ML20237H678

FOIA Request for Insp Repts 50-445/81-94,50-445/82-28, 50-445/83-05,50-445/83-42,50-445/83-45,50-445/87-01, 50-445/87-04 & 50-445/81-05.Last Rept,Requested in FOIA Request 87-119,not Obtained Due to Accession Number Error

ML20237H678
Person / Time
Site:	Comanche Peak
Issue date:	06/25/1987
From:	Williams O JRA ASSOCIATES
To:	Grimsley D NRC
References
FOIA-87-411 OGW-87-060-TBL, OGW-87-60-TBL, NUDOCS 8708170309
Download: ML20237H678 (5)

Text

- - - - -

-J/R/A .

J/R/A/ ASSOCIATES Regulato;y Information and Support Systeins

~1304 REDDITCH COURT, I.ARGO. MARYLAND 20772 (Sol) 556 4982 6Izde,

/ OGW 0 4 0 - D l i l Mr. Donnie H. Grimsley, Director AE l Division of Rules and Records REQUEST f

l 0ffice of Administration U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission

$# -g"/-y//

Washington, D.C. 20555 -- --

-7) l-

SUBJECT:

FREEDOM OF INFORMATION ACT REQUEST i

Dear Hr. Grimsley:

l j

l Pursuant to the Freeoom of Information Act, lease make available in the Public j Document Roor.1 all documents described in the appendix to this letter. That- {

information Jhould include all attachments and enclosures from the ' original '

l document (s).

Thank you for a prompt response to this. request, Feel free to call me at the number above for any further information needed to assist in satisfying this request. I l

Sinc ly yours. l

. (.

g' Wh i 4 Ophe G. Wi iams APPENDIX:INFORMATION/DQ3MENTS NEEDED:

Goradaae pug MspeevoM Renus:

)LE.hs2. SEz LtST orJ NLXT PAse.

$ap70890,.SE-1g me PDR m.

'COMANCHN'PEAKINSPECTIONREPORTS:

50445/81-94

50445/82-28 50445/83-05 50445/83-42 50445/83-45

, 50445/87-01 l 50445/87-04 l 50445/81-05 I

l I would-like to' mention that 81-05 was requested in F0IA req'uest 87-119 to which

! your office responded that it was already.ir, the Public' Document Room under the accession number 8106090434. Your response seems to be based on an erroneous data base record, a copy of which is enclosed. If your will review the' document transmitted under 8106090434, you will find inspection 50445/81-06. (See enclosures.)

Page 2 of that' document-discusses 50445/81-05 which is one of the items herein L requested.

l

9 LOOK ' REG ]

10025/4928.  ;

~ACN:- 8106090434 . j '

DATE: 810519 DTC: .TI/ TEXT-INSPECTION & AUDIT & I&E CIRCULARS DTC: UTIN/* INSPECTION REPORT, UTILITY 1 PAGES: 7 L1:- IE INSP REPTS 50-445-81-05 &'50-446-81-05 DURING APR 1981.

L2: NO NONCOMPLIANCE NOTED. MAJOR AREAS INSPECTED: FOLLOWUP ON <

L3: PREVIOUSLY IDENTIFIED INSP FINDINGS PROTECTION OF INSTALLED a L4: EQUIPMENT & INSTRUMENT CABLE INSTALLATION.-

FICHE: 08741:018-08741:024 -j PFL: ADOCK-5000445-Q-810521 .;

LPDR: Y  !

, DKT: 50445Q/fCOMANCHE PEAK STEAM ELECTRIC STATION, UNIT 1, TEXAS

' DKT:' 50446Q/# COMANCHE PEAK STEAM ELECTRIC STATION, UNIT 2, TEXAS

, RPT: 50-445-81-6 l RPT: 50-446-81-6  !

! AN#1: TAYLOR R G AN#2: CROSSMAN W A~

' AAf1: NIE4RP3/0 PROJECT SECTION 3  !

' AAf2: .

NIE4RP3/9 PROJECT SECTION 3 PACKAGE: 810521-8106090428A R OTHER: 8106090428 i D END j

!1 HITS j

-j l

1 I

1 l

i i

i a.

~

U. S.. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSICN' 0FFICE OF. INSPECTION AND ENFORCEMENT REGION'IV .,

Reports: 50-445/81-06;-50-446/81 Dockets: 50-445;-50-446 Category:

L A2 Licensee: Texas ' Utilities Generating Company 2001 Bryan Tower j Dallas, Texas 75201-

{

Facility Name: Comanche Peak, Units 1 and 2 Inspection at: Comanche Peak Steam Electric Station V Inspection

.q Conducted: April 1981 -]

Inspector: / -, -

R. G. Taylor, Resicent Reactor In~spector S//9lBf Projects Section No. 3 Date-

.1 '

l l Approved: =

W. A, Crossman, chief S//M8/

Reactor Projects Section No. 3 Date Inspection Summary:

. Inspection during April 1981 (Re,9ert 50-445/81-06; 50-446/81-06)

Areas Inspected:

Routine, announced inspection by the Resident Reactor Inspector (RRI) including general site tours; followup on previously' identified inspection findings; protection of installed equipment; installation and welding of safety-relater

• piping; installation of large pipe restraint l systems; and instrument cable installation. The inspection involved.87 inspector-hours by. the RRI.

Results:

No violations or deviations were identified.

O f

I

. , .. =

)

j .,

2 -

k DETAILS

1. Persons Contacted Prinicipal Licensee Employees  :

• R. G. Tolson, TUGCO, Site Quality Assurance Supervisor "J. R. Merritt, TUSI, Engineering and Construction Manager Other Persons l J. V. Hawkins, Brown and Root, Project Quality Assurance Manager The RRI also interviewed other licensee and Brown and Rgot employees during )

V the inspection period. ,

)

1

• Denotes those persons with whom the RRI held on-site management meetings during the inspection period. ,

j

(

2. Licensee Action On Previous Inspection Findings "

1 l

(Closed) Violation (50-445/81-02) Failure to Follow Procedures For Piping  ;

l Installation. As noted in Inspection Report 50-445/81-05; 50-446/81-05,

paragraph 2, all procedures and instructions with associated training- 4 L relative to this matter issued during March 1981 provide a substantial- '

improvement in the area of properly supporting partially installed piping. l l

The RRI has been provided with a detailed stress analysis which indicated j i that no damage was sustained by the piping found unsupported by the RRI '

on February 20, 1981. During the past several weeks, the RRI has observed a sustained effort to prnvide temporary "hard" supports for piping whera g the permanent supports have not been installed. These supports are usually fastened to the building structure or clamped to the piping and bolted in place so as to make removal substantially more difficult than the previously used wood blocking, chain falls 'and "come-a-longs." The licensee also issued an informal instruction giving recommended spacing between supports  !

for various sizes of pipe. The recommendations were based on industry practice and were extracted from the " Standard Handbook for Mechanical Ergineers" by Baumeister and Marks. . Although this matter is considered closed for the purposes of this report, the matter will continue to receive close attention from the RRI and other NRC Inspectors since a substantial amount of piping is yet to be installed in Unit 2.

a t

)

u 4

4