ML11252B120

From kanterella
Revision as of 01:48, 6 December 2019 by StriderTol (talk | contribs) (Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Jump to navigation Jump to search

NRR E-mail Capture - Acceptance Review: Turkey Point, Units 3 and 4: DC Sources Surveillance Requirements LAR (ME6859 and ME6860)
ML11252B120
Person / Time
Site: Turkey Point  NextEra Energy icon.png
Issue date: 09/08/2011
From: Jason Paige
Plant Licensing Branch II
To: Tomonto B
Florida Power & Light Co
References
TAC ME6859, TAC ME6860
Download: ML11252B120 (2)


Text

NRR-PMDAPEm Resource From: Paige, Jason Sent: Thursday, September 08, 2011 11:08 AM To: Tomonto, Bob Cc: Hanek, Olga; Everett, Ronald

Subject:

ACCEPTANCE REVIEW: Turkey Point, Units 3 and 4: DC Sources Surveillance Requirements LAR (ME6859 and ME6860)

SUBJECT:

DC SOURCES SURVEILLANCE REQUIREMENTS LICENSE AMENDMENT REQUEST (ME6859 AND ME6860)

By letter dated August 5, 2011, Florida Power & Light Co. submitted a license amendment for Turkey Point, Units 3 and 4. The purpose of this e-mail is to provide the results of the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) staffs acceptance review of this amendment request. The acceptance review was performed to determine if there is sufficient technical information in scope and depth to allow the NRC staff to complete its detailed technical review. The acceptance review is also intended to identify whether the application has any readily apparent information insufficiencies in its characterization of the regulatory requirements or the licensing basis of the plant.

The NRC staff has reviewed your application and concluded that it does provide technical information in sufficient detail to enable the NRC staff to complete its detailed technical review and make an independent assessment regarding the acceptability of the proposed amendment in terms of regulatory requirements and the protection of public health and safety and the environment. Given the lesser scope and depth of the acceptance review as compared to the detailed technical review, there may be instances in which issues that impact the NRC staffs ability to complete the detailed technical review are identified despite completion of an adequate acceptance review. If additional information is needed, you will be advised by separate correspondence.

If you have any questions, please contact me.

Jason Paige, Turkey Point Project Manager Plant Licensing Branch II-2 Division of Operating Reactor Licensing Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation US Nuclear Regulatory Commission Phone: (301) 415-5888 1

Hearing Identifier: NRR_PMDA Email Number: 140 Mail Envelope Properties (Jason.Paige@nrc.gov20110908110700)

Subject:

ACCEPTANCE REVIEW: Turkey Point, Units 3 and 4: DC Sources Surveillance Requirements LAR (ME6859 and ME6860)

Sent Date: 9/8/2011 11:07:32 AM Received Date: 9/8/2011 11:07:00 AM From: Paige, Jason Created By: Jason.Paige@nrc.gov Recipients:

"Hanek, Olga" <Olga.Hanek@fpl.com>

Tracking Status: None "Everett, Ronald" <Ronald.Everett@fpl.com>

Tracking Status: None "Tomonto, Bob" <Bob.Tomonto@fpl.com>

Tracking Status: None Post Office:

Files Size Date & Time MESSAGE 1822 9/8/2011 11:07:00 AM Options Priority: Standard Return Notification: No Reply Requested: No Sensitivity: Normal Expiration Date:

Recipients Received: