ML20127D601
| ML20127D601 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Braidwood  |
| Issue date: | 10/12/1984 |
| From: | Hansel J EVALUATION RESEARCH CORP. |
| To: | |
| Shared Package | |
| ML20127D578 | List: |
| References | |
| NUDOCS 8506240282 | |
| Download: ML20127D601 (90) | |
Text
__ _ -__ -_______
EVALUATION RESEARCH CORPORATION (ERC)
BRAIDWOOD CONSTRUCTION ASSESSMENT PROGRAM (BCAP)
INDEPENDENT EXPERT OVERVIEW GROUP (IEOG)
First Interim Report (March - September 1984)
--+ Y /c 2.s W
\
/
John L. Hansel Date Project Manager fh R
h
r TABLE OF CONTENTS Page
- 1. EXECUTIVE
SUMMARY
...................... 1
- 2. INTRODUCTORY REMARKS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3 2.1 Fu nc ti on o f the I E0G . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3 2.2 Brief Historical Background .............. 4
- 3. ACTIVITIES AND PROGRESS ................... 6 3.1 IEOG Quality Assurance Pl an and Procedures . . . . . . . 6 3.1.1 Quality Assurance Plan ............. 6 3.1.2 Quality Assurance Procedures .......... 7 3.2 Doc umen t Revi ews . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9 3.2.1 Nature of Comments ............... 11 3.2.2 Resolution of Comments ............. 12 3.2.3 Current IEOG Position on BCAP Documents . . . . . 12 3.2.4 Open Issues . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 12 3.3 Surveill ances ..................... 12 3.3.1 Surveill ances Performed . . . . . . . . . . . . . 12 3.3.2 Re sul ts to D ate . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 14 3.4 A ud i t s . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 14 3.5 Observations and Request for Corrective Action . . . . . 15 3.5.1 Ob s e rv ati on s I s s ue d . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 15 3.5.2 Discussion of Observations ........... 17 3.5.3 Request for Corrective Action Issued ...... 18 3.6 Open Issues and Concerns . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 18 3.6.1 Delineation of Open Issues and Concerns . . . . . 19 3.6.2 Significance of Each Open Issue and Concern . . . 19 3.6.3 Requirements for Resolution of Each Open Issue and Concern . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 20
- 4. PROJECTED NEAR-TERM ACTIVITIES . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 22
- 5. IE0G PROGRAM ASSESSMENT ................... 24 APPENDICES . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 25 APPENDIX A. Resumes for Personnel ............. 26 APPENDIX B. Trai ni ng Record s . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 65 APPENDIX C. Certification Records ............. 75 APPENDIX D. Quali ty Assurance Pl an . . . . . . . . . . . . . 87 APPENDIX E. Ob serv ati on s . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 116 APPENDIX F. Audit Reports ................. 127 i
i i
i
4 i
LIST OF TABLES
, Table Page 3.1 Quality Assurance Procedures for BCAP . . . . . . . . . . . . 8 3.2 ERC Audits of BCAP ,.................... 16 i
4 1
i J
i I
i
- . . - . - . - . . , . . , - . - _ . . . - . . - - _ - . _ - - - - . - . . - - . . . . - - . . . . - _ _ _ . - - . . . . - . - - _ - - - = _
4 STATEMENT OF INDEPENDENCE This Interim Report delineates the activities and progress of the Independent Expert Overview Group (IE0G) assembled by Evaluation Research Corporation (ERC) to perfonn an overview of the Braidwood Construction Assessment Program (BCAP) being conducted by Commonwealth Edison Company (CECO) at the Braidwood Station.
As the ERC Project Manager for this overview activity, I certify that the IE0G has maintained independence from other organizations at the Braid-wood Station and that the IE0G has not been coerced by any of the parties involved but has received complete cooperation from each project partici-pant contacted.
/
~
John L. Hansel Project Manager tii
The open issues and concerns currently being watched by the IEOG are:
o The open observation o Inspector certification o Completion of document revisions to incorporate coments agreed upon by the BCAP Task Force, and to remove anomolies among doctments.
As the programmatic phase changes to the implementation phase, the IE0G will switch its emphasis to overview of inspections and construction procedure review. This will comprise a major effort of the IEOG in the near future.
I l
{
l l
l t .
- 2. INTRODUCTORY REMARKS Comonwealth Edison Company (CECO) has undertaken a program of inspections and mytews as a prudent measure to answer any legit 0nate question concerning the overall quality of construction of the Braidwood Station. This effort is in addition to the ongoing implementation of CECO's Quality Assurance Program. These inspections and reviews comprise the BCAP. The objectives of BCAP are to assure that:
o There are no programatic design-significant problems in the construction of Braidwood which have not been identified and addressed; o the on-site contractors' procedures governing the ongoing safety-related construction and quality assurance activities address all applicable design and regulatory requirements; and o where past construction problems have been identified which re-suited in significant corrective actions, such corrective actions have been adequately implemented and documented.
2.1 Function of the IE0G CECO retained the services of Evaluation Research Corporation (ERC),
of Arlington, Virginia as an outside organization to bring together and
[ direct a team of experts whose purpose is to provide an independent
! overview of the BCAP. ERC has formed this team of senior experts and professional staff to work under the direction of Mr. John L. Hansel.
The IE0G activities include the following:
l l 0 Conducting an overall review of the BCAP scope doctsnent objectives, and a review of each of the BCAP elements to determine if the BCAP elements will fulfill their objectives.
l l 3
o Ascertaining if the BCAP effort is identified in the scope docu-ments, is properly focused, and whether the goals of the BCAP are being fulfilled.
o Conducting audits that will address the implementation of each of the BCAP elements. Items to be specifically audited will be ad-herence to Program procedures, evaluation of Quality Assurance involvement, qualifications of the personnel performing inspec-tions, and identification of nonconformances and adequacy of the corrective actions.
o Performing an independent review of selected BCAP identified dis-crepancies to provide assurance that the engineering evaluation for design significance was adequately performed and documented.
o Preparing in-depth audit reports.
The results of the overview are to be submitted in periodic reports to the Manager of Projects with a copy to the President and Chairman of the Board of CECO.
2.2 Brief Historical Background Mr. Hansel of ERC was initially contacted on March 8,1984 by Mr.
James O' Conner requesting Mr. Hansel to visit with him concerning a planned assessment of the quality of construction at the Braidwood Facility. Mr.
Hansel met briefly with Mr. O' Conner to gain some insight into the planned project. An additional meeting was held on March 19, 1984 with other members of the staff to define the scope of work for ERC.
Initially, the program was entitled as the Quality Requirements Verification Program (QRVP), and consisted of those corrective action programs now included in the Review of Significant Corrective Action 4
Program (RSCAP) elemene of BCAP. Outlined below are some of the significant program milestones:
- 1. March 19, 1984 - ERC received written authorization to begin work in support of Ceco on the QRYP.
- 2. March 23,1984 - ERC submitted a written proposal to Ceco.
- 3. From March 23, 1984 to April 27, 1984 - CECO redefined the program and released the first draft of the BCAP plan on April 27, 1984.
- 4. June,1984 - CECO released the first official version of the BCAP.
This was then followed by a BCAP Overview Plan, and three separate element plans for Construction Sample Reinspection (CSR), Reveri-fication of Procedures to Specification Requirements (RPSR), and RSCAP.
- 5. July 22,1984 - CECO forwarded the BCAP plan to the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) for their review and acceptance.
- 6. July 27,1984 - Mr. Keppler, NRC Region III Administrator, responded to Ceco with a set of comments and rec,ommendations, and their requirements for protocol to be followed between ERC, CECO, and the NRC.
- 7. August 30, 1984 - Mr. O' Conner of CECO responded to Mr. Keppler's comments and recommendations.
- 8. September 6,1984 - The first BCAP status meeting was held between CECO, the NRC, and ERC. This meeting was open to the public as requested by the'NRC.
5
- 3. ACTIVITIES AND PROGRESS 3.1 IE0G Quality Assurance Plan and Procedures 3.1.1 Quality Assurance Plan The Quality Assurance P1an which the ERC IEOG applied to the scope of work for CECO, BCAP at the Braidwood Station, Braceville, IL, is described in the Quality Assurance Plan Docunent No. BCAP-001 ( Appendix D).
The plan is designed to assure that the program activities affecting the validity of the program results are conducted in accordance with the applicable quality assurance requirements of Title 10 of the Code of Federal Regulations, Part 50, Appendix B (10 CFR 50, Appendix B).
In order to conduct an independent overview, it is essential that the IE0G operate with an unrestricted degree of freedom. As such, the Quality Assurance Plan provides for the monitoring of the BCAP organization in a nunber of ways to determine if the BCAP activities are being fulfilled, i.e.:
o Attending meetings o Reviewing p1 ans and procedures o Conducting random and unstructured surveillances and reviews of certain aspects of the program o Assessing the process for identifying discrepancies and methods used for determining corrective actions o Conducting formal audits The scope of the IE0G required that it perform certain tasks which came under the purview of 10 CFR 50, Appendix B, such as audits, inspect-ions, training, records management, etc. The Quality Assurance Plan therefore identified the applicable criteria and the centrols to be applied 6
z l
by ERC. As such, the following criteria (ntsnber and title) of 10 CFR 50, Appendix B, were addressed in the plan:
1.0 Organization and Responsibilities 2.0 Quality Assurance Program 4.0 Procurement Docunent Control 5.0 Instructions, Procedures and Drawings 6.0 Document Control 10.0 Inspection 15.0 Nonconforming Material, Parts and Components 16.0 Corrective Action 17.0 Quality Assurance Records 18.0 Audits The ERC/BCAP Project Manager approved the Quality Assurance Plan and issued a directive to all personnel who either perfonned or verified work that compliance with the Quality Assurance Plan was mandatory.
3.1.2 Quality Assurance Procedures The Quality Assurance Plan provides that all activities affecting quality are to be accomplished in accordance with documented policies and procedures. Additionally, appropriate quantitative and qualitative means of l verifying quality are to be satisfactorily delineated and included as well.
ERC subsequently established written procedures implementing the Quality l Assurance Plan requirements to provide assurance that all activities
( affecting quality are planned, controlled, and docunented, as appropriate.
Each procedure contains instructions for the execution of activities.
Approval and distribution of procedures, as well as changes to these pro-l cedures are controlled by the Quality Assurance Manager. Details of measures l
implemented to control the preparation, review, approval, release, change, and distribution of procedures are described in the Quality Assurance Plan
- and docunented in a specific Quality Assurance Procedure. The ERC Procedures l applicable to the BCAP program are identified in Table 3.1.
l l
l 7
Table 3.1 Quality Assurance Procedures for BCAP QAP-1.1 Personnel Qualifications QAP-1.2 Indoctrination and Training of Per-sonnel QAP-2.1 Daily Log QAP-5.1 Preparation, Review and Approval of Quality Assurance Procedures QAP-6.1 Distribution and Control of Quality Assurance Doctments QAP-10.1 Quality Review and Surveillance QAP-10.2 Qualification and Certification of Inspection Personnel QAP-15.1 Documentation and Disposition of Ob-servations and Discrepancies QAP-16.1 Corrective Action QAP-17.1 Quality Assurance Records Program QAP-18.1 Quality Assurance Audit Program QAP-18.2 Qualification of Audit Personnel 1
8 1
ERC personnel assigned to the BCAP program were selected based on their personal and professional qualifications and education. Indoctri-nation and training sessions were conducted for all project members which covered the purpose and scope of the program, as well as the implementation of quality-related procedures and instructions. Where required, selected personnel were qualified or certified to perfonn certain tasks, such as aujiting or inspecting. Appendices A, B, and C provide resumes, records of training, and certification of the ERC personnel assigned to BCAP.
3.2 Document Reviews Since the inception of the IE0G, many doctanents have been reviewed and comments have been provided to the BCAP team. Included in the IE0G review were many drafts of the BCAP policy doctanent, beginning with the initial preliminary draft. In addition, each of the following doctanents has been reviewed and. coninents provided to the BCAP team:
o BCAP - Overview Plan o BCAP Plan for Review of Significant Corrective Action Program (RSCAP Plan) o BCAP Plan for Reverification of Procedures to Specification Requirements (RPSR P1an) o BCAP Plan for Construction Sample Reinspection (CSR Plan) o BCAP Site Quality Assurance Overview Group Plan (QA Plan) o BCAP Procedures
- BCAP-01 Program Indoctrination for Employees
- BCAP-02 Organization and Responsibility
- BCAP-03 Records Management
- BCAP-04 BCAP Interface with Contractors and Architect / Engineer
- BCAP-05 (now deleted)
- BCAP-06 Observation and Discrepancy / Concern Processing
- BCAP-07 BCAP Reports
- BCAP-08 Qualification and Certification of Reinspection Personnel
- BCAP-20 CSR-Establish Populations
- BCAP-21 CSR-Sample Selection 9
- BCAP-22 CSR-Preparation of Instructions and Checklists
- BCAP-23 CSR-Performance of Inspection and Docunent Review
- BCAP-25 (not yet available)
- BCAP-40 (now deleted)
- BCAP-41 RPSR-Identification of Specifications and Contractor Procedures
- BCAP-42 RPSR-Preparation of Checklists
- BCAP-43 RPSR-Review of Contract Procedures
- BCAP-60 RSCAP-Review Methods o Quality Assurance Special Instructions
- QASI-01 Control of Quality Assurance Special Instructions
- QASI-02 Corrective Action Requests
- QASI-03 (now deleted)
- QASI-04 Training, Qualification and Certification of Quality Assurance Personnel
- QASI-05 Correspondence Control
- QASI-06 Document Reviews
- QASI-07 Surveill ances
- QASI-08 Audits
- QASI-09 Docunentation/ Records Control
- QASI-10 Interface with the SCAP Task Force
- QASI-11 Monthly Status Report
- QASI-12 Final Overview Report
- QASI-13 Stop Work Order
- QASI-14 Trend Analysis
- QASI-15 Sample Selection
- QASI-16 Performance of Reinspection and Docunent Review Overview o CSR Checklists
- Small Bore Piping Configuration
- Conduit
- Concrete P1acement
- HVAC Duct
- AWS DI.3 Visual Weld Inspection
- Generic AWS D1.1 Visual Weld Inspection
- HVAC Hangers and Auxiliary Steel 10
with regard to these elements (codes, specs., etc.)", including FSAR com-mitments and regul atory requirements. Comments were also provided in this letter r<egarding sampling techniques for CSR.
Many comments have been provided regarding the necessity for a con-sistent cut-off date for old work versus new work, with regard to BCAP.
3.2.2 Resolution of Comments To date, all comments have been resolved. However, not all comments have been incorporated. It is presently expected that the next revision of the BCAP vrogram Document, the BCAP Overview Plan, the RSCAP Plan, the CSR Plan, the BCAP QA Plan, and BCAP Procedures BCAP-07 and -60 will incorpo-rate the remaining resolved connents.
3.2.3 Current IE0G Position on BCAP Documents Excluding the exceptions noted in 3.2.2, all documents are judged to be acceptable for implementation of the Braidwood Construction Assessment.
The emphasis must now be placed on implementation of these processes in the field.
i 3.2.4 Open Issues No unresolved issues remain regarding comments on documents. However, until all the documents are revised, they will remain as open issues.
3.3 Surveillances .
l The IEOG has been performing surveillance activities in an overview l fashion to enable assessment of BCAP plans, walk-throughs, and the imple-
! mentation of various elements. The surveillances have focused on both the programmatic and technical aspects of the BCAP. Surveillances have been timed in order to assure coincidence with key element milestones.
l 3.3.1 Surveillances Performed Surveillance activities have been limited during this phase of the IE0G overview activities due to delays in actual program implementation.
12 l
With the exception of the CSR checklists, all of the documents have been reviewed in draft stages and in the final issue. The checklists have been reviewed in draft stages only.
3.2.1 Nature of Comments Comments provided to the BCAP team by the IEOG have covered a broad spectrum from general comments to specific suggestions; from suggestions for deleting scope to suggestions for adding scope; and from program evaluation to program acceptance.
A majority of the comments has been provided in order to enhance both the technical validity and the clarity of the document under review. Since many of these comments were editorial in nature, they will not be covered in detail here. Only major comments will be discussed.
The first major scope comment was provided on April 27, 1984, in which it was stated that "... purpose and scope of the BCAP are inadequately defi ned. . ." . This same letter suggested deleting discussion of the current QA system and recommended dealing with the proposed BCAP work only. It was suggested that if deemed necessary, destructive testing be conducted out- '
side the purview of BCAP, thereby maintaining the major thrust of BCAP.
On June 14, 1984, the IEOG commented that it would be necessary to establish a cut-off date between old work being validated by CSR and RSCAP and new work being validated by RPSR. This same letter made comments i asserting the need to work in accordance with the latest valid require-ments, and delineated a suggested method for handling discrepancies. Thi s
! letter also included the first of several comments on sampling, specifically, obtaining statistically valid samples using random sampling techni ques.
l By the letter of July 20, 1984, the IEOG repeated a comment made earlier regarding the RPSR Pl an that action be taken "...to thoroughly research the S&L specifications to determine that they are all-encompassingf 1
I 11
\
Postponements of inspector certification have hindered the initiation of reinspections, and thus precluded more surveillance activities. Howevcr, selective surveillances have been performed as outlined in the CSR section below.
CSR. Surveillances on the CSR element were begun in July in order '
that they might coincide with the availability of the CSR Plan. Subsequent to the availability of CSR Procedures in August, the IEOG performed sur-veillance activities on the CSR team while the team was implementing a procedures walk-through.
Several surveillances were performed during August and September on several of the CSR populations, specifically:
- a. Small Bore Piping Configuration
- b. Concrete Placement
- c. Cc.1duit
- d. HVAC Ductwork
- e. AWS D1.3 Visual Weld Inspection
One observation was generated as a result of a surveillance on the snall bore piping configuration, and is discussed in Section 3.5.
RPSR. As with the CSR element, surveillances on the RPSR element began in July, coincident with the availability of the RPSR Plan and Procedures. During August, the IEOG performed a surveillance on the RPSR l
team while that team was performing its procedures walk-through.
l Surveillances have continued during August and September on a random b asi s. No observations have been generated during these surveillances.
However, the audit scheduled for September 24, 1984 was postponed for approximately one month, based on surveillance results.
l 13 L.
RSCAP. Surveillances were initiated at an earlier date in July for the RSCAP element, due to the earlier issuance of the element. Surveil-Iances have been ongoing since that time, but have not resulted in the filing of any observations.
Quality Assurance. Surveillances of BCAP Quality Assurance activities were initiated in late July, and have been random and ongoing since that time. No observations have been filed on BCAP Quality Assurance activi-tie s. -
Admi ni stration. The level of activity employed in order to develop procedures, train and orient personnel, and develop the necessary ad-ministrative support functions has been fairly significant since June.
Subsequently, this has b,een the area where more surveillances have occurred. An observation was issued and resolved in the area of training i
records. That observation is dis' cussed in Section 3.5.
3.3.2 Results to Date Surveillance activities to date have provided the IE0G with a neces-sary programmatic and technical assessment of BCAP activities adequate to allow conclusion that the BCAP appears to be sound and structured in such a manner as to provide the desired construction appraisal. Only two obser-vations have been generated as a result of surveillances, and one of those has been closed. The other observation has an October 12, 1984 requested resolution, and therefore falls out of the purview of this particular re-port.
3.4 Audits I
- An audit program was established and maintained in order to access the implementation of each BCAP element. Items specifically audited were:
o Adherence to program procedures l o Evaluation of quality assurance involvement 14
o Qualification of personnel o Identification of non-conformances and adequacy of corrective actions Procedures were established and implemented for conducting the audits.
Audit plans were developed, implemented, and documented. Each audit was led by a Lead Auditor certified in accordance with ANSI /ASME N45.2.23,
" Qualification of Quality Assurance Program Audit Personnel." Audits were performed using prepared checklists requiring docunentation that objective evidence was examined for compliance with Quality Assurance progran re-quirements.
The results of each audit were documented in a written report to the responsible manager whose organization had been audited. ilhere findings of deviation existed, the report required the audited organizations to reply within a specified time agreeable to both parties. The response was to identify planned corrective actions for deficiencies and a schedule for.
implementation of the corrective actions. Table 3.2 contains a sunmary of audits as perfcrmed by ERC. Appendix F contains individual audit reports.
3.5 Observations and Requests for Corrective Action 3.5.1 Observations Issued To date, two observations have been issued. The first observation re-suited from a surveillance in the quality assurance / inspection area of BCAP. The second resulted from a checkly! review.
Observation BCAP-0BS-001 was ig ea ,qast 29, 1984, and dealt with training and certification. Observation BCAP-0BS-002 was issued September 13, 1984, and covered the lack of data for the as-built drawings used to check small bore piping configuration. Copies of both observations are contained in Appendix E.
15
l Table 3.2 ERC Audits of BCAP Audit No. Date Perfonned Title Letter No.
ERC-84-101 9/11-12/84 BCAP-60 "RSCAP-Review Method" BCAP-018 ERC-84-102 9/18-27/84 BCAP Administrative Procedures BCAP-035 16
I, l 3.5.2 Discussion of Observations Background on Observation Report for BCAP-0BS-001. BCAP-0BS-001
- developed from an IEOG review of the qualification records for BCAP inspection personnel. These inspectors were to be certific4 to ANSI /ASME N45.2.6, in accordance with BCAP-08. During the review, it became evident that inconsistencies existed between procedural requirements and procedural implementations. Specifically, no objective evidence existed with regard i
to Ceco's approval of a contractor; there were records signed by persons not yet certified as " Level III" Inspectors; and it was not clear from the doctmentation who the employer was, as is required by ANSI /ASME N45.2.6.
Background on Observation Report for BCAP-CBS-002. BCAP-0BS-002 4
resulted from an IEOG review of the checklist on small bore piping
! configuration issued by the CSR element of BCAP. This checklist indicated that as-built drawings were to be used for evaluation of the piping con-figuration, valve orientation, and drainage in the piping reinspection.
After meeting with BCAP personnel and reviewing one of the selected as-built drawings, PG-2537A-15A, Rev. A, " Component Cooling", it became apparent that this drawing contained insufficient data to complete the reinspection.
Subject Matter of Observation for BCAP-0BS-001. BCAP-0BS-001 ad-dressed the following three issues:
o No doctments were available designating Daniel International as an approved contractor at the time, o Docunents were signed as " Level III" by non-ccrtified persons.
o The " employer" was not identifled as required by ANSI /ASME N45.2.6.
Subject Matter of Observation for BCAP-0BS-002. As a method of focusing attention on what might develop into a generic problem and to correct a specific deficiency, Observation BCAP-0BS-002 was issued. Thi s observation notes that on the as-built PG-2537A-15A, Rev. A drawing, 17
certain information appeared to be incomplete with regard to attesting to the fact that the as-constructed system agreed with design requirements. ;
Specific deficiencies existed with regard to determining valve orientation; flow direction of the fluid versus the flow arrow on the valve; direction and orientation of valve stems; orientation of branch connections; and :
drainage and slopes of the main piping, branch connections, and trapped j secti ons. i Status of Observation for BCAP-0BS-001. A response to the observation was provided on September 13, 1984, and was accepted and closed by ERC on September 19, 1984.
Status of Observation for BCAP-0BS-002. To date there have been two meetings between BCAP personnel and the IE0G (one formal and one infonnal),
the purpose of which was to develop a mutual understanding of the problem.
During the formal meeting, the BCAP director stated that where adequate data are not available, it is BCAP's job to obtain additional data that will fulfill requirements. The informal meeting was between members of the IEOG and engineers from CSR who are working to solve the problem. Thi s observation is still open.
3.5.3 Requests for Corrective Action Issued To date, no Requests for Corrective Action have been issued since all corrective actions required have been limited to observations.
3.6 Open Issues and Concerns Many issues have been opened by the IEOG during document reviews and the planning process in the period covered by this Interim Report. Some of these issues wre resolved within the BCAP, and at least one was resolved by actions independent of BCAP. The BCAP personnel have been very objec-tive and responsive in understanding the basis for IE0G comments, and in establishing an acceptable resolution. As of this date, only a few issues remain open, primarily due to the need for some revisions to selected BCAP plans and procedures.
18
3.6.1 Delineation of Open Issues and Concerns The following open issues and concerns exist as of October 2,1984:
- 1. Revisions of selected documents to incorporate revisions previously committed to the IE0G. (0 pen Issue)
- 2. Response to Observation BCAP-0BS-002 (CSR - Small Bore Piping Configuration Population). (0 pen Issue)
- 3. Inspector certifications and the certification process. (Concern) 3.6.2 Significance of Each Open Issue and Concern The significance of each open issue and concern is addressed in the same order in which it is presented in 3.6.1.
- 1. Even though the technical or administrative issues have been re-solved, until all the affected documents are actually revised, the IEOG will retain each unrevised document (s) as an open issue.
Schedules have been established to revise the documents, but until revised, the IEOG will remain sensitive to the needs for the re-vi sions. At this time, the following documents are undergoing revisions incorporating accepted modifications:
o BCAP Program Document o BCAP Overview Document o RSCAP Plan o CSR Plan o BCAP QA Plan o BCAP Procedures BCAP-07, -60
- 2. Although the BCAP team agreed with the IEOG Observation BCAP-085-002, the CSR/Small Bore Piping Configuration Population cannot proceed until the Observation is cleared. A hold was placed on any activity related to use of the previously planned as-built i sometric. The Observation has not been placed in the Concern 19
}
4 category. Also, a resolution date of October 12, 1984 was establi shed. Until that date the IE0G will withhold further j udgment/ comment.
I
> - 3. Four audit findings were issued against procedure BCAP-08 and the 8 CAP Quality Assurance organization placed a fonnal Hold on any inspectors being released to perform inspection functions until they had specifically released each inspector.
The BCAP Task Force responses to IEOG audit findings have reason-ably resolved those findings, but the significance of inspector certification problems will mandate that the IEOG retain the inspector certification problem as a concern until all have been certified and cleared by BCAP QA.
3.6.3 Requirements for Resolution of Each Open Issue and Concern Each issue is addressed in the order it is presented in 3.6.1.
- 1. Resolution of the unrevised document issue requires a revision be made to the appropriate documents incorporating previously agreed-to comments. Care should be exercised to ensure that all sub-tier documents reflect corresponding changes made to higher-tier documents.
- 2. The resolution of BCAP-0BS-002 will probably require more effort in order to first define the root problem and then to resolve the problem such that the CSR Small Bore Piping Configuration Popu-lation can proceed. The final product of this resolution will be the definition of a technically acceptable document (s) for use in evaluating the quality of the constructed piping configuration.
It may be necessary for CSR personnel to evaluate related docu-ments from design through construction, with regard to as-built isometrics in order to resolve this issue.
- 3. The inspector certification concern can be resolved by incorporat-ing certification and record-keeping processes that agree with 20
ANSI /ASME N45.2.6, followed by certifying inspectors in accordance with those procedures. The previously attempted shortcuts should be avoided, and the process allowed to proceed objectively in accordance with accepted BCAP procedures.
I i
I 1
21
1 l
- 4. PROJECTED NEAR-TERM ACTIVITIES Until now, the majority of IE0G activity has been involved with document reviews of BCAP Plans and Procedures. However, that phase of the Program is essentially complete, with only minor revisions remaining.
Near-term BCAP activities are anticipated to be oriented towards program element initiation, especially the CSR reinspection. This phase change in BCAP will nece:sitate a corresponding change in IE0G overview activi ties.
4 Specific IEOG activities in the near term are expected to be focused on the following areas:
o Increased overview audits to ensure that programmatic procedural commitments are being incorporated satisfactorily.
o Initiation of overview inspection activities including document reviews, surveillance of reinspections, and independent over-inspections.
o Continued surveillance of the CSR checklists and front-end initiation of population reinspections.
o Overviews by IE0G te:hnical experts in all elements to ensure the technical accuracy of implementation activities, including an overview of observations generated and evaluations of selected observations which have progressed through the full cycle ~to a NCR, and those which have been resolved within BCAP.
o Increased overview in each of the (11) RSCAP programs.
o Overviews to observe interactions among BCAP elements to ensure that problems surfaced in one element, which may effect another element, are evaluated / incorporated as appropriate.
22
- - - , .r -
- e. - - , - ,-,w,- _ee-..m.-..-m -- , ~ , . . ---,------.--,-.--.,------------------y,-- ------i--------m-
'}
- o Overview of BCAP Quality Assurance activities.
o Review of the certifications of BCAP/ Daniel and BCAP QA/PTL~ in-spectors.
e 7
23
I
- 5. IEOG PROGRAM ASSESSMENT From an overall perspective, the IEOG believes the basic framework of the BCAP is sound and should provide for a reasonable review of con-struction quality. The BCAP personnel have exhibited a desire and an enthusiasm to do the best job possible. All personnel appear to be technically qualified for, and challenged by their assignments, but not strained to the point where difficulties could be expected.
The initial rapid entry into the Program created problems connected with attempts to perform tasks in parallel that were better left to a series type interface. However, most problems have been resolved, and the Program is falling into a more orderly sequence. The initial completion schedule has now been revised in the positive favor of a quality product.
The IEOG supports this position.
In summary, the IE0G views the BCAP and BCAP team members as a post-tive approach for assessing the quality of construction for the Braidwood Pl an t. Anomalies more than likely will occur, as in the past, but the Director and tean members should quickly and alertly solve these as they occur.
24
f APPENDICES 25
APPENDIX A. Resumes for Personnel i
l 26
l t
, Qualifications and Experience of Gester H. Brown, Jr., Consultant l 1
More than 30 years as a structural engineer with a diverse experience in the civil, aeronautical arxi nuclear fields and has held supervisory positions in all three fields.
10 years at the Westirghause Advanced Reactors Division - was responsible for design of special assemblies of FFFF and was lead engineer in the structural design of. reactor vessel, reactor internals and core com-ponents of 1000.We design stuiles and in the structural reliability
- study of pipirs supports for the "rototype large Breeder Reactor. As a member of the Nbclear Safety Group, was involved in studies of the effects of hypothetical core disruptive accidents on a reactor vessel and its internals for a generic large metal fast breeder. reactor.
9 years as the senior structural engineer at Atomic Power Development Associates in charge of post-construction structural analysis of the reactor vessel, core supports and fuel assemblies of the Fermi Fast Breeder Reactor. Responsible for dynamic analysis of the reactor vessel and internals as well as blast test experiments conducted at the Naval Ordnance laboratory. Responsible for stress and defor-
, mation analysis of the fuel initial core assemblies for t& reactor safety report. Was lead structural ergineer on developnent of a *
- place-type core element. Coordinated the efforts of two consulting organizations and a pilot manufacturing program.
Previous experience with the Fairchilc. Aircraft Co. Responsible for development of analytical methods for the structural analysis of aircraft assemblies and conponents. Evolved a method of stress analysis for a new turbine concept which was to be patented, including a conputer code. ,
4 years experience as a senior structural engineer with Chas. T. Main, Inc.
in Boston in charge of bridge design.
Prior to that was a research engine;er with the Supersonic laboratory and the Structures and Aercelastic Laboratory at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology for six years. Was instrunental in developing methods of
- aerolastic and structural analysis for guided missiles, was in charge of an experimental blast program.at Aberdeen Proving Ground, and was j manager of a pruject perparing aircraft structural tests aod analytic techniques for the Eniwetok A-Bomb Tests.
i Massachusetts Institute of Technology, B.S. Structural Engineer,1937.
- Covemnent Defense Course, Aeronautical Ergineering,1940. (Also at M.I.T.)
i Member of Sigma XI.
- i 27 l . . _ - . _ _ _ . _ - , - - - - . - . - - - - - - - - ~ - - - - - - - - - - - - - - ~ ~ ~ - ~~ ~ ' ~ ~ ~~ ~~
r CHESTER H. BROWN Mr. Brown has over 30 years of broad engineering experience ranging across the fields of civil, aeronautical, power plant and nuclear reactor engineering. His experience has , included, numerous management and super-ETsory as'signmFntis inc.luding: ^res'ponsibility for an ex' tensive blast '
effect test program conducted at Aberdeen and Dahlgren Proving Grounds for the, Massachusetts Institute of Technology Aeroelastic and Structures
- Laboratory, lead bridge engineer for a bridge design group,, re'sident en-gineer on the structural modification of a newspaper plant, responsibility for a structural test program conducted at the. Naval Ordnance Laboratory for Atomic Power Development Assocfatesdan' responsibility for structural phase of a fuel fabrication development program conducted at the Oak Ridge National Laboratory for Atomic' Power Development Associates. His last eighteen years'have been in the nuclear power field, specifically in the areas of structural / mechanical design, reliability and safety.
E00 CATION - "
B.Sc. (Structural Engineering) Hassachusetts Institute of Technology Intensive Graduate Aeronautical Course (Gov't) (Aeronautical Engineer)
Massachusetts Institute of Technology PROFESSIONAL EXPERIENCE Civil and Structural, Engineering
- Ex'p erience in this field consisted of design and analysis of steel and reinforced concrete structures including:
Building frames, towers, tanks, coal bunkers, machinery and equip-ment supports i Retaining walls, abutments, foundations, cofferdams Plate-girder highway bridges and through-truss bridges !
Shell structures and domes
- . Piping and piping " support analysis Analytical techniques used in this. work included
l . Limit analysis for steel frames
. ' Yield-line theory foFreinfirfed" conc ~ rete structures l .
Stability analysis of structural elements and systems i .
Matrix analysis and finite element analysis for indeterminate struc-tures and space frameworks. including thermal, dynamic and seismic effects j .
Use of general purpose structural analysis computer codes 28 ,
e
. This work has involved familiarity with the current AISC and ACI
- codes .
. The majority of this work was performed as:
. Structural Analysis Specialist - 1 1/2 years Stone & , Webster Engineering Corporation, Boston, Massachusetts
. .. Structural Analysis Specialist - 31/2 years Chas. T. Main Inc., Boston, Massachusetts
. Struc'tural Analysis Specialist - 2 years Pittsburgh-DesMoines Steel Corp., Pittsburgh, PA Stress Analysis, Engineering Mechanics, and Mechanics of Materials
. Experience in these areas consists of over 11 1/2 years in the aeronautical and aero-structure research fields and over 181/2 years in the nuclear power industry. -
. W'ork in the aeronautical field consisted of design and analysis of aircraf t and missile structures including dynamic effects.
.. In the aero-structural research field, work included the evolu-tion and study of methods of analysis of flight structures under oscillatory and blast loads - together with thermal ef-fec ts. Also included coordination of experimental program for blast effects on aircraft at Aberdeen Proving Grg,und and Dahlgren Proving Ground.
.- Experience in the nuclear power industry has included:
, .- The structural analysis and design of core elements and supports
. The structural analysis of reactor vessels
. The structural investigation of containment problems associated with blast loads
. Coordination of containment studies and blast experiments for the Fenni Reactor at.the Naval Ordnance Laboratory
. Study of structural / mechanical design of fuel pins
. ' Piping analysis and investigation of piping integrity Work in the foregoing fields included the following types of inves-tigation:
Computer analysis of structures using general purpose finite element codes Mathematical and numerical analysis of thermo-elastic problems
. Analysis of structural elements under creep and relaxation condi-tions
- Ar.. .ysis of structural elements for thermal and strain cycling fatigue and for mechanical fatigue
. Study of impact and blast effects on structures _and structural elements Vibration analysis of structures and structural elements including seismic effects *
. Stability analysis of structures including plates and shells 29
p T
, .- Failure analysis
.; Study of behavior of materials under states of combined stress
.. Study of behavior of materials under dynamic and impact conditions This has involved familiar ity with the ASilE 8. & P.V. Code Sect. III and Piping Code, B31.1:1967, and B31.7-)976.
. The aforem'entione'd work was performed as:' '
.#StrOEAnakhsE - 5 yeais
Grunnan Aircraf t Engineering Corporation Bethpage. New York The Martin Company, Baltimore, Maryland Fairchild Engine &' Airplane Corporation' Hagerstown, Maryland Structural Research Engineer - 61/2 years Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Aeronautical Engineering Department, Cambridge, Massachusetts Structural Engineer and Analyst - 81/2 years '
Atom 1c Power Development Associates Inc., Detroit, Michigan Structural / Mechanical Design Safety and Reliability Engineering - Nuclear In addition to*the purely structural work described above, experience in the nuclear field has also included work in the areas of component design, safety and reliability.
Work in these areas included: "
. Design .
Conceptual and detailed design of reactor internals and core components. Study.of fuel pin, conceptual structural design.
Definition of functions and requirements, establishment of de-sign criteria, specifications and star.dards for reactor com-ponents. .
Liaison with fabricator, development of installation and main-tenance procedures for reactor components.
. ' Reliability Application of Failure Mode and Effects Analysis, Fault Tree Diagrams and Event Trees to structural / mechanical components and to a sodium loop system Reliability analysis of large piping supports using stress /
strength overlap method.
Structural reliability analysis.
. Safety -
Investigation of interaction of structural configuration and Hypothetical Core Disruptive Accident (HCDA) for reactor upper internals.
Parametric analysis of generic reactor vessel and internals for HCDA interaction using REXCO computer code.
. The foregoing work was performed as:
Senior Engineer and Cognizant Engineer s 91/2 years Westinghouse Electric Corporation Advanced Reactors Division,
, itadison, Pennsylvania
- 30
. .a ...e===*e ....
f ...
SECURITI CLEARANCE -
Has held AEC "Q" clearance and D00 Secret clearance. '
PROFESSIONAL ACTIVITIES -
e .
- e. , .
Society o{.S. igma Xi.1952
. . e - s (Ho.norary R.es.ea' ch Society) e,-
r PUBLICATIONS .
Response of Aircraft Structures and Structural Components to Blast Effects -
n U.S. Air Force Balanced Stress Turbine Design - Fairchild Aircraft Cylindrical Fuel Element Flow Stability - Atomic Power Development Asso-ciates -
. . e e
O 9 S0 0
e e
e e
e 0
e 9
0 e
e g
e 6
31 1
I l i
. 1 i
1 WAYNE L. O MSE, P.E. I i 113 Fairfield Drive
' New Stanton, Pa. 15672 i
(412) 925-7818 ,
I SLM MRY More than 34 years of broad ergineerirg and management experience in the ruclear field incitxling extensive experience in prbject and engineerirg management. Well versed in all phases of ergineerirg development, procure-ment, construction. check-out, and operation of reactors, fuel processirg < .
plants and test rigs. Experienced in writing safety analyses reports and in defendirg designs and design philosophies before the Nuclear Regulatory Comnission and the Advisory Comnittee on Reactor Safeguards.
Experienced pt= =4 pro in contactirg clients and in obtainirg financial support for negotiations jects. Participated in contractor selections and contract one in the multi-million dollar rarge.
Harq;ed the design of the heat transport systems of the three largest liquid- -
meta:. cooled fast reactors in the U.S. - OtBRP, HTF, and FERMI. .
EXPERIENCE HISIORY 5/82 to Present.- President, OMSE CONSULTANIS, INC. ~~
- Orrently, a member of a consultirg team providio6 a utility with overview and audit services, for the reinspection of the' construction of a nuclear powered electrical generating plant.
, Previously,
. technology, provided inserviceconsultirg inspectionservices and designto Westinghouse studies. on INFBR's, sodium 5/70 to 4/82 - WESTItCHOUSE EIECIRIC 00RPORATION, Advars.ed Reactors Division, Madison, Pa.
5/74 to 4/82 - Hanager, INFER Heat Transport System, CRBRP Project Managed and guided the efforts of ergineers and scientists in all l activities associated with systems design, system integration, review functions, and in establishirg design requirements and parameters for the heat transport systern of the Clinch River Breeder Reactor Plant (CRBRP). Interfaced with other sections at Westinghouse, the A/E, and with the customer. Maintained close liaison with the Mechanical Equipment Section and the Reactor Vessel Section to influence hardware design and to integrate design changes into the system design. Documented design and analytical. results 32
__ _ _ _ ___ _ .- _ _ _ _J
/
Wayne L. Chase Page 2 for use in other INFBR work. Participated in design reviews, con-ferences, and other technical meetirgs. From 5/74 to 8/75 also was responsible for the CRBRP HIS piping design. Acted as the Westirg-house member of the Project Interface Control Board. Budgeted and controlled assigned budgets.
1/74 to 4/74 -. Special Assistant to the Manager, CRBRP Plant Design ,
Performed design and trouble shooting tasks as assigned. Assisted ;
section managers with troublesane design tasks. Served on Task Forces.
5/70 to 12/73 - Manager, Fluid Systems Design, HTF Project Managed ard guided the efforts of engineers and scientists in all activities associated with systems design, system integration; review functions, and with establishing design requirements and parameters. Interfaced with other HIF sections at ARD, the A/E, .
HEIL, and the AEC. Maintained close liaison with vendors through the Mechanical Cwycnents Section ard the Reactor Design Section to influence hardware design and to integrate design charges into the system design. M= anted design and analytical results for ,
use in other INFER work. Established liaison and comunication ,
with other Westirghause technical organizations. Participated in '
design reviews, conferences, and other technical meetin6s. Acted ,
as the Westinghouse representative on the Project Interface Control
. Board.. . . . .
1/67 to 4/70 - BATTalE 10R1 WEST (BNW), Richland,' Washirgton 4/68to4/70-ResidentManager Represented BNW withthe Reactor Plant Designer (RPD - Westirghouse) ,
who was designirg the nuclear island of the Fast Flux Test Facility (EFIF). Coordinated all BNW technical and administrative interfaces
- between BNW and the RPD. '
6/67 to 4/68 - Manager, Canpon'e nts Section Responsible for managing the design, development, and procx-ewc of cwycnents for the FFIT heat transport systems.
Served as Secretary of the Selection Board for the selection of the reactor plant designer and as a mernber of the contract negotiatity board. .
0 33 e
4
t
)
Wayne L. Chase Page 3 1
! 1/67 to 5/67 - Senior Research Associate, Design and Construction i F.sgineering, FFIF Project 9
Provided expertise in liquid metals to the organization. Assisted in reorganizing the group, management plaming and coordination, l writirg the Design Management Plan, and the scope of work for the
! reactor plant designer and architect ergineer. Served as chairman 4 of a fuel handlirg concept identification task force and as a menber j of the comnittee deciding the conceptual design of the FFIF.
t 10/57. to 12/66 - ATCHIC POWER DEVELOPMENT ASSOCIATES, Detroit, Michigan 8/60 to 12/66 - Section Manager 3
Supervised ergineers and designers in researth, development, and i design of liquid metal heat transport systems and cumccents associ- :
i ated with fast reactors.
Responsible for all plant systems such as the prenary and secondary sodiun systems, their associated service and gas systems, waste gas systems, and ventilation systsns. Responsibilities included concep-cual design work, specifying functions of systems ard cumccents preparing specifications for systems and c.upents, procurement follow-up, and performing development work associated with systems and cuiywents.
I
~
ents for the Enrico Fermt 4
Managed Fast Breeder theReactor design for systems (FERMI). and cui[with the writing of the Assiste
, hazards sunnary report ard defended my portion of the design before 4
the NRC and the ACRS.
10/57 to 8/60 - Ergineer, Systems Section i
Performed design and project engineering of the primary inert gas
! )
! system, the secondary inert gas system and the waste gas system . ;
- for the Fermt Reactor.
] .
\
i 9/53 to 9/57 - PHILLIPS PEIROLE.H 00., Atomic Energy Divison, National i i
Reactor Testirg Station (NRTS), Idaho Falls, Idaho Chemical Engineer Conducted high cenperature research ard developnent in heat transfer l 1
of calcinedradioactive waste materials. Performed nuclear calculations, )
pilot plant design, design of a waste gas disposal system, testing of bellows-scaled valves, and general research and development effort associated with reactor fuel reprocessirg. ,
, 34
Wayne L. Chas'e Page 4 Carried out assignnents associated with developing a process for
, calcining high level radioactive wastes.
6/51 to 9/53 - AMERICAN CYANAMID CO., Atanic Energy Divison, NKrS, Idaho Falls, Idaho Worked in various responsible positions in a design group developing designs for processes in a fuel processing plant. Loaned to Knolls Atomic Power Laboratory (KAPL) to maintain conpany interfaces and
. assist KAPL in design and development work associated with a liquid metal cooled naval reactor.
Received instruction in nuclear techrology at Oak Ridge National"
- Laboratory (ORNL) caught by the ORNL staff. This was supplemented by hands-on experience at the reactor (Clinton Pile) and the pilot plant for reprocessing spent nuclear fuel.
- ~
9/50 to 5/51 - UNIVERSITY OF IDAID, Moscow, Idaho
~
Held position of Engineer ard Inspector doing general engineering work ard inspection of materials for new construction.
EIIJCATION and PROFESSIONAL DEVEIOPMENT mem.E. (Prof. De M.S.(Gem.E.),6/50, gree),6/57,UniversityofIdaho University of Idaho B.S.( Gem.E.), 6/49, University of Idaho ,
Teachers Certificate, 6/41, Northern Idaho Coll'ege of Education Additional training irx:ltdes tucicar courses at Oak Ridge National Iaboratory, '
Basic PERT, Statistical Design of Experiments, Neutron Diffusion Theory, Basic Electronics, Basic Stpervision, Technical Writing, Project Management, Decision Making, Kanag ement by Objectives, Ccmnunnication, Management Ebnctions ard .
PoItcy.
Registered Professional Engineer 35 L ,
Page 5 Wayne L. Ouse PROFESSIONAL SOCIETIES
~
Fellow, American Institute of Gemical Ehgineers Member, American Nuclear Society Manber, American Society of Mechanical Engineers Member, National Society of Professional Engineers Member,Section XI, Div. 3, ASME B&PV Code on Inservice Inspection of Liquid Metal Reactor Plants Chatunan, Working Group on Liquid Metal Reactor Covers Quitman, Task Group on leak Detection Member, Task Group on Steam Generators Member, Task Group on Supports R1BLICATIONS Author and co-author of many AEC reports. Author of Chapter 4, " Heat Transport Systems," in the book, Fast Reactor Technology - Plant Design, published by MIT Press. Also author ot publications in the Transactions of the ANS, ard co-author of "An Investigation of 'Ibbe Wastage caused by SantL teaks of Water in a Sodiun Heated Steam Generator" presented at the IAEA Synpostun on Alkali Metal Coolants in Vienna,1966.
PATENIS ,
" Device for Testing a Body of Fluid" - U.S. patent tunber 3,442,118 PERSONAL DATA Birthplace: Irwiston, Idaho Ik.ight: 6'4" Weight: 200 lbs.
- Marital Status: Married Health: Excellent Security Cicarance: AEC-Q; D0D-Secret Social Security No.: 518-14-5760 36
6 A. EDWARD COCOROS HOME BUSINESS 11816 West Monticello Drive Box 1037 Knoxville, Tennessee 37922 Oak Ridgd, TN 37830 Phone: 615/966-4526 Phone: 615/576-1636 EXPERIENCE WESTINGHOUSE ELECTRIC CORPORATION 38 Years i
SUMMARY
- Management 32.0 yrs Proj. Mgmt. 2.0 yrs l Engineering 15.5 yrs Nuclear 21.0 yrs Quality Assurance 13.5 yrs Aircraft 15.0 yrs 4 Manufacturing 7.0 yrs Defense 17.0 yrs 1/84-Present CONSULTANT COCOROS & ASSOCIATES
- Oak Ridge, Tennessee President of a small, highly experienced group of professionals which provides technical and management services in the field of Quality Assurance to industry, government and research institutions.
, 4/80-1/84 QUALITY ASSURANCE MANAGER Westinghouse Advanced Energy Systems Division, i ,
Oak Ridge, Tennessee -
- Responsible for establishing, directing, and managing the i
overall Project Quality Assurance Program for the Clinch River Breeder Reactor Project NSSS including the effective execution of the program within Westinghouse and between Westinghouse and
! the Major Subcontractors, General Electric and Atomics International. Personally involved in such items as Management Reviews and Assessments of Subcontractors and Suppliers, i Auditing, quality improvement programs, prime interface with
- Customer (DOE) locally and Germantown, Maryland. Assigned to l this position in April 1980 by the General Manager of Westinghouse Advanced Reactors Division with the responsibility of upgrading the QA Department to meet Customer requirements.
This was accomplished and the latest rating of QA by the Customer was Excellent. Certified as Lead Auditor to ANSI 45.2.23.
4/74-4/80 MANAGER, QUALITY ENGINEERING & FIELD SURVEILLANCE Westinghouse Advanc'ed Reactors Division (ARD),
Waltz Mill, PA l Responsible for assuring that Engineering, Procurement, Safety
! and Supplier Activities were conducted in accordance with l contractual quality assurance requirements and implementing procedures. Also responsible for the surveillance of Supplier operations relative to manufacturing, testing, and inspection.
Personally conducted survellances and management reviews of i approximately 30 suppliers. Was instrumental in establishing
, the Clinch River Breeder Reactor Quality Assurance Program Plan, QA Manual, QA Procedures, and Design and Manufacturing Verification Programs. .
, 37 i
~ - - - , - - - - ~ , . ~ - - - - _ , - - , , , - ,- _ _ _ , , - .,_-,,,n--.- - .-- ,--.-,. n - - .-,-.,,-----,.-,e
1 11/73-4/74 MANAGER, AUDITS AND PROCEDURES i
Westinghouse Advanced Reactors Division, Waltz Mill, PA Responsible for the overall Division QA audit program for all
' Suppliers and internally within ARD and for the initiation, approval and issuance of Quality Assurance Manual, including the Quality Assurance Procedures.
12/.71-11/73 EXECUTIVE ASSISTANT TO ENGINEERING MANAGER ;
Westinghouse Advanced Reactors Division, '
Waltz Mill, PA Responsible for technical, administrative, budgeting and schedular duties as well as special assignments as required to support the Engineering Manager during design and construction period of Fast Flux Test Reactor Facility (FFTF) . Coordinated engineering efforts between Westinghouse Pittsburgh Design l Office and Reactor Site (Hanford, Washington).
6/69-12/71 MANAGER, QUALITY ASSURANCE & TECHNICAL SUPPORT Westinghouse Weapons Division Baltimore, MD Reporting to the Division General Manager, was responsible for the management of all Quality Assurance operations for the MARK 48/ MARK 27 Torpedo Program and overseeing the Quality Assurance operations at the Keyport, Washington Test Site and the Feeder Manfacturing operation in Pompano, Florida whose Quality Assurance Managers reported to this position. Also responsible for the management of the following departments: PURCHASING, MANAGEMENT & BUSINESS SYSTEMS, ENGINEERING LABORATORIES, MODEL SHOP, DRAFTING, TECHNICAL PUBLICATIONS and PLANT MAINTENANCE.
Program terminated November 1971.
, 2/69-6/69 MANAGER, ENVIRONMENTAL SYSTEMS i Westinghouse Astronuclear Laboratory I
Large, PA Responsible for planning and directing the marketing, systems engineering, design development, and manufacturing operations -
related to thermoelectric products for environmental heating and cooling as well as air conditioning.
9/66-2/69 MANAGER OF MANUFACTURING Westinghouse Astronuclear Laboratory Large, PA Responsible for directing the manufacturing for all programs in j the Laboratory which included the following functions: (1) i MATERIAL PROCUREMENT, (2) MANUFACTURING AND INDUSTRIAL ENGINEERING, (3) MANUFACTURING TOOL DESIGN, (4) PROCUREMENT PLANNING AND SCHEDULING, (5) PRODUCTION AND MATERIAL CONTROL, (6) FABRICATION, and (7) ASSEMBLY OPERATIONS.
9 38
, o*
e .
12/62-9/66 MANAGER, REACTOR ASSEMBLY LABORATORY Westinghouse Astronuclear Division Large, PA Responsible for the overall management of the Reactor Assembly Laboratory Operati'ons. Personally directed building contractors in the construction and modification of buildings for the Assembly Laboratory. Directed the design and procurement of tooling, fixtures and equipment. Established the operational procedures, administrative policies and organizational requirements for the laboratory, including the criticality manual and fuel accountability system. Created job descriptions then interviewed, hired, and trained the personnel to staff the organization.
4/61-12/62 PROJECT MANAGER, NUCLEAR CORE PWR-2 Westinghouse Atomic Fuel Division Cheswick, PA Managed the overall activities related to the manufacture and assembly of the second nuclear core for Duquesne Power and Light, reporting to the Division Manager. Specific responsibilities included: (1) CONTRACTUAL COORDINATION, (2)
DIRECTING ENGINEERING EFFORT IN ESTABLISHING PRE-PRODUCTION PROGRAM AND IN ESTABLISHING AND PROVIDING PROCESS TOOLING, SPECIAL EQUIPMENT FOR MANUFACTURE, QUALITY DETERMINATION, AND ASSEMBLY OF PRODUCT, (3) MONITORING TOTAL DIVISION PERFORMANCE RELATIVE TO PROGRAM AND OBTAINING NECESSARY ACTION AS REQUIRED EITHER WITH CUSTOMER'S MANAGEMENT OR WITH DIVISION MANAGEMENT STAFF, (4) PRODUCTION MANAGER FOR DIVISION.
12/49-4/61 Westinghouse Aviation Gas Turbine Division Kansas City, MO - In folloding positions:
3/60-4/61 ASSISTANT MANAGER, DIVISION MANUFACTURING Assisted the Division Manufacturing Manager in directing the manufacture of jet engines, related parts and sub-contract items and acted for the Division Manufacturing Manager in his absence (a department of 1500 people) until plant shutdown.
5/56-3/60 ENGINEERING SECTION MANAGER Managed an engineering section responsible for all engineering problems associated with the manufacture, assembly, test, inspection, and shipment of J34, J46 and J40 jet engines.
39
. _ _ . =- - .. - . _ _ _ _ _ - . - _ _ - . .- _.
9/52-5/56 SUPERVISING ENGINEER - ENGINE DESIGN Developed and directed a technical organization to study all aspects of Rolls-Royce aviation gas turbine engines having a
,, U.S. production potential which was also responsible for the complete design control of the J46-WE-18 jet engine.
12/49-9/52 SUPERVISING ENGINEER - ASSEMBLY, TEST & ACCESSORIES
, The initial assignment involved transferring to Kansas City,
, from Philadelphia, as one of five engineers assigned to activate and develop an engineering department at the newly established l jet engine plant. Hired, trained, and managed a section responsible for handling engineering problems related to engine assembly, testing, and accessories, (hydraulic, electrical and electronic).
10/45-12/49 DESIGN ENGINEER Westinghouse Aviation Gas Turbine Division
. Philadelphia, PA Responsible for the design, development and improvement programs of a successful jet engine fuel control (J34).
EDUCATION: Bachelor of Engineering (B.E.), Mechanica'l Engineering, The Johns Hopkins University,
- (full scholastic scholarship)
! Continuous, numerous Westinghouse management j development courses 1
SECURITY CLEARANCE: Highest clearance ever held: AEC-Q, DOD-Secret MILITARY SERVICE: Captain, U.S. Army, Corps of Engineers (Honorable Discharge) l PROFESSIONAL Society of Automotive Engineers (SAE) . Past Chairman, '
AFFILIATIONS: Kansas City Chapter; Past Publicity Chairman, i Los Angeles National Meeting
- American Society of Quality Control (ASQC).
! Proceedings Chairman for Annual Energy Division Conferences 1980-1984.
i American Society of Engineering Management (ASEM)
PATENTS: Gas Turbine Thrust Reverser f
i 40
M Robert Ellis Ham Twenty years experience in the electro-mechanical engineering field with 4
the last sixteen being in the nuclear power plant field. Experience in-cludes line/ project management, technical and quality assurance activities associated with design and installation of reactor coolant and auxillary components / systems.
! c EMPLOYHENT:
1984 - Present Evaluation Research Corporation, Oak Ridge, TN.
Senior Analyst. Responsibtitties include development of business and application of quality assurance / quality control principals to meet industrial needs.
~
1982 - 1984 Gilbert /Comonwealth. Inc., Quality Assurance Divi.sion, Reaaing, PA.
' Business Development Manager. Responsible for providing guidance to the Division in the development of business
' for quality assurance / quality control (QA/QC) services.
Activities required a thorough knowledge of QA/QC prin-cipl es. Responsibilities included preparation of busi-l ness plans (annual and long term), development of marketing strategics, diverstftcation into non-nuclear l utility and non-utility markets and, in general, an l overview of all business generation efforts by the j
' Division.
EDS Nuc1 car Inc. (now Impe11), Norcross, GA.
1980 - 1982 i
At termination: Division Manager, Administration.
Responsible for the total administration of EDS Nu-clear's Southeast Regional Office. Responsibilities included Facilities, Personnel, Human Resources, Re-cruiting, Office Services Accounting," Computer, Quality Assurance and Contracts.
Office size was approximately 245 engineers and support staff, which had been growing at a rate of at least 50% per year for the*1ast three years. At the same time, responsibilities included overseeing the construction, layout and fact 11 ties plan-ning for a new office building required to support con-tinued growth.
Previous: Olvision Manager, Project Development. Re-sponsible for marketing and project management of engi-neering services for nuclear and fossil power plants in the southeast. The division organization was developed
- from only the incunbent in October 1980,to seven project 41 l
i Robert E. Ham - 2 management and three marketing personnel when transfer-red to Administration in August 1981. Included in the project management portion of the organization were pro-ject managers responsible for client projects totalling in excess of ,$23,000,000 per year.
Previous: Section Manager, Project Manager. Responsible for managing projects for three clients while assigned to the Western Region Office in San Francisco. This assignment was a short-term assignment from May,1980 until October,1980.
1968 - 1980 Babcock & Wilcox Company, Lynchburg, VA. .
At Termination: Product Line Manager, Engineering Services. Responsible for the marketing and project management of engineering services related to support of operating nuclear plants. This included accurate deft-l nition of programs, markett'ng strategy, and project man-agement goals.
This was a new area of the' Company and responsibilities -
included establishment of administrative detatis to ef-fect the goals and objectives for the organization. In-cluded in this position was the responsibility for per-sonnel staffing and associated responsibilities.
i This position required considerable contact with the ,
l NRC, especially in the aftenmath of Three Nile Island, to respond to their concerns and negotiate positions which would allow Babcock & Wilcox plants to continue ,
operation.
Previous: Senior Product Manager. Responsible for the project management activities related to engineering services projects in support of operating nuclear pl ants. This responsibility included technical content of programs, financial, schedules and the legal /-
commercial interface with clients.
4 Previous: Technical Manager. Responsible for the tech- ,
nical assistance provided a subsidiary company in West Germany. This required a knowicdge of U.S.A. and Germany licensing requirements to assist the German -
company by defining areas Babcock & Wilcox could provide engineering assistance. This position required con-siderable travel to Europe exposing the incumbent to international activities. The incombent also produced
' an analysis network, during the assignment, which showed the interaction between all the analysis necessary to design the nucicar island of a nuclear power plant.
42
l Robert E. Ham - 3 Previous: Unit Manager. Responsible for eng'neering personnel engaged in the preparation of equipment spect- '
fictions for Reactor Coolant System Components. This required active involvement with ASME Codes, AEC Regula- j tory Cufdes, Safety Analysis Reports, manufacturing i problems, Quality Assurance requirements and all other
, associated activities.
Previous: The incumbent progressed from a Designer through the engineering levels to his position as Product Line Manager, Engineering Services elle with the Babcock & Wilcox Company. Areas of experience gained also included Auxiliary Equipment procurement and .
Auxiliary Fluid System design. ,
1966 - 1968 West Virginia Pulp and Paper Company (now WESTVACO),
, Govington, VA.
Senior Draftsman. Responsible for design and procure-ment of equipment and associated structures to modify existing operations or install new operations necessary ,'
to produce paper. This exposed the incunbent to a full .
range of design challenges.
1964 - 1966 Harnischfeger Corporation, Charlottesville, VA.
- Design-Layout Draftsman. Responsibic for the layout and l design of D.C. power sources up to 20,000 amp output.
l 1962 - 1964 Westinghouse Corporation., Verona, VA.
Layout Draftsman. . Primarily engaged in the development of designs for new air conditioning units for speciff e applications.
PROFESSIONAL J AFFILIATIONS: American Society of Mechanical Engineers - Member American Scciety for Quality Control - iicmber CERTIFICATIONS: Auditor - ANSI N45.2.23 EDUCATION:
1959 - 1960 Attended Virginia Polytechnic Institute - Civil Engineering 1961 International Correspondence Schools - Division I, Highway Engineer 43
oe _
Robert E. Ham - 4 1966 - 1971 International Correspondence Schools - Mechanical Engineering - Diploma (Equivalent to BSME) 1970 Teldyne Company - Codes Application Seminar 1971 - Present Yarious management seminars including AMA's "The Kanagement Course' AWARDS /SPECIAL RECOGNITION:
Who's Who in the South and Southwst k980.
S O
e 44
John L. Hansel
- u =,} p'* ,', l - . _
.', c d .f%
'<.';? " ;
.. , :7 '..
s 4 ,,.g$y:q g PROFESSIONAL EXPERIENCE g.. ; .
J M -1.'
i '. Frff$
.). . C'N-Mr. Hansel's professional career encompasses 29 years of experience in the conduct and management of large Y'f,lg
- .y7 t 5
} ~ complex programs for major energy and aerospace
' i . *r .. p'rojects. His management and technical experience
- ' h. ' - , - -
covers a wide range of projects, such as the Gas
,' ,.V ,- - *-
'h ,'1, Centrifuge Uranium Enrichment Plant, Three Mile Island m - 4 Investigation, Apollo and Space Shuttle programs, re-entry vehicles, rocket and let engine engineering test programs,
'. and the Advent Satellite.
. e e .*- : .
-. g E E N E O E E E E E $ E O E N N N N N N N E a"s N E y Test Engineer /Superusor. F5ght Propdston Laboratory General Elect,rfc j Manager Cas Turt4ne Test FacEty ,
Pratt & Whitney g Manager. Product Conformance . Re-Entry veticles General E' lectric y
Manager. Quarity Assuranc). Aposo Spacecraft '
i North American Aviation Director. QuaKfy Assurance. t aunch Operations y
Roi: kwell International Director. Quasty Assurance. Space Shutee Ortster Assembly and Test -
1 Rockwell International Associate Proiect Director. GCEP Support Contract System Development Co,rporat,lon Project Director. GCEP System Developeient Corporation V.ce President. Oak R.dge Operat ons Presearch incorporated L
45
4 i
JOHN L. HANSEL 104 Humbolt Court
" Oak Ridge, TN 37830 (615) 482-3981
SUMMARY
- Thirty years experience in quality assurance, reliability, maintainability, system safety, systems management and pro-ject management / control. Strong general management compe-tence built upon extensive ex craft, launch vehicle, gas t' perience in the urbine and manned energy space-industries.
CAREER HICHLIGHTS: o Serving as a consultant to the President's Commission on the Three Mile Island accident.
o Serving as the Director of, Quality Assurance and Reli-ability on the NASA Apollo Program.
CURRENT ACTIVITIES: o Conducting overview study on the reinspection program
- for the Commonwealth Edison Company (CECO) owned Byron .
nuclear powered, electrical generating plant.
o Directing the overview of the Braidwood Construction Assessment Program (BCAP) for the CECO owned Braidwood nuclear powered, electrical generating plant.
o Directing a review of design, quality assurance prac-tices and the " mirror image" problems on the Pacific Gas and Electric owned, Diablo Canyon nuclear powered, elec-trical generating plant.
EXPERIENCE:
1/84 - Present EVALUATION RESEARCH CORPORATION. Oak Ridge, TN 9/83 - 1/84 PRESEARCH INCORPORATED. Oak Ridge, TN .
System support services to the DOE and individual con-tractors: 512M annual sales.
Vice President - Oak Ridge Operations Division - 9/83 -
1/84 Managed the Division's business development and marketing programs. Responsible for management of all non-00E con-tracts involving St.9M in 1983 with projections of $4.2M in 1984. Managed 32 people.
46
98 1
6 JOHN L. HANSEL - 2 o Developed a comprehensive business plan to provide an increase in client base and additional lines of busi-ness.
o Identified six new potential c1 tents. Provided infor-mation on personnel capabilities, services and company experience.
o Identified four potential joint venture / teaming part-ners.
o Developed a formalized procedure for management of the bid and proposal process and associated budgets.
1979-1983 SYSTEM DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION / SYSTEMS MANAGEMENT AND ENGINEERING DIVISION. Oak Ridge, TN ,
System Support Contractor to the Department of Energy:
$10M annual sales.
Project Director of System Support Contract - 1981 - 1983 Directed a joint venture of SDC and Daniel, Mann, Johnson and Mendenhall (SDC managing partner) responsible for pro-viding system engineering, project planning / control, quali-ty assurance, data management and computer services to the Department of Energy's Gas Centrifuge Enrichment Project.
Managed 220 people.
o Increased the contract value from $79M to $132M (Ten year contract period).
o Received excellent ratings on contract performance and increased fee from 6.5% to 7%.
o Significantly increased the range and types of services.
o Managed the devel,opment of system engineering and pro-ject control methodology for a $108 project involving (14) contractors.
o Developed a system requiring the integration of quality and reliability assessments to improve the programmatic approach to systems management and quality control.
o Successfully bid and won a $4.5M contract with Goodyear Atomic Corporation for training services.
o Provided personal consulting services to key DOE per-sonnel on quality assurance, systems management and project management. -
47
l l
l JOHN L. HANSEL - 2
)
o Developed a comprehensive business plan to provide an increase in client base and additional lines of bust- '
ness.
1 o Identified six new potential clients. Provided infor- '
mation on personnel capabilities, services and company '
experience.
o Identified four potential joint venture / teaming part-ners.
o Developed a, formalized procedure for management of the bid and proposal process and associated budgets.
- 1979-1983 SYSTEM DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION / SYSTEMS MANAGEMENT AND ENGINEERING DIVISION. Oak Ridge TN System Support Contractor to the Department of Energy:
$10M annual sales.
Project Director of System Support Contract - 1981 - 1983 Directed a joint venture of SDC and Daniel, Mann, Johnson and Mendenhall (SOC managing partner) responsible for pro-viding system engineering, project planning / control, quali-ty assurance, data management and computer services to the Department of Energy's Gas Centrifuge Enrichment Project.
Managed 220 people.
o Increased the contract value from $79M to $132M (Ten year contract perici).
o Received excellent ratings on contract performance and increased fee from 6.5% to 7%.
o Significantly increased the range and types of services.
- o Managed the development of system engineering and pro-ject control methodology for a $108 project involving (14) contractors. .
o Developed a system requiring the integration of quality and reliability assessments to improve the programmatic approach to systems management and quality control.
o Successfully bid and won a $4.5M contract with Goodyear Atomic Corporation for training services.
o Provided personal consul ting services to key 00E per-sonnel on quality assurance, systems management and project management. -
48
1
., JOHN L. HANSEL - 3
. l
! o Served as a consultant to the President's Commission on the Three Mile Island accident. ;
Associate Project Director - 1979 - 1981 i
- Directed project control, financial management / analysis.
quality assurance, configuration management, data manage-ment and computer services functions.
1965 - 1979 ROCKWELL INTERNATIONAL / SPACE DIVISION. Downey, CA 1
Producer of the Space Shuttle Orbitor, Apollo spacecraft, and satellites for the D00.
Director of Quality Assurance and Reliability - Space Shuttle - 1974 - 1979 .
Directed the Division's quality assurance and reliability program at the Palmdale, California assembly plant. Pro-gram consisted of quality engineering, inspection, test, major subcontractor quality audits and reliability. Man-
- aged 260 people, o Managed development of the quality program for control-Ifng manufacturing, assembly, test, and procurement ac-tivities.
o Managed supplier quality assurance program for major assemblies, i.e., mid fuselage, aft fuselage, wings, etc.
o Directed the development of highly specialized test and inspection equipment for space shuttle hardware and systems.
o Managed quality assurance effort for the flight test program.
- o Directed development of all quality and reliability data .
systems including collection, analysis, synthesis and i feedback of results.
o Assisted management at Cape Kennedy in development of I
the launch site quality assurance and reliability pro-grams to assure a smooth transition and transfer of technology.
Director of Launch Operations Quality / Reliability Assurance and System Safety - 1961 - 1914 49
_ - _ . ~- ,. _ _ _ , . - - _ . _ _ _ . .
, JOHN L. HANSEL - 4 4 i Directed quality assurance and reliability programs at Cape Kennedy on the Apollo spacecraft and Saturn S-II launch vehicle. Managed 360 people.
Manager Apollo Quality Assurance - 1965 - 1967 i
Managed the quality assurance program on the apollo Space-craft and associated ground support and equipment. Managed 240 people.
1961 - 1965 GENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANY / MISSILE AND SPACE DIVISION. Cape Canaveral, FL Manager - Product Conformance, Mark VI Re-Entry Vehicles -
1961 - 1965 ,
Responsible for quality assurance program. Managed 40 1 -
peopl e.
1959 - 1961 PRATT & WHITNEY AIRCRAFT CORPORATION. West F11m Beach, FL General Foreman - 1959 - 1961 Responsible for supervision of quality control and test techniqians involved in operation of a turbine test facility. Managed 60 people.
1953 - 1959 GENERAL ELECTRIC FLIGHT PROPULSION DIVISION. Evendale, OH Supervisor - Jet Engine Component Test Laboratories - 1957
- 1959 Test Technician and Supervisor - Meterology - 1953 - 1957
- LICENSES / Registered Professional Quality Engineer - California '
CERTIFICATIONS ASQC Certified Quality Engineer i
- PROFESSIONAL American Society for Quality Control - currently AFFILIATIONS President-El ect National Society of Professional Engineers National Contract Management Association '
EDUCATION MS, Systems Management, Florida Institute of Technology -
1971 .
BS, Math and Science, Rollins College - 1965 50
JOHN L. HANSEL - S Currently serves as a lecturer for the ASQC. Have taught -
evening university / college courses in quality, reliability, management and industrial engineering.
AWARDS /SPECIAL Recipient of the National Aeronautics and Space Admini-RECOGNITION stration award for significant contribution to the nation's space program.
SECURITY Department of Energy "Q" CLEARANCES Department of Defense - Secret 4
9 I
t I
+
s 51
JON E. H0FF Mr. Hoff has 12 years experience in Quality Control and Quality Assurance in the fossil and nuclear power plant fields. Experience includes manage-ment of an on-site civil, inspection laboratory, inspection of c~ivil con-struction activities, and 5 years Quality Assurance activities related to nuclear power plant construction.
EXPERIENCE:
1984 - Present Evaluation Research Corporation, Oak Ridge, TN. Quali ty Assurance Engineer. Evaluation of quality assurance and quality control procedures for compliance with ap-plicable codes, standards, specifications, and program requirements. Develop survelliance checklist and per-form surveillances of quality assurance activities.
Evaluate inspection documentation for adherence to approved inspection procedures. Certified Level III Inspector in accordance with ANSI N45.2.6 and Qualified Auditor in accordance with ANSI N45.2.12.
1984 Consumers Power Company, Midland Energy Center Project, Midl and, M1. Quality Assurance Engineer. Certi fied Level III Inspector, ANSI N45.2.6. Evaluated Quality Control inspection records for conformance with program requirements, provided surveillance of Quality Control inspection activities, wrote corrective action requests <
and nonconformance reports as necessary, developed sur-veillance checklists, and reviewed Project-Quality Con-trol Instructions for adherence to program requirements.
l 1981 - 1984 Public Service Indiana, Harble Hill Nuclear Generating Station, New Washington, IN. Quality Assurance Engineer. Certified Level II and Level III Inspector, ANSI N 45.2.6. Monitored contractors' Quality Assurance programs through the performance of scheduled as well as unscheduled surveillances. Documented nonconforming conditions utilizing Corrective Action Requests and Con-struction Surveillance Reports. Closed out assigned nonconformance reports, and corrective action requests.
Reviewed contractor Quality Assurance documents for compliance with approved QA program requirements. Per-formed surveillance of assigned mandatory " hold points".
Issued "stop further processing orders", as well as "re-quest stop work orders". Assisted in the training of j new employees.
52
Jon E. Hof f - 2 Reviewed Quality Control procedures to assure compliance with approved codes, standards, and spect fications.
Identified and reported conditions, materials, equip-ment, and activities in noncompliance with codes, stan-dards, specifications, and procedures. Reviewed techni-cal data generated to assure compliance. As Senior Inspector, supervise and provided technical direction to Lead Inspectors in concrete inspections / tests within the scope of Civil Inspection and Testing Services. Deter-mined and evaluated validity of inspections / tests. Re-viewed and approved required doctmentation, and assured that inspections / tests were perforned in accordance with implementing procedures.
1972 - 1981 Peabody Testing Services, Inc., Division of Magnaflux Corporation, Chicago, IL.
2/81 - 5/81, Civil Testing Training Instructor ... Re-sponsible for the organization, implementation, and instruction of classes in Construction Materials Testing and Inspection for Magnaflux Corporation, Elk Grove Village Training Facility.
7/80 - 2/81, Project Manager. Plains Escalante Gene-rating Station, Prewitt, NM.
11/79 - 7/80, Project Manager. Merom Generating Station, Merom, IN.
2/75 - 9/78, Project Manager. White Bluff Generating Station, Redfield, AR.
11/74 - 2/75, Project Lab Supervisor. Newton Generating Station, Newton, IL.
10/72 - 12/73, Project Lab Supervisor. Gibson Gene-rating Station, Princeton, IN.
Responsibilities for the listed positions included or-ganization, set up, and management of on-site test and inspection facilities; organization, review, and re-porting of data to clients; training and direction of technicians and inspectors and control of quality docu-mentation.
9/78 - 11/79, Manager. - Li ttle Rock Laboratory, Little Rock, AR. Supervised a regional laboratory providing civil engineering testing and inspection, subsurface investigation, and nondestructive testing services.
Duties included management, sales, and marketing, and
, supervision of field and laboratory operations and activities of the local drilling crews.
53
Jon E. Hof f - 3 12/73 - 11/74, Manager. Henderson Laboratory, Hender-son, KY. Supervised a regional laboratory, conducting lab and field tests on construction materials performing subsurface investigations. Duties included management
, and supervision of personnel and sales.
EDUCATION: .'
1972 Indiana State University, Terre Haute, IN - Bachelor of Science (Major Geography; Minor Geology)
Associate Engineering Technician - Certificate No. 39918 March 1984 Auditor Training, Bechtel Power Corporation March 1984 Audit Team Leader Training Program, Consuners Power Company Training Course March 1982 Contract Administration Workshop, Public Service of Indiana Training Course June 1981 Use of Nuclear Testing Equipment, Troxler Electronic Laboratories Training Course 54
. RESUME -
ROBERT V. LANEY 24 Trout Farm Lane Duxbury, MA 02332 Phone: 617-585-8912 Robert V. Laney is a consultant in nuclear energy and energy project management. He has broad executive and technical exper-ience in power plant operation, in energy research and develop-ment, in the construction and operation of large energy projects, and with the complexities of bringing new energy processes into practical use. His working experience includes extensive per-iods in operating power plants for the U. S. Navy, in the Navy nuclear reactor program, in the construction industry, in Government, and in energy research and development.
While an officer in the Navy, Mr. Laney was a member of a small group of engineers chosen by Admiral H. G.- Rickover to assist him in developing nuclear power plants for naval ship propulsion. He served as Project Manager for the development, design, and construction of the land prototype of the Sea Wolf
, nuclear power plant. He participated in the construction of the first nuclear submarines, the U.S.S. Nautilus and Sea Wolf.
These wcre followed by several other applications of nuclear power, including surface ships and the first utility-operated nuclear power station at Shippingport, Pennsylvania.
While Naval representative at the Bettis Laboratory, Mr.
Laney developed the first comprehensive quality assurance pro-gram for the Navy's network of nuclear component suppliers.
From this work in developing a new energy technology for -
the Navy, Mr. Laney, as a civilian, moved into nuclear ship con-struction at the General Dynamics Shipyard in Quincy, Massachu-
- setts. In 1963, he was appointed Vice-President and General t Manager. In this capacity, he was responsible for the design and construction of a number of the Navy's most successful nuc-lear powered surface ships and submarines.
l In 1970, he turned to the development of more advanced l energy technologies when he was asked by the University of .
! Chicago to become Associate Director of the Argonne National Laboratory, devoted to developing a range of new energy options.
He was later appointed Deputy Director with additional respons-ibility for total Laboratory administration. During this period, he directed programs for improved methods of coal combustion, conservation technologies, high-temperature high-efficiency batteries, nuclear fusion, and breeder reactors.
He retired from Argonne in 1979 to become a private consult-ant. Since then he has:
Served as a member of the Senior Advisory Panel to the Chairman of Commonwealth Edison to determine the strengths and deficiencies in the Company's nuclear energy program in the light of Three Mile Island.
i 55
1
~
n ,
\
. , 1 l
2 -
Served as a member of an Advisory Committee to the :
President of General Public Utilities to evaluate two areas of concern after the Three Mile Island accident:
personnel selection and training; and man / machine inter- 0 face and communications. i Participated in the Department of Energy /New York State program to find suitable ways to solidify and remove high-level radioactive wastes which are lochted at West Valley, NY. *'
Served as member of a Nuclear Advisory Board formed to advise the Governor of Illinois on nuclear issues facing .
the state. ,
Served as chairman of a team which evaluated and advised '
ways to improve the nuclear engineering and construction programs of the Washington Public Power Supply System.
- Served as chairman of a committee of experts formed to advise the Department of Energy concerning the merits of various processes for vitrifying high-level nuclear waste.
. Served as a member of a team representing Technical Audit Associates to assist the New York State Consumer Protection Board'to prepare for public hearings concerning the con-struction of Nine Mile 2 nuclear power plant.
Served as a consultant to Houston Lighting and Power
- Company in an evaluation of the Engineering Assurance Program for their South Texas nuclear plant.
. Currently serving as chairman of a Technical Audit Associates panel which is auditing the Washington Public Power Supply System's program for verifying the design and construction of their WNP-2 Nuclear Station.
. Currently serving as member of a special study group formed to advise the Nuclear Regulatory Commission on means to improve the design and construction quality of
- commercial reactor plants.
~
Recently assisted Admiral Rickover to prepare an assess-ment of. GPU Nuclear Corporation 's management competence to operate THI-1.
Mr. Laney holds a B.S. degree from the U. S. Naval Academy, an M.S. degree from the Massachusetts Institute of Technology, and an MBA from the University of Chicago.
56
~
ROBERT V. LANEY Employment History November 1, 1979 to Present Consultant in Energy Project i Management .
1972 to November 1, 1979 Deputy Director, Argonne National Laboratory, University of Chicago.
Responsible for all applied re-search and development, and for Laboratory administration of this 5300 person institution.
1970 - 1972 Associate Director, Argonne National Laboratory, responsible for nuclear reacter research and development.
1964 - 1970 Vice President and General Manager of Quincy (Massachusetts)
Shipyard Division of General Dynamics. (8500 employees) 1960 - 1964 Nuclear Design and Construction Manager of Quincy Shipyard o'f Bethlehem Steel Company.
1954 - 1960 As U. S. Naval Captain, tech-nical representative of the Atomic Energy Commission at the Westinghouse Bettis Atomic Power Laboratory, Pittsburgh.
1948 - 1954 Reactor Development Project Manager in the Naval Reactor Program of the Atomic Energy Commission and the Navy's Bureau -
of Ships, Washington, DC.
1939 - 1948 Active duty Naval officer; various duties at sea and ashore.
Engineer office on carrier, destroyer, and battleship.
57
NICH01.AS A. PETRICK EDUCATION:
B.S. Mechanical Engineering, University of Michigan, 1945 M.S. Mechanical Engineering, Pennsylvania State University, 1949 Oak Ridge School Reactor Technology, 1953.
Post Graduate Work - University of Pittsburg Registered Professional Engineer -
Pennsylvania - -
EXPERIENCE:
1945 - 1946 Naval Officer - Pacific - Destroyer and Naval Office of Research and Inventions.
8/1946 - 2/1950 Pennsylvania State University Graduate Student, Graduate Assistant and Instructor Mechanical Engineering Faculty.
2/1950 - 8/1967 Westinghouse Bettis Atomic Power Laboratory.
Design of Naval Nuclear Power Plant Systems.
Positions included:
Engineer - Reactor Core Design Supervisor - Nautilus Core Design Manager - Surface Ship Reactor Design Sub-Oivision Manager - Naval Power Plant Engineering 8/1967 - 2/1973 Westinghouse Advanced Reactors Division:
Product Manager - Fast Flux Test Facility Engineering Manager and Project Manager -
Demonstration Liquid Metal Breeder Reactor Project - which later became Clinch River.
2/1973 - 7/1973 Westinghouse Power Systems Projects Division.
Project Manager - Europe, Midd le Ea;t anc Africa with responsibility for West-inghouse construc' tion overseas.
58
Nicholas A. Petrick - 2 Since 7/1973 Executive Director of SNUPPS (Standardized Nuclear Unit Power Plant Systems)
President - Nuclear Projects Inc. of Rockville, Md.
The responsibility included:
As Agent for the SNUPPs Utilities (Kansas Gas & Electric, Kansas City Power and Light, Union Electric, Northern States Power, Rochester Gas & Electric) manage the work done by Bechtel Power Corporation as Architect / Engineer in the design of what was originally (6) standardized nuclear plants. There are now (2) SNUPPS plants, Callaway and Wolf Creek, which are virtually complete.
In addition to managing Bechtel, the Staff has had responsibility for licensing, QA, procurement management and coordination of the utilities.
Nuclear Projects, Inc.
5 Choke Cherry Road -
Ro.ckville, Md. 20850 59
~
Catherine M. Thompson Fifteen years experience in the nuclear industry. Experience includes quality control testing of reactor instrumentation and the full scope of qualityts.
projec assurance activities on major nuclear power plant construction EMPLOYMENT:
- 1984 - Present t Evaluation Research Corporation, Oak Ridge TN QA Engineer. Responsibilities include developing
- quality assurance plans and procedures, performing audits, and applying quality assurance / quality control principals to industry nedds.
1973 - 1984 Stone and Webster Engineering Corporation Boston HA Quality Engineering Group Supervisor. Responsible for the Quality Engineering activities and personnel on the Clinch River Breeder Reactor Plant Project. The activi-ties included the quality review of engineering docu-
- ments, the approval of inspecticn plans, the coordina- .
tion of technfcal assistance in specialty-a,reas, and the preparation / maintenance of the QA Program description and the supporting procedural base. .
Previous: Senior QA Engineer, Procurement 0A Division.
Responsibile for the coordination and development of QA procedurbs and instructions; the coordination of PQA personnel training, and for developing budgets and mont-toring expenditures in the PQA Division. Also partict-pated in audits of suppiters.
Previous: 0A Program Administrator. Functioned as the liaison between the QA department, client, project NSSS.
suppiter, and o.ther suppliers on the River Bend Project -
for Gulf States Utilities. Also coordinated all quality related procedures and training and Indoctrination pro-grams; participated in the preparation of QA Department
, budget and monitored expenditures, and represented the project in a11' internal and external audits.
Previous: 0A Engineer. Responsible for developing l systems and procedures for controlling quality related activities associated with the construction of nuclear power plants, including management construction and
. inspection tasks.
60
e Catherine H. Thompson - 2
- 1969 - 1973 Reuter Stokes Inc., Cleveland, OH Test Engineer. Responsible for testing the operating '
characteristics of a wide range of radiation sensors and associated instrumentation. Assisted customers in solving applications problems and often traveled to their reactor / test facility.
PROFESSIONAL AFFILIATIONS: Society of Women Engineers - Member American Society of Quality Control - Member EDUCATION:
1970 - 1973 Attended Cleveland. State University - Physics 1973 - 1974 Northeastern University - Associate of Science -
Nath/ Physics .
9 9
9 m
S e
6 1
G 61 t
r b
JAMES E. YOUNG i
Mr. Young has 13 years experience in Quality Assurance in the nuclear power industry. Experience includes Quality Assurance engineering with extensive experience as an auditor, and Lead Auditor.
EXPERIENCE:
198'4 - Present Evaluation Research Corporation, Oak Ridge, TN, Lead Auditor. Responsible for directing and performing audits of structures, systems, components, and programs in accordance with ANSI N45.2.12. Responsibilities in-clude organizing, conducting, and reporting evaluation of corrective action and closure of assigned audits.
Other responsibilities include leadership and coordi-nation for auditors, technical specialists and other personnel assigned to the audit.
1984 Consumers Power Company, Midland Energy Center Project, Midl and, M1. Certified Lead Auditor. Responsible for performing audits for Consumers Power Company on activities affecting the quality of structures, systems, components and programs for safety-related and "Q" i tems. Responsibilities include organizing, conduct-ing, reporting, evaluation of corrective action and closure of assigned audits. Provide leadership atd co-ordination for auditors, technical specialists and other personnel assigned to the audit.
1983 - 1984 Public Service Indiana, Marble Hill Nuclear Generating Station. Supplier Audit Supervisor. Responsible for the following activities: Supervise Pre-Award Surveys of prospective supplier's facilities; Supervise PSI QA
' Surveillance activities and audits at supplier facili-ties regarding Category I and reliability-related items; Supervise the review and accept / reject Quality records at supplier facilities; develop and implement a Supplier Surveillance Program for safety and select reliability-related systems and structures; Supervise the follow-up regarding required supplier corrective actions; assist i
with the preparation of training outlines; Supervise the work activities of assigned personnel; review and accept
, Source Surveillance Checklists; analyze workload and manpower needs and make necessary recommendations; i
assist with the preparation of the Group budget; assist with the establishment of Mandatory Inspection Hold Points; prepare various reports regarding SQER's activi-ties; assist with the review / comment / approval of pro-spective Supplier Quality Assurance Program Manuals.
- 62 L
i James E. Young - 2 1980 - 1983 Senior Quality Assurance Engineer, Audit Section.
Responsible for coordination of all vendor audit
. functions in relation to the Marble Hill Project for Public Service Indiana. Generate and maintain audit schedules; schedule audits and assign Audit Team Lead-ers; maintain vendor Audit Findings Reports while ef-fecting resolutions and closure through coordination with.l.ead Auditors. Responsibility included performance of supplier audits, including the AE; audits of site contractors at Marble Hill; support of PSI Internal Audit Program provided as required.
1977 - 1983 Babcock and Wilcox, Nuclear Power Generataion Division, Lynchburg, VA. Lead Quality Assurance Engineer.
Responsible for evaluation of B&W Supplier QA Programs, NSS Construction Sites including Inservice Inspection Activities, and B&W Nuclear component manufacturing f acilities. Responsibilities included: coordinating, planning, scheduling &nd follow-up of Supplier Audits.
Technical reviews of th'e Supplier's Quality program, Quality systems, QA policies, deficiency reports, and performance of Quality Audits, including sub-tier vendor evaluations. Position required interface with B&W Sup-pliers, Purchasing, Project Management and customers.
1971 - 1977 Babcock and Wilcox, Nuclear Equipment Division, Mt.
Vernon, IN. Quality Assurance Engineer. Responsible i
for technical review and conformance verification of ,
manufacturing processes on B&W design commercial Nuclear Once-through Steam Generators. Respcnsibility included:
review of QA policies, procedures and contract varia-l tions; analysis of manufacturing problems; shop surveil-l lance, and performance of Internal Quality Audits (two l QA personnel reporting).
l l 1970 - 1971 Supervisor of Automated Machine Department. Duties
- included
- Supervising machining operations of a nunerically controlled computer programmed machining center and operations of boring mills for a wide range '
of machining operations. ( Approximately ten employees reporting.)
1964 - 1970 Machining Operator. Duties included: Machining nuclear systems components. Assignments included: '
operating lathes, milling machines, drills, shapers, boring mills and numerical controlled computer programmed machine centers.
I 63
7 James E. Young - 3 EDUCATION:
1979 University of Evansville, Evansville, IN - Bachelor of Liberal Studies Degree not granted at this time pending completion of Thesi s 1977 Amerfcan Society for Quality Control Certified Quality Engineer, Certi ficate Number E-6228 1974 Certified as a Quality Auditor according to ANSI N45.2.23 by Babcock & Wilcox 1960 McLeansboro Township High School, Hamilton . IL, College Preparatory PROFESSIONAL AFFILIATIONS: American Society for Quality Control - Member American Welding Society - Member f
i 64 l_
APPENDIX B. Trrining Records 65
tvAt.UAT10!! RESEARCil CORPORATIO:1 QUAL.lTY ASSURANCE RECORD OF ASSIGilED REA0!!!G ASSIGi1ED TO: M u/ ((. S.S. Il0:
O14- o t - 58C 9 E!4P. NO:
Doc. -
No. Rev. Date Title Completed
- Signature 1
ERC QA P1an for BCAP 9 /2,4-[64- (,, t-j, h 6/84 BCAP Policy Docunent _
9 /24-/% C .f-1, b a h ,
7/16/84 BCAP Site QA Over- w view Group Plan N
.QAP-1.1 0 9/24-/8 4 Q,4. hap.
Personnel Qualifications qg4/e4 Q y,ba QAP-1.2 0 . - _
Indoctrination and Train- '
ing of Personnel 9[M 84 C.N. b h
/
QAP-2.1 0 Daily t.og g/24/a+ C,Qb QAP-10.1 0 Quality Review and Sur-veillance -
4/PMo4- C 44 O*"%Y*
cts n Pe onnel 9/2MB4 C. M.6% -
QAP-15.1 0 Docu:nentation and Dis-position of Observations and Discrepancies q/24/84- C.ld.Oo A QAP-16.1 0 Corrective Action 9/2k/84 CMhh. ?
QAP-18.1 0 Quality Assurance Audit _
Program q/2.#st Cg b m .
QAP-18.2 0 Qualification of Audit .-
Personnel
/a+ C R6mh -
ANSI /AS!4E- 1977 Requirements.for Auditing ..
le Pow r Ian Ob *- * -
- Signature acknowledges that I have read the docu:nents and have been provi opportunity to have questions answered to assure my understanding.
Reviewed By: _
Da te: 7 2'# [
QA Hanager 66
EVALUATION RESEARCH CORPORATIO!! i QUALITY ASSURANCE RECORD OF ASSIGNED READING k
ASSIGNED TO: Wayne L. Chase S.S. NO: Fed. I .D. # 25-1416577 EMP. NO: A/!4 l
Doc. Date No. Rev. Title Completed
/g 7/16/84 BCAP Site QA Over- /
view Group P1an 7[/d'I8Y $ ',
-QAP-1.1 0 Personnel Qualifications g/3/gg g g QAP-1.2 0 Indoc r nation nd Train-
-QAP-2.1 0 Daily Log ,ggf[gf A QAP-10.1 0 Qu 1 eview and Sur- .
ecti n P rsonnel gfy 'gr,g_
QAP-15.1 0 Documentation and Dis-position of Observations //
and Discrepancies j <
/ / ,,,
-QAP-16.1 QAP-18.1 0
0 Corrective Action Quality Assurance Audit fg/p'f [ f
)/
Program
/ [ p //
QAP-18.2 0 alification of Audit ANSI /ASME- 1977 Requirements for Auditing N45.2.12 of QA Programs for Nu- [,
clear Power Plants gy -
/
- Signature acknowledges that I have read the documents and have been p'rovided an opportunity to have questions answered to assure my understanding.
Review d Dy: Date: 1 E
J#[
QA Manager 67 d
l l
EVAt.UATION RESEARCH CORPORATION QUALITY ASSURANCE RECORD OF ASSIGNED READING C
i ASSIGHED TO: . [. OxQ COM.3 S.S. NO: R/.2-/8-26Oi !
EMP. NO: O 2_ 6 C 9 Doc.
No.
Date Rev. Ti tle Completed
6/84 BCAP Policy Document
[ .
7/16/84 BCAP Site QA Over- l view Group Plan .,f([ /
y/ / , fy ,y QAP-1.1 0 Personnel Qualifications gy7[g QAP-1.2 0 Indoctrination and Train-ing of Personnel f37[fy QAP-2.1 0 Daily Log QAP-10.1 0 Quality Review and Sur-f[ygy. [
veillance fn[ty >
QAP-10.2 0 Quali fication of In- >
spection Personnel
([t; y, ..
QAP-15.1 0 Documentation and Dis-position of Observations and Discrepancies 7 g' QAP-16.1 0 Corrective Action ~
cP[77[y QAP-18.1 0 Quality Assurance Audit Program f>7 /
QAP-18.2 0 alific tion of Audit ANSI /ASME- 1977 Requirements for Auditing N45.2.12 of QA Programs for Nu- 'l7 clear Power P1 ants
- Signature acknowledges that I have read the documents and have been provided an opportunity to have questions answered to assure my understanding.
Reviewed By: /XM1 - et- %VZc Date:
kf8Y f c}'9A:Hakiger 68
~ . -. _ . .. = . _ - . . . - -. -
j EVALUATION RESEARCH CORPORATION QUALITY ASSURANCE RECORD OF ASSIGNED READING ASSIGNED TO: Robert E. Ham S.S. NO: 247-62-0967 EMP. NO:
Doc.
No. Rev.
Date Ti tle Completed
- Signature l 1 ERC QA Plan for 8 CAP 6[tq[f y h 6/84 8 CAP Policy Docunent i g, /g q Qg 7/16/84 BCAP Site QA Over-view Group Plan 7[/ g/gy h k.hh t
- QAP-1.1 0 Personnel Qualifications q/y/g y
- QAP-1.2 0 Q Q g, Indoctrination and Train-ing of Personnel j
9[y[gy Q
- **QAP-2.1 0 Daily Log i
q/y/gy Q {,
- QAP-10.1 0 Quality Review and Sur-
] veillance 9fi[8V k(hg
- QAP-10.2 0 Qualification of In-j spection Personnel
- QAP-15.1 0 T[([9 Y Q(,hy
- Documentation and Dis-position of Observations
{ and Discrepancies 9[I[hl[ k 4 i
- QAP-16.1 0 Corrective Action
- QAP-18.1 0 Quality Assurance Audit q/y[g(/ ~ QQ
. Program 9[y[pt( (
- QAP-18.2 0 Qualification of Audit Personnel 4[y[(y Q{p ANSI /ASME- 1977 N45.2.12 Requirements for Auditing of QA Programs for Nu-clear Power Plants i-("I[ hh
- Signature acknowledges that I have read the documents and have been provided an opportunity to have questions answered to assure my understanding.
- To be issued.
Reviewed By:
Date: f QA Manager 69
- EVALUATIO!! RESEARCH CORPORATIO1 QUALITY ASSURANCE
_ RECORD OF ASSIGNED READING C
ASSIGNED TO:
M At4SEL IDH ed L.
. S.S. NO: 3 tO-2.6-o 7 35'-
EMP. NO: 1-lo735-Doc.
No. Rev. Date Ti tle Completed
- Signature 1
ERC QA P1an for BCAP 6/84 BCAP Policy Docunent g
eg g 7/16/84 7 f gy (/ [g BCA" Site QA Over-view Group P1an gf,fgtf ,,g
.QAP-1.1 0 QAP-1.2 Personnel Qualifications h/,/jy hQ 0 '
Indoctrination and Train-ing of Personnel d 9l,lgy gg,,)
QAP-2.1 0 Daily 1.og QAP-10.1 0
h/,py hgfLg Quality Review and Sur- ,
veill ance q[f[gy h,,3f QAP-10.2 0 y Qualification of In- /j spection Personnel 9[,[py g QAP-15.1 0 Documentation and Dis-position of Observations [
and Discrepancies QAP-16.1 0 ql,lgy Qf Corrective Action QAP-18.1 g / ,# h - [
0 Quality Assurance Audit
, Program
,, 9, ff/g h(g I QAP-18.2 0 ,
,,,[
Qualification of Audit .
Personnel
! @f f[ 0/
Q ,[
ANSI /ASME- 1977 '
L Requirements for Auditing N45.2.12 of QA Programs for Nu- [ I clear Power Plants 4f gy ,, , f
{ //
- Signature acknowledges that I hase read the docunents and have been pr opportunity to have questions answered to assure my understanding. >
j QA flanager '
! i i 70
QUAL.!TY ASSURA!!CE RECORD OF ASSIGilED REA0l!!G o.
ASSIGilED TO: 7. ow F. HofA S.S. HO: '/9 7 .p/ - ?/ f ~7 EITP. HO: _ N ? / '4 ~~?
. Doc.
- Date i No. Rev. Ti tle Comple ted
- Signature !
1 ERC QA P1an for 8 CAP 9,g ,gy 7 6/84 , BCAP Policy Docunent 9 - /2 -M- % T. ,'#M 7/16/84 BCAP Site QA Over-view Group Plan N #
9, ,gy A._ g ,tj g
.QAP-1.1 0 Personnel Quali fications 9,,7,gy ) 7 kg QAP-1.2 0 Indoctrination and Train-ing of Personnel
. \ / b 9 , g , gy 3 y , fj, QAP-2.1 1/@ daily I.og 9 , f1,gy 7 y QAP-10.1 0 Quality Review and Sur-
\(
veillance 9 , ,, ,g y, g[
QAP-10.2 0 Qualification of in- N k QAP-15.1 0 spection Personnel 9,, ,gy J [7jg Documentation and Dis-position of Observations \ [
and Discrepancies t
9364 Ew \
T feg y% 7,/ . ugv-QAP-16.1 0 Corrective Action 9_f g _gy QAP-18.1 hl)N$ality Assurance Audit /
Program y.gz . gy )wy QAP-18.2 0 Qualification of Audit Personnel
\
ANSI /ASME- 1977 9 ./2 - O V- M T. k N45.2.12 Requirements for Auditing of QA Programs for Hu-
/ N clear Power Plants 9 f v_ - ey
( y ,,tjcg N I (L/
- Signature acknowledges that I have read the documents and have been provided an opportunity to have questions answered to assure my understanding.
Reviewd By:
Da te:
QA flanager
- 71 i
EVALUATION RESEARCH CORPORATION QUALITY ASSURANCE ,
RECORD OF ASSIGNED READING C
ASSIGNED TO: Nicholas A. Petrick S.S. NO: LO 4 -\ 4--7 %
gqv EMP. NO:
Doc. . Date No. Rev. Ti tle Completed
- Signature
" 9/A 0 -ool ?'
1 ERC QA P1an for BCAP 6 3\\@ s 6/84 BCAP Policy Docunent Q Y 7/16/84 BCAP Site QA Over- %
view Group P1an 91 N \
- QAP-1.1 0 Personnel Qualificattons S\4\\@
- QAP-1.2 0 Indoctrination and Train-ing of Personnel hf\kN
- QAP-2.1 0 Daily Log c3%Q
- QAP-10.1 0 Quality Review and Sur-
{ veillance 6 (A -
- QAP-10.2 0 Qualification of In- g spection Personnel *
- QAP-15.1 0 Docunentation and Dis-position of Observations $\g\\CaQ and Discrepancies {
- QAP-16.1 0 Corrective Action Okb\\Tk ~
- QAP-18.1 0 Quality Assurance Audit Program 99 k
- QAP-18.2 0 Qualification of Audit Personnel \%
ANSI /ASME- 1977 Requirements for Auditing t
)
N45.2.12 of QA Programs for Nu-clear Power Plants gk,Q 2 k -
/
- Signature acknowledges that I have read the docunents and have been provided an opportunity to have questions answered to assure my understanding.
- To be issued.
Reviewed By: -
Date: 2 QA Hanager 72
EVALUATION RESEARCH CORPORATION
~ QUALITY ASSURANCE RECORD OF ASSIGNED READING ASSIGNED TO: Catherine M. Thompson S.S. NO: 302-38-6814 EMP. NO: I48M Doc. Date No. Rev. Titie Completed
6/84 BCAP Policy Document '
7/16/84 BCAP Site QA Over- , /
view Group P1an f/pd/ Q /g, y f
- -QAP-1.1 0 Personnel Qualifications . pQg/ -
hg h,h
..,i-
-QAP-1.2 0 Indoctrination and Train- /
ing of Personnel fjf/g'k r -y /)
,ry jg(/
QAP-2.1 0 Daily Log
'g/yyy j, /
QAP-10.1 0 Quality Review and Sur- *
'I ' '.. - /
Elloi k //$ $72u71./2f.
QAP-10.2 0 Qualification of In- "'
spection Personnel
/p/
,,,p/ ff[ggj. ,
QAP-15.1 0 Doctmentation and Dis- [
position of Observations y and Discrepancies [g,f(/ /
(,,/) g gJ 4
QAP-16.1 0 Corrective Action /g ~ ..,g g,//
QAP-18.1 0 Quality Assurance Audit I # ' '
, g/
Program fjf , ,1).) .i.. ,.,,
- QAP-18.2 0 Qualification of Audit 3 . .: s Personnel g,/g/E;/ f *g 7 Jg /
ANSI /ASME- ## #
N45.2.12 1977 Requirements for Auditing of QA Programs for Nu-7 '
/'
/ f ej )
clear Power Plants f//f/'k, ogf
, , ig/
- Signature acknowledges that I have read the documents and have been provided'an opportunity to have questions answered to assure my understanding.
Reviewed By: Date: 7 QA Hanager 73
EVAL.UATION RESEARCH CORPORATION
~~
QUAllTY ASSURANCE.
RECORD OF ASSIGNED READING ASSIGNED TO: _ cam d.s A '}o u . 9 S.S. NO:
.. 3 s~ P'- 3 -/- t- V3 Y EMP. NO:
Doc.
No. Rev. Date Tit 1e Compieted
- Signature 1
6/84 BCAP Policy Document 7/16/84 9g/pg Q' BCAP Site QA Over- # '
view Group P1an gfg/g g , __y QAP-1.1 0 Personnel Qualifications g 9/
QAP-1.2 0 . ' /
Indoctrinatf or and Train- /
ing of Personnel QAP-2.1 0 9/F[P[ _
Daily Log ' t g/3-/p/ g 4_ _ 4 QAP-10.1 0 Quality Review and Sur-veillance
- k. 9/3[g/ Q g]., r - 9 QAP-10.2 0 Qualification of In- / /
spection Personnel 9! /g/p! 9 b QAP-15.1 0 Documentation and Dis-position of Observations and Discrepancies 9/f[P[ 96 r-
{
QAP-16.1 0 Corrective Action QAP-18.1 0 Quality Assurance Audit 9[.s[ff~ $4fa y QAP-18.2 0 Program Qualification of Audit 9[ff/ hE ey Personnel ANSI /ASME- 1977 9[S/' [ e~y Requirements for Auditing #
N4S.2.12 of QA Programs for Nu-clear Power Plants 9[y/[pf g6 /
m- e
/
- Signature acknowledges that I have read the documents and have been provided an opportunity to have questions answered to assure my understanding.
Reviewed By: _ )IM~ ~ Da te:
QA Hanager 74 !
i
APPENDIX C. Certification Records l
t
~~ 75
MEMO Harch 27, 1984 T0: ERC Files qg FROM: John Hansel
SUBJECT:
Indoctrination of ERC Personnel per QAP-1.2 for BCAP-IEOG An indoctrination session was conducted by Mr. J. Hansel for Mr. W. Chase at the Commonwealth Edison Offices in Chicago, IL on March 26, 1984. The session ran approximately one hour and the following items were covered.
o The scope of IEOG as related to Braidwood o The purpose of BCAP at the Braidwood Station o Discussed the BCAP Policy Document o History of problems at Byron which could be related to Braidwood JLH:rf 76
MEMO April 10, 1984 T0: ERC Files FROM: John Hansel
SUBJECT:
Indoctrination of ERC Personnel per QAP-1.2 for BCAP-IE0G An indoctrination session was conducted by Mr. J. Hansel for Mr. A.E.
Cocoros at the Evaluation Research Corporation office at Oak Ridge, TN on April 9,1984. The session ran approximately one hour and the following i tems were covered.
o Purpose of BCAP as established by CECO o Scope of IEOG o Reviewed BCAP Policy Docoment and discussed various programs o History of problems at Byron Station JLH:rf l
l 77
t MEMO June 12, 1984 TO: ERC Files FROM: John L. Hansel
SUBJECT:
Indoctrination o ERC Personnel per QAP-1.2 for BCAP-IEOG An indoctrination session was conducted by Mr. J.L. Hansel for Mr. R.E. Ham at the Evaluation Research Corporation office at Oak Ridge, TN on June 11, 1984. The session ran approximately 60 minutes and the following items were covered.
o BCAP Program content and description o ERC responsibilities in the BCAP o Schedules and responsibilities for R.E. Ham JLH:rf 78
September 13, 1984 TO: ERC Files FROM: Robert E. Ham
SUBJECT:
Indoctrination of ERC Personnel per QAP-1.2 for BCAP-IEOG An indoctrination session was conducted by Mr. R.E. Ham 'or Mr. J. Hoff at the Evaluation Research Corporation office on the Braidwood Site on September 12, 1984. The session ran approximately 60 minutes and the following items were covered.
o BCAP Progran content and description o ERC interactions with BCAP personnel and responsibilities o Schedules and responsibilities for J.E. Hoff REH:rf lW N d L ScwM O g 79
July 11,1984 T0: ERC Files FROM: R.E. Ham
SUBJECT:
Indoctrination of ERC Personnel per QAP-1.2 for BCAP-IEOG An indoctrination session was conducted by Mr. R.E. Ham for Messrs. N.
Petrick and R. Laney at the Evaluation Research Corporation office on the Braidwood Site on July 10, 1984. The session ran approximately 60 minutes and the following items were covered.
o BCAP plan documents and their levels o Status of Program o Reviewed BCAP definition and described the 3 elements o Reviewed their responsibilities in support of ERC REH:rf M NV 8L kmsc(
f b
July 6,1984 T0: ERC Files FROM: Robert E. Ham
SUBJECT:
Indoctrination of ERC Personnel per QAP-1.2 for BCAP-IEOG An indoctrination session was conducted by Mr. R.E. Ham for Ms. C. Thompson at the Evaluation Research Corporation office at Oak Ridge, TN on July 5, 1984. The session ran approximately 90 minutes and the following items were covered.
o BCAP Program content and. description o ERC interactions with BCAP personnel and responsibilities o Schedules and responsibilities for C.M. Thompson REH:rf M '\W d L Na~t6 d e
81
September 6,1984 T0: ERC Files FROM: Robert E. Ham
SUBJECT:
Indoctrination of ERC Personnel per QAP-1.2 for BCAP-!EOG An indoctrination session was conducted by Mr. R.E. Ham for Mr. J. Young at the Evaluation Research Corporation office on the Braidwood Site on September 4,1984. The session ran approximately 60 minutes and the following items were covered.
I o Mandatory Reading Assignments per the ERC " Record of Assigned Reading" form.
o The design of BCAP and why so structured.
o IEOG's relationship to BCAP and the NRC.
e Five categories of BCAP to be audited.
o Planned overinspection of BCAP.
o Reading assignment of the BCAP plans.
REH:rf , 3 s T At Raus4 82
E .
MEMO
~
September 14, 1984 QA #110 TO: ERC Files
SUBJECT:
Certificate of Qualification I have reviewed the education records, professional qualifications, and work experience of Mr. John Hoff and having met the requirements of QAP 10.2, Attachment 6.3, I do hereby certify him as.a Level III inspector in the Civil discipline.
A. E. Cocoros Manager, Quality Assurance 1
AEC/sjs i
l 9
83
f
'$$$$h&$$hY'$$$$$$D$$D$
i
, t4 DOp j 'h, i
I ENERGY and ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENC h i
y DIVISION '
- 32) This is to certify that af
- di ik JON E. HOFF ik lt - -
has successfully met the requirements of ANSI 45.2.6 it
" Qualifications of Inspection, Examination and Testing hh' 2Q Personnel for Nuclear Power Plants" MC and is hereby certified as a -
$b Quality Assurance Inspector $b b5- M ,._ ;$
ik , 9 _
manager, quality Assurance '
at 4t ,
Ed74f
~
jgm.m.2.2 oate jh
@%@.9%$%#%#%@%@%$%@%@%@
$ % $ $ $ $ $ 5 $ % $ $ $ $ $ $ $ % $ $ %.@
l 99 %g h y ENERGY and ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES k gi DIVISION A g' hh b This is to certify that -
kh 2* A. EDWARD COCOROS
% H ik th B ' g' has successfully met the requirements of ANSI 45.2.23 2h M
f99 " Qualification of Quality Assurance Program Audit Personnel for Nuclear Power Plants" fh 93, G and is hereby certified as a R.i
$k Quality Assurance Lead Auditor ik
$ Q& '
Manager, Quality Assurance.
iko,..2.2 Date Nd b f Th
@'%@@%$2@%#%#%@%@%@%@%@
w*wawmevere h s e ** Co, g
11~ f eNeacy ana eNvinoNueNTAL SCIENCE DIVISION gA b
}'
hh This is to certify that kh AP
- 4P 1h .
JAMES E. YOU NG th a Mfl 'g-has successfully met the requirements of ANSI 45.2.23 fh " Qualification of Quality Assurance Program Audit h
99 '
Personnel for Nuclear Power Plants" 33t Mt .and is hereby certified as a 'MC
$k Quality Assurance Lead Auditor $b 5
Manager, Quality Assurance.
E Q F-10.2.2 oa,e 9/m/sy ?
42L4M4124. ?lll8 MLA tW/b 6%W.Mf/* M G%W.4LVD h1En W W
APPENDIX D. Quality Assurance Plan 87