|
---|
Category:E-Mail
MONTHYEARML22235A7862022-08-23023 August 2022 Acceptance Review: Exemption Request from 10 CFR 20, Appendix G, LLW Shipping Investigation Requirements ML21181A1882021-06-30030 June 2021 E-mail from S. Johnston, Holtec, to A. Snyder and F. Bower, NRC - Oyster Creek Nuclear Generating Station - Readiness Status for ISFSI Only Inspection ML21175A2092021-06-24024 June 2021 E-mail from A. Sterdis to P. Longmire - Oyster Creek Nuclear Generating Station: ISFSI-only Physical Security Plan (Stating Implementation Intent) ML21162A3602021-06-11011 June 2021 E-mail Response from the State of New Jersey Regarding the Pending Revision to the Emergency Plan to Reflect Independent Spent Fuel Storage Installation Only Status ML21162A1172021-06-11011 June 2021 E-mail to HDI: Acceptance Review - FOF Exemption ML21168A0172021-06-10010 June 2021 E-mail from HDI: RAI Response ML21161A2572021-06-0707 June 2021 State Consultation: ISFSI-only Physical Security Plan (Email Response) ML21175A0712021-06-0202 June 2021 Issuance of Request for Additional Information: Oyster Creek Nuclear Generating Station. Request for Amendment to Technical Specifications ML21148A0562021-05-27027 May 2021 E-mail to State of New Jersey Informing of the Pending Revision to the Emergency Plan to Reflect Independent Spent Fuel Storage Installation Only Status ML21132A3182021-05-12012 May 2021 E-Mail from V. Gubbi, DEP to Z. Cruz, NRC - Oyster Creek Nuclear Generating Station - State of New Jersey Response to the Pending Revision to the Defueled Technical Specifications to Reflect Independent Spent Fuel Storage Installation Only ML21132A0312021-05-11011 May 2021 E-mail to State of New Jersey Informing of the Pending Revision to the Physical Security Plan to Reflect Independent Spent Fuel Storage Installation Only Status ML21119A1422021-04-28028 April 2021 E-mail to State of New Jersey Informing of the Pending Revision to the Emergency Plan to Reflect Independent Spent Fuel Storage Installation Only Status ML21113A0742021-04-23023 April 2021 Acceptance Review Email - April 20, 2021 Oyster Creek Request for Exemption from 10 CFR Part 73 Requirements Due to Covid ML21099A0382021-04-0808 April 2021 Email from Z. Cruz to A. Sterdis - Request for Additional Information - HDI Request for Approval of Oyster Creek Nuclear Generating Station Independent Spent Fuel Storage Installation Facility Only Emergency Plan ML21085A4872021-03-26026 March 2021 E-mail from Z. Cruz to A. Sterdis - Acceptance Review: Oyster Creek Nuclear Generating Station - Request for Approval of Independent Spent Fuel Storage Installation Only Permanently Defueled Technical Specifications ML21064A2432021-03-0505 March 2021 Email from Z. Cruz to A. Sterdis Acceptance Review_ Oyster Creek Nuclear Generating Station - Request for Approval of Independent Spent Fuel Storage Installation Facility Only Emergency Plan and Emergency Action Level Scheme ML21064A2392021-03-0202 March 2021 E-mail from Z. Cruz to A. Sterdis Acceptance Review - Oyster Creek Nuclear Generating Station - Request for Approval of Independent Spent Fuel Storage Installation Only Physical Security Plan ML20345A1462020-12-0909 December 2020 E-mail - Response to Request for Additional Information: HDI Request for One-Time Exemption from Part 73, Appendix B FOF Requirements ML20335A3112020-11-30030 November 2020 Request for Additional Information Regarding Request for a one-time Exemption from Part 73, Appendix B Requirements for Oyster Creek Nuclear Generating Station ML20332A1472020-11-24024 November 2020 Acceptance Review: November 20 2020 Exemption Request from 10 CFR Part 73 Appendix B Requirements for Oyster Creek ML20297A2372020-10-22022 October 2020 Request for Additional Information - HDI Fleet Decommissioning Quality Assurance Program ML20279A5082020-10-0505 October 2020 Email to Holtec - Response to Notification of Oyster Creek Onsite Property Insurance Coverage ML20266G4032020-09-22022 September 2020 Acceptance Review Email - Request for Approval of HDI Fleet Decommissioning Quality Assurance Program, Revision 0 ML20134H8742020-05-12012 May 2020 Request for Additional Information Regarding Request for Temporary Exemption from Part 73, Appendix B Requirements ML20133J9182020-05-11011 May 2020 Acceptance Review Email - Oyster Creek Request for Exemption from Part 73 Qualification Requirements ML20120A0252020-04-22022 April 2020 NRR E-mail Capture - (External_Sender) Oyster Creek Sea Turtle Handling and Conservation Recommendation Obligations NRC-2019-0073, Response from NEIMA Local Community Advisory Board Questionnaire 10-30-2019 R Discenza2019-10-30030 October 2019 Response from NEIMA Local Community Advisory Board Questionnaire 10-30-2019 R Discenza ML19344C8022019-10-20020 October 2019 Response from NEIMA Local Community Advisory Board Questionnaire 10-20-2019 a Dressler ML19344C8002019-10-0909 October 2019 Response from NEIMA Local Community Advisory Board Questionnaire 10-09-2019 W Mcmullin ML19344C7982019-10-0909 October 2019 Response from NEIMA Local Community Advisory Board Questionnaire 10-09-2019 M Noto ML19344C7992019-10-0909 October 2019 Response from NEIMA Local Community Advisory Board Questionnaire 10-09-2019 s Feldman ML19344C7932019-10-0909 October 2019 Response from NEIMA Local Community Advisory Board Questionnaire 10-09-2019 C Bischoff ML19344C7962019-10-0909 October 2019 Response from NEIMA Local Community Advisory Board Questionnaire 10-09-2019 G Adams ML19344C7912019-10-0808 October 2019 Response from NEIMA Local Community Advisory Board Questionnaire 10-08-2019 J Branciforte ML19344C7902019-10-0808 October 2019 Response from NEIMA Local Community Advisory Board Questionnaire 10-08-2019 Anonymous ML19344C7892019-10-0505 October 2019 Response from NEIMA Local Community Advisory Board Questionnaire 10-05-2019 P Dressler ML19263D1222019-09-20020 September 2019 for Your Action Request for Additional Information Hdi Oyster Creek PSDAR ML19214A0452019-08-0202 August 2019 NRC to NMFS, Revised Proposed Action for Oyster Creek Endangered Species Act Section 7 Consultation ML19182A3422019-07-0101 July 2019 Transaction ML19178A0702019-06-26026 June 2019 Email to State of New Jersey - Oyster Creek - Request Comments on Proposed Amendment to Remove Reference to the Oyster Creek Cyber Security Plan and Update License Condition 2.C.(4) in the Renewed Facility License ML19196A3422019-06-20020 June 2019 Email: Courtesy Notice on the Issuance of the Oyster Creek License Transfer and Exemption (Sierra Club) ML19196A3342019-06-20020 June 2019 Email: Courtesy Notice on the Issuance of the Oyster Creek License Transfer and Exemption ML19162A2242019-06-11011 June 2019 NRC to NMFS, NRC Responses to NMFS Requests for Additional Information for Oyster Creek ESA Section 7 Consultation NRC-2018-0237, Comment from Paul Dressler of the Concerned Citizens for Lacey Coalition, Regarding the Oyster Creek Nuclear Plant License Transfer Application2019-06-0707 June 2019 Comment from Paul Dressler of the Concerned Citizens for Lacey Coalition, Regarding the Oyster Creek Nuclear Plant License Transfer Application ML19155A1182019-06-0404 June 2019 Incoming E-mail from State of New Jersey on the Oyster Creek Exemption for Reduced Insurances and Use of Decommissioning Trust Fund for Spent Fuel Management and Site Restoration ML19155A1192019-06-0404 June 2019 State of New Jersey Comments - Oyster Creek Conforming Amendment Associated with the Oyster Creek Generating Station License Transfer Application ML19154A0582019-05-31031 May 2019 E-mail Response from State of New Jersey Dated May 31, 2019, Notification-and-Request-Oyster Creek License Transfer Application L-2018-LLM-0002 ML19158A2912019-05-30030 May 2019 NRR E-mail Capture - Oyster Creek ESA Consultation: Information Requests from NMFS ML19158A2772019-05-28028 May 2019 NRR E-mail Capture - Oyster Creek ESA Consultation: Information Requests from NMFS ML19148A4392019-05-24024 May 2019 NMFS to NRC, Requests for Additional Information to Support Oyster Creek Reinitiated Section 7 Consultation 2022-08-23
[Table view] |
Text
Elizabeth Keighley From: John Richmond Sent: Wednesday, October 29, 2008 9:04 PM To: Richard Conte
Subject:
RE: OC LRI Daily Update 29 Sensitivity:
Confidential If I was successful with Outlook, then I've sent this message as CONFIDENTIAL When Michael said he "observed implementation of thickness gauging" ... What he didn't say, is that we have not witnessed any UT data taking inside the drywell (at any location).
Today, NDE techs were suppose to do UTs at 19 locations on the lowest level in the drywell (sandbed elevation).
This is a critical location for UT measurements.
Dose rates at this elevation are apparently high (Michael says 140 mr/hr ...he got 11 mr in 10 or 15 minutes).
Michael did observe NDE techs cal check their equip prior to entry, and did observe the techs trying to do a UT, but they weren't able to actually take any UT readings.
Michael saw them find the correct location, mind the match marks, prepare (clean) the surface, but the template didn't line up to the match marks, because of interference with caulk (a moisture barrier seal put on the floor curb last outage, after the UT had been done). Michael say no need to go back in to watch any UT data taking at that elevation, he's seen enough.Michael may observe some actual UT data taking at a few other locations within the drywell." Tim O'Hara will continue to follow the UT and VT activities in the sandbed (drywell external) tomorrow.Because of the schedule slips, and other problems with the NDE jobs, Tim will not be able to cover any of the UT work inside the drywell. Thursday (tomorrow) is Tim's last day on-site with us.Michael says he's willing to work the weekend, but doesn't think there's any reason to. Michael believes that we've seen enough to verify that they're implemented their commitment.
So we're really done with this portion of the 71003 inspection.
On an administrative note: Michael can't get pai{ (b)(6) and says he also can't get Comp Time.So, expecting him to work may not be fair.I hope to be back on-site mid to late Thurs afternoon.
---Original Message -----From: Richard Conte Sent: Wednesday, October 29, 2008 7:23 PM To: Michael Modes; John Richmond; Darrell Roberts; Ronald Bellamy; David Lew Cc: Jeffrey Kulp; Stephen Pindale; Glenn Meyer; Marjorie McLaughlin; Justin Heinly; Timothy OHara
Subject:
RE: OC LRI Daily Update 29 what meaningful reports, nice job guys -in spite of schedule coordination problems, you guys are observing a lot.-----Original Message -----From: Michael Modes Sent: Wednesday, October 29, 2008 6:44 PM To: John Richmond; Richard Conte; Darrell Roberts; Ronald Bellamy; David Lew Cc: Jeffrey Kulp; Stephen Pindale; Glenn Meyer; Marjorie McLaughlin; Justin Heinly; Timothy OHara
Subject:
RE: OC LRI Daily Update 29 bF*.o'mn OIn V6 wdwas0 d~M&ooetlno witlh the Freedom of hlxM O 5 Exemp~~ons
- 5J{5-I'm filling in for John until his return on Friday.Inspection Progress~(b)(5)[ne NK(U inspectors continUe to have problems tametina relevant insoections because the outaoe ..hrd continues to be very fluid.L (b)(5)L"(b)(5) .7 Today's Inspection Activities
- 2) Tim O'Hara entered one former sand bed bay today and performed a visual inspection finding everything to be satisfactory.
The applicant performed a visual inspection of the same bay and took ultrasonic thickness readings (the result are not yet available).
- 2) Dave Lew, and resident staff, entered the same bay today. They-expressed the opinion that conditions seemed satisfactory.
3)*Michael Modes accompanied NDE personnel to 11'3" elevation (drywell opposite the former sand bed) and observed implementation of thickness gauging. The licensee did not factor in the caulking placed on the curb-to-drywell joint after the last outage and the NDE technicians were unable to align the metal template with the center line. -arks on the drywell. Michael observed one trench free of water while accompanying the NDE personneL., P.rir to issuing a work request to remove the caulk in the way of the template the licensee had to be reminded, by the NRC, that they committed to an as-found visual inspection of the caulk. We anticipate a further delay as their try to schedule the inspection prior to their remediatiort.
- 4) John Richmond accompanied the technicians performing a structural insp§0etion of the inside of the circ water intake tunnel. John indicated the tunnel condition was good and he did not observe any exceptional conditions such as exposed rebar or flaking.5) Glenn Meyer, prior to his departure, observed the excavation of buried ESW pipe, noting that the pipe wrap was in good condition, and the pipe internal wall of a removed section had adequate remaining wall with no evidence of perforation, or excessive corrosion.
- 6) John Richmond independently verified the absence of water in the sand bed drain collection bottles after flood-up and observed an OC operator verifying the same.LR Commitment Issues or Concerns None.Drywell Structural Integrity Issues or Concerns None.NJ State Interface Congenial Team Location:
OCAB 2nd Floor, Visiting Exec Office, 609-9714830 2
Received:
from R1CLSTR01.nrc.gov
([148.184.99.7])
by R1MS01.nrc.gov
([148.184.99.10])
with mapi; Wed, 29 Oct 2008 21:04:20 -0400 Content-Type:
application/ms-tnef; name="winmail .dat" Content-Transfer-Encoding:
binary From: John Richmond <John.Richmond@nrc.gov>
To: Richard Conte <Richard.Conte@nrc.gov>
Sensitivity:
company-confidential Date: Wed, 29 Oct 2008 21:04:19 -0400
Subject:
RE: OC LRI Daily Update 29 Thread-Topic:
OC LRI Daily Update 29 Thread-Index:
AQHJOhfGDRyPaDWKwUS/WMdjsWJ08o7hxhhwgAAUfZA=
Message-ID:
<2856BC46F6A308418F033D973BBOEE72AA43632898@R1CLSTRO1 .nrc.gov>
References:
<2856BC46F6A308418F033D973BBOEE72AA43460274@R1CLSTRO1.nrc.gov>
<2856BC46F6A308418F033D973BBOEE72AA437498A9@R1 CLSTR01 .nrc.gov>In-Reply-To:
<2856BC46F6A308418F033D973BBOEE72AA437498A9@R1 CLSTRO1 .nrc.gov>Accept-Language:
en-US Content-Language:
en-US X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-Exchange-Organization-SCL:
-1 X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
<2856BC46F6A308418F033D973BB0EE72AA43632898@R1 CLSTR01 .nrc.gov>MIME-Version:
1.0 I Received:
from R1CLSTR01 .nrc.gov ([148.184.99.7])
by R1IMS01 .nrc.gov ([148.184.99.10])
with mapi; Wed, 29 Oct 2008 21:04:20 -0400 Content-Type:
application/ms-tnef; name="winmail.dat" Content-Transfer-Encoding:
binary From: John Richmond <John. Richmond@nrc.gov>
To: Richard Conte <Richard.Conte@nrc.gov>
Sensitivity:
company-confidential Date: Wed, 29 Oct 2008 21:04:19 -0400
Subject:
RE: OC LRI Daily Update 29 Thread-Topic:
OC LRI Daily Update 29 Thread-Index:
AQHJOhfG DRyPaDWKwUSIWMdjsWJ08o7hxhhwgAAUfZA=
Message-ID:
<2856BC46F6A308418F033D973BBOEE72AA43632898@R1 CLSTR01 .nrc.gov>
References:
<2856BC46F6A308418F033D973BBOEE72AA43460274@R1 CLSTR01. nrc.gov><2856BC46F6A308418F033D973BBOEE72AA437498A9@R1 CLSTR01 .nrc.gov>In-Reply-To:
<2856BC46F6A308418F033D973BBOEE72AA437498A9@R1 CLSTR01 .nrc.gov>Accept-Language:
en-US Content-Language:
en-US X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-Exchange-Organization-SCL:
-1 X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
<2856BC46F6A308418F033D973BBOEE72AA43632898@RICLSTRO1.nrc.gov>
MIME-Version:
1.0