ML20274A160
| ML20274A160 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Issue date: | 01/07/2020 |
| From: | Roldan L NRC/NMSS/DMSST |
| To: | |
| Roldan-Otero L | |
| Shared Package | |
| ML20183A152 | List: |
| References | |
| Download: ML20274A160 (1) | |
Text
Comment Resolution Document - External Summary of Comments for Interim SA-100, Integrated Materials Implementation Program (IMPEP)
Sent to the Agreement States, NRC NMSS, NRC Regions I, III, and IV for Comment in STC letter 20-004, dated January 7, 2020 Comment Source Location Comment Accepted Remarks No.
1 Colorado SA-100 Section V.E.2 lists Compatibility Yes Change made.
Section Requirements as an item, but this item has V.E.2 changed names in SA-107.
2 Wisconsin V.C.4.b. Can the NRC clarify when should the MRB Yes The MRB should be be scheduled? Page 12 says no later than scheduled between 90-105 90 days after the IMPEP exit meeting and days. Language was added page 26 says approximately 90-105 days on page 12 to be consistent from the last day of the IMPEP review. with page 26.
3 New Jersey Introduction To be consistent with SA-102. Others need Yes Changes made to be changing if this is the protocol. consistent with other SA procedures.
4 New Jersey V.M Are there any timeframes that the EDO NA SA-106 outlines the appeal must follow? 90 days after appeal, or process and timeframes. The some other timeframe? SA-100 points to that procedure in Section V.5 where it references MRBs.