ML061170621

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
NRC SIT Slides for the Public Meeting Regarding Contamination of Onsite Groundwater
ML061170621
Person / Time
Site: Indian Point  Entergy icon.png
Issue date: 03/28/2006
From:
NRC Region 1
To:
References
Download: ML061170621 (12)


Text

NRC Special Inspection Indian Point Energy Center September 20, 2005 - February 28, 2006 Contamination of Onsite Groundwater Nuclear Regulatory Commission - Region I Public Meeting, Peekskill, New York March 28, 2006

2 Agenda

  • Overview of Special Inspection
  • Discussion of Dose and Dose Limits
  • NRC Communications

3 NRC Overview

  • Discovery and Initiation of Special Inspection
  • Special Inspection Charter and Revision
  • Scope of Special Inspection
  • Results
  • Next Steps

4 Discovery and Initiation of Special Inspection

  • August 22, 2005 - Moist SFP crack first identified, nothing detectable
  • September 1, 2005 - Contamination detected on swipe sample-NRC informed
  • September 7-15, 2005 - NRC preliminary structural and radiological assessments performed
  • September 12, 2005 - First liquid volume collected for analysis
  • September 19, 2005 - Tritium detected from SFP crack leakage similar to SFP
  • September 20, 2005 - Special Inspection Charter issued
  • October 5, 2005 - Tritium contamination found in an onsite monitoring well (MW-111)
  • October 7, 2005 - Special Inspection Charter revised

Special Inspection Charter and 5 Revision

  • Determine the facts and assess the conditions of the Unit 2 spent fuel pool leak
  • Areas of Review: spent fuel pool structural strength, radiological sampling and dose impact assessment, and adequacy of Entergys corrective actions
  • Charter was revised to include investigation of groundwater contamination in the Unit 2 transformer yard (MW-111) and monitoring/control of the Unit 1 SFP leakage

6 Scope of Special Inspection

  • Unit 2 spent fuel pool structural integrity
  • Unit 2 spent fuel pool liner inspection for leaks
  • Radiological assessment of bounding dose calculation
  • Independent sampling of both onsite groundwater and offsite water locations
  • Site groundwater transport characterization
  • Previous samples and data reviewed for possible precursor conditions
  • Unit 1 spent fuel pool leakage collection efficiency

7 Inspection Results

  • No issues relative to Unit 2 spent fuel pool structural integrity
  • Approximately 40% of pool liner inspected - no leaks identified, more to follow
  • Bounding dose calculations continue to indicate that regulatory dose limits are being met
  • The most recent estimated dose was approximately 0.1% of regulatory limits
  • 3-way sample splits between New York State, the NRC, and Entergy confirmed no plant-related activity detected at offsite environmental sampling locations

8 Inspection Results (Cont.)

  • Site groundwater characterization efforts are technically sound and provide useful information
  • To date, no circumstances identified that reasonably should have led Entergy to earlier detection or prevention of current onsite conditions
  • Unit 1 spent fuel pool drain system performance and efficiency are not completely understood. Continued efforts are necessary to assure that all leakage is accounted for and effectively handled
  • The cause of the onsite conditions and corrective actions are being pursued in a reasonable manner. Efforts to determine source(s) of contamination and effect mitigation or remediation are progressing.

9 Next Steps

  • Continue to assess Entergys performance, effectiveness, and diligence relative to resolving the source and extent of this groundwater contamination
  • Recognizing the evolving nature of this investigation, take appropriate regulatory actions as warranted by inspection findings
  • Continually assess dose consequence, regulatory compliance and impact to public health and safety
  • Evaluate onsite and offsite groundwater monitoring plans to assure early detection of contamination

10 Summary Of Current NRC Assessment

  • Based on current information, public health and safety has not been, nor is likely to be, adversely affected.
  • The source(s) causing ground water contamination have not been positively identified.
  • The NRC will continue regulatory oversight of Entergys efforts and activities to resolve the condition. A follow-up NRC inspection report will provide final conclusions.
  • Since discovery, Entergys response has been reasonable and technically sound.
  • NRC is reviewing generic implications of groundwater contamination.

11 Radiation Dose Perspective

  • Background (est.) 360 mrem/year (NCRP 94)
  • Public Dose Limits 100 mrem/year (10CFR20.1301) 25 mrem/year (40CFR190)
  • Liquid Effluent Limit 3 mrem/year, total body 10 mrem/year, organ (10CFR50, App. I)
  • Estimated Dose Rate 0.0034 mrem/year, total body 0.01 mrem/year, bone
  • EPA drinking water limits (40 CFR 141.16)

Tritium (H-3) 20,000 pCi/L Strontium (Sr- 90) 8 pCi/L (EPA maximum contaminant level based on 4 mrems per year)

NRC Communications 12

  • Lessons learned
  • Corrective actions
  • Communication efforts going forward