CNL-15-122, Presentation Slides for Closed Meeting Extended Power Uprate (EPU) License Amendment Request

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Presentation Slides for Closed Meeting Extended Power Uprate (EPU) License Amendment Request
ML15198A424
Person / Time
Site: Browns Ferry  Tennessee Valley Authority icon.png
Issue date: 07/08/2015
From: James Shea
Tennessee Valley Authority
To:
Document Control Desk, Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
Shared Package
ML15198A423 List:
References
CNL-15-122, TAC MF4851, TAC MF4852, TAC MF4853
Download: ML15198A424 (94)


Text

Proprietary Information Withhold from Public Disclosure Under 10 CFR 2.390(a)(4)

This letter is decontrolled when separated from Enclosures 1 and 4 Tennessee Valley Authority, 1101 Market Street, Chattanooga, Tennessee 37402 CNL-15-122 July 8, 2015 10 CFR 50.4 ATTN: Document Control Desk U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, D.C. 20555-0001 Browns Ferry Nuclear Plant, Units 1, 2, and 3 Renewed Facility Operating License Nos. DPR-33, DPR-52, and DPR-68 NRC Docket Nos. 50-259, 50-260, and 50-296

Subject:

Presentation Slides for Closed Meeting on Browns Ferry Nuclear Plant Planned Submittal of Extended Power Uprate (EPU) License Amendment Request (TAC Nos. MF4851, MF4852, and MF4853)

References:

1. Meeting Notice from NRC, Forthcoming Closed Meeting with Tennessee Valley Authority (TVA) on Browns Ferry Nuclear Plant Planned Submittal of Extended Power Uprate (EPU) License Amendment Request (TAC Nos. MF4851, MF4852, AND MF4853), dated April 8, 2015 (ADAMS Accession No. ML15097A230)

By memorandum dated April 8, 2015 (Reference 1), the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) scheduled a closed meeting with the Tennessee Valley Authority (TVA) for April 22, 2015. The purpose of the meeting was for TVA to provide information regarding the steam dryer replacement for the Browns Ferry Nuclear Plant (BFN) for its planned extended power uprate (EPU).

Enclosures 1 and 4 to this letter contain the slides and supplemental slides, respectively, presented at the April 22, 2015 closed meeting with the NRC. Enclosures 1 and 4 contain information that GE Hitachi (GEH) considers to be proprietary in nature and subsequently, pursuant to 10 CFR 2.390, Public inspections, exceptions, request for withholding, paragraph (a)4, it is requested that such information be withheld from public disclosure.

Enclosures 2 and 5 contain the non-proprietary version of the slides and supplemental slides, respectively, and are suitable for public disclosure. Enclosures 3 and 6 provide the affidavits supporting the request for withholding of Enclosures 1 and 4, respectively.

U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission CN IL-15-122 Pa9e 2 July 8, 2014 There are no new regulatory commitments contained in th is submittal. Please address any questions regarding this submittal to Mr. Edward D. Schrull at (423) 751-3850.

~y;_,_

J. W . Shea Vice President, Nuclear Licensing

Enclosures:

1. GEH Slides for TVA Presentation to the NRC in Support of Steam Dryer Replacement, GEH Proprietary Information (Enclosure 1 to GEH Letter No. 175528-011 , Revision 1)
2. GEH Slides for TVA Presentation to the NRC in Support of Steam Dryer Replacement , Non-Proprietary Information (Enclosure 2 to GEH Letter No. 175528-011 , Revision 1)
3. GEH Affidavit Supporting the Request to Withhold GEH Proprietary Information (included in Enclosure 1) from the Public (Enclosure 3 to GEH Letter No. 175528-011 , Revision 1)
4. Supplemental GEH Slides for TVA Presentation to the NRC in Support of Steam Dryer Replacement, GEH Proprietary Information (Enclosure 1 to GEH Letter No. 175528-011 , Revision 2)
5. Supplemental GEH Slides for TVA Presentation to the NRC in Support of Steam Dryer Replacement, Non-Proprietary Information (Enclosure 2 to GEH Letter No . 175528-01 1, Revision 2)
6. GEH Affidavit Supporting the Request to W ithhold GEH Proprietary Information (included in Enclosure 4) from the Public (Enclosure 3 to GEH Letter No. 175528-011 , Revision 2) cc (Enclosures) :

NRC Regional Administrator - Region II NRC Senior Resident Inspector - Browns Ferry Nuclear Plant NRC Project Manager - Browns Ferry Nuclear Plant

ENCLOSURE 2 GEH Slides for TVA Presentation to the NRC in Support of Steam Dryer Replacement, Non-Proprietary Information E2-1

GE-Hitachi Nuclear Energy Americas LLC ENCLOSURE 2 GE Letter No. 175528-011, Revision 1 GEH Slides for TVA Presentation to the NRC in Support of Steam Dryer Replacement Non-Proprietary Information NON-PROPRIETARY NOTICE This is a non-proprietary version of Enclosure 1 of GEH Letter No. 175528-011, Revision 1 which has the proprietary information removed. Portions of the document that have been removed are indicated by an open and closed bracket as shown here (( )).

Non-Proprietary Information - Class I (Public)

Browns Ferry Nuclear Plant Replacement Steam Dryers Gerry Doyle Director EPU April 22, 2015

Non-Proprietary Information - Class I (Public)

Agenda

  • Introductions G. Doyle
  • Overview and Background G. Doyle
  • Browns Ferry Replacement Steam Dryer P. Donahue Design
  • Browns Ferry Replacement Steam Dryer P. Donahue Analysis
  • Browns Ferry Replacement Steam Dryer P. Donahue Power Ascension Monitoring
  • Browns Ferry Replacement Steam Dryer P. Donahue Inspection Plan
  • Questions/Comments G. Doyle Browns Ferry EPU License Amendment Request Startup Test Plan l 2

Non-Proprietary Information - Class I (Public)

Overview and Background

  • New Replacement Steam Dryers (RSDs) will be installed in all three Browns Ferry Units
  • To resolve any issues that existing steam dryers may have under EPU conditions
  • Previous submittals, now withdrawn, had over 260 RAIs associated with steam dryers
  • New EPU License Amendment Request (LAR) submittal will address previous issues , look to minimize RAIs, and support NRC approval
  • Current strategy and design complies with existing and contemporary regulatory requirements
  • Contracted with GEH to build our RSDs as they are the Original Equipment Manufacturer and have experience in other recent RSDs
  • We are here to present an overview of our RSDs design, analysis, monitoring plan and inspection plan with an expectation that NRC fully understands the RSD information we plan to submit as part of our EPU LAR
  • Presenter is Pete Donahue, Senior Manager for EPU Engineering
  • Supported by GEH personnel Browns Ferry EPU License Amendment Request Startup Test Plan l 3

Non-Proprietary Information - Class I (Public)

BFN Replacement Steam Dryer

  • Based on the curved hood six bank prototype replacement dryer first used in a BWR/4 reactor.
  • Design is significantly more robust than the original steam dryer it replaces.
  • BFN acoustic load definition developed using MSL acoustic pressure measurements taken at the three Browns Ferry units.
  • The FIV fatigue evaluation and primary stress methodologies used for BFN RSD analysis has been reviewed in detail on BWR/6 RSD and ESBWR projects.
  • Analyzed for the applicable primary structural loads for normal operation and for transient and accident conditions.

Browns Ferry Replacement Steam Dryer Analysis l 4

Browns Ferry RSD Design

Non-Proprietary Information - Class I (Public)

EPU Replacement Dryer Experience Successful operating history for replacement dryers at EPU

  • Quad Cities Units 1/2 RSD
  • Dresden Units 2/3 RSD
  • Susquehanna Units 1/2 RSD
  • Grand Gulf RSD
  • Vermont Yankee original dryer with modifications Browns Ferry Replacement Steam Dryer Analysis l 6

Non-Proprietary Information - Class I (Public)

Steam Dryer Structural Design Timeline

((

))

Browns Ferry Replacement Steam Dryer Analysis l 7

Non-Proprietary Information - Class I (Public)

Steam Dryer Structural Design Timeline

((

))

Browns Ferry Replacement Steam Dryer Analysis l 8

Non-Proprietary Information - Class I (Public)

Steam Dryer Structural Design Timeline

((

))

Browns Ferry Replacement Steam Dryer Analysis l 9

Non-Proprietary Information - Class I (Public)

BFN Replacement Dryer Design

  • Based on the curved hood six bank prototype replacement dryer first used in a BWR/4 reactor.
  • Design is significantly more robust than the original steam dryer it replaces.
  • Both the Browns Ferry reactor vessel and the BWR/4 reactor vessel where the BWR/4 prototype RSD was installed have the same internal diameter; so in essence,

((

))

Browns Ferry Replacement Steam Dryer Analysis l 10

Non-Proprietary Information - Class I (Public)

BFN Replacement Dryer Design

((

  • Changes to prototype dryer design
  • Dryer/vessel interface changes
  • Address OE lessons learned
  • Stress reduction

)) Browns Ferry Replacement Steam Dryer Analysis l 11

Non-Proprietary Information - Class I (Public)

BFN Replacement Dryer Design

((

))

Browns Ferry Replacement Steam Dryer Analysis l 12

Non-Proprietary Information - Class I (Public)

BFN Replacement Dryer Design

((

))

Browns Ferry Replacement Steam Dryer Analysis l 13

Non-Proprietary Information - Class I (Public)

BFN RSD Design Improvement

((

))

Browns Ferry Replacement Steam Dryer Analysis l 14

Non-Proprietary Information - Class I (Public)

BFN RSD Design Improvement

((

))

Browns Ferry Replacement Steam Dryer Analysis l 15

Non-Proprietary Information - Class I (Public)

BFN RSD Design Improvement

((

))

Browns Ferry Replacement Steam Dryer Analysis l 16

Non-Proprietary Information - Class I (Public)

BFN RSD Design Refinement

((

))

Browns Ferry Replacement Steam Dryer Analysis l 17

Non-Proprietary Information - Class I (Public)

BFN RSD Design Refinement

((

))

Browns Ferry Replacement Steam Dryer Analysis l 18

Non-Proprietary Information - Class I (Public)

BFN RSD Design Refinement

((

))

Browns Ferry Replacement Steam Dryer Analysis l 19

Non-Proprietary Information - Class I (Public)

BFN RSD Design Refinement

((

))

Browns Ferry Replacement Steam Dryer Analysis l 20

Non-Proprietary Information - Class I (Public)

BFN RSD Design Refinement

((

))

Browns Ferry Replacement Steam Dryer Analysis l 21

Non-Proprietary Information - Class I (Public)

BFN RSD Design Refinement

((

))

Browns Ferry Replacement Steam Dryer Analysis l 22

Browns Ferry RSD Analysis

Non-Proprietary Information - Class I (Public)

BFN RSD Analysis Overview

((

))

Browns Ferry Replacement Steam Dryer Analysis l 24

Browns Ferry RSD Load Definition

Non-Proprietary Information - Class I (Public)

BFN RSD Analysis Load Definition

((

))

Browns Ferry Replacement Steam Dryer Analysis l 26

Non-Proprietary Information - Class I (Public)

BFN RSD Analysis Load Definition

((

))

Browns Ferry Replacement Steam Dryer Analysis l 27

Non-Proprietary Information - Class I (Public)

BFN RSD Analysis Load Definition

((

))

Browns Ferry Replacement Steam Dryer Analysis l 28

Non-Proprietary Information - Class I (Public)

BFN RSD Analysis Load Definition

((

))

Browns Ferry Replacement Steam Dryer Analysis l 29

Non-Proprietary Information - Class I (Public)

Potential SRV Resonance Frequencies

((

))

Browns Ferry Replacement Steam Dryer Analysis l 30

Non-Proprietary Information - Class I (Public)

SRV Resonance Fundamental Frequency

((

))

Browns Ferry Replacement Steam Dryer Analysis l 31

Non-Proprietary Information - Class I (Public)

MSL Acoustic Mode Interaction

((

))

Browns Ferry Replacement Steam Dryer Analysis l 32

Non-Proprietary Information - Class I (Public)

MSL Acoustic Mode Interaction

((

))

Browns Ferry Replacement Steam Dryer Analysis l 33

Non-Proprietary Information - Class I (Public)

Postulated SRV Resonances

((

))

Browns Ferry Replacement Steam Dryer Analysis l 34

Non-Proprietary Information - Class I (Public)

((

SRV Adders for Design Load Definition

))

Browns Ferry Replacement Steam Dryer Analysis l 35

Non-Proprietary Information - Class I (Public)

EPU SRV Scale Factor

((

))

Browns Ferry Replacement Steam Dryer Analysis l 36

Non-Proprietary Information - Class I (Public)

EPU SRV Scale Factor

((

))

Browns Ferry Replacement Steam Dryer Analysis l 37

Non-Proprietary Information - Class I (Public)

BFN RSD Analysis Load Definition

((

))

Browns Ferry Replacement Steam Dryer Analysis l 38

Non-Proprietary Information - Class I (Public)

Dryer Load Comparison

((

))

Browns Ferry Replacement Steam Dryer Analysis l 39

Non-Proprietary Information - Class I (Public)

BFN RSD Analysis Load Definition

((

))

Browns Ferry Replacement Steam Dryer Analysis l 40

Non-Proprietary Information - Class I (Public)

BFN RSD Analysis Load Definition

((

))

Browns Ferry Replacement Steam Dryer Analysis l 41

Non-Proprietary Information - Class I (Public)

BFN RSD Analysis Load Definition

((

))

Browns Ferry Replacement Steam Dryer Analysis l 42

Non-Proprietary Information - Class I (Public)

BFN RSD Analysis Load Definition

((

))

Browns Ferry Replacement Steam Dryer Analysis l 43

Non-Proprietary Information - Class I (Public)

BFN RSD Analysis Load Definition

((

))

Browns Ferry Replacement Steam Dryer Analysis l 44

Non-Proprietary Information - Class I (Public)

BFN RSD Analysis Load Definition

((

))

Browns Ferry Replacement Steam Dryer Analysis l 45

Browns Ferry RSD FIV Analysis

Non-Proprietary Information - Class I (Public)

BFN RSD Finite Element Model

((

))

Browns Ferry Replacement Steam Dryer Analysis l 47

Non-Proprietary Information - Class I (Public)

BFN-Specific Design Improvements

((

))

Browns Ferry Replacement Steam Dryer Analysis l 48

Non-Proprietary Information - Class I (Public)

BFN-Specific Design Improvements

((

))

Browns Ferry Replacement Steam Dryer Analysis l 49

Non-Proprietary Information - Class I (Public)

BFN-Specific Design Improvements

((

))

Browns Ferry Replacement Steam Dryer Analysis l 50

Non-Proprietary Information - Class I (Public)

BFN RSD FEM Mesh Convergence

((

))

Browns Ferry Replacement Steam Dryer Analysis l 51

Non-Proprietary Information - Class I (Public)

BFN RSD FIV Analysis

((

))

Browns Ferry Replacement Steam Dryer Analysis l 52

Non-Proprietary Information - Class I (Public)

BFN RSD FIV Analysis

((

))

Browns Ferry Replacement Steam Dryer Analysis l 53

Non-Proprietary Information - Class I (Public)

End to End Bias and Uncertainty

((

))

Browns Ferry Replacement Steam Dryer Analysis l 54

Non-Proprietary Information - Class I (Public)

End to End Bias and Uncertainty

((

))

Browns Ferry Replacement Steam Dryer Analysis l 55

Non-Proprietary Information - Class I (Public)

FIV Stress Adjustment

((

))

Browns Ferry Replacement Steam Dryer Analysis l 56

Non-Proprietary Information - Class I (Public)

FIV Stress Adjustment

((

))

Browns Ferry Replacement Steam Dryer Analysis l 57

Non-Proprietary Information - Class I (Public)

BFN RSD Fatigue Analysis Results

((

))

Browns Ferry Replacement Steam Dryer Analysis l 58

Browns Ferry RSD Primary Stress Evaluation

Non-Proprietary Information - Class I (Public)

BFN RSD Primary Stress Evaluation

  • The steam dryer is a non-safety related item and is classified as an Internal Structure as defined in ASME Subsection NG, Paragraph NG-1122.
  • The steam dryer is not an ASME Code component, ((

))

Browns Ferry Replacement Steam Dryer Analysis l 60

Non-Proprietary Information - Class I (Public)

Service Load Load Case Operating Condition Conditions Combination

((

BFN RSD Primary Stress Analysis Load Combinations

))

Browns Ferry Replacement Steam Dryer Analysis l 61

Non-Proprietary Information - Class I (Public)

BFN RSD Primary Stress Results

((

))

Browns Ferry Replacement Steam Dryer Analysis l 62

Browns Ferry RSD Power Ascension Monitoring

Non-Proprietary Information - Class I (Public)

BFN Power Ascension Monitoring

  • The BFN lead unit is classified as a ((

))

  • Power ascension monitoring process similar to previous RSD projects
  • Both RSD and MSLs instrumented
  • Monitor using strain gauges, on-dryer pressure transducers, and accelerometer Browns Ferry Replacement Steam Dryer Analysis l 64

Non-Proprietary Information - Class I (Public)

BFN Power Ascension Monitoring

  • BFN Lead Unit (continued)

((

))

  • Confirmatory structural analysis for lead unit at EPU ((

))

  • Follow-on Units

(( ))

  • Confirmatory structural evaluation based on MSL measurements Browns Ferry Replacement Steam Dryer Analysis l 65

Non-Proprietary Information - Class I (Public)

BFN RSD Instrumentation Locations

((

))

Browns Ferry Replacement Steam Dryer Analysis l 66

Non-Proprietary Information - Class I (Public)

((

BFN RSD Instrumentation

))

Browns Ferry Replacement Steam Dryer Analysis l 67

Non-Proprietary Information - Class I (Public)

BFN On-dryer Acceptance Limits

((

))

Browns Ferry Replacement Steam Dryer Analysis l 68

Non-Proprietary Information - Class I (Public)

BFN MSL Acceptance Limits

((

))

Browns Ferry Replacement Steam Dryer Analysis l 69

Non-Proprietary Information - Class I (Public)

BFN Lead Unit CLTP Evaluation

((

))

Browns Ferry Replacement Steam Dryer Analysis l 70

Non-Proprietary Information - Class I (Public)

BFN Lead Unit Test Plan

((

))

Browns Ferry Replacement Steam Dryer Analysis l 71

Non-Proprietary Information - Class I (Public)

BFN Power Ascension Monitoring

((

))

Browns Ferry Replacement Steam Dryer Analysis l 72

Non-Proprietary Information - Class I (Public)

BFN RSD Inspection Plan

  • During the first two scheduled refueling outages after reaching EPU conditions, a visual inspection will be conducted on the replacement steam dryer for each unit.

The inspection plan will be consistent with the industry guidance. The inspection plan will include all accessible exterior and interior critical locations identified in the vibration and stress analyses for the Browns Ferry RSDs.

Browns Ferry Replacement Steam Dryer Analysis l 73

Acronyms Non-Proprietary Information - Class I (Public)

Short Form Description Short Form Description ASME American Society of Mechanical MPC Multi Point Constraint Engineers MSL Main Steam Line ASR Alternating Stress Ratio MSLB Main Steam Line Break AVS Acoustic Vibration Suppressor OBE Operating Basis Earthquake BFN Browns Ferry Nuclear Plant PBLE Plant Based Load Evaluation BWR Boiling Water Reactor PBLE01 PBLE Input On-Dryer Based CLTP Current Licensed Thermal Power PBLE02 PBLE Input MSL Based DP Differential Pressure PSD Power Spectral Density DW Deadweight RMS Root-Mean-Squared EPU Extended Power Uprate RPV Reactor Pressure Vessel FE Finite Element RSD Replacement Steam Dryer FEM Finite Element Model SDAR Steam Dryer Analysis Report FIV Flow Induced Vibration SG Strain Gauge FRF Frequency Response Function SRV Safety Relief Valve HF High Frequency SSE Safe Shutdown Earthquake IN Information Notice TSV Turbine Stop Valve LAR License Amendment Request VFD Variable Frequency Drive LF Low Frequency VPF Vane Passing Frequency MASR Minimum alternating stress ratio Browns Ferry Replacement Steam Dryer Analysis l 75

Thank you!

Questions?

Comments?

Browns Ferry Replacement Steam Dryer Analysis l 76

ENCLOSURE 3 GEH Affidavit Supporting the Request to Withhold GEH Proprietary Information (included in Enclosure 1) from the Public E3-1

ENCLOSURE 3 GEH Letter No. 175528-011, Revision 1 GEH Affidavit

AFFIDAVIT I, Peter M. Yandow, state as follows:

(1) I am the Vice President, Nuclear Plant Projects/Services Licensing, Regulatory Affairs, GE-Hitachi Nuclear Energy Americas LLC (GEH), and have been delegated the function of reviewing the information described in paragraph (2) which is sought to be withheld, and have been authorized to apply for its withholding.

(2) The information sought to be withheld is contained in Enclosure 1 of GEH letter, GEH Letter No. 175528-011, Revision 1, Scott Gowdy (GEH) to Peter Donahue (TVA) entitled GEH Slides for TVA Presentation to the NRC in Support of Steam Dryer Replacement, dated April 14, 2015. The GEH proprietary information in Enclosure 1, which is entitled GEH Slides for TVA Presentation to the NRC, is identified by a dotted underline inside double square brackets. ((This sentence is an example.{3}))

Figures and large objects containing proprietary information are identified with double square brackets before and after the object. In each case, the superscript notation {3}

refers to Paragraph (3) of this affidavit, which provides the basis for the proprietary determination.

(3) In making this application for withholding of proprietary information of which it is the owner or licensee, GEH relies upon the exemption from disclosure set forth in the Freedom of Information Act (FOIA), 5 U.S.C. Sec. 552(b)(4), and the Trade Secrets Act, 18 U.S.C. Sec. 1905, and NRC regulations 10 CFR 9.17(a)(4), and 2.390(a)(4) for trade secrets (Exemption 4). The material for which exemption from disclosure is here sought also qualifies under the narrower definition of trade secret, within the meanings assigned to those terms for purposes of FOIA Exemption 4 in, respectively, Critical Mass Energy Project v. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, 975 F.2d 871 (D.C. Cir. 1992),

and Public Citizen Health Research Group v. FDA, 704 F.2d 1280 (D.C. Cir. 1983).

(4) The information sought to be withheld is considered to be proprietary for the reasons set forth in paragraphs (4)a. and (4)b. Some examples of categories of information that fit into the definition of proprietary information are:

a. Information that discloses a process, method, or apparatus, including supporting data and analyses, where prevention of its use by GEH's competitors without license from GEH constitutes a competitive economic advantage over other companies;
b. Information that, if used by a competitor, would reduce their expenditure of resources or improve their competitive position in the design, manufacture, shipment, installation, assurance of quality, or licensing of a similar product;
c. Information that reveals aspects of past, present, or future GEH customer-funded development plans and programs, resulting in potential products to GEH;
d. Information that discloses trade secret or potentially patentable subject matter for which it may be desirable to obtain patent protection.

GEH Letter No. 175528-011, Revision 1 Page 1

GE-Hitachi Nuclear Energy Americas LLC (5) To address 10 CFR 2.390(b)(4), the information sought to be withheld is being submitted to NRC in confidence. The information is of a sort customarily held in confidence by GEH, and is in fact so held. The information sought to be withheld has, to the best of my knowledge and belief, consistently been held in confidence by GEH, not been disclosed publicly, and not been made available in public sources. All disclosures to third parties, including any required transmittals to the NRC, have been made, or must be made, pursuant to regulatory provisions or proprietary or confidentiality agreements that provide for maintaining the information in confidence. The initial designation of this information as proprietary information, and the subsequent steps taken to prevent its unauthorized disclosure, are as set forth in the following paragraphs (6) and (7).

(6) Initial approval of proprietary treatment of a document is made by the manager of the originating component, who is the person most likely to be acquainted with the value and sensitivity of the information in relation to industry knowledge, or who is the person most likely to be subject to the terms under which it was licensed to GEH.

(7) The procedure for approval of external release of such a document typically requires review by the staff manager, project manager, principal scientist, or other equivalent authority for technical content, competitive effect, and determination of the accuracy of the proprietary designation. Disclosures outside GEH are limited to regulatory bodies, customers, and potential customers, and their agents, suppliers, and licensees, and others with a legitimate need for the information, and then only in accordance with appropriate regulatory provisions or proprietary or confidentiality agreements.

(8) The information identified in paragraph (2), above, is classified as proprietary because it contains the details of GEH methodology. These methods, techniques, and data along with their application to the design, modification, and analyses were achieved at a significant cost to GEH.

The development of the evaluation processes along with the interpretation and application of the analytical results is derived from the extensive experience databases that constitute a major GEH asset.

(9) Public disclosure of the information sought to be withheld is likely to cause substantial harm to GEH's competitive position and foreclose or reduce the availability of profit-making opportunities. The information is part of GEH's comprehensive BWR safety and technology base, and its commercial value extends beyond the original development cost. The value of the technology base goes beyond the extensive physical database and analytical methodology and includes development of the expertise to determine and apply the appropriate evaluation process. In addition, the technology base includes the value derived from providing analyses done with NRC-approved methods.

The research, development, engineering, analytical and NRC review costs comprise a substantial investment of time and money by GEH. The precise value of the expertise to GEH Letter No. 175528-011, Revision 1 Page 2

GE-Hitachi Nuclear Energy Americas LLC devise an evaluation process and apply the correct analytical methodology is difficult to quantify, but it clearly is substantial. GEH's competitive advantage will be lost if its competitors are able to use the results of the GEH experience to normalize or verify their own process or if they are able to claim an equivalent understanding by demonstrating that they can arrive at the same or similar conclusions.

The value of this information to GEH would be lost if the information were disclosed to the public. Making such information available to competitors without their having been required to undertake a similar expenditure of resources would unfairly provide competitors with a windfall, and deprive GEH of the opportunity to exercise its competitive advantage to seek an adequate return on its large investment in developing and obtaining these very valuable analytical tools.

I declare under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct.

Executed on this 14th day of April 2015.

Peter M. Yandow Vice President, Nuclear Plant Projects/Services Licensing, Regulatory Affairs GE-Hitachi Nuclear Energy Americas LLC 3901 Castle Hayne Rd.

Wilmington, NC 28401 Peter.Yandow@ge.com GEH Letter No. 175528-011, Revision 1 Page 3

ENCLOSURE 5 Supplemental GEH Slides for TVA Presentation to the NRC in Support of Steam Dryer Replacement, Non-Proprietary Information E5-1

GE-Hitachi Nuclear Energy Americas LLC ENCLOSURE 2 GE Letter No. 175528-011, Revision 2 Supplemental GEH Slides for TVA Presentation to the NRC in Support of Steam Dryer Replacement Non-Proprietary Information NON-PROPRIETARY NOTICE This is a non-proprietary version of Enclosure 1 of GEH Letter No. 175528-011, Revision 1 which has the proprietary information removed. Portions of the document that have been removed are indicated by an open and closed bracket as shown here (( )).

Box Beam Non-Proprietary Information - Class I (Public)

((

))

l 1 Browns Ferry Replacement Steam Dryer Analysis

Non-Proprietary Information - Class I (Public)

BFN SDAR Report Format Main Body - BFN-Specific Analyses and Results Appendix A - Overall Dryer Analysis Methodology Appendix B - PBLE01 On-dryer Based Load Definition Model Description Appendix C - PBLE02 MSL-Based Load Definition Model Description Appendix D - Supporting BFN Analysis Inputs and Results Appendix E - Power Ascension Test Plan and Limit Curves l 2 Browns Ferry Replacement Steam Dryer Analysis

ENCLOSURE 6 GEH Affidavit Supporting the Request to Withhold GEH Proprietary Information (included in Enclosure 4) from the Public E6-1

ENCLOSURE 3 GEH Letter No. 175528-011, Revision 2 GEH Affidavit

AFFIDAVIT I, Peter M. Yandow, state as follows:

(1) I am the Vice President, Nuclear Plant Projects/Services Licensing, Regulatory Affairs, GE-Hitachi Nuclear Energy Americas LLC (GEH), and have been delegated the function of reviewing the information described in paragraph (2) which is sought to be withheld, and have been authorized to apply for its withholding.

(2) The information sought to be withheld is contained in Enclosure 1 of GEH letter, GEH Letter No. 175528-011, Revision 2, Scott Gowdy (GEH) to Peter Donahue (TVA) entitled Supplemental GEH Slides for TVA Presentation to the NRC in Support of Steam Dryer Replacement, dated April 30, 2015. The GEH proprietary information in Enclosure 1, which is entitled Supplemental GEH Slides for TVA Presentation to the NRC, is identified by a dotted underline inside double square brackets. ((This sentence is an example.{3})) Figures and large objects containing proprietary information are identified with double square brackets before and after the object. In each case, the superscript notation {3} refers to Paragraph (3) of this affidavit, which provides the basis for the proprietary determination.

(3) In making this application for withholding of proprietary information of which it is the owner or licensee, GEH relies upon the exemption from disclosure set forth in the Freedom of Information Act (FOIA), 5 U.S.C. Sec. 552(b)(4), and the Trade Secrets Act, 18 U.S.C. Sec. 1905, and NRC regulations 10 CFR 9.17(a)(4), and 2.390(a)(4) for trade secrets (Exemption 4). The material for which exemption from disclosure is here sought also qualifies under the narrower definition of trade secret, within the meanings assigned to those terms for purposes of FOIA Exemption 4 in, respectively, Critical Mass Energy Project v. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, 975 F.2d 871 (D.C. Cir. 1992),

and Public Citizen Health Research Group v. FDA, 704 F.2d 1280 (D.C. Cir. 1983).

(4) The information sought to be withheld is considered to be proprietary for the reasons set forth in paragraphs (4)a. and (4)b. Some examples of categories of information that fit into the definition of proprietary information are:

a. Information that discloses a process, method, or apparatus, including supporting data and analyses, where prevention of its use by GEH's competitors without license from GEH constitutes a competitive economic advantage over other companies;
b. Information that, if used by a competitor, would reduce their expenditure of resources or improve their competitive position in the design, manufacture, shipment, installation, assurance of quality, or licensing of a similar product;
c. Information that reveals aspects of past, present, or future GEH customer-funded development plans and programs, resulting in potential products to GEH; GEH Letter No. 175528-011, Revision 2 Page 1

GE-Hitachi Nuclear Energy Americas LLC

d. Information that discloses trade secret or potentially patentable subject matter for which it may be desirable to obtain patent protection.

(5) To address 10 CFR 2.390(b)(4), the information sought to be withheld is being submitted to NRC in confidence. The information is of a sort customarily held in confidence by GEH, and is in fact so held. The information sought to be withheld has, to the best of my knowledge and belief, consistently been held in confidence by GEH, not been disclosed publicly, and not been made available in public sources. All disclosures to third parties, including any required transmittals to the NRC, have been made, or must be made, pursuant to regulatory provisions or proprietary or confidentiality agreements that provide for maintaining the information in confidence. The initial designation of this information as proprietary information, and the subsequent steps taken to prevent its unauthorized disclosure, are as set forth in the following paragraphs (6) and (7).

(6) Initial approval of proprietary treatment of a document is made by the manager of the originating component, who is the person most likely to be acquainted with the value and sensitivity of the information in relation to industry knowledge, or who is the person most likely to be subject to the terms under which it was licensed to GEH.

(7) The procedure for approval of external release of such a document typically requires review by the staff manager, project manager, principal scientist, or other equivalent authority for technical content, competitive effect, and determination of the accuracy of the proprietary designation. Disclosures outside GEH are limited to regulatory bodies, customers, and potential customers, and their agents, suppliers, and licensees, and others with a legitimate need for the information, and then only in accordance with appropriate regulatory provisions or proprietary or confidentiality agreements.

(8) The information identified in paragraph (2), above, is classified as proprietary because it contains the details of GEH methodology. These methods, techniques, and data along with their application to the design, modification, and analyses were achieved at a significant cost to GEH.

The development of the evaluation processes along with the interpretation and application of the analytical results is derived from the extensive experience databases that constitute a major GEH asset.

(9) Public disclosure of the information sought to be withheld is likely to cause substantial harm to GEH's competitive position and foreclose or reduce the availability of profit-making opportunities. The information is part of GEH's comprehensive BWR safety and technology base, and its commercial value extends beyond the original development cost. The value of the technology base goes beyond the extensive physical database and analytical methodology and includes development of the expertise to determine and apply the appropriate evaluation process. In addition, the technology base includes the value derived from providing analyses done with NRC-approved methods.

GEH Letter No. 175528-011, Revision 2 Page 2

GE-Hitachi Nuclear Energy Americas LLC The research, development, engineering, analytical and NRC review costs comprise a substantial investment of time and money by GEH. The precise value of the expertise to devise an evaluation process and apply the correct analytical methodology is difficult to quantify, but it clearly is substantial. GEH's competitive advantage will be lost if its competitors are able to use the results of the GEH experience to normalize or verify their own process or if they are able to claim an equivalent understanding by demonstrating that they can arrive at the same or similar conclusions.

The value of this information to GEH would be lost if the information were disclosed to the public. Making such information available to competitors without their having been required to undertake a similar expenditure of resources would unfairly provide competitors with a windfall, and deprive GEH of the opportunity to exercise its competitive advantage to seek an adequate return on its large investment in developing and obtaining these very valuable analytical tools.

I declare under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct.

Executed on this 30th day of April 2015.

Peter M. Yandow Vice President, Nuclear Plant Projects/Services Licensing, Regulatory Affairs GE-Hitachi Nuclear Energy Americas LLC 3901 Castle Hayne Rd.

Wilmington, NC 28401 Peter.Yandow@ge.com GEH Letter No. 175528-011, Revision 2 Page 3