IA-78-256, Rejection of FOIA Request for Successful Proposal Submitted by Bdm Corp Which Contains Proprietary Info and Is Being Withheld Pursuant to Exemption 4 of the Foia.Foia Rejection May Be Appealed
| ML20197B057 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Issue date: | 10/23/1978 |
| From: | Felton J NRC OFFICE OF ADMINISTRATION (ADM) |
| To: | Casanave M AFFILIATION NOT ASSIGNED |
| References | |
| FOIA-78-256 NUDOCS 7811010223 | |
| Download: ML20197B057 (2) | |
Text
. ,_ .
, g j 4 UNITE D STATES eV .? NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMiss!ON
$d WASHINGTON, D. C. 20555 m...y ..
OCT 2 31978 Ms. Marilyn D. Casanave DAMANS and Associates Montgomery Professional Park 2 Professional Drive, Suite 247 IN RESPONSE REFER ,
Gaithersburg, Maryland 20760 TO F0IA-78-257 '
This is in response to your letter dated September 28, 1978 in which you requested, pursuant to the Freedom of Information Act, a copy of the successful proposal submitted in response to NRC RFP RS-ADM-78-414.
Your letter was received by the Office of Administration on October 3, 1978.
The Division of Contracts will contact you directly regarding your request for a debriefing. !
l The proposal submitted by the BDM Corporation contains information which ,
the BDM Corporation considers commercial business (proprietary) information '
and is being withheld from public disclosure pursuant to exemption (4) of the Commission's of the Freedom of Information Act (5 U.S.C. 552(b)(4)) and 10 CFR 9.5(a)(4) regulations. We have asked the originators of this information to justify their proprietary claim, and will let you know as soon as possible whether the documents, or any portions thereof, may be disclosed to the public.
Pursuant to 10 CFR 9.9 of the Commission's regulations, it has been determined that the information withheld is exempt from production or disclosure, and that its production or disclosure is contrary to the public interest. The persons responsible for this denial are the undersigned and Mr. Edward L. Halman, Director, Division of Contracts.
This denial may be appealed to the Commission's Executive Director for Operations within 30 days from the receipt of this letter. As provided in 10 CFR 9.11, any such appeal must be in writing, addressed to the Executive Director for Operations, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Washington, D.C. 20555, and should clearly state on the envelope and in the letter that it is an " Appeal from an Initial F0IA Decision."
Sincerely,
,L , / ! /m , J . -
.j /
, J. M. Felton, Director hh Division of Rules & Records Office of Administration
-L.re.im.
. u aAe-4
- .m ....
7TMTN;SAEASSOCIATES i Mo5tgon:ry Prorcosional Park k"b.;f
' ~
~
~
Technical Assistance
? Professional Drive, Suite 2h7 -
Manai;c:aent Support Gaithersburg, Maryland 20760 Training 301/8ho-9117 e:ry C. Cacanave, Jr.
- rtner
':riiyn D. Casanave
- rtner ,
FREEDOM OF INFORMATION '
ACT REQUEST <
f)/,G "~l $ ~
September 28, 1978
,qrc tt' /6 7A
?
Ms. Mary Jo Mattia ;
Contracting Officer U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, D.C. 20555
Dear Ms. Mattia:
Under provisions of the Freedom of Information Act, we request a copy of the successful proposal submit-ted in response to RPP No: RS- ADM- 78-414 ,
In addition, we request a debriefing on our proposal submitted.in response to the above cited RFP.
Sincerely, i
. Marilyn D. asanave
! Partner cc: GAO i
r I
d 4
1 i ,
b j