IR 05000219/1985022

Meeting Rept 50-219/85-22 on 850625.No Deficiencies Noted. Major Areas Discussed:Actions to Satisfy IE Bulletins 79-02 & 79-14 & Corrective Actions Re Insp Rept 50-219/85-14

ML20134A450
Person / Time
Site:	Oyster Creek
Issue date:	07/22/1985
From:	Conner E, Durr J, Ebneter S, Kamal Manoly NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION I)
To:
Shared Package
ML20134A383	List: IR 05000219/1985022 ML20134A379
References
50-219-85-22, IEB-79-02, IEB-79-14, IEB-79-2, NUDOCS 8508150312
Download: ML20134A450 (3)

Text

^

,

.

U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

REGION I

'

Report N /85-22 Docket N '

License N DPR-16 Priority Category-C Licensee: GPU Nuclear Corporation P. O. Box 388 Forked River, NJ 08731 Factitty Name: Oyster Creek Nuclear Generating Station Meeting At: GPU Nuclear Corporation Parsippany, New Jersey Meeting Conducted: June 25,1985 NRC Participants: j

&h&b f

Q St'eGart D. Ebneter, Director l/ */d date

'

Division of Reactor Safety

)h* n 7 8 " a Eben L. Conner, Chief 7ll9 lW date Reactor Project Section 1A, DRP lseawt -w , 7bf/f.5" date #

gamalVA. Manoly, Lead ReadVor Engineer Operations Branch, DRS Thomas Cheng, Senior Structural Engineer Division of Licensing, NRR

'

M. Nitzel, Engineering Specialist EG&G Idaho Approved by: dtattp ,AeLJ __7 f/b" cque#P. Durr, Chief, ~ daYe

_ngineering Branch, DRS l

8508150312 850723-t PDR ADOCK 05000219 a PDR I

l I

._ -- _- .- .--

.- . . . .. _- --

.

.

'

.

Meeting Summary: A meeting and inspection was conducted at General Public Utilities Corporate offices on June 25, 1985, to examine the documentation recently retrieved that supports licensee actions for satisfying IE Bulletins 79-02 and 79-1 In addition, the licensee's program for reinspection and completion of corrective actions relating to the inspection findings described in Inspection Report 50-219/85-14 were reviwed and discussed. Detailed items of. discussion were as follows:

(1) Preliminary screening of MNCR's for significant Deviations that could affect system operabilit (2) The status of MNCR revie _

(3) Any impact on the SE (4) Quality Assurance involvement in engineering and the reinspectio (5) The overall IEB 79-14 reinspection progra (6) Adequacy of staffing and schedules for completion of corrective action The following understandings were agreed to by the licensee and the NRC staff:

(1) Completed piping system packages will be sent to the NRC SEP review group as they become available. The completed packages for the CRD and liquid poison systems will be sent in the immediate futur (2) The schedule for completion of corrective actions are:

(a) IEB 79-14 reinspection will be completed during the fall 1985 outage. The reanalysis will be completed within the two month

'

period following the outag (b) IEB 79-02 will be completed during the April 1986 outage.

(3) Supports or portions of supports obscured from inspection by insulation will be evaluated to determine the scope and significance of the proble (4) MNCR's will be reviewed to assure that dispositions are adequately and clearly supported by accompanying statement (5) The piping system screening evaluation criteria will be formalize (6) The SEP Group, NRC and the licensee will coordinate the selection of the appropriate floor response spectra to be used in the confirmatory pipe

, analysis.

,

, . - - , , - . , , . , - . , - ,-

- _ _ _ _ _

. .

-

..

, The NRC review of preliminary efforts to resolve Inspection Report N findings indicates that adequate programs have been established, appropriate engineering is bqing applied and that no major system deficiencies have been identified.

i i

I L

e

4

.

I

- . . . . ...- . . .

.. . . .- .-