) 17,127 10,010 2,280 4,368 17,960 51,745 Avg Pumping Rate (gpd) 100 760 2000 120 215 3,195 Avg pCi/Day 1,712,718 7,607,911 4,559,046 524,148 3,861,374 18,265,197 (.2009 Site Conceptual Model -Seabrook Station RSCS, Inc., June 2009 0 Figure 1: Site Location Map: rigure I Site Location lap Seabrook Station Seabrook, NH 2009 Site Conceptual Model -Seabrook Station RSCS, Inc., June 2009 Figure 2: Monitoring Well Locations 2009 Site Conceptual Model -Seabrook Station RSCS, Inc., June 2009 FIGURE 3: Surficial Aquifer Inferred Ground Water Contours!,!w. .SD 2 9.46 2009 Site Conceptual Model -Seabrook Station RSCS, Inc., June 2009 Figure 4: SD-I Hydrograph Seabrook Station Monitoring Well SD-1: Elevation and Temperature vs. Time Groundwater 10.5 E 0 10 9.5 -9 53 5149 47 45 U.-.i 43 E I--41 39 37_-SD-1 Groundwater Elevation MSL (ft)Temp (F)8.5 7.5 2/5/2009 35 2/12/2009. 2/19/2009 2/26/2009 3/5/2009 3/12/2009 3/19/2009 3/26/2009 4/2/2009 Time 2009 Site Conceptual Model -Seabrook Station RSCS, Inc., June 2009 Figure 5: SW- Hydrograph Seabrook Station Monitoring.Well SW-I: Depth to Water and Temperature vs. *Time 11* 62 SW-1 Groundwater Elevation MSL (ft).. ... ... ......... ... ................... ................ ............. .. ...... ... .. ..... ..... ....w].2 10 .= 9 .5 ... ..... ......... ...--...... ..... .. ... .......................................................... -- -- 5 6 --- ---56 E= 9-.9 8 5 ........ ............. ....... ..... ..... .5 2....... .. .. ... ... ................................ 0 54 8.5 ----- ------- _ _- ----------- 52- __-8 ----50 12/18/08 1/8/09 1/29/09 2/19/09 3/12/09 4/2/09 Time 2009 Site Conceptual Model -Seabrook Station RSCS, Inc., June 2009 Figure 6: SD-I Hydrograph with Precipitation Seabrook Station Monitoring Well SD-I: Ground Water Elevation and Precipitation vs. Time 10.5 10 9.5 0 (D~0u Cn 9 2 1.6-1.2 0'-0.8 L.)0.4 0_- SD-1 Groundwater Elevation MSL (ft)-Liquid Precipitation 8.5 8 _L 7.5 _A 2/5/2009 2/12/2009 2/19/2009 2/26/2009 3/5/2009 3/12/2009 3/19/2009 3/26/2009 4/2/2009 Time 2009 Site Conceptual Model -Seabrook Station RSCS, Inc., June 2009 Figure 7: SW- Hydrograph with Precipitation Seabrook Station Monitoring Well SW-I: 'Ground Water Elevation and Precipitation vs. Time 112 2 0 I-LM 0.10.5 10 9.5 9-SW-1 Groundwater Elevation MSL (ft)1.8 h ¸ 1.6 S14-Liquid Precipitation 1 4 1.2 0.8 0.'0.6 n A'*./. ='t 2.0 12/18/08 01/08/09 0.2 0 01/29/09 02/19/09 03/12/09 04/02/09-Time 2009 Site Conceptual Model -Seabrook Station RSCS,.Inc., June 2009 0 Figure 8: Bedrock Aquifer Inferred Ground Water Contours WELL BD 3 9.34 2009 Site Conceptual Model -Seabrook Station RSCS, Inc., June 2009 Figure 9: Excavation Detail and Pumping Location in Unit I Area LEOEI6-TO ý20-E6 ro 46-ýB TO. 2O I 'ýIt_2009 Site Conceptual Model -Seabrook Station RSCS; Inc., June 2009. Figure 10: Tidal Impacts in Surficial and Bedrock Aquifers Seabrook Statibn Monitoring Wells BD-1, BD-2, SD-1, SW-i and Tidal Groundwater Elevation vs. Time Variations: 11 U)0 a)0 10.5 10 9.5 9 11 9 7-_J Cn 00 (U 3=1 8.5 .............................. ............................................................... ... .. ...................................................-......................... 3/1/2009 12:00 3/2/2009 0:00 3/2/2009 12:00 3W3/2009 0:00 Time.1--..... -I........... f -1 3/3/2009 12:00 2009 Site Conceptual Model -Seabrook Station RSCS, Inc,, June 2009 " Figure 11: Conceptual Ground Water Flow in the Surficial.Aquifer 2009 Site Conceptual Model -Seabrook Station RSCS, Inc., June 2009 Figure 12: Ground Water Elevations in the Surficial and Bedrock Aquifers Seabrook Station Monitoring Wells BD-1, BD-2, SD-1 and SW-I: Groundwater Elevation vs. Time 11_J 0 o 0 l.U C,.w 1 0 .5 --. -_ _ -- -.. ....--.... ............. .. .. ........... ... ... ... ........... ... ... ...... ..---.. .. ... .... ......10,........ .......... ...... ...-BD-2 Groundwater Elevation MSL (ft)-BD-1 Groundwater Elevation MSL (ft)9 ...... -n:- SD-1 Groundwater Elevation MSL (ft) -------X- --SW-1 Groundwater Elevation MSL (ft)A .------------- ---- -- ---- ------ ----- ----3/1/2009 12:00 3/2/2009 0:00 3/2/2009 12:00 Time.3/3/2009 0:00 3/3/2009 12:00 2009 Site Conceptual Model -Seabrook Station RSCS, Inc., June 2009 Figure 13: CEVA Tritium Ground Water Withdrawal Data.-J C., E.I--4000000 3500000 3000000 2500000 2000000 1500000 1000000 500000 ECEVA Annulus!H]lm []0 6/23/2000 6/18/2001 6/13/2002 6/8/2003 6/2/2004 5/28/2005 Sample Date 5/23/2006 5/18/2007 5/12/2008 5/7/2009 2009 Site Conceptual Model -Seabrook Station RSCS, Inc., June 2009 Figure 14: PAB Tritium Ground Water Withdrawal Data 20000 18000 16000 14000 12000 L)C-, 0.10000 E 8000 6000ý4000 2000-0 12/A A*4 ^0-......../6/99 11/30/00 11/25/01 11/20/02 11/15/03 11/9/04 Sample Date 11/4/05 10/30/06 10/25/07 10/19/08 2009 Site Conceptual Model -Seabrook Station RSCS, Inc., June 2009 2 C-, E.E I-4000 3500 3000 2500 2000 1500 1000 500 0 911 Figure 15: RHR and B Electrical Tunnel Tritium Ground Water Withdrawal Data*[RHR M B Electrical Tunnel-0[]U* ,* ,, e~*.*** ,* *I I*/2002 8/27/2003 8/21/2004 8/16/2005 8/11/2006 Sample Date 8/6/2007 7/31/2008 2009 Site Conceptual Model -Seabrook Station RSCS, Inc., June 2009 Figure 16: EFW Tritium Ground Water Withdrawal Data 2 a,--E I-8000 7000 6000 5000 4000 3000 2000 1000 0 2/13 A A EFW.A A A A A A A A AA AA A AA A A A ~AA Aý AA AAeA AA -A A A AAAA A A AA&" A AA AAA AAI AA/2002 2/8/2003 2/3/2004 1/28/2005 1/23/2006 Sam pie Date 1/18/2007 1/13/2008 1/7/2009 2009 Site Conceptual Model -Seabrook Station RSCS, Inc., June 2009 Figure 17: Tritium in Monitoring Well SW-I 2004-2009-.J E I-3500 3000 2500 2000 1500 1000 500 0 08/01/04.. .. .. .. .. .. ..I .............01/28/05 07/27/05 01/23/06 07/22/06 01/18/07 Sample Date 07/17/07 01/13/08 07/11/08 01/07/09 2009 Site Conceptual Model -Seabrook Station RSCS, Inc., June 2009 Figure 18: Fall 2004 Tritium in Surficial Aquifer 2009 Site Conceptual Model -Seabrook Station RSCS, Inc., June 2009 Figure 19: Fall 2004 Tritium in Bedrock Aquifer 2009 Site Conceptual Model -Seabrook Station RSCS, Inc., June 2009 Figure 20: March 2006 Tritium in Surficial Aquifer 2009 Site Conceptual. Model -Seabrook Station RSCS, Inc., June 2009 0 Figure 21: March 2006 Tritium in Bedrock Aquifer 2009 Site Conceptual Model -Seabrook Station RSCS, Inc., June 2009 Figure 22: June 2008 Tritium in Surficial Aquifer 2009 Site Conceptual Model -Seabrook Station RSCS, Inc., June 2009 p Figure 23: June 2008 Tritium in Bedrock Aquifer 2009 Site Conceptual Model -Seabrook Station RSCS,.Inc., June 2009 k5c , b~RADIATION SAFETY & CONTROL SERVICES, INC.Technical Support Document J TSD # 09-039 TRITIUM DISTRIBUTION AND GROUND WATER FLOW AT SEABROOK STATION Revision 00 Originator: Melville P. Dickenson Ill, Ph.D.Date: Auqust 31, 2009'1/!/Irn/~-/&/~ I/77~7f//{/ 1~1 Reviewer:* o Matthew Darois Date: Augqust 31, 2009 Matthew Darois Approval: L-riFE. Daro-1s, CHP Date: August 31, 2009

  • TSD # 09-039 Revision 00 Page 2 of 31 SEABROOK STATION -TRITIUM DISTRIBUTION AND GROUND WATER FLOW TABLE OF CONTENTS Section 1.0 INTRO DUCTIO N ..........................................................................................................

4-2.0 TRITIUM DISTRIBUTION IN SURFICIAL AQUIFER .............................................. ,..5 2.1 GROUND WATER ELEVATIONS AND GROUND WATER FLOW ............. 5 2.2 IMPACTS RELATED TO GROUNDWATER WITHDRAWAL .......................... 6 3.0 TRITIUM DISTRIBUTION IN BEDROCK AQUIFER ............................................. 7 3.1 BEDROCK WELL CONFIGUATION...: ......... ..................... 7 3.2. EVALUATION OF GROUND WATER LEVELS IN BD-2 AND SD-1 ............... 8 3.3 GROUNDWATER PUMPING AND TRITIUM ANALYSES IN BD-2 .................. 8 4.0 C O N C LUS IO N S ............................................................................................................... 9 5.0 RECO M M ENDATIO NS ................................................................................................. 10 , TSD # 09-039 Revision 0 Page 3 of 31 LIST OF TABLES Table 1: Monitoring W ell Installation Details ............................................................. .12 Table 2: Tritium Ground Water Laboratory Analytical Results, pCi/L ...................... 13 LIST OF FIGURES Figure 1: Monitoring Well Locations .................................. 18 Figure 2: Tritium Concentrations in Ground Water .................................................. 19 Figure 3: Tritium Concentrations SD-I SW-I, and BD-2 June/August 2009 ..... 20 Figure 4: Tritium in Surficial Aquifer June 2008 ..............................................................

21 Figure 5: Tritium in Surficial Aquifer July 2009 ..........................

.22 Figure 6: Hydrographs SD-I, BD-2, and SW-I December 2008-August 2009 .......... 23'Figure 7: Hydrographs for SD-I and SW-I and BD-2 12/2004 through 3/2009 ....... 24 Figure 8: Surficial Aquifer Inferred Ground Water Contours April 2009 ........ 25 Figure 9: Excavation Detail and Pumping Location in Unit 1 Area ...................... 26 Figure 10: RHR Dewatering Rate ............................. ........ 27 Figure 11:ý Hydrographs for June -August 2009 and RHR Dewatering Rate .......... 28 Figure 12: Hydrographs SD-I, BD-2, and SW-I June-August 2009 ........................ 29 Figure 13: Hydrographs SD-I, BD-2, and SW-I 2004-March 2009 .......................... 30 Figure 14: BD-2 Pumping Test and Tritium Analyses July 8, 2009 ....................... 31 Tritium Distribution and Ground Water Flow at Seabrook Station RSCS, Inc., August 2009 TSD # 09-039 Revision 0 Page 4 of 31

1.0 INTRODUCTION

Radiation Safety and Control Services (RSCS) has prepared this Technical Support Document (TSD) to assess the recent changes in tritium distribution in ground water at Seabrook Station. Historically, tritium has been reported in.a focused portion of the surficial aquifer adjacent to the fuel pool and Unit 1. More recently, tritium has been detected at concentrations in excess of the minimum detectable activity (MDA) in selected monitoring wells in both the surficial and bedrock aquifers.RSCS has recently developed a site conceptual model (SCM) for the Seabrook facility (RSCS, 2008 and 2009). The SCM includes the presence of two aquifers at the Site. A surficial aquifer occurs within the engineered fill and a bedrock aquifer is present in the bedrock below. Quantitative ground water flow has been characterized in both aquifers, as synoptic ground water levels have been collected at the Site. Ground water in both aquifers generally flows to the east, discharging to the tidal marsh on the east and southeast side of the Site.A tritium release from theUnit 1 spent fuel system, refueling canal, and cask handling area liners was identified in 1999. The leak was characterized and appropriate corrective actions were initiated. As part of the corrective actions, ground water (withdrawal was initiated and incorporated into the remedial program at five locations within and nearby the release area, and a monitoring well network was established in both the surficial and bedrock aquifers.Historically, tritium has been detected at concentrations up to 3,000 pCi/L adjacent to the release area in the surficial aquifer. Tritium sampling results for the monitoring well network during the 2004 through March 2009-time period have indicated that tritium has been limited to surficial monitoring well SW-1 located in the Unit 1 containment area, and has been below the MDA in the bedrock aquifer.In addition to the recent changes in the tritium distribution at the-Site, changes in the hydrology and ground water removal have also occurred at the Seabrook facility during the June through August 2009 time frame. Significant rainfall during the spring-early summer 2009 time period has raised ground water elevations in several monitoring wells to levels in excess of historic levels, and ground water withdrawal rates in the RHR vault have significantly decreased. The specific objectives of this TSD are to assess the new tritium detections, determine the likely reason(s) for the changes, and evaluate the potential impacts to ground water at the site. The assessment includes: Evaluation of ground water elevations and-ground water flow in the surficial aquifer;Evaluation of ground water pumping and withdrawal at the Site; and Tritium Distribution and Ground Water Flow at Seabrook Station RSCS, Inc., August 2009 TSD # 09-039 Revision 0 Page 5 of 31 o Evaluation of tritium distribution in the surficial and bedrock aquifers.2.0 TRITIUM DISTRIBUTION IN SURFICIAL AQUIFER Recent hydrogeologic studies at Seabrook Station have identified tritium in the surficial aquifer at concentrations ranging from 617 pCi/L to 2,930 pCi/L. The detected tritium has been limited to monitoring well SW-1 located adjacent to the Fuel Pool (Figure 1)(RSCS 2008 and 2009). Through March 2009, tritium has not been detected above the MDA in monitoring wells in the surficial aquifer or bedrock aquifer except for SW-1.More recently, tritium has been detected in monitoring wells SD-1 and BD-2 located approximately 75 feet southwest of SW-1 (Figure 2). Monitoring well SD-1 is a shallow well screened in the surficial aquifer and BD-2 is a deeper monitoring well in the bedrock aquifer. Tritium has been detected at concentrations ranging from 969 pCi/L to 2,360 pCi/L in SD-1 and 832 pCi/L to 1,880 pCi/L in BD-2 over the June through August 2009 time period, while concentrations in SW-1 remained consistent with historic values (Figure 3). During this time period, the tritium concentrations in SD-1 are typically greater than those observed in BD-2, with the highest values associated with SW-1 (Figure 3).Prior to March 2009, the tritium distribution at the site was limited to the area around Unit 1 and SW-1 in the surficial aquifer (Figure 4). Based on the consistent detection of tritium in SD-1 over the June through August 2009 time frame a larger area of tritium-contaminated ground water has been identified for the surficial aquifer, and the 1000 pCi/L isopleth is now shown to include monitoring well SD-1 (Figure 5).2.1 GROUND WATER ELEVATIONS AND GROUND WATER FLOW During the June through August 2009 time period, the ground water elevation in SD-1 has been slightly less than that measured in SW-1, confirming that SD-1 is downgradient of SW-1 (Figure 6). The downgradient relationship between SW-1 and SD-1 is consistent with the migration of the tritium plume established at SW-1 moving towards and encompassing SD-I. The ground water elevation relationship between SW-1 and SD-1 through time is shown in Figure 7. While SW-1 commonly has a ground water elevation greater than that observed in SD-1, there are several occasions when this is not the case. During the spring when higher ground water levels are observed, SW-1 typically has a higher water level than that observed for SD-1 (Figure 7). The fall time period, where ground water levels are lower, exhibits several occasions where the ground water level in SD-1 is greater than that observed in-SW-1 (Figure 7). These observations indicate that ground water flow at SD-1 is generally side gradient with respect to SW-1, consistent with the ground water flow map established during spring 2009 (Figure 8) (RSCS, 2009)'Tritium Distribution and Ground Water Flow at Seabrook Station RSCS, Inc., August 2009 TSD # 09-039 Revision 0 Page 6 of 31 While the ground water elevations in SW-1 and SD-I are similar,.during high water level conditions theground water elevation in SW-1 is always higher than that observed in SD-1 (Figure 7). During the June, July and August 2009 time period, the ground water elevations measured in SD-I and SW-1 are significantly higher than that historically observed during summer time period.(Figures 6 and 7). The increased ground water elevations are in response to significant rainfall in the spring and early summer time period (Figure 6). During the summer 2009-time period, the ground water elevation difference between SW-1 and SD-1 is commonly 0.5 feet (Figure 6). Historically, during the June through August time period the ground Water elevation difference between the two wells has been closer to 0.2 feet (Figure 7). Based on these relationships, the migration of the tritium plume towards SD-I potentially appears to be a function of the high water levels established during the June, July and August 2009 time period, and the resulting hydraulic gradient established between SW-1 and SD-i.2.2 IMPACTS RELATED TO GROUNDWATER WITHDRAWAL Ground water pumping/withdrawal activities are ongoing at several locations at the Site.Approximately 32,000 gallons per day (gpd) of ground water is pumped from the Unit 2 containment building to control inflow of ground water. This ground water removal in Unit 2 gives rise to a ground water depression near SW-3 and reverses the ground water gradient in the SW-1 and SD-1 area (Figure 8). The ongoing pumping and ground water withdrawal in the Unit 2 area is not believed to have effected any recent changes in the hydrology at the Site.Ground water withdrawal activities have also been focused on the Unit I containment area to minimize ground water inflow to the buildings. A total of five locations'have regularly withdrawn ground water under hydrostatic conditions in the Unit 1 area at a combined rate of approximately 3,000 gpd (Figure 9). The most significant location of ground water withdrawal is located in the RHR vault at an elevation of -61i feet MSL.Over the past several years, this location has removed approximately 1,500 to 2,000 gallons per day (Figure 10). During early July, the RHR ground water withdrawal rate decreased to levels below 200 gallons per day (Figure 10). Aside from the change in RHR withdrawal rate, no other changes in the pumping or withdrawal rate have occurred in this portion of the site. Evaluation of the potential impact of the decreasing RHR pumping rate and ground water elevation are summarized in Figure 11 where hydrographs of SW-1, SD-1, BD-2 and 14-inch well are graphed along with the RHR pumping rate. Monitoring wells SW-1, SD-1, and BD-2 are part of the 19-well.monitoring network at the Site, while the 14-inch well is a deep 14-inch casing that is tied into a french drain system around the Unit 1 Containment that was historically used for dewatering during construction of the facility.As summarized in Figure 11, ground water elevations in SW-1, SD-1, and BD-2 do not change in response to decreasing withdrawal rate in RHR. The only consistent Tritium Distribution and Ground Water Flow at Seabrook Station RSCS, Inc., August 2009 TSD # 09-039 Revision 0 Page 7 of 31 response to decreasing ground water withdrawal in the RHR is the increasing ground water level observed in the 14-inch well during the July time period (Figure 11). All four monitoring wells have a decreasing elevation in August as a function of the decreased precipitation relative to that experienced in spring and early Summer 2009 (Figure 6). The increase in ground water elevation observed in the 14-inch well suggests that the french drain system may have a hydraulic connection with the RHR vault. The change in RHR withdrawal rate does not appear to play a significant role in the recent change in tritium distribution at the Site.3.0 TRITIUM DISTRIBUTION IN BEDROCK AQUIFER The presence of detectable concentrations of tritium in monitoring well BD-2 is not consistent with historic observations at Seabrook Station. The only tritium detections in the bedrock aquifer have occurred in monitoring well BD-2 during the June through August 2009 time period (Figure 3). The tritium concentrations in BD-2 during the June-August-time period ranged from below the MDA to 1,880 pCi/L. Tritium was first detected in a sample from BD-2 (1,565 pCi/L) on June 20, 2009. From June 20 to July 22, 2009 tritium decreased to 866 pCi/L, and was below the MDA from July 27 to August 15, 2009. Tritium was again reported above the MDA on August 24, 2009 at a concentration of 1,104 pCi/L.3.1 BEDROCK WELL CONFIGUATION The tritium detections in the bedrock aquifer may be related to the physical construction of the bedrock well, as the bedrock wells installed at Seabrook Station are not consistent with typical monitoring well construction. The bedrock wells do not include PVC well construction material (i.e. riser and well screen), but are simply metal well casing installed through the overburden material and seated into bedrock. Below the seated metal casing an open bedrock hole is present to the bottom of the boring (Table 1). This configuration allows access to the bedrock aquifer, but may not provide a permanent seal between the surficial and bedrock aquifers and provides the potential for ground water to flow into the well through well casing joints. The casing material is most likely installed as 10-foot sections and at least one casing joint is located in the well casing installed through the 20 feet of overburden material. The current configuration.of BD-2 indicates that a well casing joint is most likely located approximately 10 feet below grade at approximately 10 feet MSL. This casing joint is threaded, but is not watertight. If the water level in the surficial aquifer in the BD-2 area exceeds the elevation of the casing joint (approximately 10 feet MSL), ground water from the surficial aquifer has the potential to flow into the bedrock well through the casing joint.Tritium Distribution and Ground Water Flow at Seabrook Station RSCS, Inc., August 2009 TSD # 09-039 Revision 0 Page 8 of 31 3.2 EVALUATION OF GROUND WATER LEVELS IN BD-2 AND SD-I Monitoring wells SD-i and BD-2 represent a shallow/deep monitoring well pair and are located adjacent to one another in, the southern portion of the Site southwest of Unit 1 (Figure 1). Water levels from both monitoring wells have been measured since 2004 and hydrographs for the monitoring wells are summarized in Figures 12 and 13'. Also included in Figures 12 and 13 is the elevation of the casing joint in BD-2 that is located at approximately 10 feet MSL. 'The water elevations in the surficial aquifer for SD-i from 2004 through March 2009 are consistently below the elevation of the casing joint in BD-2, and indicate that groundwater in the surficial aquifer in the vicinity of BD-2 is at too low an elevation to flow into BD-2 (Figure 13) through the suspect casing joint.In contrast to the historic water levels in SD-i during the 2004 through March 2009 time period, ground water elevations in SD-I consistently exceed the 10-foot MSL casing joint elevation in BD-2 during the July and early August 2009 time period (Figure 12).During this time period the tritium plume in the surficial aquifer has migrated to SD-1 and tritium-contaminated ground water has the potential to flow through the casing joint into BD-2. The tritium concentration in BD-2 is typically less than that observed in SD-1, consistent with source of tritium in BD-2 being related to ground water from the surficial aquifer flowing into BD-2 (Figure 3).The decrease in tritium concentration in BD-2 during late July and early August 2009 occurs during the time period when decreasing water levels in SD-1 bring the ground water elevation of the surficial aquifer in SD-1 to levels at or below the presumed elevation of the casing joint in BD-2 (Figures 3 and 12). This relationship further supports the concept that the source of tritium in BD-2 is from inflow of the tritium-contaminated surficial aquifer through the casing joint.Assuming a flow rate in the range of 1 to 10 gallons per hour over the June through mid-July time period, 1,000 to 10,000 gallons of tritium-contaminated ground water could have flowed from the surficial aquifer into BD-2 and impacted the bedrock aquifer in the vicinity of BD-2.3.3 GROUNDWATER PUMPING AND TRITIUM ANALYSES IN BD-2 To assess the tritium concentrations in BD-2, two small-scale pumping tests were conducted in BD-2 on July 8 and July 10, 2009. During the pumping tests, ground water samples from BD-2 were periodically taken and analyzed for tritium. The results of the ground water drawdown and associated tritium concentrations for the July 8, 2009 pumping test are summarized in Figure 14.The initial drawdown in BD-2 to 31 feet is associated with a small decrease in tritium (Figure 14). The tritium concentration further decreases to 929 pCi/L during the middle Tritium Distribution and Ground Water Flow at Seabrook Station RSCS, Inc., August 2009 TSD # 09-039 Revision 0 Page 9 of 31 portion of the pumping test and rebounds to pretest values at the end of the pumping test (Figure 14). The pumping test was conducted during the time period when tritium-contaminated groundwater from the surficial aquifer was potentially flowing into BD-2, and the rebound in tritium concentration at the end of the pumping-test may reflect this, process. Similar results were observed in the second pumping test conducted on July 10, 2009.The results of the two pumping tests do not provide significant insight to the presence-of tritium in BD-2. If tritium-contaminated ground water has been flowing into BD-2 over the June and early July time period, thousands of gallons of tritium-contaminated ground water would have potentially flowed into the monitoring well over that time period, and the removal of 120 and 170 gallons, respectively of ground water from BD-2 during the pumping tests on July. 8 and July 10, 2009 would not have removed enough tritium-contaminated ground water from the bedrock aquifer to effect significant changes in the tritium concentration measured in BD-2. Likewise, the potential for tritium to flow into BD-2 through the casing joint would also potentially impact the measured tritium concentration during the pumping test.

4.0 CONCLUSION

S This TSD has evaluated distribution of tritium in the surficial and bedrock aquifers at Seabrook Station. While the presence tritium has historically been limited to monitoring well SW-1 screened in the surficial aquifer and located adjacent to Unit 1, recent analyses has indicated the presence of tritium in nearby monitoring wells SD-1 (surficial aquifer) and BD-2 (bedrock aquifer) over the July and August 2009 time period. To assess the changes in tritium distribution in site ground water, RSCS has evaluated two changes in the hydrology in the vicinity of SW-1, SD-1, and BD-2 that have occurred during the spring-early summer 2009 time period.Changes in the ground water withdrawal rate in the RHR have been shown to have no significant impact on ground water elevations in SW-1, SD-1 and BD-2 or ground water flow in the surficial and bedrock aquifers in the vicinity of the monitoring wells.In contrast, the impact of significant precipitation in the spring-early summer time period has significantly increased ground water elevations in the surficial aquifer. The increases in the elevation of the water table in the surficial aquifer have resulted in subtle changes in the ground water gradient in the vicinity of SW-1 and SD-1. The increased gradient between SW-1 and SD-1 has resulted in southwestern migration of the tritium plume established at SW-1 to include SD-1 (Figure 5).The increased ground water elevations in the surficial aquifer during the spring and early summer time period have also resulted in tritium-contaminated ground water from the surficial aquifer flowing into monitoring well BD-2 via the likely presence of a casing joint. The elevation of the casing joint in BD-2 has historically been above the level of Tritium Distribution and Ground Water Flow at Seabrook Station RSCS, Inc., August 2009 TSD # 09-039 Revision 0 Page 10 of 31 the water table in the surficial aquifer, however the high water levels in the surficial aquifer during the June and July time period have exceeded the casing joint elevation, resulting in the flow of tritium-contaminated ground water into BD-2 (Figures 12 and 13).Assuming a flow rate of 1 to 10 gallons per hour, approximately 1,000 to 10,000 gallons of tritium-contaminated water has potentially flowed from the surficial aquifer into BD-2 over the June and July time period.5.0 RECOMMENDATIONS Based on the conclusions of this TSD, the following recommendations are provided by RSCS for Seabrook Station:* Assess the surficial aquifer along the facility boundary south of SD-1 for the presence of tritium. The potential exists for the tritium plume to have migrated to the south and southwest towards the adjacent tidal marsh;* Perform a down-hole geophysical investigation of BO-2, and other bedrock monitoring wells of similar construction, to verify the construction details of the well(s). This information will allow for the design of 2 inch, bedrock aquifer(isolated wells, within each existing well.* Complete the installation of two-inch monitoring wells within the four-inch bedrock well casings. These new monitoring wells will minimize the potential for migration of ground water from the surficial aquifer to the bedrock aquifer. The new monitoring wells will also provide a more complete characterization of vertical gradients between the surficial and bedrock aquifers; and Develop a three-dimensional numerical ground water flow model capable of evaluating dewatering, ground water pumping, and tritium migration/containment at the Site.Tritium Distribution and Ground Water Flow at Seabrook Station RSCS, Inc., August 2009 TSD # 09-039 Revision 0 Page 11 of 31

6.0 REFERENCES

RSCS, 2008, Preliminary Site Conceptual Model, Seabrook Station, August, 2009.RSCS, 2009, 2009 Conceptual Site Ground Water Model for Seabrook Station, June, 2009.Tritium Distribution and Ground Water Flow at Seabrook Station RSCS, Inc., August 2009 TSD # 09-039 Revision 0 Page 12 of 31 Table 1: Monitoring Well Installation Details WELL ID SU-1 SD-I SD-4 SC-I SD-3 SD-2 SW-I SW-2 SW-3 BU-1 SHALLOW I DEEP -SHALLOW SHALLOW SHALLOW SHALLOW SHALLOW SHALLOW SHALLOW SHALLOW SHALLOW DEEP NORTHING 10631.84 9949.08 9954.06 9816.79 10528.84 10130.12 10020.8 10034.47 10055.91 10632.05 EASTING 4602.61 5228.95 4547.25 4739.04 5724.32 5975.95 5253.01 5681.84 4964.14 4597.73 SURFACE ELEVATION 23.33 19.89 19.85 22.98 14.53 14.76 20.03 20.04 20.08 23.01 BEDROCK ELEVATION 5.0' 1.6' 8.0' 5.4' 1' 1.6' -2 4.0' 0.4' 6.0'DEPTH TO BEDROCK* 15' 181' 12' 141' 10' 11' 22' 161' 20' 14'WELL SCREENED

  • 4'to 15' 12'to 18%' 7'to 12' 9'to 14Y' 5' to 10' 6'to 11' 12' to 22' 9'to 161/2' 1'to 20' na FIRST WATER* 4' 12 1' 9' 9' 5' 6' 12' 9' 12' 31'WELL DEPTH* 15' 18-1' 12' 14%' 10' 11' 22' 161/2/' 20' 46'STAND / FLUSH CAP STAND FLUSH FLUSH STAND STAND STAND FLUSH FLUSH FLUSH STAND WELL ID BD-2 BD-5 BD-1 BD-4 BD-3 SU-10 SU-11 BU-10 BU-11 SHALLOW I DEEP DEEP DEEP DEEP DEEP DEEP SHALLOW SHALLOW DEEP DEEP NORTHING 9953.8 9949.76 9816.56 10532.64 10135.38 10826.5 10687.05 10810.59 10682.63 EASTING -5229.11 4547.27 4743.65 5721.93 5975.42 4999.35 5539.53 5010.62 5541.83 SURFACE ELEVATION 19.88 19.69 23.24 14.39 15.05 20;03 19.9 20.44 19.9 BEDROCK ELEVATION

-0.9 8.1' 4.9' 2.5' 1.6' na na na na DEPTH TO BEDROCK* 21' 12' 15' 8%' 11' na na na na WELL SCREENED

  • na na na na na na na na na FIRST WATER* 26' 158' 39' 168' 151' na na na na WELL DEPTH
  • 100' 167' 101' 174' 171' na na na na STAND / FLUSH CAP FLUSH FLUSH STAND STAND STAND na na na na Notes: All
  • depths are approximate (within inches), measured in "feet down from surface elevation" unless otherwise noted.All deep wells are 4"dia, all shallow are 2" diameter Tritium Distribution and Ground Water Flow at Seabrook Station RSCS, Inc., August 2009 TSD # 09-039 Revision 0 Page 13 of 31 Table 2: Tritium GroundWater Laboratoy Analytical Results, pCi/L Sample Date tBD-1 BD-2 BD-3 BD-4 BD-5 BU-1 SC-1 SD-1 SD-2 SD-3 SD-4 SU-1 SW-1 SW-2 SW-3 SU-10tSU-11 BU-10BU-11 09/07/04 < 554 09/08/04 < 549 ,09/14/04

< 546 09/17/04 < 554 09/22/04 < 550 09/22/04 < 547 09/23/04 < 607 09/29/04 1930 < 553 10/29/04 < 547 11/03/04 < 547 11/05/04 584 11/05/04 < 511 11/05/04 < 513 11/08/04 < 524 728 11/18/04. 880 < 560 1570 114.0 < 557 11/23/04 < 560 11/23/04 < 559 < 560 <560 11/23/04 < 559 11/08/04 12/22/04 _ _2930 02/03/0"5 I<559 < 563 02/05/05 < 564 06/09/05 < 548 620 06/15/05 __1160 691 06/22/05 < 538 < 534 Tritium Distribution and Ground Water Flow at Seabrook Station RSCS, Inc., August 2009 TSD # 09-039 Revision 0 Page 14of31 Sample Date BD-1 BD-2 BD-3 BD-4 BD-5 BU-1 SC-I SD-I SD-2 SD-3 SD-4 SU-1 SW-1 SW-2 SW-3 SU-10 SU-11 BU-10 BU-11 07/07/05 < 549 < 548 07/08/05 < 553 < 548 < 545 < 545 < 546 07/12105 < 549 < 550 < 542 < 543, 10/03/05 < 549 11/02/05 < 546 11/17/05 < 569 < 590 617 11/18/05 < 569 < 565 < 586 617 11/19/05 < 574 < 565 11/21/05 < 580 <582 NW < 574 03/11/06 <577 I < 579 1550 < 582 03/16/06 610 03/18/06 < 592 < 587 < 588 03/25/06 < 562 < 670 < 554 < 555 < 557 _03/27/06 <592 I< 586 05/05/06 I2020 06/14/06 < 589 1320 06/24/06_ _ < 590 __< 585 <589 06/25/06 < 598 < 590 < 590 < 590 07/09/06 < 583 _ < 586 07/15/06 1_ _11280 07/16/06 < 607 < 607 < 594 < 591*08/12/06 57]<570 < 571 1540 1 571* 08/13/06 < 573 '1 < 573 1 < 573 1- _ ___I< 589 1 1 < 573 1 _09/17/06 <604 < 600 < 601 < 600 < 6001 <598 Tritium Distribution and Ground Water Flow at Seabrook Station RSCS, Inc., August 2009 TSD # 09-039 Revision 0 Page 15 of 31 Sample Date BD-1 BD-2 BD-3 BD-4 BD-5 BU-1 SC-I SD-I SD-2 SD-3 SD-4 SU-1 SW-1 SW-2 SW-3 SU-10 SU-11 BU-10 BU-11 09/24/06 1660 10/17/06 1470 11/18/06 < 666 <.667 985 < 669 < 666 11/19/06 < 580 < 587 < 584 < 580 < 594 12/09/06 1 1 1 1 1 1_1_< 597 1320 12/10/06 < 598 < 606 1 1 1 < 598 < 594____________ ________ ____ ___ ____ ____i~h~1 ing207 bonsipirig __01/28/07 < 574 < 596 742 02/19/07 " '_1110 03/10/07 < 556 < 556 1360 < 574 03/11/07 < 557 < 556 < 556 < 558 .< 656 03/30/07 < 622 < 620 < 619 < 616 _ _< 6161 04/01/07 -_< 627 04/29/07 1190 05/12/07 < 557 < 573 853 592 05/13/07 < 614 < 561 < 555 < 554 < 555 05/26/07 < 618 _ < 607 05/27/07 < 564 F < 607 < 607 < 604 06/28/07 929 07/13/07 < 601 < 601 969 NW < 603 07/14/07 <610 <666. <620 <609 <623 NW <598 <603 NW. <603 08/19/07 < 601 09/07/07 859 10/03/07 .< 612 10/06/07 < 620 < 620 966 NW <614 10/07/07 < 614 <574 < 583 < 611 Tritium Distribution and Ground Water Flow at Seabrook Station RSCS, Inc., August 2009 TSD # 09-039 Revision 0 Page 16 of 31 Sample Date BD-1 BD-2 BD-3 BD-4 BD-5 BU-1 SC-1 SD-I SD-2 SD-3 SD-4 SU-1 SW-1 SW-2 SW-3 SU-10 SU-11 BU-10 BU-11 11/10/07 <576 < 617 < 614 < 614 < 604 11/11/07 < 614 < 623 <614 964 NW 12/17/07 < 590 < 554 12/27/07 < 555 12/27/07 < 554 12/29/07 < 554 12/29/07 < 554 03/27/08 1900 < 564 05/24/08 2240 < 576 < 596 05/25/08 < 598 < 573 < 577 < 570 < 598 < 596 _05/26/08 < 574 < 596 < 598 < 597 06/14/08 < 584 < 580 < 592 < 579 06/15/08 635 849 2430 07/19/08 < 587 < 609 1680 < 586 08/23/08 < 570 < 570 1487 < 570ýali- rt e U , 1-325 1 'E , 09/30/08 < 572 < 570 1500 < 576 11/22/08 <600 1270 11/23/08 <610 <604 <617 <626 <604 <603 <603 <600 NW NW <624 12/04/08 <600 <606 < 590 12/05/08 <606 <606 < 596 03/14/09 < 550 < 550 1380 <546 <544 <547 03/15/09 <546 <544 <544 <548 <552 <566 <544 <546 06/20/09 1565 1066 1441 <617 06/21/09 <612 <613 <610 < 619 06/27/09 1180 1780 1 ' <593 <589 <592 <592 Tritium Distribution and Ground Water Flow at Seabrook Station RSCS, Inc., August 2009 TSD # 09-039 Revision 0 Page 17 of 31 Sample Date BD-1 BD-2 BD-3 BD-4 BD-5 BU-1 SC-1 SD-I SD-2 SD-3 SD-4 SU-1 SW-1 SW-2 SW-3 SU-10 SU-11 BU-10 BU-11 06/28/09 < 592 <596 <595 < 587 <589 06/30/09 <631 <627 07/04/09 1880 2360 2060 07/06/09 1160 2100 1810 07/08/09 1340 .1690 07/10/09 1520 07/11/09 978 1505 1731 07/16/09 07/18/09 832 1170 1740 < 592 < 595 07/22/09 866 1270 2070 < 590 < 593 07/25/09 < 568 1380 2530 < 567 < 563 08/01/09 < 577 1060 1362 < 577,< 577 08/08/09 < 577 1542 1831 < 577 <577 08/15/09 < 636 969 1250 < 602 < 601 08/24/09 .1104 1505 1872 Tritium Distribution and Ground Water Flow at Seabrook Station RSCS, Inc., August 2009 0 TSD # 09-039 Revision 0 Page 18 of 31 Figure 1: Monitoring Well Locations Tritium Distribution and Ground Water Flow at Seabrook Station RSCS, Inc., August 2009 TSD # 09-039 Revision 0 Page 19 of 31 Figure 2: Tritium Concentrations in Ground Water 3000 2500 2000 3 1500 E i--1000 500 0--SW-1-4--SD-1 BD-2~~~BD-2 Below Detection.Limit .1'.....i ..I ........i ...I I i ......I .....I ............08/01/04 01/28/05 07/27/05 01/23/06 07/22/06 01/18/07 07/17/07 01/13/08 07/11/08 01/07/09 07/06/09 Sample Date Tritium Distribution and Ground Water Flow at Seabrook Station RSCS, Inc., August 2009 TSD # 09-039 Revision 0 Page 20 of31 FIGURE 3: Tritium Concentrations SD-I SW-1, and BD-2 June/August 2009 3000 2500 2000 E 1500 SW-1 SD-1 BD-2 BD-2 Below Detection Limit AA ELI 1000 500 03 0 n6114/09 06/28/09 07/12/09 07/26/09 Sample Date 08/09/09 08/23/09 Tritium Distribution and Ground Water Flow at Seabrook Station RSCS, Inc., August 2009 0 TSD # 09-039 Revision 0 Page 21 of 31 Tritium Distribution and Ground Water Flow at Seabrook Station RSCS, Inc., August 2009 0 TSD # 09-039 Revision 0 Page 22 of 31 Tritium Distribution and Ground Water Flow at Seabrook Station RSCS, Inc., August 2009 TSD # 09-039 Revision 0 Page 23 of 31 Figure 6: Hydrographs SD-1, BD-2, and SW-I December 2008-August 2009 2-W'U~0 0 11 10.5 10 9.5 9 8.5 4 3.5 3 2.5 -.0 2 m L3-0.oJ 1.5 " 0.5 0 8 7.5 7 12/18/200 1/8/2009 1/29/2009 2/19/2009 3/12/2009 4/2/2009 4/23/2009 5/14/2009 6/4/2009 6/25/2009 7/16/2009 8/6/2009 8/27/2009 8.Date Tritium Distribution and Ground Water Flow at Seabrook Station RSCS, Inc., August 2009 TSD # 09-039 Revision 0 Page 24 of 3i Figure 7: Hydrographs for SD-I and SW-I and BD-2 12/2004 through 3/2009 12.00 11.00 --10.00.2o 8 .00.i.800 .03 7.00 i- 6.00..1 5.00 4.00-u--sw-i-4e-SD-1-4-U BD-2 3.00. -.11/1/2004 5/2/2005 11/1/2005 5/2/2006 11/1/2006 5/2/2007 11/1/2007 5/1/2008 10/31/2008 Time Tritium Distribution and Ground Water Flow at Seabrook Station RSCS, Inc., August 2009 TSD # 09-039 Revision 0 Page 25 of 31 Figure 8: Surficial Aquifer Inferred Ground Water Contours April 2009 2 0 ii L ---< "- i ..l ] ' ' , '-' / -Ils , ,x

  • Tritium Distribution and Ground Water Flow at Seabrook Station RSCS, Inc., August 2009 TSD # 09-039 Revision 0 Page 26 of 31 Figure 9: Excavation Detail and Pumping Location in Unit I Area I \11ý '.ýbb-tAp UMIM Tritium Distribution and Ground Water Flow at Seabrook Station RSCS, Inc., August 2009 N TSD # 09-039 Revision 0 Page 27 of 31 Figure 10: RHR Dewatering Rate 2500 2000 0.1500 C)1000 500 RHe De7-tng]0 3/8/2009 3/28/2009 4/17/2009 5/7/2009 5/27/2009 6/16/2009 7/6/2009 7/26/2009 8/15/2009 9/412009 Date Tritium'Distribution and Ground Water Flow at Seabrook Station RSCS, Inc., August 2009 TSD # 09-039 Revision 0 Page 28 of 31 Figure 11: Hydrographs for June -August 2009 and RHR Dewatering Rate 11 10.5'0 0'V 10 9.5 9 8.5 1600 1400 1200 1000 800 600 400 200 0 E.S01u BD-2-SD-1~ --- RHR Dewatering 0)*-C-,.I-8 4--6/30/09 7/7/09 7/14/09 7/21/09 7/28/09 8/4/09 8/11/09 8/18/09 8/25/09 Date Tritium Distribution and Ground Water Flow at Seabrook Station RSCS, Inc., August 2009 TSD # 09-039 Revision 0 Page 29 of 31 Figure 12: Hydrographs SD-1, BD-2, and SW-I June-August 2009 with BD-2 Casing Joint Elevation 11 10.5'U 0 10 9.5 9 8.5 8 7.5 7..12/18/200 4/2/2009 4/23/2009 5/14/2009 6/4/2009 6/25/2009 7/16/2009 8 Date Tritium Distribution and Ground Water Flow at Seabrook Station RSCS, Inc., August 2009 TSD # 09-039 Revision 0 Page 30 of 31 Figure 13: Hydrographs SD-1, BD-2, and SW-1 2004-March 2009 with BD-2 Casing Joint Elevation 0 0"'I-*o 09 12.00 11.00 10.00 9.00 8.00 7.00 6.00 5.00 4.00 3.00 11/1 Anpr )dmAtpF1pmfinnnf 7 1 BD'-2 CasingJoint 4*SD-1 BD-2 Joint I 1/2004 5/1/2008 10/31/2008 5/2/2005 11/1/2005 5/2/2006 11/1/2006 5/2/2007 11/1/2007 Time 4 Tritium Distribution and Ground Water Flow at Seabrook Station RSCS, Inc., August 2009 TSD # 09-039 Revision 0 Page 31 of 31 Figure 14: BD-2 Pumping Test and Tritium Analyses July 8, 2009 40.00 1600 35.00 -1400 30.00 1200 25.00 .1000.~~~~~~ / .."OD-2 " 20.00 800 °--".H-3 (pCi/lL)o CL o 15.00 -600 E 10.00 400 5.00 200 0.00 .0 7/8/09 12:00 7/8/09 12:28 7/8/09 12:57 7/8/09 13:26 7/8/09 13:55 .7/8/09 14:24 7/8/09 14:52 7/8/09 15:21 Date Tritium Distribution and Ground Water Flow at Seabrook Station RSCS, Inc., August 2009 Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP)NextEra Energy Seabrook,.LLC June 2009 Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan for: NextEra Energy Seabrook, LLC PO Box 300, 626 Lafayette Rd Seabrook, NH 03874 603-773-7000 SWPPP Contact(s):

NextEra Energy Seabrool,, LLC Licensing Department PO Box 300, Lafayette Rd.Seabrook, NH 03874 603-773-7773 SWPPP Preparation Date: 07101 12009 Rev. 41 I I Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP)NextEra Energy Seabrook, LLC June 2009 Contents SECTION 1: FACILITY DESCRIPTION AND CONTACT INFORMATION ............................................... ... I 1.1 Facility Inform ation ............................................ ......................................................................

1.2 Contact

lnformation/Responsible Parties ....................................... .................................... 2 1.3 Stormwater Pollution Prevention Team ............................................................................... 2 1.4 Activities at the Facility ................................................................................................ 3 1.5 General Location Map ............................................. 3 1.6 S ite M ap .............................................................. ...3.............................................................. 3 SECTION 2: POTENTIAL POLLUTANT SOURCES ... ...... ................................................... 4 2.1 Industrial Activity and Associated Pollutants ............................. 4............................................... 4 2.2 S pills and Leaks ... ............................................................ ....................... ....................... 7 2.3 Non-Stormwater Discharges Documentation ......... ......................................................... 8 2.4 Salt Storage ...................................... ................... ...................... ....... ............................

I 11 2.5 Sampling Data Summary .....................................

........................... ..... I.... .......... .............. 11 SECTION 3: STORMWATER CONTROL MEASURES ..................................... ............................... 12 3.1 Minimize Exposure ............................................... I ........................................................... 12 3.2 Good Housekeeping ...................................................................................................... 12 3.3 M aintenance ..........................................................................................

  • ..............................

12 3.4 Spill Prevention and Response .......................... ................................................................. 12 3.5 Erosion and Sediment Controls ............................. .......................................................... 13 3.6 Management of Runoff ..... ............................................................... 13 3.7 Salt Storage Piles or Piles Containing Salt ........ ................................................. 13 3.8 MSGP Sector-Specific Non-Numeric Effluent Limits ................. ........................................ 14 3.9 Employee Training .............................................. 14 3.10 Non-Stormwater Discharges ........................................................................................... 14 3.11 Waste, Garbage and Floatable Debris .. ............................................................... 14 3.12 Dust Generation and Vehicle Tracking of Industrial Materials ............................................ 14 SECTION 4: SCHEDULES AND PROCEDURES FOR MONITORING ............................. 15 SECTION 5: INSPECTIONS ..................... ....... "......... .................................................................. 15 SECTION 6: DOCUMENTATION TO SUPPORT ELIGIBILITY CONSIDERATIONS UNDER OTHER FEDERA L LAW S ........................................................................................................................................... 16 6.1 Documentation Regarding Endangered Species. ..... ............................... 16 6.2 Documentation Regarding Historic Properties........... ............................................................-.. 16 6.3 Documentation Regarding NEPA Review (if applicable) ........................ 16 SECTION 7: SWPPP CERTIFICATION ................................. ................................................................... 17 SECTION 8: SWPPP MODIFICATIONS ................................................................................................... 18 SWPPP ATTACHMENTS ....... .......................................... 22 Attachment A -General Location Map -Attachment B -Site Maps Attachment C -Sampling Data Summary Attachment D -Endangered Species Attachment E -2008 MSGP ii Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP)NextEra Energy Seabrook, LLC June 2009 SECTION 1: FACILITY DESCRIPTIONAND CONTACT INFORMATION 1.1 -Facility Information Facility Inforymation Name of Facility: FPL Energy Seabrook LLC Street: 626 Lafayette Road City: Seabrook State: NiH ZIP Code: 03874 County or Similar Subdivision: Rockingham Permit Tracking Number: NHR05A729 Latitude/Longitude (Use one of three possible formats, and specify method)Latitude: Longitude:

1. 42 0 53' 55" N (degrees, minutes, seconds) 1. 70 0 50' 57 "W (degrees, minutes, seconds)2. 0 ' N (degrees, minutes, decimal) 2. o 'W (degrees, minutes, decimal)3. 0 N (decimal)
3. o W.(decimal)

Method for determining latitude/longitude (check one): Fli USGS topographic map (specify scale: .) .j] EPA Web site El GPS Other (please specify): Is the facility located in Indian Country? Yes X No If yes, name of Reservation, or if not part of a Reservation, indicate "not applicable." Is this facility considered a FederalFacility? Yes, X No Estimated area of industrial activity at site exposed to storm water: 182.1 (acres)Discharge Information Does this facility discharge stormwater into an.MS4? El Yes E No If yes, name of MS4 operator: Name(s) of water(s) that receive stormwater from your facility:, Atlantic Ocean Are any of your discharges directly into any segment of an "impaired" water? El Yes [ No If Yes, identify name of the impaired water (and segment,if applicable): Identify the pollutant(s) causing the impairment: For pollutants identified, which do you have reason to believe will be present in your discharge? I Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP)NextEra Energy Seabrook, LLC June 2009 For pollutants identified, which have a completed TM DL?Do you discharge into receiving water designated as Tier 2 (or Tier 2.5) water? E] Yes [Z No Are any of your stormwater discharges subject to effluent guidelines? F-1 Yes N No If Yes, which guidelines apply?Primary SIC Code or 2-letter Activity Code: (refer to Appendix D of the 2008 MSGP)Identify your applicable sector and subsector:

1.2 Contact

Information/Responsible Parties Facility Operator (s): Name- NextEra Energy Seabrook, LLC Address: PO Box 300, 626 Lafayette Rd.City, State, Zip Code: Seabrook, NH 03874 Telephone Number: 603-773-7000 Email address: www.NextEraEnergyresources.com Fax number: 603-773-7740 Facility Owner (s): Name: NextEra Energy Seabrook, LLC Address: PO Box 300, 626 Lafayette Rd City, State, Zip Code: Seabrook, NH 03874 Telephone Number: 603-773-7000 Email address: Fax number: 603-773-7740 SWPPP Contact: Name: Control Room Telephone number: 603-474-7184 Email address: Fax number: 1.3 Stormwater Pollution Prevention Team Staff Names Individual Responsibilities Sabre Gagnon

  • SME Al Legendre Environmental Compliance Michael O'Keefe Licensing Manager -Responsible Official 2 Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP).NextEra Energy Seabrook, LLC June 2009 1.4 Activities at the Facility Seabrook Station is located on the western shore of Hampton Harbor in the township of Seabrook, New Hampshire (Figure 1). The site is bounded on the north, east and south by marshland.

Access to the site is from the West via two roads, both entering from U.S. Route 1.A rail line traverses the site, but is inactive and has been abandoned'by its owner. The total site area is about 900 acres, of which about 600 acres is salt marsh which includes two tidal streams, the Brown's River and Hunt's Island Creek.Site industrial activity includes electrical power generation, accompanying switchyard, and related support functions such as shipping and receiving, material storage, and maintenance. Non-industrial activity includes administrative buildings, accompanying parking lots, former construction laydown areas, and undeveloped land.1.5 General Location Map General location map for this facility is located in Attachment A.1.6 Site Map The site map for this facility is located in Attachment B.3 Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP)NextEra Energy Seabrook, LLC June 2009 SECTION 2: POTENTIAL POLLUTANT SOURCES 2.1 Industrial Activity and Associated Pollutants -Drainage Location Description Associated Pollutant In-place BMP Subarea and Exposure Risk Probability/Consequenc e A 50-yard line DGB diesel fuel Oil spill. Procedures OS1026.05 and delivery (bulk) Moderate/Moderate OS 1026.13 identify storm drains that drains in area must be covered during fuel transfers. Procedure MX0526.10 includes berm provisions for oil tank draining.A Chlorination Salt/Sand Storage Salt runoff. Salt storage maintained in-covered Bldg -West structure. End Low/Low A Chlorination Sodium hypochlorite Sodium hypochlorite Additions performed in accordance Bldg delivery (bulk) spill. Low/Moderate with procedure ON1038.12. Building drains are closed and drip pans are used during deliveries. A DGB Slot Sodium hydroxide Sodium hydroxide spill. Additions are performed in.delivery (bulk) Low/Moderate accordance with procedure OS 1006.03. The area around the fill truck and fill connection is roped off, posted, and diked.A Fire Pump ASTs: 2 x 550-gal fuel Oil spill. Low/Low Tanks are diked. Additions House oil performed in accordance with procedure OS0043.05. A Fire Pump Water Storage Tanks Chlorinated water spill. Routine inspections. House Low/Moderate A North of Sand/Salt storage Salt runoff. Low/Low Salt storage maintained in covered Furniture structure. Storage (Ref 48)A Fuel Oil AST: 270,000-gal fuel Oil spill. Low/High Tank diked. Fuel additions. Storage oil performed in accordance with procedure ON1041.05. Spill_equipment provided at location.A Maintenanc ASTs: 6K-gal diesel, Oil spill: Low/Moderate Tanks diked. Spill equipment e Shop 5K-gal gasoline provided at location.A Maintenanc Equipment storage Oil spill from machinery. Routine inspections of trucks and e Shop (trucks and cranes) Moderate/Low cranes.A OSB west OSB emergency diesel Oil spill. Low/Moderate Tank diked.'side " 4 Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP)NextEra Energy Seabrook, LLC June 2009 Drainage Location Description Associated Pollutant In-place BMP Subarea and Exposure Risk Probability/Consequenc e A Primary Acid and Caustic Acid or Caustic spill. Procedures ON0021.09 and Auxiliary delivery Moderate/Moderate ON0021.10 require boom installation Bldg -south around catch basins CB-1, CB-2 and side CB-60 during deliveries. A Production Hazardous materials Hazardous material spill. Spill equipment provided. Adjacent Warehouse unloading/loading Moderate/Moderate storm drain covered during loading unloading/ operations. loading area A Scrap Scrap Transfer Facility Runoff from scrap Routine inspections. Area is large Transfer material (iron). Low/Low and flat with minimal runoff.Area A Siren Mobile 300-gal diesel Oil spill. Low/Moderate Parked on impervious surface. Spill Maintenanc tanker equipment provided.e A Siren Spare Transformer Transformer oil spill. Transformer diked.Maintenanc Low/Low e A Turbine Acid and caustic Acid or caustic spill. Spill equipment provided.Bldg -north delivery (drums) Low/Moderate side A Turbine 9 x 345 kV Transformer oil spill. Transformers diked.Bldg -north transformers Low/Moderate side A Turbine Main Turbine Lube Oil Oil spill. Low/Moderate Additions performed in accordance Bldg. -Storage Tank fill and with Procedure ON1045.01. south side drain connections. A Turbine Lube oil vent Runoff from oil vapor Container used to collect condensed Bldg, .discharge. oil vapor.Heater Bay Moderate/Low Roof A Warehouse. Numerous unloading/ Hazardous material spill. Spill equipment available. 1 &2 loading activities, Moderate/Moderate including hazardous materials B Hanger Storage of motors, Oil spill. Low/Low Inside building on concrete floor Shop pumps and MOVs with no floor drains.B Unit 2 Rotormaintenance Oil spill. Low/Low Only lubricating oil present, No bulk Turbine activities oil storage.Rotor Bldg C Carpenter Vehicle parking Oil leak. Low/Low Drip pans under large vehicles.Shop area .5 Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP)NextEra Energy Seabrook, LLC June 2009 Drainage Location Description Associated Pollutant In-place BMP Subarea and Exposure Risk Probability/Consequenc e.E GOB Office supply Oil spill. Low/Moderate, Oil/water separator in catch basin.unloading! unloading/loading loading area H Stump Recreational Vehicle Oil spill. Low/Low Vehicles are stored without fuel.dump Storage (boats, trailers)I South 40 Exposed soils Soil erosion. Low/Low Slopes rip rapped. Routine__ _inspections. Buildings Washing Roofs with Erosion of soil. None~necessary. Minimal amounts on site Fire Protection Water Low/Low of water used.Fire Flushing Soil erosion and Operating procedures OX0443.04, Hydrants discharge of chlorinated OX0443.11, ON0443.49, water. Low/Low ON0443.51, ON0443.59, and 0D0443.86 have steps to avoid runoff.Rocks Road Snow Storage Area Soil erosion. Low/Low Routine inspections.(by Sundial .Substation) Rock pile Fire Fighters Training Chemical spill. Low/Low Propane used as fire source not oil.Facility 6 Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP)NextEra Energy Seabrook, LLC June 2009 2.2 Spills and Leaks, Areas of Site Where Potential SpillslLeaks Could Occur Subarea f Description Drainage Area Square Feet Acres A Main plant area and eastern portion of the North 4,181,200 96 Access Road.B Laydown areas along South Access Road. 2,726,700 63 C High Rise parking lot and vicinity. 483,600 11 D Upper General Office Building (GOB) 76,800 1.8 parking lot.E General Office Building (GOB). 20,100 0.5 F Training Center area. 104,200 2.4 G Science and Nature Center parking lot. 38,600 0.9 H Western portion of North Access Road. 125,000 2.9 I Western portion of South Access Road. 155,000 3.6 Note: Areas of the property not designated above are either marsh or areas surrounding the'marsh that discharge directly to the marsh by overland sheet flow.Description of Past Spills/Leaks Date Description Outfalls November 2000 In November 2000, a spill of 400 -500 gallons of None lubricating oil occurred during a flush of the B-Emergency Diesel Generator (EDG) Lube Oil System.No oil reached the environment due to the effectiveness of the pre-installed spill containment measures and the'rapidresponse by spill response personnel. The cause for the oil spill was improper assembly of the connection between the flush hose sections.-November 2000 In November 2000, a leak was discovered in the underground fuel supply -line from the Auxiliary Boiler Fuel Oil Tank. The tank and steel fuel lines were None 7 Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP)NextEra Energy Seabrook, LLC June 2009 installed in 1977. Excavation of the fuel line revealed a1/4-inch hole in the four-inch supply line to the Auxiliary Boiler. The fuel line was immediately repaired.Contaminated soil was removed prior to replacement of both 1,200-foot sections of the fuel line and return line during the summer of 2001. This replacement was accomplished by inserting a new line inside the old lines.The results of the Site Investigation, which included soil borings and monitoring wells, indicated that no residual source of oil was present. Concentrations of contaminants in groundwater (specifically MTBE) at levels slightly greater than the ambient groundwater quality standards remain. Groundwater sampling, as directed by NHDES. continues in this location.4 I.March 2001 In March 2001, a leak was discovered in the underground gasoline and diesel fuel lines at the Vehicle Maintenance Shop. This 40-foot long piping system was installed in 1993 and consisted of two-inch diameter pipes with a corrosion protection wrapping. The fuel release did not impact surface waters either directly or via the storm drainage system. Contaminated soil was removed prior to installation of a new pump station. A Site Investigation including soil borings and monitoring wells was performed. Groundwater samples obtained to-date indicate that concentrations of gasoline-related compounds continue to show a decreasing trend with no VOCs other than MTBE detected at levels above the ambient groundwater quality standards. Groundwater monitoring is ongoing.None The site Spill Prevention Control and Countermeasure (SPCC) Plan (Reference 3.4) contains a full description of the historical large oil spills on site.2.3 Non-Stormwater Discharges Documentation The presence of non-storm water discharges was evaluated in two phases both of which where completed during 1993-1994. Phase I involved a plant schematic review and Phase II verified the review with a visual inspection of the drains. Power plant effluents and a large part of the Seabrook Station site (Subarea A) discharge into the storm drain system that in turn discharge into the Circulating Water System (at Manhole 34). The discharge of the Circulating Water System (Outfall 001) is controlled and monitored under the NPDES Permit.8 Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP)NextEra Energy Seabrook, LLC June 2009 The Station Drain Table Reference (Reference 3.3) lists the results of the evaluation and includes those drains (roof, floor, equipment, etc.) that discharge directly to the storm drain system.Excluded are those drains that first discharge to a NPDES-monitored outfall, such as an oil/water separator, before discharging to the storm water drain system. Reference 3.3 also includes the drain type, any contaminants -in the vicinity, the type of BMP in place, and the likelihood of a material release causing storm water pollution. Attachment B contains a certification of the results.Other non-storm water discharges include* Fire hydrant flushing* Potable water sources, including waterline flushings Air conditioning condensate

  • Discharges.

from naturally occurring streams* Routine exterior building wash-down that does not use detergents or other compounds Pavement wash waters where detergents are not used and where leaks or spills of hazardous materials have not occurred* Dewatering of building groundwater inleakage* Dewatering operations that may occur during the performance of construction activities The locations of the discharges described above occur throughout Seabrook Station and are too numerous to individually identify in Figure 5. These discharges may be made to New Hampshire surface waters either through Outfall 001 or directly via sheet runoff. Each is administratively controlled either by procedures or routine inspection. All dewatering operations are administratively controlled and include the following:

1.

of ground water to New Hampshire Surface Waters 2. Return of ground water to the ground without a discharge to New Hampshire Surface-Waters

3. Removal of storm water that has collected on site Case 1: The routine discharge of groundwater to NPDES Permit Outfall 001 (ocean discharge) is described in the documentation that supports the renewal of Seabrook Station's NPDES Permit ,(effective April 2002).Dewatering of several plant buildings (Containment Annulus, Primary Auxiliary Building, Yard Equipment Vaults and Fuel Storage Building) may contain small amounts of radioactive tritium.9 StormwaterPollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP)NextEra Energy Seabrook,-LLC June 2009 The groundwater dewatering system discharges directly to the storm drain system which flows via Manhole 34 in the Circulating Water System Junction Box Wet Weather Discharge to Outfall 001 (Ocean Discharge).

Radioactive discharges are addressed in Seabrook Station's NPDES Permit Part I.A. 10 for Outfall 001 (ocean discharge), which states that the discharge of radioactive materials shall be in accordance with the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) requirements (10 CFR 20 and the Seabrook Station Operating License, Appendix A, Technical Specifications). The following guidance is used in determining the requirements for the discharges of groundwater to Outfall 001: 1 If the groundwater is being removed from an area that has no history-of soil contamination, measures shall be taken to avoid the discharge of silt.The effluent shall also be inspected for an oil sheen or odor, which are indications of oil or chemical contamination. If there is an indication of contamination, the discharge must be terminated.

2. If the groundwater is being removed from an area that has a potential history of soil contamination or known history of soil contamination, such as areas near the Vehicle Maintenance Facility or Auxiliary Boiler fuel-line, then a Temporary Surface Water Discharge Permit will be acquired from the New Hampshire Department of Environmental Services and the Environmental Protection Agency in accordance with Env-Ws 1505. This permit will specify the water discharge parameters, treatment methods, water quality sampling requirements and reporting requirements.

Case 2: Groundwater may be returned to the ground if it does not reach surface waters such as the surrounding wetlands and may proceed using the following guidance: 1. If the groundwater is being removed from an area that has no history of soil contamination, the water can be returned to the ground. and allowed to percolate into the ground provided none of the water runs off into a surface water. The groundwater shall be inspected for an oil sheen or odor, which are indications of oil or chemical contamination. If there is an indication of contamination, the discharge must be terminated.

2. If the groundwater is being removed from an area that has a potential history of soil contamination or known history of soil contamination, the New Hampshire Department of Environmental Compliance Groundwater Protection Bureau must be contacted prior to discharging the effluent back to the ground.Case 3: Storm water from precipitation is an expected discharge to Outfall 001 or nearby wetlands.

Therefore, if a depression or excavation contains known storm water, it can be returned directly to the ground or can be routed to Outfall 001. The discharge of silty water should be avoided.10 Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP)NextEra Energy Seabrook, LLC June 2009 2.4 Salt Storage 1. North of Furniture Storage Building (Ref. 48)- Covered, Structure 2. West End of Clorination Building (Ref. -Covered Structure 2.5 Sampling Data Summary See Attachment C for summary of all stormwater samples collected. 11 Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP)NextEra Energy Seabrook, LLC June 2009 SECTION 3: STORMWATER CONTROL MEASURES 3.1 Minimize Exposure The SWPPP uses the following measures and controls as standard Best Management Practices (BMPs).3.2 Good Housekeeping The Maintenance Manual (Reference 3.10) requires that personnel practice basic good housekeeping methods. These include operation practices, material inventory practices, and material storage practices. These practices are identified, performed, and reviewed through the work order system (Reference 3.8), which establishes the administrative controls for repetitive tasks. Where practicable, large dumpsters for trash or industrial materials have covers to prevent exposure to precipitation.

3.3 Maintenance

Station preventive maintenance uses the Repetitive Tasks system as well as departmenf procedures to provide timely inspection and maintenance of storm water management devices.The tasks include maintenance of oil/water separators. Catch basins are cleaned periodically on an as-needed basis to remove sand and silt.3.4 Spill Prevention and Response Seabrook Station maintains the Spill Prevention Control and Countermeasure (SPCC) Plan and the Oil and Hazardous Substances Pollution Contingency Plan. Together, these plans identify potential oil and hazardous materials pollution sources, provide physical structures and systems to prevent discharge, and the resources (both personnel and equipment) available to implement cleanup if it is needed..12 Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP)NextEra Energy Seabrook, LLC June 2009 3.5 Erosion and Sediment Controls Various sediment and erosion control measures have been implemented. These include road paving and traffic control; regular street sweeping and catch basin maintenance; grading, seeding, and construction of diversion structures. In addition, regular Licensing Department Surveillances are conducted (see §5.3.4).3.6 Management of Runoff Two routine inspection programs are conducted by site personnel to review designated equipment and areas for leaks and potential sources of pollution. These include: Nuclear Systems Operator routine inspections of Station-related equipment and areas.Licensing Department surveillances and inspections of the nonradiological aspects of the Environmental ComplianceProgram. Licensing personnel perform routine quarterly environmental surveillances of the Seabrook Station site and initiate a corrective action program document (Condition Report) as necessary. The purpose of these broader environmental inspections is to identify and correct items which are not in compliance with applicable environmental regulations or site policies and procedures. These items include leaks from tanks, equipment, transformers or stored materials including chemicals or compressed gases, erosion, and debris.The quarterly inspections of the site are performed in accordance with the Licensing Department Site Environmental Surveillance Instruction (ENV-4).Deficiencies in implementation of the Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan identified during these inspections are corrected within 14 days of discovery in accordanrce with the Storm Water Multi-sector General Permit.3.7 Salt Storage Piles or Piles Containing Salt Sand mixed with salt is used on site roads and walkways for deicing. The sand/salt is stockpiled in the former Hazardous Waste Facility structure west of the Production Warehouse (Figure 5).A smaller storage area is located at the west end of the Clorination Building. The sand/salt is stored in roofed structures at all locations. Covers are also used to reduce blowing of sand/salt piles.13 Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP)NextEra Energy Seabrook, LLC June 2009 3.8 MSGP Sector-Specific Non-Numeric Effluent Limits Does not apply to Nuclear Utility.3.9 Employee Training Seabrook Station maintains the Training and Qualification Program to identify training needs-(Reference 3.14). All station personnel, including contractors, receive environmental awareness training. In addition, every employee receives. annual Plant Access Training (PAT), which addresses topics such as spill identification and response, good housekeeping, and material management practices. Station personnel, whose work involves significant environmental aspects, receive specialized training to minimize impacts (Reference 3.13). For instance, Fire Brigade personnel receive training as primary responders to hazardous material spills or releases. In addition, a Spill Event Response Team (SERT) is trained in the control and cleanup of oil and hazardous material spills, including the use of equipment maintained on site (see Reference 3.4).3.10 Non-Stormwater Discharges Reference Section 2.3 3.11 Waste, Garbage and Floatable Debris Trash is disposed in dumpsters staged in the vicinity of selected site buildings. A central trash disposal area has also been established on the southern side of Rocks Road in the "G" parking area. This area has three roll-off style dumpsters for trash, metal and wood. A trash hauler and metal recycling vendor periodically remove the dumpster contents. The central area is periodically surveyed to. ensure good housekeeping and proper disposal of authorized materials. 3.12 Dust Generation and Vehicle Tracking of industrial Materials Construction projects having the potential to generate significant dust will incorporate measures to control.the amount generated. Generally surface wetting will be used as the primary control mechanism. Construction projects will' also consider the potential for industrial material to be tracked away from the construction area by vehicles. Control measures such as pressure washing vehicles when exiting the construction area will be used as required.14 Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP)NextEra Energy Seabrook, LLC June 2009 SECTION 4: SCHEDULES AND PROCEDURES FOR MONITORING Benchmark Effluent State or Tribal Other(as Monitoring (2008 Limitations Specific Impaired Waters required by EPA MsGP, Part Guidelines S Monitoring 2008 MSGP Part 6.2.1)* Monitoring Monitoring 6.2.5)Storm Drain Rad Reference Sample Monitor and Procedure CP n/a n/a n/a Locations North Road Delivery Access 9.1-Figure

5.1 Pollutant

Reference Parameters to Total Iron Procedure CP n/a n/a n/a be sampled 9.1 Fiqure 5.1 4 quarterly Monitoring samples that Reference Schedule averaged do not Procedure CP n/a n/a n/a exceed 9.1 Figure 5.1 benchmark Numeric Reference Limitations 1.0 mg/L Procedure CP n/a n/a n/a 9.1 Figure 5.1 Reference ENV-11 SWPPP Rernc Procedures ENV-l Procedure CP n/a n/a n/a Sa mpling 9.1 Figure 5.1*Benchmark data will be located under Attachment C of SWPPP SECTION 5: INSPECTIONS Routine Facility Quarterly Visual Comprehensive Site Inspections (2008 MSGP, Assessment of Stormwater Inspection (2008 MSGP, Part 4.1) Discharges (2008 MSGP, Part 4.3)Part 4.2)Responsible Dept Environmental Dept. Environmental Dept. Environmental Dept.Schedule Quarterly Per qualifying rain event Annual June .1st Specific Locations/Areas. All Locations as specified Storm Drain Rad Monitor All Locations as specified in Section 2.1 and North Road Delivery in Section 2.1 Access Procedures ENV-4 Site Surveillance ENV-11 SWPPP Sampling ENV-18 SWPPP Annual Comprehensive Site Inspection 15 Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP)NextEra Energy Seabrook, LLC June 2009 SECTION 6: DOCUMENTATION TO SUPPORT ELIGIBILITY CONSIDERATIONS UNDER OTHER FEDERAL LAWS 6.1 Documentation Regarding Endangered Species.Refer to Attachment D for Endangered Species Documentation

6.2 Documentation

Regarding Historic Properties Industrial facilities are eligible for coverage under the Storm Water Multi-sector General Permit (MSGP) if their storm water discharges do not affect a property that is listed or is eligible for listing on the National Register of Historic Places (per MSGP Section 1.2.3.7). The following information documents the basis for Seabrook Station's eligibility for cove-rage under the MSGP wNith respect to historic places. Seabrook Station's storm water discharges and non-storm water discharges do not have the potential to affect property that is either listed or eligible for listing on the National Register of Historic Places since no historic properties are located in the vicinity of the locations where storm water discharges reach the receiving waters that includes the surrounding salt marsh and Atlantic Ocean. This condition meets the MSGP Addendum B Eligibility Criteria 1.A review of the National Park Service National Register of Historic Places website (http://www.nr.nps.gov/) for Rockingham County, New Hampshire identified no historic places in the Town of Seabrook. Several Historic Places were identified in the adjoining towns of Hampton and Hampton Falls. However, none of these historic places are in the path of Seabrook Station's storm water and non-storm water discharges or where construction activities may be planned to install best management practices (BMIPs) to control such discharges.

6.3 Documentation

Regarding NEPA Review (if applicable) This requirement is not applicable to Seabrook Station. Seabrook Station does not discharge stormwater that is subject to New Source Performance Standards stormwater-specific effluent limitations guidelines (ref: Section 1.1.2.5 of General Permit and Table 1-1) thus there is no NEPA review documentation. 16 Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP)NextEra Energy Seabrook, LLC June 2009 SECTION 7: SWPPP CERTIFICATION-I certify under penalty of lawthat this document and all attachments were prepared under my direction or supervision in accordance with a system designed to assure that qualified personnel properly gathered and evaluated the information submitted. Based on my inquiry of the person or persons who manage the system, or those persons directly responsible for gathering the information, the information submitted is, to the best of my knowledge and belief, true, accurate, and complete. I am aware that there are significant penalties for submitting false information, including the possibility of fine and imprisonment for knowing violations. Name: 1" 1C /Lale. 0'&;Signature: Title: /i d-e ,, ;i .Date: // /17 Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP)NextEra Energy Seabrook, LLC June 2009 SECTION 8: SWPPP MODIFICATIONS-Rev. 41 SWPPP rewrite to new EPA Standard Template 7/1/09 Removed Sand/Salt location south of High Rise Building Rev. 40 December 30, 2008 additions to section 1.2 including 1.2.1 and 1.2.2. PSB. submitted NOI under new 2008 MSGP on this day.October 2008: Replaced Attachment D, Site Drain System with updated drawing 1-NHY-650018.' Drawing is in PDF version of plan.Rev. 39: Added two sand/salt locations to Table 2 and removed Plate Yard. Table 4 up to date on rain sample data.Changed all mention of Regulatory Compliance Department to Licensing Department. December 2007: Added sheet 9 to Table 4 to show results of visual examination of storm water discharges and monitoring results for 2006.Rev. 38: Relocated plan from Environmental Compliance Manual to Seabrook Home Page Library Tab.Rev. 37: Updated Attachment D, Site Drain System.Rev. 36: This appendix was unaffected by this revision to the manual.Rev. 35: Added sheet 8 to Table 4 to show results of visual examination of storm water discharges and benchmark monitoring results through fourth quarter 2005.Rev. 34: There were no changes affecting Appendix B.Rev. 33: 'Changed Environmental Compliance Department personnel to Regulatory Compliance Department/personnel throughout'. 18 Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP)NextEra Energy Seabrook, LLC June 2009* Added sheet 7 to Table 4 to show results of visual examination of storm water discharges and benchmark monitoring results through fourth quarter 2004.Rev. 32:* In §5.3.4, added timeframe to correct deficiencies identified during inspections.

  • Added sheet 5 and 6 to Table 4, to show results of visual examination of storm water discharges and benchmark monitoring results of third quarter 2003 through first quarter 2004.Revised organizational titles throughout.

Rev. 31: There were no changes affecting Appendix B.Rev. 30: This revision was initiated to address deficiencies in the Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan identified during the June 2003 NPDES Permit Inspection performed by the NH Department of Environmental Services (Reference CR 03-06275). Several other changes were made to improve the clarity of the Plan.Specific major changes are as follows: " In §1.0 provided more information about the purpose of the Plan and explained the effective date for coverage under the Storm Water Multi-sector General Permit." In §5.2.4 revised description of Subarea A and added reference to the new Table 4 regarding results of quarterly visual examination of storm water discharges and benchmark monitoring results." In §5.3.4 clarified section describing site environmental surveillances performed by the Environmental Compliance Department." Revised Table 2.* Revised Figure 3." Revised Figure 4." Revised Figure 5.Rev. 27, 28, and 29: There were no changes affecting Appendix B.Rev. 26: This revision was initiated to provide more detailed information on the basis for why Seabrook Station's storm water runoff does not impact endangered species or properties listed on the National Register of Historic Places.19 Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP)NextEra Energy Seabrook, LLC June 2009 Rev. 25: This revision was initiated as a result of recommendations made by FPL Energy as part of the transition to new ownership. Specific changes are as follows:* In §3.0 updated reference 2.* In §5.1.2 added information on large format original for Attachment D." In §5.2.3 added information on the remediation efforts pertaining to the November 2000 leak of the Auxiliary Boiler Fuel Oil Tank supply line and March 2001 underground leak at the Vehicle Maintenance Shop. Deleted paragraph referencing Attachment C, Petroleum Product Remediation Activities, which has been deleted." In §5.3.5, paragraph one, added last two sentences on discharges Added two paragraphs under Case I on dewatering and radiological discharges.

  • In §5.3.7 added last paragraph on potential storm water run-on." In §5.4.2 added EPA definition of benchmark levels." Clarified

§5.8.2 on recordkeeping. 0 In §6.0 added reference to the organizational chart.* Updated Table 2.0 Revised Figure 5.a In Attachment B added second sentence on review and evaluation.

  • Deleted Attachment C and re-lettered subsequent attachments.

Rev. 24: This appendix was unaffected by this revision to the manual.Rev. 23: This revision was initiated to incorporate the requirements of the Storm Water Multi-Sector General Permit (MSGP). This revision was necessary because the Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan is no longer a requirement of the renewed NPDES Permit (effective as of April 1, 2002). In general, the contents of the Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan Were reordered tomatch MSGP requirements or expanded to add requirements not otherwise addressed previously. Specific. major changes are as follows: Quarterly visual monitoring of storm water discharges is now required to assess potential pollutant inputs. Previously, analytical samples Were taken for pH, oil and grease and total suspended solids.These pollutants will now be assessed visually. The only parameter measured now in storm water discharges will be total iron.20 Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP)NextEra Energy Seabrook, LLC June 2009* A new attachment was added -- Endangered Species and Historic Places Assessment, which shows that Seabrook Station's storm water discharges will not impact endangered species or historic buildings. 21 Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP)NextEra Energy Seabrook, LLC June 2009 SWPPP ATTACHMENTS Attachment A -General Location Map-Attachment B -Site Map Attachment C -Sampling Data Summary Attachment D -Endangered Species and Historic Places Assessment Attachment E -2008 MSGP 22 Attachment A: General Site Locat el~'Sil.1 Attachment A: Seabrook Station Property Boundaries r ---- --- -- ---.- ----.- -----,,* ,...~ ~../ " ':* .; .... .-.' LOTL* .5 i .4r ,II. L .,-. ..II * .,,,,.. V ,: S L. LOT -joI , t o.. l -, i ;" !. ij .-O": i~~~~~*' ~ ~ ~ ~ O 82 -hLTI0140 l14 JII ~4E-.L.20(n.. .. .?4cuf~ .Ic II, FIGUR E! -*.Ofi 2 .B PS- AM " "M4:1]~~DW II "LO"W..S' " SEABROOK STATION1 A -.-044 L1 W. NE O PROPERTY BOUNDAJ IES mi l , L---------- ... .-- ------------ -------------"--- t -- -- --- --- --2 0 Attachment B: Site Storm Water Drainage Subareas I Attachment B: Storm Water Drainage Subarea Detail% I N~PARK ING' / -FACILITY

  • .TRAINING " SIMULýATOR PARKING RUO OFFRICE SUBAREA NATURE"C F " .C E N ER..~ P A R K I N G .-LEGEND-." J MARSH.' ~~RUNOFF FR OM SUBAREA .*.--------------------2 Attachment B: Seabrook Station Site Plan (and Inventory of Exposed Materials) 9'12/B09 SS PLAN IIS C.IJGN RECREAT1IONAL VENICLE.ST RADE N STUMP " I'DUMP S i 'I: "80- 1SnT LA'TINr , '- .. .. J.:... .1 ARA S..-.-..151'f B A A, A N53 E? ,RE STO.R..NIARA.RAMP

." AU" N B 10N hUNI IM R U{ ULON 1 48[N :: -UL .B ILD ITN LL 88 883 AREA F ~:. ii 18AREA SAL I "RACE: )AURE6 ILAD, RE SUMMTRAN ORY.. OOCEAN.OG U DH ' ... .,NN : E!f=K E -t : RAMI N. UNIT 'I.WA[T4EP T BUILDINB 2 U T P RIMARY I 4, TRAINING SIMLTORA E"BUILIN ' Y E 5. D58E AL 1 FUEL- ..2.H UI l SITRC. INAE. BUPHUILIN 22, WRHUIT '80WS T.SRAE TIT<

  • SCIENCE &LL NATURE CETERAG 8 Rh3OMRAS UNOOI. ATR80 ANK .--,-ITK;&DICAG"UNl l.AC NSERVC WATIRON M HII OUSE 21s COOLING TOERI'I 4. FAI~TNES *FPACI TOAG P. 388 G/AL. MOBIE ' [O]NERRLC REOLM NONILNOTONAL)

.12ELECTRIOCAL"R OTOE" 4. FIENRELOrNNE LX.OI* GI.:EUS ME' E-" O"UILO AINK I.2 ____"__'O DI ESELO GELONE TOR I DN 33. STRE AI NTENGANN CE 45 "'T2. AGE .BTT .: DR 51SOIM.8 OR88 E WATERhVNOIJTNOTRV o 8la C ORNAII IFL SON R B U LDIN G -4 IIL MI¥ .-O 46, 8fNEST OIHN UILOINU F-REDU HPCLRIE ( ADSR SILNG NDS 7 UNIT I PRNTINMARYAU BUILDING 27. BUELDING SHEOPED 47. SHEET MIETAL SH&OMPO57.ALTENAT "PCEKPI.....F UNLVPTOD" SER .....HASN ER MNSI ARSHE AGRYUN -TRAE AAK I{fl UNIT '1 WTE PUR EOINE.: BUILDING 28. OPRTIFE NSAO -UPRT 48ON: 5B FURN EUL S1TORAfl:ULON WE IENSOAG.AE I. DISEL UpDELE POWER INESPIL A AG WAESEE SEERTORAG TANLD2N .WRSEHOUSEIY 1 q 1112 TflD 5.SAYA 4 I CC FUER HST E 3UIDIN 5. 3ARPE HOPS .S L E SEADE..UMMARYN.A RE .SATARF PTNTTALSTATIONS 1INV BU ILOEDTRGS IS INTAKEOUCE STUTRK5riEPM OS.8 USOL TRG ULIG A L ~ GL EPFE AUNLOACING AREA I NT 2TRIEAIDN .7SEAINLSPOTWIGN I R ULSOSR B.MAEHINKERY IRICRAE BA.1RUO SORG AK.88 A 0.N.RD, MAT ERALM. CRNSE .DEE 88GL P L 18 UNIBT -'2CONTROLEN q01 uILDING 21. UNII l:ASSOR [ AUSE BIDN L TANN: IULTRBIDN:0 E BA 7P DIESE GI ISUNIT 2SIESEO BUL DENERGO 2UL O 3' SCUOLINGTY WE 43UILENOACIIT GE ERAO SILL E R EM: ATO AREAR 2 UNIT 2:.- FUEL STORAGE BUILDING ' 8."CARENR ENGR SULIG:EABOK TTIN STE PAN(N P.SHE SANDY &<.L STOAT OW STORM SHOPDAPL 48OINTA INVAENBUILDI OF EXPYOOC:SED TA M A RERALS 3 Attachment C: Seabrook Station Storm Water Sample Data (Manhole 34, former NPDES Permit Outfall 002B)Parameter' Year Season TSS (Avg) TSS (Max) O&G (Avg) O&G (Max) pH (units)Limit30" Limit=100 Limit=15 Limit=20 Limit = 6-9 1995 Spring 8.9 8.9 0 0 7.4 Fall 3.0 3.0 0 0 7.6 1996 Spring 2.2 2.2 0 0 7.8 Fall 1.9 1.9 0 0 7.5 1997 Spring 0.6 0.6 0 0 .7.7 Fall 2.0 2.0 0 0 7.5 1998 Spring 0.8 0.8 0 0- 7.5 Fall 0.0 0.0 0 0 7.4 1999 Spring 1.1 1.1 0 0 8.2 Fall 6.5 6.5 0 0 7.3 2000 Spring 4.8 4.8 0 0 7.6 Fall 0.9 0.9 0 .0 7.5 2001 Spring 4.4 4.4 0 0 9.0 Fall 2.3 2.3 0 0 7.1 All values in milligrams per liter (mg/i). Attachment C: Seabrook Station Benchmark IRON Sample Data (North Access Rd, RadMonitor) Date Quarter Location Iron Comments, 8/11/2009___ _ (mg/L) _ _Monitor_1.5_Exceeded 8/11/2009 3Q Monitor 1.5 Exceeded lmg/L Attachment C: Results of Quarterly Visual Examination of Storm Water Discharges and Benchmark Monitoring Results (Sheet I of 11)Visual .Storm Event Data Sample Storm Examination (or Summary of Storm Water Discharge Sampling Data YeaLr/Qtr note if. Total rainfall Duration (Complete records in L benchmark (or note if of Licensing Department Files)Sample) snowmelt) storm event 2002/2 Storm 6/22/02 R. Sher 0.53 inches 7 hours Negligible settled and suspended solids. -Color neutral and clear.Drain Rad Neutral odor. No floating solids. No foam or oil sheen.Monitor 2002/2- Storm 6/22/02 Benchmark Iron 0.53 inches 7 hours 1.5 mg/L total recoverable iron. See discussion under Drain Rad Analysis August 13, 2002 benchmark storm water samiple result.Monitor 2002/2 North No storm water visual sample was collected of the runoff from this Road area. There were very limited qualifying rainfall events during Delivery normal business hours during the second quarter of 2002.Access 2002/3 Storm 8/13/02 R. Sher 0.30 inches 40 minutes Brown/green color. Chemical odor. Turbid. Settled and suspend Drain Rad silt. No foam or oil sheen.Monitor Paving of the large area east of the A-Lot during the previous week was the likely source of odor and solids in the storm water sample. The lack of rainfall during the previous two weeks probably caused algae growth in the storm drain system that resulted inrthe brown/green color of the discharge sample. No corrective actions were taken, as this was an unavoidable and temporary condition. Attachment C: Results of Quarterly Visual Examination of Storm Water Discharges and Benchmark Monitoring Results (Sheet 2 of 11)-Visual Sample Storm Examination (or Summary of Storm Water Discharge Sampling Data Year/Qtr a Event nexinationh(or Storm Event Data (Complete records in Location note if benchmark Date Sample) Licensing Department Files)2002/3 Storm 8/13/02 Benchmark Iron 0.30 inches 40 minutes 10.0 mg/L total recoverable iron. The June August 2002 total Drain Rad Analysis recoverable iron levels of 1.5 mg/l andl 0.0 mg/l respectively, Monitor were higher than the benchmark level of 1.0 mg/l. These atypical benchmark results were attributed to the fact that the storm water samples were collected after periods of extended dry weather.This condition allowed normal standing storm .water in the storm drain system to be in contact with metal surfaces for a prolonged time thus concentrating the iron oxide in the storm drain system water which normally would be flushed away by periodic rainfall events. The follow-up benchmark storm water sample collected on October 16, 2002 -after rainfall had returned to more normal frequencies -had a total recoverable iron level of 0.21 mg/l which is below the benchmark level. Note: this follow-up benchmark sample was collected after the MSGP Year 2 (October 1, 2001 to September 30, 2002). This condition was documented in Condition Report 02-12946. 0 Attachment C: Results of Quarterly Visual Examination of Storm. Water Discharges and Benchmark Monitoring Results (Sheet 3 of 11)Visual Sample Event Examination (ork Summary of Storm Water Discharge Sampling Data Location Exaifatnea r Storm Event Data (Complete records in Licensing Department Files)Yer/tr Location Date Sample)2002/3 North 8/13/02 R. Sher 0.30 40 minutes Brown color. Neutral odor. Turbid. Settled and suspended silt.Road No foam or oil-sheen. A new access road extension had recently Delivery been built and paved adjacent to the storm water sample location.Access The disturbed soils resulted in silt in the runoff. No corrective action was taken initially, as it was expected that vegetation would grow along the. road and stabilize the soils. Drought conditions during the summer and early fall of 2002 prevented sufficient growth of vegetation to control erosion. CR 02-17037 was initiated to install erosion protection adjacent to the new road.Snow cover and frozen ground stabilized the exposed soil in this area and temporarily stopped erosion. Riprap was subsequently installed adjacent to the west side of the road in May 2003 to effectively control erosion.2002/4 Storm 10/16/02 R. Sher 1.40 inches 16 hours No floating, settled or suspended solids. Color neutral and clear.Drain Rad Neutral odor. No foam or oil sheen.Monitor 2002/4 North 10/16/02 R. Sher 1.40 inches 16 hours No floating, settled or suspended solids. Color neutral and clear.Road Neutral odor. No foam or oil sheen.Delivery Access - Attachment C: Results of Quarterly Visual Examination of Storm Water Discharges and Benchmark Monitoring Results (Sheet 4 of 11)Visual Sample Storm Examination (or Summary of Storm Water Discharge Sampling Data YearQtr Location Event note if bencn mark Storm Event Data (Complete records in Date Sample) Licensing Department Files)2003/1 Storm Drain-Rad Monitor No storm water visual samples were collected of the runoff during the first quarter of 2003. Minimal rainfall occurred this quarter 2003/1 North during daylight hours due to very cold weather. In the future, Road samples of snowmelt will be collected in lieu of rainfall samples.Delivery Access 2003/2 Storm 4/22/03 R. Sher 0.26 inches 13 hours No floating or suspended solids. Color neutral and clear. Neutral Drain Rad odor. No foam or oil sheen. Slight dusting of silt on bottom of Monitor sample collection bottle.2003/2 North 4/22/03 R. Sher 0.26 inches 13 hours No floating or suspended solids. Color neutral. Neutral odor. No Road foam or oil sheen. Small amOunt of detritus possibly decayed leaf Delivery litter. Minor turbidity. Access 0 Attachment C: Results of Quarterly Visual Examination of Storm Water Discharges and Benchmark Monitoring Results (Sheet 5 of 11)S Storm Visual Summary of Storm Water Discharge Sampling Data Year/Qtr Sation Event note if benchmark Storm Event Data (Complete records in Date Sample) Licensing Department Files)Storm No foam, oil sheen or floating' solids. Neutral odor. Small 2003/3- Drain Rad 9/16/03 R. Sher 0.83 inches 4 hours amounts of suspended and settled silt.Monitor No floating or settled solids. Color neutral and clear. Neutral North odor. No foam or oil sheen. One small piece of suspended 2003/3 Road detritus. Tbtal rainfall amount was less than the required 0.1 2003/3r 9/26/03 R. Sher 0.06 inches 1.5 hours -I Delivery inches, however, good runoff and flow occurred at sample point.Access No other qualifying rainfall event occurred when sampler was available during the quarter.Storm No floating, settled or suspended solids. Color neutral and clear.2003/4 Drain Rad 11/20/03 R. Sher 0.20 inches 4 hours. Neutral odor. No foam or oil sheen..Monitor*North 2003/4 Road .10/27/03 " R. Sher 0.47 inches 8 hour-s No floating or suspended solids. Color neutral. Neutral odor. No Delivery foam or oil sheen. Very slight cloudiness. -Access Storm-3 Drm Benchmark Iron 0 1.1 mg/L total recoverable iron -slightly higher than the 2003/4 Drain Rad 12/11/03 0.62 inches 8 hours* bnhaklvlo .gl Monitor Analysis benchmark level of 1.0 mg/1. Attachment C: Results of Quarterly Visual Examination' of Storm Water Discharges and Benchmark Monitoring Results (Sheet 6 of 11)Storm Visual Summary of Storm Water Discharge Sampling Data Year/Qtr Event Examina r Storm Event Data (Complete records in SerQt oample note if benchmark Date Sample) Licensing Department Files)Storm 2004/1 Drain Rad 3/5/04 R. Sher 0.17 inches 12 hours No floating or suspended solids. Color neutral. Neutral odor. No Monitor foam or oil sheen. A few dirt particles. North Road 3 No floating or suspended solids. Color neutral. Neutral odor. No 2004/1 Delivery 3/25/04 R. Sher 0.11 inches 8 hours foam or oil sheen. A few silt particles. Access Storm Benchmark lion 2004/1 Drain Rad Analysis 0.17 inches 12 hours 0.23 total recoverable iron.Monitor Storm No floating or suspended solids. Color neutral. Slight asphalt 2004/2 Drain Rad 6/9/04 R. Sher 0.35 inches 4 hours odor due to runoff surface. No. foam or oil sheen. No dirt or silt Monitor particles. Storm 2004/2 Drain Benchmark Iron 0.35 inches 4 hours 0.28 total recoverable iron.Monitor Analysis North Light brown color from very fine suspended organic material.2004/2 Road Very fine organic material settled and suspended, a few particles Delivery organic floating due to decay of vegetation. No odor, sheen, or Access foam. Attachment C: Results of Quarterly Visual Examination of Storm Water Discharges and Benchmark Monitoring Results (Sheet 7 of 11)Storm Visual Summary of Storm Water Discharge Sampling Data Sample Event. Eotminaton (or Storm Event Data (Complete records in*Yea r/Qtr Loainnote if benchmark Date Sample) Licensing Department Files)Storm No floating or suspended solids. Small amount of fine settled Mo0anir 7sediment. Color neutral. Neutral odor. No foam or oil sheen.Monitor Storm Benchmark Iron 1.5 mg/L total recoverable iron -slightly higher than the 2004/3 Drain Rad 7/8/04 Analysis 0.12 inches 2.5 hours benchmark level of 1.0 mg/l.Monitor North Neutral color and odor with turbid clarity. No floating or Road 7 2004/3 Delivery 7/8/04 R. Sher .12 inches 2.5 hours suspended solids. Small amounts of very fine detritus probably Accessl due to decaying vegetation. No foam or oil sheen.Storm (Snow storm followed by rain -only qualifying event for quarter)2004/4 Drain Rad 12/17/04 E. Carley .3 inches 8 hours No floating, suspended or settled solids. Neutral odor and color.Monitor No foam or oil sheen.North (Snow storm followed by rain -only qualifying event for quarter)Road Neutral color and odor. No floating or suspended solids. Small 2004/4 Delivery 12/17/04 E. Carley .3 inches 8 hours amouht of settled sediment due to vegetation decay. No foam or Access oil sheen. Attachment C: Results of Quarterly Visual Examination of Storm Water Discharges and Benchmark Monitoring Results (Sheet 8 of 11)Visual Sample .Storm Examination (or Summary of Storm Water Discharge Sampling Data Year/Qtr Event vent Data (Complete records in Date Sample) Licensing Department Files)Storm No floating or suspended solids. Color neutral. Neutral odor. No 2005/1 Drain Rad 3/8/05 A. Legendre 0.82 inches 17 hours Monitorfoam or oil sheen.Monitor Storm No floating or suspended solids. Color neutral. Neutral odor. No 2005/3 Drain Rad 9/15/05 A. Legendre .33 inches 8 hours foam or oil sheen.Monitor North Road Floating or suspended, solids of various organic material, leaves, 2005/4 Delivery 11/15/05 E. Carley .26 inches 18 hours dirt, etc. Slight tint from suspended organics& Turbid clarity from Accessle suspended solids. Neutral odor. No foam or oil sheen.Storm, 2.No floating or suspended solids. Color neutral. Neutral odor. -No 2005/4 Drain Rad 11/15/05 A. Legendre .26 inches 18 hours fa rolsen foam oilsheen.Monitor o Attachment C: Results of Quarterly Visual Examination of Storm Water Discharges and Benchmark Monitoring Results (Sheet 9 of 11)Visual Sample Storm Examination (or Summary of Storm Water Discharge Sampling Data Year/Qtr Event Storm Event Data (Complete records in Location Dae note if benchmark Date Sample) Licensing Department Files)North Floating solids of small bugs and vegetation. Settled solids of dirt 2006/4 Road 9/29/06 M. O'Keefe .23 inches and vegetation. Color neutral. Neutral odor. No foam or oil Delivery sheen.Access North No floating or suspended solids. Color neutral. Neutral odor. No Road foam or oil sheen.2006/4 Delivery 10/17/06 M. O'Keefe .14 inches 6 hours Access North 2006/4 Road 10/17/06 M. O'Keefe 0.14 inches 6 hours No floating or suspended. solids. Color neutral. Neutral odor. No Delivery 0 i so foam or oil sheen.Access There were no samples taken from the Storm Drain Rad Monitor in 2006. Samples were not taken from the North Road Delivery Access for all quarters of 2006 as staff was not available during qualifying rain events in the first, second and third quarters. Condition Report 07-05201 documents~the lack of sampling and corrective actions to prevent recurrence. Attachment C: Results of Quarterly Visual Examination of Storm Water Discharges and Benchmark Monitoring Results (Sheet 10 of 11)Visual Storm Summary of Storm Water Discharge Sampling Data YerQr Sample Eet- Examination (or I Year/Qtr .Event Storm Event Data (Complete records in Location note if benchmark Date Sample) Licensing Department Files)Storm 5 No floating or suspended solids, some sediment. Color. neutral.2007/2 " Drain Rad 5/11/07. A. Legendre .49 inches -3 hours NetaodrNofmorilsen MntrNeutral odor. NO foam or oil sheen.Monitor" Storm No fidating or suspended solids. Color neutral. Neutral odor. No 2007/3 Drain Rad 7/23/07 A. Legendre .14 inches 13 hours foam or oil sheen.Monitor North Nort Minor' floating, suspended, and settled solids from general.2007/4 Road 7/23/07 E. Carley .14 inches 13 hours pavement runoff. Color neutral. Neutral odor. No foam or oil Delivery sheen.Access North 2007/3 Road 8/6/07 E. Carley .42 inches 3 hours No floating or suspended solids, minor settled solids. Color Delivery neutral. Neutral odor. No foam or oil sheen.Access Storm 2008/2 Drain Rad. 6/4/08 S. Gagnon .25 inches 10 hours No floating or suspended solids, minor settled solids.. Color neutral. Neutral odor. No foam or oil sheen.Monitorth N h No floating minor settled and suspended solids from road salt and 2008/2 Road 6/4/08 S. Gagnon .25 inches 10 hours pollen. Color slightly grey haze. Neutral odor. No foam or oil Delivery sheen.Access Attachment C: Results. of Quarterly Visual Examination -of Storm Water Discharges and Benchmark Monitoring Results (Sheet 11 of 11)Storm Visual Summary of Storm Water Discharge Sampling Data Sample Event Examination (or Storm Event Data (Complete records in ear/tr Location note if benchmark ,Date *Sml)Licensing Department Files)Sample) Fls North 2009/2 Road 5/14/09 S. Gagnon .21 6 hours Slightly yellow and cloudy with no odor, pollen with salt and sand Delivery runoff Access Storm 2009/2 Drain Rad 6/9/09 S. Gagnon .10 12 hours Very fine particles suspended and settled pollen Monitor North Norah Neutral color and odor. Sample was clear except for heavy pollen, 2009/2 Road 6/9/09 S. Gagnon .10 12 hours very little sand and salt from runoff. Runoff was heavy in yellow Delivery pollen.Access Storm 2009/2 Drain Rad 6/18/09 S. Gagnon 1.5 24 hours No pollutants, clear sample Monitor North 2009/3 Road 8/11/09 5. Gagnon 1.0 3 hours Grayish clear water with heavy amount of bugs, some pollen, sand Delivery and organic matter =Access Storm 2009/3 Drain Rad 8/11/09 S. Gagnon 1.0 3 hours Sample clear of pollutants -preserved for Iron Benchmark Monitor Attachment D: Endangered Species and Historic Places Assessment (Sheet 1 of 16)Industrial facilities are eligible for coverage under the Storm Water Multi-sector General Permit (MSGP) if their storm water discharges do not impact listed endangered or threatened species or critical habitat.(per MSGP Section 1.1.4.5). The following information documents the basis for Seabrook Station's eligibility for coverage under the MSGP with respect to listed endangered or threatened species or critical habitat.Seabrook Station meets the MSGP Eligibility Criterion A since no endangered or threatened species or critical habitat are in proximity to the facility or the locations where storm water discharges reach the receiving waters that includes the surrounding salt marsh and Atlantic Ocean. The surrounding salt marsh and Atlantic Ocean (proximate to the cooling water system discharge diffuser nozzles) constitute the "action area" for storm water discharges. Informal consultation with U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service in support of a future extension of the Seabrook Station Operating License confirms the Eligibility Criterion A determination. As required by MSGP Addendum A Eligibility Criteria A the following documentation is attached: 1. U.S Fish and Wildlife Service Listing of "Federally Listed Endangered and Threatened Species in New Hampshire" dated July 31, 2008.2. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service letter dated May 14, 2009 concluding "No Federally listed or proposed threatened or endangered species or critical habitat are known to occur in the project areas".3. NH Fish and Game Department listing of "Endangered and Threatened Wildlife of New Hampshire" effective September 20, 2008.4. NH Natural Heritage Bureau "Rare Plants, Rare Animals, and Exemplary Natural Communities in New Hampshire Towns," dated July 2009.5. Request for Project Review by the NH Division of Historical Resources April 24, 2009 concluding that the proposed 20 year license extension will not impact historical resources. 1 Attachment D:.Endangered Species and Historic Places Assessment (Sheet 2 of 16)FEDERALLY LISTED ENDANGERED AND THREATENED SPECIES IN NEW HAMPSHIRE COUNTY SPECIES FEDERAL CENERAL TOWNS, STATUS LOCATION/IHABITAT __" Belknap Small whorled Pogonia Threateiied Forests with somewhat poorly Meredith, Alton and drained soils and/or a seasonally Laconia hi.h water table Carroll Small whorled Pogonia Threatened Forests with somewhat poorly Albany, Eaton, Madison./drained soils and/or a seasonally Wolfeboro, Brookfield '_*_ high water table and Wakefield Cons Canada Lynx Threatened Regenerating softwood forest, All 'Towns asually with a high density of snowshoe hare.Dwarf wedgesmunsel Endangered Connecticut River main channel Northumbcrland, and Johns River Lancaster and Dalton Cheshire Drwarf wedgernassel Endangered S. Branch Ashuelot River and Swanzey, Keene and.Ashuelot River Surry -Grafton Dwarf Endangered Connecticut River main channel Haverhill, Piermont, I Orford and Lyme Small whorled Pogunia Threatened. Forests with somewhat poorly Holderncss drained soils and/or a seasonally _ high water table Hillsborough Small whorledPogonia Threatened Forests with somewhat poorly Weare drained soils and/or a seasonally high water table " Merrimack Kamer Blue Butterfly Endangered Pine Barrens with wild blue Concord and Pembroke lupine Small whorled Pogonia Threatened Forests Danbury, Epsom, Warner and Allenstown Rockingham Piping Plover Threatened Coastal Beaches Hampton and Seabrook Roseate Tern Endangered Atlantic Ocean and nesting at the Isle of Shoals Small whorled Pogonia Threatened Forests Northwood, Nottingham, and Epping Strafford Small whorledPogonia Threatened Forests with somewhat poorly Middleton, New Durham, drained soils and/or a seasonally Milton, Farmington, high water table Strafford, Barrington, and S _Madbury Sullivan Northeastern bulrush Endangered Wetlands Acworth, Charlestown,_ _ _ _Langdon and Walpole Dwarf wcdgtmusicl Endangered Conneuticut River main channel Plainfield, Cornish, Claremont and Charlestown .Jesup's milk-vetch Endangered Banks of the Connecticut River Plainfleld and Claremont-Eastern cougar, gray wolf and Puritan tiger beetle are considered extirpated in New Hampshire.-Endangered gray wolves are not known to be present in New Hampshire, but dispersing individuals from source populations in Canada may occur stateivide.-There is no federally-designated Critical Habitat in New Hampshire. 7/31/2008 2 Attachment D: Endangered Species and Historic Places Assessment (Sheet 3 of 16)United States Department of the Interior FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICE New England Field Office 70 Commercial Street, Suite 300 SConcord, New'Hampshire 03301-5087

Dear Mr. O'Keefe:

This responds to your recent correspondence requesting information on the presence of federally-listed and/or proposed endangered or threatened species in relation to the Seabrook Station (Station)in Seabrook, New Hampshire. FiL Energy Seabrook Station plans to apply to the Nuclear Regulatory Commission for renewal of the Operating License for 20 years beyond the current expiration date of Marmb 15, 2030.No federally-listed or proposed, threatened or endangered species or critical habitat under the jurisdiction of the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service are known to occur in the project areas. However, the federally-threatened piping plover (Charadrius melodus) is known to nest on the coastal beaches located approximately

1.8 miles

cast of the Station. This office is not aware of any impacts to the piping plover that could be attributed to the operation of the Station. In addition, the federally-endangered roseate tern (Sterna dougallii) is known to occur in the coastal waters ofNew Hampshire and is likely to be found in the vicinity of the cooling water intake and discharge structures. Because these structures are located approximately

1.3 miles

offshore in about 60 feet of water, no effects to the roseate tern or its habitat are known or anticipated. Preparation of a Biological Assessment or further consultation with us under Section 7 of the Endangered Species Act is not required.While there are no occurrences of federally-listed species in the project area, the New England cottontail (Sylvilagus transitionatis) is known to occur in the Towns ofDerry and Londonderry, New Hampshire. Furthermore, our records indicate that the New England cottontail has been recorded at a sitejust east of the Scobie Pond substation in Derry, New Hampshire. The U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service announced the New England cottontail as a Candidate Species for listing on September 12, 2006 in the Federal Register (50 CFR part 17). While the New England cottontail remains an official candidate species, there is currently no legal federal obligation to avoid affecting the habitat of the species. However, the New England cottontail is state-listed as an endangered species by the New Hampshire Department of Fish and Game (NHDF&G), and we suggest that you contact the NHDF&G for further guidance.3 Attachment D: Endangered Species and Historic Places Assessment (Sheet 4 of 16).Michael O Keefe 2 May 15, 2009 New England cottontails are considered habitat specialists; insofar as they are dependent on early-successional habitats typically described as thickets. In addition to New England cottontails demonstrating a strong affinity for heavy cover, they arc also reluctant to stray from it (>5 in), Habitats of this type are typically associated with beaver-flowage wetlands, idle agricultural lands, power line corridors, railroad right-of-ways, and patches of rcgcnerating forests, In contrast, castcrn cottontails (which can often be found living with New England cottontails) appear to have relatively generalized habitat requirements and can often be found in residential-type habitats, such as private lawns, golf courses, and active agriculture areas.Vegetation management along utility right-of-ways has a significant impact on the New England cottontail. In fact, there is strong evidence that take of New England cottontails has occurred as a result of powerline right-of-way management. Long-term management that converts scrub-shrub corridors into herbaceous covers serves to eliminate habitat and binder dispersal, while short-term management of shrubs serves as a temporary impact to habitat. These short-term impacts to shrub vegetation are necessary to ensure that successional forces do not proceed todthe point where habitat is no longer suitable for the New England cottontail. Given the conservation status of this species, a full federal listing in the future is probable. As such, it maybe beneficial to begin a discussion about how your company could manage habitat for this species.This concludes our review of listed species and critical habitat in the project locations and environs.referenced above. No further Endangered Species Act coordination of this type is necessary for a period of one year from the date of this letter, unless additional information on listed or proposed species becomes available. In order to curtail the need to contact this office in the future for updated lists of federally-listed or proposed threatened or endangered species and critical habitats, please visit the Endangered Species Consultation page on the New England Field Office's website: www.fws.gov/northeastlnewenglandfieldoftice/EndangeredSpee-Consultation.htm In addition, there is a link to procedures that may allow you to conclude ifhabitat for a listed species is present in the project area. If no habitat exists, then no federally-listed species are present in the project area and there is no need to contact us for further consultation. If the above conclusion cannot be reached, further consultation with this office is advised. Information describing the nature and location of the proposed activity that should be provided to us for further informal consultation can be found at the above-referenced site.4 Attachment D: Endangered Species and Historic Places Assessment (Sheet 5 of 16)M4ichael O Keefe 3IS, 2D09 Thank you for your coordination. Please contact Anthony Tur at 603-223-2541 to discuss management ofthe transmission corridors and their impacts to the New England cottontailR or if we can be of further assistance. Sincerely yours," Eric L. Derleth Acting Supervisor New England Field Office 5 Attachment D: Endangered Species and Historic Places Assessment (Sheet 6 of 16)Endangered wildlife are those native species that are in danger of extinction In New Hampshire because of a loss or change in habitat, over-exAploitation, predation, com-petition, disease, disturbance or contamination. Assistance is needed to ensure these species' continued existence as viable members of the state's wildlife community. INVERTEBRATES Dwarf wedge mussel, Alasmidonta heterodon** Brook floater mussel, Alasmtdonta varicose Ringed boghaunter, WI//iamsonia //ntneri Cobblestone tiger beetle, Cicindela margin/pennis Puritan tiger beetle, Cicindela puritana*Frosted elfin butterfly, Callophtys irus Karner blue butterfly, Lycaeides melissa samue/is** White Mountain fritillary, Boloria titania montinus Persius duskywing skipper, Erynnis persius FISH American brook lamprey, Lampetra bifrenatus Shortnose sturgeon, Acipenserbrevirostrum** REPTILES Blanding's turtle, Emydoidea blandingli Eastern hognose snake, Heterodon plafirhinos Timber rattlesnake, Crotalus horridus AMPHIBIANS Marbled salamander, Ambystorna opacum BIRDS Northern harrier, Circus cyaneus Golden eagle, Aquila chrysaetos Common nighthawk, Chordei/es minor Piping plover, Charaddus melodus*Upland sandpiper, Bartramia long/cauda Roseate tern, Sterna dougal//i** Least tern, Sterna antillarum Sedge wren, Clstothorus platensis MAMMALS Small-footed bat, Myots /elbli New England cottontail, Sylvilagus transitlonalis Canada lynx, Lynx canadensis* Gray wolf, Canis lupus** Federaty Threatened -Federally Endangered Tt"rATEN[ED Threatened wildlife are those native species that are likely to become endangered in the near'future, if conditions surrounding them begin, or continue, to decline.INVERTEBRATES Pine pinion moth, Lithophane lepida lepida White Mountain arctic, Oeneis melissa semidea FISH Bridle shiner, Notropis bifrenatus REPTILES Spotted turtle, Clemmys guttata Black racer, Coluber constrictor AMPHIBIANS (none)BIRDS Pied-billed grebe, Podilymbus podiceps Common loon, Gavia immer Bald eagle, Haliaetus leucocephalus Peregrine falcon, Falco peregrinus Common tem, Sterna hltund.American three-toed woodpecker, Picoides dorsal/s Grasshopper sparrow, Ammodramus savannarum MAMMALS American marten, Mattes americana Omi-qC n an efith-6 6ir~ri,4 Est d 6ak 6eparnl 6 Attachment D: Endangered Species and Historic Places Assessment (Sheet 7 of 16)history of Endangered Wildlife Protection in New Hampslire 1973 -The Endangered Species Act, a federal law, was passed. It protects wildlife and plant species in danger of nationwide extinction. 1979 -The New Hampshire Endangered Species Conservation Act was passed, giving New Hampshire Fish and Game Department the authority to protect wildlife in danger of becoming extinct in New Hampshire. 1980 -The first list of New Hampshire threatened and endangered wildlife was created.1987 & 2000 -The New Hampshire threatened and endangered wildlife list was revised.2006 -The first New Hampshire Wildlife Action Plan took effect.2008 -The current New Hampshire threatened and endangered wildlife list took effect on 9/20/08.The list of New Hampshire's endangered and threatened wildlife Is maintained by the New Hampshire Fish and Game Department. The list is used to determine protection and management actions necessary to ensure the survival of the state's endangered and threatened wildlife. State and federal agencies and numer-ous New Hampshire nonprofit conservation organizations work cooperatively to protect and manage the state's wildlife. The Fish and Game Department has legal authority regarding all wildlife, game, nongame and endangered or threatened species.This work is made possible through federal- grants, the sale of N.H. Conservation License Plates (moose plates) and private contributions. Donations to the Nongame Program are matched by state dollars. With your help we are able to protect New Hampshire's wildlife.For more information about the Nongame and Endangered Wildlife Program, to report a sighting of endangered or threatened wildlife, or to make a contribution, contact: Nongame and Endangered Wildlife Program New Hampshire Fish and Game Department 11 Hazen Drive, Concord, NH 03301 (603) 271-2461 www.WildNH.com NHCIOM .bld 7 Attachment D: Endangered Species and Historic Places Assessment (Sheet 8 of 16)NEw HAMPSHIRE NATURAL HERITAGE BuREAU DRED -DIVISION OF FORESTS &.LANDS PO Box 1856 -172 PEMBIROKE ROAD, CONCORD, NH 03302-1856 (603) 271-2214 Rare Plants, Rare Animals, and Exemplary Natural Communities in New Hampshire Towns'July 2009 8 Attachment D: Endangered Species and Historic Places Assessment (Sheet 9 of 16)NNil Naural Heritage Bureau NiH Natural Heritage is a bureau in the Division of Forests & Lands. Our mission Is to find, track, mid facilitate the protection of New Hampshire's rare plants and exemplary natural communities (which are essentially different types of forests, wetlands, grasslands, etc). We currently study more than 740 plant and animal species, 195 natural communities. Our database contains information on more than 5,500 species or natural community occurrences throughout the state.Plants, Animal, and Natural Communilies Tracked by the NiU Natural Heritage Bureau The following lists note the rare plants, rare animals, and exemplary natural communities that the NH Natural Heritage Bureau has on record in each town. This document may not be used as a substitute for NH Natural Heritage Bureau reviews that are required bythe Department of Environmental Services, Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, or any other local, state, or federal government agency. Afew species that are highly vulnerable to collection are not inclucled in the town lists. In addition, the list is dynamic: as new populations and natural communities are reported to our office, the list grows. Planners and interested residents should therefore contact the N-i Natural Heritage Bureau directly if they need up-to-date information or have questions.- Exremplary Vatural Communities Natural communities are basically different types of forests, wetlands, grasslands, etc.: formally defined as assemblages ofplants and animals that recur in predictable patterns across the landscape under similar physical conditions. Most of the New Hampshire landscape is covered by relatively common natural community types. Scattered throughout the state, however, and usually in predictable areas, are distinctive communities found in few other places.Particular sets of natural communities tend to co-occur in the landscape and are linked by a common set of driving forces, such as landforms, flooding, soils, and nutrient regime. These are referred to as natural community systems. Systems are at an appropriate scale for many conservation applications, including mapping and predictive modeling, correspondence to wildlite and wildlife habitats, and as direct conservation targets in conservation planning.The NH Natural Heritage Bureau tracks "exemplary" natural community and system occurrences-To qualify as exemplary, a natural community or system in a given place must be of a rare type, such as a calcareous riverside seep, or must be a very old occurrence ofa common community in good condition, such as an old-growth spruce -fir forest Rare Plant Species The NH Natural Heritage Bureau tracks the state's rarest and most imperiled plant species. We have identilied these plants in cooperation with researchers, conservation organizations such as The Nature Conservancy, and knowledgeable amateur botanists-We obtained plant locations from sources including herbarium specimens (some dating from the late 1800s), personal contacts, the scientific literature, and through extensive field research. The NH Natural Heritage Bureau undertakes surveys on private property only with landowner permission, Rare Animal Species The NH Natural Heritage Bureau tracks rare animal species in cooperation with the Nongame &Endangered Wildlife Program of the NH Fish & Game Department. The Nongame Program has idcntified these species in cooperation with researchers, conservation organizations such as the Audubon 9 Attachment D: Endangered Species and Historic Places Assessment (Sheet 10 of 16)Nl-IINaiural lerfltag Bureau'Society of New Hampshire, Iiowledgeable amateur biologists, and the NI-I Natural Heritage Bureau.Wildlife locations were obtained from sources including museum specimens, personal contacts, tiie scientific literature, and through extensive field research.For each plant,-animal, and exemplary natural community within a town, we have provided the following information: Name Plants: Readers should remember that common names vary across the range of the plant. For example, "wild lupine" (Zupinus perennis) in New Hampshire is called"wild blue lupine" in New York and "sundial lupine" in other parts of its range; the name also commonly leads to confusion with garden lupine (Lupinuspolyphyllus) which is not native to New Hampshire but grows wild in some areas. Scientific names are standardized with the scientific names used by other Natural Heritage prograins throughout North and South America. The primary refcrcnces-used are: Flora of North Anmerica Editorial 1993-2003. Flora of North America North of Mexico, vols. 1-4, 22, 23,25,26. Oxford University Press, NY.Kartesz, J.T. and I. Kartcsz. 1980. A Synonynmted Checklist of the Vascular Flora of the United States, Canada, and Greenland. vol. 2 -Thc Bliota of North Amei'ca, "lhe Univey of North CarolinaPress, Chapel Thill, NC.Wildlife: Common names are provided for all species that have them, Many insect species, particularly moths, do not have common names, so geneial terms such as "A Noctuid Moth" are used or no name is given ("--"). Scientific names are standardized with the scientific names used by otherNatural Heritage programs throughout the United States, Canada, the Caribbean, Latin America, and South America.Natural Communities: The names of natural communities reflect the plants that help define them, such as a Beech Forest, or the environmental processes that influence them, such as a Boulder -Cobble River Channel.Listlng Plants: Most of New Hampshire's rare plants are listed as "threatened" or"endangered" under the NH Native Plant Protection Act of 1987 (NH RSA 217-A).The most recent revision of the list came into effect on June 25, 2005. A subset of species are also listed under the federal Endangered Species Act of 1973 (42 USCA-4 4321-4370c). Listing represents apolitical recognition of rarity, so some species that are biologically rare (and therefore included in the list) may not be listed as"threatened" or "endangered." Under the NH Native Plant Protection Act,'endangered" species are those in danger of being extirpated from the state, while"threatened" species face the possibility of becoming "endangered." The presence ofa rare plant or natural community does not limit a landowners ability to use their land -this is stated explicitly in the NH Native Plant Protection Act.Landowners applying for state wetland permits are required by the NH Department of Environmental Services to review options for achieving their land-use objectives while protecting a rare plant or natural community, but projects will not be denied solely on the basis of a rare plant occurrence. In our experience, rare plants are typically destroyed because landowners are not aware of them; minor changes to their projects usually could have saved the rarities. Ourgoal is to help landowners protect rarities on their properties voluntarily. 10 Attachment D: Endangered Species and Historic Places Assessment (Sheet 11 of 16)Known Locations X1i1 Natural Hritag. Bureau Wildlife: A portion ofNew Hampshire's rare animals are listed as "threatened" or"endangered" wider the NH Endangered Species Conservation Act of 1979 (NH- RSA 212-A). A subset of these species are also listed under the federal Endangered Species Act o 1973 (42 USCA na 43214370c). As with plants, listing represents a political recognition ofrarity, so some species that are biologically rare (and therefore included in the list) may not be listed as "threatened" or "endangered." Under the NH Endangered Species Conservation Act, "endangered" species are those in danger of being extirpated from the state, while "threatened" species face the possiility of becoming "endangered." Rare wildlife ib New Hampshire are under thejurisdiction of the Nongame and Endangered Wildlife Program in the N-i Fish & Game Department. We have noted the number of occurrences or a given plant, animal, or natural community within each town. There has not been a comprehensive search of the state for rare species or natural communities, so we arc frequently finding or learning about previouly unknown populations, Further, many rare plant and animal populations have not been checked since they were originally found, sometimes more than 50 years ago, so we do not know the status of these populations. We have listed populations that have not been reported to us in the last 20 years as *historical only"; these populations may still be present, but field surveys are necessary to confirm their survival.We have also included the number of known occurrences of each plant, animal, end natural community within the entire state. Ifino locations are indicated (- -), the species is known to have once occurred in the state; but specific sites are not in our database.When considering the rarity of a species, it is important to consider the status ofa species both in New Hampshire and across its total range. Some spchi=, such as the wildflower Jesup's milk-vtclh (Astragalus robbinsii var.jesupio, are critically imperiled both globally and in New Hampshire. fesup's milk-vetch has three known populations on the planet, all on a 16-mile stretch of the Connecticut River. Other species, such as small yellow lady's-slipper (Cypripedium parvjflorain), are very rare in New Hampshire but quite common in other parts of their range.We refer to a plant species as "globally are" if it has fewer than 20 populations anywhere in the world, or If it has more populations but few reproducing individuals. "State rare" species are those that may be common elsewhere, but have few populations or total individuals in New Hampshire. The rankings for wildlife are based more on the degree of imperilment than on the number of occurrences in the state, although abundance certainly plays a role in assessing a species' long-term viability in New Hampshire. Some species, such as the fish crow (Corms ossffragus) have only a few occurreoces in New Hampshire but, since they are expanding northward into the state, they are considered to be vulnerable but not imperiled. Blanding's turtles (Emydoidea blandingio, on the other hand, appear to be distributed fairly broadly across the state, but populations am small and vulnerable to habitat loss, so they am considered at risk.Flags 11 Attachment D: Endangered Species and Historic Places Assessment (Sheet 12 of 16)NH Natnral Heritage Bureau (The relative quality of a rare species population or natural community is also important when assessing its conservation importance. We consider all populations to be of high conservatiori value, but an "exceleut" population (say with several hundred plants) of a globally rare species is particularly important when compared to a "marginal" population (say with only five plants).To help planners assess the relative importance of rare species and exem'plary natural c6mmunities in their town, we have attached "flags" to occurrences that have been recorded in the last 20 years. The flags are as follows: H" lighest An excellent example of a globally rare species or natural community* Extremely High A good example of a global rarity or an excellent example of a state rarity** Very 1igh A marginal example of a global rarity or a good example of a state rarity* High A marginal example of a state rarity Readers should remember that there are many different ways to assess the value of a rare species population or a natural community. We therefore recommend that towns contact the NH Natural Heritage Bureau at (603) 271-2214 to discuss why occurrences in their towns were flagged at each level Note In addition to recognizing Endangered mid Threatened plant species, the NH Native Plant Protection Act identifies II plants as Special Concern. These species are somewhat uncommon in New Hampshire, and are at risk of decline due to ov"r-collecion, The NH Natural Heritage Bureau does not track these species.Narrow-leaf wild leek A/lium trfrocL-nm var. burdkcki Wild leek A4Itu1a Iricoccum var. tricetccm Wild gingcr A-wrum canadense GChnt blue cohosh Calophyllum giganweum Bla cohosh Caulophyllum Ihalicirrides Sea Limonium carollnianum Ostrich fern Matteuccla strshtopterlt var. pen'vavnica Canadian bumet Sngsuixsrba cuanadtnis Slippery tlm Ulmis rubra If you have any questions or need additional information, please do not hesitate to contact us. Thank youl Addbess: NH Natural HeritagelDRED Telephone: (603) 271-2214 Fox: (603)271-6488 PO Box 1856 Concord, NH 03302-1856 l Web page: wwwnkgov/dmd/dvisions/fosertandlsnds/bueeau. 12 Attachment D: Endangered Species and Historic Places Assessment (Sheet 13 of 16)NH NaWral Heritage'Bureau Town Listed? # reported last 20 Flag Species or Community Name Federal State Town State Seabrook Natural Communities .Terrestrial Bayberry -beach plum maritime shrubland -I -2* Beach grass grassland.. -3 4 Dry Appalachian oak -hickory forest 15* HLodsonia maritme shrubland -1*: 1* Maritime wooded dune -I 1 Natural Communities -Palustrine

  • Coastal interdunal marsh/swalo I Natural Communities

-Estuarine Brackish marsh -- 2 13 Coastal shoreline strand/svwale -- 1 1 l*High salt marsh .-1 14 Low salt marsh -1 6 Saline/bracksh intertidal flat -1 6 Sallne/braddsh subtidal channel/bay bottom -1 6*Tidal creek bottom -1 6 Plants* American Plum (Prunus amerfcana) -E 1 7 Arethusa (Arethusa bulbosa) -T Historical 21 Beach Grass (Ammophila brevi/igulata) -T 3 10 Bulbous Bitter Cress (Cardamine bulbosa) -E Historical 5 Climbing Hempweed (Mlkanla acandons) -T Historical 10 Coast-blite Goosefoot (Chenapodlum rubrum) -E Historical 6 Common Sandbur (Cenchjus'ongispinus) -E Historical 11 Cross Polygala (Pogala cruciata var. aqulbonia) -E Historical 3 Dwarf Glasswort (Salic/rmia bigeloviI) -E 2 7 Engelmann's Qulllwort (Ioeles engelmannt) -E Historical Is Erect Knotweed (Pol'gonUm ereclum) -E Historical 3 Gray's Umbrella Sedge (Cype/m grayi) -- E 3 1-Hackberry (Ceit/s occidentalis). -T 1 15* Hairy Hudsonla (Hudsohla tomentosa var. tomentosa) -T 3 5 Hay Sedge (Carex sicoata) -E Historical 5 Inkberry (Ifex glabra) -E Historical I Long-fruited Anemone (Anemone mylnd'ice) -E Historical 11-Missouri Rock Cress (Arebls missoudensis) -T 1 13 Netted Chain Fern (Woodwardia areolata) -E Historical 4 Nuttalls Reedgrass (Calamagroslis cinnoides) -E Historical 6 Orange Horse-gentian (Tnostoum eurantlacum) -E 2 2 Prolific Knotweed (Po/ygonum profificum) -E Historical 9 Robust Knotwe4d (Persicarda rbustbor)- E Historical 6 Salt Marsh Fleabane (Pluchea odorata var. succulenta) -E 1 I Salt-loving Spike-rush (Eleochads uniglumis) -T 2 12 Salt-marsh Gerardla (Aga/inis mar*lma) -T 4 10 Salt-meadow Grass (Leptochloa fusca ssp. fasciculads) -E Historical 1 Listed? E= Endangered T= Threatened W= Special concern (watch list) M =Monitored Flags 1H1lihestlmportance -These flags are based on acomblnlteon of(1) how rare the species or community Is and ExtremelylhighnIportance (2) how large or healthy its examples are inathattown. Please.contacttheNatural Very high impcrtance Heritage Bureau at (603) 271-2214 to eam morm about approaches to setting priorities. H =i'gh importance July 2009 IS5 13 Attachment D: Endangered Species and Historic Places Assessment (Sheet 14 of 16)Nit Natural Heritag[e Starant Town Flag Species or Community Name Sand Dropsod (Sporobolus cryptandras) Sea-beach Needle Grass (Adsttica tuberculosa) Sea-chickweed (Honckenya peploides sasp. mbusa)" Small Spike-rush (Elcocharispaavula)i -.Tall Wormwood (AMtemitsa campnstris ssp. caudata)TubularThoroughwort (Eupatodurn fistu/osum) Tundra Alkali Grass (Puscei/nia tene/la sap. /angeana)Woody Glasswort (Sarcocmina purennis)Yellow Thistle (am/um hoindulum) Vertebrates -Birds Common Tern (Sterna hirundo)Piping Plover (Charaddys motodus)WVilet (Catopbmphorus semilealalus) Vertebrates -Reptiles Blanding's Turtle (Ernydoklea bland/ngh/) Second Collene Natural Communities -Riverlne Montase/near-boreal floodplain system Natural Communities -Terrestrial Lowland spruce -fir forest Montane circumneutmil diff Natural Communities -Palustrine -Acidic riverbank outcrop Acidic rivemide seep-High-gradient rocky riverbank system Moderate-gradlent sandy-cobbly riverbank system Sugar maple -silver maple -white ash floodplaIn forest Plants roanchl/ng Bur-reed (Sparganimr androcaladum)

    • Cranesbill (Geranium caoinianum var. oonferbflotrn)" Fragrant Fern (Dryopteis ftgrans)Green Adders Mouth (Malaxis unifoioa)Lance-leaved Draba (Drabs brewer/var.

cone)Mountain Sweet Cieey (Osmorhiza berterem)Nodding Sticksaed (Hackftea deflexa var. americana) Robinson's Hawkweed (1-r/erclum rabinsonk) White Bluegrass (Poea g/auca)Vertebrates -Mammals-American Marten (Mattes americana) Vertebrates -Birds Osprey (Pandion ha/baetus)

  • Peregrine Faloon (Faftopetegdnus anatun)Ring-necked Duck (Aythya co//er/)Listed? # reported last 2.Federal State Town State-T 1 5-E 3 2-- -Historical 1-T 1 21-T 3 4-G Historical 7-E Historical 7-E Historical 4-E Historical 3 T T 1 9 T, E I-C 1 5 E 11$--Historical

--1 1-- 1.--2-,- 2-E Hlistorical -I I-T 1-T Historical -I 1-E Historical -E Historical -I I E Historical -T 7-C 2 M T I--Historical 6 IS 6 4 7 3 2 15 57 1.22 1 1 a 69 76 11 9 Listed7 E= Endangered T e Tlhreavenad W -Speclal conQemr (wolctCloll M-= Monfloed.Flags -- -gChest Impordanoe These larss am bsed on a cemetinatn of (1) how rare sle apades or communlry is and Satremely hIighlnporltance (2) how large or healthy its am In that town. Please contact ft Natural-Very high Irnpcrsnce Imeritage Bureau at (O3) 271-2214 to learn mere about approaches to settng plriotles.

  • -lIsh lsperlaree July 2009 151 14 Attachment D: Endangered Species and Historic Places Assessment (Sheet 15 of 16)Please mail the completed form and required material to: New Hampshire Division of Historical Resources State Historic Preservation Office Attention:

Review & Compliance 19 Pillsbury Street, Concord, NH '03301-3570 1)113 Use Only leglaDatn k d SAl)tO Y pease-Cc LuI L-)LuJ Request for. Project Review by the New Hampshire Division of Historical Resources UThis is a new submittal. [lThis is additional information relating to DHR Review #.GENERAL PROJECT INFORMATION Project Title License Renewal for the Seabrook Sta ion Nuclear Power Plant Project Location Seabrook, New Hampshire NH State Plane Geographic Coordinates: Easting 1202708 Northing 146127 Lead Federal Agency Nuclear Regulatory Commisaion (Agency providing funds, licenses, or permits)Permit or Job Reference# n/e State Agency and Contact (if applicable) Permit or Job Reference

  1. APPLICANT INFORMATION Applicant Name FPL Energy Seabrook, LLC StreetAddress Seabrook Station, P.O. Box 300, Lafayette Road Phone Number 6037737000 City Seabrook State NH Zip 03874 Email CONTACT PERSON TO RECEIVE RESPONSE Name/Company Mr. Richard Clichd I FPL Energy Seabrook, LLC Street Addreas Seabrook Station, P.O. Box 800, Lafayette Road Phone Number 6037737003 City Seabrook State NH Zip 03814 Email richardccliehefpl.com Please refer to the Request for Project Review manual for direction on completinC this form. Submit one copy of this p ct review form for each project for which review is requested.

-.S.&. .Project submissions will not be accepted via facsimile or e-mail. This form is required.Review request form must be complete for review to begin, Incomplete forms will be sent back to the applicant without commont. Please be aware that this form may onlyinitiate consultation. For some projects, the Division of Historical Resources (DHR) may require additional information to complete our review. All items and supporting documentation submitted with a review request, including photographs and publications, must be retained by the DHR as part of its review records. Items to be kept confidential should be dearly identified. For qucations regarding the DUR review process, pkease visit our website at: http:/lwwwnh.gov/nhdhr/review or contact the R&C Specialist at 603.271.3558. 15 Attachment D:'Endangered Species and Historic Places Assessment (Sheet 16 of 16)P~O~CTOUNDA1ESA

PI4D P:E1?770nN-R.EQUIRED"Attach the relevant portion of a 7.5' USGS Map (photocopied or computer-generated) indicating the defined project boundary.[] Attach a detailed written doscription of the proposed project. Inalude: (I) a narrative description of the proposed project; (2) site plan: (3) photos and description of the proposed work if the project involves rehabilitation, demolition, additions, or alterations to existing buildings or structures; and (4) a photocopy of the relevant portion of a soils map (if accessible) for ground-disturbing projects, Archigeelare Axe there any buildings or structures within the project area? [ Yes I] No If yea, submit all of the following information:

Approximate age(s): C] Photographs of each building located within the project area along with a photo key. Include atreetacapo images if applicable. (Digital photograpphs are accepted. All photographA must be clear, crisp and focused)Please note that as part of the review process, the DHR may request an architectural survey or other additional information. Archaepig Does the proposed undertaking involve ground-disturbing activity? C] Yes [] No If yea, submit all of the following information: F] Project specific map and/or preliminary site plan that fully describes the project boundaries and areas of proposed excavation. F] Description of current and previous land use and disturbances. El Any available information concerning known or suspected archaeological resources within the project area.Please note that as part of the review process, the DHR may request an archaeological survey or other additional information. ential to cause Effects Aditionnl iaformationais needflin or ..arco-xplate our review,.verse iffe UNoH' at-.i Propert.es.i. .eted' ", .Advee e .t me 'm 'I. .If plans orxpaourceara diecover.4.in th. couree.of-thiýprojeeýt, r mat contact the Divisioneof Historieal Resources as re quired byfdersIe-1aia;sand týeg tirq*-AnthorizedlSignature: t' ~ e L +/-k~16 General Permit United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA)National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES)MULTI-SECTOR GENERAL PERMIT FOR STORMWATER DISCHARGES ASSOCIATED WITH INDUSTRIAL ACTIVITY (MSGP)AUTHORIZATION TO DISCHARGE UNDER THE NATIONAL POLLUTANT DISCHARGE ELIMINATION SYSTEM In compliance with the provisions of the Clean Water Act (CWA), as amended (33 U.S.C. 1251 et seq.), operators of stormwater discharges associated with industrial activity located in an area identified in Appendix C where EPA is the permitting authority are authorized to discharge to waters of the United States in accordance with the eligibility and Notice of Intent (NOI) requirements, effluent limitations, inspection requirements, and other conditions set forth in this permit. This permit is structured as follows: " general requirements that apply to all facilities are found in Parts 1 through 7;* industry sector-specific requirements are found in Part 8; and* specific requirements that apply in individual States and Indian Country Lands are found in Part 9.The Appendices (A through K) contain additional permit conditions that apply to all operators covered under this permit.This permit becomes effective on September 29, 2008.This permit and the authorization to discharge expire at midnight, September 29, 2013.Robert W. Varney, Regional Administrator Timothy C. Henry, Acting Director, Water Division EPA Region I EPA Region 5 Carl-Axel P. Soderberg, Division Director, Caribbean Miguel 1. Flores, Director, Water Quality Protection Environmental Protection Division Division EPA Region 2 EPA Region 6 Jon M. Capacasa, Director, Water Protection Alexis Strauss, Director, Water Division Division EPA Region 9 EPA Region 3 Michael Gearheard, Director, Office of Water and Watersheds EPA Region 10 Stormwater Discharges Associated with Industrial Activity General Permit NPDES MULTI-SECTOR GENERAL PERMITS FOR STORMWATER DISCHARGES ASSOCIATED WITH INDUSTRIAL ACTIVITY TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. Coverage under this Permit ............. ............................. 1 1.1 E ligib ility ......................................................................................................................................................... 1.1.1 F acilities C overed ..................................................................................................................................... 1 1.1.2 Allowable Stormwater Discharges ................................................................................................... 1 1.1.3 Allowable Non-Stormwater Discharges .............................................................................................. 2 1.1.4 L im itations on C overage .......................................................................................................................... 3 1.1.4.1 Discharges Mixed with Non-Stormwater ................................................................................... 3 1.1.4.2 Stormwater Discharges Associated with Construction Activity ................................................. 3 1.1.4.3 Discharges Currently or Previously Covered by Another Permit .............................................. 3 1.1.4.4 Stormwater Discharges Subject to Effluent Limitations Guidelines ............................. 3 1.1.4.5 Endangered and Threatened Species and Critical Habitat Protection. .................................... 3 1.1.4.6 Historic Properties Preservation ...................................................................................................... 5 1.1.4.7 New Discharges to Water Quality Impaired Waters .................................................................. 6 1.1.4.8 New Discharges to Waters Designated as Tier 3for Antidegradation Purposes. ...................... 7 1.2 P erm it C om p lian ce ........................................................................................................................................ 7 1.3 Authorization under this Permit .................................................................................................................. 7 1.3.1 H ow to O btain A uthorization ................................................................................................................... 7 1.3.2 C ontinuation of this Perm it ...................................................................................................................... 9 1.4 T erm inating C overage ................................................................................................................................ 10 1.4.1 Submitting a Notice of Termination .................................................................................................. 10 1.4.2 When to Submit a Notice of Termination ......................................................................................... 10 1.5 Conditional Exclusion for No Exposure .................................................................................................... I1 1.6 A ltern ativ e P erm its ..................................................................................................................................... 1 1 1.6.1 EPA Requiring Coverage under an Alternative Permit .................................................................... 11 1.6.2 Permittee Requesting Coverage under an Alternative Permit ........................................................... 11 1.7 S ev erab ility .................................................................................................................................................. 12 2. Control M easures and Effl uent Limits .................................................................... 12 2.1 C ontrol M easu res ........................................................................................................................................ 12 2.1.1 Control Measure Selection and Design Considerations .................................................................... 12 2.1.2 Non-Numeric Technology-Based Effluent Limits (BPT/BAT/BCT) ................................................ 13 2.1.2.1 M inim ize E xp osu re ........................................................................................................................ 13 2 1.2.2 G ood H ousekeep ing ....................................................................................................................... 13 2.1.2.3 M ain ten an ce .................................................................................................................................. 14 2.1.2.4 Spill Prevention and Response Procedures ............................................................................... 14 2.1.2.5 Erosion and Sediment Controls. ............................................................................................... 14 2 1.2.6 M anagem ent of R unoff ................................................................................................................. 15 2.1.2.7 Salt Storage Piles or Piles Containing Salt. .............................................................................. 15 2.1.2.8 Sector Specific Non-Numeric Effluent Limits .......................................................................... 15 2.1.2.9 E m p loy ee T rain ing ........................................................................................................................ 15 2.1.2.10 Non-Stormwater Discharges ..................................................................................................... 15 2.1.2.11 Waste, Garbage and Floatable Debris .......................................................................................... 15 2.1.2.12 Dust Generation and Vehicle Tracking of Industrial Materials. ............................................. 16 2.1.3 Numeric Effluent Limitations Based on Effluent Limitations Guidelines ........................................ 16 2.2 Water Quality-Based Effluent Limitations ......................................................................................... 16 2.2.1 W ater Q uality Standards ........................................................................................................................ 16 2.2.2 Discharges to Water Quality Impaired Waters ................................................................................. 17 2.2.2.1 Existing Discharge to an Impaired Water with an EPA Approved or Established TMDL ......... 17 2.2.22 Existing Discharge to an Impaired Water without an EPA Approved or Established TMDL.... 17 2.223 New Discharge to an Impaired Water ..................................................................................... 17 2.2.3 Tier 2 Antidegradation Requirements for New or Increased Dischargers ........................................ 17 2.3 Requirements Relating to Endangered Species and Historic Properties .......................................... 17 2.4 Requirements Relating to the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) Review ......................... 18 Stormwater Discharges Associated With Industrial Activity ii General Permit 3. C orrective A ctions ........................................................................................................... 18 3.1 Conditions Requiring Review and Revision to Elim inate Problem .................................................. 18 3.2 Conditions Requiring Review to Determine if Modifications Are Necessary .................................. 18 3.3 Corrective Action Deadlines ........................................................................................................................ 18 3.4 Corrective Action Report ........................................................................................................................... 19 3.5 Effect of Corrective Action ......................................................................................................................... 19 3.6 Substantially Identical O utfalls .................................................................................................................. 20 4. Inspections ........................................................................................................................ 20 4.1 Routine Facility Inspections ....................................................................................................................... 20 4.1.1 Routine Facility Inspection Procedures ............................................................................................ 20 4.1.2 Routine Facility Inspection Docum entation ..................................................................................... 20 4.1.3 Exceptions to Routine Facility Inspections ....................................................................................... 21 4.2 Q uarterly Visual Assessm ent of Storm w ater Discharges ................................................................... 21 4.2.1 Quarterly Visual Assessment Procedures .......................................................................................... 21 4.2.2 Quarterly Visual Assessm ent Docum entation ................................................................................... 22 4.2.3 Exceptions to Quarterly Visual Assessments ................................................................................... 22 4.3 Com prehensive Site Inspections .................................................................................. .............................. 24 4.3.1 Com prehensive Site Inspection Procedures ..................................................................................... 24 4.3.2 Com prehensive Site Inspection Docum entation .............................................................................. 25 5. Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) ..................................................... 25 5.1 Contents of Your SW PPP ........................................................................................................................... 26 5.1.1 Storm water Pollution Prevention Team ........................................................................................... 26 5.1.2 Site Description ...................................................................................................................................... 26 5.1.3 Sum m ary of Potential Pollutant Sources ......................................................................................... 27 5.1.3.1 Activities in the area ...................................................................................................................... 27 5.1.3.2 Pollutants ....................................................................................................................................... 28 5.1.3.3 Spills and Leaks. ............................................................................................................................ 28 5.1.3.4 Non-Storm water D ischarges ..................................................................................................... 28 5.1.3.5 Salt Storage .................................................................................................................................... 28 5.1.3.6 Sampling D ata.. ............................................................................................................................... 28 5.1.4 Description of Control M easures ...................................................................................................... 28 5.1.4.1 Control Measures to Meet Technology-Based and Water Quality-Based Effluent Limits .......... 28 5.1.5 Schedules and Procedures ...................................................................................................................... 29 5.1.5.1 Pertaining to Control Measures Used to Comply with the Effluent Limits in Part 2. ............ 29 5.1.5.2 Pertaining to M onitoring and Inspection ................................................................................. 29 5.1.6 Documentation to Support Eligibility Considerations Under Other Federal Laws ........................... 31 5.1.6.1 D ocum entation Regarding Endangered Species ...................................................................... 31 5.1.6.2 Docum entation Regarding H istoric Properties ......................................................................... 31 5.1.6.3 Docum entation Regarding NEPA Review ............................................................................... 31 5.1.7 Signature Requirem ents ......................................................................................................................... 31 5.2 Required SW PPP M odifications ................................................................................................................ 31 5.3 SW PPP Availability .................................................................................................................................... 31 5.4 Additional Docum entation Requirem ents ............................................................................................ 32 6. M onitoring ........................................................................................................................ 33 6.1 M onitoring Procedures ..............................................................................................

................................

33 6.1.1 M onitored Outfalls ................................................................................................................. ............... 33 6.1.2 Com m ingled Discharges ........................................................................................................................ 33 6.1.3 M easurable Storm Events ....................................................................................................................... 33 6.1.4 Sam ple Type .......................................................................................................................................... 34 6.1.5 A dverse W eather Conditions ................................................................................................................. 34 6.1.6 Clim ates w ith Irregular Storm water Runoff ..................................................................................... 34 6.1.7 M onitoring Periods ................................................................................................................................. 34 6.1.8 M onitoring for Allow able N on-Storm water Discharges .................................................................... 35 6.2 Required M onitoring .................................................................................................................................. 35 6.2.1 Benchm ark M onitoring .......................................................................................................................... 35 Stormwater Discharges Associated With Industrial Activity iii General Permit 6.2.1.1 Applicability of Benchm ark M onitoring ................................................................................. 35 6.2.1.2 Benchm ark M onitoring Schedule. .......................................................................................... 36 6.2.1.3 Exception for Inactive and Unstaffed Sites ............................................................................. 37 6.2.2 Effluent Lim itations M onitoring ............................................................................................................ 38 6.2.2.1 M onitoring Based on Effl uent Limitations Guidelines ............................................................ 38 6.2.2.2 Substantially Identical Outfalls .................................................................. 38 6.2.3 State or Tribal Provisions M onitoring .............................................................................................. 38 6.2.3.1 Sectors Required to Conduct State or Tribal M onitoring ....................................................... 38 6.2.3.2 State or Tribal M onitoring Schedule ....................................................................................... 38 6.2.4 D ischarges to Im paired W aters M onitoring ..................................................................................... 39 6.2.4.1 Permittees Required to Monitor Discharges to Impaired Waters ............................................. 39 6.2.4.2 Impaired W aters M onitoring Schedule. .................................................................................. 39 6.2.5 Additional M onitoring Required by EPA ................ I ........................................................................ 40 6.3 Follow-up Actions if Discharge Exceeds Numeric Effluent Limit ..................................................... 40 6.3.1 Subm it an Exceedance Report ................................................................................................................ 40 6.3.2 Continue to M onitor ............................................................................................................................... 40 7. R eporting and R ecordkeeping .................................................................................... 41 7.1 Reporting M onitoring Data to EPA ........................................................................................................... 41 7.2 Annual Report ............................................................................................................................................. 41 7.3 Exceedance Report for Num eric Effl uent Lim its ................................................................................. 41 7.4 Additional Reporting .................................................................................................................................. 42 7.5 Recordkeeping ............................................................................................................................................. 43 7.6 Addresses for Reports ................................................................................................................................. 43 7.6.1 EPA Addresses ....................................................................................................................................... 43 7.6.2 Regional Addresses ................................................................................................................................ 44 7.6.3 State and Tribal Addresses ..................................................................................................................... 46 8. Sector Specific R equirem ents ..................................................................................... 47 8A .Sector A : Tim ber Products ............................................................................................................................ 47 8B. Sector B: Paper and Allied Products ............................................................................................................. 50 8C. Sector C: Chem icals and Allied Products M anufacturing ........................................................................ 51 8D. Sector D: Asphalt Paving and Roofing Materials and Lubricant Manufacturing .................................... 54 8E. Sector E: Glass, Clay, Cem ent, Concrete, and Gypsum Products ........................................................... 56 8F. Sector F: Prim ary M etals ............................................................................................................................... 58 8G .Sector G : M etal M ining (Ore M ining and Dressing) ............................................................................... 60 8H. Sector H: Coal M ines and Coal M ining-Related Facilities ...................................................................... 71 81. Sector 1: Oil and Gas Extraction and Refining ......................................................................................... 77 8J. Sector J: M ineral M ining and Dressing ......................................................................................................... 79 8K .Sector K : Hazardous W aste Treatm ent, Storage, or D isposal Facilities ................................................... 87 8L. Sector L: Landfills, Land Application Sites, and Open Dum ps ............................................................... 91 8M .Sector M : Automobile Salvage Yards ........................................................................................................... 95 8N .Sector N : Scrap Recycling Facilities ............................................................................................................. 97 80 .Sector 0 : Steam Electric Generating Facilities ........................................................................................... 103 8P. Sector P: Land Transportation and W arehousing ........................................................................................ 107 8Q .Sector Q : W ater Transportation ................................................................................................................... 110 8R. Sector R: Ship and Boat Building and Repairing Yards .............................................................................. 113 8S. Sector S: Air Transportation Facilities ........................................................................................................ 116 8T. Sector T: Treatm ent W orks ......................................................................................................................... 121 8U. Sector U: Food and K indred Products ......................................................................................................... 123 8V. Sector V: Textile Mills, Apparel, and Other Fabric Product Manufacturing; Leather and Leather Products ....................................................................................................................................................... 125 8W .Sector W : Furniture and Fixtures ................................................................................................................ 127 8X .Sector X : Printing and Publishing ............................................................................................................... 128 8Y. Sector Y: Rubber, Miscellaneous Plastic Products, and Miscellaneous Manufacturing Industries ............. 130 8Z. Sector Z: Leather Tanning and Finishing ................................................................................................... 132 Stormwater Discharges Associated With Industrial Activity iv General Permit 8AA .Sector AA : Fabricated M etal Products ........................................................................................................ 134 8AB. Sector A B: Transportation Equipm ent, Industrial or Com m ercial M achinery ............................................ 137 8AC. Sector AC: Electronic, Electrical, Photographic, and Optical Goods .......................................................... 138 8AD. Sector AD : N on-Classified Facilities .......................................................................................................... 139 9. State/T ribal Specific R equirem ents .............................................................................. 140 Appendices Appendix A Definitions and Acronym s ................................................................................................................... A-I Appendix B Standard Perm it Conditions ................................................................................................................. B-I Appendix C Areas Covered ...................................................................................................................................... C-1 Appendix D Activities Covered ................................................................................................................................ D-I Appendix E Procedures relating to Endangered Species .......................................................................................... E-1 Appendix F N ational Historic Preservation Act Procedures .................................................................................... F-I Appendix G N otice of Intent .................................................................................................................................... G-1 Appendix H N otice of Term ination .......................................................................................................................... H-1 Appendix I Comprehensive Site Inspection and Reporting Form ............................................................................ 1-1 Appendix J Calculating Hardness in Receiving Waters for Hardness Dependent Metals .................................... J-I Appendix K N o Exposure Certification .................................................................................................................... K-I Stormwater Discharges Associated With Industrial Activity V General Permit 1. Coverage under this Permit.1.1 Eligibility.

1.1.1 Facilities

Covered.To be eligible to discharge under this permit, you must (1) have a stormwater discharge associated with industrial activity from your primary industrial activity, as defined in Appendix A, provided your primary industrial activity is included in Appendix D, or (2) be notified by EPA that you are eligible for coverage under Sector AD of this permit.1.1.2 Allowable Stormwater Discharges. Unless otherwise made ineligible under Part 1.1.4, the following discharges are eligible for coverage under this permit: 1.1.2. 1 Stormwater discharges associated with industrial activity for any primary industrial activities and co-located industrial activities, as defined in Appendix A;1.1.2.2 Discharges designated by EPA as needing a stormwater permit as provided in Sector AD;1.1.2.3 Discharges that are not otherwise required to obtain NPDES permit authorization but are commingled with discharges that are authorized under this permit;1.1.2.4 Discharges subject to any of the national stormwater-speciflc effluent limitations guidelines listed in Table 1-1; and Table 1-1. Stormwater-specific Effluent Limitations Guidelines 40 CFR MSGP New Source New Regulated Discharge Section Sector Performance Source Standard (NSPS) Date Discharges resulting from spray Part 429, A Yes 1/26/81 down or intentional wetting of Subpart I logs at wet deck storage areas Runoff from phosphate fertilizer Part 418, C Yes 4/8/74 manufacturing facilities that Subpart A comes into contact with any raw materials, finished product, by-products or waste products (SIC 2874)Runoff from asphalt emulsion Part 443, D Yes 7/28/75 facilities Subpart A Runoff from material storage Part 411, E Yes 2/20/74 piles at cement manufacturing Subpart C facilities Stormwater Discharges Associated With Industrial Activity I General Permit Mine dewatering discharges at Part 436, J No N/A crushed stone, construction sand Subparts and gravel, or industrial sand B, C, and mining facilities D Runoff from hazardous waste and Part 445, K, L Yes 2/2/00 non-hazardous waste landfills Subparts A and B Runoff from coal storage piles at Part 423 0 Yes 11/19/82 steam electric generating facilities (10/8/74)1 1.1.2.5 Discharges subject to any New Source Performance Standards (NSPS) identified in Table 1-1 (i.e., where facilities were constructed after the promulgation of that industry's NSPS), provided that you obtain and retain the following EPA documentation with your SWPPP, prior to submitting your NOI, and that you comply with any limits pursuant to Part 2.4: " Determination of"No Significant Impact" under the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA); or* A completed Environmental Impact Statement in accordance with an environmental review conducted by EPA pursuant to 40 CFR 6.102(a)(6) 2.1.1.3 Allowable Non-Stormwater Discharges. The following are the non-stormwater discharges authorized under this permit, provided the non-stormwater component of your discharge is in compliance with Part 2.1.2.10:* Discharges from fire-fighting activities; o Fire hydrant flushings;

  • Potable water, including water line flushings;" Uncontaminated condensate from air conditioners, coolers, and other compressors and from the outside storage of refrigerated gases or liquids;o Irrigation drainage;* Landscape watering provided all pesticides, herbicides, and fertilizer have been applied in accordance with the approved labeling;o Pavement wash waters where no detergents are used and no spills or leaks of toxic or hazardous materials have occurred (unless all spilled material has been removed);* Routine external building washdown that does not use detergents;" Uncontaminated ground water or spring water;1NSPS promulgated in 1974 were not removed via the 1982 regulation; therefore wastewaters generated by Part 423-applicable sources that were New Sources under the 1974 regulations are subject to the 1974 NSPS.2 Note that if you have previously completed an Environmental Impact Statement or obtained a "No Significant Impact" statement for discharges subject to NSPS, you have met your obligation under this provision and you only need to retain this documentation for your files.Stormwater Discharges Associated With Industrial Activity 2 Stormwater Discharges Associated With Industrial Activity 2 General Permit" Foundation or footing drains where flows are not contaminated with process materials; and" Incidental windblown mist from cooling towers that collects on rooftops or adjacent portions of your facility, but not intentional discharges from the cooling tower (e.g., "piped" cooling tower blowdown or drains).1.1.4 Limitations on Coverage.1.1.4.1 Discharges Mixed with Non-Stormwater.

Stormwater discharges that are mixed with non-stormwater, other than those non-stormwater discharges listed in Part 1.1.3, are not eligible for coverage under this permit.1.1.4.2 Stormwater Discharges Associated with Construction Activity. Stormwater discharges associated with construction activity disturbing one acre or more are not eligible for coverage under this permit, unless in conjunction with mining activities or certain oil and gas extraction activities as specified in Sectors G, H, I, and J of this permit.1.1.4.3 Discharges Currently or Previously Covered by Another Permit. Unless you received written notification from EPA specifically allowing these discharges to be covered under this permit, you are not eligible for coverage under this permit for any of the following:

  • Stormwater discharges associated with industrial activity that are currently covered under an individual NPDES permit or an alternative NPDES general permit;* Discharges covered within five years prior to the effective date of this permit by an individual permit or alternative general permit where that permit established site-specific numeric water quality-based limitations developed for the stormwater component of the discharge; or* Discharges from facilities where any NPDES permit has been or is in the process of being denied, terminated, or revoked by EPA (this does not apply to the routine reissuance of permits every five years).1.1.4.4 Stormwater Discharges Subject to Effluent Limitations Guidelines.

For discharges subject to stormwater effluent limitation guidelines under 40 CFR, Subchapter N, only those stormwater discharges identified in Table 1-I are eligible for coverage under this permit.1.1.4.5 Endangered and Threatened Species and Critical Habitat Protection. Coverage under this permit is available only if your stormwater discharges, allowable non-stormwater discharges, and stormwater discharge-related activities will not adversely affect any species that are federally-listed as endangered or threatened ("listed") under the Endangered Species Act (ESA) and will not result in the adverse modification or destruction of habitat that is federally-designated as "critical habitat" under the ESA.You must meet one of the criteria below, following the procedures in Appendix E: Stormwater Discharges Associated With Industrial Activity 3 Stormwater Discharges Associated With Industrial Activity 3 General Permit Criterion A.Criterion B.No federally-listed threatened or endangered species or their designated critical habitat are likely to occur in the "action area" as defined in Appendix A; or Consultation between a Federal agency and the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service and/or the National Marine Fisheries Service (together, the "Services") under section 7 of the ESA has been concluded. Consultations can be either formal or informal, and would have occurred only as a result of a separate federal action (e.g., during application for an individual wastewater discharge permit or the issuance of a wetlands dredge and fill permit).The consultation must have addressed the effects of your facility's stormwater discharges, allowable non-stormwater discharges, and stormwater discharge-related activities on federally-listed threatened or endangered species and federally-designated critical habitat, and must have resulted in either: a biological opinion finding no jeopardy to federally-listed species or destruction/adverse modification of federally-designated critical habitat; or ii. written concurrence from the Service(s) with a finding that the facility's stormwater discharges associated with industrial activity, discharge-related activities and allowable non-stormwater discharges are not likely to adversely affect federally-listed species or federally-designated critical habitat; or Criterion C.Criterion D.Criterion E.Your industrial activities are authorized through the issuance of a permit under section 10 of the ESA, and authorization addresses the effects of the stormwater discharges associated with industrial activity, discharge-related' activities, and allowable non-stormwater discharges on federally-listed species and federally-designated critical habitat; or Coordination between you and the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service and/or the National Marine Fisheries Service has been concluded. The coordination must have addressed the effects of the facility's stormwater discharges associated with industrial activity, discharge-related activities, and allowable non-stormwater discharges on federally-listed threatened or endangered species and federally-designated critical habitat. The result of the coordination must be a written statement from the Service concluding that authorizing your stormwater discharges, discharge-related activities, and allowable non-stormwater discharges is consistent with the determination that the issuance of the MSGP is not likely to adversely affect federally-listed threatened or endangered species and federally-designated critical habitat. Any conditions or prerequisites deemed necessary to achieve consistency with the "not likely to adversely effect" determination become eligibility conditions for MSGP coverage, and permit requirements under Part 2.3; or Authorizing your stormwater discharges associated with industrial activity, discharge-related activities, and allowable non-stormwater discharges is Stormwater Discharges Associated With Industrial Activity 4 Stormwater Discharges Associated With Industrial Activity 4 General Permit consistent with the determination that the issuance of the MSGP is not likely to adversely affect any federally-listed endangered and threatened ("listed") species or designated critical habitat ("critical habitat"). To support your determination that you meet Criterion E, you must provide supporting documentation for your determination.

i. If you are an existing discharger, you must provide the following information with your completed Notice of Intent (NOI) form: (1) a list of the federally-listed threatened or endangered species or their designated critical habitat that are likely to occur in the "action area"; (2) a list of the pollutant parameters for which you have ever exceeded an applicable benchmark or effluent limitations guideline, or for which your discharge has ever been found to cause or contribute to an exceedance of an applicable water quality standard, or to violate State or Tribal water quality requirements (Part 9); and (3) your rationale supporting your determination that you meet Criterion E, including appropriate measures to be undertaken to avoid or eliminate the likelihood of adverse effects.ii. If you are a new discharger, you must provide the following information with your completed NOI form: (1) a list of the federally-listed threatened or endangered species or their designated critical habitat that are likely to occur in the "action area"; (2) a list of the potential pollutants in your discharge; and (3)your rationale supporting your determination that you meet Criterion E, including appropriate measures to be undertaken to avoid or eliminate the likelihood of adverse effects; or Criterion F.The facility's stormwater discharges associated with industrial activity, discharge-related activities, and allowable non-stormwater discharges were already addressed in another operator's valid certification of eligibility that included these discharges and activities and there is no reason to believe that federally-listed species or federally-designated critical habitat not considered in the prior certification may be present or located in the "action area". To certify eligibility under this criterion there must be no lapse of coverage in the other operator's certification.

By certifying eligibility under this criterion, you agree to comply with any measures or controls upon which the other operator's certification was based. You must comply with any applicable terms, conditions, or other requirements developed in the process of meeting the eligibility requirements of the criteria in this section to remain eligible for coverage under this permit. If your certification is based on another operator's certification under Criterion E, that certification is valid only if you have documentation showing that the other operator had certified under Criterion E, and you provide EPA with the supporting information required of existing dischargers in Criterion E (above, under subparagraph (i)) in your NOI form.1.1.4.6 Historic Properties Preservation. Coverage under this permit is available only if your stormwater discharges, allowable non-stormwater discharges, and stormwater discharge-Stormwater Discharges Associated With Industrial Activity 5 General Permit related activities meet one of the eligibility criteria below, following the procedures in Appendix F: Criterion A.Criterion B.Criterion C.Criterion D.Your stormwater discharges and allowable non-stormwater discharges do not have the potential to have an effect on historic properties and you are not constructing or installing new stormwater control measures on your site that cause subsurface disturbance; or Your discharge-related activities (i.e., construction and/or installation of stormwater control measures that involve subsurface disturbance) will not affect historic properties; or Your stormwater discharges, allowable non-stormwater discharges, and discharge-related activities have the potential to have an effect on historic properties, and you have consulted with the State Historic Preservation Officer (SHPO), Tribal Historic Preservation Officer (THPO), or other tribal representative regarding measures to mitigate or prevent any adverse effects on historic properties, and you have either (1) obtained and are in compliance with a written agreement that outlines all such measures, or (2) been unable to reach agreement on such measures; or You have contacted the State Historic Preservation Officer, Tribal Historic Preservation Officer, or other tribal representative and EPA in writing informing them that you have the potential to have an effect on historic properties and you did not receive a response from the SHPO, THPO, or tribal representative within 30 days of receiving your letter.If you have been unable to reach agreement with a SHPO, THPO, or other tribal representative regarding appropriate measures to mitigate or prevent adverse effects, EPA may notify you of additional measures you must implement to be eligible for coverage under this permit.1.1.4. 7New Discharges to Water Quality Impaired Waters. If you are a new discharger you are not eligible for coverage under this permit to discharge to an "impaired water", as defined in Appendix A unless you: a. prevent all exposure to stormwater of the pollutant(s) for which the waterbody is impaired, and retain documentation of procedures taken to prevent exposure onsite with your SWPPP; or b. document that the pollutant(s) for which the waterbody is impaired is not present at your site, and retain documentation of this finding with your SWPPP; or c. in advance of submitting your NOI, provide to the appropriate EPA Regional Office data to support a showing that the discharge is not expecied to cause or contribute to an exceedance of a water quality standard, and retain such data Stormwater Discharges Associated With Industrial Activity 6 General Permit onsite with your SWPPP. To do this, you must provide data and other technical information to the Regional Office sufficient to demonstrate:

i. For discharges to waters without an EPA approved or established TMDL, that the discharge of the pollutant for which the water is impaired will meet in-stream water quality criteria at the point of discharge to the waterbody; or ii. For discharges to waters with an EPA approved or established TMDL, that there are sufficient remaining wasteload allocations in an EPA approved or established TMDL to allow your discharge and that existing dischargers to the waterbody are subject to compliance schedules designed to bring the waterbody into attainment with water quality standards.

You are eligible under Part 1.1.4.7.c if you receive an affirmative determination from the Regional Office that your discharge will not contribute to the existing impairment, in which case you must maintain such determination onsite with your SWPPP, or if the Regional Office fails to respond within 30 days of submission of data to the Regional Office.1.1.4.8 New Discharges to Waters Designated as Tier 3for Antidegradation Purposes. If you are a new discharger, you are not eligible for coverage under this permit for discharges to waters designated by a State or Tribe as Tier 3 (outstanding natural resource waters) for antidegradation purposes under 40 CFR 131.13(a)(3) (see list of Tier 3 waters on EPA's website at http://www.epa.gov/npdes/stormwater/msgp).

1.2 Permit

Compliance. Any noncompliance with any of the requirements of this permit constitutes a violation of the Clean Water Act. As detailed in Part 3 (Corrective Actions) of this permit, failure to take any required corrective actions constitute an independent, additional violation of this permit and the Clean Water Act. As such, any actions and time periods specified for remedying noncompliance do not absolve parties of the initial underlying noncompliance. However, where corrective action is triggered by an event that does not itself constitute permit noncompliance, such as an exceedance of an applicable benchmark, there is no permit violation provided you take the required corrective action within the relevant deadlines established in Part 3.3.1.3 Authorization under this Permit.1.3.1 How to Obtain Authorization. To obtain authorization under this permit, you must: o Be located in a State, territory, or Indian Country, or be a Federal Facility identified in Appendix C where EPA is the permitting authority;" Meet the Part 1.1 eligibility requirements; Stormwater Discharges Associated With Industrial Activity 7 General Permit o Select, design, install, and implement control measures in accordance with Part 2.1 to meet numeric and non-numeric effluent limits;" Submit a complete and accurate Notice of Intent (NOI) either using EPA's electronic Notice of Intent (eNOI) system (accessible at www.epa.gov/npdes/eNOI) or using a paper form (included in Appendix G of this permit) and then submitting that paper form to the address listed in Part 7.6.1; and* Develop a SWPPP according to the requirements in Part 5 of this permit.EPA will post on the Internet, at www.epa.gov/npdes/noisearch, all NOIs received. Late NOIs will be accepted but authorization to discharge will not be retroactive. Timeframes for discharge authorization are contained in Table 1-2. Some authorization dates in Table 1-2 are dependent on you posting a copy of your SWPPP on the Internet. Posting requires that (1) your NOI identifies the Uniform Resource Locator (URL) that provides direct access to your SWPPP, (2) you post a complete copy of your SWPPP at that URL, and (3) the SWPPP is available from that URL at least for the period starting the day you submit your NOI until you are authorized to discharge. You are not required to post any confidential business information (CBI) at this URL, but you must clearly identify those portions of the SWPPP that are being withheld from public access as a result of your determination of CBI.Stormwater Discharges Associated With Industrial Activity x Stormwater Discharges Associated With Industrial Activity R General Permit Table 1-2. NOI Submittal Deadlines/Discharge Authorization Dates Category NOI Submission Discharge Authorization Date'Deadline Existina Dischargers -in No later than January 5, 30 days after EPA posts your NOI.operation as of October 30, 2005 2009.and authorized for coverage Your authorization under the MSGP under MSGP 2000. 2000 is automatically continued until you have been granted coverage under this permit or an alternative permit, or coverage is otherwise terminated. New Dischargers or New As soon as possible but 30 days after EPA posts your NOI.Sources -have commenced no later than January 5, discharging between October 30, 2009.2005 and January 5, 2009.New Dischargers or New A minimum of 60 days If you post your SWPPP on the Internet, Sources -commence discharging prior to commencing 30 days after EPA posts your NOL.after January 5, 2009. discharge, or a minimum Otherwise, 60 days after EPA posts your of 30 days if your NOI.SWPPP is posted on the Internet during this period and the Internet address (i.e., URL) to your SWPPP is provided on the NOI form.New Owner/Operator of A minimum of 30 days 30 days after EPA posts your NOI.Existing Discharger -transfer of prior to date that the ownership and/or operation of a transfer will take place to facility whose discharge is the new owner/operator. authorized under this permit Other Eligible Dischargers -in Immediately, to If you post your SWPPP on the Internet, operation prior to October 30, minimize the time 30 days after EPA posts your NOI.2005, but not covered under the discharges from the Otherwise, 60 days after EPA posts your MSGP 2000 or another NPDES facility will continue to NOI.permit. be unauthorized. 'Based on a review of your NOI or other information, EPA may delay your authorization for further review, notify you that additional effluent limitations are necessary, or may deny coverage under this permit and require submission of an application for an individual NPDES permit, as detailed in Part 1.6. In these instances, EPA will notify you in writing of the delay, of the need for additional effluent limits, or of the request for submission of an individual NPDES permit application.

1.3.2 Continuation

of this Permit.If this permit is not reissued or replaced prior to the expiration date, it will be administratively continued in accordance with 40 CFR 122.6 and remain in force and effect. If Stormwater Discharges Associated With Industrial Activity Q) General Permit you were authorized to discharge under this permit prior to the expiration date, any discharges authorized under this permit will automatically remain covered by this permit until the earliest of:* Your authorization for coverage under a reissued permit or a replacement of this permit following your timely and appropriate submittal of a complete NOI requesting authorization to discharge under the new permit and compliance with the requirements of the new permit; or o Your submittal of a Notice of Termination; or a Issuance or denial of an individual permit for the facility's discharges; or a A formal permit decision by EPA not to reissue this general permit, at which time EPA will identify a reasonable time period for covered dischargers to seek coverage under an alternative general permit or an individual permit. Coverage under this permit will cease at the end of this time period.1.4 Terminating Coverage.1.4.1 Submitting a Notice of Termination. To terminate permit coverage, you must submit a complete and accurate Notice of Termination either electronically (strongly encouraged) at www.epa.gov/npdes/eNOI or using the paper Notice of Termination form included in Appendix H of this permit, to the address listed in Part 7.6.1. Your authorization to discharge under this permit terminates at midnight of the day that a complete Notice of Termination is processed and posted on EPA's website (www.epa.gov/npdes/noisearch). If you submit a Notice of Termination without meeting one or more of the conditions identified in Part 1.4.2, then your Notice of Termination is not valid. You are responsible for meeting the terms of this permit until your authorization is terminated. 1.4.2 When to Submit a Notice of Termination. You must submit a Notice of Termination within 30 days after one or more of the following conditions have been met: o A new owner or operator has taken over responsibility for the facility; or o You have ceased operations at the facility, there are not or no longer will be discharges of stormwater associated with industrial activity from the facility, and you have already implemented necessary sediment and erosion controls as required by Part 2.1.2.5;* You are a Sector G, H, or J facility and you have met the applicable termination requirements; or" You have obtained coverage under an individual or alternative general permit for all discharges required to be covered by an NPDES permit, unless EPA has required that you obtain such coverage under authority of Part 1.6.1, in which case coverage under this permit will terminate automatically. Stormwater Discharges Associated With Industrial Activity 10 General Permit 1.5 Conditional Exclusion for No Exposure.If you are covered by this permit, and become eligible for a no exposure exclusion from permitting under 40 CFR 122.26(g), you may file a No Exposure Certification. You are no longer required to have a permit upon submission of a complete and accurate no exposure certification to EPA. If you are no longer required to have permit coverage because of a no exposure exclusion and have submitted a No Exposure Certification form to EPA, you are not required to submit a Notice of Termination. You must submit a No Exposure Certification to EPA once every five years. File your No Exposure Certification using the eNOI system at www.epa.,gov/npdes/eNOI.

1.6 Alternative

Permits.1.6.1 EPA Requiring Coverage under an Alternative Permit.EPA may require you to apply for and/or obtain authorization to discharge under either an individual NPDES permit or an alternative NPDES general permit in accordance with 40 CFR 122.64 and 124.5. Any interested person may petition EPA to take action under this paragraph. If EPA requires you to apply for an individual NPDES permit, EPA will notify you in writing that a permit application is required. This notification will include a brief statement of the reasons for this decision and will provide application information. In addition, if you are an existing discharger authorized to discharge under this permit, the notice will set a deadline to file the permit application, and will include a statement that on the effective date of the individual NPDES permit, or the alternative general permit as it applies to you, coverage under this general permit will terminate. EPA may grant additional time to submit the application if you request it.If you are covered under this permit and fail to submit an individual NPDES permit application as required by EPA, then the applicability of this permit to you is terminated at the end of the day specified by EPA as the deadline for application submittal. EPA may take appropriate enforcement action for any unpermitted discharge.

1.6.2 Permittee

Requesting Coverage under an Alternative Permit.You may request to be excluded from coverage under this general permit by applying for an individual permit. In such a case, you must submit an individual permit application in accordance with the requirements of 40 CFR 122.26(c)(1)(ii), with reasons supporting the request, to EPA at the applicable EPA Regional Office listed in Part 7.6.2 of this permit. The request may be granted by issuance of an individual permit or authorization of coverage under an alternative general permit if your reasons are adequate to support the request.When an individual NPDES permit is issued to you or you are authorized to discharge under an alternative NPDES general permit, your authorization to discharge under this permit is terminated on the effective date of the individual permit or the date of authorization of coverage under the alternative general permit.Stormwater Discharges Associated With Industrial Activity I I General Permit 1.7 Severability. Invalidation of a portion of this permit does not necessarily render the whole permit invalid. EPA's intent is that the permit is to remain in effect to the extent possible; in the event that any part of this permit is invalidated, EPA will advise the regulated community as to the effect of such invalidation.

2. Control Measures and Effluent Limits.In the technology-based limits included in Part 2.1 and in Part 8, the term "minimize" means reduce and/or eliminate to the extent achievable using control measures (including best management practices) that are technologically available and economically practicable and achievable in light of best industry practice.2.1 Control Measures.You must select, design, install, and implement control measures (including best management practices) to address the selection and design considerations in Part 2.1.1, meet the non-numeric effluent limits in Part 2.1.2, and meet limits contained in applicable effluent limitations guidelines in Part 2.1.3. The selection, design, installation, and implementation of these control measures must be in accordance with good engineering practices and manufacturer's specifications.

Note that you may deviate from such manufacturer's specifications where you provide justification for such deviation and include documentation of your rationale in the part of your SWPPP that describes your control measures, consistent with Part 5.1.4. If you find that your control measures are not achieving their intended effect of minimizing pollutant discharges, you must modify these control measures as expeditiously as practicable. Regulated stormwater discharges from your facility include stormwater run-on that commingles with stormwater discharges associated with industrial activity at your facility.2.1.1 Control Measure Selection and Design Considerations You must consider the following when selecting and designing control measures:* preventing stormwater from coming into contact with polluting materials is generally more effective, and less costly, than trying to remove pollutants from stormwater; o using control measures in combination is more effective than using control measures in isolation for minimizing pollutants in your stormwater discharge; o assessing the type and quantity of pollutants, including their potential to impact receiving water quality, is critical to designing effective control measures that will achieve the limits in this permit;* minimizing impervious areas at your facility and infiltrating runoff onsite (including bioretention cells, green roofs, and pervious pavement, among other approaches) can reduce runoff and improve groundwater recharge and stream base flows in local streams, although care must be taken to avoid ground water contamination; Stormwater Discharges Associated With Industrial Activity 12 General Permit" attenuating flow using open vegetated swales and natural depressions can reduce in-stream impacts of erosive flows;* conserving and/or restoring of riparian buffers will help protect streams from stormwater runoff and improve water quality; and" using treatment interceptors (e.g., swirl separators and sand filters) may be appropriate in some instances to minimize the discharge of pollutants. 2.1.2 Non-Numeric Technology-Based Effluent Limits (BPT/BAT/BCT). 2.1.2.1 Minimize Exposure. You must minimize the exposure of manufacturing, processing, and material storage areas (including loading and unloading, storage, disposal, cleaning, maintenance, and fueling operations) to rain, snow, snowmelt, and runoff by either locating these industrial materials and activities inside or protecting them with storm resistant coverings (although significant enlargement of impervious surface area is not recommended). In minimizing exposure, you should pay particular attention to the following: -use grading, berming, or curbing to prevent runoff of contaminated flows and divert run-on away from these areas;-locate materials, equipment, and activities so that leaks are contained in existing containment and diversion systems (confine the storage of leaky or leak-prone vehicles and equipment awaiting maintenance to protected areas);-clean up spills and leaks promptly using dry methods (e.g., absorbents) to prevent the discharge of pollutants; -use drip pans and absorbents under or around leaky vehicles and equipment or store indoors where feasible;-use spill/overflow protection equipment; -drain fluids from equipment and vehicles prior to on-site storage or disposal;-perform all cleaning operations indoors, under cover, or in bermed areas that prevent runoff and run-on and also that capture any overspray; and-ensure that all washwater drains to a proper collection system (i.e., not the stormwater drainage system).The discharge of vehicle and equipment washwater, including tank cleaning operations, is not authorized by this permit. These wastewaters must be covered under a separate NPDES permit, discharged to a sanitary sewer in accordance with applicable industrial pretreatment requirements, or disposed of otherwise in accordance with applicable law.Note: Industrial materials do not need to be enclosed or covered if stormwater runoff from affected areas will not be discharged to receiving waters or if discharges are authorized under another NPDES permit.2.1.2.2 Good Housekeeping. You must keep clean all exposed areas that are potential sources of pollutants, using such measures as sweeping at regular intervals, keeping materials orderly and labeled, and storing materials in appropriate containers. Stormwater Discharges Associated With Industrial Activity 13 General Permit 2.1.2.3 Maintenance. You must regularly inspect, test, maintain, and repair all industrial equipment and systems to avoid situations that may result in leaks, spills, and other releases of pollutants in stormwater discharged to receiving waters. You must maintain all control measures that are used to achieve the effluent limits required by this permit in effective operating condition. Nonstructural control measures must also be diligently maintained (e.g., spill response supplies available, personnel appropriately trained). If you find that your control measures need to be replaced or repaired, you must make the necessary repairs or modifications as expeditiously as practicable. 2.1.2.4 Spill Prevention and Response Procedures. You must minimize the potential for leaks, spills and other releases that may be exposed to stormwater and develop plans for effective response to such spills if or when they occur. At a minimum, you must implement:

  • Procedures for plainly labeling containers (e.g., "Used Oil," "Spent Solvents,""Fertilizers and Pesticides," etc.) that could be susceptible to spillage or leakage to encourage proper handling and facilitate rapid response if spills or leaks occur;* Preventative measures such as barriers between material storage and traffic areas, secondary containment provisions, and procedures for material storage and handling;" Procedures for expeditiously stopping, containing, and cleaning up leaks, spills, and other releases.

Employees who may cause, detect, or respond to a spill or leak must be trained in these procedures and have necessary spill response equipment available. If possible, one of these individuals should be a member of your stormwater pollution prevention team (see Part 5.1.1); and o Procedures for notification of appropriate facility personnel, emergency response agencies, and regulatory agencies. Where a leak, spill, or other release containing a hazardous substance or oil in an amount equal to or in excess of a reportable quantity established under either 40 CFR Part 110, 40 CFR Part 117, or 40 CFR Part 302, occurs during a 24-hour period, you must notify the National Response Center (NRC) at (800) 424-8802 or, in the Washington, DC, metropolitan area, call (202) 267-2675 in accordance with the requirements of 40 CFR Part 110, 40 CFR Part 117, and 40 (CFR Part 302 as soon as you have knowledge of the discharge. State or local requirements may necessitate reporting spills or discharges to local emergency response, public health, or drinking water supply agencies. Contact information must be in locations that are readily accessible and available. 2.1.2.5 Erosion and Sediment Controls. You must stabilize exposed areas and contain runoff using structural and/or non-structural control measures to minimize onsite erosion and sedimentation, and the resulting discharge of pollutants. Among other actions you must take to meet this limit, you must place flow velocity dissipation devices at discharge locations and within outfall channels where necessary to reduce erosion and/or settle out pollutants. In selecting, designing, installing, and implementing appropriate control measures, you are encouraged to consult with EPA's internet-based resources relating to BMPs for erosion and sedimentation, including the sector-specific Industrial Stormwater Stormwater Discharges Associated With Industrial Activity 14 General Permit Fact Sheet Series, (www.epa.gov/npdes/stormwater/msgp), National Menu of Stormwater BMPs (www.epa.gov/npdes/stormwater/menuofbmps), and National Management Measures to Control Nonpoint Source Pollution from Urban Areas (www.epa.gov/owow/nps/urbanmm/index.html), and any similar State or Tribal publications. 2.1.2.6 Management of Runoff You must divert, infiltrate, reuse, contain, or otherwise reduce stormwater runoff, to minimize pollutants in your discharges. In selecting, designing, installing, and implementing appropriate control measures, you are encouraged to consult with EPA's internet-based resources relating to runoff management, including the sector-specific Industrial Stormwater Fact Sheet Series, (www.epa.gov/npdes/stormwater/msgp), National Menu of Stormwater BMPs (www.epa.gov/npdes/stormwater/menuofbmps), and National Management Measures to Control Nonpoint Source Pollution from Urban Areas (www.epa.gov/owow/nps/urbanmm/index.html), and any similar State or Tribal publications. 2.1.2.7Salt Storage Piles or Piles Containing Salt. You must enclose or cover storage piles of salt, or piles containing salt, used for deicing or other commercial or industrial purposes, including maintenance of paved surfaces. You must implement appropriate measures (e.g., good housekeeping, diversions, containment) to minimize exposure resulting from adding to or removing materials from the pile. Piles do not need to be enclosed or covered if stormwater runoff from the piles is not discharged or if discharges from the piles are authorized under another NPDES permit.2.1.2.8 Sector Specific Non-Numeric Effluent Limits. You must achieve any additional non-numeric limits stipulated in the relevant sector-specific section(s) of Part 8.2.1.2.9 Employee Training. You must train all employees who work in areas where industrial materials or activities are exposed to stormwater, or who are responsible for implementing activities necessary to meet the conditions of this permit (e.g., inspectors, maintenance personnel), including all members of your Pollution Prevention Team.Training must cover both the specific control measures used to achieve the effluent limits in this Part, and monitoring, inspection, planning, reporting, and documentation requirements in other parts of this permit. EPA recommends training be conducted at least annually (or more often if employee turnover is high).2.1.2.10 Non-Stormwater Discharges. You must eliminate non-stormwater discharges not authorized by an NPDES permit. See Part 1.2.3 for a list of non-stormwater discharges authorized by this permit.2.1.2.11 Waste, Garbage and Floatable Debris. You must ensure that waste, garbage, and floatable debris are not discharged to receiving waters by keeping exposed areas free of such materials or by intercepting them before they are discharged. Stormwater Discharges Associated With Industrial Activity 15 General Permit 2.1.2.12 Dust Generation and Vehicle Tracking of Industrial Materials. You must minimize generation of dust and off-site tracking of raw, final, or waste materials.

2.1.3 Numeric

Effluent Limitations Based on Effluent Limitations Guidelines If you are in an industrial category subject to one of the effluent limitations guidelines identified in Table 6-1 (see Part 6.2.2.1), you must meet the effluent limits referenced in Table 2-1 below:, Table 2-1. Applicable Effluent Limitations Guidelines Regulated Activity 40 CFR Part/Subpart Effluent Limit Discharges resulting from spray down or Part 429, Subpart I See Part 8.A.7 intentional wetting of logs at wet deck storage areas Runoff from phosphate fertilizer Part 418, Subpart A See Part 8.C.4 manufacturing facilities that comes into contact with any raw materials, finished product, by-products or waste products (SIC 2874)Runoff from asphalt emulsion facilities Part 443, Subpart A See Part 8.D.4 Runoff from material storage piles at Part 411, Subpart C See Part 8.E.5 cement manufacturing facilities Mine dewatering discharges at crushed Part 436, Subparts B, C, See Part 8.J.9 stone, construction sand and gravel, or or D industrial sand mining facilities Runoff from hazardous waste landfills Part 445, Subpart A See Part 8.K.6 Runoff from non-hazardous waste Part 445, Subpart B See Part 8.L. 10 landfills Runoff from coal storage piles at steam Part 423 See Part 8.0.8 electric generating facilities

2.2 Water

Quality-Based Effluent Limitations.

2.2.1 Water

Quality Standards Your discharge must be controlled as necessary to meet applicable water quality standards. EPA expects that compliance with the other conditions in this permit will control discharges as necessary to meet applicable water quality standards. If at any time you become aware, or EPA determines, that your discharge causes or contributes to an exceedance of applicable water quality standards, you must take corrective action as required in Part 3.1, document the corrective actions as required in Parts 3.4 and 5.4, and report the corrective actions to EPA as required in Part 7.2.Stormwater Discharges Associated With Industrial Activity 16 General Permit Additionally, EPA may impose additional water quality-based limitations on a site-specific basis, or require you to obtain coverage under an individual permit, if information in your NOI, required reports, or from other sources indicates that your discharges are not controlled as necessary to meet applicable water quality standards.

2.2.2 Discharges

to Water Quality Impaired Waters.2.2.2.1 Existing Discharge to an Impaired Water with an EPA Approved or Established TMDL. If you discharge to an impaired water with an EPA approved or established TMDL, EPA will inform you if any additional limits or controls are necessary for your discharge to be consistent with the assumptions of any available wasteload allocation in the TMDL, or if coverage under an individual permit is necessary in accordance with Part 1.6.1.2.2.2.2 Existing Discharge to an Impaired Water without an EPA Approved or Established TMDL. If you discharge to an impaired water without an EPA approved or established TMDL, you are required to comply with Part 2.2.1 and the monitoring requirement of Part 6.2.4. Note that this provision also applies to situations where EPA determines that your discharge is not controlled as necessary to meet water quality standards in a downstream water segment, even if your discharge is to a receiving water that is not specifically identified on a Section 303(d) list.2.2.2.3 New Discharge to an Impaired Water. If your authorization to discharge under this permit relied on Part 1.1.4.7 for a new discharge to an impaired water, you must implement and maintain any control measures or conditions on your site that enabled you to become eligible under Part 1.1.4.7, and modify such measures or conditions as necessary pursuant to any Part 3 corrective actions. You are also required to comply with Part 2.2.1 and the monitoring requirements of Parts 6.2.4.2.2.3 Tier 2 Antidegradation Requirements for New or Increased Dischargers If you are a new discharger, or an existing discharger required to notify EPA of an increased discharge consistent with Part 7.4 (i.e., a "planned changes" report), and you discharge directly to waters designated by a State or Tribe as Tier 2 or Tier 2.5 for antidegradation purposes under 40 CFR 131.12(a) (see list of Tier 2 and 2.5 waters on EPA's website at http://www.epa.gov/npdes/stormwater/msgp), EPA may notify you that additional analyses, control measures, or other permit conditions are necessary to comply with the applicable antidegradation requirements, or notify you that an individual permit application is necessary in accordance with Part 1.6.1.2.3 Requirements Relating to Endangered Species and Historic Properties If your eligibility under either Part 1. 1.4.5 or Part 1.1.4.6 was made possible through your, or another operator's, agreement to include certain measures or prerequisite actions, or implement certain terms and conditions, you must comply with all such agreed-upon requirements to maintain eligibility under the MSGP.Stormwater Discharges Associated With Industrial Activity 17 General Permit 2.4 Requirements Relating to the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) Review If your eligibility under Part 1.1.2.5 was made possible through your agreement to implement any mitigation measures as a result of the NEPA review process, you must comply with all such agreed-upon measures to maintain eligibility under the MSGP.3. Corrective Actions 3.1 Conditions Requiring Review and Revision to Eliminate Problem If any of the following conditions occur, you must review and revise the selection, design, installation, and implementation of your control measures to ensure that the condition is eliminated and will not be repeated in the future: " an unauthorized release or discharge (e.g., spill, leak, or discharge of non-stormwater not authorized by this or another NPDES permit) occurs at your facility;o a discharge violates a numeric effluent limit;o you become aware, or EPA determines, that your control measures are not stringent enough for the discharge to meet applicable water quality standards; o an inspection or evaluation of your facility by an EPA official, or local, State, or Tribal entity, determines that modifications to the control measures are necessary to meet the non-numeric effluent limits in this permit; or o you find in your routine facility inspection, quarterly visual assessment, or comprehensive site inspection that your control measures are not being properly operated and maintained.

3.2 Conditions

Requiring Review to Determine if Modifications Are Necessary If any of the following conditions occur, you must review the selection, design, installation, and implementation of your control measures to determine if modifications are necessary to meet the effluent limits in this permit: o construction or a change in design, operation, or maintenance at your facility significantly changes the nature of pollutants discharged in stormwater from your facility, or significantly increases the quantity of pollutants discharged; or o the average of 4 quarterly sampling results exceeds an applicable benchmark. If less than 4 benchmark samples have been taken, but the results are such that an exceedence of the 4 quarter average is mathematically certain (i.e., if the sum of quarterly sample results to date is more than 4 times the benchmark level) this is considered a benchmark exceedence, triggering this review.3.3 Corrective Action Deadlines You must document your discovery of any of the conditions listed in Parts 3.1 and 3.2 within 24 hours of making such discovery. Subsequently, within 14 days of such discovery, you Stormwater Discharges Associated With Industrial Activity 18 General Permit must document any corrective action(s) to be taken to eliminate or further investigate the deficiency, or if no corrective action is needed, the basis for that determination. Specific documentation required within 24 hours and 14 days is detailed in Part 3.4. If you determine that changes are necessary following your review, any modifications to your control measures must be made before the next storm event if possible, or as soon as practicable following that storm event. These time intervals are not grace periods, but are schedules considered reasonable for documenting your findings and for making repairs and improvements. They are included in this permit to ensure that the conditions prompting the need for these repairs and improvements are not allowed to persist indefinitely.

3.4 Corrective

Action Report Within 24 hours of discovery of any condition listed in Parts 3.1 and 3.2, you must document the following information (i.e., questions 3-5 of the Corrective Actions section in the Annual Reporting Form, provided in Appendix I): " Identification of the condition triggering the need for corrective action review;o Description of the problem identified; and" Date the problem was identified. Within 14 days of discovery of any condition listed in Parts 3.1 and 3.2, you must document the following information (i.e., questions 7-11 of the Corrective Actions section in the Annual Reporting Form, provided in Appendix I): o Summary of corrective action taken or to be taken (or, for triggering events identified in Part 3.2 where you determine that corrective action is not necessary, the basis for this determination); o Notice of whether SWPPP modifications are required as a result of this discovery or corrective action;o Date corrective action initiated; and o Date corrective action completed or expected to be completed. You must submit this documentation in an annual report as required in Part 7.2 and retain a copy onsite with your SWPPP as required in Part 5.4.3.5 Effect of Corrective Action If the event triggering the review is a permit violation (e.g., non-compliance with an effluent limit), correcting it does not remove the original violation. Additionally, failing to take corrective action in accordance with this section is an additional permit violation. EPA will consider the appropriateness and promptness of corrective action in determining enforcement responses to permit violations. Stormwater Discharges Associated With Industrial Activity 19 Stormwater Discharges Associated With Industrial Activity 19 General Permit 3.6 Substantially Identical Outfalls If the event triggering corrective action is linked to an outfall that represents other substantially identical outfalls, your review must assess the need for corrective action for each outfall represented by the outfall that triggered the review. Any necessary changes to control measures that affect these other outfalls must also be made before the next storm event if possible, or as soon as practicable following that storm event.4. Inspections You must conduct the inspections in Parts 4.1, 4.2, and 4.3 at your facility.4.1 Routine Facility Inspections.

4.1.1 Routine

Facility Inspection Procedures. Conduct routine facility inspections of all areas of the facility where industrial materials or activities are exposed to stormwater, and of all stormwater control measures used to comply with the effluent limits contained in this permit. Routine facility inspections must be conducted at least quarterly (i.e., once each calendar quarter) although in many instances, more frequent inspection (e.g., monthly) may be appropriate for some types of equipment, processes, and control measures or areas of the facility with significant activities and materials exposed to stormwater. Perform these inspections during periods when the facility is in operation. You must specify the relevant inspection schedules in your SWPPP document as required in Part 5.1.5. These routine inspections must be performed by qualified personnel (for definition see Appendix A) with at least one member of your stormwater pollution prevention team participating. At least once each calendar year, the routine facility inspection must be conducted during a period when a stormwater discharge is occurring.

4.1.2 Routine

Facility Inspection Documentation. You must document the findings of each routine facility inspection performed and maintain this documentation onsite with your SWPPP as required in Part 5.4. You are not required to submit your routine facility inspection findings to EPA, unless specifically requested to do so. At a minimum, your documentation of each routine facility inspection must include:* The inspection date and time;* The name(s) and signature(s) of the inspector(s);

  • Weather information and a description of any discharges occurring at the time of the inspection;
  • Any previously unidentified discharges of pollutants from the site;* Any control measures needing maintenance or repairs;o Any failed control measures that need replacement; o Any incidents of noncompliance observed; and o Any additional control measures needed to comply with the permit requirements.

Stormwater Discharges Associated With Industrial Activity 20 General Permit Any corrective action required as a result of a routine facility inspection must be performed consistent with Part 3 of this permit.4.1.3 Exceptions to Routine Facility Inspections. Inactive and Unstaffed Sites: The requirement to conduct routine facility inspections on a quarterly basis does not apply at a facility that is inactive and unstaffed, as long as there are no industrial materials or activities exposed to stormwater. Such a facility is only required to conduct an annual comprehensive site inspection in accordance with the requirements of Part 4.3. To invoke this exception, you must maintain a statement in your SWPPP pursuant to Part 5.1.5.2 indicating that the site is inactive and unstaffed, and that there are no industrial materials or activities exposed to precipitation, in accordance with the substantive requirements in 40 CFR 122.26(g)(4)(iii). The statement must be signed and certified in accordance with Appendix B, Subsection

11. If circumstances change and industrial materials or activities become exposed to stormwater or your facility becomes active and/or staffed, this exception no longer applies and you must immediately resume quarterly facility inspections.

If you are not qualified for this exception at the time you are authorized under this permit, but during the permit term you become qualified because your facility is inactive and unstaffed, and there are no industrial materials or activities that are exposed to stormwater, then you must include the same signed and certified statement as above and retain it with your records pursuant to Part 5.4.Inactive and unstaffed facilities covered under Sectors G (Metal Mining), H (Coal Mines and Coal Mining-Related Facilities), and J (Non-Metallic Mineral Mining and Dressing), are not required to meet the "no industrial materials or activities exposed to stormwater" standard to be eligible for this exception from routine inspections, consistent with the requirements established in Parts 8.G.8.4, 8.H.8.1, and 8.J.8.1.4.2 Quarterly Visual Assessment of Stormwater Discharges.

4.2.1 Quarterly

Visual Assessment Procedures. Once each quarter for the entire permit term, you must collect a stormwater sample from each outfall (except as noted in Part 4.2.3) and conduct a visual assessment of each of these samples. These samples are not required to be collected consistent with 40 CFR Part 136 procedures but should be collected in such a manner that the samples are representative of the stormwater discharge. The visual assessment must be made: " Of a sample in a clean, clear glass, or plastic container, and examined in a well-lit area;" On samples collected within the first 30 minutes of an actual discharge from a storm event. If it is not possible to collect the sample within the first 30 minutes of discharge, the sample must be collected as soon as practicable after the first 30 Stormwater Discharges Associated With Industrial Activity 21 General Permit minutes and you must document why it was not possible to take samples within the first 30 minutes. In the case of snowmelt, samples must be taken during a period with a measurable discharge from your site; and For storm events, on discharges that occur at least 72 hours (3 days) from the previous discharge. The 72-hour (3-day) storm interval does not apply if you document that less than a 72-hour (3-day) interval is representative for local storm events during the sampling period.You must visually inspect the sample for the following water quality characteristics: Color;Odor;Clarity;Floating solids;Settled solids;Suspended solids;Foam;Oil sheen; and Other obvious indicators of stormwater pollution.

4.2.2 Quarterly

Visual Assessment Documentation. You must document the results of your visual assessments and maintain this documentation onsite with your SWPPP as required in Part 5.4. You are not required to submit your visual assessment findings to EPA, unless specifically requested to do so. At a minimum, your documentation of the visual assessment must include:* Sample location(s)

  • Sample collection date and time, and visual assessment date and time for each sample;* Personnel collecting the sample and performing visual assessment, and their signatures; o Nature of the discharge (i.e., runoff or snowmelt);" Results of observations of the stormwater discharge; o Probable sources of any observed stormwater contamination,* If applicable, why it was not possible to take samples within the first 30 minutes.Any corrective action required as a result of a quarterly visual assessment must be performed consistent with Part 3 of this permit.4.2.3 Exceptions to Quarterly Visual Assessments.

Adverse Weather Conditions: When adverse weather conditions prevent the collection of samples during the quarter, you must take a substitute sample during the next qualifying storm event. Documentation of the rationale for no visual assessment for the quarter must be included with your SWPPP records as described in Part 5.4. Adverse conditions are Stormwater Discharges Associated With Industrial Activity 22 General Permit those that are dangerous or create inaccessibility for personnel, such as local flooding, high winds, or electrical storms, or situations that otherwise make sampling impractical, such as drought or extended frozen conditions. Climates with Irregular Stormwater Runofi: If your facility is located in an area where limited rainfall occurs during many parts of the year (e.g., arid or semi-arid climate) or in an area where freezing conditions exist that prevent runoff from occurring for extended periods, then your samples for the quarterly visual assessments may be distributed during seasons when precipitation runoff occurs.Areas Subiect to Snow: In areas subject to snow, at least one quarterly visual assessment must capture snowmelt discharge, as described in Part 6.1.3, taking into account the exception described above for climates with irregular stormwater runoff.Inactive and unstaffed sites: The requirement for a quarterly visual assessment does not apply at a facility that is inactive and unstaffed, as long as there are no industrial materials or activities exposed to stormwater. To invoke this exception, you must maintain a statement in your SWPPP as required in Part 5.1.5.2 indicating that the site is inactive and unstaffed, and that there are no industrial materials or activities exposed to precipitation, in accordance with the substantive requirements in 40 CFR 122.26(g)(4)(iii). The statement must be signed and certified in accordance with Appendix B, Subsection

11. If circumstances change and industrial materials or activities become exposed to stormwater or your facility becomes active and/or staffed, this exception no longer applies and you must immediately resume quarterly visual assessments.

If you are not qualified for this exception at the time you are authorized under this permit, but during the permit term you become qualified because your facility is inactive and unstaffed, and there are no industrial materials or activities that are exposed to stormwater, then you must include the same signed and certified statement as above and retain it with your records pursuant to Part 5.4.Inactive and unstaffed facilities covered under Sectors G (Metal Mining), H (Coal Mines and Coal Mining-Related Facilities), and J (Non-Metallic Mineral Mining and Dressing), are not required to meet the "no industrial materials or activities exposed to stormwater" standard to be eligible for this exception from quarterly visual assessment, consistent with the requirements established in Parts 8.G.8.4, 8.H.8.1, and 8.J.8.1.Substantially identical outfalls: If your facility has two or more outfalls that you believe discharge substantially identical effluents, as documented in Part 5.1.5.2, you may conduct quarterly visual assessments of the discharge at just one of the outfalls and report that the results also apply to the substantially identical outfall(s) provided that you perform visual assessments on a rotating basis of each substantially identical outfall throughout the period of your coverage under this permit.If stormwater contamination is identified through visual assessment performed at a substantially identical outfall, you must assess and modify your control measures as appropriate for each outfall represented by the monitored outfall.Stormwater Discharges Associated With Industrial Activity 23 General Permit 4.3 Comprehensive Site Inspections.

4.3.1 Comprehensive

Site Inspection Procedures. You must conduct annual comprehensive site inspections while you are covered under this permit, Annual, as defined in this Part, means once during each of the following inspection periods beginning with the period you are authorized to discharge under this permit: Year 1: September 29, 2008 -September 29, 2009 Year 2: September 29, 2009 -September 29, 2010 Year 3: September 29, 2010 -September 29, 2011 Year 4: September 29, 2011 -September 29, 2012 Year 5: September 29, 2012 -September 29, 2013 You are waived from having to perform a comprehensive site inspection for an inspection period, as defined above, if you obtain authorization to discharge less than three months before the end of that inspection period.Should your coverage be administratively continued after the expiration date of this permit, you must continue to perform these inspections annually until you are no longer covered.Comprehensive site inspections must be conducted by qualified personnel with at least one member of your stormwater pollution prevention team participating in the comprehensive site inspections. Your comprehensive site inspections must cover all areas of the facility affected by the requirements in this permit, including the areas identified in the SWPPP as potential pollutant sources (see Part 5.1.3) where industrial materials or activities are exposed to stormwater, any areas where control measures are used to comply with the effluent limits in Part 2, and areas where spills and leaks have occurred in the past 3 years. The inspections must also include a review of monitoring data collected in accordance with Part 6.2. Inspectors must consider the results of the past year's visual and analytical monitoring when planning and conducting inspections. Inspectors must examine the following: o Industrial materials, residue, or trash that may have or could come into contact with stormwater; o Leaks or spills from industrial equipment, drums, tanks, and other containers; o Offsite tracking of industrial or waste materials, or sediment where vehicles enter or exit the site;o Tracking or blowing of raw, final, or waste materials from areas of no exposure to exposed areas; and o Control measures needing replacement, maintenance, or repair.Stormwater Discharges Associated With Industrial Activity 24 Stormwater Discharges Associated With Industrial Activity 24 General Permit Stormwater control measures required by this permit must be observed to ensure that they are functioning correctly. If discharge locations are inaccessible, nearby downstream locations must be inspected. Your annual comprehensive site inspection may also be used as one of the routine inspections, as long as all components of both types of inspections are included.4.3.2 Comprehensive Site Inspection Documentation. You must document the findings of each comprehensive site inspection and maintain this documentation onsite with your SWPPP as required in Part 5.4. In addition, you must submit this documentation in an annual report as required in Part 7.2. At a minimum, your documentation of the comprehensive site inspection must include (see the Annual Reporting Form included as Appendix I): " The date of the inspection; o The name(s) and title(s) of the personnel making the inspection; o Findings from the examination of areas of your facility identified in Part 4.3.1;o All observations relating to the implementation of your control measures including: " previously unidentified discharges from the site," previously unidentified pollutants in existing discharges,[ evidence of, or the potential for, pollutants entering the drainage system;" evidence of pollutants discharging to receiving waters at all facility outfall(s), and the condition of and around the outfall, including flow dissipation measures to prevent scouring, and" additional control measures needed to address any conditions requiring corrective action identified during the inspection. o Any required revisions to the SWPPP resulting from the inspection; o Any incidents of noncompliance observed or a certification stating the facility is in compliance with this permit (if there is no noncompliance); and* A statement, signed and certified in accordance with Appendix B, Subsection II of the permit.Any corrective action required as a result of the comprehensive site inspection must be performed consistent with Part 3 of this permit.5. Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP).You must prepare a SWPPP for your facility before submitting your Notice of Intent (NOI) for permit coverage. If you prepared a SWPPP for coverage under a previous NPDES permit, you must review and update the SWPPP to implement all provisions of this permit prior to submitting your NOI. The SWPPP does not contain effluent limitations; the limitations are contained in Part 2 of the permit, and for some sectors, Parts 8 and 9 of the permit. The SWPPP is intended to document the selection, design, and installation of control measures. As distinct from the SWPPP, the additional documentation requirements (see Part 5.4) are intended to Stormwater Discharges Associated With Industrial Activity 25 General Permit document the implementation (including inspection, maintenance, monitoring, and corrective action) of the permit requirements.

5.1 Contents

of Your SWPPP.For coverage under this permit, your SWPPP must contain all of the following elements: " Stormwater pollution prevention team (see Part 5.1.1);" Site description (see Part 5.1.2);* Summary of potential pollutant sources (see Part 5.1.3);* Description of control measures (see Part 5.1.4);" Schedules and procedures (see Part 5.1.5);* Documentation to support eligibility considerations under other federal laws (see Part 5.1.6); and" Signature requirements (see Part 5.1.7).Where your SWPPP refers to procedures in other facility documents, such as a Spill Prevention, Control and Countermeasure (SPCC) Plan or an Environmental Management System (EMS) developed for a National Environmental Performance Track facility, copies of the relevant portions of those documents must be kept with your SWPPP.5.1.1 Stormwater Pollution Prevention Team.You must identify the staff members (by name or title) that comprise the facility's stormwater pollution prevention team as well as their individual responsibilities. Your stormwater pollution prevention team is responsible for assisting the facility manager in developing and revising the facility's SWPPP as well as maintaining control measures and taking corrective actions where required. Each member of the stormwater pollution prevention team must have ready access to either an electronic or paper copy of applicable portions of this permit and your SWPPP.5.1.2 Site Description. Your SWPPP must include the following: o Activities at the Facility. Provide a description of the nature of the industrial activities at your facility.o General location map. Provide a general location map (e.g., U.S. Geological Survey (USGS) quadrangle map) with enough detail to identify the location of your facility and all receiving waters for your stormwater discharges." Site map. Provide a map showing: " the size of the property in acres;" the location and extent of significant structures and impervious surfaces;" directions of stormwater flow (use arrows);" locations of all existing structural control measures;Stormwater Discharges Associated With Industrial Activity 26 General Permit" locations of all receiving waters in the immediate vicinity of your facility, indicating if any of the waters are impaired and, if so, whether the waters have TMDLs established for them;" locations of all stormwater conveyances including ditches, pipes, and swales;* locations of potential pollutant sources identified under Part 5.1.3.2;" locations where significant spills or leaks identified under Part 5.1.3.3 have occurred;" locations of all stormwater monitoring points;" locations of stormwater inlets and outfalls, with a unique identification code for each outfall (e.g., Outfall No. 1, No. 2, etc), indicating if you are treating one or more outfalls as "substantially identical" under Parts 4.2.3, 5.1.5.2, and 6.1.1, and an approximate outline of the areas draining to each outfall;" municipal separate storm sewer systems, where your stormwater discharges to them;* locations and descriptions of all non-stormwater discharges identified under Part 2.1.2.10;" locations of the following activities where such activities are exposed to precipitation: o fueling stations;o vehicle and equipment maintenance and/or cleaning areas;o loading/unloading areas;o locations used for the treatment, storage, or disposal of wastes;o liquid storage tanks;o processing and storage areas;o immediate access roads and rail lines used or traveled by carriers of raw materials, manufactured products, waste material, or by-products used or created by the facility;o transfer areas for substances in bulk; and o machinery; and" locations and sources of run-on to your site from adjacent property that contains significant quantities of pollutants.

5.1.3 Summary

of Potential Pollutant Sources.You must document areas at your facility where industrial materials or activities are exposed to stormwater and from which allowable non-stormwater discharges are released.Industrial materials or activities include, but are not limited to: material handling equipment or activities; industrial machinery; raw materials; industrial production and processes; and intermediate products, by-products, final products, and waste products. Material handling activities include, but are not limited to: the storage, loading and unloading, transportation, disposal, or conveyance of any raw material, intermediate product, final product or waste product. For each area identified, the description must include: 5.1.3.1 Activities in the area. A list of the industrial activities exposed to stormwater (e.g., material storage; equipment fueling, maintenance, and cleaning; cutting steel beams).Stormwater Discharges Associated With Industrial Activity 27 Stormwater Discharges Associated With Industrial Activity 27 General Permit 5.1.3.2 Pollutants. A list of the pollutant(s) or pollutant constituents (e.g., crankcase oil, zinc, sulfuric acid, and cleaning solvents) associated with each identified activity. The pollutant list must include all significant materials that have been handled, treated, stored, or disposed, and that have been exposed to stormwater in the 3 years prior to the date you prepare or amend your SWPPP.5.1.3.3 Spills and Leaks. You must document where potential spills and leaks could occur that could contribute pollutants to stormwater discharges, and the corresponding outfall(s) that would be affected by such spills and leaks. You must document all significant spills and leaks of oil or toxic or hazardous pollutants that actually occurred at exposed areas, or that drained to a stormwater conveyance, in the 3 years prior to the date you prepare or amend your SWPPP.Note: Significant spills and leaks include, but are not limited to, releases of oil or hazardous substances in excess of quantities that are reportable under CWA Section 311 (see 40 CFR 110.6 and 40 CFR 117.21) or Section 102 of the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liability Act (CERCLA), 42 USC §9602.This permit does not relieve you of the reporting requirements of 40 CFR 110, 40 CFR 117, and 40 CFR 302 relating to spills or other releases of oils or hazardous substances. 5.1.3.4 Non-Stormwater Discharges. You must document that you have evaluated for the presence of non-stormwater discharges and that all unauthorized discharges have been eliminated. Documentation of your evaluation must include:* The date of any evaluation; o A description of the evaluation criteria used;" A list of the outfalls or onsite drainage points that were directly observed during the evaluation;

  • The different types of non-stormwater discharge(s) and source locations; and* The action(s) taken, such as a list of control measures used to eliminate unauthorized discharge(s), if any were identified.

For example, a floor drain was sealed, a sink drain was re-routed to sanitary, or an NPDES permit application was submitted for an unauthorized cooling water discharge. 5.1.3.5 Salt Storage. You must document the location of any storage piles containing salt used for deicing or other commercial or industrial purposes.5.1.3.6 Sampling Data. You must summarize all stormwater discharge sampling data collected at your facility during the previous permit term.5.1.4 Description of Control Measures.5.1.4.1 Control Measures to Meet Technology-Based and Water Quality-Based Effluent Limits. You must document the location and type of control measures you have installed and implemented at your site to achieve the non-numeric effluent limits in Part 2.1.2, and where applicable in Part 8, the effluent limitations guidelines-based limits in Part 2.1.3, Stormwater Discharges Associated With Industrial Activity 28 General Permit the water quality-based effluent limits in Part 2.2, and any agreed-upon endangered species or NEPA-related requirements in Parts 2.3 and 2.4, and describe how you addressed the control measure selection and design considerations in Part 2.1.1. This documentation must describe how the control measures at your site address both the pollutant sources identified in Part 5.1.3, and any stormwater run-on that commingles with any discharges covered under this permit.5.1.5 Schedules and Procedures 5.1.5.1 Pertaining to Control Measures Used to Comply with the Effluent Limits in Part 2.The following must be documented in your SWPPP: o Good Housekeeping (See Part 2.1.2.2) -A schedule for regular pickup and disposal of waste materials, along with routine inspections for leaks and conditions of drums, tanks and containers; o Maintenance (See Part 2.1.2.3) -Preventative maintenance procedures, including regular inspections, testing, maintenance, and repair of all industrial equipment and systems, and control measures, to avoid situations that may result in leaks, spills, and other releases, and any back-up practices in place should a runoff event occur while a control measure is off-line;o Spill Prevention and Response Procedures (See Part 2.1.2.4) -Procedures for preventing and responding to spills and leaks. You may reference the existence of other plans for Spill Prevention Control and Countermeasure (SPCC) developed for the facility under Section 311 of the CWA or BMP programs otherwise required by an NPDES permit for the facility, provided that you keep a copy of that other plan onsite and make it available for review consistent with Part 5.3;and* Employee Training (Part 2.1.2.9) -A schedule for all types of necessary training.5.1.5.2 Pertaining to Monitoring and Inspeetion. You must document in your SWPPP your procedures for conducting the five types of analytical monitoring specified by this permit, where applicable to your facility, including: o Benchmark monitoring (see Part 6.2.1);o Effluent limitations guidelines monitoring (see Part 6.2.2);o State- or Tribal-specific monitoring (see Part 6.2.3);" Impaired waters monitoring (see Part 6.2.4); and o Other monitoring as required by EPA (see Part 6.2.5).For each type of monitoring, your SWPPP must document: " Locations where samples are collected, including any determination that two or more outfalls are substantially identical; o Parameters for sampling and the frequency of sampling for each parameter; o Schedules for monitoring at your facility, including schedule for alternate monitoring periods for climates with irregular stormwater runoff (see Part 6.1.6);Stormwater Discharges Associated With Industrial Activity 29 General Permit" Any numeric control values (benchmarks, effluent limitations guidelines, TMDL-related requirements, or other requirements) applicable to discharges from each outfall; and* Procedures (e.g., responsible staff, logistics, laboratory to be used, etc.) for gathering storm event data, as specified in Part 6.1.If you are invoking the exception for inactive and unstaffed sites for benchmark monitoring, you must include in your SWPPP the information to support this claim as required by Part 6.2.1.3.You must document the following in your SWPPP if you plan to use the substantially identical outfall exception for your quarterly visual assessment requirements in Part 4.2 or your benchmark monitoring requirements in Part 6.2.1:* Location of each of the substantially identical outfalls;* Description of the general industrial activities conducted in the drainage area of each outfall;* Description of the control measures implemented in the drainage area of each outfall;* Description of the exposed materials located in the drainage area of each outfall that are likely to be significant contributors of pollutants to stormwater discharges;

  • An estimate of the runoff coefficient of the drainage areas (low = under 40%;medium = 40 to 65%; high = above 65%); and* Why the outfalls are expected to discharge substantially identical effluents.

You must document in your SWPPP your procedures for performing, as appropriate, the three types of inspections specified by this permit, including: o Routine facility inspections (see Part 4.1);o Quarterly visual assessment of stormwater discharges (see Part 4.2); and o Comprehensive site inspections (see Part 4.3).For each type of inspection performed, your SWPPP must identify:* Person(s) or positions of person(s) responsible for inspection;

  • Schedules for conducting inspections, including tentative schedule for facilities in climates with irregular stormwater runoff discharges (see Part 4.2.3); and o Specific items to be covered by the inspection, including schedules for specific outfalls.If you are invoking the exception for inactive and unstaffed sites relating to routine facility inspections and quarterly visual assessments, you must include in your SWPPP the information to support this claim as required by Parts 4.1.3 and 4.2.3.Stormwater Discharges Associated With Industrial Activity 30 General Permit 5.1.6 Documentation to Support Eligibility Considerations Under Other Federal Laws.5.1.6.1 Documentation Regarding Endangered Species. You must keep with your SWPPP the documentation supporting your determination with regard to Part 1.1.4.5 (Endangered and Threatened Species and Critical Habitat Protection).

5.1.6.2 Documentation Regarding Historic Properties. You must keep with your SWPPP the documentation supporting your determination with regard to Part 1.1.4.6 (Historic Properties Preservation). 5.1.6.3 Documentation Regarding NEPA Review. You must keep with your SWPPP the documentation supporting your certification of eligibility under Part 1.1.2.5 (Discharges Subject to Any New Source Performance Standards).

5.1.7 Signature

Requirements. You must sign and date your SWPPP in accordance with Appendix B, Subsection 11, including the date of signature.

5.2 Required

SWPPP Modifications. You must modify your SWPPP whenever necessary to address any of the triggering conditions for corrective action in Part 3.1 and to ensure that they do not reoccur, or to reflect changes implemented when a review following the triggering conditions in Part 3.2 indicates that changes to your control measures are necessary to meet the effluent limits in this permit.Changes to your SWPPP document must be made in accordance with the corrective action deadlines in Parts 3.3 and 3.4, and must be signed and dated in accordance with Appendix B, Subsection 11.5.3 SWPPP Availability. You must retain a copy of the current SWPPP required by this permit at the facility, and it must be immediately available to EPA; a State, Tribal, or local agency approving stormwater management plans; the operator of an MS4 receiving discharges from the site; and representatives of the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS) or the National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS) at the time of an onsite inspection or upon request. EPA may provide access to portions of your SWPPP to a member of the public upon request. Confidential Business Information (CBI) may be withheld from the public, but may not be withheld from those staff cleared for CBI review within EPA, USFWS, or NMFS.EPA encourages you to post your SWPPP online and provide the website address on your NOI.Stormwater Discharges Associated With Industrial Activity 31 Stormwater Discharges Associated With Industrial Activity 31 General Permit 5.4 Additional Documentation Requirements. You are required to keep the following inspection, monitoring, and certification records with your SWPPP that together keep your records complete and up-to-date, and demonstrate your full compliance with the conditions of this permit: o A copy of the NOI submitted to EPA along with any correspondence exchanged between you and EPA specific to coverage under this permit;* A copy of the acknowledgment letter you receive from the NOI Processing Center or eNOI system assigning your permit tracking number;* A copy of this permit (an electronic copy easily available to SWPPP personnel is also acceptable);

  • Descriptions and dates of any incidences of significant spills, leaks, or other releases that resulted in discharges of pollutants to waters of the U.S., through stormwater or otherwise; the circumstances leading to the release and actions taken in response to the release; and measures taken to prevent the recurrence of such releases (see Part 2.1.2.4);* Records of employee training, including date training received (see Part 2.1.2.9);" Documentation of maintenance and repairs of control measures, including the date(s) of regular maintenance, date(s) of discovery of areas in need of repair/replacement, and for repairs, date(s) that the control measure(s) returned to full function, and the justification for any extended maintenance/repair schedules (see Part 2.1.2.3);" All inspection reports, including the Routine Facility Inspection Reports (see Part 4.1), the Quarterly Visual Assessment Reports (see Part 4.2), and the Comprehensive Site Inspection Reports (see Part 4.3);* Description of any deviations from the schedule for visual assessments and/or monitoring, and the reason for the deviations (e.g., adverse weather or it was impracticable to collect samples within the first 30 minutes of a measurable storm event) (see Parts 4.2.1, 6.1.4, and 6.2.1.2);" Description of any corrective action taken at your site, including triggering event and dates when problems were discovered and modifications occurred;o Documentation of any benchmark exceedances and how they were responded to, including either (1) corrective action taken, (2) a finding that the exceedence was due to natural background pollutant levels, or (3) a finding that no further pollutant reductions were technologically available and economically practicable and achievable in light of best industry practice consistent with Part 6.2.1.2;o Documentation to support any determination that pollutants of concern are not expected to be present above natural background levels if you discharge directly to impaired waters, and that such pollutants were not detected in your discharge or were solely attributable to natural background sources (see Part 6.2.4.2);

and o Documentation to support your claim that your facility has changed its status from active to inactive and unstaffed with respect to the requirements to conduct routine facility inspections (see Part 4.1.3), quarterly visual assessments (see Part 4.2.3), and/or benchmark monitoring (see Part 6.2.1.3).Stormwater Discharges Associated With Industrial Activity 32 Stormwater Discharges Associated With Industrial Activity 32 General Permit 6. Monitoring. You must collect and analyze stormwater samples and document monitoring activities consistent with the procedures described in Part 6 and Appendix B, Subsections 10 -12, and any additional sector-specific or State/Tribal-specific requirements in Parts 8 and 9, respectively. Refer to Part 7 for reporting and recordkeeping requirements.

6.1 Monitoring

Procedures

6.1.1 Monitored

Outfalls.Applicable monitoring requirements apply to each outfall authorized by this permit, except as otherwise exempt from monitoring as a "substantially identical outfall." If your facility has two or more outfalls that you believe discharge substantially identical effluents, based on the similarities of the general industrial activities and control measures, exposed materials that may significantly contribute pollutants to stormwater, and runoff coefficients of their drainage areas, you may monitor the effluent ofjust one of the outfalls and report that the results also apply to the substantially identical outfall(s). As required in Part 5.1.5.2, your SWPPP must identify each outfall authorized by this permit and describe the rationale for any substantially identical outfall determinations. The allowance for monitoring only one of the substantially identical outfalls is not applicable to any outfalls with numeric effluent limitations. You are required to monitor each outfall covered by a numeric effluent limit as identified in Part 6.2.2.6.1.2 Commingled Discharges. If discharges authorized by this permit commingle with discharges not authorized under this permit, any required sampling of the authorized discharges must be performed at a point before they mix with other waste streams, to the extent practicable.

6.1.3 Measurable

Storm Events.All required monitoring must be performed on a storm event that results in an actual discharge from your site ("measurable storm event") that follows the preceding measurable storm event by at least 72 hours (3 days). The 72-hour (3-day) storm interval does not apply if you are able to document that less than a 72-hour (3-day) interval is representative for local storm events during the sampling period. In the case of snowmelt, the monitoring must be performed at a time when a measurable discharge occurs at your site.For each monitoring event, except snowmelt monitoring, you must identify the date and duration (in hours) of the rainfall event, rainfall total (in inches) for that rainfall event, and time (in days) since the previous measurable storm event. For snowmelt monitoring, you must identify the date of the sampling event.Stormwater Discharges Associated With Industrial Activity 33 Stormwater Discharges Associated With Industrial Activity 33 General Permit 6.1.4 Sample Type.You must take a minimum of one grab sample from a discharge resulting from a measurable storm event as described in Part 6.1.3. Samples must be collected within the first 30 minutes of a measurable storm event. If it is not possible to collect the sample within the first 30 minutes of a measurable storm event, the sample must be collected as soon as practicable after the first 30 minutes and documentation must be kept with the SWPPP explaining why it was not possible to take samples within the first 30 minutes. In the case of snowmelt, samples must be taken during a period with a measurable discharge.

6.1.5 Adverse

Weather Conditions. When adverse weather conditions as described in Part 4.2.3 prevent the collection of samples according to the relevant monitoring schedule, you must take a substitute sample during the next qualifying storm event. Adverse weather does not exempt you from having to file a benchmark monitoring report in accordance with your sampling schedule. You must report any failure to monitor as specified in Part 7.1 indicating the basis for not sampling during the usual reporting period.6.1.6 Climates with Irregular Stormwater Runoff.If your facility is located in areas where limited rainfall occurs during parts of the year (e.g., arid or semi-arid climates) or in areas where freezing conditions exist that prevent runoff from occurring for extended periods, required monitoring events may be distributed during seasons when precipitation occurs, or when snowmelt results in a measurable discharge from your site. You must still collect the required number of samples.6.1.7 Monitoring Periods.Monitoring requirements in this permit begin in the first full quarter following either April 1, 2009 or your date of discharge authorization, whichever date comes later. If your monitoring is required on a quarterly basis (e.g., benchmark monitoring), you must monitor at least once in each of the following 3-month intervals: o January 1 -March 31;o April 1 -June 30;* July 1 -September 30; and a October 1 -December 31.For example, if you obtain permit coverage on June 2, 2009, then your first monitoring quarter is July 1 -September 30, 2009. This monitoring schedule may be modified in accordance with Part 6.1.6 if the revised schedule is documented with your SWPPP and provided to EPA with your first monitoring report.Stormwater Discharges Associated With Industrial Activity 34 General Permit 6.1.8 Monitoring for Allowable Non-Stormwater Discharges You are only required to monitor allowable non-stormwater discharges (as delineated in Part 1.1.3) when they are commingled with stormwater discharges associated with industrial activity.6.2 Required Monitoring. This permit includes five types of required analytical monitoring, one or more of which may apply to your discharge: " Quarterly benchmark monitoring (see Part 6.2.1)* Annual effluent limitations guidelines monitoring (see Part 6.2.2);" State- or Tribal-specific monitoring (see Part 6.2.3);o Impaired waters monitoring (see Part 6.2.4); and" Other monitoring as required by EPA (see Part 6.2.5).When more than one type of monitoring for the same parameter at the same outfall applies (e.g., total suspended solids once per year for an effluent limit and once per quarter for benchmark monitoring at a given outfall), you may use a single sample to satisfy both monitoring requirements (i.e., one sample satisfying both the annual effluent limit sample and one of the 4 quarterly benchmark monitoring samples).All required monitoring must be conducted in accordance with the procedures described in Appendix B, Subsection IO.D.6.2.1 Benchmark Monitoring. This permit stipulates pollutant benchmark concentrations that may be applicable to your discharge. The benchmark concentrations are not effluent limitations; a benchmark exceedance, therefore, is not a permit violation. Benchmark monitoring data are primarily for your use to determine the overall effectiveness of your control measures and to assist you in knowing when additional corrective action(s) may be necessary to comply with the effluent limitations in Part 2.6.2.1.1 Applicability of Benchmark Monitoring. You must monitor for any benchmark parameters specified for the industrial sector(s), both primary industrial activity and any co-located industrial activities, applicable to your discharge. Your industry-specific benchmark concentrations are listed in the sector-specific sections of Part 8. If your facility is in one of the industrial sectors subject to benchmark concentrations that are hardness-dependent, you are required to submit to EPA with your first benchmark report a hardness value, established consistent with the procedures in Appendix J, which is representative of your receiving water.Samples must be analyzed consistent with 40 CFR Part 136 analytical methods and using test procedures with quantitation limits at or below benchmark values for all benchmark parameters for which you are required to sample.Stormwater Discharges Associated With Industrial Activity 35 General Permit 6.2.1.2 Benchmark Monitoring Schedule. Benchmark monitoring must be conducted quarterly, as identified in Part 6.1.7, for your first 4 full quarters of permit coverage commencing no earlier than April 1, 2009. Facilities in climates with irregular stormwater runoff, as described in Part 6.1.6, may modify this quarterly schedule provided that this revised schedule is reported to EPA when the first benchmark sample is collected and reported, and that this revised schedule is kept with the facility's SWPPP as specified in Part 5.4.Data not exceeding benchmarks: After collection of 4 quarterly samples, if the average of the 4 monitoring values for any parameter does not exceed the benchmark, you have fulfilled your monitoring requirements for that parameter for the permit term. For averaging purposes, use a value of zero for any individual sample parameter, analyzed using procedures consistent with Part 6.2.1.1, which is determined to be less than the method detection limit. For sample values that fall between the method detection level and the quantitation limit (i.e., a confirmed detection but below the level that can be reliably quantified), use a value halfway between zero and the quantitation limit.Data exceeding benchmarks: After collection of 4 quarterly samples, if the average of the 4 monitoring values for any parameter exceeds the benchmark, you must, in accordance with Part 3.2, review the selection, design, installation, and implementation of your control measures to determine if modifications are necessary to meet the effluent limits in this permit, and either:* Make the necessary modifications and continue quarterly monitoring until you have completed 4 additional quarters of monitoring for which the average does not exceed the benchmark; or* Make a determination that no further pollutant reductions are technologically available and economically practicable and achievable in light of best industry practice to meet the technology-based effluent limits or are necessary to meet the water-quality-based effluent limitations in Parts 2 of this permit, in which case you must continue monitoring once per year. You must also document your rationale for concluding that no further pollutant reductions are achievable, and retain all records related to this documentation with your SWPPP. You must also notify EPA of this determination in your next benchmark monitoring report.In accordance with Part 3.2, you must review your control measures and perform any required corrective action immediately (or document why no corrective action is required), without waiting for the full 4 quarters of monitoring data, if an exceedance of the 4 quarter average is mathematically certain. If after modifying your control measures and conducting 4 additional quarters of monitoring, your average still exceeds the benchmark (or if an exceedance of the benchmark by the 4 quarter average is mathematically certain prior to conducting the full 4 additional quarters of monitoring), you must again review your control measures and take one of the two actions above.Stormwater Discharges Associated With Industrial Activity 36 General Permit Natural background pollutant levels: Following the first 4 quarters of benchmark monitoring (or sooner if the exceedance is triggered by less than 4 quarters of data, see above), if the average concentration of a pollutant exceeds a benchmark value, and you determine that exceedance of the benchmark is attributable solely to the presence of that pollutant in the natural background, you are not required to perform corrective action or additional benchmark monitoring provided that: " The average concentration of your benchmark monitoring results is less than or equal to the concentration of that pollutant in the natural background; o You document and maintain with your SWPPP, as required in Part 5.4, your supporting rationale for concluding that benchmark exceedances are in fact attributable solely to natural background pollutant levels. You must include in your supporting rationale any data previously collected by you or others (including literature studies) that describe the levels of natural background pollutants in your stormwater discharge; and o You notify EPA on your final quarterly benchmark monitoring report that the benchmark exceedances are attributable solely to natural background pollutant levels.Natural background pollutants include those substances that are naturally occurring in soils or groundwater. Natural background pollutants do not include legacy pollutants from earlier activity on your site, or pollutants in run-on from neighboring sources which are not naturally occurring. 6.2.1.3 Exception for Inactive and Unstaffed Sites. The requirement for benchmark monitoring does not apply at a facility that is inactive and unstaffed, as long as there are no industrial materials or activities exposed to stormwater. To invoke this exception, you must do the following: " Maintain a statement onsite with your SWPPP stating that the site is inactive and unstaffed, and that there are no industrial materials or activities exposed to stormwater in accordance with the substantive requirements in 40 CFR 122.26(g)and sign and certify the statement in accordance with Appendix B, Subsection 11;and o If circumstances change and industrial materials or activities become exposed to stormwater or your facility becomes active and/or staffed, this exception no longer applies and you must immediately begin complying with the applicable benchmark monitoring requirements under Part 6.2 as if you were in your first year of permit coverage. You must indicate in your first benchmark monitoring report that your facility has materials or activities exposed to stormwater or has become active and/or staffed.o If you are not qualified for this exception at the time you are authorized under this permit, but during the permit term you become qualified because your facility is inactive and unstaffed, and there are no industrial materials or activities that are exposed to stormwater, then you must notify EPA of this change in your next benchmark monitoring report. You may discontinue benchmark monitoring once Stormwater Discharges Associated With Industrial Activity 37 General Permit you have notified EPA, and prepared and signed the certification statement described above concerning your facility's qualification for this special exception. Note: This exception has different requirements for Sectors G, H, and J (see Part 8).6.2.2 Effluent Limitations Monitoring. 6.2.2.1 Monitoring Based on Effluent Limitations Guidelines. Table 6-1 identifies the stormwater discharges subject to effluent limitation guidelines that are authorized for coverage under this permit. Beginning in the first full quarter following April 1, 2009 or your date of discharge authorization, whichever date comes later, you must monitor once per year at each outfall containing the discharges identified in Table 6-1 for the parameters specified in the sector-specific section of Part 8.Table 6-1. Required Monitoring for Effluent Limits Based on Effluent Limitations Guidelines Regulated Activity Effluent Limit Monitoring Sample Frequency Type Discharges resulting from spray down or intentional See Part 8.A.7 1/year Grab wetting of logs at wet deck storage areas Runoff from phosphate fertilizer manufacturing See Part 8.C.4 1/year Grab facilities that comes into contact with any raw materials, finished product, by-products or waste products (SIC 2874)Runoff from asphalt emulsion facilities See Part 8.D.4 1/year Grab Runoff from material storage piles at cement See Part 8.E.5 1/year Grab manufacturing facilities Mine dewatering discharges at crushed stone, See Part 8.J.9 1/year Grab construction sand and gravel, or industrial sand mining facilities Runoff from hazardous waste landfills See Part 8.K.6 1/year Grab Runoff from non-hazardous waste landfills See Part 8.L.10 1/year Grab Runoff from coal storage piles at steam electric See Part 8.0.8 1/year generating facilities 6.2.2.2 Substantially Identical Outfalls. You must monitor each outfall discharging runoff from any regulated activity identified in Table 6-1. The substantially identical outfall monitoring provisions are not available for numeric effluent limits monitoring.

6.2.3 State

or Tribal Provisions Monitoring 6.2.3.1 Sectors Required to Conduct State or Tribal Monitoring. You must comply with any State or Tribal monitoring requirements (see Part 9) applicable to your facility's location.6.2.3.2 State or Tribal Monitoring Schedule. If a monitoring frequency is not specified for an applicable requirement in Part 9, you must monitor once per year for the entire permit term.Stormwater Discharges Associated With Industrial Activity 38 General Permit 6.2.4 Discharges to Impaired Waters Monitoring. 6.2.4.1 Permittees Required to Monitor Discharges to Impaired Waters. If you discharge to an impaired water, you must monitor for all pollutants for which the waterbody is impaired and for which a standard analytical method exists (see 40 CFR Part 136).If the pollutant for which the waterbody is impaired is suspended solids, turbidity or sediment/sedimentation, you must monitor for Total Suspended Solids (TSS). If the pollutant for which the waterbody is impaired is expressed in the form of an indicator or surrogate pollutant, you must monitor for that indicator or surrogate pollutant. No monitoring is required when a waterbody's biological communities are impaired but no pollutant, including indicator or surrogate pollutants, is specified as causing the impairment, or when a waterbody's impairment is related to hydrologic modifications, impaired hydrology, or temperature. 6.2.4.2 Impaired Waters Monitoring Schedule.Discharges to impaired waters without an EPA approved or established TMDL: Beginning in the first full quarter following April 1, 2009 or your date of discharge authorization, whichever date comes later, you must monitor once per year at each outfall (except substantially identical outfalls) discharging stormwater to impaired waters without an EPA approved or established TMDL. This monitoring requirement does not apply after one year if the pollutant for which the waterbody is impaired is not detected above natural background levels in your stormwater discharge, and you document, as required in Part 5.4 (Additional Documentation Requirements), that this pollutant is not expected to be present above natural background levels in your discharge. If the pollutant for which the water is impaired is not present and not expected to be present in your discharge, or it is present but you have determined that its presence is caused solely by natural background sources, you should include a notification to this effect in your first monitoring report, after which you may discontinue annual monitoring. To support a determination that the pollutant's presence is caused solely by natural background sources, you must keep the following documentation with your SWPPP records: o An explanation of why you believe that the presence of the pollutant causing the impairment in your discharge is not related to the activities at your facility; and" Data and/or studies that tie the presence of the pollutant causing the impairment in your discharge to natural background sources in the watershed. Natural background pollutants include those substances that are naturally occurring in soils or groundwater. Natural background pollutants do not include legacy pollutants from earlier activity on your site, or pollutants in run-on from neighboring sources which are not naturally occurring. Stormwater Discharges Associated With Industrial Activity 39 Stormwater Discharges Associated With Industrial Activity 39 General Permit Discharg-es to impaired waters with an EPA approved or established TMDL: For stormwater discharges to waters for which there is an EPA approved or established TMDL, you are not required to monitor for the pollutant for which the TMDL was written unless EPA informs you, upon examination of the applicable TMDL and/or WLA, that you are subject to such a requirement consistent with the assumptions of the applicable TMDL and/or WLA. EPA's notice will include specifications on which pollutant to monitor and the required monitoring frequency during the first year of permit coverage. Following the first year of monitoring: 0 If the TMDL pollutant is not detected in any of your first year samples, you may discontinue further sampling, unless the TMDL has specific instructions to the contrary, in which case you must follow those instructions. You must keep records of this finding onsite with your SWPPP.* If you detect the presence of the pollutant causing the impairment in your stormwater discharge for any of the samples collected in your first year, you must continue monitoring annually throughout the term of this permit, unless the TMDL specifies more frequent monitoring, in which case you must follow the TMDL requirements.

6.2.5 Additional

Monitoring Required by EPA.EPA may notify you of additional discharge monitoring requirements. Any such notice will briefly state the reasons for the monitoring, locations, and parameters to be monitored, frequency and period of monitoring, sample types, and reporting requirements. 6.3 Follow-up Actions if Discharge Exceeds Numeric Effluent Limit.You must conduct follow-up monitoring within 30 calendar days (or during the next qualifying runoff event, should none occur within 30 days) of implementing corrective action(s)taken pursuant to Part 3 in response to an exceedance of a numeric effluent limit contained in this permit. See Part 9 for specific monitoring requirements applicable to individual States or Tribes. Monitoring must be performed for any pollutant(s) that exceeds the effluent limit. If this follow-up monitoring exceeds the applicable effluent limitation, you must comply with both Parts 6.3.1 and 6.3.2.6.3.1 Submit an Exceedance Report.You must submit an Exceedance Report consistent with Part 7.3.6.3.2 Continue to Monitor.You must continue to monitor, at least quarterly, until your discharge is in compliance with the effluent limit or until EPA waives the requirement for additional monitoring. Stormwater Discharges Associated With Industrial Activity 40 General Permit 7. Reporting and Recordkeeping

7.1 Reporting

Monitoring Data to EPA.All monitoring data collected pursuant to Parts 6.2 and 6.3 must be submitted to EPA using EPA's online eNOI system (www.epa.gov/npdes/eNOI) no later than 30 days (email date or postmark date) after you have received your complete laboratory results for all monitored outfalls for the reporting period. If you cannot access eNOI, paper reporting forms must be submitted by the same deadline to the appropriate address identified in Part 7.6.1. If you are using paper, reporting forms, EPA strongly recommends that you use the MSGP discharge monitoring report (MDMR) available at www.epa.gov/npdes/stormwater/msgp. See Part 9 for specific reporting requirements applicable to individual States or Tribes.For benchmark monitoring, note that you are required to submit sampling results to EPA no later than 30 days after receiving laboratory results for each quarter that you are required to collect benchmark samples, in accordance with Part 6.2.1.2. If you collect multiple samples in a single quarter (e.g., due to adverse weather conditions, climates with irregular stormwater runoff, or areas subject to snow), you are required to submit all sampling results to EPA within 30 days of receiving the laboratory results.7.2 Annual Report You must submit an annual report to EPA that includes the findings from your Part 4.3 comprehensive site inspection and any corrective action documentation as required in Part 3.4.If corrective action is not yet completed at the time of submission of this annual report, you must describe the status of any outstanding corrective action(s). In addition to the information required in Parts 3.4 (Corrective Action Report) and 4.3.2 (Comprehensive Site Inspection Documentation), you must include the following information with your annual report:-Facility name-NPDES permit tracking number-Facility physical address-Contact person name, title, and phone number EPA strongly recommends that you submit this report using the Annual Reporting Form provided as Appendix I. You must submit the annual report to EPA within 45 days (postmark date) after conducting the comprehensive site inspection to the address identified in Part 7.6.1.7.3 Exceedance Report for Numeric Effluent Limits If follow-up monitoring pursuant to Part 6.3 exceeds a numeric effluent limit, you must submit an Exceedance Report to EPA no later than 30 days after you have received your lab results. Your report must include the following: 0 NPDES permit tracking number;Stormwater Discharges Associated With Industrial Activity 41 General Permit* Facility name, physical address and location;* Name of receiving water;* Monitoring data from this and the preceding monitoring event(s);* An explanation of the situation; what you have done and intend to do (should your corrective actions not yet be complete) to correct the violation; and o An appropriate contact name and phone number.7.4 Additional Reporting. In addition to the reporting requirements stipulated in Part 7, you are also subject to the standard permit reporting provisions of Appendix B, Subsection 12.Where applicable, you must submit the following reports to the appropriate EPA Regional Office listed in Part 7.6.2, as applicable. If you discharge through an MS4, you must also submit these reports to the MS4 operator (identified pursuant to Part 5.1.2).o 24-hour reporting (see Appendix B, Subsection 12.F) -You must report any noncompliance which may endanger health or the environment. Any information must be provided orally within 24 hours from the time you become aware of the circumstances;

  • 5-day follow-up reporting to the 24 hour reporting (see Appendix B, Subsection 12.F) -A written submission must also be provided within five days of the time you become aware of the circumstances; o Reportable quantity spills (see Part 2.1.2.4) -You must provide notification, as required under Part 2.1.2.4, as soon as you have knowledge of a leak, spill, or other release containing a hazardous substance or oil in an amount equal to or in excess of a reportable quantity.Where applicable, you must submit the following reports to EPA Headquarters at the appropriate address in Part 7.6. 1: o Planned changes (see Appendix B, Subsection 12.A) -You must give notice to EPA as soon as possible of any planned physical alterations or additions to the permitted facility that qualify the facility as a new source or that could significantly change the nature or significantly increase the quantity of pollutants discharged; o Anticipated noncompliance (see Appendix B, Subsection 12.B) -You must give advance notice to EPA of any planned changes in the permitted facility or activity which you anticipate will result in noncompliance with permit requirements; o Transfer of ownership and/or operation

-You must submit a complete and accurate NOI in accordance with the requirements of Appendix G of this permit and by the deadlines specified in Table 1-2;o Compliance schedules (see Appendix B, Subsection 12.F) -Reports of compliance or noncompliance with, or any progress reports on, interim and final requirements contained in any compliance schedule of this permit must be submitted no later than 14 days following each schedule date;Stormwater Discharges Associated With Industrial Activity 42 General Permit* Other noncompliance (see Appendix B, Subsection 12.G) -You must report all instances of noncompliance not reported in your monitoring report (pursuant to Part 7.1), compliance schedule report, or 24-hour report at the time monitoring reports are submitted; and" Other information (see Appendix B, Subsection 12.H) -You must promptly submit facts or information if you become aware that you failed to submit relevant facts in your NOI, or that you submitted incorrect information in your NOI or in any report.7.5 Recordkeeping. You must retain copies of your SWPPP (including any modifications made during the term of this permit), additional documentation requirements pursuant to Part 5.4 (including documentation related to corrective actions taken pursuant to Part 3), all reports and certifications required by this permit, monitoring data, and records of all data used to complete the NOI to be covered by this permit, for a period of at least 3 years from the date that your coverage under this permit expires or is terminated.

7.6 Addresses

for Reports 7.6.1 EPA Addresses Paper copies of any reports required in Part 6 and 7, not otherwise submitted electronically via EPA's eNOI system (www.epa.gov/npdes/eNOI) must be sent to one of the following addresses: Via U.S. mail: U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Office of Water, Water Permits Division Mail Code 4203M, ATTN: MSGP Reports 1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW Washington, D.C. 20460 Or Via Overnight/Express Delivery: U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Office of Water, Water Permits Division Room 7420, ATTN: MSGP Reports 1201 Constitution Avenue, NW Washington, D.C. 20004 Phone number: 202-564-9545 Notices of Intent and Notices of Termination should be submitted using EPA's eNOI system (www.epa.gov/npdes/eNOI) or sent to EPA's NOI Center (see Appendix G for the address).Stormwater Discharges Associated With Industrial Activity 43 General Permit All other written correspondence concerning discharges in any State, Indian Country land, Territory, or from any Federal facility covered under this permit and directed to the EPA, including individual permit applications, must be sent to the address of the appropriate EPA Regional Office listed below: 7.6.2 Regional Addresses 7.6.2.1 Region 1: Connecticut, Massachusetts, and New Hampshire, Rhode Island, Vermont.U.S. EPA Region I Office of Ecosystem Protection One Congress Street -CIP Boston, MA 02114 7.6.2.2 Region 2: New Jersey, New York, Puerto Rico, and Virgin Islands.For Puerto Rico and the Virgin Islands U.S. EPA Region 2 Caribbean Environmental Protection Division Environmental Management Branch Centro Europa Building 1492 Ponce de Leon Avenue, Suite 417 San Juan, PR 00907-4127 For New Jersey and New York: (Coverage not available under this permit.)U.S. EPA Region 2 Division of Environmental Planning and Protection 290 Broadway New York, NY 10007-1866 7.6.2.3 Region 3: Delaware, District of Columbia, Maryland, Pennsylvania, Virginia, West Virginia.U.S. EPA Region 3 Water Protection Division (3WP40)Stormwater Coordinator 1650 Arch Street Philadelphia, PA 19103 Stormwater Discharges Associated With Industrial Activity 44 Stormwater Discharges Associated With Industrial Activity 44 General Permit 7.6.2.4 Region 4: Alabama, Florida, Georgia, Kentucky, Mississippi, North Carolina, South Carolina, Tennessee.(Coverage not available under this permit.)U.S. EPA Region 4 Clean Water Act Enforcement Section Water Programs Enforcement Branch Water Management Division Atlanta Federal Center 61 Forsyth Street SW Atlanta, GA 30303 7.6.2.5 Region 5: Illinois, Indiana, Michigan, Minnesota, Ohio, Wisconsin. U.S. EPA Region 5 Water Division NPDES Programs Branch 77 W. Jackson Blvd.Mail Code WN16J Chicago, IL 60604 7.6.2.6 Region 6: Arkansas, Louisiana, Oklahoma, Texas, and New Mexico (except see Region 9 for Navajo lands, and see Region 8 for Ute Mountain Reservation lands).U.S. EPA Region 6 Stormwater Coordinator Compliance Assurance and Enforcement Division (6EN-WC)EPA SW MSGP P.O. Box 50625 Dallas, TX 75205 7.6.2.7 Region 7: Iowa, Kansas, Missouri, Nebraska.(Coverage not available under this permit.)U.S. EPA -Region 7 901 N. 5th Street Kansas City, KS 66101 Stormwater Discharges Associated With Industrial Activity 45 Stormwater Discharges Associated With Industrial Activity 45 General Permit 7.6.2.8 Region 8: Colorado, Montana, North Dakota, South Dakota, Wyoming, Utah (except see Region 9 for Goshute Reservation and Navajo Reservation lands), the Ute Mountain Reservation in New Mexico, and the Pine Ridge Reservation in Nebraska.(Coverage not available under this permit.)U.S. EPA Region 8 Stormwater Coordinator (8P-W-P)999 1 8 th Street, Suite 300 Denver, CO 80202-2466 7.6.2.9 Region 9: Arizona, California, Hawaii, Nevada, Guam, American Samoa, the Commonwealth of the Northern Mariana Islands, the Goshute Reservation in Utah and Nevada, the Navajo Reservation in Utah, New Mexico, and Arizona, the Duck Valley Reservation in Idaho, Fort McDermitt Reservation in Oregon.U.S. EPA Region 9 Water Management Division, WTR-5 Stormwater Coordinator 75 Hawthorne Street San Francisco, CA 94105 7.6.2.10 Region 10: Alaska, Idaho, Oregon (except see Region 9 for Fort McDermitt Reservation), Washington. U.S. EPA Region 10 Office of Water and Watersheds OWW-130 Stormwater Coordinator 1200 6th Avenue Seattle, WA 98101 7.6.3 State and Tribal Addresses. See Part 9 (States and Tribes) for the addresses of applicable States or Tribes that require submission of information to their agencies.Stormwater Discharges Associated With Industrial Activity 46 General Permit Part 8 -Sector-Specific Requirements for Industrial Activity Subpart A -Sector A -Timber Products.You must comply with Part 8 sector-specific requirements associated with your primary industrial activity and any co-located industrial activities, as defined in Appendix A. The sector-specific requirements apply to those areas of your facility where those sector-specific activities occur. These sector-specific requirements are in addition to any requirements specified elsewhere in this permit.8.A.1 Covered Stormwater Discharges. The requirements in Subpart A apply to stormwater discharges associated with industrial activity from Timber Products facilities as identified by the SIC Codes specified under Sector A in Table D-1 of Appendix D of the permit.8.A.2 Limitation on Coverage 8.A.2.1 Prohibition of Discharges. (See also Part 1.1.4) Not covered by this permit: stormwater discharges from areas where there may be contact with the chemical formulations sprayed to provide surface protection. These discharges must be covered by a separate NPDES permit.8.A.2.2 Authorized Non-Stormwater Discharges. (See also Part 1.1.3) Also authorized by this permit, provided the non-stormwater component of the discharge is in compliance with the requirements in Part 2.1.2 (Non-Numeric Effluent Limits): discharges from the spray down of lumber and wood product storage yards where no chemical additives are used in the spray-down waters and no chemicals are applied to the wood during storage.8.A.3 Additional Technology-Based Effluent Limits.8.A.3.l Good Housekeeping. (See also Part 2.1.2.2) In areas where storage, loading and unloading, and material handling occur, perform good housekeeping to limit the discharge of wood debris, minimize the leachate generated from decaying wood materials, and minimize the generation of dust.8.A.4 Additional SWPPP Requirements. 8.A.4.1 Drainage Area Site Map. (See also Part 5.1.2) Document in your SWPPP where any of the following may be exposed to precipitation or surface runoff: processing areas, treatment chemical storage areas, treated wood and residue storage areas, wet decking areas, dry decking areas, untreated wood and residue storage areas, and treatment equipment storage areas.8.A.4.2 Inventory of Exposed Materials. (See also Part 5.1.3.2) Where such information exists, if your facility has used chlorophenolic, creosote, or chromium-copper-arsenic formulations for wood surface protection or preserving, document in your SWPPP the following: areas where contaminated soils, treatment equipment, and stored materials still remain and the management practices employed to minimize the contact of these materials with stormwater runoff.Stormwater Discharges Associated With Industrial Activity -Sector A 47 General Permit 8.A.4.3 Description of Stormwater Management Controls. (See also Part 5.1.4) Document measures implemented to address the following activities and sources: log, lumber, and wood product storage areas; residue storage areas; loading and unloading areas;material handling areas; chemical storage areas; and equipment and vehicle maintenance, storage, and repair areas. If your facility performs wood surface protection and preservation activities, address the specific control measures, including any BMPs, for these activities. 8.A.5 Additional Inspection Requirements. See also Part 4.1. If your facility performs wood surface protection and preservation activities, inspect processing areas, transport areas, and treated wood storage areas monthly to assess the usefulness of practices to minimize the deposit of treatment chemicals on unprotected soils and in areas that will come in contact with stormwater discharges. 8.A.6 Sector-Specific Benchmarks Table 8.A-1 identifies benchmarks that apply to the specific subsectors of Sector A.These benchmarks apply to both your primary industrial activity and any co-located industrial activities, which describe your site activities. Table 8.A-1 Subsector Benchmark (You may be subject to requirements for more than Parameter Monitoring one sector/subsector) Concentration Subsector Al. General Sawmills and Planing Mills Chemical Oxygen 120.0 mg/L (SIC 2421) Demand (COD)Total Suspended 100 mg/L Solids (TSS)Total Zinc' Hardness Dependent Subsector A2. Wood Preserving (SIC 2491) Total Arsenic 0.15 mg/L Total Copper' Hardness Dependent Subsector A3. Log Storage and Handling Total Suspended 100 mg/L (SIC 2411) Solids (TSS)Subsector A4. Hardwood Dimension and Flooring Chemical Oxygen 120.0 mg/L Mills; Special Products Sawmills, not elsewhere Demand (COD)classified; Millwork, Veneer, Plywood, and Structural Wood; Wood Pallets and Skids; Wood Containers, not Total Suspended 100.0 mg/L elsewhere classified; Wood Buildings and Mobile Solids (TSS)Homes; Reconstituted Wood Products; and Wood Products Facilities not elsewhere classified (SIC 2426, 2429, 2431-2439 (except 2434), 2441, 2448, 2449, 2451, 2452, 2493, and 2499)The benchmark values of some metals are dependent on water hardness. For these parameters, permittees must determine the hardness of the receiving water (see Appendix J, "Calculating Hardness in Receiving Waters for Hardness Dependent Metals," for methodology), in accordance with Part 6.2.1.1, to identify the applicable 'hardness range' for determining their benchmark value applicable to their facility. The ranges occur in 25 mg/L increments. Hardness Dependent Benchmarks follow in the table below: Stormwater Discharges Associated With Industrial Activity -Sector A 48 General Permit Copper Zinc Water Hardness Range (mg/L) (mg/L)0-25 mg/L 0.0038 0.04 25-50 mg/L 0.0056 0.05 50-75 mg/L 0.0090 0.08 75-100 mgiL 0.0123 0.11 100-125 mg/L 0.0156 0.13 125-150 mg/L 0.0189 0.16 150-175 mg/L 0.0221 0.18 175-200 mg/L 0.0253 0.20 200-225 mg/L 0.0285 0.23 225-250 mg/L 0.0316 0.25 250+ mg/L 0.0332 0.26 8.A.7 Effluent Limitations Based on Effluent Limitations Guidelines (See also Part 6.2.2.1 of the permit.)Table 8.A-2 identifies effluent limits that apply to the industrial activities described below. Compliance with these effluent limits is to be determined based on discharges from these industrial activities independent of commingling with any other wastestreams that may be covered under this permit.Table 8.A-21 Industrial Activity Discharges resulting from spray down or pH 6.0 -9.0 s.u intentional wetting of logs at wet deck Debris (woody material No discharge of debris that storage areas such as bark, twigs, will not pass through a branches, heartwood, or 2.54-cm (1-in.) diameter sapwood) round opening'Monitor annually.Stormwater Discharges Associated With Industrial Activity -Sector A 49 General Permit Part 8 -Sector-Specific Requirements for Industrial Activity Subpart B -Sector B -Paper and Allied Products.You must comply with Part 8 sector-specific requirements associated with your primary industrial activity and any co-located industrial activities, as defined in Appendix A. The sector-specific requirements apply to those areas of your facility where those sector-specific activities occur. These sector-specific requirements are in addition to any requirements specified elsewhere in this permit.8.B.1 Covered Stormwater Discharges. The requirements in Subpart B apply to stormwater discharges associated with industrial activity from Paper and Allied Products Manufacturing facilities, as identified by the SIC Codes specified under Sector B in Table D- I of Appendix D of the permit.8.B.2 Sector-Specific Benchmarks. (See also Part 6 of the permit.)Table 8.B-1.Subsector Benchmark (You may be subject to requirements for more Parameter Monitoring than one sector/subsector) Concentration Subsector BI. Paperboard Mills Chemical Oxygen 120 mg/L (SIC Code 2631) Demand (COD)Stormwater Discharges Associated With Industrial Activity -Sector B 50 Stormwater Discharges Associated With tndustrial Activity -Sector B 50 General Permit Part 8 -Sector-Specific Requirements for Industrial Activity Subpart C -Sector C -Chemical and Allied Products Manufacturing, and Refining.You must comply with Part 8 sector-specific requirements associated with your primary industrial activity and any co-located industrial activities, as defined in Appendix A. The sector-specific requirements apply to those areas of your facility where those sector-specific activities occur. These sector-specific requirements are in addition to any requirements specified elsewhere in this permit.8.C.1 Covered Stormwater Discharges. The requirements in Subpart C apply to stormwater discharges associated with industrial activity from Chemical and Allied Products Manufacturing, and Refining facilities, as identified by the SIC Codes specified under Sector C in Table D-1 of Appendix D of the permit.8.C.2 Limitations on Coverage.8.C.2.1 Prohibition of Non-Stormwater Discharges. (See also Part 1.1.4) The following are not covered by this permit: non-stormwater discharges containing inks, paints, or substances (hazardous, nonhazardous, etc.) resulting from an onsite spill, including materials collected in drip pans; washwater from material handling and processing areas; and washwater from drum, tank, or container rinsing and cleaning.8.C.3 Sector-Specific Benchmarks Table 8.C-1 identifies benchmarks that apply to the specific subsectors of Sector C.These benchmarks apply to both your primary industrial activity and any co-located industrial activities. Stormwater Discharges Associated With Industrial Activity -Sector C 51 Stormwater Discharges Associated With Industrial Activity -Sector C 51 General Permit Table &.C-I.Subsector Benchmark Monitoring (You may be subject to requirements for Parameter Cnceta tion more than one sector/subsector) Concentration Subsector C1. Agricultural Chemicals (SIC Nitrate plus Nitrite Nitrogen 0.68 mg/L 2873-2879) Total Lead' Hardness Dependent Total Iron 1.0 mg/L Total Zinc' Hardness Dependent Phosphorus 2.0 mg/L Subsector C2. Industrial Inorganic Chemicals Total Aluminum 0.75 mg/ L (SIC 2812-2819) Total Iron 1.0 mg/L Nitrate plus Nitrite Nitrogen 0.68 mg/L Subsector C3. Soaps, Detergents, Cosmetics, Nitrate plus Nitrite Nitrogen 0.68 mg/L and Perfumes (SIC 2841-2844) Total Zinc' Hardness Dependent Subsector C4. Plastics, Synthetics, and Resins Total Zinc' Hardness Dependent (SIC 282 1-2824)The benchmark values of some metals are dependent on water hardness. For these parameters, permittees must determine the hardness of the receiving water (see Appendix J, "Calculating Hardness in Receiving Waters for Hardness Dependent Metals," for methodology), in accordance with Part 6.2.1.1, to identify the applicable 'hardness range' for determining their benchmark value applicable to their facility. The ranges occur in 25 mg/L increments. Hardness Dependent Benchmarks follow in the table below: Water Lead Zinc Hardness (mg/L) (mg/L)Range 0-25 mg/L 0.014 0.04 25-50 mg/L 0.023 0.05 50-75 mg/L 0.045 0.08 75-100 mg/L 0.069 0.11 100-125 mg/L 0.095 0.13 125-150 mg/L 0.122 0.16 150-175 mg/L 0.151 0.18 175-200 mg/L 0.182 0.20 200-225 mg/L 0.213 0.23 225-250 mg/L 0.246 0.25 250+ mg/L 0.262 0.26 8.C.4 Effluent Limitations Based on Effluent Limitations Guidelines (See also Part 6.2.2.1 of the permit.)Table 8.C-2 identifies effluent limits that apply to the industrial activities described below. Compliance with these effluent limits is to be determined based on discharges from these industrial activities independent of commingling with any other wastestreams that may be covered under this permit.Stormwater Discharges Associated With Industrial Activity -Sector C 52 General Permit Table 8.C-2'Industrial Activity Parameter Effluent Limit Runoff from phosphate fertilizer Total Phosphorus (as P) 105.0 mg/L, daily maximum manufacturing facilities that comes into 35 mg/L, contact with any raw materials, finished 30-day avg.product, by-products or waste products Fluoride 75.0 mg/L, (SIC 2874) daily maximum 25.0 mg/L, 30-day avg.'Monitor annually.Stormwater Discharges Associated With Industrial Activity -Sector C 53 General Permit Part 8 -Sector-Specific Requirements for Industrial Activity Subpart D -Sector D -Asphalt Paving and Roofing Materials and Lubricant Manufacturing. You must comply with Part 8 sector-specific requirements associated with your primary industrial activity and any co-located industrial activities, as defined in Appendix A. The sector-specific requirements apply to those areas of your facility where those sector-specific activities occur. These sector-specific requirements are in addition to any requirements specified elsewhere in this permit.8.D.1 Covered Stormwater Discharges. The requirements in Subpart D apply to stormwater discharges associated with industrial activity from Asphalt Paving and Roofing Materials and Lubricant Manufacturing facilities, as identified by the SIC Codes specified under Sector D in Table D-1 of Appendix D of the permit.8.D.2 Limitations on Coverage.The following stormwater discharges associated with industrial activity are not authorized by this permit (See also Part 1.1.4)8.D.2.1 Discharges from petroleum refining facilities, including those that manufacture asphalt or asphalt products, that are subject to nationally established effluent limitation guidelines found in 40 CFR Part 419 (Petroleum Refining); or 8.D.2.2 Discharges from oil recycling facilities; or 8.D.2.3 Discharges associated with fats and oils rendering. 8.D.3 Sector-Specific Benchmarks Table 8.D-1 identifies benchmarks that apply to the specific subsectors of Sector D.These benchmarks apply to both your primary industrial activity and any co-located industrial activities, which describe your site activities. Table 8.D-1.Subsector Parameter Benchmark Monitoring Concentration Subsector D1. Asphalt Paving and Roofing Total Suspended Solids 100 mg/L Materials (SIC 2951, 2952) (TSS)Stormwater Discharges Associated With Industrial Activity -Sector D 54 Stormwater Discharges Associated With Industrial Activity -Sector D 54 General Permit 8.D.4 Effluent Limitations Based on Effluent Limitations Guidelines (See also Part 6.2.2.1 of the permit.)Table 8.D-2 identifies effluent limits that apply to the industrial activities described below. Compliance with these effluent limits is to be determined based on discharges from these industrial activities independent of commingling with any other wastestreams that may be covered under this permit.Table 8.D-21 Industrial Activity Parameter Effluent Limit Discharges from asphalt emulsion facilities. Total Suspended Solids 23.0 mg/L, (TSS) daily maximum 15.0 mg/L, 30-day avg.pH 6.0 -9.0 s.u.Oil and Grease 15.0 mg/L, daily maximum 10 mg/L, 30-day avg.'Monitor annually.Stormwater Discharges Associated With Industrial Activity-. Sector D 55 Stormwater Discharges Associated With Industrial Activity -Sector D 55 General Permit Part 8 -Sector-Specific Requirements for Industrial Activity Subpart E -Sector E -Glass, Clay, Cement, Concrete, and Gypsum Products.You must comply with Part 8 sector-specific requirements associated with your primary industrial activity and any co-located industrial activities, as defined in Appendix A. The sector-specific requirements apply to those areas of your facility where those sector-specific activities occur. These sector-specific requirements are in addition to any requirements specified elsewhere in this permit.8.E.1 Covered Stormwater Discharges. The requirements in Subpart E apply to stormwater discharges associated with industrial activity from Glass, Clay, Cement, Concrete, and Gypsum Products facilities, as identified by the SIC Codes specified under Sector E in Table D-1 of Appendix D of the permit.8.E.2 Additional Technology-Based Effluent Limits.8.E.2.1 Good Housekeeping Measures. (See also Part 2.1.2.2) With good housekeeping, prevent or minimize the discharge of spilled cement, aggregate (including sand or gravel), kiln dust, fly ash, settled dust, or other significant material in stormwater from paved portions of the site that are exposed to stormwater. Consider sweeping regularly or using other equivalent measures to minimize the presence of these materials. Indicate in your SWPPP the frequency of sweeping or equivalent measures. Determine the frequency based on the amount of industrial activity occurring in the area and the frequency of precipitation, but it must be performed at least once a week if cement, aggregate, kiln dust, fly ash, or settled dust are being handled or processed. You must also prevent the exposure of fine granular solids (cement, fly ash, kiln dust, etc.) to stormwater, where practicable, by storing these materials in enclosed silos, hoppers, or buildings, or under other covering.8.E.3 Additional SWPPP Requirements. 8.E.3.l Drainage Area Site Map. (See also Part 5.1.2) Document in the SWPPP the locations of the following, as applicable: bag house or other dust control device;recycle/sedimentation pond, clarifier, or other device used for the treatment of process wastewater; and the areas that drain to the treatment device.8.E.3.2 Certification. (See also Part 5.1.3.4) For facilities producing ready-mix concrete, concrete block, brick, or similar products, include in the non-stormwater discharge certification a description of measures that ensure that process waste waters resulting from washing trucks, mixers, transport buckets, forms, or other equipment are discharged in accordance with NPDES requirements or are recycled.8.E.4 Sector-Specific Benchmarks. Table 8.E-1 identifies benchmarks that apply to the specific subsectors of Sector E.These benchmarks apply to both your primary industrial activity and any co-located industrial activities, which describe your site activities. Stormwater Discharges Associated With Industrial Activity -Sector E 56 General Permit Table 8.E-I.Subsector Benchmark (You may be subject to requirements for Parameter Monitoring Cutoff more than one sector/subsector) Concentration Subsector El. Clay Product Manufacturers Total Aluminum 0.75 mg/L (SIC 3251-3259, 3261-3269) Subsector E2. Concrete and Gypsum Product Total Suspended Solids 100 mg/L Manufacturers (SIC 3271-3275) (TSS)Total Iron 1.0 mg/L 8.E.5 Effluent Limitations Based on Effluent Limitations Guidelines (See also Part 6.2.2.1 of the permit.)Table 8.E-2 identifies effluent limits that apply to the industrial activities described below. Compliance with these limits is to be determined based on discharges from these industrial activities independent of commingling with any other wastestreams that may be covered under this permit.Table 8.E-2 1 Industrial Activity Parameter Effluent Limit Discharges from material storage piles at Total Suspended Solids 50 mg/L, daily cement manufacturing facilities (TSS) maximum pH 6.0 -9.0 s.u.'Monitor annually.Stormwater Discharges Associated With Industrial Activity -Sector E 57 Stormwater Discharges Associated With Industrial Activity -Sector E 57 General Permit Part 8 -Sector-Specific Requirements for Industrial Activity Subpart F -Sector F -Primary Metals.You must comply with Part 8 sector-specific requirements associated with your primary industrial activity and any co-located industrial activities, as defined in Appendix A. The sector-specific requirements apply to those areas of your facility where those sector-specific activities occur. These sector-specific requirements are in addition to any requirements specified elsewhere in this permit.8.F.1 Covered Stormwater Discharges. The requirements in Subpart F apply to stormwater discharges associated with industrial activity from Primary Metals facilities, as identified by the SIC Codes specified under Sector F in Table D-1 of Appendix D of the permit.8.F.2 Additional Technology-Based Effluent Limits 8.F.2.1 Good Housekeeping Measures. (See also Part 2.1.2.2) As part of your good housekeeping program, include a cleaning and maintenance program for all impervious areas of the facility where particulate matter, dust, or debris may accumulate, especially areas where material loading and unloading, storage, handling, and processing occur;and, where practicable, the paving of areas where vehicle traffic or material storage occur but where vegetative or other stabilization methods are not practicable (institute a sweeping program in these areas too). For unstabilized areas where sweeping is not practicable, consider using stormwater management devices such as sediment traps, vegetative buffer strips, filter fabric fence, sediment filtering boom, gravel outlet protection, or other equivalent measures that effectively trap or remove sediment.8.F.3 Additional SWPPP Requirements. 8.F.3.1 Drainage Area Site Map. (See also Part 5.1.2) Identify in the SWPPP where any of the following activities may be exposed to precipitation or surface runoff: storage or disposal of wastes such as spent solvents and baths, sand, slag and dross; liquid storage tanks and drums; processing areas including pollution control equipment (e.g., baghouses); and storage areas of raw material such as coal, coke, scrap, sand, fluxes, refractories, or metal in any form. In addition, indicate where an accumulation of significant amounts of particulate matter could occur from such sources as furnace or oven emissions, losses from coal and coke handling operations, etc., and could result in a discharge of pollutants to waters of the United States.8.F.3.2 Inventory of Exposed Material. (See also Part 5.1.3.2) Include in the inventory of materials handled at the site that potentially may be exposed to precipitation or runoff, areas where deposition of particulate matter from process air emissions or losses during material-handling activities are possible 8.F.4 Additional Inspection Requirements. (See also Part 4.1) As part of conducting your quarterly routine facility inspections (Part 4.1), address all potential sources of pollutants, including (if applicable) air pollution control equipment (e.g., baghouses, electrostatic precipitators, scrubbers, and cyclones), for any signs of degradation (e.g., leaks, Stormwater Discharges Associated With Industrial Activity -Sector F 58 General Permit corrosion, or improper operation) that could limit their efficiency and lead to excessive emissions. Consider monitoring air flow at inlets and outlets (or use equivalent measures) to check for leaks (e.g., particulate deposition) or blockage in ducts. Also inspect all process and material handling equipment (e.g., conveyors, cranes, and vehicles) for leaks, drips, or the potential loss of material; and material storage areas (e.g., piles, bins, or hoppers for storing coke, coal, scrap, or slag, as well as chemicals stored in tanks and drums) for signs of material losses due to wind or stormwater runoff.8.F.5 Sector-Specific Benchmarks. (See also Part 6 of the permit.)Table 8.F-I.Subsector Benchmark Monitoring (You may be subject to requirements for Parameter Cutoff Concentration more than one sector/subsector) CutoffConcentration Subsector Fl. Steel Works, Blast Furnaces, Total Aluminum 0.75 mg/L and Rolling and Finishing Mills Total Zinc 1 Hardness Dependent (SIC 3312-3317) Subsector F2. Iron and Steel Foundries Total Aluminum 0.75 mg/L (SIC 3321-3325) Total Suspended Solids (TSS) 100 mg/L Total Copper 1 Hardness Dependent Total Iron 1.0 mg/L Total Zinc 1 Hardness Dependent Subsector F3. Rolling, Drawing, and Total Copper' Hardness Dependent Extruding of Nonferrous Metals Total Zinc 1 Hardness Dependent (SIC 3351-3357) Subsector F4. Nonferrous Foundries Total Copper' Hardness Dependent (SIC 3363-3369) Total Zinc' Hardness Dependent The benchmark values of some metals are dependent on water hardness. For these parameters, permittees must determine the hardness of the receiving water (see Appendix J, "Calculating Hardness in Receiving Waters for Hardness Dependent Metals," for methodology), in accordance with Part 6.2.1.1, to identify the applicable 'hardness range' for determining their benchmark value applicable to their facility. The ranges occur in 25 mg/L increments. Hardness Dependent Benchmarks follow in the table below: Copper Zinc Water Hardness Range (rg/L) (ag/L)0-25 mg/L 0.0038 0.04 25-50 mg/L 0.0056 0.05 50-75 mg/L 0.0090 0.08 75-100 mg/L 0.0123 0.11 100-125 mg/L 0.0156 0.13 125-150 mg/L 0.0189 0.16 150-175 mg/L 0.0221 0.18 175-200 mg/L 0.0253 0.20 200-225 mg/L 0.0285 0.23 225-250 mg/L 0.0316 0.25 250+ mg/L 0.0332 0.26 Stormwater Discharges Associated With Industrial Activity -Sector F 59 General Permit Part 8 -Sector-Specific Requirements for Industrial Activity Subpart G -Sector G -Metal Mining..You must comply with Part 8 sector-specific requirements associated with your primary industrial activity and any co-located industrial activities, as defined in Appendix A. The sector-specific requirements apply to those areas of your facility where those sector-specific activities occur. These sector-specific requirements are in addition to any requirements specified elsewhere in this permit.8.G.1 Covered Stormwater Discharges. The requirements in Subpart G apply to stormwater discharges associated with industrial activity from Metal Mining facilities, including mines abandoned on Federal lands, as identified by the SIC Codes specified under Sector G in Table D-1 of Appendix D. Coverage is required for metal mining facilities that discharge stormwater contaminated by contact with, or that has come into contact with, any overburden, raw material, intermediate product, finished product, byproduct, or waste product located on the site of the operation. 8.G.1.1 Covered Discharges from Inactive Facilities. All stormwater discharges. 8.G.1.2 Covered Discharges from Active and Temporarily Inactive Facilities. Only the stormwater discharges from the following areas are covered: waste rock and overburden piles if composed entirely of stormwater and not combining with mine drainage; topsoil piles; offsite haul and access roads; onsite haul and access roads constructed of waste rock, overburden, or spent ore if composed entirely of stormwater and not combining with mine drainage; onsite haul and access roads not constructed of waste rock, overburden, or spent ore except if mine drainage is used for dust control; runoff from tailings dams or dikes when not constructed of waste rock or tailings and no process fluids are present; runoff from tailings dams or dikes When constructed of waste rock or tailings and no process fluids are present, if composed entirely of stormwater and not combining with mine drainage; concentration building if no contact with material piles;mill site if no contact with material piles; office or administrative building and housing if mixed with stormwater from industrial area; chemical storage area; docking facility if no excessive contact with waste product that would otherwise constitute mine drainage;explosive storage; fuel storage; vehicle and equipment maintenance area and building;parking areas (if necessary); power plant; truck wash areas if no excessive contact with waste product that would otherwise constitute mine drainage; unreclaimed, disturbed areas outside of active mining area; reclaimed areas released from reclamation requirements prior to December 17, 1990; and partially or inadequately reclaimed areas or areas not released from reclamation requirements. 8.G. 1.3 Covered Discharges from Exploration and Construction of Metal Mining and/or Ore Dressing Facilities. All stormwater discharges. 8.G.1.4 Covered Discharges from Facilities Undergoing Reclamation. All stormwater discharges. Stormwater Discharges Associated With Industrial Activity -Sector G 60 General Permit 8.G.2 Limitations on Coverage.8.G.2. 1 Prohibition of Stormwater Discharges. Stormwater discharges not authorized by this permit: discharges from active metal mining facilities that are subject to effluent limitation guidelines for the Ore Mining and Dressing Point Source Category (40 CFR Part 440).NOTE: Stormwater runoff from these sources are subject to 40 CFR Part 440 if they are mixed with other discharges subject to Part 440. In this case, they are not eligible for coverage under this permit. Discharges from overburden/waste rock and overburden/waste rock-related areas are not subject to 40 CFR Part 440 unless they: (1)drain naturally (or are intentionally diverted) to a point source; and (2) combine with"mine drainage" that is otherwise regulated under the Part 440 regulations. For such sources, coverage under this permit would be available if the discharge composed entirely of stormwater does not combine with other sources of mine drainage that are not subject to 40 CFR Part 440, and meets the other eligibility criteria contained in Part 1.2 of the permit. Permit applicants bear the initial responsibility for determining if they are eligible for coverage under this permit, or must seek coverage under another NPDES permit. EPA recommends that permit applicants contact the relevant NPDES permit issuance authority for assistance to determine the nature and scope of the "active mining area" on a mine-by-mine basis, as well as to determine the appropriate permitting mechanism for authorizing such discharges. 8.G.2.2 Prohibition of Non-Stormwater Discharges. Not authorized by this permit: adit drainage, and contaminated springs or seeps discharging from waste rock dumps that do not directly result from precipitation events (see also the standard Limitations on Coverage in Part 1.1.4).8.G.3 Definitions. The following definitions are not intended to supersede the definitions of active and inactive mining facilities established by 40 CFR 122.26(b)(14)(iii). 8.G.3.1 Mining operation -Consists of the active and temporarily inactive phases, and the reclamation phase, but excludes the exploration and construction phases.8.G.3.2 Exploration phase -Entails exploration and land disturbance activities to determine the viability of a site. The exploration phase is not considered part of "mining operations." 8.G.3.3 Construction phase -Includes the building of site access roads and removal of overburden and waste rock to expose mineable minerals. The construction phase is not considered part of "mining operations." 8.G.3.4 Active phase -Activities including the extraction, removal or recovery of metal ore.For surface mines, this definition does not include any land where grading has returned the earth to a desired contour and reclamation has begun. This definition is derived from the definition of "active mining area" found at 40 CFR 440.132(a). The active phase is considered part of "mining operations." Stormwater Discharges Associated With Industrial Activity -Sector G 61 General Permit 8.G.3.5 Reclamation phase -Activities undertaken, in compliance with applicable mined land reclamation requirements, following the cessation of the "active phase", intended to return the land to an appropriate post-mining land use in order to meet applicable Federal and State reclamation requirements. The reclamation phase is considered part of "mining operations." 8.G.3.6 Active metal mining facility -A place where work or other activity related to the extraction, removal, or recovery of metal ore is being conducted. For surface mines, this definition does not include any land where grading has returned the earth to a desired contour and reclamation has begun. This definition is derived from the definition of"active mining area" found at 40 CFR 440.132(a). 8.G.3.7 Inactive metal mining facility -A site or portion of a site where metal mining and/or milling occurred in the past but is not an active facility as defined above, and where the inactive portion is not covered by an active mining permit issued by the applicable State or Federal agency. An inactive metal mining facility has an identifiable owner /operator. Sites where mining claims are being maintained prior to disturbances associated with the extraction, beneficiation, or processing of mined materials and sites where minimal activities are undertaken for the sole purpose of maintaining a mining claim are not considered either active or inactive mining facilities and do not require an NPDES industrial stormwater permit.8.G.3.8 Temporarily inactive metal mining facility -A site or portion of a site where metal mining and/or milling occurred in the past but currently are not being actively undertaken, and the facility is covered by an active mining permit issued by the applicable State or Federal agency.8.G.3.9 Final Stabilization -A site or portion of a site is "finally stabilized" when it has implemented all applicable Federal and State reclamation requirements. 8.G.4 Technology-Based Effluent Limits for Clearing, Grading, and Excavation Activities. Clearing, grading, and excavation activities being conducted as part of the exploration and construction phase of mining activities are covered under this permit.8.G.4.1 Management Practices for Clearing, Grading, and Excavation Activities. 8.G.4. 1.1 Selecting and installing control measures. For all areas affected by clearing, grading, and excavation activities, you must select, design, install, and implement control measures that meet applicable Part 2 effluent limits.8.G.4.1.2 Good Housekeeping. Litter, debris, and chemicals must be prevented from becoming a pollutant source in stormwater discharges. 8.G.4.1.3 Retention and Detention of Stormwater Runoff For drainage locations serving more than one acre, sediment basins and/or temporary sediment traps should be used. At a minimum, silt fences, vegetative buffer strips, or equivalent sediment controls are required for all down slope boundaries (and for side slope boundaries as necessary based on individual site conditions) of the development area unless a sediment basin providing storage for a calculated Stormwater Discharges Associated With Industrial Activity -Sector G 62 General Permit volume of runoff from a 2-year, 24-hour storm or 3,600 cubic feet of storage per acre drained is provided. You are required to remove sediment from sediment traps or sedimentation ponds when design capacity has been reduced by 50 percent. Due to high sediment discharges from some Sector G facilities, permittees may need to implement a combination of structural BMP approaches to sufficiently decrease discharge of sediment from their facilities. 8.G.4.2 Inspection of Clearing, Grading, and Excavation Activities. 8.G.4.2.1 Inspection Frequency. Inspections must be conducted either at least once every 7 calendar days, or at least once every 14 calendar days and within 24 hours of the end of a storm event of 0.5 inches or greater. Inspection frequency may be reduced to at least once every month if the entire site is temporarily stabilized (pursuant to Part 8.G.4.3.2), if runoff is unlikely due to winter (e.g., site is covered with snow or ice) or frozen conditions, or construction is occurring during seasonal dry periods in arid areas and semi-arid areas.8.G.4.2.2 Location of Inspections. Inspections must include all areas of the site disturbed by clearing, grading, and/or excavation activities and areas used for storage of materials that are exposed to precipitation. Sedimentation and erosion control measures must be observed to ensure proper operation. Discharge locations must be inspected to ascertain whether erosion control measures are effective in preventing significant impacts to waters of the United States, where accessible. Where discharge locations are inaccessible, nearby downstream locations must be inspected to the extent that such inspections are practicable. Locations where vehicles enter or exit the site must be inspected for evidence of significant off-site sediment tracking.8.G.4.2.3 Inspection Reports. For each inspection required above, you must complete an inspection report. At a minimum, the inspection report must include the information required in Part 4.1.8.G.4.3 Requirements for Cessation of Clearing, Grading, and Excavation Activities. 8.G.4.3.1 Inspections and Maintenance. Inspections and maintenance of control measures, including BMPs, associated with clearing, grading, and excavation activities being conducted as part of the exploration and construction phase of a mining operation must continue until final stabilization has been achieved on all portions of the disturbed area, or until the commencement of the active mining phase for those areas that have been temporarily stabilized as a precursor to mining.8.G.4.3.2 Temporary Stabilization ofDisturbedAreas. Stabilization measures should be initiated immediately in portions of the site where clearing, grading and/or excavation activities have temporarily ceased, but in no case more than 14 days after the clearing, grading and/or excavation activities in that portion of the site have temporarily ceased. In arid, semiarid, and drought-stricken areas, or in areas subject to snow or freezing conditions, where initiating perennial Stormwater Discharges Associated With Industrial Activity -Sector G 63 General Permit vegetative stabilization measures is not possible within 14 days after mining, exploration, and/or construction activity has temporarily ceased, temporary vegetative stabilization measures must be initiated as soon as practicable. Until temporary vegetative stabilization is achieved, interim measures such as erosion control blankets with an appropriate seed base and tackifiers must be employed. In areas of the site, where exploration and/or construction has permanently ceased prior to active mining, temporary stabilization measures must be implemented to minimize mobilization of sediment or other pollutants until such time as the active mining phase commences. 8.G.4.3.3 Final Stabilization of Disturbed Areas. Stabilization measures should be initiated immediately in portions of the site where exploration and/or construction activities have permanently ceased, but in no case more than 14 days after the exploration and/or construction activity in that portion of the site has permanently ceased. In arid, semiarid, and drought-stricken areas, or in areas subject to snow or freezing conditions, where initiating perennial vegetative stabilization measures is not possible within 14 days after mining, exploration, and/or construction activity has permanently ceased, final vegetative stabilization measures must be initiated as soon as possible. Until final stabilization is achieved temporary stabilization measures, such as erosion control blankets with an appropriate seed base and tackifiers, must be used.8.G.5 Additional Technology-Based Effluent Limits.8.G.5.1 Employee Training. (See also Part 2.1.2.9) Conduct employee training at least annually at active and temporarily inactive sites.8.G.5.2 Stormwater Controls. Apart from the control measures you implement to meet your Part 2 effluent limits, consider implementing the following control measures at your site.The potential pollutants identified in Part 8.G.6.3 shall determine the priority and appropriateness of the control measures selected.8.G.5.2.1 Stormwater Diversions: Consider diverting stormwater away from potential pollutant sources. Following are some options: interceptor or diversion controls (e.g., dikes, swales, curbs, or berms); pipe slope drains; subsurface drains; conveyance systems (e.g., channels or gutters, open-top box culverts, and waterbars; rolling dips and road sloping; roadway surface water deflector and culverts); or their equivalents. 8.G.5.2.2 Capping: When capping is necessary to minimize pollutant discharges in stormwater, identify the source being capped and the material used to construct the cap.8.G.5.2.3 Treatment: If treatment of stormwater (e.g., chemical'or physical systems, oil and water separators, artificial wetlands) is necessary to protect water quality, describe the type and location of treatment used. Passive and/or active treatment of stormwater runoff is encouraged where practicable. Treated runoff may be discharged as a stormwater source regulated under this permit Stormwater Discharges Associated With Industrial Activity -Sector G 64 General Permit provided the discharge is not combined with discharges subject to effluent limitation guidelines for the Ore Mining and Dressing Point Source Category (40 CFR Part 440).8.G.5.3 Certification of Discharge Testing. (See also Part 5.1.3.4) Test or evaluate all outfalls covered under this permit for the presence of specific mining-related non-stormwater discharges such as seeps or adit discharges, or discharges subject to effluent limitations guidelines (e.g., 40 CFR Part 440), such as mine drainage or process water.Alternatively (if applicable), you may keep a certification with your SWPPP consistent with Part 8.G.6.6.8.G.6 Additional SWPPP Requirements. 8.G.6.1 Nature ofIndustrialActivities. (See also Part 5.1.2) Briefly document in your SWPPP the mining and associated activities that can potentially affect the stormwater discharges covered by this permit, including a general description of the location of the site relative to major transportation routes and communities. 8.G.6.2 Site Map. (See also Part 5.1.2) Document in your SWPPP the locations of the following (as appropriate): mining or milling site boundaries; access and haul roads; outline of the drainage areas of each stormwater outfall within the facility with indications of the types of discharges from the drainage areas; location(s) of all permitted discharges covered under an individual NPDES permit, outdoor equipment storage, fueling, and maintenance areas; materials handling areas; outdoor manufacturing, outdoor storage, and material disposal areas; outdoor chemicals and explosives storage areas;overburden, materials, soils, or waste storage areas; location of mine drainage (where water leaves mine) or other process water; tailings piles and ponds (including proposed ones); heap leach pads; off-site points of discharge for mine drainage and process water; surface waters; boundary of tributary areas that are subject to effluent limitations guidelines; and location(s) of reclaimed areas.8.G.6.3 Potential Pollutant Sources. (See also Part 5.1.3) For each area of the mine or mill site where stormwater discharges associated with industrial activities occur, identify the types of pollutants (e.g., heavy metals, sediment) likely to be present in significant amounts. Consider these factors: the mineralogy of the ore and waste rock (e.g., acid forming); toxicity and quantity of chemicals used, produced, or discharged; the likelihood of contact with stormwater; vegetation of site (if any); and history of significant leaks or spills of toxic or hazardous pollutants. Also include a summary of any existing ore or waste rock or overburden characterization data and test results for potential generation of acid rock. If any new data is acquired due to changes in ore type being mined, update your SWPPP with this information. 8.G.6.4 Documentation of Control Measures. Document all control measures that you implement consistent with Part 8.G.5.2. If control measures are implemented or planned but are not listed in Part 8.G.5.2 (e.g., substituting a less toxic chemical for a more toxic one), include descriptions of them in your SWPPP.8.G.6.5 Employee Training. All employee training(s) must be documented in the SWPPP.Stormwater Discharges Associated With Industrial Activity -Sector G 65 Stormwater Discharges Associated With Industrial Activity -Sector G 65 General Permit 8.G.6.6 Certification of Permit Coverage for Commingled Non-Stormwater Discharges: If you are able, consistent with Part 8.G.5.3 above, to certify that a particular discharge composed of commingled stormwater and non-stormwater is covered under a separate NPDES permit, and that permit subjects the non-stormwater portion to effluent limitations prior to any commingling, retain such certification with your SWPPP. This certification must identify the non-stormwater discharges, the applicable NPDES permit(s), the effluent limitations placed on the non-stormwater discharge by the permit(s), and the points at which the limitations are applied.8.G.7 Additional Inspection Requirements.(See also Part 4.1 and 8.G.4.2.) Except for areas of the site subject to clearing, grading, and/or excavation activities conducted as part of the exploration and construction phase, which are subject to Part 8.G.4.2.1, inspect sites at least quarterly unless adverse weather conditions make the site inaccessible. Sites which discharge to waters designated as outstanding waters or waters which are impaired for sediment or nitrogen must be inspected monthly. See Part 8.G.8.4 for inspection requirements for inactive and unstaffed sites.8.G.8 Monitoring and Reporting Requirements. (See also Part 6 of the permit.)Note: There are no Part 8.G.8 monitoring and reporting requirements for inactive and unstaffed sites.8.G.8.1 Benchmark Monitoring for Active Copper Ore Mining and Dressing Facilities. Active copper ore mining and dressing facilities, must sample and analyze stormwater discharges for the pollutants listed in Table 8.G-1.Table 8.G-I Subsector Benchmark (You may be subject to requirements for Parameter Monitoring more than one sector/subsector) Concentration Subsector G1. Active Copper Ore Mining and Total Suspended Solids 100 mg/L Dressing Facilities (TSS)(SIC 1021) Nitrate plus Nitrite 0.68 mg/L Nitrogen Chemical Oxygen Demand 120 mg/L (COD)8.G.8.2 Benchmark Monitoring Requirements for Discharges From Waste Rock and Overburden Piles at Active Metal Mining Facilities. For discharges from waste rock and overburden piles, perform benchmark monitoring once in the first year for the parameters listed in Table 8.G-2, and twice annually in all subsequent years of coverage under this permit for any parameters for which the benchmark has been exceeded. You are also required to conduct analytic monitoring for the parameters listed in Table 8.G-3 in accordance with the requirements in Part 8.G.6.3. The Director may also notify you that you must perform additional monitoring to accurately characterize the quality and quantity of pollutants discharged from your waste rock and overburden piles.Stormwater Discharges Associated With Industrial Activity -Sector G 66 General Permit Table 8.G-2.Subsector (Discharges may be subject to Parameter Benchmark Monitoring requirements for more than one Cutoff Concentration sector/subsector) Subsector G2. Iron Ores; Copper Ores; Total Suspended Solids (TSS) 100 mg/L Lead and Zinc Ores; Gold and Silver Ores; Turbidity 50 NTU Ferroalloy Ores, Except Vanadium; and pH 6.0-9.0 s.u.Miscellaneous Metal Ores (SIC Codes Hardness (as CaCO 3; cac. from no benchmark value 1011, 1021, 1031, 1041, 1044, 1061, 1081, Ca, Mg)'1094, 1099) Total Antimony 0.64 mg/L (Note: when analyzing hardness for a suite Total Arsenic 0.15 mg/ L of metals, it is more cost effective to add Total Beryllium 0.13 mg/L analysis of calcium and magnesium, and Total Cadmium 1 Hardness Dependent have hardness calculated than to require Total Copper' Hardness Dependent hardness analysis separately) Total Iron 1.0 mg/L Total Lead' Hardness Dependent Total Mercury 0.00 14 mg/L Total Nickel' Hardness Dependent Total Selenium 0.005 mg/L Total Silver' Hardness Dependent Total Zinc' Hardness Dependent The benchmark values of some metals are dependent on water hardness. For these parameters, permittees must determine the hardness of the receiving water (see Appendix J, "Calculating Hardness in Receiving Waters for Hardness Dependent Metals," for methodology), in accordance with Part 6.2.1. 1, to identify the applicable 'hardness range' for determining their benchmark value applicable to their facility. The ranges occur in 25 mg/L increments. Hardness Dependent Benchmarks follow in the table below: Cadmium Copper Lead Nickel Silver Zinc Water Hardness Range (mg/L) (mg/L) (mg/L) (mg/L) (mg/L) (mg/L)0-25 mg/L 0.0005 0.0038 0.014 0.15 0.0007 0.04 25-50 m/L 0.0008 0.0056 0.023 0.20 0.0007 0.05 50-75 mg/L 0.0013 0.0090 0.045 0.32 0.0017 0.08 75-100 mg/L 0.0018 0.0123 0.069 0.42 0.0030 0.11 100-125 mg/L 0.0023 0.0156 0.095 0.52 0.0046 0.13 125-150 m /L 0.0029 0.0189 0.122 0.61 0.0065 0.16 150-175 mg/L 0.0034 0.0221 0.151 0.71 0.0087 0.18 175-200 mg/L 0.0039 0.0253 0.182 0.80 0.0112 0.20 200-225 mg/L 0.0045 0.0285 0.213 0.89 0.0138 0.23 225-250 mg/L 0.0050 0.0316 0.246 0.98 0.0168 0.25 250+ mg/L 0.0053 0.0332 0.262 1.02 0.0183 0.26 8.G.8.3 Additional Analytic Monitoring Requirements for Discharges From Waste Rock and Overburden Piles at Active Metal Mining Facilities. In addition to the monitoring required in Part 8.G.6.2 for discharges from waste rock and overburden piles, you must also conduct monitoring for additional parameters based on the type of ore you mine at your site. Where a parameter in Table 8.G-3 is the same as a pollutant you are required Stormwater Discharges Associated With Industrial Activity -Sector G 67 General Permit to monitor for in Table 8.G-2 (i.e., for all of the metals, you must use the corresponding benchmark in Table 8.G-2 and you may use any monitoring results conducted for Part 8.G.6.2 to satisfy the monitoring requirement for that parameter for Part 8.G.6.3. For radium and uranium, which do not have corresponding benchmarks in Table 8.G-2, there are no applicable benchmarks.) The frequency and schedule for monitoring for these additional parameters is the same as that specified in Part 6.2.1.2.Table 8.G-3. Additional Monitoring Requirements for Discharges from Waste Rock and Overburden Piles Supplemental Requirements Pollutants of Concern Type of Ore Mined Total Suspended pH Metals, Total Solids (TSS)Tungsten Ore X X Arsenic, Cadmium (H), Copper (H), Lead (H), Zinc (H)Nickel Ore X X Arsenic, Cadmium (H), Copper (H), Lead (H), Zinc (H)Aluminum Ore X X Iron Mercury Ore X X Nickel (H)Iron Ore X X Iron (Dissolved) Platinum Ore Cadmium (H), Copper (H), Mercury, Lead (H), Zinc (H)Titanium Ore X X Iron, Nickel (H), Zinc (H)Vanadium Ore X X Arsenic, Cadmium (H), Copper (H), Lead (H), Zinc (H)Molybdenum X X Arsenic, Cadmium (H), Copper (H), Lead (H), Mercury, Zinc (H)Uranium, Radium, and X X Chemical Oxygen Demand, Arsenic, Vanadium Ore Radium (Dissolved and Total), Uranium, Zinc (H)Note: An "X" indicated for TSS and/or pH means that you are required to monitor for those parameters. (H)indicates that hardness must also be measured when this pollutant is measured.8.G.8.4 Inactive and Unstaffed Sites -Conditional Exemption from No Exposure Requirements for Quarterly Visual Assessments and Routine Facility Inspections. As a Sector G facility, if you are seeking to exercise a waiver from the quarterly visual assessment and routine facility inspection requirements for inactive and unstaffed sites (including temporarily inactive sites), you are conditionally exempt from the requirement to certify that "there are no industrial materials or activities exposed to stormwater" in Part 4.2.3.This exemption is conditioned on the following: " If circumstances change and your facility becomes active and/or staffed, this exception no longer applies and you must immediately begin complying with the quarterly visual assessment requirements; and" EPA retains the authority to revoke this exemption and/or the monitoring waiver where it is determined that the discharge causes, has a reasonable potential to cause, Stormwater Discharges Associated With Industrial Activity -Sector G 68 General Permit or contributes to an instream excursion above an applicable water quality standard, including designated uses.Subject to the two conditions above, if your facility is inactive and unstaffed, you are waived from the requirement to conduct quarterly visual assessments and routine facility inspections. You are not waived from conducting the Part 4.3 comprehensive site inspection. You are encouraged to inspect your site more frequently where'you have reason to believe that severe weather or natural disasters may have damaged control measures or increased discharges. Table 8.G-4. Applicability of the Multi-Sector General Permit to Stormwater Runoff From Active Mining and Dressing Sites, Temporarily Inactive Sites, and Sites Undergoing Reclamation Discharge/Source of Discharge Note/Comment Piles Waste rock/overburden If composed entirely of stormwater and not combining with mine drainage. See note below.Topsoil --Roads constructed of waste rock or spent ore Onsite haul roads If composed entirely of stormwater and not combining with mine drainage. See note below.Offsite haul and access roads Roads not constructed of waste rock or spent ore Onsite haul roads Except if mine drainage is used for dust control Offsite haul and access roads Milling/concentrating Runoff from tailings dams and dikes when Except if process fluids are present and only if constructed of waste rock/tailings composed entirely of stormwater and not combining with mine drainage. See Note below.Runoff from tailings dams/dikes when not Except if process fluids are present constructed of waste rock and tailings Concentration building If stormwater only and no contact with piles Mill site If stormwater only and no contact with piles Ancillary areas Office and administrative building and housing If mixed with stormwater from the industrial area Chemical storage area Docking facility Except if excessive contact with waste product that would otherwise constitute mine drainage Explosive storage Fuel storage (oil tanks/coal piles)Vehicle and equipment maintenance area/building --Parking areas But coverage unnecessary if only employee and visitor-type parking Power plant Truck wash area Except when excessive contact with waste product I that would otherwise constitute mine drainage Stormwater Discharges Associated With Industrial Activity -Sector G 69 General Permit Table 8.G-4. Applicability of the Multi-Sector General Permit to Stormwater Runoff From Active Mining and Dressing Sites, Temporarily Inactive Sites, and Sites Undergoing Reclamation Reclamation-related areas Any disturbed area (unreclaimed) Only if not in active mining area Reclaimed areas released from reclamationI requirements prior to Dec. 17, 1990 Partially/inadequately reclaimed areas or areas not released from-reclamation requirements Note: Stormwater runoff from these sources are subject to the NPDES program for stormwater unless mixed with discharges subject to 40 CFR Part 440 that are regulated by another permit prior to mixing. Non-stormwater discharges from these sources are subject to NPDES permitting and may be subject to the effluent limitation guidelines under 40 CFR Part 440. Discharges from overburden/waste rock and overburden/waste rock-related areas are not subject to 40 CFR Part 440 unless: (1) it drains naturally (or is intentionally diverted) to a point source; and (2) combines with "mine drainage" that is otherwise regulated under the Part 440 regulations. For such sources, coverage under this permit would be available if the discharge composed entirely of stormwater does not combine with other sources of mine drainage that are not subject to 40 CFR Part 440, as well as meeting other eligibility criteria contained in Part 1.1 of the permit. Permit applicants bear the initial responsibility for determining the applicable technology-based standard for such discharges. EPA recommends that permit applicants contact the relevant NPDES permit issuance authority for assistance to determine the nature and scope of the"active mining area" on a mine-by-mine basis, as well as to determine the appropriate permitting mechanism for authorizing such discharges. 8.G.9. Termination of Permit Coverage 8.G.9.1 Termination of Permit Coverage for Sites Reclaimed After December 17, 1990. A site or a portion of a site that has been released from applicable state or federal reclamation requirements after December 17, 1990, is no longer required to maintain coverage under this permit. If the site or portion of a site reclaimed after December 17, 1990, was not subject to reclamation requirements, the site or portion of the site is no longer required to maintain coverage under this permit if the site or portion of the site has been reclaimed as defined in Part 8.G.7.2.8.G.9.2 Termination ofPermit Coverage for Sites Reclaimed Before December 17, 1990. A site or portion of a site that was released from applicable state or federal reclamation requirements before December 17, 1990, or that was otherwise reclaimed before December 17, 1990, is no longer required to maintain coverage under this permit if the site or portion of the site has been reclaimed. A site or portion of a site is considered to have been reclaimed if. (1) stormwater runoff that comes into contact with raw materials, intermediate byproducts, finished products, and waste products does not have the potential to cause or contribute to violations of state water quality standards, (2) soil disturbing activities related to mining at the sites or portion of the site have been completed, (3) the site or portion of the site has been stabilized to minimize soil erosion, and (4) as appropriate depending on location, size, and the potential to contribute pollutants to stormwater discharges, the site or portion of the site has been revegetated, will be amenable to natural revegetation, or will be left in a condition consistent with the post-mining land use.Stormwater Discharges Associated With Industrial Activity -Sector G 70 General Permit Part 8 -Sector-Specific Requirements for Industrial Activity Subpart H -Sector H -Coal Mines and Coal Mining-Related Facilities. You must comply with Part 8 sector-specific requirements associated with your primary industrial activity and any co-located industrial activities, as defined in Appendix A. The sector-specific requirements apply to those areas of your facility where those sector-specific activities occur. These sector-specific requirements are in addition to any requirements specified elsewhere in this permit.8.11.1 Covered Stormwater Discharges. The requirements in Subpart H apply to stormwater discharges associated with industrial activity from Coal Mines and Coal Mining-Related facilities as identified by the SIC Codes specified under Sector H in Table D-1 of Appendix D.8.11.2 Limitations on Coverage.8.H.2.1 Prohibition of Non-Stormwater Discharges. (See also Part 1.1.4) Not covered by this permit: discharges from pollutant seeps or underground drainage from inactive coal mines and refuse disposal areas that do not result from precipitation events, and discharges from floor drains in maintenance buildings and other similar drains in mining and preparation plant areas.8.H.2.2 Discharges Subject to Stormwater Effluent Guidelines. (See also Part 1.1.4.4) Not authorized by this permit: stormwater discharges subject to an existing effluent limitation guideline at 40 CFR Part 434.8.H.3 Definitions The following definitions are not intended to supersede the definitions of active and inactive mining facilities established by 40 CFR 122.26(b)(14)(iii). 8.H.3.1 Mining operation -Consists of the active and temporarily inactive phases, and the reclamation phase, but excludes the exploration and construction phases.8.H.3.2 Exploration phase -Entails exploration and land disturbance activities to determine the financial viability of a site. The exploration phase is not considered part of "mining operations." 8.H.3.3 Construction phase -Includes the building of site access roads and removal of overburden and waste rock to expose mineable coal. The construction phase is not considered part of "mining operations." 8.H.3.4 Active phase -Activities including the extraction, removal or recovery of coal. For surface mines, this definition does not include any land where grading has returned the earth to a desired contour and reclamation has begun. This definition is derived from the definition of "active mining area" found at 40 CFR 434.11 (b). The active phase is considered part of "mining operations." Stormwater Discharges Associated With Industrial Activity -Sector H 71 General Permit 8.H.3.5 Reclamation phase -Activities undertaken, in compliance with applicable mined land reclamation requirements, following the cessation of the "active phase", intended to return the land to an appropriate post-mining land use. The reclamation phase is considered part of "mining operations." 8.H.3.6 Active coal mining facility -A place where work or other activity related to the extraction, removal, or recovery of coal is being conducted. For surface mines, this definition does not include any land where grading has returned the earth to a desired contour and reclamation has begun. This definition is derived from the definition of"active mining area" found at 40 CFR 434.11 (b).8.H.3.7 Inactive coal mining facility -A site or portion of a site where coal mining and/or milling occurred in the past but is not an active facility as defined above, and where the inactive portion is not covered by an active mining permit issued by the applicable State or Federal agency. An inactive coal mining facility has an identifiable owner / operator.Sites where mining claims are being maintained prior to disturbances associated with the extraction, beneficiation, or processing of mined materials and sites where minimal activities are undertaken for the sole purpose of maintaining a mining claim are not considered either active or inactive mining facilities and do not require an NPDES industrial stormwater permit.8.H.3.8 Temporarily inactive coal mining facility -A site or portion of a site where coal mining and/or milling occurred in the past but currently are not being actively undertaken, and the facility is covered by an active mining permit issued by the applicable State or Federal agency.8.H.3.9 Final Stabilization -A site or portion of a site is "finally stabilized" when it has implemented all applicable Federal and State reclamation requirements. 8.H.4 Technology-Based Effluent Limits for Clearing, Grading, and Excavation Activities. Clearing, grading, and excavation activities being conducted as part of the exploration and construction phase of mining activities are covered under this permit.8.H.4.1 Management Practices for Clearing, Grading, and Excavation Activities. 8.H.4. 1.1 Selecting and installing control measures. For all areas affected by clearing, grading, and excavation activities, you must select, design, install, and implement control measures that meet applicable Part 2 effluent limits.8.H.4.1.2 Good Housekeeping. Litter, debris, and chemicals must be prevented from becoming a pollutant source in stormwater discharges. 8.H.4.1.3 Retention and Detention of Stormwater Runoff. For drainage locations serving more than one acre, sediment basins and/or temporary sediment traps should be used. At a minimum, silt fences, vegetative buffer strips, or equivalent sediment controls are required for all down slope boundaries (and side slope boundaries as necessary based on individual site conditions) of the development area unless a sediment basin providing storage for a calculated volume of runoff from a 2-year, 24-hour storm or 3,600 cubic feet of storage Stormwater Discharges Associated With Industrial Activity -Sector H 72 General Permit per acre drained is provided. You are required to remove sediment from sediment traps or sedimentation ponds when design capacity has been reduced by 50 percent. Due to high sediment discharges from some Sector H facilities, permittees may need to implement a combination of structural BMP approaches to sufficiently decrease discharge of sediment from their facilities. 8.H.4.2 Inspection of Clearing, Grading, and Excavation Activities. 8.H.4.2.1 Inspection Frequency. Inspections must be conducted either at least once every 7 calendar days, or at least once every 14 calendar days and within 24 hours of the end of a storm event of 0.5 inches or greater. Inspection frequency may be reduced to at least once every month if the entire site is temporarily stabilized (pursuant to Part 8.H.4.3.2), if runoff is unlikely due to winter (e.g., site is covered with snow or ice) or frozen conditions, or construction is occurring during seasonal dry periods in arid areas and semi-arid areas.8.H.4.2.2 Location of Inspections. Inspections must include all areas of the site disturbed by clearing, grading, and/or excavation activities and areas used for storage of materials that are exposed to precipitation. Sedimentation and erosion control measures must be observed to ensure proper operation. Discharge locations must be inspected to ascertain whether erosion control measures are effective in preventing significant impacts to waters of the United States, where accessible. Where discharge locations are inaccessible, nearby downstream locations must be inspected to the extent that such inspections are practicable. Locations where vehicles enter or exit the site must be inspected for evidence of significant off-site sediment tracking.8.H.4.2.3 Inspection Reports. For each inspection required above, you must complete an inspection report. At a minimum, the inspection report must include the information required in Part 4.1.8.H.4.3 Requirements for Cessation of Clearing, Grading, and Excavation Activities. 8.H.4.3.1 Inspections and Maintenance. Inspections and maintenance of control measures, including BMPs, associated with clearing, grading, and/or excavation activities being conducted as part of the exploration and construction phase of a mining operation must continue until final stabilization has been achieved on all portions of the disturbed area.8.H.4.3.2 Temporary Stabilization of Disturbed Areas. Stabilization measures should be initiated immediately in portions of the site where clearing, grading and/or excavation activities have temporarily ceased, but in no case more than 14 days after the clearing, grading and/or excavation activities in that portion of the site have temporarily ceased. In arid, semiarid, and drought-stricken areas, or in areas subject to snow or freezing conditions, where initiating perennial vegetative stabilization measures is not possible within 14 days after mining, exploration, and/or construction activity has temporarily ceased, temporary vegetative stabilization measures must be initiated as soon as practicable. Stormwater Discharges Associated With Industrial Activity -Sector H 73 General Permit Until temporary vegetative stabilization is achieved, interim measures such as erosion control blankets with an appropriate seed base and tackifiers must be employed. In areas of the site, where exploration and/or construction has permanently ceased prior to active mining, temporary stabilization measures must be implemented to minimize mobilization of sediment or other pollutants until such time as the active mining phase commences. 8.H.4.3.2 Final Stabilization of Disturbed Areas. Stabilization measures should be initiated immediately in portions of the site where exploration and/or construction activities have permanently ceased, but in no case more than 14 days after the exploration and/or construction activity in that portion of the site has permanently ceased. In arid, semiarid, and drought-stricken areas, or in areas subject to snow or freezing conditions, or in areas subject to snow or freezing conditions, where initiating perennial vegetative stabilization measures is not possible within 14 days after mining, exploration, and/or construction activity has permanently ceased, temporary vegetative stabilization measures must be initiated as soon as possible. Until final stabilization is achieved temporary stabilization measures, such as erosion control blankets with an appropriate seed base and tackifiers, must be used.8.H.5 Additional Technology-Based Effluent Limits.8.H.5.l Good Housekeeping Measures. (See also Part 2.1.2.2) As part of your good housekeeping program, consider using sweepers and covered storage, watering haul roads to minimize dust generation, and conserving vegetation (where possible) to minimize erosion.8.H.5.2 Preventive Maintenance. (See also Part 2.1.2.3) Perform inspections or other equivalent measures of storage tanks and pressure lines of fuels, lubricants, hydraulic fluid, and slurry to prevent leaks due to deterioration or faulty connections. 8.H.6 Additional SWPPP Requirements. 8.H.6.1 OtherApplicable Regulations. Most active coal mining-related areas (SIC Codes 1221-1241) are subject to sediment and erosion control regulations of the U.S. Office of Surface Mining (OSM) that enforces the Surface Mining Control and Reclamation Act (SMCRA). OSM has granted authority to most coal-producing states to implement SMCRA through State SMCRA regulations. All SMCRA requirements regarding control of stormwater-related pollutant discharges must be addressed and then documented with the SWPPP (directly or by reference). 8.H.6.2 Site Map. (See also Part 5.1.2) Document in your SWPPP where any of the following may be exposed to precipitation or surface runoff: haul and access roads; railroad spurs, sliding, and internal hauling lines; conveyor belts, chutes, and aerial tramways;equipment storage and maintenance yards; coal handling buildings and structures; and inactive mines and related areas; acidic spoil, refuse, or unreclaimed disturbed areas;and liquid storage tanks containing pollutants such as caustics, hydraulic fluids, and lubricants. Stormwater Discharges Associated With Industrial Activity -Sector H 74 General Permit 8.H.6.3 Potential Pollutant Sources. (See also Part 5.1.3) Document in your SWPPP the following sources and activities that have potential pollutants associated with them: truck traffic on haul roads and resulting generation of sediment subject to runoff and dust generation; fuel or other liquid storage; pressure lines containing slurry, hydraulic fluid, or other potential harmful liquids; and loading or temporary storage of acidic refuse or spoil.8.H.7 Additional Inspection Requirements. 8.H.7.l Inspections ofActive Mining-Related Areas. (See also Part 4) Except for areas of the site subject to clearing, grading, and/or excavation activities conducted as part of the exploration and construction phase, which are subject to Part 8.H.4.2.1, perform quarterly inspections of active mining areas covered by this permit, corresponding with the inspections as performed by SMCRA inspectors, of all mining-related areas required by SMCRA. Also maintain the records of the SMCRA authority representative. See Part 8.H.8.1 for inspection requirements for inactive and unstaffed sties.8.H.7.2 Sediment and Erosion Control. (See also Part 2.1.2.5) As indicated in Part 8.H.6.1, SMCRA requirements regarding sediment and erosion control measures must be complied with for those areas subject to SMCRA authority, including inspection requirements. 8.H.7.3 Comprehensive Site Inspections. (See also Part 4.3) Your inspection program must include inspections for pollutants entering the drainage system from activities located on or near coal mining-related areas. Among the areas to be inspected are haul and access roads; railroad spurs, sliding, and internal hauling lines; conveyor belts, chutes, and aerial tramways; equipment storage and maintenance yards; coal handling buildings and structures; and inactive mines and related areas.8.H.8 Sector-Specific Benchmarks. (See also Part 6 of the permit.)Table 8.H-1.Subsector Benchmark (You may be subject to requirements for Parameter Monitoring more than one sector/subsector) Concentration Subsector HI. Coal Mines and Related Areas Total Aluminum 0.75 mg/L (SIC 1221-1241) Total Iron 1.0 mg/L Total Suspended Solids (TSS) 100 mg/L 8.H.8.1 Inactive and Unstaffed Sites -Conditional Exemption from No Exposure Requirement for Routine Inspections, Quarterly Visual Assessments, and Benchmark Monitoring. As a Sector H facility, if you are seeking to exercise a waiver from either the quarterly visual assessment or the benchmark monitoring requirements for inactive and unstaffed sites (including temporarily inactive sites), you are conditionally exempt from the requirement to certify that "there are no industrial materials or activities exposed to Stormwater Discharges Associated With Industrial Activity -Sector H 75 General Permit stormwater" in Parts 4.2.3 and 6.2.1.3, respectively. Additionally, if you are seeking to reduce your required quarterly routine inspection frequency to a once annual comprehensive inspection, as is allowed under Part 4.1.3, you are also conditionally exempt from the requirement to certify that "there are no industrial materials or activities. exposed to stormwater." These conditional exemptions are based on the following requirements:

  • If circumstances change and your facility becomes active and/or staffed, this exception no longer applies and you must immediately begin complying with the applicable benchmark monitoring requirements as if you were in your first year of permit coverage, and the quarterly visual assessment requirements; and* EPA retains the authority to revoke this exemption and/or the monitoring waiver where it is determined that the discharge causes, has a reasonable potential to cause or contribute to an instream excursion above an applicable water quality standard, including designated uses.Subject to the two conditions above, if your facility is inactive and unstaffed, you are waived from the requirement to conduct quarterly visual assessments and routine facility inspections.

You are not waived from conducting the Part 4.3 comprehensive site inspection. You are encouraged to inspect your site more frequently where you have reason to believe that severe weather or natural disasters may have damaged control measures or increased discharges. 8.H.9 Termination of Permit Coverage 8.H.9.1 Termination of Permit Coverage for Sites Reclaimed After December 17, 1990. A site or a portion of a site that has been released from applicable state or federal reclamation requirements after December 17, 1990, is no longer required to maintain coverage under this permit. If the site or portion of a site reclaimed after December 17, 1990, was not subject to reclamation requirements, the site or portion of the site is no longer required to maintain coverage under this permit if the site or portion of the site has been reclaimed as defined in Part 8.H.7.2.8.H.9.2 Termination of Permit Coverage for Sites Reclaimed Before December 17, 1990. A site or portion of a site that was released from applicable state or federal reclamation requirements before December 17, 1990, or that was otherwise reclaimed before December 17, 1990, is no longer required to maintain coverage under this permit if the site or portion of the site has been reclaimed. A site or portion of a site is considered to have been reclaimed if: (1) stormwater runoff that comes into contact with raw materials, intermediate byproducts, finished products, and waste products does not have the potential to cause or contribute to violations of state water quality standards, (2) soil disturbing activities related to mining at the sites or portion of the site have been completed, (3) the site or portion of the site has been stabilized to minimize soil erosion, and (4) as appropriate depending on location, size, and the potential to contribute pollutants to stormwater discharges, the site or portion of the site has been revegetated, will be amenable to natural revegetation, or will be left in a condition consistent with the post-mining land use.Stormwater Discharges Associated With Industrial Activity -Sector H 76 General Permit Part 8 -Sector-Specific Requirements for Industrial Activity Subpart I -Sector I -Oil and Gas Extraction. You must comply with Part 8 sector-specific requirements associated with your primary industrial activity and any co-located industrial activities, as defined in Appendix A. The sector-specific requirements apply to those areas of your facility where those sector-specific activities occur. These sector-specific requirements are in addition to any requirements specified elsewhere in this permit.8.1.1 Covered Stormwater Discharges. The requirements in Subpart I apply to stormwater discharges associated with industrial activity from Oil and Gas Extraction facilities as identified by the SIC Codes specified under Sector I in Table D-1 of Appendix D of the permit.Discharges of stormwater runoff from field activities or operations associated with oil and gas exploration, production, processing, or treatment operations or transmission facilities are exempt from NPDES permit coverage unless, in accordance with 40 CFR 122.26(c)(1)(iii), the facility: " Has had a discharge of stormwater resulting in the discharge of a reportable quantity for which notification is or was required pursuant to 40 CFR 117.21 or 40 CFR 302.6 at anytime since November 16, 1987; or* Has had a discharge of stormwater resulting in the discharge of a reportable quantity for which notification is or was required pursuant to 40 CFR 110.6 at any time since November 16, 1987; or" Contributes to a violation of a water quality standard.Any stormwater discharges that require permit coverage as a result of meeting one of the conditions of 122.26(c)(1)(iii) may be covered under this permit unless otherwise required to obtain coverage under an alternative NPDES general permit or an individual NPDES permit as specified in Part 1.6.1.8.1.2 Limitations on Coverage.8.1.2.1 Stormwater Discharges Subject to Effluent Limitation Guidelines. (See also Part 1.1.4.4) This permit does not authorize stormwater discharges from petroleum drilling operations that are subject to nationally established effluent limitation guidelines found at 40 CFR Part 435, respectively. 8.1.2.2 Non-Stormwater Discharges. Discharges of vehicle and equipment washwater, including tank cleaning operations, are not authorized by this permit. Alternatively, washwater discharges must be authorized under a separate NPDES permit, or be discharged to a sanitary sewer in accordance with applicable industrial pretreatment requirements. Stormwater Discharges Associated With Industrial Activity -Sector I 77 General Permit 8.1.3 Additional Technology-Based Effluent Limits.8.1.3.1 Vegetative Controls. Implement vegetative practices designed to preserve existing vegetation, where attainable, and revegetate open areas as soon as practicable after grade drilling. Consider the following (or equivalent measures): temporary or permanent seeding, mulching, sod stabilization, vegetative buffer strips, and tree protection practices. Begin implementing appropriate vegetative practices on all disturbed areas within 14 days following the last activity in that area.8.1.4 Additional SWPPP Requirements. 8.1.4.1 Drainage Area Site Map. (See also Part 5.1.2) Document in your SWPPP where any of the following may be exposed to precipitation or surface runoff: Reportable Quantity (RQ) releases; locations used for the treatment, storage, or disposal of wastes;processing areas and storage areas; chemical mixing areas; construction and drilling areas; all areas subject to the effluent guidelines requirements for "No Discharge" in accordance with 40 CFR 435.32; and the structural controls to achieve compliance with the "No Discharge" requirements. 8.1.4.2 Potential Pollutant Sources. (See also Part 5.1.3) Also document in your S WPPP the following sources and activities that have potential pollutants associated with them: chemical, cement, mud, or gel mixing activities; drilling or mining activities; and equipment cleaning and rehabilitation activities. In addition, include information about the reportable quantity (RQ) release that triggered the permit application requirements: the nature of the release (e.g., spill of oil from a drum storage area), amount of oil or hazardous substance released, amount of substance recovered, date of the release, cause of the release (e.g., poor handling techniques and lack of containment in the area), areas affected by the release (i.e., land and water), procedure to clean up release, actions or procedures implemented to prevent or improve response to a release, and remaining potential contamination of stormwater from release (taking into account human health risks, the control of drinking water intakes, and the designated uses of the receiving water).8.1.4.3 Erosion and Sedimentation Control. (See also Part 2.1.2.5) Unless covered by the current Construction General Permit (CGP), the additional documentation requirements for sediment and erosion controls for well drillings and sand/shale mining areas include the following: 8.1.4.3.1 Site Description. Also include a description in your SWPPP of the nature of the exploration activity, estimates of the total area of site and area disturbed due to exploration activity, an estimate of runoff coefficient of the site, a site drainage map, including approximate slopes, and the names of all receiving waters.8.1.4.3.2 Vegetative Controls. Document vegetative practices used consistent with Part 8.1.3.1 in the SWPPP.8.1.5 Additional Inspection Requirements. All erosion and sedimentation control measures must be inspected every 7 days.Stormwater Discharges Associated With Industrial Activity -Sector I 78 General Permit Part 8 -Sector-Specific Requirements for Industrial Activity Subpart J -Sector J -Non-Metallic Mineral Mining and Dressing.You must comply with Part 8 sector-specific requirements associated with your primary industrial activity and any co-located industrial activities, as defined in Appendix A. The sector-specific requirements apply to those areas of your facility where those sector-specific activities occur. These sector-specific requirements are in addition to any requirements specified elsewhere in this permit.8.J.1 Covered Stormwater Discharges. The requirements in Subpart J apply to stormwater discharges associated with industrial activity from Active and Inactive Non-Metallic Mineral Mining and Dressing facilities as identified by the SIC Codes specified under Sector J in Table D-1 of Appendix D of the permit.8.J. 1.1 Covered Discharges from Inactive Facilities. All stormwater discharges. 8.J. 1.2 Covered Discharges from Active and Temporarily Inactive Facilities. All stormwater discharges, except for most stormwater discharges subject to the existing effluent limitation guideline at 40 CFR Part 436. Mine dewatering discharges composed entirely of stormwater or uncontaminated ground water seepage from: construction sand and gravel, industrial sand, and crushed stone mining facilities in Regions 1, 2, 3, 6, 9, and 10 are covered by this permit.8.J. 1.3 Covered Discharges from Exploration and Construction of Non-Metallic Mineral Mining Facilities. All stormwater discharges. 8.J. 1.4 Covered Discharges from Sites Undergoing Reclamation. All stormwater discharges. 8.J.2 Limitations on Coverage.Most stormwater discharges subject to an existing effluent limitation guideline at 40 CFR Part 436 are not authorized by this permit. The exceptions to this limitation, which are covered by this permit, are mine dewatering discharges composed entirely of stormwater or uncontaminated ground water seepage from construction sand and gravel, industrial sand, and crushed stone mining facilities in Regions 1, 2, 3, 6, 9, and 10.8.J.3 Definitions. The following definitions are not intended to supersede the definitions of active and inactive mining facilities established by 40 CFR 122.26(b)(14)(iii). 8.J.3.1 Mining operations -Consists of the active and temporarily inactive phases, and the reclamation phase, but excludes the exploration and construction phases.8.J.3.2 Exploration phase -Entails exploration and land disturbance activities to determine the financial viability of a site. The exploration phase is not considered part of "mining operations." Stormwater Discharges Associated With Industrial Activity -Sector J 79 General Permit 8.J.3.3 Construction phase -Includes the building of site access roads and removal of overburden and waste rock to expose mineable minerals. The construction phase is not considered part of "mining operations". 8.J.3.4 Active phase -Activities including the extraction, removal or recovery of minerals. For surface mines, this definition does not include any land where grading has returned the earth to a desired contour and reclamation has begun. This definition is derived from the definition of "active mining area" found at 40 CFR 440.1'32(a). The active phase is considered part of "mining operations." 8.J.3.5 Reclamation phase -Activities undertaken, in compliance with applicable mined land reclamation requirements, following the cessation of the "active phase", intended to return the land to an appropriate post-mining land use. The reclamation phase is considered part of "mining operations". NOTE: The following definitions are not intended to supersede the definitions of active and inactive mining facilities established by 40 CFR 122.26(b)(14)(iii). 8.J.3.6 Active Mineral Mining Facility -A place where work or other activity related to the extraction, removal, or recovery of minerals is being conducted. For surface mines, this definition does not include any land where grading has returned the earth to a desired contour and reclamation has begun. This definition is derived from the definition of"active mining area" found at 40 CFR 440.132(a). 8.J.3.7 Inactive Mineral Mining Facility -A site or portion of a site where mineral mining and/or milling occurred in the past but is not an active facility as defined above, and where the inactive portion is not covered by an active mining permit issued by the applicable State or Federal agency. An inactive mineral mining facility has an identifiable owner / operator. Sites where mining claims are being maintained prior to disturbances associated with the extraction, beneficiation, or processing of mined materials, and sites where minimal activities are undertaken for the sole purpose of maintaining a mining claim are not considered either active or inactive mining facilities and do not require an NPDES industrial stormwater permit.8.J.3.8 Temporarily Inactive Mineral Mining Facility -A site or portion of a site where metal mining and/or milling occurred in the past but currently are not being actively undertaken, and the facility is covered by an active mining permit issued by the applicable State or Federal agency.8.J.3.9 Final Stabilization -a site or portion of a site is "finally stabilized" when it has implemented all applicable Federal and State reclamation requirements. 8.J.3.10 Uncontaminated -Free from the presence of pollutants attributable to industrial activity.8.J.4 Technology-Based Effluent Limits for Clearing, Grading, and Excavation Activities. Clearing, grading, and excavation activities being conducted as part of the exploration and construction phase of mining activities are covered under this permit.8.J.4.1 Management Practices for Clearing, Grading, and Excavation Activities. Stormwater Discharges Associated With Industrial Activity -Sector J 80 General Permit 8.J.4.1.1 Selecting and installing control measures. For all areas affected by clearing, grading, and excavation activities, you must select, design, install, and implement control measures that meet applicable Part 2 effluent limits.8.J.4.1.2 Good Housekeeping. (See also Part 2.1.2.2) Litter, debris, and chemicals must be prevented from becoming a pollutant source in stormwater discharges. 8.J.4.1.3 Retention and Detention of Stormwater Runoff For drainage locations serving more than one acre, sediment basins and/or temporary sediment traps should be used. At a minimum, silt fences, vegetative buffer strips, or equivalent sediment controls are required for all down slope boundaries (and for those side slope boundaries deemed appropriate as dictated by individual site conditions) of the development area unless a sediment basin providing storage for a calculated volume of runoff from a 2-year, 24-hour storm or 3,600 cubic feet of storage per acre drained is provided.8.J.4.2 Inspection of Clearing, Grading, and Excavation Activities. (See also Part 4)8.J.4.2.1 Inspection Frequency. Inspections must be conducted either at least once every 7 calendar days or at least once every 14 calendar days and within 24 hours of the end of a storm event of 0.5 inches or greater. Inspection frequency may be reduced to at least once every month if the entire site is temporarily stabilized (pursuant to Part 8.J.4.3.2), if runoff is unlikely due to winter conditions (e.g., site is covered with snow, ice, or the ground is frozen), or construction is occurring during seasonal arid periods in arid areas and semi-arid areas.8.J.4.2.2 Location of Inspections. Inspections must include all areas of the site disturbed by clearing, grading, and/or excavation activities and areas used for storage of materials that are exposed to precipitation. Sedimentation and erosion control measures implemented must be observed to ensure proper operation. Discharge locations must be inspected to ascertain whether erosion control measures are effective in preventing significant impacts to waters of the United States, where accessible. Where discharge locations are inaccessible, nearby downstream locations must be inspected to the extent that such inspections are practicable. Locations where vehicles enter or exit the site must be inspected for evidence of significant off-site sediment tracking.8.J.4.2.3 Inspection Reports. (See also Part 4.1) For each inspection required above, you must complete an inspection report. At a minimum, the inspection report must include the information required in Part 4.1.8.J.4.3 Requirements for Cessation of Clearing, Grading, and Excavation Activities. 8.J.4.3.1 Inspections and Maintenance. Inspections and maintenance of control measures, including any BMPs, associated with clearing, grading, and/or excavation activities being conducted as part of the exploration and construction phase of a mining operation must continue until final stabilization has been achieved on all portions of the disturbed area or until the Stormwater Discharges Associated With Industrial Activity -Sector J 81 General Permit commencement of the active mining phase for those areas that have been temporarily stabilized as a precursor to mining 8.J.4.3.2 Temporary Stabilization ofDisturbed Areas. Stabilization measures should be initiated immediately in portions of the site where clearing, grading and/or excavation activities have temporarily ceased, but in no case more than 14 days after the clearing, grading and/or excavation activities in that portion of the site have temporarily ceased. In arid, semiarid, and drought-stricken areas, or in areas subject to snow or freezing conditions, where initiating perennial vegetative stabilization measures is not possible within 14 days after mining, exploration, and/or construction activity has temporarily ceased, temporary vegetative stabilization measures must be initiated as soon as practicable. Until temporary vegetative stabilization is achieved, interim measures such as erosion control blankets with an appropriate seed base and tackifiers must be employed. In areas of the site, where exploration and/or construction has permanently ceased prior to active mining, temporary stabilization measures must be implemented to minimize mobilization of sediment or other pollutants until such time as the active mining phase commences. 8.J.4.3.3 Final Stabilization of Disturbed Areas. Stabilization measures should be initiated immediately in portions of the site where mining, exploration, and/or construction activities have permanently ceased, but in no case more than 14 days after the exploration and/or construction activity in that portion of the site has permanently ceased. In arid, semiarid, and drought-stricken areas, or in areas subject to snow or freezing conditions, where initiating perennial vegetative stabilization measures is not possible within 14 days after mining, exploration, and/or construction activity has permanently ceased, final vegetative stabilization measures must be initiated as soon as possible. Until final stabilization is achieved temporary stabilization measures, such as erosion control blankets with an appropriate seed base and tackifiers must be used.8.J.5 Additional Technology-Based Effluent Limits.8.J.5.1 Employee Training. Conduct employee training at least annually at active and temporarily inactive sites. (See also Part 2.1.2.9)8.J.5.2 Stormwater Controls. Apart from the control measures you implement to meet your Part 2 effluent limits, where necessary to minimize pollutant discharges, implement the following control measures at your site. The potential pollutants identified in Part 8.J.5.3 shall determine the priority and appropriateness of the control measures selected.8.J.5.2.l Stormwater Diversions: Consider diverting stormwater away from potential pollutant sources. Following are some control measure options: interceptor or diversion controls (e.g., dikes, swales, curbs, or berms); pipe slope drains;subsurface drains; conveyance systems (e.g., channels or gutters, open-top box culverts, and waterbars; rolling dips and road sloping; roadway surface water deflector and culverts); or their equivalents. Stormwater Discharges Associated With Industrial Activity -Sector J 82 General Permit 8.J.5.2.2 Capping: When capping is necessary to minimize pollutant discharges in stormwater, identify the source being capped and the material used to construct the cap.8.J.5.2.3 Treatment: If treatment of stormwater (e.g., chemical or physical systems, oil and water separators, artificial wetlands) is necessary to protect water quality, describe the type and location of treatment used. Passive and/or active treatment of stormwater runoff is encouraged. Treated runoff may be discharged as a stormwater source regulated under this permit provided the discharge is not combined with discharges subject to effluent limitation guidelines for the Mineral Mining and Processing Point Source Category (40 CFR Part 436).8.J.5.3 Certification of Discharge Testing: (See also Part 5.1.4.4) Test or evaluate all outfalls covered under this permit for the presence of specific mining-related non-stormwater discharges such as discharges subject to effluent limitations guidelines (e.g., 40 CFR Part 436). Alternatively (if applicable), you may keep a certification with your SWPPP.8.J.6 Additional SWPPP Requirements. The requirements in Part 8.J.6 are applicable for sites undergoing exploration and construction, active mineral mining facilities, temporarily inactive mineral mining facilities, and sites undergoing reclamation. The requirements in Part 8.J.6 are not applicable to inactive mineral mining facilities. 8.J.6.1 Nature of Industrial Activities. (See also Part 5.1.2) Document in your S WPPP the mining and associated activities that can potentially affect the stormwater discharges covered by this permit, including a general description of the location of the site relative to major transportation routes and communities. 8.J.6.2 Site Map. (See also Part 5.1.2) Document in your SWPPP the locations of the following (as appropriate): mining or milling site boundaries; access and haul roads; outline of the drainage areas of each stormwater outfall within the facility with indications of the types of discharges from the drainage areas; location(s) of all permitted discharges covered under an individual NPDES permit, outdoor equipment storage, fueling, and maintenance areas; materials handling areas; outdoor manufacturing, outdoor storage, and material disposal areas; outdoor chemicals and explosives storage areas;overburden, materials, soils, or waste storage areas; location of mine drainage dewatering or other process water; heap leach pads; off-site points of discharge for mine dewatering and process water; surface waters; boundary of tributary areas that are subject to effluent limitations guidelines; and location(s) of reclaimed areas.8.J.6.3 Potential Pollutant Sources. (See also Part 5.1.3) For each area of the mine or mill site where stormwater discharges associated with industrial activities occur, document in your SWPPP the types of pollutants (e.g., heavy metals, sediment) likely to be present in significant amounts. For example, phosphate mining facilities will likely need to document pollutants such as selenium, which can be present in significant amounts in their discharges. Consider these factors: the mineralogy of the waste rock (e.g., acid forming); toxicity and quantity of chemicals used, produced, or discharged; the Stormwater Discharges Associated With Industrial Activity -Sector J 83 General Permit likelihood of contact with stormwater; vegetation of site (if any); and history of significant leaks or spills of toxic or hazardous pollutants. Also include a summary of any existing waste rock or overburden characterization data and test results for potential generation of acid rock drainage.8.J.6.4 Stormwater Controls. To the extent that you use any of the control measures in Part 8.J.5.2, document them in your SWPPP pursuant to Part 5.1.4. If control measures are implemented or planned but are not listed here (e.g., substituting a less toxic chemical for a more toxic one), include descriptions of them in your SWPPP.8.J.6.4 Employee Training. All employee training(s) conducted in accordance with Part 8.J.5.1 must be documented with the SWPPP.8.J.6.5 Certification of Permit Coverage for Commingled Non-Stormwater Discharges. If you determine that you are able to certify, consistent with Part 8.J.5.3, that a particular discharge composed of commingled stormwater and non-stormwater is covered under a separate NPDES permit, and that permit subjects the non-stormwater portion to effluent limitations prior to any commingling, you must retain such certification with your SWPPP. This certification must identify the non-stormwater discharges, the applicable NPDES permit(s), the effluent limitations placed on the non-stormwater discharge by the permit(s), and the points at which the limitations are applied.8.J.7 Additional Inspection Requirements. Except for areas of the site subject to clearing, grading, and/or excavation activities conducted as part of the exploration and construction phase, which are subject to Part 8.J.4.2.1, you must inspect sites at least quarterly unless adverse weather conditions make the site inaccessible. Sites which discharge to waters which are designated as outstanding waters or waters which are impaired for sediment or nitrogen must be inspected monthly. See Part 8.J.8.1 for inspection requirements for inactive and unstaffed sites. (See also Part 4.1 and 8.J.4.2.)8.J.8 Sector-Specific Benchmarks Table 8.J-1 identifies benchmarks that apply to the specific subsectors of Sector J. These benchmarks apply to both your primary industrial activity and any co-located industrial activities, which describe your site activities. Table 8.J-1.Subsector Benchmark (You may be subject to requirements for more Parameter Monitoring than one sector/subsector) Concentration Subsector i1. Sand and Gravel Mining (SIC Nitrate plus Nitrite Nitrogen 0.68 mg/L 1442, 1446) Total Suspended Solids (TSS) 100 mg/L Subsector J2. Dimension and Crushed Stone and Total Suspended Solids (TSS) 100 mg/L Nonmetallic Minerals (except fuels) (SIC 1411, 1422-1429, 1481, 1499)Stormwater Discharges Associated With Industrial Activity -Sector J 84 General Permit 8.J.8.1 Inactive and Unstaffed Sites -Conditional Exemption from No Exposure Requirement for Routine Inspections, Quarterly Visual Assessments, and Benchmark Monitoring. As a Sector J facility, if you are seeking to exercise a waiver from either the routine inspection, quarterly visual assessment or the benchmark monitoring requirements for inactive and unstaffed sites (including temporarily inactive sites), you are conditionally exempt from the requirement to certify that "there are no industrial materials or activities exposed to stormwater" in Parts 4.2.3 and 6.2.1.3, respectively. This exemption is conditioned on the following: " If circumstances change and your facility becomes active and/or staffed, this exception no longer applies and you must immediately begin complying with the applicable benchmark monitoring requirements as if you were in your first year of permit coverage, and the quarterly visual assessment requirements; and o EPA retains the authority to revoke this exemption and/or the monitoring waiver where it is determined that the discharge causes, has a reasonable potential to cause, or contributes to an instream excursion above an applicable water quality standard, including designated uses.Subject to the two conditions above, if your facility is inactive and unstaffed, you are waived from the requirement to conduct quarterly visual assessments and routine facility inspections. You are not waived from conducting the Part 4.3 comprehensive site inspection. You are encouraged to inspect your site more frequently where you have reason to believe that severe weather or natural disasters may have damaged control measures or increased discharges. 8.J.9 Effluent Limitations Based on Effluent Limitations Guidelines (See also Part 6.2.2.1 of the permit)Table 8.J-2 identifies effluent limits that apply to the industrial activities described below.Compliance with these effluent limits is to be determined based on discharges from these industrial activities independent of commingling with any other wastestreams that may be covered under this permit.Table 8.J-2 Industrial Activity Parameter Effluent Limit'Mine dewatering discharges at crushed stone mining pH 6.0 -9.0 facilities (SIC 1422 -1429)Mine dewatering discharges at construction sand and pH 6.0 -9.0 gravel mining facilities (SIC 1442)Mine dewatering discharges at industrial sand mining Total Suspended 25 mg/L, monthly avg.facilities (SIC 1446) Solids (TSS) 45 mg/L, daily maximum I pH 6.0-9.0'Monitor annually.Stormwater Discharges Associated With Industrial Activity -Sector J 85 General Permit 8.J.10 Termination of Permit Coverage 8.J. 10.1 Termination of Permit Coverage for Sites Reclaimed After December 17, 1990. A site or a portion of a site that has been released from applicable state or federal reclamation requirements after December 17, 1990, is no longer required to maintain coverage under this permit. If the site or portion of a site reclaimed after December 17, 1990, was not subject to reclamation requirements, the site or portion of the site is no longer required to maintain coverage under this permit if the site or portion of the site has been reclaimed as defined in Part 8.J.7.2.8.J. 10.2 Termination of Permit Coverage for Sites Reclaimed Before December 17, 1990. A site or portion of a site that was released from applicable state or federal reclamation requirements before December 17, 1990, or that was otherwise reclaimed before December 17, 1990, is no longer required to maintain coverage under this permit if the site or portion of the site has been reclaimed. A site or portion of a site is considered to have been reclaimed if: (1) stormwater runoff that comes into contact with raw materials, intermediate byproducts, finished products, and waste products does not have the potential to cause or contribute to violations of state water quality standards, (2) soil disturbing activities related to mining at the sites or portion of the site have been completed, (3) the site or portion of the site has been stabilized to minimize soil erosion, and (4) as appropriate depending on location, size, and the potential to contribute pollutants to stormwater discharges, the site or portion of the site has been revegetated, will be amenable to natural revegetation, or will be left in a condition consistent with the post-mining land use.Stormwater Discharges Associated With Industrial Activity -Sector J 86 General Permit Part 8 -Sector-Specific Requirements for Industrial Activity Subpart K -Sector K -Hazardous Waste Treatment, Storage, or Disposal Facilities. You must comply with Part 8 sector-specific requirements associated with your primary industrial activity and any co-located industrial activities, as defined in Appendix A. The sector-specific requirements apply to those areas of your facility where those sector-specific activities occur. These sector-specific requirements are in addition to any requirements specified elsewhere in this permit.8.K.1 Covered Stormwater Discharges. The requirements in Subpart K apply to stormwater discharges associated with industrial activity from Hazardous Waste Treatment, Storage, or Disposal facilities (TSDFs) as identified by the Activity Code specified under Sector K in Table D-1 of Appendix D of the permit.8.K.2 Industrial Activities Covered by Sector K.This permit authorizes stormwater discharges associated with industrial activity from facilities that treat, store, or dispose of hazardous wastes, including those that are operating under interim status or a permit under subtitle C of RCRA.Disposal facilities that have been properly closed and capped, and have no significant materials exposed to stormwater, are considered inactive and do not require permits.8.K.3 Limitations on Coverage.8.K.3.1 Prohibition of Non-Stormwater Discharges. (See also Part 1.1.4) The following are not authorized by this permit: leachate, gas collection condensate, drained free liquids, contaminated ground water, laboratory-derived wastewater, and contact washwater from washing truck and railcar exteriors and surface areas that have come in direct contact with solid waste at the landfill facility.8.K.3.2 Limitations on Coverage for Facilities Providing Commercial TSDF Services. For facilities located in Region 6 (see Appendix C) coverage is limited to hazardous waste TSDFs that are self-generating (including occasionally accepting wastes from community household hazardous waste collection events as public service), handle only residential wastes, and/or only store hazardous wastes and do not treat or dispose of them. Coverage under this permit is not available to commercial waste disposal and treatment facilities located in Region 6 that dispose and treat on a commercial basis any produced hazardous wastes (i.e., not their own) as a service to commercial or industrial generators. 8.K.4 Definitions. 8.K.4.1 Contaminated stormwater -stormwater that comes into direct contact with landfill wastes, the waste handling and treatment areas, or landfill wastewater as defined in Part 8.K.4.5. Some specific areas of a landfill that may produce contaminated stormwater include (but are not limited to) the open face of an active landfill with exposed waste (no cover added); the areas around wastewater treatment operations; trucks, equipment, or machinery that has been in direct contact with the waste; and waste dumping areas.Stormwater Discharges Associated With Industrial Activity -Sector K 87 General Permit 8.K.4.2 Drained free liquids -aqueous wastes drained from waste containers (e.g., drums) prior to landfilling. 8.K.4.3 Landfill -an area of land or an excavation in which wastes are placed for permanent disposal, but that is not a land application or land treatment unit, surface impoundment, underground injection well, waste pile, salt dome formation, salt bed formation, underground mine, or cave as these terms are defined in 40 CFR 257.2, 258.2, and 260.10.8.K.4.4 Landfill wastewater -as defined in 40 CFR Part 445 (Landfills Point Source Category), all wastewater associated with, or produced by, landfilling activities except for sanitary wastewater, non-contaminated stormwater, contaminated groundwater, and wastewater from recovery pumping wells. Landfill wastewater includes, but is not limited to, leachate, gas collection condensate, drained free liquids, laboratory derived wastewater, contaminated stormwater, and contact washwater from washing truck, equipment, and railcar exteriors and surface areas that have come in direct contact with solid waste at the landfill facility.8.K.4.5 Leachate -liquid that has passed through or emerged from solid waste and contains soluble, suspended, or miscible materials removed from such waste.8.K.4.6 Non-contaminated stormwater -stormwater that does not come into direct contact with landfill wastes, the waste handling and treatment areas, or landfill wastewater as defined in Part 8.K.4.4. Non-contaminated stormwater includes stormwater that flows off the cap, cover, intermediate cover, daily cover, and/or final cover of the landfill.8.K.5 Sector-Specific Benchmarks Table 8.K-I identifies benchmarks that apply to the specific subsectors of Sector K.These benchmarks apply to both your primary industrial activity and any co-located industrial activities, which describe your site activities. Stormwater Discharges Associated With Industrial Activity -Sector K 88 General Permit Table 8.K-1.Subsector Benchmark (You may be subject to requirements Parameter Monitoring for more than one sector/subsector) Concentration Subsector KI. ALL -Industrial Activity Ammonia 2.14 mg/L Code "HZ" (Note: permit coverage Total Magnesium 0.064 mg/L limited in some States). Benchmarks only Chemical Oxygen Demand (COD) 120 mg/L applicable to discharges not subject to Total Arsenic 0.15 mg/L effluent limitations in 40 CFR Part 445 Total Cadmium' Hardness Dependent Subpart A (see below). Total Cyanide 0.022 mg/ L Total Lead' Hardness Dependent Total Mercury 0.0014 mg/ L Total Selenium 0.005 mg/L Total Silver' Hardness Dependent The benchmark values of some metals are dependent on water hardness. For these parameters, permittees must determine the hardness of the receiving water (see Appendix J, "Calculating Hardness in Receiving Waters for Hardness Dependent Metals," for methodology), in accordance with Part 6.2.1.1, to identify the applicable 'hardness range' for determining their benchmark value applicable to their facility. The ranges occur in 25 mg/L increments. Hardness Dependent Benchmarks follow in the table below: Cadmium Lead Silver Water Hardness Range (mg/L) (mg/L) (mg/L)0-25 mg/L 0.0005 0.014 0.0007 25-50 mg/L 0.0008 0.023 0.0007 50-75 mg/L 0.0013 0.045 0.0017 75-100 mg/L 0.0018 0.069 0.0030 100-125 mg/L 0.0023 0.095 0.0046 125-150 mg/L 0.0029 0.122 0.0065 150-175 mg/L 0.0034 0.151 0.0087 175-200 mgiL 0.0039 0.182 0.0112 200-225 mg/L 0.0045 0.213 0.0138 225-250 mg/L 0.0050 0.246 0.0168 250+ mg/L 0.0053 0.262 0.0183 8.K.6 Effluent Limitations Based on Effluent Limitations Guidelines (See also Part 6.2.2.1 of the permit.)Table 8.K-2 identifies effluent limits that apply to the industrial activities described below. Compliance with these effluent limits is to be determined based on discharges from these industrial activities independent of commingling with any other wastestreams that may be covered under this permit.Stormwater Discharges Associated With Industrial Activity -Sector K 89 General Permit Table 8.K-2 1 Industrial Activity Parameter Effluent Limit Discharges from hazardous Biochemical Oxygen 220 mg/L, daily maximum waste landfills subject to Demand (BOD 5) 56 mg/L, monthly avg. maximum effluent limitations in 40 Total Suspended Solids 88 mg/L, daily maximum CFR Part 445 Subpart A (see (TSS) 27 mg/L, monthly avg. maximum footnote). Ammonia 10 mg/L, daily maximum 4.9 mg/L, monthly avg. maximum Alpha Terpineol 0.042 mg/L, daily maximum 0.019 mg/L, monthly avg. maximum Aniline 0.024 mg/L, daily maximum 0.015 mg/L, monthly avg. maximum Benzoic Acid 0.119 mg/L, daily maximum 0.073 mg/L, monthly avg. maximum Naphthalene 0.059 mg/L, daily maximum 0.022 mg/L, monthly avg. maximum p-Cresol 0.024 mg/L, daily maximum 0.0 15 mg/L, monthly avg. maximum Phenol 0.048 mg/L, daily maximum 0.029 mg/L, monthly avg. maximum Pyridine 0.072 mg/L, daily maximum 0.025 mg/L, monthly avg. maximum Total Arsenic 1.1 mg/L, daily maximum 0.54 mg/L, monthly avg. maximum Total Chromium 1.1 mg/L, daily maximum 0.46 mg/L, monthly avg. maximum Total Zinc 0.535 mg/L, daily maximum 0.296 mg/L, monthly avg. maximum pH Within the range of 6-9 standard pH units (s.u.)Monitor annually. As set forth at 40 CFR Part 445 Subpart A, these numeric limitations apply to contaminated stormwater discharges from hazardous waste landfills subject to the provisions of RCRA Subtitle C at 40 CFR Parts 264 (Subpart N) and 265 (Subpart N) except for any of the following facilities: (a) landfills operated in conjunction with other industrial or commercial operations when the landfill receives only wastes generated by the industrial or commercial operation directly associated with the landfill;(b) landfills operated in conjunction with other industrial or commercial operations when the landfill receives wastes generated by the industrial or commercial operation directly associated with the landfill and also receives other wastes, provided that the other wastes received for disposal are generated by a facility that is subject to the same provisions in 40 CFR Subchapter N as the industrial or commercial operation or that the other wastes received are of similar nature to the wastes generated by the industrial or commercial operation;(c) landfills operated in conjunction with Centralized Waste Treatment (CWT) facilities subject to 40 CFR Part 437, so long as the CWT facility commingles the landfill wastewater with other non-landfill wastewater for discharge. A landfill directly associated with a CWT facility is subject to this part if the CWT facility discharges landfill wastewater separately from other CWT wastewater or commingles the wastewater from its landfill only with wastewater from other landfills; or (d) landfills operated in conjunction with other industrial or commercial operations when the landfill receives wastes from public service activities, so long as the company owning the landfill does not receive a fee or other remuneration for the disposal service.Stormwater Discharges Associated With Industrial Activity -Sector K General Permit Part 8 -Sector-Specific Requirements for Industrial Activity Subpart L -Sector L -Landfills, Land Application Sites, and Open Dumps.You must comply with Part 8 sector-specific requirements associated with your primary industrial activity and any co-located industrial activities, as defined in Appendix A. The sector-specific requirements apply to those areas of your facility where those sector-specific activities occur. These sector-specific requirements are in addition to any requirements specified elsewhere in this permit.8.L.1 Covered Stormwater Discharges. The requirements in Subpart L apply to stormwater discharges associated with industrial activity from Landfills and Land Application Sites and Open Dumps as identified by the Activity Code specified under Sector L in Table D-1 of Appendix D of the permit.8.L.2 Industrial Activities Covered by Sector L.This permit may authorize stormwater discharges for Sector L facilities associated with waste disposal at landfills, land application sites, and open dumps that receive or have received industrial waste, including sites subject to regulation under Subtitle D of RCRA. This permit does not cover discharges from landfills that receive only municipal wastes.8.L.3 Limitations on Coverage.8.L.3.1 Prohibition of Non-Stormwater Discharges. (See also Part 1.1.4) The following discharges are not authorized by this permit: leachate, gas collection condensate, drained free liquids, contaminated ground water, laboratory wastewater, and contact washwater from washing truck and railcar exteriors and surface areas that have come in direct contact with solid waste at the landfill facility.8.L.4 Definitions. 8.L.4.1 Contaminated stormwater -stormwater that comes into direct contact with landfill wastes, the waste handling and treatment areas, or landfill wastewater. Some areas of a landfill that may produce contaminated stormwater include (but are not limited to) the open face of an active landfill with exposed waste (no cover added); the areas around wastewater treatment operations; trucks, equipment, or machinery that has been in direct contact with the waste; and waste dumping areas.8.L.4.2 Drained free liquids -aqueous wastes drained from waste containers (e.g., drums) prior to landfilling. 8.L.4.3 Landfill wastewater -as defined in 40 CFR Part 445 (Landfills Point Source Category)all wastewater associated with, or produced by, landfilling activities except for sanitary wastewater, non-contaminated stormwater, contaminated groundwater, and wastewater from recovery pumping wells. Landfill process wastewater includes, but is not limited to, leachate; gas collection condensate; drained free liquids; laboratory-derived wastewater; contaminated stormwater; and contact washwater from washing truck, Stormwater Discharges Associated With Industrial Activity -Sector L 91 General Permit equipment, and railcar exteriors and surface areas that have come in direct contact with solid waste at the landfill facility.8.L.4.4 Leachate -liquid that has passed through or emerged from solid waste and contains soluble, suspended, or miscible materials removed from such waste.8.L.4.5 Non-contaminated stormwater -stormwater that does not come into direct contact with landfill wastes, the waste handling and treatment areas, or landfill wastewater. Non-contaminated stormwater includes stormwater that flows off the cap, cover, intermediate cover, daily cover, and/or final cover of the landfill.8.L.5 Additional Technology-Based Effluent Limits.8.L.5.1 Preventive Maintenance Program. (See also Part 2.1.2.3) As part of your preventive maintenance program, maintain the following: all elements of leachate collection and treatment systems, to prevent commingling of leachate with stormwater; the integrity and effectiveness of any intermediate or final cover (including repairing the cover as necessary), to minimize the effects of settlement, sinking, and erosion.8.L.5.2 Erosion and Sedimentation Control. (See also Part 2.1.2.5) Provide temporary stabilization (e.g., temporary seeding, mulching, and placing geotextiles on the inactive portions of stockpiles) for the following: materials stockpiled for daily, intermediate, and final cover; inactive areas of the landfill or open dump; landfills or open dump areas that have gotten final covers but where vegetation has yet to establish itself; and land application sites where waste application has been completed but final vegetation has not yet been established. 8.L.5.3 Unauthorized Discharge Test Certification. (See also Part 5.1.3.4) The discharge test and certification must also be conducted for the presence of leachate and vehicle washwater. 8.L.6 Additional SWPPP Requirements. 8.L.5.1 Drainage Area Site Map. (See also Part 5.1.2) Document in your SWPPP where any of the following may be exposed to precipitation or surface runoff: active and closed landfill cells or trenches, active and closed land application areas, locations where open dumping is occurring or has occurred, locations of any known leachate springs or other areas where uncontrolled leachate may commingle with runoff, and leachate collection and handling systems.8.L.5.2 Summary of Potential Pollutant Sources. (See also Part 5.1.3) Document in your SWPPP the following sources and activities that have potential pollutants associated with them: fertilizer, herbicide, and pesticide application; earth and soil moving; waste hauling and loading or unloading; outdoor storage of significant materials, including daily, interim, and final cover material stockpiles as well as temporary waste storage areas; exposure of active and inactive landfill and land application areas; uncontrolled leachate flows; and failure or leaks from leachate collection and treatment systems.Stormwater Discharges Associated With Industrial Activity -Sector L 92 General Permit 8.L.7 Additional Inspection Requirements. (See also Part 4)8.L.7.1 Inspections ofActive Sites. Except in arid and semi-arid climates, inspect operating landfills, open dumps, and land application sites at least once every 7 days. Focus on areas of landfills that have not yet been finally stabilized; active land application areas, areas used for storage of material and wastes that are exposed to precipitation, stabilization, and structural control measures; leachate collection and treatment systems;and locations where equipment and waste trucks enter and exit the site. Ensure that sediment and erosion control measures are operating properly. For stabilized sites and areas where land application has been completed, or where the climate is arid or semi-arid, conduct inspections at least once every month.8.L.7.2 Inspections of Inactive Sites. Inspect inactive landfills, open dumps, and land application sites at least quarterly. Qualified personnel must inspect landfill (or open dump) stabilization and structural erosion control measures, leachate collection and treatment systems, and all closed land application areas.8.L.8 Additional Post-Authorization Documentation Requirements. 8.L.8.1 Recordkeeping and Internal Reporting. Keep records with your SWPPP of the types of wastes disposed of in each cell or trench of a landfill or open dump. For land application sites, track the types and quantities of wastes applied in specific areas.8.L.9 Sector-Specific Benchmarks Table 8.L-1 identifies benchmarks that apply to the specific subsectors of Sector L.These benchmarks apply to both your primary industrial activity and any co-located industrial activities, which describe your site activities. Table 8.L-1.Subsector Benchmark (You may be subject to requirements for more than one Parameter Monitoring sector/subsector) Concentration' Subsector LU. All Landfill, Land Application Sites and Open Total Suspended 100 mg/L Dumps (Industrial Activity Code "LF") Solids (TSS)Subsector L2. All Landfill, Land Application Sites and Open Total Iron 1.0 mg/L Dumps, except Municipal Solid Waste Landfill (MSWLF) Areas Closed in Accordance with 40 CFR 258.60 (Industrial Activity Code "LF")'Benchmark monitoring required only for discharges not subject to effluent limitations in 40 CFR Part 445 Subpart B (see Table L-2 above).Stormwater Discharges Associated With Industrial Activity -Sector L 93 General Permit 8.L.10. Effluent Limitations Based on Effluent Limitations Guidelines (See also Part 6.2.2.1 of the permit.)Table 8.L-2 identifies effluent limits that apply to the industrial activities described below. Compliance with these effluent limits is to be determined based on discharges from these industrial activities independent of commingling with any other wastestreams that may be covered under this permit.Table 8.L-21 Industrial Activity Parameter Effluent Limit Discharges from non- Biochemical Oxygen Demand 140 mg/L, daily maximum hazardous waste landfills (BODO) 37 mg/L, monthly avg. maximum subject to effluent limitations Total Suspended Solids (TSS) 88 mg/L, daily maximum in 40 CFR Part 445 Subpart 27 mg/L, monthly avg. maximum B. Ammonia 10 mg/L, daily maximum 4.9 mg/L, monthly avg. maximum Alpha Terpineol 0.033 mg/L, daily maximum 0.0 16 mg/L monthly avg. maximum Benzoic Acid 0.12 mg/L, daily maximum 0.071 mg/L, monthly avg. maximum p-Cresol 0.025 mg/L, daily maximum 0.014 mg/L, monthly avg. maximum Phenol 0.026 mg/L, daily maximum 0.015 mg/L, monthly avg. maximum Total Zinc 0.20 mg/L, daily maximum 0.11 mg/L, monthly avg. maximum pH Within the range of 6-9 standard pH units (s.u.)Monitor annually. As set forth at 40 CFR Part 445 Subpart B, these numeric limitations apply to contaminated stormwater discharges from MSWLFs that have not been closed in accordance with 40 CFR 258.60, and to contaminated stormwater discharges from those landfills that are subject to the provisions of 40 CFR Part 257 except for discharges from any of the following facilities: (a) landfills operated in conjunction with other industrial or commercial operations, when the landfill receives only wastes generated by the industrial or commercial operation directly associated with the landfill;(b) landfills operated in conjunction with other industrial or commercial operations, when the landfill receives wastes generated by the industrial or commercial operation directly associated with the landfill and also receives other wastes, provided that the other wastes received for disposal are generated by a facility that is subject to the same provisions in 40 CFR Subchapter N as the industrial or commercial operation, or that the other wastes received are of similar nature to the wastes generated by the industrial or commercial operation;(c) landfills operated in conjunction with CWT facilities subject to 40 CFR Part 437, so long as the CWT facility commingles the landfill wastewater with other non-landfill wastewater for discharge. A landfill directly associated with a CWT facility is subject to this part if the CWT facility discharges landfill wastewater separately from other CWT wastewater or commingles the wastewater from its landfill only with wastewater from other landfills; or (d) landfills operated in conjunction with other industrial or commercial operations when the landfill receives wastes from public service activities, so long as the company owning the landfill does not receive a fee or other remuneration for the disposal service.Stormwater Discharges Associated With Industrial Activity -Sector L 94 Stormwater Discharges Associated With Industrial Activity -Sector L 94 General Permit Part 8 -Sector-Specific Requirements for Industrial Activity Subpart M -Sector M -Automobile Salvage Yards.You must comply with Part 8 sector-specific requirements associated with your primary industrial activity and any co-located industrial activities, as defined in Appendix A. The sector-specific requirements apply to those areas of your facility where those sector-specific activities occur. These sector-specific requirements are in addition to any requirements specified elsewhere in this permit.8.M.1 Covered Stormwater Discharges. The requirements in Subpart M apply to stormwater discharges associated with industrial activity from Automobile Salvage Yards as identified by the SIC Code specified under Sector M in Table D-1 of Appendix D of this permit.8.M.2 Additional Technology-Based Effluent Limits.8.M.2.1 Spill and Leak Prevention Procedures. (See also Part 2.1.2.4) Drain vehicles intended to be dismantled of all fluids upon arrival at the site (or as soon thereafter as feasible), or employ some other equivalent means to prevent spills and leaks.8.M.2.2 Employee Training. (See also Part 2.1.2.9) If applicable to your facility, address the following areas (at a minimum) in your employee training program: proper handling (collection, storage, and disposal) of oil, used mineral spirits, anti-freeze, mercury switches, and solvents.8.M.2.3 Management of Runoff (See also Part 2.1.2.6) Consider the following management practices: berms or drainage ditches on the property line (to help prevent run-on from neighboring properties); berms for uncovered outdoor storage of oily parts, engine blocks, and above-ground liquid storage; installation of detention ponds; and installation of filtering devices and oil and water separators. 8.M.3 Additional SWPPP Requirements. 8.M.3.1 Drainage Area Site Map. (See also Part 5.1.2) Identify locations used for dismantling, storage, and maintenance of used motor vehicle parts. Also identify where any of the following may be exposed to precipitation or surface runoff: dismantling areas, parts (e.g., engine blocks, tires, hub caps, batteries, hoods, mufflers) storage areas, and liquid storage tanks and drums for fuel and other fluids.8.M.3.2 Potential Pollutant Sources. (See also Part 5.1.3) Assess the potential for the following to contribute pollutants to stormwater discharges: vehicle storage areas, dismantling areas, parts storage areas (e.g., engine blocks, tires, hub caps, batteries, hoods, mufflers), and fueling stations.8.M.4 Additional Inspection Requirements. (See also Part 4.1) Immediately (or as soon thereafter as feasible) inspect vehicles arriving at the site for leaks. Inspect quarterly for signs of leakage all equipment containing oily parts, hydraulic fluids, any other types of fluids, or mercury switches. Also, inspect quarterly for signs of leakage all vessels and Stormwater Discharges Associated With Industrial Activity -Sector MN 95 General Permit areas where hazardous materials and general automotive fluids are stored, including, but not limited to, mercury switches, brake fluid, transmission fluid, radiator water, and antifreeze. 8.M.5 Sector-Specific Benchmarks. (See also Part 6 of the permit.)Table 8.M-1.Subsector Benchmark (You may be subject to requirements for Parameter Monitoring more than one sector/subsector) Concentration Subsector M1. Automobile Salvage Total Suspended Solids (TSS) 100 mg/L Yards (SIC 5015) Total Aluminum 0.75 mg/L Total Iron 1.0 mg/L Total Lead' Hardness Dependent The benchmark values of some metals are dependent on water hardness. For these parameters, permittees must determine the hardness of the receiving water (see Appendix J, "Calculating Hardness in Receiving Waters for Hardness Dependent Metals," for methodology), in accordance with Part 6.2.1.1, to identify the applicable 'hardness range' for determining their benchmark value applicable to their facility. The ranges occur in 25 mg/L increments. Hardness Dependent Benchmarks follow in the table below: Lead Water Hardness Range (mg/L)0-25 mg/L 0.014 25-50 mg/L 0.023 50-75 mg/L 0.045 75-100 mg/L 0.069 100-125 mg/L 0.095 125-150 mg/L 0.122 150-175 mg/L 0.151 175-200 mg/L 0.182 200-225 mg/L 0.213 225-250 mg/L 0.246 250+ mg/L 0.262 Stormwater Discharges Associated With Industrial Activity -Sector M General Permit Part 8 -Sector-Specific Requirements for Industrial Activity Subpart N -Sector N -Scrap Recycling and Waste Recycling Facilities. You must comply with Part 8 sector-specific requirements associated with your primary industrial activity and any co-located industrial activities, as defined in Appendix A. The sector-specific requirements apply to those areas of your facility where those sector-specific activities occur. These sector-specific requirements are in addition to any requirements specified elsewhere in this permit.8.N.1 Covered Stormwater Discharges. The requirements in Subpart N apply to stormwater discharges associated with industrial activity from Scrap Recycling and Waste Recycling facilities as identified by the SIC Code specified under Sector N in Table D-1 of Appendix D of the permit.8.N.2 Limitation on Coverage.Separate permit requirements have been established for recycling facilities that only receive source-separated recyclable materials primarily from non-industrial and residential sources (i.e., common consumer products including paper, newspaper, glass, cardboard, plastic containers, and aluminum and tin cans). This includes recycling facilities commonly referred to as material recovery facilities (MRF).8.N.2.1 Prohibition of Non-Stormwater Discharges. (See also Part 1.1.4) Non-stormwater discharges from turnings containment areas are not covered by this permit (see also Part 8.N.3.2.3). Discharges from containment areas in the absence of a storm event are prohibited unless covered by a separate NPDES permit.8.N.3 Additional Technology-Based Effluent Limits.8.N.3.1 Scrap and Waste Recycling Facilities (Non-Source Separated, Nonliquid Recyclable Materials). Requirements for facilities that receive, process, and do wholesale distribution of nonliquid recyclable wastes (e.g., ferrous and nonferrous metals, plastics, glass, cardboard, and paper). These facilities may receive both nonrecyclable and recyclable materials. This section is not intended for those facilities that accept recyclables only from primarily non-industrial and residential sources.8.N.3. 1.1 Inbound Recyclable and Waste Material Control Program. Minimize the chance of accepting materials that could be significant sources of pollutants by conducting inspections of inbound recyclables and waste materials. Following are some control measure options: (a) provide information and education to suppliers of scrap and recyclable waste materials on draining and properly disposing of residual fluids (e.g., from vehicles and equipment engines, radiators and transmissions, oil filled transformers, and individual containers or drums) and removal of mercury switches from vehicles before delivery to your facility; (b) establish procedures to minimize the potential of any residual fluids from coming into contact with precipitation or runoff; (c) establish procedures for accepting scrap lead-acid batteries (additional requirements for Stormwater Discharges Associated With Industrial Activity -Sector N 97 General Permit the handling, storage, and disposal or recycling of batteries are contained in the scrap lead-acid battery program provisions in Part 8.N.3.2.6); (d) provide training targeted for those personnel engaged in the inspection and acceptance of inbound recyclable materials; and (e) establish procedures to ensure that liquid wastes, including used oil, are stored in materially compatible and non-leaking containers and are disposed of or recycled in accordance with the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA).8.N.3.1.2 Scrap and Waste Material Stockpiles and Storage (Outdoor). Minimize contact of stormwater runoff with stockpiled materials, processed materials, and nonrecyclable wastes. Following are some control measure options: (a)permanent or semi-permanent covers; (b) sediment traps, vegetated swales and strips, catch basin filters, and sand filters to facilitate settling or filtering of pollutants; (c) dikes, berms, containment trenches, culverts, and surface grading to divert runoff from storage areas; (d) silt fencing; and (e) oil and water separators, sumps, and dry absorbents for areas where potential sources of residual fluids are stockpiled (e.g., automobile engine storage areas).8.N.3.1.3 Stockpiling of Turnings Exposed to Cutting Fluids (Outdoor Storage).Minimize contact of surface runoff with residual cutting fluids by: (a) storing all turnings exposed to cutting fluids under some form of permanent or semi-permanent cover, or (b) establishing dedicated containment areas for all turnings that have been exposed to cutting fluids. Any containment areas must be constructed of concrete, asphalt, or other equivalent types of impermeable material and include a barrier (e.g., berms, curbing, elevated pads) to prevent contact with stormwater run-on. Stormwater runoff from these areas can be discharged, provided that any runoff is first collected and treated by an oil and water separator or its equivalent. You.must regularly maintain the oil and water separator (or its equivalent) and properly dispose of or recycle collected residual fluids.8.N.3. 1.4 Scrap and Waste Material Stockpiles and Storage (Covered or Indoor Storage). Minimize contact of residual liquids and particulate matter from materials stored indoors or under cover with surface runoff. Following are some control measure options: (a) good housekeeping measures, including the use of dry absorbents or wet vacuuming to contain, dispose of, or recycle residual liquids originating from recyclable containers, or mercury spill kits for spills from storage of mercury switches; (b) not allowing washwater from tipping floors or other processing areas to discharge to the storm sewer system; and (c) disconnecting or sealing off all floor drains connected to the storm sewer system.8.N.3.1.5 Scrap and Recyclable Waste Processing Areas. Minimize surface runoff from coming in contact with scrap processing equipment. Pay attention to operations that generate visible amounts of particulate residue (e.g., shredding) to minimize the contact of accumulated particulate matter and residual fluids with runoff (i.e., through good housekeeping, preventive maintenance, etc.). Following are some control measure options: (a) regularly Stormwater Discharges Associated With Industrial Activity -Sector N 98 General Permit inspect equipment for spills or leaks and malfunctioning, worn, or corroded* parts or equipment; (b) establish a preventive maintenance program for processing equipment; (c) use dry-absorbents or other cleanup practices to collect and dispose of or recycle spilled or leaking fluids or use mercury spill kits for spills from storage of mercury switches; (d) on unattended hydraulic reservoirs over 150 gallons in capacity, install protection devices such as low-level alarms or equivalent devices, or secondary containment that can hold the entire volume of the reservoir; (e) containment or diversion structures such as dikes, berms, culverts, trenches, elevated concrete pads, and grading to minimize contact of stormwater runoff with outdoor processing equipment or stored materials; (f) oil and water separators or sumps; (g) permanent or semi-permanent covers in processing areas where there are residual fluids and grease; (h) retention or detention ponds or basins; sediment traps, and vegetated swales or strips (for pollutant settling and filtration); (i) catch basin filters or sand filters.8.N.3.1.6 Scrap Lead-Acid Battery Program. Properly handle, store, and dispose of scrap lead-acid batteries. Following are some control measure options (a)segregate scrap lead-acid batteries from other scrap materials; (b) properly handle, store, and dispose of cracked or broken batteries; (c) collect and dispose of leaking lead-acid battery fluid; (d) minimize or eliminate (if possible) exposure of scrap lead-acid batteries to precipitation or runoff; and (e) provide employee training for the management of scrap batteries. 8.N.3.1.7 Spill Prevention and Response Procedures. (See also Part 2.1.2.4)install. alarms and/or pump shutoff systems on outdoor equipment with hydraulic reservoirs exceeding 150 gallons in the event of a line break. Alternatively, a secondary containment system capable of holding the entire contents of the reservoir plus room for precipitation can be used. Use a mercury spill kit for any release of mercury from switches, anti-lock brake systems, and switch storage areas.8.N.3.1.8 Supplier Notification Program. As appropriate, notify major suppliers which scrap materials will not be accepted at the facility or will be accepted only under certain conditions. 8.N.3.2 Waste Recycling Facilities (Liquid Recyclable Materials). 8.N.3.2.1 Waste Material Storage (Indoor). Minimize or eliminate contact between residual liquids from waste materials stored indoors and from surface runoff.The plan may refer to applicable portions of other existing plans, such as Spill Prevention, Control, and Countermeasure (SPCC) plans required under 40 CFR Part 112. Following are some control measure options (a) procedures for material handling (including labeling and marking); (b) clean up spills and leaks with dry absorbent materials, a wet vacuum system; (c) appropriate containment structures (trenching, curbing, gutters, etc.); and (d) a drainage system, including appurtenances (e.g., pumps or ejectors, manually operated valves), to handle discharges from diked or bermed areas. Drainage should be Stormwater Discharges Associated With Industrial Activity -Sector N 99 General Permit discharged to an appropriate treatment facility or sanitary sewer system, or otherwise disposed of properly. These discharges may require coverage under a separate NPDES wastewater permit or industrial user permit under the pretreatment program.8.N.3.2.2 Waste Material Storage (Outdoor). Minimize contact between stored residual liquids and precipitation or runoff. The plan may refer to applicable portions of other existing plans, such as SPCC plans required under 40 CFR Part 112.Discharges of precipitation from containment areas containing used oil must also be in accordance with applicable sections of 40 CFR Part 112. Following are some control measure options (a) appropriate containment structures (e.g., dikes, berms, curbing, pits) to store the volume of the largest tank, with sufficient extra capacity for precipitation; (b) drainage control and other diversionary structures; (c) corrosion protection and/or leak detection systems for storage tanks; and (d).dry-absorbent materials or a wet vacuum system to collect spills.8.N.3.2.3 Trucks and Rail Car Waste Transfer Areas. Minimize pollutants in discharges from truck and rail car loading and unloading areas. Include measures to clean up minor spills and leaks resulting from the transfer of liquid wastes.Following are two control measure options: (a) containment and diversionary structures to minimize contact with precipitation or runoff, and (b) dry clean-up methods, wet vacuuming, roof coverings, or runoff controls.8.N.3.3 Recycling Facilities (Source-Separated Materials). The following identifies considerations for facilities that receive only source-separated recyclables, primarily from non-industrial and residential sources.8.N.3.3.1 Inbound Recyclable Material Control. Minimize the chance of accepting nonrecyclables (e.g., hazardous materials) that could be a significant source of pollutants by conducting inspections of inbound materials. Following are some control measure options: (a) providing information and education measures to inform suppliers of recyclables about acceptable and non-acceptable materials, (b) training drivers responsible for pickup of recycled material, (c) clearly marking public drop-off containers regarding which materials can be accepted, (d) rejecting nonrecyclable wastes or household hazardous wastes at the source, and (e) establishing procedures for handling and disposal of nonrecyclable material.8.N.3.3.2 Outdoor Storage. Minimize exposure of recyclables to precipitation and runoff. Use good housekeeping measures to prevent accumulation of particulate matter and fluids, particularly in high traffic areas. Following are some control measure options (a) provide totally enclosed drop-off containers for the public; (b) install a sump and pump with each container pit and treat or discharge collected fluids to a sanitary sewer system; (c) provide dikes and curbs for secondary containment (e.g., around bales of recyclable waste paper); (d) divert surface water runoff away from outside material storage areas; (e) provide covers over containment bins, dumpsters, and roll-off boxes;Stormwater Discharges Associated With Industrial Activity -Sector N 100 General Permit and (f) store the equivalent of one day's volume of recyclable material indoors.8.N.3.3.3 Indoor Storage and Material Processing. Minimize the release of pollutants from indoor storage and processing areas. Following are some control measure options (a) schedule routine good housekeeping measures for all storage and processing areas, (b) prohibit tipping floor washwater from draining to the storm sewer system, and (c) provide employee training on pollution prevention practices. 8.N.3.3.4 Vehicle and Equipment Maintenance. Following are some control measure options for areas where vehicle and equipment maintenance occur outdoors (a)prohibit vehicle and equipment washwater from discharging to the storm sewer system, (b) minimize or eliminate outdoor maintenance areas whenever possible, (c) establish spill prevention and clean-up procedures in fueling areas, (d) avoid topping off fuel tanks, (e) divert runoff from fueling areas, (f)store lubricants and hydraulic fluids indoors, and (g) provide employee training on proper handling and storage of hydraulic fluids and lubricants. 8.N.4 Additional SWPPP Requirements. 8.N.4.1 Drainage Area Site Map. (See also Part 5.1.2) Document in your SWPPP the locations of any of the following activities or sources that may be exposed to precipitation or surface runoff: scrap and waste material storage, outdoor scrap and waste processing equipment; and containment areas for turnings exposed to cutting fluids.8.N.4.2 Maintenance Schedules/Procedures for Collection, Handling, and Disposal or Recycling of Residual Fluids at Scrap and Waste Recycling Facilities. If you are subject to Part 8.N.3.1.3, your SWPPP must identify any applicable maintenance schedule and the procedures to collect, handle, and dispose of or recycle residual fluids.8.N.5 Additional Inspection Requirements. 8.N.5.1 Inspections for Waste Recycling Facilities. The inspections must be performed quarterly, pursuant to Part 4. 1, and include, at a minimum, all areas where waste is generated, received, stored, treated, or disposed of and that are exposed to either precipitation or stormwater runoff.Stormwater Discharges Associated With Industrial Activity -Sector N 101 Stormwater Discharges Associated With Industrial Activity -Sector N 101 General Permit 8.N.6 Sector-Specific Benchmarks. (See also Part 6 of the permit.)Table 8.N-1.Subsector (You may be subject to requirements for Parameter Concentration more than one sector/subsector) Concentration Subsector NI. Scrap Recycling and Waste Chemical Oxygen Demand 120 mg/L Recycling Facilities except Source-Separated (COD)Recycling (SIC 5093) Total Suspended Solids 100 mg/L (TSS)Total Recoverable 0.75 mg/L Aluminum Total Recoverable Copper' Hardness Dependent Total Recoverable Iron 1.0 mg/L Total Recoverable Lead' Hardness Dependent Total Recoverable Zinc' Hardness Dependent The benchmark values of some metals are dependent on water hardness. For these parameters, permittees must determine the hardness of the receiving water (see Appendix J, "Calculating Hardness in Receiving Waters for Hardness Dependent Metals," for methodology), in accordance with Part 6.2.1.1, to identify the applicable 'hardness range' for determining their benchmark value applicable to their facility. The ranges occur in 25 mg/L increments. Hardness Dependent Benchmarks follow in the table below: Copper Lead Zinc Water Hardness Range (mg/L) (mg/L) (mg/L)0-25 mg/L 0.0038 0.014 0.04 25-50 mg/L 0.0056 0.023 0.05 50-75 mg/L 0.0090 0.045 0.08 75-100 mg/L 0.0123 0.069 0.11 100-125 mg/L 0.0156 0.095 0.13 125-150 mg/L 0.0189 0.122 0.16 150-175 mg/L 0.0221 0.151 0.18 175-200 mg/L 0.0253 0.182 0.20 200-225 mg/L 0.0285 0.213 0.23 225-250 mg/L 0.0316 0.246 0.25 250+ mg/L 0.0332 0.262 0.26 Stormwater Discharges Associated With Industrial Activity -Sector N 102 General Permit Part 8 -Sector-Specific Requirements for Industrial Activity Subpart 0 -Sector 0 -Steam Electric Generating Facilities. You must comply with Part 8 sector-specific requirements associated with your primary industrial activity and any co-located industrial activities, as defined in Appendix A. The sector-specific requirements apply to those areas of your facility where those sector-specific activities occur. These sector-specific requirements are in addition to any requirements specified elsewhere in this permit.8.0.1 Covered Stormwater Discharges. The requirements in Subpart 0 apply to stormwater discharges associated with industrial activity from Steam Electric Power Generating Facilities as identified by the Activity Code specified under Sector 0 in Table D-1 of Appendix D.8.0.2 Industrial Activities Covered by Sector 0.This permit authorizes stormwater discharges from the following industrial activities at Sector 0 facilities: 8.0.2.1 steam electric power generation using coal, natural gas, oil, nuclear energy, etc., to produce a steam source, including coal handling areas;8.0.2.2 coal pile runoff, including effluent limitations established by 40 CFR Part 423; and 8.0.2.3 dual fuel facilities that could employ a steam boiler.8.0.3 Limitations on Coverage.8.0.3.1 Prohibition of Non-Stormwater Discharges. Non-stormwater discharges subject to effluent limitations guidelines are not covered by this permit.8.0.3.2 Prohibition of Stormwater Discharges. Stormwater discharges from the following are not covered by this permit: 8.0.3.2.1 ancillary facilities (e.g., fleet centers and substations) that are not contiguous to a stream electric power generating facility;8.0.3.2.2 gas turbine facilities (providing the facility is not a dual-fuel facility that includes a steam boiler), and combined-cycle facilities where no supplemental fuel oil is burned (and the facility is not a dual-fuel facility that includes a steam boiler); and 8.0.3.2.3 cogeneration (combined heat and power) facilities utilizing a gas turbine.8.0.4 Additional Technology-Based Effluent Limits. The following good housekeeping measures are required in addition to Part 2.1.2.2: 8.0.4.1 Fugitive Dust Emissions. Minimize fugitive dust emissions from coal handling areas.To minimize the tracking of coal dust offsite, consider procedures such as installing Stormwater Discharges Associated With Industrial Activity -Sector 0 103 General Permit specially designed tires or washing vehicles in a designated area before they leave the site and controlling the wash water.8.0.4.2 Delivery Vehicles. Minimize contamination of stormwater runoff from delivery vehicles arriving at the plant site. Consider procedures to inspect delivery vehicles arriving at the plant site and ensure overall integrity of the body or container and procedures to deal with leakage or spillage from vehicles or containers. 8.0.4.3 Fuel Oil Unloading Areas. Minimize contamination of precipitation or surface runoff from fuel oil unloading areas. Consider using containment curbs in unloading areas, having personnel familiar with spill prevention and response procedures present during deliveries to ensure that any leaks or spills are immediately contained and cleaned up, and using spill and overflow protection devices (e.g., drip pans, drip diapers, or other containment devices placed beneath fuel oil connectors to contain potential spillage during deliveries or from leaks at the connectors). 8.0.4.4 Chemical Loading and Unloading. Minimize contamination of precipitation or surface runoff from chemical loading and unloading areas. Consider using containment curbs at chemical loading and unloading areas to contain spills, having personnel familiar with spill prevention and response procedures present during deliveries to ensure that any leaks or spills are immediately contained and cleaned up, and loading and unloading in covered areas and storing chemicals indoors.8.0.4.5 Miscellaneous Loading and Unloading Areas. Minimize contamination of precipitation or surface runoff from loading and unloading areas. Consider covering the loading area;grading, berming, or curbing around the loading area to divert run-on; locating the loading and unloading equipment and vehicles so that leaks are contained in existing containment and flow diversion systems; or equivalent procedures. 8.0.4.6 Liquid Storage Tanks. Minimize contamination of surface runoff from above-ground liquid storage tanks. Consider protective guards around tanks, containment curbs, spill and overflow protection, dry cleanup methods, or equivalent measures.8.0.4.7 Large Bulk Fuel Storage Tanks. Minimize contamination of surface runoff from large bulk fuel storage tanks. Consider containment berms (or their equivalent). You must also comply with applicable State and Federal laws, including Spill Prevention, Control and Countermeasure (SPCC) Plan requirements. 8.0.4.8 Spill Reduction Measures. Minimize the potential for an oil or chemical spill, or reference the appropriate part of your SPCC plan. Visually inspect as part of your routine facility inspection the structural integrity of all above-ground tanks, pipelines, pumps, and related equipment that may be exposed to stormwater, and make any necessary repairs immediately. 8.0.4.9 Oil-Bearing Equipment in Switchyards. Minimize contamination of surface runoff from oil-bearing equipment in switchyard areas. Consider using level grades and gravel surfaces to retard flows and limit the spread of spills, or collecting runoff in perimeter ditches.8.0.4.10 Residue-Hauling Vehicles. Inspect all residue-hauling vehicles for proper covering over the load, adequate gate sealing, and overall integrity of the container body. Repair Stormwater Discharges Associated With Industrial Activity -Sector 0 104 General Permit vehicles without load covering or adequate gate sealing, or with leaking containers or beds.8.0.4.11 Ash Loading Areas. Reduce or control the tracking of ash and residue from ash loading areas. Clear the ash building floor and immediately adjacent roadways of spillage, debris, and excess water before departure of each loaded vehicle.8.0.4.12 Areas Adjacent to Disposal Ponds or Landfills. Minimize contamination of surface runoff from areas adjacent to disposal ponds or landfills. Reduce ash residue that may be tracked on to access roads traveled by residue handling vehicles, and reduce ash residue on exit roads leading into and out of residue handling areas.8.0.4.13 Landfills, Scrap yards, Surface Impoundments, Open Dumps, General Refuse Sites.Minimize the potential for contamination of runoff from these areas.8.0.5 Additional SWPPP Requirements. 8.0.5.1 Drainage Area Site Map. (See also Part 5.1.2) Document in your SWPPP the locations of any of the following activities or sources that may be exposed to precipitation or surface runoff: storage tanks, scrap yards, and general refuse areas; short- and long-term storage of general materials (including but not limited to supplies, construction materials, paint equipment, oils, fuels, used and unused solvents, cleaning materials, paint, water treatment chemicals, fertilizer, and pesticides); landfills and construction sites; and stock pile areas (e.g., coal or limestone piles).8.0.5.2 Documentation of Good Housekeeping Measures. You must document in your SWPPP the good housekeeping measures implemented to meet the effluent limits in Part 8.0.4.8.0.6 Additional Inspection Requirements. 8.0.6.1 Comprehensive Site Compliance Inspection. (See also Part 4.3) As part of your inspection, inspect the following areas monthly: coal handling areas, loading or unloading areas, switchyards, fueling areas, bulk storage areas, ash handling areas, areas adjacent to disposal ponds and landfills, maintenance areas, liquid storage tanks, and long term and short term material storage areas.8.0.7 Sector-Specific Benchmarks Table 8.0-1 identifies benchmarks that apply to the specific subsectors of Sector 0.These benchmarks apply to both your primary industrial activity and any co-located industrial activities, which describe your site activities. Table 8.0-1.Subsector Benchmark (You may be subject to requirements for more than one Parameter Monitoring sector/subsector) Concentration Subsector

01. Steam Electric Generating Facilities (Industrial Total Iron 1.0 mg/L Activity Code "SE")Stormwater Discharges Associated With Industrial Activity -Sector 0 105 General Permit 8.0.8 Effluent Limitations Based on Effluent Limitations Guidelines (See also Part 6.2.2.1 of the permit.)Table 8.0-2 identifies effluent limits that apply to the industrial activities described below. Compliance with these effluent limits is to be determined based on discharges from these industrial activities independent of commingling with any other wastestreams that may be covered under this permit.Table 8.0-21 Industrial Activity Parameter Effluent Limit Discharges from coal storage piles at Steam Electric TSS 50 mg/I 2 Generating Facilities pH 6.0 min -9.0 max 1 Monitor annually.2 If your facility is designed, constructed, and operated to treat the volume of coal pile runoff that is associated with a 10-year, 24-hour rainfall event, any untreated overflow of coal pile runoff from the treatment unit is not subject to the 50 mg/L limitation for total suspended solids.Stormwater Discharges Associated With Industrial Activity -Sector 0 106 General Permit Part 8 -Sector-Specific Requirements for Industrial Activity Subpart P -Sector P -Land Transportation and Warehousing.

You must comply with Part 8 sector-specific requirements associated with your primary industrial activity and any co-located industrial activities, as defined in Appendix A. The sector-specific requirements apply to those areas of your facility where those sector-specific activities occur. These sector-specific requirements are in addition to any requirements specified elsewhere in this permit.8.P.1 Covered Stormwater Discharges. The requirements in Subpart P apply to stormwater discharges associated with industrial activity from Land Transportation and Warehousing facilities as identified by the SIC Codes specified under Sector P in Table D-1 of Appendix D of the permit.8.P.2 Limitation on Coverage 8.P.2.1 Prohibited Discharges (see also Parts 1.1.4 and 8.P.3.6) This permit does not authorize the discharge of vehicle/equipment/surface washwater, including tank cleaning operations. Such discharges must be authorized under a separate NPDES permit, discharged to a sanitary sewer in accordance with applicable industrial pretreatment requirements, or recycled on-site.8.P.3 Additional Technology-Based Effluent Limits.8.P.3.1 Good Housekeeping Measures. (See also Part 2.1.2.2) In addition to the Good Housekeeping requirements in Part 2.1.2.2, you must do the following. Recommended control measures are discussed as indicated: 8.P.3.1.1 Vehicle and Equipment Storage Areas. Minimize the potential for stormwater exposure to leaky or leak-prone vehicles/equipment awaiting maintenance. Consider the following (or other equivalent measures): use of drip pans under vehicles/equipment, indoor storage of vehicles and equipment, installation of berms or dikes, use of absorbents, roofing or covering storage areas, and cleaning pavement surfaces to remove oil and grease.8.P.3.1.2 Fueling Areas. Minimize contamination of stormwater runoff from fueling areas. Consider the following (or other equivalent measures): Covering the fueling area; using spill/overflow protection and cleanup equipment; minimizing stormwater run-on/runoff to the fueling area; using dry cleanup methods; and treating and/or recycling collected stormwater runoff.8.P.3.1.3 Material Storage Areas. Maintain all material storage vessels (e.g., for used oil/oil filters, spent solvents, paint wastes, hydraulic fluids) to prevent contamination of stormwater and plainly label them (e.g., "Used Oil," "Spent Solvents," etc.). Consider the following (or other equivalent measures): storing the materials indoors; installing berms/dikes around the areas;minimizing runoff of stormwater to the areas; using dry cleanup methods; and treating and/or recycling collected stormwater runoff.Stormwater Discharges Associated With Industrial Activity -Sector P 107 General Permit 8.P.3.1.4 Vehicle and Equipment Cleaning Areas. Minimize contamination of stormwater runoff from all areas used for vehicle/equipment cleaning.Consider the following (or other equivalent measures): performing all cleaning operations indoors; covering the cleaning operation, ensuring that all washwater drains to a proper collection system (i.e., not the stormwater drainage system); treating and/or recycling collected washwater, or other equivalent measures.8.P.3.1.5 Vehicle and Equipment Maintenance Areas. Minimize contamination of stormwater runoff from all areas used for vehicle/equipment maintenance. Consider the following (or other equivalent measures): performing maintenance activities indoors; using drip pans; keeping an organized inventory of materials used in the shop; draining all parts of fluid prior to disposal; prohibiting wet clean up practices if these practices would result in the discharge of pollutants to stormwater drainage systems; using dry cleanup methods; treating and/or recycling collected stormwater runoff, minimizing run on/runoff of stormwater to maintenance areas.8.P.3.1.6 Locomotive Sanding (Loading Sand for Traction) Areas. Consider the following (or other equivalent measures): covering sanding areas; minimizing stormwater run on/runoff; or appropriate sediment removal practices to minimize the offsite transport of sanding material by stormwater. 8.P.3.2 Employee Training. (See also Part 2.1.2.9) Train personnel at least once a year and address the following activities, as applicable: used oil and spent solvent management; fueling procedures; general good housekeeping practices; proper painting procedures; and used battery management. 8.P.4 Additional SWPPP Requirements. 8.P.4.1 Drainage Area Site Map. (See also Part 5.1.2) Identify in the SWPPP the following areas of the facility and indicate whether activities occurring there may be exposed to precipitation/surface runoff: Fueling stations; vehicle/equipment maintenance or cleaning areas; storage areas for vehicle/equipment with actual or potential fluid leaks;loading/unloading areas; areas where treatment, storage or disposal of wastes occur;liquid storage tanks; processing areas; and storage areas.8.P.4.2 Potential Pollutant Sources. (See also Part 5.1.3) Assess the potential for the following activities and facility areas to contribute pollutants to stormwater discharges: Onsite waste storage or disposal; dirt/gravel parking areas for vehicles awaiting maintenance; illicit plumbing connections between shop floor drains and the stormwater conveyance system(s); and fueling areas. Describe these activities in the SWPPP.8.P.4.3 Description of Good Housekeeping Measures. You must document in your SWPPP the good housekeeping measures you implement consistent with Part 8.P.3.8.P.4.4 Vehicle and Equipment Washwater Requirements. If applicable, attach to or reference in your SWPPP, a copy of the NPDES permit issued for vehicle/equipment washwater or, if an NPDES permit has not been issued, a copy of the pending application. If an Stormwater Discharges Associated With Industrial Activity -Sector P 108 General Permit industrial user permit is issued under a local pretreatment program, attach a copy to your SWPPP. In any case, implement all non-stormwater discharge permit conditions or pretreatment conditions in your SWPPP. If washwater is handled in another manner (e.g., hauled offsite), describe the disposal method and attach all pertinent documentation/information (e.g., frequency, volume, destination, etc.) in the plan.8.P.5 Additional Inspection Requirements. (See also Part 4.1) Inspect all the following areas/activities: storage areas for vehicles/equipment awaiting maintenance, fueling areas, indoor and outdoor vehicle/equipment maintenance areas, material storage areas, vehicle/equipment cleaning areas and loading/unloading areas.Stormwater Discharges Associated With Industrial Activity -Sector P 109 General Permit Part 8 -Sector-Specific Requirements for Industrial Activity Subpart Q -Sector Q -Water Transportation. You must comply with Part 8 sector-specific requirements associated with your primary industrial activity and any co-located industrial activities, as defined in Appendix A. The sector-specific requirements apply to those areas of your facility where those sector-specific activities occur. These sector-specific requirements are in addition to any requirements specified elsewhere in this permit.8.Q.1 Covered Stormwater Discharges. The requirements in Subpart Q apply to stormwater discharges associated with industrial activity from Water Transportation facilities as identified by the SIC Codes specified under Sector Q in Table D-1 of Appendix D of the permit.8.Q.2 Limitations on Coverage.8.Q.2.1 Prohibition of Non-Stormwater Discharges. (See also Part 1.1.4) Not covered by this permit: bilge and ballast water, sanitary wastes, pressure wash water, and cooling water originating from vessels.8.Q.3 Additional Technology-Based Effluent Limits.8.Q.3.1 Good Housekeeping Measures. You must implement the following good housekeeping measures in addition to the requirements of part 2.1.2.2: 8.Q.3.1.1 Pressure Washing Area. If pressure washing is used to remove marine growth from vessels, the discharge water must be permitted by a separate NPDES permit. Collect or contain the discharges from the pressures washing area so that they are not co-mingled with stormwater discharges authorized by this permit.8.Q.3.1.2 Blasting and Painting Area. Minimize the potential for spent abrasives, paint chips, and overspray to discharge into receiving waters or the storm sewer systems. Consider containing all blasting and painting activities or use other measures to minimize the discharge of contaminants (e.g., hanging plastic barriers or tarpaulins during blasting or painting operations to contain debris).When necessary, regularly clean stormwater conveyances of deposits of abrasive blasting debris and paint chips.8.Q.3.1.3 Material Storage Areas. Store and plainly label all containerized materials (e.g., fuels, paints, solvents, waste oil, antifreeze, batteries) in a protected, secure location away from drains. Minimize the contamination of precipitation or surface runoff from the storage areas. Specify which materials are stored indoors, and consider containment or enclosure for those stored outdoors. If abrasive blasting is performed, discuss the storage and disposal of spent abrasive materials generated at the facility. Consider implementing an inventory control plan to limit the presence of potentially hazardous materials onsite.Stormwater Discharges Associated With Industrial Activity -Sector Q 110 General Permit 8.Q.3.1.4 Engine Maintenance and Repair Areas. Minimize the contamination of precipitation or surface runoff from all areas used for engine maintenance and repair. Consider the following (or their equivalents): performing all maintenance activities indoors, maintaining an organized inventory of materials used in the shop, draining all parts of fluid prior to disposal, prohibiting the practice of hosing down the shop floor, using dry cleanup methods, and treating and/or recycling stormwater runoff collected from the maintenance area.8.Q.3.1.5 Material Handling Area. Minimize the contamination of precipitation or surface runoff from material handling operations and areas (e.g., fueling, paint and solvent mixing, disposal of process wastewater streams from vessels).Consider the following (or their equivalents): covering fueling areas, using spill and overflow protection, mixing paints and solvents in a designated area (preferably indoors or under a shed), and minimizing runoff of stormwater to material handling areas.8.Q.3.1.6 Drydock Activities. Routinely maintain and clean the drydock to minimize pollutants in stormwater runoff. Address the cleaning of accessible areas of the drydock prior to flooding, and final cleanup following removal of the vessel and raising the dock. Include procedures for cleaning up oil, grease, and fuel spills occurring on the drydock. Consider the following (or their equivalents): sweeping rather than hosing off debris and spent blasting material from accessible areas of the drydock prior to flooding and making absorbent materials and oil containment booms readily available to clean up or contain any spills.8.Q.3.2 Employee Training. (See also Part 2.1.2.9) As part of your employee training program, address, at a minimum, the following activities (as applicable): used oil management, spent solvent management, disposal of spent abrasives, disposal of vessel wastewaters, spill prevention and control, fueling procedures, general good housekeeping practices, painting and blasting procedures, and used battery management. 8.Q.3.3 Preventive Maintenance. (See also Part 2.1.2.3) As part of your preventive maintenance program, perform timely inspection and maintenance of stormwater management devices (e.g., cleaning oil and water separators and sediment traps to ensure that spent abrasives, paint chips, and solids will be intercepted and retained prior to entering the storm drainage system), as well as inspecting and testing facility equipment and systems to uncover conditions that could cause breakdowns or failures resulting in discharges of pollutants to surface waters.8.Q.4 Additional SWPPP Requirements. 8.Q.4.1 Drainage Area Site Map. (See also Part 5.1.2) Document in your SWPPP where any of the following may be exposed to precipitation or surface runoff: fueling; engine maintenance and repair; vessel maintenance and repair; pressure washing; painting;sanding; blasting; welding; metal fabrication; loading and unloading areas; locations used for the treatment, storage, or disposal of wastes; liquid storage tanks; liquid Stormwater Discharges Associated With Industrial Activity -Sector Q III General Permit storage areas (e.g., paint, solvents, resins); and material storage areas (e.g., blasting media, aluminum, steel, scrap iron).8.Q.4.2 Summary of Potential Pollutant Sources. (See also Part 5.1.3) Document in the SWPPP the following additional sources and activities that have potential pollutants associated with them: outdoor manufacturing or processing activities (e.g., welding, metal fabricating) and significant dust or particulate generating processes (e.g., abrasive blasting, sanding, and painting.) 8.Q.5 Additional Inspection Requirements.(See also Part 4.1) Include the following in all quarterly routine facility inspections: pressure washing area; blasting, sanding, and painting areas; material storage areas; engine maintenance and repair areas; material handling areas; drydock area; and general yard area.8.Q.6 Sector-Specific Benchmarks. (See also Part 6 of the permit.)Table 8.Q-1.Subsector Benchmark Monitoring (You may be subject to requirements for Parameter Concentration more than one sector/subsector) Subsector QI. Water Transportation Total Aluminum 0.75 mg/L Facilities Total Iron 1.0 mg/L (SIC 4412-4499) Total Lead' Hardness Dependent Total Zinc1 Hardness Dependent'The benchmark values of some metals are dependent on water hardness. For these parameters, permittees must determine the hardness of the receiving water (see Appendix J, "Calculating Hardness in Receiving Waters for Hardness Dependent Metals," for methodology), in accordance with Part 6.2.1. 1, to identify the applicable 'hardness range' for determining their benchmark value applicable to their facility. The ranges occur in 25 mg/L increments. Hardness Dependent Benchmarks follow in the table below: Lead Zinc Water Hardness Range (mg/L) (mg/L)0-25 mg/L 0.014 0.04 25-50 mg/L 0.023 0.05 50-75 mg/L 0.045 0.08 75-100 mg/L 0.069 0.11 100-125 mg/L 0.095 0.13 125-150 mg/L 0.122 0.16 150-175 mg/L 0.151 0.18 175-200 mg/L 0.182 0.20 200-225 mg/L 0.213 0.23 225-250 mg/L 0.246 0.25 250+ mg/L 0.262 0.26 Stormwater Discharges Associated With Industrial Activity -Sector Q 112 General Permit Part 8 -Sector-Specific Requirements for Industrial Activity Subpart R -Sector R -Ship and Boat Building and Repair Yards.You must comply with Part 8 sector-specific requirements associated with your primary industrial activity and any co-located industrial activities, as defined in Appendix A. The sector-specific requirements apply to those areas of your facility where those sector-specific activities occur. These sector-specific requirements are in addition to any requirements specified elsewhere in this permit.8.R.1 Covered Stormwater Discharges. The requirements in Subpart R apply to stormwater discharges associated with industrial activity from Ship and Boat Building and Repair Yards as identified by the SIC Codes specified under Sector R in Table D-1 of Appendix D of the permit.8.R.2 Limitations on Coverage.8.R.2.1 Prohibition ofNon-Stormwater Discharges. (See also Part 1.1.4) Discharges containing bilge and ballast water, sanitary wastes, pressure wash water, and cooling water originating from vessels are not covered by this permit.8.R.3 Additional Technology-Based Effluent Limits.8.R.3.1 Good Housekeeping Measures. (See also Part 2.1.2.2)8.R.3.1.1 Pressure Washing Area. If pressure washing is used to remove marine growth from vessels, the discharged water must be permitted as a process wastewater by a separate NPDES permit.8.R.3.1.2 Blasting and Painting Area. Minimize the potential for spent abrasives, paint chips, and overspray to discharging into the receiving water or the storm sewer systems. Consider containing all blasting and painting activities, or use other measures to prevent the discharge of the contaminants (e.g., hanging plastic barriers or tarpaulins during blasting or painting operations to contain debris).When necessary, regularly clean stormwater conveyances of deposits of abrasive blasting debris and paint chips.8.R.3.1.3 Material Storage Areas. Store and plainly label all containerized materials (e.g., fuels, paints, solvents, waste oil, antifreeze, batteries) in a protected, secure location away from drains. Minimize the contamination of precipitation or surface runoff from the storage areas. If abrasive blasting is performed, discuss the storage and disposal of spent abrasive materials generated at the facility. Consider implementing an inventory control plan to limit the presence of potentially hazardous materials onsite.8.R.3.1.4 Engine Maintenance and Repair Areas. Minimize the contamination of precipitation or surface runoff from all areas used for engine maintenance and repair. Consider the following (or their equivalents): performing all maintenance activities indoors, maintaining an organized inventory of Stormwater Discharges Associated With Industrial Activity -Sector R 113 General Permit materials used in the shop, draining all parts of fluid prior to disposal, prohibiting the practice of hosing down the shop floor, using dry cleanup methods, and treating and/or recycling stormwater runoff collected from the maintenance area.8.R.3.1.5 Material Handling Area. Minimize the contamination of precipitation or surface runoff from material handling operations and areas (e.g., fueling, paint and solvent mixing, disposal of process wastewater streams from vessels).Consider the following (or their equivalents): covering fueling areas, using spill and overflow protection, mixing paints and solvents in a designated area (preferably indoors or under a shed), and minimizing stormwater run-on to material handling areas.8.R.3.1.6 Drydock Activities. Routinely maintain and clean the drydock to minimize pollutants in stormwater runoff. Clean accessible areas of the drydock prior to flooding and final cleanup following removal of the vessel and raising the dock. Include procedures for cleaning up oil, grease, or fuel spills occurring on the drydock. Consider the following (or their equivalents): sweeping rather than hosing off debris and spent blasting material from accessible areas of the drydock prior to flooding, and having absorbent materials and oil containment booms readily available to clean up and contain any spills.8.R.3.2 Employee Training. (See also Part 2.1.2.9) As part of your employee training program, address, at a minimum, the following activities (as applicable): used oil management, spent solvent management, disposal of spent abrasives, disposal of vessel wastewaters, spill prevention and control, fueling procedures, general good housekeeping practices, painting and blasting procedures, and used battery management. 8.R.3.4 Preventive Maintenance. (See also Part 2.1.2.3) As part of your preventive maintenance program, perform timely inspection and maintenance of stormwater management devices (e.g., cleaning oil and water separators and sediment traps to ensure that spent abrasives, paint chips, and solids will be intercepted and retained prior to entering the storm drainage system), as well as inspecting and testing facility equipment and systems to uncover conditions that could cause breakdowns or failures resulting in discharges of pollutants to surface waters.8.R.4 Additional SWPPP Requirements. 8.R.4.1 Drainage Area Site Map. (See also Part 5.1.2) Document in your SWPPP where any of the following may be exposed to precipitation or surface runoff: fueling; engine maintenance or repair; vessel maintenance or repair; pressure washing; painting;sanding; blasting; welding; metal fabrication; loading and unloading areas; treatment, storage, and waste disposal areas; liquid storage tanks; liquid storage areas (e.g., paint, solvents, resins); and material storage areas (e.g., blasting media, aluminum, steel, scrap iron).8.R.4.2 Potential Pollutant Sources. (See also Part 5.1.3) Document in your SWPPP the following additional sources and activities that have potential pollutants associated with them (if applicable): outdoor manufacturing or processing activities (e.g., welding, Stormwater Discharges Associated With Industrial Activity -Sector R 114 General Permit metal fabricating) and significant dust or particulate generating processes (e.g., abrasive blasting, sanding, and painting). 8.R.4.3 Documentation of Good Housekeeping Measures. Document in your SWPPP any good housekeeping measures implemented to meet the effluent limits in Part 8.R.3.8.R.4.3.1 Blasting and Painting Areas. Document in the SWPPP any standard operating practices relating to blasting and painting (e.g., prohibiting uncontained blasting and painting over open water or prohibiting blasting and painting during windy conditions, which can render containment ineffective). 8.R.4.3.2 Storage Areas. Specify in your SWPPP which materials are stored indoors, and consider containment or enclosure for those stored outdoors.8.R.5 Additional Inspection Requirements.(See also Part 4.1) Include the following in all quarterly routine facility inspections: pressure washing area; blasting, sanding, and painting areas; material storage areas; engine maintenance and repair areas; material handling areas; drydock area; and general yard area.Stormwater Discharges Associated With Industrial Activity -Sector R 115 General Permit Part 8 -Sector-Specific Requirements for Industrial Activity Subpart S -Sector S -Air Transportation. You must comply with Part 8 sector-specific requirements associated with your primary industrial activity and any co-located industrial activities, as defined in Appendix A. The sector-specific requirements apply to those areas of your facility where those sector-specific activities occur. These sector-specific requirements are in addition to any requirements specified elsewhere in this permit.8.S.1 Covered Stormwater Discharges. The requirements in Subpart S apply to stormwater discharges associated with industrial activity from Air Transportation facilities identified by the SIC Codes specified under Sector S in Table D-1 of Appendix D of the permit.8.S.2 Limitation on Coverage 8.S.2.1 Limitations on Coverage. This permit authorizes stormwater discharges from only those portions of the air transportation facility that are involved in vehicle maintenance (including vehicle rehabilitation, mechanical repairs, painting, fueling and lubrication), equipment cleaning operations or deicing operations. Note: "deicing" will generally be used to imply both deicing (removing frost, snow or ice) and anti-icing (preventing accumulation of frost, snow or ice) activities, unless specific mention is made regarding anti-icing and/or deicing activities. 8.S.2.2 Prohibition of Non-Stormwater Discharges. (See also Part 1.1.4 and Part 8.S.3) This permit does not authorize the discharge of aircraft, ground vehicle, runway and equipment washwaters; nor the dry weather discharge of deicing chemicals. Such discharges must be covered by separate NPDES permit(s). Note that a discharge resulting from snowmelt is not a dry weather discharge. 8.S.3 Additional Technology-Based Effluent Limits.8.S.3.1 Good Housekeeping Measures. (See also Part 2.1.2.2)8.S.3.1.1 Aircraft, Ground Vehicle and Equipment Maintenance Areas. Minimize the contamination of stormwater runoff from all areas used for aircraft, ground vehicle and equipment maintenance (including the maintenance conducted on the terminal apron and in dedicated hangers). Consider the following practices (or their equivalents): performing maintenance activities indoors; maintaining an organized inventory of material used in the maintenance areas; draining all parts of fluids prior to disposal; prohibiting the practice of hosing down the apron or hanger floor; using dry cleanup methods; and collecting the stormwater runoff from the maintenance area and providing treatment or recycling. 8.S.3.1.2 Aircraft, Ground Vehicle and Equipment Cleaning Areas. (See also Part 8.S.3.6) Clearly demarcate these areas on the ground using signage or other Stormwater Discharges Associated With Industrial Activity -Sector S 116 General Permit appropriate means. Minimize the contamination of stormwater runoff from cleaning areas.8.S.3.1.3 Aircraft, Ground Vehicle and Equipment Storage Areas. Store all aircraft, ground vehicles and equipment awaiting maintenance in designated areas only and minimize the contamination of stormwater runoff from these storage areas. Consider the following control measures, including any BMPs (or their equivalents): storing aircraft and ground vehicles indoors; using drip pans for the collection of fluid leaks; and perimeter drains, dikes or berms surrounding the storage areas.8.S.3.1.4 Material Storage Areas. Maintain the vessels of stored materials (e.g., used oils, hydraulic fluids, spent solvents, and waste aircraft fuel) in good condition, to prevent or minimize contamination of stormwater. Also plainly label the vessels (e.g., "used oil," "Contaminated Jet A," etc.). Minimize contamination of precipitation/runoff from these areas. Consider the following control measures (or their equivalents): storing materials indoors; storing waste materials in a centralized location; and installing berms/dikes around storage areas.8.S.3.1.5 Airport Fuel System and Fueling Areas. Minimize the discharge of fuel to the storm sewer/surface waters resulting from fuel servicing activities or other operations conducted in support of the airport fuel system. Consider the following control measures (or their equivalents): implementing spill and overflow practices (e.g., placing absorptive materials beneath aircraft during fueling operations); using only dry cleanup methods; and collecting stormwater runoff.8.S.3.1.6 Source Reduction. Minimize, and where feasible eliminate, the use of urea and glycol-based deicing chemicals, in order to reduce the aggregate amount of deicing chemicals used and/or lessen the environmental impact. Chemical options to replace ethylene glycol, propylene glycol and urea include: potassium acetate; magnesium acetate; calcium acetate; and anhydrous sodium acetate.8.S.3.1.6.1 Runway Deicing Operation: Minimize contamination of stormwater runoff from runways as a result of deicing operations. Evaluate whether over-application of deicing chemicals occurs by analyzing application rates, and adjust as necessary, consistent with considerations of flight safety. Also consider these control measure options (or their equivalents): metered application of chemicals; pre-wetting dry chemical constituents prior to application; installing a runway ice detection system;implementing anti-icing operations as a preventive measure against ice buildup.8.S.3.1.6.2 Aircraft Deicing Operations. Minimize contamination of stormwater runoff from aircraft deicing operations. Determine whether excessive application of deicing chemicals occurs and Stormwater Discharges Associated With Industrial Activity -Sector S 117 General Permit adjust as necessary, consistent with considerations of flight safety.This evaluation should be carried out by the personnel most familiar with the particular aircraft and flight operations in question (versus an outside entity such as the airport authority). Consider using alternative deicing/anti-icing agents as well as containment measures for all applied chemicals. Also consider these control measure options (or their equivalents) for reducing deicing fluid use: forced-air deicing systems, computer-controlled fixed-gantry systems, infrared technology, hot water, varying glycol content to air temperature, enclosed-basket deicing trucks, mechanical methods, solar radiation, hangar storage, aircraft covers, and thermal blankets for MD-80s and DC-9s. Also consider using ice-detection systems and airport traffic flow strategies and departure slot allocation systems.8.S.3.1.7 Management of Runoff. (See also 2.1.2.6) Where deicing operations occur, implement a program to control or manage contaminated runoff to minimize the amount of pollutants being discharged from the site. Consider these control measure options (or their equivalents): a dedicated deicing facility with a runoff collection/ recovery system; using vacuum/collection trucks;storing contaminated stormwater/deicing fluids in tanks and releasing controlled amounts to a publicly owned treatment works; collecting contaminated runoff in a wet pond for biochemical decomposition (be aware of attracting wildlife that may prove hazardous to flight operations); and directing runoff into vegetative swales or other infiltration measures. Also consider recovering deicing materials when these materials are applied during non-precipitation events (e.g., covering storm sewer inlets, using booms, installing absorptive interceptors in the drains, etc.) to prevent these materials from later becoming a source of stormwater contamination. Used deicing fluid should be recycled whenever possible.8.S.3.2 Deicing Season. You must determine the seasonal timeframe (e.g., December-February, October -March, etc.) during which deicing activities typically occur at the facility. Implementation of control measures, including any BMPs, facility inspections and monitoring must be conducted with particular emphasis throughout the defined deicing season. If you meet the deicing chemical usage thresholds of 100,000 gallons glycol and/or 100 tons of urea, the deicing season you identified is the timeframe during which you must obtain the four required benchmark monitoring event results for deicing-related parameters, i.e., BOD, COD, ammonia and pH. See also Part 8.S.6.8.S.4 Additional SWPPP Requirements. An airport authority and tenants of the airport are encouraged to work in partnership in the development of a SWPPP. If an airport tenant obtains authorization under this permit and develops a SWPPP for discharges from his own areas of the airport, prior to authorization, that SWPPP must be coordinated and integrated with the SWPPP for the entire airport. Tenants of the airport facility include air passenger or cargo companies, fixed based operators and other parties Stormwater Discharges Associated With Industrial Activity -Sector S 118 General Permit who have contracts with the airport authority to conduct business operations on airport property and whose operations result in stormwater discharges associated with industrial activity.8.S.4.1 Drainage Area Site Map. (See also Part 5.1.2) Document in the SWPPP the following areas of the facility and indicate whether activities occurring there may be exposed to precipitation/surface runoff: aircraft and runway deicing operations; fueling stations;aircraft, ground vehicle and equipment maintenance/cleaning areas; storage areas for aircraft, ground vehicles and equipment awaiting maintenance. 8.S.4.2 Potential Pollutant Sources. (See also Part 5.1.3) In your inventory of exposed materials, describe in your SWPPP the potential for the following activities and facility areas to contribute pollutants to stormwater discharges: aircraft, runway, ground vehicle and'equipment maintenance and cleaning; aircraft and runway deicing operations (including apron and centralized aircraft deicing stations, runways, taxiways and ramps). If you use deicing chemicals, you must maintain a record of the types (including the Material Safety Data Sheets [MSDS]) used and the monthly quantities, either as measured or, in the absence of metering, as estimated to the best of your knowledge. This includes all deicing chemicals, not just glycols and urea (e.g., potassium acetate), because large quantities of these other chemicals can still have an adverse impact on receiving waters. Tenants or other fixed-based operations that conduct deicing operations must provide the above information to the airport authority for inclusion with any comprehensive airport SWPPPs.8.S.4.3 Vehicle and Equipment Washwater Requirements. Attach to or reference in your SWPPP, a copy of the NPDES permit issued for vehicle/equipment washwater or, if an NPDES permit has not been issued, a copy of the pending application. If an industrial user permit is issued under a local pretreatment program, include a copy in your SWPPP. In any case, if you are subject to another permit, describe your control measures for implementing all non-stormwater discharge permit conditions or pretreatment requirements in your SWPPP. If washwater is handled in another manner (e.g., hauled offsite, retained onsite), describe the disposal method and attach all pertinent documentation/information (e.g., frequency, volume, destination, etc.) in your SWPPP.8.S.4.4 Documentation of Control Measures Used for Management of Runoff" Document in your SWPPP the control measures used for collecting or containing contaminated melt water from collection areas used for disposal of contaminated snow.8.S.5 Additional Inspection Requirements. 8.S.5.1 Inspections. (See also Part 4.1) At a minimum conduct routine facility inspections at least monthly during the deicing season (e.g., October through April for most mid-latitude airports). If your facility needs to deice before or after this period, expand the monthly inspections to include all months during which deicing chemicals may be used.The Director may specifically require you to increase inspection frequencies. 8.S.5.2 Comprehensive Site Inspections. (See also Part 4.3) Using only qualified personnel, conduct your annual site inspection during periods of actual deicing operations, if possible. If not practicable during active deicing because of weather, conduct the Stormwater Discharges Associated With Industrial Activity -Sector S 119 General Permit inspection during the season when deicing operations occur and the materials and equipment for deicing are in place.8.S.6 Sector-Specific Benchmarks. (See also Part 6 of the permit.)Monitor per the requirements in Table 8.S-1.Table 8.S-1.Subsector Benchmark (You may be subject to requirements for more Parameter Monitoring than one sector/subsector) Concentration For airports where a single permittee, or a Biochemical Oxygen Demand 30 mg/L combination of permitted facilities use more than (BODO)'100,000 gallons of glycol-based deicing Chemical Oxygen Demand 120 mg/L chemicals and/or 100 tons or more of urea on an (COD)'average annual basis, monitor the first four Ammonia' 2.14 mg/L parameters in ONLY those outfalls that collect pH' 6.0 -9.0 s.u.runoff from areas where deicing activities occur (SIC 4512-4581). 'These are deicing-related parameters. Collect the four benchmark samples, and any required follow-up benchmark samples, during the timeframe defined in Part 8.S.3.2 when deicing activities are occurring. Stormwater Discharges Associated With Industrial Activity -Sector S 120 Stormwater Discharges Associated With Industrial Activity -Sector S 120 General Permit Part 8 -Sector-Specific Requirements for Industrial Activity Subpart T -Sector T -Treatment Works.You must comply with Part 8 sector-specific requirements associated with your primary industrial activity and any co-located industrial activities, as defined in Appendix A. The sector-specific requirements apply to those areas of your facility where those sector-specific activities occur. These sector-specific requirements are in addition to any requirements specified elsewhere in this permit.8.T.1 Covered Stormwater Discharges. The requirements in Subpart T apply to stormwater discharges associated with industrial activity from Treatment Works as identified by the Activity Code specified under Sector T in Table D-1 of Appendix D of the permit.8.T.2 Industrial Activities Covered by Sector T.The requirements listed under this part apply to all existing point source stormwater discharges associated with the following activities: 8.T.2.1 Treatment works treating domestic sewage, or any other sewage sludge or wastewater treatment device or system used in the storage, treatment, recycling, and reclamation of municipal or domestic sewage, including land dedicated to the disposal of sewage sludge; that are located within the confines of a facility with a design flow of 1.0 million gallons per day (MGD) or more; or are required to have an approved pretreatment program under 40 CFR Part 403.8.T.2.2 The following are not required to have permit coverage: farm lands, domestic gardens or lands used for sludge management where sludge is beneficially reused and which are not physically located within the facility, or areas that are in compliance with Section 405 of the CWA.8.T.3 Limitations on Coverage.8.T.3.1 Prohibition of Non-Stormwater Discharges. (See also Part 1.1.4) Sanitary and industrial wastewater and equipment and vehicle washwater are not authorized by this permit.8.T.4 Additional Technology-Based Effluent Limits.8.T.4.1 Control Measures. (See also the non-numeric effluent limits in Part 2.1.2) In addition to the other control measures, consider the following: routing stormwater to the treatment works; or covering exposed materials (i.e., from the following areas: grit, screenings, and other solids handling, storage, or disposal areas; sludge drying beds; dried sludge piles; compost piles; and septage or hauled waste receiving station).8.T.4.2 Employee Training. (See also Part 2.1.2.9) At a minimum, training must address the following areas when applicable to a facility: petroleum product management; process chemical management; spill prevention and controls; fueling procedures; general good Stormwater Discharges Associated With Industrial Activity -Sector T 121 General Permit housekeeping practices; and proper procedures for using fertilizer, herbicides, and pesticides. 8.T.5 Additional SWPPP Requirements. 8.T.5.1 Site Map. (See also Part 5.1.2) Document in your SWPPP where any of the following may be exposed to precipitation or surface runoff: grit, screenings, and other solids handling, storage, or disposal areas; sludge drying beds; dried sludge piles; compost piles; septage or hauled waste receiving station; and storage areas for process chemicals, petroleum products, solvents, fertilizers, herbicides, and pesticides. 8.T.5.2 Potential Pollutant Sources. (See also Part 5.1.3) Document in your SWPPP the following additional sources and activities that have potential pollutants associated with them, as applicable: grit, screenings, and other solids handling, storage, or disposal areas; sludge drying beds; dried sludge piles; compost piles; septage or hauled waste receiving station; and access roads and rail lines.8.T.5.3 Wastewater and Washwater Requirements. Keep a copy of all your current NPDES permits issued for wastewater and industrial, vehicle and equipment washwater discharges or, if an NPDES permit has not yet been issued, a copy of the pending application(s) with your SWPPP. If the washwater is handled in another manner, the disposal method must be described and all pertinent documentation must be retained onsite.8.T.6 Additional Inspection Requirements.(See also Part 4.1) Include the following areas in all inspections: access roads and rail lines; grit, screenings, and other solids handling, storage, or disposal areas; sludge drying beds;dried sludge piles; compost piles; and septage or hauled waste receiving station.Stormwater Discharges Associated With Industrial Activity -Sector T 122 Stormwater Discharges Associated With Industrial Activity -Sector T 122 General Permit Part 8 -Sector-Specific Requirements for Industrial Activity Subpart U -Sector U -Food and Kindred Products.You must comply with Part 8 sector-specific requirements associated with your primary industrial activity and any co-located industrial activities, as defined in Appendix A. The sector-specific requirements apply to those areas of your facility where those sector-specific activities occur. These sector-specific requirements are in addition to any requirements specified elsewhere in this permit.8.U.1 Covered Stormwater Discharges. The requirements in Subpart U apply to stormwater discharges associated with industrial activity from Food and Kindred Products facilities as identified by the SIC Codes specified in Table D-1 of Appendix D of the permit.8.U.2 Limitations on Coverage.8.U.2. 1 Prohibition of Non-Stormwater Discharges. (See also Part 1.1.4) The following discharges are not authorized by this permit: discharges containing boiler blowdown, cooling tower overflow and blowdown, ammonia refrigeration purging, and vehicle washing and clean-out operations. 8.U.3 Additional Technology-Based Limitations. 8.U.3.1 Employee Training. (See also Part 2.1.2.9) Address pest control in your employee training program.8.U.4 Additional SWPPP Requirements. 8.U.4.1 Drainage Area Site Map. (See also Part 5.1.2) Document in your SWPPP the locations of the following activities if they are exposed to precipitation or runoff: vents and stacks from cooking, drying, and similar operations; dry product vacuum transfer lines; animal holding pens; spoiled product; and broken product container storage areas.8.U.4.2 Potential Pollutant Sources. (See also Part 5.1.3) Document in your SWPPP, in addition to food and kindred products processing-related industrial activities, application and storage of pest control chemicals (e.g., rodenticides, insecticides, fungicides) used on plant grounds.8.U.5 Additional Inspection Requirements.(See also Part 4.1) Inspect on a quarterly basis, at a minimum, the following areas where the potential for exposure to stormwater exists: loading and unloading areas for all significant materials; storage areas, including associated containment areas; waste management units; vents and stacks emanating from industrial activities; spoiled product and broken product container holding areas; animal holding pens; staging areas; and air pollution control equipment. Stormwater Discharges Associated With Industrial Activity -Sector U 123 General Permit 8.U.6 Sector-Specific Benchmarks. (See also Part 6 of the permit.)Table 8.U-I.Subsector Benchmark (You may be subject to requirements Parameter Monitoring for more than one Sector / Subsector) Concentration Subsector UI. Grain Mill Products Total Suspended Solids (TSS) 100 mg/L (SIC 2041-2048) Subsector U2. Fats and Oils Products Biochemical Oxygen Demand 30 mg/L (SIC 2074-2079) (BOD,)Chemical Oxygen Demand (COD) 120 mg/L Nitrate plus Nitrite Nitrogen 0.68 mg/L Total Suspended Solids (TSS) 100 mg/L Stormwater Discharges Associated With Industrial Activity -Sector U 124 General Permit Part 8 -Sector-Specific Requirements for Industrial Activity Subpart V -Sector V -Textile Mills, Apparel, and Other Fabric Products.You must comply with Part 8 sector-specific requirements associated with your primary industrial activity and any co-located industrial activities, as defined in Appendix A. The sector-specific requirements apply to those areas of your facility where those sector-specific activities occur. These sector-specific requirements are in addition to any requirements specified elsewhere in this permit.8.V.1 Covered Stormwater Discharges. The requirements in Subpart V apply to stormwater discharges associated with industrial activity from Textile Mills, Apparel, and Other Fabric Product manufacturing as identified by the SIC Codes specified under Sector V in Table D-1 of Appendix D of the permit.8.V.2 Limitations on Coverage.8.V.2.1 Prohibition of Non-Stormwater Discharges. (See also Part 1.1.4) The following are not authorized by this permit: discharges of wastewater (e.g., wastewater resulting from wet processing or from any processes relating to the production process), reused or recycled water, and waters used in cooling towers. If you have these types of discharges from your facility, you must cover them under a separate NPDES permit.8.V.3 Additional Technology-Based Limitations. 8.V.3.1 Good Housekeeping Measures. (See also Part 2.1.2.2)8.V.3. 1.1 Material Storage Areas. Plainly label and store all containerized materials (e.g., fuels, petroleum products, solvents, and dyes) in a protected area, away from drains. Minimize contamination of the stormwater runoff from such storage areas. Also consider an inventory control plan to prevent excessive purchasing of potentially hazardous substances. For storing empty chemical drums or containers, ensure that the drums and containers are clean (consider triple-rinsing) and that there is no contact of residuals with precipitation or runoff. Collect and dispose of washwater from these cleanings properly.8.V.3.1.2 Material Handling Areas. Minimize contamination of stormwater runoff from material handling operations and areas. Consider the following (or their equivalents): use of spill and overflow protection; covering fueling areas; and covering or enclosing areas where the transfer of material may occur. When applicable, address the replacement or repair of leaking connections, valves, transfer lines, and pipes that may carry chemicals, dyes, or wastewater. 8.V.3.1.3 Fueling Areas. Minimize contamination of stormwater runoff from fueling areas. Consider the following (or their equivalents): covering the fueling area, using spill and overflow protection, minimizing run-on of stormwater to the fueling areas, using dry cleanup methods, and treating and/or recycling stormwater runoff collected from the fueling area.Stormwater Discharges Associated With Industrial Activity -Sector V 125 Stormwater Discharges Associated With Industrial Activity -Sector V 125 General Permit 8.V.3.1.4 Above-Ground Storage TankArea. Minimize contamination of the stormwater runoff from above-ground storage tank areas, including the associated piping and valves. Consider the following (or their equivalents): regular cleanup of these areas; including measures for tanks, piping and valves explicitly in your SPCC program; minimizing runoff of stormwater from adjacent areas;restricting access to the area; inserting filters in adjacent catch basins;providing absorbent booms in unbermed fueling areas; using dry cleanup methods; and permanently sealing drains within critical areas that may discharge to a storm drain.8.V.3.2 Employee Training. (See also Part 2.1.2.9) As part of your employee training program, address, at a minimum, the following activities (as applicable): use of reused and recycled waters, solvents management, proper disposal of dyes, proper disposal of petroleum products and spent lubricants, spill prevention and control, fueling procedures, and general good housekeeping practices. 8.V.4 Additional SWPPP Requirements. 8.V.4.1 Potential Pollutant Sources. (See also Part 5.1.3) Document in your SWPPP the following additional sources and activities that have potential pollutants associated with them: industry-specific significant materials and industrial activities (e.g., backwinding, beaming, bleaching, backing bonding, carbonizing, carding, cut and sew operations, desizing, drawing, dyeing locking, fulling, knitting, mercerizing, opening, packing, plying, scouring, slashing, spinning, synthetic-felt processing, textile waste processing, tufting, turning, weaving, web forming, winging, yam spinning, and yam texturing). 8.V.4.2 Description of Good Housekeeping Measures for Material Storage Areas. Document in the SWPPP your containment area or enclosure for materials stored outdoors in connection with Part 8.V.3. l.1 above.8.V.5 Additional Inspection Requirements.(See also Part 4.1) Inspect, at least monthly, the following activities and areas (at a minimum): transfer and transmission lines, spill prevention, good housekeeping practices, management of process waste products, and all structural and nonstructural management practices. Stormwater Discharges Associated With Industrial Activity -Sector V 126 General Permit Part 8 -Sector-Specific Requirements for Industrial Activity Subpart W -Sector W -Furniture and Fixtures.You must comply with Part 8 sector-specific requirements associated with your primary industrial activity and any co-located industrial activities, as defined in Appendix A. The sector-specific requirements apply to those areas of your facility where those sector-specific activities occur. These sector-specific requirements are in addition to any requirements specified elsewhere in this permit.8.W.1 Covered Stormwater Discharges. The requirements in Subpart W apply to stormwater discharges associated with industrial activity from Furniture and Fixtures facilities as identified by the SIC Codes specified under Sector W in Table D-1 of Appendix D of the permit.8.W.2 Additional SWPPP Requirements. 8.W.2.1 Drainage Area Site Map. (See also Part 5.1.2) Document in your SWPPP where any of the following may be exposed to precipitation or surface runoff: material storage (including tanks or other vessels used for liquid or waste storage) areas; outdoor material processing areas; areas where wastes are treated, stored, or disposed of; access roads; and rail spurs.Stormwater Discharges Associated With Industrial Activity -Sector W 127 General Permit Part 8 -Sector-Specific Requirements for Industrial Activity Subpart X -Sector X -Printing and Publishing. You must comply with Part 8 sector-specific requirements associated with your primary industrial activity and any co-located industrial activities, as defined in Appendix A. The sector-specific requirements apply to those areas of your facility where those sector-specific activities occur. These sector-specific requirements are in addition to any requirements specified elsewhere in this permit.8.X.1 Covered Stormwater Discharges. The requirements in Subpart X apply to stormwater discharges associated with industrial activity from Printing and Publishing facilities as identified by the SIC Codes specified under Sector X in Table D-1 of Appendix D of the permit.8.X.2 Additional Technology-Based Effluent Limits.8.X.2.1 Good Housekeeping Measures. (See also Part 2.1.2.2)8.X.2. 1.1 Material Storage Areas. Plainly label and store all containerized materials (e.g., skids, pallets, solvents, bulk inks, hazardous waste, empty drums, portable and mobile containers of plant debris, wood crates, steel racks, and fuel oil) in a protected area, away from drains. Minimize contamination of the stormwater runoff from such storage areas. Also consider an inventory control plan to prevent excessive purchasing of potentially hazardous substances. 8.X.2.1.2 Material Handling Area. Minimize contamination of stormwater runoff from material handling operations and areas (e.g., blanket wash, mixing solvents, loading and unloading materials). Consider the following (or their equivalents): using spill and overflow protection, covering fueling areas, and covering or enclosing areas where the transfer of materials may occur. When applicable, address the replacement or repair of leaking connections, valves, transfer lines, and pipes that may carry chemicals or wastewater. 8.X.2.1.3 Fueling Areas. Minimize contamination of stormwater runoff from fueling areas. Consider the following (or their equivalents): covering the fueling area, using spill and overflow protection, minimizing runoff of stormwater to the fueling areas, using dry cleanup methods, and treating and/or recycling stormwater runoff collected from the fueling area.8.X.2.1.4 Above Ground Storage TankArea. Minimize contamination of the stormwater runoff from above-ground storage tank areas, including the associated piping and valves. Consider the following (or their equivalents): regularly cleaning these areas, explicitly addressing tanks, piping and valves in the SPCC program, minimizing stormwater runoff from adjacent areas, restricting access to the area, inserting filters in adjacent catch basins, providing absorbent booms in unbermed fueling areas, using dry cleanup methods, and permanently sealing drains within critical areas that may discharge to a storm drain.Stormwater Discharges Associated With Industrial Activity -Sector X 128 General Permit 8.X.2.2 Employee Training. (See also Part 2.1.2.9) As part of your employee training program, address, at a minimum, the following activities (as applicable): spent solvent management, spill prevention and control, used oil management, fueling procedures, and general good housekeeping practices. 8.X.3 Additional SWPPP Requirements. 8.X.3.1 Description of Good Housekeeping Measures for Material Storage Areas. In connection with Part 8.X.2. 1.1, describe in the SWPPP the containment area or enclosure for materials stored outdoors.Stormwater Discharges Associated With Industrial Activity -Sector X 129 General Permit Part 8 -Sector-Specific Requirements for Industrial Activity Subpart Y -Sector Y -Rubber, Miscellaneous Plastic Products, and Miscellaneous Manufacturing Industries. You must comply with Part 8 sector-specific requirements associated with your primary industrial activity and any co-located industrial activities, as defined in Appendix A. The sector-specific requirements apply to those areas of your facility where those sector-specific activities occur. These sector-specific requirements are in addition to any requirements specified elsewhere in this permit.8.Y.1 Covered Stormwater Discharges. The requirements in Subpart Y apply to stormwater discharges associated with industrial activity from Rubber, Miscellaneous Plastic Products, and Miscellaneous Manufacturing Industries facilities as identified by the SIC Codes specified under Sector Y in Table D-I of Appendix D of the permit.8.Y.2 Additional Technology-Based Effluent Limits.8.Y.2.1 Controls for Rubber Manufacturers. (See also Part 2.1.2) Minimize the discharge of zinc in your stormwater discharges. Parts 8.Y.2.1.1 to 8.Y.2.1.5 give possible sources of zinc to be reviewed and list some specific control measures to be considered for implementation (or their equivalents). Following are some general control measure options to consider: using chemicals purchased in pre-weighed, sealed polyethylene bags; storing in-use materials in sealable containers, ensuring an airspace between the container and the cover to minimize "puffing" losses when the container is opened, and using automatic dispensing and weighing equipment. 8.Y.2.1.1 Zinc Bags. Ensure proper handling and storage of zinc bags at your facility.Following are some control measure options: employee training on the handling and storage of zinc bags, indoor storage of zinc bags, cleanup of zinc spills without washing the zinc into the storm drain, and the use of 2,500-pound sacks of zinc rather than 50- to 100-pound sacks.8.Y.2.1.2 Dumpsters. Minimize discharges of zinc from dumpsters. Following are some control measure options: covering the dumpster, moving the dumpster indoors, or providing a lining for the dumpster.8.Y.2.1.3 Dust Collectors and Baghouses. Minimize contributions of zinc to stormwater from dust collectors and baghouses. Replace or repair, as appropriate, improperly operating dust collectors and baghouses. 8.Y.2.1.4 Grinding Operations. Minimize contamination of stormwater as a result of dust generation from rubber grinding operations. One control measure option is to install a dust collection system.8.Y.2.1.5 Zinc Stearate Coating Operations. Minimize the potential for stormwater contamination from drips and spills of zinc stearate slurry that may be released Stormwater Discharges Associated With Industrial Activity -Sector Y 130 General Permit to the storm drain. One control measure option is to use alternative compounds to zinc stearate.8.Y.2.2 Controls for Plastic Products Manufacturers. Minimize the discharge of plastic resin pellets in your stormwater discharges. Control measures to be considered for implementation (or their equivalents) include minimizing spills, cleaning up of spills promptly and thoroughly, sweeping thoroughly, pellet capturing, employee education, and disposal precautions. 8.Y.3 Additional SWPPP Requirements. 8.Y.3.l Potential Pollutant Sources for Rubber Manufacturers. (See also Part 5.1.3) Document in your SWPPP the use of zinc at your facility and the possible pathways through which zinc may be discharged in stormwater runoff.8.Y.4 Sector-Specific Benchmarks. (See also Part 6 of the permit.)Table 8.Y-1.Subsector Benchmark Monitoring (You may be subject to requirements for more Parameter Concentration than one sector/subsector) Subsector YI. Rubber Products Manufacturing Total Zinc' Hardness Dependent (SIC 3011,3021, 3052, 3053, 3061, 3069) _1 The benchmark values of some metals are dependent on water hardness. For these parameters, permittees must determine the hardness of the receiving water (see Appendix J, "Calculating Hardness in Receiving Waters for Hardness Dependent Metals," for methodology), in accordance with Part 6.2.1. 1, to identify the applicable 'hardness range' for determining their benchmark value applicable to their facility. The ranges occur in 25 mg/L increments. Hardness Dependent Benchmarks follow in the table below: Zinc Water Hardness Range (mg/L)0-25 mg/L 0.04 25-50 mg/L 0.05 50-75 mg/L 0.08 75-100 mg/L 0.11 100-125 mg/L 0.13 125-150 mg/L 0.16 150-175 mg/L 0.18 175-200 mg/L 0.20 200-225 mg/L 0.23 225-250 mg/L 0.25 250+ mg/L 0.26 Stormwater Discharges Associated With Industrial Activity -Sector Y 131 General Permit Part 8 -Sector-Specific Requirements for Industrial Activity Subpart Z -Sector Z -Leather Tanning and Finishing. You must comply with Part 8 sector-specific requirements associated with your primary industrial activity and any co-located industrial activities, as defined in Appendix A. The sector-specific requirements apply to those areas of your facility where those sector-specific activities occur. These sector-specific requirements are in addition to any requirements specified elsewhere in this permit.8.Z.1 Covered Stormwater Discharges. The requirements in Subpart Z apply to stormwater discharges associated with industrial activity from Leather Tanning and Finishing facilities as identified by the SIC Code specified under Sector Z in Table D-l of Appendix D of the permit.8.Z.2 Additional Technology-Based Effluent Limits.8.Z.2.3 Good Housekeeping Measures. (See also Part 2.1.2.2)8.Z.2.3.1 Storage Areas for Raw, Semiprocessed, or Finished Tannery By-products. Minimize contamination of stormwater runoff from pallets and bales of raw, semiprocessed, or finished tannery by-products (e.g., splits, trimmings, shavings). Consider indoor storage or protection with polyethylene wrapping, tarpaulins, roofed storage, etc. Consider placing materials on an impermeable surface and enclosing or putting berms (or equivalent measures) around the area to prevent stormwater run-on and runoff.8.Z.2.3.2 Material Storage Areas. Label storage containers of all materials (e.g., specific chemicals, hazardous materials, spent solvents, waste materials) minimize contact of such materials with stormwater. 8.Z.2.3.3 Buffing and Shaving Areas. Minimize contamination of stormwater runoff with leather dust from buffing and shaving areas. Consider dust collection enclosures, preventive inspection and maintenance programs, or other appropriate preventive measures.8.Z.2.3.4 Receiving, Unloading, and Storage Areas. Minimize contamination of stormwater runoff from receiving, unloading, and storage areas. If these areas are exposed, consider the following (or their equivalents): covering all hides and chemical supplies, diverting drainage to the process sewer, or grade berming or curbing the area to prevent stormwater runoff.8.Z.2.3.5 Outdoor Storage of Contaminated Equipment. Minimize contact of stormwater with contaminated equipment. Consider the following (or their equivalents): covering equipment, diverting drainage to the process sewer, and cleaning thoroughly prior to storage.8.Z.2.3.6 Waste Management. Minimize contamination of stormwater runoff from waste storage areas. Consider the following (or their equivalents): covering Stormwater Discharges Associated With Industrial Activity -Sector Z 132 General Permit dumpsters, moving waste management activities indoors, covering waste piles with temporary covering material such as tarpaulins or polyethylene, and minimizing stormwater runoff by enclosing the area or building berms around the area.8.Z.3 Additional SWPPP Requirements. 8.Z.3.1 Drainage Area Site Map. (See also Part 5.1.2) Identify in your SWPPP where any of the following may be exposed to precipitation or surface runoff: processing and storage areas of the beamhouse, tanyard, and re-tan wet finishing and dry finishing operations. 8.Z.3.2 Potential Pollutant Sources. (See also Part 5.1.3) Document in your SWPPP the following sources and activities that have potential pollutants associated with them (as appropriate): temporary or permanent storage of fresh and brine-cured hides; extraneous hide substances and hair; leather dust, scraps, trimmings, and shavings.Stormwater Discharges Associated With Industrial Activity -Sector Z 133 General Permit Part 8 -Sector-Specific Requirements for Industrial Activity Subpart AA -Sector AA -Fabricated Metal Products You must comply with Part 8 sector-specific requirements associated with your primary industrial activity and any co-located industrial activities, as defined in Appendix A. The sector-specific requirements apply to those areas of your facility where those sector-specific activities occur. These sector-specific requirements are in addition to any requirements specified elsewhere in this permit.8.AA.1 Covered Stormwater Discharges. The requirements in Subpart AA apply to stormwater discharges associated with industrial activity from Fabricated Metal Products facilities as identified by the SIC Codes specified under Sector AA in Table D-1 of Appendix D of the permit.8.AA.2 Additional Technology-Based Effluent Limits.8.AA.2.1 Good Housekeeping Measures. (See also Part 2.1.2.2)8.AA.2. 1.1 Raw Steel Handling Storage. Minimize the generation of and/or recover and properly manage scrap metals, fines, and iron dust. Include measures for containing materials within storage handling areas.8.AA.2.1.2 Paints and Painting Equipment. Minimize exposure of paint and painting equipment to stormwater. 8.AA.2.2 Spill Prevention and Response Procedures. (See also Part 2.1.2.4) Ensure that the necessary equipment to implement a cleanup is available to personnel. The following areas should be addressed 8.AA.2.2.1 Metal Fabricating Areas. Maintain clean, dry, orderly conditions in these areas. Consider using dry clean-up techniques. 8.AA.2.2.2 Storage Areas for Raw Metal. Keep these areas free of conditions that could cause, or impede appropriate and timely response to, spills or leakage of materials. Consider the following (or their equivalents): maintaining storage areas so that there is easy access in the event of a spill, and labeling stored materials to aid in identifying spill contents.8.AA.2.2.3 Metal Working Fluid Storage Areas. Minimize the potential for stormwater contamination from storage areas for metal working fluids.8.AA.2.2.4 Cleaners andRinse Water. Control and clean up spills of solvents and other liquid cleaners, control sand buildup and disbursement from sand-blasting operations, and prevent exposure of recyclable wastes. Substitute environmentally benign cleaners when possible.8.AA.2.2.5 Lubricating Oil and Hydraulic Fluid Operations. Minimize the potential for stormwater contamination from lubricating oil and hydraulic fluid operations. Consider using monitoring equipment or other devices to detect and control Stormwater Discharges Associated With Industrial Activity -Sector AA 134 General Permit leaks and overflows. Consider installing perimeter controls such as dikes, curbs, grass filter strips, or equivalent measures.8.AA.2.2.6 Chemical Storage Areas. Minimize stormwater contamination and accidental spillage in chemical storage areas. Include a program to inspect containers and identify proper disposal methods.8.AA.2.3 Spills andLeaks. (See also Part 5.1.3.3) In your spill prevention and response procedures, required by Part 2.1.2.4, pay attention to the following materials (at a minimum): chromium, toluene, pickle liquor, sulfuric acid, zinc and other water priority chemicals, and hazardous chemicals and wastes.8.AA.3 Additional SWPPP Requirements. 8.AA.3.1 Drainage Area Site Map. (See also Part 5.1.2) Document in your SWPPP where any of the following may be exposed to precipitation or surface runoff: raw metal storage areas; finished metal storage areas; scrap disposal collection sites; equipment storage areas; retention and detention basins; temporary and permanent diversion dikes or berms; right-of-way or perimeter diversion devices; sediment traps and barriers;processing areas, including outside painting areas; wood preparation; recycling; and raw material storage.8.AA.3.2 Potential Pollutant Sources. (See also Part 5.1.3) Document in your SWPPP the following additional sources and activities that have potential pollutants associated with them: loading and unloading operations for paints, chemicals, and raw materials; outdoor storage activities for raw materials, paints, empty containers, corn cobs, chemicals, and scrap metals; outdoor manufacturing or processing activities such as grinding, cutting, degreasing, buffing, and brazing; onsite waste disposal practices for spent solvents, sludge, pickling baths, shavings, ingot pieces, and refuse and waste piles.8.AA.4 Additional Inspection Requirements 8.AA.4. I Inspections. (See also Part 4) At a minimum, include the following areas in all inspections: raw metal storage areas, finished product storage areas, material and chemical storage areas, recycling areas, loading and unloading areas, equipment storage areas, paint areas, and vehicle fueling and maintenance areas.8.AA.4.2 Comprehensive Site Inspections. (See also Part 4.3) As part of your inspection, also inspect areas associated with the storage of raw metals, spent solvents and chemicals storage areas, outdoor paint areas, and drainage from roof. Potential pollutants include chromium, zinc, lubricating oil, solvents, aluminum, oil and grease, methyl ethyl ketone, steel, and related materials. Stormwater Discharges Associated With Industrial Activity -Sector AA 135 General Permit 8.AA.5 Sector-Specific Benchmarks. (See also Part 6 of the permit.)Table 8.AA-1 Subsector Benchmark Monitoring (You may be subject to requirements for Parameter Concentration more than one sector/subsector) Subsector AAI. Fabricated Metal Total Aluminum 0.75 mg/L Products, except Coating (SIC 3411-3499; Total Iron 1.0 mg/L 3911-3915) Total Zinc' Hardness Dependent_ Nitrate plus Nitrite Nitrogen 0.68 mg/L Subsector AA2. Fabricated Metal Coating Total Zinc' Hardness Dependent and Engraving (SIC 3479) Nitrate plus Nitrite Nitrogen 0.68 mg/L The benchmark values of some metals are dependent on water hardness. For these parameters, permittees must determine the hardness of the receiving water (see Appendix J, "Calculating Hardness in Receiving Waters for Hardness Dependent Metals," for methodology), in accordance with Part 6.2.1.1, to identify the applicable 'hardness range' for determining their benchmark value applicable to their facility. The ranges occur in 25 mg/L increments. Hardness Dependent Benchmarks follow in the table below: Water Hardness Range Zinc (mg/L)0-25 mg/L 0.04 25-50 mg/L 0.05 50-75 mg/L 0.08 75-100 mg/L 0.11 100-125 mg/L 0.13 125-150 mg/L 0.16 150-175 mg/L 0.18 175-200 mg/L 0.20 200-225 mg/L 0.23 225-250 mg/L 0.25 250+ mg/L 0.26 Stormwater Discharges Associated With Industrial Activity -Sector AA 136 General Permit Part 8 -Sector-Specific Requirements for Industrial Activity Subpart AB -Sector AB -Transportation Equipment, Industrial or Commercial Machinery Facilities. You must comply with Part 8 sector-specific requirements associated with your primary industrial activity and any co-located industrial activities, as defined in Appendix A. The sector-specific requirements apply to those areas of your facility where those sector-specific activities occur. These sector-specific requirements are in addition to any requirements specified elsewhere in this permit.8.AB.1 Covered Stormwater Discharges. The requirements in Subpart AB apply to stormwater discharges associated with industrial activity from Transportation Equipment, Industrial or Commercial Machinery facilities as identified by the SIC Codes specified under Sector AB in Table D-I of Appendix D of the permit.8.AB.2 Additional SWPPP Requirements. 8.AB.2.1 Drainage Area Site Map. (See also Part 5.1.2) Identify in your SWPPP where any of the following may be exposed to precipitation or surface runoff: vents and stacks from metal processing and similar operations. Stormwater Discharges Associated With Industrial Activity -Sector AB 137 General Permit Part 8 -Sector-Specific Requirements for Industrial Activity Subpart AC- Sector AC -Electronic and Electrical Equipment and Components, Photographic and Optical Goods.You must comply with Part 8 sector-specific requirements associated with your primary industrial activity and any co-located industrial activities, as defined in Appendix A. The sector-specific requirements apply to those areas of your facility where those sector-specific activities occur. These sector-specific requirements are in addition to any requirements specified elsewhere in this permit.8.AC.1 Covered Stormwater Discharges. The requirements in Subpart AC apply to stormwater discharges associated with industrial activity from facilities that manufacture Electronic and Electrical Equipment and Components, Photographic and Optical goods as identified by the SIC Codes specified in Table D-1 of Appendix D of the permit.8.AC.2 Additional Requirements. No additional sector-specific requirements apply.Stormwater Discharges Associated With Industrial Activity -Sector AC 138 General Permit Part 8 -Sector-Specific Requirements for Industrial Activity Subpart AD -Sector AD -Stormwater Discharges Designated by the Director as Requiring Permits.You must comply with Part 8 sector-specific requirements associated with your primary industrial activity and any co-located industrial activities, as defined in Appendix A. The sector-specific requirements apply to those areas of your facility where those sector-specific activities occur. These sector-specific requirements are in addition to any requirements specified elsewhere in this permit.8.AD.1 Covered Stormwater Discharges. Sector AD is used to provide permit coverage for facilities designated by the Director as needing a stormwater permit, and any discharges of stormwater associated with industrial activity that do not meet the description of an industrial activity covered by Sectors A-AC.8.AD. 1.1 Eligibility for Permit Coverage. Because this sector is primarily intended for use by discharges designated by the Director as needing a stormwater permit (which is an atypical circumstance), and your facility may or may not normally be discharging stormwater associated with industrial activity, you must obtain the Director's written permission to use this permit prior to submitting an NOI. If you are authorized to use this permit, you will still be required to ensure that your discharges meet the basic eligibility provisions of this permit at Part 1.2.8.AD.2 Sector-Specific Benchmarks and Effluent Limits. (See also Part 6 of the permit.)The Director will establish any additional monitoring and reporting requirements for your facility prior to authorizing you to be covered by this permit. Additional monitoring requirements would be based on the nature of activities at your facility and your stormwater discharges. Stormwater Discharges Associated With Industrial Activity -Sector AD 139 Final Permit 9. Permit Conditions Applicable to Specific States, Indian Country Lands, or Territories

9.1 Region

1 9.1.1 CTR05000I: Indian Country lands within the State of Connecticut No additional requirements.

9.1.2 MAR050000

Commonwealth of Massachusetts, except Indian Country lands.Permittees in Massachusetts must also meet the following conditions. 9.1.2.1 Additional Section 401(a) conditions required by the Commonwealth of Massachusetts. Discharges covered by the general permit must comply with the provisions of 314 CMR 3.00; 314 CMR 4.00; 314 CMR 9.00; and 314 CMR 10.00 and any other related policies adopted under the authority of the Massachusetts Clean Waters Act, MGL c.21, ss. 26-53 and Wetlands Protection Act, MGL s. 40.New facilities or redevelopment of existing facilities subject to this permit must comply with applicable stormwater performance standards prescribed by state regulation or policy. A permit under 314 CMR 3.04 is not required for existing facilities which meet state stormwater performance standards. An application for a permit under 314 CMR 3.00 is required only when required under 314 CMR 3.04(2)(b) {designation of a discharge on a case-by-case basis} or is otherwise identified in 314 CMR 3.00 or any Department policy as a discharge requiring a permit application. Department regulations and policies may be obtained through the State House Bookstore or online at www.mass.gov/dep. 9.1.2.2 SWPPPAvailability. The Department may request a copy of the Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) and the permittee is required to submit the SWPPP to the Department within 14 days of such a request.9.1.2.3 Authorization to Inspect. The Department may conduct an inspection of any facility covered by this permit to ensure compliance with state law requirements, including state water quality standards. The Department may enforce its certification conditions. 9.1.2.4 Submission of Monitoring Data. The results of any monitoring required by this permit must be sent to the appropriate Regional Office of the Department [attention: Bureau of Waste Prevention] where the monitoring identifies exceedances of any effluent limits or benchmarks for any parameter for which Stormwater Discharges Associated With Industrial Activity 140 Final Permit monitoring is required under this permit. In addition, any follow-up monitoring and a description of the corrective actions required and undertaken to meet the effluent limits or benchmarks must be sent to the appropriate Department Regional Office.9.1.2.5 Sector-Specific Requirements. The Massachusetts Coastal Zone Management Program submitted the following conditions to be added to the permit in order to meet the Programs Consistency Review and which will be included in the requirements of this Water Quality Certification: o In Sector Q [Water Transportation] add copper and tributyltin to the required monitoring parameters." In Sector R [Ship and Boat Building and Repair Yards] add aluminum, iron, lead, copper and tributyltin to the list of required monitoring parameters o For both Sector Q and R, the benchmark for tributyltin should be 0.42 ug/l, the acute saltwater criteria; report any exceedances of that value.o Modify the monitoring requirements [Part 6.2.1.2 of the permit] such that all four of the quarterly monitoring samples must meet the benchmarks rather than the average of the four before no further monitoring is required.9.1.3 MAR05000I: Indian Country lands within the Commonwealth of Massachusetts. No additional requirements.

9.1.5 NHR050000

State of New Hampshire. Permittees in New Hampshire must also meet the following conditions: 9.1.5.1 On-site Infiltration of Stormwater. In Part 2.1.1 (Control Measure Selection and Design Considerations), you are required to consider opportunities for infiltrating runoff onsite. This is encouraged, but it should only be done if consistent with the statutes and rules of the Department of Environmental Services written to protect groundwater. Infiltration BMPs are not recommended at industrial sites except in areas where industrial activities do not occur, such as at office buildings and their associated parking facilities, or in drainage areas at the facility where a certification of no exposure will always be possible [see 40 CFR 122.26(g)]. Other justifiable reasons for not using on-site infiltration BMPs include the following: o The facility is located in a wellhead protection area as defined in RSA 485-C:2; or o The facility is located in an area where groundwater has been reclassified to GAA, GAI or GA2 pursuant to RSA 485-C and Env-Ws 420; or Stormwater Discharges Associated With Industrial Activity 141 Final Permit Any areas that would be exempt from the groundwater recharge requirements contained in Env-Ws 415.41, including all land uses or activities considered to be a "High-load site." 9.1.5.2 Maintenance of infiltration best management practices. In addition to the requirements in Part 5, the SWPPP must contain the following:

  • A description of and the location of each on-site infiltration BMP installed;" The maintenance procedures that will be followed to ensure proper operation, including the removal of sediment from pretreatment devices;o The inspection procedures that will be followed at least annually.

These should include the procedures for ensuring that the stormwater being infiltrated is not exposed to industrial pollutants and the procedures for ensuring proper drainage to prevent mosquito breeding;o The employee name (or title of the position) who is a member of the stormwater pollution prevention team (see Part 5.1.1) who will be responsible for the maintenance required in this section, the inspections required in this section, and any necessary corrective actions required in Part 3; and o Records for all maintenance performed, inspections conducted, and corrective actions taken.9.1.5.3 Discontinue, Permit or Register On-site Infiltration BMP if Necessary. If at any time a certification of no exposure can no longer be made for any of the stormwater to be infiltrated, then the infiltration BMP must cease for that portion of the runoff or the discharge must be permitted or registered as appropriate. The following may be required:* Infiltration BMP that meet the definition of a Class V well or that infiltrates stormwater via a subsurface structure (i.e. concrete chambers, dry well, leach field, etc.) will need an underground injection control (UIC) registration from NHDES; and* Permitting as a groundwater discharge as required in Env-Ws 1500, if the stormwater will or may contain regulated contaminants. The SWPPP must be modified immediately if new infiltration BMPs are proposed or if existing infiltration BMPs will cease.9.1.5.4 Required NHDES notification.

  • Notify the NHDES Groundwater Discharge Permit Coordinator immediately if you believe that any infiltration BMP may need to be permitted or registered (See Part 9.1.5.3) during the permit term.o Notify the NHDES Wastewater Engineering Bureau immediately of any plans to discharge any new non-stormwater discharges during the permit term. This does not include the allowable non-stormwater discharges listed in Part 1.1.3.Stormwater Discharges Associated With Industrial Activity 142 Stormwater Discharges Associated With Industrial Activity 142 Final Permit 9.1.5.5 Information that may be requested by NHDES. To ensure compliance with RSA 485-C, RSA 485-A, RSA 485-A:13, l(a), Env-Wq 400 and Env-Ws 401 the following information may be requested by NHDES. This information must be kept on site unless you receive a written request from NHDES that it be sent to the address shown in Part 9.1.5.6.o A site map required in Part 5.1.2, showing the type and location of all on-site infiltration BMPs utilized at the facility or the reason(s) why none were installed.

o A list of all non-stormwater discharges that occur at the facility, including their source locations and the control measures being used (See Sections 1.1.3 and 5.1.3.4)." A copy of the Annual Reports required in Part 7.2.9.1.5.6 Where to Submit Information. All required or requested documents must be sent to: NH Department of Environmental Services, Wastewater Engineering Bureau, Permits & Compliance Section, P.O. Box 95, Concord, NH 03302-0095. 9.1.5.7 Modification of Clean Water Act Section 401 Water Quality Certification. When NHDES determines that additional water quality certification requirements are necessary to the protect water quality, it may require individual dischargers to meet additional conditions to obtain or continue coverage under the MSGP. Any such conditions must be supplied to the permittee in writing. Any required pollutant loading analyses and any designs for structural best management practices necessary to protect water quality must be prepared by a civil or sanitary engineer registered in New Hampshire.

9.1.6 RIR05000I

Indian Country lands within the State of Rhode Island.No additional requirements.

9.1.7 VTR0500OF

Federal Facilities in the State of Vermont.No additional requirement.

9.2 Region

2 9.2.1 PPR050000: Commonwealth of Puerto Rico No additional requirements.

9.3 Region

3 9.3.1 DCR050000: The District of Columbia Permittees in the District of Columbia must also meet the following conditions: Stormwater Discharges Associated With Industrial Activity 143 Final Permit 9.3.1.1 Compliance with District of Columbia Laws and Regulations. Discharges covered by the MSGP must comply with the District of Columbia Water Pollution Control Act, (D.C. Code.§ 8-103.01 et seq.) and its implementing regulations in Title 21, Chapters 11 and 19 of the District of Columbia Municipal Regulations. Nothing in this permit will be construed to preclude the institution of any legal action or relieve the permittee from any responsibilities, liabilities, or penalties established pursuant to District of Columbia laws and regulations. 9.3.1.2 Submission of SWPPP. The Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP)shall be submitted to the District Department of the Environment (Department) at the same time the NOI is submitted to EPA, to ensure compliance with District of Columbia laws and regulations. 9.3.1.3 Submission of No Exposure Certflcation and NOT. Copies of the No Exposure Certification and Notice of Termination (NOT) shall be submitted to the Department at the same time it is submitted to EPA.9.3.1.4 Authorization to Inspect. The permittee shall allow the Department to inspect any facilities, equipment, practices, or operations regulated or required under this permit and to access records maintained under the conditions of this permit.9.3.1.5 Submission of Reports. Signed copies of all reports required under this permit including the reporting requirements of Appendix B.12 shall be submitted to the Department at the same time it is submitted to EPA.9.3.1.6 Where to Submit Information. All required or requested documents shall be sent to the: District Department of the Environment, Natural Resources Administration, 51 N Street, NE, 5 th Floor, Washington, D.C. 20002, Attention: Associate Director, Water Quality Division.9.3.2 DER0500OF: Federal Facilities within the State of Delaware.No additional requirements.

9.4 Region

4 Permit coverage not available.

9.5 Region

5 9.5.1 MJR05000I: Indian Country Lands within the State of Michigan No additional requirements.

9.5.2 MNR05000I

Indian Country Lands within the State of Minnesota Stormwater Discharges Associated With Industrial Activity 144 Final Permit 9.5.2.1 Fond du Lac Reservation The following conditions apply only to discharges on the Fond du Lac Reservation. 9.5.2.1.1 Submission of NOI and NOT. Copies of the Notice of Intent (NOI) and Notice of Termination (NOT) shall be submitted to the Office of Water Protection at the same time it is submitted to EPA.9.5.2.1.2 Submission of SWPPP. A copy of the Stormwater Pollution Plan (SWPPP)shall be submitted to the Office of Water Protection at least thirty (30) days in advance of submitting the NOI to EPA.9.5.2.1.3 Benchmark Monitoringfor TSS. Benchmark Monitoring Concentration (BMC) for Total Suspended Solids (TSS) shall be 10 mg/L for Sector A (Timber Products), Sector J (Mineral Mining and Dressing), and Sector M (Automobile Salvage Yards) that conduct Industrial Activities on the Fond du Lac Reservation. 9.5.2.1.4 Benchmark Monitoring for Nitrate plus Nitrite Nitrogen. Benchmark Monitoring Concentration (BMC) fro Nitrate plus Nitrite Nitrogen shall be 0. l2mg/L for Sector J (Mineral Mining and Dressing) that conduct Industrial Activities on the Fond du Lac Reservation. 9.5.2.1.5 Submission of Monitoring Reports. Copies of all Monitoring Reports required by this permit shall be submitted tothe Office of Water Protection. 9.5.2.1.6 Where to Submit Information. All required or requested documents shall be sent to the: Fond du Lac Reservation Office of Water Protection (OWP) at Fond du Lac Reservation, Office of Water Protection, 1720 Big Lake Road, Cloquet, Minnesota 55720.9.5.2.2 Grand Portage Reservation The following conditions apply only to discharges on the Grand Portage Reservation. 9.5.2.2.1 Compliance with Grand Portage Reservation Laws and Regulations. All industrial stormwater discharges authorized by this permit must comply with the Grand Portage Water Quality Standards, Applicable Federal Standards, and the Grand Portage Water Resources Ordinance, as amended, ("Water Resources Ordinance"). 9.5.2.2.2 Additional Monitoring Required by Grand Portage Reservation. The Board must be contacted, at the address in Part 9.5.2.2.10, at the onset of writing the Stormwater Discharges Associated With Industrial Activity 145 Final Permit Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP). Grand Portage may require monitoring of stormwater discharges as determined on a case-by-case basis.If the Board determines that a monitoring plan is necessary, the monitoring plan must be prepared and incorporated in the SWPPP before the Notice of Intent (NOI) is submitted to EPA.9.5.2.2.3 Submission of SWPPP and NOL A copy of the SWPPP and NOI must be submitted to the Board for review and approval at least 30 days before submitting the NOI to EPA.9.5.2.2.4 Submission of NOT. A copy of the Notice of Termination (NOT) must be submitted to the Board at the address in Part 9.5.3.10 at the same time it is submitted to EPA.9.5.2.2.5 Additional Information. If requested by the Grand Portage Environmental Department, the permittee is required to provide additional information necessary for a case-by-case eligibility determination to assure compliance with the Grand Portage Water Quality Standards and any Applicable Federal Standards. 9.5.2.2.6 Submission of Monitoring Data. All analytical data (e.g., Discharge Monitoring Reports, etc.) must be submitted to the Board at the same time it is submitted to EPA.9.5.2.2. 7 Water Quality Standards. Discharges that the Board has determined to be or may reasonably be expected to be contributing to a violation of Grand Portage Water Quality Standards or Applicable Federal Standards are not authorized by this permit. Upon receipt of this determination EPA will notify the permittee to either improve their SWPPP to comply with Grand Portage Water Standards or apply for and obtain an individual NPDES permit for these discharges. 9.5.2.2.8 Appeals. Appeals related to Tribal decisions actions, or enforcement taken pursuant to any of the preceding conditions will be heard by the Grand Portage Tribal Court.9.5.2.2.9 Definitions. The definitions set forth in the Grand Portage Water Resources Ordinance, as amended, govern these certification conditions. 9.5.2.2.10 Where to Submit Information. All required or requested documents shall be sent to the: Grand Portage Environmental Resources Board, P.O. Box 428, Grand Portage, MN 55605.9.5.3 WIR05000I: Indian Country lands within the State of Wisconsin, except those on Sokaogon Chippewa Community lands Stormwater Discharges Associated With Industrial Activity 146 Final Permit No additional requirements. Note: Facilities in the Sokaogon Chippewa Community are not eligible for stormwater discharge coverage under this permit. Contact the EPA Region 5 office for an individual permit application.

9.6 Region

6 9.6.1 LAR05000I: Indian Country Lands within the State of Louisiana No additional requirements. 9.6.2 The State of New Mexico, except Indian Country lands.Permittees in New Mexico must also meet the following conditions: 9.6.2.1 Certification Requirements. Operators are not eligible to obtain authorization under this permit for all new and existing stormwater discharges to outstanding national resource waters (ONRWs) (also referred to as "Tier 3" waters.) As of 2/16/06, the following ONRWs have been designated by the SWQB in New Mexico (see Subsection D of 20.6.4.9 NMAC). (1) Rio Santa Barbara, including the west, middle and east forks from their headwaters downstream to the boundary of the Pecos Wilderness; and (2) the water within the US forest service Valle Vidal special management unit including: (a) Rio Costilla, including Comanche, La Cueva, Fernandez, Chuckwagon, Little Costilla, Holman, Gold, Grassy, LaBelle, and Vidal creeks, from their headwaters downstream to the boundary of the US forest service Valle Vidal special management unit. (b)Middle Ponil creek, including the waters of Greenwood Canyon, from their headwaters downstream to the boundary of the Elliott S. Barker wildlife management area; (c) Shuree lakes; (d) North Ponil creek, including McCrystal and Seally Canyon creeks, from their headwaters downstream to the boundary of the US forest service Valle Vidal special management unit; and (e) Leandro creek from its headwaters downstream to the boundary of the US forest service Valle Vidal.9.6.3 Indian Country lands within the State of New Mexico, except Ute Mountain Reservations Lands (see Region 8) and Navajo Reservation Lands (see Region 9).9.6.3.1 Pueblo of Acoma.The following condition applies only to discharges on the Pueblo of Acoma: 9.6.3.1.1 Submission of NOI and NOT. The Pueblo will require the owner/operator of each facility on or bordering the Pueblo of Acoma to submit copies of its Stormwater Discharges Associated With Industrial Activity 147 Final Permit Notice of Intent (NOI) and Notice of Termination (NOT) to the Haaku Water Office (HWO) Director at the same time it is submitted to EPA.9.6.3.1.2 SWPPP Availability. The HWO may request a copy of the Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) and the permittee is required to submit the SWPPP to the HWO upon such request.9.6.3.1.3 Submission of Monitoring Data. All analytical data shall also be provided to the HWO at the same time it is submitted to EPA.9.6.3.1.4 Where to Submit Information. All required or requested documents shall be sent to: HWO Director, Haaku Water Office, P.O. Box 309, Pueblo of Acoma, NM 87034.9.6.3.2 Pueblo of Isleta.The following conditions apply only to discharges on the Pueblo of Isleta: 9.6.3.2.1 Submission of SWPPP. The Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP)must be submitted to the Pueblo of Isleta prior to submitting the Notice of Intent (NOI) to EPA.9.6.3.2.2 SWPPPModification. Any update or amendment of the SWPPP shall be submitted to the Pueblo of Isleta within 5 calendar days of its finalization. 9.6.3.2.3 Submission of Monitoring Data. All monitoring data and reports shall be submitted to the Pueblo of Isleta at the same time they are submitted to EPA.9.6.3.2.4 Submission of Inspection Reports. All inspection reports, including the Compliance Evaluation Report, shall be submitted to the Pueblo of Isleta within 5 calendar days of their finalization. 9.6.3.2.6 AdditionalReporting. Any spill or leak directly to waters designated by the Pueblo of Isleta as 'Primary Contact Recreation' and/or 'Primary Contact Ceremonial' shall be considered significant if it contains toxic or hazardous pollutants, oil or petroleum products. The Pueblo of Isleta shall be notified of any spill containing toxic or hazardous pollutants and of any spill of oil or petroleum product within 8-hours of spill detection. 9.6.3.2.7 Benchmark Monitoring. Following 4 quarters of benchmark monitoring, if the maximum value of the 4 monitoring values does not exceed the benchmark, you have fulfilled your monitoring requirements for that parameter for the permit term. If any of the 4 monitoring values exceeds the benchmark, quarterly monitoring shall continue until no exceedances of the benchmark are detected in four consecutive quarters. Following this determination, you may reduce monitoring for that pollutant to once per year Stormwater Discharges Associated With Industrial Activity 148 Final Permit for the duration of the permit period unless an exceedance is again detected at which time quarterly sampling will again be required.9.6.3.2.8 Corrective Action. You must take corrective action following any benchmark exceedance if you'determine as a result of reviewing your SWPPP that your SWPPP does not meet the requirements of Part 5 of this permit.9.6.3.2.9 Conditions applicable only to Sector G, Metal Mining. (See Part G.4.2. 1.Inspection Frequency). Inspections must be conducted at least once every 7 calendar days or at least once every 14 calendar days and within 24 hours of the end of a storm event of 0.25 inches or greater. Inspection frequency may be reduced to at least once every month if the entire site is temporarily stabilized, if runoff is unlikely due to winter conditions (e.g., site is covered with snow, ice, or the ground is frozen), or construction is occurring during seasonal arid periods in arid areas and semi-arid areas.9.6.3.2.10 Where to Submit Information. All required or requested documents shall be sent to: Director, Environment Department, Pueblo of Isleta, P.O. Box 1270, Isleta, NM 87022.9.6.3.3 Pueblo of Nambe.The following conditions apply only to discharges on the Pueblo of Nambe: 9.6.3.3.1 Submission of NOI and NOT. Copies of the Notice of Intent (NOI) and Notice of Termination (NOT) shall be submitted to the Pueblo of Nambe at the same time it is submitted to EPA.9.6.3.3.2 SWPPP Availability. A copy of the Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) must also be submitted to the Pueblo of Nambe, if requested, at the same time the NOI is submitted to EPA.9.6.3.3.3 Submission of Reports. All analytical data and a copy of all written reports shall be provided to the Pueblo of Nambe at the same time they are provided to the EPA, if requested by the Pueblo of Nambe.9.6.3.3.4 Where to Submit Information. All required or requested documents shall be sent to: Alan G Hook, Manager, Pueblo of Nambe, Department of Environment and Natural Resources (DENR), Rt. I Box 117-BB, Sante Fe, NM 87506.9.6.3.4 Pueblo of Pojoaque.The following conditions apply only to discharges on the Pueblo of Pojoaque: Stormwater Discharges Associated With Industrial Activity 149 Final Permit 9.6.3.4.1 Submission of NOI and NOT. Copies of the Notice of Intent (NOI) and Notice of Termination (NOT) shall be provided at the same time it is provided to EPA.9.6.3.4.2 SWPPP Availability. The Pueblo may request a copy of the Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) and the permittee is required to submit the SWPPP to the Pueblo upon such request.9.6.3.4.3 Submission of Monitoring Data. All analytical data (e.g., Discharge Monitoring Reports, etc) shall be submitted to the Pueblo at the same time it is submitted to EPA.9.6.3.4.4 Where to Submit Information. All required or requested documents shall be sent to: Luke Mario Duran, Director, Environment Department, 5 West Gutierrez, Suite 2B, Sante Fe, NM 87506.9.6.3.5 Ohkay Owingeh -(formerly known as San Juan Pueblo).The following condition applies only to discharges on Ohkay Owingeh (formerly known as San Juan Pueblo): 9.6.3.5.1 Submission of NOI and NOT. Copies of the Notice of Intent (NOI) and Notice of Termination (NOT) shall be submitted to Ohkay Owingeh at the same time it is submitted to EPA.9.6.3.5.2 Submission of Monitoring Data and Additional Reporting. Copies of monitoring data or other documents required under the permit must also be submitted to Ohkay Owingeh upon request.9.6.3.5.3 Where to Submit Information. All required or requested documents shall be sent to the: Ohkay Owingeh, Office of Environmental Affairs, P.O. Box 1099, San Juan Pueblo, NM 87566.9.6.3.6 Pueblo of Sandia.The following conditions apply only to discharges on the Pueblo of Sandia: 9.6.3.6.1 Submission of NOI. A copy of the Notice of Intent (NOI) must be submitted to the Environment Director at the same time it is submitted to EPA.9.6.3.6.2 Submission of NOT. A copy of the Notice of Termination (NOT) must be submitted to the Environment Director at the same time it is submitted to EPA. The Pueblo of Sandia must verify termination of activities prior to EPA's termination of the permit.Stormwater Discharges Associated With Industrial Activity]so Final Permit 9.6.3.6.3 SWPPP Availability. The Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP)must be made available to Pueblo of Sandia Environment Department personnel upon request.9.6.3.6.4 Submission of Monitoring Data. All analytical data (e.g., Discharge Monitoring Reports, follow-up monitoring reports, Exceedance reports, etc)shall be submitted to the Environment Director at the same time it is submitted to EPA.9.6.3.6.5 Submission of Quarterly Visual Assessments. Copies of all "Quarterly Visual Assessments" (Part 4.2) must be submitted to the Environment Director within 7 days of completion. 9.6.3.6.6 Submission of Comprehensive Site Inspection Reports. Copies of all"Comprehensive Site Inspection Reports" (Part 4.3) must be submitted to the Environment Director within 10 days of completion. 9.6.3.6.7 Additional Reporting. Any notice of release of oils or hazardous substances shall be provided to the Environment Director within twenty-four (24) hours of becoming aware of the circumstance, followed by the reporting requirements of 40 CFR 110, 40 CFR 302, and 40 CFR 302 relating to spills or other releases of oil or hazardous substances. The permittee must also telephone the Pueblo of Sandia Environment Department at (505) 867-4533 of any spills or unauthorized discharges that may affect drinking water supplies, ceremonial and recreational surface waters, elicit fish kills, harm wildlife or endangered species or endanger human health or the environment within ten (10) hours of becoming aware of the circumstance, followed by the written report when it is sent to the EPA.9.6.3.6.8 Water Quality Standards. If requested by the Pueblo of Sandia Environment Department, the permittee shall provide additional information necessary for a"case by case" eligibility determination to assure compliance with Pueblo of Sandia Water Quality Standards. Note: Upon receipt of a determination by the Pueblo of Sandia that discharges from a perimittee have reasonable potential to be causing or contributing to a violation of Pueblo of Sandia Water Quality Standards, EPA Region 6 would be notified. EPA Region 6 would then notify the permittee to either improve their Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) to achieve compliance with the Pueblo of Sandia Water Quality Standards or apply for and obtain an individual NPDES permit for these discharges per CFR 122.28(b)(3). 9.6.3.6.9 Authorization to Inspect. If requested by the Pueblo of Sandia Environment Department the permittee must allow the Pueblo to perform its own routine or compliance inspection to ensure the permittee is in compliance and any Stormwater Discharges Associated With Industrial Activity 151 Final Permit discharge is not contributing to a violation of the Pueblo of Sandia's Water Quality Standard.9.6.3.6.10 Alternative Permit. Any industry discharging to waters of the United States that has been designated by the EPA as an impaired water shall not be covered under the Multi-Sector General Permit but will be required to obtain an individual permit.9.6.3.6.11 Where to Submit Information. All required or requested documents shall be sent to: Environment Director, Pueblo of Sandia Environment Department at 481 Sandia Loop, Bernalillo, New Mexico 87004 9.6.3.7 Pueblo of Santa Clara.The following condition applies only to discharges on the Santa Clara Indian Pueblo: 9.6.3. 7.1 Submission of NOI and NOT. The Notice of Intent (NOI) and Notice of Termination (NOT) must be submitted to the Santa Clara Pueblo Governor's Office at the same time it is submitted to EPA 9.6.3.7.2 SWPPP Availability. A copy of the Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan must be made available to the Pueblo of Santa Clara staff upon request.9.6.3.7.3 Where to Submit Information. All required or requested documents shall be sent to the: Santa Clara Pueblo, Governor's Office, P.O. Box 580, Espanola, NM 87532.9.6.3.8 Pueblo of Taos The following conditions apply only to discharges on the Pueblo of Taos: 9.6.3.8.1 Submission of NOI and NOT. Copies of the Notice of Intent (NOI) and Notice of Termination (NOT) shall be provided at the same time it is provided to EPA.9.6.3.8.2 Submission of SWPPP. Upon request by the Pueblo, a copy of the Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan must be provided to the Taos Pueblo Environmental Officer.9.6.3.8.3 Submission of Data and Reports. All analytical data and a copy of all written reports shall be provided to the Pueblo at the same time it is provided to the EPA.Stormwater Discharges Associated With Industrial Activity 152 Stormwater Discharges Associated With Industrial Activity 152 Final Permit 9.6.3.8.4 Where to Submit Information. All requested materials shall be sent to Program Manager, Taos Pueblo Environmental Office Program Manager, P.O.Box 1846, Taos, NM, 97571.9.6.3.9 Pueblo of Tesuque.The following conditions apply only to discharges on the Pueblo of Tesuque: 9.6.3.9.1 Submission of NOI and NOT. Copies of the Notice of Intent (NOI) and Notice of Termination (NOT) shall be provided at the same time it is provided to EPA.9.6.3.9.2 Submission of SWPPP. A copy of the Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan must also be made available to the Pueblo of Tesuque at the time the NOI submitted. 9.6.3.9.3 Submission of Monitoring Data. All analytical data (e.g., Discharge Monitoring Reports, etc) shall be provided to the Pueblo at the same time it is provided to the EPA.9.6.3.9.4 Where to Submit Information. All required or requested documents shall be sent to: Jennifer Montoya, Director, Pueblo of Tesuque Environment Department, Rt. 42 Box 360-T, Santa Fe, NM 87506.9.6.4 OKRO50001: Indian Country lands within the State of Oklahoma 9.6.4.1 Certification Requirements. In order to protect downstream waters subject to the state of Oklahoma's Water Quality Standards (OAC 785:45-5-25) coverage under this permit is not available for any new or proposed discharges located within the watershed of any part of the Oklahoma Scenic Rivers system, including the Illinois River, Flint Creek, Barren Fork Creek, Upper Mountain Fork Creek, Little Lee Creek, and Big Lee Creek or to any water designated as an Outstanding Resource Water (ORW). Existing discharges of stormwater in these watersheds may be permitted under this permit only from point sources existing as of June 25, 1992, whether or not such stormwater discharges were permitted as point sources prior to June 25, 1992. For any such existing discharge, increased load of any pollutant above levels of June 25, 1992 is prohibited. Any new or proposed discharges not eligible for permit coverage under this paragraph must apply for an individual permit.9.6.4.2 Pawnee Nation of Oklahoma The following conditions apply only to discharges on the Pawnee Nation of Oklahoma: Stormwater Discharges Associated With Industrial Activity 153 Stormwater Discharges Associated With Industrial Activity 153 Final Permit 9.6.4.2.1 Submission of NOI and NOT. Copies of the Notice of Intent (NO1) and Notice of Termination (NOT) shall be provided at the same time it is provided to EPA.9.6.4.2.2 Submission of SWPPP. Copies of the Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan must be provided to the Director of the Pawnee Nation Department of Environmental Conservation and Safety (DECS) no later than the same time as submitted to EPA.9.6.4.2.3 Submission of Data and Reports. All analytical data and a copy of all written reports shall be provided to DECS no later than the same time it is submitted to the EPA.9.6.4.2.4 Spills or Leaks. All spills or leaks of any size or amount occurring upon the Pawnee Nation shall be reported to DECS and the Bureau of Indian Affairs -Pawnee Agency, Bureau of Land Management-Moore Office, Oklahoma City, immediately upon detection as required under Title X, Article 6, section 611 (Pawnee Nation Oil Pollution Control Act -Emergency Response/Notification) of the Pawnee Nation Law and Order Code.9.6.4.2.5 Discharges from Secondary Containment. Discharge of stormwater from secondary containment is prohibited and shall not be authorized as cited in Title X, Article 6, Section 604(B) (Pawnee National Oil Pollution Control Act-Secondary Containment). 9.6.4.2.6 Where to Submit Information. All required or requested documents shall be sent to: Director of the Pawnee Nation Department of Environmental Conservation and Safety (DECS), P.O. Box 470, Pawnee, OK 74058.9.6.5 OKRO5000F: Facilities in the State of Oklahoma not under the jurisdiction of the Oklahoma Department of Environmental Quality, except those on Indian Country lands.9.6.5.1 Certification Requirements. In accordance with Oklahoma's Water Quality Standards (OAC 785:45-5-25) coverage under this permit is not available for any new or proposed discharges located within the watershed or any part of the Oklahoma Scenic Rivers system, including Illinois River, Flint Creek, Barren Fork Creek, Upper Mountain Fork River, Little Lee Creek, and Big Lee Creek or to any water designated as an Outstanding Resource Water (ORW). Existing discharges of stormwater in these watersheds may be permitted under this permit only from point sources existing as of June 25, 1992, whether or not such stornwater discharges were permitted as point sources prior to June 25, 1992.For any such existing discharge, increased load of any pollutant above levels of June 25, 1992 is prohibited. Any new or proposed discharges not eligible for permit coverage under this paragraph must apply for an individual permit.Stormwater Discharges Associated With Industrial Activity 154 Stormwater Discharges Associated With Industrial Activity 154 Final Permit 9.6.6 TXR05000F: Facilities in the State of Texas not under the jurisdiction of the Texas Commission on Environmental Quality, except those on Indian Country lands.No additional requirements.

9.6.7 TXR05000I

Indian Country lands within the State of Texas.No additional requirements.

9.7 Region

7 Permit coverage not available 9.8 Region 8 Permit coverage not available 9.9 Region 9 9.9.1 ASR050000: The islands of American Samoa The following condition applies only to discharges on the American Samoa: 9.9.1.1 Submission of NOI. All Notices of Intent (NOIs) for stormwater discharges covered under the general permits in American Samoa shall be submitted to the American Samoa Environmental Protection Agency at the same time it is submitted to EPA.9.9.1.2 Submission of SWPPPs. All SWPPPs for stormwater discharges in American Samoa shall be submitted to the American Samoa Environmental Protection Agency for review and approval.9.9.2 AZR05000I: Indian Country lands within the State of Arizona, including Navajo Reservation lands in New Mexico and Utah.9.9.2.1 Hualapai Tribe (Arizona)The following condition applies only to discharges on the Hualapai Tribe: 9.9.2.1.1 Submission of NOI and SWPPP. All Notices of Intent (NOIs) and Stormwater Pollution Plans (SWPPPs) for stormwater discharges on Hualapai Tribal lands shall be submitted to the Water Resource Program through the Tribal Chairman for review and approval Stormwater Discharges Associated With Industrial Activity 155 Final Permit 9.9.2.1.2 Where to Submit Information. All required or requested documents shall be sent to: Water Resource Program through the Tribal Chairman, P.O. Box 179, Peach Springs, AZ 86434.9.9.2.2 Navajo Nation (Arizona). The following conditions apply only to discharges on the Navajo Nation: 9.9.2.2.1 Submission of NOL Notices of Intent (NOI) must be submitted to Navajo EPA for review, comment and tracking.9.9.2.2.2 Submission of SWPPP. Copies of Stormwater Water Pollution Plans (SWPPPs) and supporting Best Management Practices (BMPs) must be submitted to Navajo EPA for review and concurrence. 9.9.2.2.3 Submission of Monitoring Data. Copies of all monitoring reports must be provided to Navajo EPA.9.9.2.3 White Mountain Apache Tribe (Arizona). The following condition applies only to discharges on the White Mountain Apache Tribe: 9.9.2.3.1 Submission of NOI. All Notices of Intent for proposed stormwater discharges under the MSGP must be submitted to the Tribal Environmental Office.9.9.2.3.2 Where to Submit Information. All required or requested documents shall be sent to the: Tribal Environmental Office, Attention: Doreen E. Gatewood, P.O. Box 1000, Whiteriver, AZ 85941.9.9.3 CAR05000I: Indian Country lands within the State of California. 9.9.3.1 Big Pine Paiute Tribe of the Owens Valley (California). The following condition applies only to discharges on the Big Pine Paiute Tribe of the Owens Valley: 9.9.3.1.1 Submission of NOL Copies of Notices of Intent (NOIs) shall be submitted to the Tribe at the same time (or prior to) it is submitted to EPA.9.9.3.2 Bishop Paiute Tribe (California). The following condition applies only to discharges on the Bishop Paiute Tribe: Stormwater Discharges Associated With Industrial Activity 156 Final Permit 9.9.3.2.1 Submission of NOL Copies of Notices of Intent (NOIs) for proposed stormwater discharges must be submitted to the Tribe's Environmental Management Office for review and comment by the Tribal Environmental Protection Agency (TEPA) Board.9.9.3.3 Hoopa Valley Tribe (California). The following conditions apply only to discharges on the Hoopa Valley Tribe: 9.9.3.3.1 Submission of NOL All Notices of Intent (NOI) submitted for stormwater discharges under the general permits in Hoopa Valley Indian Reservation (HVIR) shall be submitted to the Tribal Environmental Protection Agency (TEPA).9.9.3.3.2 Submission of SWPPP. All Stormwater Pollution Plans (SWPPPs) for stormwater discharges in HVIR shall be submitted to TEPA for review and approval.9.9.3.4 Twenty-Nine Palms Band of Mission Indians (California) The following conditions apply only to discharges on the Twenty-Nine Palms Band of Mission Indians: 9.9.3.4.1 Submission of NOL Notices of Intent (NOI) must be submitted to the 29 Palms Tribal EPA for review, comment, and tracking.9.9.3.4.2 Submission of SWPPP. Copies of Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plans (SWPPPs) and supporting best management practices (BMPs) must be submitted to the 29 Palms Tribal EPA for review and compliance. 9.9.3.4.3 Submission of Monitoring Data. Copies of all monitoring reports must be provided to the 29 Palms Tribal EPA.9.9.4 GUR050000: The Island of Guam.No additional requirements.

9.9.5 JAR050000

Johnston Atoll.No additional requirements.

9.9.6 MWR050000

Midway Island and Wake Island.No additional requirements.

9.9.7 Commonwealth

of the Northern Mariana Islands Stormwater Discharges Associated With Industrial Activity 157 Final Permit The following conditions apply only to discharges on the Commonwealth of the Northern Mariana Islands (CNMI): 9.9.7.1 Submission of NOI. Pursuant to Part 10.3(h)(5) of the Standards, every Notice of Intent (NOI) submitted to EPA for activities in the CNMI that are to be covered under this permit must be postmarked no less than seven (7) calendar days prior to any stormwater discharges and a copy must be submitted to the Director of Division of Environmental Quality (DEQ) no later than seven (7) calendar days prior to any stormwater discharges. 9.9.7.2 Submission of SWPPP. Pursuant to Part 10.3(h)(3) of the Standards, for any activity subject to the permit in the CNMI, a Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) for stormwater discharges associated with industrial activities must be submitted to DEQ and approved by the Director of DEQ prior to submission of the NOI to EPA.9.9.7.3 Submission of SWPPP Approval Letter. Pursuant to Part 10.3(h)(4) of the Standards, every NO[ submitted to EPA for activities in the CNMI that are to be covered under this permit must be accompanied by a SWPPP approval letter from DEQ.9.9.7.4 Submission of Monitoring Data. Pursuant to Part 10.3(h)(6) of the Standards, permittees covered under this permit must submit copies of all monitoring reports to DEQ.9.9.7.5 Certification. Pursuant to Section 10.6 of the Standards, this certification shall be subject to amendment or modification if and to the extent that existing water quality standards are made more stringent, or new water quality standards are adopted, by DEQ.This certification does not relieve the applicant from obtaining other applicable local or federal permits.9.9.8 NVR05000I: Indian Country lands within the State of Nevada, including the Duck Valley Reservation in Idaho, the Fort McDermitt Reservation in Oregon and the Confederated Tribes of the Goshute Reservation in Utah 9.9.8.1 Pyramid Lake Paiute Tribe (Nevada)The following conditions apply only to discharges on the Pyramid Lake Paiute Tribe: 9.9.8.1.1 Submission of NOI. Notice of Intents (NOI) must be submitted to the Tribe for review, comments, and tracking.Stormwater Discharges Associated With Industrial Activity 158 Final Permit 9.9.8.1.2 Submission of SWPPP. Copies of Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plans (SWPPPs) and supporting best management practices (BMPs) must be submitted to the Pyramid Lake Paiute Tribe for review and concurrence. 9.9.8.1.3 Submission of Monitoring Data. Copies of all monitoring reports must be submitted to the Pyramid Lake Paiute Tribe.9.10 Region 10 9.10.1 AKR050000: The State of Alaska, except Indian Country lands.[Reserved for additional requirements to be included upon permit issuance.] 9.10.2 AKR05000I: Indian Country lands within Alaska No additional requirements. 9.10.3 IDR050000: The State of Idaho, except Indian Country lands[Reserved for additional requirements to be included upon permit issuance.] 9.10.4 IDR050001: Indian Country lands within the State of Idaho, except Duck Valley Reservation lands, which are covered under Nevada permit NVR050001 listed in Part C.9[Reserved for additional requirements to be included upon permit issuance.] 9.10.5 0RR050001: Indian Country lands within the State of Oregon, except Fort McDermitt Reservation lands, which are covered under Nevada permit NVR050001 listed in Part C.9[Reserved for additional requirements to be included upon permit issuance.] 9.10.6 WAR050001: Indian Country lands within the State of Washington [Reserved for additional requirements to be included upon permit issuance.] 9.10.7 WAR05000F: Federal Facilities in the State of Washington, except those located on Indian Country lands[Reserved for additional requirements to be included upon permit issuance.] Stormwater Discharges Associated With Industrial Activity 159 General Permit Appendix A Definitions, Abbreviations and Acronyms Stormwater Discharges Associated With Industrial Activity -Appendix A A-1 General Permit Appendix A. Definitions, Abbreviations, and Acronyms (for the purposes of this permit).Action Area -all areas to be affected directly or indirectly by the stormwater discharges, allowable non-stormwater discharges, and stormwater discharge-related activities, and not merely the immediate area involved in these discharges and activities. Arid Climate -areas where annual rainfall averages from 0 to 10 inches.Best Management Practices (BMPs) -schedules of activities, practices (and prohibitions of practices), structures, vegetation, maintenance procedures, and other management practices to prevent or reduce the discharge of pollutants to waters of the United States. BMPs also include treatment requirements, operating procedures, and practices to control plant site runoff, spillage or leaks, sludge or waste disposal, or drainage from raw material storage. See 40 CFR 122.2.Co-located Industrial Activities -Any industrial activities, excluding your primary industrial activity(ies), located on-site that are defined by the stormwater regulations at 122.26(b)(14)(i)-(ix) and (xi). An activity at a facility is not considered co-located if the activity, when considered separately, does not meet the description of a category of industrial activity covered by the stormwater regulations or identified by the SIC code list in Appendix D.Control Measure -refers to any BMP or other method (including effluent limitations) used to prevent or reduce the discharge of pollutants to waters of the United States.Director -a Regional Administrator of the Environmental Protection Agency or an authorized representative. See 40 CFR 122.2.Discharge -when used without qualification, means the "discharge of a pollutant." See 40 CFR 122.2.Discharge of a pollutant -any addition of any "pollutant" or combination of pollutants to"waters of the United States" from any "point source," or any addition of any pollutant or combination of pollutants to the waters of the "contiguous zone" or the ocean from any point source other than a vessel or other floating craft which is being used as a means of transportation. This includes additions of pollutants into waters of the United States from: surface runoff which is collected or channeled by man; discharges through pipes, sewers, or other conveyances, leading into privately owned treatment works. See 40 CFR 122.2.Discharge-related activities -activities that cause, contribute to, or result in stormwater and allowable non-stormwater point source discharges, and measures such as the siting, construction and operation of BMPs to control, reduce, or prevent pollution in the discharges. Drought-stricken area -a period of below average water content in streams, reservoirs, ground-water aquifers, lakes and soils.Stormwater Discharges Associated With Industrial Activity -Appendix A A-2 General Permit EPA Approved or Established Total Maximum Daily Loads (TMDLs) -"EPA Approved TMDLs" are those that are developed by a State and approved by EPA. "EPA Established TMIDLs" are those that are developed by EPA.Existing Discharger -an operator applying for coverage under this permit for discharges authorized previously under an NPDES general or individual permit.Facility or Activity -any NPDES "point source" (including land or appurtenances thereto) that is subject to regulation under the NPDES program. See 40 CFR 122.2.Federal Facility -any buildings, installations, structures, land, public works, equipment, aircraft, vessels, and other vehicles and property, owned by, or constructed or manufactured for the purpose of leasing to, the federal government. Impaired Water (or "Water Quality Impaired Water" or "Water Quality Limited Segment") -A water is impaired for purposes of this permit if it has been identified by a State or EPA pursuant to Section 303(d) of the Clean Water Act as not meeting applicable State water quality standards (these waters are called "water quality limited segments" under 40 CFR 30.20)). Impaired waters include both waters with approved or established TMDLs, and those for which a TMDL has not yet been approved or established. Indian Country -(a) all land within the limits of any Indian reservation under the jurisdiction of the United States Government, notwithstanding the issuance of any patent, and including rights-of-way running through the reservation; (b) all dependent Indian communities within the borders of the United States, whether within the original or subsequently acquired territory thereof, and whether within or without the limits of a State, and (c) all Indian allotments, the Indian titles to which have not been extinguished, including rights-of-way running through the same. This definition includes all land held in trust for an Indian tribe. (18 U.S.C. 1151)Industrial Activity -the 10 categories of industrial activities included in the definition of"stormwater discharges associated with industrial activity" as defined in 40 CFR 122.26(b)(14)(i)-(ix) and (xi).Industrial Stormwater -stormwater runoff from industrial activity.Municipal Separate Storm Sewer -a conveyance or system of conveyances (including roads with drainage systems, municipal streets, catch basins, curbs, gutters, ditches, man-made channels, or storm drains): (i) Owned or operated by a State, city, town, borough, county, parish, district, association, or other public body (created by or pursuant to State law) having jurisdiction over disposal of sewage, industrial wastes, stormwater, or other wastes, including special districts under State law such as a sewer district, flood control district or drainage district, or similar entity, or an Indian tribe or an authorized Indian tribal organization, or a designated and approved management agency under section 208 of the CWA that discharges to waters of the United States;Stormwater Discharges Associated With Industrial Activity -Appendix A A-3 General Permit (ii) Designed or used for collecting or conveying stormwater;(iii) Which is not a combined sewer; and (iv) Which is not part of a Publicly Owned Treatment Works (POTW) as defined at 40 CFR 122.2. See 40 CFR 122.26(b)(4) and (b)(7).New Discharger -a facility from which there is a discharge, that did not commence the discharge at a particular site prior to August 13, 1979, which is not a new source, and which has never received a finally effective NPDES permit for discharges at that site. See 40 CFR 122.2.New Source -any building, structure, facility, or installation from which there is or may be a"discharge of pollutants," the construction of which commenced: a after promulgation of standards of performance under section 306 of the CWA which are applicable to such source, or a after proposal of standards of performance in accordance with section 306 of the CWA which are applicable to such source, but only if the standards are promulgated in accordance with section 306 within 120 days of their proposal.See 40 CFR 122.2.New Source Performance Standards (NSPS) -technology-based standards for facilities that qualify as new sources under 40 CFR 122.2 and 40 CFR 122.29.No exposure -all industrial materials or activities are protected by a storm-resistant shelter to prevent exposure to rain, snow, snowmelt, and/or runoff. See 40 CFR 122.26(g). Operator -any entity with a stormwater discharge associated with industrial activity that meets either of the following two criteria: (i) The entity has operational control over industrial activities, including the ability to modify those activities; or (ii) The entity has day-to-day operational control of activities at a facility necessary to ensure compliance with the permit (e.g., the entity is authorized to direct workers at a facility to carry out activities required by the permit).Person -an individual, association, partnership, corporation, municipality, State or Federal agency, or an agent or employee thereof. See 40 CFR 122.2.Point source -any discernible, confined, and discrete conveyance, including but not limited to any pipe, ditch, channel, tunnel, conduit, well, discrete fissure, container, rolling stock, concentrated animal feeding operation, landfill leachate collection system, vessel, or other floating craft from which pollutants are or may be discharged. This term does not include return flows from irrigated agriculture or agricultural stormwater runoff. See 40 CFR 122.2.Stormwater Discharges Associated With Industrial Activity -Appendix A A-4 General Permit Pollutant -dredged spoil, solid waste, incinerator residue, filter backwash, sewage, garbage, sewage sludge, munitions, chemical wastes, biological materials, heat, wrecked or discarded equipment, rock, sand, cellar dirt, and industrial, municipal and agricultural waste discharged into water. See 40 CFR 122.2.Pollutant of concern -A pollutant which causes or contributes to a violation of a water quality standard, including a pollutant which is identified as causing an impairment in a state's 303(d)list.Primary industrial activity -includes any activities performed on-site which are (1) identified by the facility's primary SIC code; or (2) included in the narrative descriptions of 122.26(b)(14)(i), (iv), (v), or (vii), and (ix). [For co-located activities covered by multiple SIC codes, it is recommended that the primary industrial determination be based on the value of receipts or revenues or, if such information is not available for a particular facility, the number of employees or production rate for each process may be compared. The operation that generates the most revenue or employs the most personnel is the operation in which the facility is primarily engaged. In situations where the vast majority of on-site activity falls within one SIC code, that activity may be the primary industrial activity.] Narrative descriptions in 40 CFR 122.26(b)(14) identified above include: (i) activities subject to stormwater effluent limitations guidelines, new source performance standards, or toxic pollutant effluent standards; (iv) hazardous waste treatment storage, or disposal facilities including those that are operating under interim status or a permit under subtitle C of the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA); (v) landfills, land application sites and open dumps that receive or have received industrial wastes; (vii) steam electric power generating facilities; and (ix) sewage treatment works with a design flow of 1.0 mgd or more.Qualified Personnel -Qualified personnel are those who possess the knowledge and skills to assess conditions and activities that could impact stormwater quality at your facility, and who can also evaluate the effectiveness of control measures.Reportable Quantity Release -a release of a hazardous substance at or above the established legal threshold that requires emergency notification. Refer to 40 CFR Parts 110, 117, and 302 for complete definitions and reportable quantities for which notification is required.Runoff coefficient -the fraction of total rainfall that will appear at the conveyance as runoff.See 40 CFR 122.26(b)(1 1).Semi-Arid Climate -areas where annual rainfall averages from 10 to 20 inches.Significant materials -includes, but is not limited to: raw materials; fuels; materials such as solvents, detergents, and plastic pellets; finished materials such as metallic products; raw materials used in food processing or production; hazardous substances designated under section 101 (14) of CERCLA; any chemical the facility is required to report pursuant to section 313 of Title III of SARA; fertilizers; pesticides; and waste products such as ashes, slag and sludge that have the potential to be released with stormwater discharges. See 40 CFR 122.26(b)(12). Stormwater Discharges Associated With Industrial Activity -Appendix A A-5 General Permit Special Aquatic Sites -sites identified in 40 CFR 230 Subpart E. These are geographic areas, large or small, possessing special ecological characteristics of productivity, habitat, wildlife protection, or other important and easily disrupted ecological values. These areas are generally recognized as significantly influencing or positively contributing to the general overall environmental health or vitality of the entire ecosystem of a region.Stormwater -stormwater runoff, snow melt runoff, and surface runoff and drainage. See 40 CFR 122.26(b)(13). Stormwater Discharges Associated with Construction Activity -a discharge of pollutants in stormwater runoff from areas where soil disturbing activities (e.g., clearing, grading, or excavating), construction materials, or equipment storage or maintenance (e.g., fill piles, borrow areas, concrete truck washout, fueling), or other industrial stormwater directly related to the construction process (e.g., concrete or asphalt batch plants) are located. See 40 CFR 122.26(b)(14)(x) and 40 CFR 122.26(b)(15). Stormwater Discharges Associated with Industrial Activity -the discharge from any conveyance that is used for collecting and conveying stormwater and that is directly related to manufacturing, processing or raw materials storage areas at an industrial plant. The term does not include discharges from facilities or activities excluded from the NPDES program under Part 122. For the categories of industries identified in this section, the term includes, but is not limited to, stormwater discharges from industrial plant yards; immediate access roads and rail lines used or traveled by carriers of raw materials, manufactured products, waste material, or by-products used or created by the facility; material handling sites; refuse sites; sites used for the application or disposal of process waste waters (as defined at part 401 of this chapter); sites used for the storage and maintenance of material handling equipment; sites used for residual treatment, storage, or disposal; shipping and receiving areas; manufacturing buildings; storage areas (including tank farms) for raw materials, and intermediate and final products; and areas where industrial activity has taken place in the past and significant materials remain and are exposed to stormwater. For the purposes of this paragraph, material handling activities include storage, loading and unloading, transportation, or conveyance of any raw material, intermediate product, final product, by-product or waste product. The term excludes areas located on plant lands separate from the plant's industrial activities, such as office buildings and accompanying parking lots as long as the drainage from the excluded areas is not mixed with stormwater drained from the above described areas. Industrial facilities include those that are federally, State, or municipally owned or operated that meet the description of the facilities listed in 40 CFR 122.26(b)(14). The term also includes those facilities designated under the provisions of 40 CFR 122.26(a)(1)(v). See 40 CFR 122.26(b)(14). Tier 2 Waters -For antidegradation purposes, pursuant to 40 CFR 131.12(a)(2), Tier 2 waters are characterized as having water quality that exceeds the levels necessary to support propagation of fish, shellfish, and wildlife and recreation in and on the water.Tier 2.5 Waters -For antidegradation purposes, Tier 2.5 waters are those waters designated by States or Tribes as neither Tier 2 nor Tier 3. States have special requirements for these waters.Stormwater Discharges Associated With Industrial Activity -Appendix A A-6 General Permit These waters are given a level of protection equal to and above that given to Tier 2 waters, but less than that given Tier 3 waters.Tier 3 Waters -For antidegradation purposes, pursuant to 40 CFR 131.12(a)(3), Tier 3 waters are identified by states as having high quality waters constituting an Outstanding Natural Resource Water (ONRW), such as waters of National Parks and State Parks, wildlife refuges, and waters of exceptional recreational or ecological significance. Total Maximum Daily Loads (TMDLs) -A TMDL is a calculation of the maximum amount of a pollutant that a waterbody can receive and still meet water quality standards, and an allocation of that amount to the pollutant's sources. A TMDL includes wasteload allocations (WLAs) for point source discharges; load allocations (LAs) for nonpoint sources and/or natural background, and must include a margin of safety (MOS) and account for seasonal variations.(See section 303(d) of the Clean Water Act and 40 CFR 130.2 and 130.7).Water Quality Impaired -See 'Impaired Water'.Water Quality Standards -A water quality standard defines the water quality goals of a water body, or portion thereof, by designating the use or uses to be made of the water and by setting criteria necessary to protect the uses. States and EPA adopt water quality standards to protect public health or welfare, enhance the quality of water and serve the purposes of the Clean Water Act (See CWA sections 101(a)2 and 303(c)). Water quality standards also include an antidegradation policy. See P.U.D. o. I of Jefferson County et al v. Wash Dept of Ecology et al, 511 US 701, 705 (1994)."You" and "Your" -as used in this permit are intended to refer to the permittee, the operator, or the discharger as the context indicates and that party's facility or responsibilities. The use of"you" and "your" refers to a particular facility and not to all facilities operated by a particular entity. For example, "you must submit" means the permittee must submit something for that particular facility. Likewise, "all your discharges" would refer only to discharges at that one facility.A.2. ABBREVIATIONS AND ACRONYMS BAT -Best Available Technology Economically Achievable BOD5 -Biochemical Oxygen Demand (5-day test)BMP -Best Management Practice BPJ -Best Professional Judgment BPT -Best Practicable Control Technology Currently Available CERCLA -Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liability Act Stormwater Discharges Associated With Industrial Activity -Appendix A A-7 General Permit CGP -Construction General Permit COD -Chemical Oxygen Demand CWA -Clean Water Act (or the Federal Water Pollution Control Act, 33 U.S.C. § 1251 et seq)CWT -Centralized Waste Treatment DMR -Discharge Monitoring Report EPA -U. S.:Environmental Protection Agency ESA -Endangered Species Act FWS -U. S. Fish and Wildlife Service LA -Load Allocations MDMR -MSGP Discharge Monitoring Report MGD -Million Gallons per Day MOS -Margin of Safety MS4 -Municipal Separate Storm Sewer System MSDS -Material Safety Data Sheet MSGP -Multi-Sector General Permit NAICS -North American Industry Classification System NEPA -National Environmental Policy Act NHPA -National Historic Preservation Act NMFS -U. S. National Marine Fisheries Service NOI -Notice of Intent NOT -Notice of Termination NPDES -National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System NRC -National Response Center Stormwater Discharges Associated With Industrial Activity -Appendix A A-8 General Permit NRHP -National Register of Historic Places NSPS -New Source Performance Standard NTU -Nephelometric Turbidity Unit OMB -U. S. Office of Management and Budget ORW -Outstanding Resource Water OSM -U. S. Office of Surface Mining POTW -Publicly Owned Treatment Works RCRA -Resource Conservation and Recovery Act RQ -Reportable Quantity SARA -Superfund Amendments and Reauthorization Act SHPO -State Historic Preservation Officer SIC -Standard Industrial Classification SMCRA -Surface Mining Control and Reclamation Act SPCC -Spill Prevention, Control, and Countermeasures SWPPP -Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan TH-PO -Tribal Historic Preservation Officer TMDL -Total Maximum Daily Load TSDF -Treatment, Storage, or Disposal Facility TSS -Total Suspended Solids USGS -United States Geological Survey WLA -Wasteload Allocation WQS -Water Quality Standard Stormwater Discharges Associated With Industrial Activity -Appendix A A-9 General Permit Appendix B Standard Permit Conditions Stormwater Discharges Associated With Industrial Activity -Appendix B B-1 General Permit Appendix B. Standard Permit Conditions. Standard permit conditions in Appendix B are consistent with the general permit provisions required under 40 CFR 122.41.B.1 Duty To Comply.You must comply with all conditions of this permit. Any permit noncompliance constitutes a violation of the Clean Water Act and is grounds for enforcement action; for permit termination, revocation and reissuance, or modification; or for denial of a permit renewal application. A. You must comply with effluent standards or prohibitions established under section 307(a)of the Clean Water Act for toxic pollutants within the time provided in the regulations that establish these standards, even if the permit has not yet been modified to incorporate the requirement. B. Penalties for Violations of Permit Conditions: The Director will adjust the civil and administrative penalties listed below in accordance with the Civil Monetary Penalty Inflation Adjustment Rule (61 FR 252, December 31, 1996, pp. 69359-69366, as corrected in 62 FR 54, March 20, 1997, pp.1 3 5 14-13517) as mandated by the Debt Collection Improvement Act of 1996 for inflation on a periodic basis. This rule allows EPA's penalties to keep pace with inflation. The Agency is required to review its penalties at least once every 4 years thereafter and to adjust them as necessary for inflation according to a specified formula. The civil and administrative penalties following were adjusted for inflation starting in 1996.1. Criminal Penalties.

1.1 Negligent

Violations. The CWA provides that any person who negligently violates permit conditions implementing Sections 301, 302, 306, 307, 308, 318, or 405 of the Act is subject to criminal penalties of not less than $2,500 nor more than $25,000 per day of violation, or imprisonment of not more than one year, or both. In the case of a second or subsequent conviction for a negligent violation, a person shall be subject to criminal penalties of not more than $50,000 per day of violation or by imprisonment of not more than two years, or both.1.2. Knowing Violations. The CWA provides that any person who knowingly violates permit conditions implementing Sections 301, 302, 306, 307, 308, 318, or 405 of the Act is subject to a fine of not less than $5,000 nor more than $50,000 per day of violation, or by imprisonment for not more than 3 years, or both. In the case of a second or subsequent conviction for a knowing violation, a person shall be subject to criminal penalties of not more than $100,000 per day of violation, or imprisonment of not more than 6 years, or both.Stormwater Discharges Associated With Industrial Activity -Appendix B B-2 General Permit 1.3. Knowing Endangerment. The CWA provides that any person who knowingly violates permit conditions implementing Sections 301, 302, 306, 307, 308, 318, or 405 of the Act and who knows at that time that he or she is placing another person in imminent danger of death or serious bodily injury shall upon conviction be subject to a fine of not more than $250,000 or by imprisonment of not more than 15 years, or both. In the case of a second or subsequent conviction for a knowing endangerment violation, a person shall be subject to a fine of not more than $500,000 or by imprisonment of not more than 30 years, or both. An organization, as defined in section 309(c)(3)(B)(iii) of the Act, shall, upon conviction of violating the imminent danger provision be subject to a fine of not more than $1,000,000 and can fined up to $2,000,000 for second or subsequent convictions.

1.4. False

Statement. The CWA provides that any person who falsifies, tampers with, or knowingly renders inaccurate any monitoring device or method required to be maintained under this permit shall, upon conviction, be punished by a fine of not more than $10,000, or by imprisonment for not more than 2 years, or both. If a conviction of a person is for a violation committed after a first conviction of such person under this paragraph, punishment is a fine of not more than $20,000 per day of violation, or by imprisonment of not more than 4 years, or both. The Act further provides that any person who knowingly makes any false statement, representation, or certification in any record or other document submitted or required to be maintained under this permit, including monitoring reports or reports of compliance or non-compliance shall, upon conviction, be punished by a fine of not more than $10,000 per violation, or by imprisonment for not more than 6 months per violation, or by both.2. Civil Penalties. The CWA provides that any person who violates a permit condition implementing Sections 301, 302, 306, 307, 308, 318, or 405 of the Act is subject to a civil penalty not to exceed the maximum amounts authorized by Section 309(d) of the Act and the Federal Civil Penalties Inflation Adjustment Act (28 U.S.C. § 2461 note) as amended by the Debt Collection Improvement Act (31 U.S.C. § 3701 note) (currently $32,500 per day for each violation).

3. Administrative Penalties.

The CWA provides that any person who violates a permit condition implementing Sections 301, 302, 306, 307, 308, 318, or 405 of the Act is subject to an administrative penalty, as follows 3.1. Class I Penalty. Not to exceed the maximum amounts authorized by Section 309(g)(2)(A) of the Act and the Federal Civil Penalties Inflation Adjustment Act (28 U.S.C. § 2461 note) as amended by the Debt Collection Improvement Act (31 U.S.C. § 3701 note) (currently $11,000 per violation, with the maximum amount of any Class I penalty assessed not to exceed$32,500).Stormwater Discharges Associated With Industrial Activity -Appendix B B-3 General Permit 3.2. Class IIPenalty. Not to exceed the maximum amounts authorized by Section 309(g)(2)(B) of the Act and the Federal Civil Penalties Inflation Adjustment Act (28 U.S.C. § 2461 note) as amended by the Debt Collection Improvement Act (31 U.S.C. § 3701 note) (currently $11,000 per day for each day during which the violation continues, with the maximum amount of any Class I penalty not to exceed $157,500). B.2 Duty to Reapply.If you wish to continue an activity regulated by this permit after the expiration date of this permit, you must apply for and obtain authorization as required by the new permit once EPA issues it.B.3 Need to Halt or Reduce Activity Not a Defense.It shall not be a defense for you in an enforcement action that it would have been necessary to halt or reduce the permitted activity in order to maintain compliance with the conditions of this permit.B.4 Duty to Mitigate.You must take all reasonable steps to minimize or prevent any discharge in violation of this permit which has a reasonable likelihood of adversely affecting human health or the environment. B.5 Proper Operation and Maintenance. You must at all times properly operate and maintain all facilities and systems of treatment and control (and related appurtenances) which are installed or used by you to achieve compliance with the conditions of this permit. Proper operation and maintenance also includes adequate laboratory controls and appropriate quality assurance procedures. This provision requires the operation of backup or auxiliary facilities or similar systems which are installed by you only when the operation is necessary to achieve compliance with the conditions of this permit.B.6 Permit Actions.This permit may be modified, revoked and reissued, or terminated for cause. Your filing of a request for a permit modification, revocation and reissuance, or termination, or a notification of planned changes or anticipated noncompliance does not stay any permit condition. B.7 Property Rights.This permit does not convey any property rights of any sort, or any exclusive privileges. Stormwater Discharges Associated With Industrial Activity -Appendix B B-4 General Permit B.8 Duty to Provide Information. You must furnish to EPA or an authorized representative (including an authorized contractor acting as a representative of EPA), within a reasonable time, any information which EPA may request to determine whether cause exists for modifying, revoking and reissuing, or terminating this permit or to determine compliance with this permit. You must also furnish to EPA or an authorized representative upon request, copies of records required to be kept by this permit.B.9 Inspection and Entry.You must allow EPA or an authorized representative (including an authorized contractor acting as a representative of EPA), upon presentation of credentials and other documents as may be required by law, to: A. Enter upon your premises where a regulated facility or activity is located or conducted, or where records must be kept under the conditions of this permit;B. Have access to and copy, at reasonable times, any records that must be kept under the conditions of this permit;C. Inspect at reasonable times any facilities, equipment (including monitoring and control equipment), practices, or operations regulated or required under this permit; and D. Sample or monitor at reasonable times, for the purposes of assuring permit compliance or as otherwise authorized by the Clean Water Act, any substances or parameters at any location.B.10 Monitoring and Records.A. Samples and measurements taken for the purpose of monitoring must be representative of the volume and nature of the monitored activity.B. You must retain records of all monitoring information, including all calibration and maintenance records and all original strip chart recordings for continuous monitoring instrumentation, copies of all reports required by this permit, and records of all data used to complete the application for this permit, for a period of at least three years from the date the permit expires or the date the permittee's authorization is terminated. This period may be extended by request of EPA at any time.C. Records of monitoring information must include: I. The date, exact place, and time of sampling or measurements;

2. The individual(s) who performed the sampling or measurements; Stormwater Discharges Associated With Industrial Activity -Appendix B B-5 General Permit 3. The date(s) analyses were performed 4. The individual(s) who performed the analyses;5. The analytical techniques or methods used; and 6. The results of such analyses.D. Monitoring must be conducted according to test procedures approved under 40 CFR Part 136, unless other test procedures have been specified in the permit.E. The Clean Water Act provides that any person who falsifies, tampers with, or knowingly renders inaccurate any monitoring device or method required to be maintained under this permit shall, upon conviction, be punished by a fine of not more than $10,000, or by imprisonment for not more than 2 years, or both. If a conviction of a person is for a Violation committed after a first conviction of such person under this paragraph, punishment is a fine of not more than $20,000 per day of violation, or by imprisonment of not more than 4 years, or both.B.11 Signatory Requirements.

A. All applications, including NOIs, must be signed as follows: 1. For a corporation: By a responsible corporate officer. For the purpose of this subsection, a responsible corporate officer means: (i) a president, secretary, treasurer, or vice-president of the corporation in charge of a principal business function, or any other person who performs similar policy- or decision-making functions for the corporation, or (ii) the manager of one or more manufacturing, production, or operating facilities, provided, the manager is authorized to make management decisions which govern the operation of the regulated facility including having the explicit or implicit duty of making major capital investment recommendations, and initiating and directing other comprehensive measures to assure long term environmental compliance with environmental laws and regulations; the manager can ensure that the necessary systems are established or actions taken to gather complete and accurate information for permit application requirements; and where authority to sign documents has been assigned or delegated to the manager in accordance with corporate procedures.

2. For a partnership or sole proprietorship:

By a general partner or the proprietor, respectively; or 3. For a municipality, state, federal, or other public agency: By either a principal executive officer or ranking elected official. For purposes of this subsection, a principal executive officer of a federal agency includes (i) the chief executive officer of the agency, or (ii) a senior executive officer having responsibility for Stormwater Discharges Associated With Industrial Activity -Appendix B B-6 General Permit the overall operations of a principal geographic unit of the agency (e.g., Regional Administrator of EPA).B. Your SWPPP, including changes to your SWPPP to document any corrective actions taken as required by Part 3.1, and all reports submitted to EPA, must be signed by a person described in Appendix B, Subsection I .A above or by a duly authorized representative of that person. A person is a duly authorized representative only if: 1. The authorization is made in writing by a person described in Appendix B, Subsection 11 .A;2. The authorization specifies either an individual or a position having responsibility for the overall operation of the regulated facility or activity such as the position of plant manager, operator of a well or a well field, superintendent, position of equivalent responsibility, or an individual or position having overall responsibility for environmental matters for the company. (A duly authorized representative may thus be either a named individual or any individual occupying a named position); and 3. The signed and dated written authorization is included in the SWPPP. A copy must be submitted to EPA, if requested. C. All other changes to your SWPPP, and other compliance documentation required under Part 5.4, must be signed and dated by the person preparing the change or documentation. D. Changes to Authorization. If an authorization under Appendix B, Subsection 11..B is no longer accurate because the industrial facility has been purchased by a different entity, a new NOI satisfying the requirements of Subsection 11 .B must be submitted to EPA. See Table 1-2 in Part 1.3.1 of the permit. However, if the only change that is occurring is a change in contact information or a change in the facility's address, the operator need only make a modification to the existing NOI submitted for authorization. E. Any person signing documents in accordance with Appendix B, Subsections I1 .A or 11..B above must include the following certification: "I certify under penalty of law that this document and all attachments were prepared under my direction or supervision in accordance with a system designed to assure that qualified personnel properly gathered and evaluated the information contained therein. Based on my inquiry of the person or persons who manage the system, or those persons directly responsible for gathering the information, the information contained is, to the best of my knowledge and belief, true, accurate, and complete. I am aware that there are significant penalties for submitting false information, including the possibility of fine and imprisonment for knowing violations." Stormwater Discharges Associated With Industrial Activity -Appendix B B-7 General Permit F. The CWA provides that any person who knowingly makes any false statement, representation, or certification in any record or other document submitted or required to be maintained under this permit, including monitoring reports or reports of compliance or non-compliance shall, upon conviction, be punished by a fine of not more than $10,000 per violation, or by imprisonment for not more than 6 months per violation, or by both.B.12 Reporting Requirements. A. Planned changes. You must give notice to EPA as soon as possible of any planned physical alterations or additions to the permitted facility. Notice is required only when: I. The alteration or addition to a permitted facility may meet one of the criteria for determining whether a facility is a new source in 40 CFR 122.29(b); or 2. The alteration or addition could significantly change the nature or increase the quantity of pollutants discharged. This notification applies to pollutants which are subject neither to effluent limitations in the permit, nor to notification requirements under 40 CFR 122.42(a)(1). B. Anticipated noncompliance. You must give advance notice to EPA of any planned changes in the permitted facility or activity which may result in noncompliance with permit requirements. C. Transfers. This permit is not transferable to any person except after notice to EPA. Where a facility wants to change the name of the permittee, the original permittee (the first owner or operators) must submit a Notice of Termination pursuant to Part 1.4. The new owner or operator must submit a Notice of Intent in accordance with Part 1.3.1 and Table 1-2. See also requirements in Appendix B, Subsections 11 .B and 11 .D.D. Monitoring reports. Monitoring results must be reported at the intervals specified elsewhere in this permit.1. Pursuant to Part 7.1, all monitoring data collected pursuant to Part 6.2 and 6.3 must be submitted to EPA using EPA's online eNOI system (www.epa.gov/npdes/eNOI). Alternatively, if you cannot access eNOI, monitoring results should be reported on the MSGP Discharge Monitoring Report (MDMR) form, available at www.epa.gov/npdes/stormwater/msgp, and submitted to EPA.2. If you monitor any pollutant more frequently than required by the permit using test procedures approved under 40 CFR Part 136 or as specified in the permit, the results of this monitoring must be included in the calculation and reporting of the data submitted in the MDMR.3. Calculations for all limitations which require averaging of measurements must use an arithmetic mean. For averaging purposes, use a value of zero for any Stormwater Discharges Associated With Industrial Activity -Appendix B B-8 General Permit individual sample parameter, which is determined to be less than the method detection limit. For sample values that fall between the method detection level and the quantitation limit (i.e., a confirmed detection but below the level that can be reliably quantified), use a value halfway between zero and the quantitation limit.E. Compliance schedules. Reports of compliance or noncompliance with, or any progress reports on, interim and final requirements contained in any compliance schedule of this permit must be submitted no later than 14 days following each schedule date.F. Twenty-four hour reporting. I. You must report any noncompliance which may endanger health or the environment. Any information must be provided orally within 24 hours from the time you become aware of the circumstances. A written submission must also be provided within five days of the time you become aware of the circumstances. The written submission must contain a description of the noncompliance and its cause; the period of noncompliance, including exact dates and times, and if the noncompliance has not been corrected, the anticipated time it is expected to continue; and steps taken or planned to reduce, eliminate, and prevent reoccurrence of the noncompliance.

2. The following shall be included as information which must be reported within 24 hours under this paragraph.
a. Any unanticipated bypass which exceeds any effluent limitation in the permit. (See 40 CFR 122.41(m)(3)(ii))
b. Any upset which exceeds any effluent limitation in the permit c. Violation of a maximum daily discharge limit for any numeric effluent limitation. (See 40 CFR 122.44(g).)
3. EPA may waive the written report on a case-by-case basis for reports under Appendix B, Subsection 12.F.2 if the oral report has been received within 24 hours.G. Other noncompliance.

You must report all instances of noncompliance not reported under Appendix B, Subsections 12.D, 12.E, and 12.F, at the time monitoring reports are submitted. The reports must contain the information listed in Appendix B, Subsection 12.F.H. Other information. Where you become aware that you failed to submit any relevant facts in a permit application, or submitted incorrect information in a permit application or in any report to the Permitting Authority, you must promptly submit such facts or information. Stormwater Discharges Associated With Industrial Activity -Appendix B B-9 General Permit B.13 Bypass.A. Definitions.

1. Bypass means the intentional diversion of waste streams from any portion of a treatment facility See 40 CFR 122.41(m)(1)(i).
2. Severe property damage means substantial physical damage to property, damage to the treatment facilities which causes them to become inoperable, or substantial and permanent loss of natural resources which can reasonably be expected to occur in the absence of a bypass. Severe property damage does not mean economic loss caused by delays in production.

See 40 CFR 122.41(m)(1)(ii). B. Bypass not exceeding limitations. You may allow any bypass to occur which does not cause effluent limitations to be exceeded, but only if it also is for essential maintenance to assure efficient operation. These bypasses are not subject to the provisions of Appendix B, Subsections 13.C and 13.D. See 40 CFR 122.41(m)(2). C. Notice.1. Anticipated bypass. If you know in advance of the need for a bypass, you must submit prior notice, if possible at least ten days before the date of the bypass.See 40 CFR 122.41(m)(3)(i).

2. Unanticipated bypass. You must submit notice of an unanticipated bypass as required in Appendix B, Subsection 12.F (24-hour notice). See 40 CFR 122.41 (m)(3)(ii).

D. Prohibition of bypass. See 40 CFR 122.41(m)(4).

1. Bypass is prohibited, and EPA may take enforcement action against you for bypass, unless: a. Bypass was unavoidable to prevent loss of life, personal injury, or severe property damage;b. There were no feasible alternatives to the bypass, such as the use of auxiliary treatment facilities, retention of untreated wastes, or maintenance during normal periods of equipment downtime.

This condition is not satisfied if adequate back-up equipment should have been installed in the exercise of reasonable engineering judgment to prevent a bypass which occurred during normal periods of equipment downtime or preventive maintenance; and Stormwater Discharges Associated With Industrial Activity -Appendix B B-10 General Permit c. You submitted notices as required under Appendix B, Subsection 13.C.2. EPA may approve an anticipated bypass, after considering its adverse effects, if EPA determines that it will meet the three conditions listed above in Appendix B, Subsection 13.D. 1.B.14 Upset.A. Definition. Upset means an exceptional incident in which there is unintentional and temporary noncompliance with technology based permit effluent limitations because of factors beyond your reasonable control. An upset does not include noncompliance to the extent caused by operational error, improperly designed treatment facilities, inadequate treatment facilities, lack of preventive maintenance, or careless or improper operation. See 40 CFR 122.41(n)(1). B. Effect of an upset. An upset constitutes an affirmative defense to an action brought for noncompliance with such technology based permit effluent limitations if the requirements of Appendix B, Subsection 14.C are met. No determination made during administrative review of claims that noncompliance was caused by upset, and before an action for noncompliance, is final administrative action subject to judicial review. See 40 CFR 122.41(n)(2). C. Conditions necessary for a demonstration of upset. See 40 CFR 122.4l(n)(3). A permittee who wishes to establish the affirmative defense of upset must demonstrate, through properly signed, contemporaneous operating logs, or other relevant evidence that: 1. An upset occurred and that you can identify the cause(s) of the upset;2. The permitted facility was at the time being properly operated; and 3. You submitted notice of the upset as required in Appendix B, Subsection 12.F.2.b (24 hour notice).4. You complied with any remedial measures required under Appendix B, Subsection 4.D. Burden of proof. In any enforcement proceeding, you, as the one seeking to establish the occurrence of an upset, have the burden of proof. See 40 CFR 122.41(n)(4). Stormwater Discharges Associated With Industrial Activity -Appendix B B-1II General Permit Appendix C Areas Covered Stormwater Discharges Associated With Industrial Activity -Appendix C C-1 General Permit Appendix C. Permit Area.EPA can only provide permit coverage in these areas and for classes of discharges that are outside the scope of a State's NPDES program authorization. C.1 EPA Region 1: Connecticut, Massachusetts, Maine, New Hampshire, Rhode Island, Vermont.This permit offers NPDES permit coverage for stormwater discharges associated with industrial activity from the following areas in EPA Region 1: Permit Number Areas of Coverage/Where EPA Is Permitting Authority CTR05000I Indian Country within the State of Connecticut MAR050000 Commonwealth of Massachusetts, except Indian Country MAR05000I Indian Country within the Commonwealth of Massachusetts NHR050000 State of New Hampshire RIR050001 Indian Country within the State of Rhode Island VTR05000F Federal facilities in the State of Vermont For stormwater discharges in EPA Region 1 outside the areas of coverage identified above, please contact your State NPDES permitting authority to obtain coverage under a State-issued NPDES permit.C.2 EPA Region 2: New Jersey, New York, Puerto Rico, Virgin Islands.This permit offers NPDES permit coverage for stormwater discharges associated with industrial activity from the following areas in EPA Region 2: Permit Number Areas of Coverage/Where EPA Is Permitting Authority PRR050000 Commonwealth of Puerto Rico For stormwater discharges in EPA Region 2 outside the areas of coverage identified above, please contact your State NPDES permitting authority to obtain coverage under a State-issued NPDES permit.C.3 EPA Region 3: Delaware, District of Columbia, Maryland, Pennsylvania, Virginia, West Virginia.This permit offers NPDES permit coverage for stormwater discharges associated with industrial activity from the following areas in EPA Region 3: Permit Number Areas of Coverage/Where EPA Is Permitting Authority DCR050000 District of Columbia DER05000F Federal facilities in the State of Delaware Stormwater Discharges Associated With Industrial Activity -Appendix C C-2 General Permit For stormwater discharges in EPA Region 3 outside the areas of coverage identified above, please contact your State NPDES permitting authority to obtain coverage under a State-issued NPDES permit.C.4 EPA Region 4: Alabama, Florida, Georgia, Kentucky, Mississippi, North Carolina, South Carolina, Tennessee (Coverage not available under this permit).For stormwater discharges in EPA Region 4, please contact your State NPDES permitting authority to obtain coverage under a State-issued NPDES permit.C.5 EPA Region 5: Illinois, Indiana, Michigan, Minnesota, Ohio, Wisconsin. This permit offers NPDES permit coverage for stormwater discharges associated with industrial activity from the following areas in EPA Region 5: Permit Number Areas of Coverage/Where EPA Is Permitting Authority MIR05000I Indian Country within the State of Michigan MNR05000I Indian Country within the State of Minnesota WIR05000I Indian Country within the State of Wisconsin, except those on Sokaogon Chippewa Community lands For stormwater discharges in EPA Region 5 outside the areas of coverage identified above, please contact your State NPDES permitting authority to obtain coverage under a State-issued NPDES permit.C.6 EPA Region 6: Arkansas, Louisiana, Oklahoma, Texas, and New Mexico (except see Region 9 for Navajo lands, and see Region 8 for Ute Mountain Reservation lands).This permit offers NPDES permit coverage for stormwater discharges associated with industrial activity from the following areas in EPA Region 6: Permit Number Areas of Coverage/Where EPA Is Permitting Authority LAR05000I Indian Country within the State of Louisiana NMR050000 The State of New Mexico, except Indian Country NMR05000I Indian Country within the State of New Mexico, except Ute Mountain Reservation lands that are covered under Colorado permit COR05000I listed in Part C.8 and Navajo Reservation lands that are covered under Arizona permit AZR05000I listed in Part C.9.OKRO5000I Indian Country within the State of Oklahoma OKRO5000F Facilities in the State of Oklahoma not under the jurisdiction of the Oklahoma Department of Environmental Quality, except those on Indian Country. EPA jurisdiction facilities include SIC Codes 1311, 1381, 1382, 1389, and 5171 and point source (but not nonpoint source) discharges associated with agricultural production, services, and silviculture. Stormwater Discharges Associated With Industrial Activity -Appendix C C-3 General Permit Permit Number Areas of Coverage/Where EPA Is Permitting Authority TXR05000F Facilities in the State of Texas not under the jurisdiction of the Texas Commission on Environmental Quality, except those on Indian Country. EPA-jurisdiction facilities include SIC Codes 1311, 1321, 1381, 1382, and 1389 (other than oil field service company "home base" facilities). TXR05000I Indian Country within the State of Texas For stormwater discharges in EPA Region 6 outside the areas of coverage identified above, please contact your State NPDES permitting authority to obtain coverage under a State-issued NPDES permit.C.7 EPA Region 7: Iowa, Kansas, Missouri, Nebraska (Coverage not available under this permit).For stormwater discharges in EPA Region 7, please contact EPA Region 7 or your State NPDES permitting authority to obtain coverage under a State-issued NPDES permit.C.8 EPA Region 8: Colorado, Montana, North Dakota, South Dakota, Wyoming, Utah (Coverage not available under this permit).For stormwater discharges in EPA Region 8 please contact EPA Region 8 or your State NPDES permitting authority to obtain coverage under an NPDES permit.C.9 EPA Region 9: California, Hawaii, Nevada, Guam, American Samoa, the Commonwealth of the Northern Mariana Islands, the Confederated Tribes of the Goshute Reservation in Utah and Nevada, Indian Country within the State of Arizona including the Navajo Reservation in Utah and New Mexico and Arizona, the Duck Valley Reservation in Idaho, and the Fort McDermitt Reservation in Oregon.This permit offers NPDES permit'coverage for stormwater discharges associated with industrial activity from the following areas in EPA Region 9: Permit Number Areas of Coverage/Where EPA Is Permitting Authority ASR050000 The islands of American Samoa AZR05000I Indian Country within the State of Arizona, including Navajo Reservation lands in New Mexico and Utah CAR05000I Indian Country within the State of California GUR050000 The island of Guam JAR050000 Johnston Atoll MWR050000 Midway Island and Wake Island NIR050000 Commonwealth of the Northern Mariana Islands NVR050001 Indian Country within the State of Nevada, including the Duck Valley Reservation in Idaho, the Fort McDermitt Reservation in Oregon and the Confederated Tribes of the Goshute Reservation in Utah Stormwater Discharges Associated With Industrial Activity -Appendix C C-4 General Permit For stormwater discharges in EPA Region 9 outside the areas of coverage identified above, please contact your State NPDES permitting authority to obtain coverage under a State-issued NPDES permit.C.10 Region 10: Alaska, Idaho (except see Region 9 for Duck Valley Reservation lands), Oregon (except see Region 9 for Fort McDermitt Reservation), Washington. This permit offers NPDES permit coverage for stormwater discharges associated with industrial activity from the following areas in EPA Region 10: Permit Number Areas of Coverage/Where EPA Is Permitting Authority AKR050000 The State of Alaska, except Indian Country lands lcoverage not yet availablel AKR05000I Indian Country lands within Alaska IDR050000 The State of Idaho, except Indian Country lands Icoverage not yet availablel IDR05000I Indian Country lands within the State of Idaho, except Duck Valley Reservation lands, which are covered under Nevada permit NVR05000I listed in Part C.9_coverage not yet availablel ORRO5000I Indian Country lands within the State of Oregon, except Fort McDermitt Reservation lands, which are covered under Nevada permit NVR05000I listed in Part C.9 [coverage not yet availablel WAR05000I Indian Country lands within the State of Washington [coverage not yet availablel WAR05000F Federal facilities in the State of Washington, except those located on Indian Country lands [coverage not yet available] For stormwater discharges in EPA Region 10 outside the areas of coverage identified above, please contact your State NPDES permitting authority to obtain coverage under a State-issued NPDES permit.Stormwater Discharges Associated With Industrial Activity -Appendix C C-5 General Permit Appendix D Activities Covered Stormwater Discharges Associated With Industrial Activity -Appendix D D-1 General Permit Appendix D. Facilities and Activities Covered Your permit eligibility is limited to discharges from facilities in the "sectors" of industrial activity summarized in Table D-1. These sector descriptions are based on Standard Industrial Classification (SIC) Codes and Industrial Activity Codes. References to "sectors" in this permit (e.g., sector-specific monitoring requirements) refer to these groupings. Table D-1. Sectors of Industrial Activity Covered by This Permit Subsector (May be subject to SIC Code or more than one Activity Code' Activity Represented sector/subsector) SECTOR A: TIMBER PRODUCTS Al 2421 General Sawmills and Planing Mills A2 2491 Wood Preserving A3 2411 Log Storage and Handling 2426 Hardwood Dimension and Flooring Mills 2429 Special Product Sawmills, Not Elsewhere Classified 2431-2439 (except 2434) Millwork, Veneer, Plywood, and Structural Wood (see Sector W)A4 2448 Wood Pallets and Skids 2449 Wood Containers, Not Elsewhere Classified 2451, 2452 Wood Buildings and Mobile Homes 2493 Reconstituted Wood Products 2499 Wood Products, Not Elsewhere Classified A5 2441 Nailed and Lock Corner Wood Boxes and Shook SECTOR B: PAPER AND ALLIED PRODUCTS BI 2631 Paperboard Mills 2611 Pulp Mills 2621 Paper Mills B2 2652-2657 Paperboard Containers and Boxes 2671-2679 Converted Paper and Paperboard Products, Except Containers and Boxes SECTOR C: CHEMICALS AND ALLIED PRODUCTS C1 2873-2879 Agricultural Chemicals C2 2812-2819 Industrial Inorganic Chemicals C3 2841-2844 Soaps, Detergents, and Cleaning Preparations; Perfumes, Cosmetics, and Other Toilet Preparations C4 282 1-2824 Plastics Materials and Synthetic Resins, Synthetic Rubber, Cellulosic and Other Manmade Fibers Except Glass Medicinal Chemicals and Botanical Products; Pharmaceutical 2833-2836 Preparations; in vitro and in vivo Diagnostic Substances; and Biological C5 Products, Except Diagnostic Substances 2851 Paints, Varnishes, Lacquers, Enamels, and Allied Products Stormwater Discharges Associated With Industrial Activity -Appendix D D-2 General Permit Table D-1. Sectors of Industrial Activity Covered by This Permit Subsector (May be subject to SIC Code or Activity Represented more than one Activity Code'sector/subsector) 2861-2869 Industrial Organic Chemicals 2891-2899 Miscellaneous Chemical Products 3952 Inks and Paints, Including China Painting Enamels, India Ink, Drawing (limited to list of Ink, Platinum Paints for Burnt Wood or Leather Work, Paints for China inks and paints) Painting, Artist's Paints and Artist's Watercolors 2911 Petroleum Refining SECTOR D: ASPHALT PAVING AND ROOFING MATERIALS AND LUBRICANTS D 1 2951, 2952 Asphalt Paving and Roofing Materials D2 2992, 2999 Miscellaneous Products of Petroleum and Coal SECTOR E: GLASS, CLAY, CEMENT, CONCRETE, AND GYPSUM PRODUCTS 3251-3259 Structural Clay Products El 3261-3269 Pottery and Related Products E2 3271-3275 Concrete, Gypsum, and Plaster Products 3211 Flat Glass 3221, 3229 Glass and Glassware, Pressed or Blown 3231 Glass Products Made of Purchased Glass E3 3241 Hydraulic Cement 3281 Cut Stone and Stone Products 3291-3299 Abrasive, Asbestos, and Miscellaneous Nonmetallic Mineral Products SECTOR F: PRIMARY METALS F1 3312-3317 Steel Works, Blast Furnaces, and Rolling and Finishing Mills F2 3321-3325 Iron and Steel Foundries F3 3351-3357 Rolling, Drawing, and Extruding of Nonferrous Metals F4 3363-3369 Nonferrous Foundries (Castings) 3331-3339 Primary Smelting and Refining of Nonferrous Metals F5 3341 Secondary Smelting and Refining of Nonferrous Metals 3398, 3399 Miscellaneous Primary Metal Products SECTOR G: METAL MINING (ORE MINING AND DRESSING)Gi 1021 Copper Ore and Mining Dressing Facilities 1011 Iron Ores 1021 Copper Ores 1031 Lead and Zinc Ores G2 1041, 1044 Gold and Silver Ores 1061 Ferroalloy Ores, Except Vanadium 1081 Metal Mining Services 1094, 1099 Miscellaneous Metal Ores Stormwater Discharges Associated With Industrial Activity -Appendix D D-3 General Permit Table D-1. Sectors of Industrial Activity Covered by This Permit Subsector (May be subject to SIC Code or Activity Represented more than one Activity Code'sector/subsector) SECTOR H: COAL MINES AND COAL MINING-RELATED FACILITIES Hi 1221-1241 Coal Mines and Coal Mining-Related Facilities SECTOR 1: OIL AND GAS EXTRACTION AND REFINING 1311 Crude Petroleum and Natural Gas I1 1321 Natural Gas Liquids 1381-1389 Oil and Gas Field Services SECTOR J: MINERAL MINING AND DRESSING 1442 Construction Sand and Gravel J1 1446 Industrial Sand 1411 Dimension Stone J2 1422-1429 Crushed and Broken Stone, Including Rip Rap 1481 Nonmetallic Minerals Services, Except Fuels 1499 Miscellaneous Nonmetallic Minerals, Except Fuels 1455, 1459 Clay, Ceramic, and Refractory Materials 1474-1479 Chemical and Fertilizer Mineral Mining SECTOR K: HAZARDOUS WASTE TREATMENT, STORAGE, OR DISPOSAL FACILITIES Hazardous Waste Treatment, Storage, or Disposal Facilities, including K1 HZ [those that are operating under interim status or a permit under subtitle C of RCRA SECTOR L: LANDFILLS, LAND APPLICATION SITES, AND OPEN DUMPS Li LF All Landfill, Land Application Sites and Open Dumps All Landfill, Land Application Sites and Open Dumps, except Municipal L2 LF Solid Waste Landfill (MSWLF) Areas Closed in Accordance with 40 CFR 258.60 SECTOR M: AUTOMOBILE SALVAGE YARDS M1 5015 [ Automobile Salvage Yards SECTOR N: SCRAP RECYCLING FACILITIES NI 5093 Scrap Recycling and Waste Recycling Facilities except Source-Separated Recycling N2 5093 Source-separated Recycling Facility SECTOR 0: STEAM ELECTRIC GENERATING FACILITIES 01 SE Steam Electric Generating Facilities, including coal handling sites SECTOR P: LAND TRANSPORTATION AND WAREHOUSING P1 4011,4013 Railroad Transportation 4111-4173 Local and Highway Passenger Transportation 4212-4231 Motor Freight Transportation and Warehousing 4311 United States Postal Service Stormwater Discharges Associated With Industrial Activity -Appendix D D-4 General Permit Table D-1. Sectors of Industrial Activity Covered by This Permit Subsector (May be subject to SIC Code or Activity Represented more than one Activity Code'sector/subsector) 5171 Petroleum Bulk Stations and Terminals SECTOR Q: WATER TRANSPORTATION Q1 4412-4499 Water Transportation Facilities SECTOR R: SHIP AND-BOAT BUILDING AND REPAIRING YARDS RI 3731, 3732 Ship and Boat Building or Repairing Yards SECTOR S: AIR TRANSPORTATION FACILITIES S1 4512-4581 Air Transportation Facilities SECTOR T: TREATMENT WORKS Treatment Works treating domestic sewage or any other sewage sludge or wastewater treatment device or system, used in the storage, treatment, recycling, and reclamation of municipal or domestic sewage, including land dedicated to the disposal of sewage sludge that are located within TI TW the confines of the facility, with a design flow of 1.0 mgd or more, or required to have an approved pretreatment program under 40 CFR Part 403. Not included are farm lands, domestic gardens or lands used for sludge management where sludge is beneficially reused and which are not physically located in the confines of the facility, or areas that are in compliance with section 405 of the CWA SECTOR U: FOOD AND KINDRED PRODUCTS Ul 2041-2048 Grain Mill Products U2 2074-2079 Fats and Oils Products 2011-2015 Meat Products 2021-2026 Dairy Products 2032-2038 Canned, Frozen, and Preserved Fruits, Vegetables, and Food Specialties 2051-2053 Bakery Products U3 2061-2068 Sugar and Confectionery Products 2082-2087 Beverages 2091-2099 Miscellaneous Food Preparations and Kindred Products 2111-2141 Tobacco Products SECTOR V: TEXTILE MILLS, APPAREL, AND OTHER FABRIC PRODUCT MANUFACTURING; LEATHER AND LEATHER PRODUCTS 2211-2299 Textile Mill Products Apparel and Other Finished Products Made from Fabrics and Similar V1 2311-2399 Materials Leather and Leather Products (note: see Sector ZI for Leather Tanning 3 and Finishing) SECTOR W: FURNITURE AND FIXTURES 2434 Wood Kitchen Cabinets WI 2511-2599 !Furniture and Fixtures Stormwater Discharges Associated With Industrial Activity -Appendix D D-5 General Permit Table D-1. Sectors of Industrial Activity Covered by This Permit Subsector (May be subject to SIC Code or Activity Represented more than one Activity Code'sector/subsector) SECTOR X: PRINTING AND PUBLISHING Xl 2711-2796 Printing, Publishing, and Allied Industries SECTOR Y: RUBBER, MISCELLANEOUS PLASTIC PRODUCTS, AND MISCELLANEOUS MANUFACTURING INDUSTRIES 3011 Tires and Inner Tubes 3021 Rubber and Plastics Footwear Y3053 Gaskets, Packing and Sealing Devices, and Rubber and Plastic Hoses and 3052, 0 Belting 3061, 3069 Fabricated Rubber Products, Not Elsewhere Classified 3081-3089 Miscellaneous Plastics Products 3931 Musical Instruments 3942-3949 Dolls, Toys, Games, and Sporting and Athletic Goods 3951-3955 Y2 (except 3952 -Pens, Pencils, and Other Artists' Materials see Sector C)3961, 3965 Costume Jewelry, Costume Novelties, Buttons, and Miscellaneous Notions, Except Precious Metal 3991-3999 Miscellaneous Manufacturing Industries SECTOR Z: LEATHER TANNING AND FINISHING ZI 3111 [Leather Tanning and Finishing SECTOR AA: FABRICATED METAL PRODUCTS 3411-3499 Fabricated Metal Products, Except Machinery and Transportation AA1 (except 3479) Equipment, and Coating, Engraving, and Allied Services.3911-3915 Jewelry, Silverware, and Plated Ware AA2 3479 Fabricated Metal Coating and Engraving SECTOR AB: TRANSPORTATION EQUIPMENT, INDUSTRIAL OR COMMERCIAL MACHINERY 3511-3599 Industrial and Commercial Machinery, Except Computer and Office (except 3571- Equipment (see Sector AC)AB 3579)ABp3711-3799 Transportation Equipment Except Ship and Boat Building and Repairing (except 3731, (see Sector R)SECTOR AC: ELECTRONIC, ELECTRICAL, PHOTOGRAPHIC, AND OPTICAL GOODS 3571-3579 Computer and Office Equipment 3812-3873 Measuring, Analyzing, and Controlling Instruments; Photographic and ACI Optical Goods, Watches, and Clocks 3612-3699 Electronic and Electrical Equipment and Components, Except Computer 3 Equipment Stormwater Discharges Associated With Industrial Activity -Appendix D D-6 General Permit Table D-1. Sectors of Industrial Activity Covered by This Permit Subsector (May be subject to SIC Code or Activity Represented more than one Activity Code'sector/subsector) SECTOR AD: NON-CLASSIFIED FACILITIES Other stormwater discharges designated by the Director as needing a permit (see 40 CFR AD1 122.26(a)(9)(i)(C) & (D)) or any facility discharging stormwater associated with industrial activity not described by any of Sectors A-AC. NOTE: Facilities may not elect to be covered under Sector AD. Only the Director may assign a facility to Sector AD.A complete list of SIC Codes (and conversions from the newer North American Industry Classification System" (NAICS)) can be obtained from the Internet at www.census.gov/epcd/www/naics.html or in paper form from various locations in the document titled Handbook of Standard Industrial Classifications, Office of Management and Budget, 1987.Stormwater Discharges Associated With Industrial Activity -Appendix D D-7 General Permit Appendix E Procedures Relating to Endangered Species Protection Stormwater Discharges Associated With Industrial Activity -Appendix E E-1 General Permit Appendix E. Procedures Relating to Endangered Species Protection E.1 Assessing the Effects of Your Discharge and Discharge-Related Activities You must follow the procedures in this appendix to assess the potential effects of applicable stormwater discharges, discharge-related activities, and allowable non-stormwater discharges on listed species and their critical habitat and determine which of the eligibility criterion (see Part E.2), if any, you qualify under. In accordance with Part 5.1.6.1 of this permit, you must keep documentation with your SWPPP to support your determination of eligibility under Part 1.1.4.5, including the process employed and results of the endangered species investigation. If you are seeking renewal of coverage under the MSGP, you must complete this analysis using any data collected when your site was fully active and operational, even if you are now claiming that your site is inactive and no industrial materials or activities are exposed to stormwater. If no such data exist for your facility, you should utilize the best available information from any industrial facility(ies) expected to discharge substantially similar effluents, based on the similarities of the general industrial activity, control measures, and runoff coefficients of their drainage areas. You should contact EPA if you need assistance in obtaining data from a facility with a substantially similar effluent.When evaluating the potential effects of your activities, you must consider effects to listed species or critical habitats within the "action area." Action area is defined in Appendix B as all areas affected directly or indirectly by the stormwater discharges, allowable non-stormwater discharges, and stormwater discharge-related activities, and not merely the immediate area involved in these discharges and activities. This includes areas beyond the footprint of the facility that are likely to be affected by stormwater discharges, discharge-related activities, and allowable non-stormwater discharges. For example, normal construction, operations and maintenance activities can result in noise impacts and discharges of pollutants into downstream areas which can increase the "action area" beyond the footprint of the facility."Facility" is defined in Appendix A.Step One: Determine if the Eligibility Requirements of Criterion B, C, or F Can Be Met.You should first determine whether you are eligible under Criteria 13, C, or F because of a previously completed ESA section 7 consultation, a previously issued ESA Section 10 permit, or because your activities were already addressed in another discharger's certification of eligibility as follows: The effects of your activities have been addressed in a consultation under ESA Section 7 on a separate Federal action (check box B corresponding to Criterion B).ii. The effects of your activities have been addressed through approval of a Habitat Conservation Plan under Section 10 of the ESA (check box C corresponding to Criterion C). Stormwater discharges from your industrial facility may be Stormwater Discharges Associated With Industrial Activity -Appendix E E-2 General Permit authorized by this MSGP if some activity is authorized through the issuance of a permit under section 10 of the ESA and that authorization addressed the effects of your stormwater discharges on federally-listed species and designated critical habitat. You must follow U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (FWS) and/or National Marine Fisheries Service, also known as NOAA Fisheries (NMFS) procedures when applying for an ESA Section 10 permit (see 50 CFR 17.22(b)(1) for FWS and 222.22 for NMFS). Application instructions for section 10 permits for FWS and NMFS can be obtained by accessing the FWS and NMFS websites (www.fws.gov and www.nmfs.noaa.gov) or by contacting the appropriate FWS and NMFS regional office.iii. You are covered under the eligibility certification of another operator for the project area (check box F corresponding to Criterion F). Your stormwater discharges, discharge-related activities, and allowable non-stormwater discharges were already addressed in another discharger's certification of eligibility under Criteria A, B, C, D, or E, which also included your facility and determined that federally listed endangered or threatened species or designated critical habitat would not be jeopardized. To certify eligibility under this criterion there must be no lapse of coverage in the other operator's certification. By certifying eligibility under Criterion F, you agree to comply with any measures or controls upon which the other discharge certification under Criterion B, C, or D was based. If your certification is based on another operator's certification under Criterion E, that certification is valid only if you have documentation showing that the other operator had certified under Criterion E, and you provide EPA with the relevant supporting information in your NOI form. Certification under Criterion F is discussed in more detail in the Fact Sheet that accompanies this permit.Step Two: Determine if Listed Threatened or Endangered Species and Critical Habitat are Present in the Action Area.Next, you should first determine whether federally-listed species are likely to occur in your action area. If you determine that there is a federally-listed species likely to occur in your action area, follow Step 3. If you determine that there are no federally-listed species likely to occur in your action area, you can certify that the facility meets Criteria A (check box A corresponding to Criteria A).You can do this by obtaining a list of threatened and endangered species that are likely to occur in your general area, including the appropriate receiving water for your discharges. County-specific or sometimes township-specific lists of Federally threatened and endangered species are available from the local offices of FWS, and NMFS, or on their internet sites. The types of species that are likely to be present determine which Service office you should contact (in general, NMFS has jurisdiction over marine, estuarine, and anadromous species). Visit www.epa.gov/npdes/stormwater/cgp to find the appropriate site for your state or check with your local Service office. If there are listed species in your county or township, you must then determine, as best you are able, whether any of the species are likely to occur in your action area Stormwater Discharges Associated With Industrial Activity -Appendix E E-3 General Permit (use the Services or State and Tribal Heritage Centers, as necessary). General species information can be found at www.fws.gov/endangered.wildlife.html. You must also check to see if critical habitat has been designated and whether such areas overlap your action area. Critical habitat should be listed on the species list for your county or township available from the appropriate Service office. You can also find critical habitat designations at 50 CFR Parts 17 and 226 www.access.gpo.gov and at www.fws.gov/endangered/wildlife.htm i.If there are no listed species and no critical habitat areas that overlap your action area, or if your local FWS or NMFS indicates that listed species are not likely to occur in your action area, you have satisfied your eligibility obligations under Criterion A (check box A on the Notice of Intent Form). If there are listed species and if you determine or your local FWS, NMFS, or State or Tribal Heritage Center indicates that these species could occur in the action area, you will need to evaluate whether your action area supports habitat(s) that are suitable for listed species or the constituent elements of critical habitat. Your evaluation may utilize one or more of the following approaches: Gather information about the species and critical habitat that are likely to occur in your action area (www.fws.gov/endangered/wildlife.html). Conduct a visual inspection of the action area to assess the potential presence of listed species and their habitats. Compare the size and'types of habitats available in your action area and adjacent areas with the size and types of habitats used by listed species and constituent elements of critical habitat. This method may be particularly suitable for facilities where the action area is smaller in size or located in non-natural settings such as highly urbanized areas or industrial parks where there is little or no natural habitat, or for facilities that discharge directly into municipal separate storm sewer systems.Conduct a formal biological survey (typically performed by environmental consulting firms). In some cases, biological surveys may be an appropriate way to assess whether species are likely to be located in the action area and whether there could be adverse effects to such species. A biological survey may in some cases be useful in conjunction with Steps Two, Three or Four of these instructions. However, biological surveys can often be inconclusive and some survey methods may require a special State or Federal permit. You should coordinate with the appropriate Service office before conducting biological surveys for threatened and endangered species.Reference an environmental assessment completed for the site under the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA). Such assessments may indicate whether listed species and critical habitats are likely to occur in the action area. Coverage under this MSGP may trigger a requirement for such an assessment for new sources (that is, dischargers subject to New Source Performance Standards under section 306 of the Clean Water Act). Other facilities might require an assessment under NEPA for other reasons, such as federal funding or other federal involvement in the facility. If the action area likely supports listed threatened or endangered species or critical habitat, you must evaluate the potential for impacts to species and/or habitat when following Steps Three through Five. Note that many but not all measures implemented to protect listed species under these steps will also protect critical habitat. Thus, meeting the Stormwater Discharges Associated With Industrial Activity -Appendix E E-4 General Permit eligibility requirements of this MSGP may require measures to protect critical habitat that are separate from those to protect listed species.Step Three: Determine ifyour Activities Are Not Likely to Adversely Affect Listed Threatened or Endangered Species or Designated Critical Habitat To receive MSGP coverage, you must analyze the effects of your activities, which may include not only your discharge, but also any construction, operation, and maintenance activities related to stormwater management. You must be able to conclude that your discharge and stormwater management related activities are not likely to adversely affect threatened or endangered species or designated critical habitat that are likely to occur in your action area. To arrive at this conclusion, you should be able to conclude that listed species and critical habitat are not likely to be exposed to the effects of your activities, or if they are exposed, they are not likely to respond to the effects, or if they do respond, the responses are not sufficient to reduce an individual's chances of surviving and reproducing or diminish the amount or suitability of constituent elements of critical habitat. Construction, operation, and maintenance of facilities related to your stormwater discharge can potentially result in the following adverse effects: Hydrological. Stormwater discharges may adversely affect receiving waters from pollutant parameters such as temperature, salinity or pH. These effects will vary with the amount of stormwater discharged and the volume and condition of the receiving water. Where a stormwater discharge constitutes a minute portion of the total volume of the receiving water, adverse hydrological effects are less likely. Industrial activity itself may also alter drainage patterns on a site where construction occurs, which can impact listed species, their habitat, and critical habitat.* Habitat. Outdoor activities, such as storage of materials and land disturbances associated with stormwater management-related activities, such as the installation or placement of stormwater control measures, may adversely affect listed species, their habitat, and critical habitat. Stormwater may drain or inundate listed species habitat.* Toxicity. Pollutants in stormwater may have toxic effects on listed species and adversely affect critical habitat. Exceedances of benchmarks, effluent limitation guidelines, or State or Tribal water quality requirements may be indicative of potential adverse affects on listed species or critical habitat.The scope of effects to consider will vary with each site. If you are having difficulty determining whether your facility is likely to adversely affect listed species or critical habitat, or one of the Services has already raised concerns to you, you must contact the appropriate office of the FWS or NMFS for assistance. If adverse effects are not likely, you have satisfied your eligibility obligations under Criterion E and you may proceed to submitting your NOI for coverage under the MSGP (check box E corresponding to Criterion E). As part of certifying your compliance with Criterion E, you must submit information to support your findings. If you are an existing discharger, you are required to (1) identify any pollutant parameters for which you have ever exceeded the benchmark or effluent limitations guideline, or have ever been found to have caused or contributed to an exceedance of an applicable water quality standard, or Stormwater Discharges Associated With Industrial Activity -Appendix E E-5 General Permit violated a State or Tribal water quality requirement; (2) provide a list of the federally-listed threatened or endangered species or their designated critical habitat that are likely to occur in the action area; and (3) provide your rationale supporting your determination that you qualify under Criterion E. If you are a new discharger, you must provide the list of species or critical habitat and the technical evaluation (described in (2) and (3) above, respectively), and you must also include a list of the potential pollutants in your discharge. If you can not yet conclude your stormwater discharge is not likely to adversely affect listed species or critical habitat, or if you conclude that your stormwater discharge could potentially adversely affect listed species or critical habitat, you must follow Step Four.Step Four: Determine if Measures Can Be Implemented to Avoid Adverse Effects or If Further Analysis Supports the Conclusion that Adverse Effects Are Not Likely.If you could not make a preliminary determination in Step 3 that adverse effects to listed species and/or critical habitat are not likely to occur, you can still receive coverage under Criterion E if appropriate measures are undertaken to avoid or eliminate the likelihood of adverse effects prior to applying for MSGP coverage. These measures may be relatively simple, e.g., re-routing a stormwater discharge to bypass an area where species are located, relocating control measures, or changing the "footprint" of the industrial activity. Provided you are able to install and implement appropriate measures, you may proceed to submitting your NOI for coverage under the MSGP (check box E corresponding to Criterion E). As part of certifying your compliance with Criterion E, you must submit information to support your findings. If you are an existing discharger, you are first required to (1) identify any pollutant parameters for which you have ever exceeded a benchmark or an effluent limitations guideline, or have ever been found to have caused or contributed to an exceedance of an applicable water quality standard, or violated a State or Tribal water quality requirement; (2) provide a list of the federally-listed threatened or endangered species or their designated critical habitat that are likely to occur in the action area; and (3) provide your rationale supporting your determination that you qualify under Criterion E, including a description of measures you will implement to avoid or eliminate the likelihood of adverse effects. If you are a new discharger, you must provide the list of species or critical habitat and the technical evaluation (described in (2) and (3) above, respectively), and you must also include a list of the potential pollutants in your discharge. If you cannot ascertain which measures to implement to avoid the likelihood of adverse effects, you must follow Step Five.Step Five: Determine if the Eligibility Requirements of Criteria D Can Be Met.Where adverse effects are likely and you are unable to avoid or eliminate the likelihood of adverse effects, you must contact the FWS and/or NMFS. However, you may still be eligible for MSGP coverage if any likely adverse effects can be addressed through meeting Criteria D as follows: You have coordinated your activities with the appropriate Service office (see Criterion D). In the absence of any other conditions set forth in Step Four, you may still be able to Stormwater Discharges Associated With Industrial Activity -Appendix E E-6 General Permit qualify for coverage under this MSGP if you coordinate with the FWS or NMFS and the Service provides a letter or memorandum concluding that permitting your stormwater discharges under the MSGP is consistent with the "not likely to adversely affect" determination for the MSGP. If you adopt measures to avoid or eliminate adverse effects, per the Service's requirements or recommendations, you must abide by those measures for the duration of your coverage under the MSGP. Any such measures must be described in the Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan and are enforceable MSGP conditions and/or conditions for meeting the eligibility criteria in Part 1.1.4.5.You must comply with any terms and conditions imposed under the eligibility requirements to ensure that your storrnwater discharges, discharge-related activities, and allowable non-stormwater discharges are protective of listed species and/or critical habitat. See Part 2.3 of the permit. If the eligibility requirements cannot be met, and, maintained, then you are not eligible for coverage under this MSGP. In'these instances, you may consider applying to EPA for an individual permit.E.2 Eligibility Criterion As required by Part 1.1.4.5, you must meet one or more of the following six criteria (A-F)to be eligible for coverage under the permit for your stormwater discharge, discharge-related activities, and allowable non-stormwater discharges: Criterion A. No federally-listed threatened or endangered species or their designated critical habitat are likely to occur in the "action area"; or Criterion B. Consultation between a Federal agency and the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service and/or the National Marine Fisheries Service (together, the "Services") under section 7 of the ESA has been concluded. Consultations can be either formal or informal, and would have occurred only as a result of a separate federal action (e.g., during application for an individual wastewater discharge permit or the issuance of a wetlands dredge and fill permit).The consultation must have addressed the effects of your facility's stormwater discharges, allowable non-stormwater discharges, and stormwater discharge-related activities on federally-listed threatened or endangered species and federally-designated critical habitat, and must have resulted in either: a biological opinion finding no jeopardy to federally-listed species or destruction/adverse modification of federally-designated critical habitat; or ii. written concurrence from the Service(s) with a finding that the facility's stormwater discharges associated with industrial activity, discharge-related activities and allowable non-stormwater discharges are not likely to adversely affect federally-listed species or federally-designated critical habitat; or Stormwater Discharges Associated With Industrial Activity -Appendix E E-7 General Permit Criterion C.Criterion D.Criterion E.Your industrial activities are authorized through the issuance of a permit under section 10 of the ESA, and authorization addresses the effects of the stormwater discharges associated with industrial activity, discharge-related activities, and allowable non-stormwater discharges on federally-listed species and federally-designated critical habitat; or Coordination between you and the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service and/or the National Marine Fisheries Service has been concluded. The coordination must have addressed the effects of the facility's stormwater discharges associated with industrial activity, discharge-related activities, and allowable non-stormwater discharges on federally-listed threatened or endangered species and federally-designated critical habitat. The result of the coordination must be a written statement from the Service concluding that authorizing your stormwater discharges, discharge-related activities, and allowable non-stormwater discharges is consistent with the determination that the issuance of the MSGP is not likely to adversely affect federally-listed threatened or endangered species and federally-designated critical habitat. Any conditions or prerequisites deemed necessary to achieve consistency with the "not likely to adversely effect" determination become eligibility conditions for MSGP coverage, and permit requirements under Part 2.3; or Authorizing your stormwater discharges associated with industrial activity, discharge-related activities, and allowable non-stormwater discharges is consistent with the determination that the issuance of the MSGP is not likely to adversely affect any federally-listed endangered and threatened ("listed") species or designated critical habitat ("critical habitat"). To support your determination that you meet Criterion E, you must provide supporting documentation for your determination. If you are an existing discharger, you must provide the following information with your completed Notice of Intent (NOI) form: (1) a list of the federally-listed threatened or endangered species or their designated critical habitat that are likely to occur in the "action area"; (2) a list of the pollutant parameters for which you have ever exceeded the benchmark or applicable effluent limitations guideline, or for which you have ever been found to have caused or contributed to an exceedance of an applicable water quality standard or to have violated a State or Tribal water quality requirement (Part 9); and (3) your rationale supporting your determination that you meet Criterion E, including appropriate measures to be undertaken to avoid or eliminate the likelihood of adverse effects.ii. If you are a new discharger, you must provide the following information with your completed NOI form: (1) a list of the federally-listed threatened or endangered species or their designated critical habitat that are likely to occur in the "action area"; (2) a list of the potential pollutants in your discharge; and (3)your rationale supporting your determination that you meet Criterion E, including Stormwater Discharges Associated With Industrial Activity -Appendix E E-8 General Permit appropriate measures to be undertaken to avoid or eliminate the likelihood of adverse effects; or Criterion F.The facility's stormwater discharges associated with industrial activity, discharge-related activities, and allowable non-stormwater discharges were already addressed in another operator's valid certification of eligibility that included the industrial activities and there is no reason to believe that federally-listed species or federally-designated critical habitat not considered in the prior certification may be present or located in the "action area". To certify eligibility under this criterion there must be no lapse of coverage in the other operator's certification. By certifying eligibility under this criterion, you agree to comply with any measures or controls upon which the other operator's certification was based.You must comply with any applicable terms, conditions, or other requirements developed in the process of meeting the eligibility requirements of the criteria in this section to remain eligible for coverage under this permit. Documentation-must be kept with your SWPPP. If your certification is based on another operator's certification under Criterion E, that certification is valid only if you have documentation showing that the other operator had certified under Criterion E, and you provide EPA with the relevant supporting information required of existing dischargers in Criterion E (above, under subparagraph (i)) in your NOI form.Stormwater Discharges Associated With Industrial Activity -Appendix E General Permit Appendix F Procedures Relating to Historic Properties Preservation Stormwater Discharges Associated With Industrial Activity -Appendix F F-1 General Permit Appendix F -Procedures Relating to Historic Properties Preservation Section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act (NHPA) requires Federal agencies to take into account the effects of Federal "undertakings" on historic properties that are either listed on, or eligible for listing on, the National Register of Historic Places. The term Federal"undertaking" is defined in the NHPA regulations to include a project, activity, or program of a Federal agency including those carried out by or on behalf of a Federal agency, those carried out with Federal financial assistance, and those requiring a Federal permit, license or approval. See 36 CFR 800.16(y). Historic properties are defined in the NHPA regulations to include prehistoric or historic districts, sites, buildings, structures, or objects that are included in, or are eligible for inclusion in, the National Register of Historic Places. This term includes artifacts, records, and remains that are related to and located within such properties. See 36 CFR 800.16(1). EPA's issuance of the Multi-Sector General Permit is a Federal undertaking within the meaning of the NHPA regulations. To address any issues relating to historic properties in connection with issuance of the permit, EPA has included criteria for applicants to certify that potential impacts of their covered activities on historic properties have been appropriately considered and addressed. Although individual applications for coverage under the general permit do not constitute separate Federal undertakings, the screening criteria and certifications provide an appropriate site-specific means of addressing historic property issues in connection with EPA's issuance of the permit. Applicants seeking coverage under the MSGP are thus required to make certain certifications regarding the potential effects of their stormwater discharge, allowable non-stormwater discharge, and discharge-related activities on properties listed or eligible for listing on the National Register of Historic Places.You must meet one or more of the four criteria (A-D), which are also included in Part 1.1.4.6, to be eligible for coverage under this permit.Criterion A.Criterion B.Criterion C.Your stormwater discharges and allowable non-stormwater discharges do not have the potential to have an effect on historic properties and you are not constructing or installing new stormwater control measures on your site that cause subsurface disturbance; or Your discharge-related activities (i.e., construction and/or installation of stormwater control measures that involve subsurface disturbance) will not affect historic properties; or Your stormwater discharges, allowable non-stormwater discharges, and discharge-related activities have the potential to have an effect on historic properties, and you have obtained and are in compliance with a written agreement with the State Historic Preservation Officer (SHPO), Tribal Historic Preservation Officer (THPO), or other tribal representative regarding measures to mitigate or prevent any adverse effects on historic properties, and you have either (1)obtained and are in compliance with a written agreement that outlines all such measures, or (2) been unable to reach agreement on such measures; or Stormwater Discharges Associated With Industrial Activity -Appendix F F-2 General Permit Criterion D. You have contacted the State Historic Preservation Officer, Tribal Historic Preservation Officer, or other tribal representative and EPA in writing informing them that you have the potential to have an effect on historic properties and you did not receive a response from the SHPO, THPO, or tribal representative within 30 days of receiving your letter.If you have been unable to reach agreement with a SHPO, THPO, or other tribal representative regarding appropriate measures to mitigate or prevent adverse effects, EPA may notify you of additional measures you must implement in order to be eligible for coverage under this permit.Activities with No Potential to Have an Effect on Historic Properties A determination that a Federal undertaking has no potential to have an effect on historic properties fulfills an agency's obligations under the NHPA. EPA has reason to believe that the vast majority of activities authorized under the MSGP have no potential to have effects on historic properties. The purpose of this permit is to control pollutants that may be transported in stormwater runoff from industrial facilities. EPA does not anticipate effects on historic properties from the pollutants in the stormwater and allowable non-stormwater discharges from these industrial facilities. Thus, to the extent EPA's issuance of this general permit authorizes discharges of such constituents, confined to existing stormwater channels or natural drainage areas; the permitting action does not have the potential to cause effects on historic properties. In addition, the overwhelming majority of sources covered under this permit will be facilities that are seeking renewal of previous permit coverage. These existing dischargers should have already addressed NHPA issues in the 2000 MSGP as they were required to certify that they were either not affecting historic properties or they had obtained written agreement from the applicable State Historic Preservation Officer (SHPO) or Tribal Historic Preservation Officer (THPO) regarding methods of mitigating potential impacts. Both existing and new dischargers must follow the historic property screening procedures to determine their eligibility. EPA is not aware of any impacts on historic properties from activities covered under the 2000 MSGP, or, for that matter, any need for a written agreement. Therefore, to the extent this permit authorizes renewal of prior coverage without relevant changes in operations, it has no potential to have an effect on historic properties. Activities with Potential to Have an Effect on Historic Properties EPA believes this permit may have some potential to have an effect on historic properties where permittees construct and/or install stormwater control measures that involve subsurface disturbance and impact less than one (1) acre of land to comply with this permit. (Ground disturbances of one (1) acre or more require coverage under a different permit, the Construction General Permit.) Where you have to disturb the land through the construction and/or installation of control measures, there is a possibility that artifacts, records, or remains associated with historic properties could be impacted. Therefore, if you are establishing new or altering existing control measures to manage your stormwater that will involve subsurface ground disturbance of less than one (1) acre, you will need to ensure (1) that historic properties will not be impacted by Stormwater Discharges Associated With Industrial Activity -Appendix FI F-3 General Permit your activities or (2) that you have consulted with the appropriate SHPO, THPO, or other tribal representative regarding measures that would mitigate or prevent any adverse effects on historic properties. Examples of Control Measures Which Involve Subsurface Disturbance EPA reviewed typical control measures currently employed to determine which practices involve some level of earth disturbance. The types of control measures that are presumptively expected to cause subsurface ground disturbance include: o Dikes* Berms o Catch Basins* Ponds o Ditches o Trenches o Culverts o Land manipulation: contouring, sloping, and grading o Channels o Perimeter Drains o Swales EPA cautions dischargers that this list is non-inclusive. Other control measures that involve earth disturbing activities that are not on this list must also be examined for the potential to affect historic properties. Historic Property Screening Process You should follow the following screening process in order to certify your compliance with historic property eligibility requirements under this permit (see Part 1.1.4.6). The following four steps describe how applicants can meet the permit eligibility criteria for protection of historic properties under this permit: Step One: Are you an existing facility that is reapplyingfor certification under the 2008 MSGP?If you are an existing facility you should have already addressed NHPA issues. To gain coverage under the 2000 MSGP you were required to certify that you were either not affecting historic properties or had obtained written agreement from the relevant SHPO or THPO regarding methods of mitigating potential impacts. As long as you are not constructing or installing any new stormwater control measures then you have met eligibility Criterion A of the MSGP. After you submit your NOI, there is a 30-day waiting period during which the SHPO, THPO, or other tribal representative may review your NOI. The SHPO, THPO, or other tribal representative may request that EPA hold up authorization based on concerns about potential adverse impacts to historic properties. EPA will evaluate any such request and notify you if any additional measures to address adverse impacts to historic properties are necessary. Stormwater Discharges Associated With Industrial Activity -Appendix F F-4 General Permit If you are an existing facility and will construct or install stormwater control measures that require subsurface disturbance of less than one (1) acre then you should proceed to Step Three. (Note: Construction activities disturbing one (1) acre or more are not eligible for coverage under this permit.)If you are a new facility then you should proceed to Step Two.Step Two: Are you constructing or installing any stormwater control measures that require subsurface disturbance of less than one (1) acre?If, as part of your coverage under this permit, you are not building or installing control measures on your site that cause less than one (1) acre of subsurface disturbance, then your discharge-related activities do not have the potential to have an effect on historic properties. You have no further obligations relating to historic properties. You have met eligibility Criterion A of the MSGP. After you submit your NOI, there is a 30-day waiting period during which the SHPO, THPO, or other tribal representative may review your NOL. The SHPO, THPO, or other tribal representative may request that EPA hold up authorization based on concerns about potential adverse impacts to historic properties. EPA will evaluate any such request and notify you if any additional measures to address adverse impacts to historic properties are necessary. If the answer to the Step Two question is yes, then you should proceed to Step Three.Step Three: Have prior earth disturbances determined that historic properties do not exist, or have prior disturbances precluded the existence of historic properties? If previous construction either revealed the absence of historic properties or prior disturbances preclude the existence of historic properties, then you have no further obligations relating to historic properties. You have met eligibility Criterion B of the MSGP. After you submit your NOI, there is a 30-day waiting period during which the SHPO, THPO, or other tribal representative may review your NOI. The SHPO, THPO, or other tribal representative may request that EPA hold up authorization based on concerns about potential adverse impacts to historic properties. EPA will evaluate any such request and notify you if any additional measures to address adverse impacts to historic properties are necessary. If the answer to the Step Three question is no, then you should proceed to Step Four.Step Four: Contact the appropriate historic preservation authorities Where you are building and/or installing control measures affecting less than one (1) acre of land to control stormwater or allowable non-stormwater discharges associated with this permit, and the answer to Step Three is no, then you should contact the relevant SHPO, THPO, or other tribal representative to determine the likelihood that artifacts, records, or remains are potentially present on your site. This may involve examining local records to determine if historic artifacts have been found in nearby areas, as well as limited surface and subsurface examination carried out by qualified professionals. Stormwater Discharges Associated With Industrial Activity -Appendix F F-5 General Permit If through this process it is determined that such historic properties potentially exist and may be impacted by your construction or installation of control measures, you should contact the relevant SHPO, THPO, or tribal representative in writing and request to discuss mitigation or prevention of any adverse effects. The letter should describe your facility, the nature and location of subsurface disturbance activities that are contemplated, any known or suspected historic properties in the area, and any anticipated effects on such properties. The letter should state that if the SHPO, THPO, or tribal representative does not respond within 30 days of receiving your letter, you may submit your NOI without further consultation. EPA encourages applicants to contact the appropriate authorities as soon as possible in the event of a potential adverse effect to an historic property.If the SHPO, THPO, or tribal representative sent you a response within 30 days of receiving your letter and you enter into, and comply with, a written agreement with the SHPO, THPO, or other tribal representative regarding how to address any adverse impacts on historic properties, you have met eligibility Criterion C. In this case, you should retain a copy of the written agreement consistent with Part 5.1.6.2 of the MSGP. After you submit your NOI, there is a 30-day waiting period during which the SHPO, THPO, or other tribal representative may review your NOI. The SHPO, THPO, or other tribal representative may request that EPA delay authorization based on concerns about potential adverse impacts to historic properties. However, EPA would generally accept any written agreement as fully addressing such concerns unless new information was brought to the Agency's attention that was not considered in your previous discussions with the SHPO, THPO or other tribal representative. If you receive a response within 30 days after the SHPO, THPO, or tribal representative received your letter and you consult with the SHPO, THPO or tribal representative regarding adverse impacts to historic properties and measures to mitigate them but an agreement cannot be reached between you and the SHPO, THPO, or other tribal representative, you have still met the eligibility for Criterion C. In this case you should include in your SWPPP a brief description of potential effects to historic properties, the consultation process, any measures you will adopt to address the potential adverse impacts, and any significant remaining disagreements between you and the SHPO, THPO or other tribal representative. After you submit your NOI, there is a 30-day waiting period during which the SHPO, THPO, or other tribal representative may review your NOI. The SHPO, THPO, or other tribal representative may request that EPA delay authorization based on concerns about potential adverse impacts to historic properties. EPA will evaluate any such request and notify you if any additional measures to address adverse impacts to historic properties are necessary. If you have contacted the SHPO, THPO, or tribal representative in writing regarding your potential to have an effect on historic properties and the SHPO, THPO, or tribal representative did not respond within 30 days of receiving your letter, you have met eligibility Criterion D. You are advised to get a receipt from the post office or other carrier confirming the date on which your letter was received. In this case, you should submit a copy of your letter notifying the SHPO, THPO or tribal representative of potential impacts with your NOI. After you submit your NOI, there is a 30-day waiting period during which the SHPO, THIPO, or other tribal representative may review your NOT. The SHPO, THPO, or other tribal representative may Stormwater Discharges Associated With Industrial Activity -Appendix F F-6 General Permit request that EPA hold up authorization based on concerns about potential adverse impacts to historic properties. EPA will evaluate any such request and notify you if any additional measures to address adverse impacts to historic properties are necessary. Addresses for State Historic Preservation Officers and Tribal Historic Preservation Officers may be found on the Advisory Council on Historic Preservation's website (www.achp.gov/programs.html). In instances where a Tribe does not have a Tribal Historic Preservation Officer, you should contact the appropriate Tribal government office when responding to this permit eligibility condition. Stormwater Discharges Associated With Industrial Activity -Appendix F F-7 General Permit Appendix G Notice of Intent (NOI) Form Stormwater Discharges Associated With Industrial Activity -Appendix G G-1 General Permit Appendix G -Notice of Intent (NOI) Form To obtain coverage under this permit, you must submit a Notice of Intent (NOI). You must submit an NOI using either (1) EPA's Electronic Notice of Intent (eNOI) system, available at www.epa.gov/npdes/eNOl, or (2) file a paper copy of the NOI, a copy of which follows.Stormwater Discharges Associated With Industrial Activity -Appendix G G-2 UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY Form Approved.NPDES WASHINGTON, DC 20460 OMB No. 2040-0086 FORM -6NOTICE OF INTENT (NOI) FOR STORMWATER DISCHARGES ASSOCIATED WITH INDUSTRIAL ACTIVITY UNDER THE NPDES MULTI-SECTOR GENERAL PERMIT Submission of this completed Notice of Intent (NOI) constitutes notice that the operator identified in Section B of this form requests authorization to discharge pollutants to waters of the United States from the facility or site identified in Section C under EPA's NPDES Stormwater Multi-Sector General Permit (MSGP) for industrial stormwater. Submission of this NOI constitutes your notice to EPA that the facility identified in Section C of this form meets the eligibility conditions of Part 1.1 of the MSGP. Please read and make sure you comply with all eligibility requirements, including the requirement to prepare a stormwater pollution prevention plan. Refer to the instructions at the end of this form to complete your NOI.A. Permit III R II elgbeeitu er (see Appendix C of the MSGP for the list of Tracking Numbeir (EPA Use Only): Number: LL .LL L J eligible permit numbers)m B. Facility Operator Information

1. Nam e: _ l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l l_ l l_ _2. IRS Employer Identification Number (EIN): -I bI llLl 3: Mailing Address: a. Street: I I I I b. City: I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I_ _ 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 c. State: [__L d. ZipCode: e. Phone: [.[___ Jj_ f.oFaXna 11_ ii 11111 _ _ _ g. E-mail: (optional):

L W .-a l: _ _C. Facility Information

1. Facility Name: IIII_ I I_ I I lII_ I I_ I II_ I I l II_ I I_ I l l lI_ I_ I I l l 2. Have stormwater discharges from your site been covered previously under an NPDES permit? D YES El NO a. If yes, provide the Tracking Number if you had coverage under EPA's MSGP 2000 or the NPDES permit number if you had coverage under an EPA individual permit. m b.1 If no, was your facility in operation and discharging stormwater prior to October 30, 2005? 0] YES El NO b.2 If no to C.2.b.1, did your facility commence discharging after October 30, 2005 and before January 5, 2009? El YES El NO 3. Location Address: a. Street I b .C ity : I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I_ I c. County or similar government subdivision:

I I I I I I _ I I _ I d. State: [j,. e. Zip Code: I II I I I-Lany o e f tN (degrees, minutes, seconds) g. Longitude:

1. W (degrees, minutes, seconds)treformatitd(se
2. .'N (ersmntscos)(use any of--------------W(dgesmiusecn) anyrne ofomth 2. °N (degrees, minutes, decimal) these 3 2. '-W (degrees, minutes, decimal)provided.)
3. __ ._ N ( degrees decimal) formats) 3. °--. -W (degrees decimal)h. Lat/Long Data Source: El USGS topographic map El EPA web site El GPS El Other: If you used a USGS topographic map, what was the scale?4. Estimated area of industrial activity at your site exposed to stormwater:

__ (acres)5. Is this a federal facility? LI YES El NO 6. Is your facility located on Indian Country lands? Dl YES El NO If yes, name of reservation, or if not part of a reservation, put "Not Applicable:" EPA FORM 3510-6 (Revised 09-2008)Page 1 of 7 D. Discharge information

1. Does your facility discharge stormwater into a Municipal Separate Storm Sewer System (MS4)? D YES [] NO If yes, name of MS4 operator: 2. Receiving Waters and Wetlands (Note: If additional space is needed for this question, fill out Attachment 1.)a. What is the name(s) of your receiving water(s) If you answered yes to question D.2.b, then answer the following three questions:

that receive stormwater directly and/or through an b Are any of your MS4)? discharges directly b.2. Are the b.3. Has a TMDL into any segment of b.1. What pollutant(s) are causing tle pollutant(s) causing been completed for If your receiving water is impaired then identify the an "impaired" impairment? the impairment the pollutant(s) name of the impaired segment, if applicable, in water? present in your causing the parentheses following the receiving water name. discharge? impairment? 0DYES 0D NO D YES D NO D YES D NO D YES D NO D YES D NO []YES 0 NO D YES D NO DYES D NO D YES D NO D YES DNO DYES DNO DYES DNO D YES DNO DYES [lNO []YES []NO D YES DNO DYES [lNO []YES []NO D YES DNO DYES [JNO [0]YES [J]NO DYES DNO DYES D NO DYES D NO D YES D NO D YES D NO DYES D NO_DYES DNO DYES D NO DYES D NO 3. Water Quality Standards (for new dischargers only)a. Are any of your discharges into any portion of a receiving water designated by the state or tribal authority under its antidegradation policy as a Tier 2 (or Tier 2.5) water (water quality exceeds levels necessary to support propagation of fish, shellfish, and wildlife and recreation in and on the water)? D YES [D NO b. Has the receiving water(s) been designated by the state or tribal authority under its antidegradation policy as a Tier 3 water (Outstanding Natural Resource Water)? [D YES D NO 4. Federal Effluent Limitation Guidelines and Sector-Specific Requirements

a. Are you requesting permit coverage for any stormwater discharges subject to effluent limitation guidelines?

D YES [] NO b. If yes, which effluent limitation guidelines apply to your stormwater discharges? 40 CFR Part/Subpart Eligible Discharges Affected MSGP Sector Check If Applicable Part 411, Subpart C Runoff from material storage piles at cement manufacturing facilities E D Runoff from phosphate fertilizer manufacturing facilities that comes Part 418 Subpart A into contact with any raw materials, finished product, by-products or C D waste products (SIC 2874)Part 423 Coal pile runoff at steam electric generating facilities 0 D Part 429, Subpart I Discharges resulting from spray down or intentional wetting of logs at A wet deck storage areas.Part 436, Subpart B, C, or D Mine dewatering discharges at crushed stone mines, construction sand and gravel mines, or industrial sand mines D Part 443, Subpart A Runoff from asphalt emulsion facilities D D Part 445, Subparts A & B Runoff from hazardous waste and non-hazardous waste landfills K, L D c. If you are a Sector S (Air Transportation) facility, do you anticipate using more than 100,000 gallons of glycol-based deicing/anti-icing chemicals and/or 100 tons or more of urea on an average annual basis? Dl YES D NO 5. Identify the 4-digit Standard Industrial Classification (SIC) code or 2-letter Activity Code that best represents the products produced or services rendered for which your facility is primarily engaged, as defined in MSGP: Primary SIC Code: [IJ..JJ OR Primary Activity Code IL.]6. Identify the applicable sector(s) and subsector(s) of industrial activity, including co-located industrial activity, for which you are requesting permit coverage: a. Sector I Subsector [J d. Sector I Subsector [J b. Sector I SubsectorU

e. Sector I SubsectorU
c. Sector s SubsectorL
f. Sector Subsector

[U 7.a. Is your site presently inactive and unstaffed? D YES RDNO bl. If yes, is your site expected to be inactive and unstaffed for the entire permit term? D YES D NO b2. If you select "no" in 7.bl above, then indicate the length of time that you expect your facility to be inactive and unstaffed EPA FORM 3510-6 (Revised 09-2008) Page 2 otT EPA FORM 3510-6 (Revised 09-2008)Page 2 of 7 E. Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) Contact Information la. SWPPP Contact Name: II I I I I I I I _IIIIIII I I I II I I I b. Phone: IIJJ-JJ1 -JJ _J Ex. c.E-ma -_: 2. URL of SWPPP (if applicable): F. Endangered Species Protection

1. Using the instructions in Appendix E of the MSGP, under which criterion listed in Part 1.1.4.5 are you eligible for coverage under this permit?lA LB iC LbD DIE --F 2. If you select criterion E from Part 1.1.4.5: a. What federally-listed species or federally-designated critical habitat are in your "action area?" b. List the pollutants expected to be present in your discharge c. If you are an existing discharger, do you have effluent monitoring data from EPA's MSGP 2000, or another previous NPDES permit? EIYES El NO c.1 if no, why not? El No monitoring required for my sector El Inactive/unstaffed site El Other c.2 Do you have any other data characterizing pollutants in your stormwater (describe)?

c.3 If you have benchmark monitoring data, did you exceed any of the applicable benchmarks? E YES EL NO c.4 Did you exceed any applicable effluent limitation guideline or cause or contribute to an exceedance of a State or Tribal water quality standard?EI YES L NO c.5 If you answered "yes" to either question F.2.c.3 or F.2.c.4 above, for what pollutant(s)?

d. Attach documentation supporting criterion E eligibility.

Documentation should address species and habitat listed in F.2,a and the potential effects of pollutants listed in F.2.b (including any monitoring data for these pollutants) on the listed species and habitat.3. If you select criterion F from Part 1.1.4.5, provide the operator's NPDES Tracking Number under which you are certifying eligibility: G. Historic Preservation Using the instructions in Appendix F of the MSGP, under which criterion listed in Part 1.1.4.6 are you eligible for coverage under this permit?LIA ELB oc LD H. Certifier Name and Title I certify under penalty of law that I meet the eligibility conditions of this permit and that this document and all attachments were prepared under my direction or supervision in accordance with a system designed to assure that qualified personnel properly gather and evaluate the information submitted. Based on my inquiry of the person or persons who manage the system, or those persons directly responsible for gathering the information, I certify that the information submitted is, to the best of my knowledge and belief, true, accurate, and complete. I certify that I am aware that there are significant penalties for submitting false information, including the possibility of fines and imprisonment for knowing violations. Print Name: III I Title: 1 S ignature: Date: IIIII E-mail: NOI Preparer (Complete if NOI was prepared by someone other than the certifier) Prepared by: III Organization: I Phone: ELIJ-LLU-IlUJ ext. [II E-mail: EPA FORM 3510-6 (Revised 09-2008)Page 3 of 7 Attachment

1. (Fill in as necessary if more space is required for D.2 a-e)a. What is the name(s) of your receiving water(s) If you answered yes to question D.2.b, then answer the following three questions:

that receive stormwater from your facility (directly b dsAre any of your and/or through an MS4)? discharges directly b.2. Are the b.3. Has a TMDL into any segment of pollutant(s) causing been completed for If your receiving water is impaired then identify the an "impaired" b.1. What pollutant(s) are causing the pollutant(s) name of the impaired segment, if applicable, in water? impairment? present in your causing the parentheses following the receiving water name. discharge? impairment? 0 YES O]NO 0 YES [j NO 0 YES [-]NO 0 YES 0 NO DYES 0 NO 0 YES 0 NO 0 YES 0DNO YES NO 0 YES 0 NO O]YES W NO DYES NO YES NO[YES NO [YES NO YES NO DYES DNO DYES LINO DYES NO__YES NO DYES NO YES NO 0DYES 0DNO D YES NO YES NO D YES [jNO DYES NO YES NO DYES DNO DYES LINO DYES D NO DYES [DNO D YES D NO 0 YES D NO D YES 0DNO D YES 0 NO IDYES D NO[] YES []NO D YES LINO [] YES D NO D YES LINO D YES LINO D YES D NO DYES 0NO DYES L NO D0YES D NO DYES LINO DYES []NO DYES []NO DYES LINO DYES []NO DYES []NO DYES ]NO DYES KNO DYES HNO D YES DNO D YES LINO [ YES D NO DYES DNO DYES LINO DYES D NO D YES DNO D YES LINO D YES D NO D YES LINO D YES LINO D YES D NO D YES DNO D YES LINO D YES D NO D YES D NO D YES L NO D YES D NO D YES LINO D YES LINO D YES D NO D YES DNO D YES [L NO D YES D NO DYES LINO DYES LINO DYES D NO DYES LINO DYES D NO D YES [ NO DYES LINO DYES D NO DYES LINO DYES E]NO D YES D NO D YES LINO DYES DINO DYES DONO D YES D NO DYES LINO DYES D NO DYES D NO D YES LINO LIYES D NO D YES D NO D YES LINO D YES D NO D YES D NO DYES LINO DYES []NO DYES []NO DYES [DNO D YES [jNO DYES LiNO DYES DNO YES HNO DYES NO DYES LINO DYES [jNO D]YES LiNO DYES LINO DYES DNO DYES DNO D YES DNO D YES LINO D YES D NO D YES DNO D YES D NO D YES D NO D YES DNO D YES LINO D YES D NO LIYES DNO D YES LI NO D YES D NO DYES LINO DYES LINO DYES D NO DYES LINO DYES []NO DYES []NO DYES IlNO DYES LiNO DYES LiINO DYES []NO DYES []NO DYES [IINO D YES D NO DYES []NO DYES [INO DYES DNO DYES []NO DYES HNO D YES DNO D YES LINO D YES D NO DYES DNO DYES LINO DYES LINO__YES DNO DYES D NO D YES DNO EPA FORM 3510-6 (Revised 09-2008)Page 4 of 7 Instructions for Completing the Notice of Intent for Stormwater Discharges Associated with INDUSTRIAL ACTIVITY under the Multi-Sector General Permit (MSGP)NOI Submittal DeadlineslDischarge Authorization Dates Category NOI Deadline-Discharge Authorization Date 1 Existing Dischargers -in No later than January 30 days after EPA posts your operation as of October 5, 2009. NOI. Your authorization under 30, 2005 and authorized the MSGP 2000 is automatically for coverage under continued until you have been MSGP 2000. granted coverage under this permit or an alternative permit, or coverage is otherwise terminated. New Dischargers or As soon as possible 30 days after EPA posts your New Sources -have but no later than NOI.commenced discharging January 5, 2009.between October 30, 2005 and January 5, 2009.New Dischargers or A minimum of 60 days If you post your SWPPP on the New Sources -prior to commencing Internet, 30 days after EPA commence discharging operation of the facility, posts your NOI. Otherwise, 60 after January 5, 2009. or a minimum of 30 days after EPA posts your NOI.days if your SWPPP is posted on the Internet during this period and the Internet address (i.e., URL) to your SWPPP is provided on the NOI form.New Owner/Operator of A minimum of 30 days 30 days after EPA posts your Existing Discharger -prior to date that the NOI.transfer of ownership transfer will take place and/or operation of a to the new facility whose discharge owner/operator. is authorized under this permit Other Eligible Immediately, to If you post your SWPPP on the Dischargers -in minimize the time Internet, 30 days after EPA operation prior to discharges from the posts your NOI. Otherwise, 60 October 30, 2005 but facility will continue to days after EPA posts your NOI..not covered under the be unauthorized. MSGP 2000 or another NPDES permit-- _Based on a review of your NOI or other information, EPA may delay your authorization for further review, notify you that additional effluent limitations are necessary, or may deny coverage under this permit and require submission of an application for an individual NPDES permit, as detailed in MSGP Part 1.6. In these instances, EPA will notify you in writing of the delay or the request for submission of an individual NPDES permit application. EPA will post these NOls on its website at www.epa.gov/npdes/enoi. Who Must File a Notice of Intent with EPA?Under section 402(p) of the Clean Water Act (CWA) and regulations at 40 CFR Part 122, stormwater discharges associated with industrial activity are prohibited to waters of the United States unless authorized under a National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) permit. You can obtain coverage under the MSGP by submitting a completed NOI if you operate a facility: " that is located in a jurisdiction where EPA is the permitting authority, listed in Appendix C of the MSGP," that discharges stormwater associated with industrial activities, identified in Appendix D of the MSGP," that meets the eligibility requirements in Part 1.1 of the permit," that develops a stormwater pollution prevention plan (SWPPP) in accordance with Part 5 of the MSGP; and" that installs and implements control measures in accordance with Part 2 to meet numeric and non-numeric effluent limits.If you are unsure if you need an NPDES stormwater permit, contact your EPA or State NPDES stormwater permit program. Contacts are listed at www.epa.gov/npdes/stormwatercontacts. One NOI must be submitted for each facility or site for which you are seeking permit coverage. You do not need to submit separate NOls for each type of industrial activity present at your facility, provided your SWPPP covers all activities. When to File the NOI Form Do not file your NOI until you have obtained and thoroughly read a copy of the.MSGP. A copy of the MSGP is located on the EPA website (www.epa.qov/npdes/stormwater/msqp). The MSGP describes procedures to ensure your eligibility, prepare your SWPPP, install and implement appropriate stormwater control measures, and complete the NOI form questions -all of which must be done before you sign the NOI certification statement attesting to the EPA FORM 3510-6 (Revised 09-2008)accuracy and completeness of your NOI. You will also need a copy of the MSGP once you have obtained coverage so that you can comply with the implementation requirements of the permit.Where to File the NOI Form EPA encourages you to complete the NOI form electronically via the Internet.EPA's Electronic Notice of Intent System (eNOI) can be found at www.epa.qov/nodes/enoi. Filing electronically is the fastest way to obtain permit coverage and help ensure that your NOI is complete. If you choose not to file electronically, you must send the NOI to one of the addresses listed below.NOls sent regular mail: Stormwater Notice Processing Center (4203M)USEPA 1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW Washington, DC,20460 NOls sent overnight/express mail: Stormwater Notice Processing Center EPA East Building, Rm. 7420 1201 Constitution Avenue, NW Washington, DC 20004 202-564-9545 If you have questions, please contact EPA's Stormwater Notice Processing Center toll free at (866) 352-7755." If you file a paper NOI, please submit the original with a signature in ink-Do Not Send Copies. Also, faxed copies will not be accepted." Your SWPPP does not need to be submitted for review unless specifically requested by EPA or as otherwise required in Part 9 of the MSGP (State, Territory, and Tribal requirements). You must keep a copy of your SWPPP on-site or otherwise make it available to facility personnel responsible for implementing provisions of the permit.Completing the NOI Form To complete this form, type or print in uppercase letters in the appropriate areas only. Please make sure you complete all questions. Make sure you make a photocopy for your records before you send the completed original form to the address above. You may also use this paper form as a checklist for the information you will need when filing an NOI electronically via EPA's eNOI system.Section A. Permit Number Appendix C of the MSGP 2008 contains a list of geographic areas covered by the permit. If your facility is located in one of the listed areas, include the appropriate permit number in this section. (For example, if you facility is located in Massachusetts, and not on Indian Lands, you would write MAR050000 in this space.) If your facility is located in an area not covered by the MSGP, please contact your EPA Region, state or territorial NPDES stormwater coordinator (see www.epa.qov/npdes/stormwatercontacts for a list of contacts). Section B. Facility Operator Information

1. Provide the legal name of the person, firm, public organization or any other public entity that operates the facility described in this application.

An operator of a facility is a legal entity that controls the operation of the facility.2. Provide the Employer Identification Number (EIN from the Internal Revenue Service (IRS)), commonly referred to as your taxpayer ID number. If the operator does not have an EIN, enter "NA" in the space provided.3. Provide the operator's mailing address, telephone number, fax number (optional), and email address. Correspondence will be sent to this address.Section C. Facility Information

1. Enter the facility's official or legal name. Unless the name of your facility has changed, please use the same name provided on prior NOls or permit applications.

You can use EPA's NOI Search website (www.epa.qov/npdes/noisearch) to view your previous NOI.2. Indicate if industrial stormwater discharges from your facility were previously covered by an NPDES permit.2a.lf your facility was covered by EPA's MSGP-2000, please include the tracking number that you received in your confirmation letter or email from EPA's Stormwater Notice Processing Center. You can find the tracking number assigned to your previous NOI on EPA's NOI Search website (www.epa.gov/npdes/noisearch). 2bl.If your facility was not previously covered by an NPDES permit and discharged industrial stormwater, then indicate if it was in operation before October 30, 2005 and not covered under the MSGP 2000. If you select "yes" to this question then you have a 30 day waiting period before you are authorized to discharge. 2b2.lf you select "no" in C.2.b.1, then indicate if your facility discharged stormwater between October 30, 2005 and January 5, 2009. If you select 'yes" to this Page 5 of 7 question then you have a 30 day waiting period before you are authorized to discharge. If you select "no" to this question and you post your SWPPP on the Internet and provide EPA the URL in E.2, then you have a 30 day waiting period before you are authorized to discharge. If you select "no" to this question, but do not post your SWPPP on the Internet and therefore do not answer E.2, then you have a 60 day waiting period before you are authorized to discharge. 3.a-e. Enter the street address, including city, state, zip code, county or similar government subdivision of the actual physical location of the facility. Do not use a P.O. Box.3.f-g. Provide the facility latitude and longitude in one of three formats: (1) degrees, minutes, seconds; (2) degrees, minutes, decimal; or(3) degrees decimal. You can obtain your facility's latitude and longitude though Global Positioning System (GPS) receivers, U.S. Geological Survey (USGS) quadrangle or topographic maps, and EPA's web-based siting-tools, among other methods.Refer to www.epa.qov/npdes/stormwater/msqp for guidance on the use of these methods. For consistency, EPA requests you take measurements from the location of your facility's stormwater outfall. Outfalls are locations where the stormwater exits the facility, including pipes, ditches, swales, and other structures that transport stormwater. If there is more than one outfall present, measure at the primary outfall (i.e., the outfall with the largest volume of stormwater discharge associated with industrial activity). 3.h. Identify the data source that you used to determine the facility latitude and longitude. If you did not use a USGS quadrangle or topographic map, the EPA website, or GPS receivers, then select "Other" and write the method used on the line provided. If you used a USGS quadrangle or topographic map, write the map scale on the line provided. Scale should be identified on the map.4. Enter the estimated area of industrial activity at your site exposed to stormwater, in acres.5. Indicate if the facility is considered a "federal facility" -Federal facilities include any buildings, installations, structures, land, public works, equipment, aircraft, vessels, and other vehicles and property, owned or leased by the federal government.

6. Indicate whether the facility is located in indian Country, and, if so, provide the name of the reservation, if applicable.

Section D. Discharge Information

1. Indicate whether stormwater from your site will be discharged into a municipal separate storm sewer system (MS4). An MS4 is a conveyance or system of conveyances, including roads with drainage systems, municipal streets, catch basins, storm drains, curbs and gutters, ditches and man-made channels, owned or operated by a state, city, town, borough, county, parish, district, association or other public body, used to collect or convey stormwater.

If you check "Yes" then identify the name of the MS4 operator on the line provided. If you are uncertain of the MS4 operator, contact your local government for that information. MS4s are different than combined sewers, which are designed to convey both stormwater and sanitary wastewater. Discharges to combined sewers do not require an NPDES permit but may be subject to other CWA requirements (contact the combined sewer operator for more information).

2. Enter information regarding your discharge.

If additional space is needed fill out Attachment 1.2a. Indicate in column "a" of the table the name(s) of the receiving water(s) into which stormwater from your facility will discharge. Also provide in parentheses the name of the impaired water (and segment, if applicable) into which your stormwater is discharged. If you identified more than on receiving water for your facility, indicate the first receiving water and complete question 2b and 2.b.1-3 (if applicable), before entering the next receiving water. The EPA's Water Locator Tool can help you identify the closest receiving water to your facility (www.epa.qov/npdes/msqp). Your receiving water may be a lake, stream, river, ocean, wetland or other waterbody, and may or may not be located adjacent to your facility. Your stormwater may discharge directly to the receiving water or indirectly via a storm sewer system, an open drain or ditch, or other conveyance structure. Do NOT list a man-made conveyance, such as a storm sewer system, as your receiving water. Indicate the first receiving water your stormwater discharge enters. For example, if your discharge enters a storm sewer system, that empties into Trout Creek, which flows into Pine River, your receiving water is Trout Creek, because it is the first waterbody your discharge will reach. Similarly, a discharge into a ditch that feeds Spring Creek should be identified as "Spring Creek" since the ditch is a manmade conveyance. If you discharge into a municipal separate storm sewer system (MS4), you must identify the waterbody into which that portion of the storm sewer discharges. That information should be readily available from the operator of the MS4.2b. Indicate in column Vb" of the table whether you discharge directly to an impaired water (lake, stream segment, estuary, etc), listed as "impaired" under section 303(d) of the Clean Water Act. Each state water quality agency maintains a list of waters that are impaired. Most state agencies publish these lists online. The EPA's Water Locator Tool may also help you identify if the nearest receiving water is impaired (www.eoa.qov/npdes/msqo). If you discharge into a stream EPA FORM 3510-6 (Revised 09-2008)segment that is upstream of a listed impaired water but which is not itself on the State's impaired waters list, answer "no" to this question. In this case, requirements in the MSGP for discharges into impaired waters do not apply to you, unless notified otherwise by EPA.Answer the following three questions only if you answered "Yes" to D 2.b: 2b1. Provide the pollutant(s) listed as causing the impairment in the water identified in D.2.b.1 above. Enter each pollutant individually on a separate row in the table.2b2. Out of the pollutant(s) that you identified in D.2.b.1 above, indicate which pollutants you believe will be present in your discharge. If you do not expect the pollutant(s) to be in your discharge, then select "no." 2b3.lndicate the pollutant(s) that have a Total Maximum Daily Load (TMDL) for the impaired stream segment that you identified in D.2.b.2 above. Check with your state water quality agency for lists of waters with approved or established TMDLs. See www.epa.qov/npdes/msqp for more information.

3. Water Quality Standards 3a.lf you selected "no" in C.2 indicating that stormwater discharges from your facility have not been previously covered under an NPDES permit, then you are considered a new discharger and must answer this question; otherwise you are considered an existing discharger and may skip this question.

State water quality agencies are responsible for setting water quality standards for waters within the state's boundaries. Check EPA's website (www.epa.gov/npdes/msqp) to determine if the water(s) that you discharge into are designated as a "Tier 2 (or Tier 2.5) water" (See Appendix A of the MSGP 2008 for definitions of "Tier 2 water" and "Tier 2.5 water"). If you discharge into these waters, EPA may impose additional permit conditions to ensure that you do not violate the State's antidegradation policy.3.b Idenitfy whether your receiving water is designated as a Tier 3 waterbody. Go to www.epa.qov/npdes/msqp for a list of Tier 3 waterbodies. Note that new discharges into designated Tier 3 waters are not eligible for coverage under the MSGP 2008.4. Federal Effluent Limitation Guidelines and Sector-Specific Requirements 4.a-b. Depending on your industrial activities, your facility may be subject to effluent limitation guidelines which include additional effluent limits and monitoring requirements for your facility. Please review these requirements, described in Part 2.1.3 of the MSGP, and check any appropriate boxes on the NOI form.4.c. For Sector S facilities (Air Transportation), indicate whether you anticipate that the entire airport facility will use more than 100,000 gallons of glycol-based deicing/anti-icing chemicals and/or 100 tons or more of urea on an average annual basis. If so, additional effluent limits and monitoring conditions apply to your discharge (see Part 8 Sector S of the MSGP 2008).5. List the four-digit Standard Industrial Classification (SIC) code and/or two character activity code that best describes the primary industrial activities performed by your facility under which you are required to obtain permit coverage. Your primary industrial activity includes any activities performed on-site which are (1) identified by the facility's one SIC code for which the facility is primarily engaged; and (2) included in the narrative descriptions of 40 CFR 122.26(b)(14)(i), (iv), (v), or (vii), and (ix). See Appendix D of the MSGP for a complete list of SIC codes and activities codes.6. If your site has co-located industrial activities that are not identified as your primary industrial activity, identify the sector and subsector codes that describe these other industrial activities. For a complete list of sector and subsector codes, see Appendix D of the MSGP.7.a-b Indicate whether your facility is currently inactive and unstaffed. If so then indicate whether your facility will be inactive and unstaffed for the entire permit term, or if not, specify the specific length of time in units of days, weeks, months, or years (e.g. 3 months) that you expect the facility to be inactive and unstaffed. Section E. Facility Contact Information and SWPPP Location 1.a-c. Identify the name, telephone number, and email address of the person who will serve as a contact for EPA on issues related to stormwater management at your facility. This person should be able to answer questions related to stormwater discharges, the SWPPP, and other issues related to stormwater permit coverage, or have immediate access to individuals with that knowledge. This person does not have to be the facility operator, but should have intimate knowledge of stormwater management activities at the facility.2. If you are making your Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan publicly available on a website provide the appropriate Internet URL address. (Please note that by posting your SWPPP on the web, you may qualify for a shortened authorization waiting period. See Table 1-2 of the MSGP for more information.) Section F. Endangered Species Protection

1. Based on the instruction provided in Appendix E of the MSGP 2008, indicate which permit criterion (A,B,C,D,E, or F) listed in Part 1.1.4.5 you are using to satisfy your eligibility obligations for protection of endangered and threatened species, and designated critical habitat.Page 6 ot 7 2.a. If you select criterion E (not likely to adversely affect), list those federally-listed endangered or threatened species and any federally-listed designated critical habitat expected to exist in proximity to your facility.2.b List the pollutants that you expect to be present in your stormwater discharge.

Include any pollutants that you may have included in D.2.b.3 above.2.c If you selected "yes" in C.2 then you are considered an existing discharger and must answer all the questions in F.2.c.1-5; otherwise you are considered a new discharger and may skip the questions under F.2.c. If you are an exisfing discharger who was previously covered under the MSGP 2000, indicate whether you have any previous effluent monitoring data.2.cl-2.If you select "No," to F.2.c then indicate why you don't have any data. Also indicate if you have any other data characterizing pollutants in your stormwater discharge. 2.c.3. If you select 'Yes," to F.2.c then indicate whether you exceeded any benchmark. 2.c.4 Indicate whether you have exceeded any applicable effluent limitation guideline, or caused or contributed to an exceedance of state or tribal water quality requirement(s). 2.c.5. If you select "Yes" to F.2.c.3.and/or F.2.c.4 then indicate the pollutant parameters for which you exceeded the benchmark, applicable effluent limitation guideline, or State or Tribal water quality requirement(s). 2.d. Attach your supporting rationale for your determination of the applicability of Criterion E for your facility (applies to both new and existing dischargers). Your documentation should address species and habitat listed in F.2.a and the potential effects of pollutants listed in F.2.b on the listed species and habitat.This should include consideration of any available data characterizing pollutants in your stormwater discharge, or in the discharge of similar facilities if data for you facility is not available, that may be of concern to listed species.3. If you select Criterion F (already addressed in another operators valid certification), provide the tracking number that the operator received in their confirmation letter or email from EPA's NOI Processing Center (see Appendix E). You can find the tracking number assigned to your previous NOI on EPA's NOI Search website (www.epa.gov/npdes/noisearch). An example where criterion F may apply includes airports where several individual aidines have applied for coverage under the MSGP, and the entire airport also has applied for or obtained coverage. If the airport has already certified under Appendix E, and that certification addresses any potential impacts from the individual airlines, then the airlines may reference the airport's permit tracking number.Section G. Historic Preservation Based on the instruction provided in Appendix F of the MSGP 2008, indicate which permit criterion (A, B, C, or D) listed in Part 1.1.4.6 of the MSGP you used to satisfy your eligibility obligations for protection of historic properties. Section H. Certification Certification statement and signature (see Section B.1 1 of Appendix B of the MSGP for more information). Enter certifier's printed name, titie and email address.Sign and date the form. (CAUTION: An unsigned or undated NOI form will prevent the granting of permit coverage.) Federal statutes provide for severe penalties for submitting false information on this application form. Federal regulations require this application to be signed as follows: For a corporation: by a responsible corporate officer, which means: (i) president, secretary, treasurer, or vice-president of the corporation in charge of a principal business function, or any other person who performs similar policy or decision making functions for the corporation, or (ii) the manager of one or more manufacturing, production, or operating facilities, provided the manager is authorized to make management decisions which govern the operation of the regulated facility including having the explicit or implicit duty of making major capital investment recommendations, and initiating and directing other comprehensive measures to assure long term environmental compliance with environmental laws and regulations; the manager can ensure that the necessary systems are established or actions taken to gather complete and accurate information for permit application requirements; and where authority to sign documents has been assigned or delegated to the manager in accordance with corporate procedures; For a partnership or sole proprietorship: by a general partner or the proprietor; or For a municipal, State, Federal, or other public facility: by either a principal executive or ranking elected official.If the NOI was prepared by someone other than the certifier (for example, if the NOI was prepared by the facility SWPPP contact or a consultant for the certifier's signature), include the name, organization, phone number and email address of the NOI preparer.Paperwork Reduction Act Notice Public reporting burden for this certification is estimated to average 3.7 hours per certification, including time for reviewing instructions, searching existing data sources, gathering and maintaining the data needed, and completing and reviewing the collection of information. Burden means the total time, effort, or financial resources expended by persons to generate, maintain, retain, or disclose to provide EPA FORM 3510-6 (Revised 09-2008)information to or for a Federal agency. This includes the time needed to review instructions; develop, acquire, install, and utilize technology and systems for the purposes of collecting, validating, and verifying information, processing and maintaining information, and disclosing and providing information; adjust the existing ways to comply with any previously applicable instructions and requirements; train personnel to be able to respond to a collection of information; search data sources;complete and review the collection of information; and transmit or otherwise disclose the information. An agency may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required to respond to, a collection of information unless it displays a currently valid OMB control number. Send comments regarding the burden estimate, any other aspect of the collection of information, or suggestions for improving this form, including any suggestions which may increase or reduce this burden to: Director, Office of Environmental Information Services, Collection Services Division (2823), USEPA, 1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Washington, DC 20460. Include the OMB control number of this form on any correspondence. Do not send the completed NOI form to this address.Page 7 of 7 General Permit Appendix H Notice of Termination (NOT) Form Stormwater Discharges Associated With Industrial Activity -Appendix H H-1 General Permit Appendix H -Notice of Termination (NOT) Form To terminate coverage under this permit, you must submit a Notice of Termination (NOT). You must either (1) terminate coverage using EPA's online eNOl system, available at www.epa.gov/npdes/eNOl or (2) file a paper copy of the NOT, a copy of which follows.Stormwater Discharges Associated With Industrial Activity -Appendix H H-2 This Form Replaces Previous Form 2040-0086 (Please See Instructions Before Completing This Form)UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY NP3DES1p A WASHINGTON, DC 20460 Form Approved.FORM NOTICE OF TERMINATION (NOT) OF COVERAGE UNDER A NPDES GENERAL PERMIT OMB No. 2040-0086 FOR STORMWATER DISCHARGES ASSOCIATED WITH INDUSTRIAL ACTIVITY Submission of this Notice of Termination (NOT) constitutes notice that the party identified in Section B of this form is no longer authorized to discharge stormwater associated with industrial activity under the NPDES program for the facility identified in Section C of this form. All necessary information must be included on this form.Refer to the instructions at the end of this form.A. Permit Number: 1. NPDES Permit Tracking Number: I[1LJ1111 2. Reason for Termination (check one only): a. El You transferred operational control to another operator.b. El You no longer have a stormwater discharge associated with industrial activity subject to regulation under the NPDES program, and you have already implemented necessary sediment and erosion controls as required by Part 2.1.2.5.c. Eli You are a Sector G, H, or J facility and you have met the applicable termination requirements.

d. EL You obtained coverage under an alternative NPDES permit.B. Facility Operator Information
1. Name: Il I lI II_ I _II II_1 1 II I IIII_ I I1 1 II III I II I_1_1 2. IRS Employer Identification Number (EIN): -L 111LL 1 3. Mailing Address: a.'Street:l b.City: Illc.'State:...[..

d.ZipC ode: :[jjI jJ- [jjJ a. Phone: f, JJ] WJJ Fax g E-ma l __(optiona,): 1 1 1 ' -I I I Ig m " C. Facility Information 1.Facility Name:I I I I I II II I I I I 2. Location Address: a. Street I b. City: 1 c. County or similar government subdivision: II _II II II II d. State: a. Zip Code: i_[]_]_] -L _M D. Certifier Name and Title I certify under penalty of law that I have met at least one of the reasons for terminating permit coverage listed in Section A.2 above. I understand that by submitting this Notice of Termination, I am no longer authorized to discharge stormwater associated with industrial activity under this general permit, and that discharging pollutants in stormwater associated with industrial activity to waters of the United States is unlawful under the Clean Water Act where the discharge is not authorized by a NPDES permit. I also understand that the submittal of this Notice of Termination does not release an operator from liability for any violations of this permit or the Clean Water Act.Print Name: ____________________________ Title: IIIIIIIII IIII Signature: Date: IIIjj E-mail: EPA FORM 3510-7 (Revised 09-2008)Page I of 2 Instructions for Completing the Notice of Termination for Sto.rmwater Discharges Associated with INDUSTRIAL ACTIVITY under the Multi-Sector General Permit (MSGP)Who May File Notice of Termination (NOT) Form Permittees currently covered by EPA's NPDES Stormwater Multi-Sector General Permit may submit a Notice of Termination (NOT) form. You must submit an NOT within 30 days after one or more of the following conditions have been met:* a new owner or operator has assumed responsibility for the facility; or" you have ceased operations at the facility and there are not or no longer will be discharges of stormwater associated with industrial activity from the facility, and you have already implemented necessary sediment and erosion controls as required by Part 2.1.2.5;* you are a Sector G, H, or J facility and you have met the applicable termination requirements; or" you have obtained coverage under an individual or alternative general permit for all discharges required to be covered by an NPDES permit.See the MSGP Part 1.4 for more information. Where to File NOT form EPA encourages you to complete the NOT form online, via the Intemet. The Electronic Notice of Intent System (eNOI) is found at www.epa.gov/npdes/eNOl. If you cannot access the electronic system, you must send the NOT to the address listed below.NOTs sent regular mail: Stormwater Notice of Termination (4203M)USEPA 1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW Washington, D.C. 20460 NOTs sent overnight/express Stormwater Notice of Termination US EPA East Building, Rm 7420 1201 Constitution Avenue, NW Washington, D.C. 20004 (202) 564-9545 Completing the Form To complete this form, type or print in uppercase letters in the appropriate areas only.Please make sure you complete all questions. Make sure you make a photocopy for your records before you send the completed original form to the address above.Please use ink when you sign the original document-DO NOT send copies. If you have any questions about this form, you may call the EPA's Stormwater Notice Processing Center at (866) 352-7755.Section A. Permit Information

1. Enter the NPDES tracking number assigned by EPA's Stormwater Notice Processing Center to the facility.

If you do not know the tracking number, you can find the tracking number assigned to your previous NOI on EPA's NOI Search website (www.epa.,qov/npdes/noisearch).

2. Indicate your reason for submitting this Notice of Termination by checking the appropriate box (see MSGP Part 1.4 for more information).

Section B. Facility Operator Information

1. Give the legal name of the person, firm, public organization, or any other entity that operates the facility described in this application.

The operator of the facility is the legal entity which controls the facility's operation, rather than the plant or site manager.Do not use a colloquial name.2-3. Enter the facility operator's IRS Employer Identification Number (also know as the tax payer ID number). Enter the complete mailing address, email address and telephone number of the operator. This address will be used for any future correspondence between EPA and the facility operator.Section C. Facility Information 1-2. Enter the facility's official or legal name and complete address, including city, county or similar government subdivision, state, and ZIP code.Section D. Certification Certification statement and signature (see Section B.11 of Appendix B of the MSGP for more information). Enter certifier's printed name, fitle and email address. Sign and date the form. Federal statutes provide for severe penalties for submitting false information on this application form. Federal regulations require this application to be signed as follows: For a corporation: by a responsible corporate officer, which means: (i) president, secretary, treasurer, or vice-president of the corporation in charge of the principal business function, or any other person who performs similar policy or decision making functions, or (ii) the manager of one or more manufacturing, production, or operating facilities employing more than 250 persons or having gross annual sales or expenditures exceeding $25 million (in second-quarter 1980 dollars), if authority to sign documents has been assigned or delegated to the manager in accordance with corporate procedures; For a partnership or sole proprietorship: by a general partner or the proprietor; or For a municipality State, Federal, or other facility. by either a principal executive office or ranking elected official.Paperwork Reduction Act Notice Public reporting burden for this application is estimated to average 0.5 hours per application, including time for reviewing instructions, searching existing data sources, gathering and maintaining the data needed, and completing and reviewing the collection of information. Send comments regarding the burden estimate, any other aspect of the collection of information, or suggestions for improving this form, including any suggestions which may increase or reduce this burden to: Director, Office of Environmental Information Services, Collection Services Division (2823), USEPA, 1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Washington, DC 20460. Include the OMB control number of this form on any correspondence. Do not send the completed NOT form to this address.EPA FORM 3510-7 (Revised 09-2008)Page 2 of 2 General Permit Appendix I Annual Reporting Form Stormwater Discharges Associated With Industrial Activity -Appendix I 1-1 NPDES Permit Tracking No.: UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY WASHINGTON, DC 20460 Annual Reporting Form A. GENERAL INFORMATION

1. Fac ,iiy am e: I I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I I I I I I I I 1 1 1 2. NPDES Permit Tracking No.: L1111LLLL11
3. Facility Physical Address: a .Street: I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I l l l b.C ity: i l l i l l I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 c. State: 4.LeadlnspectorsN ame: I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I Title: I W d.ZipCode:Wl WI I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 Ilrlllllll[lllfllfl}l I Additional Inspectors Name(s): Ill 5. Contact Person: III 111111111111111111111 Title: I 1111111111111111111 Phone: I ý -I Id I 1 -1 1 1 I IExt. I E-mail:l 6. Inspection Date: M / M /I WI__ I B. GENERAL INSPECTION FINDINGS 1. As part of this comprehensive site inspection, did you inspect all potential pollutant sources, including areas where industrial activity may be exposed to stormwater?

ED YES EL NO If NO, describe why not: NOTE: Complete Section C of this form for each industrial activity area inspected and included in your SWPPP or as newly identified in B.2 or B.3 below where pollutants may be exposed to stormwater.

2. Did this inspection identify any stormwater or non-stormwater outfalls not previously identified in your SWPPP? El YES E1 NO If YES, for each location, describe the sources of those stormwater and non-stormwater discharges and any associated control measures in place:

NPDES Permit Tracking No.: 3. Did this inspection identify any sources of stormwater or non-stormwater discharges not previously identified in your SWPPP? El YES El NO If YES, describe these sources of stormwater or non-stormwater pollutants expected to be present in these discharges, and any control measures in place: 4. Did you review stormwater monitoring data as part of this inspection to identify potential pollutant hot spots? El YES LI NO [I NA, no monitoring performed If YES, summarize the findings of that review and describe any additional inspection activities resulting from this review: 5. Describe any evidence of pollutants entering the drainage system or discharging to surface waters, and the condition of and around outfalls, including flow dissipation measures to prevent scouring: 6. Have you taken or do you plan to take any corrective actions, as specified in Part 3 of the permit, since your last annual report submission (or since you received authorization to discharge under this permit if this is your first annual report), including any corrective actions identified as a result of this annual comprehensive site inspection? El YES El NO If YES, how many conditions requiring review for correction action as specified in Parts 3.1 and 3.2 were addressed by these corrective actions? w NOTE: Complete the attached Corrective Action Form (Section D) for each condition identified, including any conditions identified as a result of this comprehensive stormwater inspection. NPDES Permit Tracking No.: C. INDUSTRIAL ACTIVITY AREA SPECIFIC FINDINGS Complete one block for each industrial activity area where pollutants may be exposed to stormwater. Copy this page for additional industrial activity areas.In reviewing each area, you should consider:* Industrial materials, residue, or trash that may have or could come into contact with stormwater; .Leaks or spills from industrial equipment, drums, tanks, and other containers; .Offsite tracking of industrial or waste materials from areas of no exposure to exposed areas; and.Tracking or blowing of raw, final, or waste materials from areas of no exposure to exposed areas.INDUSTRIAL ACTIVITY AREA 1. Brief

Description:

2. Are any control measures in need of maintenance or repair? EI YES El NO 3. Have any control measures failed and require replacement?

E3 YES E- NO 4. Are any additional/revised control measures necessary in this area? El YES 0l NO If YES to any of these three questions, provide a description of the problem: (Any necessary corrective actions should be described on the attached Corrective Action Form)INDUSTRIAL ACTIVITY AREA 1. Brief

Description:

2. Are any control measures in need of maintenance or repair? El YES 0l NO 3. Have any control measures failed and require replacement?

El YES El NO 4. Are any additional/revised c necessary in this area? El YES El NO If YES to any of these three questions, provide a description of the problem: (Any necessary corrective actions should be described on the attached Corrective Action Form)INDUSTRIAL ACTIVITY AREA Brief

Description:

2. Are any control measures in need of maintenance or repair? El YES [] NO 3. Have any control measures failed and require replacement?

El YES El NO 4. Are any additionasVrevised BMPs necessary in this area? El YES El NO If YES to any of these three questions, provide a description of the problem: (Any necessary corrective actions should be described on the attached Corrective Action Form) NPEDES Permit Tracking No.: NOTE: Copy this page and attach additional pages as necessary INDUSTRIAL ACTIVITY AREA 1. Brief

Description:

2. Are any control measures in need of maintenance or repair? [I YES El NO 3. Have any control measures failed and require replacement?

El YES El NO 4. Are any additional/revised BMPs necessary in this area? E- YES [I NO If YES to any of these three questions, provide a description of the problem: (Any necessary corrective actions should be described on the attached Corrective Action Form)INDUSTRIAL ACTIVITY AREA -: 1. Brief

Description:

2. Are any control measures in need of maintenance or repair? El YES El NO 3. Have any control measures failed and require replacement?

El YES El NO 4. Are any additional/revised BMPs necessary in this area? El YES [E NO If YES to any of these three questions, provide a description of the problem: (Any necessary corrective actions should be described on the attached Corrective Action Form)INDUSTRIAL ACTIVITY AREA 1. Brief

Description:

2. Are any control measures in need of maintenance or repair? El YES 3. Have any control measures failed and require replacement?

[E YES 4. Are any additional/revised BMPs necessary in this area? El YES If YES to any of these three questions, provide a description ot the problem: Corrective Action Form)El NO El NO El NO (Any necessary corrective actions should be described on the attached NPDES Permit Tracking No.: D. CORRECTIVE ACTIONS Complete this page for each specific condition requiring a corrective action or a review determining that no corrective action is needed. Copy this page for additional corrective actions or reviews.Include both corrective actions that have been initiated or completed since the last annual report, and future corrective actions needed to address problems identified in this comprehensive stormwater inspection. Include an update on any outstanding corrective actions that had not been completed at the time of your previous annual report.1. Corrective Action # LL of [_J for this reporting period.2. Is this corrective action: El An update on a corrective action from a previous annual report; or El A new corrective action?3. Identify the condition(s) triggering the need for this review: El Unauthorized release or discharge[] Numeric effluent limitation exceedance El Control measures inadequate to meet applicable water quality standards El Control measures inadequate to meet non-numeric effluent limitations El Control measures not properly operated or maintained El Change in facility operations necessitated change in control measures El Average benchmark value exceedance El Other (describe):

4. Briefly describe the nature of the problem identified:
5. Date problem identified:

W/ iii 6. How problem was identified: El Comprehensive site inspection El Quarterly visual assessment El Routine facility-inspection El Benchmark monitoring El Notification by EPA or State or local authorities El Other (describe):

7. Description of corrective action(s) taken or to be taken to eliminate or further investigate the problem (e.g., describe modifications or repairs to control measures, analyses to be conducted, etc.) or if no modifications are needed, basis for that determination:

B. Did/will this corrective action require modification of your SWPPP? El YES El NO 9. Date corrective action initiated: I_ / L /I I /I / I I I I 10. Date correction action completed: c.JjJJ or expected to be Li Li ~~completed:LiLi ii 11. If corrective action not yet completed, provide the status of corrective action at the time of the comprehensive site inspection and describe any remaining steps (including timeframes associated with each step) necessary to complete corrective action: NPDES Permit Tracking No.: I I I I I I I I I I I E. ANNUAL REPORT CERTIFICATION

1. Compliance Certification Do you certify that your annual inspection has met the requirements of Part 4.2 of the permit, and that, based upon the results of this inspection, to the best of your knowledge, you are in compliance with the permit? El YES El NO If NO, summarize why you are not in compliance with the permit: 2. Annual Report Certification I certify under penalty of law that this document and all attachments were prepared under my direction or supervision in accordance with a system designed to assure that qualified personnel properly gathered and evaluated the information submitted.

Based on my inquiry of the person or persons who manage the system, or those persons directly responsible for gathering the information, the information submitted is, to the best of my knowledge and belief, true, accurate, and complete. I am aware that there are significant penalties for submitting false information, including the possibility of fine and imprisonment for knowing violations. Authorized Representative I I I I I I I Title: III I I I I Printed Name: Date Signed: Signature: Date Signed: General Permit Appendix J Calculating Hardness in Receiving Waters for Hardness Dependent Metals Stormwater Discharges Associated With Industrial Activity -Appendix J J-1 -General Permit Appendix J. Calculating Hardness in Receiving Waters for Hardness Dependent Metals Overview EPA adjusted the benchmarks for six hardness-dependent metals (i.e., cadmium, copper, lead, nickel, silver, and zinc) to further ensure compliance with water quality standards and provide additional protection for endangered species and their critical habitat. For any sectors required to conduct benchmark samples for a hardness-dependent metal, EPA includes 'hardness ranges'from which benchmark values are determined. To determine which hardness range to use, you must collect data on the hardness of your receiving water(s). Once the site-specific hardness data have been collected, the corresponding benchmark value for each metal is determined by comparing where the hardness data fall within 25 mg/L ranges, as shown in Table 1.Table 1. Hardness Ranges to Be Used to Determine Benchmark Values for Cadmium, Copper, Lead, Nickel, Silver, and Zinc.All Units '" Benchmark Values (mgiL/ total)mg/L Cadmium Copper Lead Nickel Silver Zinc 0.0005 0.0038 0.014 0.15 0.0007 0.04 0.0008 0.0056 0.023 0.20 0.0007 0.05._i5'. L 0.0013 0.0090 0.045 0.32 0.0017 0.08 71006 / 0.0018 0.0123 0.069 0.42 0.0030 0.11 S0.0023 0.0156 0.095 0.52 0.0046 0.13 ql 0.0029 0.0189 0.122 0.61 0.0065 0.16 L5.al7g'nM. 0.0034 0.0221 0.151 0.71 0.0087 0.18 U/ 0.0039 0.0253 0.182 0.80 0.0112 0.20 2 f 9 0.0045 0.0285 0.213 0.89 0.0138 0.23 mg/i% 0.0050 0.0316 0.246 0.98 0.0168 0.25 g51,/L , 0.0053 0.0332 0.262 1.02 0.0183 0.26 How to Determine Hardness for Hardness-Dependent Parameters. You may select one of three methods to determine hardness, including; individual grab sampling, grab sampling by a group of operators which discharge to the same receiving water, or using third-party data. Regardless of the method used, you are responsible for documenting the procedures used for determining hardness values. Once the hardness value is established, you are required to include this information in your first benchmark report submitted to EPA so that the Agency can make appropriate comparisons between your benchmark monitoring results and the corresponding benchmark. You must retain all report and monitoring data in accordance with Part 7.5 of the permit. The three method options for determining hardness are detailed in the following sections.(1) Permittee Samples for Receiving Stream Hardness This method involves collecting samples in the receiving water and submitting these to a laboratory for analysis. If you elect to sample your receiving water(s) and submit samples for Stormwater Discharges Associated With Industrial Activity -Appendix J J-2 General Permit analysis, hardness must be determined from the closest intermittent or perennial stream downstream of your point of discharge. The sample can be collected during either dry or wet weather. Collection of the sample during wet weather is more representative of conditions during stormwater discharges; however, collection of in-stream samples during wet weather events may be impracticable or present safety issues.Hardness must be sampled and analyzed using approved methods as described in 40 CFR Part 136 (Guidelines Establishing Test Procedures for the Analysis of Pollutants). (2) Group Monitoring for Receiving Stream Hardness You can be part of a group of permittees discharging to the same receiving waters and collect samples that are representative of the hardness values for all members of the group. In this scenario, hardness of the receiving water must be determined using 40 CFR Part 136 procedures and the results shared by group members. To use the same results, hardness measurements must be taken on a stream reach within a reasonable distance of the discharge points of each of the group members.(3) Collection of Third-Party Hardness Data You can submit receiving stream hardness data collected by a third party provided the results are collected consistent with the approved 40 CFR Part 136 methods. These data may come from a local water utility, previously conducted stream reports, TMDLs, peer reviewed literature, other government publications, or data previously collected by the permittee. Data should be less than 10 years old.Water quality data for many of the nation's surface waters are available on-line or by contacting EPA or a state environmental agency. EPA's data system STORET, short for STOrage and RETrieval, is a repository for receiving water quality, biological, and physical data and is used by state environmental agencies, EPA and other federal agencies, universities, private citizens, and many others. Similarly, state environmental agencies and the U.S. Geological Service (USGS) also have water quality data available that, in some instances, can be accessed online. "Legacy STORET" codes for hardness include: 259 hardness, carbonate; 260 hardness, noncarbonated; and 261 calcium + magnesium, while more recent, "Modern STORET" data codes include: 00900 hardness, 00901 carbonate hardness, and 00902 noncarbonate hardness; or the discrete measurements of calcium (00915) and magnesium (00925) can be used to calculate hardness. Hardness data historically has been reported as "carbonate," "noncarbonate," or "Ca +Mg." If these are unavailable, then individual results for calcium (Ca) and magnesium (Mg) may be used to calculate hardness using the following equation: mg/L CaCO 3 = 2.497 (Ca mg/L) + 4.118 (Mg mg/L)When interpreting the data for carbonate and non-carbonate hardness, note that total hardness is equivalent to the sum of carbonate and noncarbonate hardness if both forms are reported. If only carbonate hardness is reported, it is more than likely that noncarbonate hardness is absent and the total hardness is equivalent to the available carbonate hardness.Stormwater Discharges Associated With Industrial Activity -Appendix J J-3 General Permit Appendix K No Exposure Certification Form Stormwater Discharges Associated With Industrial Activity -Appendix K K-1 NPDES UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY Form Approved FORM WASHINGTON, DC 20460 OMB No. 2040-0211 3510-11 NO EXPOSURE CERTIFICATION FOR EXCLUSION FROM NPDES STORMWATER PERMITTING Submission of this No Exposure Certification constitutes notice that the entity identified in Section A does not require permit authorization for its stormwater discharges associated with industrial activity in the State identified in Section B under EPA's Stormwater Multi Sector General Permit due to the existence of a condition of no exposure.A condition of no exposure exists at an industrial facility when all industrial materials and activities are protected by a storm resistant shelter to prevent exposure to rain, snow, snowmelt, and/or runoff. Industrial materials or activities include, but are not limited to, material handling equipment or activities, industrial machinery, raw materials, intermediate products, by-products, final products, or waste products. Material handling activities include the storage, loading and unloading, transportation, or conveyance of any raw material, intermediate product, final product or waste product.A storm resistant shelter is not required for the following industrial materials and activities: -drums, barrels, tanks, and similar containers that are tightly sealed, provided those containers are not deteriorated and do not leak. "Sealed" means banded or otherwise secured and without operational taps or valves;-adequately maintained vehicles used in material handling; and-final products, other than products that would be mobilized in stormnwater discharges (e.g., rock salt).A No Exposure Certification must be provided for each facility qualifying for the no exposure exclusion. In addition, the exclusion from NPDES permitting is available on a facility-wide basis only, not for individual outfalls. If any industrial activities or materials are or will be exposed to precipitation, the facility is not eligible for the no exposure exclusion. By signing and submitting this No Exposure Certification form, the entity in Section A is certifying that a condition of no exposure exists at its facility or site, and is obligated to comply with the terms and conditions of 40 CFR 122.26(g). ALL INFORMATION MUST BE PROVIDED ON THIS FORM.Detailed instructions for completing this form and obtaining the no exposure exclusion are provided on pages 3 and 4.A. Facility Operator Information 1 .2. Phone: LLL-L-1..~

3. Email: I 4. Mailing Address: a. Street b. City: I I I I ý Ic. State d. Zip Code: LJ -I I I I B. Facility/Site Location Information
1. Facility Name: 2. a. Street Address: III I b. City:I I I I I I I I I I c. County: d. State: iiM e. Zip Code: LILL1L-3. Is the facility located on Indian Lands? [1 YES [] NO 4. Is this a Federal facility?

F]YES Ln NO 5. a. Latitude: II LiJI J IIII b.Longitude: [ J [ '[6. a. Was the facility or site previously covered under an NPDES stormwater permit? LI YES [] NO b. If yes, enter NPDES permit number or tracking number: 7. SIC/Activity Codes: Primary: [JJ Secondary (if applicable):

8. Total size of site associated with industrial activity:

acres 9. a. Have you paved or roofed over a formerly exposed, pervious area in order to qualify for the no exposure exclusion? DI YES D] NO b. If yes, please indicate approximately how much area was paved or roofed over. Completing this question does not disqualify you for the no exposure exclusion. However, your permitting authority may use this information in considering whether stormwater discharges from your site are likely to have an adverse impact on water quality, in which case you could be required to obtain permit coverage.Less than one acre El One to five acres nI More than five acres EL EPA Form 3510-11 (09-08) Page 1 of 4 EPA Form 3510-11 (09-08)Page 1 of 4 I I C. Exposure Checklist Are any of the following materials or activities exposed to precipitation, now or in the foreseeable future?(Please check either "Yes" or "No" in the appropriate box.) If you answer "Yes" to any of these questions (1) through (11), you are not eligible for the no exposure exclusion.

1. Using, storing or cleaning industrial machinery or equipment, and areas where residuals from using, storing or cleaning industrial machinery or equipment remain and are exposed to stormwater
2. Materials or residuals on the ground or in stormwater inlets from spills/leaks
3. Materials or products from past industrial activity 4. Material handling equipment (except adequately maintained vehicles)5. Materials or products during loading/unloading or transporting activities Yes No n D1 n n n El n n R D-D] LI LI LI LI LI LI LI 6. Materials or products stored outdoors (except final products intended for outside use [e.g., new cars] where exposure to stormwater does not result in the discharge of pollutants)
7. Materials contained in open, deteriorated or leaking storage drums, barrels, tanks, and similar containers
8. Materials or products handled/stored on roads or railways owned or maintained by the discharger
9. Waste material (except waste in covered, non leaking containers

[e.g., dumpsters])

10. Application or disposal of process wastewater (unless otherwise permitted)
11. Particulate matter or visible deposits of residuals from roof stacks and/or vents not otherwise regulated (i.e., under an air quality control permit) and evident in the stormwater outflow D. Certification Statement I certify under penalty of law that I have read and understand the eligibility requirements for claiming a condition of "no exposure" and obtaining an exclusion from NPDES stormwater permitting.

I certify under penalty of law that there are no discharges of stormwater contaminated by exposure to industrial activities or materials from the industrial facility or site identified in this document (except as allowed under 40 CFR 122.26(g)(2)). I understand that I am obligated to submit a no exposure certification form once every five years to the NPDES permitting authority and, if requested, to the operator of the local municipal separate storm sewer system (MS4) into which the facility discharges (where applicable). I understand that I must allow the NPDES permitting authority, or MS4 operator where the discharge is into the local MS4, to perform inspections to confirm the condition of no exposure and to make such inspection reports publicly available upon request. I understand that I must obtain coverage under an NPDES permit prior to any point source discharge of stormwater from the facility.Additionally, I certify under penalty of law that this document and all attachments were prepared under my direction or supervision in accordance with a system designed to assure that qualified personnel properly gathered and evaluated the information submitted. Based on my inquiry of the person or persons who manage the system, or those persons directly responsible for gathering the information, the information submitted is to the best of my knowledge and belief true, accurate and complete. I am aware that there are significant penalties for submitting false information, including the possibility of fine and imprisonment for knowing violations. Print Name: I I I I Print Title : I I I I I I _I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I Signature: Date: W I / W/W/1 Mo Day Year E m ail: I I I I I I I I I I I II I 1 I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 EPA Form 3510-11 (09-08)Page 2 of 4 Instructions for the NO EXPOSURE CERTIFICATION for Exclusion from NPDES Stormwater Permitting Who May File a No Exposure Certification Federal law at 40 CFR Part 122.26 prohibits point source discharges of stormwater associated with industrial activity to waters of the U.S. without a National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) permit. However, NPDES permit coverage is not required for discharges of stormwater associated with industrial activities identified at 40CFR 122.26(b)(14)(i)-(ix) and (xi) if the discharger can certify that a condition of "no exposure" exists at the industrial facility or site.Stormwater discharges from construction activities identified in 40CFR 122.26(b)(14)(x) and (b)(15) are not eligible for the no exposure exclusion. Obtaining and Maintaining the No Exposure Exclusion This form is used to certify that a condition of no exposure exists at the industrial facility or site described herein. This certification is only applicable in jurisdictions where EPA is the NPDES permitting authority and must be re-submitted at least once every five years.The industrial facility operator must maintain a condition of no exposure at its facility or site in order for the no exposure exclusion to remain applicable. If conditions change resulting in the exposure of materials and activities to stormwater, the facility operator must obtain coverage under an NPDES stormwater permit immediately. Where to File the No Exposure Certification Form No Exposure Forms sent regular mail: SW No Exposure Certification (4203M)USEPA 1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW Washington, D.C. 20460 Forms sent overnight/express: SW No Exposure Certification US EPA East Building, Rm. 7420 1201 Constitution Avenue, NW Washington, D.C. 20004 (202) 564-9545 Section B. Facility/Site Location Information

1. Enter the official or legal name of the facility or site.2. Enter the complete street address (if no street address exists, provide a geographic description

[e.g., Intersection of Routes 9 and 55]), city, county, state, and zip code. Do not use a P.O.Box number.3. Indicate whether the facility is located on Indian Lands.4. Indicate whether the industrial facility is operated by a department or agency of the Federal Government (see also Section 313 of the Clean Water Act).5. Enter the latitude and longitude of the approximate center of the facility or site in degrees/minutes/seconds. Latitude and longitude can be obtained from United States Geological Survey (USGS) quadrangle or topographic maps, by calling 1-(888) ASK-USGS, or by accessing the Census Bureau at: www.census.qov/cqi-bin/qazetteer Latitude and longitude for a facility in decimal form must be converted to degrees (o), minutes ('), and seconds (") for proper entry on the certification form. To convert decimal latitude or longitude to degrees/minutes/seconds, follow the steps in the following example.Example: Convert decimal latitude 45.1234567 to degrees (0), minutes ('), and seconds (").a) The numbers to the left of the decimal point are the degrees: 450.b) To obtain minutes, multiply the first fournumbers to the right of the decimal point by 0.006:1234 x 0.006 = 7.404.c) The numbers to the left of the decimal point in the result obtained in (b) are the minutes: 7'.d) To obtain seconds, multiply the remaining three numbers to the right of the decimal from the result obtained in (b) by 0.06: 404 x 0.06 = 24.24. Since the numbers to the right of the decimal point are not used, the result is 24".e) The conversion for 45.1234567 = 450 724".6. Indicate whether the facility was previously covered under an NPDES stormwater permit. If so, include the permit number or permit tracking number.7. Enter the 4-digit SIC code which identifies the facility's primary activity and second 4-digit SIC code identifying the facility's secondary activity, if applicable. SIC codes can be obtained from the Standard Industrial Classification Manual, 1987.8. Enter the total size of the site associated with industrial activity in acres. Acreage may be -determined by dividing square footage by 43,560, as demonstrated in the following example.Example: Convert 54,450 ft 2 to acres Divide 54,450 ft 2 by 43,450 square feet per acre: 54, 450 ft 2 ÷ 43,560 ft 2/acre = 1.25 acres.9. Check "Yes" or "No" as appropriate to indicate whether.you have paved or roofed over a formerly exposed, pervious area (i.e., lawn, meadow, dirt or gravel road/parking lot) in order to qualify for no exposure. If yes, also indicate approximately how much area was paved or roofed over and is,now impervious area.Completing the Form You must type or print, using uppercase letters, in appropriate areas only. Enter only one character per space (i.e., between the marks).Abbreviate if necessary to stay within the number of characters allowed for each item. Use one space for breaks between words.One form must be completed for each facility or site for which you are seeking to certify a condition of no exposure. Additional guidance on completing this form can be accessed at EPA's website: www.epa.gov/npdes/stormwater. Please make sure you have addressed all applicable questions and have made a photocopy for your records before sending the completed form to the above address.Section A. Facility Operator Information

1. Provide the legal name of the person, firm, public organization, or any other entity that operates the facility or site described in this certification.

The name of the operator may or may not be the same as the name of the facility. The operator is the legal entity that controls the facility's operation, rather than the plant or site manager.2. Provide the telephone number of the facility operator.3. Provide the email address of the facility operator.4. Provide the mailing address of the operator (P.O. Box numbers may be used). Include the city, state, and zip code. All correspondence will be sent to this address.EPA Form 3510-11 (09-08)Page 3 of 4 Instructions for the NO EXPOSURE CERTIFICATION for Exclusion from NPDES Stormwater Permitting Section C. Exposure Checklist Check "Yes" or "No" as appropriate to describe the exposure condition at your facility. If you answer "Yes" to ANY of the questions (1) through (11) in this section, a potential for exposure exists at your site and you cannot certify to a condition of no exposure. You must obtain (or already have) coverage under an NPDES stormwater permit. After obtaining permit coverage, you can institute modifications to eliminate the potential for a discharge of stormwater exposed to industrial activity, and then certify to a condition of no exposure.Section D. Certification Statement Federal statutes provide for severe penalties for submitting false information on this application form. Federal regulations require this application to be signed as follows: For a corporation: by a responsible corporate officer, which means: (i) president, secretary, treasurer, or vice-president of the corporation in charge of a principal business function, or any other person who performs similar policy or decision making functions for the corporation, or (ii) the manager of one or more manufacturing, production, or operating facilities, provided the manager is authorized to make management decisions which govern the operation of the regulated facility including having the explicit or implicit duty of making major capital investment recommendations, and initiating and directing other comprehensive measures to assure long term environmental compliance with environmental laws and regulations; the manager can ensure that the necessary systems are established or actions taken to gather complete and accurate information for permit application requirements; and where authority to sign documents has been assigned or delegated to the manager in accordance with corporate procedures; For a partnership or sole proprietorship: by a general partner or the proprietor, or For a municipal, State, Federal, or other public facility: by either a principal executive or ranking elected official.Paperwork Reduction Act Notice Public reporting burden for this certification is estimated to average 1.0 hour per certification, including time for reviewing instructions, searching existing data sources, gathering and maintaining the data needed, and completing and reviewing the collection of information. Burden means the total time, effort, or financial resources expended by persons to generate, maintain, retain, or disclose to provide information to or for a Federal agency. This includes the time needed to review instructions; develop, acquire, install, and utilize technology and systems for the purposes of collecting, validating, and verifying information, processing and maintaining information, and disclosing and providing information; adjust the existing ways to comply with any previously applicable instructions and requirements; train personnel to be able to respond to a collection of information; search data sources;complete and review the collection of information; and transmit or otherwise disclose the information. An agency may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required to respond to, a collection of information unless it displays a currently valid OMB control number.Send comments regarding the burden estimate, any other aspect of the collection of information, or suggestions for improving this form, including any suggestions which may increase or reduce this burden to: Director, OPPE Regulatory Information Division (2137), USEPA, 401 M Street, SW, Washington, D.C. 20460. Include the OMB control number of this form on any correspondence. Do not send the completed No Exposure Certification form to this address.EPA Form 3510-11 (09-08)Page 4 of 4 Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP)NextEra Energy Seabrook, LLC Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan for: NextEra Energy Seabrook, LLC PO Box 300, 626 Lafayette Rd Seabrook, NH 03874 603-773-7000 SWPPP Contact(s): NextEra Energy Seabrook, LLC Licensing Department PO Box 300, Lafayette Rd.Seabrook, NH 03874 603-773-7773 SWPPP Preparation Date: 10115/2010 Rev. 42.i Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP)NextEra Energy Seabrook, LLC Contents SECTION 1: FACILITY DESCRIPTION AND CONTACT INFORMATION ...................................................... 1 1.1 Facility Information ...............................................

1.2 Contact

Information/Responsible Parties.... ..... .............................. 2 1.3 Stormwater Pollution Prevention Team 2 1.4 Activities at the Facility ....................................................... 3 1.5 G eneral Location M ap .... .............................................................................................. ..3 1.6 S ite M ap .................................................... ............................................ ............................ ... 3 SECTION 2: POTENTIAL POLLUTANT SOURCES '...................... ......... 4 2.1 Industrial Activity and Associated Pollutants ............................................ K. ....................... 4 2.2 Spills and Leaks ............. ............................................................................... ..7 2.3 Non-Stormwater Dischaes Documentation

  • 8 2.4 Salt Storage ........................................................................................................................

11 2.5 Sampling Data Summary ........................................... 11 SECTION 3: STORMWATER CONTROL MEASURES ............................................................................ 12 3.1 M inim ize Exposure ........................................................................................................ ..12 3.2 G ood Housekeeping ....................................................................................................... 12 3.3 M aintenance ........................................................................................................................ 12 3,4 Spill Prevention and Response ....................................................... I ...................................... 12 3.5 Erosion and Sedim ent Controls ......................................................................................... 13 3.6 M anagem ent of Runoff ..................................................................................................... 13 3.7 Salt Storage Piles or Piles Containing Salt ....................................................................... 13 3.8 MSGP Sector-Specific Non-Numeric Effluent Limits ............................................................ 14 3.9 Employee Training ........... .............................. ........... 14 3.10 Non-Stormwater Discharges. ............................ 15 3.11 W aste, Garbage and Floatable Debris ............................................................................... 15 3.12 Dust Generation and Vehicle Tracking of Industrial Materials.............................................. 15 SECTION 4: SCHEDULES AND PROCEDURES FOR MONITORING .................................................... 16 SECTION 5: INSPECTIONS ........................................................................................... ..... 16 SECTION 6: DOCUMENTATION TO SUPPORT ELIGIBILITY CONSIDERATIONS UNDER OTHER FE D E RA L LA W S ............................................................................................................................................ 17 6.1 Documentation Regarding Endangered-Species ............................................................... 17 6.2 Documentation Regarding Historic Properties .................................................................... 17, 6.3 Documentation Regarding NEPA Review (if applicable) ...................................................... 17 SECTION 7: SW PPP CERTIFICATION ................................................................................................ !. 18 SECTION 8: SW PPP MODIFICATIONS ................................................................................................. 19 SWPPP ATTACHMENTS ................................................ 233 Attachment A -General Location Map Attachment B- Site Maps Attachment C -Sampling Data Summary Attachment D -Endangered Species Attachment E -2008 MSGP ii Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP)NextEra Energy Seabrook, LLC SECTION 1: FACILITY DESCRIPTION AND CONTACT INFORMATION

1.1 Facility

Information Facility Information Name of Facility: FPL Energy.Seabrook LLC Street: 626 Lafayette Road.City: Seabrook State: NH ZIP Code: 03874 County or Similar Subdivision: Rockingham Permit Tracking Number: NHR05A729 Latitude/Longitude (Use one of three possible formats, and specify method)Latitude: Longitude:

1. 42 0 53' 55" N (degrees, minutes, seconds) 1. 70 0 50' 57 " W (degrees, minutes, seconds)2. o0 N (degrees, minutes, decimal) 2. 0 ' W (degrees, minutes, decimal)3.. N (decimal)
3. -W (decimal)Method for determining latitude/longitude (check one): F USGS topographic map (specify scale: Zj EPA Web site F1 GPS Other (please specify): Is the facility located in Indian Country? Yes X No If yes, name of Reservation, or if not part of a Reservation, indicate "not applicable." Is this facility considered a Federal Facility?

Yes X No Estimated area of industrial activity at site exposed to storm water: 182.1 (acres)Discharge Information Does this facility discharge stormwater into an MS4? E] Yes Z No If yes, name of MS4 operator: Name(s) of water(s) that receive stormwater from your facility: Atlantic Ocean Are any of your discharges directly into any segment of an "impaired" water? D Yes M No If Yes, identify name of the impaired water (and segment, if applicable): Identify the pollutant(s) causing the impairment: For pollutants identified, which do you have reason to believe will be present in your discharge? I I Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP)NextEra Energy Seabrook, LLC For pollutants identified, which have a completed TMDL?Do you discharge into receiving water designated as Tier 2 (or Tier 2.5) water? ED Yes M No Are any of your stormwater discharges subject to effluent guidelines? L] Yes Z No If Yes, which guidelines apply?Primary SIC Code or 2-letter Activity Code: (refer to Appendix D of the 2008 MSGP)Identify your applicable sector and subsector:

1.2 Contact

Information/Responsible Parties Facility Operator (s): Name: NextEra Energy Seabrook, LLC Address: PO Box 300, 626 Lafayette Rd.City, State, Zip Code: Seabrook, NH 03874 Telephone Number: 603-773-7000 Email address: www.NextEraEnergyresources.com Fax number: 603-773-7740 Facility Owner (s): Name: NextEra Energy Seabrook, LLC Address: PO Box 300, 626 Lafayette Rd City, State; Zip Code: Seabrook, NH 03874 Telephone Number: 603-773-7000 Email address: Fax number: 603-773-7740 SWPPP Contact: Name: Control Room Telephone number: 603-474-7184 Email address: Fax number: 1.3 Stormwater Pollution Prevention Team Staff Names Individual Responsibilities Sabre Gagnon SME Al Legendre Environmental Compliance Michael O'Keefe Licensing Manager -Responsible Official 2 Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP)NextEra Energy Seabrook, LLC 1.4 Activities at the Facility Seabrook Station is located on the western shore of Hampton Harbor in the township of Seabrook, New Hampshire (Figure 1). The site is bounded on the north, east and south by marshland. Access to the site is from the west via two roads, both entering from U.S. Route 1.A rail line traverses the site, but is inactive and has been abandoned by its owner. The total site area is about 900 acres, of which about 600 acres is salt-marsh which includes two tidal streams, the Brown's River and Hunt's Island Creek.Site industrial activity includes electrical power generation, accompanying switchyard, and relatedsupport functions such as shipping and receiving, material storage, and maintenance. Non-industrial activity includes administrative buildings, accompanying parking lots, former construction laydown areas, and undeveloped land.1.5 General Location Map General location map for this facility is located in Attachment A.1.6 Site Map The site map for this facility is located in Attachment B, 3 Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP)NextEra Energy Seabrook, LLC SECTION 2: POTENTIAL POLLUTANT SOURCES 2.1 Industrial Activity and Associated Pollutants Drainage Location Description Associated Pollutant In-place BMP Subarea and Exposure Risk Probability/Consequenc e A 50-yardline DGB diesel fuel Oil spill. Procedures OS1026.05 and delivery (bulk) Moderate/Moderate OS 1026.13 identify storm drains that drains in area must be covered during fuel transfers. Procedure MX0526.10 includes berm provisions for oil tank draining.A Chlorination Salt/Sand Storage Salt runoff. Salt storage maintained in covered Bldg -West structure. End Low/Low A Chlorination Sodium hypochlorite Sodium hypochlorite Additions performed in accordance Bldg delivery (bulk) spill. Low/Moderate with procedure ON 1038.12.Building drains are closed and drip pans are used during deliveries. A DGB Slot Sodium hydroxide Sodium hydroxide spill. Additions are performed in delivery (bulk) Low/Moderate accordance with procedure OS1006.03. The area around the fill truck and fill connection is roped off, posted, and diked.A Fire Pump ASTs: 2 x 550-gal fuel Oil spill. Low /Low Tanks are diked. Additions House oil performed in accordance with procedure OS0043.05. A Fire Pump Water Storage Tanks Chlorinated water spill. Routine inspections. House Low/Moderate A North of Sand/Salt storage Salt runoff. Low/Low Salt storage maintained in covered Furniture structure. Storage (Ref 48)A Fuel Oil AST: 270,000-gal fuel Oil spill. Low/High Tank diked. Fuel additions Storage oil performed in accordance with procedure ON1041.05. Spill equipment provided at location.A Maintenanc ASTs: 6K-gal diesel, Oil spill. Low/Moderate Tanks diked. Spill equipment e Shop 5K-gal gasoline provided at location.A Maintenanc Equipment storage Oil spill from machinery. Routine inspections of trucks and e Shop ' , (trucks and cranes) Moderate/Low cranes.A OSB west OSB emergency diesel Oil spill. Low/Moderate Tank diked.side 4 Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP)NextEra Energy Seabrook, LLC Drainage Location Description Associated Pollutant In-place BMP Subarea and Exposure Risk Probability/Consequenc e A Primary Acid and Caustic Acid or Caustic spill. Procedures ON0021.09 and Auxiliary delivery Moderate/Moderate ON0021.10 require boom installation Bldg -south around catch basins CB-1, CB-2 and side CB-60 during deliveries. A Production Hazardous materials Hazardous material spill, Spill equipment provided. Adjacent Warehouse unloading/loading Moderate/Moderate storm drain covered during loading unloading/ operations. loading area A Scrap Scrap Transfer Facility Runoff from scrap Routine inspections. Area is large Transfer material (iron). Low/Low and flat with minimal runoff.Area A Siren Mobile 300-gal diesel Oil spill. Low/Moderate Parked on impervious surface. Spill Maintenanc tanker equipment provided.e A Siren Spare Transformer Transformer oil spill. Transformer diked.Maintenanc Low/Low e A Turbine Acid and caustic Acid or caustic spill. Spill equipment provided.Bldg -north delivery (drums) Low/Moderate side A Turbine 9 x 345 kV Transformer oil spill. Transformers diked.Bldg -north transformers Low/Moderate side A Turbine Main Turbine Lube Oil Oil spill. Low/Moderate Additions performed in accordance Bldg. -Storage Tank fill and with Procedure ON1045.01. south side drain connections. A Turbine Lube oil vent Runoff from oil vapor Container used to collect condensed Bldg discharge. oil vapor.Heater Bay Moderate/Low Roof A Warehouse Numerous unloading/ Hazardous material spill. Spill equipment available. 1&2 loading activities, Moderate/Moderate including hazardous materialsý B Hanger. Storage of motors, Oil spill. Low/Low Inside building on concrete floor Shop pumps and MOVs with no floor drains.B Unit 2*. Rotor maintenance Oil spill. Low/Low Only lubricating oil present. No bulk Turbine activities oil storage.Rotor Bldg C Carpenter Vehicle parking Oil leak. Low/Low Drip pans under large vehicles.Shop area 5 Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP)NextEra Energy Seabrook, LLC Drainage Location Description Associated Pollutant In-place BMP Subarea and Exposure Risk Probability/Consequenc e E GOB Office supply Oil spill. Low/Moderate Oil/water separator in catch basin.unloading! unloading/loading loading area H Stump Recreational Vehicle Oil spill. Low/Low Vehicles are stored without fuel.dump Storage (boats, trailers)I South 40 Exposed soils Soil erosion. Low/Low Slopes rip rapped. Routine inspections. Buildings Washing Roofs with Erosion of soil. -None necessary. Minimal amounts on site Fire Protection Water Low/Low of water used.Fire Flushing Soil erosion and Operating procedures OX0443.04, Hydrants discharge of chlorinated OX0443.11, ON0443.49, water. Low/Low ON0443.51, ON0443.59, and OD0443.86 have steps to avoid runoff.Rocks Road Snow Storage Area Soil erosion. Low/Low Routine inspections.(by Sundial Substation) Rock pile Fire Fighters Training Chemical spill. Low/Low Propane used as fire source not oil.I Facility 6 Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP).NextEra Energy Seabrook, LLC 2.2 Spills and Leaks Areas of Site Where Potential Spills/Leaks Could Occur Subarea Description Drainage Area Square Feet Acres A Main plant area and eastern portion of the North 4,181,200 96 Access Road.B Laydown areas along South Access Road. 2,726,700 63 C High Rise parking lot and vicinity. 483,600 11 D Upper General Office Building (GOB) 76,800 1.8 parking lot.E General Office Building (GOB). 20,100 0.5 F Training Center area. 104,200 2.4 G Science and Nature Center parking lot. 38,600 0.9 H Western portion of North Access Road. 125,000 2.9 I Western portion of South Access Road. 155,000 3.6 Note: Areas of the property not designated above are either marsh or areas surrounding the marsh that discharge directly to the marsh by overland sheet flow.Description of Past Spills/Leaks Date Description Outfalls November 2000 In November 2000, a spill of 400 + 500 gallons of None lubricating oil occurred during a flush of the B-Emergency Diesel Generator (EDG) Lube Oil System.No oil reached the environment due to the effectiveness of the pre-installed spill containment measures and the rapid response by spill response personnel. The cause for the oil spill was improper assembly of the connection between the flush hose sections.November 2000 In November 2000,. a leak was discovered in the underground fuel supply line from the Auxiliary Boiler Fuel. Oil Tank. The tank and steel fuel lines were None 7 Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP)NextEra Energy Seabrook, LLC installed in 1977. Excavation of the fuel line revealed a'A-inch hole in the four-inch supply line to the Auxiliary Boiler. The fuel line was immediately repaired.Contaminated soil was removed prior to replacement of both 1,200-foot sections of the fuel-line and return line during the summer of 2001. This replacement was accomplished by inserting a new line inside the old lines.The results of the Site Investigation, which included soil borings and monitoring wells, indicated that no residual source of oil was present. Concentrations of contaminants, in groundwater (specifically MTBE) at levels slightly greater than the ambient groundwater quality standards remain. Groundwater sampling, as directed by NHDES, continues in this location.March 2001 In March 2001, a leak was discovered in the underground None.-gasoline and diesel fuel lines at the Vehicle Maintenance Shop. This 40-foot long piping system was installed in 1993 and consisted of two-inch diameter pipes with a corrosion protection wrapping. The fuel release did not impact surface waters either directly or via the storm drainage system. Contaminated soil was removed prior to installation of a new pump station. A Site Investigation including soil borings and monitoring wells was performed. Groundwater samples obtained to-date indicate that concentrations of gasoline-related compounds continue to show a decreasing trend with no VOCs other than MTBE detected at levels above the ambient groundwater quality standards: Groundwater monitoring is ongoing.The site Spill Prevention Control and Countermeasure (SPCC) Plan (Reference 3.4) contains a full description of the historical large oil spills on site.2.3 Non-Stormwater Discharges Documentation The presence of non-storm water discharges was evaluated in two phases both of which where completed during 1993-1994. Phase I involved a plant schematic review and Phase II verified the review with a visual inspection of the drains. Power plant effluents and a large part of the Seabrook Station site (Subarea A) discharge into the storm drain system that in turn discharge into the Circulating Water System (at Manhole 34). The discharge of the Circulating Water System (Outfall 001) is controlled and monitored under the NPDES Permit.8 Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP)NextEra Energy Seabrook, LLC The Station Drain Table Reference (Reference 3.3) lists the results of the evaluation and includes those drains (roof, floor, equipment, etc.) that discharge directly to the storm drain system.Excluded are those drains that firstdischarge to a NPDES-monitored outfall, such as an oil/water separator, before discharging to the storm water drain system. Reference 3.3 also includes the drain type, any contaminants in the vicinity, the type of BMP in place, and the likelihood of a-material release causing storm water pollution. Attachment B contains a certification of the results.Other non-storm water discharges include* Fire hydrant flushing* Potable water sources, including waterline flushings* Air conditioning condensate

  • Discharges from naturally occurring streams* Routine exterior building wash down that does not use detergents or other compounds Pavement wash waters where detergents are not used and where leaks or spills of hazardous materials have not occurred* Dewatering of building groundwater inleakage* Dewatering operations that may occur during the performance of construction activities The locations of the discharges described above occur throughout Seabrook Station and are too numerous to individually identify in Figure 5. These discharges may be made to New Hampshire surface waters either through Outfall 001 or directly via sheet runoff. Each is administratively controlled either by procedures or routine inspection.

All dewatering operations are administratively controlled and include the following:

1. Discharge of ground water to New Hampshire Surface Waters 2. Return of ground water. to the ground without a discharge to New Hampshire Surface Waters 3. Removal of storm water that has collected on site Case 1: The routine discharge of groundwater to NPDES Permit Outfall 001 (ocean discharge) is described in the documentation that supports the renewal of Seabrook Station's NPDES Permit (effective April 2002).Dewatering of several plant buildings (Containment Annulus, Primary Auxiliary Building, Yard Equipment Vaults and Fuel Storage Building) may contain small amounts of radioactive tritium.9 Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP)NextEra Energy Seabrook, LLC The groundwater dewatering system discharges directly to the storm drain system which flows via Manhole 34 in the Circulating Water System Junction Box Wet Weather Discharge to Outfall 001 (Ocean Discharge).

Radioactive discharges are addressed in Seabrook Station's NPDES Permit Part I.A. 10 for Outfall 001 (ocean discharge), which states that the discharge of radioactive materials shall be in accordance with the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) requirements (10 CFR 20 and the Seabrook Station Operating License, Appendix A, Technical Specifications). The following guidance is used in determining the requirements for the discharges of groundwater to Outfall 001: 1. If the groundwater is being removed from an area that has no history of soil contamination, measures shall be taken to avoid the discharge of silt.The effluent shall also be inspected for an oil sheen or odor, which are indications of oil or chemical contamination. If there is an indication of contamination, the discharge must be terminated.

2. If the groundwater is being removed from an area that has a potential history of soil contamination or known history of soil contamination, such as areas near the Vehicle Maintenance Facility or Auxiliary Boiler fuel line, then a Temporary Surface Water Discharge Permit will be acquired from the New Hampshire Department of Environmental Services and the Environmental Protection Agency in accordance with Env-Ws 1505. This permit will specify the water discharge parameters, treatment methods, water quality sampling requirements and reporting requirements.

Case 2: Groundwater may be returned to the ground if it does not reach surface waters such as the surrounding wetlands and may proceed using the following guidance: 1. If the groundwater is being removed from an area that has no history of soil contamination, the water can be returned to the ground and allowed to percolate into the ground provided none of the water runs off into a surface water. The groundwater shall be inspected for an oil sheen or odor, which are indications of oil or chemical contamination. If there is an indication of contamination, the discharge must be terminated.

2. If the groundwater is being removed from an area that has a potential.

history of soil contamination or known history of soil contamination, the New Hampshire Department of Environmental Compliance Groundwater Protection Bureau must be contacted prior to discharging the effluent back ,to the ground.Case 3: Storm water from precipitation is an expected discharge to Outfall 001 or nearby wetlands. Therefore, if a depression or excavation contains known storm water, it can be returned directly to the ground or can be routed to Outfall 001. The discharge of silty water should be avoided.10 Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP)NextEra Energy Seabrook, LLC 2.4 Salt Storage 1. North of Furniture Storage Building (Ref. 48) -Covered Structure 2. West End of Clorination Building (Ref. 45) -Covered Structure 2.5 Sampling Data Summary See Attachment C for summary of all stormwater samples collected. 11 Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP)NextEra Energy Seabrook, LLC SECTION 3: STORMWATER CONTROL MEASURES 3.1 Minimize Exposure The SWPPP uses the following measures and controls as standard Best Management Practices (BM Ps).3.2 Good Housekeeping The Maintenance Manual (Reference 3.10) requires that personnel practice basic good housekeeping methods. These include operation practices, material inventory practices, and material storage practices. These practices are identified, performed, and reviewed through the work order system (Reference 3.8), which establishes the administrative controls for repetitive tasks. Where practicable, large dumpsters for trash or industrial materials have covers to prevent exposure to precipitation.

3.3 Maintenance

Station preventive maintenance uses the Repetitive Tasks system as well as department procedures to provide timely inspection and maintenance of storm water management devices.The tasks include maintenance of oil/water separators. Catch basins are cleaned periodically on an as-needed basis to remove sand and silt.3.4 Spill Prevention and Response Seabrook Station maintains the Spill Prevention Control and Countermeasure (SPCC) Plan and the Oil and Hazardous Substances Pollution Contingency Plan. Together, these plans identify potential oil and hazardous materials pollution sources, provide physical structures and systems to prevent discharge, and the resources (both personnel and equipment) available to implement cleanup if it is needed.12 Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP)NextEra Energy Seabrook, LLC 3.5 Erosion and Sediment Controls Various sediment and erosion control measures have been implemented. These include road paving and traffic control; regular street sweeping and catch basin maintenance; grading, seeding, and construction of diversion structures. In addition, regular Licensing Department Surveillances are conducted (see §5.3.4).3.6 Management of Runoff Two routine inspection programs are conducted by site personnel to review designated equipment and areas for leaks and potential sources of pollution. These include: Nuclear Systems Operator routine inspections of Station-related equipment and areas.Licensing Department surveillances and inspections of the nonradiological aspects of the Environmental Compliance Program. Licensing personnel perform routine quarterly environmental surveillances of the Seabrook Station site and initiate a corrective action program document (Condition Report) as necessary. The purpose of these broader environmental inspections is to identify and correct items which are not in compliance with applicable environmental regulations or site policies and procedures. These items include leaks from tanks, equipment, transformers or stored materials including chemicals or compressed gases, erosion, and debris.The quarterly inspections of the site are performed in accordance with the Licensing Department-Site Environmental Surveillance Instruction (ENV-4).Deficiencies in implementation of the Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan identified during these inspections are corrected within 14 days of discovery in accordance with the Storm Water Multi-sector General Permit.3.7 Salt Storage Piles or Piles Containing Salt Sand mixed with salt is used on site roads and walkways for deicing. The sand/salt is stockpiled in the former Hazardous Waste Facility structure west of the Production Warehouse (Figure 5).A smaller storage area is located at the west end of the Clorination Building.The following are Best Management Practices for Sand and Salt issued by NH DES: 13 Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP)NextEra Energy Seabrook, LLC (The BMPs will be complied with to the extent practical with consideration given to the environmental risk posed b, the storage location and features of the structure.) All salt and sand/salt mixtures should be stored on pads of impermeable asphalt or concrete. Storage and loading areas should have an impermeable floor constructed of asphalt, concrete, or other suitable material that extends around the building and work area exterior. The area should be sloped away to prevent stormwater from entering the loading areas or structure.

  • Concrete pads and walls should be treated to prevent concrete deterioration (spalling).
  • Structure hardWare should be galvanized and concrete block buildings should be waterproofed inside.* If using a three-sided building, the exposed salt at the open end should be covered. The sand/salt should be maintained within the confines of the structure.
  • Stormwater and snowmelt runoff should be properly controlled.

Building floors and storage pads should be sloped to prevent ponding and allow any water to drain away from the storage piles.3.8 MSGP Sector-Specific Non-Numeric Effluent Limits Does not apply to Nuclear Utility.3.9 Employee Training Seabrook Station maintains the Training and Qualification Program to identify training needs (Reference 3.14). All station personnel, including contractors, receive environmental awareness training. In addition, every employee receives annual Plant Access Training (PAT), which addresses topics such as spill identification and response, good housekeeping, and material management practices. Station personnel, Whose work involves significant environmental aspects, receive specialized training to minimize impacts (Reference 3.13). For instance, Fire Brigade personnel receive training as primary responders to hazardous material spills or releases. In addition, a Spill Event 14 Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP)NextEra Energy Seabrook, LLC Response Team (SERT) is trained in the control and cleanup of oil and hazardous material spills, including the use of equipment maintained on site (see Reference 3.4).3.10 Non-Stormwater Discharges Reference Section 2.3 3.11 Waste, Garbage and Floatable Debris Trash is disposed in dumpsters staged in the vicinity of selected site buildings. A central trash disposal area has also been established on the southern side of Rocks Road in the ."G" parking area. This area has three roll-off style dumpsters for trash, metal and wood. A trash hauler and metal recycling vendor periodically remove the dumpster contents. The central area is periodically surveyed to ensure good housekeeping and proper disposal of authorized materials. 3.12 Dust Generation and Vehicle Tracking of Industrial Materials Construction projects having the potential to generate significant dust will incorporate measures to control the amount generated. Generally surface wetting will be used as the primary control mechanism. Construction projects will also consider the potential for industrial material to be tracked away from the construction area by vehicles. Control measures such as pressure washing vehicles when exiting the construction area will be used as required.15 Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP)NextEra Energy Seabrook, LLC SECTION 4: SCHEDULES AND PROCEDURES FOR MONITORING Benchmark Effluent State or Tribal Other(as Monitoring (2008 Limitations Specific Impaired Waters required by EPA MSGP, Part Guidelines Monitoring 2008 MSGP Part 6.2.1)* Monitoring Monitoring 6.2.5)Storm Drain Rad Reference Sample Monitor and Procedure CP n/a n/a, n/a Locations North Road Delivery Access Pollutant Reference Parameters to Total Iron Procedure CP n/a n/a n/a be sampled 9.1 Figure 5.1 4 quarterly Monitoring samples that Reference Schedule averaged do not Procedure CP n/a n/a n/a exceed 9.1 Figure 5.1 benchmark Numeric Reference 1.0 mg/L Procedure CP n/a n/a n/a 9.1 Figure 5.1 Reference Procedures ENVSa SWPPP Procedure CP n/a n/a n/a Sampling 9.1 Figure 5.1*Benchmark data will be located underAttachment C of SWPPP SECTION 5: INSPECTIONS Routine Facility Quarterly Visual Comprehensive Site Inspections (2008 MSGP, Assessment of Stormwater Inspection (2008 MSGP, Part 4.1) Discharges (2008 MSGP, Part 4.3)Part 4.2)Responsible Dept Environmental Dept. Environmental Dept. Environmental Dept.Schedule Quarterly Per qualifying rain event Annual June 1st Specific Locations/Areas All Locations as specified Storm Drain Rad Monitor All Locations as specified in Section 2.1 and North Road Delivery in Section 2.1 Access _ _I Procedures ENV-4 Site Surveillance ENV-11 SWPPP Sampling ENV-18 SWPPP Annual Comprehensive Site Inspection 16 Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP)NextEra Energy Seabrook, LLC SECTION 6: DOCUMENTATION TO SUPPORT ELIGIBILITY CONSIDERATIONS UNDER OTHER FEDERAL LAWS 6.1 Documentation Regarding Endangered Species.Refer to Attachment D for Endangered Species Documentation

6.2 Documentation

Regarding Historic Properties Industrial facilities are eligible for coverage under the Storm Water Multi-sector General Permit (MSGP) if their storm water discharges do not affect a property that is listed or is eligible for listing on the National Register of Historic Places (per MSGP Section 1.2.3.7).- The following information documents the basis for Seabrook Station's eligibility for coverage under the MSGP with respect to historic places. Seabrook Station's storm water discharges and non-storm water discharges do not have the potential to affect property that is either listed or eligible for listing on the National Register of Historic Places since no historic properties are located in the vicinity of the locations where storm water discharges reach the receiving waters that includes the surrounding salt marsh and Atlantic Ocean. This condition meets the MSGP Addendum B Eligibility Criteria 1.A review of the National Park Service National Register of Historic Places website (http://www.nr.nps.gov/) for Rockingham County, New Hampshire identified no historic places in the Town of Seabrook. Several Historic Places were identified in the adjoining towns of Hampton and Hampton Falls. However, none of these historic places are in the path of Seabrook Station's storm water and non-storm water discharges or where construction activities may be planned to install best management practices (BMPs) to control such discharges.

6.3 Documentation

Regarding NEPA Review (if applicable) This requirement is not applicable to Seabrook Station. Seabrook Station does not discharge stormwater that is subject to New Source Performance Standards stormwater-specific effluent limitations guidelines (ref; Section 1.1.2.5 of General Permit and Table 1-1) thus there is no NEPA review documentation. 17 Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP)NextEra Energy Seabrook, LLC SECTION 7: SWPPP CERTIFICATION I certify under penalty of law that this document and all attachments were prepared under my direction or supervision in accordance with a system designed to assure that qualified personnel properly gathered and evaluated the information submitted. Based on my inquiry of the person or persons who manage the system, or those persons directly responsible for gathering the information, the information submitted is, to the best of my knowledge and belief, true, accurate, and complete. I am aware that there are significant penalties for submitting false information, including the possibility of fine and imprisonment for knowing violations. Name: Michael O'Keefe Title: Licensing Manager Signature: Date: /() 4 F 16 18 Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP)NextEra Energy Seabrook, LLC SECTION-8: SWPPP MODIFICATIONS Rev. 42 Updated Section 3.7 with NHDES Best Management Practices for Sand and Salt Rev. 41 SWPPP rewrite to new EPA Standard Template 7/1/09 Removed Sand/Salt location south of High Rise Building Rev. 40 December 30, 2008 additions to section 1.2 including 1.2.1 and 1.2.2. PSB submitted NOI under new 2008 MSGP on this day.October 2008: Replaced Attachment D, Site Drain System with updated drawing I-NHY-650018. Drawing is in PDF version of plan.Rev. 39: Added two sand/salt locations to Table 2 and removed Plate Yard. Table 4 up to date on rain sample data.Changed all mention of Regulatory Compliance Department to Licensing Department. December 2007: Added sheet 9 to Table 4 to show results of visual examination of storm water discharges and monitoring results for 2006.Rev. 38: Relocated plan from Environmental Compliance Manual to Seabrook Home Page Library Tab.Rev. 37: Updated Attachment D, Site Drain System.Rev. 36: This appendix was unaffected by this revision to the manual.Rev. 35: Added sheet 8 to Table 4 to show results of visual examination of storm water discharges and benchmark monitoring results through fourth quarter 2005.Rev. 34: There were no changes affecting Appendix B.Rev. 33: 19 Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP)NextEra Energy Seabrook, LLC* Changed Environmental Compliance Department / personnel to Regulatory Compliance Department/personnel throughout.

  • Added sheet 7 to Table 4 to show results of visual examination of storm water discharges and benchmark monitoring results through fourth quarter 2004.Rev. 32:* ' In §5.3.4, added timeframe to correct deficiencies identified-during inspections.
  • Added sheet 5 and 6 to Table 4, to show results of visual examination of storm water discharges and benchmark monitoring results ofthird quarter 2003 through first quarter 2004.Revised organizational titles throughout.

Rev. 31: There were no changes affecting Appendix B.Rev. 30: This revision was initiated to address deficiencies in the Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan identified during the June 2003 NPDES Permit Inspection performed by the NH Department of Environmental Services (Reference CR 03-06275). Several other changes were made to improve the clarity of the Plan.Specific major changes are as follows: " In §1.0 provided more information about the purpose of the Plan and explained the effective date for coverage under the Storm Water Multi-sector General Permit." In §5.2.4 revised description of Subarea A and added reference to the new Table 4 regarding results of quarterly visual examination of storm water discharges and benchmark monitoring results.* In §5.3.4 clarified section describing site environmental surveillances performed by the Environmental Compliance Department." Revised Table 2.o Revised Figure 3.o Revised Figure 4.o Revised Figure 5.20 Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP)NextEra Energy Seabrook, LLC Rev. 27, 28, and 29: There were no changes affecting Appendix B.Rev. 26: This revision was initiated to provide more detailed information on the basis for why Seabrook Station's storm water runoff does not impact endangered species or properties listed on the National Register of Historic Places.Rev. 25: This revision was initiated as a result of recommendations made by FPL Energy as part of the transition to new ownership. Specific changes are as follows:* In §3,0 updated reference 2." In §5,1.2 added information on large format original for Attachment D.* In §5,2.3 added information on the remediation efforts pertaining to the November 2000 leak of the Auxiliary Boiler Fuel Oil Tank supply line and March 2001 underground leak at the Vehicle Maintenance Shop. Deleted paragraph referencing Attachment C, Petroleum Product Remediation Activities, which has been deleted.* In §5.3.5, paragraph one, added last two sentences on discharges. Added two paragraphs under Case.1 on dewatering and radiological discharges. o In §5.3.7 added last paragraph on potential storm water run-on." In §5.4.2 added EPA definition of benchmark levels.o Clarified §5.8.2 on recordkeeping." In §6.0 added reference to the organizational chart.o Updated Table 2.o Revised Figure 5.o In Attachment B added second sentence on review and evaluation.

  • Deleted Attachment C and re-lettered subsequent attachments.

Rev. 24: This appendix was unaffected by this revision to the manual.21 Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP)NextEra Energy Seabrook, LLC Rev. 23: This revision was initiated to incorporate the requirements of the Storm Water Multi-Sector General Permit (MSGP). This revision was necessary because the Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan is no longer a requirement of the renewed NPDES Permit (effective as of April 1, 2002). In general, the contents of the Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan were reordered to match MSGP requirements or expanded to add requirements not otherwise addressed previously. Specific major changes are as follows: Quarterly visual monitoring of storm water discharges is now required to assess potential pollutant inputs. Previously, analytical samples were taken for pH, oil and grease and total suspended solids.These pollutants will now be assessed visually. The only parameter measured now in storm water discharges will be total iron.A new attachment was added -- Endangered Species and Historic Places Assessment, which shows that Seabrook Station's storm water discharges will not impact endangered species or historic buildings. 22 Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP)NextEra Energy Seabrook, LLC SWPPP ATTACHMENTS Attachment A -General Location Map Attachment B -Site Map Attachment C -Sampling Data Summary Attachment D -Endangered Species and Historic Places Assessment Attachment E -2008 MSGP 23 The State of New Hampshire DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES Thomas S. Burack, Commissioner July 20, 2010 LETTER OF COMPLIANCE for NextEra Energy Seabrook, LLC LETTER OF DEFICIENCY Allen Legendre, Jr., Principal Engineer No. WD WWEB/C 10-002 P.O. Box 330, Lafayette Road Seabrook, NH 03874

Subject:

National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES)Compliance Evaluation Inspection (CEI)NextEra Energy Seabrook, LLC (Seabrook Station)NPDES Permit No. NH0020-338

Dear Mr. Legendre:

The New Hampshire Department of Environmental Services, Water Division, Wastewater Engineering Bureau (DES) reviewed the actions taken by Seabrook Station in response to the June 3, 2010 NPDES CEI. Based on Seabrook Station's response letter dated July 15, 2010, DES determined that Seabrook Station resolved the issues addressed in the Letter of Deficiency in a manner consistent with Water Division regulations and NPDES permit requirements. DES hereby grants Seabrook Station's request for an extension of the submittal date of its laboratory Quality Assurance/Quality Control (QA/QC) Manual to September 13, 2010.Please be advised that DES will continue to monitor Seabrook Station's compliance status, and that this letter does not provide relief against any existing or future violations. If you have any questions regarding this matter, please contact Stephanie Larson at (603) 271-1493.Sincerely, Paul Heirtzler, P.E., Esq.Administrator Wastewater Engineering Bureau cc: Joy Hilton, USEPA Water Technical Unit Tracy L. Wood, P.E., Compliance Engineer, WWEB Gretchen Hamel, Enforcement Coordinator, DES DES, WD, WWEB/File.CERTIFIED MAIL/RRR: 7000 1670 0001 2908 6205 DES Web site: www.des.iili.gov P.O. Box 95, 29 Hazen Drive, Concord, New Hampshire 03302-0095 Telephone: (603) 271-3503

  • Fax: (603) 271-2982 -TDD Access: Rclay NH 1-800-735-2964 The State of New Hampshire NHDES' DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES NHDES, Thomas S. Burack, Commissioner June 15, 2010 LETTER OF DEFICIENCY WD WWEB/C 10-002 NextEra Energy Seabrook, LLC Allen Legendre, Jr., Principal Engineer P.O. Box 330, Lafayette Road Seabrook, NH 03874

Subject:

National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES)Compliance Evaluation Inspection (CEI)NextEra Energy Seabrook, LLC (Seabrook Station)NPDES Permit No.NH0020338

Dear Mr. Legendre:

On June 3, 2010, Stephanie Larson, as a representative of the New Hampshire Department of Environmental Services, Water Division, Wastewater Engineering Bureau (DES), conducted a NPDES CEI at Seabrook Station. Objectives of a CEI include determining compliance with NPDES permit conditions, verifying accuracy of permit required information, and confirming adequacy of permittee sampling and monitoring. The following people were present during this CEI: Allen Legendre, Jr., Principal Engineer, Seabrook Station Paul Dullea, Sr. Nuclear Chemist, Seabrook Station Sabre Gagnon, Nuclear Engineering Analystj Seabrook Station Stephanie Larson, Environmental Inspector, DES Included is a copy of EPA's Water Compliance Inspection Report Form 3560-3 and the Discharge Monitoring Report (DMR) violations summary for January through December 2009 (the period reviewed). During the inspection the following deficiencies were noted by DES: DEFICIENCY: (Response Required).

1) Part II, Section B.1. of Seabrook Station's NPDES permit requires proper operation and maintenance of all facilities and systems of treatment necessary to achieve compliance with the permit. Proper operation and maintenance includes adequate laboratory controls and appropriate quality assurance procedures.

As discussed in Stephanie Larson's May 17, 2010 e-mail to Seabrook Station and during the CEI, Seabrook Station must submit a Quality Assurance/Quality Control (QA/QC) manual to DES for review and approval. Copies of the NHDES Wastewater Laboratory QA Program Guidelines and the US EPA NPDES Compliance Inspection Manual are available on the NHDES website.REPEAT DEFICIENCY: Noted in the October 6,2005 and September 18,2008 Inspections (Response Required). DES Web site: www.des.nh.gov P.O. Box 95, 29 Hazen Drive, Concord, New Hampshire 03302-0095 Telephone: (603) 271-3503

  • Fax: (603) 271-2982 & TDD Access: Relay NH 1-800-735-2964 NextEra Energy Seabrook, LLC June 15, 2010 Seabrook, New Hampshire Page 2 of 3 1) Seabrook Station has not been completing its DMRs according to EPA's DMR instructions.

DES' monthly compliance database report for the period of January through December 2009 was reviewed with the facility during the inspection. Seabrook Station had DMR violations in 3 of the 12 months reviewed. Corrected DMRs have been submitted. It should also be noted that DMR errors have occurred each year since 2004. A copy of DES' monthly compliance database report from January 2004 through April 2010 was left with facility personnel.. As Seabrook Station is certifying that the DMR information provided is true, accurate, and complete, more attention must be paid to the accuracy of this information. RECOMMENDATION/COMMENT: (No Response Required).

1) DES recommends that, when is use, incubator temperatures-be monitored and recorded twice daily at least 4 hours apart in accordance with Standard Methods, Section 9020 B.CORRECTIVE ACTIONS REQUIRED: DES requests that Seabrook Station describe all steps taken to correct the deficiencies identified by the inspector.

This description should also include the dates the deficiencies were corrected or the anticipated correction date. When the response is complete, the responsible official for the municipality or industry must sign the response. If the submitted response is acceptable to DES and the deficiencies are/were not repeat deficiencies and/or have not resulted in environmental harm, DES will close out the inspection and no further action, other than continued compliance, is required by the permittee. If DES identifies repeat deficiencies or deficiencies that result in environmental harm in this or future inspections, DES may proceed immediately with enforcement action.DES requests that Seabrook Station submit its response to DES by July 16, 2010. If DES does not receive a signed, complete response within the allowed time frame, DES may proceed with an appropriate enforcement action.Please mail your inspection response to: Stephanie Larson NHDES-WWEB P.O. Box 95 Concord, NH 03302-0095 If you have any questions, please call Stephanie Larson at (603) 271-1493.Sincere Paul Heirtzler, P.E., Esq.Administrator Wastewater Engineering Bureau NextEra Energy Seabrook, LLC Seabrook, New Hampshire, June 15, 2010 Page 3 of 3

Enclosures:

EPA Water Compliance Inspection Report Form 3560-3 DMR Summary of Violations (January through December 2009)Cc: JoyHilton, USEPA-Region 1, Water Technical Unit Tracy Wood, P.E., Compliance Supervisor, WWEB, DES Gretchen Hamel, Enforcement Coordinator, DES DES, WD, WWEB/File CERTIFIED MAIL/RRR: 7007 2560 0001 3867 5531 United States Environmental Protection Agency F _ Washington, D.C. 20460 I ý!&VEPAWater Compliance Inspection Report Section Ak National Data System Coding (i.e., PCS)Transaction Code I F2 F5 NPDES .yr/mo/day NIHIo0121013131811 121 11010603 1 7 Remarks Inspection Type 18 19 Inspector Fac Type 201 2.11 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 [ I I I I I j I I I I I I I I I ý I I [ [ I [ [ [ [ I I _L L P 6 Inspection Work Days.67FT-1569 Facility Self-Monitoring Evaluation Rating 70W3 B1 QA 71j 72[N-Reserved


73 [-_1 74 7S II-] 80 Section B: Facility Data Name and Location of Facility Inspected (For industrial users discharging to POTW, also Entry Time/Date Permit Effective Date include POTW name and NPDES permit number) 9:30 AM 4/1/2002 FPL Seabrook Station POTW Name/Permit No.. 6/3/2010 P.O. Box 330, Lafayette Rd.Sea.brook3, La t 07 Exit Time/Date Permit Expiration Date Seabrook, NH 03874---30PM4127 3:00 PM 4/1/2007 6/312010 Name(s) of On-Site Representative(s)/Title(s)/Phone and Fax Number(s) Other Fadlity'Data (e.g., SIC NAICS, and other Al Legendre, Jr., Principal Engineer descriptive information) Paul Dullea, Sr. Nuclear Chemist Phone: (603)773-7773 Sabre Gagnon, Nuclear Engineering Analyst Fax:.Name, Address of Responsible Official/Tile/Phone and Fax Number Michael O'Keefe, Liscensing Mgr. Phone: (603)773-7745 P.O. Box 330, Lafayette. Rd. Fax: Contacted Seabrook, NH 03874 C- te d EYes ENo Section C: Areas Evaluated During Inspection (Check only those areas evaluated) DPermit E]Self Monitoring Program --Pretreatment OMS4 WTRecords/Reports IlCompliance Schedules DPollution Prevention I-Facility Site Review IWLaboratory DStorm Water["Effluent/Receiving Waters -]6perations/Maintenance DCombined Sewer Overflow FIlow Measurement FISludge Handling/Disposal -]Sanitary Sewer Overflow Section D: Summary of Findings/Comments (Attach additional sheets of narrative and checklists, including Single Event Violation codes, as necessary) SEV Codes 5EV Description B0020 Improper Operation and Maintenance E0013 Improper/Incorrect Reportinc; (DMR)Signaturýe spect r Agency/Office/Phone and Fax Numbers SignatureofMa R r ,NHDES/WD/W W EB (603) 271-3908/4128 " Signature of Man gement PA Reviewer Agency/Office/Phone and Fax Numbers 17 Tra cy L. Wood, P.E. 9d".ý L,- t$ PE" -NHDES/WD/WWEBý (603) 271-3909/ 4128 & 61 EPA Form 3560-3 (Rev 7-05) Previous editions are obsolete, E-1 INSTRUCTIONS Section A: National Data System Coding (i.e., PCS)Column 1: Transaction Code: Use N, C, or D for New, Change, or Delete. All inspections will be new unless there is an error In the data entered.Columns 3-11: NPDES Permit No. Enter the facility's NPDES permit number. (Use the Remarks columns to record the State permit number, if necessary.) Columns 12-17: Inspection Date. Insert the date entry was made into the facility. Use the year/month/day format (e.g., 94/06/30 June 30,.1994).Column 18: Inspection Type. Use one of the codes listed below to describe the type of inspection: A Performance Audit M Multimedia 2 IU Sampling Inspection B Compliance Biomonitoring 0 Compliance Evaluation (oversight) 3 IU Non-Sampling inspection C Compliance Evaluation (non-sampling) P Pretreatment Compliance inspection 4 IU Toxics Inspection D Diagnostic R Reconnaissance 5 IU Sampling Inspection with E Corps of Engineers Inspection S Compliance Sampling Pretreatment , F Pretreatment Follow-up U IU inspection with Pretreatment Audit 6 IU Non-Sampling Inspection with G Pretreatment Audit X Toxics Inspection Pretreatment I Industrial User (IU) Inspection Z Sludge 7 IU Toxics with Pretreatment L Enforcement Case Support Column 19: InspectorCode. Use one of the codes listed below to describe the lead agency in the inspection. C -Contractor or Other Inspectors (Specify in.Remarks N -NEIC Inspectors columns) R -EPA Regional Inspector E -Corps of Engineers S -State Inspector J -Joint EPA/State Inspectors-EPA Lead T -Joint State/EPA Inspectors-State lead Column 20: Facility Type. Use one of the codes below to describe the facility.1 -Municipal. Publicly Owned Treatment Works (POTWs) with 1987 Standard Industrial Code (SIC) 4952.2 -Industrial. Other than municipal, agricultural, and Federal facilities. 3 -Agricultural. Facilities classified with 1987 SIC 0111 to 0971.4 -Federal. Facilities identified as Federal by the EPA Regional Office.5 -Oil & Gas. Facilities classified with 1987 SIC 1311 to 1389..Columns 21-66: Remarks. These columns are reserved for remarks at the discretion of the Region.Columns 67-69: Inspection Work Days. Estimatethe total work effort (to the nearest 0.1 work day), up to 99.9 days, that were used to complete the inspection and submit a QA reviewed report of findings. This estimate includes the accumulative effort of all participating inspectors; any effort for laboratory analyses, testing, and remote sensing; and the billed payroll time for travel and pre and post inspection preparation. This estimate does not require detailed documentation. Column 70: Facility Evaluation Rating. Use information gathered during the inspection (regardless of inspection type) to evaluate the quality of the facility self-monitoring program. Grade the program using a scale of 1 to 5 with a score of 5 being used for very reliable self-monitoring programs, 3.being satisfactory, and 1 being used for very unreliable programs.Column 71: Biomonltoring Information. Enter D for static testing. Enter F for flow through testing. Enter N for no biomonitoring. Column 72: Quality Assurance Data Inspection. Enter Q if the inspection was conducted as follow up on quality assurance sample results. Enter N otherwise. Columns 73-80: These columns are reserved for regionally defined information. Section B: Facility Data This section is self-explanatory except for "Other Facility Data," which may Include new information not in the permit or PCS (e.g., new outfalls, names of receiving waters, new ownership, and other updates to the record).Section C: Areas Evaluated During Inspection Check only those areas evaluated by marking the appropriate box. Use Section D and additional sheets as necessary. Support the findings, as necessary, in a brief narrative report. Use the headings given on the report form (e.g., Permit, Records/Reports) when discussing the areas evaluated during the inspection. The heading marked "Multimedia" may indicate medias such as CAA, RCRA, and TSCA. The heading marked "Other" may indicate activities such as SPCC, BMPs, and concerns that are not covered elsewhere. Section D: Summary of FindingslComments Briefly summarize the inspection findings. This summary should abstract the pertinent inspection findings, not replace the narrative report. Reference a list of attachments, such as completed checklists taken from the NPDES Compliance Inspection Manuals and pretreatment guidance documents,* including effluent data when sampling has been done. Use extra sheets as necessary. EPA Form 3560-3 (Rev. 10-04) Reverse E-2

  1. of Repoited MonthParameter 4 pH Type Daily Maximum Units su# of Reported Permit Limit Result violation properly?8 82 1 No Postmark date: 5115120o8 Comments 001A -did not include explanation of violation.

No violations for outfatls 022A, 023A. 024A. 025A. 025C, 025D. 026A and 027A.No discharge from outfalls 003A and 025B.no violations for outfalls 00IA, 022A. 0023A, 024A, 025A, 0258, 020C, 025D, 026A, 027Ak No discharge from outfall 003A.I DMR toxicity DMR DMR mid-year report 2007 Env. Mon. Rpt toxidty" DMR DMR Yes Yes 6/16/2008 7115/2008 Passed Passed No 7/1512008 No violations for outfalls 001A. 022A. 023A, 024A, 025A. 025B.025C, 025D and 027A. No discharge for outfalls O03Aand 026A. Did not fill in the outfall 027A TRO units. Corrected DMR submitted. Yes 8/15/2008 no violations for outfalls OCIA, 022A, 023A, 024A, 025A, 0258, 025C, 025D. No discharge for outfalls 003A, 026A and 027Ak 713012008 2008 Environmental Monitoring Program Mid-Year Report submitted. DES date-stamp 8M29108. 2007 Environmental Monitoring Report submitted. Yes 10/15,2008 3rd qtr WET tests.Yes No violations for outfalls 001A, 022A, 023A. 024A, 025A, 0258, 025C, 025D and 027Ak No discharge for outfalls 003A and 026A.Yes 10/15t2008 no violations for outfalls 0OlA, 022A, 023A. 024A, 025A. 0258, 025C, 025D and 027Ak No discharge from outfalls 003A and 026A.Yes 11114=2008 no violations for outfalls 001A, 022A, 023A. 024A. 025A, 025B, 025C, 025D and 027A. No discharge from outfalls 003A and 026A.Yes 12/15/2008 no violations for butfalls 001A& 022A, 023A, 024A, 025A, 025B, 025C and 0250. No discharge for outfalls 003A, 026A and 027k Yes 1/1412009 no violations for outfalls 001A, 022A, 023A. 024A, 025A, 025B, 025C, 025D and 027Ak No discharge for outfalls 003A and 026A.10 DMR 11 12 DMR DMR 2009+I toxicity Passed No 2/13/2009 did not fill in number of exceedances for chronic tests. Corrected DMR submitted. Fyiday, June 11, 2010 Fridy, une 1,2)0 Pged~ef4j 3 tO Aoont hParameter Type# of Repot Units Permit Limit Result vi#ation prope rted fl~y?.Postmark Comments date: 1 DMR DMR 2 18 Chlorine Minimization F:3 DMR 4 DMR 5 DMR 5 2008 rad operating rpt.5 toxicity Passed No 2/13/2009 no violations for outfalls 001A, 022A, 023A, 024A. 025A, 0258, 025C. 025D, and 027A No discharge from outfalls 003A and 026A. Did not fill in the number ofexceedances for outfa 1001A TRO. Corrected DMR submitted. Yes 3/1212009 no violations for outfalls 001A, 022A, 023A, 024A, 025A, 0258, 015C, 025D and 027A No discharge for outfalls 003A and 026A.DES date-stamp 2/26109. 2008 Chlorine Minimization Report submitted. Yes 411512009 no violations for outtalls 001A, 022A. 023A, 024A, 025A -D.027A. No discharge for outfalls 003A and 026Ak Yes 5/1412009 no violations for outfafls 001A, 022A, 023A, 024A. 025A, 025B, 025C, 025D. 027A. No discharge from outfalls 003A and 026A Yes 6/15/2009 No violations for outfalls 001A, 022A, 023A, 024A, 025A, 0258, 025C, 025D and 027A. No discharge for outfall 003A and 026A.DES date-stamp 6/3/09. 2008 Annual Radiological Environmental Operating Report submitted. Yes 6115/2009 2nd qtr WET test Yes DES date-stamp 7/16/09. No violations for outfalls 001A, 022A.023A, 024A. 025A, 0258, 025C, 025D and 027A. No discharge for outfalls 003A and 026A.7/13)209 2009 Environmental Monitoring Program Mid-Year Report submitted 712/2009 Michael U Keefe, Al Legendre, Dave Robinson, Paul Dullea and Pete Harvey are authorized to sign the DMRs and other reports Yes 8/1412009 no violations for outlals 001A, 022A, 023A, 024A, 025A, 025B, 0250, 025D and 027A. No discharge from 003A and 026A.Yes 9/15/2009 no violations for outfalls 00IA, 022A, 023A, 024A, 025A. 025B, 025C, 025D and 027A. No discharge from 003A and 026Ak DES date-stamp 911/09. 2008 Environmental Monitoring Report received.Yes 10/15&2009 3rd qtr WET test DES date-stamp 8131109. 2008 Environmental Monitoring Report submitted 6 6 DMR 6 mid-year report 6 revised signatory 7 DMR DMR 8 -008 Env. Monitoring Rpt, 8 8 toxicity Passed 2008 env monitoring rpt Ffidtiy, June 11, 2010 Page S.f-9-1 5y/.tii = lI m# of Reported MonthParameter 9 DMR 10 DMR Type Units Permit Limit Result violation Droepolte Yes 10 12 12 diffusor inspection rpt.DMR diffusor nozzle inspection DMR Postmark Comments date: 10/15/2009 no violations for outfalls 001A, 022A, 023A. 024A, 025A, 0258, 025C, and 025D. No discharge from outfaus 003A, 026A and 027A.11113/2009 no violations for outfalls 001A, 022A, 023A, 024A, 025A, 0258, 025C. 025D, 026A and 027A. No discharge from outfalls 003A, 025B.12/2912009 discharge diffusor inspection report submitted. Diffusor inspection performed in 1012009 1211512009 no violations for outfalls 001A. 022A& 023A. 024A, 025A. 025C, 0250 and 027A. No discharge for outfalls 003A and 0255.12/29/2009 Discharge Diffusor Nozzle Inspection submitted 1/15/2010 No violations for outfalls OCA, 022A, 023A, 024A, 025A, 025B, 025C, 025D and 027A. No discharge from outfalls 003A and 026Ak 1/15/2010 4th qtr WET test. Did not include certification. Certification submitted 12 toxicity Passed X 2010 1 2 3 3 4 DMR 2009 hydro monitoring rpt DMR Yes 211212010 no violations for outfalls 001A, 022A, 023A, 024A, 025A 0258, 025C, 025D and 027A. No discharge from outfalls 003A and 026A.DES date-stamp 2/5/10. 2009 Hydrological Monitoring Report submitted Yes 3/15/2010 no violations for outfalls 00lA, 022A, 023A, 024A, 025A, 0258, 025C, 025D and 027A. No discharge from outtaflls 003A and 026A Yes 411412010 1st qtr WET test Yes 4114)2010 no violations for outfalls 001A, 022A, 023A, 024A, 025A, 025B, 025C, 025D, 027A. No discharge from.outfans 003A and 026A Yes 5/14/2010 no violations for outfalls 001& 022A, 023A, 024A, 025A4 025B, 025C. 025D and 027A. No discharge from outfalls 003A and 026A toxicity DMR DMR Passed Ffiday, June 11, 2010 Jpage 1-. INEXTera" ENEFRGY4 July 15, 2010 SBK-L-10132 State of New Hampshire Department of Environmental Services PO Box 95 Concord, NH 03302-0095 Attention: Stephanie Larson Wastewater Engineering Bureau Seabrook Station Response to Letter of Deficiency -NPDES Compliance Evaluation Inspection (CE])NextEra Energy Seabrook, LLC, has enclosed responses to the two deficiencies identified in Letter of Deficiency WD WWEB/C 10-002. The subject NPDES Compliance Evaluation Inspection was conducted on June 3, 2010 at Seabrook Station (NPDES Permit NH0020338). If you have questions on this matter, please call Allen Legendre, Principal Engineer, at (603) 773-7773.Sincerely, NextEra Energy Seabrook, LLC Michael O'Keefe/Licensing Manager NextEra Energy Seabrook, LLC, P.O. Box 300, Lafayette Road, Seabrook, NH 03874 ENCLOSURE TO SBK-L-10132 Response to Letter of Deficiency WD WWEB/C 10-002 NPDES Compliance Evaluation Inspection (CEI)June 3, 2010, Seabrook Station (NPDES Permit N110020338) DEFICIENCY: (Response Required)1) Part II, Section B.1. of Seabrook Stations's NPDES permit requires proper operation and maintenance of all facilities and systems of treatment necessary to achieve compliance with the permit. Proper operation and maintenance includes adequate laboratory controls and appropriate quality assurance procedures. As discussed in Stephanie Larson's May 17, 2010, email to Seabrook Station and during the CEI, Seabrook Station must submit a Quality Assurance/Quality Control (QA/QC) Manual to DES for review and approval.Copies of the NHDES Wastewater Laboratory QA Program Guidelines and the US EPA NPDES Compliance Inspection manual are available on the N[HDES website.NextEra Energy Seabrook Response: The Seabrook Station procedure for the NPDES Permit QA/QC requirements, CD0923.24"NPDES Quality Assurance/Quality Control Procedure", was not submitted for NI-DES review as was recommended in the previous CEI report (September 2008). Subsequent to the September 2008 CEL, in accordance with the inspector's recommendation, changes were made to two Chemistry Department procedures to update references to EPA approved analytical methods.The effected procedures were CN0923.01 "NPDES -pH" and CN0923.05 "NPDES -Total Residual Oxidant by Amperometric Titration". The inspector's recommendation to submit the QA/QC procedure to NHDES was not completed as there was no tracking item for the action to do so. Our corrective action program should have been used to track the action to submit the QA/QC procedure to NHDES but was not used for an indeterminate reason.NextEra Energy Seabrook requests an additional 60 days from the date of this letter to submit procedure CD0923.24 to NHDES. The requested additional time will allow us to make changes to the procedure that may be necessitated by our review of the current revisions of the NHDES Wastewater Laboratory QA Program Guidelines and the US EPA NPDES Compliance Inspection Manual. The procedure will be submitted by September 13, 2010.Additionally, understanding that NHDES is required to periodically review permitee QA/QC manuals a task will be established in our work management system to routinely review the procedure for any needed updates and to submit the procedure to NHDES for review. The frequency for this task will be set at 48 months. We will provide written confirmation by September 13, 2010, that this work task has been created. REPEAT DEFICIENCY: Noted in the October 6, 2005 and September 18, 2008 Inspections (Response Required)1) Seabrook Station has not been completing its DMRs according to EPA's DMR instructions. DES' monthly compliance database report for the period of January through December 2009 was reviewed with the facility during the inspection. Seabrook Station had DMR violations in 3 of the 12 months reviewed. Corrected DMRs have been submitted. It should also be noted that DMR errors have occurred each year since 2004. A copy of DES'monthly compliance database report from January 2004 through April 2010 was left with facility personnel. As Seabrook Station is certifying that the DMR information provided is true, accurate, and complete, more attention must be paid to the accuracy of this information. NextEra Energy Seabrook Response: The deficiency statement is correct that a lack of attention to detail is the cause for the identified DMR violations. The personnel responsible for DMR preparation and review did not adequately use institutionalized error prevention techniques which would have precluded the DMR violations. The expectation to use established error prevention techniques in conjunction with the preparation and review of DMRs will be reinforced with the responsible personnel by July 30, 2010. To further ensure thorough DMR preparation and review the Chemistry Department procedure for DMR preparation CN0923.11 will be revised to add a checklist specifying the attributes for review of DMRs. The checklist will require DMR preparer and reviewer signatures and will be filed with the monthly DMR documentation. The checklist will be added to procedure CN0923.11 by August 30, 2010.NextEra Energy Seabrook also believes that utilization of the electronic DMR submission software, NetDMR, currently available on a voluntary basis to state permitees will aid in the submittal of complete DMRs. It is our intent to obtain the prerequisite training offered by EPA and to transition to electronic DMR submission prior to March 31, 2011. GEOLOGIC LOG'ýkRSC SEABROOK STATION SEABROOK NEW HAMPSHIRE START DATE: 5/24/10 COMPLETION DATE: 5/25&2010 (BOREHOLE) 6/2/2010 (WELL DEVELOP I DEPTH TO WATER (FT BELOW TOC): 14.59 DEPTH TO BOTTOM (FT BELOW GRADE): 51.0 DATE: 10/22/10 ELEVATION TOC: 22.69 ELEVATION TOP OF ROAD BOX: (-3' Stick-up DEPTH SA (FT BGS)I DRILLING CO:;METHOD: SONIC & HQ CORE WITH POTABLE WATER AS DRILLING FLUID ING METHOD: 4 X 60-INCH SONIC SAMPLER AND HQ CORE BARREL SAMPLE RQD WELL COMPLETION RECOVERY " % LEL(%)DETAILS ,MPLE DECRIPTION SOFT DIG W/VAC TRUCK TO 15FT. 0-15FT CONSISTS OF L: BROWN M. SAND FILL.EXCA VA TION BA CKFILLED TO FA CILITA TE DRILLING.DRIVE SAMPLER FROM 15 FT TO 20 FT.15.0 TO 20.0 FT-L. BROWN M. SAND FILL, SOME M. SUB ANGULAR TO ANGULAR GRAVEL, LOOSE, SATURATED. RECOVERY: 4.7'ONSTRUCTION DETAILS KEY: WELL MATERIAL: 2' DIAMETER FLUSH JOINT SCHEDULE 40 PVC. (0'2')4 N DIA. 3 FT PROTECTIVE STICK-UP 10 SLOT FLUSH-JOINT SCHEDULE 40 F.77 SENTONITE CHIPS (3/8")PVC WELL SCREEN (51.-41') L (39'-2)NO. I SAND 11/2-INCH CRUSHED STONE*(51-39) " [NOT USED]NOTES: -ROD = ROCK QUALITY DESIGNATION -% LEL = % LOWER EXPLOSIVE LIMIT OF BOREHOLE AIR AT TOP OF 4-INCH STEEL CASING HORIZONTAL AXIS NOT TO SCALE-ALL DEPTH ARE REFERENCED TO GRADE LEVEL UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED-MONITORING WELL SURVEY PERFORMED BY EMANUEL ENGINEERING INC. DURING SEPTEMBER 2010.-ELEVATIONS, IN FEET, BASED ON SITE BENCHMARK(S) I/O1 -GEOLOGIC LOG A PROJECTILOCATIN: SESTATION SOIL BORING/WELL 1D: START DATE: 5/24/10 SEABROOK NEW H PSIRTBD-6 dCOMPLETION DATE: W512010 (BOREHOLE) E_ H2/2010 (WELL DEVELOPMENT) DEPTH TO WATER (FT BELOW TOC): 14.59 DRILLING CO: DRILLING METHOD: SONIC& HQ CORE WITH POTABLE DEPTH TO BOTTOM (FT BELOW GRADE): 51.0 AQUIFER DRILLING AND TESTING, INC WATER AS DRILLING FLUID DATE: 10/22/10 GEOLOGIST: SAMPLING METHOD: 4 X 60-INCH SONIC SAMPLER ELEVATION TOC: 22.69 MATTDAROIS ELEVATION TOP OF ROAD BOX: (-3' Stick-up) AND HQ CORE BARREL DEPTH

  • SAMPLE ROD WELL COMPLETION (FT B(S) SAMPLE DECRIPTION RECOVERYF

(% % LEL DETAILS DRIVE SAMPLER FROM 20 FT TO 25 FT.20.0 TO 25.0 FT: SAME AS ABOVE, SATURATED. 4.9 N/A N/M DRIVE SAMPLER FROM. 25 FT TO 30 FT.25.0 TO 28.5 FT: SAME AS ABOVE, SATURATED.4 4.9 N/A N/M 28.5 TO 30.0 FT: CONCRETE. SEABROOK ENGINEERING NOTIFIED TO INSPECT. IDENTIFIED AS"LEVELING/FILL" CONCRETE.3.0 ____ _C DRIVE SAMPLER FROM 30 FT TO 35 FT.30.0 TO 35.0 FT-SAME AS ABOVE, (CONCRETE). 5.0 N/A N/M I I 35 DRIVE SAMPLER FROM 35.0 FT TO 35.3 FT.35 TO 35.3 FT: SAME AS ABOVE (CONCRETE). REFUSAL ON BEDROCKA T 35.3 FT BEGIN HQ CORE RUN I CORE RUN #1: INCOMPLETE RUN DUE TO DEBRIS/ASSEMBLY MALFUNCTION. RUN RECOVERY: 0.9'. DARK GRAY, FINE GRAINED DIORITE, GRADING TO GRANULITE OF THE KITTERY FORMATION. POSSIBLE FX@ -36.0'W/DIP OF 80 DEG.CORE RUN #2: (36.2-41.2) RECOVERY: 4.2'. FINE-GRAINED GRANULITE GRADING TO A SLIGHTLY FOLIATED F. GRAIN DIORITEIGRANULITE FROM 37.6 TO 40.2 FT. FX'S CONTAIN IRON STAINING AND PYRITE ON FX FACIES. POSSIBLE FX'S: 37.1(40 DEG), 38.0 (VERT), 38.8 (60 DEG), 39.9'(60 DEG)35 0.9 4.2 44 59 N/M N/M 401.CONSTRUCTION DETAILS KEY: NOTES: -ROD = ROCK QUALITY DESIGNATION. WELL MATERIAL: 2" DIAMETER FLUSH JOINT SCHEDULE 40 PVC. CONCRETE -% LEL = % LOWER EXPLOSIVE LIMIT OF 4 (0'-2') BOREHOLE AIR AT TOP OF 4-INCH STEEL CASING.4IN DIA. 3FT PROTECTIVE STICK-UP 10 SLOT FLUSH-JOINT SCHEDULE 40 BENTONITE CHIPS(Y/8) -HORIZONTAL AXIS NOT TO SCALE PVC WELL SCREEN (51F-4 1) (392) 2. -ALL DEPTH ARE REFERENCED TO GRADE LEVEL UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED (311-INH .-MONITORING WELL SURVEY PERFORMED BY PAGE#NO. I SAND I 112-INCH CRUSHED STONE EMANUEL ENGINEERING INC. DURING SEPTEMBER 2010.(51'-39) [NOT USED]), .-ELEVATIONS, IN FEET; BASED ON SITE BENCHMARK(S) 213 GEOLOGIC LOG R...PROJECT/LOCATION: SEABROOK STATION SOIL BORINGIWELL ID: -START DATE: 5/24/10 SEABROOK NEW HAMPSHIRE BD-6 COMPLETION DATE: 5/25W2010(BOREHOLE) T O M2010 (WELL DEVELOPMENI) DEPTH TO WATER (FT BELOW TOG): 14.59 DRILLING CO: DRILLING METHOD: SONIC & HQ CORE WITH POTABLE DEPTH TO BOTTOM (FT BELOW GRADE): 51.0 AQUIFER DRILLING AND TESTING, INC WATER AS DRILLING FLUID DATE: 10/22/10 GEOLOGIST: SAMPLING METHOD: 4 X 60-INCH SONIC SAMPLER ELEVATION TOC: 22.69 MA TT DAROIS ELEVATION TOP OF ROAD BOX: (-3'Stick-up) .ANDHQ COREBARREL DEPTH SAMPLE ROD L WELL COMPLETION (FT BGS) RECOVERYT) I%) .DETAILS DRIVE OUTER 5" CASING TO 41.2 FT -4.65 68 N/M CORE RUN #3 (41.2-46.2): RECOVERY: 4.65'. -4.FINE-GRAINED DARK GRAY GRANULITE/DIORITE, LITTLE TO NO FOLIATION. FX FACIES CONTAIN PYRITE. ADVANCEMENT RATE: 14 MINIFT POSSIBLE FX'S: 42.2' (35 DEG), 42.7' (5 DEG), 44.0' (20 DEG), 44.3'(30 DEG), 44.7'(35 DEG), 45.2' (60 DEG).DRIVE OUTER 5" CASING TO 46.2 FT CORE RUN #4 (46.2-51.2): RECOVERY: 4.80'.FINE-GRAINED DARK GRAY GRANULITE/DIORITE, LITTLE TO NO FOLIATION, HARD, FX FACIES CONTAIN PYRITE.POSSIBLE FX'S: 48.95' (30 DEG), 49.65' (25 DEG), 50.45' (10 DEG), 50.90' (25 DEG), 51.0' (35 DEG).DRIVE OUTER 5" CASING TO 51.2 FT. SOUNDED DEPTH: 51.0'4.80 93 N/M c 55 55 60 60 CONSTRUCTION DETAILS KEY: CONCRETE NOTES: -RQD = ROCK QUALITYDESIGNATION WELL MATERIAL: 2'DIAMETER FLUSH JOINT SCHEDULE 40 PVC. CONE E- % LEL = % LOWER EXPLOSIVE LIMIT OF 4 IN DIA. 3 FT PROTECTIVE STICK-UP BOREHOLE AIR AT TOP OF 4-INCH STEEL CASING 10 SLOT FLUSH-JOINT S CHEDULE 40 BENTONITE ICHIPS (3/8') -HORIZONTAL AXIS NOT TO SCALE 0PVCWELLUSCREENT(51C-4

1) BTT(39'-2') -ALL DEPTH ARE REFERENCED TO GRADE LEVEL UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED 1 P -MONITORING WELL SURVEY PERFORMED BY " NO I1SAND 1 /2-INCH CRUSHED STONE EMANUEL ENGINEERING INC. DURING SEPTEMBER 2010.[(51 39) NOT USED] -ELEVATIONS, IN FEET, BASED ON SITE BENCHMARK(S) 3 GEOLOGIC LOG PROJECTAOCATION:

SEABROOK STATION SOIL BORING/WELL ID: START DATE: 5/7/10 SEABROOK NEWIHAMPSHIRE SD-5 COMPLETION DATE: 5/7/2010 (BOREHOLE) .SEBROK NW HAPSHRE 2/2010(WELL DEVELOPMEN7) DEPTH TO WATER (FT BELOW TOC): 14.73 DRILLING CO: DRILLING METHOD: DEPTH TO BOTTOM (FT BELOW GRADE): 28.0 AQUIFER DRILLING AND TESTING, INC ROTO-SONIC DATE: 10/26/10 GEOLOGIST: SAMPLING METHOD: ELEVATION TOC: 22.89 MATT DAROIS 4 X 60-INCH SONIC SAMPLER ELEVATION TOP OF ROAD BOX: (-3' Stick-up)DEPTH SAMPLE ROD WELL COMPLETION (FT BGS) SAMPLE DECRIPTION RECOVERY LEL ILS.FEET) __%)__ DETAILS_SOFT DIG W/VAC TRUCK TO 15FT. 0-15FT CONSISTS OF L. BROWN M. SAND FILL.EXCAVATION BACKFILLED TO FACILITATE DRILLING.BASE OF STICK-UP N/A N/A N/M I 10 10 1 5 F i- i DRIVE SAMPLER FROM 15 FT TO 20 FT.15.0 TO 20.0 FT: POORLY SORTED M. TO F. SAND, SOME M. TO C. SUBANGULAR GRAVEL, LOOSE, SATURATED. 4.5 N/A I N/M 20 20 CONSTRUCTION DETAILS KEY: COCRTE NOTES: -ROD = ROCK QUALITY DESIGNATION WELL MATERIAL: 2" DIAMETER FLUSH JOINT SCHEDULE 40 PVC. IN (02 % LEL = %LOWER EXPLOSIVELIMITROF 4 IN DIA 3 FTPROTECTIVE STICK-UP BOREHOLE AIR AT TOP OF 4-INCH STEEL CASING-HORIZONTAL AXIS NOT TO SCALE 10 SLOTFLUSH-JOINTSCHEDULE 40 )'7 BENTONITE CHIPS (Y-8) -ALL DEPTH ARE REFERENCED TO GRADE LEVEL UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED PVC WELL SCREEN (28'-18) I (16.92) -MONITORING WELL SURVEY PERFORMED BY PA.NO. 1 SAND 1 1/2-INCH CRUSHED STONE EMANUEL ENGINEERING INC. DURING SEPTEMBER 2010.(29"16.9) [NOT USED) -ELEVATIONS, IN FEET, BASED ON SITE BENCHMARK(S) GEOLOGIC LOG RSCS PROJECTA.OCATION: SEABROOK STATION SOIL BORING/WELL ID: START DATE: 5/1/10 SEABROOK NEW HAMPSHIRE SD-5 COMPLETION DATE: 51712010(BOREHOLE) MRN H I010 (WEL DEVELOPMENT) DEPTH TO WATER (FT BELOW TOC): 14.73 DRILLING CO: DRILLING METHOD: ROTO-SONIC DEPTH TO BOTTOM (FT BELOW GRADE): 28.0 AQUIFER DRILLING AND TESTING, INC DATE: 10/26/10 GEOLOGIST: TTSAMPLING METHOD: ELEVATION TOC: -22.89 MA4 X 60-INCH SONIC SAMPLER ELEVATION TOP OF ROAD BOX: (-3' Stick-up)DEPTH SAMPLE ROD WELL COMPLETION FSAMPLE DECRIPTION-RECOVERY %LELE (FT (FEET) ) DETAILS DRIVE SAMPLER FROM 20 FT TO 25 FT.20 TO 25 FT-SAME AS ABOVE.1.6 N/A N/M 25 25 DRIVE SAMPLER FROM 25 FT TO 29 FT.25.0 TO 28.4 FT: SAME AS ABOVE. 2.5 N/A N/M 28.4 TO 29 FT: FILL CONCRETE 30 30 35 .35 CONSTRUCTION DETAILS KEY: NOTES: -ROD ROCK QUALITY DESIGNATION WELL MATERIAL: 2 DIAMETER FLUSH JOINT SCHEDULE 40 PVC. CONCRETE %LEL = %LOWER EXPLOSIVE.LIMITOF 4 IN 0A. 3 FTPROTECTIVE STICK-UP (0'-2) BOREHOLE AIR AT TOP OF 4-INCH STEEL CASING 0oSLOTFLUSH-JOINT SCHEDULE 40 -BENTONITE CHIPS/(38) HORIZONTAL AXIS NOT TO SCALE PVC WELL SCREEN(28'-18) (16,9-2) -ALL DEPTH ARE REFERENCED TO GRADE LEVEL UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED W -I " -MONITORING WELL SURVEYPERFORMED BY PAGE 0: NO. I SAND I 1/2-INCH CRUSHED STONE EMANUEL ENGINEERING INC. DURING SEPTEMBER 2010.(2916,9') .[NOT USED) ELEVATIONS, IN FEET, BASED ON SITE BENCHMARK(S) .. GEOLOGIC LOG PROJECT/LOCATION: SEABROOK STATION SOIL BORING/WELL ID: START DATE: 5/17/10 SEABROOK NEW HAMPSHIRE SW-4 COMPLETION DATE: &/1712010 612o210 (WELL DEVELOPMENT) DEPTH TO WATER (FT BELOW TOC): 11.38 DRILLING C DEPTH TO BOTTOM (FT BELOW GRADE): 27.0 DATE: 10/25/10 GEOLOGIS ELEVATION TOC: 19.86 ELEVATION TOP OF ROAD BOX: (-20.5)AQUIFER DRILLING AND TESTING, INC DRILLING METHOD: ROTO-SOlvIC MA TT DAROIS SAMPLING METHOD: 4 X 60-INCH SONIC SAMPLER DEPTH (FT 8OS)SAMPLE DECRIPTION SOFT DIG W/VAC TRUCK TO APPROX. 15FT 0-15FT CONSISTS OFL. BROWN M.SAND FILL. EXCAVATION BACKFILLED TO FACILITATE DRILLING.5 10 15 DRIVE SAMPLER FROM 15 FT TO 20 FT.15.0 TO 20.0 FT: (15-15.6): BROWN-GRAYM TO F SAND, SOME M SUBANGULAR GRAVEL, TRACE SILT, MOIST, FIRM.(16.5-20): MEDIUM L BROWN SAND, SOME SUBANGULAR TO ROUNDED M GRAVEL, LOOSE, SATURATED. 20 CONSTRUCTION DETAILS KEY: WELL MATERIAL: 2?DIAMETER FLUSH JOINT SCHEDULE 40 PVC.2'X 2'X 2' (DEEP) VAUL T-TYPE ROAD BOX[ 10 SLOT FLUSH-JOINT SCHEDULE 40 BENTONITE CHIPS (3i8")PVC WELL SCREEN (27-17) .(15'-2.5)NO. I SAND I. 1/2-INCH CRUSHED STONE (28.4'15) (2.5-2)NOTES: -ROD = ROCK QUALITY DESIGNATION -%LEL = % LOWER EXPLOSIVE LIMIT OF BOREHOLE AIR AT TOP OF 4-INCH STEEL CASING-HORIZONTAL AXIS NOT TO SCALE-ALL DEPTH ARE REFERENCED TO GRADE LEVEL UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED-MONITORING WELL SURVEY PERFORMED BY PACE #: EMANUEL ENGINEERING INC. DURING SEPTEMBER 2010. 1/--ELEVATIONS, IN FEET, BASED ON SITE BENCHMARK(S) 1112 GEOLOGIC LOG CS PROJECT/LOCATION: SEABROOK STATION SOIL BORING/WELL ID: START DATE: 5/17/10 SEABROOK NEWHAMPSHIRE SW4 COMPLETION DATE: 5/17/2010 6M2010 (WELL DEVELOPMENT DEPTH TO WATER (FT BELOW TOC): 11.38 DRILLING CO: DRILLING METHOD: DEPTH TO BOTTOM (FT BELOW GRADE): 27.0 AQUIFER DRILLING AND TESTING, INC DATE: 10/25/10 GEOLOGIST: SAMPLING METHOD: ELEVATION TOC: 19.86 MATTDAROIS 4 X 60-INCH SONIC SAMPLER ELEVATION TOP OF ROAD BOX: (-20.5)DEPTH f SAMPLE WELL COMPLETION SAMPLE DECRIPTION RECOVERY ROD() V. % WLEL , OMPE TION (FT BGS) ý FEET) _____ LE DETAILS DRIVE SAMPLER FROM 20 FT TO 25 FT (20-25): SAME AS ABOVE.5.0 N/A N/M 25.i i i ---4: DRIVE SAMPLER FROM 25 FT TO 28.4 FT.(25-27'): MEDIUM TO F. BROWN SAND FILL, TRACE M. SUBANGULAR GRAVEL, SATURATED. 3.4 N/A N/M (27-28.4): FILL CONCRETE WITH DIORITE FRAGMENT LODGED IN SAMPLE SHOE.SAMPLER REFUSAL ON BEDROCK A T 28.4'.3C IV 30 401 4o CONSTRUCTION DETAILS KEY: NOTES: -ROD = ROCK QUALITY DESIGNATION WELL MATERIAL: 2 DIAMETER FLUSH JOINT SCHEDULE 40 PVC. -% LEL= % LOWER EXPLOSIVE LIMITOF 2'X2' X 2'(DEEP) VAULT-TYPE ROAD BOX. BOREHOLE AIR AT TOP OF 4-INCH STEEL CASING 10 SL O T FLUSH-JOINT SCHEDULE 40 [77.BENTONITE CHIPS (Y8)- HORIZONTAL AXIS NOT TO SCALE 10C WLTLUSCR-E CHEN UL 40') ] -NT S ALL DEPTH ARE REFERENCED TO GRADE LEVEL UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED PVC WELL SCREEN (27-17) (15-2.5') -MONITORING WELL SURVEYPERFORMEDBY PAGE#[ NO.1 SAND 1/2-INCH CRUSHED STONE EMANUEL ENGINEERING INC. DURING SEPTEMBER 2010.(28.4') (2.5'-2) -ELEVATIONS, IN FEET, BASED ON SITE BENCHMARK(S) GEOLOGIC LOG PROJECT/LOCATION: SEABROOK STATION -SO1 BORINGIWELL ID: , START DATE: 5/18/10 SEABROOK NEWHAMPSHIRE SW-5 COMPLETION DATE: 5/19/2010 I/2&2K00 (VWELL DEVELOPMENT) DEPTH TO WATER (FT BELOWTOC): 12.08 DRILLING CO: DRILLING METHOD: ROTC-SONIC DEPTH TO BOTTOM (FT BELOWGRADE): 14.8 AQUIFER DRILLING AND TESTING, INC DATE: 1 10/27/10 GEOLOGIST: SAMPLING METHOD: ELEVATION TOG: 20.11 MATTDAROIS 4X 60-INCH SONIC SAMPLER ELEVATION TOP OF ROAD BOX: (-20.5)DEPTH SAMPLE DECRIPTION SAMPLE ROD WELL COMPLETION (FT BGS) RECOVERY (%] %LEL DETAILS (FEET) 06 EAL SOFT DIG W/VAC TRUCK TO APPROX. 14.5 FT. TO (0-14.5): L. BROWN M.-F. SAND FILL, SOME M.-SUBANGULAR GRAVEL, 'TRACE C. SAND AND SILT CASIN EXCAVATION BACKFILLED TO FACILITATE DRILLING. N/A N/A N/M DRIVE SAMPLER FROM 14.5 FT TO 14.8 FT.REFUSAL-ON BEDROCK AT 14.8'5 :, 10 ~10 151 20 _______________________ ________ 20 CONSTRUCTION DETAILS KEY: NOTES: -ROD =ROCK QUALITY DESIGNATION WELL MATERIAL: 2" DIAMETER FLUSH JOINT SCHEDULE 40 PVC. -% LEL = % LOWER EXPLOSIVE LIMIT OF 2'X 2'X 2'(DEEP) VAULT-TYPE ROAD BOX BOREHOLE AIR AT TOP OF 4-INCH STEEL CASING--HORIZONTAL AXIS NOT TO SCALE PV0 SELO FLSH-JOINTSHDL 40.-78 (67-2BETNIECHPS) E ALL DEPTH ARE REFERENCED TO GRADE LEVEL UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED PVCWEL SCEEN(140-B) j-.(B.7-25)- MONITORING WELL SURVEY PERFORMED BY FPAOE#It NO. I SAND I11/2-INCH CRUSHED STONE EMANUEL ENGINEERING INC. DURING SEPTEMBER 2010.Tx(14.8-6.7') (2.5'-2') .ELEVATIONS, IN FEET, BASED ON SITE, BENCHMARK(S) - GEOLOGIC LOG PROJECT/LOCATION: SEABROOK STATION SOIL BORING/WELL ID: START DATE: 5/14/10 SEABROOK NEW HAMPSHIRE SW-6 COMPLETION DATE: 5I1/2010 6010 (2ELL DEVELOPMEN7 DEPTH TO WATER (FT BELOW TOC): 11.67 DRILLING CO: DRILLING METHOD: ROTO-SONIC DEPTH TO BOTTOM (FT BELOWGRADE): 14.5 AQUIFER DRILLING AND TESTING, INCR N DATE: 10/26/10 GEOLOGIST: SAMPLING METHOD: ELEVATION TOG: 19.93 MATT DAROIS 4 X 60-INCH SONIC SAMPLER ELEVATION TOP OF ROAD BOX: (-20.5)DEPTH rSAMPLE 1 WELL COMPLETION (FT BGSH SAMPLE DECRIPTION RECOVERY ID % LEL (FEET) () ._ DETAILS SOFT DIG W/VA C TRUCK TO APPROX. 1.3FT.(0-13): L. BROWN M.-F. SAND FILL, TRACE C. SAND AND SILT.EXCAVATION BACKFILLED TO FACILITATE DRILLING.DRIVE SAMPLER FROM 13 FT TO 15.2 FT.(13-14.5'): SILT AND ANGULAR ROCK FRAGMENTS/GRAVEL, MOIST.(14.5-15.2): BEDROCK, M. TO F. GRAIN DIORITE.REFUSAL AT 15.2'N/M N/A N/A STOP OF QD SPVC lK cx CASING0 1.0 10 15 15 2C 20 CONSTRUCTION DETAILS KEY: NOTES: -ROD = ROCK QUALITY DESIGNATION WELL MATERIAL: 2' DIAMETER FLUSH JOINT SCHEDULE 40 PVC. -% LEL =% LOWER EXPLOSIVE LIMIT OF 2'X 2'X 2' (DEEP) VAUL T- TYPE ROAD BOX BOREHOLE AIR AT TOP OF 4-INCH STEEL CASING I- HORIZONTAL AXIS NOT TO SCALE 10 SLOTFLUSH-JOINT SCHEDULE 40 BENTONITE CHIPS (5') -ALL DEPTH ARE REFERENCED TO GRADE LEVEL UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED* -MONITORING WELL SURVEY PERFORMED BY PAGES: NO. 1 SAND I 51/2-INCH CRUSHED STONE EMANUEL ENGINEERING INC. DURING SEPTEMBER 2010.(15.2-6.6) " (2.5-2) " -ELEVATIONS, IN FEET, BASED ON SITE BENCHMARK(S) . GEOLOGIC LOG RSCS PROJECT/LOCATION: SEABROOK STATION. SOIL BORING/WELL ID:. START DATE: 9/22109 SEABROOK NEW HAMPSHIRE TW-1, COMPLETION DATE: 9209 9t29109 (WELL DEVELOPMENT) DEPTH TO WATER (FT BGS): 2.57 DRILLING CO: DRILLING METHOD: DEPTH TO BOTTOM (FT BELOW GRADE): 10.0 RSCS DATE: 10/27/10 GEOLOGIST: SAMPLING METHOD: ELEVATION TOC: -5 MATTDAROIS 2 X 48-INCH PUSH SAMPLER ELEVATION TOPOF ROAD BOX: (-3 STICK-UP)DEPTH SAMPLE ROD WELL COMPLETION BG)SAMPLE DECRIPTION .RECOVERY RD % LEL (FT BGS) (FEET) 0%) DETAILS DRIVE SAMPLER FROM 0 FT TO 4 FT BROWN TO L. BROWN FINE SILTY SAND, SOME ORGANICS, SATURATED. .... ....4.0 N/A N/Mý5 DRIVE SAMPLER FROM 4 FT TO,8 FT:- 5 ABRUPT CHANGE IN LITHOLOGYA T 6.570T BLUE-GRAY MARINE CLAY,-.10÷MOST , ..LASTIC. 4.0 N/A N 15 15 AliONSTRUCTION DETAILS KEY: NOTES: -ROD ROCK QUALITY DESIGNA TION WELL MATERIAL: 1"DIAMETER FLUSH JOINT SCHEDULE 40 PVC. -% LEL =% LOWER EXPLOSIVE LIMIT OF UNPROTECTED 1" DIA. PVC STICK-UP RISER BOREHOLE AIR AT TOP OF 4-INCH STEEL CASING IVSLOTFLUSH-JOINT SCHEDULE 40 BENTONITE CHIPS (3/8) HORIZONTAL AXIS NOT TO SCALE PVC, WELL SCREEN (5I0') (4' ALL DEPTH ARE REFERENCED TO GRADE LEVEL UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED NATURL FORATIONMATERAL(S)(4~ -ELEVATIONS, IN FEET, BASED ON SITE BENCHMARK(S) PG S(4ý10) 1, GEOLOGIC LOG RSCS PROJECT/LOCATION: SEABROOK STATION SOIL BORING/WELL ID: START DATE:. 9/22109 SEABROOK NEW HAMPSHIRE TW-2 COMPLETION DATE: 9122109 9129109 (WELL DEVELOPMENT) R (FT BGS): 2:18 DRILLING CO: DRILLING METHOD: DIRECT PUSH DEPTH TO BOTTOM (FT BELOW GRADE): 6.0 RSCS DATE: 10/27/10 GEOLOGIST: SAMPLING METHOD: ELEVATION TOC: -5 MATT DAROIS 2 X 48-INCH PUSH SAMPLER ELEVATION TOP OF ROAD BOX: (-3 STICK-UP)DEPTH .S~'EW SAMPLE DECRIPTION RESAMLE RQD WELL COMPLETION (FT BGS) : ECOVERY D E TAL (FT BGS) (FEET) No%) " DETAILS DRIVE SAMPLER FROM 0 FT TO 4 FT.FINE GRAVEL FILL, SOME SAND AND SILT, MOIST 3.8 NIA N/M DRIVE SAMPLER FROM 4 FT TO 6 FT.5 .5.ABRUPTCHANGEINLITHOLOGYAT4'.TOA 2" THICK LAYER OF BROWN-BLACK 2.0 N/A N/M ORGANICS ABRUPTLY CHANGING TO MASSIVE GRAY-BLUE CLAY, PLASTIC, MOIST ". .* .... -REFUSAL AT6 FT BELOW GROUND SURFACE 10. .10* -7 1515 CONSTRUCTION DETAILS KEY: NOTES: -ROD ROCK QUALITY DESIGNATION ELL MATERIAL: 1" DIAMETER FLUSH JOINT SCHEDULE 40 PVC. -% LEL = % LOWER EXPLOSIVE LIMIT OF NPROTECTED 1" DIA. PVC STICK-UP RISER BOREHOLE AIR AT TOP OF 4-INCH STEEL CASING'10 SLOTFLUSH-JOINTSCHEDULE40 C- HORIZONTAL AXIS NOT TOSCALE PVC WELL SCREEN (6-3.5)BI -ALL DEPTH ARE REFERENCED TO GRADE LEVEL UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED NATURAL FOREEN MATERL(2.5-0 -ELEVATIONS, IN FEET, BASED ON SITE BENCHMARK(S) PAGE NATURAL FORMATION MATERIAL(S) (_______5__-_______--__________1/ GEOLOGIC LOG .RSCS PROJECT/LOCATION: SEABROOK STATION SOIL BORING/WELL ID: START DATE: 9/22109 SEABROOK NEW HAMPSHIRE TW-3 COMPLETION DATE: 122109 SA 9129/09 (WELL DEVELOPMENT) EPTH TO WATER (FT BGS): 0.85 DRILLING CO: DRILLING METHOD: DIRECT PUSH DEPTH TO BOTTOM (FT BELOW GRADE): 6.0 RSCS DATE: 10/27/10 GEOLOGIST: SAMPLING METHOD: ELEVATION TOC: ~4 MA TT DAROIS 2 X 48-INCH PUSH SAMPLER ELEVATION TOP OF ROAD BOX: (-3 STICK-UP)DEPTH sAMPLE DECRIPTION SAWLE ROD WELL COMPLETION (FT BGS) SAMPLE DECRECOVERY % LEL (FEET) N%) DETAILS DRIVE SAMPLER FROM OFT TO 4 FT.BROWN TO L. BROWN FINE MARINE SAND, SOME SILT, TRA CE CLAY, MOIST. 4.0 N/A N/M DRIVE SAMPLER FROM 4 FT TO 6 FT.SAMEASABOVE, REFUSAL AT6FTBELOWGROUND SURFACE 2.0 N/A N/M 10 10 15 15 20 ._20 ,JNSTRUCTION DETAILS KEY: -NOTES: -ROD ROCK QUALITY DESIGNATION ELL MATERIAL: 1" DIAMETER FLUSH JOINT SCHEDULE 40 PVC. -% LEL = % LOWER EXPLOSIVE LIMIT OF SUNPROTECTED I" DIA. PVC STICK-UP RISER

  • BOREHOLE AIR A T TOP OF 4-INCH STEEL CASING 10 SLOT FLUSH-JOINT SCHEDULE 40 BENTONITE CHIPS (3/8") HORIZONTAL AXIS NOT TO SCALE 0 WL SCREEN (6-3.5) 4 ] (25BE3 -ALL DEPTH ARE REFERENCED TO GRADE LEVEL UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED PVC WELL SREE6'3.0

-ELEVATIONS, IN FEET, BASED ON SITE BENCHMARK(S) ~r~NATURAL FORMATION MA TERIAL(S) AEt Li(2.5-6) 1/1 ' -+ SD-2&0 NOTES: GROUND WATER FLOW DIRECTION SRSCS Radiation Safety &Control Services, Inc.September 2010 Tritium Plume (pCi/L)Surficial Aquifer Water Table Elevation and Ground Water Flow Directions Shown I)EWATERING WELL LOCATIONS -{- -WELL LOCATIONS 4--91 Portsmouth Avenue Stratham, NH 03885 Phone: 603/525-8339 Fax: 603/778-6879 Email: info@rodsofety.cor PREPARED M. Darois 10.05. O oAr CHECKED APPROVED ENGINEER SCALE Do Not Scale Seabrook Station OCA and Protected Area Seabrook NH o/o5/200 r I. BD-3 0 0 NOTES: GROUND WATER FLOW DIRECTION A DEWATERING WELL LOCATIONS

  1. #SCS Radiatio Saft &Control SrieIc September 2010 Bedrock Aquifer Water Table -Elevation'arid Ground Water Flow Directions shown WELL LOCATIONS+91 Portsmouth Avenue Strathom, NH 03885 Phone: 603/525-8339 Fax: 603/778-6879 Email: info@rodscfety.com PREPARED M. Darois 110.29.0 CHECKED APPROVED ENGINEER SCALE: Do Not Scale Seabrook Station OCA and Protected Area Seabrook NH DATE. 1REV SHEET DT.10/29/2010 RE I I ILOCATION:

JOB CODE* UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY LU oREGION 1 0 1 CONGRESS STREET, SUITE 1100 0 PotOBOSTON, MASSACHUSETTS 02114-2023 PRO~'ito'CERTIFIED MAIL -RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED May 25, 2007 Mr. Gene St. Pierre Site Vice President FPL Energy Seabrook LLC PO Box 300 Seabrook, NH 03874 RE: NPDES Application No. NH0020338 -FPL Energy Seabrook LLC

Dear Mr. St. Pierre:

Your reapplication for a National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) permit has been reviewed and appears to be complete. You may be contacted for additional information as the permit is developed, should it be necessary to clarify, modify or supplement any previously submitted in-formation. By copy of this letter, your State Water Pollution Control Agency is furnished a copy of your complete application for certification pursuant to Section 401 (a)(1) of the Clean WaterAct, as amended, 33 U.S.C. Section 1341(a)(1). A draft permit and statement of basis or fact sheet will be prepared by this office and forwarded to you for comment prior to the opening of the public comment period. The draft permit will then be publicly noticed and forwarded for state certification if certification has not previously been received on the application. If it is deemed necessary, a public hearing will be held, in which case, the comment period will be extended until the close of the hearing. After the close of the public comment period, your final permit will be issued providing no new substantial questions are raised. If new questions develop during the comment period, it may be necessary to draft a new permit, revise the statement of basis or fact sheet and/or reopen the public comment period.The conditions of your present permit will continue in force until your new permit is issued and becomes effective since you filed a complete application. 40 C.F.R. Section 122.6, 48 Fed. Reg. 14158 (April 1, 1983).Toll Free- 1-888-372-7341 Intemet Address (URL). http://www.epa.gov/regionl Recycled/Recyclable -Printed with Vegetable OIl Based Inks on Recycled Paper (Minimum 30% Postconsumeir) The conditions of your present permit will continue in force until your new permit is issued and becomes effective since you have filed a timely and complete application. 40 C.F.R. Section 122.6, 48 Fed. Reg. 14158 (April 1, 1983). The continuation of the present permit is contingent upon a timely submission of a CZM constituency statement, if required, and any additional information that may be needed to complete the permit issuance process. 40 C.F.R. Section 122249(d). Should you have any questions concerning the permit issuance process, do not hesitate to contact me directly at 617/918-1545. Sincerely, Shelley B. Puleo Environmental Protection Specialist Municipal Assistance Unit cc: NH DES}}