ML18023A141

From kanterella
Revision as of 04:21, 6 July 2018 by StriderTol (talk | contribs) (Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Comment (27) of Sherine Smith on Standard Review Plan for Spent Fuel Dry Storage Systems and Facilities
ML18023A141
Person / Time
Site: San Onofre  Southern California Edison icon.png
Issue date: 01/02/2018
From: Shawn Smith
- No Known Affiliation
To:
Rules, Announcements, and Directives Branch
References
82FR52944 00027, NRC-2017-0211
Download: ML18023A141 (1)


Text

As of: 1/8/18 4:25 PM Received:

January 02, 2018 Status: Pending_Post Page 1 of 1 PUBLIC SUBMISSION Tracking No. lk2-90pd-b5fn Comments Due: January 02, 2018 Submission Type: Web Docket: NRC-2017-0211 Standard Review Plan for Spent Fuel Dry Storage Systems and Facilities Comment On: NRC-2017-0211-0001 Standard Review Plan for Spent Fuel Dry Storage Systems and Facilities; Request for Comment on Draft NUREG Document:

NRC-2017-0211-DRAFT-0028 Comment on FR Doc# 2017-24734 Submitter Information Name: Sherine Smith Address: 1 1/1~ /z_p/7 &?' Fi< S Z 1 '-I l/-20 Via Santa Maria San Clemente, CA, 92672 General Comment I am just sick about the decision you have made* to allow for temporary, thin, dangerous, and inadequate storage containers for the San Onofre nuclear waste. You do realize we are in California, and in an earthquake zone? Several schools are located in the radiation zone if there were to be an accident.

Why haven't you moved the waste to a stable geographic area? This verges on insane. SUNSI Review Complete Template = ADM -013 E-RIDS= ADM-03 . Add= I.e_rLMA.f S,wi,-f'h G*r,gc;) --. https://www.fdms.gov/fdms/

getcontent?objectld=0900006482d8fb 12&format=xml&showorig=false

' 01/08/2018