ML102980075

E-Mail from Ohara to Conte, Et Al., NRC Inspector Questions AFW Buried Pipe

ML102980075
Person / Time
Site:	Salem
Issue date:	05/26/2010
From:	O'Hara T Engineering Region 1 Branch 1
To:	Arthur Burritt, Conte R, Daniel Schroeder NRC/NSIR/DPR/DDEP, Reactor Projects Branch 3, Engineering Region 1 Branch 1
References
FOIA/PA-2010-0334
Download: ML102980075 (3)

Text

OHara, Timothy From: OHara, Timothy. *'-

Sent: Wednesday, May 26, 2010 11:31 AM

• To: Conte, Richard; Burritt, Arthur; Schroeder, Daniel

Subject:

FW: NRC Inspector Questions AFW Buried Pipe Attachments: 0000eea8.tif Importance: High Rich, Art, Dan, Note the email below. The EQACE for Ul AFW piping has been extended to 6/8 for MRC presentation.

Tim OHara From: Berrick, Howard G. [1]

Sent: Wednesday, May 26, 2010 10:35 AM To: OHara, Timothy Cc: Montgomery, Robert S.; Johnson, Alan A.

Subject:

RE: NRC Inspector Questions AFW Buried Pipe Importance: High Tim, A TIF.file copy of Technical Standard NC.NE-TS.ZZ-6605, Revision 5 is attached. [Let me know if you can't open - I'm also trying to get a pdf copy of this procedure].

The EQACE for Unit 1 AFW Piping will be complete and ready for MRC presentation on 06/08/10 [an extension to 6/8 was approved by MRC this week]. The EQACE is on track for 6/8 to present to MRC for review / approval.

Howard Howard Berrick IPSEG Nuclear LLC Salem Regulatory Assurance PSEG Nuclear - Salem Generating Stations (W) 856-339-1862 (Fax) 856-339-1448.

(Br) ()6 From: OHara, Timothy [2]

Sent: Wednesday, May 26, 2010 9:19 AM /

To: Berrick, Howard G.

Subject:

RE: NRC Inspector Questions AFW Buried Pipe Good Morning Howard,

,

Inomation i this record was deleted in accOrdan!

• wfth thFroedom of Information Act.

Can you please provide a copy of Technical Standard NC.NE-TS.ZZ-6605, Revision 5? This is Reference 1 to Technical Evaluation 60084266 which you sent me last week.

Also, have you been able to confirm the the Eq: ACE for the Unit 1 AFW Piping will be completed on 6/2/10?

Thanks.

Tim OHara From: Berrick, Howard G. [3]

Sent: Thursday, May 20, 2010 1:48 PM To: OHara, Timothy Cc: Hennessy, Philip; Ayers, Patrick K.; Mattingly, William F.

Subject:

FW: NRC Inspector Questions AFW Buried Pipe Importance: High Tim, Attached is the evaluation for the Enercon coating. Itwas accomplished in work order 60084266, SIAF System Buried Pipe Inspection.

This evaluation will be part of an upcoming revision to the DCP.

q With respect to the basis for the response "The original coating was good for life of plant", we have no supporting documentation that would lead us to believe it was anything less than the life of the plant. I don't think we will be able provide any additional basis. I will check again with our Engineering department.

Howard Howard Berrick PSEG Nuclear LLC Salem Regulatory Assurance PSEG Nuclear - Salem Generating Stations (W) 856-339-1862

• '* (.Fax)

(* 856-339-1448 pr) (b)(6) _

From: Ayers, Patrick K.

Sent: Thursday, May 20, 2010 12:58 PM To: Berrick, Howard G.; Johnson, Alan A.; Hennessy, Philip

Subject:

RE: NRC Inspector Questions AFW Buried Pipe Howard, Refer to technical evaluation 60084266-0105 for the technical basis for using the Enercon coating.

Pat Ayers phone: 856-339-1408 From: Berrick, Howard G.

Sent: Thursday, May 20, 2010 10:19 AM 2

To: Johnson, Alan A.; Hennessy, Philip Cc: Ayers, Patrick K.

Subject:

FW: NRC Inspector Questions AFW Buried Pipe Importance: High Alan, Phil, Can I get what Tim's asked for from you (i.e., DCP [for basis on Enercon coating being equivalent] and basis for coating life statement, ... ).

Please get back to me P.S. I have responded to Tim on the Guided Wave report - I have a copy and will make it available to him when he returns to the site.

Howard Howard Berrick JPSE*( Nuclear LLC Salem Regulatory Assurance PSEG Nuclear - Salem Generating Stations (W) 856-339-1862 (Fax) 856-339-1448 FBpr) 4 The information contained in this e-mail, including any attachment(s), is intended'solely for use by the named addressee(s). If you are not the intended recipient, or a person designated as responsible for delivering such messages to the intended recipient, you are not authorized to disclose copy, distribute or retain this message, in whole or in part, without written authorization from PSEG. This e-mail may contain proprietary, confidential or privileged information. If you have received this message in error, please notify the sender immediately. This notice is included in all e-mail messages leaving PSEG. Thank you for your cooperation.

3