ML102980395

Email from O'Hara, Timothy to Conte, Richard, Attached Image

ML102980395
Person / Time
Site:	Salem
Issue date:	07/06/2010
From:	O'Hara T Engineering Region 1 Branch 1
To:	Conte R Engineering Region 1 Branch 1
References
FOIA/PA-2010-0334
Download: ML102980395 (1)

Text

Conte, Richard From: OHara, Timothy Sent: Tuesday, July 06, 2010 8:05 PM To: Conte, Richard

Subject:

RE: Attached Image

Rich, There may be a problem with the licensee-identified violation because we don't know what their corrective action process is going to say.

My interpretation was that lAW 0612-10, paragraph c. NRC added value "Ifa problem exists with the licensee's evaluation or corrective actions associated with the finding and if further inspection added significant value, then document the finding as a NRC-identified finding under the applicable cornerstone of the report in accordance with Section 0612-06, 'The four part format,' of this IMC. Documentation should clearly emphasize that the licensee identified the issue but failed to recognize or correct the problem identified by the inspector."

So this is why I wrote it up in 4 part format. And the violation should be in the mitigating systems cornerstone section. I note that this should not be in 40A7 We can discuss this tomorrow, but a solution could be to call this issue a URI until we get their EQ:ACE and Root Cause. If we decide to do this we can have the resident's update the issue at their exit on Friday, 7/9/10.

Tim From: Conte, Richard. ...

Sent: Tuesday, July 06, 2010 7:3 AM To: OHara, Timothy

Subject:

FW: Attached Image As promised, Chris' comments are in the back of mine. I tried to incorporate his comment into mine not knowing he had a markup.

Caution: the stuff he calls assessment are really observations which should be strongly considered in the PIR writeup now that we have a finding.

From: rlscan@nrc.gov [1]

Sent: Tuesday, July 06, 2010 7:36 AM To: Conte, Richard

Subject:

Attached Image