ML12174A104

E-mail from C. Miller, Region I to R. Conte, Region I, Et Al; Subject: for Your Review - Revised Public Meeting Notice - Seabrook ASR - January 19, 2012

ML12174A104
Person / Time
Site:	Seabrook
Issue date:	12/06/2011
From:	Christopher Miller Division of Reactor Safety I
To:	Burritt A L, Conte R J, Lamb J G Plant Licensing Branch 1, Reactor Projects Branch 3, Engineering Region 1 Branch 1
References
FOIA/PA-2012-0119
Download: ML12174A104 (2)

Text

Chernoff, Harold From: Miller, Chris Sent: Tuesday, Dedembrer 06, 2011 6:15 PM To: Conte, Richard; Lamb, John; Burritt, Arthur Cc: Roberts, Darrell; Chernoff, Harold; Miller, Ed

Subject:

RE: For Your Review -Revised Public Meeting Notice -Seabrook ASR -January 19, 2012 r A) 4na 'f w ed tii:, a-t the DD involved after that, let us knv' (b)(5)* (b)(5)From: Conte, Richard \(L. \Sent: Tuesday, December 06, 2011 11:51 Am To: Lamb, John; Burritt, Arthur Cc: Miller, Chris; Roberts, Darrell; Chernoff, Harold; Miller, Ed Subject; RE: For Your Review -Revised Public Meeting Notice -Seabrook ASR -January 19, 2012 (b)(5) We should talk face to face at least at the branch level. .Perhaps with need a branch level meeting soon.From: Lamb, John \{( .' .Sent: Tuesday, December 06, 2011 11:48 AM To: Burritt, Arthur Cc: Conte, Richard; Miller, Chris; Roberts, Darrell; Chernoff, Harold; Miller, Ed

Subject:

RE: For Your Review -Revised Public Meeting Notice -Seabrook ASR -January 19, 2012 Art, Your points are well taken and sound very reasonable to me. I totally agree about the operability being top priority.I will look at a Headquarters conference room for the week of February 13 -17, 2012, and place a hold on it, if a public meeting is needed.Thanks.John From: Burritt, Arthur\.L\

Sent: Tuesday, Decenribýrl0, 2011 11:32 AM To: Lamb, John Cc: Conte, Richard; Miller, Chris; Roberts, Darrell

Subject:

RE: For Your Review -Revised Public Meeting Notice -Seabrook ASR -January 19, 2012'1 (b)(5) I will work with Rich Conte to come up with key milestones toc resolve the Part 50 portion of the concrete issue at Seabrook.Here are my proposed next steps with Region I in the lead with support from NRR, DLR: Interim Operablity Information In this record w*9 deleted, 1 in .', ,;,ih thejreedom of hifamrtion 7 Act, exemptions

.-FOIA- /22,- 0Q11

" NRR complete the TIA response (12/31/11)" Region I apply the TIA results to the existing open operability determinations to identify inadequacies or gaps in information (1/20/12)* If no gaps or inadequacies are identified conduct a public meeting. (2/12)* If inadequacies or gaps are identified evaluate for additional regulatory action, 50.54f letter, CAL or a reactive inspection (initiate actions by 1/31/12),* As part of or following additional regulatory action conduct a public meeting Long term Operability (current license period)* Region I apply the TIA results to the licensee's comprehensive plan including testing to ensure operability through the end of the current licensing period (12/31/11.

• If inadequacies or gaps are identified address the problems within the inspection program commensurate with the period established above for interim operability.

All information from the above should be provided to DLR for consideration and assessment of the aging management program in parallel but subordinate to reviewing operability within the current licensing period. I will give you a call in the next few days to solicit your thoughts.From: Lamb, John ý0ý-Sent: Monday, Dec mer 05, 2011 12:36 PM To: Burritt, Arthur; Conte, Richard; Chernoff, Harold; Manoly, Kamal; Murphy, Martin; Thomas, George; Sheikh, Abdul;Miller, Ed Cc: Baxter, Angela

Subject:

For Your Review -Revised Public Meeting Notice -Seabrook ASR -January 19, 2012 Importance:

High Gentlemen:

I found an error on the previous meeting notice agenda and fixed it. Please provide your comments on or before Monday, December 12, 2011.Thanks.John 2