ML20009F203

From kanterella
Revision as of 08:25, 21 December 2024 by StriderTol (talk | contribs) (StriderTol Bot change)
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Forwards Response to NRC 800701 Request for Addl Info Re Environ Rept.Info Incorporated Into Facility OL Application
ML20009F203
Person / Time
Site: Callaway  Ameren icon.png
Issue date: 07/24/1981
From: Bryan J
UNION ELECTRIC CO.
To: Harold Denton
Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
References
ULNRC-472, NUDOCS 8107300137
Download: ML20009F203 (6)


Text

-

UNION ELECTRIC COMPANY 1901 GRATIOT STREET ST. Louis, MISSOURI JOHN M..RYAN o.on 34.

.r. covi mi..ou......

July 24, 1981 e,

//

d%

61,0u 3

0 JUL 2 81981* C Mr. Harold R.

Denton Director of Nuclear Reactor Regulation 61 "'

U.

S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission S

Washington, D.C.

20555 4

/

T/

s

Dear Mr. Denton:

ULNRC-4 72 DOCKET NUMBERS 50-483 AND 50-486 CALLAWAY PLANT, UNITS 1 & 2 ENVIRONMENTAL REPORT

Reference:

NRC letter dated July 1, 1980, from R.

L. Tedesco The reference letter requested additional information concerning the Callaway Plant Environmental Report.

Transmitted herewith are responses to questions in the referenced letter.

This information will be forrr. ally incorporated into the Callaway Plant Environmental Report in the next revision.

This information is hereby incorporated into the Callaway application.

Ver ruly yours, t

vLS)an&JH(aR J

K.

Brya j

BFH/afg i

Enclosure l

l l

l 00f si i 8107300137 810724 I

"~

{DRADOCK 05000483 PDR I

_3

P STATE OF MISSOURI )

)

SS CITY OF ST. LOUIS )

l John K.

Bryan, of lawful age, being first duly sworn upon oath says that he is Vice President-Nuclear and an officer of Union Electric Company; that he has read the foregoing document and knows the content thereof; that he has executed the same for and on behalf of said company with full power and authority to do so; and that the facts therein stated are true and correct to the best of his knowledge, Information and belief.

f By EhfA j g

a Tn' K. Btihrn' ce President clear SUBSCRIBED and sworn to before me this 24th day of July, 1981

.Aldd w x

BARSARA.PFAFF NOTARY PU3DC, STATE OF M:550' Rt J

NY COMMISS10ft EXPIRES APRIL 22, 1925 ST. LOUIS COJNTY.

cc:

Glenn L. Koester Vice President Operations Kansas Gas & Electric P.O.

Box 208 Wichita, Kansas 67201 John E.

Arthur Chief Engineer Rochester Gas & Electric Company 89 East Avenue 4

Rochester, New York 14649 l-A. V.

Dienhart Vice President Plant Engineering and Construction Northern States Power 414 Nicollet Mall Minneapolis, Minnesota 55401 t

4-Donald T. McPhee Vice. President I

Kansas City Power and Light Company 1330 Baltimore Avenue Kansas City, Missouri 64141 i

i Gerald Charnoff, Esq.

Shaw, Pittman, Potts & Trowbridge 4

W s ingt n D C.

bO36 i

Nicholas A. Petrick Executive Director SNUPPS 5 Choke Cherry Road Rockville, Maryland 20850 1

W. Hansen Callaway Resident Office i

U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission RR#1 Steedman, Missouri 65077 i

t i

f 1

4 i

i

l bec:

3456-0021.6 l

3456-0547.4 Nuclear Date JKB/ Chrono l

J.

K.

Bryan J.

F. McLaughlin J.

E.

Birk D.

F.

Schnell I

W.

H. Weber I

F.

D.

Field R. J.

Schukai M. A.

Stiller D.

E.

Shain F. W.

Orunson J.

J. Beisman Missouri Public Service Commission D. W.

Capone A. C. Passwater W.

H.

Zvanut R.

P. Wendling N.

G.

Slaten V.

M. Weber D.

E.

Shafer J.

E.

Davis J.

V.

Laux W.

S.

Strothman G.

L.

Randolph J.

N. Kaelin

ITEM 291.13C Please show the calculations leading to the estimates of the maximum usage of sulfuric acid for cooling water pH control and to the estimates of the average and maximum amounts of organophosphonates used (Table 3.6-2).

The method of calculation given in response to question 291.10, if used, would lead to a number that was different from the estimated maximum amount of sulfuric acid (31,000 lb/ day) given in Table 3.6-2.

The difference between the average sulfuric acid use for pH control (25,200 lb/ day) and the maximum use (31,000 lb/ day),

as listed in Table 3.6-2, appears to be small when compared with the difference between the average river alkalinity (160 mg/L) and maximum river alkalinity (319 mg/L) listed in Table 3.6-1.

Response (1)

The average amount of sulfuric acid used for cooling water pH control was calculated as described in the response to question 291.10 (see Reference 2), using an average make-up water flow rate of 31,120 gpm (2 Units) and average alkalinity of 160 mg CACO / liter (to be 3

reduced to 100 mg/L)

The maximum daily usage of H SO4 was based on the 2

maximum daily flow rate of 38,300 gpm (2 Units) and the s a m,e, average, alkalinity figure.

The maximum

/ liter represents a alkalinity figure of 319 mg CACO 3 single sample collected during a limited study.

More comprehensive river data, albeit from further downstream, shows the river alkalinity has not been seen as high as 319 and that the alkalinity level variance is less than the 319 would indicate; therefore, the use of the same (160) alkalinity value to calculate the H SO4 consumptions at average and 2

maximum flows was considered to be reasonable.

(2)

The estimates for the average and maximum amounts of organophosphonates used are based on the flow rates given in (1), above, and a dosage of 5.0 mg/L (vendor's recommendation).

291.13C

IT.'M 291.14C The numbers for the maximum use of NaOH, H SO and Nacl 2

4 listed in Table 3.6-2 are not consistent with the maximum amounts of sodium, sulfate and chloride added to the plant discharge as listed in Table 3.6-5, Revision 1.

Please explain the discrepancy or provide updated tables that are consistent.

Response

The apparent differences, aside from round-off adjustments, between the maximum amounts of sodium, sulfate, and chloride added to the plant discharge (Table 3.6-5, Rev. 1) and the maximum use of NaOH, H #04, and Nacl (Table 3.6-2) are the amounts of those species recovered from the ion exchange resins upon regeneration.

The recovered amounts are estimated to be:

Sodium 600 lb/ day Sulfate -

816 lb/ day Chloride - 160 lb/ day These constituents are removed from the water being treated and are returned to the discharge line as part of the ion exchange regeneration wastes.

l l

l l

[

291.14C

,