Text

Application to Revise Technical Specifications to Adopt TSTF-426, Revise or Add Actions to Preclude Entry Into LCO 3.0.3 - RITSTF Initiatives 6b & 6c, Using the Consolidated Line Item Improvement Process
	ML15356A657
Person / Time
Site:	Arkansas Nuclear
Issue date:	12/22/2015
From:	Jeremy G. Browning; Entergy Operations
To:	; Document Control Desk, Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
References
	2CAN121502
	Download: ML15356A657 (28)
	v • d • e

s Entergy Operations, Inc.

1448 S.R. 333 Russellville, AR 72802 Tel 479-858-3110 Jeremy G. Browning Vice President - Operations Arkansas Nuclear One 2CAN121502 December 22, 2015 U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Attn: Document Control Desk Washington, DC 20555

SUBJECT:

Application to Revise Technical Specifications to Adopt TSTF-426, "Revise or Add Actions to Preclude Entry Into LCO 3.0.3 - RITSTF Initiatives 6b & 6c,"

Using the Consolidated Line Item Improvement Process Arkansas Nuclear One, Unit 2 Docket No. 50-368 License No. NPF-6

Dear Sir or Madam:

Pursuant to 10 CFR 50.90, Entergy Operations, Inc. (Entergy), is submitting a request for an amendment to the Technical Specifications (TSs) for Arkansas Nuclear One, Unit 2 (ANO-2).

The proposed amendment would modify TS requirements to adopt the changes described in TSTF-426, Revision 5, "Revise or Add Actions to Preclude Entry into LCO 3.0.3 - RITSTF Initiatives 6b & 6c."

Attachment 1 provides a description and assessment of the proposed changes, the requested confirmation of applicability, and plant-specific verifications. Attachment 2 provides the existing TS pages marked up to show the proposed changes. Attachment 3 provides revised (clean) TS pages. Attachment 4 provides existing TS Bases pages for information only, marked up to illustrate the proposed changes.

Approval of the proposed amendment is requested by December 1, 2016. Once approved, the amendment shall be implemented within 90 days.

In accordance with 10 CFR 50.91(b)(1), a copy of this application is being provided to the designated Arkansas state official.

No new commitments have been identified in this letter.

If you have any questions or require additional information, please contact Stephenie Pyle at 479-858-4704.

2CAN121502 Page 2 of 2 I declare under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct.

Executed on December 22, 2015.

Sincerely, ORIGINAL SIGNED BY JEREMY G. BROWNING JGB/dbb Attachments:

1. Description and Assessment

2. Proposed Technical Specification Changes (Mark-Up)

3. Revised Technical Specification Pages

4. Proposed Technical Specification Bases Changes (Mark-Up - For Information Only) cc: Mr. Marc L. Dapas Regional Administrator U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Region IV 1600 East Lamar Boulevard Arlington, TX 76011-4511 NRC Senior Resident Inspector Arkansas Nuclear One P. O. Box 310 London, AR 72847 U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Attn: Ms. Andrea E. George MS O-8B1 One White Flint North 11555 Rockville Pike Rockville, MD 20852 Mr. Bernard R. Bevill Arkansas Department of Health Radiation Control Section 4815 West Markham Street Slot #30 Little Rock, AR 72205

Attachment 1 to 2CAN121502 Description and Assessment to 2CAN121502 Page 1 of 8 Description and Assessment

1.0 DESCRIPTION

The proposed change provides a short Allowable Outage Time (AOT) to restore an inoperable system for conditions under which the existing Arkansas Nuclear One, Unit 2 (ANO-2) Technical Specifications (TSs) require a plant shutdown. The proposed amendment is consistent with TSTF-426, Revision 5, "Revise or Add Actions to Preclude Entry into LCO 3.0.3 - RITSTF Initiatives 6b & 6c."

2.0 ASSESSMENT 2.1 Applicability of Published Safety Evaluation Entergy Operations, Inc. (Entergy), has reviewed the model safety evaluation dated May 20, 2013, as part of the Federal Register Notice of Availability. This review included a review of the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) safety evaluation (SE), as well as the information provided in TSTF-426, Revision 5, and the referenced Topical Report WCAP-16125-NP-A, Revision 2, "Justification for Risk-Informed Modifications to Selected Technical Specifications for Conditions Leading to Exigent plant Shutdown". As described in the subsequent paragraphs, Entergy has concluded that the justifications presented in the TSTF-426 proposal and the model SE prepared by the NRC staff are applicable to ANO-2 and justify this amendment for the incorporation of the changes to the ANO-2 TSs.

2.2 Optional Changes and Variations Entergy is proposing the following variations from the TS changes described in the TSTF-426, Revision 5, or the applicable parts of the NRC staffs model SE dated May 20, 2013.

With respect to the above, WCAP-16125-NP-A, Revision 2, system noun-names and acronyms differ in some cases from the equivalent ANO-2 system noun-names and acronyms. In addition, the ANO-2 TSs have not been converted to the improved standard version (NUREG 1432, Standard Technical Specifications for Combustion Engineering Plants) and, therefore, Action wording may differ slightly from TSTF-426 to maintain consistency with the ANO-2 TS vintage. The following table describes the minor differences in noun-names and acronyms. Entergy considers these differences to be administrative in nature such that these differences do not constitute a deviation from TSTF-426 that would require unique or additional NRC review. Wording differences between NUREG 1432 and TSTF-426, when compared with the affected ANO-2 TS Actions, are discussed further below.

WCAP Noun-Name WCAP Acronym ANO Noun-Name ANO Acronym Control Room Emergency Air Control Room Emergency CREACS CREVS Cleanup System Ventilation System Control Room Emergency Air Control Room Emergency CREATCS CREACS Temperature Control System Air Conditioning System to 2CAN121502 Page 2 of 8 Variation 1 - Pressurizer As is common to Combustion Engineering plants, ANO-2 maintains two vital-powered groups of Pressurizer proportional heaters. In addition, four groups of non-vital powered backup heaters are available. The proportional heaters normally respond automatically to maintain Pressurzier pressure within required operating bands. The heaters are designated as proportional because the firing rate automatically adjusts depending on the amount of deviation between actual Pressurizer pressure and the pressure control setpoint of the heaters. The backup heaters are manually controlled by the Operator, either full on or full off, to assist Pressurizer pressure control during abnormal conditions.

The ANO-2 proportional and backup heater groups are not credited in the accident analyses, but the proportional heater groups have been maintained in the TSs since the heaters aid in controlling Pressurizer pressure during a natural circulation cool down (reference ANO-2 Safety Analysis Report (SAR) Section 5.5.10.2). While the proportional heaters support power operations and simplify plant heat up and cool down, these functions alone would not meet the criteria for inclusion in the TSs. However, a natural circulation cool down may be required following a loss of offsite power, since the Reactor Coolant Pumps (RCPs) are powered from a non-vital AC source. ANO-2 TS 3.4.4, Action (b), currently associates heater group inoperability only with the respective emergency power supply since, from a TS perspective, the proportional heater groups only support loss of offsite power natural circulation cool down, a condition requiring only the emergency power supply to be available. However, this Action fails to account for a heater bank with less than the required 150 kW of heater capacity available.

NUREG 1432 provides a 72-hour restoration time for a single Pressurizer proportional heater group inoperability.

With respect to ANO-2 TS 3.8.1.1, Action b.3, the associated Emergency Diesel Generator (EDG) must be restored within 14 days provided the ANO Alternate AC Diesel Generator (AACDG) is functional. The AACDG is the sites station blackout power supply, capable of supplying the required loads of both ANO units during a site-wide blackout condition (reference ANO-2 SAR Section 8.3.3 for additional information). If the AACDG is not available, the EDG, and likewise the associated Pressurizer heater group, must be restored within 72 hours8.333333e-4 days 0.02 hours 1.190476e-4 weeks 2.7396e-5 months , consistent with NUREG 1432. However, the wording of TS 3.4.4, Action (b) states that the proportional heater group must be restored as required by TS 3.8.1.1, Action b.3. TS 3.8.1.1, Action b.3, does not specifically refer to TS 3.4.4 or the proportional heaters; therefore, Entergy proposes to slightly modify the current wording of TS 3.4.4, Action (b), to provide clarity:

(b) With the pressurizer inoperable due to an inoperable emergency power supply to the pressurizer heaters, either restore the inoperable emergency power supply in accordance withas required by TS 3.8.1.1, Aaction b.3, for an inoperable Emergency Diesel Generator, or be in at least HOT SHUTDOWN within 12 hours1.388889e-4 days 0.00333 hours 1.984127e-5 weeks 4.566e-6 months .

Entergy considers the above change administrative in nature, being neither more or less restrictive than the current Action statement.

To gain better consistency with NUREG 1432, Entergy proposes to modify TS 3.4.4 to add Action (c), addressing heater group capacity consistent with NUREG 1432. In the absence of such an Action, a plant shutdown could be required in accordance with TS 3.0.3 for a single proportional heater group inoperability, which is contrary to all other TS requirements associated with single train impacts. TS 3.0.3 is generally applied when a plants configuration is not to 2CAN121502 Page 3 of 8 described in the associated TS governing the required structure, system, or component (SSC).

The new Acton (c) provides the clarification necessary to assist Operators in initiating appropriate corrective action upon single proportional heater group inoperability and avoids the risk and SSC challenges that would be realized during an unnecessary shutdown of the plant.

This addition is also necessary to permit adoption of the TSTF-426 Action associated with two heater group inoperabilities.

(c) With the pressurizer inoperable due to a single proportional heater group having less than a 150 kW capacity, restore the inoperable proportional heater group to OPERABLE status within 72 hours8.333333e-4 days 0.02 hours 1.190476e-4 weeks 2.7396e-5 months , or be in at least HOT SHUTDOWN within 12 hours1.388889e-4 days 0.00333 hours 1.984127e-5 weeks 4.566e-6 months .

A review of the original ANO-2 TSs noted that TS 3.4.4 did not include an Action specific to the capacity of a single heater group, although operability was established as requiring at least 150 kW of capacity. It is extremely unusual for a TS to include a surveillance (operability) requirement without establishing an Action to address not meeting the stated requirement.

Therefore, Entergy believes this to be on oversight in development of the original ANO-2 TSs.

Consistent with NUREG 1432, the 72-hour AOT is reasonable considering that a heater demand caused by loss of offsite power would be unlikely during this period (reference associated NUREG 1432 TS Bases). In addition, the AACDG can be utilized to energize either proportional heater group should a single failure of an EDG occur concurrent with a loss of offsite power event. The remaining proportional heater group or, in the absence of a loss of offsite power, the non-vital backup Pressurizer heater banks are sufficient to support Pressurizer pressure control during normal operations or plant cool down. Note, however, that the AACDG or an EDG can be aligned to supply power to backup heater groups under emergency conditions. The design total capacity of the four backup heater groups is approximately 921 kW (reference Operations Systems Training Manual 2-03-1), well above the minimum 150 kW required of the proportional heater group.

Minor wording and formatting differences between TSTF-426 and the proposed changes to ANO-2 TS 3.4.4 have been included to support the format and wording used in the non-standard ANO-2 TSs. These differences continue to meet the intent of TSTF-426.

Entergy believes the above changes are necessary to support adoption of TSTF-426 and are acceptable based on consistency with NUREG 1432 and consistency with TS requirements associated with single train inoperabilities. In light of the necessary changes described above, TSTF-426, Action (c), will be designated as Action (d) in ANO-2 TS 3.4.4. However, no non-administrative differences between this ANO-2 Action adoption and TSTF-426 are proposed.

Variation 2 - Containment Spray The ANO-2 Containment Spray System (CSS) is credited to support post-accident iodine removal from the Containment Building atmosphere (reference SAR Sections 6.2.2.2.1, 6.2.3.3.1.1, and 15.1.13.1); therefore, associated TSTF-426 changes are applicable to ANO-2.

However, NUREG 1432 combines requirements for the CSS and the Containment Cooling System (CCS) in a single TS. These requirements are separate for ANO-2 (TS 3.6.2.1 for CSS and TS 3.6.2.3 for CCS). The associated ANO-2 actions are consistent with NUREG 1432, with the exception that one train of CSS can be inoperable for only 72 hours8.333333e-4 days 0.02 hours 1.190476e-4 weeks 2.7396e-5 months (NUREG 1432 permits up to 7 days) and only a shutdown to Mode 4 is required (CSS is only required to be operable in to 2CAN121502 Page 4 of 8 Modes 1, 2, and 3 for ANO-2). Nevertheless, TSTF-426 and the associated WCAP are applicability to ANO-2 for adopting an Action to permit both CSS trains to be inoperable for a short period of time.

Due to formatting differences, the single train restoration Action in TS 3.6.2.1 is now designated Action a). The new two-train restoration Action is designated as Action b). Minor wording and formatting differences between TSTF-426 and the proposed changes to ANO-2 TS 3.6.2.1 have been included to support the format and wording used in the non-standard ANO-2 TSs. These differences continue to meet the intent of TSTF-426.

Entergy has determined that the aforementioned administrative differences do not impact the adoption of the TSTF-426 Action associated with two inoperable CSS trains into the ANO-2 TSs. Note that it is not necessary to add an Action requiring TS 3.0.3 entry to gain further consistency with NUREG 1432 since such entry is required whenever a configuration exists that is not addressed by the TSs. Neither the ANO-2 CSS TS or the CCS TS permit a combination of three of the four trains (two CSS trains and two CCS trains) to be inoperable at any time; therefore, such inoperability would require immediate entry into TS 3.0.3.

Variation 3 - CREVS and CREACS Separate TSs are provided in NUREG 1432 for the CREVS and CREACS. These two systems are contained in a single ANO-2 TS. Nevertheless, the associated ANO-2 Actions are consistent with NUREG 1432, given that ANO-2 has previously adopted TSTF-422, Change in Technical Specifications End States, which revised the associated shutdown requirements for single CREVS and CREACS train inoperabilities. These single-train differences have no impact on the applicability of two-train inoperability Actions of TSTF-426 to ANO-2.

Because the two systems are contained in one specification and due to ANO-2 TS formatting, TS 3.7.6.1 Action e is modified to address two inoperable CREVS trains and current Action f through Action j are relabeled to permit a new Action f addressing two inoperable CREACS trains, consistent with TSTF-426. Other minor wording and formatting differences between TSTF-426 and the proposed changes to ANO-2 TS 3.7.6.1 have been included to support the format and wording used in the non-standard ANO-2 TSs. Entergy considers these changes to be administrative in nature, having no impact on the applicability of TSTF-426 to ANO-2.

The shutdown statements associated with two train inoperability of CREVS or CREACS differs from TSTF-426 to match the shutdown statements of other Modes 1, 2, 3, and 4 Actions, consistent with the previous adoption of TSTF-422 as mentioned previously. In accordance with the intent of TSTF-422, remaining within the Applicability (Mode 4) of the LCO is acceptable because in MODE 4 there are more accident mitigation systems available and there is more redundancy and diversity in core heat removal mechanisms than in MODE 5. Specifically, Mode 4 permits core cooling by either decay heat removal systems or the Steam Generators, while Mode 5 is limited to decay heat removal systems only. In addition, accident scenarios which may occur in Mode 4 are much less severe when compared to the SAR assumption that the applicable accidents are initiated at full power operation. Therefore, Entergy has concluded that the nuclear safety benefit of TSTF-422 should equally applied to conditions where two CREVS or CREACS are inoperable.

to 2CAN121502 Page 5 of 8 Related to the above, the shutdown statements for each Mode 1, 2, 3, and 4 Action are equivalent. Therefore, Entergy proposes to remove the shutdown statement from each individual Mode 1, 2, 3, and 4 Action and relocate to a single shutdown statement following these Actions:

With ACTIONS a, b, c, d, e, and/or f not met, be in at least HOT STANDBY within the next 6 hours6.944444e-5 days 0.00167 hours 9.920635e-6 weeks 2.283e-6 months and in HOT SHUTDOWN within the following 6 hours6.944444e-5 days 0.00167 hours 9.920635e-6 weeks 2.283e-6 months . LCO 3.0.4.a is not applicable when entering HOT SHUTDOWN.

Entergy considers this change to be administrative in nature, having no impact on the applicability of TSTF-426 to ANO-2.

Note that WCAP-16125-NP-A, Revision 2, implies that the CREVS emergency radiation mode and toxic gas mode are different. With respect to ANO-2, both operational modes are equivalent, isolating and pressurizing the control room with filtered air. This emergency mode of operation is automatically initiated following receipt of a high radiation or high chlorine level signal. While the Control Room will isolate on smoke detection, should a fire occur internal to the Control Room, the system may be aligned to exhaust smoke from the area if necessary.

This minor difference from the WCAP discussion has no impact on the acceptability of applying TSTF-426 to the ANO-2 CREVS.

ANO-2 design does not include Pressurizer Power Operated Relief Valves, a Shield Building Exhaust Air Cleanup System, Iodine Cleanup System, or Emergency Core Cooling System Pump Room Exhaust Air Cleanup System. The ANO-2 TSs do not include the Penetration Room Exhaust Air Cleanup System as this system is not credited in the ANO-2 accident analyses. Therefore the TSTF-426 changes for those systems are not included. includes a mark-up (for information only) of the associated ANO-2 TS Bases to include the information added via TSTF-426; however, the ANO-2 TS Bases have not been converted to the improved standard version and do not contain the detail of NUREG 1432.

Therefore, minor wording and editorial changes were required to accommodate TSTF-426 inserts.

2.3 Licensee Verifications Entergy confirms that plant procedures can establish temporary alternate means of Control Room cooling, as assumed in the justification of the proposed change to the CREACS (reference procedure OP-2014.007, Control Room Emergency Air Conditioning and Ventilation).

to 2CAN121502 Page 6 of 8

3.0 REGULATORY ANALYSIS

3.1 No Significant Hazards Consideration Determination Entergy Operations, Inc., (Entergy) requests adoption of TSTF-426, Revision 5, "Revise or Add Actions to Preclude Entry into LCO 3.0.3 - RITSTF Initiatives 6b & 6c," which is an approved change to the standard technical specifications (STS), into the non-standard Arkansas Nuclear One, Unit 2 (ANO-2) Technical Specifications (TSs). The proposed change provides a short Allowable Outage Time (AOT) to restore an inoperable system for conditions under which the existing TSs require a plant shutdown to begin within one hour in accordance with Limiting Condition for Operation (LCO) 3.0.3.

A new Action to address one Pressurizer proportional heater group have a capacity of less than 150 kW is also proposed. This latter change was not part of TSTF-426, but was necessary to meet the functional flow of the TS in light of TSTF-426 adoption.

Entergy has evaluated whether or not a significant hazards consideration is involved with the proposed amendment(s) by focusing on the three standards set forth in 10 CFR 50.92, "Issuance of amendment," as discussed below:

1. Does the proposed change involve a significant increase in the probability or consequences of an accident previously evaluated?

Response: No.

The proposed change provides a short AOT to restore an inoperable system for conditions under which the existing TSs require a plant shutdown to begin within one hour in accordance with LCO 3.0.3. In addition, a new TS Action associated with Pressurizer proportional heater capacity for a single proportional heater group is proposed. Entering into TS Actions is not an initiator of any accident previously evaluated. As a result, the probability of an accident previously evaluated is not significantly increased. The consequences of any accident previously evaluated that may occur during the proposed AOTs are no different from the consequences of the same accident during the existing one-hour allowance. As a result, the consequences of any accident previously evaluated are not significantly increased.

Therefore, the proposed change does not involve a significant increase in the probability or consequences of an accident previously evaluated.

2. Does the proposed change create the possibility of a new or different kind of accident from any accident previously evaluated?

Response: No.

No new or different accidents result from utilizing the proposed change. The proposed change does not involve a physical alteration of the plant (i.e., no new or different type of equipment will be installed) or a change in the methods governing normal plant operation.

In addition, the proposed change does not impose any new or different requirements. The proposed change does not alter assumptions made in the safety analysis.

Therefore, the proposed change does not create the possibility of a new or different kind of accident from any previously evaluated.

to 2CAN121502 Page 7 of 8

3. Does the proposed change involve a significant reduction in a margin of safety?

Response: No.

The proposed change increases the time the plant may operate without the ability to perform an assumed safety function. The analyses in WCAP-16125-NP-A, "Justification for Risk-Informed Modifications to Selected Technical Specifications for Conditions Leading to Exigent plant Shutdown," Revision 2, August 2010, demonstrated that there is an acceptably small increase in risk due to a limited period of continued operation in these conditions and that this risk is balanced by avoiding the risks associated with a plant shutdown. As a result, the change to the margin of safety provided by requiring a plant shutdown within one hour is not significant.

The new Pressurizer proportional heater capacity Action permits 72 hours8.333333e-4 days 0.02 hours 1.190476e-4 weeks 2.7396e-5 months to restore the affect heater group to an operable status, consistent with the STS and consistent with TS requirements associated with single train inoperabilities. The proportional heaters are not credited in the ANO-2 accident analyses, but aid in Pressurizer pressure control during a loss of offsite power event that results in the need to perform a natural circulation cool down of the plant. The associated STS bases for the standard 72-hour AOT assumes the likelihood of a loss of offsite power event during this time period that would require a demand on the proportional heaters is minimal and acknowledges the use of non-vital powered backup heater groups absent a loss of offsite power event. Note also that under emergency conditions, an Emergency Diesel Generator or the Alternate AC Diesel Generator (i.e., Station Blackout diesel) can be aligned to power any of the non-vital Pressurizer backup heater groups. As a result, the change to the margin of safety provided by the new 72-hour AOT for a single proportional heater train is not significant.

Therefore, the proposed change does not involve a significant reduction in a margin of safety.

Based on the above, Entergy concludes that the proposed change presents no significant hazards consideration under the standards set forth in 10 CFR 50.92(c), and, accordingly, a finding of "no significant hazards consideration" is justified.

4.0 ENVIRONMENTAL EVALUATION The proposed change would change a requirement with respect to installation or use of a facility component located within the restricted area, as defined in 10 CFR 20, or would change an inspection or surveillance requirement. However, the proposed change does not involve (i) a significant hazards consideration, (ii) a significant change in the types or significant increase in the amounts of any effluents that may be released offsite, or (iii) a significant increase in individual or cumulative occupational radiation exposure. Accordingly, the proposed change meets the eligibility criterion for categorical exclusion set forth in 10 CFR 51.22(c)(9). Therefore, pursuant to 10 CFR 51.22(b), no environmental impact statement or environmental assessment need be prepared in connection with the proposed change.

to 2CAN121502 Page 8 of 8

5.0 REFERENCES

1. Federal Register Notice (78 FR 32476), dated May 30, 2013, "Models for Plant-Specific Adoption of TSTF-426, Revision 5, "Revise or Add Actions to Preclude Entry into LCO 3.0.3

- RITSTF Initiatives 6b & 6c," Using the Consolidated Line Item Improvement Process" (ML13036A371)

2. Technical Specification Task Force Improved Technical Specification Change Traveler, TSTF-426, Revision 5, "Revise or Add Actions to Preclude Entry into LCO 3.0.3 - RITSTF Initiatives 6b & 6c," dated November 22, 2011 (ML113260461)

3. Topical Report WCAP-16125-NP-A, Revision 2, "Justification for Risk-Informed Modifications to Selected Technical Specifications for Conditions Leading to Exigent plant Shutdown," dated August 2010 (ML110070499)

Attachment 2 2CAN121502 Proposed Technical Specification Changes (mark-up)

REACTOR COOLANT SYSTEM PRESSURIZER LIMITING CONDITION FOR OPERATION 3.4.4 The pressurizer shall be OPERABLE with a water volume of 910 cubic feet (equivalent to 82% of wide range indicated level) and both pressurizer proportional heater groups shall be OPERABLE.

APPLICABILITY: MODES 1, 2 and 3.

ACTION:

(a) With the pressurizer inoperable due to water volume 910 cubic feet, be in at least HOT SHUTDOWN with the reactor trip breakers open within 12 hours1.388889e-4 days 0.00333 hours 1.984127e-5 weeks 4.566e-6 months .

(b) With the pressurizer inoperable due to an inoperable emergency power supply to the pressurizer heaters, either restore the inoperable emergency power supply in accordance withas required by TS 3.8.1.1, Aaction b.3, for an inoperable Emergency Diesel Generator, or be in at least HOT SHUTDOWN within 12 hours1.388889e-4 days 0.00333 hours 1.984127e-5 weeks 4.566e-6 months .

(c) With the pressurizer inoperable due to a single proportional heater group having less than a 150 KW capacity, restore the inoperable proportional heater group to OPERABLE status within 72 hours8.333333e-4 days 0.02 hours 1.190476e-4 weeks 2.7396e-5 months , or be in at least HOT SHUTDOWN within 12 hours1.388889e-4 days 0.00333 hours 1.984127e-5 weeks 4.566e-6 months .

(d) With the pressurizer inoperable due to both proportional heater groups being inoperable for any reason (Note 1), restore at least one proportional heater group to OPERABLE status within 24 hours2.777778e-4 days 0.00667 hours 3.968254e-5 weeks 9.132e-6 months , or be in at least HOT SHUTDOWN within 12 hours1.388889e-4 days 0.00333 hours 1.984127e-5 weeks 4.566e-6 months .

SURVEILLANCE REQUIREMENTS 4.4.4.1 The pressurizer water volume shall be determined to be within its limits at least once per 12 hours1.388889e-4 days 0.00333 hours 1.984127e-5 weeks 4.566e-6 months .

4.4.4.2 The pressurizer proportional heater groups shall be determined to be OPERABLE.

(a) At least once per 12 hours1.388889e-4 days 0.00333 hours 1.984127e-5 weeks 4.566e-6 months by verifying emergency power is available to the heater groups, and (b) At least once per 18 months by verifying that the summed power consumption of the two proportional heater groups is 150 KW.

Note 1: Action (d) is not applicable when the second group of required pressurizer heaters is intentionally made inoperable.

ARKANSAS - UNIT 2 3/4 4-5 Amendment No. 20,234,

CONTAINMENT SYSTEMS 3/4.6.2 DEPRESSURIZATION, COOLING, AND pH CONTROL SYSTEMS CONTAINMENT SPRAY SYSTEM LIMITING CONDITION FOR OPERATION 3.6.2.1 Two independent containment spray systems shall be OPERABLE with each spray system capable of taking suction from the RWT on a Containment Spray Actuation Signal (CSAS) and automatically transferring suction to the containment sump on a Recirculation Actuation Signal (RAS). Each spray system flow path from the containment sump shall be via an OPERABLE shutdown cooling heat exchanger.

APPLICABILITY: MODES 1, 2, and 3.

ACTION:

a. With one containment spray system inoperable, restore the inoperable spray system to OPERABLE status within 72 hours8.333333e-4 days 0.02 hours 1.190476e-4 weeks 2.7396e-5 months or be in at least HOT STANDBY within the next 6 hours6.944444e-5 days 0.00167 hours 9.920635e-6 weeks 2.283e-6 months and in HOT SHUTDOWN within the following 6 hours6.944444e-5 days 0.00167 hours 9.920635e-6 weeks 2.283e-6 months .

b. With both containment spray systems inoperable (Note 1):

1. Within 1 hour1.157407e-5 days 2.777778e-4 hours 1.653439e-6 weeks 3.805e-7 months verify both CREVS trains are OPERABLE, and

2. Restore at least one containment spray system to OPERABLE status within 24 hours2.777778e-4 days 0.00667 hours 3.968254e-5 weeks 9.132e-6 months .

Otherwise, be in at least HOT STANDBY within the next 6 hours6.944444e-5 days 0.00167 hours 9.920635e-6 weeks 2.283e-6 months and in HOT SHUTDOWN within the following 6 hours6.944444e-5 days 0.00167 hours 9.920635e-6 weeks 2.283e-6 months .

SURVEILLANCE REQUIREMENTS 4.6.2.1 Each containment spray system shall be demonstrated OPERABLE:

a. At least once per 31 days by:

1. Verify each containment spray manual, power operated, and automatic valve in the flow path that is not locked, sealed, or otherwise secured in position is in the correct position.

2. Verifying that the system piping is full of water from the RWT to at least elevation 505' (equivalent to > 12.5% indicated narrow range level) in the risers within the containment.

b. Verify each containment spray pumps developed head at the flow test point is greater than or equal to the required developed head when tested pursuant to the Inservice Testing Program.

Note 1: ACTION b is not applicable when the second containment spray system is intentionally made inoperable.

ARKANSAS - UNIT 2 3/4 6-10 Amendment No. 194,233,252,268, 301,

PLANT SYSTEMS 3/4.7.6 CONTROL ROOM EMERGENCY VENTILATION AND AIR CONDITIONING SYSTEM LIMITING CONDITION FOR OPERATION 3.7.6.1 Two independent control room emergency ventilation and air conditioning systems shall be OPERABLE. (Note 1)

APPLICABILITY: MODES 1, 2, 3, 4, or during handling of irradiated fuel.

ACTION:

MODES 1, 2, 3, and 4

a. With one control room emergency air conditioning system (CREACS) inoperable, restore the inoperable system to OPERABLE status within 30 days or be in at least HOT STANDBY within the next 6 hours6.944444e-5 days 0.00167 hours 9.920635e-6 weeks 2.283e-6 months and in HOT SHUTDOWN within the following 6 hours6.944444e-5 days 0.00167 hours 9.920635e-6 weeks 2.283e-6 months .

LCO 3.0.4.a is not applicable when entering HOT SHUTDOWN.

b. With one control room emergency ventilation system (CREVS) inoperable for reasons other than ACTION d, restore the inoperable system to OPERABLE status within 7 days or be in at least HOT STANDBY within the next 6 hours6.944444e-5 days 0.00167 hours 9.920635e-6 weeks 2.283e-6 months and in HOT SHUTDOWN within the following 6 hours6.944444e-5 days 0.00167 hours 9.920635e-6 weeks 2.283e-6 months . LCO 3.0.4.a is not applicable when entering HOT SHUTDOWN.

c. With one CREVS inoperable for reasons other than ACTION d and one CREACS inoperable, restore the inoperable CREVS to OPERABLE status within 7 days and restore the inoperable CREACS to OPERABLE status within 30 days or be in at least HOT STANDBY within the next 6 hours6.944444e-5 days 0.00167 hours 9.920635e-6 weeks 2.283e-6 months and in HOT SHUTDOWN within the following 6 hours6.944444e-5 days 0.00167 hours 9.920635e-6 weeks 2.283e-6 months .

LCO 3.0.4.a is not applicable when entering HOT SHUTDOWN.

d. With one or more CREVS inoperable due to an inoperable CRE boundary:

1. Immediately initiate action to implement mitigating actions, and

2. Verify mitigating actions ensure CRE occupant exposures to radiological, chemical, and smoke hazards will not exceed limits within 24 hours2.777778e-4 days 0.00667 hours 3.968254e-5 weeks 9.132e-6 months , and

3. Restore the CRE boundary to OPERABLE status within 90 days Otherwise, be in at least HOT STANDBY within the next 6 hours6.944444e-5 days 0.00167 hours 9.920635e-6 weeks 2.283e-6 months and in HOT SHUTDOWN within the following 6 hours6.944444e-5 days 0.00167 hours 9.920635e-6 weeks 2.283e-6 months . LCO 3.0.4.a is not applicable when entering HOT SHUTDOWN.

e. With two CREVS inoperable for reasons other than ACTION d (Note 2): or with two CREACS inoperable, enter Specification 3.0.3.

1. Immediately initiate action to implement mitigating actions, and

2. Within 1 hour1.157407e-5 days 2.777778e-4 hours 1.653439e-6 weeks 3.805e-7 months , verify LCO 3.4.8, Specific Activity, is met, and

3. Within 24 hours2.777778e-4 days 0.00667 hours 3.968254e-5 weeks 9.132e-6 months , restore at least one CREVS to OPERABLE status.

ARKANSAS - UNIT 2 3/4 7-17 Amendment No. 206,219,255,288, 301,

f. With two CREACS inoperable (Note 2), restore at least one CREACS to OPERABLE status within 24 hours2.777778e-4 days 0.00667 hours 3.968254e-5 weeks 9.132e-6 months .

With ACTIONS a, b, c, d, e, and/or f not met, be in at least HOT STANDBY within the next 6 hours6.944444e-5 days 0.00167 hours 9.920635e-6 weeks 2.283e-6 months and in HOT SHUTDOWN within the following 6 hours6.944444e-5 days 0.00167 hours 9.920635e-6 weeks 2.283e-6 months . LCO 3.0.4.a is not applicable when entering HOT SHUTDOWN.

Note 1: The control room envelope (CRE) boundary may be open intermittently under administrative controls.

Note 2: ACTION e is not applicable if the second CREVS is intentionally made inoperable.

ACTION f is not applicable if the second CREACS is intentionally made inoperable.

ARKANSAS - UNIT 2 3/4 7-17 Amendment No. 206,219,255,288, 301,

PLANT SYSTEMS 3/4.7.6 CONTROL ROOM EMERGENCY VENTILATION AND AIR CONDITIONING SYSTEM LIMITING CONDITION FOR OPERATION During Handling of Irradiated Fuel gf. With one CREACS inoperable, restore the inoperable system to OPERABLE status within 30 days or immediately place the OPERABLE system in operation; otherwise, suspend all activities involving the handling of irradiated fuel.

hg. With one CREVS inoperable, restore the inoperable system to OPERABLE status within 7 days or immediately place the control room in the emergency recirc mode of operation; otherwise, suspend all activities involving the handling of irradiated fuel.

ih. With one CREVS inoperable for reasons other than ACTION d and one CREACS inoperable:

1. restore the inoperable CREVS to OPERABLE status within 7 days or immediately place the CRE in the emergency recirc mode of operation, and

2. restore the inoperable CREACS to OPERABLE status within 30 days or immediately place the OPERABLE system in operation;

3. otherwise, suspend all activities involving the handling of irradiated fuel.

ji. With both CREACS inoperable, immediately suspend all activities involving the handling of irradiated fuel.

kj. With both CREVS inoperable or with one or more CREVS inoperable due to an inoperable CRE boundary, immediately suspend all activities involving the handling of irradiated fuel.

ARKANSAS - UNIT 2 3/4 7-17a Amendment No. 206,219,255,281, 288,

Attachment 3 2CAN121502 Revised Technical Specification Pages

REACTOR COOLANT SYSTEM PRESSURIZER LIMITING CONDITION FOR OPERATION 3.4.4 The pressurizer shall be OPERABLE with a water volume of 910 cubic feet (equivalent to 82% of wide range indicated level) and both pressurizer proportional heater groups shall be OPERABLE.

APPLICABILITY: MODES 1, 2 and 3.

ACTION:

(a) With the pressurizer inoperable due to water volume 910 cubic feet, be in at least HOT SHUTDOWN with the reactor trip breakers open within 12 hours1.388889e-4 days 0.00333 hours 1.984127e-5 weeks 4.566e-6 months .

(b) With the pressurizer inoperable due to an inoperable emergency power supply to the pressurizer heaters, either restore the inoperable emergency power supply in accordance with TS 3.8.1.1, Action b.3, for an inoperable Emergency Diesel Generator, or be in at least HOT SHUTDOWN within 12 hours1.388889e-4 days 0.00333 hours 1.984127e-5 weeks 4.566e-6 months .

(c) With the pressurizer inoperable due to a single proportional heater group having less than a 150 KW capacity, restore the inoperable proportional heater group to OPERABLE status within 72 hours8.333333e-4 days 0.02 hours 1.190476e-4 weeks 2.7396e-5 months , or be in at least HOT SHUTDOWN within 12 hours1.388889e-4 days 0.00333 hours 1.984127e-5 weeks 4.566e-6 months .

(d) With the pressurizer inoperable due to both proportional heater groups being inoperable for any reason (Note 1), restore at least one proportional heater group to OPERABLE status within 24 hours2.777778e-4 days 0.00667 hours 3.968254e-5 weeks 9.132e-6 months , or be in at least HOT SHUTDOWN within 12 hours1.388889e-4 days 0.00333 hours 1.984127e-5 weeks 4.566e-6 months .

SURVEILLANCE REQUIREMENTS 4.4.4.1 The pressurizer water volume shall be determined to be within its limits at least once per 12 hours1.388889e-4 days 0.00333 hours 1.984127e-5 weeks 4.566e-6 months .

4.4.4.2 The pressurizer proportional heater groups shall be determined to be OPERABLE.

(a) At least once per 12 hours1.388889e-4 days 0.00333 hours 1.984127e-5 weeks 4.566e-6 months by verifying emergency power is available to the heater groups, and (b) At least once per 18 months by verifying that the summed power consumption of the two proportional heater groups is 150 KW.

Note 1: Action (d) is not applicable when the second group of required pressurizer heaters is intentionally made inoperable.

ARKANSAS - UNIT 2 3/4 4-5 Amendment No. 20,234,

CONTAINMENT SYSTEMS 3/4.6.2 DEPRESSURIZATION, COOLING, AND pH CONTROL SYSTEMS CONTAINMENT SPRAY SYSTEM LIMITING CONDITION FOR OPERATION 3.6.2.1 Two independent containment spray systems shall be OPERABLE with each spray system capable of taking suction from the RWT on a Containment Spray Actuation Signal (CSAS) and automatically transferring suction to the containment sump on a Recirculation Actuation Signal (RAS). Each spray system flow path from the containment sump shall be via an OPERABLE shutdown cooling heat exchanger.

APPLICABILITY: MODES 1, 2, and 3.

ACTION:

a. With one containment spray system inoperable, restore the inoperable spray system to OPERABLE status within 72 hours8.333333e-4 days 0.02 hours 1.190476e-4 weeks 2.7396e-5 months or be in at least HOT STANDBY within the next 6 hours6.944444e-5 days 0.00167 hours 9.920635e-6 weeks 2.283e-6 months and in HOT SHUTDOWN within the following 6 hours6.944444e-5 days 0.00167 hours 9.920635e-6 weeks 2.283e-6 months .

b. With both containment spray systems inoperable (Note 1):

1. Within 1 hour1.157407e-5 days 2.777778e-4 hours 1.653439e-6 weeks 3.805e-7 months verify both CREVS trains are OPERABLE, and

2. Restore at least one containment spray system to OPERABLE status within 24 hours2.777778e-4 days 0.00667 hours 3.968254e-5 weeks 9.132e-6 months .

Otherwise, be in at least HOT STANDBY within the next 6 hours6.944444e-5 days 0.00167 hours 9.920635e-6 weeks 2.283e-6 months and in HOT SHUTDOWN within the following 6 hours6.944444e-5 days 0.00167 hours 9.920635e-6 weeks 2.283e-6 months .

SURVEILLANCE REQUIREMENTS 4.6.2.1 Each containment spray system shall be demonstrated OPERABLE:

a. At least once per 31 days by:

1. Verify each containment spray manual, power operated, and automatic valve in the flow path that is not locked, sealed, or otherwise secured in position is in the correct position.

2. Verifying that the system piping is full of water from the RWT to at least elevation 505' (equivalent to > 12.5% indicated narrow range level) in the risers within the containment.

b. Verify each containment spray pumps developed head at the flow test point is greater than or equal to the required developed head when tested pursuant to the Inservice Testing Program.

Note 1: ACTION b is not applicable when the second containment spray system is intentionally made inoperable.

ARKANSAS - UNIT 2 3/4 6-10 Amendment No. 194,233,252,268, 301,

PLANT SYSTEMS 3/4.7.6 CONTROL ROOM EMERGENCY VENTILATION AND AIR CONDITIONING SYSTEM LIMITING CONDITION FOR OPERATION 3.7.6.1 Two independent control room emergency ventilation and air conditioning systems shall be OPERABLE. (Note 1)

APPLICABILITY: MODES 1, 2, 3, 4, or during handling of irradiated fuel.

ACTION:

MODES 1, 2, 3, and 4

a. With one control room emergency air conditioning system (CREACS) inoperable, restore the inoperable system to OPERABLE status within 30 days.

b. With one control room emergency ventilation system (CREVS) inoperable for reasons other than ACTION d, restore the inoperable system to OPERABLE status within 7 days.

c. With one CREVS inoperable for reasons other than ACTION d and one CREACS inoperable, restore the inoperable CREVS to OPERABLE status within 7 days and restore the inoperable CREACS to OPERABLE status within 30 days.

d. With one or more CREVS inoperable due to an inoperable CRE boundary:

1. Immediately initiate action to implement mitigating actions, and

2. Verify mitigating actions ensure CRE occupant exposures to radiological, chemical, and smoke hazards will not exceed limits within 24 hours2.777778e-4 days 0.00667 hours 3.968254e-5 weeks 9.132e-6 months , and

3. Restore the CRE boundary to OPERABLE status within 90 days

e. With two CREVS inoperable for reasons other than ACTION d (Note 2):