ML15005A160

From kanterella
Revision as of 05:52, 15 June 2018 by StriderTol (talk | contribs) (Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Southern California Edison Company, San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station, Units 2 and 3; Notice of Receipt; Availability; Public Meeting, and Request for Comment
ML15005A160
Person / Time
Site: San Onofre  Southern California Edison icon.png
Issue date: 12/18/2014
From: Conn R
- No Known Affiliation
To: Bladey C K
Division of Administrative Services
References
NRC-2014-0223
Download: ML15005A160 (1)


Text

RULES ' CELet Laguna Vote1960 Glenneyre St Laguna Beaf ,. CA 92651ZI 0C 2-9 P 15December 18, 2014U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission /Attn: Cindy BladeyOffice of Administration, NRCMail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44MWashington, DC 20555-0001

Dear Commissioners,

In response to the Nuclear Regulatory Commission's request for comment on Southern CaliforniaEdison's decommissioning plan for the San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station, in the last 20 dayswe have gathered the signatures of 487 people, mostly residents of Laguna Beach, on a letter askingthat the spent nuclear fuel on the site be moved to a secure location as soon as possible (seeattached letters). In addition we have collected 383 signatures on an online petition. You can viewthe petition at www.LetLagunaVote.comThe City of Laguna Beach, CA is located in the 20 mile dead zone of the San Onofre Nuclear Powerplant. The Laguna Beach City Council passed a Resolution last night to address the gravity of anycareless handling and storage of this deadly waste (see attached Resolution).Laguna Beach city leaders and residents are concerned that an exposed site on an ocean bluff nearan interstate highway, adjacent to the train tracks where there is the risk of an accident due toearthquakes, tsunamis, fire, and terrorism, is no place to store highly radioactive materials for anindefinite period of time. We urge you to do everything you can working the relevant agencies, tomake sure this nuclear waste is moved to a safe interim repository rather than remaining in placeuntil a permanent repository is identified.Sincerely,Rita ConnChairperson, Let Laguna Votewww.LetLagunaVote.comPh 949-497-5148 RULKO-f KKX i" %-WTIVESMU.S. Nuclear Regulatory CommissionAttn: Cindy BladeyOffice of Administration, NRCMail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44MWashington, DC 20555-0001

Dear Commissioners,

As a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject topermanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre NuclearGenerating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan forthe plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years orindefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.It's my understanding that the spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactivefor tens of thousands of generations and that the plant was closed due to faulty steamgenerator replacements and had a history of safety complaints from its employees andcontractors. The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in arecognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable to climate changeand terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean. If there were a radiationaccident there, we here in Laguna might escape with our lives, but we would never beable to come back to the homes we love.The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed, andit's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.I urge you (1) to work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense tocreate a secure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparselypopulated location-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be movedand safely stored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restorationactivities; and (2) to hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and securityat SONGS as long as the spent fuel rods remain there.Sincerely,Print NeSign UEmail address KU Lx.U.S. Nuclear Regulatory CommissionAttn: Cindy Bladey .':Office of Administration, NRC ___ KC 9- 5 5Mail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44MWashington, DC 20555-0001

Dear Commissioners,

RP- 7As a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject topermanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre NuclearGenerating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan forthe plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years orindefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.It's my understanding that the spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactivefor tens of thousands of generations and that the plant was closed due to faulty steamgenerator replacements and had a history of safety complaints from its employees andcontractors. The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in arecognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable to climate changeand terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean. If there were a radiationaccident there, we here in Laguna might escape with our lives, but we would never beable to come back to the homes we love.The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed, andit's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.I urge you (1) to work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense tocreate a secure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparselypopulated location-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be movedand safely stored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restorationactivities; and (2) to hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and securityat SONGS as long as the spent fuel rods remain there.Sincerely,Print NameEmailk ef t.)sEmail address U.S. Nuclear Regulatory CommissionAttn: Cindy Bladey znlt : 29 Pu ,.5Office of Administration, NRCMail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44MWashington, DC 20555-0001

Dear Commissioners,

RFr-f!, /,R0As a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject topermanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre NuclearGenerating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan forthe plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years orindefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.It's my understanding that the spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactivefor tens of thousands of generations and that the plant was closed due to faulty steamgenerator replacements and had a history of safety complaints from its employees andcontractors. The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in arecognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable to climate changeand terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean. If there were a radiationaccident there, we here in Laguna might escape with our lives, but we would never beable to come back to the homes we love.The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed, andit's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.I urge you (1) to work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense tocreate a secure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparselypopulated location-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be movedand safely stored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restorationactivities; and (2) to hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and securityat SONGS as long as the spent fuel rods remain there.Sincerely,PL.4- -]t, (5Print NameSignEmail address RULES Dr ; RyEC IVES2 14OT~ 2D 9 F~ M,4: 5 5U.S. Nuclear Regulatory CommissionAttn: Cindy BladeyOffice of Administration, NRCMail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44MWashington, DC 20555-0001

Dear Commissioners,

RFC rVPFDAs a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject topermanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre NuclearGenerating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan forthe plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years orindefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.It's my understanding that the spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactivefor tens of thousands of generations and that the plant was closed due to faulty steamgenerator replacements and had a history of safety complaints from its employees andcontractors. The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in arecognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable to climate changeand terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean. If there were a radiationaccident there, we here in Laguna might escape with our lives, but we would never beable to come back to the homes we love.The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed, andit's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.I urge you (1) to work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense tocreate a secure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparselypopulated location-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be movedand safely stored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restorationactivities; and (2) to hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and securityat SONGS as long as the spent fuel rods remain there.Sincerely,Print NameSignEmail addressCr4'~ch)I 01U4 RU LL-', A'* t1 L -iRLCIVES7Oq1A 2, R1, 155U.S. Nuclear Regulatory CommissionAttn: Cindy BladeyOffice of Administration, NRCMail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44MWashington, DC 20555-0001

Dear Commissioners,

R FC'\EAs a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject topermanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre NuclearGenerating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan forthe plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years orindefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.It's my understanding that the spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactivefor tens of thousands of generations and that the plant was closed due to faulty steamgenerator replacements and had a history of safety complaints from its employees andcontractors. The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in arecognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable to climate changeand terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean. If there were a radiationaccident there, we here in Laguna might escape with our lives, but we would never beable to come back to the homes we love.The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed, andit's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.I urge you (1) to work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense tocreate a secure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparselypopulated location-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be movedand safely stored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restorationactivities; and (2) to hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and securityat SONGS as long as the spent fuel rods remain there.Sincerely,Print NameSignEmail address RULES Nd\U I BIPANJCHU.S. Nuclear Regulatory CommissionAttn: Cindy BladeyOffice of Administration, NRC ?UI' n 5Mail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44MWashington, DC 20555-0001

Dear Commissioners,

RFCH\, FlVAs a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject topermanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre NuclearGenerating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan forthe plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years orindefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.It's my understanding that the spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactivefor tens of thousands of generations and that the plant was closed due to faulty steamgenerator replacements and had a history of safety complaints from its employees andcontractors. The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in arecognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable to climate changeand terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean. If there were a radiationaccident there, we here in Laguna might escape with our lives, but we would never beable to come back to the homes we love.The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed, andit's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.I urge you (1) to work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense tocreate a secure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparselypopulated location-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be movedand safely stored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restorationactivities; and (2) to hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and securityat SONGS as long as the spent fuel rods remain there.Sincerely,IA' J'd SPrint SignEmai address RU7 L LE 6`- i ,.,.! L,,7 SU.S. Nuclear Regulatory CommissionAttn: Cindy Bladey 701 29 Pt'l 4: 55Office of Administration, NRCMail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44MWashington, DC 20555-0001

Dear Commissioners,

R .VEDAs a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject topermanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre NuclearGenerating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan forthe plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years orindefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.It's my understanding that the spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactivefor tens of thousands of generations and that the plant was closed due to faulty steamgenerator replacements and had a history of safety complaints from its employees andcontractors. The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in arecognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable to climate changeand terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean. If there were a radiationaccident there, we here in Laguna might escape with our lives, but we would never beable to come back to the homes we love.The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed, andit's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.I urge you (1) to work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense tocreate a secure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparselypopulated location-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be movedand safely stored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restorationactivities; and (2) to hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and securityat SONGS as long as the spent fuel rods remain there.Sincerely,Print NameSignEmail address RULES !-o.. 1i.,ECTIVESU.S. Nuclear Regulatory CommissionAttn: Cindy BladeyOffice of Administration, NRC 7014 10Dr 29 Pil 41: 55Mail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44MWashington, DC 20555-0001

Dear Commissioners,

RF2F1\1-V\EDAs a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject topermanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre NuclearGenerating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan forthe plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years orindefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.It's my understanding that the spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactivefor tens of thousands of generations and that the plant was closed due to faulty steamgenerator replacements and had a history of safety complaints from its employees andcontractors. The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in arecognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable to climate changeand terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean. If there were a radiationaccident there, we here in Laguna might escape with our lives, but we would never beable to come back to the homes we love.The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed, andit's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.I urge you (1) to work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense tocreate a secure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparselypopulated location-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be movedand safely stored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restorationactivities; and (2) to hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and securityat SONGS as long as the spent fuel rods remain there.Sincerely,Print NameSignEmailaddress ,]

RULE5:.,.. liVESU.S. Nuclear Regulatory CommissionAttn: Cindy Bladey 00JJ flFC29 PI:l q:Office of Administration, NRCMail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44MWashington, DC 20555-0001

Dear Commissioners,

F 'As a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject topermanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre NuclearGenerating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan forthe plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years orindefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.It's my understanding that the spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactivefor tens of thousands of generations and that the plant was closed due to faulty steamgenerator replacements and had a history of safety complaints from its employees andcontractors. The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in arecognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable to climate changeand terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean. If there were a radiationaccident there, we here in Laguna might escape with our lives, but we would never beable to come back to the homes we love.The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed, andit's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.I urge you (1) to work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense tocreate a secure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparselypopulated location-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be movedand safely stored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restorationactivities; and (2) to hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and securityat SONGS as long as the spent fuel rods remain there.Sincerely,Print Narme--SignEmail address.

RULEL , C IVESU.S. Nuclear Regulatory CommissionAttn: Cindy BladeyOffice of Administration, NRC 20Ui1 Mail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44MWashington, DC 20555-0001

Dear Commissioners,

As a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject topermanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre NuclearGenerating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan forthe plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years orindefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.It's my understanding that the spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactivefor tens of thousands of generations and that the plant was closed due to faulty steamgenerator replacements and had a history of safety complaints from its employees andcontractors. The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in arecognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable to climate changeand terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean. If there were a radiationaccident there, we here in Laguna might escape with our lives, but we would never beable to come back to the homes we love.The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed, andit's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.I urge you (1) to work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense tocreate a secure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparselypopulated location-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be movedand safely stored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restorationactivities; and (2) to hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and securityat SONGS as long as the spent fuel rods remain there.Sincerely,Print Name-,Email address RULES ,A,. UElrUTIVESU.S. Nuclear Regulatory CommissionAttn: Cindy Bladey 2 0L! [1V0C 29 PH 4I: 55Office of Administration, NRCMail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44MWashington, DC 20555-0001

Dear Commissioners,

RF C R ", F D\ /! D-- / DAs a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject topermanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre NuclearGenerating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan forthe plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years orindefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.It's my understanding that the spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactivefor tens of thousands of generations and that the plant was closed due to faulty steamgenerator replacements and had a history of safety complaints from its employees andcontractors. The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in arecognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable to climate changeand terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean. If there were a radiationaccident there, we here in Laguna might escape with our lives, but we would never beable to come back to the homes we love.The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed, andit's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.I urge you (1) to work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense tocreate a secure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparselypopulated location-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be movedand safely stored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restorationactivities; and (2) to hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and securityat SONGS as long as the spent fuel rods remain there.Sincerely,Print Namea61ail ddU U.S. Nuclear Regulatory CommissionAttn: Cindy BladeyOffice of Administration, NRCMail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44MWashington, DC 20555-0001

Dear Commissioners,

R ULE 9 +CT iV E Sd 'n201 HC 2 9 Nr 5: 55RFCEI\/FDAs a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject topermanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre NuclearGenerating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan forthe plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years orindefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.It's my understanding that the spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactivefor tens of thousands of generations and that the plant was closed due to faulty steamgenerator replacements and had a history of safety complaints from its employees andcontractors. The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in arecognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable to climate changeand terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean. If there were a radiationaccident there, we here in Laguna might escape with our lives, but we would never beable to come back to the homes we love.The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed, andit's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.I urge you (1) to work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense tocreate a secure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparselypopulated location-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be movedand safely stored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restorationactivities; and (2) to hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and securityat SONGS as long as the spent fuel rods remain there.Sincerely,Print lamn_Sign/ .fEmail adff RULE ., -' 3h iESU.S. Nuclear Regulatory CommissionAttn: Cindy BladeyOffice of Administration, NRC f 9 ?Vi 14:5Mail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44MWashington, DC 20555-0001

Dear Commissioners,

R FI\/!EDAs a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject topermanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre NuclearGenerating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan forthe plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years orindefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.It's my understanding that the spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactivefor tens of thousands of generations and that the plant was closed due to faulty steamgenerator replacements and had a history of safety complaints from its employees andcontractors. The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in arecognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable to climate changeand terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean. If there were a radiationaccident there, we here in Laguna might escape with our lives, but we would never beable to come back to the homes we love.The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed, andit's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.I urge you (1) to work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense tocreate a secure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparselypopulated location-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be movedand safely stored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restorationactivities; and (2) to hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and securityat SONGS as long as the spent fuel rods remain there.Sincerely,Print NameSignEmail address RULES Ai C TIVESU.S. Nuclear Regulatory CommissionAttn: Cindy BladeyOffice of Administration, NRC 7014 EC 29 9 : 56Mail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44MWashington, DC 20555-0001

Dear Commissioners,

R F F !\ DAs a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject topermanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre NuclearGenerating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan forthe plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years orindefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.It's my understanding that the spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactivefor tens of thousands of generations and that the plant was closed due to faulty steamgenerator replacements and had a history of safety complaints from its employees andcontractors. The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in arecognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable to climate changeand terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean. If there were a radiationaccident there, we here in Laguna might escape with our lives, but we would never beable to come back to the homes we love.The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed, andit's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.I urge you (1) to work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense tocreate a secure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparselypopulated location-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be movedand safely stored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restorationactivities; and (2) to hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and securityat SONGS as long as the spent fuel rods remain there.Sincerely,Print NameSign.Email address RULES ,,!D b!FIICTiVESU.S. Nuclear Regulatory CommissionAttn: Cindy BladeyOffice of Administration, NRC "U1'4 GEC 22 t: 56Mail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44MWashington, DC 20555-0001

Dear Commissioners,

'QF( -\!KDAs a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject topermanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre NuclearGenerating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan forthe plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years orindefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.It's my understanding that the spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactivefor tens of thousands of generations and that the plant was closed due to faulty steamgenerator replacements and had a history of safety complaints from its employees andcontractors. The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in arecognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable to climate changeand terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean. If there were a radiationaccident there, we here in Laguna might escape with our lives, but we would never beable to come back to the homes we love.The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed, andit's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.I urge you (1) to work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense tocreate a secure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparselypopulated location-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be movedand safely stored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restorationactivities; and (2) to hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and securityat SONGS as long as the spent fuel rods remain there.Sincerely,Print NameEmaildEmail address -

RUL i-l- /-SU.S. Nuclear Regulatory CommissionAttn: Cindy BladeyOffice of Administration, NRCMail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44MWashington, DC 20555-0001

Dear Commissioners,

,As a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject topermanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre NuclearGenerating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan forthe plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years orindefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.It's my understanding that the spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactivefor tens of thousands of generations and that the plant was closed due to faulty steamgenerator replacements and had a history of safety complaints from its employees andcontractors. The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in arecognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable to climate changeand terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean. If there were a radiationaccident there, we here in Laguna might escape with our lives, but we would never beable to come back to the homes we love.The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed, andit's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.I urge you (1) to work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense tocreate a secure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparselypopulated location-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be movedand safely stored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restorationactivities; and (2) to hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and securityat SONGS as long as the spent fuel rods remain there.Sincerely,Print NameSignE iladdress RULES AIJ' ,CTIVESU.S. Nuclear Regulatory CommissionAttn: Cindy BladeyOffice of Administration, NRC NA 2° p[j LI: 56Mail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44MWashington, DC 20555-0001

Dear Commissioners,

R-7!\As a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject topermanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre NuclearGenerating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan forthe plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years orindefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.It's my understanding that the spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactivefor tens of thousands of generations and that the plant was closed due to faulty steamgenerator replacements and had a history of safety complaints from its employees andcontractors. The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in arecognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable to climate changeand terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean. If there were a radiationaccident there, we here in Laguna might escape with our lives, but we would never beable to come back to the homes we love.The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed, andit's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.I urge you (1) to work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense tocreate a secure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparselypopulated location-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be movedand safely stored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restorationactivities; and (2) to hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and securityat SONGS as long as the spent fuel rods remain there.Sincerely,Print eSi ldEmail address HU ; L I_ ESU.S. Nuclear Regulatory CommissionAttn: Cindy BladeyOffice of Administration, NRC 201 K C 2)? On' R: 56Mail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44MWashington, DC 20555-0001

Dear Commissioners,

As a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject topermanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre NuclearGenerating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan forthe plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years orindefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.It's my understanding that the spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactivefor tens of thousands of generations and that the plant was closed due to faulty steamgenerator replacements and had a history of safety complaints from its employees andcontractors. The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in arecognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable to climate changeand terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean. If there were a radiationaccident there, we here in Laguna might escape with our lives, but we would never beable to come back to the homes we love.The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed, andit's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.I urge you (1) to work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense tocreate a secure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparselypopulated location-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be movedand safely stored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restorationactivities; and (2) to hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and securityat SONGS as long as the spent fuel rods remain there.Sincerely,Print NamessSigFEmail address RULES F~UU~IVE~U.S. Nuclear Regulatory CommissionAttn: Cindy BladeyOffice of Administration, NRC d, PC 2 9 V 56Mail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44MWashington, DC 20555-0001

Dear Commissioners,

REOF,, F -,As a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject topermanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre NuclearGenerating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan forthe plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years orindefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.It's my understanding that the spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactivefor tens of thousands of generations and that the plant was closed due to faulty steamgenerator replacements and had a history of safety complaints from its employees andcontractors. The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in arecognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable to climate changeand terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean. If there were a radiationaccident there, we here in Laguna might escape with our lives, but we would never beable to come back to the homes we love.The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed, andit's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.I urge you (1) to work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense tocreate a secure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparselypopulated location-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be movedand safely stored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restorationactivities; and (2) to hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and securityat SONGS as long as the spent fuel rods remain there.Sincerely,Print 'meSi l I4AJ~qa6ixý?AAbi1/ (o AllEmail address RULES -' .. ., i ; F1!- , TIVES-'HU.S. Nuclear Regulatory CommissionAttn: Cindy BladeyOffice of Administration, NRC 7014 LDEC 29? P' " 56Mail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44MWashington, DC 20555-0001

Dear Commissioners,

RFC..I\/FAs a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject topermanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre NuclearGenerating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan forthe plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years orindefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.It's my understanding that the spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactivefor tens of thousands of generations and that the plant was closed due to faulty steamgenerator replacements and had a history of safety complaints from its employees andcontractors. The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in arecognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable to climate changeand terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean. If there were a radiationaccident there, we here in Laguna might escape with our lives, but we would never beable to come back to the homes we love.The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed, andit's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.I urge you (1) to work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense tocreate a secure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparselypopulated location-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be movedand safely stored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restoration.activities; and (2) to hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and securityat SONGS as long as the spent fuel rods remain there.Sincerely,Print NamSignEmail address RULE, C! L.U.S. Nuclear Regulatory CommissionAttn: Cindy BladeyOffice of Administration, NRC " 1LC2 , L: 56Mail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44MWashington, DC 20555-0001

Dear Commissioners,

FC:F\/FDAs a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject topermanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre NuclearGenerating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan forthe plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years orindefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.It's my understanding that the spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactivefor tens of thousands of generations and that the plant was closed due to faulty steamgenerator replacements and had a history of safety complaints from its employees andcontractors. The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in arecognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable to climate changeand terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean. If there were a radiationaccident there, we here in Laguna might escape with our lives, but we would never beable to come back to the homes we love.The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed, andit's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.I urge you (1) to work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense tocreate a secure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparselypopulated location-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be movedand safely stored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restorationactivities; and (2) to hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and securityat SONGS as long as the spent fuel rods remain there.Sincerely,/ffS p i n t, e ' /

RULES /\N"L); ?CTIVESU.S. Nuclear Regulatory CommissionAttn: Cindy BladeyOffice of Administration, NRC 4,114 DEC 2-9 P 5 6Mail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44MWashington, DC 20555-0001

Dear Commissioners,

Ra'CFI,/-DAs a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject topermanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre NuclearGenerating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan forthe plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years orindefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.It's my understanding that the spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactivefor tens of thousands of generations and that the plant was closed due to faulty steamgenerator replacements and had a history of safety complaints from its employees andcontractors. The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in arecognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable to climate changeand terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean. If there were a radiationaccident there, we here in Laguna might escape with our lives, but we would never beable to come back to the homes we love.The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed, andit's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.I urge you (1) to work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense tocreate a secure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparselypopulated location-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be movedand safely stored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restorationactivities; and (2) to hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and securityat SONGS as long as the spent fuel rods remain there.Sincerely,Print NameSignEmail address RULES /-)D-RIECTIVESU.S. Nuclear Regulatory CommissionAttn: Cindy BladeyOffice of Administration, NRC 9 0PI C F : 56Mail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44MWashington, DC 20555-0001

Dear Commissioners,

fj3 f- -'As a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject topermanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre NuclearGenerating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan forthe plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years orindefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.It's my understanding that the spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactivefor tens of thousands of generations and that the plant was closed due to faulty steamgenerator replacements and had a history of safety complaints from its employees andcontractors. The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in arecognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable to climate changeand terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean. If there were a radiationaccident there, we here in Laguna might escape with our lives, but we would never beable to come back to the homes we love.The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed, andit's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.I urge you (1) to work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense tocreate a secure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparselypopulated location-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be movedand safely stored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restorationactivities; and (2) to hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and securityat SONGS as long as the spent fuel rods remain there.Sincerely,Printý,m,/Sign AEmail address R U ,L , 1.1.0-nL , T 1t VEOU.S. Nuclear Regulatory CommissionAttn: Cindy BladeyOffice of Administration, NRC 2011 07- 292 9 4: 56Mail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44MWashington, DC 20555-0001

Dear Commissioners,

R--.i-\As a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject topermanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre NuclearGenerating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan forthe plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years orindefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.It's my understanding that the spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactivefor tens of thousands of generations and that the plant was closed due to faulty steamgenerator replacements and had a history of safety complaints from its employees andcontractors. The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in arecognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable to climate changeand terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean. If there were a radiationaccident there, we here in Laguna might escape with our lives, but we would never beable to come back to the homes we love.The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed, andit's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.I urge you (1) to work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense tocreate a secure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparselypopulated location-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be movedand safely stored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restorationactivities; and (2) to hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and securityat SONGS as long as the spent fuel rods remain there.Sincerely,Print NameSignEmail address RULES -7"CTE-U.S. Nuclear Regulatory CommissionAttn: Cindy BladeyOffice of Administration, NRC 701 DIT 229 Pil f: 56Mail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44MWashington, DC 20555-0001

Dear Commissioners,

RFCH\/W-RP- N-EDAs a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject topermanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre NuclearGenerating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan forthe plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years orindefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.It's my understanding that the spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactivefor tens of thousands of generations and that the plant was closed due to faulty steamgenerator replacements and had a history of safety complaints from its employees andcontractors. The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in arecognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable to climate changeand terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean. If there were a radiationaccident there, we here in Laguna might escape with our lives, but we would never beable to come back to the homes we love.The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed, andit's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.I urge you (1) to work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense tocreate a secure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparselypopulated location-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be movedand safely stored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restorationactivities; and (2) to hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and securityat SONGS as long as the spent fuel rods remain there.Sincerely,Pri t NameSignEmail address .

RULES RIECTIIESNOIU.S. Nuclear Regulatory CommissionAttn: Cindy BladeyOffice of Administration, NRC 2 9P.'R 14: 56Mail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44MWashington, DC 20555-0001

Dear Commissioners,

RF-__\, --As a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject topermanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre NuclearGenerating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan forthe plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years orindefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.It's my understanding that the spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactivefor tens of thousands of generations and that the plant was closed due to faulty steamgenerator replacements and had a history of safety complaints from its employees andcontractors. The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in arecognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable to climate changeand terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean. If there were a radiationaccident there, we here in Laguna might escape with our lives, but we would never beable to come back to the homes we love.The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed, andit's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.I urge you (1) to work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense tocreate a secure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparselypopulated location-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be movedand safely stored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restorationactivities; and (2) to hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and securityat SONGS as long as the spent fuel rods remain there.Sincerely,Print Name ISign d'Email address RUL/,; ;t U.S. Nuclear Regulatory CommissionAttn: Cindy Bladey .9 ."'l 56Office of Administration, NRC r 7 9 r 5Mail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44MWashington, DC 20555-0001

Dear Commissioners,

\F. 'F \/FDAs a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject topermanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre NuclearGenerating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan forthe plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years orindefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.It's my understanding that the spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactivefor tens of thousands of generations and that the plant was closed due to faulty steamgenerator replacements and had a history of safety complaints from its employees andcontractors. The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in arecognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable to 'climate changeand terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean. If there were a radiationaccident there, we here in Laguna might escape with our lives, but we would never beable to come back to the homes we love.The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed, andit's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.I urge you (1) to work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense tocreate a secure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparselypopulated location-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be movedand safely stored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restorationactivities; and (2) to hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and securityat SONGS as long as the spent fuel rods remain there.Sincerely,1"-. aa- 60rc-(:ý &NameStreet AddressCity 5 State RULES/,N LE DRECTIVESU.S. Nuclear Regulatory CommissionAttn: Cindy BladeyOffice of Administration, NRC C 29 Y f 1 L-: 56Mail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44MWashington, DC 20555-0001

Dear Commissioners,

R F F IVF-DAs a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject topermanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre NuclearGenerating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan forthe plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years orindefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.It's my understanding that the spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactivefor tens of thousands of generations and that the plant was closed due to faulty steamgenerator replacements and had a history of safety complaints from its employees andcontractors. The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in arecognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable to climate changeand terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean. If there were a radiationaccident there, we here in Laguna might escape with our lives, but we would never beable to come back to the homes we love.The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed, andit's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.I urge you (1) to work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense tocreate a secure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparselypopulated location-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be movedand safely stored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restorationactivities; and (2) to hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and securityat SONGS as long as the spent fuel rods remain there.Sincer ly,NameCiStreet Address RULES i 'ECTIVES*YANF-iU.S. Nuclear Regulatory CommissionAttn: Cindy BladeyOffice of Administration, NRC 'C 9 P' LI: 56Mail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44MWashington, DC 20555-0001

Dear Commissioners,

R1F2 IVF\FDAs a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject topermanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre NuclearGenerating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan forthe plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years orindefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.It's my understanding that the spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactivefor tens of thousands of generations and that the plant was closed due to faulty steamgenerator replacements and had a history of safety complaints from its employees andcontractors. The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in arecognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable to climate changeand terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean. If there were a radiationaccident there, we here in Laguna might escape with our lives, but we would never beable to come back to the homes we love.The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed, andit's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.I urge you (1) to work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense tocreate a secure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparselypopulated location-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be movedand safely stored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restorationactivities; and (2) to hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and securityat SONGS as long as the spent fuel rods remain there.Sincerely,Str dresCity State RULES ii,, Q)iKC-TIVESU.S. Nuclear Regulatory CommissionAttn: Cindy BladeyOffice of Administration, NRC Kit5Mail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44M 4: 56Washington, DC 20555-0001

Dear Commissioners,

R\ nAs a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject topermanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre NuclearGenerating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan forthe plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years orindefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.It's my understanding that the spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactivefor tens of thousands of generations and that the plant was closed due to faulty steamgenerator replacements and had a history of safety complaints from its employees andcontractors. The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in arecognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable to climate changeand terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean. If there were a radiationaccident there, we here in Laguna might escape with our lives, but we would never beable to come back to the homes we love.The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed, andit's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.I urge you (1) to work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense tocreate a secure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparselypopulated location-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be movedand safely stored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restorationactivities; and (2) to hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and securityat SONGS as long as the spent fuel rods remain there.Sincerely,NameStreet AddressCity State RULL E L, .L'U.S. Nuclear Regulatory CommissionAttn: Cindy Bladey 7:Office of Administration, NRC ..... 5 ' " 6Mail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44MWashington, DC 20555-0001

Dear Commissioners,

F, -,1 ,'!DAs a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject topermanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre NuclearGenerating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan forthe plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years orindefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.It's my understanding that the spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactivefor tens of thousands of generations and that the plant was closed due to faulty steamgenerator replacements and had a history of safety complaints from its employees andcontractors. The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in arecognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable to climate changeand terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean. If there were a radiationaccident there, we here in Laguna might escape with our lives, but we would never beable to come back to the homes we love.The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed, andit's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.I urge you (1) to work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense tocreate a secure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparselypopulated location-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be movedand safely stored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restorationactivities; and (2) to hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and securityat SONGS as long as the spent fuel rods remain there.Sir , Street Address rCity ctt4 RULES £;,3 L),RLlVESU.S. Nuclear Regulatory CommissionAttn: Cindy Bladey rlrc- 29 114 q4: 56Office of Administration, NRCMail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44MWashington, DC 20555-0001

Dear Commissioners,

rmF.. v\!--nAs a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject topermanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre NuclearGenerating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan forthe plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years orindefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.It's my understanding that the spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactivefor tens of thousands of generations and that the plant was closed due to faulty steamgenerator replacements and had a history of safety complaints from its employees andcontractors. The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in arecognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable to climate changeand terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean. If there were a radiationaccident there, we here in Laguna might escape with our lives, but we would never beable to come back to the homes we love.The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed, andit's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.I urge you (1) to work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense tocreate a secure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparselypopulated location-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be movedand safely stored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restorationactivities; and (2) to hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and securityat SONGS as long as the spent fuel rods remain there.Sincerely,Name 9Street AddressCity-'3 State RULES ) /,-ýJ DBECTIVESU.S. Nuclear Regulatory CommissionAttn: Cindy Bladey 201Q 5 C 29 PIN 14: 6Office of Administration, NRCMail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44MWashington, DC 20555-0001

Dear Commissioners,

R F-. IV.. .DAs a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject topermanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre NuclearGenerating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan forthe plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years orindefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.It's my understanding that the spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactivefor tens of thousands of generations and that the plant was closed due to faulty steamgenerator replacements and had a history of safety complaints from its employees andcontractors. The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in arecognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable to climate changeand terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean. If there were a radiationaccident there, we here in Laguna might escape with our lives, but we would never beable to come back to the homes we love.The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed, andit's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.I urge you (1) to work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense tocreate a secure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparselypopulated location-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be movedand safely stored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restorationactivities; and (2) to hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and securityat SONGS as long as the spent fuel rods remain there.Sincerely,Name UStreet Addres,5 RULES /,',;:J V mTjEU.S. Nuclear Regulatory CommissionAttn: Cindy Bladey T4,: 57Office of Administration, NRC 14 29 F 5Mail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44MWashington, DC 20555-0001

Dear Commissioners,

As a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject topermanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre NuclearGenerating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan forthe plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years orindefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.It's my understanding that the spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactivefor tens of thousands of generations and that the plant was closed due to faulty steamgenerator replacements and had a history of safety complaints from its employees andcontractors. The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in arecognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable to climate changeand terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean. If there were a radiationaccident there, we here in Laguna might escape with our lives, but we would never beable to come back to the homes we love.The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed, andit's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.I urge you (1) to work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense tocreate a secure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparselypopulated location-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be movedand safely stored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restorationactivities; and (2) to hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and securityat SONGS as long as the spent fuel rods remain there.Sincerely,NameStreet AddressCity 'State RULES ,-, -VESU.S. Nuclear Regulatory CommissionAttn: Cindy Bladey r 2 ; Li-57Office of Administration, NRCMail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44MWashington, DC 20555-0001

Dear Commissioners,

RN 2.. \/!=DAs a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject topermanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre NuclearGenerating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan forthe plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years orindefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.It's my understanding that the spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactivefor tens of thousands of generations and that the plant was closed due to faulty steamgenerator replacements and had a history of safety complaints from its employees andcontractors. The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in arecognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable to climate changeand terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean. If there were a radiationaccident there, we here in Laguna might escape with our lives, but we would never beable to come back to the homes we love.The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed, andit's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.I urge you (1) to work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense tocreate a secure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparselypopulated location-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be movedand safely stored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restorationactivities; and (2) to hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and securityat SONGS as long as the spent fuel rods remain there.Sincerely,NameStreet Address~4-Cw, 'kCCccý CACity SState RULE; i 1 K2OTLVESU.S. Nuclear Regulatory CommissionAttn: Cindy BladeyOffice of Administration, NRC 201'i 0Z1 29 FM V-: 57Mail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44MWashington, DC 20555-0001

Dear Commissioners,

RFO; t\!EDAs a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject topermanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre NuclearGenerating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan forthe plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years orindefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.It's my understanding that the spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactivefor tens of thousands of generations and that the plant was closed due to faulty steamgenerator replacements and had a history of safety complaints from its employees andcontractors. The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in arecognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable to climate changeand terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean. If there were a radiationaccident there, we here in Laguna might escape with our lives, but we would never beable to come back to the homes we love.The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed, andit's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.I urge you (1) to work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense tocreate a secure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparselypopulated location-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be movedand safely stored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restorationactivities; and (2) to hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and securityat SONGS as long as the spent fuel rods remain there.Sincerely,NameStreet AddressCit9-J State RULLP). bKH7CHVEU.S. Nuclear Regulatory CommissionAttn: Cindy Bladey 9. N 5 7Office of Administration, NRC Lu. L-: 5Mail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44MWashington, DC 20555-0001

Dear Commissioners,

RF- C-....As a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject topermanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre NuclearGenerating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan forthe plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years orindefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.It's my understanding that the spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactivefor tens of thousands of generations and that the plant was closed due to faulty steamgenerator replacements and had a history of safety complaints from its employees andcontractors. The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in arecognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable to climate changeand terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean. If there were a radiationaccident there, we here in Laguna might escape with our lives, but we would never beable to come back to the homes we love.The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed, andit's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.I urge you (1) to work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense tocreate a secure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparselypopulated location-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be movedand safely stored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restorationactivities; and (2) to hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and securityat SONGS as long as the spent fuel rods remain there.Sincerely,Name9( 2-- tALD6P 11VStreet AddressCity State RUL1 A.. L...I CTIVESU.S. Nuclear Regulatory CommissionAttn: Cindy BladeyOffice of Administration, NRC 7014 _ 29 PH LI: 57Mail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44MWashington, DC 20555-0001

Dear Commissioners,

RFO -\/EDAs a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject topermanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre NuclearGenerating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan forthe plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years orindefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.It's my understanding that the spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactivefor tens of thousands of generations and that the plant was closed due to faulty steamgenerator replacements and had a history of safety complaints from its employees andcontractors. The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in arecognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable to climate changeand terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean. If there were a radiationaccident there, we here in Laguna might escape with our lives, but we would never beable to come back to the homes we love.The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed, andit's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.I urge you (1) to work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense tocreate a secure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparselypopulated location-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be movedand safely stored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restorationactivities; and (2) to hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and securityat SONGS as long as the spent fuel rods remain there.Sincerely,Name 5lStreet Addr,-LdL~ v~f~tCityState RIJULES -. CTIVESU.S. Nuclear Regulatory CommissionAttn: Cindy BladeyOffice of Administration, NRC Z_01 F' 2 9 P. N .- 5 7Mail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44MWashington, DC 20555-0001

Dear Commissioners,

rF-,-!EDAs a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject topermanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre NuclearGenerating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan forthe plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years orindefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.It's my understanding that the spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactivefor tens of thousands of generations and that the plant was closed due to faulty steamgenerator replacements and had a history of safety complaints from its employees andcontractors. The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in arecognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable to climate changeand terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean. If there were a radiationaccident there, we here in Laguna might escape with our lives, but we would never beable to come back to the homes we love.The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed, andit's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.I urge you (1) to work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense tocreate a secure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparselypopulated location-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be movedand safely stored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restorationactivities; and (2) to hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and securityat SONGS as long as the spent fuel rods remain there.Sincerely,Name.ý K VýJ-ob' m nn v IStreet AddressCit VCity Statevk HU~lS ~+CTI E2014 FTýE 29 R1 V: 57U.S. Nuclear Regulatory CommissionAttn: Cindy BladeyOffice of Administration, NRCMail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44MWashington, DC 20555-0001

Dear Commissioners,

RF.2. F-\!FD©As a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject topermanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre NuclearGenerating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan forthe plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years orindefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.It's my understanding that the spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactivefor tens of thousands of generations and that the plant was closed due to faulty steamgenerator replacements and had a history of safety complaints from its employees andcontractors. The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in arecognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable to climate changeand terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean. If there were a radiationaccident there, we here in Laguna might escape with our lives, but we would never beable to come back to the homes we love.The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed, andit's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.I urge you (1) to work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense tocreate a secure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparselypopulated location-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be movedand safely stored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restorationactivities; and (2) to hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and securityat SONGS as lonWas the spent fuel rods remain there.Street AddressCityCSA- te 124e5State RULS K) L) ýECTIVESU.S. Nuclear Regulatory CommissionAttn: Cindy BladeyOffice of Administration, NRC 20111 OFT, 29 P1 4I: 57Mail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44MWashington, DC 20555-0001

Dear Commissioners,

R [ F\/.DAs a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject topermanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre NuclearGenerating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan forthe plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years orindefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.It's my understanding that the spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactivefor tens of thousands of generations and that the plant was closed due to faulty steamgenerator replacements and had a history of safety complaints from its employees andcontractors. The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in arecognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable to climate changeand terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean. If there were a radiationaccident there, we here in Laguna might escape with our lives, but we would never beable to come back to the homes we love.The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed, andit's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.I urge you (1) to work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense tocreate a secure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparselypopulated location-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be movedand safely stored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restorationactivities; and (2) to hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and securityat SONGS as long as the spent fuel rods remain there.Sincerely,A Y- -NameStreet Addresscity 1ý'State RULES , TIV.,U.S. Nuclear Regulatory CommissionAttn: Cindy Bladey 2 V 9 el q: 5 7Office of Administration, NRCMail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44MWashington, DC 20555-0001

Dear Commissioners,

RF-i'i\!EDAs a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject topermanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre NuclearGenerating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan forthe plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years orindefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.It's my understanding that the spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactivefor tens of thousands of generations and that the plant was closed due to faulty steamgenerator replacements and had a history of safety complaints from its employees andcontractors. The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in arecognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable to climate changeand terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean. If there were a radiationaccident there, we here in Laguna might escape with our lives, but we would never beable to come back to the homes we love.The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed, andit's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.I urge you (1) to work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense tocreate a secure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparselypopulated location-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be movedand safely stored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restorationactivities; and (2) to hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and securityat SONGS as long as the spent fuel rods remain there.Sincerely,Street AddressStv 91Q30 CA qZto1City State RULES 011 ,,ECTIVESU.S. Nuclear Regulatory CommissionAttn: Cindy BladeyOffice of Administration, NRC 20tl11 [EC 29 RI : 57Mail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44MWashington, DC 20555-0001

Dear Commissioners,

F F(7,..\.. ..As a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject topermanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre NuclearGenerating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan forthe plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years orindefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.It's my understanding that the spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactivefor tens of thousands of generations and that the plant was closed due to faulty steamgenerator replacements and had a history of safety complaints from its employees andcontractors. The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in arecognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable to climate changeand terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean. If there were a radiationaccident there, we here in Laguna might escape with our lives, but we would never beable to come back to the homes we love.The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed, andit's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.I urge you (1) to work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense tocreate a secure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparselypopulated location-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be movedand safely stored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restorationactivities; and (2) to hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and securityat SONGS as long as the spent fuel rods remain there.Sincerely,NameIZ (ý o C- lkvStreet Address5 '-) & 1~CityState RULES i u.L R U L E , v. s.U.S. Nuclear Regulatory CommissionAttn: Cindy Bladey 70LI.V 9 pj L: S7Office of Administration, NRCMail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44MWashington, DC 20555-0001

Dear Commissioners,

IAs a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject topermanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre NuclearGenerating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan forthe plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years orindefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.It's my understanding that the spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactivefor tens of thousands of generations and that the plant was closed due to faulty steamgenerator replacements and had a history of safety complaints from its employees andcontractors. The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in arecognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable to climate changeand terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean. If there were a radiationaccident there, we here in Laguna might escape with our lives, but we would never beable to come back to the homes we love.The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed, andit's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.I urge you (1) to work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense tocreate a secure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparselypopulated location-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be movedand safely stored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restorationactivities; and (2) to hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and securityat SONGS as long as the spent fuel rods remain there.Sincerely,NameL 71D C I coStreet AddressCity State 61--ýCityState RULES .. T.- /U.S. Nuclear Regulatory CommissionAttn: Cindy Bladey 219 Nil L1 57Office of Administration, NRCMail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44MWashington, DC 20555-0001

Dear Commissioners,

RiF--, /EDAs a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject topermanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre NuclearGenerating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan forthe plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years orindefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.It's my understanding that the spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactivefor tens of thousands of generations and that the plant was closed due to faulty steamgenerator replacements and had a history of safety complaints from its employees andcontractors. The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in arecognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable to climate changeand terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean. If there were a radiationaccident there, we here in Laguna might escape with our lives, but we would never beable to come back to the homes we love.The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed, andit's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.I urge you (1) to work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense tocreate a secure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparselypopulated location-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be movedand safely stored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restorationactivities; and (2) to hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and securityat SONGS as long as the spent fuel rods remain there.S eeCityState HUIL; i( SlvE2014 OrC90Pl~ 57U.S. Nuclear Regulatory CommissionAttn: Cindy BladeyOffice of Administration, NRCMail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44MWashington, DC 20555-0001

Dear Commissioners,

RFC~F~1N ITAs a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject topermanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre NuclearGenerating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan forthe plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years orindefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.It's my understanding that the spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactivefor tens of thousands of generations and that the plant was closed due to faulty steamgenerator replacements and had a history of safety complaints from its employees andcontractors. The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in arecognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable to climate changeand terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean. If there were a radiationaccident there, we here in Laguna might escape with our lives, but we would never beable to come back to the homes we love.The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed, andit's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.I urge you (1) to work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense tocreate a secure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparselypopulated location-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be movedand safely stored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restorationactivities; and (2) to hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and securityat SONGS as long as the spent fuel rods remain there.Sincerely,~4~eA4c4Name QJ "Street AddressCity IState U.S. Nuclear Regulatory CommissionAttn: Cindy BladeyOffice of Administration, NRCMail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44MWashington, DC 20555-0001

Dear Commissioners,

FRULL5! _ CToEoO'~v: 2p ~ 57As a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject topermanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre NuclearGenerating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan forthe plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years orindefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.It's my understanding that the spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactivefor tens of thousands of generations and that the plant was closed due to faulty steamgenerator replacements and had a history of safety complaints from its employees andcontractors. The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in arecognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable to climate changeand terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean. If there were a radiationaccident there, we here in Laguna might escape with our lives, but we would never beable to come back to the homes we love.The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed, andit's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.I urge you (1) to work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense tocreate a secure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparselypopulated location-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be movedand safely stored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restorationactivities; and (2) to hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and securityat SONGS as long as the spent fuel rods remain there.Sincerely,ýghzcolR elSrmeStreet Addres4bCit IState RULES fi i) I-.,TI' VESU.S. Nuclear Regulatory CommissionAttn: Cindy BladeyOffice of Administration, NRC 20lN BEC 29 PH 4: 5 57Mail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44MWashington, DC 20555-0001

Dear Commissioners,

R[FC NVEDAs a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject topermanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre NuclearGenerating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan forthe plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years orindefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.It's my understanding that the spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactivefor tens of thousands of generations and that the plant was closed due to faulty steamgenerator replacements and had a history of safety complaints from its employees andcontractors. The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in arecognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable to climate changeand terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean. If there were a radiationaccident there, we here in Laguna might escape with our lives, but we would never beable to come back to the homes we love.The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed, andit's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.I urge you (1) to work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense tocreate a secure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparselypopulated location-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be movedand safely stored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restorationactivities; and (2) to hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and securityat SONGS as long as the spent fuel rods remain there.Sincerely,NameStreet Address(City') State FIU..:- .,,7 .L i :-i:TiVESU.S. Nuclear Regulatory CommissionAttn: Cindy BladeyOffice of Administration, NRC 20t14 D 2 V : 57Mail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44MWashington, DC 20555-0001

Dear Commissioners,

_As a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject topermanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre NuclearGenerating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan forthe plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years orindefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.It's my understanding that the spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactivefor tens of thousands of generations and that the plant was closed due to faulty steamgenerator replacements and had a history of safety complaints from its employees andcontractors. The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in arecognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable to climate changeand terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean. If there were a radiationaccident there, we here in Laguna might escape with our lives, but we would never beable to come back to the homes we love.The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed, andit's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.I urge you (1) to work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense tocreate a secure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparselypopulated location-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be movedand safely stored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restorationactivities; and (2) to hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and securityat SONGS as long as the spent fuel rods remain there.Sincerely,it AddressCity State ULB) Ah. L;:ETJIVESRULS .L ' 11 57201Iq RI ,"C 2 9 5i Li7U.S. Nuclear Regulatory CommissionAttn: Cindy BladeyOffice of Administration, NRCMail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44MWashington, DC 20555-0001

Dear Commissioners,

RFC7R/~DAs a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject topermanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre NuclearGenerating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan forthe plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years orindefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.It's my understanding that the spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactivefor tens of thousands of generations and that the plant was closed due to faulty steamgenerator replacements and had a history of safety complaints from its employees andcontractors. The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in arecognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable to climate changeand terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean. If there were a radiationaccident there, we here in Laguna might escape with our lives, but we would never beable to come back to the homes we love.The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed, andit's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.I urge you (1) to work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense tocreate a secure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparselypopulated location-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be movedand safely stored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restorationactivities; and (2) to hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and securityat SONGS as long as the spent fuel rods remain there.Sincerely,MCPVMX \kcýNameS\!WQe ~Street AddressCitycA C ZosState RULES /%.:`D L /- SU.S. Nuclear Regulatory CommissionAttn: Cindy Bladey Mt[Lj P'- 9,) L-, 57Office of Administration, NRCMail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44MWashington, DC 20555-0001

Dear Commissioners,

R FOrF1 DAs a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject topermanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre NuclearGenerating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan forthe plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years orindefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.It's my understanding that the spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactivefor tens of thousands of generations and that the plant was closed due to faulty steamgenerator replacements and had a history of safety complaints from its employees andcontractors. The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in arecognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable to climate changeand terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean. If there were a radiationaccident there, we here in Laguna might escape with our lives, but we would never beable to come back to the homes we love.The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed, andit's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.I urge you (1) to work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense tocreate a secure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparselypopulated location-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be movedand safely stored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restorationactivities; and (2) to hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and securityat SONGS as long as the spent fuel rods remain there.Sincerely,NameStreet AddressCity State RULE.'i- DF,"CTIVES.C2 9 P M, 57U.S. Nuclear Regulatory CommissionAttn: Cindy BladeyOffice of Administration, NRCMail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44MWashington, DC 20555-0001

Dear Commissioners,

D E EI HI. \ .rAs a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject topermanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre NuclearGenerating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan forthe plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years orindefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.It's my understanding that the spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactivefor tens of thousands of generations and that the plant was closed due to faulty steamgenerator replacements and had a history of safety complaints from its employees andcontractors. The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in arecognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable to climate changeand terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean. If there were a radiationaccident there, we here in Laguna might escape with our lives, but we would never beable to come back to the homes we love.The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed, andit's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.I urge you (1) to work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense tocreate a secure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparselypopulated location-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be movedand safely stored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restorationactivities; and (2) to hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and securityat SONGS as long as the spent fuel rods remain there.Sincerely,6R 6im 10- --- ý16( mhjýýIName~i yStreet Addresscity ttAo'd (0ýtate 7 0i 13K D 2 E ~ C1 F 4: 5 7U.S. Nuclear Regulatory CommissionAttn: Cindy BladeyOffice of Administration, NRCMail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44MWashington, DC 20555-0001

Dear Commissioners,

R F-- r.As a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject topermanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre NuclearGenerating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan forthe plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years orindefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.It's my understanding that the spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactivefor tens of thousands of generations and that the plant was closed due to faulty steamgenerator replacements and had a history of safety complaints from its employees andcontractors. The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in arecognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable to climate changeand terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean. If there were a radiationaccident there, we here in Laguna might escape with our lives, but we would never beable to come back to the homes we love.The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed, andit's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.I urge you (1) to work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense tocreate a secure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparselypopulated location-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be movedand safely stored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restorationactivities; and (2) to hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and securityat SONGS as long as the spent fuel rods remain there.Sincerely,-1.A PAName .ICityCA5Z(6 T IState FU L L, L) I) I 1Q, E CF71 E S20flU7C 29 F,% LI: 57U.S. Nuclear Regulatory CommissionAttn: Cindy BladeyOffice of Administration, NRCMail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44MWashington, DC 20555-0001

Dear Commissioners,

RrFCF,-t\,'WAs a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject topermanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre NuclearGenerating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan forthe plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years orindefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.It's my understanding that the spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactivefor tens of thousands of generations and that the plant was closed due to faulty steamgenerator replacements and had a history of safety complaints from its employees andcontractors. The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in arecognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable to climate changeand terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean. If there were a radiationaccident there, we here in Laguna might escape with our lives, but we would never beable to come back to the homes we love.The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed, andit's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.I urge you (1) to work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense tocreate a secure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparselypopulated location-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be movedand safely stored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restorationactivities; and (2) to hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and securityat SONGS as long as the spent fuel rods remain there.Sincerely,f-11,01:11T44tý'e-- -' '770 t() A5SrtAddressity State RU -.U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission ., -. 57Attn: Cindy BladeyOffice of Administration, NRCMail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44MWashington, DC 20555-0001

Dear Commissioners,

As a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject topermanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre NuclearGenerating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan forthe plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years orindefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.It's my understanding that the spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactivefor tens of thousands of generations and that the plant was closed due to faulty steamgenerator replacements and had a history of safety complaints from its employees andcontractors. The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in arecognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable to climate changeand terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean. If there were a radiationaccident there, we here in Laguna might escape with our lives, but we would never beable to come back to the homes we love.The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed, andit's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.I urge you (1) to work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense tocreate a secure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparselypopulated location-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be movedand safely stored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restorationactivities; and (2) to hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and securityat SONGS as long as the spent fuel rods remain there.Sincerely,1 cANameStreet AddressCit SatCityState RULES i", li-.ECIVESU.S. Nuclear Regulatory CommissionAttn: Cindy Bladey 70N DEC 29 PH 4: 58Office of Administration, NRCMail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44MWashington, DC 20555-0001

Dear Commissioners,

REOF', /FDAs a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject topermanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre NuclearGenerating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan forthe plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years orindefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.It's my understanding that the spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactivefor tens of thousands of generations and that the plant was closed due to faulty steamgenerator replacements and had a history of safety complaints from its employees andcontractors. The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in arecognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable to climate changeand terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean. If there were a radiationaccident there, we here in Laguna might escape with our lives, but we would never beable to come back to the homes we love.The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed, andit's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.I urge you (1) to work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense tocreate a secure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparselypopulated location-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be movedand safely stored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restorationactivities; and (2) to hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and securityat SONGS as long as the spent fuel rods remain there.Sincerely,, CNameI-`S-6 0Street AddressCity State H ULE7 E ,N LTIVESU.S. Nuclear Regulatory CommissionAttn: Cindy BladeyOffice of Administration, NRC lit4 ri F9 r; Li: 58Mail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44MWashington, DC 20555-0001

Dear Commissioners,

RF FC E/As a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject topermanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre NuclearGenerating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan forthe plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years orindefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.It's my understanding that the spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactivefor tens of thousands of generations and that the plant was closed due to faulty steamgenerator replacements and had a history of safety complaints from its employees andcontractors. The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in arecognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable to climate changeand terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean. If there were a radiationaccident there, we here in Laguna might escape with our lives, but we would never beable to come back to the homes we love.The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed, andit's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.I urge you (1) to work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense tocreate a secure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparselypopulated location-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be movedand safely stored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restorationactivities; and (2) to hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and securityat SONGS as long as the spent fuel rods remain there.Sincerely,Nam4Street Address)City "t St-cAcity ' State RULES PV..ii" -U.S. Nuclear Regulatory CommissionAttn: Cindy Bladey "Office of Administration, NRC 2014 29 1:Mail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44MWashington, DC 20555-0001

Dear Commissioners,

R F F FQIV )As a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject topermanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre NuclearGenerating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan forthe plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years orindefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.It's my understanding that the spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactivefor tens of thousands of generations and that the plant was closed due to faulty steamgenerator replacements and had a history of safety complaints from its employees andcontractors. The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in arecognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable to climate changeand terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean. If there were a radiationaccident there, we here in Laguna might escape with our lives, but we would never beable to come back to the homes we love.The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed, andit's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.I urge you (1) to work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense tocreate a secure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparselypopulated location-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be movedand safely stored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restorationactivities; and (2) to hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and securityat SONGS as long as the spent fuel rods remain there.Sincerely,NameStreet AddressýýwvjC-ACity SState RULES /\AiD LW::!ECIVESU.S. Nuclear Regulatory CommissionAttn: Cindy Bladey 70,1l1 KEC 29 PM 1-: 58Office of Administration, NRCMail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44MWashington, DC 20555-0001

Dear Commissioners,

R FCF.I\!DAs a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject topermanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre NuclearGenerating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan forthe plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years orindefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.It's my understanding that the spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactivefor tens of thousands of generations and that the plant was closed due to faulty steamgenerator replacements and had a history of safety complaints from its employees andcontractors. The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in arecognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable to climate changeand terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean. If there were a radiationaccident there, we here in Laguna might escape with our lives, but we would never beable to come back to the homes we love.The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed, andit's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.I urge you (1) to work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense tocreate a secure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparselypopulated location-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be movedand safely stored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restorationactivities; and (2) to hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and securityat SONGS as long as the spent fuel rods remain there.SincereK;),6y/

HULLS) .U.S. Nuclear Regulatory CommissionAttn: Cindy BladeyOffice of Administration, NRC 2Oi- Fi"- 29 I'I : 58Mail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44MWashington, DC 20555-0001

Dear Commissioners,

Dl,(" \ Q \1As a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject topermanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre NuclearGenerating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan forthe plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years orindefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.It's my understanding that the spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactivefor tens of thousands of generations and that the plant was closed due to faulty steamgenerator replacements and had a history of safety complaints from its employees andcontractors. The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in arecognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable to climate changeand terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean. If there were a radiationaccident there, we here in Laguna might escape with our lives, but we would never beable to come back to the homes we love.The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed, andit's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.I urge you (1) to work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense tocreate a secure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparselypopulated location-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be movedand safely stored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restorationactivities; and (2) to hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and securityat SONGS as long as the spent fuel rods remain there.Sincer y,NameStreet Addresst -State/

Ru .F -. '.f , 11-U.S. Nuclear Regulatory CommissionAttn: Cindy BladeyOffice of Administration, NRC 2OVT DEC 29 PHi 4: 58Mail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44MWashington, DC 20555-0001

Dear Commissioners,

FCF- -DAs a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject topermanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre NuclearGenerating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan forthe plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years orindefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.It's my understanding that the spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactivefor tens of thousands of generations and that the plant was closed due to faulty steamgenerator replacements and had a history of safety complaints from its employees andcontractors. The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in arecognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable to climate changeand terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean. If there were a radiationaccident there, we here in Laguna might escape with our lives, but we would never beable to come back to the homes we love.The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed, andit's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.I urge you (1) to work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense tocreate a secure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparselypopulated location-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be movedand safely stored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restorationactivities; and (2) to hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and securityat SONGS as long as the spent fuel rods remain there.Sincerely,NameStreet AddressLA676ro& PCH CA 2sCityState U.S. Nuclear Regulatory CommissionAttn: Cindy BladeyOffice of Administration, NRC 20YH F-P" 1 i: 58Mail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44MWashington, DC 20555-0001

Dear Commissioners,

'i9 .\ D-:-, , ....! V , 1 ... )As a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject topermanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre NuclearGenerating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan forthe plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years orindefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.It's my understanding that the spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactivefor tens of thousands of generations and that the plant was closed due to faulty steamgenerator replacements and had a history of safety complaints from its employees andcontractors. The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in arecognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable to climate changeand terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean. If there were a radiationaccident there, we here in Laguna might escape with our lives, but we would never beable to come back to the homes we love.The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed, andit's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.I urge you (1) to work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense tocreate a secure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparselypopulated location-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be movedand safely stored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restorationactivities; and (2) to hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and securityat SONGS as long as the spent fuel rods remain there.Sincerely,trlee Aq ty State RULLS iD UF.U:ECTIVESU.S. Nuclear Regulatory CommissionAttn: Cindy BladeyOffice of Administration, NRC L2 -"K '7; ,U i: 58Mail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44MWashington, DC 20555-0001

Dear Commissioners,

R ..H\V'DAs a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject topermanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre NuclearGenerating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan forthe plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years orindefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.It's my understanding that the spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactivefor tens of thousands of generations and that the plant was closed due to faulty steamgenerator replacements and had a history of safety complaints from its employees andcontractors. The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in arecognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable to climate changeand terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean. If there were a radiationaccident there, we here in Laguna might escape with our lives, but we would never beable to come back to the homes we love.The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed, andit's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.I urge you (1) to work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense tocreate a secure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparselypopulated location-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be movedand safely stored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restorationactivities; and (2) to hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and securityat SONGS as long as the spent fuel rods remain there.Sincerely,NameStreet AndrsCityi State RULE" L., CTNESU.S. Nuclear Regulatory CommissionAttn: Cindy BladeyOffice of Administration, NRC %O!4 L 29 4u: 58Mail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44MWashington, DC 20555-0001

Dear Commissioners,

RVC>H ,_.,DAs a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject topermanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre NuclearGenerating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan forthe plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years orindefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.It's my understanding that the spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactivefor tens of thousands of generations and that the plant was closed due to faulty steamgenerator replacements and had a history of safety complaints from its employees andcontractors. The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in arecognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable to climate changeand terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean. If there were a radiationaccident there, we here in Laguna might escape with our lives, but we would never beable to come back to the homes we love.The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed, andit's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.I urge you (1) to work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense tocreate a secure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparselypopulated location-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be movedand safely stored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restorationactivities; and (2) to hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and securityat SONGS as long as the spent fuel rods remain there.Sincerely,Naii t-Street Address-Ci

,, v--U.S. Nuclear Regulatory CommissionAttn: Cindy Bladey 70f4 D_ C 2 (1) PN 4: 58Office of Administration, NRCMail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44MWashington, DC 20555-0001

Dear Commissioners,

...i'!./V'.As a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject topermanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre NuclearGenerating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan forthe plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years orindefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.It's my understanding that the spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactivefor tens of thousands of generations and that the plant was closed due to faulty steamgenerator replacements and had a history of safety complaints from its employees andcontractors. The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in arecognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable to climate changeand terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean. If there were a radiationaccident there, we here in Laguna might escape with our lives, but we would never beable to come back to the homes we love.The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed, andit's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.I urge you (1) to work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense tocreate a secure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparselypopulated location-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be movedand safely Stored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restorationactivities; and (2) to hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and securityat SONGS as long as the spent fuel rods remain there.SincereNameStreet AddressCity State RULES ,S J 'F.j-E.fIVESU.S. Nuclear Regulatory CommissionAttn: Cindy Bladey 2014 C 29 P0 58Office of Administration, NRCMail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44MWashington, DC 20555-0001

Dear Commissioners,

REQ FC..E./ )DAs a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject topermanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre NuclearGenerating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan forthe plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years orindefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.It's my understanding that the spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactivefor tens of thousands of generations and that the plant was closed due to faulty steamgenerator replacements and had a history of safety complaints from its employees andcontractors. The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in arecognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable to climate changeand terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean. If there were a radiationaccident there, we here in Laguna might escape with our lives, but we would never beable to come back to the homes we love.The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed, andit's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.I urge you (1) to work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense tocreate a secure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparselypopulated location-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be movedand safely stored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restorationactivities; and (2) to hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and securityat SON S as long as the spent fuel rods remain there.Si 6ce y,ree dresty State RULESYi,, Di:iCTVESU.S. Nuclear Regulatory CommissionAttn: Cindy BladeyOffice of Administration, NRC u Z9 L: 58Mail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44MWashington, DC 20555-0001

Dear Commissioners,

RF2V'c \/1FDAs a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject topermanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre NuclearGenerating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan forthe plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years orindefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.It's my understanding that the spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactivefor tens of thousands of generations and that the plant was closed due to faulty steamgenerator replacements and had a history of safety complaints from its employees andcontractors. The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in arecognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable to climate changeand terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean. If there were a radiationaccident there, we here in Laguna might escape with our lives, but we would never beable to come back to the homes we love.The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed, andit's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.I urge you (1) to work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense tocreate a secure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparselypopulated location-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be movedand safely stored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restorationactivities; and (2) to hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and securityat SONGS as long as the spent fuel rods remain there.Sincerely,ameStreet AddressCity I State RULE2T1 2 Pl !': 5U.S. Nuclear Regulatory CommissionAttn: Cindy BladeyOffice of Administration, NRCMail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44MWashington, DC 20555-0001

Dear Commissioners,

FlZQ) FEA IVF.)As a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject topermanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre NuclearGenerating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan forthe plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years orindefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.It's my understanding that the spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactivefor tens of thousands of generations and that the plant was closed due to faulty steamgenerator replacements and had a history of safety complaints from its employees andcontractors. The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in arecognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable to climate changeand terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean. If there were a radiationaccident there, we here in Laguna might escape with our lives, but we would never beable to come back to the homes we love.The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed, andit's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.I urge you (1) to work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense tocreate a secure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparselypopulated location-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be movedand safely stored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restorationactivities; and (2) to hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and securityat SONGS as long as the spent fuel rods remain there.Sincerely,D6I ell71~~5-)< I/oNameStreet AddressCiLt "3a C StatCitJ State RULES -I L I .tVESU.S. Nuclear Regulatory CommissionAttn: Cindy BladeyOffice of Administration, NRC 2014 2,1, 2 9 4 -: 58Mail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44MWashington, DC 20555-0001

Dear Commissioners,

F --IVFDAs a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject topermanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre NuclearGenerating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan forthe plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years orindefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.It's my understanding that the spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactivefor tens of thousands of generations and that the plant was closed due to faulty steamgenerator replacements and had a history of safety complaints from its employees andcontractors. The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in arecognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable to climate changeand terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean. If there were a radiationaccident there, we here in Laguna might escape with our lives, but we would never beable to come back to the homes we love.The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed, andit's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.I urge you (1) to work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense tocreate a secure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparselypopulated location-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be movedand safely stored there before decommissioning funds are depleted n-site-restorationactivities; and (2) to hold Southern California Edison si le for safety and securityat SONGS as long as ths spt fuel rods re ee.Name/ ."Street Address City RULES e.-,;.. J ; -,-! TV SU.S. Nuclear Regulatory CommissionAttn: Cindy Bladey C,> 1 0, IN LlOffice of Administration, NRCMail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44MWashington, DC 20555-0001

Dear Commissioners,

As a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject topermanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre NuclearGenerating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan forthe plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years orindefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.It's my understanding that the spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactivefor tens of thousands of generations and that the plant was closed due to faulty steamgenerator replacements and had a history of safety complaints from its employees andcontractors. The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in arecognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable to climate changeand terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean. If there were a radiationaccident there, we here in Laguna might escape with our lives, but we would never beable to come back to the homes we love.The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed, andit's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.I urge you (1) to work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense tocreate a secure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparselypopulated location-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be movedand safely stored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restorationactivities; and (2) to hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and securityat SONGS as long as the spent fuel rods remain there.Sincerely,Nametret AddressCity State HU L- A -, -C-,-, SU.S. Nuclear Regulatory CommissionAttn: Cindy Bladey 79iq TT 2 1? PM 4: 58Office of Administration, NRCMail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44MWashington, DC 20555-0001

Dear Commissioners,

RF .'.\/ DAs a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject topermanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre NuclearGenerating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan forthe plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years orindefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.It's my understanding that the spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactivefor tens of thousands of generations and that the plant was closed due to faulty steamgenerator replacements and had a history of safety complaints from its employees andcontractors. The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in arecognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable to climate changeand terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean. If there were a radiationaccident there, we here in Laguna might escape with our lives, but we would never beable to come back to the homes we love.The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed, andit's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.I urge you (1) to work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense tocreate a secure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparselypopulated location-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be movedand safely stored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restorationactivities; and (2) to hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and securityat SONGS as long as the spent fuel rods remain there.NameAddressCty State"C.-CityState

.( ' .-, ' r ,i rRULE ,) L.1,;-ECTIVESU.S. Nuclear Regulatory CommissionAttn: Cindy Bladey t HC 22 i~I : 58Office of Administration, NRCMail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44MWashington, DC 20555-0001

Dear Commissioners,

F I F I\/DAs a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject topermanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre NuclearGenerating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan forthe plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years orindefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.It's my understanding that the spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactivefor tens of thousands of generations and that the plant was closed due to faulty steamgenerator replacements and had a history of safety complaints from its employees andcontractors. The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in arecognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable to climate changeand terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean. If there were a radiationaccident there, we here in Laguna might escape with our lives, but we would never beable to come back to the homes we love.The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed, andit's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.I urge you (1) to work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense tocreate a secure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparselypopulated location-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be movedand safely stored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restorationactivities; and (2) to hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and securityat SONGS as long as the spent fuel rods remain there.Sincerely,*ameStreet Address \ IC-city :7'State RULE 1Ji,, ii.'. CT1/ESU.S. Nuclear Regulatory CommissionAttn: Cindy Bladey 29 PU L: 58Office of Administration, NRC [C P 5Mail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44MWashington, DC 20555-0001

Dear Commissioners,

RF Fr--- 1V- )DAs a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject topermanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre NuclearGenerating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan forthe plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years orindefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.It's my understanding that the spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactivefor tens of thousands of generations and that the plant was closed due to faulty steamgenerator replacements and had a history of safety complaints from its employees andcontractors. The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in arecognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable to climate changeand terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean. If there were a radiationaccident there, we here in Laguna might escape with our lives, but we would never beable to come back to the homes we love.The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed, andit's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.I urge you (1) to work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense tocreate a secure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparselypopulated location-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be movedand safely stored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restorationactivities; a (2) to hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and securityat SON long as the spent fuel rods remain there.Sinc r y,4ameq2j(), (j,0,0V6W VAStreet Address .City State RULES E DiTnVt -U.S. Nuclear Regulatory CommissionAttn: Cindy Bladey Fil LIP. 5Office of Administration, NRC -i,' 79 Pu L.: 59Mail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44MWashington, DC 20555-0001

Dear Commissioners,

,Fr' \11DAs a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject topermanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre NuclearGenerating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan forthe plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years orindefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.It's my understanding that the spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactivefor tens of thousands of generations and that the plant was closed due to faulty steamgenerator replacements and had a history of safety complaints from its employees andcontractors. The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in arecognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable to climate changeand terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean. If there were a radiationaccident there, we here in Laguna might escape with our lives, but we would never beable to come back to the homes we love.The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed, andit's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.I urge you (1) to work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense tocreate a secure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparselypopulated location-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be movedand safely stored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restorationactivities; and (2) to hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and securityat SONGS as long as the spent fuel rods remain there.Sincerely,StreStreet Addresscity/ State" RULK S~LRCIE2011, IEC 219 10d 4: 591U.S. Nuclear Regulatory CommissionAttn: Cindy BladeyOffice of Administration, NRCMail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44MWashington, DC 20555-0001

Dear Commissioners,

RF(.f'!V!FDAs a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject topermanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre NuclearGenerating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan forthe plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years orindefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.It's my understanding that the spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactivefor tens of thousands of generations and that the plant was closed due to faulty steamgenerator replacements and had a history of safety complaints from its employees andcontractors. The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in arecognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable to climate changeand terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean. If there were a radiationaccident there, we here in Laguna might escape with our lives, but we would never beable to come back to the homes we love.The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed, andit's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.I urge you (1) to work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense tocreate a secure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparselypopulated location-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be movedand safely stored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restorationactivities; and (2) to hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and securityat SONGS as long as the spent fuel rods remain there.Sincerely,Nameet ddressCity SttState LULESý I\ I CVIESU.S. Nuclear Regulatory CommissionAttn: Cindy Bladey 701"G' DEC 9_9 P'i 4: 59Office of Administration, NRCMail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44MWashington, DC 20555-0001

Dear Commissioners,

As a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject topermanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre NuclearGenerating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan forthe plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years orindefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.It's my understanding that the spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactivefor tens of thousands of generations and that the plant was closed due to faulty steamgenerator replacements and had a history of safety complaints from its employees andcontractors. The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in arecognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable to climate changeand terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean. If there were a radiationaccident there, we here in Laguna might escape with our lives, but we would never beable to come back to the homes we love.The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed, andit's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.I urge you (1) to work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense tocreate a secure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparselypopulated location-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be movedand safely stored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restorationactivities; and (2) to hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and securityat SONGS as long as the spent fuel rods remain there.Sincerely,NameStree 7 Adre jStreet AddressKeg ( M- 190(Q3CityState

%UL , ,.`mCT1 ESRULES iU.S. Nuclear Regulatory CommissionAttn: Cindy Bladey 2 PHOffice of Administration, NRC 2 O 21 F 41: 59Mail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44MWashington, DC 20555-0001

Dear Commissioners,

RFC "\/FDAs a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject topermanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre NuclearGenerating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan forthe plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years orindefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.It's my understanding that the spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactivefor tens of thousands of generations and that the plant was closed due to faulty steamgenerator replacements and had a history of safety complaints from its employees andcontractors. The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in arecognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable to climate changeand terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean. If there were a radiationaccident there, we here in Laguna might escape with our lives, but we would never beable to come back to the homes we love.The people Of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed, andit's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.I urge you (1) to work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense tocreate a secure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparselypopulated location-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be movedand safely stored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restorationactivities; and (2) to hold Southern California Edison responsible for.safety and securityat SONGS as long as the spent fuel rods remain there.Sincerely,-?-- -- --0 ="&4 --.1Street AddressState HULE ,L .\LbU.S. Nuclear Regulatory CommissionAttn: Cindy Bladey Q9-:5Office of Administration, NRC 29 P0 4: 5/Mail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44MWashington, DC 20555-0001

Dear Commissioners,

RF 1V\/EDAs a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject topermanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre NuclearGenerating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan forthe plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years orindefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.It's my understanding that the spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactivefor tens of thousands of generations and that the plant was closed due to faulty steamgenerator replacements and had a history of safety complaints from its employees andcontractors. The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in arecognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable to climate changeand terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean. If there were a radiationaccident there, we here in Laguna might escape with our lives, but we would never beable to come back to the homes we love.The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed, andit's imperative that that happen as. soon as possible.I urge you (1) to work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense tocreate a secure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparselypopulated location-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be movedand safely stored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restorationactivities; and (2) to hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and securityat SONGS as long as the spent fuel rods remain there.Sincerely,NameStreet AddressCity State hULW id u E IJECTIVES,.',/ , -.U.S. Nuclear Regulatory CommissionAttn: Cindy Bladey ?9 NO LV 59Office of Administration, NRC LIt _:Mail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44MWashington, DC 20555-0001

Dear Commissioners,

r F .As a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject topermanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre NuclearGenerating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan forthe plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years orindefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.It's my understanding that the spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactivefor tens of thousands of generations and that the plant was closed due to faulty steamgenerator replacements and had a history of safety complaints from its employees andcontractors. The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in arecognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable to climate changeand terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean. If there were a radiationaccident there, we here in Laguna might escape with our lives, but we would never beable to come back to the homes we love.The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed, andit's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.I urge you (1) to work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense tocreate a secure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparselypopulated location-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be movedand safely stored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restorationactivities; and (2) to hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and securityat SONGS as long as the spent fuel rods remain there.Sincerely,Name JStreet AddressCity State RULE'U'f!(iiU.S. Nuclear Regulatory CommissionAttn: Cindy BladeyOffice of Administration, NRC 701A C 29 PO 4, 59Mail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44MWashington, DC 20555-0001

Dear Commissioners,

As a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject topermanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre NuclearGenerating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan forthe plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years orindefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.It's my understanding that the spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactivefor tens of thousands of generations and that the plant was closed due to faulty steamgenerator replacements and had a history of safety complaints from its employees andcontractors. The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in arecognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable to climate changeand terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean. If there were a radiationaccident there, we here in Laguna might escape with our lives, but we would never beable to come back to the homes we love.The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed, andit's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.I urge you (1) to work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense tocreate a secure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparselypopulated location-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be movedand safely stored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restorationactivities; and (2) to hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and securityat SONGS as long as the spent fuel rods remain there.Sincerely,Namer-Street AddressCi Stae HULEL , 'VESU.S. Nuclear Regulatory CommissionAttn: Cindy Bladey 2011 'E'"C 9 R-1 4j: 59Office of Administration, NRCMail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44MWashington, DC 20555-0001

Dear Commissioners,

......As a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject topermanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre NuclearGenerating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan forthe plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years orindefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.It's my understanding that the spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactivefor tens of thousands of generations and that the plant was closed due to faulty steamgenerator replacements and had a history of safety complaints from its employees andcontractors. The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in arecognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable to climate changeand terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean. If there were a radiationaccident there, we here in Laguna might escape with our lives, but we would never beable to come back to the homes we love.The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed, andit's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.I urge you (1) to work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense tocreate a secure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparselypopulated location-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be movedand safely stored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restorationactivities; and (2) to hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and securityat SONGS as long as the spent fuel rods remain there.Sincerely,NameStreet AddressC642tS7city State RULES ." 'LC""-iEU.S. Nuclear Regulatory CommissionAttn: Cindy BladeyOffice of Administration, NRC 270q DEC 2 9 Pti 4: 59Mail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44MWashington, DC 20555-0001

Dear Commissioners,

RFCrFI\/!-DAs a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject topermanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre NuclearGenerating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan forthe plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years orindefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.It's my understanding that the spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactivefor tens of thousands of generations and that the plant was closed due to faulty steamgenerator replacements and had a history of safety complaints from its employees andcontractors. The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in arecognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable to climate changeand terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean. If there were a radiationaccident there, we here in Laguna might escape with our lives, but we would never beable to come back to the homes we love.The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed, andit's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.I urge you (1) to work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense tocreate a secure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparselypopulated location-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be movedand safely stored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restorationactivities; and (2) to hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and securityat SONGS as long as the spent fuel rods remain there.Sincerely,NameStreet AddressL,12.4CityState U.S. Nuclear Regulatory CommissionAttn: Cindy BladeyOffice of Administration, NRCMail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44MWashington, DC 20555-0001

Dear Commissioners,

RULES piUTI\!ES254 F 29 Pjl 4: 59REOH ,F ý V/F.DAs a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject topermanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre NuclearGenerating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan forthe plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years orindefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.It's my understanding that the spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactivefor tens of thousands of generations and that the plant was closed due to faulty steamgenerator replacements and had a history of safety complaints from its employees andcontractors. The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in arecognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable to climate changeand terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean. If there were a radiationaccident there, we here in Laguna might escape with our lives, but we would never beable to come back to the homes we love.The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed, andit's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.I urge you (1) to work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense tocreate a secure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparselypopulated location-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be movedand safely stored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restorationactivities; and (2) to hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and securityat SONGS as long as the spent fuel rods remain there.Sincerely,6/ 1 fM41?A1NameStreet Addressý_,q 1 U OAK;74CityState U.S. Nuclear Regulatory CommissionAttn: Cindy Bladey 99 t. 59Office of Administration, NRCMail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44MWashington, DC 20555-0001

Dear Commissioners,

As a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject topermanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre NuclearGenerating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan forthe plant involves storage of its, spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years orindefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.It's my understanding that the spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactivefor tens of thousands of generations and that the plant was closed due to faulty steamgenerator replacements and had a history of safety complaints from its employees andcontractors. The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated inarecognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable to climate changeand terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean. If there were a radiationaccident there, we here in Laguna might escape with our lives, but we would never beable to come back to the homes we love.The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed, andit's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.I urge you (1) to work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense tocreate a secure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparselypopulated location-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be movedand safely stored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restorationactivities; and (2) to hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and securityat SONGS as long as the spent fuel rods remain there.Sincerely,NameStreet AddressCity JState RULE ' b-U ICTIVESU.S. Nuclear Regulatory CommissionAttn: Cindy Bladey 7011L L 2I,Office of Administration, NRCMail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44MWashington, DC 20555-0001

Dear Commissioners,

RF -i....\/ DAs a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject topermanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre NuclearGenerating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan forthe plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years orindefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.It's my understanding that the spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactivefor tens of thousands of generations and that the plant was closed due to faulty steamgenerator replacements and had a history of safety complaints from its employees andcontractors. The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in arecognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable to climate changeand terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean. If there were a radiationaccident there, we here in Laguna might escape with our lives, but we would never beable to come back to the homes we love.The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed, andit's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.I urge you (1) to work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense tocreate a secure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparselypopulated location-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be movedand safely stored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restorationactivities; and (2) to hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and securityat SONGS as long as the spent fuel rods remain there.Sincerely,NameStreet dressity State R!,- J JNEU.S. Nuclear Regulatory CommissionAttn: Cindy BladeyOffice of Administration, NRC 2 Y ?- / P9 ', 59Mail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44MWashington, DC 20555-0001

Dear Commissioners,

F7 E--!\V)As a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject topermanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre NuclearGenerating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan forthe plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years orindefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.It's my understanding that the spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactivefor tens of thousands of generations and that the plant was closed due to faulty steamgenerator replacements and had a history of safety complaints from its employees andcontractors. The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in arecognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable to climate changeand terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean. If there were a radiationaccident there, we here in Laguna might escape with our lives, but we would never beable to come back to the homes we love.The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed, andit's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.I urge you (1) to work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense tocreate a secure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparselypopulated location-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be movedand safely stored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restorationactivities; and (2) to hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and securityat SONGS as long as the spent fuel rods remain there.Sincerely,NameStreet Addresscity XState U.S. Nuclear Regulatory CommissionAttn: Cindy BladeyOffice of Administration, NRC '/Jlf 5¶Nl 29 Pi1 L_: 59Mail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44MWashington, DC 20555-0001

Dear Commissioners,

R F. -D,!, _As a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject topermanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre NuclearGenerating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan forthe plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years orindefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.It's my understanding that the spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactivefor tens of thousands of generations and that the plant was closed due to faulty steamgenerator replacements and had a history of safety complaints from its employees andcontractors. The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in arecognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable to climate changeand terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean. If.there were a radiationaccident there, we here in Laguna might escape with our lives, but we would never beable to come back to the homes we love.The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed, andit's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.I urge you (1) to work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense tocreate a secure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparselypopulated location-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be movedand safely stored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restorationactivities; and (2) to hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and securityat SONGS as long as the spent fuel rods remain there.Sincerely,.Name.)Sleet AddressCity State U.S. Nuclear Regulatory CommissionAttn: Cindy Bladey 2_Office of Administration, NRCMail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44MWashington, DC 20555-0001

Dear Commissioners,

_-As a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject topermanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre NuclearGenerating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan forthe plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years orindefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.It's my understanding that the spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactivefor tens of thousands of generations and that the plant was closed due to faulty steamgenerator replacements and had a history of safety complaints from its employees andcontractors. The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in arecognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable to climate changeand terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean. If there were a radiationaccident there, we here in Laguna might escape with our lives, but we would never beable to come back to the homes we love.The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed, andit's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.I urge you (1) to work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense tocreate a secure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparselypopulated location-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be movedand safely stored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restorationactivities; and (2) to hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and securityat SONGS as long as the spent fuel rods remain there.Sincerely,NameStreet AddressCity State RULES ;~ TVIES'7 0 4 0 D2'2 29 P H LI: 591U.S. Nuclear Regulatory CommissionAttn: Cindy BladeyOffice of Administration, NRCMail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44MWashington, DC 20555-0001RVCFV/W

Dear Commissioners,

As a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject topermanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre NuclearGenerating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan forthe plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years orindefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.It's my understanding that the spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactivefor tens of thousands of generations and that the plant was closed due to faulty steamgenerator replacements and had a history of safety complaints from its employees andcontractors. The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in arecognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable to climate changeand terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean. If there were a radiationaccident there, we here in Laguna might escape with our lives, but we would never beable to come back to the homes we love.The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed, andit's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.I urge you (1) to work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense tocreate a secure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparselypopulated location-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be movedand safely stored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restorationactivities; and (2) to hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and securityat SONGS as long as the spent fuel rods remain there.Sincerely,CA/NameStreet Ad ssi4tyTP hA J-,1 ýý <NState '

BULEi5 "&T.. ".. ..SR L _ ,_ ,t % , ý ' [ -' 'L. I , C ý_.U.S. Nuclear' Regulatory CommissionAttn: Cindy Bladey R, Q- 55Office of Administration, NRC -2 ? ; : 55Mail Stop: 3WFN-06-A44MWashington, DC 20555-0001

Dear Commissioners,

RF""I\/Fi)As a resident of Laguna Beach, which is located within the 20-mile area subject topermanent relocation in the event of a radiation accident at the San Onofre NuclearGenerating Station (SONGS), I was alarmed to learn that the decommissioning plan forthe plant involves storage of its spent nuclear fuel rods on site for sixty years orindefinitely until the government removes them to a final deposit repository.It's my understanding that the spent fuel stored on the site will remain highly radioactivefor tens of thousands of generations and that the plant was closed due to faulty steamgenerator replacements and had a history of safety complaints from its employees andcontractors. The plant is not a safe place to store dangerous spent fuel as it is situated in arecognized tsunami, earthquake, and firestorm zone and is vulnerable to climate changeand terrorist attack in a densely populated area on the ocean. If there were a radiationaccident there, we here in Laguna might escape with our lives, but we would never beable to come back to the homes we love.The people of California were promised that the spent fuel rods would be removed, andit's imperative that that happen as soon as possible.I urge you (1) to work with the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense tocreate a secure interim location-perhaps on a military base or in some other sparselypopulated location-for the spent fuel rods from SONGS and require that they be movedand safely stored there before decommissioning funds are depleted on site restorationactivities; and (2) to hold Southern California Edison responsible for safety and securityat SONGS as long as the spent fuel rods remain there.Sincerely,(iIe~hfl mq'12ýe,&SignElail address