IR 05000424/1985044

Insp Rept 50-424/85-44 on 850909-13.No Violation or Deviation Noted.Major Areas Inspected:Operations, Organization & Administration & Module 5 Readiness Review

ML20133B432
Person / Time
Site:	Vogtle
Issue date:	09/23/1985
From:	Belisle G, Latta R NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION II)
To:
Shared Package
ML20133B424	List: IR 05000424/1985044 ML20133B420
References
50-424-85-44, NUDOCS 8510030284
Download: ML20133B432 (8)

Text

{{#Wiki_filter:- - - . . - - - - . - _ . - ~.... ~ ,= -= -...----

       .
        . ~ . *

UNITED STATES ~

 ,
 [m2 Moqq'o   NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMIS$10N
 [  ',. REGION ll J*  j   101 MARIETTA STREET. r   ATLANTA. GEORGIA 30323

 \...../

Report No.:

  ~

50-424/85-44 - Licensee: Georgia-Power Company

'

P. O. Box 4545 Atlanta, GA 30302 { Docket No.: 50-424 License No.: CPPR-108 i t

'

Facility Name: Vogtle 1 ! Inspection Conducted: September 9 - 13, 1985 Inspector: [9N R. M. Latta

     '

v /f - A s~ Date Signed

;

Approved by: [ -ff - / 7 G.'A. Bel fsleJ Acting Section Chief

        // ?J[[[

60 ate / Signed - Division of Reactor Safety

         :

i j SUMMARY , l Scope: This routine, unannounced inspection entailed 36 inspector-hours on site i in the areas of . Operations Organization and Administration, Module 5 Readiness i

Revie i Results: No violations or deviations were identifie ! 1 ' J I I' i i i l i i l I  ; I

         '

! !

l ! I i i ! )

         :

i G pg34 i ! {

         -

_ _ _ - - _ _ _ _ _

.

. REPORT DETAILS Persons Contacted Licensee Employees

* Belflower, QA Site Manager (Operations)
"S. Bradley, Readiness Review Team Leader, Module 2 W. Copeland, Plant Engineer
"J. D'Amico, Superintendent, Regulatory Compliance
*K. Holmes, Supervisor, Operations Training D. Rhodes, Consultant
*G. Trudeau, Readiness Review Department Manager
*H. Varnadoe, Supervisor, Plant Engineering
"C. Wells, Readiness Review Team Member Other 1lcensee employees contacted included construction craftsmen, engineers, technicians, and office personne NRC Resident Inspector
     '
*J. Rogge, Senior Resident Inspector
* Attended exit interview Exit Interview The inspection scope and findings were summarized on September 13, 1985, with those persons indicated in paragraph 1 above. The inspector described the areas inspected and discussed in detail the inspection finding No dissenting comments were received from the license Inspector Followup Item - Verify QA Audit of Module 5 Findings, paragraph The licensee did not identify as proprietary any of the material provided to or reviewed by the inspector during this inspectio . Licensee Action on Previous Enforcement Matters This subject was not addressed in the inspectio . Operations Organization and Administration, Module 5, Readiness Review Section 3.5 Implementation Matrix The inspector selected various commitments from Modulo 5, Implementa-tion Matrix, to determine if the reference procedures clearly

'
    .

.

delineated the corresponding requirements. The following commitments and implementing documents were selected for review: Source Document Section Implementing Document ANSI N45.2.4-1972 . C, Revision 0 ANSI N45.2.4-1972 C, Revision 2 ANSI 18.7-1976 VEGP QA Manual, Revision 7 ANSI 18.7-1976 VEGP QA Manual, Revision 7 ANSI 18.7-1976 VEGP QA Manual, Revision 7 ANSI N45.2.1-1973 C, Revision 0 ANSI N45.2.2-1975 C, Revision 0 ANSI N45.2.2-1975 C, Revision 0 ANSI N45.2.2-1975 C, Revision 2 ANSI N45.2.2-1975 C, Revision 2 ANSI N45.2.2-1975 C, Revision 0 ANSI N45.2.2-1975 C, Revision 0 ANSI N45.2.2-1975 C, Revision 0 ANSI N45.2.2-1975 C, Revision 4 ANSI N45.2.2-1975 C, Revis, ion 2 ANSI N45.2.2-1975 C, Revision 0 ANSI N45.2.2-1975 C, Revision 0 ANSI N45.2.2-1975 C, Revision 0 ANSI N45.2.9-1974 C, Revision 2 ANSI N45.2.9-1974 C, Revision 2 ANSI N45.2.9-1974 C, Revision 2 ANSI N45.2.9-1974 C, Revision 2 ANSI N45.2.9-1974 C, Revision 2 ANSI N45.2.9-1974 C, Revision 2 ANSI N45.2.9-1974 C, Revision 2 ANSI N45.2.13-1976 Nuclear Procurement Policy Manual, Revision 1 ANSI N45.2.13-1976 C, Revision 2 ANSI N45.2.13-1976 Nuclear Procurement Policy Manual, Revision 1 ANSI N45.2.13-1976 Nuclear Procurement Policy Manual, Revision 1 ANSI N45.2.13-1976 Nuclear Procurement Policy Manual, Revision 1 ANSI N45.2.13-1976 Nuclear Procurement Policy Manual Revision 1 ANSI N45.2.13-1976 Nuclear Procurement Policy Manual, Revision 1 ANSI N45.2.13-1976 1 Nuclear Procurement Policy Manual, Revision 1

_ - - - _ _ _ - _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ ___ _ . _ _ _ _ . ___ _________ __ ___ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ -_____ _ ____________ ______ _ ___-___ . _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ - _

  .

f

1 Source Documents Section Implementing Document ANSI N45.2.13-1976 1 Nuclear Procurement Policy Manual, Revision 1 ANSI N45.2.13-1976 1 Nuclear Procurement Policy Manual, Revision 1

FSAR 17. C, Revision 0 FSAR 17. C, Revision 1 ,

FSAR 17. C, Revision 0 FSAR 17. C, Revision 1 FSAR 17. C, Revision 0 FSAR 17. C, Revision 0 FSAR 17. QA-04-01, Revision 4 FSAR 17. C, Revision 0 FSAR 17. C, Revision 3

,

FSAR 17. SI-C, Revision 1 i FSAR 17. C, Revision 1 FSAR 17. QA Manual, Revision 7 QA Procedures Manual, Amendment 38 FSAR 17. C, Revision 2 FSAR 17. C, Revision 2 , FSAR 17. C, Revision 4

,     FSAR    17. C, Revision 1 FSAR    17. C, Revision 2
,     FSAR    17. C, Revision 0 FSAR    17. C, Revision 0 FSAR    17. C, Revision 1 FSAR    17. C, Revision 1 FSAR    17. C, Revision 0

FSAR 17. C, Revision 0 FSAR 17. C, Revision 2 FSAR 17. C, Revision 0 FSAR 17. Nuclear Procurement Policy Manual, Revision 1 FSAR 17. C, Revision 2 '

FSAR 17. C, Revision 2 , FSAR 17. C Revision 0 FSAR 17. C, Revision 0 FSAR 17. C, Revision 0 FSAR 17. C, Revision 1 FSAR 17. C, Revision 3 FSAR 17. C, Revision 0 FSAR 17. C, Revision 1 FSAR 17. C, Revision 0

T i

. __ - ._ . - - _ . - .
.

Source Document Section Implementing Document

; FSAR 17. Nuclear Procurement Policy Manual, Revision 1, FSAR 17. C, Revision 2 FSAR 17. C, Revision 2 FSAR 17. C, Revision 0 FSAR 17. C, Revision 3 FSAR 17. C, Revision 1 FSAR 17. SUM-18, Revision 3 FSAR 17. C, Revision 2
; FSAR 17. C, Revision 0
'

FSAR 17. C, Revision 3 FSAR 17. C, Revision 2 FSAR 17. C, Revision 0 FSAR 17.2.10 00201-C, Revision 1 FSAR 17.2.10 85100-C, Revision 2 FSAR 17.2.10 85301-C, Revision 0 FSAR 17.2.10 00208-C, Revision 0 FSAR 17.2.10 85001-C, Revision 1 FSAR 17.2.10 85002-C, Revision 3 FSAR 17.2.10 85003-C, Revision 2

;

FSAR 17.2.11 00404-C, Revision 0 FSAR 17.2.12 00208-C, Revision 0 ' FSAR 17.2.12 00002-C, Revision 2 FSAR 17.2.12 85303-C, Revision 0 . l FSAR 17.2.13 00851-C, Revision 0 ] i FSAR 17.2.14 00200-C, Revision 1 ' FSAR 17.2.14 85307-C, Revision 3 FSAR 17.2.14 85100-C, Revision 2 FSAR 17.2.14 85301-C, Revision 0 FSAR 17.2.14 00304-C, Revision 3 ", FSAR 17.2.14 00204-C, Revision 0 FSAR 17.2.14 00850-C, Revision 2 j FSAR 17.2.14 00853-C, Revision 2 ! FSAR 17.2.15 85307-C, Revision 3

FSAR 17.2.15 00200-C, Revision 1 l ' FSAR 17.2.15 00850-C, Revision 2 FSAR 17.2.15 00853-C, Revision 2 FSAR 17.2.15 00002-C, Revision 2 '

!

[

_ - _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ - _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ - _ _ ____ _ !

!
    -

,

          ,
   -       ;

4 n Source Document Section Implementing Document

          .

FSAR 17.2.17 00100-C, Revision 2 FSAR 17.2.17 00103-C, Revision 0 Tech Spec 6. C, Revision 1 Based on a review of the above listed documents the inspector deter-mined that the implementing procedures appear to satisfy existing f , regulatory requirements and commitment Within this area, no violations or deviations were identifie b. Section 4.1, Implementation of 10 CFR 50 Appendix B

          ,

The inspector selected 37 plant procedures from Table 4.1-1 and

          ~
!

j determined that the reference procedures appear to meet the criteria

,      for 10 CFR 50 Appendix B.

! j Within this area, no violations or deviations were identified.

l c. Section 4.8, Procedure Control

:

! The inspector reviewed procedures and policies which control the '

,      nuclear operations organization. The following procedures which  !
!      provide guidance for activities such as technical specification surveillance tests, maintenance programs, administrative controls,  '

regulatory compliance, and quality control were reviewed:

Procedure N _ Revision Procedure Title

'

00050-C 3 Procedure Development 00051-C f 1 Procedures Development, Review and Approval

!      00052-C  0 Temporary Changes to Procedures i 00053-C  0 Temporary Procedures  ,
,

00054-C 0 Rules for Performing Procedures '

!      00056-C  0 Safety Evaluations I

00350-0 0 Maintenance Program  : ! 00404-C 0 Surveillance Test Tracking Program  ; 00405-C 1 Commitment Identification, i Tracking, and Implementation

          '

l< The inspector determined that adequate administrative controls appear

to exist for the preparation, review, approval, and issue of plant

procedures, i

! Within this area, no violations or deviations were identifie '

i

!
          '

j ,

          '

J

.

. 6 Section 5.0, Audits The inspector reviewed project audits and responses and verified that plant administrative procedures identified as affecting quality or safety were . reviewed by quality assurance for the inclusion of pertinent requirement The following audits, responses, and corrective actions were reviewed: Audit Title Conducted TP01-84/02 Nuclear Operations 9/17/84 Administrative Controls OP19-85/01 Control of Vendor Manuals 4/23-5/1/85 OP01-85/05 Administrative Controls 7/22-26/85 and Reporting Requirements OP21-85/07 Corrective Actions Program 8/26-30/85 Note: The above listed audits were used as a basis for the Audit Finding Reports presented in Section 5.1 of Module During this audit review, the inspector verified that an audit schedule had been prepared for 1984, 1985, and 1986, that an approved audit checklist was used, that audits were issued as procedurally required, and that corrective action was planned or had been completed for audit finding Within this area, one inspector followup item was identifie Module 5, Section 6.2, contains a list of findings, responses, and corrective actions identified by the readiness review team during the operations organization and administration verification. The inspector determined that corrective action for these findings was in progress or had been completed and that the findings were being tracked by operational QA personnel. An audit had been scheduled to verify corrective action adequacy and completion, however, as of the date of this inspection the audit had not been initiated. Until operations QA have conducted this audit and verified corrective action completion for the readiness review findings, this is identified as inspector followup item 424/85-44-0 e. Section 6.0, Operations Organization and Administration Vertftcation This section describes the verification process and results obtained by the readiness review tt:7 Section 6.1 contains the identification of FSAR commitments and development of the verification plan and scop Section 6.2, which was developed from the findings of Section 6.1, describes the results, responses, and corrective action The inspector interviewed personnel directly involved in the verifica-tion process and reviewed the verification plan used to ascertain

l

     '

l .- i .

I

     ,

)j whether the operations organization and administration commitments were implemented properly. Additionally, the following sample of 15 and of 26 readiness review verification packages were examined: , , Title / Description knpleted i

) QC Inspection   No Date ;

Contractors QA Program 5-30-85 .l Document Control 5-1-85 t i Commitment Tracking 5-30-85 ! Surveillance Test Tracking No Date l

,

Operations Assessment Program No Date i

'

Control of M&TE 5-6-85 Control of Materials, Parts,& Components No Date , Instructions, Procedures, & Drawings 5-7-85 ! Procurement Document Control No Date - 1 Receipt Inspection No Date Plant Review Board 6-4-85

.

Safety Review Board 6-3-85 L l Corrective Action Program 5-8-85 i Procedure Program 5-7-85 l

     ,

l The inspector reviewed each verification process finding and the 'j proposed corrective action for these finding The inspector i determined that the proposed corrective action appeared adequate, .l however, corrective action completion was not verified. An audit is j scheduled by the operations QA group to verify corrective action !

!

completio One inspector followup item was identified pending QA ' i completion of this audit, and this is discussed in paragraph 4.d.

) Within this area, no violations or deviations were identifie ' ' l l t i

i i

     >

l e i i _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ }}