ML18113A533

From kanterella
Revision as of 08:52, 2 December 2019 by StriderTol (talk | contribs) (Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Jump to navigation Jump to search

NRR E-mail Capture - Accepted for Review - Brunswick Unit 2 Relief Request for Proposed Alternative in Accordance with 10 CFR 50.55A(Z)(2) for End of Interval Leakage Test
ML18113A533
Person / Time
Site: Brunswick Duke Energy icon.png
Issue date: 04/23/2018
From: Natreon Jordan
Plant Licensing Branch II
To: Grzeck L
Duke Energy Carolinas
References
L-2018-LLA-0038
Download: ML18113A533 (2)


Text

NRR-DMPSPEm Resource From: Jordan, Natreon Sent: Monday, April 23, 2018 2:51 PM To: Grzeck, Lee (Lee.Grzeck@duke-energy.com)

Cc: Hon, Andrew

Subject:

Accepted for Review - BRUNSWICK UNIT 2 RELIEF REQUEST FOR PROPOSED ALTERNATIVE IN ACCORDANCE WITH 10 CFR 50.55A(Z)(2) FOR END OF INTERVAL LEAKAGE TEST (EPID No. L-2018-LLA-0038)

By letter dated March 23, 2018 (ADAMS NO. ML18082A037), as supplemented by letter dated April 5, 2018 (ADAMS Accession No ML18095A026), Duke Energy Progress requested relief from the requirements of the American Society of Mechanical Engineers Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code (ASME Code),Section XI for their Brunswick, Unit 2 Facility. The purpose of this e-mail is to provide the results of the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) staffs acceptance review of this relief request. The acceptance review was performed to determine if there is sufficient technical information in scope and depth to allow the NRC staff to complete its detailed technical review. The acceptance review is also intended to identify whether the submittal has any readily apparent information insufficiencies in its characterization of the regulatory requirements or the licensing basis of the plant.

The NRC staff has reviewed your submittal and concluded that it does provide technical information in sufficient detail to enable the NRC staff to complete its detailed technical review and make an independent assessment regarding the acceptability of the proposed request in terms of regulatory requirements and the protection of public health and safety and the environment. Given the lesser scope and depth of the acceptance review as compared to the detailed technical review, there may be instances in which issues that impact the NRC staffs ability to complete the detailed technical review are identified despite completion of an adequate acceptance review. If additional information is needed, you will be advised by separate correspondence.

Based on the information provided in your submittal, the NRC staff has estimated that this licensing request will take approximately 100 hours4.167 days <br />0.595 weeks <br />0.137 months <br /> to complete. The NRC staff expects to complete this review in under the 1-year metric for routine relief requests. However, we will prioritize our efforts to support the date requested by you. If there are emergent complexities or challenges in our review that would cause changes to the initial forecasted completion date or significant changes in the forecasted hours, the reasons for the changes, along with the new estimates, will be communicated during the routine interactions with the assigned project manager.

If you have any questions, please contact me.

Andy Hon, PE Project Manager (Sequoyah Nuclear Plant and TVA Fleet)

Plant Licensing Branch II-2 Division of Operating Reactor Licensing Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation 301-415-8480 OWFN O8E06 Mail Stop O8B1A andrew.hon@nrc.gov 1

Hearing Identifier: NRR_DMPS Email Number: 313 Mail Envelope Properties (Natreon.Jordan@nrc.gov20180423145000)

Subject:

Accepted for Review - BRUNSWICK UNIT 2 RELIEF REQUEST FOR PROPOSED ALTERNATIVE IN ACCORDANCE WITH 10 CFR 50.55A(Z)(2) FOR END OF INTERVAL LEAKAGE TEST (EPID No. L-2018-LLA-0038)

Sent Date: 4/23/2018 2:50:58 PM Received Date: 4/23/2018 2:50:00 PM From: Jordan, Natreon Created By: Natreon.Jordan@nrc.gov Recipients:

"Hon, Andrew" <Andrew.Hon@nrc.gov>

Tracking Status: None "Grzeck, Lee (Lee.Grzeck@duke-energy.com)" <Lee.Grzeck@duke-energy.com>

Tracking Status: None Post Office:

Files Size Date & Time MESSAGE 2644 4/23/2018 2:50:00 PM Options Priority: Standard Return Notification: No Reply Requested: No Sensitivity: Normal Expiration Date:

Recipients Received:

NRR-DMPSPEm Resource From: Jordan, Natreon Sent: Monday, April 23, 2018 2:51 PM To: Grzeck, Lee (Lee.Grzeck@duke-energy.com)

Cc: Hon, Andrew

Subject:

Accepted for Review - BRUNSWICK UNIT 2 RELIEF REQUEST FOR PROPOSED ALTERNATIVE IN ACCORDANCE WITH 10 CFR 50.55A(Z)(2) FOR END OF INTERVAL LEAKAGE TEST (EPID No. L-2018-LLA-0038)

By letter dated March 23, 2018 (ADAMS NO. ML18082A037), as supplemented by letter dated April 5, 2018 (ADAMS Accession No ML18095A026), Duke Energy Progress requested relief from the requirements of the American Society of Mechanical Engineers Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code (ASME Code),Section XI for their Brunswick, Unit 2 Facility. The purpose of this e-mail is to provide the results of the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) staffs acceptance review of this relief request. The acceptance review was performed to determine if there is sufficient technical information in scope and depth to allow the NRC staff to complete its detailed technical review. The acceptance review is also intended to identify whether the submittal has any readily apparent information insufficiencies in its characterization of the regulatory requirements or the licensing basis of the plant.

The NRC staff has reviewed your submittal and concluded that it does provide technical information in sufficient detail to enable the NRC staff to complete its detailed technical review and make an independent assessment regarding the acceptability of the proposed request in terms of regulatory requirements and the protection of public health and safety and the environment. Given the lesser scope and depth of the acceptance review as compared to the detailed technical review, there may be instances in which issues that impact the NRC staffs ability to complete the detailed technical review are identified despite completion of an adequate acceptance review. If additional information is needed, you will be advised by separate correspondence.

Based on the information provided in your submittal, the NRC staff has estimated that this licensing request will take approximately 100 hours4.167 days <br />0.595 weeks <br />0.137 months <br /> to complete. The NRC staff expects to complete this review in under the 1-year metric for routine relief requests. However, we will prioritize our efforts to support the date requested by you. If there are emergent complexities or challenges in our review that would cause changes to the initial forecasted completion date or significant changes in the forecasted hours, the reasons for the changes, along with the new estimates, will be communicated during the routine interactions with the assigned project manager.

If you have any questions, please contact me.

Andy Hon, PE Project Manager (Sequoyah Nuclear Plant and TVA Fleet)

Plant Licensing Branch II-2 Division of Operating Reactor Licensing Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation 301-415-8480 OWFN O8E06 Mail Stop O8B1A andrew.hon@nrc.gov 1

Hearing Identifier: NRR_DMPS Email Number: 313 Mail Envelope Properties (Natreon.Jordan@nrc.gov20180423145000)

Subject:

Accepted for Review - BRUNSWICK UNIT 2 RELIEF REQUEST FOR PROPOSED ALTERNATIVE IN ACCORDANCE WITH 10 CFR 50.55A(Z)(2) FOR END OF INTERVAL LEAKAGE TEST (EPID No. L-2018-LLA-0038)

Sent Date: 4/23/2018 2:50:58 PM Received Date: 4/23/2018 2:50:00 PM From: Jordan, Natreon Created By: Natreon.Jordan@nrc.gov Recipients:

"Hon, Andrew" <Andrew.Hon@nrc.gov>

Tracking Status: None "Grzeck, Lee (Lee.Grzeck@duke-energy.com)" <Lee.Grzeck@duke-energy.com>

Tracking Status: None Post Office:

Files Size Date & Time MESSAGE 2644 4/23/2018 2:50:00 PM Options Priority: Standard Return Notification: No Reply Requested: No Sensitivity: Normal Expiration Date:

Recipients Received: