ML20203C134

Amend 217 to License NPF-3,revising Surveillance Interval from 18 Months to Each Refueling Interval for TS 3/4.5.2, TS 3/4.6.5.1,TS 3/4.7.6.1,TS 3/4.7.7.2,TS 3/4.9.12 & TS Bases 3/4.7.7

ML20203C134
Person / Time
Site:	Davis Besse
Issue date:	12/02/1997
From:	Hansen A NRC (Affiliation Not Assigned)
To:
Shared Package
ML20203C138	List: ML20203C134 ML20203C140
References
NUDOCS 9712150238
Download: ML20203C134 (10)

Text

.

~

___m gk4 N'g

[

k UNITE 3 STATES 3

f' NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION WASM6NGTON D.C. SpeeH001

\\.... /'j TOLEDO EDISON COMPANY

, CENTER 10R SERVICE COMPANY atQ IHLCLEVELAND ELECTRIC ILLUMINATING COMPANY DOCKET NO. 50-3_%

Dayli-E iSE NUCLEAR POWER STATION. UNIT NO. 1 AENDMENT TO FACillTY OPERATING LICENSE Amendment No.217 License No. NPF-3 1.

The Nuclear Regulatory Connission (the Comission) has found that:

A.

The application for smandment by the Toledo Edison Company, Centerior Service Company, and The Cleveland Electric illuminating Company (the licensees) dated September 17, 1996, as supplemented by letters dated November 27, 1996, and October 14, 1997, complies with the standards and requirements of the Atomic Energy Act of 1954, as amended (the Act), and the Comission's rules and regulations set forth in 10 CFR Chapter I; 8.

The facility will operate in conformity with the application, the provisions of the Act, and the rules and regulations of sne Commission; C.

There is reasonabic assurance (i) that the activities authorized by this amendment can be conducted without endangering the health and safety of the public, and (ii) thtt such activities will be conducted in compliance with the Comission's regulations; D.

The issuance of this amendnient will not be inimical to the common defense and security or to the health and safety of the pubitc; and E.

The issuance of this amendment is in wcordance with 10 CFP. Part 51 of the Commission's regulations and all aoplicable requirements have been satisfied.

2.

Accordingly, the license is amended by changes to the Technical Specifications as indicated in the attachment to this license amendment, and paragraph 2.C.(2)llows:of Facility Operating License No. NPF-3 is hereby amended to read as fo 9712150238 971202 DR ADOCK 050 y 6

(2)

Technical Soecifications The Technical Specifications contained in Appendix A, as revised through Amendment No. 217. ure hereby incorporated in the license.

The roledo Edison Company shall operate the facility in accordance with the Technical Specifications.

3.

This license amendment is effective as of its date of issuance and shall be implemented no later than 120 days after issuance.

FOR THE NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION Allen G. Hansen, Project Manager Project Directorate 111-3 Division of Reactor Projects 111/IV Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation

Attachment:

Changes to the Technical Specifications Date of issuance: December 2. 1997

ATTACHMENT TO LICENSE AMENDMENT NO. 217 FAClllTY OPERATING LICENSE NO. NPF-3 DOCKET NO. 50-346 Replace the following anges of the Appendix "A" Technical Specifications with the attached pages. T1e revised pages are identified by amendment number and contain vertical lines indicating the area of change.

Remove Insert 3/4 6-28 3/4 6-28 3/4 6-29 3/4 6-29 3/4 7-17 3/4 7-17 3/4 7-18 3/4 7-18 3/4 7-23 3/4 7-23 3/4 9 12 3/4 9-12 B 3/4 7-Sa B 3/4 7-Sa

L CONTAINMENT SYSTEMS r

3/4.6.5 SHIELD BUILDING EMERGENCY VENTILATION SYSTEM LIMITING CONDITION FOR OPERATION 3.6.5.1 Two independent emergency ventilation systems shall be OPERABLE.

APPLICABILITY:

MODES 1, 2, 3 and 4.

ACIION:

With one emergency ventilation system inoperable, restore the inoperable system to OPERABLE status within 7 days or be in at least HOT STANDBY within the next 6 hours6.944444e-5 days <br />0.00167 hours <br />9.920635e-6 weeks <br />2.283e-6 months <br /> and in COLD SHUTDOWN within the following 30

hours, f

SURVEllLANCE RE0VI_REMENTS 4.6.5.1 Each emergency ventilation system shall be demonstrated OPERABLE:

At least once per 31 days on a STAGGERED TEST BASIS by initiating, from the control room, flow through the HEPA filters and charcoal adsorbers and verifying that the system operates for at least 15 minutes, b.

At least once each REFUELING INTERVAL or (1) after any structural l

maintenance on the HEPA filter or charcoal adsorber housings, or (2) following painting, fire or chemical release in any ventilation zone communicating with the system by:

DAVIS-BESSE, UNIT 1 3/4 6-28 Amendment No.1&&r217

[4NTAINMENT SYSTEMS SURVElltf,Ef RE0VIREMENTS (Continued) 1.

Verifying that the cleanup system satisfies the in-place penetration and bypass leakage testing acceptance criteria of less than 1% and uses the test procedure guidance in Regulatory Positions C.5.a. C.5.c and C.S.d of Regulatory Guide 1.52, Revision 2, March 1978, and the system flow rate is 8,000 cfm i 10%;

2.

Verifying, within 31 days after removal, that a laboratory analysis of a representative carbon sample obtained in accordance with Regulatory Position C.6.b of Regulatory Guide 1.52, Revision 2, March 1978, meets the laboratory testing criteria of Regulatory Position C.6.a* of Regulator)

Guide 1.52, Revision 2, March 1978, for a methyliodide penetration of less than 1%; and 3.

Verifying a system flow rate of 8,000 cfm i 10% during system operation when tested in accordance with ANSI N510-1980, c.

After every 720 hours0.00833 days <br />0.2 hours <br />0.00119 weeks <br />2.7396e-4 months <br /> of charcoal adsorber o>eration by verify-ing, within 31 days after removal, that a la) oratory analysis of a representative carbon sample obtained in accordance with Regulatory Position C.6.b of Regulatory Guide 1.52, Revision 2, March 1978, meets the laboratory testing criteria of Regulatory Position C.6.a* of Regulatory Guide 1.52, Revision 2, March 1978, for a methyliodide penetration of less than 1%.

d.

At least once each REFUELING INTERVAL by:

l 1.

Verifying that the pressure drop across the combined HEPA filters and charcoal adsorber banks is less than 6 inches Water Gauge while operating the system at a flow rate of 8,000 cfm i 10%;

2.

Verifying that the system starts automatically on any containment isolation test signal; 3.

Verifying that the filter cooling bypass valves can be manually opened; and

• The test is performed in accordance with ASTM D 3803-1979 with the following conditions:

1) equilibrate for 16 hours1.851852e-4 days <br />0.00444 hours <br />2.645503e-5 weeks <br />6.088e-6 months <br /> at 30'C/70% relative humidity (RH), 2) challenge for 2 hours2.314815e-5 days <br />5.555556e-4 hours <br />3.306878e-6 weeks <br />7.61e-7 months <br /> at 30*C/70% RH, 3) elution for 2 hours2.314815e-5 days <br />5.555556e-4 hours <br />3.306878e-6 weeks <br />7.61e-7 months <br /> at 30'C/70% RH.

DAVIS-BESSE, UNIT 1 3/4 6-29 Amendment No. 4h+35,155,209,217

i PLANT SYSTEMS 3/4.7.6 CONTROL RDON EMERGENCY VENTILATION SYSTEM LIMITING CONDITION FOR OPERATION 3.7.6.1 Two independent control room emergency ventilation systems shall be OPERABLE.

APPLICABILITY: MODES 1, 2, 3 and 4.

ACTION:

With one control room emergency ventilation system inoperable, restore the.

inoperable system to OPERABLE status within 7 days or be in at least HOT STANDBY within the next 6 hours6.944444e-5 days <br />0.00167 hours <br />9.920635e-6 weeks <br />2.283e-6 months <br /> and in COLD SHUTDOWN within the following 30 hours3.472222e-4 days <br />0.00833 hours <br />4.960317e-5 weeks <br />1.1415e-5 months <br />.

SURVEILLANCE REQUIREMENTS 4.7.6.1 fach control room emergency ventilation system shall be demonstrated OPERABLE:

a.

At least once per 12 hours1.388889e-4 days <br />0.00333 hours <br />1.984127e-5 weeks <br />4.566e-6 months <br /> by verifying that the control room air ten.perature is less than or equal to 110'F when the control room emergency ventilation system is operating.

b.

At least once per 31 days on a STAGGERED TEST BASIS by initiating, from the control room, flow through the HEPA filters and charcoal adsorbers and verifying that the system operates for at least 15 minutes, c.

At least once each REFUELING INTERVAL or (1) after any structural l

maintenance on the HEPA filter or charcoal adsorber housings, or (2) following painting, fire or chemical release in any ventilation zone communicatil.g with the system by:

DAVIS-BESSE,' UNIT 1 3/4 7-17 Amendment No. 135,155,217

fibHT SYSTEMS SVRVElllANCE RE0VIREMENTS (ContinuedL

1. Verifying that the cleanup system satisfies the in-place penetration and bypass leakage testing acceptance criteria of less than 1% and uses the test procedure guidance in Regulatory Positions C.S.a. C.S.c and C.S.d of Regulatory Guide 1.52, Revision 2, March 1978, and the system flow rate is 3300 cfm 110%;

2.

Verifying, within 31 days after removal, that a laboratory analysis of a representative carbnn sample obtained in accordance with Regulatory Position C.6.b of Regulatory Guide 1.52 Revision 2, March 1978, meets the laboratory testing criteria of Regulatory Position C.6.a* of Regulatory Guide 1.52, Revision 2, March 1978, for a methyliodide penetration of less than 1%; and 3.

Verifying a system flow rate of 3300 cfm 110% during system operation when tested in accordance with ANSI N510-1980.

d.

After every 720 hours0.00833 days <br />0.2 hours <br />0.00119 weeks <br />2.7396e-4 months <br /> of charcotl adsorber operation by verifying, within 31 days after removal, that a laboratory analysis of a representative carbon sample obtained in accordance with Regulatory Position,6,b of Regulatory Guide 1.52, Revision 2, r

March 1978, meets the laboratory testing criteria of Regulatory Position C.6.a* of Regulatory Guide 1.52, Revision 2, March 1978, for a methyliodide penetration of less than 1%.

e.

At least ence each REFUELING INTERVAL by:

l 1.

Verifying that the pressure drop across the combined HEPA filters and charcoal adsorber banks is less than 4.4 inches Water Gauge while operating the system at a flow rate of 3300 cfm 110%;

2.

Verifying that the control room normal ventilation system is isolated by a SFAS test signal and a Station Vent Radiation High test signal; and The test is performed in accordance with ASTM D 3803-1979 with the following conditions:

1) equilibrate for 16 hours1.851852e-4 days <br />0.00444 hours <br />2.645503e-5 weeks <br />6.088e-6 months <br /> at 30'C/70% relative humidity (RH), 2) challenge for 2 hours2.314815e-5 days <br />5.555556e-4 hours <br />3.306878e-6 weeks <br />7.61e-7 months <br /> at 30'C/70% RH, 3) elution for 2 hours2.314815e-5 days <br />5.555556e-4 hours <br />3.306878e-6 weeks <br />7.61e-7 months <br /> at 30*C/70% RH.

DAVIS-BESSE, UNIT 1 3/4 7-18 Amendment No. 444rl45,155,209,217

PLANT SYSTEMS SURVEllLANCE REOUIREMENTS (Continued)

The inspection interval for functional testing shall be each REFUELING INTERVAL.

Snubbers which are scheduled for removal for seal maintenance may be included in the test sample prior to any maintenance on the snubber.

The representative sample shall conste

' at least 10 group of(rounded off to next highest.?".ger) of each nercent snubbers in use in the Plant. The selection process shall ensure that all snubbers, regardless of their accessibility classification, are functionally tested at least once every ten inspect'on intervals.

c.

Acceptance Criteria for hydraulic snubbers (either N 1 ace testing or bench testing), the test shall verify t1at:

1.

Snubber piston w!11 allow the hydraulic fluid to

" bypass" from one side of the piston to the other to assure unrestrained action is achieved within the specified range of velocity or acceleration in both tension and compression.

2.

When the snubber is subjected to a movement which creates a laid condition thtt exceeds the specified range of velocity or acceleration, the hydraulic fluid is trapped in one end of the snubber causing suppression of that movement.

3.

Snubber release rate or bleed rate, where required, occurs in compression and tension.

For mechanical snubber in place and bench testing, the test shall verify that:

1.

The force tu.t initiates free movement of the snubber rod in either tension or compression is less than the specified maximum drag force.

2.

Activation (restraining action) is achieved in both tension and compression within the specified range.

DAVIS-BESSE, UNIT 1 3/4 7-23 Amendment No. 53,^',111,217 w-

-.g.

g

.w,y.m.,,.-

..m

,w,

,+y,,

7 g,

..7,y.g.._y,,

mr

REFUELING OPERATIONS

~ STORAGE POOL VENTILATION' LIMITING CONDITION FOR OPERATION 3.9.12 Two independent emergency ventilation systems servicing the storage pool area shall be OPERABLE.

APPLICABILITY: Whenever irradiated fuel is in the storage pool.

ACTION:.

a.

With one emergency ventilation system servicing the storage p l area.

inoperable, fuel movement within the storage pool or crane ope.. tion with loads over the storage paol may proceed provided the OPERABLE emergency ventilation system servicing the storage pool area is in operation and discharging through a' ; east one train of HEPA filters and charcoal adsorbars.

b.

With no emergency ventilation system servicing the storage pool area OPERABLE, suspend all operations involving movement of fuel within the storage pool or crane operation with loads over the storage pool until at least one system is restored to OPERABLE status, c.

The provisions of Specifications 3.0.3 and 3.0.4 are not applicable, i

SURVEILLANCE RE0VIREMENTS 4.9.12.1 The above required emergency ventilation systeni servicing the storage pool area shall be demonstrated OPERABLE per the applicable Surveillance Requirements of 4.6.5.1, and at least once each REFUELING INTERVAL-by verifying l

the storage pool area at a negative pressure of 21/8 inc$e pool area maintains that the emergency ventilation system servicing the storag es Water Gauge relative to the outside atmosphere during system operation.

4.9.12.2 The normal. storage caol ventilation system shall be demonstrated CPERABLE at least once each Rif0ELING INTERVAL by verifying that the system fans l

stop automatically and that dampers automatically divert flow into the emergency ventilation syster. On a fuel storage area high radiation test signal.

J DAVIS-BESSE, UNIT 1 3/4 9-12 Amendment No. 4%r217

I PLANT SYSTEMS BASES When a snubber is found inoperable through a visual or functional test, an engineering evaluation is performed, in addition to the determination of the snubber mode of failure, in order to determine if any safety-related component or system has been adversely affected by the inoperability of the snubber.

The engineering evaluation shall determine whether or not the snubber mode of failure has imparted a significant effect u* degrada-tion on the supported component or system.

To provide assurance of snubber functional reliability, e cwre',entative sample of the installed snubbers will be functionally tested each REFUELING INTERVAL.

Observed failures of these sample snubbers shall require functional testing of additional units. When a snubber is found to be inoperable due to failure to lock up or failure to move (i.e., frozen in place), the cause will be evaluated for further action or testing.

In cases where the cause of failure has been identified, additional snubbers that have a high probability for the sama type of failure or are being used in the same application that caused the failure shall be tested. This requirement increases the probability of locating inoperable snubbers without testing 100% of the snubbers.

Hydraulic snubbers and mechanical snubbers may each be treated as a different entity for the above surveillance programs.

DAVIS-BESSE, UNIT 1 B 3/4 7-Sa Amendment No. 947 217

.-