ML20150C555

Comment Opposing Proposed Rule 10CFR50 Re Emergency Planning & Preparedness Requirements for Nuclear Power Plant Fuel Loading & Initial Low Power Operations

ML20150C555
Person / Time
Site:	Seabrook
Issue date:	06/06/1988
From:	Malionik D, Malionik R, Malionik S AFFILIATION NOT ASSIGNED
To:	Chilk S NRC OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY (SECY)
References
FRN-53FR16435, RULE-PR-50 53FR16435-01641, 53FR16435-1641, NUDOCS 8807120532
Download: ML20150C555 (1)

Text

DOCKET NUMBER l'R0 POSED RUl.E $ 5 o

(. 6 3 F K 1 p { i s)

-x q u 0 3 Ni". g,

(/

'88 JUN 28 P5 :26 June 6, 1988 Samuel J. Chilk 'b '1 I Secretary of the Commission f0 BR AWAt t en' t ion : Docketing U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission and Service Branch 1717 H Street, N.W.

Washington, D.C. 20555

Dear Sir:

On May 9, 1988, the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) published a proposed change to its emergency planning requirements for fuel loading and low-power operation of nuclear power plants.

The proposed rule change would eliminate many existing low power licensing requirements, including offsite emergency response plans, any public-notification systems (including sirens), and the training of offsite emergency response personnel.

As a resident of the Seabrook nuclear plant area, I vigorously oppose the proposed amendment to existing safety requirements.

The proposed rule has been developbd with only the ut111ty's interests in mind. The NRC is once again moving to place the public at risk for the sole purpose of allowing Secbrook Station to obtain a low-power license, even though the question of whether it will ever be granted a full-power license is seriously in doubt.

In the interest of public safety, I urge the Commission to reject the proposed rule change. All offsite emergency response planning requirements must be in place before allowing any degree of risk to the public, including risks from low power operation.

Sincerely, 8807120532 880606 PDR PR 50 53FR16435 PDR Name and Address:

m a aat 6~

dwh <$&qn _

$so