Similar Documents at Byron |
|---|
Category:General FR Notice Comment Letter
MONTHYEARML23033A4602023-01-12012 January 2023
Comment (471) of Marguerite Winkel on Notice of Intent to Conduct Scoping Process and Prepare Environmental Impact Statement; Vistra Operations Company LLC; Comanche Peak Nuclear Power Plant, Units 1 and 2
ML15275A1572015-08-27027 August 2015
Comment (11) of Kenneth A. Westlake on Final Plant-Specific Supplement 54 to the Generic Environmental Impact Statement for the License Renewal of Byron Station, Units 1 and 2
ML15058A3882015-02-18018 February 2015
Comment (5) of Kay and Frederick Turk on License Renewal Application for Byron Station, Units 1 and 2
ML15061A1102015-02-13013 February 2015
Comment (9) of Nancy L. Ranekon Behalf of Exelon Generation, LLC on Draft Plant-Specific Supplement 54 to the Generic Environmental Impact Statement for the License Renewal of Byron Station, Units 1 and 2
ML15058A1972015-02-12012 February 2015
Comment (4) of Kenneth A. Westlake on Behalf of Us Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) on Draft Plant-Specific Supplement 54 to the Generic Environmental Impact Statement for the License Renewal of Byron Station, Units 1 and 2
ML15061A1092015-02-0303 February 2015
Comment (8) of Steven & Karen Herklotz on Behalf of Hoo Haven, Inc. on Draft Plant-Specific Supplement 54 to the Generic Environmental Impact Statement for the License Renewal of Byron Station, Units 1 and 2
ML15061A1082015-02-0202 February 2015
Comment (7) of Unknown Individual on Behalf of Nuclear Energy Information Service on the Possible Closure of Byron
ML15027A3352015-01-21021 January 2015
Comment (00002) of David Lochbaum on Behalf of Union of Concerned Scientists on License Renewal Application for Byron Station, Units 1 and 2
ML15016A1112015-01-0808 January 2015
Comment (1) by Cynthia Stacy, on Behalf of Peoria Tribe of Indians of Oklahoma Supporting Proposed License Renewal for Byron Station, Units 1 & 2
ML13277A3062013-09-27027 September 2013
Comment (2) of David Kraft on Behalf of Neis Re Supplement to Nrc'S Generic Environmental Impact Statement for License Renewal for the Byron Nuclear Power Station
ML13263A2212013-09-16016 September 2013
Comment (1) of Kim P. Gouker on Behalf of Ogle County, Illinois Supporting the License Renewal Application of the Byron Power Generating Station
ML13247A0102013-08-27027 August 2013
Comment (2) of Kim P. Gouker on Behalf of Ogle County, Illinois, Supporting License Renewal Application of the Byron Power Generating Station
ML1002716862010-01-13013 January 2010
Comment (4) of David P. Helker, on Behalf of Exelon Generation Company, on Draft Regulatory Guide DG-1199, Alternative Radiological Source Terms for Evaluating Design Basis Accidents at Nuclear Reactors.
ML0934410862009-11-25025 November 2009
Comment (3) of David P. Helker on Behalf of Exelon Generation Company, Draft Regulatory Guide DG-8039, Methods for Estimating Effective Dose Equivalent from External Exposure.
ML0929301482009-10-0101 October 2009
Comment (5) of David P. Helker on Behalf of Exelon Generation Company, LLC Opposing Draft Regulatory Guide DG-1222, Control of Preheat Temperature for Welding of Low-Alloy Steel.
ML0822000512008-07-0909 July 2008
Comment (2) of David P. Helker, on Behalf of Exelon and Amergen, Concerning Draft Regulatory Guide DG-1195, Availability of Electric Power Sources.
ML0808604892008-03-13013 March 2008
Comment (4) of David P. Helker on Behalf of Exelon Generation and Amergen Supporting Draft Regulatory Guide DG-5015, Training and Qualification of Security Personnel at Nuclear Power Reactor Facilities.
ML0531900672005-11-0808 November 2005
Comment (9) of Exelon Nuclear in Response to Questions Related to Specific Reactor Oversight Process (ROP) Program Areas
2023-01-12
[Table view] |
Text
"Hoo" Haven Inc.10823 Cleveland RoadP.O. Box 594Durand, Illinois 61024=0 (815) 629-2212A 501 (c) 3 Not for ProfitT9February3.
2015To Whom It May Concern,We would like to take a few minutes to comment on how the Exelon Nuclear Facility in Byron,Illinois is a testament of how a company is good for the community and how it helps in itsendeavor to be a good example and a good caregiver to the community and Mother Earth.Byron has shown how it helps the community and surrounding area with its willingness to giveback. They have been there to help with financial support for thle rehabilitation of any animaland migratory bird that has been hurt or injured.
They have helped with the rehabilitation andtransportation costs for wildlife and to make sure they have a safe place to be released back intothe wild.Foxelon is also been very good to the community in its willingness to go the extra mile to doeducation programs and outreach program to schools, community
- centers, etc. They show howExelon wants to be a good caregiver to Mother Earth and its neighbors.
They have asked"1100" Haven to help them with environmental programs in tile community and have helped usin our endeavor to present The Environment and how you can help give back. We teach and talkabout companies that show they care about the wildlife and how everyone can help theenvironment.
On another note, Exelon has shown that it has been very responsible in its care and upkeep oftheir facility in Byron. They are very good for the community and its surounding area.They provide needed jobs to many people. These include all the personal at the plant, thesecurity guards and of course, the tradesmen like the electricians,
- plumbers, pipefitters, weldersand all the other trades to keep the facilities in top condition.
They are very good about theirscheduled outages to keep everything in the best shape. They police themselves very well.Exelon is also good for the community in the revenue they provide for the government agenciesthat receive funding from their operation of the nuclear plant.SUNSI Review CompleteTemplate
= ADM -013E-RIDS= ADM-03Add=/.
-1100" Haven is a strong supporter of The Byron Facility.
It provides a clean source ofuninterrupted power to the local area and too many more commumnties throughout the State ofIllinois along with many other states around us. Their environmental tootprint is very lowimpact on the environment.
Thanking you for this opportunity to speak in their behalf. We strongly
- support, the ByronNuclear Facility to be around foka very long time.Steven an Kd-TL Hcr dkot/ wir,.'H0"- Haven. Inc.Steven aHaven Wildlife Rehabilitation and Education Center
