ML17319B409

Forwards XN-NF-82-37, DC Cook Unit 2,Cycle 4 SAR, XN-NF-82-35, DC Cook Unit 2 LOCA ECCS Analysis Using Exem/ PWR Large Break Results, & XN-NF-82-32(P), Plant Transient Analysis... XN-NF-82-32(P) Withheld (Ref 10CFR2.790)

ML17319B409
Person / Time
Site:	Cook
Issue date:	06/30/1982
From:	Owsley G SIEMENS POWER CORP. (FORMERLY SIEMENS NUCLEAR POWER
To:	Eisenhut D Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
Shared Package
ML17319B410	List: ML17319B409 ML17319B411 ML17319B412
References
GFO:041:82, GFO:41:82, NUDOCS 8207080385
Download: ML17319B409 (8)

Text

REGULATORY ..FORMATION DISTRIBUTION SYbM (RIOS)

AOCESSION NBR:8207080385 DOC,DATE: 82/06/30 NOTARIZED: YES DOCKET FACIL:50BYNAME316 Donald C ~ Cook Nuclear Power .Planti Unit 2E Indiana 8 05000316 AUTH AUTHOR AFFI'LIATION OlYSLEYE G ~

<R HC IP ~

F NAME

~ Exxon Nuclear .Co ~ Inc, RECIPIENT AFF IL I ATION E (sub'f Exxon Corp.)

EISENHUTED.G. Division of Licensing SUBJECT'orwards XN NF 82 37( "DC Cook Uni't 2(Cycle 4 "SARE."

XN-NF-82-35, "DC Cook Unit 2 LOCA ECCS Analysis using EXEM/

PAR Large Break Results'." 8 XN-NF-82 32(P)E "Plant Transient Analysis,. 'N NF"82 32(P). withheld (ref 10CFR2,~90 OISTRISUTIOR COOS:. T010S TITLE: - 'opical CO IES R EIVEO:LTR:L EffCLAQS Report (For copy call 28307)

E:.+&A~

ffOTES: gA N F F-g-35 ~d XNhit'- 'g2-$ g RECIPIENT COPIES RECIPIENT COPIES ID CODE/NAME LTTR ENCL ID CODE/NAME LTTR ENCL INTERNAL: ASLB 1 1 ELO/HDS3 0 NRR BERGGREN 1 1 NRR DIR 0 NRR/DE D IR 1 0 NRR/DE/ADCSE 0 NRR/DE/ADET 1 0 NRR/DE/ADMQE 0 NRR/DE/AEAB 1 0 NRR/DE/CEB 0" NRR/DE/EEB 1 0 NRR/DE/EQB 0 NRR/DE/GB 1 0 NRR/DE/HGEB 0 NRR/DE/MEB 1 0 NRR/DE/MTEB 0 NRR/DE/QAB 1 0 NRR/DE/SAB 0 NRR/DE/SEB 1 0 NRR/DHFS DEPY 0 NRR/DHFS/HFEB 1 0 NRR/DHFS/LQB 0 NRR/OHFS/OLB 1 0 NRR/DHFS/1PTRB 0 0'i NRR/DL DIR 1 NRR/DL/ADL 0 NRR/DL/ADOR 1 0 NRR/DL/ADSA 0 NRR/DL/LB1 1 0 NRR/DL/LB2 0 NRR/DL/LB3 0 NRR/DL/LB4 0 NRR/DL/ORAB 1 0 NRR/DL/ORB1 0 NRR/DL/ORB2 1 0 NRR/DL/ORB3 0 NRR/DL/ORBP 1 0 NRR/DL/ORB5 0 NRR/DL/SEPB 1 0 NRR/DL/SSPB 0 NRR/DSI DIR 1 0 NRR/DS I/ADGCS 0 NRR/DSI/AD PS 1 0 NRR/DSI/ADRP 0 NRR/DSI/AEB 1 0 NRR/DSI/ASB 0 NRR/DSI/CPB 1 0 NRR/DSI/CSB 0 NRR/OS I/ETSB 1 0 NRR/DSI/I CSB 0 NRR/DSI/PSB 1 0 NRR/DSI/RAB 0 NRR/DS I/RSB, 0 NRR/DST DIR 0 NRR/DST/ADGP., 1 0 NRR/DST/ADT 0 NRR/PST/GIB 1 0 NRR/DST/LGB 0 NRR/DST/RRAB 1 0 NRR/DST/RSCB 0 SPEB 1 0 NRR/TMIP0 D IR 0 REG F ILE 03 2 "2 RES 1

'GGREN ',6 6 EXTERNAL: ACRS 16 '. 16 NRC PDR-" E 02 NSIC 1 1 NTIS NyT'>>'65 gC,C>> S'S I>~ W fQe7g ow~ F:oh, TOTAL NUMBER OF COP IES REQUIRED: LTTR 90 ENCL 30 PREI &

9isT'.

1 4

)

4 p ua ",+' P h,L II C

C ~ J J l

+'p V

~ 5 Ic

)

I E)+ON NUCLEAR COMPLY, Inc.

t 2101 Hom Rapids Rood P. 0 Box 1X Richlond, lYashington 8KKP Phone: (509) 375-8100 Telex: 15-2878 June 30, 1982 GFO:041: 82 Donal d C. Cook Nuc 1 ear P 1 ant Uni t 2 Docket No. 50-316 License No. DPR-74 Transmittal of Safety Analysis Reports Supporting Cycle 4 Operation Hr. D. G. Eisenhut, Director Division of Licensing Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission 7920 Norfolk Avenue Bethesda, MD 20014

~

SUBJECT REPORTS: 1) XN-NF-82-32(P), "Plant Transient Analysis for the Donald C.

~"'"0 Cook Unit 2 Reactor at 3425 MWt," dated April 1982

)00.0 kU 2CUCAUCCUA )yf 0 0 EXEM/PWR Large Break Results," dated Apri 1 1982

')

3) "0. C. 0 k 0 2, 0 1 4 3 4 y A A 0

. Report,"'dated April 1982 t-' ~

Ref.: Letter, R. F. Hering to Harold R. Denton (AEP:NRC:0637A), "Appli-cation for Cycle 4 Reload and Uprate License Amendment," dated April 7, 1982

Dear Nr. Eisenhut:

This letter transmits twenty-five (25) copies of each of the subject reports. These reports provide the safety analysis information supporting the Cycle 4 operation of the Donald C: Cook Unit 2 nuclear plant. This cycle will utilize both Exxon Nuclear and Westinghouse supplied fuel. The safety analysis has been performed for a core power of 3425 NWt. This analysis also supports the increase in rated power level from 3391 MWt to 3411 NWt. as requested in the reference letter. Indiana E Michigan Electric Company will be referencing these reports in correspondence with you re-garding Cycle 4 operation.

Exxon Nuclear Company considers the information contained in XN-NF-82-32(P) to be proprietary. In accordance with the 10 CFR 2.790(b),

the enclosed Affidavit executed by our Hr. Gary J. Busselman provides. the necessary information to support the withholding of this document from public disclosure.

~Id~ X~~ ~>'1 "N ~F ~- ogP'oo ANAFFIUATEOF ONc~aonaamnu.

'g'37 8207080385 820630

>J F- PDR ADOCK 05000316 2 P PDR

Mr. D. G. Eisenhut (USNRC) June 30, 1982 Please call Dr. Juan Castresana of American Electric Power Company (telephone 212-440-9282) if you have questions or comments regarding this matter.

Sine ely, G, F. Owsley, Manager Reload Fuel Licensin GFO:gf Enclosures As noted CC: Dr. J. I. Castresana (AEP)

AFF IDAVIT STATE OF Was hi ng ton )

ss.

COUNTY OF Benton )

I, Gary J. Busselman, being duly sworn, hereby say and depose:

1. I am Manager, Fuel Design,,for Exxon Nuclear Company, Inc.

("ENC"), and as such I am authorized to execute this Affidavit.

2. I am familiar with ENC's,detailed document control system and F

=0 kl policies which govern .the protection.and control of information.

3.'. I am familiar with the l'

document XN-NF-82-32(P) entitled "Plant Transient Analysis for the i Donald C. Cook Unit 2 Reactor at 3425 MWt",

'-"'c= "-."'=.'"referred,to as "Document.."-,.'.Information co'ntained in this Document has. been'."'".,.= ...';~

proprieta'ry in with .the control system

'-,'lassified by ENC as acc'ordance and=.

l I policies established by ENC for the'control and protection of information.

4. The Document contains information of a proprietary and con-fidential nature and is of the type customarily held in confidence by ENC and not made available to the public. Based on my experience, I am aware" that other companies regard information of the kind contained in the Document as being proprietary and confidential.

5. The Document has been made available to the United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission in confidence, with the request that the information contained in the Document not be disclosed or divulged.

6. The Document contains informati'on which is vital to a com-petitive advantage of ENC and would be helpful to competitors of ENC when

. competing with ENC.

7. The information contained in the Document is considered to be proprietary by ENC because it reveals certain distinguishing aspects of ENC safety analysis methodology which secure competitive economic advantage to ENC for fuel design optimization and improved marketability, and includes information utilized by ENC in its business which affords ENC an opportunity to obtain a competitive advantage over its competitors who do not or may not know or use the information contained in the Document.

8. The disclosure of the proprietary information contained in the Document to a competitor would permit the competitor to reduce its expenditure of money and manpower and to improve its competitive position by giving it, extremely valuable insights into ENC's safety analysis methodology and would e

result in substantial harm to the competitive position of ENC.

9. The Document contains proprietary information which is held in confidence by ENC and is not available in public sources.

10. In accordance with ENC's policies governing the protection and control of information, proprietary information contained in the Document has been made available, on a limited basis, to others outside ENC only as required and under suitable agreement providing for non-disclosure and limited use of the information.

11. ENC policy requires that proprietary information be kept in a secured file or area and distributed on a need-to-know basis.

s ~ ~

g I

12. This Document provides information which reveals ENC safety analysis methodology developed by ENC over the past several years. ENC has invested hundreds of thousands of dollars and many man-years of effort in developing the safety analysis methodology revealed in the'ocument. Assum-ing a competitor had available the same background data and incentives as ENC, the competitor might, at a minimum, develop the information for the same expenditure of manpower and money as ENC.

13. Based on my experience in the industry, I do not believe that the background data and incentives of ENC's competitors are sufficiently similar to the corresponding background data and incentives of ENC to reasonably expect such competitors would be in a position to duplicate ENC's propriethry information contained in the Documents.

THAT the statements made herein'above are, to the best of my t

knowledge', information,'and belief, truthful and complete..

FURTHER AFFIANT SAYETH NOT.

SWORN TO AND SUBSCRIBED before me this~Cday of 19 1~ .

NOTARY PUBLI 7