Text

Transmittal of 2015 Annual Radiological Environmental Operating Report (AREOR)
	ML16109A273
Person / Time
Site:	Grand Gulf
Issue date:	04/19/2016
From:	Nadeau J; Entergy Operations
To:	; Document Control Desk, Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
References
	GNRO-2016/00019
	Download: ML16109A273 (84)
	v • d • e

- '"'P Entergy GNRO-2016/00019April19,2016U.S.Nuclear Regulatory Commission Attn: DocumentControlDeskWashington,DC20555-0001 Entergy Operations, Inc.P.O.Box756PortGibson,MS39150 James NadeauManager,RegulatoryAssuranceGrandGulfNuclearStationTel.(601)437-2103

SUBJECT:

DearSirorMadam:

GrandGulf NuclearStation2015Annual Radiological Environmental OperatingReport(AREOR)

Grand Gulf NuclearStation,Unit1DocketNo.50-416LicenseNo.NPF-29 In accordancewiththeGrandGulf NuclearStationUnit1 Technical Specification 5.6.2,attachedistheAnnualRadiological EnvironmentalOperatingReport(AREOR)forthetimeperiodof January1,2015through December31,2015.Therearenonew commitments containedinthissubmittal.Ifyouhaveany questionsorrequireanyadditionalinformation,pleasecontactRichardSumrallat 601-437-2115.

Sincerely, JJN/tmc

Attachment:

GrandGulf NuclearStation2015AnnualRadiological Environmental OperatingReport(AREOR)cc:(seenextpage)

GNRO-2016/00019Page2of2 cc: NRC Senior Resident InspectorGrandGulf Nuclear StationPortGibson,MS39150 U.S.Nuclear Regulatory CommissionATTN:Mr.MarcDapas(w/2)

Regional Administrator,RegionIV1600EastLamarBoulevardArlington,TX76011-4511 U.S.Nuclear Regulatory CommissionATTN:Mr.JamesKim, NRR/DORL (w/2)MailStop OWFN/8 B111555RockvillePikeRockville,MD 20852-2738Mr.B.J.SmithDirector,Divisionof Radiological HealthMississippiState DepartmentofHealthDivisionof Radiological HealthP.O.Box1700Jackson,MS39205Dr.MaryCurrier,M.D.,M.P.HStateHealth Officer Mississippi DepartmentofHealthP.O.Box1700Jackson,MS 39205-1700 Attachment 1 to GNRO-2016/00019GrandGulf NuclearStation2015Annual Radiological EnvironmentalOperatingReport (AREOR)

ENTERGY OPERATIONS, INC.GRAND GULF NUCLEAR STATION ANNUAL RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL OPERATING REPORT January1,2015-December31,2015 Prepared By Reviewed By/L/_I'I_lb.Approved By TABLEOFCONTENTS

SUMMARY

1.0INTRODUCTION

1.1 Radiological Environmental Monitoring Program 1.2 Pathways Monitored1.3LandUse Census2.0INTERPRETATIONANDTRENDSOFRESULTS2.1Air Particulate and Radioiodine Sample Results 2.2 Thermoluminescent Dosimetry (TLD)Sample Results2.3Water Sample Results 2.4 Sediment Sample Results 2.5 Milk Sample Results2.6Fish Sample Results2.7Food Product Sample Results2.8LandUse Census Results 2.9 Interlaboratory Comparison Results3.0RADIOLOGICALENVIRONMENTALMONITORINGPROGRAM

SUMMARY

3.,1 Program Results Summary 2 6 10 10 10 10 23 23 23 24 25 25 25 25 25 32 33 33 TABLE 1.1 TABLE 1.2 TABLE 2.1 TABLE 3.1LISTOF TABLES AIR SAMPLING DEVIATIONSIN2015 RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL SAMPLING PROGRAMLANDUSECENSUS RESULTS RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING PROGRAM

SUMMARY

3 8 12 27 34 FIGURE1-1FIGURE1-2 FIGURE1-3 FIGURE2-1LISTOFFIGURESEXPOSUREPATHWAYS SAMPLE COllECTIONSITES-NEARFIELD SAMPLE COllECTIONSITES-FARFIELD TlD READINGS 4 20 21 22 24 ATTACHMENT 1LISTOF ATTACHMENTS RADIOLOGICAL MONITORING REPORT

SUMMARY

OF MONITORING RESULTS 5 39 SummaryTheAnnualRadiological Environmental Operating Report presentsdataobtained through analyses of environmental samplescollectedforGrandGulfNuclear Station's (GGNS)Radiological Environmental MonitoringProgram(REMP)fortheperiod January1,2015, through December31,2015.Thisreportfulfillsthe requirementsofGGNS Technical Specification 5.6.2.To supplementtheREMP,GGNSpersonnelinstalled duplicateTLDsand collected duplicate samplesduringthereportingperiod.

Radiological Environmental Monitoring Program GGNS establishedtheREMPin1978priortothestation becoming operational(1985)toprovidedataon backgroundradiationand radioactivity normallypresentinthearea.GGNShas continued to monitor the environmentbysamplingair,water,sediment,fishandfoodproducts,aswellas measuringradiationdirectly.GGNSalso samplesmilk,if commercial milk production occurswithinfivemilesoftheplant.TheREMPincludes sampling indicatorandcontrol locationswithinan18-mileradiusoftheplant.TheREMPutilizes indicator locationsnearthesitetoshowany increasesorbuildupof radioactivitythatmight occurduetostation operationandcontrol locations fartherawayfromthesitetoindicate naturally occurring backgroundradioactivity.GGNS personnel compare indicatorresultswithcontroland preoperationalresultstoassessany impact GGNS operationmighthaveonthe surrounding environment.In2015, GGNS.personnel collected environmental samplesforradiologicalanalysis.Themonitoringresultsfor indicator locations when comparedtocontrol locations and previousstudiesshowthatGGNShasno significant effectonthelocal environment.Thereviewof2015 monitoringdata,inmanycases,showed undetectableradiationlevelsinthe environment and near backgroundlevelsinpotentialexposurepathways associatedwithGGNS.Harmful Effects or Irreversible DamageTheREMP monitoringdidnot detectanyharmful effectsorevidenceof irreversible damage inthecurrentyear.

Reporting LevelsWhenaveragedoverany calendarquarter,no environmentalsamplesequaledorexceededreportinglevelsfor radioactivityasoutlinedin Offsite Dose CalculationManual(ODCM)

SpecificationsTable6.12.1-2;theanalyticalresultsdidnot trigger any Radiological MonitoringProgramSpecialReports.

Radioactivity Not Attributable to GGNSOverpreviousyears,theGGNSREMP detected radioactivity attributabletoothersources.Thesesourcesincludedthe Chinese nucleartestin1980andthe accidentattheChernobyl NuclearPowerPlantin1986.In2011,theGGNSREMP detected radioactivityreleasedfrom the Fukushima Dai-ichi NuclearPowerPlantfollowingtheMarch11,2011,Tohoku earthquake.In2015,theGGNSREMP detected no radioactivity attributabletoothersources.

Comparison to Federal and State Programs 6 GGNSpersonnel compareREMPdatatofederalandstate monitoring programs.Historically, the programsusedfor comparisonincludedtheU.S.

Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC)Thermoluminescent Dosimeter(TLD)DirectRadiationMonitoring NetworkandtheMississippi State DepartmentofHealth(MSDH),Divisionof Radiological Health monitoring program.AlthoughtheNRCTLD NetworkProgramwas discontinuedin1998,theseresults compared favorablytothosefromtheGGNSREMP.TheMSDHandtheGGNSREMPhave similar monitoring requirements.

These programs include co-located air samplingandsharing samplemediasuchaswater, sediment,fishandfoodproducts.Both programs have obtained similarresults.The2015resultsoftheMSDH monitoring program compared favorablywiththeGGNSREMPresults.

Sample Deviations*MilkTheGGNS aDCM requires collectionofmilk samplesifthereisa commerciallyavailablesourcewithin5miles(8km)oftheplant.In2015,theREMPdidnotinclude milk sampling because no commercial milk production occurredwithin5milesofGGNS.

GGNS personnelinsteadcollected vegetation samples to monitortheingestionpathway,as specified in aDCM SpecificationsTable6.12.1-1.

Required Lower Limit of Detection (LLD)ValuesAnalyticallowerlimitof detection (LLD)valuesrequiredbythe aDCM specificationsachievedin2015werewithinthelimitsforallsamples.

Thermoluminescent DosimetersTherewereno deviationsin2015.*Air SamplesThefollowingair sample locationshadreducedruntimesdueto weather-related power outages or mechanical problems.As described in aDCM SpecificationTable6.12.1-1, footnote (a), deviationsfromtherequired sampling schedule are permitteddueto malfunction of sampling equipmentandother legitimate reasons.7 Table1.1Air Sampling Deviationsin2014RunTime Out-of-ServiceSampleLocationDateInDateOut(Hours)(Hours)

CommentsAS-7UH 01/06/1501/13/15166.05 2.03PoweroutageAS-7UH01/20/1501/27/15165.44 2.39PoweroutageAS-7UH03/03/1503/10/15165.100.68PoweroutageAS-7UH03/31/1504/07/15169.672.15PoweroutageAS-7UH04/21/1504/28/15170.552.22PoweroutageAS-7UH04/28/1505/05/15160.28 2.80Poweroutage AS-361VA06/09/1506/16/15130.4637.31PoweroutageAS-7UH06/09/1506/16/15164.20 3.45Poweroutage AS-361VA06/30/1507/07/15165.911.91Poweroutage AS-7UH06/30/1507/07/15166.661.17PoweroutageAS-7UH07/07/1507/14/15166.971.18PoweroutageAS-7UH07/28/1508/04/15166.10 1.22PoweroutageAS-7UH09/01/1509/08/15159.970.98PoweroutageAS-1PG09/08/1509/15/15166.800.62Poweroutage AS-361VA09/22/1509/29/15155.6222.21 Equipment MalfunctionAS-7UH10/20/1510/27/15165.382.47Poweroutage AS-361VA12/08/1512/15/15166.491.56PoweroutageAS-7UH12/08/1512/15/15167.001.17PoweroutageAS-7UH12/22/1512/29/15158.867.26PoweroutageBasedonthesamplecollectionperiodreductions,air sampleswerecollectedthefollowing percentagesoftheavailabletime:

Missed SamplesAS-1PG AS-361VAAS-7UH 99.9%99.2%99.6%Allrequired sampleswerecollectedin accordancewithREMP requirements.

Therewerenomissed samples.*Unavailable ResultsGGNSreceivedanalyticalresultsin adequatetimeforinclusioninthisreport.

Program ModificationsNoREMP modificationstookplaceduringthis sampling period.During2015,installationofan additional air monitoringstationinthevicinityofa communitylocatedwithinthe sectorhavingthe highest calculated XlQwasapproved.

Meteorological dataindicatesthat SectorListhe sectorwiththe highest calculated XlQatthesiteboundary.

Implementationofthenewair samplinglocationwill be completedin2016.The additional 8

monitoringlocationwill enhancethesite'sradiological environmental monitoringprogram,and will demonstrate robust compliancewiththe Offsite Dose Calculation Manual requirements.Discussionofthedata collectedfromthenewlocationwillbeincludedinthenextAnnual Radiological Environmental Operating Report.Attachments Attachment 1 containsresultsofTLD,air,water, sediment,fish,food productsandspecial samplescollectedinthe reportingperiod.TLDswere analyzed by Stanford Dosimetry ofSterling,MA.Other sampleswereanalyzedby Teledyne Brown EngineeringofKnoxville,TN.TablesA9.1andA9.2 includesresultsfrom Stanford Dosimetry's and Teledyne Brown Engineering's participation in interlaboratory comparison programs.9 1.0Introduction 1.1 R41diologicalEnvironmentalMonitoringProgram GGNS establishedtheREMPtoensurethatplant operating controls properlyfunctiontominimizeanyradiationthatcould endangerhumanhealthorthe environment.TheREMPis designed to:*Analyze important pathways for anticipatedtypesand quantities of radionuclidesreleasedintothe environment,*Consider the possibilityofabuildupoflong-lived radionuclidesinthe environment and identifyanyphysicalandbiological accumulationsthatmay contributetohuman exposures,*Considerthepotentialradiation exposuretoplantandanimallifeinthe environment surrounding GGNS,*Correlatelevelsofradiationand radioactivityinthe environment with radioactivereleasesfromthe operationofGGNS.1.2PathwaysMonitoredTheairborne, direct radiation, waterborneandingestionpathways,asseeninFigure1-1are monitoredasrequiredbytheGGNSODCMTable6.12.1-1.A description oftheGGNSREMPutilizedto monitor theexposurepathwaysisprovidedinTable1.2andshowninFigures1-2and1-3.GGNSmay supplement this program with additional samplinginordertoprovidea comprehensive and well-balanced program.Section2.0ofthisreport provides a discussion of samplingresults,withSection3.0providinga summaryofresultsforthe monitored exposure pathways.1.3LandUseCensus GGNS personnel conductabienniallandusecensus,asrequiredbyODCM Specification6.12.2.Themostrecentlandusecensusdataare included inTable2.1.Thepurposeofthiscensusisto identifylanduse changeswithineachofthe16 meteorological sectorsandwithina5-mileradiusofGGNSthatwouldrequire modificationstotheREMPortheODCM.Thecensus identifiesthenearest:

1)2)3)Occupied and unoccupied residences 2 2Gardenof greaterthan50square meters(m)[500squarefeet(ft)]

producing broadleaf vegetationAnimalmilkedforhuman consumption 10 GGNSpersonnel conductthelandusecensusby:

Conductingfieldsurveysineach meteorologicalsectorouttofivemilesinordertoconfirm:*Nearestoccupiedresidence*Nearest unoccupied residence*Nearestgardenand approximate size*Nearestmilkinganimal*Identifyinglocationsonmapsandaerialphotographs,measuringdistancestoGGNSandrecordingresultsonsurveillancedatasheets*Comparingcurrentlandusecensusresultstopreviousresultsfromthe2012census

ContactingtheClaiborneCounty Agentforverificationofnearestdairy animals No significantchangesbetweenthebienniallandusecensusperformedin2012andthemostrecentcensus performedin2014wereidentifiedthatwouldrequire modificationstotheREMPortheODCM.

11 Table 1.2 Radiological Environmental Sampling Program Exposure , Sample Point Description, Sampling and Type and Frequency Pathway Requirement Distance and Direction Collection Frequency Of Analyses Radioiodine and Particulates1sampleclosetotheSITEAS-7UH (Sector H, Radius 0.5 BOUNDARYhavingthe highest Miles)-South-southeastofGGNS calculated annual averageattheIBEWUnionHall.groundlevel 0/0.Radioiodine Canister-1-Continuous sampler131;7days Radioiodine and Particulates operation with sample Particulate Sampler-Airborne1samplefromthevicinityofaAS-1PG (Sector G, Radius 5.5 collectionper7daysorasGrossbeta radioactivity communityhavingthe highest Miles)-SoutheastofGGNSattherequiredbydustloading, following filter change, calculated annual averagePortGibsonCityBarn.

whicheverismore composite (by location)groundlevel 0/0.frequent for gammaisotopic;92 days Radioiodine and ParticulatesAS-361VA (Sector B, Radius 181samplefromacontrollocation Miles)-North-northeastofGGNS15-30km(10-20miles)onHwy61,Northofthe Vicksburg distance.Airport.TLDs M-16 (Sector A, Radius 0.9 Miles)-Meteorological Tower.Aninnerringof stationsinthe M-19 (Sector E, Radfus 0.5 Miles)DirectgeneralareasoftheSITE92days Gammadose;92 days Radiation BOUNDARY.-EasternSITE BOUNDARY Property line, North-northeast of HWSA.12 Table 1.2 Radiological Environmental Sampling Program Exposure Sample Point Description, Sampling and Type and Frequency Pathway Requirement Distance and Direction Collection Frequency Of Analyses M-21 (Sector J, Radius 0.4 Miles)-Near Former Training Center BuildingonBaldHillRoad.

M-22 (Sector G, Radius 0.5 Miles)-Former RR Entrance CrossingOnBaldHillRoad.TlDs M-23 (Sector 0, Radius 0.5 Miles)-DirectAninnerringof stationsintheGinLakeRoad50YardsNorthof RadiationgeneralareasoftheSITEHeavyHaulRoadonPowerPole.92days Gammadose;92 days BOUNDARY.M-25 (Sector N, Radius 1.6 Miles)-RadialWell Number 1.M-28 (Sector l, Radius 0.9 Miles)-BaldHillRoad.

M-94 (Sector R, Radius 0.8 Miles)-SectorRNear Meteorological Tower.13 Table 1.2 Radiological Environmental Sampling Program Sampling and Exposure Sample Point Description, Collection Type and Frequency Pathway Requirement Distance and Direction Frequency Of Analyses M-95 (Sector F, Radius 0.5 mi)-SpoilsArea,fenceofoldstoragearea,near entrance gate M-96 (Sector B, Radius 0.7 mi.)-NorthGateFence TLDs M-97 (Sector D, Radius 0.8 mi.)-Grand DirectAninnerringofstationsintheGulfRoad entrancegatetospoilsarea RadiationgeneralareasoftheSITE M-98 (Sector H, Radius 0.5 mi.)-Bald92days Gammadose;92days BOUNDARY.HillRoad,acrossfromUnionHall,in curve M-99 (Sector K, Radius 0.4 mi.)-NorthFenceofoldBallFieldnearutilitypole M-100 (Sector C, Radius 0.6 mi.)-GrandGulfRoad TLDs M-36 (Sector P, Radius 5.0 Miles)-Anouterring approximately3toCurveonHW608,PointNearestGGNS5milesfromthesite.atPowerPole.

M-40 (Sector M, Radius 2.3 Miles)-HeadlyDrive,NearRiverPortEntrance.

14 Table 1.2 Radiological Environmental Sampling Program Exposure Sample Point Description, Sampling and Type and Frequency Pathway Requirement Distance and Direction Collection Frequency Of Analyses TLDs M-48 (Sector K, Radius 4.8 Miles)-Anouterring approximately 30.4MilesSouthonMont Gomer Roadto5milesfromthesite.

on West Side.M-49 (Sector H, Radius 4.5 Miles)-ForkinBessie Weathers Road/Shaifer Road.M-50 (Sector B, Radius 5.3 Miles)-PanolaHuntingClubEntrance.

M-55 (Sector D, Radius 5.0 Miles)-NearIngelsideKarnacFerry Road/Ashland Road Intersection.

M-57 (Sector F, Radius 4.5 Miles)-DirectHwy61,Behindthe WelcometoPort RadiationGibsonSignat Glensdale Subdivision.92days Gammadose;92 days TLDs M-Ol (Sector E, Radius 3.5 Miles)-8stationsinspecial interestAcrosstheroadfromLake Claiborneareassuchas population EntryGate.(SpecialInterest)centers,nearbyresidences, ,.M-07 (Sector G, Radius 5.5 Miles)-schools,andin1or2areastoAS-1PG,PortGibsonCityBarn.serveascontrolstations.(SpecialInterest)

M-09 (Sector D, Radius 3.5 Miles)-WarnerTullyV-Camp.(SpecialInterest)

M-l0 (Sector A, Radius 1.5 Miles)-GrandGulfMilitaryPark.(Special Interest)15 Table 1.2 Radiological Environmental Sampling Program Exposure Sample Point Description, Sampling and Type and Frequency Pathway Requirement Distance and Direction Collection Frequency Of Analyses M-14 (Sector B, Radius 18.0 Miles)-AS-3-61VA,Hwy61,Northof VicksburgAirport.(Control)

TLDs M-33 (Sector P, Radius 12.5 Miles)-Newellton, Louisiana Water Tower.8stationsinspecial interest(SpecialInterest)

Directareassuchas population M-38 (Sector M, Radius 9.5 Miles)-92days Gammadose;92days Radiationcenters,nearby residences,LakeBruinStatePark,Entranceschools,andin1or2areastoRoad.(SpecialInterest)serveascontrol stations M-39 (Sector M, Radius 13.0 Miles)-S1.Joseph,Louisiana, Auxiliary WaterTank.(SpecialInterest) 16 Table 1.2 Radiological Environmental Sampling Program Sampling and Exposure Sample Point Description, Collection Type and Frequency Pathway Requirement Distance and Direction Frequency Of Analyses Surface Water MRUP (Sector R, Radius 1.8 Miles)-At92days Gamma isotopic and1sampleupstream.least4500ftupstreamoftheGGNStritiumanalyses;92 dischargepointintotheMississippiRiverto days1sampledownstream.

allow adequatemixingoftheMississippiandBigBlackRivers.

MRDOWN (Sector N, Radius 1.6 Miles)-Atleast5000ft downstreamoftheGGNS dischargepointintheMississippiRivernear WaterborneRadialWell No.1.1sampledownstreamduringa MRDOWN (Sector P, Radius 1.3 Miles)-366days Gamma isotopic andLiquidRadwasteDischarge.DownstreamoftheGGNS dischargepointintritiumanalyses;366theMississippiRivernearRadialWell No.5.days1samplefromOutfall007 OUTFAll 007 (Sector N, Radius 0.231daysTritium;31days Miles)-StormDrainSystem 17 Table 1.2 Radiological Environmental Sampling Program Exposure Sample Point Description, Sampling and Type and Frequency Pathway Requirement Distance and Direction Collection Frequency Of Analyses PGWELl (Sector G, Radius 5.0 Miles)-PortGibsonWells-Taken from distributionsystemoroneofthe Groundwaterfivewells.

WaterborneSamplesfrom2sources.

CONSTWEll (Sector Q, Radius366days Gamma isotopic andtritiumanalyses;366days 0.4 Miles)-GGNS Construction Water Well-Takenfrom distributionsystemorthewell.

SEDHAM (Sector N, Radius 1.6 Sediment From Shoreline Miles)-DownstreamoftheGGNS1samplefrom downstream dischargepointintheMississippi area.RivernearHamiltonLakeoutlet.1samplefromupstreamarea.

SEDCONT (Minimum of 100 yds)-366days Gammaisotopic;366daysUpstreamoftheGGNS dischargepointintheMississippiRiver.

Milk1samplefrommilkingCurrently,noavailablemilkinganimalswithin8km(5miles)animalswithin8kmofGGNS.ifmilkisavailable Ingestion commercially.

AlCONT (Sector K, Radius 10.592dayswhenrequired Gamma isotopic and 1-131;1controlsample(onlyif Miles)-Located South-southwest of92daysindicatorexists)>8kmifmilkGGNSatAlcornStateUniversity.isavailable.

18 Table 1.2 Radiological Environmental Sampling Program Exposure Sample Point Description, Sampling and Type and Frequency Pathway Requirement Distance and Direction Collection Frequency Of AnalysesFISHDOWN-Downstreamofthe--Fish GGNS dischargepointintothe1sampleinvicinityofGGNS Mississippi River discharge point.FISHUP-UpstreamoftheGGNS366days Gamma isotopic on edible1sample uninfluenced by dischargepointintothe Mississippiportion;366days GGNS discharge.

River uninfluencedbyplant-operations.

Food Products Ingestion1sample of broadleaf VEG-J (Sector J, Radius 0.4 Miles)vegetationgrowninoneoftwo-SouthofGGNSnear former different offsite locations with Training CenteronBaldHillRoad.

highest anticipated annual VEG-CONT (Sector K, Radius 10.5 Gamma isotopicand1-131;averagegroundlevelD/Qif Miles)-AlcornState University92dayswhen availablemilksamplingisnot performed.

south-southwest of GGNS when92days1sampleofsimilar vegetation available, otherwisealocation15-30grown15-30km distantifmilkkmdistant.samplingisnot performed.

19 Figure1-1 Exposure Pathways 20 Grand GLdf.IAlIt13.0-7 Rm<Isian sa/11 Collection Site Locations Q-4 Mile Area MapFIGURE1-2 SAMPLE COLLECTIONSITES-NEARFIELD 21 FIGURE 3.0-1 LEGEND P FISh o MSampIer o Surface Watet 6 Ground water o Broad1eaf vegetation o Sediment OTlD*Ranney Wells$-MiIkENIERGY GRANO GUlF NUClEAR STA110N Q-4 Mile EnvIn:mJentaILacsIIon Map I.5 0 1!SCALEINMILES QL lSVt1FIGURE1-3 SAMPLE COLLECTIONSITES-FAR FIELD co E tij G (5E)\"t', I/IjI 22 FIGURE 3.0-2 Collection Site Locations, General Area Map 4-10 Mile Area Map LEGEND o 0 aJltamWIilBr A.0n:Iutld WitsBtoIdsiIf'IegetaIIan

SdnIrrI 0 no*Ramey weIs."'1)(18 MILES FROM BfWI)eutF 10 8IlcIaIr (B)""""""'"-EHTERGY GRAND GULF NlJQ.EAR STAllON+-10 Mile Environmental Samplng lJJca1Ion Map Qoand Gul.Unlt 1 3.0-8 REWtslon 35 0007 2.0 Interpretation and Trends of Results 2.1 Air Particulate and Radioiodine Sample ResultsGGNSdidnot detectanyplantrelated gamma emitting radionuclidesinthe quarterly air particulate composites.TheREMPhad previously detected airborne radioactivity attributabletoother sources inthispathway.

These sourcesincludethe Chinese nucleartestin1980andthe accidentatthe Chernobyl NuclearPowerPlantin1986.TheGGNSREMP detected radioactivityreleasedfromthe Fukushima Dai-ichi NuclearPowerPlantfollowingtheMarch11, 2011, Tohoku earthquake.

No radioiodine was detectedin2015.Table3.1,whichalsoincludesgrossbetaactivity, provides a comparisonofthe indicatorandcontrolmeansandranges, further emphasizingthatthe airborne pathway remains at backgroundlevels.Inthe absence of plant-related gamma radionuclides,grossbetaactivityis attributed to naturally occurring radionuclides.Similartrendsare present forcontroland indicatorlocations,which support the presence of naturally occurring radioactivity.

2.2 Thermoluminescent Dosimetry Sample Results GGNS calculatesdoseby subtracting shield readingsfromcontroland indicator locationreadingsandreports measureddoseasnetexposure, normalizedto92days.GGNSreliesonthe comparisonofthe indicator locationstothecontrollocationasanindicationofplantimpact.

Gammaradiationdoseinthereportingperiodis comparedtocontrol location readings for previousyearsasshowninFigure2-1.

The comparisonofthe indicatorresultstothecontrol,andto previous indicator results,asseeninFigure2-1andTable3.1, indicatesthatplant operationhashadno significantimpacton ambientradiationlevelsduringthereportingperiod.

In previousyears,TLD locationsM-21(SectorJ,0.4miles),M-98(SectorH,0.5miles),andM-99 (SectorK,0.4miles)wereabove background.Thedoseratesatthesethree locationsweretheresultof Nitrogen-16 (N-16)associatedwiththeinjectionofhydrogen and subsequent N-16 production.

Hydrogeninjectionintothe feedwater system provides protection against Intergranular Stress Corrosionofplant components.

Since November2010,the hydrogeninjectionratehasbeenreducedandthedoseratesatTLD locationsM-21,M-98,andM-99havereturnedtonear background levels.23 mRlqtr 20.0 16.0 8.0 4.0A o 0o x.0 Figure 2-12015TLD Readings 2010-2014 Control Location Maximum(+2Stdev)2010-2014 Control Location Minimum (-2 Stdev)0.0+1Q15 o2Q15 63Q15 x4Q15 2.3 Water Sample Results Surface water sampleswerecollectedfromthree indicator locations(Outfall007, MRDOWN, and MRDOWN During Discharge)andonecontrollocation(MRUP)andanalyzedfor gamma emitting radionuclidesandtritium.Plantrelated gamma emitting radionuclidesandtritiumremained undetectableintheupstreamand downstreamMississippiRiverlocations,whichis consistent with preoperational and previous operationalyears.Stormwaters contributetoOutfall007andcanincludetritiumasaresultof washout and entrainmentofnormal, previously monitored gaseous effluents.Asaresult,tritiumis occasionally observed.Tritiumwas measured during February (5280+/-961pCi/L),April(950

+/-554pCi/L), October (607+/-339pCi/L),and December (449+/-280pCi/L)attheOutfall007(indicator)location.

Duplicate samplesfromOutfall007during February (5090+/-950pCi/L)andApril(1200

+/-586pCi/L)showedsimilartritiumactivity.Tritiumwasnot observedintheremainingOutfall007 samples collectedduring2015.Inadditiontothetritium samplesrequiredbytheREMP,fourspecial surface watersamplesfor gamma emitting radionuclideswerecollectedattheOutfall007location(TableA8.1).Plantrelated gamma emitting radionuclides remained undetectable inthesesamples.Basedonreviewofresultsandhistoricaldata,plant operationshadno significant impactonthis pathwayduringthereportingperiod.

24 Groundwater sampleswerecollectedfromtwo locations (indicatorandcontrol)andanalyzedfor gamma emitting radionuclidesandtritium(TablesA4.1andA4.2).Inadditiontothe samplesrequiredbytheREMP,anextrasamplefromthelocationswasanalyzedforlodine-131(TableA4.3).GGNSdidnot detectanyplantrelatedgamma emitting radionuclidesortritiumin groundwater samplesduringthereportingperiod.Basedonreviewofresultsandhistoricaldata,plant operationshadno significant impactonthis pathwayduringthereportingperiod.

2.4 Sediment Sample Results Sediment sampleswerecollectedfromtwo locations (indicatorandcontrol)andanalyzedfor gamma emitting radionuclides.GGNSdidnot detectanyplantrelatedgammaemitting radionuclidesortritiumin sediment samplesduringthereporting period.Basedonreviewofresultsandhistoricaldata,plant operationshadno significant impactonthis pathwayduringthereportingperiod.

2.5 Milk Sample Results Milk sampleswerenotcollectedwithinfivemilesofthesiteinthereportingperioddueto the absenceofmilkinganimals.SincetherearenodairieswithinfivemilesofGGNS,andbasedon non-detectableradioiodineand gamma radionuclidesinairand vegetationsamples,plant operationshadno impactonthis pathwayduringthereportingperiod.2.6Fish Sample Results Fish sampleswerecollectedfromtwo locations (indicatorandcontrol)andanalyzedforgammaemitting radionuclides.GGNSdidnot detectanyplantrelated gamma emitting radionuclidesinfish samples(edibleportions)duringthereportingperiod,ashasbeenthecasein preoperationalandprevious operationalyears.Theseresultsindicatethat this pathwayhasnotbeen affectedbyplant operations.2.7Food Product (Vegetation)

Sample ResultsFoodproduct sampleswerecollectedfromtwo locations (indicatorandcontrol)andanalyzedforlodine-131and gamma emitting radionuclides.GGNSdidnot detect anyplantrelatedlodine-131or gamma emitting radionuclides in vegetation samples duringthereportingperiod.Theseresultsindicatethatthis pathwayhasnotbeen affected by plant operations.2.8LandUse Census ResultsResultsfromthemostrecentLandUse Census performedin2014 areincludedinthisreport.MethodsutilizedtoperformtheLandUseCensusinclude:visualsurveys,doortodoorsurveys, telephoneinterviews,GlobalPositioningSystem(GPS),AerialPhotography,and consultationwiththelocal county agent concerning dairy production in Claiborne County.Duringthesurveythefollowing informationwasobtained:

1)nearestlocationof occupied and unoccupied residences 25 2)nearest location of dairy production 3)nearest location of gardens Changes from the previousLandUse Census were evaluated in accordance with GGNS surveillance"Land Use Census",06-EN-SOOO-O-0002.The differences were comparedtothe locations and assumptionsusedin calculations for compliance with the ODCM Limiting Condition for Operation 6.11.6 and 6.12.2.The locations and assumptions currently used in ODCM were determined more conservative than any of the changes.Determinationsfromthe most recentLandUse Census results are:*Because of downwind location and/or distancefromthesite,inno casewillthe occupancyofan existing unoccupied residence cause any existing ODCM critical receptor calculation resultstobeless conservative.*No additional sampling locations are requiredasthe onsite vegetation sampling location (SectorJ,0.4 miles)is more conservative than changes identifiedinthelanduse census.*Cattle are raised forhumanconsumption (most notably in SectorsF,H,J,and K).GGNS uses the Grass/Cow/Meat pathway.*The milk pathway does not needtobe activated because no commercial dairy production is occurring within 5 miles, as referenced by ODCM Table 6.12.1-1.*SectorsM,N,P,andQare remote areasinwhichthe primaryuseis hunting.Areas were surveyed by vehicle, aerial photographs, and interviews.

Gardens, regardlessofsize, were includedinthe census data Although not procedurally required,itis recommended thatthenext ODCM revision include an update to Table 2.2-3 to reflect the latestLandUse Census results.26 Table 2.1 2014 Land Use Census Parameter Sector A*Sector B Sector C*Sector 0*I.Nearest Occupieda.Distance(mile) 1.76 1.51 0.70 2.60 Residence b.Degreesfromtruenorth 351.6 23.7 42.3 60.8 II.Nearest Unoccupieda.Distance(mile) 0.94 0.83 None None Residence (closerb.Degreesfromtruenorth 8.0 15.1 than occupied residence)

III.Nearest Milk Animala.Distance None None None None IV.Nearest Broadleafa.Distance(mile) 1.02 1.52 4.53 3.06 Gardenb.Gardensize(ft 2)=400=4050=25=1200c.Degreesfromtruenorth 355.4 21.9 49.1 58.8 V.Census Comparisona.Isnearestoccupied No Yes Yes Yesresidenceinsamelocationaslastcensus?b.Isnearestmilkanimalin N/A N/A N/A N/Asamelocationaslast census?c.Isnearest broadleaf No Yes'No Nogardeninsamelocationaslastcensus?Retainedpreviousgardenlocation.Locatednoothergardensinthesector.

Changefromlastcensus.SeetableofLandUseCensusChanges 27 Table2.1 2014 landUseCensus, continued.

Parameter Sector E Sector F*Sector G*Sector H I.Nearest Occupied a.Distance (miles)0.89 2.25 3.72 1.10 Residence b.Degreesfromtruenorth 86.9 101.3 134.1 151.4 II.Nearest Unoccupied a.Distance (miles)None None 3.71 1.07 Residence (closer b.Degreesfromtruenorth 131.8 151.0 than occupied residence)

III.NearestMilkAnimala.Distance None None None None IV.Nearest Broadleaf a.Distance (miles)0.89 4.50 4.20 4.39 Gardenb.Gardensize(ft 2):::: 1000::::450:::: 1600::::200 c.Degreesfromtruenorth 86.9 110.0 130.1 155.0 V.Census Comparisona.Is nearest occupied Yes 1 Yes No Yes residenceinsamelocationaslastcensus?b.Is nearestmilkanimalin N/A N/A N/A N/Asamelocationaslast census?c.Isnearestbroadleaf garden Yes No No Yesinsamelocationaslast census?1-Nearestoccupiedresidencelocationisthesameaslastcensus.Locationdatarevisedduetonewmappingmethod.*-Changefromlastcensus.SeetableofLandUseCensusChanges 28 Table 2.1 2014 Land Use Census, continued.

Parameter Sector J Sector K Sector L Sector M I.Nearest Occupieda.Distance(miles) 3.14 2.20 0.89 None Residence b.Degreesfromtruenorth174.2 197.0 219.7 II.Nearest Unoccupieda.Distance(miles)

None 1.70 None None Residence (closer than b.Degreesfromtruenorth 203.3 occupied residence)(Hunting Lodge-InfoOnly)III.Nearest Milk Animal a.Distance (miles)None None None None IV.Nearest Broadleaf a.Distance (miles)3.16 2.18 0.89 None Gardenb.Gardensize(ft 2):::: 500:::: 2500:::: 400 c.Degreesfromtruenorth 174.0 196.3 219.5 V.Census Comparisona.Is nearest occupied Yes Yes Yes N/Aresidenceinsamelocationaslast census?b.Is nearestmilkanimalin N/A N/A N/A N/Asamelocationaslast census?c.Is nearest broadleaf Yes Yes Yes N/Agardeninsamelocationaslastcensus?

29 Table 2.12014LandUse Census, continued.

Parameter Sector N Sector P Sector Q Sector R I.Nearest Occupieda.Distance(miles)

None None None 1.11 Residenceb.Degreesfromtruenorth 346.1 II.Nearest Unoccupieda.Distance(miles)

None None None None Residence (closerb.Degreesfromtruenorth than occupied residence)

III.NearestMilkAnimala.Distance(miles)

None None None NoneIV.Nearest Broadleafa.Distance(miles)

None None None None Gardenb.Gardensize(ft2)c.DegreesfromtruenorthV.Census Comparisona.Is nearest occupied N/A N/A N/A Yesresidenceinsamelocationaslastcensus?b.Is nearestmilkanimalin N/A N/A N/A N/Asamelocationaslast census?c.Is nearest broadleaf N/A N/A N/A N/Agardeninsamelocationaslastcensus?

30 2014LandUse Census Changes SECTOR PARAMETERReasonfor Change A Nearest Occupied Residence Nearestoccupiedresidencefrom2012 census no longer occupied.New nearest occupied residence identifiedin2014.A Nearest Broadleaf GardenNogardenlocation identifiedin2012census.Newgardenlocation identifiedin2014.C Nearest Broadleaf GardenGardenlocation identifiedin2012censusno longerplanted.New nearestgardenlocation identifiedin2014.0 Nearest Broadleaf Garden New nearestgardenlocation identifiedin2014.E Nearest Occupied ResidenceNearestoccupiedresidenceisthesameas previous census.Locationdatarevisedduetonewmappingmethod.

F Nearest Broadleaf GardenNewnearestgardenlocation identifiedin2014.G Nearest Occupied Residence Nearestoccupiedresidencefrom2012 census no longer occupied.Newnearest occupied residence identifiedin2014.G Nearest Broadleaf Garden Nearestgardenlocationfrom2012censusno longerplanted.Newnearestgardenlocation identifiedin2014.31 2.9 Interlaboratory Comparison Results Stanford Dosimetry Company analyzed interlaboratory comparison thermoluminescent dosimeterstofulfillthe requirements of aDCM Specification6.12.1.TheresultsareshowninTableA.9.1.

GEL Laboratories analyzed interlaboratory comparison samplestofulfillthe requirements of aDCM Specification6.12.1.TheresultsareshowninTableA.9.2.

32 3.0 Radiological Environmental Monitoring Program Summary 3.1 Program Results SummaryTable3.1 summarizestheREMPresults.Valuesreportedaslessthanthelowerlimitofdetection

<<LLD)werenotusedwhen determiningrangesandmeansforindicatorandcontrollocations.

33 TABLE3.1RadiologicalEnvironmental Monitoring Program SummaryNameofFacility:GrandGulfNuclearStationDocketNo:50-416LocationofFacility:ClaiborneCounty,MississippiReportingPeriod:

January-December 2015SampleTypeType

&Number LLDbIndicatorLocationsLocationwithHighestAnnualMean Control Number of (Units)ofAnalysesa Mean (F)c Locations Nonroutine

[Range]Mean (F)cResultse[Range]Locationd Mean (F)c[Range]AirParticulatesGB1560.010.0172(104/104)AS-1PG 0.01779 (52/52)0.0175(52/52) 0 (pCilm 3)[0.00535-0.0280](SectorG,5.5mi)[0.00535-0.0276]

[0.0051-0.0273]

GS 12 Cs-134 0.05<LLD N/A N/A<LLD 0 Cs-137 0.06<LLD N/A N/A<LLD 0AirborneIodine 1-1311560.07<LLD N/A N/A<LLD 0 (pCilm 3)InnerRingTLDs Gamma 56 f9.6(56/56)

M-9912.8(4/4)N/A 0 (mRlQtr)[4.3-14.2](Sector J,0.4mi.)[11.9-14.2]OuterRingTLDs Gamma 28 f9.5(28/28)

M-5711.8(4/4)N/A 0 (mRlQtr)[4.5-12.2](SectorF,4.5mi.)[11.4-12.1]

Special Interest Gamma 28 f9.6(28/28)

M-0111.8(4/4)N/A 0 TLDs[8.1-12.2](SectorE,3.5mi.)[11.4-12.2](mRlQtr)ControlTLDs Gamma 4 f N/A N/A N/A10.8(4/4)0 (mRlQtr)[10.0-11.2]

34 TABLE3.1RadiologicalEnvironmental Monitoring Program SummaryNameofFacility:GrandGulfNuclearStationDocketNo:50-416LocationofFacility:ClaiborneCounty,MississippiReportingPeriod:

January-December 2015SampleTypeType

&Number llOb Indicator location locationwithHighestAnnualMean Control Number of (Units)ofAnalysesa Mean (F)c locations Nonroutine

[Range]Mean(F)cResultse[Range]location d Mean (F)c[Range]SurfaceWater H-3323000 2263 (6/26)Outfall 007 2263 (6/18)<LLD 0(pCill)[449-5280](Sector N, Radius 0.2 mi.)[449-5280]GS14 Mn-54 15<LLD N/A N/A<LLD 0 Co-58 15<LLD N/A N/A<LLD 0 Fe-59 30<LLD N/A N/A<LLD 0 Co-60 15<LLD N/A N/A<LLD 0 Zn-65 30<LLD N/A N/A<LLD 0 Nb-95 15<LLD N/A N/A<LLD 0 Zr-95 30<LLD N/A N/A<LLD 0 1-131 15<LLD N/A N/A<LLD 0 Cs-134 15<LLD N/A N/A<LLD 0 Cs-137 18<LLD N/A N/A<LLD 0 Ba-140 60<LLD N/A N/A<LLD 0 La-140 15<LLD N/A N/A<LLD 0 35 TABLE3.1RadiologicalEnvironmentalMonitoringProgramSummaryNameofFacility:GrandGulfNuclearStationDocketNo:50-416LocationofFacility:ClaiborneCounty,MississippiReportingPeriod:January-December2015 SampleTypeType&LLObIndicatorLocationsLocationwithHighestAnnualMeanControlLocations Number of (Units)Number Mean (F)cMean(F)c NonroutineofAnalysesa

[Range][Range]ResultseLocationd Mean (F)c[Range]Groundwater H-3 5 2000<LLD N/A N/A<LLD 0 (pCi/l)<LLD N/A N/A 1-13131<LLD 0 GS 3 Mn-54 15<LLD N/A N/A<LLD 0 Co-58 15<LLD N/A N/A<LLD 0 Fe-59 30<LLD N/A N/A<LLD 0 Co-50 15<LLD N/A N/A<LLD 0 Zn-55 30<LLD N/A N/A<LLD 0 Nb-95 15<LLD N/A N/A<LLD 0 Zr-95 30<LLD N/A N/A<LLD 0 Cs-134 15<LLD N/A N/A<LLD 0 Cs-137 18<LLD N/A N/A<LLD 0 Ba-140 50<LLD N/A N/A<LLD 0 La-140 15<LLD N/A N/A<LLD 0 SedimentGS4(pCi/kg)Cs-134 150<LLD N/A N/A<LLD 0 Cs-137 180<LLD N/A N/A<LLD 0 36 TABLE3.1RadiologicalEnvironmentalMonitoringProgram SummaryNameofFacility:GrandGulfNuclearStationDocketNo:50-416LocationofFacility:ClaiborneCounty,MississippiReportingPeriod:

January-December2015 Sample Type Type&LLObIndicatorLocationLocationwithHighestAnnual Control Number of (Units)NumberMean(F)c Mean Locations NonroutineofAnalysesa

[Range]Mean(F)cResultse[Range]IMean(F)cLocationd[Range]Fish GS 2(pCilkg)Mn-54 130<LLD N/A N/A<LLD 0 Co-58 130<LLD N/A N/A<LLD 0 Fe-59 260<LLD N/A N/A<LLD 0 Co-60 130<LLD N/A N/A<LLD 0 Zn-65 260<LLD N/A N/A<LLD 0 Cs-134 130<LLD N/A N/A<LLD 0 Cs-137 150<LLD N/A N/A<LLD 0 Food 1-131860<LLD N/A N/A<LLD 0 ProductsNegetation(pCilkg)GS 8 Cs-134 60<LLD N/A N/A<LLD 0 Cs-137 80<LLD N/A N/A<LLD 0-l 37 TABLE 3.1 Radiological Environmental Monitoring Program Summary Name of Facility: Grand Gulf Nuclear Station DocketNo:50-416 Location of Facility: Claiborne County, Mississippi Reporting Period: January-December 2015 Location with Highest Annual Mean Control Indicator Location Locations Number of Sample Type Type&Number Mean (F)c Mean (F)c Mean (F)c Nonroutine (Units)of Analyses a LLOb[Range]Location d[Range][Range]Results e Surface WaterGS4 (Special)Mn-54 15<LLD N/A N/A<LLD 0 (pCill)Co-58 15<LLD N/A N/A<LLD 0 Fe-59 30<LLD N/A N/A<LLD 0 Co-60 15<LLD N/A N/A<LLD 0 Zn-65 30<LLD N/A N/A<LLD 0 Nb-95 15<LLD N/A N/A<LLD 0 Zr-95 30<LLD N/A N/A<LLD 0 1-131 15<LLD N/A N/A<LLD 0 Cs-134 15<LLD N/A N/A<LLD 0 Cs-137 18<LLD N/A N/A<LLD 0 Ba-140 60<LLD N/A N/A<LLD 0 La-140 15<LLD N/A N/A<LLD 0aGB=Grossbeta; 1-131=lodine-131;H-3

=Tritium;GS

=Gamma scan.bLLD=Requiredlowerlimitofdetectionbasedon aDCMTable6.12.1-3.cMeanandrangebasedupondetectable measurementsonly.Fractionofdetectable measurementsatspecifiedlocationsisindicatedin parenthesis (F).dWhereapplicable,locationsarespecifiedbyname,distancefromreactorsiteand meteorological sector.eNon-routineresultsarethosewhichexceedtentimesthecontrolstationvalue.Ifnocontrolstationvalueisavailable,theresultis considered non-routineifitexceedstentimesthepreoperationalvalueforthelocation.fLLDisnotdefinedin aDCMTable6.12.1-3.

38 Attachment 1 Radiological Monitoring Report Summary of Monitoring Results 39 TABLEOFCONTENTS TABLE A1.1 AIR PARTICULATEFILTERGROSS BETA AND CHARCOALCARTRIDGEAS-1PG 41 TABLEA1.2AIR PARTICULATEFILTERGROSS BETA AND CHARCOALCARTRIDGEAS-361VA 43 TABLEA1.3 AIR PARTICULATEFILTERGROSS BETA AND CHARCOALCARTRIDGEAS-7UH 45 TABLEA1.4AIR PARTICULATE FILTER GAMMA 47 TABLEA2.1 THERMOLUMINESCENT DOSIMETERS 48 TABLE A2.2 THERMOLUMINESCENT DOSIMETERS 49 TABLE A2.3 THERMOLUMINESCENT DOSIMETERS 49 TABLEA3.1SURFACEWATER GAMMA 50 TABLE A3.2SURFACEWATERTRITIUM 51 TABLEA4.1 GROUNDWATER GAMMA 52 TABLE A4.2 GROUNDWATER TRITIUM 53 TABLE A4.3GROUNDWATERIODINE-131 54 TABLEA5.1 SEDIMENT 55 TABLEA6.1 FISH 56 TABLEA7.1FOODPRODUCTS 57 TABLEA8.1SPECIAL SAMPLES 58 TABLEA9.1 INTERLABORATORYPROGRAM-TLDS(14PAGES)TABLE A9.2 INTERLABORATORYPROGRAMS-SAMPLES(7PAGES)40 Table Al.lSampleType:AirParticulateFilterand Radioiodine CartridgeAnalysis:GrossBetaand 1-131Units:pCi/m3AIRSAMPLE AS-l PGLLD(pCi/m3) 0.07 0.01 LABIDSTARTDATEENDDATE 1-131GROSSBETA L61599-1/4 12/30/14 01/06/15<0.04997 0.01960+/-0.00357 L61733-1/4 01/06/15 01/13/15<0.04536 0.02190+/-0.00391 L61809-1/4 01/13/15 01/20/15<0.05241 0.02240+/-0.00383 L61916-1/4 01/20/15 01/27/15<0.05868 0.01810+/-0.00341 L62010-1/4 01/27/15 02/03/15<0.05293 0.01920+/-0.00342 L62084-1/4 02/03/15 02/10/15<0.05899 0.02760+/-0.00417 L62140-1/4 02/10/15 02/16/15<0.03465 0.02380+/-0.0041 L62223-1/4 02/16/15 02/24/15<0.05227 0.02010+/-0.0033 L62301-1/4 02/24/15 03/03/15<0.06146 0.02070+/-0.00364L62369-1/403/03/15 03/10/15<0.03657 0.01470+/-0.00317 L62445-1/403/10/1503/17/15

<0.05801 0.00868+/-0.00271L62533-1/403/17/15 03/24/15<0.0492 0.01760+/-0.00343 L62626-1/4 03/24/1503/31/15<0.05153 0.01490+/-0.00331 L62742-1/4 03/31/1504/07/15<0.0428 0.01770+/-0.00346 L62826-1/404/07/1504/14/15

<0.05923 0.01500+/-0.00324L62920-1/404/14/15 04/21/15<0.03069 0.00766+/-0.00262L63084-1/404/21/15 04/28/15<0.04648 0.01570+/-0.00328 L63140-1/404/28/1505/05/15

<0.05171 0.01950+/-0.00336L63240-1/405/05/1505/12/15<0.03923 0.01750+/-0.00318L63338-1/405/12/15 05/19/15<0.04185 0.01280+/-0.00319 L63432-1/4 05/19/15 OS/26/15<0.01745 0.01410+/-0.00321 L63525-1/4 OS/26/15 06/02/15<0.03267 0.01150+/-0.00319L63626-1/406/02/1506/09/15<0.02177 0.02280+/-0.00404L63729-1/406/09/1506/16/15

<0.05543 0.01380+/-0.0031 L63867-1/406/16/1506/23/15<0.06472 0.02160+/-0.00375L63906-1/406/23/1506/30/15

<0.06786 0.01330+/-0.00307L63992-1/406/30/1507/07/15<0.0477 0.01390+/-0.00306 L64149-1/407/07/1507/14/15<0.05783 0.01880+/-0.00333L64283-1/407/14/1507/21/15

<0.05458 0.01640+/-0.00328 L64303-1/407/21/1507/28/15<0.06074 0.01980+/-0.00357L64409-1/407/28/1508/04/15<0.06292 0.02330+/-0.00391L64500-1/408/04/1508/11/15

<0.04584 0.02400+/-0.00382L64614-1/408/11/1508/18/15

<0.05042 0.01580+/-0.00309L64658-1/408/18/1508/25/15

<0.04001 0.01180+/-0.00313L64770-1/408/25/1509/01/15<0.06471 0.02460+/-0.00377 41 Table A1.1 SampleType:Air ParticulateFilterand Radioiodine CartridgeAnalysis:GrossBetaand 1-131 Units: pCilm3 AIR SAMPLEAS-1PG LLD (pCilm3)0.07 0.01LAB10STARTDATEENDDATE 1-131 GROSS BETA L64856-1/4 09/01/15...09/08/15<0.05645 0.02710+/-0.00411 L64946-1/409/08/1509/15/15

<0.04999 0.02020+/-0.00359 L65032-1/409/15/1509/22/15

<0.05491 0.02390+/-0.00393 L65136-1/409/22/1509/29/15

<0.03989 0.01920+/-0.00353 L65243-1/409/29/1510/06/15

<0.02673 0.01230+/-0.0029 L65340-1/410/06/1510/13/15

<0.05476 0.02760+/-0.00396 L65499-1/410/13/1510/20/15

<0.06206 0.02270+/-0.00398 L65551-1/4 10/20/15 10/27/15<0.03386 0.01120+/-0.00279 L65669-1/4 10/27/15 11/03/15<0.03082 0.01600+/-0.00385 L65765-1/411/03/1511/10/15

<0.06763 0.01420+/-0.00309L65830-1/411/10/15 11/17/15<0.05215 0.01580+/-0.00336 L65909-1/4 11/17/15 11/24/15<0.02428 0.02040+/-0.00383L65959-1/411/24/1512/01/15<0.04273 0.00766+/-0.00285 L66076-1/412/01/1512/08/15<0.02887 0.02550+/-0.00389L66152-1/412/08/1512/15/15<0.02851 0.02220+/-0.00368L66241-1/412/15/1512/22/15

<0.05834 0.01330+/-0.00309 L66284-1/4 12/22/15 12/29/15<0.06672 0.00535+/-0.00255 Average: Maximum: Minimum: 42 0.01779 0.02760 0.00535 Table A1.2 SampleType:Air ParticulateFilterand Radioiodine CartridgeAnalysis:GrossBetaand 1-131Units:pCi/m3AIRSAMPLEAS-361VA LLD (pCi/m3)0.07 0.01LAB10STARTDATEENDDATE 1-131 GROSS BETA L61599-2/5 12/30/14 01/06/15<0.05007 0.0191+/-0.0036 L61733-2/5 01/06/15 01/13/15<0.04543 0.0211+/-0.0039 L61809-2/5 01/13/15 01/20/15<0.05258 0.0239+/-0.0039 L61916-2/5 01/20/15 01/27/15<0.05879 0.0175+/-0.0034 L62010-2/5 01/27/15 02/03/15<0.05298 0.0187+/-0.0034 L62084-2/5 02/03/15 02/10/15<0.0591 0.0258+/-0.0041 L62140-2/502/10/1502/16/15

<0.03438 0.0223+/-0.0040 L62223-2/502/16/1502/24/15

<0.05264 0.0213+/-0.0034 L62301-2/5 02/24/15 03/03/15<0.02729 0.0216+/-0.0037 L62369-2/503/03/1503/10/15

<0.03664 0.0124+/-0.0030 L62445-2/503/10/1503/17/15

<0.02439 0.0087+/-0.0027 L62533-2/503/17/1503/24/15

<0.04929 0.0134+/-0.0031 L62626-2/503/24/1503/31/15

<0.05172 0.0118+/-0.0031L62742-2/503/31/1504/07/15<0.04317 0.0170+/-0.0034 L62826-2/504/07/1504/14/15

<0.05911 0.0100+/-0.0028L62920-2/504/14/1504/21/15

<0.03075 0.0085+/-0.0027 L63084-2/504/21/1504/28/15

<0.04839 0.0152+/-0.0033L63140-2/504/28/1505/05/15<0.05074 0.0170+/-0.0031 L63240-2/505/05/1505/12/15

<0.03942 0.0159+/-0.0031 L63338-2/505/12/1505/19/15<0.04182 0.0103+/-0.0030L63432-2/505/19/15 OS/26/15<0.04963 0.0094+/-0.0029 L63525-2/5 OS/26/15 06/02/15<0.03319 0.0103+/-0.0031L63626-2/506/02/1506/09/15<0.008403 0.0219+/-0.0040L63729-2/506/09/1506/16/15

<0.06907 0.0201+/-0.0042L63867-2/506/16/1506/23/15<0.06487 0.0178+/-0.0035L63906-2/506/23/1506/30/15<0.06799 0.0145+/-0.0032L63992-2/506/30/1507/07/15

<0.04834 0.0127+/-0.0030 L64149-2/5 07/07/15 07/14/15<0.05795 0.0170+/-0.0032L64283-2/507/14/1507/21/15

<0.05468 0.0194+/-0.0035 L64303-2/507/21/1507/28/15

<0.06108 0.0196+/-0.0036L64409-2/507/28/1508/04/15<0.02639 0.0230+/-0.0039L64500-2/508/04/15 08/11/15<0.04588 0.0211+/-0.0036L64614-2/508/11/1508/18/15<0.04804 0.0159+/-0.0030L64658-2/508/18/1508/25/15<0.04198 0.0100+/-0.0031 43 TableA1.2SampleType:AirParticulateFilterand Radioiodine CartridgeAnalysis:GrossBetaand 1*131Units:pCi/m3AIRSAMPLEAS*361VALLD(pCi/m3) 0.07 0.01 LASIDSTARTDATEENDDATE 1*131GROSSBETA L64770-2/5 08/25/15 09/01/15<0.06832 0.0252+/-0.0039L64856-2/509/01/1509/08/15<0.05467 0.0272+/-0.0040 L64946-2/5 09/08/15 09/15/15<0.04985 0.0184+/-0.0035 L65032-2/509/15/1509/22/15

<0.05515 0.0246+/-0.0040L65136-2/509/22/1509/29/15<0.04228 0.0205+/-0.0038L65243-2/509/29/15 10/06/15<0.02796 0.0224+/-0.0038L65340-2/510/06/1510/13/15

<0.05547 0.0271+/-0.0040L65499-2/510/13/15 10/20/15<0.0613 0.0206+/-0.0038L65551-2/510/20/1510/27/15<0.03455 0.0117+/-0.0029L65669-2/510/27/15 11/03/15<0.03101 0.0167+/-0.0039L65765-2/511/03/15 11/10/15<0.06728 0.0158+/-0.0032L65830-2/511/10/1511/17/15

<0.05224 0.0178+/-0.0035L65909-2/511/17/1511/24/15

<0.06365 0.0178+/-0.0037 L65959-2/5 11/24/1512/01/15<0.04241 0.0094+/-0.0030L66076-2/512/01/1512/08/15

<0.02893 0.0273+/-0.0040L66152-2/512/08/1512/15/15<0.06884 0.0218+/-0.0037L66241-2/512/15/1512/22/15

<0.05836 0.0161+/-0.0033L66284-2/512/22/1512/29/15

<0.06696 0.0051+/-0.0025 Average: Maximum: Minimum: 44 0.0175 0.0273 0.0051 Table A1.3 SampleType:Air ParticulateFilterandRadioiodineCartridgeAnalysis:GrossBetaand 1-131Units:pCi/m3AIRSAMPLEAS-7UH LLD (pCi/m3)0.07 0.01 LASIDSTARTDATEENDDATE 1-131 GROSS BETAL61599-3/612/30/14 01/06/15<0.04989 0.0228+/-0.0038 L61733-3/6 01/06/15 01/13/15<0.04588 0.0204+/-0.0038 L61809-3/6 01/13/15 01/20/15<0.05232 0.0218+/-0.0038 L61916-3/6 01/20/15 01/27/15<0.05948 0.0202+/-0.0036L62010-3/601/27/15 02/03/15<0.05291 0.0176+/-0.0033 L62084-3/602/03/1502/10/15

<0.05893 0.0240+/-0.0040 L62140-3/6 02/10/15 02/16/15<0.03463 0.0224+/-0.0040 L62223-3/6 02/16/15 02/24/15<0.05218 0.0188+/-0.0032 L62301-3/602/24/1503/03/15

<0.06145 0.0199+/-0.0036 L62369-3/603/03/1503/10/15

<0.03669 0.0138+/-0.0031 L62445-3/603/10/1503/17/15

<0.05793 0.0071+/-0.0026L62533-3/603/17/1503/24/15

<0.04914 0.0113+/-0.0030 L62626-3/603/24/1503/31/15

<0.02161 0.0143+/-0.0033L62742-3/603/31/1504/07/15

<0.04321 0.0158+/-0.0034L62826-3/604/07/1504/14/15

<0.05927 0.0093+/-0.0028L62920-3/604/14/1504/21/15

<0.03065 0.0086+/-0.0027L63084-3/604/21/1504/28/15

<0.04704 0.0140+/-0.0032L63140-3/604/28/1505/05/15

<0.05257 0.0179+/-0.0033L63240-3/605/05/1505/12/15

<0.03919 0.0143+/-0.0029L63338-3/605/12/1505/19/15<0.04178 0.0125+/-0.0032 L63432-3/6 05/19/15 OS/26/15<0.04948 0.0085+/-0.0028 L63525-3/6 OS/26/1506/02/15<0.03258 0.0101+/-0.0031 L63626-3/6 06/02/15 06/09/15<0.02177 0.0184+/-0.0038 L63729-3/6 06/09/15 06/16/15<0.05656 0.0191+/-0.0036L63867-3/606/16/1506/23/15<0.06463 0.0185+/-0.0035L63906-3/606/23/15 06/30/15<0.06782 0.0098+/-0.0028L63992-3/606/30/1507/07/15<0.015 0.0129+/-0.0030L64149-3/607/07/1507/14/15<0.05819 0.0137+/-0.0030L64283-3/607/14/1507/21/15<0.05452 0.0166+/-0.0033L64303-3/607/21/1507/28/15<0.06046 0.0167+/-0.0034L64409-3/607/28/15 08/04/15<0.06344 0.0240+/-0.0040L64500-3/608/04/15 08/11/15<0.01776 0.0221+/-0.0037L64614-3/608/11/1508/18/15<0.05066 0.0165+/-0.0032L64658-3/608/18/1508/25/15<0.04008 0.0132+/-0.0032L64770-3/608/25/15 09/01/15"<0.02504 0.0280+/-0.0040 45 Table A1.3 SampleType:Air ParticulateFilterand Radioiodine CartridgeAnalysis:GrossBetaand 1-131Units:pCi/m3AIRSAMPLEAS-7UH LLD (pCi/m3)0.07 0.01LAB10STARTDATEENDDATE 1-131 GROSS BETA L64856-3/609/01/1509/08/15

<0.05673 0.0228+/-0.0038L64946-3/609/08/1509/15/15<0.04977 0.0186+/-0.0035L65032-3/609/15/1509/22/15

<0.05486 0.0245+/-0.0040 L65136-3/609/22/1509/29/15

<0.0398 0.0197+/-0.0036 L65243-3/609/29/1510/06/15

<0.02672 0.0124+/-0.0029L65340-3/610/06/1510/13/15

<0.02304 0.0279+/-0.0040L65499-3/610/13/1510/20/15<0.0623 0.0213+/-0.0039 L65551-3/610/20/1510/27/15

<0.03444 0.0098+/-0.0027L65669-3/610/27/1511/03/15

<0.03054 0.0126+/-0.0036 L65765-3/6 11/03/15 11/10/15<0.06777 0.0158+/-0.0032L65830-3/611/10/1511/17/15<0.05212 0.0174+/-0.0035 L65909-3/6 11/17/15 11/24/15<0.06299 0.0143+/-0.0034L65959-3/611/24/1512/01/15<0.04247 0.0071+/-0.0028 L66076-3/6 12/01/1512/08/15<0.02886 0.0235+/-0.0038L66152-3/612/08/1512/15/15<0.06843 0.0203+/-0.0036L66241-3/612/15/1512/22/15<0.0583 0.0154+/-0.0033L66284-3/612/22/1512/29/15<0.06972 0.0060+/-0.0027 Average: Maximum: Minimum: 46 0.0166 0.0280 0.0060 TableA1.4SampleType:AirParticulateFilterAnalysis:Gamma IsotopicUnits:pCi/m3 AIR PARTICULATE FILTER SAMPLES (GAMMA)LLD(pCi/m3) 0.05 0.06 LASlOLOCATIONDATE CS-134 CS-137 L62771-1AS-1PG 02/13/15<0.002665<0.002108 L62771-2 AS-361VA 02/13/15<0.002512<0.002137 L62771-3AS-7UH 02/13/15<0.002694<0.002222 L64087-1AS-1PG 05/15/15<0.003325<0.002582 L64087-2 AS-361VA 05/15/15<0.001724<0.002033 L64087-3AS-7UH 05/15/15<0.003231<0.002898 L65183-1AS-1PG 08/14/15<0.002141<0.002077 L65183-2 AS-361VA 08/15/15<0.001331<0.001341 L65183-3AS-7UH 08/14/15<0.001891<0.002219 L66362-1AS-1PG 11/13/15<0.002132<0.001742 L66362-2 AS-361VA 11/13/15<0.003417<0.003152 L66362-3AS-7UH 11/13/15<0.002692<0.001344 47 TableA2.1SampleType:

Thermoluminescent DosimetersAnalysis:GammaDose Units: mrem/Qtr InnerRing-Within General Area of Site Boundary Station1st atr 2nd atr 3rd atr 4th atr Annual Mean 10.7 9.6.................11.9 8.4 7.4 7.2 10.9" ,..'.....'...'"...*.".*...10.4 6.8 7.6 7.6 11.8 12.8 11.1 8.3 7.6 11.9 12.7 11.8 11.2 11.0 9.9 10.1 11.8 13.4....y***"**" w.',*., ,,.."*.**.,.*..:-..*w..*****"".,...."*.,_.'.*..**.o>.*.*.,**..**d'.8.8 9.6 5.8 9.0 8.1 8.6 11.2 11.8 10.7 11.0._;.6.2 7.5 7.6 7.1 12.0 14.2 11.3..!.I 10.3 10.3 9.1 9.2..,**************",***1-******

,...........

.<..11.4_--t....--

..7.6 7.6 7.3 7.2 7.6 4.3.....................................

".....10.3 10.4.*.."..,*.,.".-., , 10.7 9.2....-}.6.3 i 7.0 7.4 7.3............................................................................................

.;.7.8 7.7.................................................

,.,'..""" ,.11.8 11.4 12.6 11.9 11.0 10.1 M-16 M-19 M-21:---."

..,,, ,'"",.M-22 M-23 M-25 M-28.*.*.

.**.,..*.....M-94 M-95 M-96 M-97 M-98 M-99*M-100*Locationwithhighestannualmean OuterRing-Approximately Three (3)toFive(5)Miles from the Site Station 1st Qtr 2nd Qtr 3rd Qtr 4th Qtr Annual Mean 8.2"*..w..*..4.9 9.7 11.1!......,._..

.......w...__*__.........

....M-40 4.9 M-48 9.1 M-49 10.2 M-50 9.2 ,.".." , ,."., y,.".."""**M-55 11.4 M-57*11.5 8.2...="".4.5 9.3 10.8 9.3..................................., 10.4 11.4 8.3.........*.**,.**w.*4.8 9.9 11.3 9.9 ,..............w.w.....".,,,............

.,,.....,,.".11.8 12.1 8.4.".w,,.5.4 10.6 12.2 9.8 9.6.,...,*....*.w..y......

...w.,..w...*.*.,.."y...."........"..,...,., 11.5 11.3 12.1 11.8*Locationwithhighestannualmean 48 TableA2.2SampleType:

Thermoluminescent Dosimeters Analysis: Gamma Dose.Units: mrem/Qtr Special InterestAreas-Population Centers&Schools Station 1st atr 2nd atr 3rd Otr 4th atr Annual Mean M-01*11.5 11.4 11.9 12.2 11.8..;....*............

,...*.....M-07 10.3 9.5 10.3 10.8 10.2 M-09 9.7 9.0 9.7 10.8 9.8...",.................

M-10 9.0 8.4 8.7 9.4 8.9 M-33 8.1 8.3 8.7 8.5 8.4.........;...........;.....M-38 9.0 8.3 9.9 10.0 9.3 M-39 8.5 8.7 9.1 9.6 9.0*Location with highest annual meanTableA2.3SampleType:

Thermoluminescent Dosimeters Analysis: Gamma Dose Units: mrem/Qtr Special InterestAreas-Control Station M-14 1st Qtr 10.9 2nd Qtr 10.0 49 3rd Qtr 10.9 4th Qtr 11.2 Annual Mean 10.8 Table A3.1 Sample Type: Surface Water Analysis: Gamma Isotopic Units: pCi/LSURFACEWATER SAMPLES (GAMMA)LLD (pCilL)151530 15 3015301515186015LAB10LOCATION DATEMN-54CO-58FE-59CO-60ZN-65NB-95ZR-95 1-131CS-134CS-137 BA-140 LA-140 L62109-1 MRDOWN02/10/15<5.768<6.045<13.38<6.275<11.82<6.44<9.982<14.74<4.895<5.919<40.61<12.8L62109-3 MRUP02/10/15<3.257<3.935<8.441<4.424<8.312<4.402

<8<13.29<3.738<3.456<28.03<8.488 L63181-1 MRDOWN05/07/15<3.695

<4.034<8.489<4.172<8.4<3.804<7.878<11.76<3.713<4.078<26.27

<8.839 L63181-3 MRUP 05/07/15<4<3.468<8.245<4.244<8.519<3.9<7.461<11.65<4.195<4.049<25.76

<9.071 L63181-5MRDOWNGG05/07/15<4.52<4.657

<10.16<5.387<8.821<5.095<8.773<11.36<4.273<4.682<30.02<9.097 L63181-7MRUPGG05/07/15<3.397<4.017<7.492<3.623<7.885<3.901<7.325<10.14<3.36<3.898<23.16<6.94 L64668-1 MRDOWN08/26/15<5.967<7.661<17.18<8.563<15.01<8.014<13.39<13.2<8.182<8.487<39.24<11.72 L64668-3 MRUP08/26/15<11<8.877<22.01<8.56<16.7<9.379<17.75<12.28<9.56<9.681<38.45<14.92 L65733-1 MRDOWN11/05/15<4.001<4.88<8.607<3.616<9.81<5.419<7.589<12.1<4.891<4.665<28.63<8.372 L65733-2MRDOWNGG11/05/15<3.958<3.421<8.705<3.373<7.235<4.362<7.398<9.519<3.021<3.794<24.17

<5.049 L65733-5 MRUP 11/05/15<4.707<4.18<10.49<5.469<10.8<4.893<5.719<12.56<4.693<5.339<31.4<8.028 L65733-6MRUPGG11/05/15<5.369<5.081<12.32<6.356<10.7<6.405<7.882<14.48<5.655<5.253<32.5

<11 L65734-1 MRDOWN*11/06/15<6.792<7.568<13.75<7.562

<15.05<7.409<14.34<10.84

<6.716<7.91<31.64<10.28 L65734-3MRDOWNGG*11/06/15<6.149<5.967<12.61<6.481<14.5<5.616<11.2<10.71<5.374<6.062<26.73<7.142"GG"-indicatesduplicatesample

AnnualSamplecollectedduringliquid discharge 50 TableA3.2 Sample Type: Surface Water Analysis: TritiumUnits:pCi/L SURFACE WATER SAMPLES (TRITIUM)LLD (pCi/L)3000 LASlO LOCATION DATE H*3 L61841-1OUTFALL007 01/21/15<393L62109-2 MRDOWN 02/10/15<577L62109-4 MRUP 02/10/15<573 L62141-1C1OUTFALL007 02/16/15 5280+/-961 L62141-2C1OUTFALL007GG 02/16/15 5090+/-950 L62468-1OUTFALL007 03/17/15<527 L62864-1OUTFALL007 04/15/15 950+/-554 L62864-2OUTFALL007GG 04/15/15 1200+/-586 L63181-2 MRDOWN 05/07/15<539 L63181-4 MRUP 05/07/15<539 L63181-6MRDOWNGG 05/07/15<557 L63181-8MRUPGG 05/07/15<542 L63339-1OUTFALL007 05/19/15<576 L63655-1OUTFALL007 06/10/15<581 L63655-2OUTFALL007GG06/10/15<585L64010-1C1OUTFALL007 07/08/15<570 L64440-1OUTFALL007 08/06/15<554 L64668-2 MRDOWN 08/26/15<598 L64668-4 MRUP 08/26/15<598 L64790-1OUTFALL00709/02/15<382 L64790-2OUTFALL007GG 09/02/15<392 L65170-1OUTFALL007 09/30/15<437 L65600-1OUTFALL00710/29/15607

+/-339 L65733-3 MRDOWN 11/05/15<512 L65733-4MRDOWNGG11/05/15<505 L65733-7 MRUP11/05/15<511 L65733-8MRUPGG11/05/15<508 L65734-2 MRDOWN*11/06/15<512 L65734-4MRDOWNGG*11/06/15<506 L65912-1OUTFALL00711/24/15<477 L65912-2OUTFALL007GG11/24/15<475 L66227-1OUTFALL007 12/22/15 449+/-280*AnnualSamplecollectedduringliquid discharge"GG"-indicates duplicate sample.51 TableA4.1SampleType:GroundWaterAnalysis:GammaIsotopicUnits:pCilLGROUNDWATERSAMPLES(GAMMA)LLD(pCilL) 151530 1530153015 18 60 15LAB10LOCATIONDATEMN-54CO-58FE-59CO-60ZN-65NB-95ZR-95CS-134CS-137 BA-140 LA-140L65815-1PGWELL 11/16/15<8.964<5.698<10.43<4.605<15.79<7.858<12.46<7.007<8.887<27.88

<6.487 L65815-5 CONSTWELL3 11/16/15<5.389<5.646<9.286<5.125<10.68<5.533<12.89<5.873<6.424<23.3

<6.182 L65815-9 CONSTWELL4 11/16/15<5.369<5.325<10.35<6.158<15.13<6.665<11.89<5.243

<5.927<39.01<13.12 52 TableA4.2SampleType:GroundWaterAnalysis:TritiumUnits:pCi/L GROUND WATER SAMPLES (TRITIUM)LLD(pCi/L) 2000 LASlO LOCATION DATE H-3 L65815-3 PGWELL 11/16/15<461 L65815-4PGWELLGG 11/16/15<458 L65815-7 CONSTWELL3 11/16/15<465 L65815-8 CONSTWELL3GG 11/16/15<466 L65815-11 CONSTWELL4 11/16/15<462 L65815-12CONSTWELL4GG 11/16/15<463"GG"-indicates duplicate sample.53 TableA4.3SampleType:GroundWaterAnalysis:lodine-131Units:pCi/L GROUND WATER SAMPLES (IODINE-131)LLD(pCi/L) 1 LASIDLOCATIONDATE 1-131 L65815-2 PGWELL 11/16/15<0.293 L65815-6CONSTWELL311/16/15

<0.28 L65815-10 CONSTWELL4 11/16/15<0.3 54 TableA5.1SampleType:

SedimentAnalysis:GammaIsotopicUnits:pCi/kg SEDIMENT SAMPLES (GAMMA)LLD (pCi/kg)150 180 LASlO LOCATION DATE CS-134 CS-137 L65751-1 SEDHAM 11/05/15<34.47<41.29 L65751-2 SEDCONT 11/05/15<74.66<78.88 L65751-3SEDHAMGG 11/05/15<67.28<84.58 L65751-4 SEDCONT GG 11/05/15<45.2<43.31"GG"-indicatesduplicatesample.

55 TableA6.1SampleType:FishAnalysis:GammaIsotopicUnits:pCilkgFISHSAMPLES(GAMMA)LLD(pCilkg)130130260130260130150 LASlO LOCATION DATEMN-54CO-58FE-59CO-60ZN-65CS-134CS-137L65167-1FISHUP 09/24/15<56.01<43.59<89.19<42.55<116.5<47.55<48.26 L65167-2 FISHDOWN 09/24/15<63.65<64.9<78.64<78.44<150.2<41.3

<86.93 56 TableA7.1 Sample Type: VegetationAnalysis:GammaIsotopicUnits:pCilkg VEGETATION SAMPLES (GAMMA)LLD (pCilkg)60 60 80 LASlOLOCATIONDATE 1-131 CS-134 CS-137 L62519-1 VEG-CONT 03/19/15<13.26<6.718<7.887 L62519-2 VEG-J 03/17/15<49.25<19.4<22.02 L63651-1 VEG-CONT 06/05/15<52.83<20.66<21.94 L63651-2 VEG-J 06/08/15<49.69<21.06<21.98 L65137-1 VEG-CONT 09/28/15<59.6<25.41<31.27 L65137-2 VEG-J 09/28/15<49.91<27.81<42.83 L66045-1 VEG-CONT 12/04/15<57.38<29.45<27.2 L66045-2 VEG-J 12/03/15<54.23<29.73<27.87 57 TableA8.1SampleType:

Special Samples Analysis: Gamma IsotopicUnits:pCi/L SPECIAL SURFACE WATER SAMPLES (GAMMA)LLD 1515301530153015151850 15LAB10 LOCATION DATE MN-54 CO-58 FE-59 CO-50 ZN-55 NB-95 ZR-95 1-131 CS-134 CS-137 BA-140 LA-140 L62512-1 OUTFALL 007 03/17/15<4.157<3.6<8.896<3.594

<8.021<4.836<6.36<8.263<3.716

<3.95<19.66<6.244 L64009-1 OUTFALL 007 06/19/15<1.574<1.824

<4.251<1.679<3.388<1.933<3.44

<11.84<1.518<1.605<18.99<6.489 L65134-1 OUTFALL 007 09/29/15<6.343<6.113<11<6.801<14.54<5.951<12.49<10.7<5.015<5.767<29.93<11.13 L66341-1 OUTFALL 007 12/29/15<5.139<5.233<11.69

<5.215<10.03<5.007<8.626<11.73<4.718

<5.708<25.77<8.199 58 TableA9.1SampleType:Quality Assurance Report Analysis: Environmental Dosimeters STANFORD DOSIMETRY ENVIRONMENTAL DOSIMETRY COMPANY ANNUAL QUALITY ASSURANCE STATUS REPORT January-December 2015PreparedBy:ApprovedBy:

-,

\..Date: Date::J...@.2(16

&[ffCL{in Dosimetry Company 10 Ashton Lane-MA 01564 TABLEOF CONTENTS PageLISTOFTABLES iii EXECUTIVE SUMMARy iv I.INTRODUCTION 1A.QC Program 1B.QA Program 1 II.PERFORMANCE EVALUATION CRITERIA 1 A.Acceptance Criteria for Internal Evaluations 1B.QC InvestigationCriteriaand Result Reporting 3 C.Reporting of Environmental Dosimetry ResultstoEDC Customers 3III.DATA

SUMMARY

FOR ISSUANCE PERIOD JANUARY-DECEMBER 2015 3 A.General Discussion 3B.Result Trending 4 IV.STATUSOFEDC CONDITION REPORTS (CR)4 V.STATUS OF AUDITS/ASSESSMENTS 4 A.Internal 4 B.External 4 VI.PROCEDURES AND MANUALS REVISED DURING JANUARY-DECEMBER20154 VII.CONCLUSION AND RECOMMENDATIONS 4 VIII.REFERENCES 4 APPENDIX A DOSIMETRY QUALITY CONTROL TRENDING GRAPHS-ii-1.2.3.LIST OF TABLES Percentage of Individual Analyses Which Passed EDC Internal Criteria, January-December 2015 Mean Dosimeter Analyses (n=6), January-December 2015 Summary of Independent QC Resultsfor2015-iii-5 5 5 EXECUTIVE

SUMMARY

Routine quality control (QC)testing was performed for dosimeters issuedbythe Environmental Dosimetry Company (EDC).Duringthis annualperiod,100

%(72/72)ofthe individual dosimeters, evaluated againsttheEDC internal performance acceptance criteria (high-energy photonsonly),metthe criterion for accuracyand100%(72/72)metthe criterion for precision (Table1).In addition, 100%(12/12)ofthe dosimeter sets evaluated against the internal tolerancelimitsmetEDC acceptance criteria(Table2)and 100%(6/6)of independent testing passed the performance criteria (Table 3).Trending graphs, which evaluate performance statistic for high-energy photon irradiations and co-located stationsaregivenin Appendix A.One internal assessment was performedin2015.Therewereno findings.-iv-I.INTRODUCTIONTheTLD systemsatthe Environmental Dosimetry Company(EDC)are calibrated andoperatedto ensure consistent andaccurateevaluationofTLDs.The qualityofthe dosimetricresultsreportedtoEDCclientsis ensured by in-house performance testing and independent performancetestingbyEDC clients,andbothinternalandclient directed program assessments.

The purposeofthe dosimetry quality assuranceprogramistoprovide performance documentationoftheroutine processingofEDC dosimeters.

Performance testingprovidesa statistical measure ofthebiasandprecisionof dosimetry processing againstareliablestandard,whichinturnpointsoutany trends or performancechanges.Two programsareused:A.QC Program Dosimetry qualitycontroltestsare performedonEDC Panasonic 814 Environmental dosimeters.

Thesetestsinclude:

(1)the in-housetestingprogram coordinatedbytheEDCQA Officer and (2)independenttestperformbyEDC clients.In-housetestare performedusingsixpairsof814 dosimeters,apairisreportedasanindividualresultandsixpairsarereportedasthemeanresult.Resultsofthesetestsare describedinthisreport.Excludedfromthisreportare instrumentation checks.Although instrumentation checks represent an important aspectofthe quality assuranceprogram,theyare not included as process checksinthisreport.

Instrumentation checks represent between 5-10%oftheTLDs processed.

B.QA ProgramAninternal assessment of dosimetry activities is conducted annuallybythe Quality Assurance Officer (Reference 1).Thepurposeofthe assessmentisto review procedures, results, materials or components to identify opportunities to improve or enhance processes and/or services.II.PERFORMANCE EVALUATION CRITERIA A.AcceptanceCriteriaforInternal Evaluations1.BiasForeach dosimetertested,the measureofbiasisthe percent deviation ofthereportedresultrelativetothe delivered exposure.Thepercent deviationrelativetothe delivered exposure is calculatedasfollows:

where: H;=the corresponding reported exposureforthe l" dosimeter(i.e.,thereported exposure)Hi=the exposure deliveredtothe l" irradiated dosimeter(i.e.,the delivered exposure)1of6 2.MeanBiasForeach groupoftest dosimeters,themeanbiasisthe average percent deviationofthereportedresultrelativetothe deliveredexposure.The mean percent deviationrelativetothedelivered exposure is calculated as follows: where: H;=the corresponding reported exposurefortheith dosimeter(i.e.,thereported exposure)Hi=the exposuredeliveredtothe l" irradiated test dosimeter(i.e.,the delivered exposure)n=the number of dosimetersinthetestgroup 3.PrecisionFora groupoftest dosimeters irradiatedtoagiven exposure, the measure ofprecisionisthe percentdeviationof individualresultsrelativetothemeanreportedexposure.Atleasttwovaluesarerequiredforthe determinationofprecision.The measureofprecisionfortheith dosimeter is: where: H;=thereported exposurefortheith dosimeter(i.e.,the reported exposure)R=themeanreported exposure;i.e., R=

n=the number of dosimetersinthetest group 4.EDCInternal Tolerance Limits All evaluationcriteriaaretakenfromthe"EDCQualitySystemManual," (Reference 2).Thesecriteriaareonlyappliedto individual test dosimetersirradiatedwith high-energy photons (Cs-137)andareas follows for Panasonic Environmental dosimeters:

+/-15%forbiasand

+/-12.8%forprecision.

2of6 B.QC Investigation Criteria and Result Reporting EDC Quality System Manual (Reference 2)specifieswhenan investigation is requiredduetoaQC analysis thathasfailedtheEDCbiascriteria.Thecriteriaareas follows: 1.No investigation is necessarywhenan individualQCresultfalls outsidetheQC performancecriteriafor accuracy.2.Investigations are initiatedwhenthemeanofaQC processingbatchis outside the performance criterionforbias.C.Reporting of Environmental Dosimetry ResultstoEDC Customers 1.All resultsaretobe reportedina timely fashion.2.IftheQA Officer determinesthatan investigation is requiredforaprocess,the resultsshallbeissuedasnormal.IftheQCresults, prompting the investigation,haveameanbiasfromtheknownof greaterthan+/-20%,the resultsshallbeissuedwithanote indicatingthattheymaybeupdatedinthefuture, pending resolutionofaQAissue.

3.Environmental dosimetry resultsdonot require updatingifthe investigationhasshown thatthemeanbiasbetweenthe original resultsandthe correctedresults,basedon applicable correction factorsfromthe investigation,doesnot exceed+/-20%*III.DATA

SUMMARY

FOR ISSUANCE PERIOD JANUARY-DECEMBER 2015 A.General Discussion Results of performance tests conducted are summarized and discussedinthe following sections.Summariesofthe performance testsforthereportingperiodaregivenin Tables 1 through3and Figures 1 through 4.Table 1 provides a summary of individual dosimeter results evaluated against the EDC internal acceptance criteria for high-energy photonsonly.Duringthisperiod, 100%(72/72)ofthe individual dosimeters, evaluated against thesecriteriamet the tolerancelimitsfor accuracyand100%(72/72)metthe criterion for precision.

A graphical interpretation is provided in Figures 1 and 2.Table 2 providestheBias+Standard deviationresultsforeach group(N=6)of dosimeters evaluated against the internal tolerancecriteria.Overall,100%

(12/12)ofthe dosimeter sets evaluated against the internal tolerance performancecriteriamet thesecriteria.A graphical interpretationisprovidedin Figures 3 Table 3 presents the independentblindspikeresultsfor dosimeters processed during this annualperiod.All resultspassedthe performance acceptance criterion.

Figure 4isa graphical interpretation of SeabrookStationblindlocatedstationresults.

3of6 B.ResultTrendingOneofthemainbenefitsofperformingqualitycontroltestsonaroutinebasisistoidentifytrendsor performancechanges.TheresultsofthePanasonic environmental dosimeter performancetestsarepresentedinAppendixA.TheresultsareevaluatedagainsteachoftheperformancecriterialistedinSectionII,namely:individual dosimeteraccuracy,individual dosimeterprecision,andmean bias.Alloftheresultspresentedin AppendixAareplottedsequentiallybyprocessing date.IV.STATUSOFEDCCONDITIONREPORTS(CR)Noconditionreportswereissuedduringthisannualperiod.V.STATUSOF AUDITS/ASSESSMENTSA.InternalEDCInternalQualityAssurance Assessmentwasconductedduringthefourth quarter2015.Therewerenofindingsidentified.B.External None.VI.PROCEDURESANDMANUALSREVISEDDURINGJANUARY-DECEMBER2015Procedure1052wasrevisedon December23,2015.Severalprocedureswerereissuedwithnochangesaspartofthe 5yearreviewcycle.VII.CONCLUSIONAND RECOMMENDATIONSThequalitycontrolevaluationscontinuetoindicatethedosimetryprocessingprogramsattheEDCsatisfythecriteriaspecifiedintheQualitySystemManual.TheEDCdemonstratedtheabilitytomeetallapplicable acceptance criteria.VIII.REFERENCES1.EDCQualityControlandAudit AssessmentSchedule,2015.2.EDCManual1,QualitySystemManual,Rev.3,August1,2012.

4of6 TABLE 1 PERCENTAGE OF INDIVIDUAL DOSIMETERS THAT PASSED EDC INTERNAL CRITERIA JANUARY-DECEMBER 2015(1), (2)(1)This table summarizesresultsoftests conductedbyEDC.(2)Environmental dosimeterresultsarefreeinair.

TABLE 2 MEAN DOSIMETER ANALYSES (N=6)JANUARY-DECEMBER 2015(1), (2)4/16/2015 4/28/2015 05/07/2015 7/22/2015 7/24/2015 8/06/2015 10/30/2015 11/04/2015

11/22/2015 1/27/2016 1/31/2016 2/05/2016 55 91 48 28 106 77 28 63 85 61 112 36 4.5 2.7 0.3 1.5 2.9-3.3 3.7 2.5-2.9 3.1 2.2 3.2 1.1 1.6 1.3 1.4 1.8 1.3 2.2 1.0 1.7 0.9 1.3 1.4 Pass Pass Pass Pass Pass Pass Pass Pass Pass Pass Pass Pass (1)This table summarizesresultsoftests conductedbyEDCfor TLDsissuedin2015.

(2)Environmental dosimeterresultsarefreeinair.

TABLE 3

SUMMARY

OF INDEPENDENT DOSIMETER TESTING JANUARY-DECEMBER 2015(1), (2)1$Qtr.2015 2" Qtr.2015 2" Qtr.2015 3 r Qtr.2015 4 Qtr.2015 4 t Qtr.2015 Millstone Millstone Seabrook Millstone Millstone Seabrook (1)Performance criteriaare+/-30%.

(2)Slind spike irradiationsusingCs-137 5 of 6 APPENDIX A DOSIMETRY QUALITY CONTROL TRENDING GRAPHS ISSUE PERIOD JANAURY-DECEMBER 20156of6 l I-12-.!I.;-14jLCl-=:

_.____;::__

, I-16J*r-mm...

.....-r-*--"'--l-N

.....-.N---IN-.--

..Sts$i,....<<>>'¥PROCESSING DATE z o Cir u w 0::: a.Q PROCESSING DATE*

..'I"..000 0"'1°,.**,O OO ,,"O."!"O'0 01" 0.1"'0".0"[".0""'*.'y_O.*.'1,"r ,..(1/:::;'"of.J$'.""Y..,0'OO.MO'r: 0*.'1'r"'"".0.,".,...0',.*...., 0)0)"'"JV' TableA.9.2SampleType:Quality Assurance ReportMatrix:Milk,Soil,Liquid, Vegetation,AirCharcoal,AirParticulate, Water TELEDYNE BROWN ENGINEERING ANALYTICS ENVIRONMENTAL RADIOACTIVITYCROSSCHECKPROGRAM TELEDYNE BROWN ENGINEERING ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES (PAGE1OF2)Identification Reported Known Ratio (c)MonthlYearNumberMatrixNuclideUnits Value (a).Value (b)TBE/Analytics Evaluation (d)March2015E11181MilkSr-89 pCi/L88.997.20.91 A Sr-90pCi/L12.217.4 0.70 WE11182Milk 1-131pCi/L61.365.1 0.94 ACe-141pCi/L1041130.92 A Cr-51 pCi/L2652760.96 ACs-134pCi/L1381540.90 ACs-137pCi/L2052070.99 A Co-58pCi/L1781830.97 A Mn-54pCi/L1871880.99 A Fe-59pCi/L182177 1.03 A Zn-65pCi/L3453510.98 A Co-60pCi/L379405 0.94 AE11184AP Ce-141pCi10785.0 1.26 W Cr-51pCi261224 1.17 A Cs-134pCi74.677.0 0.97 A Cs-137pCi99.61020.98 A Co-58pCi99.81100.91 A Mn-54pCi99.296.91.02 A Fe-59pCi1091190.92 A Zn-65pCi1881831.03 A Co-60pCi200201 1.00 AE11183Charcoal 1-131pCi82.985.40.97 AE11185Water Fe-55pCi/L195019001.03 AJune2015E11234Milk Sr-89pCi/L94.992.61.02 A Sr-90 pCi/L14.312.71.13 AE11238Milk 1-131pCi/L93.295.9 0.97 ACe-141pCi/LNotprovidedforthisstudy Cr-51pCi/L349276 1.26 WCs-134pCi/L165163 1.01 ACs-137pCi/L143.01251.14 A Co-58 pCi/L82.068.4 1.20 A Mn-54pCi/L113101 1.12 A Fe-59 pCi/L184151 1.22 W Zn-65pCi/L269 248 1.08 A Co-60pCi/L208 193 1.08 AE11237AP Ce-141 pCiNotprovidedforthisstudy Cr-51 pCi323233 1.39N(1)Cs-134pCi139 138 1.01 A Cs-137pCi111 106 1.05 A Co-58 pCi54.057.8 0.93 A Mn-54 pCi 96.884.91.14 A Fe-59 pCi 162 128 1.27 W Zn-65pCi198 210 0.94 A Co-60 pCi 1781631.09 A E11236 Charcoal 1-131 pC;93.980 1.17 A ANALYTICS ENVIRONMENTAL RADIOACTIVITY CROSS CHECK PROGRAM TELEDYNE BROWN ENGINEERING ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES (PAGE2OF2)IdentificationReportedKnown Ratio (c)MonthlYearNumberMatrixNuclideUnits Value (a)Value (b)TBEIAnalytics Evaluation (d)June2015E11238WaterFe-55pCi/L189017901.06 ADecember2015 E11354MilkSr-89pCi/L96.286.81.11 A Sr-90pCi/L14.812.5 1.18 AE11355Milk 1-131pCi/L95.1 91.2 1.04 ACe-141pCi/L1171290.91 A Cr-51pCilL265281 0.94 ACs-134pCi/L153160 0.96 A Cs-137pCi/L119115 1.03 A Co-58 pCi/L107110 0.97 A Mn-54pCi/L1531451.06 A Fe-59pCi/L117 108 1.08 A Zn-65 pCi/L 2612481.05 A Co-60pCi/L2122131.00 A E11357 AP Ce-141 pCi89.984.0 1.07 A Cr-51 pCi215184 1.17 A Cs-134pCi103 105 0.98 A Cs-137pCi76.6 74.8 1.02 A Co-58 pCi76.271.9 1.06 A Mn-54 pCi 91.4 94.4 0.97 A Fe-59 pCi 78.6 70.3 1.12 A Zn-65 pCi173162 1.07 A Co-60pCi138 139 0.99 AE11422AP Sr-89 pCi 98.0 96.9 1.01 A Sr-90 pCi10.014.0 0.71 W E11356 Charcoal 1-131 pCi74.975.2 1.00 A E11358 Water Fe-55pCi/L2160 1710 1.26 W E11353 Soil Ce-141pCi/kg252 222 1.14 A Cr-51 pCi/kg 485 485 1.00 A Cs-134 pCi/kg 319 277 1.15 A Cs-137 pCi/kg 292 276 1.06 A Co-58 pCi/kg 193 190 1.02 A Mn-54 pCi/kg 258 250 1.03 A Fe-59 pCi/kg 218 186 1.17 A Zn-65pCi/kg457 429 1.07 A Co-60 pCi/kg 381 368 1.04 A(1)APCr-51

-Cr-51hasthe shortest half-life andtheweakestgamma energyofthe mixednuclidesample,which produces alargeerror.Taking into account the error;thelowestvaluewouldbe 119%ofthereferencevalue,whichwouldbe considered acceptable.NCR15-18(a)TeledyneBrown Engineering reported result.(b)TheAnalyticsknownvalueis equalto100%of the parameter presentinthe standard as determined by gravimetric and/or volumetric measurementsmadeduring standard preparation.(c)RatioofTeledyneBrown Engineering to Analytics results.(d)Analytics evaluation basedonTBE internal QC limits: A=Acceptable, reportedresultfallswithinratiolimitsof0.80-1.20.W-Acceptablewithwarning, reportedresultfallswithin 0.70-0.80or1.20-1.30.N

=NotAcceptable, reportedresultfallsoutsidetheratiolimitsof

<0.70 and>1.30.

DOE's MIXED ANALYTE PERFORMANCE EVALUATION PROGRAM (MAPEP)TELEDYNE BROWN ENGINEERING ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES (PAGE1OF1)IdentificationReportedKnownAcceptance Month/Year NumberMediaNuclide*

Units Value (a)Value (b)Range Evaluation (c)March201515-MaW32 Water Am-241Bq/L0.6320.6540.458-0.850 A Ni-63Bq/L2.5 (1)A Pu-238Bq/L0.02040.0089 (2)APu-239/240Bq/L0.90.80.582-1.082A 15-MaS32SoilNi-63Bq/kg392 448.0314-582A Sr-90Bq/kg286653487-849N(3)15-RdF32APSr-90Bq/sample-0.0991 (1)AU-234/233Bq/sample0.02110.01550.0109-0.0202N(3)

U-238Bq/sample0.0950.0990.069-0.129A15-GrF32APGr-ABq/sample0.4481.770.53-3.01N(3)Gr-BBq/sample0.7580 0.750.38-1.13A15-RdV32VegetationCs-134Bq/sample8.08 7.325.12-9.52 ACs-137Bq/sample11.69.186.43-11.93WCo-57Bq/sample-0.0096 (1)ACo-60Bq/sample6.535.553.89-7.22AMn-54Bq/sample0.0058 (1)ASr-90Bq/sample0.9991.080.76-1.40 AZn-65Bq/sample-0.108 (1)ASeptember2015 15-MaW33WaterAm-241Bq/L1.0121.0550.739-1.372 A Ni-63Bq/L11.88.55 5.99-11.12N(4)Pu-238Bq/L0.7270.6810.477-0.885APu-239/240Bq/L0.8300.9000.630-1.170 A 15-MaS33SoilNi-63Bq/kg635682477-887A Sr-90Bq/kg429425298-553 A 15-RdF33APSr-90Bq/sample1.482.181.53

-2.83N(4)U-234/233Bq/sample0.1430.1430.100-0.186AU-238Bq/sample0.1490.1480.104-0.192 A15-GrF33APGr-ABq/sample0.4970.900.27-1.53 AGr-BBq/sample1.34 1.560.78-2.34A15-RdV33VegetationCs-134Bq/sample6.105.804.06-7.54 ACs-137Bq/sample0.0002 (1)ACo-57Bq/sample8.016.624.63-8.61 WCo-60Bq/sample4.974.563.19-5.93AMn-54Bq/sample8.337.685.38-9.98 ASr-90Bq/sample0.3861.300.91-1.69N(4)(1)Falsepositivetest.

Zn-65Bq/sample6.075.463.82-7.10 A (2)Sensitivity evaluation.(3)SoilSr-90

-incomplete digestionofthesampleresultedinlowresults;AP U-234/233-extremely low activity was difficult to quantifyAPGr-A-the MAPEPfilterhasthe activity embeddedinthefilter.To correctedthelowbias,TBEwillcreatean attenuated efficiency forMAPEPsamples.NCR 15-13(4)WaterNi-63 extremely low activity was difficulttoquantify;AP

&VegetationSr-90waslostduringseparation, possible from substanceaddedby MAPEP NCR 15-21.(a)TeledyneBrown Engineering reported result.(b)TheMAPEPknownvalueisequalto100%ofthe parameter preseminthe standard as determined by gravimetric and/or volumetric measurementsmadeduring standard preparation.

(c)DOE/MAPEP evaluation:

A=acceptable,W=acceptablewithwarning, N=not acceptable.

ERA ENVIRONMENTAL RADIOACTIVITY CROSS CHECK PROGRAM TELEDYNE BROWN ENGINEERING ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES (PAGE1OF1)IdentificationReportedKnownAcceptance Month/YearNumberMediaNuclideUnits Value (a)Value (b)Limits Evaluation (c)May2015RAD-101WaterSr-89pCi/L45.263.251.1-71.2 N(1)Sr-90pCi/L28.041.930.8-48.1 N (1)Sa-133pCi/L80.6 82.563.9-90.8 ACs-134pCi/L71.775.761.8-83.3ACs-137pCi/L187 189170-210 A Co-60pCi/L85.784.576.0-95.3A Zn-65pCi/L197203183-238 A Gr-ApCi/L26.142.622.1-54.0 A Gr-SpCi/L28.832.921.3-40.6A 1-131pCi/L23.523.819.7-28.3A U-NatpCi/L6.196.594.99-7.83A H-3pCi/L314532802770-3620AMRAD-22FilterGr-A pCi/filter28.362.220.8-96.6A 011/01/2015 RAD-103 Water Sr-89pCi/L40.935.726.7-42.5A Sr-90pCi/L29.331.122.7-36.1ASa-133pCi/L31.532.525.9-36.7ACs-134pCi/L59.6562.350.6-68.5ACs-137pCi/L156157141-175 A Co-60pCi/L70.671.164.0-80.7 A Zn-65pCi/L145126113-149A Gr-ApCi/L38.251.626.9-64.7A Gr-S'pCi/L42.036.624.1-44.2A 1-131pCi/L24.826.321.9-31.0A U-NatpCi/L146.9056.245.7-62.4 N(2)H-3pCi/L211002130018700-23400 A MRAD-23FilterGr-ApCi/filterLostduringprocessing(1)Yieldonthehighsideofour acceptance range indicates possibility of calciuminterference.NCR15-09(2)Technicianfailedtodilute original sample.Ifdilulted,theresultwouldhavebeen 57.1,whichfellwithinthe acceptancelimits.NCR15-19(a)TeledyneBrown Engineering reported result.(b)TheERAknownvalueis equalto100%ofthe parameter presentinthe standard as determined by gravimetric and/or VOlumetric measurementsmadeduring standard preparation.

(c)ERAevaluation:A=acceptable.ReportedresultfallswithintheWarningLimits.NA=notacceptable.ReportedresultfallsoutsideoftheControlLimits.CE=checkforError.ReportedresultfallswithintheControlLimitsandoutsideoftheWarningLimit.

FortheTBElaboratory,131outof139analysesperformedmetthe specified acceptancecriteria.Eightanalyses(AP-Cr-51,U-234/233,GrA,Sr-90;SoilSr-90; Water-Ni-3andUnatural;VegetationSr-90samples)didnotmeetthespecifiedacceptancecriteriaforthefollowing reasons:1.TeledyneBrown Engineering'sAnalytics'June2015air particulateCr-51resultof323

+/-45.5pCiwashigherthantheknownvalueof233pCiwitharatioof1.39.Theupperratioof1.20wasexceeded.Theairparticulatesampleiscountedonashelf(abovethedetector),whichistheidealgeometryforthissample.ButduetothefactthatCr-51hastheshortesthalf-lifeandtheweakestgammaenergyofthemixednuclidesample,this geometry producesalargererrorfortheCr-51.Takinginto consideration theuncertainty,theactivityofCr-51overlapswiththeknownvalueataratioof1.19,whichwouldbeconsideredacceptable.NCR15-182.TeledyneBrown Engineering'sMAPEPMarch2015soilSr-90resultof286TotalBq/kgwaslowerthantheknownvalueof653Bq/kg,exceedingthelower acceptancerangeof487Bq/kg.Thefailurewasduetoincompletedigestionofthesample.NCR15-13 3.Teledyne Brown Engineering'sMAPEPMarch2015air particulateU-234/233resultof0.0211Bq/samplewashigherthantheknownvalueof0.0155Bq/sample,exceedingtheupper acceptance rangeof0.0202Bq/sample.Duetotheextremelylowactivity,itwasdifficulttoquantifytheU-234/233.Takinginto consideration theuncertainty,theactivityofU-234/233overlapswiththeknownvalue,whichis statisticallyconsideredthesamevalue.NCR15-13 4.Teledyne Brown Engineering'sMAPEPMarch2015airparticulategrossalpharesultof0.448Bq/samplewaslowerthantheknownvalueof1.77Bq/sample,exceedingthelower acceptancerangeof0.53Bq/sample.The efficiencyusedforgrossalphaismadefrom a non-attenuatedalphastandard.TheMAPEPfilterhasthealphasembeddedinthefilter,requiringanattenuatedefficiency.Inordertocorrectthelowbias,TBEwillcreateanattenuated efficiency forMAPEPairparticulatefilters.NCR15-13 5.Teledyne Brown Engineering's MAPEP SeptemberwaterNi-63resultof11.8

+/-10.8Bq/Lwashigherthantheknownvalueof8.55Bq/L,exceedingtheupperacceptancerangeof11.12Bq/L.Theoriginalsamplewasrunwitha10mLaliquotwhichwasnot sufficientforthelowlevelofNi-63inthesample.Thererunaliquotof30mLproducedan acceptableresultof 8.81Bq/L.NCR15-21 6.Teledyne Brown Engineering's MAPEP September air particulateSr-90resultof1.48Bq/samplewaslowerthantheknownvalueof2.18Bq/sample,exceedingthelower acceptancerangeof1.53 Bq/sample.Inthepast,MAPEPhasadded substances (unusual compoundsfoundinDOEcomplexes)tovariousmatricesthathaveresultedin incompleteremovaloftheisotopeofinterestforthe laboratoriesanalyzingthecrosschecks.Wefeelthatthisispossiblythecasewiththissample.NCR15-21 7.Teledyne Brown Engineering's MAPEP Septembervegetation90resultof0.386Bq/samplewaslowerthantheknownvalueof1.30Bq/sample,exceedingthelower acceptancerangeof0.91Bq/sample.Inthepast,MAPEPhasadded substances (unusual compoundsfoundinDOEcomplexes)tovarious matricesthathaveresultedin incompleteremovaloftheisotopeofinterestforthe laboratoriesanalyzingthecrosschecks.Wefeelthatthisis possiblythecasewiththissample.NCR15-21 8.Teledyne Brown Engineering's ERA NovemberwaterUraniumnaturalresultof146.9pCi/Lwashigherthantheknownvalueof56.2pCi/L, exceedingtheupper acceptancelimitof62.4pCi/L.

The technicianfailedtodilutetheoriginalsample,butusedtheentire12mLsample.Whenrecalculatedusingthe12mLaliquot,theresultof57.16agreedwiththeassignedvalueof56.2.NCR 15-19

- '"'P Entergy GNRO-2016/00019April19,2016U.S.Nuclear Regulatory Commission Attn: DocumentControlDeskWashington,DC20555-0001 Entergy Operations, Inc.P.O.Box756PortGibson,MS39150 James NadeauManager,RegulatoryAssuranceGrandGulfNuclearStationTel.(601)437-2103