ML20215G442

Notice of Violation from Insp on 860801-31

ML20215G442
Person / Time
Site:	Waterford
Issue date:	10/16/1986
From:	NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION IV)
To:
Shared Package
ML20215G433	List: IR 05000382/1986016 ML20215G430 ML20215G442
References
50-382-86-16, NUDOCS 8610200374
Download: ML20215G442 (2)

Text

.

APPENDIX A NOTICE OF VIOLATION Louisiana Power & Light Company Docket: 50-382 Waterford Steam Electric Station Unit 3 License: NPF-38 During an NRC inspection conducted on August 1-31, 1986, three violations of NRC requirements were identified. These violations involved failure to properly implement the fire protection program, inadequate execution of the inspection program and failure to properly implement requirements of physical security procedures. In accordance with the " General Statement of Policy and Procedure for NRC Enforcement Actions," 10 CFR Part 2, Appendix C (1986), these violations are listed below:

A. Technical Specification (TS) 6.8.1.f requires that written procedures covering the implementation of the fire protection program be established and implemented. FP-1-017, Revision 2, " Transient Combustibles and Hazardous Materials," is a procedure that implements a portion of the fire protection program. Sections 6.1.18 and 6.3 of FP-1-017 require that combustible liquids shall be placed in safety cans and stored in designated cabinets when not in use.

Contrary to the above, on August 19, 1986, six safety cans, each partially full of combustible liquid, were found unattended in areas containing safety-related equipment.

This is a Severity Level IV violation. (Supplement I)(382/8616-02)

B. 10 CFR 73.55(b)(3)(i) requires, in part, written security procedures "which detail the duties of guards, watchmen, and other individuals resonsible for security . . . ."

The Waterford 3 physical security plan implements the requirements of 10 CFR 73.55(b)(3)(i).

PS-90-101, Revision 3, " Security Department Organization, Duties, and Responsibilities," in part, implements the Waterford 3 physical security plan by detailing the duties and responsibilities of security personnel including the secondary alarm station console operator (SASCO) and the security officer (50). These duties and responsibilities include monitoring equipment on the SAS console in order to fully implement the site security program.

Contrary to the above, the duties and responsibilities specified in PS-90-101, Revision 3, were not properly implemented in that, on August 29, 1986, the NRC inspector observed that the SAS console was not being properly monitored in that publications not related to the' job are being read by the SASCO in the SAS.

This is a Severity Level'IV violation. (Supplement III)(382/8616-03) 8610200374 861016 2 PDR ADOCK 0500 G

C. 10 CFR 50, Appendix B, Criterion X requires, in part, that, "A program for inspection of activities affecting quality shall be established and executed by or for the organization performing the . activity to verify conformance with the documented instructions, procedures, and drawings for accomplishing the activity.. . . ." ,,

Contrary to the above, the Louisiana Power and Light Company inspection program was not adequately executed to ensure proper installation of certain components as described below:

1._ The front and rear anchor welds for the hydrogen recombines power supply panel B were not installed as required by the installation drawing.

2. One of the anchor bolt nuts for the 120V nuclear instrumentation static uninterruptible power supply 3MBS panel did not have the minimum thread engagement required by installation specifications.

This is a Severity Level IV violation. (SupplementII)(382/8616-05)

Pursuant to the provisions of 10 CFR 2.201, Louisiana Power & Light Company is hereby required to submit to this office within 30 days of the date of the letter transmitting this Notice, a written statement or explanation in reply, including for each violation: (1) the reason for the violations if admitted,

2) the corrective steps which have been taken and the results achieved.

3) the corrective steps which will be taken to avoid further violations, and

4) the date when full compliance will be achieved. Where good cause is shown, consideration will be given to extending the response time.

Dated at Arlington, Texas, this /69 dayof$c,#. 1986

- - - . .