ML15005A161
| ML15005A161 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | San Onofre  |
| Issue date: | 12/19/2014 |
| From: | Nouri H, Rollinger V, Strombotne C - No Known Affiliation |
| To: | Bladey C K Division of Administrative Services |
| References | |
| 79FR61668, NRC-2014-0223 | |
| Download: ML15005A161 (23) | |
Text
RULEr; D RL-,' C7VF ... ,' U -" TI,-,-U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Attn: Cindy BladeyOffice of Administration, NRC ?OII U-C29 P,1 1:29Mail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44M Washington, DC 20555-0001
Dear Commissioners,
Zi -i\/_As a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject topermanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre NuclearGenerating Station (SONGS),
I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan forthe plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years orindefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.
It's my understanding that:(1) The spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactive for tens ofthousands of generations and(2) The plant was closed due to faulty steam generator replacements and had a historyof safety complaints from its employees and contractors.
(3) The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in arecognized
- tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable toclimate change and terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean.(4) If there were a radiation accident there, we here in Laguna might escape with ourlives, but we would never be able to come back to the homes we love.The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed fromSan Onofre, and it's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.
I urge you(1) To work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense to create asecure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparsely populated location-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be moved and safelystored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restoration activities; and(2) To hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and security at SONGS aslong as the spent fuel rods remain there.Sincerely, C O N ` "Y/n m i qo h -)eron-@jT~M cbm RULES 1-, -[}-fICTIVES U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Attn: Cindy BladeyOffice of Administration, NRC 0171 2l 9 PR i 29Mail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44M Washington, DC 20555-0001
Dear Commissioners,
RF .,R\/FDAs a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject topermanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre NuclearGenerating Station (SONGS),
I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan forthe plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years orindefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.
It's my understanding that:(1) The spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactive for tens ofthousands of generations and(2) The plant was closed due to faulty steam generator replacements and had a historyof safety complaints from its employees and contractors.
(3) The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in arecognized
- tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable toclimate change and terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean.(4) If there were a radiation accident there, we here in Laguna might escape with ourlives, but we would never be able to come back to the homes we love.The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed fromSan Onofre, and it's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.
I urge you(1) To work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense to create asecure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparsely populated location-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be moved and safelystored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restoration activities; and(2) To hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and security at SONGS aslong as the spent fuel rods remain there.Sincerely, RULES I,:L)ý RECTIVESU.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Attn: Cindy BladeyOffice of Administration, NRC C0JL r _' 29 PH1 4: 29Mail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44M Washington, DC 20555-0001
Dear Commissioners,
RFQ'IE,/FD As a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject topermanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre NuclearGenerating Station (SONGS),
I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan forthe plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years orindefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.
It's my understanding that:(1) The spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactive for tens ofthousands of generations and(2) The plant was closed due to faulty steam generator replacements and had a historyof safety complaints from its employees and contractors.
(3) The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in arecognized
- tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable toclimate change and terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean.(4) If there were a radiation accident there, we here in Laguna might escape with ourlives, but we would never be able to come back to the homes we love.The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed fromSan Onofre, and it's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.
I urge you(1) To work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense to create asecure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparsely populated location-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be moved and safelystored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restoration activities; and(2) To hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and security at SONGS aslong as the spent fuel rods remain there.S*c+ -eIy,,r~ / /03 -:,a0Ue1X4 Re/Aax),
RULS TI-VESU.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Attn: Cindy BladeyOffice of Administration, NRC 2011H C 2(2 P1 4: 29Mail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44M Washington, DC 20555-0001
Dear Commissioners,
-(' \ /I fl)As a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject topermanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre NuclearGenerating Station (SONGS),
I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan forthe plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years orindefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.
It's my understanding that:(1) The spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactive for tens ofthousands of generations and(2) The plant was closed due to faulty steam generator replacements and had a historyof safety complaints from its employees and contractors.
(3) The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in arecognized
- tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable toclimate change and terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean.(4) If there were a radiation accident there, we here in Laguna might escape with ourlives, but we would never be able to come back to the homes we love.The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed fromSan Onofre, and it's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.
I urge you(1) To work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense to create asecure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparsely populated location-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be moved and safelystored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restoration activities; and(2) To hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and security at SONGS aslong as the spent fuel rods remain there.Sincerely,6 3I o A V et,\;I" c M r ((, 14-9)1 t 50 3 RULES Al) LD;.RICTIVES U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Attn: Cindy BladeyOffice of Administration, NRC 2014 DEC 29 PM 41: 29Mail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44M Washington, DC 20555-0001
Dear Commissioners,
-F , F /\/F 17)As a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject topermanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre NuclearGenerating Station (SONGS),
I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan forthe plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years orindefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.
It's my understanding that:(1) The spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactive for tens ofthousands of generations and(2) The plant was closed due to faulty steam generator replacements and had a historyof safety complaints from its employees and contractors.
(3) The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in arecognized
- tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable toclimate change and terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean.(4) If there were a radiation accident there, we here in Laguna might escape with ourlives, but we would never be able to come back to the homes we love.The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed fromSan Onofre, and it's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.
I urge you(1) To work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense to create asecure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparsely populated location-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be moved and safelystored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restoration activities; and(2) To hold Southern Califomia Edison responsible for safety and security at SONGS aslong as the spent fuel rods remain there.Sincerely,
&,- rot o.Vg o. 6 __.
RULES r,1, 'Lý' L ECTiVES, ... ..U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Attn: Cindy BladeyOffice of Administration, NRC ZL"ON ,C. 29 Pi 14: 29Mail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44M Washington, DC 20555-0001
Dear Commissioners,
H\/EDAs a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject topermanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre NuclearGenerating Station (SONGS),
I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan forthe plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years orindefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.
It's my understanding that:(1) The spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactive for tens ofthousands of generations and(2) The plant was closed due to faulty steam generator replacements and had a historyof safety complaints from its employees and contractors.
(3) The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in arecognized
- tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable toclimate change and terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean.(4) If there were a radiation accident there, we here in Laguna might escape with ourlives, but we would never be able to come back to the homes we love.The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed fromSan Onofre, and it's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.
I urge you(1) To work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense to create asecure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparsely populated location-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be moved and safelystored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restoration activities; and(2) To hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and security at SONGS aslong as the spent fuel rods remain there.Sincerely, RULES) D1 11ECTIVES U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Attn: Cindy Bladey 2011 299Office of Administration, NRCMail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44M Washington, DC 20555-0001
Dear Commissioners,
RP -As a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject topermanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre NuclearGenerating Station (SONGS),
I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan forthe plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years orindefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.
It's my understanding that:(1) The spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactive for tens ofthousands of generations and(2) The plant was closed due to faulty steam generator replacements and had a historyof safety complaints from its employees and contractors.
(3) The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in arecognized
- tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable toclimate change and terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean.(4) If there were a radiation accident there, we here in Laguna might escape with ourlives, but we would never be able to come back to the homes we love.The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed fromSan Onofre, and it's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.
I urge you(1) To work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense to create asecure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparsely populated location-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be moved and safelystored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restoration activities; and(2) To hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and security at SONGS aslong as the spent fuel rods remain there.Sincerely, RULE) i "NL.CTIVES U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Attn: Cindy BladeyOffice of Administration, NRC 20 1L rp C 29 PM1 1: 29Mail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44M Washington, DC 20555-0001
Dear Commissioners,
L.As a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject topermanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre NuclearGenerating Station (SONGS),
I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan forthe plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years orindefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.
It's my understanding that:(1) The spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactive for tens ofthousands of generations and(2) The plant was closed due to faulty steam generator replacements and had a historyof safety complaints from its employees and contractors.
(3) The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in arecognized
- tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable toclimate change and terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean.(4) If there were a radiation accident there, we here in Laguna might escape with ourlives, but we would never be able to come back to the homes we love.The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed fromSan Onofre, and it's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.
I urge you(1) To work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense to create asecure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparsely populated location-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be moved and safelystored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restoration activities; and(2) To hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and security at SONGS aslong as the spent fuel rods remain there.Sincerlly, RULES AIHECTIVES U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Attn: Cindy BladeyOffice of Administration, NRC q0117 'C 29 PM H: 3_0Mail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44M Washington, DC 20555-0001
Dear Commissioners,
F -If/[-DAs a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject topermanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre NuclearGenerating Station (SONGS),
I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan forthe plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years orindefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.
It's my understanding that:(1) The spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactive for tens ofthousands of generations and(2) The plant was closed due to faulty steam generator replacements and had a historyof safety complaints from its employees and contractors.
(3) The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in arecognized
- tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable toclimate change and terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean.(4) If there were a radiation accident there, we here in Laguna might escape with ourlives, but we would never be able to come back to the homes we love.The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed fromSan Onofre, and it's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.
I urge you(1) To work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense to create asecure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparsely populated location-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be moved and safelystored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restoration activities; and(2) To hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and security at SONGS aslong as the spent fuel rods remain there.Sincerely, RULES,"L
-EU.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Attn: Cindy BladeyOffice of Administration, NRC 20141 LEC 29 PM 4:: 30Mail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44M Washington, DC 20555-0001
Dear Commissioners,
RFOr F- \L/F7DAs a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject topermanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre NuclearGenerating Station (SONGS),
I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan forthe plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years orindefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.
It's my understanding that:(1) The spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactive for tens ofthousands of generations and(2) The plant was closed due to faulty steam generator replacements and had a historyof safety complaints from its employees and contractors.
(3) The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in arecognized
- tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable toclimate change and terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean.(4) If there were a radiation accident there, we here in Laguna might escape with ourlives, but we would never be able to come back to the homes we love.The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed fromSan Onofre, and it's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.
I urge you(1) To work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense to create asecure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparsely populated location-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be moved and safelystored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restoration activities; and(2) To hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and security at SONGS aslong as the spent fuel rods remain there.Sincerely, rýU F' c::,'l4J U DIKCTIVES U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Attn: Cindy BladeyOffice of Administration, NRC 7o1m1 nV £ 29 PM 14: 30Mail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44M Washington, DC 20555-0001
Dear Commissioners,
FF- I"-\!FDAs a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject topermanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre NuclearGenerating Station (SONGS),
I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan forthe plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years orindefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.
It's my understanding that:(1) The spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactive for tens ofthousands of generations and(2) The plant was closed due to faulty steam generator replacements and had a historyof safety complaints from its employees and contractors.
(3) The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in arecognized
- tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable toclimate change and terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean.(4) If there were a radiation accident there, we here in Laguna might escape with ourlives, but we would never be able to come back to the homes we love.The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed fromSan Onofre, and it's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.
I urge you(1) To work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense to create asecure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparsely populated location-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be moved and safelystored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restoration activities; and(2) To hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and security at SONGS aslong as the spentfuel
-rods remain there.&2~3l 7- C RULES ;i ©IE L"TIVESU.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Attn: Cindy BladeyOffice of Administration, NRC 701q ?EE 29 PH 4: 30Mail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44M Washington, DC 20555-0001
Dear Commissioners,
RFOF-\/'D As a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject topermanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre NuclearGenerating Station (SONGS),
I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan forthe plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years orindefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.
It's my understanding that:(1) The spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactive for tens ofthousands of generations and(2) The plant was closed due to faulty steam generator replacements and had a historyof safety complaints from its employees and contractors.
(3) The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in arecognized
- tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable toclimate change and terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean.(4) If there were a radiation accident there, we here in Laguna might escape with ourlives, but we would never be able to come back to the homes we love.The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed fromSan Onofre, and it's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.
I urge you(1) To work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense to create asecure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparsely populated location-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be moved and safelystored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restoration activities; and(2) To hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and security at SONGS aslong as the spent fuel rods remain there.cwA_ ~ ~2L HULEES Il) RECTIVESU.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Attn: Cindy BladeyOffice of Administration, NRC 7fJ21 0EC 29 P 14: 30Mail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44M Washington, DC 20555-0001
Dear Commissioners,
RFQFU\I/FD As a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject topermanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre NuclearGenerating Station (SONGS),
I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan forthe plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years orindefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.
It's my understanding that:(1) The spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactive for tens ofthousands of generations and(2) The plant was closed due to faulty steam generator replacements and had a historyof safety complaints from its employees and contractors.
(3) The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in arecognized
- tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable toclimate change and terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean.(4) If there were a radiation accident there, we here in Laguna might escape with ourlives, but we would never be able to come back to the homes we love.The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed fromSan Onofre, and it's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.
I urge you(1) To work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense to create asecure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparsely populated location-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be moved and safelystored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restoration activities; and(2) To hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and security at SONGS aslong as the spent fuel rods remain there.Sincerely, RULES ET' IVESU.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Attn: Cindy BladeyOffice of Administration, NRC 2011 DEC 29 P1I1 L: 30Mail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44M Washington, DC 20555-0001
Dear Commissioners,
RF(- \/EDAs a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject topermanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre NuclearGenerating Station (SONGS),
I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan forthe plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years orindefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.
It's my understanding that:(1) The spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactive for tens ofthousands of generations and(2) The plant was closed due to faulty steam generator replacements and had a historyof safety complaints from its employees and contractors.
(3) The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in arecognized
- tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable toclimate change and terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean.(4) If there were a radiation accident there, we here in Laguna might escape with ourlives, but we would never be able to come back to the homes we love.The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed fromSan Onofre, and it's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.
I urge you(1) To work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense to create asecure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparsely populated location-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be moved and safelystored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restoration activities; and(2) To hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and security at SONGS aslong as the spent fuel rods remain there.Si ce elyS/7 e7c BULES ',,.TI IESU.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Attn: Cindy Bladey 0Office of Administration, NRC , 29 P11 30Mail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44M Washington, DC 20555-0001
Dear Commissioners,
RFfF'As a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject topermanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre NuclearGenerating Station (SONGS),
I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan forthe plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years orindefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.
It's my understanding that:(1) The spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactive for tens ofthousands of generations and(2) The plant was closed due to faulty steam generator replacements and had a historyof safety complaints from its employees and contractors.
(3) The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in arecognized
- tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable toclimate change and terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean.(4) If there were a radiation accident there, we here in Laguna might escape with ourlives, but we would never be able to come back to the homes we love.The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed fromSan Onofre, and it's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.
I urge you(1) To work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense to create asecure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparsely populated location-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be moved and safelystored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restoration activities; and(2) To hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and security at SONGS aslong as the spent fuel rods remain there.Sincerely, 1A A ( cI ,CA RULESU.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Attn: Cindy BladeyOffice of Administration, NRC 201q KC 2 9 PR q: 3oMail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44M Washington, DC 20555-0001
Dear Commissioners,
RPV --.... -I\.,/i--As a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject topermanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre NuclearGenerating Station (SONGS),
I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan forthe plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years orindefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.
It's my understanding that:(1) The spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactive for tens ofthousands of generations and(2) The plant was closed due to faulty steam generator replacements and had a historyof safety complaints from its employees and contractors.
(3) The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in arecognized
- tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable toclimate change and terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean.(4) If there were a radiation accident there, we here in Laguna might escape with ourlives, but we would never be able to come back to the homes we love.The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed fromSan Onofre, and it's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.
I urge you(1) To work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense to create asecure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparsely populated location-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be moved and safelystored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restoration activities; and(2) To hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and security at SONGS aslong as the spent fuel rods remain there.
HULES fid ECItVESU.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Attn: Cindy Bladey 201q r,5 219 Pm 4: 30Office of Administration, NRCMail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44M Washington, DC 20555-0001
Dear Commissioners,
R F r.'-- 1\1/ DAs a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject topermanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre NuclearGenerating Station (SONGS),
I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan forthe plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years orindefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.
It's my understanding that:(1) The spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactive for tens ofthousands of generations and(2) The plant was closed due to faulty steam generator replacements and had a historyof safety complaints from its employees and contractors.
(3) The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in arecognized
- tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable toclimate change and terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean.(4) If there were a radiation accident there, we here in Laguna might escape with ourlives, but we would never be able to come back to the homes we love.The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed fromSan Onofre, and it's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.
I urge you(1) To work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense to create asecure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparsely populated location-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be moved and safelystored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restoration activities; and(2) To hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and security at SONGS aslong as the spent fuel rods remain there.Sincerely, D1 ~C LoS A1105 Af4.)021M f5 5 oR\ V 1-eS0 CA ) .:i )(,c,,1 RULES i rF 'EU.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission 0 OFT 29 PH 4 30Attn: Cindy BladeyOffice of Administration, NRCMail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44M Washington, DC 20555-0001 R F
Dear Commissioners,
As a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject topermanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre NuclearGenerating Station (SONGS),
I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan forthe plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years orindefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.
It's my understanding that:(1) The spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactive for tens ofthousands of generations and(2) The plant was closed due to faulty steam generator replacements and had a historyof safety complaints from its employees and contractors.
(3) The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in arecognized
- tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable toclimate change and terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean.(4) If there were a radiation accident there, we here in Laguna might escape with ourlives, but we would never be able to come back to the homes we love.The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed fromSan Onofre, and it's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.
I urge you(1) To work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense to create asecure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparsely populated location-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be moved and safelystored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restoration activities; and(2) To hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and security at SONGS aslong as the spent fuel rods remain there.S in c e r e ly , _b Vý c, t , "l , ) "
RULE, ", l IESU.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Attn: Cindy BladeyOffice of Administration, NRC ?LI 99 PHA LI: 30Mail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44M Washington, DC 20555-0001
Dear Commissioners,
FI- !/-DAs a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject topermanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre NuclearGenerating Station (SONGS),
I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan forthe plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years orindefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.
It's my understanding that:(1) The spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactive for tens ofthousands of generations and(2) The plant was closed due to faulty steam generator replacements and had a historyof safety complaints from its employees and contractors.
(3) The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in arecognized
- tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable toclimate change and terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean.(4) If there were a radiation accident there, we here in Laguna might escape with ourlives, but we would never be able to come back to the homes we love.The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed fromSan Onofre, and it's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.
I urge you(1) To work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense to create asecure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparsely populated location-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be moved and safelystored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restoration activities; and(2) To hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and security at SONGS aslong a-s the spent fuel rods remain there.Sincerely, I ýC0-A ~f FIU .L:C CTiV,-SPULLJ ",tL(2I CU.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Attn: Cindy BladeyOffice of Administration, NRC 201q DEC 29 4: 30Mail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44M Washington, DC 20555-0001
Dear Commissioners,
FQ' R!! DAs a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject topermanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre NuclearGenerating Station (SONGS),
I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan forthe plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years orindefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.
It's my understanding that:(1) The spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactive for tens ofthousands of generations and(2) The plant was closed due to faulty steam generator replacements and had a historyof safety complaints from its employees and contractors.
(3) The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in arecognized
- tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable toclimate change and terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean.(4) If there were a radiation accident there, we here in Laguna might escape with ourlives, but we would never be able to come back to the homes we love.The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed fromSan Onofre, and it's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.
I urge you(1) To work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense to create asecure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparsely populated location-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be moved and safelystored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restoration activities; and(2) To hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and security at SONGS aslong as the spent fuel rods remain there.Sincerely y,116'C,)f RULES, -, L ---,-U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Attn: Cindy Bladey 70LI n!,r 29 PINOffice of Administration, NRC ' U-C 2Mail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44M Washington, DC 20555-0001
Dear Commissioners,
R F_-.Q \/DAs a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject topermanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre NuclearGenerating Station (SONGS),
I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan forthe plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years orindefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.
It's my understanding that:(1) The spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactive for tens ofthousands of generations and(2) The plant was closed due to faulty steam generator replacements and had a historyof safety complaints from its employees and contractors.
(3) The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in arecognized
- tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable toclimate change and terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean.(4) If there were a radiation accident there, we here in Laguna might escape with ourlives, but we would never be able to come back to the homes we love.The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed fromSan Onofre, and it's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.
I urge you(1) To work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense to create asecure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparsely populated location-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be moved and safelystored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restoration activities; and(2) To hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and security at SONGS aslong as the spent fuel rods remain there.Sincerely, RULES .f>iZiflT1VE$
U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Attn: Cindy BladeyOffice of Administration, NRC 70111 fVC 29 PI t4: m oMail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44M Washington, DC 20555-0001
Dear Commissioners,
RF R CI- I\/"DAs a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject topermanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre NuclearGenerating Station (SONGS),
I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan forthe plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years orindefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.
It's my understanding that:(1) The spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactive for tens ofthousands of generations and(2) The plant was closed due to faulty steam generator replacements and had a historyof safety complaints from its employees and contractors.
(3) The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in arecognized
- tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable toclimate change and terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean.(4) If there were a radiation accident there, we here in Laguna might escape with ourlives, but we would never be able to come back to the homes we love.The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed fromSan Onofre, and it's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.
I urge you(1) To work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense to create asecure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparsely populated location-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be moved and safelystored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restoration activities; and(2) To hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and security at SONGS aslong as the spent fuel rods remain there.Sincerely, 0 _ _6 U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Attn: Cindy BladeyOffice of Administration, NRCMail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44M Washington, DC 20555-0001 RULES , , u FIVES291q DEC 29 P 4: 29
Dear Commissioners,
RFOFl\I/FD As a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject topermanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre NuclearGenerating Station (SONGS),
I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan forthe plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years orindefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.
It's my understanding that:(1) The spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactive for tens ofthousands of generations and(2) The plant was closed due to faulty steam generator replacements and had a historyof safety complaints from its employees and contractors.
(3) The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in arecognized
- tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable toclimate change and terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean.(4) If there were a radiation accident there, we here in Laguna might escape with ourlives, but we would never be able to come back to the homes we love.The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed fromSan Onofre, and it's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.
I urge you(1) To work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense to create asecure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparsely populated location-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be moved and safelystored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restoration activities; and(2) To hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and security at SONGS aslong as the spent fuel rods remain there.Sincerely,