ENS 51994
From kanterella
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
ENS Event | |
|---|---|
19:26 Jun 8, 2016 | |
| Title | Unanalyzed Condition That Could Potentially Degrade Plant Safety |
| Event Description | At 1526 Eastern Daylight Time on 6/8/2016, a determination was made involving the potential impact of a tornado on the Emergency Diesel Generators (EDGs). The EDGs are required to be operable to provide power to ensure that acceptable fuel design limits, reactor coolant system pressure boundary limits, and containment integrity are not exceeded during abnormal transients. Further, the EDGs are designed with a crankcase pressure trip (setpoint = 1 inch water), which is bypassed during an emergency start. Engineering has determined that a tornado could potentially cause actuation of the crankcase pressure trip due to a low barometric condition. If an emergency start signal has NOT previously occurred, then during a tornado, actuation of the crankcase pressure trip would energize the shutdown relay causing an EDG lockout condition. The EDG lockout condition prevents subsequent EDG starts (normal or emergency) until operators manually reset the lockout condition locally at the EDG. This condition could potentially affect all four EDGs simultaneously.
The EDGs are operable but degraded. All EDGs have successfully passed their required surveillances within the appropriate frequency. No severe weather warnings or watches are forecast in the local areas, which could challenge the crankcase pressure trip. This condition places both units in an unanalyzed condition that potentially significantly degrades plant safety, 10 CFR 50.72 (b)(3)(ii)(B). A compensatory measure has been established, that upon notification of a Tornado Warning, the EDGs would be 'emergency started' and run during the time the Tornado Warning was in effect. This action bypasses the crankcase pressure trip function and allows the EDGs to perform their required safety function. The NRC Senior Resident Inspector has been notified. |
| Where | |
|---|---|
Sequoyah  Tennessee (NRC Region 2) | |
| Reporting | |
| 10 CFR 50.72(b)(3)(ii)(B), Unanalyzed Condition | |
| Time - Person (Reporting Time:+-2.27 h-0.0946 days <br />-0.0135 weeks <br />-0.00311 months <br />) | |
| Opened: | Robert Urbanski 17:10 Jun 8, 2016 |
| NRC Officer: | Mark Abramovitz |
| Last Updated: | Jun 8, 2016 |
| 51994 - NRC Website | |
Unit 1 | |
|---|---|
| Reactor critical | Critical |
| Scram | No |
| Before | Power Operation (100 %) |
| After | Power Operation (100 %) |
Unit 2 | |
|---|---|
| Reactor critical | Critical |
| Scram | No |
| Before | Power Operation (100 %) |
| After | Power Operation (100 %) |
WEEKMONTHYEARENS 544872020-01-22T03:18:00022 January 2020 03:18:00
[Table view]10 CFR 50.72(b)(3)(ii)(B), Unanalyzed Condition ENS 521872016-08-17T21:22:00017 August 2016 21:22:00 10 CFR 50.72(b)(3)(ii)(B), Unanalyzed Condition Unanalyzed Condition Due to Not Meeting Single Failure Criteria ENS 519942016-06-08T19:26:0008 June 2016 19:26:00 10 CFR 50.72(b)(3)(ii)(B), Unanalyzed Condition Unanalyzed Condition That Could Potentially Degrade Plant Safety ENS 519352016-05-17T01:05:00017 May 2016 01:05:00 10 CFR 50.72(b)(3)(ii)(B), Unanalyzed Condition Unanalyzed Condition That Significantly Degrades Plant Safety ENS 518542016-04-07T19:07:0007 April 2016 19:07:00 10 CFR 50.72(b)(3)(ii)(B), Unanalyzed Condition Unanalyzed Condition - High Pressure Fire Suppression Isolated from Containment ENS 515272015-11-10T20:02:00010 November 2015 20:02:00 10 CFR 50.72(b)(3)(v)(B), Loss of Safety Function - Remove Residual Heat, 10 CFR 50.72(b)(3)(v)(D), Loss of Safety Function - Mitigate the Consequences of an Accident, 10 CFR 50.72(b)(3)(ii)(B), Unanalyzed Condition Unanalyzed Condition Due to Debris Dropped Into Reactor Cavity Equipment Pit ENS 502442014-07-01T02:46:0001 July 2014 02:46:00 10 CFR 50.72(b)(3)(ii)(B), Unanalyzed Condition Unanalyzed Condition That Could Have Resulted in an Increased Maximum Flood Level ENS 496902014-01-03T20:00:0003 January 2014 20:00:00 10 CFR 50.72(b)(3)(ii)(B), Unanalyzed Condition Abgts Potentially Inoperable for Both Units Under Worst-Case Conditions ENS 485842012-12-13T00:14:00013 December 2012 00:14:00 10 CFR 50.72(b)(3)(v)(A), Loss of Safety Function - Shutdown the Reactor, 10 CFR 50.72(b)(3)(ii)(B), Unanalyzed Condition Risk of Possible Flooding to Ercw Building During Design Basis Flood ENS 487252009-07-28T05:00:00028 July 2009 05:00:00 10 CFR 50.72(b)(3)(ii)(B), Unanalyzed Condition Unanalyzed Condition That Could Have Resulted in an Increased Maximum Flood Level ENS 448142009-01-28T19:25:00028 January 2009 19:25:00 10 CFR 50.72(b)(3)(ii)(B), Unanalyzed Condition Unanalyzed Condition Related to a Postulated Appendix R Fire Scenario 2020-01-22T03:18:00 | |
Retrieved from "https://kanterella.com/w/index.php?title=ENS_51994&oldid=82677"