|
|---|
Category:E-Mail
MONTHYEARML22235A7862022-08-23023 August 2022
Acceptance Review: Exemption Request from 10 CFR 20, Appendix G, LLW Shipping Investigation Requirements
ML21181A1882021-06-30030 June 2021
E-mail from S. Johnston, Holtec, to A. Snyder and F. Bower, NRC - Oyster Creek Nuclear Generating Station - Readiness Status for ISFSI Only Inspection
ML21175A2092021-06-24024 June 2021
E-mail from A. Sterdis to P. Longmire - Oyster Creek Nuclear Generating Station: ISFSI-only Physical Security Plan (Stating Implementation Intent)
ML21162A3602021-06-11011 June 2021
E-mail Response from the State of New Jersey Regarding the Pending Revision to the Emergency Plan to Reflect Independent Spent Fuel Storage Installation Only Status
ML21162A1172021-06-11011 June 2021
E-mail to HDI: Acceptance Review - FOF Exemption
ML21168A0172021-06-10010 June 2021
E-mail from HDI: RAI Response
ML21161A2572021-06-0707 June 2021
State Consultation: ISFSI-only Physical Security Plan (Email Response)
ML21175A0712021-06-0202 June 2021
Issuance of Request for Additional Information: Oyster Creek Nuclear Generating Station. Request for Amendment to Technical Specifications
ML21148A0562021-05-27027 May 2021
E-mail to State of New Jersey Informing of the Pending Revision to the Emergency Plan to Reflect Independent Spent Fuel Storage Installation Only Status
ML21132A3182021-05-12012 May 2021
E-Mail from V. Gubbi, DEP to Z. Cruz, NRC - Oyster Creek Nuclear Generating Station - State of New Jersey Response to the Pending Revision to the Defueled Technical Specifications to Reflect Independent Spent Fuel Storage Installation Only
ML21132A0312021-05-11011 May 2021
E-mail to State of New Jersey Informing of the Pending Revision to the Physical Security Plan to Reflect Independent Spent Fuel Storage Installation Only Status
ML21119A1422021-04-28028 April 2021
E-mail to State of New Jersey Informing of the Pending Revision to the Emergency Plan to Reflect Independent Spent Fuel Storage Installation Only Status
ML21113A0742021-04-23023 April 2021
Acceptance Review Email - April 20, 2021 Oyster Creek Request for Exemption from 10 CFR Part 73 Requirements Due to Covid
ML21099A0382021-04-0808 April 2021
Email from Z. Cruz to A. Sterdis - Request for Additional Information - HDI Request for Approval of Oyster Creek Nuclear Generating Station Independent Spent Fuel Storage Installation Facility Only Emergency Plan
ML21085A4872021-03-26026 March 2021
E-mail from Z. Cruz to A. Sterdis - Acceptance Review: Oyster Creek Nuclear Generating Station - Request for Approval of Independent Spent Fuel Storage Installation Only Permanently Defueled Technical Specifications
ML21064A2432021-03-0505 March 2021
Email from Z. Cruz to A. Sterdis Acceptance Review_ Oyster Creek Nuclear Generating Station - Request for Approval of Independent Spent Fuel Storage Installation Facility Only Emergency Plan and Emergency Action Level Scheme
ML21064A2392021-03-0202 March 2021
E-mail from Z. Cruz to A. Sterdis Acceptance Review - Oyster Creek Nuclear Generating Station - Request for Approval of Independent Spent Fuel Storage Installation Only Physical Security Plan
ML20345A1462020-12-0909 December 2020
E-mail - Response to Request for Additional Information: HDI Request for One-Time Exemption from Part 73, Appendix B FOF Requirements
ML20335A3112020-11-30030 November 2020
Request for Additional Information Regarding Request for a one-time Exemption from Part 73, Appendix B Requirements for Oyster Creek Nuclear Generating Station
ML20332A1472020-11-24024 November 2020
Acceptance Review: November 20 2020 Exemption Request from 10 CFR Part 73 Appendix B Requirements for Oyster Creek
ML20297A2372020-10-22022 October 2020
Request for Additional Information - HDI Fleet Decommissioning Quality Assurance Program
ML20279A5082020-10-0505 October 2020
Email to Holtec - Response to Notification of Oyster Creek Onsite Property Insurance Coverage
ML20266G4032020-09-22022 September 2020
Acceptance Review Email - Request for Approval of HDI Fleet Decommissioning Quality Assurance Program, Revision 0
ML20134H8742020-05-12012 May 2020
Request for Additional Information Regarding Request for Temporary Exemption from Part 73, Appendix B Requirements
ML20133J9182020-05-11011 May 2020
Acceptance Review Email - Oyster Creek Request for Exemption from Part 73 Qualification Requirements
ML20120A0252020-04-22022 April 2020
NRR E-mail Capture - (External_Sender) Oyster Creek Sea Turtle Handling and Conservation Recommendation Obligations
NRC-2019-0073, Response from NEIMA Local Community Advisory Board Questionnaire 10-30-2019 R Discenza2019-10-30030 October 2019
Response from NEIMA Local Community Advisory Board Questionnaire 10-30-2019 R Discenza
ML19344C8022019-10-20020 October 2019
Response from NEIMA Local Community Advisory Board Questionnaire 10-20-2019 a Dressler
ML19344C8002019-10-0909 October 2019
Response from NEIMA Local Community Advisory Board Questionnaire 10-09-2019 W Mcmullin
ML19344C7982019-10-0909 October 2019
Response from NEIMA Local Community Advisory Board Questionnaire 10-09-2019 M Noto
ML19344C7992019-10-0909 October 2019
Response from NEIMA Local Community Advisory Board Questionnaire 10-09-2019 s Feldman
ML19344C7932019-10-0909 October 2019
Response from NEIMA Local Community Advisory Board Questionnaire 10-09-2019 C Bischoff
ML19344C7962019-10-0909 October 2019
Response from NEIMA Local Community Advisory Board Questionnaire 10-09-2019 G Adams
ML19344C7912019-10-0808 October 2019
Response from NEIMA Local Community Advisory Board Questionnaire 10-08-2019 J Branciforte
ML19344C7902019-10-0808 October 2019
Response from NEIMA Local Community Advisory Board Questionnaire 10-08-2019 Anonymous
ML19344C7892019-10-0505 October 2019
Response from NEIMA Local Community Advisory Board Questionnaire 10-05-2019 P Dressler
ML19263D1222019-09-20020 September 2019
for Your Action Request for Additional Information Hdi Oyster Creek PSDAR
ML19214A0452019-08-0202 August 2019
NRC to NMFS, Revised Proposed Action for Oyster Creek Endangered Species Act Section 7 Consultation
ML19182A3422019-07-0101 July 2019
Transaction
ML19178A0702019-06-26026 June 2019
Email to State of New Jersey - Oyster Creek - Request Comments on Proposed Amendment to Remove Reference to the Oyster Creek Cyber Security Plan and Update License Condition 2.C.(4) in the Renewed Facility License
ML19196A3422019-06-20020 June 2019
Email: Courtesy Notice on the Issuance of the Oyster Creek License Transfer and Exemption (Sierra Club)
ML19196A3342019-06-20020 June 2019
Email: Courtesy Notice on the Issuance of the Oyster Creek License Transfer and Exemption
ML19162A2242019-06-11011 June 2019
NRC to NMFS, NRC Responses to NMFS Requests for Additional Information for Oyster Creek ESA Section 7 Consultation
NRC-2018-0237, Comment from Paul Dressler of the Concerned Citizens for Lacey Coalition, Regarding the Oyster Creek Nuclear Plant License Transfer Application2019-06-0707 June 2019
Comment from Paul Dressler of the Concerned Citizens for Lacey Coalition, Regarding the Oyster Creek Nuclear Plant License Transfer Application
ML19155A1182019-06-0404 June 2019
Incoming E-mail from State of New Jersey on the Oyster Creek Exemption for Reduced Insurances and Use of Decommissioning Trust Fund for Spent Fuel Management and Site Restoration
ML19155A1192019-06-0404 June 2019
State of New Jersey Comments - Oyster Creek Conforming Amendment Associated with the Oyster Creek Generating Station License Transfer Application
ML19154A0582019-05-31031 May 2019
E-mail Response from State of New Jersey Dated May 31, 2019, Notification-and-Request-Oyster Creek License Transfer Application L-2018-LLM-0002
ML19158A2912019-05-30030 May 2019
NRR E-mail Capture - Oyster Creek ESA Consultation: Information Requests from NMFS
ML19158A2772019-05-28028 May 2019
NRR E-mail Capture - Oyster Creek ESA Consultation: Information Requests from NMFS
ML19148A4392019-05-24024 May 2019
NMFS to NRC, Requests for Additional Information to Support Oyster Creek Reinitiated Section 7 Consultation
2022-08-23
[Table view] |
Text
Elizabeth Keighley From: Ed Miller i YZJ-Sent: Monday, November 17, 2008 12:03 PM To: John Richmond Cc: Richard Conte; David Pelton; Doug Tifft
Subject:
RE: 0C and NJ DEP Insight Outside of the scope I think the main thing I want to accomplish is good documentation of the staff decision.
Ed From: John Richmond Sent: Saturday, November 15, 2008 4:45 PM To: Ed Miller Cc: Richard Conte; David Pelton; Doug Tifft
Subject:
FW: OC and NJ DEP Insight K
Outside of the scope John Richmond From: Richard Conte Sent: Wednesday, November 12, 2008 7:11 AM To: John Richmond; Robert Summers Cc: Diane Screnci; Ed Miller; David Pelton; Marjorie McLaughlin; Nancy McNamara; Neil Sheehan; Ronald Bellamy
Subject:
RE: OC and NJ DEP Insight Ed Miller I understand you have an action in this area. Please call, I will be back in the area on Thursday PM and Friday AM only of this week.
(b)(5)
I kOIA/fA ntl-e -7ft l
. I I III 4//.(36
(b)(5)
An orderly answer to these questions would help - part of Comm Plan for April 9, 2009.
Richard J. Conte Chief, Engineering Branch No. 1, DRS, Reg. I Li. (b)(6) I Off. 610-337-5183
[ The information contained in this e-mail, including any attachment(s), is intended solely for use by the named addressee(s). If you are not the intended recipient, you are not authorized to disclose, copy, distribute or retain this message, in whole or in part, without written consent from the sender. This e-mail may also contain confidential or privileged information so consult with the sender before disclosing. If you have received this message in error, please notify the sender immediately. ]
From: John Richmond Sent: Tuesday, November 11, 2008 9:32 AM To: Robert Summers; Richard Conte Cc: Diane Screnci
Subject:
RE: OC and NJ DEP Insight Bob, you're comments are on target. Commitments are NOT enforceable.
(b)(5)
Commitments are proposed by the licensee in their LR Application. During the Application review and approval process, the licensee will revise and add additional commitments, in response to NRC questions (RAIs, regional inspection, ACRS). When the SER is written, the list of commitments, from the licensee's 2
Application is cut & pasted into the SER. Short of a supplemental SER (as in the case of OC), there is no mechanism for the NRC to change a specific license renewal commitment.
From: Robert Summers Sent: Monday, November 10, 2008 4:59 PM To: Richard Conte Cc: Diane Screnci; John Richmond
Subject:
RE: OC and NJ DEP Insight beyond commitments, if a state feels that a safety issue has not been adequately addressed by a licenisee, they ought to provide a 2.206 petition/request.
(b)(5)
From: Richard Conte Sent: Tuesday, November 04, 2008 8:41 AM To: Diane Screnci; John Richmond; Marjorie McLaughlin; Neil Sheehan; Ronald Bellamy Cc: Robert Summers; Darrell Roberts
Subject:
RE: OC and NJ DEP Insight Bob I have been anxious to talk with you about commitments in the CLB (b)(5)
Richard J. Conte Chief, EngineerinýBranch No. 1, DRS, Reg. I Off. 610-337-5183
[ The information contained in this e-mail, including any attachment(s), is intended solely for use by the named addressee(s). If you are not the intended recipient, you are not authorized to disclose, copy, distribute or retain this message, in whole or in part, without written consent from the sender. This e-mail may also contain confidential or privileged information so consult with the sender before disclosing. Ifyou have received this message in error, please notify the sender immediately. I From: Diane Screnci Sent: Tuesday, November 04, 2008 7:48 AM To: John Richmond; Richard Conte; Marjorie McLaughlin; Neil Sheehan; Ronald Bellamy
Subject:
RE: OC and NJ DEP Insight Guess I wouldn't mind a little tutorial on the same information.
DIANI 5CRENCI SR. PUNLIC AFFAIRS OFFICER 3
USNRC, RI 601/337-5330 From: John Richmond Sent: Tuesday, November 04, 2008 7:22 AM To: Richard Conte; Marjorie McLaughlin; Diane Screnci; Neil Sheehan; Ronald Bellamy
Subject:
OC and NJ DEP Insight An insight as to where the State of NJ may be headed,. regarding the current OC drywell coating issue.
Yesterday, during the day, Rich Pinney asked about how the NRC would change a "commitment" if Exelon needed to do more than a current commitment required. We talked, in general, about commitment management, SERs, enforceability, and what might constitute a violation of a requirement.
Rich didn't really have much to say, but he seemed to believe the NRC could "enforce" commitments, and could [or should be able to] change commitments and require a licensee to implement a new commitment.
During the 4 pm telecom with Exelon, near the end, Rich showed me a note that he'd written. "Increase sand bed inspections to every 2 years." The current commitment is to inspect the drywell shell, in the sand bed bays, every other outage [every 4 years].
I'll update if more comes to light.
John R.
4
Received: from OWMS01.nrc.gov (148.184.100.43) by R1 MSO1.nrc.gov (148.184.99.10) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 8.1.291.1; Mon, 17 Nov 2008 12:02:57 -0500 Received: from HQCLSTRO1.nrc.gov ([148.184.44.79]) by OWMS01.nrc.gov
([148.184.100.43]) with mapi; Mon, 17 Nov 2008 12:02:57 -0500 Content-Type: application/ms-tnef; name="winmail.dat" Content-Transfer-Encoding: binary From: Ed Miller <Ed.Miller@nrc.gov>
To: John Richmond <John. Richmond@nrc.gov>
CC: Richard Conte <Richard.Conte@nrc.gov>, David Pelton
<David. Pelton@nrc.gov>, Doug Tifft <Doug.Tifft@nrc.gov>
Date: Mon, 17 Nov 2008 12:03:01 -0500
Subject:
RE: OC and NJ DEP Insight Thread-Topic: OC and NJ DEP Insight Thread-Index:
Ack+d97zQQT87FF7TEG+vZ3A6P+xjwAA5b4wAAHS5JABPr8H4AAid2VwAC 1DTXAAq 1thkABa9jIA Message-ID:
<3E54A9B051 CAB64F8DA8BE 1178BC8D3781 AOF7C8D9@HQCLSTRO1. nrc.gov>
References:
<2856BC46F6A308418F033D973BBOEE72AA545E3A09@R1CLSTRO1.nrc.gov>
In-Reply-To:
<2856BC46F6A308418F033D973BBOEE72AA545E3A09@R1 CLSTRO1 .nrc.gov>
Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-Exchange-Organization-SCL: -1 X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
<3E54A9B051 CAB64F8DA8BE 1178BC8D3781AOF7C8D9@HQCLSTR01. nrc.gov>
MIME-Version: 1.0 Return-Path: Ed.Miller@nrc.gov