ML060540080

From kanterella
Revision as of 20:38, 7 December 2019 by StriderTol (talk | contribs) (Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Comment (48) of Jane Michaud Opposing Entergy'S Proposed Power Uprate at Vermont Yankee
ML060540080
Person / Time
Site: Vermont Yankee File:NorthStar Vermont Yankee icon.png
Issue date: 02/08/2006
From: Michaud J
- No Known Affiliation
To:
NRC/ADM/DAS/RDB
References
%dam200606, 71FR1774 00048
Download: ML060540080 (1)


Text

February 8, 2006 7/kK6 /7Iof TO: Chief, Rules and Directives Branch Division of Administrative Services Office of Admission T T Q XT. fs^A__AnA U .O. [N UcLear IXgulaory t-wmlh1Uon51UII Washington, DC 20555-0001 C-,

RE: Federal Register: January 11, 2006 7. r I-r (Volume 71, Number 7) Pages 1774-1776 crn

'CD I'm writing to voice my deep concern about Entergy's proposed power uprat Yankee. As a Brattleboro resident living six miles from the plant, I worry out the radiation emitted by this 33-year-old facility which endangers our health; the nuclear waste it generates and stores on-site, which will be a burden for generations to come; and the very real possibility of an accident or terrorist attack, with the human death and environmental destruction that would result. There is no effective evacuation plan. Increasing the power output of this aging reactor by 20% would only increase the already unacceptable risk we face. To expose us to this risk for the sake of one corporation's profits is insanity. Please, at the very least, mandate an Independent Safety Assessment before ruling on the uprate.

Jane Michaud 129 Forest Street, Apt. 2 Brattleboro, VT 05301 a , 5 - -Z) 5

'0 -

!5 rv /K --. I- // e-111

?e (A"EO rl_ _ (^e,4A)

/I ___=::',q, _ A,e /_ 3 U_ 106X71;_