ML20213E736

From kanterella
Revision as of 06:20, 6 August 2021 by StriderTol (talk | contribs) (StriderTol Bot insert)
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Forwards Response to Congressman Markey Re Differences Between 830719 & 0919 Board Notifications Concerning Diablo Canyon Case Study (Case C).W/O Encl
ML20213E736
Person / Time
Site: Diablo Canyon, 05000000
Issue date: 02/07/1984
From: Partlow D, Partlow J
NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE)
To: Eisenhut D
Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
Shared Package
ML20213E738 List:
References
FOIA-86-197 NUDOCS 8402210386
Download: ML20213E736 (1)


Text

..* p*

  • t a s
  1. o UNITED STATES f * ., '*

~ ,j NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION WASHINGTON, D. C. 20555

's,

.....J February 7,1984 MEMORAtlDUM FOR: Darrell Eisenhut. Director Division of Licensing, NRR FROM: James G. Partlow, Acting Director Division of Quality Assurance.

Safeguards, and Inspection Prcgrams Office of Inspection and Enforcement

SUBJECT:

HEARING BOARD NOTIFICAT10flS Cn September 2,1983, you issued a board notification which transmitted the July 19 version of the Diablo Canyon Case Study (Case C). The July 19 version was revised by the case study team, resulting in a September 19 final case study working paper. The September 19 version was the subject of a subsequent board rotification dated October 17, 1983. On November 1, Congressman fiarkey sent a letter to the f RC citing differences between the July 19 and September 19 ve rs ier.s . The fiRC response to the itarkey letter is enclosed for your use in any r.eeded board notification.,

{}

N/_n James . at To Acting Director on of Quality Assurance, Divis/eguards,andInspectionPrograns Sa Office of Inspection and Enforcement Cnclosure:

f:PC Pesponse tc Cecgressman l'arkey's Letter of !!averter 1,1983 cc: OCA j

l 1

n. ,

R V