ML15013A278

From kanterella
Revision as of 17:02, 31 October 2019 by StriderTol (talk | contribs) (Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Jump to navigation Jump to search
12-17-14 Prairie Island Indian Comm Second Letter
ML15013A278
Person / Time
Site: Prairie Island  Xcel Energy icon.png
Issue date: 12/17/2014
From: Halloran J
Jacobson, Magnuson, Anderson & Halloran P.C.
To: Langer M
NRC/OGC, US Federal Judiciary, US Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit
Creedon, Meghan
References
14-1212
Download: ML15013A278 (1)


Text

Joseph F. Halloran l Shareholder USCA Case #14-1212 Document #1527918 Filed: 12/17/2014 Attorney at Law Page 1 of 1 (651) 644-4710 E-mail: jhalloran@thejacobsonlawgroup.com December 17, 2014 Mark J. Langer, Clerk U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit 333 Constitution Avenue N.W.

Washington, D.C. 20001-2866

SUBJECT:

Prairie Island Indian Community v. U.S. Nuclear Regulatory No. 14-1212 (consolidated with Nos. 14-1210, 14-1216, 14-1217)

Dear Mr. Langer:

Enclosed herewith for filing is the Petitioner Prairie Island Indian Communitys Amended Docketing Statement, which amends and supplements the Communitys original Docketing Statement filed with the Court on December 1, 2014.

The Amended Docketing Statement supplements the Communitys response to question 6(g),

which asks for identification of cases which involve substantially the same issues as the instant case presents, and identifies a matter now pending before the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commissions Atomic Safety and Licensing Board (ASLB). The Federal Respondents counsel Andrew Averbach referenced this ASLB proceeding in his December 5, 2014 letter to you.

The Community respectfully disagrees with Mr. Averbachs assertion that the issue raised in the context of the ASLB proceeding is substantially similar to the issues presented in the context of this appeal, and his suggestion that the Community has failed to exhaust its administrative remedies, but nevertheless identifies the ASLB proceeding in its Amended Docketing Statement as a professional courtesy and out of an abundance of caution.

If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact me. Thank you for your consideration.

Sincerely,

/s/Joseph Halloran Joseph F. Halloran Enclosure (as stated)

Cc: Philip R. Mahowald, PIIC General Counsel Service List