|
|---|
Category:General FR Notice Comment Letter
MONTHYEARML23340A0182023-11-0303 November 2023
Comment (2) of Ntale Kajumba on Behalf of Us Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) on Notice of Intent to Prepare an Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) for the Dominion Energy South Carolina, Inc.; Virgil C. Summer, Subsequent License Ren
ML16097A2692016-03-29029 March 2016
Comment (7) of Anonymous on Operator Licensing Examination Standards for Power Reactors
ML15163A0242015-06-0808 June 2015
Comment (2) of Damon Bryson on Selection of Material Balance Areas and Item Control Areas; Draft Regulatory Guide for Comment
ML13022A4962012-12-13013 December 2012
Comment (248) of Deb Brown on Consideration of Environmental Impacts of Temporary Storage of Spent Fuel After Cessation of Reactor Operation
ML12208A0912012-07-19019 July 2012
Comment (2) of Susan Reese, on Behalf of South Carolina Electric & Gas, on NRC-2012-0133-0001, NRC Form 5, Occupational Dose Record for a Monitoring Period
ML12027A0072012-01-23023 January 2012
Comment (1) of Sce&G Draft NUREG-xxxx, Common - Cause Failure Analysis in Event and Condition Assessment: Guidance and Research
ML12005A0892011-12-15015 December 2011
Comment (25) of Beth Quattlebaum on Behalf of Scana Corp. on Draft Generic Letter on Seismic Risk Evaluations for Operating Reactors
ML1033505352010-11-18018 November 2010
Comment (1) of Willie C. Marting on Draft Regulatory Guide DG-1244
ML1023604862010-08-18018 August 2010
Comment (1) of W. Martin, on Behalf of VC Summer, Comments Regarding DG-1249
ML1021604012010-07-26026 July 2010
Comment (13) Jay B. Herrington on Behalf of Us Dept. of the Interior, Fish & Wildlife Service, on Virgil C. Summers Nuclear Station Draft Environmental Impact Statement
ML0918001802009-06-24024 June 2009
Comment (1) of George A. Robertson on Behalf of South Carolina Electric & Gas Co., on Draft Regulatory Guide DG-1220, Performance - Based Containment Leak-Test Program
ML0917701592009-06-23023 June 2009
Comment (1) of Willie C. Martin on Behalf of South Carolina Electric & Gas Company Re Draft NUREG, Diversity Strategies for Nuclear Power Plant Instrumentation and Control & C Systems
ML0905404442009-01-30030 January 2009
Comment (4) of Cathy Novinger, Charles D. Beaman, Steve Benjamin, Charles T. Speth, and Ike Mcleese on Behalf of the Greater Columia, Chamber of Commerce Supporting the Efforts of Sce&G and Santee Cooper to Build New Power Plants in Fairfie
ML0819000172008-06-30030 June 2008
Comment (1) of W. C. Martin, on Behalf of South Carolina Electric & Gas Co. No Comments to Draft Regulatory Guide, DG-1195
ML0527601512005-09-26026 September 2005
Comment (1) from Kenneth W. Nettles of South Carolina Electric & Gas Co. Supporting Proposed Change Described in Notice of Opportunity to Comment on Model Safety Evaluation on Elimination of Typical License Condition Requiring Reporting of
ML0326611802003-09-0202 September 2003
Comment (1) of Heinz J. Mueller Re Draft Generic Supplemental Environmental Impact Statement (Dgseis)
2023-11-03
[Table view] |
Text
t2*.9 Mendiola, Doris 711 1")
From: MARTIN, WILLIE C JR [WMARTIN@scana.com] 7-f Sent: Thursday, November 18, 2010 7:52 PM To: Rulemaking Comments
Subject:
DG-1244 n~i C/:
VC Summer Comments: DG-1244
- 1. From page 3 "Plant operators should be aware of (I) the capability of the offsite power system to supply power during operation and (2) situations that can result in a loss of offsite power or inadequate voltage following a trip of the plant or other transmission contingencies (which could potentially degrade the offsite power supplies) identified by the grid operator. If the offsite power system cannot provide the requisite power in either situation, the licensee should declare the system inoperable and follow pertinent plant technical specification provisions."
Comment 1:
This item on page 3 seems to add a new criteria. Except for a station plant trip, the GDC and Standard Review Plan do NOT require that a single contingency not impact either offsite power source, they just require that it not impact BOTH offsite power sources.
- 2. From Page 9:
"The NPP operator should validate the accuracy and conservatism of the post-trip voltages predicted by the online grid analysis tool."
Comment 2:
How can the NPP operator possibly do this? We do not have the knowledge or tools to do this. We do have System Control (Transmission) evaluate the accuracy of their prediction of post trip voltage after each actual trip. But VCSNS cannot do this beforehand.
VA FL 3 6J'f Z`07, 2 /r)nx7OS
,f1ýPJ T-c /Ioe :: ffox-O/S # jd I 5 0 ) 6 ~ 094)
I
Mendiolla, Doris From: Rulemaking Comments Sent: Monday, November 22, 2010 8:59 AM To: Mendiola, Doris
Subject:
FW: DG-1244 Attachments: DG-1244 Does this comments belong to ADM?
1.
