ML20211E333

Forwards Part I, Safeguards Sys Effectiveness Review, Part II, Vital Area Definition & Part III, Safety Safeguards Interface Review, of Regulatory Effectiveness Review Conducted on 840812-17.Encls Withheld (Ref 10CFR73.21)

ML20211E333
Person / Time
Site:	Cook
Issue date:	06/06/1986
From:	Youngblood B Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
To:	Dolan J AMERICAN ELECTRIC POWER SERVICE CORP., INDIANA MICHIGAN POWER CO. (FORMERLY INDIANA & MICHIG
References
NUDOCS 8606130320
Download: ML20211E333 (4)

Text

- ____ - _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ - _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ . _. ____ . _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _

,g.,p y , .. --- . r p,, 7,,

,c utuq .

v [g kg UNITED STATES NUCLEAR RCGULATORY COMMISSION g ;j WASHi -4GTON, D. C. 20555

.qA I

k . . . . . o# JuneN,'1986 I Docket Nos. 50-315/316 ,,

,y.

• . . m .m c::...atta:heents, Mr. John Dolan, Vice President Indiana and Michigan Electric Company C/0 American Electric Power Service Corporation 1 Riverside Plaza Columbus, Ohio 43215

SUBJECT:

DONALD C. COOK NUCLEAR PLANT, UNITS 1 AND 2 - 1EGULATORY EFFECTIVENESS REVIEW From August 12-17, 1984, the NRC conducted a Regulatory Etfectiveness Review (RER) at Donald C. Cook Nuclear Plant, Units 1 and 2. The findings of that review are documented in the enclosed portions of the RER report: Part I, Safeguards Systems Effectiveness Review; Part II, Vital Area Definition; and Part III, Safety / Safeguards Interface Review.

While a number of strengths were observed in your safeguards program, certain safeguards matters were found that warrant further consideration.

Accordingly, it is requested that you provide comments relative to those areas. indicated as needing attention in the above documents. To assist in your consideration of findings, the RER report includes some suggestions as to possible corrective measures. It should not be inferred that these are the only acceptable solutions.

The enclosed portions of the RER report present the findings of the Regulatory Effectiveness Review and do not, in themselves, constitute a requirement for any licensee action. However, some of the findings could constitute potential items of non-compliance. If such findings have not already been addressed during an inspection by the NRC Regional Office, they could be in a future inspection. We recommend that you review your plan in light of these findings and initiate any corrective action necessary to ensure that any possible items of non-compliance are corrected expeditiously.

d5 Your comments on the RER report will be reviewed to determine the need for O any subsequent regulatory actions, including the possible need to initiate

$n{'

mo any backfit procedures. A response within 45 days of the date of this letter will be appreciated.

O:f

% The vital area part of the report is provided to keep you informed of the oc results of the Los Alamos National Laboratory vital area analysis of your 5 plant. It is not intended to convey any new or changed NRC staff position

( or backfit. In fact, NRC policy concerning vital areas is presently undergoing oo staff review. Once the NRC adopts a final position regarding the identification

"" of vital equipment, the vital area analyses of all plants, including Donald C. Cook, will be reevaluated from a licensing perspective.

U ;" ." T1 T l' " ' ~ '

p r. v 9 s .x ;

i6 ,js

- t I"42

,,- The reporting and/or recordkeeping requirements contained in this letter affect fewer than ten respondents; therefore, OMB clearance is not required under P.L.96-511.

The enclosures to this letter contain Safeguards Information of a type specified in 10 CFR 73.21 and must be protected against unauthorized disclosure.

Sincerely,

^^ ^

/

B. J. Youn d, Director PWR Project Directorate #4 -

Division of PWR Licensing-A

Enclosures:

1. Safeguards Systems Effectiveness

. Review, Part I

2. Vital Area Definition, Part II

3. Safety / Safeguards Interface

, Review, Part III cc w/o enclosures: " VIOLATION OF PROTECTION REQUIREMENTS See next page 0F 10 CFR 73.21 SUBJECT TO CIVIL OR CRIMINAL PENALTIES" Eaelosure(s) contain(s)

SAFEGUARDS ;NFORMATION. ==talw Ebon separated f rota attachments.

l l

@!IS_DD0

... IMGSMS"{h)

s

.=

/ Mr. John Dolan Indiana and Michigan Electric Company Donald C. Cook Nuclear Plant cc:

Mr. M. P. Alexich The Honorable John E. Grotberg Vice President United States House of Representatives Nuclear Operations Washington, DC 20515 American Electric Power Service Corporation 1 Riverside Plaza Regie.nl Administrator, Region III Columbus, Ohio 43215 U.S. 4 sclear Regulatory Comission 799 osevelt Road Attorney General Glen dilyn, Illinois 60137 Departrient of Attorney General 525 West Ottawa Street J. Feinstein Lansing, Michigan 48913 American Electric Power Service Corporation Township Supervisor 1 Riverside Plaza Lake Township Hall Columbus, Ohio 43216 Post Office Box 818 Bridgman, Michigan 49106

' W. G. Smith, Jr., Plant Manager Donald C. Cook Nuclear Plant Post Office Box 458 Bridgman, Michigan 49106 U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Comission Resident Inspectors-Office 7700 Red Arrow Highway Stevensville, Michigan 49127 Gerald Charnoff, Esquire Shaw, Pittman, Potts and Trowbridge 1800 M Street, N.W.

Washington, DC 20036

, Mayor, City of Bridgeman Post Office Box 366 Bridgman, Michigan 49106 Special Assistant to the Governor l Room 1 - State Capitol Lansing, Michigan 48909 Nuclear Facilities and Environmental Monitoring Section Office Division of Radiological Health Department of Public Health 3500 N. Logan Street i Post Office Box 30035 Lansing, Michigan 48909 l

l l

. t June 6, 1986 The reporting and/or recordkeeping requirements contained in this letter affect fewer than ten respondents; therefore, OMB clearance is not required under P.L.96-511.

The enclosures to this letter contain Safeguards Information of a type specified in 10 CFR 73.21 and must be protected against unauthorized disclosure.

Sincerely, Original signed by D. Wigginton for B. J. Youngblood, Director PWR Project Directorate #4 Division of PWR Licensing-A

Enclosures:

1. Safeguards Systems Effectiveness Review, Part I

2. Vital Area Definition, Part II

3. Safety / Safeguards Interface Review, Part III cc w/o enclosures: " VIOLATION OF PROTECTION REQUIREMENTS See next page OF 10 CFR 73.21 SUBJECT TO CIVIL OR CRIMINAL PENALTIES" Distribution:

EDocket File -

NRC PDR BJorgensen, Sr. Resident Inspector Local PDR GWMcCorkle CBuracker (2)

EMcPeek DTondi HBerkow MDuncan DWiggington BYoungblood RBurnett, NMSS RErickson, NMSS RDube, NMSS JAHind, Region III JPartlow, IE LTen Eyck, NMSS DPWRL-B:SSPD DPWRL P.SJPD DPWRL- :SSPD D- c)4SSPD CBuracker:ac 2:" T*I N DTondi He ow M an 06/f/86% 06/Y/86 06/y/ 06/6 /86 / 6 P 4 PWR#4/

DW 'ngton BYoungbloo 6

06/(/86