ML20214P803

From kanterella
Revision as of 22:12, 18 January 2021 by StriderTol (talk | contribs) (StriderTol Bot insert)
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Notice of Deposition of J Hansel in Dallas,Tx Immediately Following Deposition by J Beck.Related Correspondence
ML20214P803
Person / Time
Site: Comanche Peak  Luminant icon.png
Issue date: 09/18/1986
From: Garde B
Citizens Association for Sound Energy, TRIAL LAWYERS FOR PUBLIC JUSTICE, P.C.
To:
Shared Package
ML20214P697 List:
References
OL, NUDOCS 8609240062
Download: ML20214P803 (4)


Text

  • '1 ,

YI@NM COLKEtED ddFOMs Tus USNBC UNITS 0 STATES NUCLBAR REGOLATORY COMMISSION 8erore tne Atomic Satety and Licensing Boara 16 37 22 P1 :12 in tne Matter ot )

hFFICE U' Eb"dMY0CK BRANCH I

T8xAS OTILITisS GdN8 RATING COMPANY, J Okt. Nos. 50-445-OL et al. ) 50-446-OL

)

-(Comancne Peak Steam 81ectric )

Station, Units 1 ano 21 J NOTICB OF DEPOSITION Intervenor CASB, pursuant to Rule JU(b) or tne Federal Rules or Civil Proceaure and lu CFR m32.720 and 740a, nereoy provices notice tnat, immealately rollowing tne deposition ot Jonn Beck,-

intervenor will taxe tne deposition upon oral examination or Jonn Hansel. Tne oeposition w111 De nela in Dallas, Texas, at the ottices of Frederick Baron ano Associates, Suite 1400, Dallas Feoeral Savings Builaing, 63JJ Uouglas Avenue, Dallas 75225.

Tne aeposition will continue trom day to day until completea, subject to sucn aajournment as may be agreea upon oy Counsel.

Mr. Hansel is also directea to bring to tne aeposition, as inoicated of tne enclosea suopoena, all accuments in nis custoaf or possession (or unaer nas control) tnat reter or relate in any Way to:

til Tne responsiolittles ana tasks Mr. Hansel nas now and nas nao regarainy tne uevelopment ana implementation or tne CPHT l'  !

p r og r asa.

8609240062 860918 PDR ADOCK 05000445 Q PDR L

. t . *

(2) The citterences Detween tne Comanche Peak reinspection program and the staidwood reinspection program, including an explanation or now tne implementation flaws laentified in the Braiowood program were corrected in tne Comanene Peak program.

(3) Tne interface between tne yA/wC Team ano the CPSES Project.

(4) dow tne nomogenous work activities were established.

(s) Tne October 1983 "stop work" oroer and subsequent "oacxtit" activities resulting therefrom.

(6) The backfit of the CPRT to comport with the NRC comments in SSSR 614.

(7) Tne quality or construction program, including the ISAP VII.c. program elements tnat resolve the SSER fil Appendix P concerns.

(d) Tne nistory ana aevelopment of the CPRT through its revisions to the present. '

(9) Tne process tnrougn which TdEC implements 10 CPR Part du, Appendix d, responsibilities in regard to CPRT activities.

(10) Tne sarety signiricance evaluation process.

l (11) Tne collective evaluation program.

(12; Tne Senior Review Team aecision process and the process oy whicn it controls tne CPRT.

tid) Tne removal ot Monty Wise as Electrical Review Team Leauer.

(14) Tne selection and evaluation process of ERC as the tnira party reviewer.

t' (13) Any otner matters with respect to tne CPRT prpgram

. 4 ~

acequacy, incluaing the Region IV NRC ana TRT involvement in the oevelopment and implementation of the program.

o

" Document" shall mean every instrument or aevice by which, tnrougn wnicn, or on wnica information has oeen recoraed, including those retlecting meetings, discussions, or conversations; notes; letters; orawings; tiles; graphs;; charts; maps; photographs; deeds; studies; data sheets; notebooks; books; appointment calendars; telepnone bills; telephone messages; receipts; voucners; minutes of meetings; pamphlets; computations; calculations; accounting (s); financial statements; voice recoroings; homputer printouts; ano any device or medium on wnich or tnrougn which intormation of any type is transmitted,

, recoraea, or preserved. The term "cocument" also means every copy or a aocument wnen such copy is not an iaentical duplicate of the original.

Counsel for intervenor will ask Mr. Hansel to identify each document produced in response to the enclosed subpoena and counsel may examine Mr. Hansel concerning tne contents of tne accuments proauced.

Counsel for intervenor will examine Mr. Hansel on all mattters relevant to tne adequacy of the CPRT and the above mentioneo matters ano all explanations given by Applicants.

. . ~.. ___ _ _ .__ ._ ,_ . . _ . _ -

i 4

Respectfully submitted, x- fAA /

BILLIE P. GARDE *, y, f Trial Lawyers for Public Justice \

3424 North Marcos Lane Appleton, WI 54911 Counsel for CAbE i Dateo: September lo, 1980 I

w- --- - , - - - ,, - . --- - - - < .,,.y.,, ,-r,,---,, --- ..,y-,-- , . - - , --m-- - - , , , ,e-,- .,yme,----ey,m,-.g , .. ,, - , - , ---,,---,~-yv-,-- -- - ,