ML20247C999

From kanterella
Revision as of 13:38, 11 February 2021 by StriderTol (talk | contribs) (StriderTol Bot insert)
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Jump to navigation Jump to search
NPDES Noncompliance Notification:On 890714,overflow from Spray Pond Blowdown Manhole & Unpermitted Discharge to Outfall 009 Observed.Discharge Stopped by Repositioning Barrier to Account for Increase in Water Level
ML20247C999
Person / Time
Site: Limerick  Constellation icon.png
Issue date: 07/19/1989
From: Mccormick M
PECO ENERGY CO., (FORMERLY PHILADELPHIA ELECTRIC
To: Bauer R
PENNSYLVANIA, COMMONWEALTH OF
References
NUDOCS 8907240503
Download: ML20247C999 (3)


Text

1 o  :

PHILADELPHIA ELECTRIC COMPANY - 1 LIMERICK GENER ATING STATION P.C). BOX A j S AN ATOG A, PENNSYLV ANI A 19464 July 19, 1989 l q

Mr. Robert Bauer, Jr.

Department of Environmental Resources Bureau of Water Quality Management 1875 New Hope Street Norristown, PA 19401'

Subject:

Unpermitted Discharge to Outfall 009, Limerick Generating Station, NPDES Permit No. PA-0051926 1

Dear Mr. Bauer:

i On July 14, 1989 at approximately 3:00 p.m. oral i notification of a non-compliance with the provisions of our NPDES permit was given to Mr. Norm Leyland. Upon completion of our preliminary investigations an hour later, the details of the non-compliance were presented to Mr. David Burke.

At 1100 that same day, water was observed to be flowing from the spray pond blowdown manhole. Routine surveillance of the manhole was in place due to past overflow problems.

A subsequent inspection of outfall 009, . which . ultimately would collect this overflow, revealed water flowing at approximately-25 gallons per minute. Upon- checking the H l spray pond, it was discovered that the level had. risen three inches since the previous afternoon. A barrier was in use ,

that would allow controlled pond discharge at a rate that i the normal drain line could handle, yet still prev >ent level 1 increases that would overflow the shoreline. The three inch -)

increase brought the level above that of the barrier. While I this prevented overflowing pond edges, it produced greater  ;

flow than the normal drain line was designed for. This  !

resulted in overflow from an associated manhole, and- j ultimate discharge through outfall 009.

The . discharge from. outfall 009 was stopped at approximately 1145 by repositioning the barrier to account for the level change. The level of the pond was then '

lowered by pumping the water to the Unit 1 cooling tower.

8907240503 890719 hr PDR ADOCK 05000352 0 S PDC

_s

4

~

N Page 2 i

Subsequent investigations revealed that one of several intertie valves between our Emergency Service Water (ESW)

. system, which operates from the Spray Pond, and our normal .

service water system, which operates from a cooling tower, )

was left. open. This allowed water to flow into the spray pond at approximately 700 gallons per minute. The ESW system was in operation for approximately three hours before the discharge was terminated. We determined based on the visual observations at 009, the estimated. total discharge was 5000 gallons. However, as mentioned to Mr. Burke, there.

is approximately 100 yards of land between the'outfall and the river. Therefore, it is very unlikely that any of this water actually entered the river. The discharged water was-of pH 8.5 and of discharge quality for the normal outfall j 001. -

Although this is a recurrence of a similar event in April 1989, the corrective actions taken at that time, and i the. heightened awareness of the situation, substantially d decreased the extent of the discharge. This recurrence appears to be due in part to a procedural deficiency. A meeting is planned to discuss this event and to develop corrective actions to prevent recurrence. We will inform you of these actions by September 1, 1989, i

Sincerely,

- i I

[g M. J. McCormick, Jr.  !

v Plant Manager {

SCD:sjm i sed 7/14/89.1 i cc: U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Document Control Desk i Washington, D.C. 20555  !

Administrator Region I  !

Office of Inspections and Enforcement l U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission '

475 Allendale Road ,

King of Prussia, PA 19406  !

Station Resident NRC Inspector Tom Kenny, M.C. #NRC i I

I I

t$

', Page 3 Program Management Section (3WM52)

Permits Enforcement Branch Water Management Division Environmental Protection Agency Water Permits Section Region III 841 Chestnut Building Philadelphia, PA 19107

- _ _____ _ __________ - _ - __ _- _ _ - _ _ _ - _