ML20135D864
| ML20135D864 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | 05200003 |
| Issue date: | 02/25/1997 |
| From: | Nydes R WESTINGHOUSE ELECTRIC COMPANY, DIV OF CBS CORP. |
| To: | |
| Shared Package | |
| ML20135D794 | List: |
| References | |
| WCAP-14822-01, WCAP-14822-1, WCAP-14822-R, WCAP-14822-R00, NUDOCS 9703060060 | |
| Download: ML20135D864 (179) | |
Text
{{#Wiki_filter:_ _ - - - _ - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
. Westinghouse Non-Proprietary Class 3 1
+ +++++++
~
\ LAP 6001 Quality
- Assuranc'e Procedures
\ SupportingNRC
- Review of: AP600 SSARESectionst 18.2;: .
- 1 and 18.8 Westinghouse Energy Systems
~
L _ -_- - - - - >
s .
^
,..'#,.;.>,.'f , - - l . ,i .[ . , 'g"s , [ .^ .; f .! '.,
,o ..s,.. , j y.;S ; ,_: $'... ..gt;s,
. .,.s.L g .. . ,f4,. --y....j. ; . ,f,. ,'N_
A. t. { ,
,."'.#.,j. g;.p; .. {.: :4,,p g ;l. ?; g , ,v.s. ,. . :.c,'
^. l q }l:,.., .i,n..:. 'f., .e., , ,, , g
..;;....,...;~,... . ;;.}
. .. a';(h
. . ...,.,.;.. *..; ..3. :. 1. ..ta,.a.. x..g, . . ..,.t : .y f .,,;p;M a.tu . . . . . . , . .4
.I- . . .. -
.s. . . s .
_> ;:<.r.'.
.-..[.....' < :/. . ; . .- ;.-
e.. .. .:'.,,.: ..? . .;;;, .d , ' a.%._:; ,1 t
. , -. 3. ,; <;:"' r2. . .: f: y;.. . . , / : n U., o b n.,[. . .g . : * . . - 79.. .'. . ,: f r; % 'w. .. , g .:
, , . ., .,p - . .
gh.. f::s.:k ,4'
.;- '.evI'0,' . ' i. C l'.3 , ,.; ? - l,.;'... *. '.'s
(:"W . 's Y'
- h. i .-^ ?;&.s,i. ."* '.& kt ug'^. ' 4;b N $ :',.i . !..:
'^
A pl: ~Y'5 k "V: Y,;k)*;^.'%-., .
; .. ,;_ f.,y l ,'Q. . ;. ' %g. +(..,.,, .:: . .'(:
~:. . .):. . t. '..;;; L .. *
.. r;t.:;. .y,; 7. ,; q,.. . . i" .% . * ,ew;;. 2
- ,p;. 9:(:;fy.;:::~;. , , ,,.,9_ . _.. .G.y!! -[::.;;;-l%.. s. ;;~ij.5;. ;,"; ,.,:! ;. -d!.a.n..
.- . :y .
,. *s L ~.:.i;(, ,;j ,'.Q
..y.,( .;s ::;c, : ,:.
1" i,. . %f.;; l .. , .,. l. ,lh
- .[,. .
<,,!_'.t .',g' r .- !,
. ., .. a:.: ;.;; g* ,,m: 1, ,'l, %:l. :l i; f,g:g:; j.' . ' A.f."..: .';f. ,,j;.:
. s.. .' 3 : '~;. h c.' (c:ljf. s.5 :n 7. p. .., ? .:. -lyw:..y;,'a'r:;s g
. ...p~;,. ! :3;' m.g f,, .f;'.; . . y> , :.,p...;..,p, : w p. s
...,..%,..*'. m v .*+.. ), .. . ,
r ..
,.'.c. 2 :. . . . .' i. - . - .
- l s . M. . ... . . ,? - *. e.:: r '. , : '; .e...; a4 :.o. .. ;,: ....e
. . ; , :' 'r :
.,._,j, 't . 4a.n M.A* ,d, -;
. . . ,s 6
.^g ' ., .
;.. ; y. ;;., _ , A v
ls ,;r .;
- p. . A.. ,;%
t
.m
.r..;';
s...,, h,' ;,Wl , .: ,%
-l'*, ' .. x . q. , - i.,'; *. .f. - ye; - .l . *. -
. :% 'i - -
l U.s -l : i ,1'.,7
.~. g;...,n..." A ..f,i ; 14 5.* . *:... ,i,..:: .. .l.,h -t...,-z
- .:i . . . s*a. ..... We~f'n Q ,.SlR. ;'.l):.R; .lQs' '
. ., .,'.2;... r:. c:
; y. r.y , .v: "..
- . ' .. o .c..l.s,-
.;v...:, f:1.= :.. .:c
_',; w:.[: v..e,x. y ; .; m f ;:.e.n, . fm. . *:;s' .;*9, w :; ":; :.. ..n. !' t.~::.:; c:m,q,;n '. - . ; i,'.
- ^ * . - . .-
( :,',l s t
- : :'..'*s '.
-l.
, . 4 ,s,i . 'f4
..;. s ~ * . - ,.
t= :
.r, ..: A !. ' p: y, j ,? .
;; . ~.'t e . . :~..u. . .:;.. v .; ..; .?'): .m .
m.; . . . - .grl. ::. c.n. , .-x. ' ,.;;r.
. A,s, ;., L;.
.: . ~ , s:. . .[n.._.y."..: ;;..*'.*:.s... , . . :: a. ; :..ap$ . ... e :.;. ^. c s
. v.:.. ' '.- ;. .'s .*; .~*- t.:;a
./l%..
, y~: .x. . .? ~ ..
. ; .. ' .J a, . &, . . .J .%.ts ,* . .,.:.<- . , . _ . . . ....g. ,f . ; *; f. ,
- .* ,ti , i. ,,s ,
' . *;.:#.;;g: . -
- :.a,e.. [ . . ' .. f c. - ,-
C. s .'l @p::.t.,y ::pj.QN h..,7}, *?, plNNY,,bh?l .&.",N,.f... Y
,,-o... . . . . - e, ,. , . . - ..
.b:; 1.. : h &4'l3..q -'.'.T:&yy s:.\ . . s . r.. y ,, c., 3.;- m 6.yN.N:;i$..'. ? g~!,$.$ &.2- -l *.i $l W
..Q. ^:..: ..;:k. . . . :. ~.~i. .. t pf*Us? ';t.r*"e :t,;. g. ..;. :. ; ,,,. , .4.- (g',r . 3 .' .f.s.
;p. ? -...
M.1,;y,. . q..
.n . . .a
- ,.s
. , ,:, .;cp. by. t : ..:- -,
) ,. s,. 1, f;r .f,y.ltl : .~l%j .
., ) - y g'.p . .y.4 g, ra;: .. , .* h:s;.;,::Q
. ,y u,,..;, ; f. .'t-w.....<+=,p.,.,. .y. ;, },7 a.,s ;",*,: ;3u), . f;; o.g -y; ;;: p '
;c 3g .;...y;.
, . , . }' gs . , . % f'.,,:: l : ,;,,. .;7, y.,,
4
..- . . u . i.:... .; ,g . .,...;-
*1 Q. , . :e - - q' - .,./c"! *.*..:.J .*,--g.7. G,e,e
;+ .M .,.,.,y**f.W:, . ,', . . -
. , . . %. , n..*;v .s.. .: -, v. ru-
. .g,r,
. .- :n. ' .. a. - .,
3;** . . '.e,-: . , ',::.,,....n%. - . . . , ..A ,; . . .. .. ; .
< . ,* ;. ,;. .-a e,. ' . .;: . . . s v..c . r,, 'e m , .1 . . . ..hR.... e
. . q' e-
..,:."o.< . . . - , . _ . , ,_. , ;. ,
.\
., . ; . :y t, .; . . ' , . . " ,; :,, . ;v. ) , v: , . :.! '*.;..f..,..
.*:..~
.(*-
-<v s - .. .=.1...,gn' : . . - - ;
'..<,*,+..'v'm-
. ; .: ...Y .:. ., ; v. :%(-
' . . . ..- .. . f. . .& . . . . . .
.,.g,.......
.,..,.y.,.g.. . f. *, *L" i.v ,.i g.:*., . i ... .b.
,,:. ::' ., .::.*B. .. v . f3 . '- 4.],' l'., ..l.:. ,...'s - % . :l,r.. '$1a; .:,.;',..,;.C s. 's... g. 'ad;
. :1., ., .;:. ' . :... ;'g,. ,- ; ,
' .- .' t S,..
. :. ' ,,. .,., ..';..e :..
- 2,
,... ,, i .e.,'. . ,. , -
+; :' r o
- :-., ,e.,.. _; ~.-
t ., . . , . p . } ,p t -
' ;',.,....'*.:y, -8. ';
;. ' g . .*
* : ". : .* ; -:*j- ; . . *
- - : .i
.e i
; .f* A . . y* *, ',, ' '. :*
w,..9.-+ .'"..:*
. - . . , -: .:. r
,.l..,.'a n..,.,,.,.,,.,,..}.5!......,.x..,.v,.. ....p,:,p.....- * , . -* .. :
.'l-* . , , . ^ . ,,,.,,.,'f.=.
- r. .s . ,.s. . r v -
... . ...n.-
- ..-. , ;- .,c.., ..b
.s e.,.*,..y.,.,- ,,.f.,:...- ,:
- ,. :e,- oi. , . ,
,.e ...-
;,., , - . ~ , .. . ., .: .;,. , , ;' i'[ ':, , ' g , , . -
y .* ; ' ,b ,j.) c ' p . g,g1
.,n'_
' ;;:,.,*as.* ...:...':".. -* ,.; ..%
.. .. --',\ V, l'. * .e-- -
l' . : ,+
. . -..y.
,w... .
g o :, . ,_..: ss; ,y. ,*
*. ..s ;. .-:*..;,
..; s *, . : *. .:i , . . ., .:. .. -
- m. t f;- ,** ; _
s.,.,, . . . : -' ; - R, . - ....-..,<s..<'.t,,.,$b'.p 1 - a ;
. .,. . ; .,w:
, no *. -u.
..~.:. , ;.y.x....,.'...-. .....
* - .. ;; .l~.., u-
_ ~, :.: . . ,; c, J g. ,ap;;'.r.. ....v.. .._ ,. 3. . ; 2 _..sb y :,8.., , . - .. . < _ ~ - *
', b. .: - - -
; ,, q
..,.(.".;<,_;
. . ._ . ..:; t:;s.. . .w ....,., j';[. .....m.e'.. v A..
. y,: ,;g
.:; ; ,; t*.... ...;... ; . : . '.
g _ . ... .; ;..,.c.,, . :
,.y s..... r.,...
,o
, ;,% :,..........._qy s .
.'y-ew-;.. c-
. * . - .. . > ::*,..A.
;.e,,
. ., .s.,..
. A,-
,...,:;........p','.;.......p,,.:.L._.a.
;_.- : r ; , ? : ,,.9,.W....',f...,.,.c..- .s.
v .p. .. .i :y=)# . , .g.,s_ . . n. , $. .? ..;:..9._..:..;..'.-
. ;e . ,. . . ; ,'; * .: f.,._ . r.
.. ~ . \l Y ; ..: , :> '
., .; -* ' , - ; .. .. p ..s .. . %. ,,,_ . *. g .,. . . . , . , . . . , , .a;,n t ,.( p, ' . ..
'i. .r . .c. *q- -
, = t . . ' a. ;. . ' , - * ,. 1, . , , . . -
..f.
.,.'.j..- *i*
**g+. **'.#. e'.,C'.f.',.,'.s
',"y,"4.... .. .i ., .
. x. , . ; . '*lQ:Q. ), ' *' y ~ :,.. ;, i.._.,;_ '. . .'. ...i t ,s. . ,p*;* :. , , ' - .
. .8,~
.,, f f, * . ' '., , ;. 4 ..".y- , ' ,,
.., s .
's..
.?. e. ..s ......t.'. .- *
. , + s,.. , ' , ..
. , _ . . f' ' . ... .f
, , , -_ %,,* y , 3,. . ,:,'.., - , " . .
s ,: p :/ .
, , ; ...,.,.e,-
...t.',.,.,,,..e,.
; _t.,
1(. .,,3 . - ..: ..
* - ' ' ~ ; ' ,. . .. - . . . . ,
,:. ; y,_ .,_3. * .,,.,.7
- . -l , .. j e
=g,,
* - ;- c . p:.: . '.;p 4,; ,5 4. ,,;'.,A . ..
- _,' .- l. , . , , 3 l,.,-
_p . .,, ,' ,,
. ,- .; s,
' [f, . ,.,: '
, e- -
'.3.
s
.p. ,._.. _
.,_...,':.,;_ . il' \ -
,':' .':.4_ f ; .-{:.Y p',,'* : :. . .'; l. - .
,.; \.,:',-{ . . q. ; .' ' , ' . ['. .' '-' )- . , s,,,,i,
- p. .' , ,'g
.' . . ;.. *fl, . ,
_* ; i
- f. ; ; ., f, g, , .:'
,J. -
.n* . . s .. ,
. -; ' ., ,. *.. ;.f.,. $ ,. -; E - . -. - ' . - .. : 4
; ...'.'.~s*....,-Q-.. . . . . .
. . ~ , . . . ,
~ - : .
.;;- . . _ *. ',.r.. ....v e . . g ,: ..g 3,..,.s n.._<. . ; ; _ ' ;;. . . ,. ..
L . . :;
- j. , ,..x._ .f
_ .s. b .- }:.q f; , _, z.;
. ,5. :,, , re:
.p ... . . . . ,_
. .. : . 1 _' ... . . . .
- 8;. , - *
%. f.{ ;, e, ; : " ,.., . . , y ';;, . :.
. ~. * .
f.;. - 4 ' - g. . ., c.v; -' , ,* . .: ,;. ., - ;
.4 . . , .
'. ,,..,'V. ....;.g3.,,.,,.
...,;f,_:.**',,
1.
'. r .' ;
_ g;; . ); . , -. . . ...;_.;'.__;,...*?f,,-. ; .{- 9...e.,.,... .. . . , .
- e. . - a:- . -
,_ .- - - ty, ,
- ' *, , , ., , . , i. ,,* .
- c. , . * , : .: ,
~
<,
- e, *t, ,-'* J , , ' ,, 4 :
.v n,.
..,....,;..,,..._~.g,,...,2 . *.. , , - ." . .; - .,
,,,g,,a..s.,......+ + i, - t ; . * ...l.',o,-,
. ,j.*"
.;,. : s % y
* ,. ,; .*; '..I*l, .* * ' - (' - ,' , ~'f .g *
.4
*,..; ,p- '.* ~ , -. ,- + - , , .
..=..q.-
, , , . . ' '*i '; -
,' '. (
.?
.= ;*; a * . , ~ , :. .. ar . _-. . .-.
.. . . ' ;* .. . . , : _- , y. - ,, .*..: , ,': .,;. * *.~. :, ;.., ._* * * - 's-
'-y .. ,
,e w_ , ' . .: .s
.* ' . . '... . - ^*;;
, . . :, ;r ,. .l:
f~ ., .. f. ..'*- ' (e_;g,j:_e :' U.' .;? ::. . ',,'- il l fi . ,' n,: -..'..l.
=. '. ,'..;W ; y; .-.
.. .? ...
. . i. l. L. . . . ; - .- ':
,z* :
., n :.. .
_' ) _ .*, ; ._','.
',f ;m':. . . . . _
(. .k .' g, '-[,pl}, ; . ,
.s,.',..,.,...,',
- y ' *,. _, - ;, _.
. :s-+, r .s;; .,s_-
. ~ , , . .e ..s:.., .(( . , s . [ L.s'.,*. ' '
, ; ; . * *. 7-. %.;:..','
,.s.....
..,.. .,:.s e -
Q :; ' ' -....9*.<~ ' ., . ".., . , ;. .~..., .. . _ . ;;-,;- a'
*. . .he ' . % , .; . , . . . _ ,s. . . . .
' , ., '..;. ...y,,, ,.~.. , , . - ',_1.; _
v ._ ' . . * ,
. a.;,; - ,
f' r
'. , e. .,j.. ; .. . ,.
c
*. i .: .- .,:: - 'I-
,e
.t'....'.' . , ' , . . . . ' ' .- ,
. . . ; . 4.
r..'..' v.
. V,. . ._.t . ;, ...'.
.. .. ..7,.
; . '.';='.. '.. , .. .. _v, . . , , ,., j-1 , : . ,.
, ,._.,,y
*'. ; .w: ., g ,;[., ' ' , _
l; 9 . :; ;- - c
~ .c.
. ,. : ~ a :, '.-' . ', ....L..
.,'.?..- .-.- :' ' ' ' . . . . ,
..s.. A
. '.. ,*- , ..f. ...-- . , ; ;. .w
..r.......v. ..
.v. .
.'.~.
' r, +, ' .
l 'u '..' ? ; s ";:. _ ' . ,,::_ .'n,...". ^ q. .e. . ' -(*. '.... . , ' : , . .y: ' : '. - -. . -, y, ...s;.'
>,a- '
V.'._ ; j...',',. *, .' ...
- - - n-
'e'. :'..% : : *
. . ...3 _. ;',. . .
. . .r
- .- - . ~ . ..,- -< . , ' :\ ;. . . . - . . , ' . ' . .,1',-
e ,
.- . j . .a .vi.- e W : s.
,r ; .
. * ., . l ,. . ; : .'
4
, .,i., ;
. }. ,z-y .; . ... .
,.~t,,s.'._.l.? ..._. 1
- 3. , b , Q[ ' l , . ,, .. . . _ , . ,' . . , . ,
?;
} *:. ,,': [,.f _<r.[. _' ..; '.,.: * -.an . . . . . ,' , ... .,
....,s...
x,.(_'..,...:..,,..s:, . ... -.-. . :.
- . __,. .. . -c, .. '. .~ . . = . . . ., , -.. t. . . ......,;.
. . . + . . .,. :: : :. . .,- .3 e . .,.. .
- e. ,
s.
. , .v..;. . ; .?
.:. .....':...,%.*...h.."s'.% .. .- .-. ... - . . .
;a ' :.
.j..,... ; - , _- . . . .. . . . . . .e,....,....'; . . . .r ~ ,. . . . . . . -
. . . . s. -. . . ~ 4...',
~ :i:...: .... .' J . ':. .: ~: ' g' . . . .,, . *..; 'h ....:.. . i.- - ^ . J ..v . ^
. :: , < ...; .;t.
. -c,\- .:,: n*.. '. . : 7. c, . . *:, . . ?.. %,,;'. :m :} .; ', * . , ::!..
r- ....n
.\..,.m... *
..,.,;'- - .. . .. . .. 3. : . , i.. ...~..,.,,,a,:,,w..,'..;.,.;p...'n'
,.....,g.3
- x. . v. . ,
, . . .: . . . . " . +
..c..... u, . .
... s.
- .: . ... : .. ,,v,._.. . .:. . .._ ,. .,:
,......r....
.~;e< .,w.........,,,~.:.v..
o.-=: a::
. . ..c .: ,.' ...,...,....u. ;. v, ;: .:. ,~. - .v:,y;v. p . .}., , y.: . . n.. . ~ -.,,.e, .~. ~. :, , ,
. . m,
[ .. .3,yc . 9. . /,. .. ,.. .. ., ;,. .,,, . .. ~~ . c.*,
% - ,, ., s : ;.. c . a, % +c,. . . , ..
..~ g
.J..
. . . ..,..,..r',..: .....:..,..v + -e, :r'. .. . ~ . .. .. ... .. .+ .. . . . . . .. .. . . . . .
s .
.I 'l i. . f. ;Q'. , ,. i ,: . ;$
'c* 7 * *r . -
f'( l'l. _ , -
., ..t .
=_1 p . . ;~ ; .. e . . ': ,
n ..;........
- f. .;;. : . : ..%.:
- ..+. ,p . .". . 'd. .:. . ' . .'. y . ; %. ..c .% . . i: . c : ..;:. n
- .. ^- ' x . . .:..> ,
...,,:.9.--.n..c.'..........,..&..,
<.f:;,:N. . n..- . . .
. .v
. ?.? .*.<
4
.; .i. .:..
. ;.. .,.t .. .. - . r . . ~ . . , - - .: r ,.w.. 4.... -:=.e..
, + -.y.s .:. .., . P:. . fy. . ..,
y ..(. . . - . ; .- :.;.,.;.
. , . . ~ ..e r-
. .+.,, , -
.u : . p.7, r;,, f,,.y. n ....y9
, Q.s ,:iv y.,q,3: ;, .q$ i,a, n .. . :;,4: _ , _;
1.,$.
,a :.; , . ,;. [ , te ..;..,: :. . -.; g,oy ,.e.;,.... . .; . , . ..... .
y y$(. h. f'. ,3ff fy:., 'dffh L'f.lll '
~
b '
.), . . .
f ffl. .
.[ .n!,% lM. .h..
~
' [.[2.
4;
- w. .m.h.h.i-l}e[.Yh( 4[;s 9.p,hhhh, n ..n w c.6h..idhk.[fdkh.i
.u ; ::..a ;,: . x:a n. am.a . ,DM
.~..:..n . ap, v.
.y w . x x, s . w . i me.~, .
wu r. .y .:. a.:. .
~. .
__u '
~
, _+ n a
~ sm .... . - . a , .w ff
. ..,. ~. .. kf.?. ~.:...v.:.3,+. n nh p{h. -
fugff. ,ff .g v. s s n, g$ . f,f '
; ff, ;
-l:f.n')w).f. n c.a .e..
~
+ w.rcy.% w .a &,f '
%.h:
5M % ;N, p.. . .M:h:v s r%,.;<~Mf.h,;!E.}qw . . . h. [ $,k..
.f q
s, 3 ft M. s .f . 4$ . ..:. . . w 4 .5.g
.v u p,h;p.wa.C,.s p
.W .s . g
. 9, ml: Y.M, k.c.;.y 5.;gWg &.l p y y .I$.
p g g"g a
- gpu,, .m#mdde w % g, gga.M.
v .
. . m.
.: E3 my & s yg m
hne,W f 4.,ir:pp.y da., .. 9,.m. %g.5g ...;.;g.w:{m b . p. ,.p < V 5%.mm. a w.W e.n : u 7; v %.;y? fig ' y ,, y d4.,,y.p. %0.:T:%j(N.;;p p;g (p ,.Yg d
&> f g. .p ; .
.Q . f.ll.f': .fs,yQ% ' _ ". Q y;Mj }'} yf l;:.,.) Y ] Q ,,i;4}}, t &s a:w{gQi, . N.,yh:
.M. . .. m,.m. . .;m, ......;:g :f.Yy '., s..
y O ,g.,, . 3 .p~M. :n.
}k.y.y.g.t.<g.:.:..sW;N.W:.d.} ;fiQ: ...;,; .,y ... g:.g:.?
,m
. ;;e; :@n,w:,m. ,r.y:
.; y ; w. . . 4, ,,,
.9.;n.g:f.y:
,). p ..;v;u ,,:;,g; 1. :..$m :$.y . . .,p.., p.ga gq.g :. .f. p p~-
- m _.
- e. -
- i. . . ,
... <(;. -
y . .c3.3 , y..y .;.j... .
.;y .ey. : w.. p.s :,y;3. . . . 3;:g:n,r .. . ;;w. a. .. . (:. y . . ;; 3 ,4.,.,. .. e.c; .y.:a;. , . q ,.u..,..
g,v..,,,,
, j. .,,
.-- _ . . - _ _ - - _ . _ . . . _ . _ -. .- . ~
AP600 DOCUMENT COVER SHEET ! TDC: IDS: 1 S l Form 58202G(5/94) {tAxxxx.wpf.1x) AP600 CENTRAL FILE USE ONLY: I 0058.FRM RFS#: RFS ITEM #: AP600 DOCUMEN1 NO. REVISION NO. ASSIGNED TO GW-GAP-200 0 Page1cL_ Robin K. Nydes { ALTERNATE DOCUMENT NUMBER: WCAP-14822 Rev 0 WORK BREAKDOWN #: 3.3.2.9 l DESIGN AGENT ORGANIZATION: TITLE: AP600 Quality Assurance Procedures Supporting NRC Rt view of AP600 SSAR Sections 18.2 and 18.8 1 l i ATTACHMENTS: DCP #/REV. INCORPORATED IN THIS DOCUMENT REVISION: l CALCULATION / ANALYSIS
REFERENCE:
ELECTRONIC FILENAME ELECTRONIC FILE FORMAT ELECTRONIC FILE DESCRIPTION n/a n/a n/a (C) WESTINGHCUSE ELECTRIC CORPORATION 1SRZ_ E WESTINGHOUSE PROPRIETARY CLASS 2 This document contains information preprietary to Westinghouse Electric Corporation; it is submitted in confidence and is to be used soley for { the purpose for which it is furnished and retumed upon request. This document and such information is not to be reproduced, transmitted, disclosed or used otherwise in whole or in part without prior written authonzation of Westinghouse Electric Corporation, Energy Systems Business Unit, subject to the legendt contained hereof. E WESTINGHOUSE PROPRIETARY CLASS 2C This document is the property of and contains Propretary information owned by Westinghouse Electric Corporation and/or its subcontractors and supplers. It is transmitted to you in confidence and trust, and you agree to treat this document in stnct accordance with the terms and conditions of the agreement under which it was provided to you. WESTINGHOUSE CLASS 3 (NON PROPRIETARY) ' COMPLETE 1 IF WORK PERFORMED UNDER DESIGN CERTIFICATION OR, COMPLETE 2 IF WORK PERFORMED UNDER FOAKE. 1 DOE DESIGN CERTIFICATION PROGRAM - GOVERNMENT LIMITED RIGHTS STATEMENT [See page 2) Copynght statement. A license is reserved to the U.S. Govemment under contract DE-AC03-90SF18495.
@ DOE Subject CONTRACT DELIVERABLES (DELIVERED DATA) to specified exceptions, disclosure of inis data is restncted until September 30,1995 o contract DE-AC03-90SF18495, whichever is later.
EPRI CONFIDENTIAL: NOTICE: 1 20 3 4 E 5 E CATEGORY: AE BE C
- DE EE F 2 g ARC FOAKE PROGRAM - ARC LIMITED RIGHTS STATEMENT [See page 2)
Copynght statement A license is reserved to the U.S. Government under contract DE-FCO2-NE34267 and subcontract ARC-93-3-SC-001. E ARC CONTRACT DELIVERABLES (CONTRACT DATA) Subject to specifed exceptions, disclosure of this data is restncted under ARC Subcontract ARC-93-3-SC-001. b b' ' 1URE" SiG If / APPROVAL DATE AP6b R' ESPONSIBL$ MANAGERniwA l#f 07%rlzrl97 ' Approval of the responsible manager signifes that document is com'pletVall required revews are complet6, elecironic file is attached and document is retcsed for use.
I AP600 DOCUZENY COVER SHEET Page 2 Form 58202G(5/94) LIMITED RIGHTS STATEMENTS l l DOE GOVERNMENT LIMITED RIGHTS STATEMENT (A) These data are submitted with limited rights under govemment contract No. DE-ACO3-90SF18495. These data may be reproduced and used by the govemment with the express hrnitaten that they will not, without wntten permission of the contractor, be used for purposes of manufacturer nor dsclosed outside the govemment; except that the government may disclose these data outside the govemment for the following purposes, if any, provded that the govemment makes such dsclosure subject to prohibRion against further use and declosure: (1) This " Proprietary Data" may be dsclosed for evaluaton purposes under the restrictions above. (ll) The " Proprietary Data" may be disclosed to the Electric Power Research Institute (EPRI), electric utility representatrves and their direct consultants, excluding direct commercial competitors, and the DOE Natonal Laboratories under the prohibitions and restnctons above. (B) This notice shall be marked on any reproduction of these data, in whole or in part. i l ARC LIMITED RIGHTS STATEMENT: This propnetary cata, fumished under Subcontract Number ARC-93-3-SC-001 with ARC may be dupicated and used by the govemment l and ARC, subject to the hmitations of Artcie H-17.F. of that subcontract, with the express hmitations that the proprietary data may not be j disclosed outsde the govemment or ARC, or ARC's Class 1 & 3 members or EPRI or be used for purposes of manufacture without prior i permsson of the Subcontractor, except that further deciosure or use may be made solely for the following purposes: i i This proprietary data may be dsclosed to other than commercial competitors of Subcontractor for evaluation purposes of this subcontract under the restrcton that the propnetary data be retained in confidence and not be further disclosed, and subject to the terms of a non-declosure agreement between the Subcontractor and that organization, excluding DOE and its contractors. DEFINITIONS CONTRACT / DELIVERED DATA - Consists of documents (e 9. specifications, drawings, reports) which are generated under the DOE or ARC contracts which contain no ' background proprietary data. EPRI CONFIDENTIALITY / OBLIGATION NOTICES NOTICE 1: The data in this document is subject to no confdentiahty obligations. NOTICE 2: The data in this document is proprietary and confdential to Westinghouse Electric Corporation and/or its Contractors. It is forwarded to recipient under an obhgaton of Confdence and Trust for hmted purposes only. Any use, disclosure to unauthonzed persons, or copying of this document or parts thereof is prohibited except as agreed to in advance by the Electric Power Research insttute (EPRI) and Westinghouse Electric Corporation. Recipient of ths data has a duty to inquire of EPRI and/or Westinghouse as to the uses of the informaton contained herein that are permitted. NOTICE 3: The data in this document is propnetary and confdential to Westinghouse Electric Corporation and/or its Contractou. It is forwarded to recipent under an obligaton of Confdence and Trust for use only in evaluation tasks specifically authorized by the Electric Power Research institute (EPRI). Any use, disclosure to unauthorized persons, or copying this document or parts thereof is prohibited exmpt as agreed to in advance by EPRI and Westinghouse Electne Corporaten. Recipient of this data has a duty to inquire of EPRI an6/or Westinghouse as to the uses of the informaton contained herein that are permitted. This document and any copes or excerpts thereof that may have been generated are to be retumed to Westinghouse, directly or through EPRI, when requested to do so. NOTICE 4: The data in this document is propnetary and confdential to Westinghouse Electric Corporation and/or its Contractors. It is being revealed in confdence and trust only to Employees of EPRI and to certain contractors of EPRI for hmited evaluaton tasks authonzed by EPRI. Any use, dsclosure to unauthonzed persons, or copying of this document or parts thereof is prohibited. This Document and any copes or excerpts thereof that may have been generated are to be retumed to Westinghouse, directly or through EPRI, when requested to do so. NOTICE 5: The data in this documet is proprietary and confdential to Westinghouse Electne Corporation and/or its Contractors. Access to ths data is given in Confdence r Trust only at Westinghouse facilites for hmited evaluaton tasks assigned by EPRI. Any use, dsclosure to unauthorized persons .' copying of this document or parts thereof is prohibited. Neitner this document nor any excerpt therefrom are to be removed from mstinghouse facihtes. EPRI CONFIDENTIALITY / OBLIGATION CATEGORIES CATEGORY "A"-(See Delivered Data) Consists of CONTRACTOR Foreground Data that is contained in an issued reported. CATEGORY "B"-(See Dehvered Data) Consists of CONTRACTOR Foreground Data that is not contained in an issued report, except for computer programs. CATEGORY "C"- Consists of CONTRACTOR Background Data except for computer programs. CATEGORY "D"- Consists of computer programs developed in the course of perforrning the Work. 1 CATEGORY "E"- Consists of computer programs developed prior to the Effective Date or after the Effective Date but outside the scope l of the Work. CATEGORY *F"- Consists of administrative plans and adminstrative reports. l
WESTINGHOUSE NON-PROPRIETARY CLASS 3 l WCAP-14822 i i AP600 Quality Assurance Procedures l Supporting NRC Review of AP600 ' SSAR Sections 18.2 and 18.8 I S. P. Kerch l K. A. Kloes R. K. Nydes , February 1997 i AP600 Document Number: GW-GAP-200 l l I I Westinghouse Electric Corporation Energy System Business Unit P.O. Box 355 Pittsburgh, PA 15230-0355 C 1997 Westinghouse Electric Corporation All Rights Reserved m:\3515w.wpf;1t>022197
WESTINGHOUSE NON-PROPRIETARY CLASS 3 iii i TABLE OF CONTENTS i
1.0 INTRODUCTION
i
2.0 REFERENCES
.i 1
.-APPENDICES f AP600 Program Procedure Matrix, Revision 19 l AP 3.1, Revision 2 AP 3.2, Revision 6 I AP 3.5, Revision 2 I t
AP 3.6, Resision 2 ' AP 3.7, Revision 0 ! AP 3.12, Revision 1
- AP 3.14, Resision 0 l AP 7.2, Revision 0
~
t I l i l i l I i i V l m:\3515w.wpf:1b-022197 February 1997 i l
, - . . , . . . , , ~ --- l
_ _ . _ _ _ _ _ . .__m . . ._ . WESTINGHOUSE NON-PROPRIETARY CLAcS 3 1-1 1 INTRODUCTION Chapter 18 of the AP600 Standard Safety Analysis Report contains the AP600 Design Certification information for Human Factors Engineering. The NRC is reviewing this information against NUREG-0711 (Reference 1) and has provided comments on Element 1, the Human Factors Program Plan, and Element 7, the Human-System Interface Design, in References 2 and 3. One comment common to both the Element 1 and Element 7 reviews is that information contained in the Westinghouse AP600 Program Operating Procedures Document (Reference 4) supports the AP600 design certification but has not been docketed. Per those references, until the pertinent information in that document is docketed, the staff is unable to reach a final safety conclusion related to the AP600 human factors engineering program. To address this review comment, the pertinent procedures have been compil d into this WCAP for transmittal to the NRC. A draft was provided in Reference 5, the format and content of which was deemed acceptable by the NRC for closing DSER open items 18.2.3.3-1 through -5 and 18.2.3.4-1, l l l
\
Introduction February 1997 m \3515w.wpf;1b4r22197
i WESTINGHOUSE NON-PROPRIETARY CLASS 3 2-1 l
2.0 REFERENCES
1
- 1. NUREG-0711, Human Factors Engineering Program Review Model, July 1994. '
l
- 2. Letter from NRC to Westinghouse (Huffman to Liparulo), Comments on AP600 l l l Related Open Items Associated with Element 1 of the Human Factors Engmeenng !
Program Review Model (HFEPRM), dated December 20,1996, j 1
- 3. Letter from NRC to Westinghouse (Huffman to Liparulo), Comments on AP600 Related Open IUms Associated with Element 7 of the Human Factors Engineering Program Review Model (HFEPRM), dated December 19,1996. !
- 4. WCAP-12601 Revision 19, Westinghouse AP600 Program Operating Procedures l Document.
- 5. Letter NRC-DCP-97-4938 (DCP/NRC0704) from Westinghouse to NRC (McIntyre to Quay), Transmittal of Draft WCAP-14822, AP600 Quality Assurance Procedures l Supporting NRC Review of AP600 SSAR Sections 18.2 and 18.8, dated January 13,1997.
f 1 I l l References February 1997 m:\3515w.vpt;1b-022197
.. ._ _ . _ . . . . . _ . . , , _ _ . . ~ . . . . _ _ _ _ _ . . . _ . _ ~ . , - . . _ . _ . - _.__..__.__m__.~..-_..._..,_. .._._..m_...__
t WESTINGHOUSE NON-PROPRIETARY CLASS 3 T A-l '- { s i ~ ' APPENDICES t i i i i I i i t i i i l j l
\
Appendices February 1997 m:\3515w.wptbO22197 4 J
i a n.v I PROCEDURE MATRIX 20 W Westinghouse Electric Corporation
! " Nuclear Project Division AP600 PROGRAM PROCEDURE MATRIX 1
AP600 - p. H. J. Dn':, chi, Gener Aanager 2-10-97 Program Procedure Matrix i soci.., p,c,,ct, oiyi ion {
- I The Westinghouse commitment to the quality assurance requirements of the American Society l 1 of Mechanical Engineers NOA-1 are established in the ESBU Quality Management System I (OMS) document, which has been accepted by the US Nuclear Regulatory Commission. The ;
I application of the OMS to the AP600 program is described in WCAP-12600, "AP600 Advanced Light Water Reactor Design Quality Assurance Program Plan," which has been accepted by the Department of Energy (DOE) for the Design Certification Project and by Advanced Reactor Corporation (ARC) for the First-of-a-kind Engineering (FOAKE) Project. I For AP600 quality-related activities performed by the Westinghouse Nuclear Projects Division I (NPD) and the Nuclear Services Division (NSD), these commitments are satisfied by j implementing the applicable Level 2 Energy Systems Business Unit (ESBU) procedures of the i ESBU Quality Policy / Procedures Manual (OPPM), the applicable Level 2 division procedures I from Section 5 Appendix A of the ESBU QPPM, and additional project-specific procedures that address unique program requirements and implementation methodology. The AP600 Program Operating Procedures Manual, WCAP-12601, controls these project-specific procedures. In I accordance with the OPPM, the procedures contained in WCAP-12601 are designated as Level 3. Existing Level 3 procedures from other manuals are also implemented where appropriate. I The attached AP600 Program Procedure Matrix is provided to show the relationship between the above described procedures and identify the procedures to be implemented on this program. The Matrix also shows the appidability of AP600 procedures to design i organizations external to NPD/NSD. This Matrix is updated as required to reflect changes in the body of implementing procedures. l m.0458w wpu b422097 Page 1 of 5 0008.FRM
.~ _m ... -- . .._ . . _ ~ _
f
$ I Quality Assurance Pregram Elements Level 2 Implementing Procedures (1) 4 l (Ref; NQA-l) ESHU Policy / Procedure Manual level 3 Implementing Procedures (2)(3)(4) 4 3 l 3. ORGANIZATION The NQA I tequuements for organization are addressed
$ l through organization charts. AP600 management I responsebeldies are descnbed in WCAP-12600. AP600 QA y l Program Plan.
l II. QUALITY ASSURANCE PROGRAM P/P 1.1 Management Review AP-2.1 Indoctrination and Trainmg l P/P 2.2 Protect Quainy Plan l P/P 416 Design Planning and Project Ikvelopment , l P/P 18.1 Training l 111. DESIGN CONTROL P/P 4 4 Reactor Coolant System Connguration
- AP-3.1 AP600 Systems Specincation Documenc l P/P 4.10 Design Specincations # AP-3.2 Design Configuration Change Control for l WP-4.5 Design Analysis the AP600 Program l WP-4.17 Design VenGcation by :.-a.m.As; Review or
- AP-3.4 Functional Specification l Alecrnate Calculations + AP-3.5 Design Reviews l WP-4.18 Design Verificmion by Testmg
- AP.3 6 AP600 Design Criteria thruments g l WP-4.l9.1 Venfication and Validation of Compeer Software
- AP-3.7 Interface Control Document ;
- I WP-4.19.2 Configuration Control of Computer Programs
- AP-3.8 Iksign Specificatiori(Component /Sonware)
E l WP-419.3 Software Erine Reporting & Resolution
- AP-3 9 Preparation and Control of Drawings N l WP-4.19.4 Ekdicsson and Installation of External Computer AP-3.10 flued Systems Eksign
- 9. l Software AP-3.12 Engineering thtabase Access 01 l WP-4.19.5 Single Application and Small Internal Use Computer # AP-3.13 Safety /Scismic Classification l l Programs AP-3.14 Plant & Instrument Control System
( l WP-4.19.6 Masneenance of Configured Compeer Programs AP-3.15 System Pil bg & Instrument Contml l System l # AP-3.16 Calculation Numbering & Filing l # AP-317 AP600 Component Numhenng l AP-3.18 System Process flow Ikagram (PFD) L l Preparation p l AP-3 21 ASME Peping Design Specirscatmn 33 l IV. PRfXNREMENT DOCUMENT P/P 6.1 Control of Purchased items and Services 8 A 1 l CONTROL O C ' 33 m E
-i 8 2 g X N1 3
K N O
3 h
$ l Quahty Assuiana liogram Elements level 2 Impleinenting Procedures (I) 5 l (Ref.: NQA1) ESBU Policy / Procedure Manual Level 3 Irnplementing Procedures (2)(3)(4) 4 $ l V. INSTRUCTIONS, PROCEDURES AND PIP 2.1 lbhcies and Procedures AP-5.1 SSAR Preparation EYoceduie
- $ l DRAWINGS WP-5.3 Preparation and Control of Drawings and AP-5.2 PRA Preparation Protuture l Engincenng Sketches SAP-5.3 AP600 Tier I Documesw Ikvelopment Q
a) l
#AP-5 4 SSAR/PRA/ITAAC IYocedure for l Responding To A Request For Additsenal l Information (R AI) l #AP-5 6 Release of Documentation to NRC in l Support of AP600 Iksign Cenification t
l VI. DOCUMENT CONTROL P/P 5.2 Document Control AP-0 0 Preparation and Control of Procedures l WP5.3 Preparation and Control of Drawings and # AP-6.1 Document Numbenng l Engineering Sketches #AP-6.2 Technical Document Release & Control l #AP-6.3 Preparation, Review & Approval of AfWW) l Documents l V!l. CONTROL OF PURCll ASED ITEMS P/P 6.1 Control of Purchased hems and Services AP-7.1 Suppher Evaluation. Audet, and Approval O l AND SERVICES #AP-7.2 Control of Subcontractor Submittals Q@ l A P-7,3 Control of AIWX) Contributed Latxw l A P-7.4 Auxiliary Equipment Iksign and Costing W l Process O.- l ESBU QA Procedures Manual: (A I ESBU-QA-7.1 Evaluation and QuaMication of ESBU l Supphers l ESBU4)A-7.2 Supplier Audits l XI. TEST CONTROL WP-18 0 Test Control AP-3 ll Af%00 Testing l Xil. CONTROL MEASURING AND 1EST WP-i l .1 Control of Inspection, Measurmg and Test l EQUIPMENT Equipment l XV. CONTROL OF NONCONFORMING WP-13.3 Deviation Notices l ITEMS o m O C 33 m E
-1 o "D 8 = R Tl 33 E N O
3 I Quainy Assurance Prograni Elements level 2 Implernenting Procedures (I) I (Ref: NQA-l) ESHU Policy /Procedwe Manual level 3 Implementing Procedures (2)(3)(4) 3 l XVI CORRECIIVE ACIlON P/P 84 I ESBU - Signincant Quainy issues AP-16.1 Customer Feedback
$ l WP-13.2 Centrul of Nonconformances I WP 14.2 Corrective and Preventsve Action l XVil QUALITY ASSURANCE RECORDS P/P 16 i Records WCAP-14530. ESBU Information and Records l Management Program Manual:
l l lRM-l.1 Organization and Responsebility } l IRM 3.2 Protection of Records on Optical Disk l XVill AUDITS P/P 17.1 Assessments AP-18.1 Self Assessments m I l (5) SUPPLEMENTAL PROGRAM P/P 21.0 Identification and Reporting of Condnions Adverse [ l DOCUMENTS to Safety e l i I i i NO E S:
" l l (1) level 2 ESBU r. adures use idenseM in stus snaaris with a *P/P* psefin. Level 2 division proceduses from Section 5 Matris A of the ESBU Policy /Procedwes Manual are
" l identified with a "WP" picns, 0
-= l f
- l (2) level 3 procedures in WCAP-12601 ase identified with an "AP" prens. Other level 3 procedures are as specifici {
l I I (3) The prefix for level 2 NPD procedwes was changed from *DP" to "WP" with the phasew of WCAP-9W cffective 8/l4/95. Where level 3 procedures refer to *DP* I procedwes, the reference shall be considered as slown in the *Proceduse Cross References" per pages 3 and 6 of this masris. Revisions to procedures are not requered for the i I sole purpose of changing level 2 references, however, the sefesences shall he corvected when the level 3 procedures ase revised. i l i l (4) Procedures that apply to design organizations caternal to (W) NPD and NSD are identined with a "** *s" or "+* as follows: [ l "o i l
- These procedwes apply only with sespect to document format and consent requesesments. 3 [
i l 8 These procedures apply only with respect to definseion of isnerface responsebelities. 8 rn t { l O ' l + This procedme applies only with respect to Huenan Factors requerennents. ;
! Ifl I Procedures not marked with a "** ~#~ or "+" do not apply to J sign organisasions external to (W) NPD.
I > l (5) Not an NQA-1 cencrion. -l h E ; g x ; J) K to ' o f
- . . . _ _ _ . _ _m -_ - _ . ._ . ___... _ ._ _ __ _ . _ _ . _ . _ _ .
PROCEDURE MATRIX 20 l l PROCEDURE CROSS-REFERENCES j i s i The following table identifies the ESBU Quality Policy / Procedures Manual references to I be used for the "DP" procedure references in WCAP-12601. I l PROCEDURE REFERS TO CHANGE _TO_ l i AP-0.0 WCAP-9948 WCAP-14530 IRM1.1 I WCAP-9565 ESBU Quality Policy / Procedures l AP-2.1 WCAP-9565 ESBU Quality Policy / Procedures 1 AP-2.2 DP-2.4 ESBU 3.1 3 i DP-4.0 ESBU 6.1
- I WCAP-13740 ESBU Quality Management System j i AP-3.1 DP-3.2.2 ESBU 4.10 I AP-3.7 DP-3.2.6 W P-5.3 l AP-3.8 DP-3.2.2 ESBU 4.10 1
) I DP-3.7.1 WP-4.19 ( l D P-3.7.2 WP-4.19.1 l DP-3.7.3 WP-4.19.2 1 DP-3.7.4 WP-4.19.3 l 1 i DP-3.7.5 WP-4.19.5
- I AP-3.9 DP-3.2.6 W P-5.3 l 1 AP-3.10 DP-3.2.8 WP-4.5 ;
i i DP-3.3.2 WP-4.17 I
- i. I AP-3.11 WCAP-9565 ESBU Quality Policy / Procedures 4 1 DP-4.0 ESBU 6.1 i DP-3.3.3 WP-4.18 I DP 11.0 WP-4.18 I DP-12.0 WP-11.1 l AP-3.14 DP-3.2.2 WP-4.17 i l DP-3.3.3 WP-4.18 1 DP-7.0 ESBU 6.1 i AP-3.15 DP 3.2.8 W P-4.5 i AP-3.16 DP-3.2.8 W P-4.5 l AP 3.21 W P-3.2.2 WP-4.17 i AP-6.2 DP-6.0 ESBU 5.2 1 AP-7.1 ESBU-QA-2.2 ESBU-QA-18.2 I ESBU-QA-7.1 ESBU-QA-6.5 I ESBU-QA-7.2 ESBU-QA-6.6 i WCAP-9565 ESBU Quality Policy / Procedures l AP-7.2 DP 4.0 ESBU 6.1 l DP-7.0 ESBU 6.1 l AP-18.1 DP18.1 Delete i WCAP-8370 Part C Delete m:\3458w.wpf:1b-012297 Page 5 of 5 0008.FRM
- n. !
AP-3.1 2 W Westinghouse Electric Corporation
" Nuclear and Advanced Technology Division AP600 SYSTEM SPECIFICATION i DOCUMENTS AP600 Program Operating Procedure a _.
H. J. Bru .G L y. ral 4anager 6-1-95 j wanced Techncik>w Bunnen Area ' i AUTHOR / COGNIZANT Contact Manager, Systems Engineering, on questions l FUNCTION conceming this procedure. 1 PURPOSE To establish the responsibilities and requirements for preparing System Specification Documents for the AP600 plant. t i DEFINITIONS AP600 Plant Design Criteria (GW-G1-001)- This document i provides plant level design criteria and is a design control I document. The design criteria for System Specification i Documents are to be consistent with the A.' 300 Plant Design i Criteris, and should reference this document, as appropriate. System Specification Documents (SSD)- Documents which identify specific system design requirements and show how the design satisfies the requirements. They provide a vehicle for controlling and documenting the formal systems design process j ' and for transmitting system design data and interface requirements to all the affected AP600 design and analysis groups. PROCEDURE ' h I General A. An SSD is prepared for each of the plant systems. Each i i SSD includes the functions of the system in the plant; the I 1 overall system design criteria and objectives; a complete 1 1 1 description of the system and its operation; requirements i l for individual components, for system layout, for I instrumentation and control, for interfacing systems, and for monitoring and testing; expected environmental conditions and qualification requirements; and a summary ! of compliance with extemal criteria. i ! l i i I ~ l l rnd1900w.wpt1b 052495 Page 1 of 3 mm l l
_ _ _ . . ._ _. ._. _ _ _ _ ~ _ ._ _ - 1 i AP-3.1 2 ) l B. The format and content of the SSDs shall conform to the 1 1 guidance given in GW-GEP-020 (Reference A), AP600 l SSD Writers Guide. In addition, each SSD shall include I an AP600 Document Cover Sheet in accordance with i Exhibit 10. Each SSD shall also include an AP600 Record of Changes in accordance with Exhibit 16. , i 1 C. The list of plant systems for which SSDs are to be I I prepared is provided in GW-GOX-001 (Reference B), List l 1 of AP600 Systems. j l RESPONSIBILITY / ACTION The following procedure applies to the preparation, revision, and issue of a System Specification Document-l Systems Engineering 1. Issue a detailed writers guide for the SSDs to be i Design Group Manager prepared by the Design Groups. > 1 2. Assign responsibility for the preparation of each SSD to a l Systems Engineer. Assign responsibility for independent I verification (peer review) and additional approvals (if any) I required for design verification (for example, when the 1 originating group lacks the expertise for complete i verification). ; I Systems Design 3. Prepare the draft SSD in accordance with the Writers l l Engineer Guide. i l I 4. Obtain independent verification (peer review) of the SSD ! I in accordance with WCAP-9565, DP-3.3.2, " Design l Verification by Independent Review or Altemate l Calculations". I I 5. Resolve all comments from design verification. I 6. Prepare AP600 Document Cover Sheet (Exhibit 10) I including signatures. Obtain required design verification I approvals using AP600 Standard Intemal Review Sheet, i Exhibit 17. I 7. Issue the SSD in accordance with AP-6.2, Technical i Document Release and Control. I Subsequent revisions to a System Specification i Document shall follow the same sequence of actions as i Steps #2 through #7 above. For each revision, the l Record of Changes (Exhibit 16), shall include a I description of significant changes along with the reason mMooow.wpt-it452495 Page 2 of 3 maam
AP 3.1 2 for the change. Approval of the revision shall be obtained from the same groups that were originally required to approve the SSD. Procedure AP-3.2 Design Crnfiguration Change Control will also apply to SSD rev.sions. I REFERENCES A. GW-GEP-020, AP600 SSD Writers Guide i ! I B. GW-GOX-001, List of AP600 Systems j FORMS / EXHIBITS AP600 Document Cover Sheet, Form 58202 Exhibit 10 l l AP600 Record of Changes, Form 58204, Exhibit 16 I AP600 Standard intemal Review Sheet, Form 58203, ' Exhibit 17 l 1 l mA1900w wpttb452495 Page 3 of 3 oms e,.
m._._.__. _ . _ . _ _ . _ _ _ _ _ __ _._._ _ _ _ _ ___._ _ ._ _ _y
! l Rev.
AP-3.2 i 6 : simon: P I W Westinghouse Electric Corporation
*'" Advanced Technology Business Area DESIGN CONFIGURATION CHANGE CONTROL -
FOR THE AP600 PROGRAM l AP600 _ H. J. stuacN, j g. wel Manager OM-H ) Program Operating Procedure w.ne.o T.ewmoorau n Ares ; h : i 1 AUTHOR / COGNIZANT Contact Manager, Project Engineering & Integration [CCB j FUNCTION Chairman), on questions concoming this procedure, i i PURPOSE This procedure defines the process and actions required for the ! ! Construction phases to implement a change to the desigri which ; j- . has been previously released in a document for project use and j placed under configuration control, as defined in GW-GOY-02,
- Westinghouse AP600 Program Configuration Management Plan.
SCOPE This procedure applies to the design under configuration control .l as reflected on documents, including, but not limited to, the j following documents: ,
- l&C Equipment Ust
. System Specification Documents
] Functional Specifications ! Containment Specification Document i Control & Protection System Functional Requirements Core Design Documentation ! ! Chemistry Specification l ! NSSS Structural Design Interface Guidelines I l NSSS Design Transients l
- Radiation Analysis Manual i l Fluid Systems Safeguards Data ' l General Arrangement Drawings 3
Piping & Instrumentation Diagrams
- Logic Drawings i Equipment Outline Drawings General Assembly Drawings
- Concrete Outline Drawings
! Steel Framing Drawings ! Electrical One une Drawings i i i 1 1 I J i mm.wytmasaw Page 1 of 37 0008.FRM i
. , _ ~ - -- - - -. - - ,. - - - _, .
AP-3.2 6
- DEFINITIONS ATBA General Manager i Selects the CCB Chairman and determines the makeup l of the CCB. The General Manager is also responsible for ,
the final decision in cases where the CCB does not reach l a consensus for a Class 1 DCP, and for issuing post-CCB ; meeting approval of DCPs approved for post-design ; certification. 4 Configuration Control Board (CCB) A board of indiv6 duals drawn from vanous organizations and disciplines to review and disposition Design Change Proposals. The CCB uses the criteria established in Table 5 to dispositen Class 1 DCPs. The organization and responsibilities of the CCB are defiried in Appendix A. Approved Design Material (Ter 2) Approved Design Material is the same as Ter 2 l information. For AP600, Tier 2 information is the Standard Safety Analysis Report (SSAR). This is an NRC definition and does not allow its use as design input. Certified Design Material (Ter 1) , Certified Design Materialis the same as Tor 1 l Information. For AP600, Tier 1 information includes inspections, Tests, Analyses, and Acceptance Critona: and "end materials
- as defined by NRC. This is an NRC definition and does not allow its use as design input.
Engineer [DCP initiator) Any engineer vyithin Westinghouse or Subcontractors' or Contributed labor Orerh4;e66 v who initiates design changes for items within his/her scope of design. The DCPI is also responsible for determining the classification of a Class 1 or Class 2 DCP based on the criteria established in this procedure. If the DCPI is not physically located at the Energy Center, then he/she is responsible for nominating an ATBA engineer as a proxy for the DCP. Responsible Manager The manager within Westinghouse or subcontractor's or Contributed labor organizations who is responsible for approving, implementing design changes for items within hir,/her scope of design, or providing impact to design mmosew.wyt.n osases Page 2 of 37 0006.FRM __ . _ _ _ _, ._ _ - _ _ . _ . - ~ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ . _ ~ _ . - . -
j 1 Ji' i i i' AP 3.2 6 j changes initiated by other design organizations. The 1 l Responsible Manager identifies whether the proposed
- change falls within Class 1,2 or 3 criteria. DCPs are j- prepared for Class 1 or 2 changes and are forwarded to the Westinghouse Project Manager. The Responsible Manager approves and implements changes that fall
'. within the Class 3 criteria. ) 1
)
i Contributed Labor . Effort applied directly to the design of AP600 provided by i employees of organizations other than Westinghouse or l Its compensated Subcontractors. 1
. Westinghouse Project Manager
! The manager within Westinghouse responsible for I confirming that Class 1 or Class 2 DCP's have been ! correctly classified and dispositioning Class 2 DCP's l using altamatives established in Table 6. j Design Certification Project Manager l The Westinghouse manager responsible for the Design Certification program. This manager is 2 member of the CCB. i
- FOAKE Project Manager
- ' The Westinghouse manager responsible for the First of-a-i Nnd-Engineering program. This manager is a member of the CCB.
] i
- DCP Administrator l The person assigned the responsibility of updating and i maintaining the DCP System database. See Appendix A for a detailed list of responsibilities. l CCB Technical Secretary
.! The person assigned the responsibility of documenting i' the CCB's decision for each DCP via the meeting minutes. See Appendix A for a detailed list of
- responsibilities.
Baseline A documented and approved design which constitutes an j established reference position of the plant design. The i Baseline Configuration identification is as defined in the AP600 Program Configuration Management Plan. m:nosew.wpt:n.osacos Page 3 of 37 0006.FRM i
AP-3.2 6 Configuration Control The process of managing proposed changes to the - configuration items and related technical documentation i which ensures that proposed changes to the plant design are identified, described, systematically reviewed and I evalueted for impad, property implemented upon approval, documented and completed. Design Documentation 1 Those documents (including drawings) that control or l specify the design, fabrication, installation,'and test of a system or component or structure. Documentation that is placed under configuration control requires that the ; revision be changed from an alpha to a numenc revision ; number. Change Control ; The systematic evaluation, coordmation, and approval or + disapprova; of all proposed configuration changes from ' established baselines. l DCP Number The standard AP600 document number that is ! automatically issued by the DCP Tracking System and [' used by the DCP Administrator for overseeing the DCP process. The AP600 document number is in accordance l with GW-GMP-005. l I DCP Classification l A design change proposal may be classified as Class 1,2 or 3. Class 1 requires Westinghouse Project Manager concurrence and CCB approval. Class 2 requires only Westinghouse Project Manager approval. Class 3 i requires only the Responsible Manager's approval. See i procedure section for further detail. 1 Design Change Proposal (DCP) Form that documents the proposed change to the contents of design document (s) under configuration control. This includes any backup information. DCPs may be approved for incorporation into the Design Certification Documentation or may be approved but not incorporated into the Certification Process. DCP Approved for Design Certification A DCP that is approved that does not affect the contents of the SSAR or ITAACs or a DCP that is approved and mmeow.wys:mesasos Pags 4 of 37 0008.FRM l l
- . ~ ,__-,n .,_~ _ -, . . _ _ _ . . . -- - -- - - , . - < - - ,
AP-3.2 6 requires changes to the SSAR or ITAAC that can t>s made in a manner which can be accommodated within the ongoing design certification process. ' DCP Approved for Post-Design Certification A DCP that is approved by the CCB on the basis that the , plant changes are considered worthwhile improvements, however implementation is to be delayed to preclude perturbing the Design Certification process. In addition to having the CCB approval, approval of the ATBA General Manager is also required. The changes will be identifed
- in the design by the Combined Operating License (COL)
Applicant. Design Change Review (DCR) ; Form issued to collect impacts of change (scope / budget / effect on design documents) from affected functional groups for Class 1 and 2 DCPs. ' DCP Tracking System The method of tracking a DCP from initiation through closure. The DCP Tracking System provides reports that may be used as part of the DCP Review Package and Meeting Minutes and in identifying outstanding DCPs. Implementation of the DCP is verifed via the Technical Document Control System. < DCP Review Package A package containing a report of the DCP/DCR impacts and a copy of associated documentation if necessary. Class 1 D.CP packages are transmitted to the initiator and CCB members prior to a CCB meeting. Class 2 DCP packages are transmitted to the Westinghouse Project Manager for approval. DCP Meeting Minutes Formal record of CCB meeting preemings and includes the CCB decision of each Class 1 or non-concurred Class 2 DCP. The CCB meeting minutes notifies the DCP Initiator and impacted organizations with a status of the DCP(s). (See Appendix C for content.) DCP Summary Status Report Report produced from the DCP Tracking System for Class 1 and 2 DCPs. DCP Summary Status Reports are issued to Project Management as requested. (See Appendix D for content.) moosen.wpt:mesases Page 5 of 37 0008.FRM
i 1 l AP-32 6 I Technical Document Control (TDC) System i A system that documents the document number / revision; ! lists all formally released documents and associated , document data such as effectwo revision number, date ! released, responsible party; and identifies all the l implemented / outstanding DCPs. l A flowchart of the procedure is given in Appendix B. PROCEDURE ! General ' A. DCP information within the AP600 Program The DCP Tracking System should be checked for status, ! or information of a DCP including all impacts. When , updating a document or drawing, each engineer should ! access the DCP Tracking System to ensure that all l related DCPs are incorporated into the document or l drawing. ; B. CCB Meeting i q A quorum of 100% is required to approve or disapprove a ; Design Changs Proposal. All members are expected to j attend each meeting personally; meetings are scheduled ! in advance to accommodate member availability. All i members should either attend or arrange with another - ! member to be represented by proxy and so notify the Chairman before the meeting. Only in unusual . circumstances, such as extended absence, may a ! member designate a subordinate to act in his/her stead J on any matter brought before the CCB. The CCB meeting attendees, including those members to whom proxies are gwen, are identified in the meetmg minutes. If a member is not present or represented at a meeting, he/she must indicate his concurrence with the decisions taken to the CCB chairman within five days of the meeting. This post meeting concurrence will be recorded in the meeting minutes. In the event that the absent member does not concur with the decisions, the CCB Chairman shall reconvene the meeting at a suitable time. C. Design Changes due to incorrect Design if a design change is being proposed because of a significant error, with potential safety consequences, the DCP Initiator shall issue a QPF (see ESBU Policy & mmosewv.ibassess Page 6 of 37 0006.FRM l
- I
! AP-3.2 6
- {
, Procedures Manual, Procedure WP-15.3) to initiate an j investigation of the causes of the design error. j D. Determination if a proposed change requires a DCP l } The engineer and the responsible manager in any of the organizations determine if the change falls within the Class 3 criteria. Class 3 changes are approved and implemented by the Responsible Manager. Other changes are submitted to the Westinghouse Project Manager using the DCP Form. The DCP initiator shall determine, using the enteria defined in the procedure ! sectum whether the change is a Class 1 or 2. In his review of DCPs, the CCB Chairman shall consider the appropriate classification of the DCP. E. Submittal of Proposed Design Changes by Extemal Parties if the initiator of the proposed design change is not located at the Energy Center, he/she shall nominate an ATBE Engineer as a proxy for the DCP. F. DCP Submittal The DCP Administrator shall receive any proposed Class 1 DCP at least three weeks before a CCB scheduled meeting. This is to allow time for sending and retuming of DCRs. DCPs received Astor tharr the three weeks may be reviewed at CCB discreten. Class 2 DCPs shall be received and sent to impactees within a week of receipt. The DCP Administrator shall review j sach DCP for ceT@cs: and has the responsibility to retum any DCPs that have information missing to the initiating party. The Administrator will retum incomplete DCPs to the Responsible Marmger within 48 hours of receipt. G. Class 1 & 2 DCP Design Certification impact Review l Each Class 1 or 2 DCP shall be reviewed by the Manager, Advanced Plant Safety and Licensing to confirm that it has been correctly classified in terms of its Design Certification impact; that areas of impact on Design i Certification have been correctly idenbfied; and that affected Design Certifc' ation documents are correctly identifed. Where there are Design Cerbfication impacts, mueow.wpr:1b.ossees Page 7 of 37 0008.FRM l l
AP-3.2 6 the Manager, Advanced Plant Safety and Licensing, shall determine whether the proposed change is arxoptable to the Design Certification Project a.nd indicato concurrence or disagreement accordingly. This revisw shall be conducted in parallel with the otner impact assessments. H. CCB Review of Class 1 DCPs Prior to CCB Meeting A DCP review package that includes a report of the DCRs is prepared and transmitted by the DCP Administrator to the DCP initiator at least a week before the CCB meeting. Additionally the report will identify any outstanding DCRs. The Administrator may provide a copy of the actual DCRs . to the DCP initiator, if necessary. l The DCP Initiator is responsible to reconcile the DCR data and obtain missing DCRs prior to the CCB meeting, and to provide the original DCRs to the DCP
)
Administrator for filing and updating the database. A final DCP review package that includes the summary report of the impacts is issued by the DCP Administrator to the DCP Initiator and CCB members in advance of the CCB meeting for review. l
- 1. Westinghouet Project Manager Review of Class 2 DCPs A DCP review package that 'mcludes thei Design Change Proposal and a summary of the Design Change Review impacts is provided to the DCP initiator, Responsible Manager and to the Westinghouse Project Manager by the DCP Administrator in advance of a meeting, if required by the Westinghouse Project Manager, to review the DCP prior to disposition.
NOTE THE WESTINGHOUSE PROJECT MANAGER MAY HAVE A MEETING WITH THE INITIATOR AND ; RESPONSIBLE MANAGER WHEN DISPOSITIONING A l CLASS 2 DCP I J. DCP Supporting Design Documentation ! All AP600 documents that are referenced in the DCP/DCR shall have an AP600 document number' 1 (altemate document' numbers may be used, but only in addition to the AP600 document number). The DCP mmosew.wpt:weaseos Page 8 of 37 0008.FRM
- i l
AP-3.2 6 I i Administrator shall verify that an AP600 document i number has been referenced in the DCP/DCR forms. If i there is no AP600 number, the DCP Administrator shall contact the DCP initiator /DCR Impactee and request that I they obtain an AP600 document number. .' K. Impactee Non-Concurrence with the Proposed Design Change-If one or more of the impactee reviewers do not concur t with the proposed design change, the DCPA will forward a copy of these forms to the DCPl. The DCPI will try to i resolve the problem (s) with the associated impactee(s). ! See main procedure for further details. L Class 1 DCP Disposition - CCB Meeting 4 The DCP Initiator will be responsible for preparing and t < presenting the proposed design change to the CCB; to I resolve impacts; and review the DCP Review Package prior to the DCP Administrator issuing the DCP Review Package to the CCB. The CCB reviews the DCP and its i impacts and dispositions the DCP using Table 5. All CCB decisions are formaliy documented by the CCB Technical i ' Secretary via meeting minutes. See Appendi:: C for typical format. t CCB approval can be given in one of two categories. A l change to be included in the Certified Plant Design SSAR, ITAACs, or technical specdication must indicate as - such as a condition of approval by the CCB. If the i ' change will not be included in the Design Certification process, the DCP can be approved for post Design j Certification incorporation and forwarded to the ATBA I L General Managst for approval. l i, 1 DCPs that are for post-Design Certification will have to be i approved by NRC during the COL licensing process if the change impacts either the technical specification or the 1 i ITAACs (Tier 1 information). Changes that affect l information contained in the SSAR (a Tier 2 document) will be permitted following the '50.59-like' review and 1; provided the justification and documentation tJe ! appropriate. The documentation must include a ~ 4 certification impact evaluation addressing the items identified in Appendix F. l 4 1 l l i ! mmosewspt.wessess Page 9 of 37 0006.FRM i~
j i ! i i {. AP-3.2 6 M. Class 2 DCP Disposition ! The Class 2 DCP and its impacts are reviewed and j dispositioned using Table 6 by the Westinghouse Project ,
- Manager. The disposition is documented along with a !
signature on the DCP Review Package. The disposhion } is then entered by the CCB Administrator in the DCP l Tracking System. A summary report is issued to the DCP
- Initiator (s), Responsible Manager (s) and the Westinghouse Project Manager listing the DCP status.
j See Appendix D for typical report format.
- N. Disapproval of Standard Class 1 Design Changes l 1
i in the event of the CCB disapproving a Class 1 DCP, the , j DCP Administrator updates the DCP database by l j statusing the DCP as R (rejected). The DCP ;
- Administrator then transmits the CCB minutes to the !
! Responsible Manager who will inform the DCP Initiator of the CCB decision. The DCP must not be implemented. {
- O. Disapproval of Standard Class 2 Design Changes i i
- In the event of the Westinghouse Project manager i
- disapproving a Class 2 DCP, the DCP Administrator i updates the DCP datkbase by statusing the DCP as R i (rejected). The DCP Administrator then transmits a letter i to the Respensible Manager who will inform the DCP j Initiator of the Westeghouse Project Manager's decision.
[ The DCP must not be implemented. ', P. DCP Implementation i i The DCP Administrator will update the DCP Tracking
- System and issue a DCP Summary Status Report, on a monthly basis or as necessary, that identifies the DCP ,
! status and a list of all affected documents. ! 1 c For Clase 1 DCPs, the CCB meeting minutes will identify l l those DCPs that have been approved by the CCB which l ! can proceed to be implemented. l
- I
! For Clase 2 DCPs, a summary report that identifies the i status of the DCPs is issued to the DCP initiator (s), i Responsible Manager (s) and the Westinghouse Project
; Manager (s). All approved Class 2 DCPs can be 4
d j notosew.wyt:1 H esses Page 10 of 37 0008.FRM 4 1
. _ _ - , -- - - - - ~ _ - _ _ . - - - . - . _ - - . _ .. . _ . - .-
i ( AP-3.2 6 a implemented when the Westinghouse Project Manager approves the DCP. l The DCP Tracking System is integrated with the TDC l ] system. The TDC system provides a list of all documents ; ! and the DCPs that have not been incorporated into the documents. The DCP system provides a list of all issued . l DCPs and the affected documents (documents which e need to be revised to incorporate the DCP). RESPONSIBILITY ACTION i i A flowchart of the procedure is given in Appendix B. ; Engineer / 1. Any engineer desiring to make a change to the design Responsible Manager determines with the Responsible Manager if the proposed change falls within the Class 1,2 or 3 criteria. The Responsible Manager ensures that the proposed change conforms with the overall plan and direction of the AP600 Program, discussing the change with likely affected groups where appropriate. For DCPs that impact information contained in the SSAR or ITAACs, the marked-up change pages shall be i provided and an initial recommendation for the implementation time (pre / post-Design Certification) shall be indicated. The initiator shall also identify the potential impact on plant safety (see Appendix F) and compliance with URD requirements. A completed safety impact sheet (Appendix F, '50.59 - Like Checklist for Certification impact Evaluation' Form 58238 shall be completed with each DCP. Engineer 2. If the Proposed change falls within the Class 3 criteria, the engineer documents the change in detail on the Record of Change form for documents or ensures that it is property reflected on the revision column for drawings. NOTE INTERFACING PARTIES NEED TO BE INFORMED THAT THE DOCUMENT HAS BEEN REVISED TO THE NEXT LEVEL EVEN IF THE CHANGE DOES NOT AFFECT THE INTERFACING PARTIES SCOPE m20eew.wyt:246279s Page 11 of 37 0008.FRM
_-_ __ _ _ _ _ . _ _ _ _ _ . _ _ _ _ _ _ . .._ _ .___ _ . _ . _ _ _ _ _ = _ _ 4 AP-3.2 6 Responsible Manager 3. Approves those proposed changes that fall within Class 3. Ensures that the changes are clearly defined in the Record of Change form or on the revision column of the drawings. The document / drawing may be revised to the next level. Engineer 4. Prepares a DCP if the proposed change falls within Class 1 or 2. Completes the DCP Form, ensures that the documents that are affected have an AP600 Document Number, attaches the required documentation, and submits it to the Responsible Manager for review and, approval. Unless otherwise assigned by the Responsible Manager, overall responsibility is vested in the Engineer to define all impacts accurately within his/her field, and to reconcile all impacts from other groups. NOTE THE DCP NEED NOT HAVE ALL SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS ATTACHED - ONE COPY MAY BE PROVIDED FOR THE OFFICIAL DCP FILE. SKETCHES, ILLUSTRATIONS THAT ARE NOT PART OF THE SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS SHOULD BE ATTACHED. Responsible Manager 5. Reviews the DCP for wT-;tteness and accuracy for those proposed changes that fan within the Class 1 or 2 critona. Signs, dates and transmits the DCP to the Westinghouse Project Manager. Engineer 6. Determines whether the proposed design change should be submitted as a Class 1 or 2 DCP using the criteria defined in Tables 1 and 2. If the DCPI is not located at the Energy Center, he/she must nominate an ATBA Engineer as proxy for the DCP. Westinghouse Project 7. Evaluates the proposed design change and confirms Manager based on the criteria defined in Table 1 or 2, that the proposed change is correctly classified. Documents the classification of the DCP on the DCP form via a signature /date. Transmits the DCP to the DCP Administrator, m m m e nesases Page 12 of 37 0006.FRM
i i AP-3.2 6 , DCP Administrator 8. Assigns a DCP number to DCPs [ Class 1 and 2]. Receives all DCPs and ensures that an AP600 Document Number has been assigned to the affected AP600 documents. Reviews form for completeness, logs it into the DCP Tracking System, and issues a Design Change Form (DCR) to obtain the schedule / budgetary /affected document impact of the proposed change from affected functional groups. Impacted g. Reviews the proposed design change identified in the Functional Group DCR (and any attachments) for impact to existing documentation that may have been developed previously. The impacted engineer and manager complete the DCR. The manager of the impacted Functional Group signs and dates the DCR, and sends it back to the DCP Administrator, if there is a need for other groups to review the DCR, the impacted engineer / manager should identify the group in the DCR Form. Additionally, for expediency, the engineer / manager could contact the DCP Administrator directly and identify the additional impacted groups. If the functKmal group decides that the proposed DCP has no impact on his/her workscope and concurs with the change, then the appropnate item is selected on the DCR Form. The Functional group's manager approves decision by signing / dating and retuming completed form to the DCP Administrator. DCP Administrator 10. Once the impacts are collected via the DCR Form, the data is entered into the DCP Database, summarized and assembled into a DCP Review package. ! For Class 1 DCPs, the DCP Review package is distributed to the DCP initiator prior to CCB meeting for , review. I For Class 2 DCPs, the DCP Review package is distributed to the DCP initiator prior to the Westinghouse Project Manager for review. ! 1 If any non<xmeurrences are identified, the DCPA shall retum a copy of the non-concurring impactee(s) form (s) to the DCPI for resolution. l m$sosew.wpr:Sosasse Page 13 of 37 - 0006.FRM
,,__._w., , ,p._..3 - _.
w-y* - =---
- AP-3.2 6 4
Engineer 11. Responsible to ensure that all impactees have responded [ [DCP initiator) and that the impactees' inputs have been properly
- . recorded in the DCR form. Also responsible to ensure
- that any areas of impact (additional to those he identified in the DCP) that are identified in the reviews are !
- assessed and reported. i
- Responsible for compiling and identifying all issues, and
! where appropriate reconciles DCR data (e.g. budgets, ! impacts). l Once the DCP/DCR data has been reviewed and is
- complete, the DCP initiator transmits the entire package
{ to the DCPA. . j If an impactee raises a non-concurrence, the DCPI shall l try to resolve the differences with the originator. There l are 5 possible outcomes of these discussions: , t i 11.1 The non-concurrences were not resolved. l 6 The DCPI notifies the DCPA who generates an . impact summary report which is taken to the next . CCB meeting for resolution. (GO TO Stop 13). l l 11.2 The norwxmcurrences were resolved, the DCP l was vnthdrawn and a new DCP is required. ! The DCPI documents how the non-concurrences were resolved and notifies the Westinghouse Project Manager, the Responsible Manager and the DCPA that the DCP has been withdrawn. The DCPA updates the DTS to reflect the latest status of the DCP and the DCPI then prepares a new DCP. The new DCP will need a new DCP number to be allocated by the DCPA. 11.3 The norH:encurrences were resolved, the DCP was withdrawn and a new DCP is not required. The DCPI documents how the non-concurrences were resolved and notifies the Westinghouse o Project Manager, the Responsible Manager and the DCPA that the DCP has been withdrawn. The DCPA updates the DTS to reflect the latest status of the DCP. estwmpt:1besaaes Page 14 of 37 0008.FRM
- . . - . - .- - - - -- - . - - . - . ~ . . . - - - - . - . - . - - . - _ - -
i i i AP-3.2 6 i i - 11.4 The non-concurrences were resolved and changes are required to the DCP. i The DCPI documents how the non-concurrences were resolved and notifies the Westinghouse Project Manager, the Responsible Manager and the DCPA that changes are required to the DCP. The DCPA updates the DTS to reflect the latest status of the DCP. The revised DCP will adopt the same unique number as the original DCP but will be processed with a higher revision number. The DCPl/RM must then confirm that the classification of the revised DCP is correct and the approval process is repeated (GO TO Step 1). 11.5 The norH:oncurrences were resolved and there are no further changes required to the DCP. The DCPI documents that the associated impactee now concurs with the DCP and identifies how the non-concurrences were resolved. DCP Administrator 12. The DCP Administrator reviews the DCP/DCR package, ensures that the DCP/DCR data is entered or updated into the DCP Database. Reports are prepared and assembled into a DCP Review package. A report identifying outstanding DCPs may be included. The distribution is as follows: For Class 1 DCPs or Class 2 DCP's with unresolved non-concurrences, the DCP Review package is distributed to the CCB members and the DCP initiator prior to CCB meeting for review [Go to Step 13]. For Class 2 DCPs, the DCP Review package is distributed to the Westinghouse Project Manager for final approval [Go to Step 16]. CCB Members / 13. Prior to the CCB meeting, CCB members review the Engineer Class 1 DCP impact list and verify that the impacts obtained are reasonable and complete. The CCB meets to review and disposition the DCP. The CCB uses the ahomatives in Tables 5 and 6 to disposition the DCP. The CCB members may make a judgement on whether or not sufficient impact statements have been , collected at the time of the CCB meeting. During the j mmosew.wpt:1t>.osacos Page 15 of 37 0008.FRM i
._.._ _ i
i 4 4
- AP-3.2
. 6 1
- meeting, the cognizant engineer presents the proposed ,
change. The technical merits of the change including input
- from impacted functional groups, are discussed.
if a consensus is reached on disapproval of the change, l no further discussion of the change is required. The CCB ! i Technical Secretary records the CCB decision in the ; meeting minutes including any resolution of issues
~
j identified ;n the DCP/DCR Forms. > i if consensus is not reached during the meeting, further discussion may be conducted at the next CCB Meeting if , i additional information/ expertise is needed to resolve the ! j issue. The DCP is " TABLED' until the next CCB meeting. l l Approved changes to be included in the Certified Plant - ! Design, SSAR, ITAACs, or technical apecifications, must j i indicate this inclusion as a condition of approval by the i i CCB. If the change is approved and will not be included i in the Design Certification process, the DCP will be ! forwarded to the ATBA General Manager for approval. , l . ) DCPs that are approved for post-Design Certification will have to be approved by NRC if the change impacts either l ! the technical specification or the ITAACs (Tier 1 - information). Changes that affect information contained in i the SSAR (a Tier 2 document) will be permitted provided : the justification and documentation are appropriate. The documentation must include a safety evaluation addressing the items identified in Appendix F. , it review of all available information still does not result in consensus, the decision will be referred to the Westinghouse ATBA General Manager. Normally, it is the responsibility of the initiator to resolv6 comments when they are part of a CCB approval condition. The CCB may assign the responsibility to resolve comments resulting from an approval action to someone other than the initiator as appropriate. CCB Technical 14. Identifies to the DCP Administrator the status of each Secretary DCP reviewed in the CCB meeting. Prepares the CCB Meeting Meutes, obtains CCB Chairman approval signature and transmits the minutes to the DCP Iriitiator, impacted organizations and functional groups, and CCB members within two weeks of the CCB meeting. mmosew.ws*1tessess Page 16 of 37 0006.FRM
4 i AP-3.2 6 i } DCP Administrator / 15. Updates the DCP database based on the DCP disposition j CCB Technical Secretary as identified by the CCB Technical Secretary. Ensures that the DCP database is complete for each i DCP. Prepares a report for iraclusion with the meeting minutes. Transmits the official DCP file [DCP/DCR Forms j- and attachments, if any] to the AP600 Central Files.
- Westinghouse Project 16. Dispositionc Class 2 DCPs using Table 6. Before
- Manager approval, Class 2 DCPs must obtain the concurrence of -
) the Manager, APSL. The Westinghouse Project Manager j documents his decision on me DCP Review Package and ,' dates / signs. The completed DCP Review Package [DCP/DCR Forms and attachments, if any)is retumed to } the DCP Administrator. l DCP Administrator 17. Updctes the DCP status on the DCP Tracking System for Class 2 DCPs based on the DCP Review Package - disposition. Prints out a report identifying the status of , the DCP and transmits this report via letter to the DCP Initiator, Responsible Manager, impacted parties and the Westinghouse Project Manager. Copies of the signed off DCP Review Package should be transmitted to the DCP Initiator and Responsible Manager. The DCP
. Administrator transmits the official final completed DCP Package to the AP600 central files.
Impacted Functional 18. The Managers of the Westinghouse Functional Group Managers Engineering, Subcontractors and contributed labor which have been notified of the approved DCP liip;eir,ent the change. Extemal groups [other Westinghouse divisions, Subcontractors, contributed labor] use their intomal procedures to implement the change. Responsible Manager 19. By signature on implementing document cover sheet or for Document / Drawing on the or drawing, the Responsible Manager ensures that l the design change defined in the approved DCP has ! been incorporated in the document or drawing. Ensures that the DCP number and revision is referenced on the document cover sheets or in the revision block of drawings. Ensures that the updated document / drawing is transmitted to the AP600 central files. moosew..dn.oanos Page 17 of 37 0006.FRM i
AP-3.2 6 Central 20. Updates the TDC tracking system to reflect the latest File Administrator document revision and enters the DCP number and revision, as noted on the document cover sheet or : drawing revision block, against the specific AP600 ' document i DCP Administrator 21. Accesses the TDC tracking system and prints out the DCP/TDC comparison report to monitor DCP implementation. Periodically, this report is issued to the l Westinghouse Project Manager as information. l REFERENCES AP-6.1, " Document Numbering' AP-6.2, " Technical Document Release and Control' ! AP-3.9, " Preparation and Control of Drawings' ! GW-GMP-005, 'AP600 Document Numbering Procedure * ' GW-G0Y-002, 'AP600 Configuration Control Plan' FORMS / EXHIBITS Design Change Proposal, Form 58184, Exhibit 11 Design Change Review, Form 58185, Exhibit 12 Record Of Changes, Form 58204, Exhibit 16 AP600 Standard intamal Review Sheet, Fctm 58203, Exhibit 17 i AP600 Document Cover Sheet, Form 58202, Exhibit 10 l AP600 Design Specification Cover Sheet, Form 58205, Exhht 18
.l 1
TABLES 1. Class 1 DCP Criteria
=
i
- 2. Class 2 DCP Criteria
- 3. Class 3 DCP Criteria l l
- 4. AP600 Systems Analyzed in PRA
- 5. CCB decision /DCP disposition and database status codes
- 6. Westinghouse Project Manager decision / database status codes APPENDICES A. Westinghouse Configuration Control Board (CCB)
Organization B. Design Configuration Change Control Flowchart C. CCB Meeting Minutes (Contents) maaosen.wptib.osacos Page 18 of 37 0006.FRM
l AP-3.2 6 D. Content of DCP Summary Status Report for Class 1 and 2 DCPs l E. Document Cover Sheet / Record of Change /intemal Review Sheet /and Drawing Block Samples F. '50.59-Like' Checklist for Certification impact Evaluation i l l l l l l \ j
)
l i +
- N "Pti m Page 19 of 37 0008.FRM
AP-3.2 6 TABLE 1 - CLASS 1 DCP CRITERIA Requires Westinghouse Project Manager Concurrence and CCB Review and Approval Prior to implementation l l I l . Potential Total Cost Impact on Design Certification, or FOAKE, or Construction i Exceeds $100,000 l
. Proposed Change causes a URD Non-Conformance I l
. Design Certification impact - change to safety principles, basis of safety arguments, l safety analysis interface data as defined by the Safeguards interface List, PRA l Interface data from systems listed in Table 4, or sections outside scope of DCP ]
initiator.
. Issue has high visibility with customers [ DOE, EPRI, ARC, USC, USG)
. There is known dispute with the change from interfacing design organizations j Degradation of material property, standardization, or other significant reductions in design margins i
- Design Certification impact-change to SSAR, PRA, ITAACS, ERGS, etc. :
TABLE 2 - CLASS 2 DCP CRITERIA i i Requires ONLY Westinghouse Project Manager Review and Approval Prior to implementation
. Potential total cost impact on program exceeds $25,000
. The change impacts interfaces with three or fewer non-mandatory areas of impact beyond initiator
. Does not comply with Class 1 criteria TABLE 3 - CLASS 3 DCP CRITERIA Requires ONLY Responsible Manager Review and Approval Prior to implementation
. The change is limited to the Responsible Manager's work scope and there is no impact on interfaces with other design organizations or design groups
. The potential cost impact is less than $25,000
. Does not comply with Class 1 or 2 criteria ;
Note: Class 1,2 and 3 changes are " major changes" in terms of ASME NQA-1 Supplement SS-1. N .w#:stessees Page 20 of 37 0006.FRM
l i AP-3.2 6 TABLE 4 - AP600 SYSTEMS ANALYZED IN PRA Main and startup feedwater Passive residual heat removal Depressurization system / overpressure protection
. Core makeup tank
. Accumulator Gravity injection and recirculation Normal residual heat removal Containment isolation Passive containment cooling Chemical and volume control Reactor coolant pump trip
. Component cooling water i
. Service water
=
Chilled water
. Integrated protection and control ,
. Reactor trip l
. Onsite ac power
. Onsite de power
. Containment hydrogen control :
. Compressed air / instrument air l Diverse actuation j I
m2059w.wyte-os2ses Page 21 of 37 0008.FRM
AP-3.2 6 TABLE 5 - CCB DECISION /DCP DISPOSITION AND DATABASE STATUS CODES CCB DECISION DCP DATABASE STATUS EXPLANATION APPROVED A= Approved for Design DCP can be implemented Certification Required actions, as recorded in the C= Approved for Design meeting minutes, are mandatory before Certification with DCP implementation. Resolution is to comments be recorded in the meeting minutes. P= Approved for Post-Design Certification incorporation N=, Approved for Post-Design Certification incorporation following NRC approval TABLED T= Tabled, Pending A DCP is " Tabled' or put on hold by ' Further P.eceipt of Data the CCB pending further information. The DCP may be reviewed at a future CCB Meeting. Once data and resolution is obtained the DCP status is changed to a different category. REJECTED R= Rejected A DCP is rejected by the CCB and is not to be implemented. WITHDRAWN W= DCP Withdrawn from CCB in the event that the DCP was initiated consideraton but witt. drawn from consideration prior to a CCb meeting, this category is selected. i SUPERSEDED S= Superseded The DCP has been replaced by a new ! DCP with a different DCP unique number. VOlD V= Void The DCP has been prepared or assessed incorrectly and has been withdrawn. l
\
ON-HOLD H= On Hold by DCP The DCP Administrator is awaiting Administrator some additional information from the DCP Initiator, the impact Reviewers or the DCP assessors. massw.wytm462ses Page 22 of 37 0008.FRM
= . . _ - . . . . . - . -.. - - . _ . - - - - . - - . - _ _ . -. . - .. - - - . .
1 ! 1 i l AP-3.2 6 TABLE 6 - WESTINGHOUSE PROJECT MANAGER DECISION /DCP DATABASE STATUS CODES DECISION DCP DATABASE STATUS EXPLANATION APPROVED A= Approved DCP can be implemented TABLED T= Tabled, Pending A DCP is " Tabled
- or put on hold by Further Receipt of Data the Westinghouse Project Manager pending further information.
Once data and resolution is obtained the DCP status is changed to a different category. REJECTED R= Rejected A DCP is rejected and is not to be implemented. WITHDRAW W= DCP is Withdrawn in the event that the Responsible Manager withdraws the DCP. SUPERSEDED S= Superseded The DCP has been replaced by a new DCP with a different DCP unique number. VOlD V= Void The DCP has been prepared or assessed incorrectly and has been withdrawn. ON-HOLD H= On Hold by DCP The DCP Administratoris awaiting Administrator some additional information from the - DCP initiator, the impact Rev'swers or the DCP assessors. i l 1 l 4 mM059w.wptib-062696 Page 23 of 37 0008.FRM
AP-3.2 6 APPENDlX A WESTINGHDUSE AP600 CONFIGURATION CONTROL ORGANIZATION CHAIRMAN, CCB Responsibilities: Administers Westinghouse Configuration Control Process in accordance with this procedure Calls CCB meetings as necessary Chairs CCB meetings Appoints CCB Technical Secretary and DCP Administrator Reviews and approves the CCB Meeting Minutes Serves as focal point with customer on Design Change Proposals Reviews Class 2 DCPs and completes the DCR Form CCB MEMBERS Responsibilities: l . Review Design Change Proposals and associated Design Change Review impacts prior to meetings If necessary, invite to CCB meetings additional personnel with specific expertise to assist in resolution of DCPs Review the DCP Impacted List to ensure that all affected groups have been identified and contacted to obtain all impacts WES7NGHOUSE PROJECT MANAGER Responsibilities: l Review Design Change Proposals and confirm that the DCP is correctly [ classified ' Transmits DCPs to the DCP Administrator for processing
. Dispositxms the Class 2 DCPs aM documents decision on the DCP Review '
Package
. Manages implementation of approved DCPs i
r CCB TECHNICAL SECRETARY Responsibilities: 1
. Attends CCB meetings l . Documents in the meeting minutes the CCB decision and/or action items for '
I each DCP l . Prepares and issues the CCB meeting minutes ; Transmits the CCB meeting minutes to CCB members, DCP Initiator (s), DCP impactees, and others as necessary i l l 1 l am.wytttmaseos Page 24 of 37 0006.FRM 1 _- .-_ - - _ - - - - -
AP-3.2 6 DCP ADMINISTRATOR Responsibilities:
. Attends CCB meetings, as required Maintains Westinghouse DCP tracking system for Class 1 and 2 DCPs
. Logs into DCP database and assigns a DCP Number
. Issues DCRs to functional groups for Class 1 and 2 Verifies that an AP600 document number has been referenced in the DCP/DCR forms for any affected document, calculation or analysis Reviews [ administrative not technical review] the DCP/DCR forms for completeness including signatures and dates
. Retums to DCP Initiator or impactee incomplete DCPs/DCRs Enters the data from the DCP/DCR into the DCP database Maintains the official DCP file [DCPs, DCRs, and associated documentation)
- Prepares a list of all DCRs received and provides the DCP initiator with the DCRs and a list of missing DCRs
. Obtains from the DCP Initiator the completed DCRs and ensures that all the DCR data is entered into the DCP database ;
- Prepares the DCP Review Package and transmits it to the DCP initiator and l CCB for their review and preparation prior to the CCB meeting '
. Ensures that the DCP tracking system is updated with the CCB decision for each DCP !
. Transmits the official DCP package for Class 1 and 2 to central files I Prepares and issues a Class 1 DCP status report to Project Management as I requested
. Prepares and issues a Class 2 DCP status report and transmits it to the Westinghouse Project Managers [with copy to CCB members) on a monthly basis or as needed
. Prepares and issues periodic reports of outstanding DCPs [DCP/TDC comparison report). Outstanding Class 1 DCPs are be identified to the CCB and outstanding Class 2 DCPs are identified to the Westinghouse Project Manager mm.wpt:2 osases Page 25 of 37 0006.FRM l
d i 4 1 AP-3.2 6 ( APPENDIX B i l. step 1 M ' COMMENIS pen ossyi Cast r 5 i EVALUATION h3 i OFIMPACT ! LEVEL ves [ ir 4
*' GOTO ST1!P wts i
4 " ,, i REVISE TIER 1 REVISE SSAR APE) lAATERIAL AFC SEND TO THE NRC { SEND TO THE NRC d J f . REVISED CHANGES . DOCURE!NTATION
- APPROVED IS SENT SYNRC 7 TO THE CCS FOR RESOLUTION i
- 14/15 o 4
DCPA UPDATES DCP STATUS IN DTS 4 15I17 DCPA TRANOMITS A 1 LETTSR (CLASE 2) OR IMPACT
SUMMARY
1 REPORT (CLASS 1) AM3 SENDS ORIGsWA TO THE CENmAL FILE 18/19 A s- -- amouP(SUMPLEMENT 3 CHANGE AND ISSUE REVISED DOCUMENT (8) WTTH DCP REFERENCED ON THE COVER SMEET s 4 i i 4
, masewmptitasases PagS 26 of 37 0008ERM e , - - . , + - -
. __ ._ .. . - . = . . .. . . - - .- . - . - . . -
AP-3.2 6 APPENDIX B (Continued) STEP MAAER COMMENTS 0 START 1 DCP) om . o , on, ,i
~
1 IDENTIFIES CHANGE I l is CHANGE ""* "=== 2 DUE TO A SIGNIFICANT Y PREP ES *
& ISSUES DESIGN ERROR gg E.Y. .isaO 1 \
i N aus 8 RM REVIEWS DCPI REVISES THE am. m ,a 3 DECIDE IF p CHANGE IS DESIGN CHANGE W DESIGN CHANGE CLASS 3 tmMAN Immm ggpg7 Y ARE omms 1/2 APPROVED N 8 THE DESIGN O CHANGE REQUIRED N' 7 ..o o OCPI ' 4 " N PREPARES ir DCP DCPIDOCUMENTS NO FU tTHER * """so m mmumm. CHANGES ON RECORD ACTION IO" " a"=."a"s".'=".=' OF CHANGES FORM OR REQUIRED ***"'""**"*" REVISION COLUMN OF DRAWINGS 1P RM APPROVE 5 AND RELEASES REYlSED DOCUMENTATION l l 1r 5 RM REVIEWS l AND SIGNS DCP l l v M 1 m:oosew.wpt:1t462ses Page 27 of 37 0008.FRM
i AP-3.2 6 APPENDlX B (Continued) STEP Nuneet COMMEffra DCP DCPI NOMINATES 6 WITHIN THE A WESTINGHOUSE E ="m*5
- T in"a "
VESTINGHOUSE : ENGINEER AS A ENERGY PROXY FOR CENTER THE DCP
?
Y 7 DCPI SENDS THE DCP TO THE WPM TO CONFIRM : THE CLASSlFICATION mRC e Gener levenn 1P WPM SENDS DCF TO * * * * * ' ' " " 8 DCPATO ASSIGN ADCP DCPA NUMBER AND ENTER RETURNS DCP TO DCPI FOR " " * * " * ' ' ' INTO DTs COMPLETION o IS THE DCP N _ coma .amme-m = mag COMPLETE 7 Y DCPA INITIATES can , ,,,,, % % DCR FORM 1 DCR FORM SENT b"O1Ta7ss, TO IMPACTEES O,*,,",",""'"". FORIMPACT **-a==a**== REVIEW A iMPACTEES IDENTIFY 9 IMPACTS (IF ANY)IN THEIR AREA AND WHETHER THEY CONCUR WITH THE DCP OR NOT 4 IMPACTEES RETURN THE DCR FORM TO THE DCPA 4 10 DCPA ENTERS DATA FROM IMPACTEES INTO THE DTS S Ceremos
*
- 58**Pt1 N Page 28 of 37 0008.FRM
i I . AP-3.2 6 l APPENDIX B (Continued) STEP i' MAMER CORMAEfffB WERE M NON- " 10 CONCURRENCES i Corit'd IDENTIFIED I l
- Y DCPA RETURNS A COPY OF THE NCMCONCURRING IWACTEE(s)
- FORM (s) TO THE DCPl WHO
- TRIES TO RESOLVE THE NON CONCURRENCES N DCPA GEPERATES AN IMPACT 11
SUMMARY
REPORT AND TAKES TO CONCURRENCES VED CCe MTG FOR RESOLUTION 1 DCPI DOCU WENTE T}E O SW 13 l RESoumON OF TNE PROSLEM(s) WAS DCPI INFORMS WPM, TIE DCP Y RM & DCPA OF DCP WITHDRAWN WITHDRAWAL 7 DCPA UPDATES DTS l
)
IS DCPI sen. ! T y CMS A NEW DCP PREPARES m. - TO TIE DCP REQUIRED NEW DCP. " ,,,
, *=_"",***
REoUIREo ? (sEE NOTE 1) 7 o DCPI REVISES DCP, N NO FURTHER ACTION l GOTO STEP 3 l (SEE NOTE 11 REQUIRED j OCTO STEP 3. LL L- j DCPi DOCUMENTS THE CONCURRENCE OF THE ASSOCIATED IMPACTEE mNxsew.wpt:1t>.os2ees Page 29 of 37 0008.FRM
AP-3.2 6 APPENDIX B (Continued) sw NUhAER COMMEMfl
*~ p r CLASS 1 Chas 1 12 On .
CLASS 2
?
Chas 2 ) 1P 1P DCPA PREPARES NAna 5 APO TRANSMITS
" sas"=*U ~
DCP REVIEW # "U" """'""' PACK TO DCPI, RM PACKTO DCPI
& WPM N I CCS MTG l l
DCP SENT TO " " * * * ' wpupon DCP SENT TO CCS APPROVAL FOR APPROVAL " .me,
==========
13/16 APPR VED - DCPA ADOS STATUS TO 9 DTS FOR CLOSE OUT , Y o a"m.. E E
""~
DCPA litANSMITS l wcLuDE LETTER (CLASS 2) OR P,,,,yg,,"'ll" l "7 CHANGES SEFORE DESGN CCS MINS. (CLASS 1) g ay,=,,,, l CERT. OR POST ,, ( SnN CE l 7 DCPI s TOLD OF i DISAPPROVAL SY j adenDuiricut RESPONSISLE MANAGER < r 00 THE No PROPOSED CHANGES IMPACT THE
,, sSAR OCTO 7 STEP ,
14 1r 1, '"258**1N Page 30 of 37 0008.FRM
l AP-3.2 6. < APPENDIX C l l 1 CONFIGURATION CONTROL BOARD MEETING MINUTES (CONTENTS) Key Elements Contained in CCB Meeting Minutes For Each Class 1 or non-concurred l Class 2, DCP acted upon in the CCB Meeting: Attendance List including proxies DCP Number and Revision Title, and initiator l Description of CCB meeting proceedings l
- CCB Disposition l Actions for DCP Initiator or others, if any, resulting from the meeting a
Gesolutions of previously identified actions,if any l Appendices (Optional) !
- DCP Summary Status Report A copy of the DCPs,if necessary l
l l 1 l l l l 1. l l mmosew.wyt:mos2ses Page 31 of 37 0008.FRM
I i AP-3.2 6
- APPENDlX D CONTENT OF DCP
SUMMARY
STATUS REPORT FOR CLASS 1 DCPs
. DCP Number and Revision
, . DCP Title
. CCB Disposition and Date [See Table 5]
. DCP Cost Summary i
. Ust of Impacted Organizations / Statements
. Ust of Affected Documents
. Final DCP Status (Approved, Rejected, Withdrawn]
CONTENT OF DCP
SUMMARY
STATUS REPORT FOR CLASS 2 DCPs l { - DCP Number and Revision
. DCP Title
, . Westinghouse Project Manager Disposition and Date (See Table 6]
. DCP Cost Summary 2
. Ust of impacted Organizations / Statements
. Ust of Affected Documents
. Final DCP Status (Approved, Rejected, Withdrawn]
t CONTENT OF TDC/DCP COMPARISON STATUS REPORT The TDC reports per AP-6.2 will also identify the following:
. Outstanding DCP Numbers and Revision and the affected Documents 4
muosew.wpt mos2ses Page 32 of 37 0008.FRM
_ - -. . ..__ - .. ._ - - . = . AP-3.2 6 u APPENDIX E " AP600 DOCUMENT COVER SHEET / RECORD OF CHANGE / I AND DRAWING REVISION BLOCK SAMPLES i l AP600 COVER SHEET l ~ The DCP Number and revision shall be shown on the cover sheet in the
- appropriate block. ;
s i RECORD OF CHANGE FORM l . The DCP Number and revision shall be shown on the change description and reason area. { i DRAWING REVISION BLOCK The DCP Number and revision shall be shown on the Revision block area of the drawing. I i i I I mN!csow.wpt:1bo62696 Page 33 of 37 0008.FRM
A ! AP-3.2 6 i ! APPENDIX E (Continued) I i AP600 DOCUMENT COVER SHEET / RECORD OF CHANGE / 1 AND DRAWING REVISION BLOCK SAMPLES I i AP600 DOCUMENT COVER SHEET i == . .
= ===.**== ==ie ==iw.,u u c:
naum. em ee m
- ,- -.= .- .
- owocwase i p i4 woTAPPucams m.TuveATs occuuswr wuusut wa wosec ensmoown e. ower ossenmosNronmasaranoie wEsmeeusE
- Tma
- sawuooouuan i i
- ATTAptSfft.IO S DCP WREY. #ConPORATE) 96 T>e5 DOCLha9ff
, naviso
- m.een. s Typic PnE=.oc.e me s
{ Gw4Es4thri 2 ca. ru. aficfWAftat.Y385 RsFEFIGeCE; 9 eta SACThosec PIL3emast maCThosec FILE FORMAT R.8CTRO8ec PLE DEsomePfoss eu.ett.wst amen.ww ce, wast:nomousa m.nense conPonanaN se gwas.mmwoues
- n. pnomaTany cu.s.s.a
.r
. u.a..r. t
- n. p r
- n. =.%.
..f W up
- c. : ..
C p.m 6 En y Sp.4. h L p
. . = .
On was.ma.no.use enom..a.te cues.se ., c
= =
ir... . , . m. ..a. ..: .- a wasTwanouns cuss s esoN PaoPRIETAPM COtsuLETE 1 F wonK PERPOnMED UseEn osstGN CENTW9 CATION g COMPL2TE 2 F WORK PERPOnhAED unoEnH w a. t Q doe DEstGN CsRITlcAT3aN PaoGRatl - GOVERNhENT LEAF 7ED fv0 hts STATEMENT le p.p.a 4 - . .mu osun D D.oE.coNm.A.CT.DE.M. n.., RAM.ES.l.osL.NERED
. . . . DATA.)
no.o c nos osa smconnoemne Ncmes. 30 :D 30 40 su c=TsoonT AOs0c0ous0 70 a a Ane som enoaswa - Anc uume niawTs sTATEutwr In- me.a C yngs a A is s u.d i. R G n t.t r Og> a**** f .4-.e I N g Anc.c.oNma.cT cantRastas.e.coNmact ! m n _a . em m e.n.ATA)e ame* .no ao n !
**'s aos ket_ hghci
.. = - - -.-
= ,lI C (4 5
- p. msas P. %:4A moosew.wyta462ees Page 34 of 37 0008.FRM
7. .) l 1 AP-3.2 6 i 1
- APPENDIX E (Continued) 4 1
AP600 DOCUMENT COVER SHEET / RECORD OF CHANGE / AND DRAWING REVISION BLOCK SAMPLES l 4 4 AP600 RECORD OF CHANGES
~~~
APeooDOCUMENTNO. GW GOY.90s REVISON 1 1 WA ALTERNATE 00C. NO. I DESIGN AGORORGANIZATION WERMGOM j TITLE SAMPtf DOCUMENT t CHANGE PAMGMPH O#MGE OfSCRrn0N AaeIEAgen m I 4 j uAmenwuusm i Appmovaumais i 12 1 OCP GW GEE.90ert WAS INCORPORATED g af/t.ypef !
- l i
i f i i i 4 i i i l 1 1 1 1 i j m259w.wptib-062696 Page 35 of 37 0008.FRM l 1 i
s AP-3.2 6 APPENDIX E (Continued) AP600 DOCUMENT COVER SHEET / RECORD OF CHANGE / AND DRAWING REVISION BLOCK SAMPLES
#5. FOAPGWGZ S0.
2PST-280 727A77 j IT. ItEVt5lm Gw 999/1 STANDARD DCP NABER W
~
km SS #tE CF Mt0CE A S Af ZODE (0+71 CD , DELETED 2 m j At 20BC W-4) CORRECTED MSF COLUMN LOCATIONS #$ $PM3dG T.IsLL vv
/
(84 3 I F f' i
-4 i
m20 sow.wyt:1b.oemees Page 36 of 37 0008.FRM I
- - - - - + +
== -
AP-3.2 6 APPENDIX F "50.59 Like" Checklist for Certification impact Evaluation DCP GW-GEE-
*so.sw.am* checklist for Certification impact Evaluation oce aw-oss.
Yes No
- 1. M the change seduos the esfety of AP800?
[ Q r ras. anwm ar ,=ame= newn w ere.s ew= san w aawr melueelenandfah Aereherign WSCR, eenemaan oilh queeeione 2 and 3 and Benew eeneequent hooussana
- 2. Wil lhe change equire snoq0Rostion to e design oorgicaden basis document paenened och e *D* h "Desipi Bees
- Asw of TDC)? Q
- 3. M Bio change equire N to bgiut date for PRA?
Q um m un,2 a,,ds syaens,e mo a saamm.
# FES to amer 2 er & deseres espost and enseer gueselone 4 4 4 enef 7.
4. 5. Wls ese change sosphe anosAAcaden to ERGS or other APeoo messed WCAP7 Q WW Was change seguire motAAosson of me 88AR. haludng techneel W7
- s. We me ehenes require eno:Anceman W PRA hegree (when lesund)?
7. Q WW #ie change seqiare amamenmai i of an issued TIER 1 (ITAAC) easten? Q um o Au. as s s a 7 sycene,o ease.e sea,m. F yEt se ANYe(4 4 4 er 7proodde esordages erafgessed payne and anseer the deaeweg guessises
- a. We me suuneemy of ssAR be burensed?
_ _ er en acamers paviousy maiussed in the Q Q
- 9. WW Wie adotoposf consequence of an soddent pavenuely evalumsed h tie SSAR be inmessed?
1R WW tio patiebaty of a mellunceon of a esloty related er _^___h^_, Q Q
^^
onusase, sysism er componers presumy evousand n 9. asAR be
>=essedt it. WW Wie adelegical eensegsence of a meNwunon previously evalueled in Sie asARmemor d?
- 12. WW Wie possemy of an sondent of e casesent type men provtoissy oielussed h pio SSAR be homesed?
- 13. WB the possbeer of a snelhancelon of a EANorert type then previously eishmand a se s8AR be opeased? Q Q
- 14. WB pie mergin of safety me doened es me been for any Indosomi m he educed? Q rw any Yes enemers, preside espionamen.
Responsene Enynner Pnmed Responsbes Enyneer Sqpeews NOTF.: This tonnla mehed to eneet to mqnhomenes of WCAP 12001 AP42 Forrn 58235 @98) rnM8w.wpf:1t462796 Page 37 of 37 0006.FRM l
AP 3.5 2 ; W Westinghouse Electric Corporation
" Nuclear Projects Division DESIGN REVIEWS AP600 w f -
ei.cm o.i.: 2-18-97 Program Operating Procedure U,7p*,$. o;",%. nager AUTHOR / COGNIZANT Contact Manager, AP600 Quality Assurance, on FUNCTION questions concerning this procedute. l l PURPOSE This procedure describes the method for preparing, conducting, and documenting formal Design Reviews (DR) performed for the l purpose of Design Verification. This procedure may also be ' used as a guide for non-verification Design Reviews. i , I SCOPE This procedure applies to all Design Reviews conducted for the AP600 project.
- DEFINITIONS See Procedure ESBU 4.12 I General Design Reviews for the AP600 project shall be performed in I accordance with procedure ESBU 4.12 of the ESBU Quality l Policy / Procedure Manual with the following modifications
I 1. In addition to the responsibilities established in l ESBU 4.12, the Cognizant Design Manager is responsible I for: I a. obtaining an AP600 document number for the I design review report, and I b. ensuring that design review action items are I entered into the AP600 open item tracking system. i l 2. The Cognizant Design Manager, rather than the Design i Review Chairman, is also responsible for following design l 1 review action items and ensuring that they are completed. I 3. The general design review checklist per ESBU 4.12 is I provided for guidance. Altemate checklists may be used I as deemed appropriate by the Design Review Chairman. I in any case, in addition to the responsibilities established I in ESBU 4.12, the Design Review Chairman is I responsible for determining the applicability of the Human I Factors Checklist per Appendix A of this procedure and I incorporating it into the review as applicable. m2445w wpf:1b-021897 Page 1 of 5 0008.FRM
AP 3.5 2 1 4. Intermediate and Final Design Reviews shall include a 1 review of the Preliminary and Intermediate Design l Reviews (respectively) to assure closure of outstanding I actions. I 5. The Design Review report format is given in Appendix B l of this procedure. I REFF.RENCES A. ESBU Quality Policy / Procedures Manual ! FORMS / EXHIBITS AP600 Document Cover Sheet, Form 58202, Exhibit 10
-l I APPENDICES A. Human Factors Engineering Checklist ;
B. Design Review Report Format i i s I i i I , 1 l , mA3445w.wpf:1M21397 Page 2 of 5 0008.FRM l i 4 1
i AP-3.5 2 l l APPENDIX A , I HUMAN FACTORS CHECKLIST f 9 I A. Product / User identification: ] l 1. Are the objectives of the product-user system appropriately defined? I 2. Are the functions required to achieve the product-user system objectives I appropriately defined? I 3. Are the functions shared between the user and the product allocated in a way I that most effectively utilizes the capabilities of each (automation or manual or I combination)? I 4. Are the users' tasks appropriately defined for anticipated modes of operation? I 5. Has an operating experience review been conducted to identify human factors I issues encountered in previous designs so that they can be avoided in the I development of the current system, or in the case of positive features, to I ensure their retention? I B. Information Requirements for the Human-System Interface: 1 1. Are the user's information requirements clearly defined for each of the tasks I defined above? I 2. Do the displays, reference materials, and navigation links appear to satisfy I these information requirements by providing the required amount of data with I the necessary accuracy and response time? i I 3. Are data presented in a covise, directly usable form? If not, can the user l I interpret the provided data quickly and accurately enough to complete the I identified tasks successfully? l 4. Have the data provided to the user been limited to that which is necessary to I satisfy the identified information requirements? i l C. Data Presentation and Controls for the Human-System Interface (HSI):
-l 1. Do control and display hardware and organization appear to match operational I requirements as defined by utility requirements?
l Are numeric data presented in Mits which the user expects and understands? l 2. I Does the range of numeric displays encompass minimum and maximum I operational values? l m:ousw.wpt:1b-0213e7 Page 3 of 5 0008.FRM
- . . . . - . . . - - . - . . . - - . - - . - - . . - - . - - - - - - . . ~ - - . ~ . . _ -
5 i j AP-3.5 2 I 1 APPENDlX A (Continued). I 3. Are the schemes for labeling and coding controls, displays, and data legible, I meaningful, and consistent? Does the HSI design follow a set of HSI design I guidelines so that there is consistency across displays and controls? 4 i l 4. Does the HS! resource include features to minimize errors and facilitate users , l l in detecting, and recovering from, potential errors they may make? j i 1 5. Are display mechanisms fault-tolerant? For example, are there provisions for ; l I loss of color in a CRT display, are there provisions for loss of an in@ator light, j l etc.?
- I 6. Do the displays include data quality coding to clearly indicate when sensors
! I have failed or values are out-of-range? , i : l l D. Work Station (Operation and Control Center System; MCR, TSC, RSR, Local): l l i
- I
- 1. Do the physical dimensions of the HSI resource take into account reach, i
!- l strength, and sensory limitations throughout the range of anticipated users? I [ l 2. Does the layout of the HSI resource provide an optimal arrangement for j l interactions between users and between the user and the equipment? !
- - 1
- I 3. Do the illumination, sound, temperature, and ventilation levels permit the user to j l perform required tasks satisfactorily?
4 ! l l 4. Are there provisions for the user's safety and comfort? I E. Maintenance and Repair: , i l l 1. Have the maintenance requirements of the HSI resource been evaluated and { l documented? i [ l 2. Do maintenance and repair tasks for the HSI resource place reasonable I technical and physical demands on service personnel? I ! I F. Design Verification: : 1 l l 1. Is the HSI resource evaluated through walk-through studies, simulation studies, I 3
-I or some analysis to verify that the product-user system objectives (see A.4 i l above) and functons have been achieved?
i 4 m:ousw.wpt:1b-021397 Page 4 of 5 0008.FRM
l l AP-3.5 2 ! APPENDIX B ! DESIGN REVIEW REPORT FORMAT l COVER PAGE AP600 Document Cover Sheet, Form 58202 j I AP600 DOCUMENT NUMBER A document number should be assigned to the i Design review report in accordance with GW GMP 3 005, " Document Numbering Procedure." l l i i
. SECTION TITLE l
1 Introduction Give data and place of design review; identify design review Chairperson,' j members, and secretary, i 2 Scope Define scope of the design review (e.g., " Scope was to evaluate the design ; impacts involved in changing from Design "A" to Design 'B").
- 3. Summary i State the number of action items and provide an overview of the action item concems.
- 4. Conclusion State DR committee's conclusion (s) based on material presented in the DR meeting (s).
- 5. Attachments
- a. List of all presenters and observers in attendance at the Design Review meeting (s)
- b. Design Review Information Sheet (s)
- c. Design Review agenda which identifies the items piesented in the Design Review meeting (s)
- d. Action item Chits issued
- e. List and copy of the Design Review presentations m:OM5w.wpf:1b-021397 Page 5 of 5 0008.FRM
l l
* \
AP-3.6 ' 2 W Westinghouse Electric Corporation
" Advanced Technology Business Area AP600 Design Criteria Documents '
AP600 db Program Operating Procedure v t & 55 v m H. bruschi. General Manager 03 11 94
%% 7 %n,,, %,
AUTHOR / COGNIZANT Contact Manager, AP600 Plant Engineering, on questions FtWCTION conceming this procedure. PURPOSE This procedure establishes requirements for the preparation, . review, approval and revision of Design Criteria Documents for the AP600. [ J SCOPE This procedure applies to all AP600 Design Criteria Documents
)
prepared by Westinghouse. AP600 contractors will prepare { Design Criteria Documents in accordance with their own procedures using a fom1at similar to that defined in this procedure. DEFINITIONS Desion Criteria Document - A document defining requirements for design of specific aspects of the AP600. Typically these documents cover a single discipline or subdiscipline. Desion Criteria Manual - A Manual that incorporates the top level Design Criteria Documents. i Responsible Manaaer - The individual who identifies the need for a Design Criteria Document and is responsible for its preparation in accordance with this procedure. Responsible Enai,eer - The engineer who is assigned to develop the Design Criteria Document. PROCEDURE General A. A Design Criteria Document is prepared to define criteria for use in subsequent design activities. It translates safety, licensing and contractual requirements into detail design requirements in order to assure a uniform design basis within all engineering activities. B. Design Criteria Documents are intended to provide mandatory requirements for subsequent design activities. The documents can be supplemented as required by design guides if guidance rather than mandatory requirements are to be defined, te2so.wpt:io(cusT)os1494 Page 1 of 5 0008.FRM
- ~ - . . - - - - . _ - - .- - ._ - - _ _ . - - .. - - .- . - ... - . - .- - . -
WESTINGHOUSE PROPRIETARY CLASS 2 AP 3.6 2 C. The initial issue and all subsequent revisions shall be prepared in accordance with the detailed procedure described below. L D. A Design Criteria Manual will be compiled consisting of top i level Design Criteria Documents. It will include documents l prepared by Westinghouse under this procedure as well as documents, prepared by other AP600 contractors, reviewed and approved for project use by Westinghouse. l E. Alphabetic revision symbols shall be used prior to placement of the criteria document under configuration control. ,
- Thereafter, numeric revision symbols shall be used. l Revnions require change approval in accordance with the change control procedure (AP 3.2). The design change i number shall be identified on the cover sheet. All technical i changes shall be listed on the Record of Changes Sheet and ;
shall be identified by a vertical line in the margin. The ! complete document will be reissued for each revision. r F. Plant Engineering coordinates preparation and completion of the Design Criteria, coordinates AP600 Contractor preparation ; and review of Design Criteria Documents and assists in : integration, review and approval cycles. Responsibility Action i Responsible Manager 1. Identifies need for a Design Criteria Document within his area !' of responsibility and define the scope of the document.
- 2. Assigns responsibility for the preparation of the Design : [
Criteria Document. : r
- 3. Identifies interfacing organizations that will provide input, i review and/or approve the Design Criteria Document.
Responsible Engineer 4. Prepares the Design Criteria Document utilizing the format ! and content guidelines identified in Appendix A. j
- 5. Obtains a document number in accordance with the standard i
~
AP600 numbering system (GW GMP 005).
- 6. Ensures that all design inpits used in the preparation of the document are protected in aci,ordance with the applicable records flow schedule.
- 7. Distributes copies of the draft document ic reviewers and I. others, as required.
ineso.w oesim Pa0e 2 of 5 roois wer:io i 1
p i ! WESTINGHOUSE PROPRIETARY CLASS 2 { AP-3.6 2 i Responsible Manager 8. Assigns an independent verifier to verify the document. 1 3 Independent Verifier 9. Reviews document for adequacy, correctness and ; completeness. ' Interfacing Groups 10. Review and comment on the draft document.
- Responsible Engineer 11. Resolves comments on the document generated during the l
- review process.
3 ?- 12. Obtains required approval signatures on the cover and intemal review sheet.
)
l ' l Responsible Manager 13. Ensures that the Responsible Engineer has resolved l comments with the verifier and mandatory reviewers and has j obtained approval signatures on the sign-off sheet. 4
- 14. Reviews, approves and signs-off the Design Criteria
- Document.
Responsible Engineer 15. Releases the Design Criteria Document to Program Control ] and Contract Administration. Program Control and 16. Distributes the Design Criteria Document as specified Contract Administration by the responsible engineer. Incorporates document in AP600 records. Plant Engineering 17. Identifies the top level criteria documents to be included in the Design Criteria Manual and identifies the distribution list for the Design Criteria Manual. Program Control and 18. Distributes the Design Criteria Documents selected for Contract Administration inclusion in the Design criteria Manual to the controlled distribution. REFERENCES l l A. AP-3.2, Design Configuration Change Control for AP600 Program, Phase 2 B. GW GMP 005, AP600 Document Numbering FORMS / EXHIBITS AP600 Document Cover Sheet - Exhibit 10 AP600 Standard Intemal Review Sheet - Exhibit 17 AP600 Record of changes Exhibit 16 teeso.wio mieu Page 3 of 5 reis wie
WESTINGHOUSE PROPRIETARY CLASS 2 AP 3.6 2
' APPENDICES Appendix A Design Criteria Format and Content I
l I f e i
?
I i t i i k i t I teno
- oasion Pa0e 4 of 5 roois w.io
t WESTINGHOUSE PROPRIETARY CLASS 2 AP 3.6 2 i APPENDIX A 2 DESIGN CRITERIA FORMAT k.4D CONTENT i The Design Critena Document shall be prepared using the following forms:
]
AP600 Document Cover Sheet - in accordance with Exhibit 10 l AP600 Standard Intemal Review Sheet - in accordance with Exhibit 17 i AP600 Record of Changes -in accordance with Exhibit 16 l h Subsequent pages shall include "AP600 Design Criteria Westinghouse Proprietary Class 2" in the header and the AP600 document number, revisior; number, page number and date in the footer. {' The Design Criteria Document shall include a Table of Contents with the following sections: Section 1.0 Introduction
1.1 Purpose and Scope
1.2 Background
1.3 Definitions and Acronyms Section 2.0 Codes and Standards Section 3.0 and subsequent section numbers may be selected by the author Section References shall be the last section Appendices The Design Criteria Document shall define the criteria in sufficient detail that design of the plant in accordance with the criteria will meet all technical and licensing requirements. The document shall consider the following design inputs: a) Regulatory requirements. If the design criteria include any exceptions from l Regulatory Guides, Standard Review Plans or other licensing documents, such exceptions shall also be documented in the "AP600 Compliance with SRP Acceptance Criteria"(GW GL 001). b) ALWR Utility Requirements. If the design criteria include any exceptions from the Utility Requirements Document, such exceptions shall also be documented in the " Comparison of AP600 Design with the Utilities Requirements Document". Section 2.0 identifies the Codes and Standards imposed on the user of the criteria document, < and is distinct from references which are provided in the last section to describe where requirements come from or to provide assistance to the user in understanding the criteria. In general, Regulatory Guides, Standard Review Plan sections and ALWR sections should be identified in the references and not in Section 2.0. AP600 requirements implementing the position should be incorporated in the body of the criteria document. Thus, any interpretation l of the Regulatory or URD requirements is done by the Responsible Engineer for the Design j Criteria Document and reviewed by all interfacing groups. ' i l me.o ma Page 5 of 5 roois war io
l nn: { AP-3.7 0 Westinghouse Electric Corporation E*M 0 Nuclear and Advanced Technology Diviolon ! INTERFACE CONTROL DOCUMENT AP600 Program Operating Procedure H.J. Bruschig. ' 'MN .AP600 Program - D. Feb. 8,1991 1 AUTHOR / RESPONSIBLE FUNCTION Contact Manager, Nuclear Equipment Engineering, for questions conceming this procedure. PURPOSE l l This procedure establishes the requirements and responsibilities for developing, approving, implementing, revising and maintaining Interface Control Documents (ICDS) related to the AP600 Program. SCOPE This procedure applies to allICDs that are to be developed for AP600 systems, equipment or computer software that interacts with equipment { or software being designed by organizaticns: DEFINITIONS 4 AP600 CONFIGURATION CONTROL BOARD (CCB) - A board of individuals drawn from various organizations and disciplines to review and approve (or disapprove) Desigr! Change Proposals (See Figure A) and to determine whether proposed changes require DOE review and approval. The CCB organization is defined in the AP600 Program Operating Procedure, AP-3.2 " Design Configuration Change Control for AP600 Program, Phase 2". INTERFACE - A functional or physical characteristic required to define a common boundary between two or more pieces of equipment, software or systems that are designed by different Westinghouse divisions, departments, or contractors / suppliers. Fonn 54062 (3-85) Page 1 of 14
- AP-3.7 0
) INTERFACE CONTROL DOCUMENT (ICD) - A formal document or l drawing which defines the interface relationships between organizations with design responsibility for the AP600 program l consistent with the program milestones ( See Fgure A). F i' The ICD applies to all physical, functional or operational interfaces of-systems, equipment. software, facilities and installation requirements (Figure B) which are typically characterized by mechanical, electrical
- or functional data parameters or procedures with associated data requirements.
The CD is designed to supplement not to duplicate information l contained in the system specification document (SSD) by providing the details of the Interfaces. ' l l t 4 LEAD ICD. ENGINEER - The Lead ICD Engineer !s the appointed j Westinghouw ??600 representative responsible for a particular CD l and the interfacing that may be required with the other affected ! { engineers for the issuance of the CD. The Lead ICD Engineer can be j the Responsible Design Engineer, ' i j ICD ENGINEER - OfficialICD interface person of the responsible group j (other Westinghouse departments / divisions or contractors / suppliers) { that has an interface with the specific AP600 equipment or software to 2 ; which the ICD applies. This person is assigned by the responsible i group organization to work with the Lead ICD ~ Engineer in the , development of the particular ICD. 2 i j SUPPLIER - As used in this procedure, a Supplier is any non-Westinghouse organization with design responsibility for, systems, structures, equipment or software that interfaces with systems, structures, equipment or software designed / integrated by Westinghouse. i i f I r s.am c== , i Page 2 of 14 i 1
\
AP-3.7 0 l ) PROCEDURE i GENERAL i A The ICD is typically prepared by the responsible design organization. i B The CD identifies the responsibilities of the responsible organizations at i the design interfaces and ensures that design changes affecting } interfaces are properly coordinated. i
- C An CD Team is assembled by the appropriate AP600 Engineering i
manager for each ICD. As a minimum the ICD team is composed of an
- appointed Lead ICD Engineer and/or a Design Engineer and those
! engineers from other organizations including outside suppliers who are i responsible for specific interfaces. L , D Each appointed CD Engineer shall enforce ICD control procedures within their organizations. 4 E The nature of the ICD varies considerably, depending on the interface being documented. It can be a physical or an operational interface. Interface definition takes the form of drawings, tables, figures, schematics, function lists, data format diagrams, and other data required by designers to complete their detail design and ensure that all the parts of the system work harmoniously (Figure B). The ICD could be a formal document or a formal drawing. In either case, the ICD shall identify the assignment of responsibilities among the participating design organizations for the review, approval, release, distribution, and revision of interface design information and the document (s) in which interface design information is defined. Additionally, each ICD should have a schedule identifying the major milestones that each organization l must meet, together, for final ICD issuance. 1 F Appendices A, B, and C provide instruction (s) for a typical ICD. G -For these ICDS which are issued as documents, the Lead ICD engineer ensures that any ICD revision contains a Record of Changes page describing, in detail, significant changes along with a reason for the ; change in addition to any approvals required by AP-3.2. Approval for ! any revision (s) shall be obtained from the groups who originally reviewed and approved the interfaces. Revisions (changes) should be identified throughout the document by a car line on the right hand margin or by "A" pages (e.g. change peges, looseleaf pages). The bar or vertical line appears once and is not cumulative in future revisions. Page 3 of 14
__ _ _. _ . ~ . _ _ . . -. . _._ ___ _ . _ _
=
AP-3.7 0 H For those ICDS which are issued as drawings, the Lead ICD engineer ensures that an Engineering Change Notice (ECN) describes the changes in detail along with a reason for the change in addition to any 4 approvals required by AP-3.2. Approval for any revision (s) shall be obtained from the groups who originally reviewed and approved the interfaces. The changes or reference to the ECN should be identified in 2 the revision column of the :Irawing.
- I Each ICD shall be controlled in accordance with this procedure. Any proposed change to the ICD (document or drawing) shall be made in writing via the designated Lead ICD Engineer using the forms identified in AP-3.2," Design Configuration Change Control for AP600 Program. '
- Phase 2". 4 4
RESPONSIBILITY / ACTION i AP600 RESPONSIBLE ' j DESIGN MANAGER 1 Identifies the need for defining interfaces that exist between specific equipment, systems, processes or software and requests the
- preparation of the ICD, 2 Responsible for administering this procedure, defining and issuing standards to third parties (other Westinghouse organizations, j
contractors, or suppliers) for any ICD information that will be required to be provided by the third party. 3 Assigns a Lead ICD Engineer and identifies interfacing organizations ] (other cognizant groups, divisions or Suppliers) that will provide input to i and approve ICD.
- i 4 Establishes milestones and a schedule for the development and completion of the ICD.
5 Obtains commitrnent from interfacing organization (s) to assign ICD Engineer (s) and forms an ICD team. 6 Supervises the ICD Team in accordance with Figure A and acts as the i arbitrator in case the ICD Team can not resolve technical issues. 7 Ensures that allICD comments have been properly resolved with the mandatory review groups and that the ICD has been properly reviewed and signed-off. Form s!402A G86) 1 4 Page 4 of 14
m AP-3.7 0 l j i 8 Ensures that the ICD meets the program and contractual requirements.
- Reviews, approves and signs the ICD.
4 , ICD TEAM
- 9 Responsible for identifying all relevant interfaces and for reviewing the l
ICD to ensure that a schedule and organizational responsibilities are l defined; and that each technical discipline (mechanical, electrical. ! l software, etc.) has been appropriately addressed. Once an ICD is i lasued, the ICD team will evaluate all proposed changes prior to ! revising the 1C0 (see Figure A). l The ICD Team shall meet, as needed, to resolve any technical i concems and reviews proposed ICD changes. i
- LEAD ICD ENGINEER l 10 identifies the ICD format e.g. a document, drawing or combination of both (See Procedure / General Section).
} 11 Obtains a document number in accordance with standard AP600 i i document numbering system (GW-GMP-005) for those ICDS that will j be issued in a document format. Furthermore, the Document Cover i sheets identified in the Forms / Exhibit section shall be utilized to formally j sign ICDS.
- 12 Ensures that all drawings required by ICD are in accordance with standard Westinghouse AP600 drawing procedures and format as j
defined in " Preparation and Control of Drawings" (Reference j WCAP-12601). T 1 13 Prepares draft ICD and distributes to ICD Engineers. Coordinates management reviews, Configuration Control Board reviews, and l verifies that all proposed changes are technically within the Baseline j Design. j 14 Resolves comments to the ICD generated during the review process. 1-15 Ensures that the " original" signed off ICD is pro'perly filed in l- accordance with the applicable AP600 records flow schedule, I document control and the Configuration Control Process. i 1 Fem 58002A (386) Page 5 of 14
a.u AP-3.7 0 ) i 16 Ensures that the ICD is maintained current as the design progresses. 17 initiates or reviews any proposed revision (s) to the ICD, and ensures i that the originalICD is revised in accordance with this procedure and j that all revisions are placed under configuration control. (Figure A). 4 j RESPONSIBLE DESIGN MANAGER j 18 Defines the level of effort required from own organization to support and provide CD input. 3 19 Provides input on schedule to support ICD. I 4 20 identifies the ICD Engineer within own organization. l 21 Reviews and approves the ICD, as appropriate. l CD ENGINEER 22 Provides input on format, content and schedule, as appropriate. t 23 Coordinates review of draft CD within own organization and orovides comments to Lead ICD Engineer. j i 24 Upon resolution of all comments, signs ICD for own organization or ; obtains authorizing signature in accordance with organization's requirements. t 25 Identifies any necessary changes to ICD to Lead ICD Engineer using i the forms identified in Procedure AP-3.2. " Design Configuration Change Control for AP600 Program, Phase 2". I 26 Responds to Lead ICD Engineer within 15 working days from the time of
- the original request on proposed changes to ICD.
REFERENCES A GW-GMP-005, "AP600 Document Numbering Procedure" B WCAP-12601, AP-3.2, " Design Configuration Change Control for ! AP600 Program, Phase 2" i 3 j C WCAP-9565, DP-3.2.6, " Preparation and Control of Drawings". 4 1 Perm 50002A (388) Pase 6 of 14
- -. .=_ - . . . . .-. . . _ . -_ _ . - . - - . . - - . . - . - . . , _ - . . . _ . . _
n.u AP-3.7 0
- FORMS / EXHIB!TS i
+ . Document Cover Sheet, Form 58202, Exhibit 10. I Standard intamal Review Sheet Form 58203, Exhibit 17. i
- Record Of Char.ges Form 58204. Exhibit 16.
2 APPENDICES
- A. ICD Document Format I B. !
ICD Tablo Of Contents (Typical Document format) C. Limited Rights Notice i l i rarm seco A pas) Page 7 of 14
l l
- FIGURE A l
i ICD INFORMATION CONFIGURATION CONTROL FLOW l l PROPOSED. TEAM U INITIATOR -> CHANGE
-> ICD , NT ACCEPTED ENGINEER AGREES MANAGEMENT MEETING on YES YES i
P, I
)
CONFIGURATION LEADICD l CONTROL - ICD ENGINEER CONTROLLED AND TEAM < DISTRIBUTION PREPARES
- g CCB FORMS l
AP600 CENTRAL lf ' FILE LEGEND (1) i CCB REVIEW I CCB = Configuration control Board DCP = Design CW Proposal da U 3CCF = Doelp Change Completion U YES Form
- ICD SIGN-OFF REVISE ICD ACCEPTED (1) REF.: AP600 Program Procedtre i
Number AP-3.2 If k I REJECTED < l
RouJ I AP-3.7 0 l 1 FIGURE B EXAMPLE : DEFINING INTERFACE FUNCTIONS The following figure depicts 4 pieces of equipment that are to be designed by different organizations; B2 B7
=
1 B5 I In an effort to identify the interfaces between all fc ar pieces of equipment, a block digram is drawn and the following questions are asked which should be antwered via an ICD: o ) if B6 ' talks' to 82, 85 and B7, What does it say? What do they say? o if 86 requires something, what does it require? How much? When? o if B6 supplies something, what does it supply? How much? When? l The ICD should break down the functional diagram into a more detailed list of the various functions, requirements, flows in or out between B6, 82, B5 and B7, B2 j
] _
1 s i B7 1B6 L ' B5
'.s 3 minimum, for the above diagram, the ICD will be the vehicle to:
o Define th9 re sponsible organizations that are affected by the various interfaces o Assign values, dimensions, tolerances, times, duations, etc. o Select c.onnec, tor types and assign pins as above 'wttles down'. 6 Defi% mounting, ducts, bolts, etc. o Depict energy balance for components. o Maintain load limits of components. Form 58002A(386) Page 9 of 14
n~ AP-3.7 0 APPENDIX A INTERFACE CONTROL DOCUMENT FORMAT ! A.1 INTERFACE CONTROL DOCUMENT COVER SHEET in accordance with axhibit 10.
- NOTE EACH ICD SHALL CONTAIN A WESTINGHOUSE INTERNAL REVIEW SHEET IN ACCORDANCE WITH EXHIBIT 17. THE INTERNAL REVIEW SHEET IS TO BE MAINTAINED INTERNAL TO THE AP600 PROGRAM.
4 4 ! A.2 RECORD OF CHANGES (REVISIONS)
- In accordance with exhibit 16.
j A.3 TABLE OF CONTENTS Appendix B provides a guideline for the preparation of an Interface Control Document. i ' This Table of Contents could be customized as needed for the specific application (See , section 4.0). ; in the event that the Limited Rights Statement needs to be identified in the document it a shall be in accordance with appendix C. s 4 B d 1 j Form 50002A (386) Page 10 of 14
~-~ ~~
AP-3.7 0 APPENDIX B t INTERFACE CONTROL DOCUMENT - TABLE OF CONTENTS
1.0 INTRODUCTION
i o Purpose 4 o Scope i o ICD Control Policy ! o Organization of ICD 1 i a ( 2.0 APPLICABLE DOCUMENTS
- 3.0 GENERAL REQUIREMENTS i
4 j 4.0 PHYSICAL INTERFACES i 1
- o Geometric Relationships: Coordinate Systems I l o MechanicalInterfaces: Envelope, Attachment Alignment.
Dimensions. Tolerancing l 5.0 STRUCTURAL INTERFACES ! o Design Limits and Constraints: Safety / Design Factors o Mass Properties: Weight, Moment of inertia, Center-of-Gravity, Location, Axes, Models of Exchange (Msth/ Physical) o Design Conditions ( ASME Category A, B, C, D) ! o Loading combinations (e.g. anchor, nozzle, support,' attachment, seismic) 6.0 FLUID INTERFACES I o Hydraulic / Pneumatic Interface: Type, Flow Rate, Temperature, Pressure o Physical Interfaces: Pips Sizes, Type Ccnnectors F== 50002A G86) Page 11 of 14
=
AP-3.7 0 APPENDIX B (Continued) 7.0 - ENVIRONMENT INTERFACES o Thermal: Temperature Range, Heating Rates, Heat Transfer Surfr,ces. o Magnetic: Flux Density,-Rate-of-Change i o Radiation: Type, Flux Density, Total Dose o Ambient: Pressure, Temperature, Flow Rates o Air Conditioning: Temperature, Flow Rates 8.0 ELECTRICAL POWER INTERFACE o Electrical Power: Type, Voltage, Power Profile, Protection, Distribution, Connectors , o Electromagnetic Compatibility System Isolation
]
9.0 l&CINTERFACES t o Command Signals: Format, Rates, Identification o Data Signals: Radio Frequency Characteristics, Format Rate o Telemetry Signals: Format. Clock, identification, Recording o Timing and Sequencing: Control and Logic, Relationships, Data . o Transfers, Input Sensing o Interconnection Diagrams 1 10.0 SOFTWARE INTERFACES o Data: Inputs, Outputs, Rates o Messages: Format. Content Storage o Protocols: Enable Processing, Validation. Error Detection Recovery o Software: I
- Diagrams, Standards and Conventions
{
- Timing and Sequencing: Control & Logic Relationships, '
Data Transfers, input Sensing Fa= ssoon pes) Page 12 of 14
a.u AP-3.7 0 i APPENDIX B (Continued) 11.0 INDUCED ENVIRONMENTS o Structural: Vibration, Shock, Acoustic, Loads. Dynamic Mode Shape l o Thermal: Temperature Range Heating Rates, Heat Transfer Surfaces l o Magnetic: Flux Density, Rate-of-Change o Radiation: Type, Flux Density Total Dose ; t 12.0 OTHER INTERFACES o Safety
~
o Materials Compatibility t 13.0 ELECTRICAL WlRING INTERFACES i i o Physicalinterfaces: Pin Assignments Type of Connectors, i Harness Management i 14.0 VERIFICA'110N: o QA Requirements o ICD Requirements Verification Matrix. I o Models i' o Support Equipment Tests o Integration Tests i 15.0 SCHEDULES This section should contain the key milestones that are to be met by each affected party that are required to provide input to the ICD. Typically schedules are tracked by PCCA. however, their inclusion as part of the ICD provides all parties with specific target dates to have their design information available for other affected parties, thus ensuring that the integration process is accomplished in an effective, efficient and cost productive manner. APPENDIX: Glossary of Terms Perm seossa <m Page 13 of 14
I a. AP-3.7 0 i APPENDIX C i a THE LIMITED RIGHTS STATEMENT IS TO BE INCLUDED lN ALL ICDS THAT ARE SIGNED OFF AND RELEASED FORMALLY OUTSIDE THE AP600 PROGRAM f LIMITED RIGHTS NOTICE 1 i l d (A) These data are submitted with limited rights urider Government , Contract No. DE-AC03-90SF18495. These data may be 4 reproduced and used by the Government with the express { limitation that they will not, without written permission of the Contractor, be used for purposes of nianufacture nor disclosed outside the Government; except tl'at the Government may disclose these data outside the Government for the following j purposes, if any, provided that the Government makes such
- disclosure subject to prohibition against furtbar use and disclosure:
l (I) This " proprietary data" may be disclosed for evaluation purposes under the restrictions above. (11) This " proprietary data" may be disclosed to the Electric j! Power Research Institute (EPRI), electric utility i representatives and their direct consultants, excluding direct commercial competitors, and the DOE National Laboratories under the prohibitions and restrictions
- above.
(B) This notice shall be marked on any reproduction of these data, in whole or in part. 1 1 l l Form 58002A (386) l Page 14 of 14 I
e AP-3.12 1 W Westinghouse Electric Corporation
" Nuclear Projects Division AP600 ENGINEERING DATA BASE (EDB)
ACCESS AND CONTROL AP600 - - ' ~
.- a- -20 s Program Operating Procedure $$,*.fpl$ ejj[nanag.
AUTHOR / COGNIZANT Contact AP600 Plant Data Base Administrator on questions FUNCTION concerning this procedure. PURPOSE This procedure establishes the requirements and responsibilities for preparing and approving the movement of data into the AP600 Engineering Data Base. SCOPE This procedure applies to the updating, accessing, and controlling of data resident in the AP600 Engineering Data Base. $ DEFINITIONS Engineering Data Base The AP600 Engineering Data Base (EDB) is a repository of , 4 AP600 design data that is accessible to parties involved i with the engineering design of the plant. As an engineering task is completed that results in the production of design data, the data is moved into the AP600 EDB so that other parties can utilize this up-to-date information in the { completion of their own design tasks. j Staging EDB l
- The staging EDB is a data base for temporary storage of l small quantities of data awaiting approval. After the data is approved, the Data Administrator moves the data from the Staging EDB to the AP600 EDB using the Control Program.
3 Lot Control Program 1 The Lot Control Program executes authorized transactions (loads, updates, etc.) from the Staging EDB and applies them to the AP600 EDB. The Lot Control Program performs the EDB updates, and produces an audit report. , AP600 EDB Data Submittal Request Form The AP600 EDB Data Submittal Request Form identifies the data to be moved into the EDB and identifies the , approval of the data for such release. 1 i m:\3484w.wpf:1b-022097 Page 1 of 3 0008.FRM
. . - . . . - . . - . - . - ~ _ . _ . - . - . - - - - . - .
i !~ Rev 1-AP-3.12 1 l j Lot Number The lot number is a unique numerical key for each potential I batch of transactions against the EDB. The lot number is how transactions are identified by the Data Administrator for j moving data from the Staging EDB to the EDB. The lot
- - number is required to track transactions against the AP600
- EDB.
Data Administrator i The Data Administrator is the person responsible for controlling the updating of information in the EDB. i- PROCEDURE To achieve the goal of providing accurate data to the users and
- to maintain configuration control of the EDB, only approved data l General is placed into the EDB.
t ] Data movement into the AP600 EDB is performed via the j Staging EDB in a controlled and documented manner, and only 4 after the data content is approved. i i RESPONSIBILITY ACTION Engineer 1. Identify data to be updated (new or revised data) to the i Data Administrator. The engineer may complete the top portion (above the dashed line) of an AP600 EDB Data - 4 Submittal Request and submit the form to the Data J Administrator. Engineer must specify the location of (or deliver) the data and specify the format. If the data is part 3 of an official AP600 project document, the document i number and revision must be identified. + l Data Administrator 2. Capture the data identified by the Engineer and import it j into the Staging EDB, where the lot number is assigned. j Engineer 3. Approve the accuracy of the data to be entered into the [ EDB by signing the AP600 Engineering Data Base Data Submittal Request Form after reviewing the data content j provided. l Data Administrator 4. Review the approved AP600 EDB Data Submittal Request j and its accompanying material to verify proper approval. Invoke the Lot Control Program to update the AP600 EDB. This includes specifying the batch of transactions by the lot number. Verify that the proper data is added to the AP600 EDB by reviewing the confirming report. m:o4 sew.wpf:1b 0204e7 Page 2 of 3 0008.FRM
l Rev. AP-3.12 3 File the AP600 EDB Data Submittal Request, the hardcopy equivalent of the data, and the confirming report produced by the Control Program in the paper file. FORMS / EXHIBITS AP600 EDB Data Submittal Form, Form 58209, Exhibit 26 - REFERENCES WCAP-12601, AP600 Program Operating Procedures AP-3.2, Design Configuration Change Control for AP600 1 _ Program, Phase 2 AP-3.3,' Document Release and Control for AP600. Program, Phase 2 l' l l e i l 1 l l l l i i' m:\3484w.wpf:1b-020497 Page 3 of 3 0008.FRM t I
AP-7.2 1 W Westinghouse Electric Corporation
" Nuclear and Advanced Technology Division CONTROL OF SUBCONTRACTOR SUBMITTALS GABA VVV w f
n . o. Engineering Procedure H. J. Bruschi. General Mana 6-1-95 Advanmd Technology Business Area 4 I I AUTHOR / RESPONSIBLE Contact Manager, Plant Engineering, on questions conceming FUNCTION this procedure. PURPOSE To establish the methodology for receipt, distribution, control, and l review of subcontractor design document submittals. SCOPE This procedure applies to all design documents submitted by ' subcontractors related to the AP600 program. Those documents are as specified in each subcontract and generally include, but ; + are not limited to: l l Applicable general specifications used in design
- System Specification Documents
. All the design drawing documents
. Design Specifications
. Design Analysis / Calculation Documents
. Design change documents
. Design and analysis report documents 4 DEFINITIONS Document - Any written or pictorialinformation describing, defining, specifying, reporting, or certifying activities, requirements, precedures, or results.
Procedure - A document that specifies or describes how an activity is to be preformed. Subcontractor - Any individual or organization who furnishes ' items or services in accordance with a procurement document. An all inclusive term used in place of any of the following: vendor, supplier, seller, contractor, fabricator, consultant and their subtier level. Document Submittal Form (DSF)- A form used by a subcontractor to submit a document. rnA2003w.wptWOS269s Page 1 of 2 0008.FRM
AP-7.2 1 PROCEDURE General A. This procedure specifies the activities for processing the receipt from AP600 subcontractors of Document Submittal Forms (DSF) and submitted documents. B. This procedure supersedes the requirements of WCAP-9565 DP-4.0 & DP-7.0 for the processing of supplier submittals for the AP600 program. RESPONSIBILITY / ACTION Subcontractor 1. Prepare the DSF in accordance with the contractual i instructions and submit the documents to the AP600 person identified in the subcontract. I Addressee 2. Forward copy of DSF and document (s) to the following: 1 1 . Responsible manager and/or responsible engineer i . Other involved individuals \ l 3. Forward original of DSF and document (s) to AP600 i Central File. I AP600 Central File 4. a. File DSF by letter number i b. File document (s) by document number e i Responsible Manager / 5. If the submitted document is a Design Change Proposal / , Engineer i (DCP), proceed in accordance with AP-3.2. I Reviewers 6. Review documents as appropriate and retum any I comments to the Responsible Manager / Engineer. I Responsible Manager / 7. Retum comments to subcontractor. I Engineer i Subcontractor 8. Act on comments prior to next document revision. REFERENCES A. WCAP-12601, Program Operating Procedures, AP-3.2 Design Configuration Change Control for the AP500 Program. I B. WCAP-9565, DP-4.0, Procurement Document Control. 1 l C. WCAP-9565, DP-7.0, Control of Purchased items and i Services. FORMS / EXHIBITS Document Submittal Form, Form 58229, Exhibit 28. mt'ooswwptibes2ess Page 2 of 2 0008.FRM
A.v. AP-3.14 0 W Westinghouse Electric Corporation
" Nuclear and Advanced Technology Division AP600 PLANT INSTRUMENTATION & CONTROL SYSTEMS AP600 Program Operating Procedure g y. 10-31-91 H. J. Bruschi, Di ; tor, AP600 Program AUTHOR / COGNIZANT Contact Manager, Plant instrumentation and Control Systems FUNCTION (Pl&CS) on questions conceming this procedure.
PURPOSE This procedure provides specific requirements, as well as guidelines, %r work done by Pl&CS personnel. SCOPE This procedure is applicable to the Pl&CS group responsible for the scope under their cognizance for the AP600 Program. It contains both mandatory requirements (denoted by the verb shall) as well as non-mandatory guidelines (denoted by the vero should). The work performed by Pl&CS for the AP600 project is categorized as Man-Machine Interface Systems design. This work includes the following: a) Man-Machine Interface Design of Control Rooms and Control Boards; b) Instrumentation and Control (l&C) Design; c) Control Room / Equipment Desen. The general Pl&CS activities are summarized in Appendix A, titled
'Pl&CS General Work Activities'.
DEFINITIONS l&C Architecture Diagram A diagram that depicts the l&C architecture. It is a system block diagram that represenis the top level view of the system and its interconnections. Instrument Lists Lists that contain information about the plant process parameters. This information usually includes channel numbers, system, type, range, description, safety class, electrical train, alarms, set points, indicators, recorders, and preferred failure states. mim,o,.i Page 1 of 20 e.,- moer russoasr=
I AP-3.14 0 Process Block Diagrams Diagrams depichng the implementation of the l&C system functional requirements, functional diagrams, flow diagrams, channel lists and other key documents, in both hardware and software. All system protection and control functions are to be 1 identified in Process Block Diagrams. Speclic.i;on Sheets Sheets created in accordance with ISA-S20 (1981) for individual instruments, as necessary, and identified by the design engineer. Note that the Specification Sheets may differ in format and content from that identified in ISA-S20 so long as sufficent information is provided. System Documentation Documentation that comprehensively describes the design of the product. The system documentation includes design specir,c.'wis that ensure that the end product will meet all of the established design criteria and functional requirements. Systems Engineering The engineering function that organizes and integrates concepts and technologies into total systems and ensures their technicalintegrity. PROCEDURE General INTERFACE MANAGEMENT Pl&CS shall be responsible for coordinatmg and integrating AP600 l&C and Man-Machme interfaces with groups that support the AP600 organizations. This includes systems provided by others through the appropriate Westinghouse interface organization. DOCUMENTATION REVIEW PROCESS Reviews of the Pl&CS documentation shall be performed by intemal personnel (within Pl&CS) and/or extemal personnel (non-Pl&CS), in either case, the personnel reviewing the documentation shall be apprwed by the Pl&CS group manager. The review process shall include, as a minimum, the following elements: a) Review of document for completeness, accuracy, and ! feasibility; b) Issuance of a Pl&CS letter to file documentag all comments with distribution to appropnate personnel for resolution; c) Resolution of comments; i === Page 2 of 20 ap,w
% mam cm
AP-3.14 0 d) Obtaining management decision on unresolved comments; e) issuing a letter to file identifyir.g the resolutions and results of the review and distributed to concemed parties. SPECIFIC WORK PROCEDURE ELEMENTS The following Specific Work Procedure Elements are defined in Figure 1 and are discussed below in more detail. .3%,- Page 3 d 20 r seocearaissione.pmu
I AP-3.14 o FIGURE 1 AP600 FLOW CHART FOR Pl&CS ENGINEERING WORK Define Engineering Plan j P
=
~ 2 M
A i N A L_ Produce System Documem $ G , E veriscabon of work 4 P I : Write Design SpecMcations N : W S W ts T E R Veri 6catxx1 of Work F p Procurement and c = n w ,,- 5 E V S Acceptance Testing g wmsoses p,y,4oggn Form 5000EA (Jet,/Utatm
AP-3.14 0
- 1. Definition of an Engineering Plan An Engineering Plan that details the scope of the work should be established at the discretion of the AP600 Pl&CS Manager.
This plan is to be developed by the responsible engineer and approved by the AP600 Pl&CS Manager. Several of the inputs listed under typical inputs of the Review Inputs sechon below will be necessary to perform these tasks. The Engineering Plan should take into account the following: ta) Work Objectives b) Required inputs c) Commitments / Milestones d) Required Outputs e) Schedule f) Funding / Resource Requirements g) Supporting Organizations / Groups h) Time-Phased Manpower Distribution
- 2. Review Inputs Based on the required work to be done, the inputs shall be checked for completeness, accuracy, and feasibility. The inputs shall be reviewed in accordance with the documentation review process detailed in this procedure to assure that:
a) All necessary information has been supplied; b) Requirements are accurate and complete; c) Implementation is feasible. The input information required to define an Engineering Plan and perform the engineering work should typically address the following items: a) Goals of the system and desired outcomes of the work to be periormed; b) The date when the work is required to be completed; c) Interfaces with other systems and the nature of those interfaces; d) Requirements on system inputs and outputs; e) Applicable govemment regulations and industry codes and standards; f) Dime.1sion and configuration envelope constraints such as size, orientation, location; g) Environmental and power source envelopes or constraints; h) Requirements related to access control, redundancy, independence, identification and test capability; l l w-- Page 5 of 20 p seammnw
AP-3.14 0 i) System classification and applicable quality assurance, reliability goals, verification and validation; j) Environmental qualification requirements based on its classification. The typical inputs include the following: a) System Specification Documents, particularly the following portions: Interlock Sheets, Channel Lists, and Load Lists; b) Protecbon Functional Requirements; c) Control Functional Requirements; d) Protection Functional Diagrams; e) Control Functional Diagrams; f) Engineering Flow Diagrams and P&lDs (Reference AP-3.15); g) Customer (e.g. contract) Requirements; h) Subcontractor Requirements; i) Govemment Regulations and Industry Codes and Standards.
- 3. Produce System Documen+ation The system documentation shall be produced as required and shall be reviewed and approved by a second engineer. -
Figure 2, titled "I&C Design Process" shows the typical output documents produced by Pl&CS, as well as the inputs that are required. The processes that produce the outputs given the inputs compose the Pl&CS Transformation Matrix. These processes consist of dynamic tasks and differ for the var 5us outputs produced. Figure 3, titled "Pl&CS Information Transformation Matrix' further relates the information that is required as inputs to produce the Pl&CS outputs. The output documentation normally includes the following: l&C Architecture Diagram (see Appendix C) Process Block Diagrams (or equivalent) (see Appendix C) Equipment (Instrument) Lists Logic Diagrams (see Appendix C) Design Specificahons l&C Datahames Standard Safety Analysis Report input eSimmatiosei Page 6 of 20 n, senau w
AP-3.14 0 System Specification Documents (SSDs) SSDs shall be prepared in accordance with procedure AP-3.1. However, when preparing Pl&CS SSDs, % breakdown of each section defined by AP-3.1 shall be done in an equivalent sub-category forrnat identified in Appendix B.
- Specification Sheets Created in accordance with ISA-S20 (1981 titled
" Specification Forms for Process Measurement and Control Instruments, Primary Elements and Control Valves") for individual instruments, as necessary, and identified by the design engineer. Note that the Specification Sheets may differin format and content from that identified in ISA S20 so long as sufficient information is provided. The Specification Sheets shall be reviewed and approved by a Pl&CS engineer. Typical equipment requiring Specification Sheets are field mounted instruments and control board instruments. Specification Sheets are not normally required for microprocessor based cabinet mounted equipment or for standardized systems.
- 4. Verification of Woi The designer shall identify and justify the appropriate type of verification to be used on his work and obtain written management approval. The choice of verification type will be documented and stored in the AP600 file. The types of verification are as follows:
a) Design Verification by Design Reviews in accordance with AP-3.5; b) Design Verification by independent Review /Altemate Calculations in accordance with WCAP-9565, DP-3.3.2; c) Design Verification by Testing in accordance with WCAP-9565, DP-3.3.3; d) Design Specifications in accordance with AP-3.8.
- 5. Procurement and Manufacturing Follow The procedures definM in coction DP-7.0, titled " Control of Purchased items and Services" in WCAP-9565 shall be followed when performing this work. However, Pl&CS shall be responsible for the following:
a) Providing the Purchase Requisition; l b) Evaluating the technical capabilities of suppliers; m - m. Page 7 of 20 p uoau.cnuvooamu
AP-3.14 0 c) Recommending aWaNe suppliers; d) Reviewing procurement documents; e) Providing Purchase Requisition Change Notices; f) Reviewing supplier documents and approving as required; g) Evaluating and approving proposed deviations from specifications by the supplier.
- 6. Acceptance Testing from Manufacturer Pl&CS shall be responsible for providing the following:
a)- Test requirements; b) Review and approval of the test procedures; c) Review and approval of the test results. RESPONSIBluTY ACTION AP600 Pl&CS Manager Responsible for administering this procedure, defining and issuing standards to third parties (other Westinghouse organizations, contractors, suppliers) for any information that will be required to be provided by a third party. Ensures that all interfacing organizations are apprised of key design changes and identifies if Interface Control Documents need to be issued. Reviews and approves the Engineering Plan. Reviews, approves, signs-off the design documentation produced by the Pl&CS group, ensures that it is verified, and that appropriate personnel within or extemal to Pl&CS are appointed to review documentation in accordance with the Documentation Review Process of this procedure. Design Engineer Prepares an Engineering Plan Responsible for performing the responsibilities outlined in WCAP-9565, procedures DP-3.3.2 and DP-3.3.3. Ensures that the Design Specifications are prepared in accordance with AP 3.8. Ensures that the System Specification Documents are prepared in accordance with the format outlined in AP-3.1 and develop a sut> category of each sechon equivalent to the sample identified in Appendix B.
- m1Mei Page 8 of 2o ,,,, - m,m
AP-3.14 0 Ensures that any Interface Control Documents are prepared in accordance with AP-3.7. Ensures that all final signed off documentation is maintained in the appropriate engineenng files and that a copy is sent to the AP600 Central File. REFERENCES A. WCAP-12601, AP600 Program Operating Procedures AP-3.1, System Speerficahon Document
. AP-3.5, Design Reviews AP-3.7, Interface Control Document AP-3.8, Design Specifications AP-3.15, System P&lD Preparation B. WCAP-9565, NATD Quality Assurance Program Plan DP-3.3.2, Design Verification by independent Review or Altemate Calculations DP-3.3.3, Design Verification by Testing C. ISA-S20 (1981), Specification Forms for Process Measurement and Control Instruments, Primary Elements and Control Valves FORMS / EXHIBITS None APPENDICES A. Pl&CS GeneralWork Activities B. SSD Section Breakdown C. Typical Diagrams (Architecture, Process and Logic)
! m, =,ow, Page 9 of 20 p- seoen mem
l \1 l ![ 3 '
=
=
paA 3QCoT o I I t gg'CEI2hgOg ggOO hgOr- O 34D I T gg I T I
=
M N M MEM IO EM T ETE TST ME T A S T EM SYS T TM R S E SY S S T YSTMY SY SE SGS TS Y KO RO A SN NSYTNNNER ORN E RE I OSE WLO G H OM U ALSSOSIGT T OC YI TST CRISAEA DRA OTI C R ETGLCCTMPU NTT TI W S S T TNOOI ONEM OOLRDRE ANS S N RCDTIPMfVO N MOK P 1D I PDENNAURC OCR O f R SE DETO AT DET OY ST RCW T m ETACIOTRDD N TARDIDS T NOU LND R U ARGOSDIRB OEN O O RGEROEE I RG TR A T NM GE E TN T PIPF R T N C OD A NL TN I I DIO OAC L S I OE CE E R E IN RUN D FI OI N I A M m N N OS T N IT O O MTN EAE K N TI Tl S S T TCM SFU YI I MS R U T C O L GR M G AC I S E I F A T C E I F EH U P T SCC T I I U m EO S B A D C C S PD D E E O S W P P S S
? _- -- O -
m N
)
K T S E e m m A S I r 1 C M TI R V l m P FO J E l I l' S C N A A T d L S U O H m U R G T N I T S E R _T
) )
WA
) -
W W E E e,. m N ( A ( A (
)
W A ( (
)
S N S L T S O T) NL ET S m tAS N T & TI OA S NE S ES) S N ONM E ROAD I T NM S TA MS " MT NE SHlL T S D O R CIO ADM S N A KELU I rIT RNE T ETRNE E E R A M CND D A N CGAIR ONA U CUD F I QE R TCGAIR ONA RUID PF UQ E R R P C M O U GA S R D T I 8CC S EO U ONA PD RNL LAO EC( T( N U A GE T S L R N N m I I(
>l $$ T#3 ao g mo u s
,eY g,
' l
)
5 I s 9 Pl&CS Information Transformation Matrix
~o INPUT DOCUMENTS h
OUTPUT DOCUMENTS (h BLOCK LOGIC INST SSD DESIGN SPEC 85 -i DIAG DIAG LIST SPEC SHEETS @ FUNCTIONAL DIAGRAMS X X X a5 y FUNCTIONAL REQUIREMENTS X X X X X Zg
% (W) ENGINEERING FLOW DIAGRAMS X X X X g3 3 (B) ENGINEERING FLOW DIAGRAMS X X X ZO O g, (W) CHANNEL LIST X X X yZE 8 (B) CHANNEL LIST X O>m (W) INTERLOCK SHEETS X
X X X X ko" (B) INTERLOCK SHEETS X hQ (W) LOAD LIST X 5g (B) LOAD LIST X Zo ELECTRICAL REQUIREMENib X X X hO X ~4 g co EPRI REQUIREMENTS X X CODES & STANDARDS X X X X X R$ X m I&C SYSTEM SPECIFICATION DOCUMENTS X X X X X K %* OTHER SYSTEM SPECIFICATICN DOCUMENTS X X X X X
$ X co STANDARD COMPONENT SPECIFICATIONS X X X X X INTERFACE DETAILS X N X X X X X X SPECIFICATIONS FOR COMPONENTS X X X X X X DESIGN CRITERIA X X X X X X O
AP-3.14 0 APPENDIX A . 1 Pl&CS GENERAL WORK ACTIVITIES 4 This appendix is included as a training aid for employees new to Pl8CS. The general Pl&CS activities are depicted in Figure 1, titled "AP600 Flow Chad For Pl&CS Engineering Work" and are detailed in this procedure. The work can encompass the total Systems Engineering function or any portion thereof. Figure 2, titled "l&C Design Process'shows the typical inputs and outputs that are used and/or generated by Pl&CS. Figure 3, titled "Pl&CS Transformation Matrix" shows the relationships between the inputs required and outputs generated by Pl&CS. The functions of Pl&CS include the following:
- Development of the I&C design criteria and requirements reflecting the requesting group's needs and in compliance with the applicable govemment regulations and industry requirements; Providing operating hardware or rendering engineering services in an effective and efficient manner; Comparing the final product (s) to input requirements to demonstrate conformance.
l
)
esmiosei Page 12 of 20 p m m,m
AP-3.14 0 APPENDIX B Pl&CS SYSTEM SPECIFICATION DOCUMENT TABLE OF CONTENTS SECTION E EAG,g, 1.0 SYSTEM FUNCTION 1.1 1.1 Summary 1.1 1.2 System Function 1.1 2.0 SYSTEM DESIGN CRITERIA & OBJECTIVES 2.1 2.1 System Performance Reathements 2.1 2.2 System Operation Requirements 2.9 2.3 System Structural Requirements 2.11 2.4 System Configurhtion and Essential 2.13 Features Requirements 2.5 System Maintenance, Testing, & 2.43 Diagnostic Requirements 2.6 System Surveillance /In-Service 2.52 Inspection Requirements 2.7 System Power Source, instrumentation 2.53 and Control Requirements 2.8 Interfacing System Requirements 2.54 2.9 System Quality Assurance Requirements 2.55 2.10 Applicable Documents Requirements 2.60 2.11 System Reliability Requirements 2.61 2.12 System Availability Requirements 2.63 2.13 System Human Factors Requirements 2.65 2.14 Plant and System Transient Requirements 2.67 3.0 SYSTEM DESIGN DESCRIPTION & DESIGN DATA 3.1 3.1 System Configuration Description 3.2 3.1.1 General Protection Subsystem Configuration 3.2 3.1.2 Integrated Protection System Subsystems 3.8 3.1.3 Engineered Safely Features Actuation 3.19 Cabinets Subsystems 3.1.4 Distributed Log 6c 3.22 3.1.5 Reactor Trip Switchgear 3.26 3.1.6 Qualified Data Processing Cabinets 3.26 3.1.7 Protection Multiplexer Cabinets 3.27 mmm. Page 13 of 20 r nsaanaswanauw
AP-3.14 0 TABLE OF CONTENTS SECTION ]T[Lg PA91 4.0 SYSTEM OPERATION AND PERFORMANCE 4.1 4.1 System Start-up 4.1 4.2 Normal Operation 4.2 4.3 Abnormal Operation 4.3 5.0 COMPONENT REQUIREMENTS AND PARAMETERS 5.1 5.1 Equipment Requirements 5.1 5.1.1 Equipment Performance Requirements 5.1 5.1.2 Equipment Operation Requirements 5.9 5.1.3 Equipment Structural Requirements 5.10 5.1.4 Equipment Configuration & Essential 5.11 1 Features Requirements 5.1.5 Equipment Maintenance, Testing, & 5.29 Diagnostic Requirements 5.1.6 Equipment Surveillance /In-Service 5.32 Inspechon Requirements : 5.1.7 Equipment Power Source, instrumentation 5.33 and Control Requirements 5.1.8 Interfacing Equipment Requirements 5.42 5.1.9 Equipment Quality Assurance Requirements 5.43 5.1.10 Applicable Documents Requirements 5.48 5.1.11 Equipment Reliability Requirements 5.48 5.1.12 Equipment Availability Requirements 5.48 5.1.13 Equipment Human Factors Requirements 5.49 5.1.14 Not Used 5.2 Equipment Desciiption (Later) 5.2.1 Integrated Protection Cabinets (Later) 5.2.2 Engineered Safety Features Cabinets (Later) 5.2.3 Protection Logic Cabinets (Later) 5.2.4 Protecbon Multiplexer Cabinets (Latar) 5.2.5 Qualified Data Processing Cabinets (Later) 5.2.6 Protection Remote input / Output Cabinets (Later) 5.2.7 Reserved (Later) 5.2.8 Reactor Trip Switchgear (Later) 5.2.9 Sensors (Later) 6.0 SYSTEM LAYOUT HEQUIREMENTS 6.1
= = == Page 14 d 20 , , , , - - , -
AP-3.14 0 TABLE OF CONTENTS SECTION TITLE PAGE 7.0 INSTRUMENT AND CONTROL REQUIREMENTS (Not Used) 8.0 SUPPORT SYSTEM REQUIREMENTS 8.1 9.0 MONITORING, TESTING AND MAINTENANCE (Later)
- u.0 ENVIRONMENTAL REQUIREMENTS 10.1 11.0
SUMMARY
OF COMPLIANCE WITH EXTERNAL 11.1 CRITERIA
12.0 REFERENCES
12.1 12.1 Correspondence 12.1 12.2 Technical Reports 12.1 12.3 Drawings and Specifications 12.1 12.4 Vendor Documents 12.1 12.5 Calculations 12.1 LIST OF FIGURES LIST OF TABLES LIST OF ACRONYMS w$msos , Page 15 of 20 r samemyaxerm I I
lilt Itt -
~
;x O gOE o a9 g Odg O l l'
3
&, .le ],
shc. - s, mc I' ji
,2
, 2 0
n. s Ae, - - i0
=
S. . i' e E R . Ae. g U . i:. T C. E
. * .=
j e _j 3Y_ gy.__p_,_ I . QLJ T .
- pi
{g H -
=
( C g, R A .,
. '. ! .: i ! ;
.j=
m e pJ, _
+u m
l' C . 1 . 4 0 - . 0 e
, , \ . 2 6 -
P u
- _. ~
A. . o o . n . _ o "J. t - j. g-n 7ei e w e J. u t ~ , c n "#' sa t - a
>r
< 1 m
a
> r .
c [ g a= a - o /, . m_
/
m
$4
~ - E
. {
e<>. i(d -
!i,I
,i* A 8
_ii l Il !!
AP-3.14 0 APPENDIX C TYPICAL PROCESS BLOCK DIAGRAM 1 5g i jr . I gl g[ is l r! E Ii I i l
. t, r s
< p i!
= c-* 1 2 $: g g i * *I' lN l
-a!. f^ l i! h i
i g fi
. r -- 7 @'
i ll : > -._.-3t_i,5 i _e -
+8** i 1
_ _ _.___. E _ l _
._._ g _ _ g j i I ^
i I
; g-- : ek..- j i *
- ek I
j ; 7_._ - ; i i ii
- i lli_. _..e_i_^ig I
n i 1
- e1 i I L -
I +i i a 8 g g...q.g. p li .... g ^ _._._. _2 _g I j h i I' g r -e-* ! l
^
j i L-g ._ !. . ;- E . " i . 4 . l i 8 ^
! i r-- = a-- ^I l
- . . . . . h . . .,. . . . .g ! ;7 .
l
,,ll
@ }
it a 11 e lll El mwo,esoues Page 17 of 20 r.,. seeae4 cass>cocarnu
AP-3.14 0 APPENDIX C TYPICAL PROCESS BLOCK DIAGRAM i ! i !ll !li llll !! ! li
!l !!
!l!!I
!lii !'
I I illi11[il li i 5 i t! 8 B ;! e l ! lII !!!! ! ! j!!! ll ! ll! g!!! e e e e r DS D.LE O ChJ i Ob O @!
!i ! i .
I!! l llel l lg g' li ll! ilI il,j a l[ ' li i i lii gt il
' l I!1 lr,!I
!!i!!!! !!!!
QC QO D I
!p I.
!!Il1-l !
il l!l! I1 l!!! l I! I li ll li 11!111 I l! I 11 0 t b "o i i ! g i! il l! l '1i i i il il il !6i ,- i il li i i,j in li .!i l' u li p 5 1 i O O d 'd b b - ! N ' % 5o$as Page 18 of 20 ,. m .
AP-3.14 0 APPENDIX C TYPICAL PROCESS BLOCK DIAGRAM i il II il i. Il-l1i! I 1l l'g- Ws:la
!!!!! i t !i !l 1 l1l1,l!11 I 1. I N5 11 a gt k
@ E Q t;,
. I ! !
I i 1, ir 1! i! l
!I IE i!
l i, 8" ' ii!i ir if llI fi l1 !! 1l. !!! l!! 5 3 ijl l!!
!!I!II!!i!!ili!!!!!!l!!i11 b's ! lr!
e o a ir s : R+ lI, li! I!! . b!! !! ! lll lr
!! JE lll !53 si s1 il E E @ ED i i'i ii l
! I l
,'lii!!ijlli!jll!
i! l!l!)II j!i l!l ll !I E' E E E E g E E bbbb m,- me Page 19 of 20 r m mem l
AP-3.14 0 APPENDIX C TYPICAL LOGIC DIAGRAM anc niec PJus im 4 4
- 4 sn we #
cua n .e.a 4 ' As l 4 I As I I u
. . , i sa.nsas ens >tu we cust l
References:
- 1. Esp Epo,ttsta EPO EsFaC system test tesest Sha 31 WESTINGHe[SELOGICALCIII No,-S 7$5ac $ic [$ APPLICATION LOGIC DIAGRAM oc aj ' '
DOE!$ LETDN TO !$0L VLY #1
- r. stair,estoi acut neccessen start tocre sa: si
- s. stce,esto . erut peacessoa state Locic sni 52 Train: C Cabinet: 100 Zone: 19 Jerry Gutaan Rev. OKA 12/13/08 DWG-1000 SHEET:440 wwo=tm t Page 20 cd 20 r momcarmrw
AP600 Open hem Tracki:g Syit;m Dat: base: Exec ~ tiva Summary Date: 2/20/97 Selectie:: lDSER Sectionl like '185* Soned by item # item DSER Secthm/ Titic/ Description Resp (W) NRC No Branch Questkm Typc Detail Status Engineer Sutus Status Inter No / Date 1302 NRR/IIIIFB 1823.1-1 DSER-Ol MMIS Closed Resolved Westinghouse should identify the starting points for each human factor engineering (IIFE) activity (i c., those aspectio~f the analysis or design that~ are inputs to the IIFE program, rather than the result ofIIFE analyses sid evaluations) For example, if functions have been allocated to plant personnel, not as part of the itFE anal) sis, the allocations should be identified. Per conference call with NRC (1 Bongarra, G Galletti, J 011 ara, J lhggins) of 2/23S5: Action W - Send a draR of the associated document and/or revision to the applicable SSAR sections. _ Action W Per NRC letter of 3/22 and conference call with NRC (1 B&igarra, G Galletti, J 01tara, J liiggins) of 2/23N5 Actkm W - Revise SSAR section 18 8.2 to include details ofinitial assumptions and startmg points for the life design process and to clarify inputs to the lit E design process, any assumptions and the initial function allocations and control room resource selectkms (URD forms input to the IIF E process and basis for these assumptions) DraR of these revised SSAR sections will be sent to the NRC. Revision to MMIS Development Plan will be needed to ensure consistency. Revised AP600 human factors engineering program plan included as SSAR I8.2 in Revision 9,7/31N6 Action N - See NRC letter dated 12MN6. Resolved by NRC letter of 12/20 rLn I/28 1303 NRR/Illil B 18 2.3.2-1 DSIR4)I MMIS Closed Resolved
~
Westinghouse should provide information regarding the human system interface (IISI) team composition Westinghouse shouId ]
- identify team members with procedures background
- identify team memebers with safety system engineermg background
- identify team memebers with RAMI background provide the specific qualificatkms of the team members Per conference call with NRC (J Bongarra, G Galletti, J O'llara, I liiggins) of 2/23S5:
Action N - Send clarificatkm on the requirement to have a safety system engineer on the life design team Clarification on the qualification requirements of the saRy system engineer (Certificate from the Board of Certified Safety Professionals in System safetyM) lPer Resolved NRC letter of 3/2S6. Formal SSAR revision required F closure. Revised AP600 human factors engineering program p8 2 *d as SSAR I8.2 in Revision 9,7/31N6 Per conference call with NRC (1 Bongarra, G Galletti, : : liiggins) of 2/23M5: Action N - Send clariFratum on the requirement to have a safety system engineer on the life design team. Clare 4 he qualification requirements of the safety system elgineer (Certificate from the Board of Certified Safety Professionals in System sal" Westinghouse has prepared a draR revision to SSAR section 18 4 that addresses the DSER open items, except fe, the clarification informatum needed from the NRC on the System Safety Engineer. As soon as this information is provided,it mill be adden to the draft SSAR section 18 4 and the draR section will be sent to the NRC. Action N - NRC to review I8.4 markup and provide feedback. Resolved by NRC letter of 12/20 rkn 1/28 - . - . . . Page. I Total Records: 109
AP600 Open Itens Tracking Systen Database: Executive Sunissary Date: 2/20/97
. Selection: lDSER Section] like '18** Soned by Item #
Item DSER Section/ Title / Description Resp. (W) NRC No Beanch Q nestion Type Detail Status Engineer Status Status Istter No I Date - 1304 NRR/IllIFB 18 2.3.2-2 DSER-OI MMIS Closed Resolved Westmghouse should provide information regarding the job desenp- tions and assignments ofIISI personnel Per conference call with NRC (J.Bongarra, G Galleni, J O'llara, J liiggins) of 2/23/95: Action W - Names of assigned personnel are not needed. Send a draft of the associated document and/or reviske to the applicable SSAR sectkms Resolved Per NRC letter of 3/2/96. Formal SSAR revision required for closure. Per conference call with NRC (J.Bongarra, G Galletti, J O*llara, J liiggins)of 2/23/95: Names of assigned personnel are not needed. Send a draR of revision to the applicable SSAR sections. . A revision et the MMIS Development Plan will be needed for ctmsistency (post 5/31, pre all). Westinghouse sent (via fax) a dran revision to SSAR I B 4 to the NRC lillFB. Action N-NRC action is to review and provide feedbacit Revised AP600 human factors engineering program plan included as SSAR 18.2 in Revision 9,7/31/96 Resolved by NRC letter of 12/20. rkn 1/28 l Fage: 2 Total Records: 109
AP690 Open Item Tracking Syst;m Dat; base: Execctive Summary Date: 2/20/97 Selection: lDSER Section) hke 'l8 Sorted by item # Item DSLR Section/ Title / Description Resp (W) NRC No Ilranch Question Type Detail Status Engineer Status Status
--_ - Letter _No /_ . _. Date 1305 NRR!IlllFil 182.33-1 DSER-OI MMIS Resolved Westinghouse should provide information regarding the life process and procedures. Westinghouse should proviTdeCiPMidi, WCAP-9817, ,
OCS-GE3-011, and any additional documents that describe the aspects of the IIFE design process identified in this criterion, such as the
- Design Reviews and Configuration Control Documents" identified in Westinghouse's response to Q620.51 5
Meeting of 3MS5: Westinghouse will make available (place in the Rockville office) to the NRC an example of a system that went through the process (design process) such as the one we passed around at the meeting (AWARE Intermediate Design Review Report). The AP600 MMIS Development Plan will also be made available aner it is revised. Action N: NRC will review our design process as described in the SSAR, RAls and in WCAP 12601,9817 and the MMIS Ikvelopment Plan and provide us feedback. _.. Action W Suberiteria Ic. and Id. need to be addressed SSAR revision to 18.8.2 is needed. Needs to be conssistenet with MMIS Ikvelopment Plan. Meeting of 3MS5: Westinghouse will make available (place in the Rockville office) to the NRC an example of a sy stem that went through the process (design process) such as the one we passed around at the meeting (AWARE Intermediate Design Review Report) 1he AP600 MMIS Development Plan will also be made available aner it is revised. Action N: NRC will review our design process as described en the SSAR, RAls and in WCAP 12601,9817 and the MMIS Ikvelopment Plan and provide us feedback. i 4/l8M5 - NRC Conference call (1 Bongarra, J O'llara, J liiggins,S Kerch, LEaster, K Kices). NRC had reviewed WCAP 12601 and 98I7 which was made available in the Rockville office. NRC questions as transmitted by 4/10S5 fax were addressed. Action N: NRC action to re-evaluate based on the 4/18N5 discussions. NRC stated that additional information will hkely be needed to eventually close open items 18 2.3.3-n In the case of I8.2.3.3-1, the first four bullets under the criteria may require additional information, although the NRC would provide further feedback. Solution may be to sesise Q62014 and or Q620.15 (map to respective procedure in WCAP 12601) to address these first s' o ur bullets and then to revise the MMIS Development Plan to be consistent. Action N. NRC action to re-evaluate based on the 4/18S5 discussions. Following NRC feedbacL/clarificatiori, Westinghouse will send a draft of document addressing this open item. Revised AP600 human factors engineering program plan included as SSAR I8.2 in Revissor: 9,7/31N6. Resolved - See NRC letter dated 12NS6. W to providq(WCAP-14822)(QA/MMIS). rkn 1/28 (g(Af pMdad_Q/,(b_1 M3h-Nf(-97 -Nf[ l Page: 3 Total Records: 109 .__ . _ _ _ _ - . _ _ _ _ _ _ _ - _ _ _ _ _ _ - _ _ - _ - _ _ _ - - _ . -- _____- __ .-_ . ___-__-___ __-_~_____ -. .__ . - . - . . - . - . - .-- - . -
AP600 Open Item Tracking System Dat: base: Exec tiveSummary Date: 2/20/97
. Selectione: [DSER Section] like 'I 8$' Sotted by item #
Item DSER Section/ Title / Description Resp (W) NRC No Branch Question T)pe Detail Status Engineer us Status Lettet No. / Date 1306 NRR/IlllFB 18 2.3.3-2 DSER-OI MMIS Resolved Westmghouse should provide information regarding the llFE process management tools. Westinghouse should kv'ide WCAP-12601, WCAP-9817. OCS-GES-Oll, and any additional documents that descnbe the tools and techniques to be used by the team during the bli E design process as identified in this criterion. Meeting of 3/9N5: Action N. NRC will review our design process as described in the SSAR, RAls and in WCAP 12601,98I7 and the MMIS Development Plan and provide us feedback. Action W Need to address the tracking of design review action item chits and the use of the human factors checLilist. Refer to NRC letter of 3/22N6 Meeting of 3/9N5: Action N: NRC will review our design process as described in the SSAR, RAfs and in WCAP 12601, o817 and the MMIS Development Plan and provide us feedback. 4/l8/95 - NRC Confere w call (J Bongarra, J.O'llara, J lliggins,S Kerch, J Easter, K Kloes). NRC had reviewed WCAP 12601 and 98I7 which was mad: available in the Rockville office. NRC questions as transmitted by 4/ IONS fax were adressed. Action N: NRC action to re-evaluate based on the 4/l8 discussions NRC stated that additional information may be needed to es ntually close open items I8 2.3.3-n. NRC to provide i further feedback. In the case of 18.2.3.3-2. solution may be to revise Q620.15 to provide additional details on the tools and techmques (e g., revicw forms) that are used by the III-E design team to ensure they fullfill their responsibilities. Revise the MMIS Ikvekyment Plan to be consistent. Action N. NRC ection to re evaluate based on the 4/IBN5 discussions. Following NRC feedback / clarification, Westinghouse will send a draft of ' document addressing this open item Revised AP600 human factors engineering program plan included as SSAR 18.2 in Revision 9,7/31N6. ! I Resolved - See NRC letter dated 12/9/96. W to provid[ CAP-14827JQA/MMIS). rkn 1/28 g)Olf) g'd JJW(Q}.-j[9fy g Page. 4 Total Records: 109
AP600 Open Item Tracking System Dat base: Executiva Summary , Date: 2/20/97 i
- Selection: lDSER Section] like 'I8" Sorted by item #
Item DSER Section/ Titic/ Description Resp (W) NRC i. No Branch Question Type Detail Status Engineer atus Status Ixtter No. / Date 1307 NRR/lillFB 18 2.3.3-3 DSLR-Of MMIS Action N Westinghouse should provide information regarding the integration of design activities. Westinghoushould provide WCAP-12601, WCAP-9817. OCS-GES-011, and any addit;onal documents that describe the integration of the design activities of the IIFE design process as identified in this cnterion Meeting of 3NM5: Action N: NRC will review our design process as descnbod in the SSAR, RAls and in WCAP 12601,9817 and the MMIS Devekyrnent Plan and provide us feedback Resolved Per NRC letter of 3/22N6. SSAR revision needed for closure. Revised AP600 human factors engineering program plan included as SSAR I82 in Revision 9,7/3tN6 Meeting of 3 MMS: Action N: NRC will review our design process as described in the SSAR, RAls and in WCAP 82601,9817 and the MMIS Development Plan and provide us feedback 4/l 8S5 - NRC Conference call (J Bongarra, J 011 ara, J Iliggins,S Kerch, J Easter, K Klocs): NRC had reuemed WCAP 12601 and 9817 which was made available in the Rocksille omcc. NRC questions as transmitted by 4/10/95 fax were adressed Action N: NRC action to re< valuate based on the discussions. NRC stased that additional information may be needed to eventually close open items I8.23.3-n In the case of I8 23 3-3 solution may be to revise the MMIS Development Plan by adding a section 4.5 titled ' Integration of life and Other Plant Design Activities" and describe examples ofintegration and how it is done (e g., SSD sections 7,8; allocations; FBTA output and verification ofI & C needs; ERG's. ERG I & C task analysis; ). Another option would be to include this info in Q620.15 revision and then later in the development plan for consistency. Action N: NRC action to re-evaluate based on the 4/18S5 discussions Following NRC feedback / clarification, Westinghouse will send a draft of I document addressing this open item by 6/23MS. Action N - See NRC letter dated 12SN6. NkC to confirm acceptability of WCAP-14822 draft so that W can provihCAP-1482)y end-Feb rkn 1/28 We peGc4cl z/24 by Ms0 - nec-% - 49W- - Page: 5 Total Records: 109
AP600 Open It;m Tracking Syst;m Database: Execctiva Summary Date: 2/20/97
. Selection: [DSER Section] like 'l 8** Sorted by item #
Item DSER Section/ Title / Description Resp (W) NRC No liranch Question Type Detail status Engineer stat Status letter No. / Date 1308 NRR/lllIFB 182.33-4 DSER-OI MMIS Contefff5I Action N [ Westinghouse should provide information regardmg the life program milestones. Westinghouse should protide WCAP-12601, WCAP-9817 OCS-GES-011. and any additional documents that describe the llFE program milestones as identified in this criterion. Meeting of 3/9/95: Action N: NRC will review our design process as described in the SSAR, RAls and in WCAP 12601,9817 and the MMIS Development Plan and provide us feedback Resolved Per NRC letter of 3/22N6. Formal SSAR revision needed for closure. Revised AP600 human factors engineering program plan included as SSAR I8 2 in Revision 9,7/31/96. Meeting of 3 MMS: Action N: NRC will review our design process as described in the SSAR, RAls and in WCAP 12601,9817 and the MMIS Development Plan and provide us feedback. 4/18N5 - NRC Conference call (J Bongarra, J O'llara, J liiggins,S Kerch, J Easter, K K!oes). NRC had reviewed WCAP 12601 and 9817 which t was made available in the Rockville ofYice. NRC questions as transmitted by 4/10/95 fax were adressed. Action N: NRC action to re-evaluate based on the discussions. NRC stated that additional information may be needed to eventually close open items 18.2 3.3-n in the case of 18.213-4, solution may be to revise the MMIS Development Plan by adding a subsection to section 3 0 titled
- Relative Schcoule oflif-E Program Milestones"(use the simplified MMIS Design block diagram that was presented during March 9 meeting.) and revise the Scheduled FOAKE Tasks l' and C- --ts subsection to reflect the current iOAKE schedule (use the high level bar graph schedule.)
Action N: NRC mion to re-evaluate based on the 4/lBS5 discussions. Following NRC feedback / clarification. Westinghouse mill send a draft of document addressing this open item by 6/23M5. Action N - See NRC letter dated 12N/96.
- NRC to confirm acceptability of WCAP-14822 draft so that W can provide [ CAP-14822)y end-Feb rLn 1/28 __ _
M ON b-Nk-@-NTT GN 2 - i I I i Page: 6 Total Records: 109
. .- . ._ . . - - . , -- - - . , ~. -- ~ . . . . _ - . - . - - . - - , ~ . _ . .- -. ~ . . .
AP600 Open it;mi Trackirg System Dat . base: Exec tivaS:mmary Dat:: 2/20/97
. Selection: (DSER Section) like *18** Sorted by item #
item DSER Section/ Titic/ Description Resp (W) NRC . . No Branch Question Type Detail Status Engineer Status letter No. I Date NRR/IlllFB 18 2.3.3-5 DSER-Of Kerch, S. 1309 Resolved
" Westinghouse should provide life documentation. Westinghouse should provide WCAP-12601. WCAP-9317.OCS-GES-Oll, and any additional documents that desenbe the IIFE documentation and associated procedures as identified in this criterion. .
{ Meeting of 3NNS: Action N: NRC will review our design process as described in the SSAR, RAls and in WCAP 12601,9817 and the MMIS Ikvelopment Plan and provide us feedback. Closed NRC considers this open item
- resolved
- per NRC letter of 3/22N6, but they do not specify any further actions that are needed such as a SSAR ,
revision. I believe that no further action is required. Meeting of 3NN5: Action N. NRC will review our design process as described in the SSAR, RAls and in WCAP 12601. 9817 and the MMIS ; Development Plan and provide us feedbacit ! 4/l8N5 - NRC Conference call (J Bongarra, J O'llara, J liiggins,S Kerch, J Easter, K Kloes) NRC had reswed WCAP 12601 and 9817 which was made available in the Rockville office. NRC questions as transmitted by 4/10/95 fax were adressed Action N NRC action to re-evaluate based on the discussions. NRC stated that additional information may be needed to eventaally close open items 18 2.3 3-n in the case of I8.2.3.3- i 5, further clarification is needed from NRC. Action N: NRC action to re-evaluate based on the 4/ISN5 discussions. Following NRC feedback / clarification, Westinghouse will send a draft of i document addressing this open item by 6/2?t95. Revised A uman factors engineering program plan included as SSAR I8.2 in Revision 9,7/3IN6. W to prov ' CAP-1482DQA/MMIS). rkn 1/28 gg g'Myg J$Q([- @]g + . Page: 7 Total Records: 109 _ _ . . _.. a _____.m_ .m._. ____m ___.m. _ ._ _ _. ___m.___ ___v. -- _ _ _ . . _ . _ . _ v,- *, . -w.-' - . - , .w,-ev*-- 3 -- v~ ,.
.~_ -_- . - ~ - - _ _ . _ . . . _ . _ _ . _ . - . - . _ _ - , . - - , - - -
5 AP649 Open Item Tracking Systeam Database: Emeestive Sesamery Date: 2/24/97
. Selection {DSER Section] like'18 Sorted by item #
r item . DSER Sectionf Title /Desenption Resp (W) NRC ; No- Branch Quesnon Type Detail Staeus Engineer Status Letter No. / Date 1310 NRR/lHffB 1823 M DSER-OI MMIS ConfragrW Action N ! Westinghouse should provide information regardag the - - f-e of the ifFE subcontractor with IHli requaements. Westinghouse should provide WCAP-12601, WCAP-9817.OCS-GES-Oll, and any additional documents that descree how the subcontractor's compliance with IIFE . regereinents is verified as identified in this criterion. i Meeting of 3/9N5: t Action N: NRC will review our design process as described in the SSAR, RAls and in WCAP 12601.9817 and the MMis Development Plan and provide us feedback Resolved . Per NRC letter of 3/22/96. Formal SSAR revsitm is needed. Revised AP600 human factors engineerug program plan included as SSAR I8.2 in Revisism 9. 7/3 tN6 , Meeting of 3/9/95: Action N: NRC will review our design process as descnbed in the SSAR, RAls and in WCAP 12601,9817 and the MMIS ! IL ' , - Plan and provide us feedback ; 4/I8/95 - NRC Conference call (J.Bongarra, J Ullara, J Higgins,S Kerch, J Easeer, K.Kloes): NRC had reviewed WCAP 12601 and 9887 which was made available in the Rockville office. NRC questions as transmitted by 4/10/95 fax were adressed We staned that flFE considerations were [ given to subcontractors through (1) the fact that WCAP 1260I is given to all subcontractors and all must folkvw its procedures in content and , format. Ex. AP3.1 sections 23,5,6b and 7 are examples of HF considerations.; and (2) through the fact that general design crieeria are given to all i subcontracton that a;e effected by them Ex. I & C General Design Criteria, section 7. The technical ihunnent control procedures govern the ! desereution and release of AP600 documents (AP 61,6 2 and 63). Provide this answer in revision to Q620.15 as Jun suggested or add a l subsection to section 4.0 of the MMIS Development Plan- 3 Action W is to make the I & C General Design Criteria Document avsilable in the Rockville office for their review and also proof that it went to applicable subconeractors i 4/25/95 - Fas sent to J Hongarra and J UHara that provides a response to this open item. The 14C General Design Criteria chunnent w as placed ; e the Rockville office (by A Seenks, attendmg an NRC meetmg in Rockville). { Action N: The NRC to review the response and determine whether it is acceptable / provide feedback Revised AP600 human factors engineerug program plan included as SSAR 18.2 in Revision 9,7/31N6 This includes SSAR 18 2 3 5. Ill E in Subcontractor Efforts. l Action N - See NRC leteer dated 12/9/96. l NRC and is to be toincorporated confirm into sent acceptabilsty F,SAR revision ska 1/28 of WCAP-14822 gg gg draR pgso that W can provhAP-148h{el W-(991 kfp1 55Ad Ck ) . f Page: 8 Total Records: 109 i
. i AP600 Open Item TracMag System Database: Executive Summar7 Date: 2/20/97 . Selection: [DSER Sectiord like *I8** Sorted by item #
item psg.R Sectron/ Title /Descriptum Resp (W) NRC , No tiranch Questen Type Detad Status Engmeer status Status Istier No. / Date 131I NRR/Illltil 182.34-1 DSER-OI
- MMIS trW Action N Westinghouse should provide information regarding the llFE issues trackmg system avadability. Westinghouse should submit WCAPs-9565, 12601, and 9817, as well as any additional documents that describe the tracking system and cl.ecklists as identified in this cnterion. i Meetmgof 3/9/95:
Westmghouse described our design issues tracking system. Tracking ofIIFE related design issues is not a separate entitiy but is part of the overall AP600 design process and design issues tracking Processes for tracking design issues. including lif E issues, are (l .) the DCP process as descnbed m WCAP I2601 AP3 2; (2 ) the design review pmcess as described in WCAP 1260I, AP 3 5 and WCAP 98I7 (human factors checklist), (3 ) p Use of SSDs - AP 3 I ansd AP3.14 of WCAP 12601. Also a writers guide esists for SSDs. De Interface Requirements or the iluman Factors Requirements of the SSDs will be used to document and track life related issues not currently addressed by the design and identified prior to DCP or design review. Final closure of these issues is verified in the validation of the ilSI versuses their functional requirements. (his description also applies to open items 18 23 4-2 thru 4 4 ) Action W: Per NRC letter of 3/22/96, the NRC stated that they found our life issues Tracking System described in the draR ofI8 4 4 as acceptable, bid they wanied to know when they could visit us and verify its implementation. At this point, the red team decided that our system (as described in the dran of I8.4 4) had some problems and might not pass an inspection from the NRC. Internal meetings are planned to discuss nuwlifications to the tracking system. Meeting of 3/9/95: Westinghouse described our design issues tracking system. Tracking ofIIFE related design issues is not a separate entitiy but is part of the overall AP600 design process and design issues tracking. Processes for tracking design issues, including IIFE issues, are (1 ) the trP process as described in WCAP 12601 AP3 2; (2.) the design review process as described in WCAP 12601, AP 3.5 and WCAP 9817 (human factors checklist), (3 ) Use of SSDs - AP 3 I ansd AP314 of WCAP 12601. Also a uviters guide exists for SSDs. De Interface Requirements or the 11uman Factors Requirements of the SSDs will be used to document and track llFE related issues not currently addressed by the design and identified prior to DCP or design review Final closure of these issues is verified in the validation of the llSI versuses their functnmal requirements. (This description also applies to open items 18 23 4-2 thru 4-4 ) Also consider using the URD comphance database as amther method used to track design issues. 4/I 8/95 - NRC Conference call (1 liongarra, J O'llara, J liiggms.S Kerch, J Easter, K Kloes). NRC had reviewed WCAP 12601 and 9817 which was made available in the Rockville ofTice. NRC questions as transmitted by 4/1095 fax were adressed NRC stated to be sure to include in the revision to Q620.15 m description of the cutoff point for closure of design review action item chits (shipment Mthe product -if any oustanding chits, then per NQA-1 the customer must be informed ) Instead of revision 2 to Q620.15. Westinghouse will sent a draR of SSAR sectiui 18.4 4 (IIFE Issues Tracking) to the NRC 1111111. Action N-NRC action is to review this draR and provide feedback. Revised AP600 human factors engmeering program plan included as SSAR I8.2 in Revision 9,7/31196 This includes SSAR I8 2 4. Iluman Factors Engineering Issues Tracking. NRC to confum acceptabihty of WCAP-14822 draR so that W can providkAP-1. y end-ieb and NRC to confirm acceptabdity of DIT mieminfa ran ii28 wfAf_pcoiduf 2/4 ~ 1/uwaf( yMr- ___ t L Page: 9 Total Records: 109
AP600 Open Item Tracking System Database: Executive Summary Date: 2/20/97 Selection: lDSI'.R Section] like 'l 8v' Sorted by item # Item DSI R Secton/ Titic/Desenption Resp (W) NRC No liranch Question lype Detail Status Engmeer States Status Date
. . _ _ _ _ _ . _ . _ _ . _ _ ___ Letter No. / _
1312 NRR/Iliff B 18234-2 DSLR-OI MMIS Closed Actiem N
~ ~ ~
WestinghAse sEid proside information regardmg the ill E issues tracking syster% method Westinghouse should subrE5C'~ b-56U[6fl[ and 9817, as well as any additional documents that describe the method fa. Handems !!FE issues as identified in this criteriori. Action W: Per NRC letter of 3/22N6, the NRC stated that they found our llFE issues Tracking System described in the draft of I8 4 4 as acceptable, but they wanted to know when they could visit us and verify its implementatinn At this point, the red team decided that our system (as descnbed in the draft of IS 4 4) had some problems and might not pass an inspection from the NRC. Intemal rnectings are planned to discuss modificatens to the tracking system Meeting of 3NN5- Westmghouse described our design issues smLing system. Tracking of lil'E related duign issues is not a separate entitiy but
, is part of the overall AP600 design process and design issues tracking Processes for tracking design issues, includmg Ill'E issues, are (1.) the DCP process as described in WCAP 12601, AP3 2. (2.) the design review process as described in WCAP 12601, AP 3 5 and WCAP 98I7 (human factors checklist), (3 ) Use of SSDs - AP 3 I ansd AP314 of WCAP I2601. Also a wnters guide exists fw SSDs.1he Interface Requirements or
'the lluman Factors Requirements of the SSDs will be used to document and track llFE related issues not currently addressed by the design and identified prior to DCP or design review. Final closure of these issues is venfied in the validation of the llSI versuses their functional equirements. (This description also applies to open items 18 2.3 4-2 thru 4-4 ) Also consider using the URD compliance database as another method used to track design issues.
l/l8N5 - NRC Conference call (J Bengarra, J Ollara, J liiggms.S Kerch. J Easter. K Kloest NRC had reviewed WCAP 12601 and 9817 whoch was made avadable in the Roch ville ofTice. NRC questions as transmitted by 4/10N5 fax =cre adressed NRC stated to be sure to melude in the ntvision to Q62015 a descripton of the cutoff point for closure of design review action item chits (shipment of the product -if any oustandmg thits, then per NQA-I the customer must be informed ) Instead of revision 2 to Q62015. Westinghouse sent a draft of SSAR section 18 4 4 (IIF E Issues TracLing) to the NRC filllR Action N- NRC action is to review this draA and pnnide feedback F!ctised AP600 human factors engineering program plan moluded as SSAR I8 2 in Revision 9. 7/33N6 This includes SSAR I8 2 4. Iluman i actn Engmeermg issues Tracking Action N per NRC letter of 12/20N6. rkn 1/28 _ . - . - . - - - .. . - - . .- - _ _ . Page: 10 Total Records: 109
AP600 Open Item Tracking System Database: Executive Summary Date: 2/20/97
. Selection: lDSER Se etion] like '18 Sorted by item #
Item DSER Sectson/ Title / Description Resp (W) NRC No flranch tjuestion T)pe __ Detail Status Engineer Status Status g.etter No / Date 1313 NRR/IllG D 182.34-3 DSI R-OI MMIS Closed Action N
' Westinghouse should provide informatkm regarding the lif'E issues tracking system documentatkw Westinghouse should submit WCAPs-9565, 12601, and 9817, as well as any additional documents that describe the method for documenting Iff E issues as identified in this criterkm.
Action W: Per NRC letter of 3/22N6. the NRC stated that they foir1d our IIFE issues Tracking System described in the draft of 18 4.4 as acceptable, bu they w anted to know when they could visit us and verify its implementation. At this point, the red team decided that our system (as described in the draft of 18 4 4) had some problems and might not pass an inspection from the NRC. Internal meetings are planned to discuss modifications to the tracking system Meeting of 3/9N5. Westmghouse described our design issues tracking system. Tracking oflif E reiated design issues is not a separate entitiy but is part of the overall AP600 design process and design issues tracking Processes for tracking design issues. including ill E issues, are (1 ) the DCP process as described in WCAP 12601, AP3 2; (2 ) the design review process as described in WCAP 12601 AP 3 5 and WCAP 9817 (human factors checklist), (3 ) Use of SSDs - AP 3 I ansd AP314 of WCAP I2601. Also a writers guide cuists for SSDs The Interface Requirements or the ilumen Factors Requirements of the SSDs will be used to document and track IIE related issues not currently addressed by the design and identified prior to DCP or design review. Final closure of these issues is verified in the ,alidatxwi of the 1851 versuses their functional requiicments. (This description aise apphes to open items 18 2.3 4-2 thru 4-4 ) Also consider using the URD comphance database as another method used to track design issues. 4/18/95 - NRC Conference call (J Bongarra, J (yllara, J liiggins S Kerch, J Easter, K Kkes) NRC had reviewed WCAP 12601 and 9817 which was made avbitable in the Rockville ofTice. NRC questions as transmitted by 4/10N5 fax were adressed. NRC stated to be sure to include in the revision to Q6u15 m description of the cutoff point for closure of design review action item chits (shipment of the product -if any oustanding chits, then per NQA-1 the customer must be informed ) Instead of reesion 2 to Q62015. Wes mghouse sent a draft of SSAR section 18 4 4 (Ill'E Issues Tratking) to the NRC Illif B. Acton N-NRC '.senion is to review this draft and provide feedback. Revised AP600 human factors engmeeting program pian included as SSAR 18.2 in Revision 9,7/31/96. This inchides SSAR 18 2 4. Iluman Factors Engineering Issues Tracking. Action N gtr NRC letter of 12/20N6 rkn i/28 _ . . - . - - - - - _ . . - - - . . - Page. 11 Total Records: 109
AP600 Open item Tracking System Database: Executive Sunessary Date: 2/26/97
. Selecties: lDSER Section]like'18** Sorted by Itern #
Item DSLR Section/ Title / Description Resp (W) NRC No Branch Question 1)pc Detail Status - Engineer Status Status Letter No. / Date 1314 NRR/Illit B 182.34-4 DSI R-OI MMIS Closed Resolved
~
Westinghouse should provide information regarding responsibility for the life issues tracking system Westinghouse should submit WCAPs-9565,1260I, and 9817, as well as any additional documents that describe the responsibilities of personnel involved in the tracking and resolutkm ofIIFE issues as identified in this critenon. _ Resolved Per NRC letter of 3/22N6 Closure requires forrnal retision to the SSAR gRevised AP600 human factors engineering program plan included as SSAR 18.2 in Revision 9,7/3 tN6 This includes SSAR 18.2 4. Iluman Tactors Engmeeting Issues Tracking. Meeting of 3NN5: Westinghouse described our design issues tracking system Tracking ofIIFE related design issues is not a separate entitiy but is part of the overall AP600 design process and design issues tracking Processes for tracking design issues, includmg IIFE issues, are (I ) the DCP process as described in WCAP 12601, AP3 2; (2 ) the design review process as described in WCAP 12601, AP 3.5 and WCAP 9817 (human factors checklist), (3.) Use of SSDs - AP 3.1 ansd AP314 of WCAP 12601 Also a writers guide exists for SSDs lhe interface Requirements or the llumen Factors Requirements of the SSDs will be used to docume it and track life related issues not currently addressed by the design and identified prior to DCP or design review. I inal closure of these issues is verified in the validation of the itSI versuses their functional
%.. a..a (This description also applies to open items 18 2.3 4-2 thru 4-4 ) Also consider using the URD compliance database as another rnethod used to track design issues.
4/1 BN5 - NRC Conference call (1 Bongarra, J O'llara, I liiggins S.Kerch, J Easter, K Kloes). NRC had reviewed WCAP 12601 and 9817 which was made available in the Rockville office. NRC questions as transmitted by 4/10N5 fax were adressed NRC stated to be sure to include in the revision to Q620.I5 a descriptien of the cutoff point for closure of design review action item chits (shipment of the product -if any oustanding chits, then per NQA-I the customer must be informed ) Instead of revision 2 to Q62015 Westmghouse sent a drah of SSAR section 18 4 4 (IIFli istues Tracking) to the NRC lilIFB. Action N-NRC action is to review this draA and provide feedback. Resolved - See NRC letter dated i2N/96. also NRC letter of 12/20. rkn 1/28 1315 NRR/lilIFB 182.35-1 DSER-OI MMIS Closed Resolved Westinghouse should provide information regardmg the life program elements and docurnentation Westinghouse should describe the
,.,vy __zic relationship between the llFE program and PRA/IIRA related activities, as well as the llFE program documentation for OLR, IIRA, and TAE activities.
Action W: Revise SSAR section 18 8 2.1 (MMIS Design Process) to include details ofinitial assurnptions and starting points for the IIFE design process and to clarify the initial function allocations and control room resource selections (URD forms input to the life process and basis for these assumptions). Include IIRA, OER, and test & evaluation results as an input to the design process (refer to DSFR eval section for this open item) Reference the llRA-IlFE Integration Implementation Plan docurrent in the SSAR section. DraR of these resised SSAR sectkms will be sent to the NRC. MMIS Development Plan needs to be consistent. Revised Chapter I8 of the AP600 SSAR submitted in Revision 9,7/3tN6. Resolved - See NRC letter dated 12NN6. and NRC letter of 12/20. rkn 1/28 __ Page: 12 Tetal Records: 109
t AP600 Open Itene Tracking Systene Database: Ezecctive Sauemary Date: 2/29/97 ,
- Selection: [DSER Section) like *18 Sorted by item 8 [
Item DSER Section/ Tnic/Desenption Resp (W) NRC No. Branch Question Type Detail Status Engmeer Status Status Lener No. / Dec ' j 1316 NRR/IIIIFH 18331-1 DSER4M MMlWerch Closed Resolved NTIMdRCM845 Westinghouse should provide a comparison to predecessor plants and systems. Westinghouse should descnbe how they will apply the lowpsure reference plant concept to the OER, and then apply it appropnasely in therh.. -.2 of a review ofogwrating expenence. I Per conference call wish NRC (J Bongarra, G Galletti, J O'llara, J iliggins) of 2/23/95: { Action W - NRC says that rev. I to RAI Q620 9 dnes not completely clanfy. Westinghouse to review *lli E Insights For Advanced Reactors Based Upon Operating Expericince" transmitted to Westinghouse on 2/13/95. Place this item on 3/8 agenda i Meeting of 3/9/95: , i Action W: Westinghouse to perform an OER that addresses open items 18 3.3.1-1 thru l-3,2-1 thru 2-3. In the Of R report we mill clarify that [ OER did not reflect the low-pressure plant as the predecessor reference plant. We will describe the scope of the piant esperience reviewed The i low pressure reference plant was used as the starting pomt for AP600 ERG development, but is not the predecessor plant for the OER. In general. l Westinghouse PWR expenence will be reviewed. .; i Also refer to Meeting Open leem, dbase item number 2063. ,h Action N Resolved - DraA OER report provided by NSD-NRC-96-4722 on 5/14N Chapter i8 of the SSAR to be reviwd to reference this document Revised Chapter 18 of the AP600 SSAR submitted in Revision 9,7/31/96 OER is referenced in SSAR 383 Formal WCAP transmittal will be made following receipt of NRC comments. I i Element 2. Comments recieved from NRC on 8/13. To close this item, SSAR Chl8 was submitted and we owe a rev to WCAP-14645, ! Closed with WCAP submittal on 10/17% rkn 10/25 , NRC w %.. with status in NSD-NRC-96-4874. rl6n 12/19 _
'f t
[ I l Page: I3 Total Records: 109 _ _ . __ __ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ . . . _ . ___ _ __ ___ _ ___ _ ______________ _ ___ _ _ _ _ _ _ . . _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ __ _ _ _ _ _ . _ _ _ _ _ _ _ __________a
AP600 Opca Item Tracking System Database: Execctiv2 Summary Date: 2/20/97
. Selection: lDSI:R Section] like 'I8$' Sorted by item #
Item I)Si R Section/ Title / Description Resp (W) NRC No liranch Question
- - . - - - T)pc - Detail Status Engineer status Status Date I etter No. / _ _ _
1317 NRR/lilliil 18331-2 16ER4)I
- MMIS/Kerch Closed Resolved NTD-NRC 96-4845
- ~
Westmghouse should prlodTefNation regarding industry life issues flie we preparirig the final $$AR, WeEinghouse should ensure thaiE OER addresses the human factors aspects of all issues identified in Appendix Il of the PRM and additional IIFE-related operating experience issues (e g , NRC Ilulletms and Generic l ctiers) identified in Chapter 20 of this report. Meeting of 3N!95: Acton W. Westinghouse to perform an OER that addresses open items 18 3 31-1 thru l-3. 2-I thru 2-3. ____ _ __ Action N esolved - Draft Operating Experience Review (GER) report provided by NSD-NRC-96-4722 on 5/14M6 Chapter i8 of the SSAR to be resised to ference this document. Revised Chapter 18 of the AP600 SSAR submitted in Revision 9,7/3186 OER is referenced in SSAR 18 3. Formal WCAP transmittal will be made following receipt of NRC comments. Dement 2. Commersts recieved from NRC on 8/13. To close this item, SSAR Chl8 was submitted and we owe a rev to % CAP-14645 bosed with WCAP submittal on 10/17N6. rkn 10/25 Reopened at NRC request. OER WCAP markup pages faxed 12/19 for concurrence rkn12/19 Acton N - See NRC letter dated 12M/96 (No, the letter dated 12N came in before this item m as resolved, i e., its old news) His item mas closed with submittal of the OER WCAP Revision 2 and SSAR Rev 10. rkn 1/1587. 1318 NRR/l(IIFil 18331-3 DSER-OI MMIS/Kerch Closed Resolved NT D-NRC-96-8845 Westinghouse should describe how they have included related IISI technologies in the OER. Meeting of 3M/95: Action W: Westinghouse to perform an OER that addresses open items 18 3 31-1 thru l-3. 2-1 thru 2-3. In the OER repmt, ulwre there is no nuclear plant expenence for the 1151 technology being applied to AP600, reference the reports that document research performed for operstmg experience in other industries. Reference to be done by title, author, date. (The committment to perform these reticws for areas where we are intendmg to apply new technologies is in revision I to RAI 620.9) Action W Resolved - Draft OER report prosided by NSD-NRC-96-4722 on 5/1466. Chapter 18 of the SSAR to be resised to reference this document Revised Chapter 18 of the AP600 SSAR submitted in Revision 9,7/31/96 OER is referenced in SSAR 18 3. Fonnal WCAP transmittal will be made following receipt of NRC comments. Element 2. Comments recieved from NRC on 8/13. To close this item, SSAR Chl8 was submitted and we owe a rev to WCAP-14645 Closed with WCAP submittal on 10/17/96. rkn 10/25 Resolved per NRC letter on Element 2, rkn 12/486 See NSD-NRC-96-4874. rkn 12/19. __ _ . _ _ __.____ _ . . _ _ Page. 14 Total Records: 109
AP600 Open Item Tracking Systeni Database: Execttive Seminaary Date: 2/20/97 Selection: (()SER Section] like'18** Sorted by item # Item DSER Section/ Titic/ Description Resp (W) NRC No Branch Question T3pc Detail Status Engineer ' Status Status txtter No. / Date 1319 NRiuliliFB 1833.1-4 DSE R-OI MMIS/Kerch Closed Resolsed NTD-NRC-96-4845 Westinghouse should provide information regardmg the results of operator interviews. Westinghouse should provide the cornent and results of the operator inteniews to the statT and dernonstrate how they address this criterion. Meeting of 3/9/95. Action W: Westinghouse to perform an OER that addresses open items 18 33 I-I thru l-3,2-1 tinu 2-3. _ Action N Resolved - DraR OER report submitt,:d by NS8wRC-96-4722 on 5/14/96. Chapter i8 of the SS AR to be resised to reference this docwnent gRevised Chapter 18 of the AP600 SSAR submitted 'n Resisen 9,7/31/96. OER is referenced in SSAR 18 3. hwmal WCAP transmittal will be
'made following receipt of NRC comments Element 2.
Comments recieved from NRC on 8/13. To dos: this item SSAR Chl8 was submitted and we owe a rev to WCAP-14645 Closed with WCAP submittal on 10/17/96 Ln 10/25 Requested additional information from Westinghouse by 12/4 letter. rLn 12/4 Status confirmed see NSD-NRC-96-4874. rkn 12/19 Action N - See NRC letter dated 12/9/96. - this was not true since it had been resolved by telecon 12/19 consistent with previous ref. RESOINED rkn i/28/97. 1320 NRR/IlllFB 18331-1 DSER-OI MMIS/Kerch Closed Resolsed N55NRC-96-4845
^
" Westinghouse should provide information regarding the operating event report (OfR) issue anald 5 Westinghouse sIIo^uid dewribe how the (di will address issues related to human performance and problems and sources of human error. In addition, Westinghouse should describe how the IIFE design addresses the issues raised by the OER.
Meeting of 3/9/95. Action W: Westinghouse to perform an OER that addresses open items 18 33.1-1 thru l-3,2-1 thra 2-3 _ _ _ . _ __ Action N Resolved - DraA OER report submitted by NSD-NRC-96-4722 on 5/I4/96 Chapter I B of the SSAR to be revised to seference this document. Revised Chapter 18 of the AP600 SSAR submitted in Revision 9,7/31/96. OER is referenced in SSAR 18 3. Formal WCAP transmittal will be made following receipt of NRC comr icnts Element 2. Comments recieved from NRC on 8/13. To close this item, SSAR Chl8 was submitted and we owe a rev to WCAP-14645 Closed with WCAP submittal on 10/17/96. rkn 10/25 ' NRC concurrence with status per NSD-NRC-96-4874. rkn 12/19 Page: 15 Total Records: 109
AP600 Open Item Tracking System Database: Executiv2 Summary Date: 2/20/97
. Selection: [DSER Sectionj like '18** Sorted by item #
Item DSI R Section/ Title / Description Resp (W) NRC No 11 ranch Question Type Detail Status Engineer Status Status letter No / _ _ . _ _ _ _ . . . _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ . . _ _ . _ _ _ _ _ . _ _ - _ Date _ _ _ 1321 NRR/lillFil 183322 DSER-Of MMIS/Kerch Closed Resolved NTD-NRC-96-4845
~ - ~
'W'estin'g'howlisEmid provide documentation ofits analysis of operating esperience. Westinghouse should proside an OER report that adequately documents the results of the reviews and how the findmgs are (or mill be) addressed by the AP600 design Meeting of 3/9/95.
Acton W: Westinghouse to perform an OER that addresses open items 18.331-1 thru l-3,2-1 thru 2-3 ne OER report needs to discuss the llSI OCR relative to SPDS, AWARE, COMPRO __ Action N Resobed - Draft OER report submitted by NSD-NRC-96-4722 on 5/14/96 Chapter 18 of the SSAR to be reued to reference this document Retised Chapter 18 of the AP600 SSAR submitted in Retision 9. 7/31/96. OER is referenced in SSAR 18 3 Formal WCAP transmittal will be made following receipt of NRC comments. Element 2. Cornments recieved from NRC on 8/13. To close this item, SSAR Chl8 was submitted and we owe a rev to WCAP-14645 Closed with WCAP submittal on 10/17/96. rkn 10/25 NRC w .w....s with status per NSD-NRC-96-4874. rkn 12/19 ___ _____ _ 1322 NRR/lillfil 18332-3 DSER-OI MMIS/Kerch Closed Resolved NTILNRC-96-4845 Westinghouse should provide mformation regarding the incorpora- tion of issues into the tracking system Westinghouse should describe how each operating experience issue determined to be appropnate for incorporation into the design is entered into the sy stem. Meetmgof 3/9/95: Action W: Westinghouse to perform an OER that addresses open items 13.3.3.I-1 thru l-3. 2-1 thru 2 3 Westinghouse needs to pros ide a discussion (at end of OER report) of how we continue to address OER committment). Informal day to day communicatkus summaritmg Ceneric letters, Information Notices, daily Site Sevice manager reports, etc. Formal process would reque a review and disposition of those that are issued between design certification and plant order. Also, describe how those OER IIFE issues rmt currently addressed by the AP600 design are entered into the tracking system _ _ _ _ Draft OER report submined by NSD-NRC-96-4722 on 5/l4/96. Chapter 18 of the SSAR to be revised to reference this document Revised Chapter 18 of the AP600 SSAR submitted in Revision 9. 7/31/96. OER is reference in SSAR 18 3. Tracking system is described in SSAR 18 2 4. Formal OER WCAP transmittal will be made following receipt of NRC comments Element 2. Comments recieved from NRC on 8/13. To close this item, SSAR Chl8 was submitted and we oue a rev to WCAP-14645. Closed with WCAP submittal on 10/17/96. rkn 10/25 Requested additional information of Westinghouse by 12/4 letter. rkn 12/4 Closed / Resolved by NSD-NRC-96-4874. rkn I2/19 Action N - See NRC letter datcJ 12/9/96~ - this was not true since it had been resolved by telecon 12/19 consistent with previous ref RESOEVED rkn l'28/97. _ _ _ . _ _ _ _ . _ _ _ _ _ _ . . . _ . _ _ _ . _ . _ _ Page: 16 Total Records: 109
AP600 Open Item Treeking System Dat: base: Executive Summary Date: 2/20/97 Seleelien: [DSER Sectionl like 'IB** Sorted by Item # Item DSER Sectum/ Titic/Descriptkm Resp (W) NRC No. Branch Question T}pe Detail Staus Engineer Status Status Dale letter No / _ 1323 NRR/IlllFH 184311 DSER-OI MMIS!Kerch Closed Resolved NSD-NRC-96-4831 Westmghouse should provide information regarding the source materials for the requirements analysis metinslogy. Westinghouse should identify the industry standards, guidelines, or practices used to perform the functional av; a.m.e analysis. Meeting of 3885: Action N - Westinghouse has asked that element three be reviewed at the compicte element lesel. NRC to resisit the criteria for element 3 (15 open items; I8.4...) and re-propose a focused set ofissues based on our discussio.1 Refer to new meeting open item which is dabase item Number ; 2064. Action W Meeting of 3885 Action N - Westinghouse has asked that element three be resicwed at the complete element lesel NRC to resisit the criteria for element 3 (15 open items; 18 4.- ) and re-propose a focused set ofissues based on our discussion. Refer to new meeting open item which is , dabase item Number 2064. Action W: Document (sent by the NRC on 5/15M5) that tefocuses the element 3 open items w as received on 5/22. Westinghouse will provide a draft response to this document Draft WCAP-14644 submitted by NSD-NRC-96-4722 on 5/14N Chapter I8 of the SSAR to be revised to reference this document Revised Chapter 18 of the AP600 SSAR submitted in Revision 9,7/3th WCAP-14644 is referenced in SSAR 18 4,l'unctional Requirements Analysis and Allocation Formal WCAP transmittal will be made following receipt of NRC comments Element 3. Comments Recieved from NRC on 8/13. To close this item, SSAR Chi 8 was submitted and we owe a rev to WCAP-14644. Closed - In reference to letter NSD-NRC-%-4831 dated 9 October 1996 _ _ . _ _ - 1 Page: 17 Total Records: 109 _ . . _ ~ _ _ . _...__.m.___._____.s_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ - . _ _ . _ _ . _ . _ - . _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ . _ _ . - _ _ _ _ . _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ . _ ~ * . , . _ - -
, ..-.-ev.-e. - ._--% =--m. w. -- -.
AP600 Open Hess Tracking Systems Database: Execntive Sumniary Date: 2/20/97
- Selecties: [DSER Section] like *18** Sorted by item # '
leem DSER Section/ Titic/ Description Resp (W) NRC. '5 No. Branch - Question _ .. _ _'ype___. I Detail Status Engineer Status Status Ectier No. I Date 1324 NRR/ Hill B 18 4.3.2-1 DSER4M MMIS/Kerch Closed Closed NSD-NRC-96-4831 ; Westinghouse siNid provide information regardag the functional analysis methods Westinghouse should describe the process for addressing faiction analysis m.@as and accuracy. t Meeting of 3/9 95: ) Action N - Westinghouse has asked that element three be reviewed at the complete element level NRC to resisit the criteria ftw element 3 (15 ! open items, I 8 4...) and re-peopose a focused set of issues based on our discussion. Refer to new meetmg tp item which is debase Item Number . 2064 Action W i Meeting of 3/965: Action N - Westinghouse has asked that element three be reviewed at the complete element level. NRC to revisit the criteria ' for element 3 (15 open itt ms, I 8 4...) and re-propose a focused set ofissues based on our discussion Refer to new meeting open item which is debase Item Number 2064. Action W; Document (sent by the NRC on 5/15/95) that refocuses the element 3 open items was received on 5/22. Westinghouse will provide a dran response to this document DraR WCAP-14644 submitted by NSD-NRC-96-4722 on 5/14/96. Chapter 18 of the SSAR to be revised to reference this document. , 1 Revised Chapter I8 of the AP600 SSAR submitted in Revision 9,7/31/96. WCAP-14644 is ;cferenced in SSAR I8 4. Functiemal Requirements Analysis and Allocation. Formal WCAP transmittal will be made following receipt of NRC comments i Element 3. i i Comments Recieved from NRC on 8/13. To close this item. SSAR Chl8 was submitted and we owe a rev to WCAP-14644 [ Closed -In reference to letter NSD-NRC-96-4831 dated 9 October 1996. ' Action N - See NRC letter dated 12/986. - NO. This was closed (repeat of 2466). rkn 1/28 i { t 4 E i E t Page: 18 Total Records: 109 _ _____ ___ _ __ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ = _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ ___ _ _ . . _ _ . - _ . . _
. - .~. - . - . _ --
AP600 Open Itemi Tracking System Database: Eueettiv2 Semimaary Date: 2/20/97
- Selection: [DSER Section] like '182# Sorted by item #
leem DSI.R Section/ Titic! Description Resp (W) NRC No. Branch Question Type Detail Status Engineer Status Status Letter No. I Date 1325 NRR/IllifB 1843.2-2 DSER-O!
- MMIS/Kerch Closed Closed NSD-NRC-96-4831 Westinghouse should provide a detailed description of modified functions Westinghouse should expand fSe comparison between the predecessor plant and the AP600 to include an analysis of plant safety functions and processes.
Meeting of 3BS5: Action N - Westinghouse has asked that element three be reviewed at the complete element level. NRC to revisit the criteria for element 3 (15 open items, I8 4 ..) and re-propose a focused set of issues based on our discussion Refer to new meeting open item which is dabase item Number 2064 Action W Meeting of 3NS5: Action N - Westinghouse has asked that element three be reviewed at the complete element level NRC to revisit the criteria for element 3 (15 open items; I8.4...) and re-propose a focused set ofissues based on our discussion Refer to new meeting open item which is dabase item Number 2064. Action W: Docuenent (sent by the NRC on 5/15S5) that refocuses the element 3 open items was received on 5/22. Westinghouse will provide a draR response to this document.. DraR WCAP-14644 submitted by NSD-NRC-96-4722 on 5/14N Chapter 18 of the SSAR to be revised to reference this document Revised Chapter 18 of the AP600 SSAR submitted in Revision 9,7/3166. WCAP-14644 is referenced in SSAR I8.4, Functional Requiremee.is Analysis and Allocation Formal WCAP transmittal will be made following receipt of NRC comments Element 3. Comments Recieved from NRC on 8/13. To close this item, SSAR Chl8 was submitted and we owe a rev to WCAP-14644 Closed -In reference to letter NSD-NRC-96-4831 dated 9 October 1996. Action N - See NRC letter dated 12NN - NO. This was closed (repeat of 2466) rLn i/28 __ _ _ _ Page: 19 Total Records: 109
AP600 Open Item Tracking System Database: ExecutivaS mmary Date: 2/20/97 Selection: [DSER Sectionl like '18** Sorted by item # Item DSFR Section/ Title / Description Resp (W) NRC No. Branch Question Type Detail Status Engineer Status Status lxtterNo / Date k 1326 NRFJIIIIFB 184.32-3 DSER4)I MMIS/Kerch Closed Closed NSD-NRC-96-4831 1%'estinghouse should identify and describe the basis for the modifed functions and processes. I h!*cting of 3M/95: Actim N - Westinghouse has asked that element three be reviewed at the complete element level. NRC to revisit the cntena for element 3 (15 open items; 18 4...) and re-propose a focused set ofissues based on our discussion. Refer to new meeting open item which is dabase Item Number l 2064. Action W ! L Meeting of 3/9M5: Action N - Westinghouse has asked that element three be revewed at the complete element level. NRC to revisit the cnteria for element 3 (15 t open items; I 8 4...) and re-propose a focused set of issues based on our descussion Refer to new meeting open item which is dabase item Number 2064. Action W: Document (sent by the NRC on 5h 5/95) that refocuses the element 3 open items was received on 5/22. Westinghouse will proside a draA response to this document. L DraA WCAP-14644 submitted by NSD-NRC-96-4722 on 554ev6 Chapter 18 of the SSAR to be revised to reference this document Revised Chapter 18 of the AP600 SSAR submitted in Revi, ion 9,7/31/96 WCAP-14644 is refc;md in SSAR 18.4. I unctional Requirements Analysis and Allocation. Formal WCAP transmittal will b: made following receipt of NRC comments. Element 3. Comments Reciesed from NRC on 8/13. To close this item, SSAR Chl8 was submitted and we owe a rev to WCAP-14644 Closed -la reference to letter NSD-NRC-96-4531 dated 9 October 1996. Action N - See NRC letter dated 12/9N - NO. This was closed (repeat of 2466). rLn I/28 __ t i i n Page: 20 Total Records- 109
AP600 Open Item Tracking Syst;m Database: Exec;tiv2 Summary Date: 2/20/97 Selection: [DSER Sectionl like *IES' Sorted by item # licm DSI R Secton/ Title /Desenption Resp (W) NRC No Branch Question Type Detail Status Engineer Status Status I etter No. / Date 1327 NRR/lllil B 184.32-4 Dst'R-Ol MMIS/Kerch Closed Closed NSD-NRC-96-4831 Westinghouse should provide information regarding the method-ological concems with plant process descaiptions % estinghouse should a&fress methodological concerns to provide assurance that there are no generic problems with the analysis method. Specifically,(a) the RCS mass inventory FDTA should be completed,(b) the topical report referenced on page 4 should be included,(c) the basic goal for high mass inventory should be addressed, (d) omission of the " ultimate cooling" injection supply should be explained and justified, and (c) the function oflisted valves slwuld be provided Per conference call with NRC () Bongarra, G Galletti, J O'llara. J liiggins) of 2/23M5. Action W - Send the revised RCS Mass Inventory i BTA and send the RCS Pressure Control MITA. Meeting of 3SNS: Action N - Westinghouse has asked that element three be reviewed at the complete element level NRC to revisit the cnteria for element 1 (15 open items, I 8 4.. ) and re-propose a focused set of issues based on our discussion Refer to new meeting open item which is daban: Item Number 2064. . _ _ Action W Meeting of 3 MSS: Action N - Westinghouse has asked that element three be reviewed at the complete element level NRC to revisit the criteria for element 3 (15 open items; I8 4.. ) and re-propose a focused set ofissues based on our discussion. Refer to new meeting open item which is dabase item Number 2064. Action W; Document (sent by the NRC on 5/l 5N51 that refocuses the element 3 open items was received on 5/22. Westmghouse wi!! proude a draft response to this document. Draft WCAP-14644 submitted by NSD-NRC-96-4722 un 5/I4N6 Chapter 18 of the SSAR to be revised to referenc.c this document Revised Chapter 18 of the AP600 SSAR submitted in Revision 9. 7/31M6 WCAP-14644 is referenced in SSAR 18 4, Functional Requirements Analysis and Allocation. Formal WCAP transmittal will be made following receipt of NRC comments. Liement 3. Comments Recieved from NRC on 8/13. To close this item, SSAR Chl8 was submitted and we owe a rev to WCAP-14644 Closed -In reference to letter NSD-NRC-96-4831 dated 9 October 1996. Action N - See NRC letter dated 12/9N6. - NO. This was closed (repeat of 2466) rkn 1/28 __ Page: 21 Total Records: 109
AP600 Open item Tracking System Database: Eseentiva Summary Date: 2/20/97 Selection: lDSER Section] like 'l 8" Sorted by item # Item DSER Section/ Titic/ Description Resp (W) NRC ! No Branch Quesuon Typc Detail Status Engineer Status Status Date _ _ . . _ _ _ _ .__ . letter No _/_ 1328 NRR/IllliB 1843.2-5 DSER-OI MMIS/Kerch Closed Closed NSD-NRC-96-4831 Westinghouse should provide detailed descriptions for all modified plant processes. Per conference call with NRC (J Bongarra. G Galletti. J 011 ara, J liiggins) or2/23N5: . Action N - NRC to resiew the material presented on 2/2N5 by Terry Schulz ( AP600 functions and associated processes, cornparism with current Westinghouse PWRs) and provide feedbad (new status) i Meeting of 3SS5: - Action N - Westinghouse has asked that element three be reviewed at the complete element level NRC to revisit the crneria for esement 3 (I 5 open items; I8 4...) and re-propose a focused set ofissues based on our discussion Refer to new meeting open item which is dabase item Number 2064. _ Action W Mcctmg of 3M/95: I Action N - Westinghouse has asked that element three be reviewed at the complete element level NRC to revisit the criteria ftw clement 3 (l5 open items; I8 4...) and re-propose e focused set ofissues based on our discussion. Refer to new meeting open item which is dabase Item Number 2064. Action W: Document (sent by the NRC on 5/15/95) that refocuses the element 3 open items =as received on 5/22. Westinghouse will provide a r draft response to this document. . Draft WCAP-14644 submitted by NSD-NRC-96-4722 on 5/l4/96 Chapter I8 of the SSAR to be revised to reference this document, Revised Chapter I8 of the AP600 SSAR submitted in Revision 9,7/3186. WCAP-14644 is referenced in SSAR I8 4, Functional Requirements [ Analysis and Allocation. Formal WCAP transmittal will be made following receipt of NRC comments. Element 3. Comments Recieved from NRC on 8/13. To close this item.SSAR Chl8 was submitted and we owe a rev to WCAP-14644 , Closed -In reference to Ictter NSD-NRC-96-4831 dated 9 October 1996. : Action N See NRC letter dated 12/9/96. - NO. This was closed (repeat of 2466) rkn I/28 _ _ _ _ [
?
F v i L Page. 22 Total Records: 109 6 t
-- -- - - - _ _ _ _ . _ . _ _ - . . - . . . - - _ _ - - _ - - _ - _ _ . _ _ . - - - - _ - - _ - - - - . - - > -. - - _ . - - - - _ --w - - +. - - , - - . - . - , , . - , - .-~w
. ~- .._~n.-.. . - - - . . . - . . _ . _ . - . - -- - . - . .-.. ~ . . . - .- -_ -. . - . ~ ~
r
- AP608 Open Items Tracking Systems Database: Exec tiveSeanmary Date: 2/20/97 ' I
- Selection: IDSER Sectionj like 'l 8" Sorted by item # j leem DSER Section/ Title / Description RCSP (W) NRC No Branch Question Type Detail Status Engineer Status Status letter No. / Dale i 1329 NRR/HIM B 18.43 2-6 DSER4M MMIS!Kerch G osed Closed NSD-NRC-96-4831 l Westinghouse should provide a commitment for updating the functional analysis as part of the function analysis methodology {
1 5 Per conference call with NRC (J Bongarra. G Galletti J O'Hara, J Higgins) of 2/23N5: ; Action W - Send a draft of the associated document and/or revision to the applicalde SSAR sections. < ? i Meeting of 3/9/95: 3 [ Action N - Westmghouse has asked that element three be reviewed at the complete clement level NRC to revisit the criteria for element 3 (15 t i open items; I 8 4 ) and re-propose a focused set ofissues based on our discussion Refer to new meeting open item which is dabec leem Number . ( 2064. [ Action W t Meeting of 3/9/95: [ I Action N - Westinghouse has asked that element three be reviewed at the complete element level. NRC to revisit the criteria for element 3 (15 open items; I8.4 .) and re-propose a focused set ofissues based on our discussion. Refer to new meeting open item which is dabase item Number .j 2064. > I Action W: Document (sent by the NRC on 5/I5/95) that refocuses the element 3 open items mas received on 5/22 Westinghms: will provide a ; draR response to this document DraR WCAP-14644 submitted by NSD-NRC-96-4722 on 5/I4N6 Chapter 18 of the SSAR to be revised to reference this document.
?
Revised Chapter 18 of the AP600 SSAR submitted in Revision 9,7/31/96. WCAP-14644 is referenced in SS AR 18 4. Functional Requirements [ Analysis and Allocation. Formal WCAP transmittal will be made killowing receipt of NRC conunents [ Elenient 3. Comments Recieved from NRC on 8/13. To close this item SSAR Chi 8 was submitted and we owe a rev to WCAP-14644 [ i Closed - In reference to letter NSD-NRC-96-4831 dated 9 October 1996. I Action N See NRC letter dated 12/9/96. - NO. This was closed (repeat of 2466). rkn 1/28 _ __ l i i i i l i Page: 23 Total Records: 109 ' i t
. _..__.-..__.____m_-. . .-_-m_ _ . _ . _ _ . _____.__...___..._.._m.___._.-..u- . . _ _ _ _ _ . _ - _ . . . - - _ _ . _ _ .___m__.m ,
- e. , -_ w,- - .- - -.v4.
AP600 Open Item Tracking System Datbase: Exec tiva Summary Date: 2/20/97 Selection: [DSER Section) like '18** Sorted by item # Item DSLR Section/ Titic/ Description Resp (W) NRC No Branch Questson Typc Detail Status Engineer Status Status Date i etter No /_ 1330 NRR/IIIIFB 1843.2-7 DSLR4)I
- MMIS/Kerch Closed Closed NSD-NRC-96-4831
~
~ Westinghouse should provide information regardmg the function requirements verification Westinghouse shorM verify that alI2the processes necessary for achiesing safe operation are identified and all of the requirements of each process are identified Meeting of 3NN5:
Action N - Westinghouse has asked that element three be reviewed at the complete element level. NRC to reusit the criteria for element 3 (15 open items, t 8 4 .) and re-propose a focused set ofissues based on our discussion Refer to new meeting open item which is dabase item Number 2064 Action W Meeting of 3NNS: Action N - Westinghouse has asked that element three be reviewed at the complete element level NRC to revisit the cnteria for element 3 (15 open items; I8 4...) and re-propose a focused set ofissues based on our discussion Refer to new meeting open item uhich is dabase item Number 2064. Action W: Document (sent by the NRC on 5/15/95) that refocuses the element 3 open items was received on 5/22. Westinghouse will provide a draft response to this document. Draft WCAP-14644 submitted by NSD-NRC-964722 on 5/14/96 Chapter 18 of the SSAR to be revised to reference this document Revised Chapter 18 of the AP600 SSAR submitted in Revision 9,7/3tN6. WCAP-14644 is referenced in SSAR I8 4. Fum.tional Requirements Analysis and Allocation Formal WCAP transmittal will be made following receipt of NRC comments. Element 3. Comments Recieved from NRC on 8/13. To close this item, SSAR Chl8 %as submitted and we owe a rev to % CAP-14644 Closed - In reference to letter NSD-NRC-96-4531 dated 9 October 1996 Action N - See NRC letter dated 12/9N6. - NO 1his was closed (repeat of 2466). rkn I/28 __ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ Page: 24 Total Records: 109
AP600 Opcis Item Tracking System Database: Executive Summary Date: 2/20/97
- I Selectio2: Fr3ER Section] like *18** Sorted by item #
. Item DSER Section/ Titic/ Description Resp (W) NRC j No Branch Question lype Detail Status Engineer Status Status gxtier No. / Dese 1331 NRR/IllifB 18433-1 DSER4M MMIS/Kerch Closed Resobed NSD-NRC-96-4831 1 i L Westinghouse should provide information regarding the basis for initial function allocations Westinghouse should describe the basis for the initial l allocations, as well as the process that will address the level of automation (e.g., fully automatic, fully manual, or automatic with manual backup) . for each unchanged function with unchanged allocation. [ f Per conference call with NRC (J Hongarre, G Galletti, J 011 ara, J Ifiggins) of 2/23M5 - Action W - Send a draR of the associated document and/or revision to the applicable SSAR sections Place on 3/8 agenda to discuss further with , NRC. r a Meeting of 3MM5: i Action N -Westinghouse has asked that element three be reviewed at the complete element level NRC to revisit the criteria for element 3 (15 l open items; I 8 4._ ) and re-propose a focused set of issues based on nur discussion. Refer to new meeting open item which is dabase Item Number i 2064. r Action W Meetmg of 3M/95: i Action N - Westinghouse has asked that element three be rev'ewed at the complete element les el NRC to revisit the criteria for element 3 (l5 [ open items; I 8 4,.) and re-propose a focused set ofissues based on our discussion Refer to new meeting open item which is dabase item Number j 2064. Action W: Document (sent by the NRC on 5/15M5) that refocuses the element 3 open items was received on 5/22. Westinghouse will provide a draR response to this document. ! DraR WCAP-14644 submitted by NSD-NRC-96-4722 on 5/14N6 Chapter 18 of the SSAR to be revised to reference this document , Revised Chapter i8 of the AP600 SSAR submitted in Revision 9,7/31M6. WCAP-14644 is referenced in SSAR I8 4. Functional Requirements l Analysis and Allocation Formal WCAP transmittal will be made following receipt of NRC comments. Element 3. Comments Recieved from NRC on 8/I3. To close this item, SSAR Chl8 was submitted and we owe a rev to % CAP-14644 Closed -In reference to letter NSD-NRC-96-4831 dated 9 October 1996 _ _ _ _ i t t l i Page: 25 Total Records: 109
AP600 Open Item Tracking System Database: Execctiva Summary Dat:: 2/29/97 Selection: lDSER Section] hic'I8** Sorted by Ite n # l'em DSER Section/ litic! Description Resp (W) NRC No Branch Question Type Detail Status Engineer Status Status Istier h / Dme 1332 NRR/IlllFH 184.33-2 DSER-OI MMISfKerch Closed Resolved NSD-NRC-96-4831
~ Westinghouse should describe how the program will develop the rationale and level of automation for each unchanged function or process with rrawhfied allocation.
Per conference call with NRC (J.Boogarra. G Galletti J O'llara. J liiggins) of 2/23M5: Action W - Send a dran of the associated document and/or revision to the applicable SSAR sections Place on 3/8 agenda to discuss further with NRC. Meeting of 3MS5: Action N - Westinghouse has asked that element three be reviewed at the complete element level NRC to revisit the criteria for element 3 (I5 open items; I8 4...) and re-propose a focused set ofissues based on our discussion Refer to new meeting twn item which is dabase item Number 2064. Action W Meeting of 38S5: Action N - Westinghouse has asked that element three be reviewed at the complete element level NRC to revisit the criteria for element 3 (15 open items; I8 4...) and re-propose a focused set ofissues based on our dscussion. Refer to new meeting tyn item which is dabase Item Numt er 2064. Action W: Document (sent by the NRC on 5/15M5) that refocuses the element 3 open items was received on 5/22. Westinghouse will provide a dran response to this document i DraR WCAP-14644 submitted by NSD-NRC-96-4722 on 5/14/96 Chapter I8 of the SSAR to be revised to reference this documem. Revised Chapter 18 of the AP600 SSAR submitted in Revision 9,7/3 tN6 WCAP-14644 is referenced in SSAR I8 4, Functional Requirements Analysis and Allocation. Formal WCAP transmittal will be made following receipt of NRC comments Element 3 Comments Recieved from NRC on 8/13. To close this item. SSAR Chi 8 was submitted and we owe a ret to WCAP-14644 Closed - In reference to letter NSD-NRC-96-4831 dated 9 October 1996. l 6 t i Page: 26 Total Records: 109 _ _ . _ _ . _ . _ .___m.__.__.a___;. 2 __ _.i..___a-_:.m__-- . _ . . _ . _ _ - _ _ - _ _ . . _ . _ . _ _ _ _ _ .-a-- _ - _ _ _____i__- __ __2__ ___2.--- u.._ _ ___.__
_ . _ . ~ . _ _ _ . _ . . - ..._ ._. _ _ _ . - _ . - . ..._ ._ _ . ...-. - . _. - . _ _._ ...- _. _ m__ . m _ . _. . .___ AP600 Open Itene Tracking Symen Database: Exec;tiva Susnaary Date: 2/20/97 Selection: [DSLR Section] like *18** Sorted by item # f item DSI R Section/ Titic/ Description Resp NRC (W) No Ikanch Question Type Detail Status Engineer Status Status Date letter No / _ 1333 NRR/lillFB 18433-3 DSI'R-OI MMIS/Kerch Closed Resobed NSD-NRC-9H831 Westmghouse should provide information regarding the function allocation for modified processes. Westinghouse should descnbe the process that ' will address the rationale, allocation, and level of automation for modified plant processes. Per conference call with NRC (1 Bongarra, G Galletti, J O'llara, j liiggins) of 2/23/95: Acton W - Send a dran of the assoc 4tcJ Jocument and/or revision to the applicable SSAR sections Place on 3/8 agenda to discuss further with i NRC. Meetmgof 3MN5. Action N - Westinghouse has asked that element three be reviewed at the complete elemens sevel. NRC to revisit the criteria for element 3 (15 open items; I8.4. ) and re-propose a focuscJ set ofissues based on our discussion Refer tu new meeting open item which is dabase item Number { 2064 Action W i i Meeting of 3NM5: Action N - Westinghouse has asked that element three be reviewed at the complete element level. NRC to resisit the criteria for element 3 (15 open items, I8 4...) and re-propose a focused set ofissues based on our discussion Refer to new meeting open item which is dabase item Number 2064. 6 Action W: Document (sent by the NRC on 5/l5/95% hat refocuses the element 3 open items was received on 5/22. Westinghouse wdi provide a draR response to this document Dran WCAP-14644 submitted by NSD-NRC-96-4724 on 5/1486 Chapter 18 of the SSAR to be revised to reference this document Revised Chapter 18 of the AP600 SSAR submitted in Revision 9,7/31N6. WCAP-14644 is referenced in SSAR 18.4, Functitmal Requirements Analysis and Allocation Formal WCAP transmittal will be made following receipt of NRC comrnents I Element 3. i Corrments Reci eved from NRC on 8/13 To close this item SSAR Chl8 was submitted and we out a rev to WCAP-14644 Closed . In reference to letter NSD-NRC-96-4831 dated 9 October 1996. _ _ _ y Page: 27 Total Records: 109 i _ _ _ , _ __ _ _ . _ _ . . _ _ . _ . _ __ ._._.._______.._.__.__._.____..________m___ __________m__.__________.___r-- _ __m ___ _ _m-. -= .- -em_.-+m_ - _ __~ . - , - - - - _ _ __ - - . _ - - - _ _
AP600 Open Item Tracking Systems Dat; base: Emecttiva Sansmary Date: 2/20/97 ; Selection: lDSER Section] hke'18** Sorted by item # leem DSER Section/ Title / Description Resp (W) NRC No Branch Question Type Detail Status Engineer Samus Status letter No / Date ' 1334 NRRAlllFB 184.33-4 DSER4H MMIS/Kerch Closed Resolved NSD-NRC-96-483I Westinghouse should provide the function aflocation results. Westinghouse should describe the analyses that will confirmthat the personnel can properly perform tasks allocated to them while mamtaining operator situation awareness, workload, and vigilance. Meeting of 3SS5. ; Action N - Westmghouse has asked that element three be reviewed at the complete element level. NRC to revisit the criteria for element 3 (15 open items; I 8 4...) and re-propose a focused set ofissues based on our discussion Refer to new meeting open item which is dabase item Nurnber 2064. Action W Meetingof 3SN5: I Action N - Westinghouse has asked ti;at element three be reviewed at the complete element level. NRC to revisit the enteria for element 3 (15 open items; I8.4. ) and re-propose a focused set ofissues based on our discussion. Refer to new meeting opm item which is debase item Number 2064, Action W: Document (sent by the NRC on 5/1585) that refocuses the element 3 open nems was received on 5/22. Westinghouse will provide a draR response to this document. DraR WCAP-14644 submitted by NSD-NRC-96422 on 5!!4% Chapter 18 of the SSAR to be revised to reference this document. Revised Chapter I8 of the AP600 SSAR submitted in Revision 9,7/31N6 WCAP-14644 is referenced in SSAR I8 4. I unctional Requircreents Analysis and Allocation. Format WCAP transmittal will be made following receipt of NRC comments Element 3. Comments Recieved from NRC on 8/l3. To close this item. SSAR Chl8 was submitted and we owe a rev to WCAP-14644 Closed -In reference to letter NSD-NRC-96483I dated 9 October 1996. .- . t i Page: 28 Total Records: 109 i
- .. - - . - . . . -- - _ . - - - , . - _ . . .- ~..!
AP600 Open Item Tracking System Database: Esecctiva Summary Date: 2/20/97 Selection: lDSER Section] like *18** Sorted by item # Item DSER Sedion/ Titic/lkscriptien Resp (W) NRC W Branch Question Type Detad Status Engineer Status Status Letter No. / Date 1135 NRR/Illli B 18433-5 DSER-O! MMIS/Kerch Closed Resolved NSD-NRC-96-4831
~~
Westinghouse should provide information regarding the use of the OER for modified process function allocation Westinghouse should describe the use of the OE R in the identification and evaluation of function allocations for those modified processes that have been identified as problematic, based on operating experience and how past problems will be addressed Meetingof 3NN5. Action N - Westinghouse has asked that element th ce be reviewed at the complete element level. NRC to reviut the cnteria for element 3115 open items,18 4.. ) and re-propose a focused set ofissues based on our discussion. Refer to new meeting open item which is dabase item Number 2064. - _ _ . _ . _ _ Actwn W Meetmg of 3NNS. Action N - Westinghouse has asked that element tinee be reviewed at the complete element lesci NRC to resisit the enteria fM clement 3 (l5 open items,18 4...) and re-propose a focused set of issues based on our discussion Refer to new meeting open item which is dabase Item Number 2064. Action W. Document (sent by the NRC on 5/l5N5) that refocuses the element 3 open items was received on 5/22 Westmghouse will provide a draft response to this document. Draft WCAP-14644 submitted by NSD-NRC-96-4722 on 5/14N6. Chapter 18 of the SSAR to be revised to reference this document Revised Chapter 18 of the AP600 SSAR submitted in Revision 9,7/31/96. WCAP-14644 is referenced in SSAR 18 4, Functional Requirements Analysis and Allocation The OER is referenced in SSAR 18.3 Formal WCAP transmittal will be made following receipt of NRC cornments. Element 3. Comments Recieved from NRC on 8/13. To close this itera, SSAR Chl8 was submitted and we owe a rev to WCAP-14644 Closed - In reference to letter NSD-NRC-96 4831 dated 9 October 1996. _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ __ Page: 29 Total Records: 109
._ _. ._ _ . _ . _ _ _ _ _ . _ _ _ . . _ , . _ . . . _ . __ - __ . _ _ _ . . . _ , . . m _ _ _ _ . _ .
AP600 Open item Tracking System Dat:hase: Executin Senemary Date: 2/20/97
~ Selection: lDSER Section] hic *18** Sorted by item #
Item DSI'R Section/ Titic/ Description Resp (W) NRC No Itranch Question Type Detail Status Engineer Status Status Ietter No / Date r 1336 NRR/IIIIFil 1843.34 DSI.R4)I MMIS/Kerch Closed Resolved NSD-NRC-96-4831
~
Westinghouse should provide informaten regardmg the use of the OER foi anchanged process function allocation % estinghouse should desenbe how unchanged furntions with unchanged function allocations that have been identified as problematic based on operating espenence will be addressed. Meeting of 3MM5: Action N - Westinghouse has asked that element three be reviewed at the compicte element level NRC to revisit the criteria for element 3 (15 open items; I8 4 ) and re-propose a focused set ofissues based on our discussion Refer to new meeting open item which is dabase item Number 2064. Action W Meetmg of 3MM5: Action N - Westinghouse has asked that element three be reviewed at the complete element level. NRC to revisit the cnteria for element 3 (15 open items; 18.4-.) and re-propose a 2xused set cfissues based on our discussion Refer to new meeting open item which is dabase item Number 2064. Action W: Document (sent by the NRC on 5/15M5) that refocuses the element 3 open items was received on 5/22. % estmghouse will provide a draR response to this document. DraR WCAP-14644 submitted by NSD-NRC-%-4722 on 5/14M6. Chapter 18 of the SSAR to be revised to reference this document i Revised Chapter 18 of the AP600 SSAR submitted in Revision 9,7/31M6 WCAP-14644 is referenced in SSAR 18 4 Functnmal Requirements 4 Analysis and Allocation Formal WCAP transmittal will be made following receipt of NRC comments. ! Element 3. r Cornments Recieved from NRC on 8/13. To close this item, SSAR Chl8 was submitted and me owe a rev to WCAP-I4644 Closed - In reference to letter NSD-NRC-96-4831 dated 9 October 1996. ____.. _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _____ ; i h l L Page: 30 Total Records: 109 i k _ . _ . _ _ . . . _ . _ _ _ _ ._ _ . _ . _ . . _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ . _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ . _ _ _ _ _ _ m.___ - . _ _ _ .-. _ - . , ,. _ , , - . . , . . _ . - . . . _.-
~. - . . --. . _ - . - - . . - - . - _ . - _~ . - - ~ ~~..~ -__ . . . . . - _ . .
AP600 Ope 2 Item Tracking Systems Database: Executiv2 Samimary Dat2: 2/20/97 Selection: [DSER Section] like 'I8 Sorted by item # , item DSER Section/ Title /Descnption Resp (W) NRC No Branch Question Type Detail Status Engineer Status Status t4tter No. I Date 1337 NRR/IIIIFB 18.4 3.3-7 DSER-OI MMIS/Kerch Closed Resolved NSD-NRC-96-4531 Westinghouse should provide information regarding the effect of new control function allocations. Westinghouse should desenbe how function allocations will be reviewed to evaluate the effect of new control function allocations on unchanged control function allocations. Meeting of 3SM5: Action N - Westinghouse has asked that element three be reviewed at the complete element level. NRC to retisit the criteria for element 3 (l 5 open items; 18 4 ) and re-propose a focused set ofissues based on our discussion. 'tefer to new meeting open item which is dabase item Number 2064. Action W i Meeting of 3S/95. Action N - Westinghouse has asked that element three be reviewed at the complete element level. NRC to revisit the critena fiw element 3 (15 [ open items; I8 4,.) and re-propose a focused set ofissues based on our discussion Refer to new meeting open item which is dabase item Number 2064. I' Action W: Document (sent by the NRC on 5/15M5) thee refocuses the element 3 open items was received on 5/22. Westmghouse will provide a draA response to this document Draft WCAP-I4644 submitted by NSD-NRC-96-4722 on 5/14M6 Chapter 18 of the SSAR to be revised to reference this &wument Revised Chapter 18 of the AP600 SSAR submitted in Revision 9,7/31M6. WCAP-14644 is referenced in SSAR I8 4, Functional Requirements Analysis and Allocation Formal WCAP transmittal will be made following receipt of NRC comments. , Eleraent 3 Comments Recieved from NRC on 8/l3. To close this item SSAR chi 8 was submitted and we owe a rei to WCAP-I4644 L Closed . In reference to letter NSD-NRC-96-4831 dated 9 October 1996. _____, l f f i L f l 1 1.
?
I Page: 31 Total Records: 109 _ _ _ _ _ . _ _ _ _ . _ _ _ _ . _ . _ . _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ . _ _ . . _ . _ _ . _ _ . _ . _ _ _ _ . _ _ . . _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ . _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ . . _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ . __.____m___m__ _ _ _ _ . _ . _ . _ _ . _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ . . _ . _ _ . _ _ _ _ _ _ . _
AP600 Open Item Tracking System Database: Exec-tiva Summary Date: 2/20/97 Seleelion: lDSER Section] like 'l8" Sorted by item # item DSI R Sccium/ Title /Descripthm Resp (W) NRC No Ilranch Queston _ Type Detail status Engineer Status Status letter No / Date 1338 NRR/IlllI B 18.5 3-1 DSLR-OI MMIS/Kerch Closed Resolved NSD-NRC-96-4831 IWestinghouse should provide information regardmg the scope of task analysis. Westinghouse should identify the threshold for defining critic.I or high-risk tasis, how the PRA will be used to identify the tasks, and the PRA levels to be included (e g, levels I and 2t Conference call with NRC 3/21N5 (1 flongarra, G Galletti, T Kenyon, J O'llara, J liiggins. A.Sterdis, J Easter, E Roth,5 Kerch). Westinghouse explained that there are no critical /high-risk tasks that have been identified in the AP600 PRA. A sensitiuty study was done where all operator actions in the PRA cutsets were set to I (ie., operator actions fail or no of<rator actions occur) The results still produced acceptable core damage frequencies (Ref. RAI Q720133) Action W: Applicable sectmn(s) of chapter of the SSAR will be revised to state this We will define threstmid criteria for
- Risk Important Tasks *.
This criteria will be consistent with the D-RAP criteria The information addressing this open item mill be included in the AP600 flRA-Ill E Integration Implementation Plan Action W Conference call with NRC 3/21/95 (J Bongarra, G Galletti, T Kenyon, J O'llara, J Iliggins, A Sterdis, J Easter, E Roth,5 Kerch) The NRC asked us uhat we meant by " deleting all manual actions". We explained that we meant that there were no operator actnms (ie , that all operator actions in the PRA cutsets were set to I.) The information addressing this open item will be included in the AP600 IIRA-IIFE Integratin Implementation Plan. 4/19N5 - Fax of draft response to 18.7.3-2 and 18 5.3-1 was sent to J Bongarra, G Galletti, J O'llara, & J Ifiggins. If acceptable, this response will be incorporated into the llRA-IIFE Integration implementatkm Plan Action W. NRC reviewed response and provided feedback via fax of 8/22/95. Westinghouse needs to address whether task analysis will be performed on representative maintenance, test, inspection and surveillance tasks. (NRC respone wnt 9/5N5) New draft of the 1ask Analysis
= plan is in red team review (4/8/96)
Revised Chapter 18 of the AP600 SSAR subm tted in Revision 9,7/31/96. This includes ShAR 5!t 5, Ta3L Analysis, and SSAR I8 II,iluman I actors Verification and Validation. Item will be closed when WCAP-14651 is revised to reflect NRC conom l Ilement 4. Item will be closed when WCAP-14651 is revised to reflect NRC comments. Closed - In reference to letter NSD-NRC-96-4831 dated 9 October 1996. Resolved in NSD-NRC-96-4874. rkn 12/19 Action N - See NRC letter dated 12/9N6. - NO. This is old news, previously resolved rkn 1/28 _ Page: 32 Total Records: 109
AP600 Open Item Tracking System Dat; base: Executiva Summary Date: 2/20/97 Selection: IDSER Section] like *18* Sorted by liern # Item DSLR Sectum/ Title / Description Resp (W) NRC No
~ _ _ _
Brarsh Question _ Type _ Iktail Status Engineer Status Status Letter No. / Date 1339 NRR/Illll B 1853-2 DSLR-OI MMIS/Kerch Closed Resolved NSD-NRC-96-4831 Westinghouse should provide information regarding the critical task evaluation Westinghouse should identify'alicritidliu7mactions as discussed in their response to Q720133, and describe how task analysis will be used in the evaluation of the critical tasks in operational sequences. Conference call with NRC 3/21M5: (J Bongarra, G Galletti, T.Kenyon, J 011 ara,1 liiggins, A Sterdis, J Easter E.Roth, S Kerch) Action W: Westinghouse esplained that there are no csstical/high-risk tasks that have been identified in the AP600 PRA A sensitivity study was done where all operator actions in the PRA cutsets were set to I (ie , operator actions fail or no operator actims occur) De results still produced acceptable core damage frequencies (Ref. RAI Q720.133) Applicable section(s)of chapter of the SSAR will be revised to state this We will defmc threshold criteria for " Risk Important Tasks". This criteria will be consistent with the D-RAP criteria. The Risk Important Tasks and our y plan to deal with them will be identified in the AP600 llRA-lll E Integration Implementation Plan. De information addressing this open item will be included in the AP600 ifRA-IIFE Integration implementatim Plan _ Action W Conference call with NRC 3/28M5; (J Bongarra, G Galletti, T.Kenyon, J 011 ara, J liiggins, A.Sterdis, J Easter E Roth, S Kerch) Action W: Westmghouse explained that there are in critical /high-risk tasks that have been identifed in the AP600 PRA A sensitivity study waa dme where all operator actions in the PRA cutsets were set to I (ie., operator actions fail or no operator actions occur) De results still produced acceptable core damage frequencies (Ref. RAI Q720.133). Applicable section(s) of chapter of t:c SSAR will be revised to state this. We will define threshold criteria for ' Risk Important Tasks". His criteria will be consistent with the D-RAP criteria. The Risk Important Tasks and our plan to i deal with them will be identified in the AP600 IIRA-IIFE Integration Implementation Plan. < Westinghouse sent (via a fax) a draft of the llRAlliFE Integration implementation Plan and a draft of the Task Analysis Descnption to the NRC lilIFB on 5/24M5. The NRC reviewed the information and provided feedback via fax of 8/22M5. Westingfumse needs to resolve the issue of critical human actions and risk important tasks. (NRC response sent 9/5/95) Revised Chapter 18 of the AP600 SSAR submitted in Revision 9,7/31/96. Bis includes SSAR 18 5. Task Analysis, and SSAR 181I. Iluman Factors Verification and Validation. t item will be closed when WCAP-14651 is revised to reflect NRC comments. Element 4. Item will be closed when WCAP-1465I is revised to reflect NRC comrnents. Closed - In reference to letter NSD-NRC-96-4831 dated 9 October 1996. l Resolved in NSD-NRC-96-4874. rka 12/19 l Action N - See NRC letter dated 12/9/96. - NO. Dis is old news, previously resolved rkn I/28 Page: 33 Total Records: 109 i
AP600 Open Itent Tracking System Dat; base: Exec:tiva Summary Datn 2/20/97 Selection: lDSER Sectionl like'l8** Sorted by item # Item DSLR Sectim/ Titic/ Description Resp (W) NRC No Ilranch Question Typc Detail Status Engineer Status Status i.etter No. / Date 1340 NRR/Illif B 1853-3 DSER-Ol ITAAC/MMIS Closed Resolved NSD-NRC-96-4875 Westinghouse should provide information regarding the task analysis methods Westinghouse should indicate how time factors, workload, tai support requirements, workplace factors, staffing, and communication will be addressed in the task analysis. Westinghouse should also describe how the cognitive task analyses and " traditional
- methods will be integrated to analyre crew tasks, what decision criteria will be used to judge .
whether tasks need the cognitive task analysis, and the total set of task analysis data that will result from the completion of all task analysis methods. Conference call with NRC 3/2iM5: (J Bongarra, G Galletti, T Kenyon, J O'Itara, J lhggins, A.Sterdis/J Easter, E.Roth S Kerch) Action W: Westinghouse's response to include the description of Operational Sequence Analyses (OSAs) he OSAs will focus on time available versus tune estimates We will rely on the lfFE V&V fro realistic estimate of workload We will evaluate how best to incorporate this information. l ne, revise applicable sections of chapter 18 of the SSAR or write a document that is referenced in the SSAR. Conference call with NRC 3/21N5: (J Bongarra, G Galletti, T Kenyon, J (Yllara, J liiggins, A.Sterdis, J Easter, E.Roth, S Kerch)' Action W: Westinghouse's response to include the description of Operational Sequence Analyses (OSAs) and workload analysis. De OSAs will focus on time ! available versus time estimates _ We will evaluate how best to incorporate this information; ie., revise applicable sections of chapter 18 of the SSAR or write a document that is referenced in the SSAR, Westinghouse sent (via a fax) a draft of a Task Analysis Description document to the NRC I!!Ifit on 5/24/95. The NRC reviewed the document and provided feedback via fax of 8/22N5, considers issue resolved. Final closure will require a revision to SSAR section 18 8 2 I and and ITAAC. (NRC response sent 9/5N5) Revised Chapter 18 of the AP600 SSAR submitted in Revision 9,7/3 tN6. This includes SSAR 18 5, Task Analysis. Closed -ITAAC submitted by NSD-NRC-96-4875 of 1 I/7N6. Resolved in NSD-NRC-96-4874. rkn 12/19 Action W - See NRC letter dated 12N!96. - NO This is old news, previously resolved rLn I/28 _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ __ , f i i i Page: 34 Total Records: 109 o _ . _ _ - . . . . - _ . . - _ . . . _.___.____.._._______m__________--___.__u_ u_ . _ _ . _ _ _ - ., .-- _ ._. w <~_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ .-
. . . .. - ~ _ - - ,-. - - . -. .- .- .. . - . - - - - . - - - - - - .~..
AP600 Opem Item Tracking Systzm Dattbase: Execttiv2 Summary Dr.te: 2/20/97 Seleelien: [DSER Section] like 'I8** Sorted by Item # Item DSER Section/ Titic! Description Resp (W) NRC Engineer 4 No. Branch Question ._ Type _ Detail Status - Status Status Letter No. / ' Date 1341 NRR/IlllFB 18 5.3-4 DSER4)I ITAAC/MMIS Closed Resolved NS3-NRC-96-4875 Westinghouse should provide information regarding the task analysis job design Westinghouse should identify the relevant [E design factors . (such as the number of crew member skills), and indicate how they will be addressed in the task analysis. Conference call with NRC 3/21M5: . (1 Bongarra, G Galletti, T.Kenyon, J O*llara, J liiggins, A.Sterdis, J. Easter E.Roth, S Kerch) Action W: Westinghouse will write a COL Action item (Information item) that states that the identificatkm of" job design factors", such as crew member skills,is a COL applicant responsibility. His information is used to deveky an operator training program ! Westinghouse will clearly state the assumptions used in the Operational Sequence Analyses Conference call with NRC 3/21/95: (1 Bongarra, G Galletti, T.Kenyon, J O^11 ara, J liiggins, A.Sterdis. J Easter, E Roth, S Kerch) Action W: [ Westinghouse will write a COL Action item (Information item) that states that the identificatkm of" job design factors", such as crew member skills, is a COL applicant responsioility. His information is used to develop an operator training program Westinghouse wi!! clearly state the . assumptions used in the Operational Sequence Analyses. Westinghouse sent (via a fax) a draft of a Task Anal) sis Description document to the NRC llliFB on 5/2485. The NRC revicwed the document and provided feedback via fax of 8/22N5, considers issue resolved. Final closure will require a revision to SSAR section 18 8 2.1 and an ITAAC. (NRC response sent 9/5M5) Revised Chapter 18 of the AP600 SSAR submitted in Revision 9,7/31/96 This includes SSAR 18.5, Task Analysis. t Closed - ITAAC submitted by NSD-NRC-96-4875 of i1/7/96. Resolved in NSD-NRC-96-4874. rkn 12/19 Action W - See NRC letter dated 12N/96 - NO Dis is old news, previously resolved rkn 1/28 ITAAC/MMIS Closed Resolved NSD-NRC-9h-4875 1342 NRR/IlllIB 1853-5 DSER-Ol j
' Westinghouse should provide information regarding the task analysis methodology source materia's. Westiaghouse should identify source _ . . _ _ _
documents to serve as the basis for determining the types ofinformation previously identified in Criterion 3 (Refer to open item I8 5.3-3). {. Conference call with NRC 3/21M5. (J Bongarra, G Galletti, T Kenyon, J O'llara, J liiggins, A.Sterdis, J Easter, E.Roth,5 Kerch) Action W: A clear statement of the documents that were considered is needed in chapter i8 of the SSAR. k.'onference call with NRC 3/2IN5: (J Bongarra, G Galletti, T.Kenyon, J.O'llara, J liiggins, A.Sterdis, J Easter, E.Roth, S Kerch) Action W: A clear statement of the documents that were considered is needed in chapter iB of the SSAR. Rev. 4 to SSAR. Westinghouse sent(via a fax) a draft of a Task Analysis Description document to the NRC lilIFB on 5/24M5. De NRC reviewed the document . f and provided feedback via fax of 8/22M5. Final closure will require a revision to SSAR section 18 8.2 I and an appropnate ITAAC. (NRC response sent 9/5/95) Revised Chapter 18 of the AP600 SSAR submitted in Revision 9,7/31/96. His includes SSAR 18.5,TaA Analysis. p i Closed -ITAAC submitted by NSD-NRC-96-4875 of 11/7/96. i Resoleed in NSD-NRC-96-4874. rkn 12/19 Action W - See NRC letter dated 128/96 - NO. This is old news, previously resolved rkn 1/28 ._ _ Page- 35 Total Records: 109
=-= .
f AP600 Opea Itzm TracLing System Database: Executive S:mmary Datn 2/10/97 Selection: (DSER Sectionl like *18** Sorted by item # Item dst R 5ection/ Title / Description Resp (W) NRC l No Hranch Question Type Detail Status Engineer . Status Status Ietter No / Date 1343 NRR/IlllFB 1863-1 DSER-OI MMIS/Kerch Closed Actkm N Westinghouse should provide information regarding the number and qualifications of personnel. Westinghouse should provide additional ;' information on how the In E design and implementation swocess will address the number and qualifications of personnel required during the futi range of plant conditions and tasks, includmg operational tasks, plant mamtenance, and plant surveillance and testing Conference call with NRC 3/2iM5: (J Hongarra, G Galletti T.Keryon,1 O'llera, J Higgins, A Sterdis, i Easter, E Roth, S Kerch) Action W: Westinghouse to revise the applealde chapter 18 SSAR sections to reflect the statements and process described in the closure path. . State that staffing levels outside of the operations staff, such as maintenance, is the responsibility c4 the COL applicant (COL Information item ! needed) The same approach will be applied to all the staffing open items. Westinghouse is to clearly identify to the NRC where in the draA , revision each open item is addressed This mili be done by utilising this database,ic , in the database for each open item provide the snap of the l open item to the garragraph(s)in the draA revision where the open item is addressed. -- Actkm W Conference call with NRC 3/11M5. (J Hongarra, G Galletti, T Kenyon, J 011 ara, J liiggins, A.Sterdis, J I aster, E Roth, S Kerchl Action W: Westinghouse to revise the arguicalde chapter 18 SSAR sections (Revision 4 to SSAR) to reficct the statements and process described in the closure path. Stase that stalling levels outside of the operations staff, such as maintenance,is the responsibility of the COL applicant (COL Information item needed). He same appmach will be applied to all the staffing open items. Westinghouse is to clearly identify to the NRC where in the draA revision each open item is addressed. Action W: A dran revision to SSAR section f 8 7 (Staffing) needs to be sent to NRC, addressing all element 5 open items. The NRC action will then be to review and provide feedback. 4/8N6: A draA of 18.7 has finished red team review; comments have been incorporated or resolved The draft is now in word processing. Resolved Per a discussion with the NRC on 5/22, staffing will be addressed as a COL responsibility. Closure will depend ugxm the revised submittal of Chapter 18. Revised Chapter I8 6 of the AP600 SSAR submitted in Revision 9,7/3 tM6. This includes combined license applicant responsibility for staffing. Item will be closed when supportmg WCAP on staffing is transmitted. 3 Element 5. With SSAR Ch 18 submittal and WCAP-14694 this is closed. Action N - See NRC letter dated 12MM6. NRC to confirm completion of Element 5. rkn I/28 -- 6 i L L d Page: 36 Total Records: 109 ______._.____._________._.__.-.__.-._______.________._____.______m__- ___ ___ _____-____m_________mm 4_m._ _- ___ _me _ _ _ _
AP600 Open Item Tracking System Database: . Executiva Summary Date: 2/20/97 Selecties: lDSER Sectionl like *18** Sorted by item # Item DSI R Sectum/ Titic/Descriptaon Resp (W) NRC No Ilranch Question Type Detail Status Engineer Status Status i.etter No ' / Dse 1344 NRR/Illlitt 1863-2 DSLR OI MMIS/Kerch Chwed Action N
~
'Westingiusse sEld provide infortnation regarding the stamng level analysis Westinghouse should discuss how the stamng design meets the requirements of 10 CI R 50 54(m), and describe the analyses conducted to determine whether these requirements were appropriate for the AP600.
Westinghouse should also describe the process that will be used to validase starTmg requirements against the task analysis and against the physical design of the AP600 operations and control centers, as well as how the availabdity of plant informatici from individual operator workstations will be used in the analysis of staffing levels Westinghouse should also discuss the availability of operators consulering other ongoing activities, and how that relates to stamng_ In addition, Westinghouse should provide more information on the required interaction between operators for diagnosis, planning.and control activities, and interaction between personnel for administrative, communcations, and reporting actisities Finally, Westinghouse should discuss how the actions required in 10 CTR 50 47 (and NUREG-0654) and stamng requirements in Sectkms 131.2 and 131.3 of NUREG-0800 and 10 CF R 50.54 will be taken into account in the stamng level deciA=65 male for the AP600 Conference call with NRC 3/21/95: (J Bongarra, G Galletti, T Kenyon, J Ollara, J liiggins, A.Sterdis, J Easter, E Roth, S Kerch) Actson W. Westinghouse to revise the applicable chapter 18 SSAR sections to reflect the statements and process described in the closure path. State that stafTmg levels outside of the operations staff, such as maintenance, is the responsibility of the COL applicant (COL Information item needed) The same approach will be applied to all the stafTmg open items. Westinghouse is to clearly identify to the NRC where in the draft revision each open item is addressed This will be done by utilizing this database;ie, in the database for each open item provide the map of the open item to the parregraph(s)in the Caft revision where the open item is addressed. _ . . _ _ _ Action W Conference call with NRC 3/21/95: (1 Bongarra, G Galletti, T Kenyon, J.Ollara, J litggins, A.Sterdis, J Easter, E.Roth, S Kerch) Actkm W: Westinghouse to esisc the applicable chapter 18 SSAR sections to reflect the statements and process described in the closure path State that stamng levels outside of the operaens :ts!T, such as maintenance, is the responsibility of the COL applicant (COL Information item needed) The same approach will be applied to all the staffmg open items Westinghouse is to clearly identify to the NRC where in the draft revision each open item is addressed Action W: A draft revision to SSAR section 18.7 (Staffing) needs to be sent to NRC, addressing all element 5 open items The NRC action will then be tu review and provide feedback. 4/8/96: A draft of 18.7 has finished red team review; comments have been incorporated or resolved 1he oraft is now in word pmcessing. Resolved Per a discussion with the NRC on 5/22, staffing will be addressed as a COL responsibility. Closure will depend uptm the revised submittal of Chapter 18 Revised Chapter i8 6 of the AP600 SSAR submitted in Revision 9,7/31/96 This includes combined license applicant responsibility for stafTmg item will be closed when supporting WCAP on staffing is transmitted Element 5. With SSAR Ch 18 submittal and WCAP 14694 this is closed. Action N - See NRC letter dated 12D/96 NRC to confirm completion of Element 5. rkn 1/28 _ _. _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ Page: 37 Total Records: 109
__ , _ _ _ . _ - . . . = _ _ _.___m .. . _ _ . _ .__m._, _ . _ _ . . AP600 Open Item Tracking Sy:: tem Detbase: Executiva Summary Dat : 2/20/97 Selection: [DSER Section] hie 'l 8 Sorted by item # hem DSER Section/ ~ Titic/Descnption Resp NRC (W) No. Branch Question Type Detail Status Engineer Status Status Extter No. / _ Date 1345 NRR/Illft B 1863-3 DSER4)I MMIS/Kerch Closed Action N Weimghouse should previde information regardmg the stamng analysis iterat' ion' Westinghouse should escribe in mosidetail the iterative nature I of the staffing level analysis inaddition, Westinghouse should discuss how the task analysis will be modified if a determination is made that the staffing level is inadequate or if meeting the stamng level requirement adds substantial specialized automatic control of equipment, agiven that it is ; not clear that the task analysis is crew memberbsed. ' Conference call with NRC 3/21M5. (1 Bongarra, G Galletti T Kenyon, J 011 ara, J lliggins, A Sterdis, J Easter, E.Roth,5 Kerch) i Acytion W: Westinghouse to resise the applicable chapter 18 SSAR sections to reflect the statements and process descnbed in the closure path. Action W Conference call with NRC 3/21M5: (J Bongarra, G Galletti T Kenyon, J 011 ara, J liiggins, A.Sterdis, J Laster E.Roth, S Kerch) Action W. Westmghouse to revise the applicaNe chapter 18 SSAR sections to reflect the statements and process described in the closure path. Action W: A dran revision to SSAR section 18.7 (Stamng) needs to be sent to NRC, addressing all element 5 open items The NRC action mill then be to review and provide feedback o 4/886: A dran of 18.7 has finished red team review, comments have been incorporated or resolved The draR is now in word processing i Resolved. Per a discussion with tlie NRC on 5/22, staffing mill be addressed as a COL responsibility. Closure will depend upon the revised [ submittal of Chapter 18. ; Revised Chapter i8 6 of the AP600 SSAR submitted in Resision 9,7/3186.1his mcludes combined license applicant responsibility Itw stamng Item mill be Gsed when supporting WCAP on stamng is transmitted. I'lement 5. ! With SS AR Ch I 8 submittal and WCAP-14694 this is closed ! Action N - See NRC letter dated I !!9/96 NRC to confirm completion of Element 5. rkn I/28 _ ______ _, , _ _ _ __ f [ i I t i i l Page: 38 Total Records: 109 } _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ . _ _ _ . -- -.-.._ _ _____ ~ ~ ~ . _ _ - _ . , . - . _ _ - - - -
~
.AP600 Open Item Tracking Sy; tem Detr. base: Exec tinSummary Date: 2/28/97 i Selecties: [DSER Sectionl hLe 'IB** Sorted by item # '
. Item DSER Section/ Tide / Description NRC z R*5P (W)
No Branch Question hpc Detad Status Engineer Status Status i.etter No. I Date . ; 1346 NRR!IMH B I863-4 DSER-OI MMIS/Kerch Closed Action N , Westinghouse should provide information reganhng the compliance of staffing with the life PRM elements Westinghouse should provide i additional information, particularly for those elements of C-iterion 4," Basis for Staffing," of this section, that are not specifically addressed for ; operations personnel, and for all the elements of Criterion 4," Basis for Staffing," of this scciton as they relate to nongations personnel. j Conference call with NRC 3/2 te95: (J.Bongarra, G Galletti, T Kenyon, J O'Hara, J liiggins, A.Secrdis, J Easter, E.Roth, S.Kerch) I Action W: Westinghouse to revise the applicabic chapter 18 SSAR sections to reflect the statements and process described in the closure path l Action W ' Conference call with NRC 3/2195: (J Bongarra,G Galletti. T Kenyon, J O'llara, I liiggins, A.Sterdis, J Easter, E Roth, S Kerch) Action W. Westinghouse to revise the appkicable chapter 18 SSAR sections to reflect the statements and process described in the closure path. [ Action W: A draft revision to'SSAR section 18.7(Staffung) needs to be sent to NRC, addressing all element 5 open items. The NRC action will then be to review and provide feedback.' [ i 4/8/96: A dran of 18 7 has fincshed red team review; comments have been incorporated or resolved the draft is now in word processing. j i l Resolved. Per a discussion with the NRC on 5/22, staffmg mill be addressed as a COL responsibility. Closure mill depend upon the revised '
?
submittal of Chapter 18. l I Revised Chapter 18 6 of the AP600 SSAR submitted in Revision 9,7/31/96. This includes cominned license applicant responsibility for staffmg. l hem will be closed when supporting WCAP on staffung is transmitted . i Element 5. ! With SSAR Ch 18 submittal and WCAP-14694 this is closed i Action N - See NRC Icteer dated 12/9/96. [ NRC to confirm completion of Element 5. rkn I/28 _ _ . _ _ _ . _ _ l I I r i t . ) 1 l l Page: 39 Total Records: 109 i k
. . - - - - - . . -- . , ~ - . _ . . _ , , _ . _ - . . _ . _ _ . . . - _ . - , - - . - - . . _ . _ , . _ _ . _ . . . . . - - _ - , . . - - . . - - _ . - , . - , _ , . , . _ . ~.,_-,.l
AP600 Open Item Tracking System DatilSase: Execdiv2 Seminaary Date: 2/20/97 Selection: [DSER Sectionj like 'IB*' Sotted by item # I Item DSI-R Section/ Title / Description Resp (W) NRC No liranch Question T)pe Detail Status Engineer Status Status Ixtier No. I Date 1347 NRR/Illil B 1863-5 DSER-OI MMIS/Kerch Closed Action N
~ ~
Westinghouse should provide infortnation regarding the stamng methodology source materials Westinghouse should identify the industry standards, guidelines, and practices on which the staffing implementation plan is based. Conference call mith NRC 3/2 t/95: (J Bongarra, G Galletti, T Kenyon, J O'llara, J Ifiggins, A Sterdis, J Easter, E.Roth, S Kerch) Action % : Westinghouse to revise the applicable chapter iB SSAR sections to reflect the statements and poucess described in the closure path
, Rased on the discussions with the NRC on stamng and the information to be provided to address cach stamng open item, this iten. will be Icovered, We need to ensure that the stafHng COL Action Item identifies the COL applicant responsibility and states the staffing assumptions that here made in design certification.
\ctkm W -
fConference call with NRC 3/21/95: (1 frongarra, G Galletti, T Kenyon, J O*Itara, J liiggins A.Sterdis, J Easter E Roth, S.Kerch) Actkm W - Westinghouse to revise the applicable chapter 18 SSAR sections to reflect the stateaents and process described in the closure path flased on the discussions with the NRC on stamng and the information to be provided to address each staffing open item, this item will be covered. We need to ensure that the stalling COL Action Item identifies the WL applicant responsibility and states the staffing assusnptions that were made in design certification. I Action W: A draR revision to SSAR section 18.7 (Staffing) needs to be sent to NRC, addressing all element 5 open items the NRC action wall then be to review and provide feedback. l t 4/8/96: A draA of 18 7 has finished red teun review; comments have been incorporated or resolved 1he draR is now in word processmg. [ t Resolved. Per a descussion with the NRC on 5/22, stamng will be addressed as a COL responsibihty. Closure will depend upon the revised . submittal of Chapter i8. Revised Chapter 18 6 of the AP600 SSAR submitted in Revision 9,7/31/96. This includes combined license applicant responsibility for staffing i Item will be closed when supporting WCAP on staffing is transmitted. Element 5. With SSAR Ch 18 submittal and WCAP-14694 this is closed Action N - See NRC letter dated 12/9/96. NRC to confirm completion of Element 5. rLn 1/28 _ _ _ _ _ [ l i Page: 40 Total Records: 109
~
AP600 Open Items Tracking System Dat:bese: Executive Summary Date: 2/20/97 Selecties: lDSER Section] like 'l8** Sorted by item #
. Item DSLR Secthm/ Titic/ Description Resp (W) - NRC No Hranch (,bestion Type Detail Status Engineer Status Status Ietter No / Date 1348 NRR/IlllFH 18 7.3-1 DSER-Ol MMIS/Kerch Closed Resolved NSD-NRC-96-4831
[ Westinghouse should provide informatior tegarding the human reliability andysis (IIRA)-life integration implementation plan.
]
- Resolved 3/31/95 - Phone conversation between Westinghouse and J Bongarra: Jim stated that generally speaking the resolution paths for all element 6 open items are acceptable Action W: To develop and submit a draA of the llRA-IIFE Integration Implementation Plan by May 31. The appropriate section of the SSAR will also be revised (Resision 4), referencing this implementation plan l The dran llRA/IIFE Integration Implementation Plan was sent (via fax) to the NRC 11111 B on 5/24MS.. All element 6 (lira) open isems are
, addressed by this document. The NRC reviewed the document and provided feedback via fax of 9/2835. NRC considers this issue resolved. (see T NRC response sent 10/3/95) i Revised SSAR 18 7, Integration ofllaman Reliability Analysis with fluman Factors Engineering submitted in Reviskm 9,7/31N6 Item will be closed when revised WCAP-14651 is submitted.
Element 6-Revised SSAR I8 7. Integration ofIluman Reliability Analysis with Iluman Factors Engineering submitted on Resisam 9,7/31N6 Item will be I closed when revised WCAP-14658 is submitted , Closed In reference to letter NSD NRC 96-48)I dased 9 October 1996 Resolved by NRC letter of 12/19 for El 6. rkn 12/19 Action W - See NRC letier dated 12M/96. - No, this is old news, resolved. rkn 1/28 i I Page: 41 Total Records: 109 i _ - _ _ _.-_.-_.--__ _ ___ a __-._a ,__a-- . _ -...i-_.e..-,--,..---v,-~..~ -- .- ..---.-.,...-.,..m- - - ~ . - - , - . . . , , . ~ . . , , _ . . .- . . - - , , .--.$ m-,. , - . , , . . . .
AP600 Opea Itzen Tracking Syst;m Datbase: Exec tivaSumm ry Dat2: 2/20/97 Seteana: lDSER Sectionl like '18** Sorted by item # item DSFR Section/ Titic/ Description Resp (W) NRC
-No Ikanch Question Type Detail status Engineer Status Status letter No. / Date 1349 NRR/IllH B 18.7.3 2 DSI R-OI MMIS/Kerch Closed Resolved NSD-NRC-%-483 I
~ Westinghouse should provide infiwmation regardmg the pnxess used fix identifying critical human actions Westinghouse should describe the process that will identify critical human actions fiw the Level I and Level 2 PRA,includmg both internal and extemal events, following the completion of sensitivity analyses.
Action N f/31/95 - Phone conversation between Westinghouse arid J Bongarra: Jun stated that generally speaking the resolution paths liv all element 6 open items are acceptabte. Action W: To develop and submit a draR of the llRA-IIFE Integration Implementation Plan by May 31. The appropriate section of the SSAR will also be revised (REv. 4), referencing this implementation plan. 4/19/95 - I ax of draft response to 18 7.3-2 and 18 5 3-1 was sent to J Bongarra, O Galletii, J 011 ara, & J lleggirc. If acceptable, this response will be incorporated into the IIRA-IIFE lategration implementation Plan. NRC reviewed this draft and provided feedback via fas of 9/28/95. Westinghouse and NRC still need to resolve the issue of critical human actions and risk important tasks. 1he NRC fillFB to coordinate a conference call with the NRC Risk Analysis (PRA) people and Westinghouse to discuss. (See NRC response sent 10/3/95) 4/8/96: A revised draft of the HRA/IIFE Integration implementation Plan should be ready liw red team review by 4/12/96 Resolved. Draft WCAP-14651, integration of Human RelialHlity Analysis with fluman Factors Engineermg Design :..y:..a,aion Plan, was 4 t-mitted to the NRC as an attachment to NSD-NRC-96-4722 on 5/l4/96. Appropriate reference to the document will be made in Chapter 18 of e + RAR. Revised SSAR 18 7, integration ofIluman Reliability Analysis with llaman Factors Engineering submitted in Revision 9,7/31/96. Item will be closed when revised WCAP-14651 is submitted Element 6. Revised SSAR 18.7 Integration of fluman Reliability Analysis with Iluman Factors Engineering submitted on Resision 9,7/31/96. Item will be closed when revised WCAP-14651 is submitted. Closed -In reference to letter NSD-NRC-96-4831 deced 9 October 1996 Resolved by NRC letter of 12/19 for El 6. rkn 12/19 Action W - See NRC Icteer deced 12/9/96. - No, this is old news, resolved. rkn 1/28 __ ._ Ivge: 42 Total Records: 109
apt 80 Open It;ni Tracking Syst:m Dat: base: Exec;tive Snaimary Date: 2/20/97 Selection: lDSER Sectionl like '18" Sorted by item # Item DSI R Sectkm/ litic/ Description Resp (W) NRC No. firanch Question Type Detail Status Engmect Status Status Extter No. / Date 1350 NRR/Illlill 1873-3 DSER-OI MMIS/Kerch Closed Resolved NSD-NRC-96-4831 [ Westinghouse should describe the process they will use to address the task analyses for critical human actions. ~
]
Resolved 3/31/95 - Phone conversation between Westinghouse and J Bongarra: Jim stated that generally speaking the resolution paths for all element 6 open items are acceptable. Action W: To develop and submit a draA of the HRA-IIFE Integratum implementation Plan by May 31. The appropriate section of the SSAR will also be revised, referencing this implementation plan The dran IIRA/HFE Integration implememation Plan was sent (via fax) to the NRC lillFB on 5/2485. All element 6 (flRA) open items are addressed by this document. The NRC reviewed the document and provided feedback sia the fax of 9/28/95 NRC considers this issue resolved. Action W (per NRC)- see NRC response sent 10/3/95 Revised SSAR 18 7, Integration oflluman Feliability Analysis with Iluman Factors lingineering submitted in Revision 9. 7/31/96 Item will be closed when revised WCAP-1465 I is submit ed. Element 6. Revised SSAR 18.7, Integration of!Iuman lleliability Analysis with Bluman Factors Engineering submitted on Resiske 9,7/31/96 Item will be closed when revised WCAP-14651 is submitted. Closed -In reference to letter NSD-NRC-96-4831 dated 9 (ktober 1996. Resolved by NRC letter of 12/19 for El 6. rkn 12/19 Action W - See NRC letter dated 12/9/96. - No, this is old news, resolved. rkn 1/28 _ _ _ _ _ . ._ _ . _ . _ _ _ . _ _ _._ _ Page: 43 Total Records: 109 _ _ _ - . . - _ _ --__-___ - _-_- - _ -_-. -,. -. - . . . , . . - _ . - . , . - . . ~ - -- -.-
- . - - . ~ . . . - _.... - - - - - . . . - . - - ~ . - . -
r
- AP600 Opea ItIm Tracking Sy: tem Dat base: ExecttiveSauem ry Date: 2/29/97 ;
j Selecties: lDSER Sectionl hke'18 Sorted by item # [ t item DSER Secten/ Title /Descriptum Resp (W) NRC . No. Etranch. Question Type Detail Status Engineer Status Status letter No / Date 1358 NRR/lillFB 187.34 DSER4M MMIS/Kerch Closed Resolved NSD-NRC-96-4831 r [ Westinghouse should provide information regardmg the detailed examination of critical actions. Westingnouse should describe the process that will (a) provide additional information on the impact of IIFE function allocations yet to be performed on the llRA. (b) provide detaded etaluations of critical actions to reduce or climinate sources oferror, and (c) clarify the possible inconsistency between the operator role assumptions in the life design and the llRA . . . _ _ Resolved 3/31/95 - Phone conversation between Westinghouse and j Bongarra. Jim stated that generally speaking the resolutkm paths for all element 6 open nems are acceptabic. Action W: To develop and submit a draft of the llRA-IIFE Integration implementation Plan by May 31 1he appropriate section of the SSAR will also be revised referencing this implementation plan. , i The draft flRA/IIIE Integration implementation Plan was sent (via fax) to the NltC litIFB on 5/24/95. All Jment 6 (llRA)open items are addressed by this document.' The NRC reviewed the docwnent and provided feedback via the fax of 9/28/95, NRC considers this issue resolved , i Action W (per NRC)- see NRC response sent 10/3/95 l Closed - Revised SSAR 18 7. Integration ofIlumen Reliability Analysis with fluman Factors Engineering submitted in Reviskm 9,7/31/96. Item I will be closed when revised WCAP-14651 is submitted ! [ Element 6 Revised SSAR I8.7, integration of Human Reliability Analysis with Bluman Factors Engineering submitted on Revision 9. 7/31/96 Item will bc ; closed when revised WCAP-1465I is submitted. Closed - In reference to letter NSD-NRC-96-4831 dated 9 October o.% Resolved by NRC letter of 12/19 for El 6. rka 12/19 ; Action W - See NRC letter dated 12/9/96. - No, this is old news, resolved rkn 1/28 . . - . . . . . . - . - - - - - t i i t Page: 44 Total Records: 109
..m_. . . -... ,__._.--m .____ _ . . _ . . ..-
_= _ _ _ . _ _ _ _ . - _ _ _ _ _ . _ _ _ _ _ - . _ . - AP600 Ope:s It2mi Tracking Systesa Database: Execativa Saussesry pas 2: 2/20/97- I Selection: [DSER Sectionj 1 Le'Is** Sorted by item # I Item DSER Section/ Title / Description Resp (W) NRC No Branch Question Type Detail Status Engineer Status Status letter No / - Date 1352 NRR/IlllFB 1873-5 DSI Rol MMIS/Kerch Closed I;esolved NSD-NRC-96-4831 Westmghouse should provide infonnation regarding the use of PRA/HRA insights. Westinghouse should provide examples of how the llRA/15A~ insights were used to improve design and limit risk to human actions and errors and describe the process whereby this effort will continue as part of ; the llFE design [
' Action W .
3/31/95 - Phone conversation between Westinghouse and J Bongarra: Jim stated that generally speaking the resokim paths for all element 6 open items are acceptable, however, the closure path to this one does not answer the question Jim said that we need to provide specific examples. Also, he said to refer to the specific PRM criteria, RAI Q720117 and the Evaluation section of the DSER for this open item for further guidance. (Ex. of influence on the MMI design?) Action W: To develop and submit a draA of the llRA-IlFE Integration implementation Plan by May 31. The ; appropriate section of the SSAR will also be revised, referencing this implementation plan
- The dreA IIRA/HFE Integration implementation Plan was sent (via fax) to the NRC fillFB on 5/24/95. All element 6 (llRA) open items are i addressed by this document. The NRC reviewed the document and provided feedback. Westinghouse needs to address the questions raised in the !
NRC fax of 9/28/95. (see NRC response sent 10/3/95) [ Resolved. Draft WCAP-14651, Integration ofIluman Reliability Analysis with Iluman Factors Engineering Design Implementation Plan, was Isulunitted to the NRC as an attachment to NSD-NRC-96-4722 on 5/14/96. Appropriate reference to the document will be made in Chapter I8 of the SSAR. J Revised SSAR 18 7 Integration ofIluman Reliability Analysis with llaman Factors Engineering submitted in Revision 9,7/31/96. Item will be closed when revised WCAP-14651 is submitted. t Element 6. Revised SSAR 18.7, Integration of fluman Rc!iability Analysis with Human Factors Engineering submined on Revision 9,7/31/96. Item mdi be closed when revised WCAP 14651 is submitted Closed - In reference to letter NSD-NRC-96-4831 dated 9 October 1996. y Resolved by NRC letter of 12/19 for El 6. rkn 12/19 [ Action W - See NRC letter dated 12/9/96. - No, this is old news, resolved. rkn 1/28 _ . _ . _ _ _ f a i l t i i r [ i t i. Page: 45 Total Records: 109 i F
_ _ _. . . . . _ _ . . - _ ~ _ .. AP600 Opea Itan Tracking Systini Database: Execttiva Snaincry Dat:: 2/20/97 I
~
Selecties: [DSER Section] like '18 Sorted by Item # Item DSI R Section/ Title / Description Resp (W) NRC No Branch Question T3pe Detail Status Engineer Status Status I etter No / Date 1353 NRR/Illll H 18 7.3-6 DSER4)I MMG/Kerch Closed Resolved NSD-NRC-96-4831 , Westmghouse should provide information regarding the llRA validation. Westinghous: should describe the prodslor validation ofIIRA assumptions and possible revision of the llRA if necessary. Resolved 3/31/95 - Phone conversation between Westinghouse and I Bongarra Jim stated that generally spealing the resolution paths for all element 6 open items are acceptable, Action W: To develop and submit a draR of the llRA-IIFE Integration Implementation Plan by May 31. De appropriate section of the SSAR will also be resised (Revision 4), referencing this Lmplementation plan. De draA flRA/IIFE Integration Implementation Plan was sent (via fax) to the NRC lilli-B on 5/24N5. All element 6 (IIRA) open items are addressed by this document. The NRC reticwed the document and provided feedback via fax of 9/28NS, NRC considers the issue resolved. Action W (per NRC)- see NRC response sent 10/3/95 Revised SSAR 18.7, Integration ofIluman Reliability Analysis with fluman Factors Engineering submitted in Revision 9,7/3tN6 Item will be closed when revised WCAP-I465I is submitted. , Element 6. Revised SSAR 18.7, Integration ofIluman Reliability Analysis with Iluman Factors Engineering submitted on Revisim 9,7/3IN6 frem will be closed when revised WCAP-14651 is subn-ined. Closed -In reference to letter NSD-NRC 46-4831 dated 9 October 1996 Resolved by NRC letter of 12/19 for El 6. rka 12/19 Action W - See NRC letter dated 12N/96. - No, this is old news, resolved rkn I/28 1354 NRR/IIHf B 18 8.1.3-1 DSER-Ol MMIS Closed NTD-NRb-9i-4%I
~
Westinghouse should provide information regarding the llSI design process guidance. Westinghouse should descriEh'~wWaluation o results wilI [ be communicated to designers, incorporated into design guidance, and reflected in final design documentation ne process by which ! implementation guidance will be developed must also be described. l t Meeting of 3/10/95: Action N: NRC will review our design process as described in the SSAR, RAls and in WCAP 12601, and Wt. AF voihad provide us feedback. The NRC will review the SSD procedures of WCAP I2601 to determine if they cover issues like "providing guidance to llSI designers fo' r i addressing / utilizing design inputs such as the FBTA results" Note that the procedures will be at a higher level, mW specifically referring to the . L FBTA or other specific IIFE analyses er reports. De staff will also review the Alarm System Design Guidelines and the Interim Report on Technical Principles for Computer Based Displays of Data (both on li!c in Rockville omcc). Informal feedback from NRC was that the display document does provide the intended guidance. Meeting of 3/10N5: NRC reviewed our design process as described in the SSAR, RAls and in WCAP 12601, and WCAP 98I7 and provided I feedback via a letter dated 7/25/95. Action W: Rev5w and address NRC feedback issues.- Revised SSAR Chapter 18 submitted in Revision 9,7/31/96. This includes SSAR 18 8 Human System Interface Design and SSAR 18.2,Iluman Factors Engineering Program Managernent. NRC letter of Dec 19 says W action for element 7. rka 12/19 Closed with submittal of WCAP-143% Rev 2. rkn 1/30/97 _ _ _ _ Page: 46 Total Records: 109
~ .__ _. . . _ .
AP600 Ope:s It;ni Tracking Sy: ten Dat; base: Exec;tiva Sanime:ry DStm 2/20/97 Selection: [DSER Sectionj hke 'l8*' Sorted by item # Item I DSI R Section/ Title / Description Resp (W) NRC No Branch Question lype Detail Status Engineer Status Status Date _ _ _ . _ _ . . _ _ _ _ _ _ . _ _ _ _ _ _ _ letter No /_ _ 1355 NRR!IlliFB 18813-2 DSLR-Oi MMIS C Ssed Resolved ' Westinghouse should provide information regarding the task-related IISI requirements. Westinghouse should describe the process by which possible omissions in controls and displays are climinated form the final design. The means by which features of controls and displays are initially defined must also be desenbed. Meet:ng of 3/I0/95: , Same as the " Action N* note in the open item description field for dbase item nuaiber 1354. Meeting of 3/10/95: NRC reviewed our design process as described in the SSAR, RAls and in WCAP 12601, arhWCAP 9817 and provided feedback via a letter dated 7/25S5 . Action W: Review and address NRC feedback issues. Revised SSAR Chapter 18 submitted in Revision 9,7/31N6 This includes SSAR 18 8,Iluman System Interface Design and SSAR 18.2,iluman Factors Engineering Program Management NRC - resolved by letter dated 12/19. rkn 12/19. Action W - See NRC letter dated 12/9N6. - No, this is old news, resolved. rkn 1/28 1356 NRR/IlliFB 188133 DSFR4)I MMIS Closed NTD-NRb7-4%I - Westinghouse should provide information regarding 11S1 characteristics. Westinghouse should describe how potential problems associated with high workload will be identified early in the design process, and how the concerns noted in the evaluation above will be addressed Westinghouse should also describe how the design of workstations (inside and outside the MCR) ensure support of optimal operator performance under a range of conditions. i Meeting of 3/10/95: 5 Same as the " Action N"_ note in the open item description field for dbase item number 1354. __
~
Meeting of 3/1085: NRCreviewed our design process as described in the SSAR, RAls and in WCAP I2601, and WCAP 9817 and provided l E feedback The NRC reviewed the SSD procedures of WCAP 12601 with respect to covering issues like "providing guidance to IISI designers for " addressing / utilizing design inputs such as the FBTA results". Note that the procedures will be at a higher level, not speciGcally referring to the J BTA or other srecific IIFE analyses or reports. The staff also reviewed the Alarm System Design Guidelines and the Interim Report on Technical Principles for Computer Based Displays of Data (both on file in Rockville office). Feedback from NRC was that the display document does ! provide the intended guidance. i 6/7M5: Fax of a response to this open item was sent to 3. Bongarra NRC reviewed the response and provided feedback indicatmg that the response is acceptable. See NRC letter dated 7/25/95. SSAR revision required for closure. l Revised SSAR Chapter 18 submitted in Revision 9,7/3 tM6. This includes SSAR 18 8. Iluman System Interface Iksign and SSAR 18 2, Iluman Factors Engineering Program Management. NRC letter rec'd 12/19 statusing Action w for El 7. rkn 12/19 Westinghouse activities completed with submittal of WCAP-143% Rev 2. rkn 1/2887. _ _ _ _ . __ __ , Page: 47 Total Records: 109
AP600 Open It;m Tracking Syst;m Dat-base: Exec;tiv2 Summ:ry Dat2: 2/20/97 Selection: [DSER Sectionl like '18*' Sorted by item # item dst R Section/ Titic/ Description Resp NRC (W) No Branch Question 1ype Detail Saatus Engineer Status Status Extter No / Date 1357 NRR/Ilitill 1881.3-4 DSER-OI MMIS Closed Resobed
~ ~ ~ ~
Westinghouse should provide informdion rcgarding design feature selection Westinghouse should describe the process used to evaluate design altermatives identified in the staffs evaluation. Meeting of 3/1085: Action W: Westinghou;c to review the level of detail for design certification relative to the MMI Ley features. Specifically need to ad&ess whether or not the " mission statements" or pupose(s) are worth certifying if mission statements are not certified then the Ley features aren't , certified even from a conceptual level. Will need to clearly identify those missions that we are covering We will indicate those Ley features that ! we do not want certified and their mission statements. Schedule will need to be quick because it will impact NRC scope of review. 5/l1: Phoncon with J Bongarra - I told Jim that we wanted the llSI design resicwed at the implementation plan level (as they have done) and that there were no design features that we wanted reviewed at a more detailed or complete level Meeting of 3/IO/95: NRC reviewed our design process as described in the SSAR, RAls and in 4 CAP 12601, and WCAP 9817 and provided , feedback via *mer of 7/25/95. Action W. keview and address NRC feedback issues. Revised SSAR Chapter 18 submitted in Revision 9,7/31/96. This includes SSAR 18 8, iluman System Interface Iksign and SSAR 18.2, iluman Factors Engineering Program Management. , Resolved by NRC letter dated 12/19 for Element 7. rkn 12/19 Action W - See NRC letter dated 12/9/96 - No, this is old news, resolved. rkn 1/28 1358 NRR/IlllFB 1881.35 DSFR-Ol ITAAC/MMIS Closed Resolved NSD-NRC-4875 Westmghouse should provide information regarding the detailed guidelines for 18S1 design. Westinghouse should proside the requested handimok and guidelines as samples of the results of the process. t Meeting of 3/10/95: Same as the " Action N" note in the open item description field for dbase item number 1354. t ERC reviewed the quideline documents and found them acceptable. See NRC letter dated 7/25/95. ITAAC required for closure Revised SSAR Chapter 18 submitted in Revision 9,7/31/96. This includes SSAR I8 8,iluman System Interface Design and SSAR 18.2,iluman Factors Engineerir.g Program Management. Element 7. SSAR Rev 9 Ch 18 and WCAP-143% Rev i submittals. Closed -ITAAC submitted by NSD-NRC-96-4875 of II/7M6 Resolved by Dec 19 NRC letter. rkn 12/19 Action W - See NRC letter dated 12/9/96. - No, this is old news, resolved. rLn 1/28 __ _ ____ lige: 48 Total Records: 109 +
i AP600 Opca Item Tracking Syst;m Dat:. base: Exec-tive Sxmmary Dat2: 2/20/97 Selection: [DSER Section] like 'I 8** Sorted by item # Item DSI'R Section/ Titicilkscription Resp (W) NRC No Branch Question Typc Iktail Status Engineer Status Status i.etter No. / Date 1359 NRR!llllFB 18 8 I.3-6 DSER-Ol ITAAC/MMIS Closed Resolved NSIbNRC-4871 Westinghouse should provide information regarding the detailed flSI design analysis. Westinghouse should descriliin more detail the analysis methods by which design issues not covertd by availabic guidance are identified and resolved. In particular, Westinghouse shou'd describe the means by which etatuaiton results are translated into design guidance (see Criterion I, *lISI Design Process Guidance,* in this sectkm. Meeting of 3/10/95: Same as the " Action N" note in the open item description field for dbase item number 1354. NRC reviewed the quideline documents and found them acceptable. See NRC letter dated 7/25/95. ITAAC requi d for closure. Revised SSAR Chapter 18 submitted in Revision 9,7/31/96. This includes SS AR 18 8. Iluman System Interface Iksign and SSAR 18 2, iluman Factors Engineering Program Management. i Element 7. SSAR Rev 9 Ch 18 and WCAP-143% Rev i submittals. l C ssed - ITAAC submitted by NSD-NRC-96-4875 of I 1/7/96 Resolved by NRC letter 12/19. rkn 12/19 Action W - See NRC letter dated 12/9/96 - No, this is old news, resolved rLn 1/28 13W NRR/IllIFB 188.13-7 DSEROI MIS Closed NSI55RU875 Westinghouse should provide information regarding the IISI cvaluation. Westinghouse should describe the rationale for the llSis, design elements, and g w,;w selected for evaluation, and for the points in the design process at which the esaluations are to occur. Westinghouse should also describe the process for identifying and resolving conflicts in guidance, as well as the rationale for design decisions that conHict with guidance. Meeting of 3/10/95: Same as the " Action N* note in the open item description ficid for dbase item number 1354. _ _ f NRC reviewed the quideline documents and found them acceptable. See NRC letter dated 7/25/95. IfAAC required for closurc~ { [ Revised SSAR Chapter 18 submitted in Revision 9,7/31/96 This includes SSAR 18 8. Iluman System Interface Iksign and SSAR 18.2. Iluman Factors Engineering Program Management. Element 7. SSAR Rev 9 Ch 18 and WCAP-143% Rev i submittals. Closed -ITAAC submitted by NSD-NRC-96-4875 of 11/7/96. Action W per NRC letter of Dec 19 fiw El 7. rkn 12/19 _ _ _ i I Page: 49 Total Records: 109
._._ . _, . ._ . _. _. . . _ - - - . _ _ . . _ _ .. _ m . - .- . . .. . . _ . . . .
AP600 Open It:m Tracking Syst;m Datbase: Execctive Samanary Date: 2/20/97
~
Selection: IDSER Section] like *18'" Sorted by item # Item DSER Section/ litle/Descripton Resp (W) NRC No Branch Question Type. Detail Sta'us Engineer Status Status triter No. / Date 1361 NRR/IllIFH 88I38 , DSER-OI ITAAC MIS Closed SD-NRC-4875 Westmghouse should describe how the llSI design will be documented. Westinghouse should desenbe how the final 1151 design will be I exumented, incorporating the bases given in the criterion Meeting of 3/10/95: Same as the
- Action N* note m the open item description field for dbase item number 1354.
NRC reviewed the quidelme documents and found them acceptable. See NRC letter dated 7/25/95. ITAAC required for closure. Revised SSAR Chapter 18 submitted in Revision 9,7/31/96. This includes SSAR I$ 8,iluman System interface Design and SSAR I8 2 Iluman Factors Engineering Program Management. l. Element 7. SSAR Rev 9 Ch 18 and WCAP-143% Rev I submittals. Closed - IT AAC submitted by NSD-NRC-96-4875 of 11/7/96. Action W per NRC letter of 12/19 for El 7. rLn 12/19 __ _ t I i i I i Page: 50 Total Records: 109 _ _ _ _ ____ __ _.__ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ ___ _____-m_ _- _ . _ _ _ _ ._ _.- . - - . -
AP600 Opca It;m Tracking Sy;t;m Dat; base: Execrtive Summ:ry Date: 2/20/97 Selection: lDSER Sectionl like '18" Sorted by item 9 Item DSI R Sectkm/ Title / Description Resp (W) NRC No Ilranch Question T)pc Detail Status Engineer Status Status Letter No / Date 1362 NRR/Illli11 I882.3-1 DSL R-OI SSARREV Confrm-W Action N Westinghouse should describe how the safety parameter display system (SPDS) design will be implemented to meet all pertinent 18S1 design criteria. Westinghouse should provide assurance that the SPDS design will meet all of the pertinent criteria as part of the 1151. Westinghouse should describe how the SPDS will privide a rapid and concise display of critical plant variables to control room operators Westinghouse should describe how the SPDS implementation will be convenient to control room personnel. Westinghouse should describe how the SPDS function will continuously display plant safety information Westinghouse should describe how the SPDS will achieve a high degree of reliabilit-- Westinghouse should describe how the SPDS will be suitably isolated from electrical or electronic interference with safety systems. Westinghouse should describe how human factors principles will be incorporated into the SPDS Westinghouse should describe how the SPDS will display sufficient information to determine plant safety status with respect to safety functions Westinghouse should describe how procedures and operator training, addressing actions both with and without the SPDS, will be implemented Per 2/16N5 conference call between Jim llongarra, John O'llara & Kerch, Easter, Roth, Mumaw-Action N - Send us any further shortcomings from a review ofour rev i response to RAI 620 48 compared against the DSI R issue 18 8 2.3 criteria (3/8 meeting in Monroevdie). Action W - After receiveing the deficiency list from NRC, respond to it Meeting of 3/8N5: Action W - Westinghouse to adress the comments provided by the NRC stafTdurmg 3/8 meeting Refer to meeting notes / minutes for the details in general, one word answers (yes or no) as found in RAI 620 48 were insufficient. Each of the 10 Cf R 50.34 requirements (la - le,2 - 9) and the additional information that was needed was discussed. Westinghouse to justify difTerence between our critical safety function parameters on the SPDS and those specified by NUREG 1342 and the generic letter. Need to address the critical safety functions listed on page 8 of NUREG 0737 Refer to meeting notes / minutes for further detail. __ __ _ _ . Action W Meeting of 3/8N5: Action W - Westinghouse to address the comments provided by the NRC staff during 3/8 meetmg Refer to meetmg notes / minutes for the details. In general, one word answers (yes or no) as found in RAI 620 48 were insufficient Each of the 10 CI'R 50 34 requirements (la - le,2 - 9) and the additional information that was needed was discussed. Westinghouse to justify difTerence between our critical safety function parameters on the SPDS and those specified by NUREG 1342 and the generic letter. Need to address the critical safety functkms listed on page 8 of NUREG 0737. Refer to meeting notes / minutes for further detail. Westinghouse will fax to the NRC 111fi Il a response to this open item. This response will be sent as a draft RAI revision 2 to Q620 48 The NRC action will be to review the response and preside feedbacit The formal documentation to close this item will be a revision to SSAR section 18 9 2.2.6 or the formal revision 2 to RAI Q620 48, luth of mhich would incorporate NRC feedback as result of revicwing the draft RAI revision. 6/7NS: Fax of document providing responses to the 9 criteria identified in the open item was sent to J llongarra NRC reviewed this document and provided feedback via fax of 9/2 tN5. Six of the nine SPDS criteria are considered resolved. Action W: To respond to remaining questions in fax of 9/21N5, (see NRC response !ctter sent 9/28N5) Revised SSAR Chapter 18 submitted in Revision 9,7/3 tN6. This includes SSAR 18 8, iluman System Interface Design. Action W Nr 2-4 of the 9 SPDS items per NRC netter of Dec 19. rkn 12/19 Action N - See NRC letter dated 12NN6 NRC approved the markup o(SSAR l 8.8 2.2) This item is open to confirm SSAR changes are incorporated into the next revision rkn 1/15N7 Page: 51 Total Records: 109
AP600 Open Iteen Tracking Sy; tem Database: Executiva Sesammary Date: 2/20/97 Selection: (DSER Sectioni like '18 Sorted by item # Item DSER Sectkm/ Titic/Ikscription Resp (W) NRC No Branch Question Type Detail Status Engineer Status Status trtter No. I Date 1363 NRR/Illtf B 18.9 3-l DSI R-OI MMIS/LRG Closed Action N Westinghouse should clarify the scope of the procedure devekyment program. Per 2/I6/95 conference call between Jim Bongarra, John 011 ara & Kerch, Easter, Roth, Mumaw: Action W - Send the revised writeup to applicable section of SSAR chapter i 8 Action W W$stinghouse sent a draft revision of SSAR section 18.9.8 to the NRC. This section will refe ence 13 5.3 which will state that the development of procedures is a combined license applicant responsibility. The revised 13.5 3 will be sent as part of the fimnal revision 3 to the SSAR. NRC to reviewed deaft of 18 9 B; see NRC fax of 2/20/96. ACflON W: to respond to concems of the fax; was discussed in conference call of 3/21/96 5 Closed - Procedure devekyment is addressed in revised SSAR Chapters 13 and I8 submitted in Rev. 9,7/31/96. Action N - See NRC letter dated 12/9/96. _ _ _ _.__ __ ____ _. It ' f f Page: 52 Total Records: 109
. . . . ._ _m _. . ~_ _ _ _- - ._ . _ _ . . _ _ - _ - . -_ . - .._ _ . _ - _ ._ ._ .. _.
T AP600 Open It;m Tracking Sy;t;m Dat2 base: Execttiva Summary Datz: 2/20/97 1 Seleesion: lDSER Sectionl like 'l8** Sorted by item # Item DSER Section/ Titic/ Description Resp (W) NRC 4 No I! ranch Question Typc Detail Status Engineer status Staus Dme
. _ _ . . _ _ _ _ _ . . . tetter No. / __
1364 NRR/IlllHI 1893-2 DSER-OI MMIS/ ERG Closed Resolved NSD-NRC-96-4794 Westinghouse should provide the technical basis for procedure development. Westinghouse should describe how (or wh5) methods, in addition to I.P ERG comparison, will be used for procedure development. Per 2/16/95 conference call between Jim Bongarra, John O'Hara & Kerch, Easter, Roth, Mumaw: i Action N - Jim flangarra will interface with NRC Rx systems branch who attended the 2/2/95 meeting in Rockville ( AP600 ERG presentatk.34 c*d decide what the NRC status is; ie. CLOSED or give us feedback on what our actkm needs to be. Feedback given to Westinghouse in 2/23 - conference call was that the material presented at 2/2 meeting (basis ofI RG development) was acceptable and the action-W is to deliver the Ems and documents by May 31. Resolved Feedback given to Westinghouse in 2/23 conference call was that the material presented at 2/2 meeting (basis of ERG devekyment) was acceptable and the action.W is to deliver the ERGS and documents by May 31,1995. Status updase provided by phone (D. Jackson 8/21)
- Action W is to complete analytical basis for AE-l, AES-I.2, AE-2, and supporting documentation for shutdown i RG Review at-power Low power / shutdown ERGS and background for at-power and low power ERGS. and the draA of SSAR section 18 9 8 sent on 8/18/95. See NRC fax of 2/20/96.
ACTM)N W: to respond to concerns of the fax; was discussed in conference call of 3/21/96 Closed - In Response to letter NSD-NRC-964794. Based on a conference call (J. liongarra. J. Sobrosky, Kerch & Nydes) of 12/I t/96 the NRC now considers tis tyen item " resolved".1 hey reviewed again WCAP-14655 and WCAP-14690 and decided that their concerns as documented in NRC letter of DEC 4,1996 (dxLet No 52-003). ' Comments On AP600 Related Open items Associated With Element 4 Of The lluman Factors Engineering Program Review Maiel* have been addressed. Resolved in NSD-NRC-96-4874. rkn 12/19 Action N - See NRC letter desed 12/9/96. - No, this is old news, resolved. rkn I/28 _ _ _ _ _ _ _
. _ _ . i i
Page: 53 Total Records: 109 l 1
. . . - - - - - . - . - - - - _ _ . . . . - - . .-. -. ~ - , - - - . . . . -.--. . . . _ _ - - _ ~ .-
AP600 Open It2m Tracking System Dat; base: Exec .tiv2 Semunary Date: 2/20M7 Selection: [DSER Section] lit e 'I B** Sorted by item # [ , Item DSER Sectionf Resp NRC Title / Description (W) I_.. _ ]_'E _ N ._. _ - - "' Engineer Status Status Ectier No. / Date -
- l)65 NRR/lWH1l 1893-3 DSER-OI MMIS/ ERG - Closed NSD-NRC-96-4805 Westinghouse Ed provide in5mation regarding the writer's guide. Westinghouse should describe how the writer's guide will address the unique feature, of a paper- ard computer-tmed presentation of procedures !
. Per 2/16/95 conference call between Jim Bongarra, John ONara & Kerch, Easter, Roth, Mumaw: j Action W - NRC agreed to resoluten path *in principic" and we need to send revision to SSAR section i
- Adm W - ;
Per 2/16/95 conference call between Jim Rongarra, John Ullara & Kerch, Easter, Roth, Mumaw: Action W - NRC agreed to resolution path *in l j principle" and we need to send revision to SSAR section i Westinghouse sent (via fax or fedex) to the NRC a draft revision to SSAR I8 9 8 on 8/l8/95 mhich will pravide the response to this open item Action N: NRC to review dran of IB 9.8 ; see NRC fax of 2/20/96. ACTION W: to respond to concerns of the fax; was discussed in conference call of 3/21/96 ; Element 8. With submittal of SSAR Rev 9 ch 18 and WCAP-14690, the MMIS portion of this item is closed. Need to determine what is required to . close ERG portion of item. Resolved - Per DCP/NRC0589, this item will be closed with submittal of the ai-power ERGS. 4 No ERG changes required skn 12/', 1 13 % NRR/lHW H 18 9.3-4 DSER-OI MMIS/ ERG Closed (AcNn W) NSD-NRC-96-4805 ; Westinghouse should praiA in'iormation regarding the contents of procedures Westinghouse should desdibe Epridaia:Eal'c for the ' differences, if any, between the paper- and computer-based presentations of the items in this criterion (or in NURi'G-0899) Per 2/16/95 conference call between Jun Hongarra, John OHara & Kerch, Easter, Roth, Mumsw: , .t Action W - NRC agreed to resolution path *in principle" and we need to send revision to SSAR section. _ ___ Action W r Per 2/!6/95 conference call between Jim Bongarra, John OHara & Kerch, Easter, Roth, Mumaw: Action W - NRC agreed to re olution path *in l principle" and we need to send revision to SSAR section. , Westinghouse sent (via fax or fedex) to the NRC a draft revision to SSAR I8 9 8 on 8/l8/95 which prosided the response to this open item I Action N: NRC to review dran of 18.9 8 ; see NRC fax of 2/20/96. ACHON W: to respond to concerns of the fam; was discussed in conference call of 3/21/96 Element 8. With submittal of SSAR Rev 9 ch it and WCAP-14690, the MMIS portion of this item is closed Need to determine what is required to close ERG portion of this item Resolved - Per DCP/NRC0589, this item will be closed with submittal of the at-power ERGS ! No ERG changes requued. rkn 12/3 l I 1 1 l
}
i 4 4 f 1 o Page: 54 Total Records: 109 , __ _ _ . - _ _ _ _ _ ___ _ --, _ .m_mrm,._m_ ~ - - - . . . . . . ..__,.m.,, ~m ~ , _ , _ ..~.-,.a...e.__,--..,.--e..y,,,._....._m,.... . . . _ _ <
_ ~ _ _ _ - - - - - - - - _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ - - - - _ - - - _ - _ _ _ _ _ - _ - _ - _ _ _ - - - _ _ - - _ - . - _ _ _ _ _ - - _ - - - - _ - _ _ . -_ - - _ _ _ _ _ - - _ _ _ _ _ _ - - - _ _ _ _ - - _ . . _ _ _ _ - _ - _ _ - AP600 Open It:m Tracking Sy;tzm Database: Exec tivaSumniary Datz 2/20/97 'i
~
Selection: lDSER Section] like 'l8" Sorted by item # Item DSER Secton/ ' Title / Description Resp (W) NRC ; No Branch Question . Type Detail Status Engineer . Status Status letter No. / Date 1 7 NRR/lillFB 18 9.3-5 DSE MMIS/ ERG Westinghot:sc should provide information regarding the symptom- based emergency operating procedures (LOI5)[Einghouse should submit Closed ( NSD-NRC-96-4794 the AP600-specific ERGS so that the staff can verify that the 10Ps will be symptom-based. i Per 2/16/95 conference call between Jim Hongarra, John 011 ara & Kerch, Easter, Roth, Mumaw Action W - NRC agreed to resolution path "in principic" and we need to send the ERGS and background documents to NRC. Action W { Per 2/16N5 conference call between Jim Bongarra, John 01tara & Kerch, Easter, Roth, Mumaw: } Action W - NRC agreed to resolution path *in principic" and we need to send the ERGS and background documents to NRC. These will be sent ; via a phased approach with phase i ERGS to be sent 5/31N5. Strtus update provided by phone (D Jackson 8/21): AcWm W is to complete analytical basis for AE-l. AES-l .2, AE-2, and supporting documentation for shutdown ERG Closed with submittal of ERCS Rev 2 on Jan 10,1997. rkn I/15M7. i l Clost 1 - In Response to letter NSD-NRC-96-4794. ( Actior, W - See NRC letter dated 12SM6. [ t This iten is closed with submittal of the ERGS Rev 2 Jan 10 rkn III5M7. l 1368 NRR/IlllFB I89.3-6 DSER-OI MMIS/ ERG Closed NSD-NRC 96-4805 Westingho sse should provide information regnding the V&V procedure. Westinghouse should clarify the relationship of the I OP V&V to the M-MIS evalua' ion issues. The V&V proceu for hardcopy procedures should also be described. Per 2/16S5 conference call between lim Bengarra, John 011 era & Kerch, Easter, Roth, Mumaw: Action W - h RC agreed to resolution pah *in principic" and we need to send revision to SSAR section h Action W i Per 2/I6/95 conference call between Jim Bongarra, John 011 era & Kerch Easter, Roth, Mumaw: Action W - NRC agreed to resolution path *in principle" and we need to send revision to SSAR section ~ Westinghouse sent (via fax or fedex) to the NRC a draA revision to SSAR 18.9.8 on 8/I8/N which prosided the response to this open item NRC to review draA of I8.9 8 ; see NRC fax of 2/20/96. r ACTION W: to respond to concems of the fas; was discussed in conference call of 3/21/94 ; Element L. With submittal of SSAR Rev 9 ch 18 and WCAP-14640, the MMIS portion of this item is closed Need to determine what is required [ to close ERG portion Resolved - Per DCP/NRC0589, this item will be closed with submittal of the at-power l'RGs. No ERG chariges required. WCAP-14401 provides the programmatic procedure V&V. rin 12S WCAP_f 14HO v a __ was prodch@d in Nbb- RC-T1- $ [ m , t/20/0. Prge: 55 Total Records: 109
AP600 Open It:m Trackirg Symm Dat base: Exec tiv2 Summary Dat;: 2/20/97 Selection: lDSI:R Section] like 'l8" Sorted by item # Item DSI R Section/ litle/ Description Resp NRC IW) No Branch Question Type Detail Status Engineer Status Status
. _ _. I.ctter No / - _ _Date _
1369 NRR/IlllF B 1893-7 DSE R4)I MMIS/ ERG Closed NSD-NRC-96-4805 f Westinghouse should provide information regarding the computer- based procedures Westinghouse should describe the process by which human engineering issues associated with computer-based procedures will be resolved (e s., concept testing, and other analyses) Per 2/16/95 conference call between Jim Bongarra, John 01(ara & Kerch, Easter, Roth, Mumaw: Actkm W - NRC agreed to resolution path *in principle" and we need to send revision to SSAR sectkm _. _ _ _ _. __.- Action W Per 2/I6/95 conference call between Jim Bongarra, John 011 ara & Kerch Easter, Roth, Mumaw. Action W - NRC agreed to resolution path *in principle" and we need to send revision to SSAR section Westinghouse sent (via fax or fedex) to the NRC a draft revision to SSAR I8.9 8 on 8/l8/95 mhich provided the response to this open item NRC to review draft of I8 9 8 ; see NRC fax of 2/20N6 ACTION W: to respond to concerns of the fax; was discussed in conference call of 3/23/96. Element 8 With submittal of SSAR Rev 9 ch 18 and WCAP-14690, the MMIS portion of this item is closed Need to determine what is required to close ERG portion. Resolved - Per DCP/NRC0589, this item will be closed with submittal of the at-power ERG's. No ERG changes required Refer to SSAR Sections 18 2 and 18 9 and Figure 18 2-3 for inputs to llSi design rkn 12/3 1370 NRR E FB 18 9.3-8 DSER-OI MMIS/ ERG Closed hetion %) NSI5NitC-96-4805 I Westinghouse should provide information regarding procedure maintenance. Westinghouse should describe the administrative procedures that will ensure that hardcopy procedures remain current and consistent with the computer-based procedures Per 2/16/95 conference call between Jim Bongarra, John 011 ara & Kerch, Easter, Roth, Mumaw. Action W - NRC agreed to resolution path "in principic" and we need to send revision to SSAR sectam Action W Per 2/16/95 conference call between Jim Dongarra. John 011 ara & Kerch, Easter, Roth, Mumaw: Acikm W - NRC agreed to resolution path "in principle" and we need to send revision to SSAR sectu>n Westinghouse sent (via fax or fedex) to the NRC a draft revision to SSAR I8 9.8 on 8/18/95 which provided the response to this open item NRC to review draft of I8 9 8; see NRC fax of 2/20/96 ACTION W: to respond to concerns of the fax; was discussed in conference call of 3/2th Element 8. With submittal of SSAR Rev 9 ch 18 and WCAP-14690, the MMIS portion of this item is closed Need to determine what is required b close ERG portion. Resolved - Per DCP/NRC0589, this item will be closed with submittal of th at-power ERG's. No ERG changes required. SSAR 13.5 notes procedure development ,includmg administrative procedures, are COL apphcant responsibihty See also SSAR 18 9 which references WCAP 14690. rkn 12/3 ___ - - - _ - _ _ . . - _ . - - . - _ _ --. _ . - . Page. 56 Total Records: 109
. . . . - .-. -- - _ . . . - - - . _ . . . . ~ - - . - . . . . - . .. . - . . . . . -_ _
AP600 Opea It2m Tracking System Dat:, base: Execctiva Summaary . Date: 2/20/97 i Selection: lDSIER Section] like *18 Sorted by item # Item DSER Sectionf Titic/ Description RcSP (W) NRC , No. Branch Question Type Detail Status Engineer Status Status 14tter No / Date 1371 NRR/IlltfB I89.3-9 DSIR4)! MMIS/ ERG Closed NSD-NRC-96-4805 Westinghouse shoul'd provide information regardmg procedure use. Westinghouse should describe provisTon5r adc'esito7nd use of, hardcepy procedures, as backups either in the control room or at locations outside the control room. Westinghouse should also describe how disruption of , ongoing activity by automatically accessed @b will be minimized. Per 2/16S5 conference call between Jim Bongarra, John Ullara & Kerch, Easter, Roth, Mumaw: Action W - NRC agreed to resolution path *in prmciple" and we need to send revision to SSAR section. Action W Per 2/16N5 conference call between Jim Hongarra, John O'llara & Kerch, Easter, Roth, Mumaw: Action W - NRC agreed to resolution path "in
- principle" and we need to send revision to SSAR section.
Westinghouse sent (via fax or fedex) to the NRC a draft revision to SSAR 18 9 8 on 8/18N5 mhich provided the response to this open item NRC to review draR of 18.9 8 ; see NRC fax of 2/2696. ACTION W: to respond to concerns of the fax; was discussed in conference call of 3/2IN6. Element 8. With submittal of SSAR Rev 9 ch 18 and WCAP-14690, the MMIS portion of this item is closed. Need to determine what is required to close ERG portion. Resolved - Per DCP/NRC0589, this item will be closed with submittal of th at-power ERGS. r No ERG changes required SSAR 13.5 notes procedure development , including administrative procedures, are Col. applicant responsibihty. See also SSAR 18 9 which references WCAP 14690. rLn 12/3 ,. _ 1372 NRR/IlliFB 18 9.3-10 DSE R4)I MMIS/Kerch Closed Westinghouse should provide information regarding the source material for procedure development. Weit'ikh'ou'e s 'siEElditedriEthe sources or - experience drawn upon in *veloping guidance for the design of the computer-based procedures. Conference call with NRC 3/21N5: (J Bongarra, G Galletti, T.Kenyon, J Ollara, j liiggins, A Sterdis, J Easter, E Roth, S Kerch) i Action W: Westinghouse to revise the applicable chapter 18 SSAR sections to reflect the statements and process descnbed in the closure path The , NRC's intent of this open item is limited to the computerization of procedures. __ j Action W Conference call with NRC 3/2IN5: (J Bongarra, G Galletti, T.Kenyon, J O'llara, J liiggins, A.Neidis, J Faster. E Roth, S Kerch) Action W: ' Westinghouse to revise the applicable chapter 18 SSAR sections to reflect the statements and process descnbed in the closure path lhe NRC's mient of this open item is hmited to the computerization of procedures Westinghouse sent (via fax or fedex) to the NRC a draR revision to SSAR 18.9 8 on 8/18N5 which provided the response to this open item i NRC to review draR of I8 9.8 ; see NRC fax of 2/20% [ i ACTION W: to respond to concerns of the fax; was discussed in conference call of 3/2 tN6 Element 8. Witit submittal of SSAR Rev 9 ch 18 and WCAP-14690, this item is closed. (Action N) See NRC letter dated I2N/96. _ ; V Page: 57 Total Records: 109 i . _ _ . _ _ _ _ _ - . _ _ - _ - - _ _ _ _ _ . _ - - _ _ _ - _ _ _ _ - - _ _ - _ - . . _ . - - _ - - . - - , _ _ ~ _ . - -. ;., .- .. . ~ . , _ . ...+.,. , ,. . , . - . -
. - - . . . . . . . . - - -- .-- . ._ - -. _- . - < . .- ~. - --- .- - -- AP600 Open it:m Tracking Sy tm Dat:. base: Execctiva Summ;ry Dat:: 2/20/97 Selection: lDSER Section] hke '18** Sorted by item # ' ltem DSER Sectkmf Titic/Descriptkm Resp NRC (W) No Branch Question -.- -- - 3.pe- T Detail Status Engineer Status Status
- - . - letter No I Date -
1373 NRR/lill1B 18103-1 DSER4)I MMIS Closed Resolved 5 Westinghouse should provide information regarding the traming program mission. Westinghouse should provide additional information regardin[ the process that will address the rationale behind the selection of the identified positions for developing training programs, as well as information on the other related areas identified in this criterion. Per 2/I655 conference call between Jim Bongarra, John 011 ara & Kerch, Easter, Roth, Mumaw: Action W - NRC agreed to resolution path "in principic" and we need to I . issue document, 2. prepare fiw March NRC meeting by list of COL applicant responsibility, and 3. revisc SSAR section Meetingof 3/8/95: Action W: Dran COL Action item. Training program development is the responsibility of the COL applicant Creation of this COL item will t close all 15 DSER items (18.10.3-I thru 3-15) that it addresses. Consider existing words in chapter 13 SSAR and DSER. Action item should be in chapter 13 and cross referenced fmm chapter i8. Two new MEETING Open items were created, both Action W, refer to dbase item number 2061 ! and 2062. Dran SSAR revision for section 18 9 9 sent to the NRC lillFB. Closure will occur when formal revision 4 is delivered Action N: NRC to review markup section and provide feedback. Closed - The training program development is addressed in revised SSAR Chapters 13 and 18 submitted in Rev 9,7/31/96. Action W - see NRC response sent I1/21M5 l 1374 NRR/lillfB 181032 DSER-Ol MMIS Closed Resolved
~ ~
Westinghouse should describe training requirements. Westinghouse should describe how the AP600 training pria7mvelopment uiit tnsure ' consistency with the regulatory documents cit:d in this cnterion Per 2/16/95 conference call between Jim Bongarra, John 011 ara & Kerch, Easter, Roth, Mumaw: [ Action W - NRC agreed to resolution path "in principle" and we need to I. issue doct ment & SSAR revision, 2. prepare for March NRC meeting by list of COL applicant responsibility, and 3. revise SSAR section. Meeting of 3/8/95: i Action W: DraA COL Action item. Training program development is the responsibility of the COL applicant Creatkm of this COL item will close all 15 DSER items (18.10 3-1 thru 3-15) that it addresses. Consider existing words in chapter 13 SSAR and DSER. Action item should be in chapter 13 and cmss referenced from chapter I8. Two new MEETING Open Items were created, both Action W, refer to dbase item number 2%I and 2%2. Dran SSAR revision for section 18.9.9 sent to the NRC filIFB. Chuure will occur when formal reviskm 4 is delivered Action N: NRC to review markup section and provide feedback. Action W - see NRC response sent i1/21/95 Closed - The training program development is addressed in revised SSAR Chapters 13 and I8 submitted in Rev 9,7/31N6 __ _ t Page- 58 Total Records: 109 m b _ _ _ . _ _ _ _ _ . _ _ _ . _ _ _ . _ _ _ . _ _ . . . . _ _ . . . . _ _ . _ _ _ _ _ _ _ . _ _ _ _ _ . . _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ ___ _ _ . _ _ m__ _ _ .. m__ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ . _ _ _ _ . _ _ - . . -- . -- .b
. - - - -- _ - --. - ..- _- . . - - ~. - - - - . - . - - - - . ._.. . - . ., ~ - .. -
AP600 Open it:in Tracking Syst:sm Database: Emeettiva Semannary Datn 2/20/97 I Selecteen. ' [DSER Section] I Le 'l8** Sorted by item # leem DSER Section/ Titic/ Description Resp (W) NRC , No Itranch Question Type . Detail Status Engineer Status Status Im No. / Date i 1375 NRR/HHFB 18103-3 DSER-OI MMIS Closed Resolved - Westinghouse should describe the SAT training approach Westinghouse should provide additonal information on the SAT approach that it is ! using, particularly with regard to the evaluation elements of the SAT process. Additionally, Westinghouse should provide information on how I cognitive task analysis will suppicment the information obeamed using a traditional SAT approach. L Per 2/16N5 conference call between Jim Hongarra, John UHara & Kerch, Easter, Roth, Mumsw: Action W - NRC agreed to resolution path *in principic" and we need to 1. issue document & SSAR revision. 2. prepare for March NRC meeting by list of COL applicant responsibility, and 3. revise SSAR section Meeting of 3/8N5: i 4 Action W: DraR COL Action item. Training program development is the responsibility of the O)L applicant. Creatum of this COL item will ;
- close all 15 DSER items (18.103-1 thru 3-15) that it addresses. Consider existing words in chapter 13 SS AR and DSER. Actkm item should be in
- i. chapter 13 and cross referenced from chapter 18. Two new MEETING Open items were created, txth Action W; refer to dbase item number 206l I and 2062.
I DraR SSAR revision for section IB 9.9 sent to the NRC HilFB. Closure will occur when formal revision 4 is delivered . i Action N: NRC to review markup section and provide feedback Action W . see NRC response sent 11/21N5 Closed . The training program development is addressed in revised SSAR Chapters 13 and 18 submetted in Rev. 9,7/31N6. [ 4 1376 NRR/HIMH 18103-4 DSER-OI MMIS Closed Resolved l
~~
5 Westinghouse should discuss organizational roles related to training. Westinghouse should specifically define the rolesa of'llIwgan'iAtions 5n~"" [* developing and E,.. . -ing the AP600 training programs. t Per 2/16N5 confesence call between Jmi Hongarra, John O'Hara & Ecrch, Easter, Roth, Mumaw: f i Acton W - NRC agreed to resolution path "in principic" and we need to 1. issue document & SSAR revision, 2 prepare for March NRC meeting [ i by list of COL apphcant responsibility, and 3. revise SSAR section. !
, I i
Meetingof 3/8/95: Action W: DreR COL Action item Training pregram development is the responsibility of the COL applicant. Creation of this COL item will ! close all 15 DSER items (18.10.3 I thru 3-15) that it addresses. Consider existing words in chapter 13 SSAR and DSER. Action item diould be in ! ghapser 13 and cross referenced from chapeer I8. Two new MEETING Open items were creased Imth Action W, refer to dbase item number 2061 land 2%2. l DraR SSAR revision for section 18 9.9 sent to the NRC HHFB. Closure will occur when formal revision 4 is delivered l Action N: NRC to review markup section and provide feedback.
~i Action W - see NRC response sent I1/21/95 ;
t Closed . The training program development is addressed in revised SSAR Chapters 13 and I8 submitted in Rev. 9,7/33N6 _ l t . Page: 59 Total Records: 109
AP600 Open Item Tracking Sy; tem Dat; base: Exec;tiva Summary Date: 2/20/97 Selection: [DSER Sectionl like 'l8** Sotted by item # Item DSFR Section/ Titic/ Description Resp (W) NRC No Ilranch Question Type Detail Status Engineer Status Status _ __ _ . _ _ _ . _ _ . _ _ _ . . _ _ _ _ _ _ . _ _ _ . _ _ __ _ _ ._i .etter _No /_ ___Date __._ 1377 NRR/Illlin 18103-5 DSLR-OI MMIS Closed Resolved
~
Westinghouse shot $1[ disc ~u~sithe goifications of training personnhcestinghouse should providUthmal indw5:$atk n on the ti alifications of organizations and personnel to be envolved in the development and conduct of training. Per 2/16N5 conference call b . tween Jim Dongarra, John 011 ara & Kerch, Easter, Roth, Mumaw: Action W - NRC agreed to esolution path *in prmcipic* and we need to I . issue document & SSAR revision, 2 prepare for March NRC meetmg by list of COL applicant resynsibility, and 3. revise SSAR section Meeting of 3/8N5. Action W: Draft COL Action item. Training program development is the responsibility of the COL applicant Creatkm of this (UL item will close all 15 DSER items (18.10.3 I thru 3-15) that it addresses Consider esisting words in chapter 13 SSAR and DSI R Acthm item should be in chapter 13 and cross referenced from chapter I8. Two new MEEllNG Open items were created, both Action W; refer to dbase item number 2061 and 2062. _ _ _ _ . _ _ . _ . - . _ _ _ _ Draft SSAR revision for section 18 9 9 sent to the NRC lil!FD Closure will occur when formal revision 4 is dehvered Action N: NRC to review markup section and provide feedback. Action W - see NRC response sent I1/2 tN5 Closed - The training program development is addressed in revised SSAR Chapters 13 and I5 submitted in Rev 9, 7/3 tN6 1378 NRR/lilitil 18 10.1-6 DSI R-OI MMIS Closed Resolved Westinghouse should describe the training scope. Westinghouse should pmside additional info,mation on how the AP600 training program will address the scope of training This information should include categories of personnel le g , senior reactor operator) to be trained, as well as specific plant conditions (normal, upset, and emergency), operational activities (e g , operations, maintenance, testmg. and surveillaneck and llSi components (e g., MCR, emergency operations facility, remote shutdown pancl, kxal control stations) Per 2/16/95 conference call between Jim Bongarra, John 011 ara & Kerch Easter, Roth, Mumaw: Action W ~ NRC agreed to resolution path "in principle
- and we need to I . issue document & SSAR revision, 2 prepare for March NRC meeting by proving hst of COL applicant responsibility (1378,1381,138),1384?), and 3 revisc SSAR section Meeting of 3/8M5:
Action W: Draft COL Action Item. T raining program development is the responsibility of the COL applicant Creation of this LUI item will close all 15 DSER items (1810.3-1 thru 3-15) that it addresses. Consider existing words in chapter 13 SSAR and DSI R Action item should be in chapter 13 and cross referenced from chapte' 18. Two new MEETING Open Items mete created, both Action W; refer to dbase item number 2061 and 2062. Draft SSAR revision for section 18 9 9 sent to the NRC 111(FB. Closure will occur when forma! resision 4 is dehvered Action N. NRC to review markup section and preside feedback. Action W- see NRC response sens iI/21/95 Closed - The training program development is addressed in revised SSAR Chapters 13 and 18 submitted in Rev 9,7/3 tN6 Page: 60 Total Records: 109
- AP600 Open It:m Tracking System Database: Execctiva S;meneary Dat:: 2/20/97 Selecties: [DSER Section) hke'18** Sorted by item #
Item DSLR Section/ Title / Description Resp (W) NRC No Branch Question T)pe Detail Status Engineer Status Status I.ctter No. / Date '
,1379 NRR/IllllB 18 10.3-7 DSER-Ol MMIS Closed Resolved
' Westinghouse should describe how Iluman Factors Engineering Program Review Model lliFE PRM) elements are incorporated into the training planning objectives, Westmghouse should describe how training issues will be identified from the seven elements for use in deriving learning objectives, namely, Operating Experience Review, Function Analysis and Allocation, Task Analysis,Iluman Reliability Assessment,IISI Design.
Plant Procedures, and Verification and Validation. Per 2/I6/95 conference call between Jim Bongarra, John O'llara & Kerch, Easter, Roth, Mumaw: Action W - NRC agreed to resolution path *in principic* and we need to I. issue document & SSAR revision. 2. prepare for March NRC meeting by proving list of COL applicant responsibility (1378,1381,1383,1384?), and 3. revise SSAR section Meeting of 3/8/95:
. Action W: Drall COL Action Item. Traming program development is the responsibility of the COL apphcant Creation of this COI. item will close all 15 DSER items (1810.3-1 thru 3-15) that it addresses. Consider existing words in chapter 13 SSAR and DSER. Action item should be in chapter 13 and cross referenced from chapter 18. Two new MEETING Open items were created,Ixe Action W, refer to dbase item number 206l and 2062.
_ _7_
, Draft SSAR revision for section 18.99 sent to the NRC liflFB. Closure will occur when formal revision 4 is delivered Action N: NRC to review markup section and provide feedback Action W - see NRC response sent 11/21/95 Closed -lhe training program development is addressed in revised SSAR Chapters 13 and I8 submitted in Rev. 9,7/31/96.
Page: 61 1otal Records: 109
_ . _ _ ~ _ . . _ _ _ _ . . _ _ _ . _ . . _ . _ . _. . _ _ . ~ _ _ .._; _ - . . . . . AP600 Open frem Tmking Syst;m Datbase: Executiv2 Summary Dat:: 2/20/97 Selection: [DSER Section) like '18$* Sorted by item # Item DSER Section/ Resp NRC Titic/Descripakm (W) No tiranch Question Type Detail Status Engineer Status Status I etter No / Date 1380 NRR/IllliB 18103-8 dst R-OI MMIS Closed Resolved Westmghouse should describe how information from other sources is incorporated into the training leaming objectives. Westinghouse should describe how the trianing development process will allow a determination to be made of uhether I .arning objectives will be derived from the final safety analysis report, system description manuals and operating procedures, facility license and license amendments, licensee event reports, and other documents identified by the staff as being important to training. Per 2/16N5 conference call between Jim Bongarra. 3ohn O*llara & Kerch, Easter, Roth, Mumaw. Action W - NRC agreed to resolution path *in principle" and we need to 1. issue document & SSAR reviskm, 2 prepare for March NRC meeting by proving list of COL applicant responsibility (1378,1381,1383,1384?), and 3. r*evise SSA R section. Meeting of 3/8N5: Action W: DraA COL Action item. Training program development is the responsibility of the COL applicant Creation of this CGL item will close all 15 DSER items (18.10.3-1 thru 3-15) that it addresses Consider existing words in chapter 13 SS AR and DSI R. Action item should be in chapter 13 and cross referenced from chapter 18. Two new MEETING Open items were created; both Actim W; refer to dbase item number 2061
- and 2062.
DraA SSAR revision for section 18 9.9 sent to the NRC liliFB. Closure will occur when fiwmal reviskm 4 is delivered. I Action N: NRC to review markup section and provide feedback Action W - sce NRC response sent iI/21/95 Closed - De training program development is addressed in revised SSAR Chapters 13 and 18 submitted in kew 9,7/31N6_ , __ 1381 NRR/IlliFB 18.10.3-9 DSER-OI MMIS Closed Pesolved IEes'tinghouse should describe details for training presentation techniques. Westinghouse should describe how learning objective's will IE conveyed to the trainee, and how the other items of this criterion are addressed. Per 2/16N5 conference call between Jim Bongarra, John O'llara & Kerch Easter, Roth, Mumaw: i Action W - NRC agreed to resolution path "in principle" and we need to I. issue document & SSAR revision, 2. prepare for March NRC meeting by proving list of COL applicant responsibility (1378,1381,1383,1384?), and 3. revise SSAR sectkm. Meeting of 3/8N5: l Action W: DraA COL Action Item. Training program development is the responsibility of the COL nplicant Creation of this COL item will close all 15 DSER items (18.10.3-1 thru 3-15) tnat it addresses. Consider existing words in chapter 63 SSRR and DSER. Action item should be in chapect 13 and cross referenced from chapter 18. Two new MEETING Open items were created, both Action W; refer to dbase item number 206I and 2062. DraA SSAR revision for section 18.9.9 sent to the NRC lillFB. Closure will occur when formal revision 4 is delivered. Action N: NRC to review markup sectkm and provide feedback Action W- see NRC response sent iI/2iN5 Closed - The training program devek 9 ment is addressed in revised SSAR Chapters 13 and I8 submitted in Rev 9,7/31N6 . . _ _ Page: 62 Total Records: 109 i __ - - _ . - _ - . - - . - _ _ _ _ - - _ _ _ _ - - _ _ . _ . _ _ _ . _ _ _ _ _ . - - - _ _ _ . - _ _ . _ .- _ , n . - . _ _ _ . . - - _ _ _ - - - _ - _ _ . _ - . - - _ - _ _
AP600 Open It:m Tracking SystIm Datbase: Exec tivaS mm:ry Dat2: 2/20/97 Selection: [DSER Sectionl like '18** Sorted by item # item DSI'R Sectron/ Title /Descriptim Resp NRC (W) No Branch Questkm Type Detail Status Engineer Status Status truer No. / Date 1382 NRR/lillIB 18 10 3-10 DSER-Ol MMIS Closed Resolved
~~
Westinghouse should describe training resources. Westinghouse should discuss how the varicus facilities and resourcc's n$ded to satisfy training design requirements will be identified. Per 2/16/95 conference call between Jim Bongarra, John O'llara & Kerch, Easter Roth, Mumaw. Action W - NRC agreed to resolution path *in principic" and we need to I. issue document & SSAR revision, 2 prepare for March NRC meeting by proving list of COL applicant responsibility (1378,1381,1383,1384?), and 3. revise SSAR section, Meeting of 3/8/95: ! Action W: Draft COI. Action item Training program development is the responsibility of the COL applicant. Creation of this COL item will close all 15 DSER items (18.10.3-1 thru 3-15) that it addresses. Consider existing words in chapter 13 SSAR and DSER Action item should be in chapter 13 and cross referenced from chapter 18. Two new MEETING Open items were created, both Action W; refer to dbase item number 2061 and 2062. Draft SSAR revision for section 18.9.9 sent to the NRC litiFB. Closure will occur when formal revision 4 is delivered. Action N: NRC to review markup section and provide feedback Action W - see NRC response sent i1/21/95 Closed - The training program development is addressed in revised SSAR Chapters 13 and 18 submitted in Rev. 9,7/31/96 1383 NRR/IlliFB 18 10.3-11 DSER-OI MMIS Closed Resolved Westinghouse should describe how training is evaluated Westinghouse should define the processes by which to idestif' y metid fEc~valu'ating ' trainee mastery of trianing objectives, as well as overall trainee proficiency. In addition, Westinghouse should specify how evaluation criteria will be defined. Per 2/16/95 conference call between Jim Bongarra, John O'Itara & Kerch, Easter, Roth, Mumaw: Action W - NRC agreed to resolution path "in principle" and we need to I. issue document & SSAR revision, 2. prepare for March NRC meeting by proving list of COL applicant responsibility (1378,1381,1383,1384?), and 3. revise SSAR section. Meeting of 3/8/95: Action W: Draft COL Action item. Training program development is the responsibility of the COL applicant. Creation of this COL item will close all 15 DSER items (18.10.3-1 thru 3-15) that it addresses. Consider existing words in chapter 13 SSAR and DSER. Action item should be in chapter 13 and cross referenced from chapter 18. Two new MEETING Open items were created; both Action W; refer to dbase item number 2061
,and 2062.
Draft SSAR revision for section 18 9.9 sent to the NRC lillFB. Closure will occur when formal rev ion 4 i i wered. Action N: NRC to review markup section and provide feedback. Action W - see NRC response sent 11/21/95 Closed - The training program development is addressed in revised SSAR Chapters 13 and 18 submitted in Rev. 9. 7/31/96 __ Page: 63 Total Records: 109
j AP600 Open item Tracking System Dat:. base: Executive Sunimar7 Date: 2/20/97 Selection: lDSER Section] hke'l8** Sorted by Item # hem DSER Sectkm/ Title /Ikscription Resp (W) NRC No Heanch Question T)pe Detail Status Engineer Status Status Letter No. / Date 1384 NRR/IlllFH 18 10 3-12 DSER-Ol MMIS Closed Resolved
~
Westinghouse should discuss venfication of the adequacy of training materials Westinghouse sEprovidcEsonal informaWton the methods that will be used to verify the accuracy and completeness of training course materials. Per 2/16N5 conference call between Jim Bongarra, John 01tara & Kerch, Easter, Roth, Mumaw: Action W - NRC agreed to resolutkm path "in principle" and we need to 1. issue document & SSAR resiskm. 2. prepare l'or March NRC meeting by prosing hst of COL applicant responsibihty (1378,1381,1383,1384?), and 3. revise SSAR section Meeting of 3/8N5: Action W: Draft COL Actkm hem Training program development is the responsibihty of the COE applicant. Creatkm of this Col. item will close all 15 DSER items (1810 3-1 thru 3-15) that it addresses. Consider esisting words in chapter 13 SSAR and DSL R. Actkm item should be m chapter 13 and cross referenced frorn chapser I8 1wo new MFETING Open Items were created, bot' Action W; refer to dbase item number 206I and 2062. Draft SSAR revision for section I8 9.9 sent to the NRC lillHI Closure will occur when formal revision 4 is dehvered Action N. NRC to review markup section and provide feedback Action W - see NRC response sent iI/2 INS Closed - He training program development is addressed in revised SSAR Chapters 13 and 18 submitted in Rev. 9,7/3 tN6 I385 NRR/IlilFH 18 13 3-14 DSERol MMIS Closed Resolved Westinghouse should discuss how the training program will be updated. Westinghouse should describe how the identified training program ' configuration management computer systems will be used to refine and update the content and conduct of training Per 2/16N5 conference call between hm Bongarra, John 011 ara & Kerch, Easter, Roth, Mumaw' Action W - NRC agreed to resolution path "in principle" and we need to I . issue document & SSAR reviskm, 2 prepare for March NRC rnectmg by proving hst of COL apptrcant responsibility (1378,1381,1383,1384?), and 3. revise SSAR sectkm Meetmg of 3/8N5. Action W: Draft COL Action Item Training program devekyment is the responsibility of the COL applicant. Creatkm of this COL item will close all 15 DSER items (1810.3-1 th u 3-15) that it addresses. Consider existing words in chapter 13 SSAR and DSER, Action item should be in chapter I3 and cross referenced from chapter I8 Two new MEETING Open items were created, both Acthm W; refer to dbase stem number 2061 and 2062. Draft SSAR revision for section i8 9.9 sent to the NRC lliIFB Closure will occur when formal resision < is dehvered Action N. NRC to review markup sectkm and provide feedback. Actkm W - see NRC response sent II/2 tN5 Closed - The trainmg program development is addressed in revised SSAR Chapters 13 and 18 submitted in Rei. 9. 7/31N6 _ __ Page: 64 Total Records: 109
AP600 Open hem Tracking System Dat; base: Executiv2 Summa 7 Date: 2/20/97 Selection: lDSER Sectionj like'l8** Sorted by item # Item DSLR Section/ Titic/Descriptkm Resp (W) NRC No Hranch Question 13pc Detail Status Engineer Status Status Date _ _ _ _ _ . _ . _ _ _ - Ixtier_N_o /.. 1386 NRR/Ilf tf B 18 10 3-15 DSI Rol MMIS Closed Resolved binghouse should describe training source materialr Westinghouse should describe Imw the training program is devekyedusing the requirements and guidance of 10 CFR 50.120," Training and Qualification of Nuclear Power Plant Personnel *,10 Cl R Part 55," Operators', l.icenses," and ANSI /ANS 3.1-1981," Selection,Qualfication, and Training of Persenet for Nuclear Power Plants? Per 2/1685 conference call between Jim Hongarra, John 011 ara & Kerch, Easter, Roth, Mumaw: Action W - NRC agreed to resolution path "in prmciple" and we need to I issue document & SSAR revision, 2. prepare for March NRC meetmg by proving list of COL applicant responsibility (1378,1381,1383,1384?), and 3. revise SSAR sectiort Meetmg of 3/RS$: Action W: Draft COL Action item Training program development is the responsibihty of the COL applicant. Creation of this COL item will fciose all 15 DSER items (18.10 3-1 thru 3-15) that it addresses Consider existing words in chapter 13 SSAR and DSI~R. Actkm item should be in chapter 13 and cross referenced from chapter 18. Two new MEETING Open items were created, both Action W; refer to dbase item number 2%I [~ and 2062.
~__
Draft SSAR revision for section 18 9 9 sent to the NRC liliFB. Closure will occur when formal revision 4 is delivered. Action N: NRC to review markup section and provide feedback. Action W - see NRC response sent iI/2185 i Closed - The training program development is addressed in revised SSAR Chapters 13 and 18 submitted in Rev. 9,7/3186 , , 1387 NRR/IllllB 1811.31-1 DSER OI MMIS Closed Resolved
~ ~
Westmghouse should clarify the general V&V scope regardmg the TSC. Westinghouse should clarify the'rrM'of the TSCTn I!valuatkm IssEW ~ , and 17. l Per 2/1685 conference call between Jim Bongarra, John 011 ara & Kerch, l' aster, Roth, Mumsw: ; 1 Action W - NRC agreed to resolution path *in prmciple" and we need to issue document & SSAR revision . t
' Resolved i
4/13S5 - Fax of the " Programmatic Level Description of the AP600 llaman Fcctors Verification and Vahdation Plan
- was sent to J Bongarra and J 011 ara. A mapping of each element 10 open item to its response / answer was also provided Action N. Review the document arw' determine [
+
whether the element 10 open items 18.1l's are adequately addressed. r Resolved. 5/17 phoncon with Jun Hongarra, Jim considers all the element 10 VAV open stems resolved Need to submit the revised I8 8 2.3 of j chapter 18 of the SSAR as part of the formal SSAR revision. Closed - The iluman Factors Verification and Validation is addressed in revised SSAR Section 18 II, submmed in Rev. 9,7/31/96 . Action W - See NRC Ictter dated 12886. [ Resolved in Jan 10 NRC ltr. rkn 1/28 __ _-_._ _- _ _ I L Page: 65 Total Records: 109 s
AP600 Open item Tracking System Database: Executive Summary Date: 2/20/97 Selection: lDSER Sectionl lile'IEP Sorted by item # liem DSI R Sectkm/ Titic/ Description Resp (W) NRC No Branch Question Type Detail Status Engineer Status Status Letter No / Date 1388 NPM/IIIIIB 18 il 31-2 DSI R-OI MMIS Closed Resolved Westmghouse should describe V&V activities and sequences Westinghouse should clarify (a) the role of human factors issue resolution, IISI task support venfication, and final plant IIFE/Ilsi design verification in the VAV sctivities, and (b) the sequence of V&V activities Per 2/16N5 conference call between Jim Bongarra, John Ullara & licrch, Easter. Roth, Mumaw: Action W - NRC agreed to resolution path *in principle
- and we need to issue &wument & SSAR reviskm __ _ _ _ _ _
4/13N5 - Fas of the
- Programmatic level Description of the AP600 Iluman iactors Verification and Validation Plan" was sent to J lhmgarra and J UItara A marping of each element 10 open item to its response / answer was prmided Action N Review the document and determine whether the element 10 open items 18 Il's are adequately addressed Resolved 5/17 phoncon with Jim Bongarra; Jim considers all the element 10 V&V open items resolved. Need to submit the revised I8 8 2.3 of chapter 18 of the SSAR as part of the formal SSAR reviskm Closed - The iluman F actors Verification and Validation is addressed in revised SSAR Section 18.11, submitted in Rev 9, 7/31N6 Action W - See NRC letter dated 12NN6 Resolved in Jan 10 NRC ltr. rkn 1/28 1389 NRR/lilIFB 18 Il.31-3 DSER4)I MMIS Closed Resolved Westinghouse should descnbe the V&V technical methodology source materials. Westinghouse should descnbe the guidance documentation used to develop the V&V program.
Per 2/16S5 conference call between Jim Bongarra, John Ullara & Kerch, Easter, Roth, Mumaw: Action W - NRC agreed to resolution path "in principle
- and we need to issue document & SSAR revision __ __ _
Resolved 4/13N5 - Fax of the " Programmatic Level Description of the AP600 lluman Factors Verificatkm and Validarkm Plan
- was sent to J ikmgarra and J Ullara A mapping of each element 10 open item to its response / answer was provided Actkm N. Review the document and determme whether the element 10 open items 18.Il's are adequately addressed Resolved. 5/17 phoncon with Jim Bongarra, Jim considers all the element 10 V&V open items resolved Need to submit the revised 18 8 2.3 of chapter 18 of the SSAR as part of the formal SSAR revision Closed - The iluman Factors Verification and Validation is addressed in revised SS AR Sectkm 18.11, submitted in Rev. 9,7/3 lN6 Action W - See NRC letter dated 12NN6.
Resolved in Jan 10 NRC itr. rLn I/28 __ __ __ _ j Page: 66 Total Records: l')9
. _ _ _ _ _ _ . , - _ _ . .. . _ _ _ _ . _ . - - . _ . _ _ _ -- = _. . - .m. . . ._ . _.
AP600 Open Item Tracking System Database: Executiva Summary Date: 2/20/97 Seleelien: [DSER Section) like '18** Sorted by item # hem DSI R Sectkm/ Titic/lkscription Resp (W) NRC No Branch Question Type Detail status Engineer Status Status letter No / Date '! 1340 NPR/Illtf B 18 II 3 2-1 DSLR-OI MMIS Closed Resolved
~
f% edm^ghouse should deveky an implemetration plan for 1151 task support verification The implementation plan should dcEtihow all aspects of the llSI required to accomplish the human tasks and actions demanded by the AP600 design will be verified Westinghouse should desenbe how the V&V methodology will verify that the llSI does not include information, displays, controls, etc., that do not support operator tasks. Itr 2/16/95 conference call between Jim Bongarra, John 011 ara & Kerch, Easter, Roth, Mumaw: Action W - NRC agreed to resolution path "m principle" and we need to issue document & SSAR retisiort Resolved 4/1385 - Fas of the
- Programmatic Level Description of the AP600 Iluman Factors Verificatkm and Validatkm Plan
- was sent to J thmgarra and J O'llara A mappmg ofeach element 10 open item to its response / answer was provided Action N. Review the document and determine whether the element 10 open items 18.114 are adequately addressed Remtved 5/17 phoncon with Jim Bongarra, Jim considers all the e:cment 10 VAV open items resolved. Need to submit the revised I8 8 2.3 of chapter IF of the SSAR as part of the formal SSAR revision ;
Closed -The llaman Factors Verification and Validation is addressed in revised SSAR Section 1811. submitted in Rev. 9,7/31N6 Action W - See NP.C let'er dated 12/9N6 Resolved in Jan 10 NRC ler. rkn 1/28 _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
'i 1391 NRR/IllifB 18 11.3.3-1 DSER4H MMIS Closed Resolved Westinghouse should describe life design verification methods Westinghouse should commit to devekiping a metimdology for IIlli design verification and related critevia, taking into consideration the concerns identified in the stafPs evaluathm of this criterion Westingimuse should ,
describe how deviations identified in the critenon will be addressed in the V&V methodology. c Per 2/1685 conference call between Jim Ekmgarra, John O'llars & Kerch, Easter, Roth, Mumaw: Action W - NRC agreed to resolution path "in principic" and we need to issue document & SSAR resision Resolved i 4/13M5 - Fax of the "Programmstic I.evel Description of the AP600 Iluman Factors Verification and Validation Plan
- was sent to J ikmgarra and 1 O'llara A mapping of each element 10 open item to its response / answer was prowhled. Action N. Review the document and determme whether the element 10 open items 18.1l's are adequately addressed.
Resolved. $/I7 phoncon with Jim Bongarra; Jim considers all the cimnent 10 V&V open items resolved Need to submit the revised 18 8 2.3 of chapter 18 of the SSAR as part olthe formal SSAR revision ; Closed - The llaman Factors Verification and Validation is addressed in revised SSAR Section i B 11, submitted in Rev. 9,7/31N6. Action W - See NRC letter dated 12MN6. I Resolved in Jan 10 NRC ltr. rkn 1/28 _ _ ___ _ - ~.__ _ _ I i [ Page: 67 Total Records: 109 I
. - _ ___ _ _ . _ _ _ _ _ __=_.- _ - -_-___ _ _____ _- _ _-___ _______ _ _ __ - _ _ -___ _ _ - - _-__ __ - - __- _ _ _ - ..-- .--. - - - .__._ -_
AP600 Open Iten Tracking System Database: Enttiva Seminaary Date: 2/20/97 Selection: [DSER Sectionl like '18 Sorted by Item #
- Item DSER Section/ Titic/ Description Resp (W) NRC No liranch Question Type Detail Status Engineer Status Status Ietter No / Date 1392 NRR/illiFB 1811.34-1 DSLR-OI MMIS Closed NTD-NRC-97-4%l Emghouse should commit to developing a methodology for integrated systemTalidation and related criteria. Winghouse should describe the~
tools to be used in evaluating dynamic task performance in the V&V methodology. Westmghouse should describe Imw the V&V methodology will address the oficctives listed as part of shis criterson Westinghouse should describe how the testing of critical human actims will be addressed in the VAV methodology. Westinghouse should describe how the V&V methodology will address the categories identified in Appendix A to RG 1.33 retardmg procedore-related activities. Westinghouse should describe how the V&V methodology will esaluaten4 .-s under a range of operational conditions and upsets, and progide additional information about the Evaluation 17 test scenanos. Westinghouse should describe how the valulaticn scenarios will be made realistic as part of the VAV methodology. Westinghouse should descnbe how the VAV methodology will addressnd ..w measures to test the achievement of WI objectives, design goals, and performance requirements. Per 2/I6/95 conference call between Jim Hongarra, John O'Itara & Kerch, Easter, Roth, Mumaw: Action W - NRC agreed to resolution path "m principic* and we need to issue document & SSAR revision Action N - NRC to provide clarification on which procedures per RG l.33 shtmid be covered by V&V. Meeting of 3/IOSS: Clarification provided (in unting) by NRC to Westinghouse (Fmiliet Brief discussion followed Westinghouse to issue SSAR resision and document Resolved i 4/I3/95 - Fax of the " Programmatic IEvel Description of the AP600 Iluman Factors Verification and Validation Plan
- was sent to J Bongarra and J (Tilara A mapping of each element 10 open item to its response / answer was provided Action N' Review the document and determine whether ;
the element 10 open items I8 Il's are adequately addressed. Resolved $/17 phoncon mith Jim Bongarra, Jim considers all the element 10 V&V open items resolved Need to submit the resised 18 8 2 3 of chapter 18 of the SSAR as part of the formal SSAR revision ; Closed -The Iluman Factors Verification and Validation is addressed in revised SSAR Section 1811. submitted in Rev 9,7/3136 Action W - See NRC letter dated 12/9/96. Completed with submittal of WCAP-I4401 Revision 2. rkn 1/28/97 / ___ _ _ _ _ _ i l Page: 68 Total Records: 109
AP600 Open Item Tracking System Dat , base: Executiv2 Summary Date: 2/20/97 Selection: [DSER Sectionl like'l8** Sorted by item # Item DSI R Section/ Titic/ Description Resp (W) NRC No Branch Question Type Iktail Status Engineer Status Status _ ._ _ _ _ _ _ . _ _ . _ _ _._ Irtter No / Date 1393 NRR/IlliFB 1811.35-I DSFR-OI MMIS Closed Resolved
~
EtinghE should devekip an issue resolution verificatum methodology. Westinghouse should commit to descloping a methmlology for hN' factors issue resoluton verification and related criteria Westmghouse should describe how the V&V methodohgy will address issues that cannot be resolved until a plant is built, and how such issues will be incorporated into the process for final plant lif FillSI design venficatkm Per 2/16N5 conference call between Jim Ekmgarra, John UIfara & Kerch, Easter, Roth, Mumaw: Action W - NRC agreed to resolution path "in principle" and we need to issue document & SSAR revision _ _ Resolved 4/13N5 - Fax of the *Pmgrammatic tesel Description of the AP600 Iluman Factors Verification and Validation Plan" was sent to J lhmgarra and J Ullara A mapping of each element 10 open item to its response! answer was provided Action N; Resicw the document and determine whether the element 10 open items 18 ll's are adequately addressed Resolved. 5/I7 phoncon with Jim Bongarra, Jim considers all the element 10 V&V open items resolved. Need to submit the resised I8 8 23 of chapter 18 of the SSAR as part of the formal SSAR revision Chued - The iluman Factors Verification and Validation is addressed in revised SSAR Section I8 II, submitted in Rev. 9,7/3 tN6 Action W - See NRC letter daied 12NN6. Resolved in Jari 10 NRC lir. rkn 1/28 _ _ 1394 NRR/IlliFB 181136-1 DSER-Of MMIS Closed Resolved Westinghouse should develop a final plant liff-lllSI design verification methodokyy. Westinghouse should commit to devekymg a methmlolog'y~ for final plant IIFFillSI design verification and related criteria Westinghouse should describe how the V&V methmlology will address aspects of the design that cannot be addressed in design process V&V, and how they will be addressed as part of the final plant ilFFillSI design verification Westinghouse should describe how the V&V methodology will address conformance of the in-plant life to the design that resulted from the llFE design pmcess and V&V activities. Per 2/I6N5 conference call between Jim Bongarra, John Ullara & Kerch, Easter, Roth, Mumaw: Action W - NRC agreed to resolution path "in principle" and we need to issue document & SSAR res esion Resolved 4/13N5 - Fax of the " Programmatic Level Description of the AP600 Iluman Factors VeriFratkm and Valutation Plan" was sent to J Ikmgarra and J Ullara A mapping of each element 10 open item to its response / answer was provided Action N Review the document and determine whether the element 10 open items 18.II's are adequalcly addressed Resolved. 5/17 phoncon with Jim Bongarra, Jim considers all the element 10 V&V open items resolved. Need to submit the resised I8 8.23 of chapter 18 of the SSAR as part of the formal SSAR revision. Closed - The iluman Factors Verification and Validation is addressed in revised SSAR Section 18.11, submitted in Rev. 9,7/3 tN6. Action W - See NRC letter dased 12NN6. Resolved in Jan 10 NRC itr. rkn 1/28 - l' age: 69 Total Records: 109
AP600 Open Item Tracking System Database: Executive Summtary Date: 2/20/97 Selection: [DSER Ectionl iike '18* Sorted by itern # Item DSI R Secten/ Title / Description Resp (W) NRC No Branch Question Typc Detail Status Engineer , , Status _ Status Date __ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ letter No _/ _ 1395 NRR/lHIFil 18 12.3-1 DSIR-Ol MMIS Action W NSD-NRC-4875 Westinghouse should submit an acceptable minimum inventory of fised-position controls, displays, and alarms for transient mitigation. Westinghouse should describe how the task analysis will define a minimum inventoryof alarms, displays, and contmis necessary to perform crew tasks. Westmghouse should describe the technical basis for the minimum inventory. Westinghouse should descr he how an imentory will be identified of fixed-position controls, displays, and alarms necessary to permit esecutkm of the operator tesks to place and mamtain the plant in a safe-shutdown condition. Westmghouse should describe how additional detaded characteristics of these commis, displays, and alarms (e g, ranges, scales, physical dunensims, and actual information presentation) will be identified, defined, and implemented Per 2/1W95 conference call between Jim Dongarra, John 011 ara & Kerch, Easter, Roth, Mumaw: Westinghouse to mclude this on the March meeting agen/a Action N - Give Westinghouse feedback on our proposed resoluten (pmposed durmg 2/2/95 meeting in Rocksille) 3/8/95 meeting: NRC requested Westinghouse consider that the detailed list remain completely in Tier 2 Tier I would include the process to select the final inventory. ACTION W: If the inventory list is provided in chapter 7, then make the cross reference strong fmm chapter I8. Also, the hst should include the process / criteria that was used to generate the list. Westinghouse position is that this list is an expansion of the RG l .97 criteeria and philosophy
'to address controls and displays Should a Tier I list be requued we will pursue use of cntieria presented at the Feb 2 meetmg versus the NRC criteria used on evolutionary plu,its Also prepare a draft Tier I list Need to take a stab at defining acceptable ITAAC and supporting SSAR information as to how the final imentory will be defined (Use PRA, EOPs, FRGs, f BTA) Caution fmm A Sterdis - there will be a strong push g to be specific in defining these design ITAAC.
# s ACTION N. NRC staff to prepare a position paper for NRC senior management, proposing Tier I include the process / cnteria Goal is to produce the paper to support the next scheduled Senior management meeting of April 4 , _
j A 2/2/95: Presentation of above made in Rockville, NRC staff to discuss and provide feedback 2/9/95: Discussed during NRC/Westmghouse senior management meeting as one of the top 50 open items Actkm N - to prmide feedback on
, Westmghouse proposal for resolution lO 2/27/95: Conference call with NRC (). liongarra, G Galletti, J. 011 ara, J Easter, A.Sterdis & S Kerch) 1 Agreed to following definitioni of ,
" fixed position"- unique location in the control room / control panel for alarms, displays, controls where present infamation from the minimum
) h g inventory; continuously available not continously displayed, doesn't have to be class I E; alwsys displayed at the same location, dedicated location where the operator can retrieve information that is part of the minimum inventory 2. Scope of mm. inv. - failed to reach a mutual understandmg on this, NRC stated that scope includes those controls and indications needed to execute the ERG high icvel operator actions including nonsafety
% d0 CFv (M system actions; disagreed on this 3. Use of FBTA & ERG development task analysis I & C list. 4. When completed where does this go tier I or q, ,
tier 2? Agreeu to discuss at 3/8 meetmg. t 3/8/95 meeting: NRC requested Westinghouse consider that the detailed list remain completely in Tier 2. Tier I would include the process to select the final inventory. ACTION W: If the inventory list is provided in chapter 7, then make the cross reference strong from chapter 18. Also, the list should include the process / criteria that was used to generate the list. Westinghouse positkm is that this list is an expansion of the RG l.97 critieria and philosophy to address controls and displays. Should a Tier I list be required we will pursue use of critieria presented at the Feb 2 , meeting versus the NRC criteria used on evolutonary plants. Also prepare a draft Tier I list Need to take a stab at defining acceptable ITAAC and supporting SSAR information as to how the final inventory will be defined (Use PRA, LOPS, ERGS, FBTA) NRC staff prepared a position paper for NRC senior management, proposing Tier I include the process / cntieria Goal is to prmfuce the paper to , support the next scheduled Senior management meeting of April 4. ( 4/19!95 - Fax sent to J.Bongarra and G Galletti of NRC that provided a preliminary (draft) description of how the total in en - itst was developed and where in the tier 2 (SSAR) docume,s it was found A description of how the minimum inventory would be seleced from the total inventory list (the criteria to be used) was also provided. This would be placed in the Tier i document. A very prelimmary draft of a minimum inventory list, using this criteria, was provided for the NRC's information and use as backup to their position paper. The NRC (G Galletti) has submitted the position paper for NRC management review. NRC to Determine whether the position paper is acceptable and the proposed Westinghouse appraoch is acceptable Arrann W see NRf%===* tem aMM , Page: 70 Total Records: 109
~ . - . _ _ _ . - _ - - - - . . _ . _ - _ _ - _.-_- - - - - _ _ . .- _
AP690 Open Iteen Tracking Systeem Database: ExecCtin Senesnary Date: 2/29/97 Selection: lDSER Section] like 'l8 Sorted by item # leem DSER Sectism/ . Resp (W) NRC T'Wion No Branch' Question Type Detail Status Engineer Staeus Status Eener No / Date
' Resolved - The mmimum inventory h addressed in revis'ed SSAR Section 18.12, submitted in Rev 9,7/31/96TA7TAAC will be prepared which will incimic the list of minimum inventory.
Closed - ITAAC subenitted by NSD-NRC 96-4875 of 11/7/96. NRC action to review the minimum inventory issue. See NSD-NRC-96-4874. rkn 12/19 Comments on Minienum Inycatory rec *d by NRC letter 1/17/97. A telecon is scheduled for Feb 5 to resolve these actions. rknX0/97 1396 NRR/HHFB 1813.31 DSEROI MIS Closed NSD-NRC-4875 Westinghouse should develop the ITAAC/DAC for certam elements of the HFE PRM. In each of the following areas, Westinghouse should provide ITAAC/DAC addressing a conunitment to complete the implementation plan and provide the results to the staff for review:
- Element 3 - Functional Requirements Analysis / Allocation j
- Element 4-Task Analysis
- Element 5 - StafFeng
- Element 6 -Human Reliabihty Analysis
- Eler,sent 7 - Human-System inee6 face Design ,
- Element I. - Procedwe Development i
- Element 9 -Training Program Development j Westinghouse should also provide ITAAC/DAC addressing a V&V ctmunitment to (a) develop a detailed implementaten plan, and (b) completc ehe "- , --- 2-ion plan and provide the results to the staff for revicw. ITAAC identifying the minimum invents) must also be developed.
Action W: Westeghouse will discuss wish the NRC HHFB our approach to ITAACS/ Tier i document for chapter 18. Closed
- ITAAC submitted by NSD-NRC-96-4875 of I1/7/96 :
1397 NRR/lHIFB 18 13.3-2 DSER Ol ( Westingtouse should provide the specified level of detail for the DCD, ITAAC, and DAC. MIS Action W ) NSD-NRC-4875 Westinghouse should:
- 1. Provide a complete set ofITAAC/DAC desenbeng the (a) design ct _. ;(b) inspections, test, and analyses, and (c) acceptance critena for Element 3. "Functennel Requirements Analysis and Allocation" Element 4. " Task Analysis *; Element 5," Staffing *, Element 6," Human Reliability l Analysis
- Elensent 7, *lluman-System interace Design *; Element 8. " Procedure Development *, and Element 9," Training Program Development l
- 2. Provide a complete set of ITAAC/DAC for all VAV activitics, includmg flSI task support venlication, human factors issue resolution verification, and feel plant HFE/SHI design verification ,
- 3. Resolve the staffs concern regenhng the use of HFE guidelines for verification {
- 4. Provide ITAAC/DAC for the menemum enventory ,
~
Action W: Westinghouse will discuss with the NRC HHFB our approach to ITAACS/ Tier i document for chapeer 18.. { Closed - ITAAC submitted by NSD-NRC-96-4875 of i1/7/96. Per NSD-NRC-96-4874 W action to respond to NRC - 2;on ITAACs. rkn 12/19 _. i i Page: 7I Total Records: 109 !
. AP600 Open item Tracking System Database: Executive Summary Date: 2/20/97 Selection: IDSER Section) hLe '18" Sorted by item #
Item DSI R Section/ litic/Descriptam Resp (W) NRC No. firanch Questkm Type Iktail Status Engineer Status Status I etter No I Date 1650 NRR/Illlit! 18 10.3-13 DSI.R.Ol MMIS/Kerch Closed Resolved ichn~ghouse should discuss how the efTectiveness of training will be demonstrate [ Westinghouse sluEld identify the process by which appropriate methods will be developed and used to evaluate the overall effectiveness of the traming programs Per 2/16/95 conference call between Jim Hongarra, Jolm O*liara & Kerch, Easter, Roth, Mumaw: Action W - NRC agreed to resolution path "in principle" and we need to I issue document & SSAR resiskm, 2. prepare for March NRC meetmg by proving list of COL applicant responsibility (1378,1381,1383,1384?), and 3. revise SSAR sectkm _ _ _ ~ _._____ Resolved Meetmgof 3/8/95: Action W: Draft COL Action item Training pmgram development is the responsibehty of the COL applicant Creation of this COL item will close all 15 DSER items (1810 3-1 thru 3-15) that it addresses Consider existing words in chapter 13 SSAR and DSI.R. Action item should be in chapter 13 and cross referenced from chapter 18. Two new MEETING Open items were created, teth Action W; refer to dbase item number 2061 and 2%2. Resolved. Draft SSAR revision for section 18.9.9 was sent to the NRC lilIFB. Closure will occur when fonnal reviskm 4 is de!!vertd filement 9. With submittal of SSAR Rev 9 ch 18 and WCAP-14655 Rev 1, this is closed . . - - - - _ _ . - - ~ . - - . . - DSER-Ol50 Kerch Closed Okised 2042 NRR/lillIll 18.
- 46. Full Scope Simulator for CR Design Review The stafT believes that a full scope simulator for the control room design review may be required. While describing the validation of the integrated MMIS in chapter i8 of the SSAR (I8 8.2.3.5), Westinghouse has used the tenn *a near full scope, high fidelity simulator consisting ofintegrated MMIS components and a high fidelity, dynamic simulation of plant behavior". I believe that the term 'near full scaye* has made this an issue This was discussed at a meeting with the NRC on 2/2/95 as part of the presentation on the APf40 i RG devekyment proces_ _ _ _ . _ _ . _ . __ _ _
Closed Meeting of 3/8/95: NRC indicated that satisfaction of the PRM requirements will address the role of the operator This item will be adressed by closure of the chapter 18 DSER issues. Action N - NRC staff to prepare and issue a policy position paper. This open item is to remain on the top 50 list at least through June Commission paper issuance. The hope is that the policy identified in the June paper uill be sufEicient to remove this item from the list. Discussed at 2M/95 SMM -Issue to be redefined to focus on role of the operator in a passive plant. 5/2/95 Status: No longer considered a Ley licensing issue by staft Resolution of related DSER issues should lead to satisfactory resolution of this matter. Letter to be sent to W. Closed. Phoncon of 5/l8/95 with Jim fiongarra, Jim has closed this open item based upon the NRC letter of 5/12NS, DRC/DCP0189, Dacket # 52-003,"AP600 Key Licensing issue-I ull Scope Simulator / Role of Operator". __ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _. _ Page: 72 Total Records: 109
-~ ,
APMG Open Items Tracking Systems Database: Exec tivaSusannary Date: 2/2e/97 ,f Selection. lDSER Sectionj lil6e 'l8** Sorted by item # i leem DSER Section/ Resp Titic/ Description (W). NRC No Ikanch Question Typc Iktail Staeus Engineer Status Status LenerNo / th ; 2043 RRAHKB 18. DSER-Ol50 ERG- Closed ' NSD-NRC-96 4g05 (Action ~
- 47. Content of ERGS !
Westinghouse,in response to a star request for an AP600 ERG subenitial, sessed that the low-pressure reference plant's ERGS in cominnation with a l design differences report, identification of high Icvel operator action strategies, and the AP600 syseent/ event snatrices are sufficient for design [ certification. He staRdoes not agree with this Westinghouse position because the passive safety syseern philosophy differs significantly froen I current plants. His was addressed in the August 1994 position paper to Westinghouse as well as in the draft safety evaluation report (DSER). t (DSER open items 5 4.7.6-I,15.3.4-3,20 4-2,20 4-21) Westinghouse has isuhcased that they will sulunit the ERGS by May 1995. Westinghouse niet the staK on Febnsary 2 and presented and discussed the ERG development process i t Action W DISCUSSED AT 2NS5 SENIOR MANAGEMENT MEEITNG: 47. Staff to confum that technical agreement has been reached and _.J ^ -ion is the only issue. May be removed at next meeting. Westinghouse believes isem 47 is resolved and waiting for stagfeedback. Action W - NRC agreed to resolution path *in principic" and we need to send the ERGS and background docwnents to NRC. Dese will be sent , via a phaud approach with phase i ERGS to be sent 5/3185 t Status updese provided by phone (D Jackson 8/21). ; Action W is to complete analytical basis for AE-l, AES-l.2. AE-2, and supporting documentation for shutdown ERG (need to submit background information on S/D ERGS. Action N - Review at-power , Low power / shutdown ERGS and background for at-power and low power ERGS. i Resolved - Per DCP/NRC05g9, this item will be closed with submittal of th at-power ERG's scheduled for 12/31. rkn 12/3 l Closed with ERG Rev 2 subnuttal Jan 10. rka 1/15S7. _, i i t i l t l i Page. 73 Total Records: 109 .
. , - . . -_-~....---._,m.__._---._..-....~,....,.~..m.- _ - . . . . . - . -
AP600 Open Item Tracking System Database: Executiv2 Summary Date: 2/20/97 Selection: [DSER Section] like 'I8$' Sorted by item # Item DSI.R Section/ Titic/ Description Resp (W) NRC No Branch Question Typc Detail Status Engineer Status Status i.etter No / Date 2044 NRR/1111F B 18 DSI R-Ol50 ITAAC/MMIS Dropped NSD-NRC-4875
~
4831mimum Inventory of Controls and thsplays Westinghouse has not submitted a minimum inventory of controls and displays for the AP600 (See DSER open stem 1812.3-1) This issue was discussed with the staff at the 2/2N5 meeting in Rockville. A resolution to this open item mas proposed and the staff stated that they needed to discuss it among themselves. (For closure, this open item may first require a completed set of AP600 ERGS ) See 1812.3-1 for further status. Action N: To review rev. 9 of ch 18, specifically sectkm 18.12. . 8N6. SSAR Rev. 9, which included a revision to Ch 18, was submitted to NRC. This included section 1812 on " minimum inventory". 2/2N5: Presentation of abose made in Rockville, NRC stafT to discuss and provide feedback. 2/9N5: thscussed during NRC/ Westinghouse senior management meeting as one of the top 50 open items Action N - to prmide feedback on Westinghouse proposal for resolution g2/27/95: Conference call with NRC (L Bongarra G. Galletti,1 O'Itara, J Easter A.Sterdis & S Kerch) 1. Agreed to following definition of
" fixed position"- unique location in the control room / control panel for alarms, displays, controis where present information from the minimum inventory; continuously available not continously displayed, doesn't have to be class I E, alway s displayed at the same location, dedicated locatkm where the operator can retrieve information that is part of the minimum in entory. 2. Scope of min inv. - failed to reach a mutual understandmg on this; NRC stated that scope includes those controls and indications needed to execute the ERG high level operator actions including nonsafety system actions, disagreed on this 3. Use of FBTA & I RG development task analysis I & C list 4. When completed where does this go tier I or tier 2? Agreed to discuss at 3/8 meeting.
3/8/95 meeting: NRC requested Westinghouse consider that the detaiicd list remain completely in Tier 2 Tier I would mclude the process to select the final inventory. ACTION W: If the inventory list is provided in chapter 7, then make the cross reference strong fmm chapter I8 Also, the list should include the process / criteria that was used to generate the list. Westinghouse position is that this list is an espansion of the RG l .97 critieria and philosophy to address controls and displays. Should a Tier I list be required we will pursue use of critieria presented at the Feb 2 meeting versus the NRC criteria used on evolutionary plants. Also prepare a draft Tier i list Need to take a stab at defining acceptable ITAAC and supporting SSAR information as to how the final inventory will be defined (Use PRA, EOPs, ERGS, FBTA) Caution from A Sterdis - Dere will be a strong push to be specific in defining these design ITAAC. ACTION N: NRC staff to prepare a position paper for NRC senior management, proposing Tier I include the process I cntieria Goal is to produce the paper to support the next scheduled Senior management meeting of April 4. 4/19/95 - Fax sent to J Bongarra and G Galletti of NRC that provided a preliminary (draft) description of how the total inventory list was developed and where in the tier 2 (SSAR) document it was found. A descriptkm of how the minimum inventory would be selected from the total gi nventory list (the criteria to be used) was also provided. This would be placed in the Tier i document. A very preliminary draft of a minimum invent *y list, using this criteria, was provided for the NRC's information and use as backup to their position paper. The NRC (G Galletti) has , submitted the position paper for NRC management review. 5/2/95 Status. Discussed during March 8-9,1995 mtg. Proposed approach under NRC management review Action N. Determme whether the position paper and Westinghouse approach is acceptable May require a SSAR revision to chapter I8. Action W - see NRC respense sent 8/21N5 Closed -ITAAC submitted by NSD-NRC-96-4875 of I1/7/96. Action N - See letter dated 12NN6. _ yDis item is dropped since 1395 is a repeat (action is being followed under item 1395) rLn 1/30N7 _ _ _ Page: 74 Total Records: 109
, AP600 Open Itein Tracking System Database: Emecttiv2 Samaniary Dat2: 2/20/97 Selection: lt)SER Sectionj like 'I8 Sorted by item e item DSFR Section/ Titic/ Description Resp (W) NRC No Branch Question lype Detail Status Engineer Status Status letter No / Date 2061 NRR/IllH B 18 10 MTG4)I MMIS Closed
[The Training Program L)evelopment open items of chapter 18 of the DSER (18.10.3-1 through 18.103-15) were discussed with NRC during 3/8/95 { meeting It was decided that a COL action item would be written stating that training program development was the responsibility of the COL
, applicant. Once done this will close all 15 DSER items that it addresses However, a new open item was agreed upon where Westinghouse is to i
} commit to provide inputs to the COL applicant for their consideration in the development of their training program
_DraR SSAR revision for section 18 9.9 sent to the NRC lilIFB. Closure mill occur when formal revision 4 is dehvered. Action N. NRC to review markup section and provide feedback Action W - see NRC response sent i1/21/95, conference call held with NRC on 3/21/96 for clarifcatitm Resolved WCAP-14655 Designer's input for the Training of the !!uman Factors Engineering Veritsation and Vahdatkm Personnel Draft SSAR Subsection,1he AP600 Training Program and Draft Subsectim i L2, Training were submitted to Ge NRC as attachments to NSD-NRC-96-4722 on 5/14/96. Item will be closed when Chapter 18 of the SSAR is issued Closed - SSAR Section 1810. Training Program Development, provided in SSAR Rev.9,7/31N6, addresses the training program development and designer's input to this program 2062 NRR/HHFB 18 10 MTG4)I MMIS Closed The Training Program Devekyment open items of chapter 18 of the DSER (1810.3-1 through 18.10.3-15) were discussed with NRC during 3/8M5 meeting. It was decided that a COL action item would be written stating that training program development was the responsibility of the WL applicant. Once done this will close all 15 DSER items that it addresses. Ilowever, a new open item was agreed upon where Westinghouse is to provide a description of the training for the till V & V crew. -
- _: =_
Draft SSAR revision for section IB 9.9 sent to the NRC lilIFB. Closure will occur when formal reviskm 4 is dehvered Action N: NRC to review markup section and proside feedback Action W - see NRC response sent i1/21/95 ; conference call held with NRC on 3/21/96 for clarifcation Resolved. WCAP-14655, Designer's input for the Training of the iluman Factors Engineering Venfication and Vahilatkm Personnel was submitted l to the NRC as an attachment to NSD-NRC-96-4722 on 5/I4N6. Item will be closed when Chapter 18 of the SSAR is issued Closed - SSAR Section 1810 Training Program Development, provided in SSAR Rev. 9,7/31/96, addresses the traming program devekyment and designer's input to this program. WCAP-14401 provided the Programmatic Ixvel Description of the AP600 Iluman Factors Verification and Validation Plan. i i I Page: 75 Total Records: 109
g AP600 Open Item Tracking Systems Database: Executiva Seminaary Date: 2/29/97 Selecties: lDSER sectioni like 'l80' Sorted by item O
' Item DSI R Section/ litic/Descriptkm Resp (W) NRC No Branch Question Type Detad Status Engineer Staus Status LetterNo / Date 206) NRR/11HFB 18 3 mfg 4M MMis/Kerch Closed NTD-NRC-96-4845 Westinghouse to conduct operating experience review of the human factor spects of the experience / events listed in Appendes B of NUREG-071I and the February 13 NRC document. During the 3/8 meeting, Westinghouse stated positkm that the application of these issues neceds 80 be consistent across the resiew.
4/24/95 - Fax sent to J Bengarra and J 011 era that presents response to this open item List ofissues not to be included in our OER IM on
.- resicw of App B and the 2/13/95 letter against NUREG 0933 and section 1.9 4 of our SS AR was submitted for NRC review.
NRC provided feedback. (via conference call of 6/19N5.) Action W: Provide dran OER addressing NRC issues. Draft of WCAP-14645 submitted 5/15/96. Item mill be closed when NRC comments are incorporated mto the find WCAP. Element 2. Comments recieved from NRC on 8/I3. To close this item, SSAR chl8 was submitted and we owe a rev to WCAP-14645. Closed with WCAP submittal on 10/17/96. rkn 10/25 2064 NRR/Hlu B 18 4 MTG4M Kerch / Easter Closed Closed During meeting of 3/8 with the NRC, Westinghouse asked that element 3 (Functional Requirements Analaysis and Task Alkda'tksbe reviewed at the complete element level instead of the implementation plan lesel as was done for the DSER __ _ NRC reevaluated element 3 and provided clarification. Westinghouse needs to respond to the NRC feedback and clarification issues via a Functional Requirements Analysis and Alhotum report Considered " closed
- per phone call of 2/96 (the element 3 DSER open items sufficiently cover the issues 2065 NRR/lillFB 18 8 MTG4M MMIS Closed As a result of our discussions of element 7 (IISI design) closure paths during the rnecting of 3/10 mith NRC 111IFB personnel, the need to miew and revise chapter 18 of the SSAR for tense and " reality" implications was identified Complete revision of Chapter I8 provided in Rev. 9 of SSAR 7/31/96.
AssanaN - See NRC letter dated 12/9/9i __ l i i Page: 76 Total Records: 109 l
, AP600 Open Item Tracking System Det.%ese: Exec tivaSummary Date: 2/20/97 Selection: lDSER Section] like '18 Sorted by item #
Item DSER Sectam! Titic/ Description Resp (W) Nkt No Branch Question Type Detail Sratus Engineer Status Status letter No_ / Dese 2465 NRR/lilli B 18 4-1 MTG4)1 MMIS/Kerch Closed Resolved NSD-NRC-96-4831 A description of the "mettuxiology* used to daic by WEC to arrive at the current AP600 level of automation, including function definition and allocation assignments already made. Based upon discussions held during the March meeting, it is our current understanding that the methodology is based to a consi:lerable degree on operating experience with predecessor plants and systems. The application ofindustry standants, guideleines, and practices (such as the ALWR URD) should be identified. The description should seek to revise or clarify the documented maecrial already reviewed by the staffin the SSAR and RAI responses. - 3 Action N l Information provided in draR WCAP titled *AP600 Function Requirements Analysis and Function Allocation
- sent by NST NRC-96-4722 on 5/14/96. His WCAP will be referenced in a revsion to chapter 18 of the SSAR.
Revised Chapter 18 of the AP600 SSAR submitted in Revision 9,7/31/96 WCAP-14644 is rcferenced in SSAR 18 4. Functkmal Requirements Anal) sis and Allocation. Formal WCAP transmittal will be made following receipt of NRC cornments. Element 3. Conunents Recieved from NRC on 8/I3. To close this item. SSAR chi 8 was submitted and we owe a rev to WCAP-14644 Closed - In reference to letter NSD-NRC-96-4831 dated 9 October 1996. 2466 NRR/lillFB 18.4-2 MTG-OI MMIS/Kerch Actkm N Action N A description of the AP600 functions, processes and systems and a comparison to the reference pianh/ systems so that one can identify areas of difference that exist. To help provide a scope to the request, it should not be necessary to develop a comparison &mn below the system level (unless Westinghouse deems it necessary). The focus on prior systems is justified since the successful experience of predecessor systems appears to ; be the prmcipal basis for AP600 design activities in this area Further, one aspect of resoiting concerns of operator role change is to see how [ AP600 functions, processes, and systems have changed in comparision to prior systems. ! The response should address the stafI's specific concerns identified in the evaluation section of DSER Section 18 4 3 2. criterion 1. The response ( should also address how the results of functional requirements analysis are verificit and how the results are updated as the oesign process proceeds. f Action N I Information provided in draR WCAP titled "AP600 Function Requirements Analysis and Function Allocation", submitted by NSD-NRC-96-4722 i on $/14/96. This WCAP will be referenced in a revsion to chapter 18 of the SSAR. j r Revised Chapter 18 of the AP600 SSAR submitted in Revision 9, ?!31/96. WCAP-14644 is referenced in SSAR I8 4, Functional Requirements Analysis and Allocation. Formal WCAP transmittal will be made following receipt of NRC comments. [ i Element 3. Comments Recieved from NRC on 8/13. To close this item, SSAR Chl8 mas submitted and we owe a rev to WCAP-14644 Even with subrnittal of this WCAP,it is the NRC action to determine how to close this item, related to task analysis, not function allocation rkn 10/8/96. Action N - See NRC letter dated 12/9/96 (This letterjust says its NRC action as described previously in the status detail rkn 1/I$/97) f r r i t Page: 77 Total Records: 100 ?
. _ - . . __ _ . . _ _ _ - _m ._-m..___,____m___._ _____s______.____-_2_ _ . _ _ _ _ _ _--__ ... _ . _ . - __._m L_ m__----___-___a'__ _ _ . .4- r - e e=.- 4-r e- --r+1.-- _ - *w
__ .__ . ._ . _ _ . . ._ . - . - _ __ . _m _ . -_ ... . - AP600 Open Item Tracking System Database: Execctiv2 Summar7 Date: 2/20/97 Selection: [DSER Sectionl like'l8** Sorted by item # , item DSFR Section/ Title /lkscription Resp NRC (W) No Ilranch Question Type Detail Status Engineer Status Status Letter No. / Date 2467 NRR/Illif B 184-3 mig-OI MMIS/Kerch Closed Resolved NSD-NRC-964831 A description of the human role in AP600 functions, processes and systems (as defined in open item I8 4-2) should be provided in terms of personnel responsibility and level of automation. Since it is our understanding that the technical basis for allocation was largely based on operating experience (e g , successful allocations were not changed and problematic allocations were changed), a comparison to the reference plants / systems should be documented so that differences in allocation can be identified. Where allocations have changed, the basis for the change should be identified Passive systems should be considered a special form of automation because initiation and control of these functions often do not require personnel actions. This item addresses the second aspect of resolving concems of operator role change;i c., to determine how AP600 functions, processes, and systems levels of automation have changed in comparison to prior systems. A description should be prosided as to how the functional allocation process for the AP600 will accomodate the need for thorough 11I E input early ! in the design process (as discussed in part 2 - section 2 of enclosure i to NRC element 3 clarification letter of 5/15N5). This is particularly important for those areas identified above that are "different" from the predecessor plant / systems. Action W This information w2 be placed in a WCAP titled *AP600 Function Requirements Analysis and Function Allocation *. This WCAP will bc ; referenced in a r vsion to chapter 18 of the SSAR. Resolved. Information provided in draft WCAP titled *AP600 Function Requirements Analysis and Functon Allocation *, submitted by NSD-NRC-96-4722 on 5/14/96. This WCAP will be referenced in a revision to chapter 18 of the SSAR. Revised Chapter 18 of the AP600 SSAR submitted in Resision 9,7/31/96. WCAP-14644 is referen 4 in SSAR 18 4 Functional Requirements Analysis and Allocation. Formal WCAP transmittal will be made following receipt of NRC comments Element 3. Comments Recieved from NRC on 8/13. To close this item, SSAR Chl8 was submitted and we one a rev to WCAP-14644 Closed -In reference to letter NSD-NRC-96-4831 dated 9 October 1996 _ _-_. _ _ _ _ _ _ _ 2468 NRR/IllifB 18 4-4 mig-Ol MMIS/Kerch Closed Resolved NSD-NRC-96-4831 A description of how the integrated role of the operator across all systems is conFumed for acceptability (as discussed in part 2 - secten 2 of enclosure I of NRC letter) If function allocation was performed by individual system designers, will the IAEA process descrited in the RAI respo=ises be used at all, and if so how? Will the URD processes be used? The process should be described by which functions are re-allocated in an iterative manner, in response so developing design specifics, operating experience, and the outcomes of on-going analyses and trade studies. Action W This information will be placed in a WCAP titled "AP600 Function Requirements Analysis and Function Allocation". This WCAP will be referenced in a revsion to chapter 18 of the SSAR. Resolved Information provided in draft WCAP titled *AP600 Function Requirements Analysis and Funcien Allocation *, submitted by NSD-NRC-96-4722 on 5/14/96. This WCAP will be referenced in a revsion to chapter 18 of the SSAR. Element 3. Cw1ments Recieved from NRC on 8/13. To close this item. SSAR Chl8 was submrtted and we owe a rev to WCAP-14644 Closed - In reference to letter NSD-NRC-96-4831 dated 9 October 1996. _ _ Page: 78 Total Records: 109 _ ,_ _ _ .- - - -- __ _ _ ~ _ . - ._. _ _ _ _ _ ____m _ _____ _}}