ML12342A262
ML12342A262 | |
Person / Time | |
---|---|
Site: | Wolf Creek |
Issue date: | 11/30/2012 |
From: | Wolf Creek |
To: | Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation |
References | |
ET 12-0032 WCAP-17678-NP, Rev 0 | |
Download: ML12342A262 (93) | |
Text
A-348 Status: N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No.: SB032D Equipment Class: (20) Instrumentation and Control Panels and Cabinets Equipment
==
Description:==
W SS PROT SYS OUT 2 TRN Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?
Yes 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and Yes masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
- 9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? Yes 10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of Yes potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?Other Adverse Conditions
- 11. Have you looked for and found no adverse seismic conditions that could Yes adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?
SWT noted a modification to add top support to fasten SBD32D to SBD33A.Verify whether modification documents the qualification reconciliation of individual equipment.
Licensing Basis Evaluation:
Condition is analyzed per WCNOC Calculation XX-FH-009-002.
No adverse seismic concern.Comments Same Cabinet enclosure as SB032C (see notes)Evaluated by: Z 5 -- Hunter Young Date: 11-15-12 WCAP-17678-NP November 2012 Revision 0 A-349 Status: N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No.: SB032D Equipment Class: (20) Instrumentation and Control Panels and Cabinets Equipment
==
Description:==
W SS PROT SYS OUT 2 TRN Timothy Nealon 11-15-12 Photos SBO32D 9-18 190 SBO32D 9-18 191 WCAP-1 7678-NP November 2012 WCAP- 17678-NP November 2012 Revision 0 A-350 Status: M N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No.: SB032D Equipment Class: (20) Instrumentation and Control Panels and Cabinets EauiDment
==
Description:==
W SS PROT SYS OUT 2 TRN SB032D 9-18 192 SB032D 9-18 193 bi32IJU U-16 194 b51d3ZUj 1b I WCAP-17678-NP November 2012 Revision 0 A-351 Status: [Y N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No.: SB032D Equipment Class: (20) Instrumentation and Control Panels and Cabinets)ment
Description:
W SS PROT SYS OUT 2 TRN SB032D 9-18 196 SB032D 9-18 197 SB032D 9-18 199 WCAP-17678-NP November 2012 Revision 0 A-352 Status: N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No.: SB041 Equipment Class: (20) Instrumentation and Control Panels and Cabinets Equipment
==
Description:==
W PROCESS ANALOG PROTECTION SET CAB-04 Project: WCNOC SWEL Location (Bldg, Elev, Room/Area):
CTRL, 2047.50 ft, 3605 Manufacturer/Model:
Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.
Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchorage 1. Is anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50%of SWEL items requiring such verification)?
No 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?
- 4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?Yes Yes Yes 5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)
Not Applicable
- 6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?
Yes WCAP-1 7678-NP November 2012 Revision 0 A-353 Status: M N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No.: SB041 Equipment Class: (20) Instrumentation and Control Panels and Cabinets Equipment
==
Description:==
W PROCESS ANALOG PROTECTION SET CAB-04 Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?
SWT noted cable tray with 1/4" vertical clearance to top of cabinet support modification.
Concern is that differential movement between the floors can cause equipment to spatially interact and cause change of state in SB041.Both pieces can be taken as rigid in the vertical direction.
Verify from In-Structure Response Spectra whether clearance is acceptable.
Licensing Basis Evaluation:
Inspection of vertical response spectra at this level confirms that 1/4" is more than adequate separation for vertically rigid components.
No adverse seismic concern.8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
- 9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?Yes Yes Yes Yes Other Adverse Conditions
- 11. Have you looked for and found no adverse seismic conditions that could Yes adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?
Cabinets RPO 18, SB041, and SB042 are bolted at their tops. This appears to be a modification not included in original equipment qualifications.
Verify whether modification documents the qualification reconciliation of individual equipment.
Licensing Basis Evaluation:
Condition is analyzed per WCNOC Calc XX-FH-009-002. No adverse seismic concern.Comments WCAP-17678-NP November 2012 Revision 0 A-354 Status: i- N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No.: SB041 Equipment Class: (20) Instrumentation and Control Panels and Cabinets Equipment
==
Description:==
W PROCESS ANALOG PROTECTION SET CAB-04 Evaluated by: Hunter Young Date: 11-15-12 STimothy Nealon 11-15-12 Photos SB041 9-18 172 SB041 9-18 174 WCAP- 17678-NP November 2012 WCAP- I17678-NP November 2012 Revision 0 A-355 Status: M N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No.: SB041 Equipment Class: (20) Instrumentation and Control Panels and Cabinets EauiDment Descrotion:
W PROCESS ANALOG PROTECTION SET CAB-04 SB041 9-18 175 SBO41 9-18 177 SB041 9-18 178 WCAP- 17678-NP November 2012 Revision 0 A-356 Status: [-] N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No.: Equipment Class: SB041 (20) Instrumentation and Control Panels and Cabinets PROTECTION SET CAB-04 13bu41 U-16 1 fu WCAP-17678-NP November 2012 Revision 0 A-357 Status: N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No.: SB079 Equipment Class: (20) Instrumentation and Control Panels and Cabinets Equipment
==
Description:==
RPV LEVEL INSTR SYS PROC PROT SYS Project: WCNOC SWEL Location (Bldg, Elev, Room/Area):
CTRL, 2047.50 ft, 3605 Manufacturer/Model:
Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.
Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchorage 1. Is anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50%of SWEL items requiring such verification)?
Yes 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?Yes 3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?
Yes 4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?Yes 5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)
Anchorage documentation brought in field did not reflect as-installed configuration.
Verify whether as-installed configuration which was as-built in field meets CLB anchorage configuration documentation.
Yes Licensing Basis Evaluation:
Detail 5 on WCNOC Dwg C-0008 (Ref. 22)indicates an acceptable anchorage weld pattern of 3/16" fillet welds, 2" long at 8" o.c. The as-installed configuration recorded in the field meets this WCAP-17678-NP November 2012 Revision 0 A-358 Status: N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No.: SB079 Equipment Class: (20) Instrumentation and Control Panels and Cabinets Equipment
==
Description:==
RPV LEVEL INSTR SYS PROC PROT SYS requirement; therefore, there is no adverse seismic condition.
- 6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of Yes potentially adverse seismic conditions?
Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?
Yes 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and Yes masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
- 9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? Yes 10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of Yes potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?Other Adverse Conditions
- 11. Have you looked for and found no adverse seismic conditions that could Yes adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?
SWT noted two missing bolts on top of the ventilation cover. Cover serves no structural function; therefore there is no adverse seismic concern. Condition notified to WCNOC.Comments Evaluated by: Hunter Young Date: 11-15-12 WCAP-1 7678-NP November 2012 Revision 0 A-359 Status: [-1 N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No.: SB079 Equipment Class: (20) Instrumentation and Control Panels and Cabinets Equipment
==
Description:==
RPV LEVEL INSTR SYS PROC PROT SYS Timothy Nealon 11-15-12 Photos SBU79 9-16 162 WCAP-1 7678-NP November 2012 Revision 0 A-360 Status: E[Y N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No.: SB079 Equipment Class: (20) Instrumentation and Control Panels and Cabinets Equipment
==
Description:==
RPV LEVEL INSTR SYS PROC PROT SYS SB079 9-18 165 ,-;t5u f U il- I ts I b4 WCAP-1 7678-NP November 2012 WCAP-17678-NP November 2012 Revision 0 A-361 Status: M N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No.: SB079 Equipment Class: (20) Instrumentation and Control Panels and Cabinets Eauioment DescnDtion:
RPV LEVEL INSTR SYS PROC PROT SYS bBU79 9-18 166 WCAP-17678-NP November 2012 Revision 0 A-362 Status: M N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No.: SB079 Equipment Class: (20) Instrumentation and Control Panels and Cabinets (S PROC PROT SYS SB079 9-18 168 SB079 9-18 170 WCAP-17678-NP November 2012 Revision 0 A-363 Status: M N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No.: SB079 Equipment Class: (20) Instrumentation and Control Panels and Cabinets ipment
Description:
RPV LEVEL INSTR SYS PROC PROT SYS I s suse ii a FlUUU- -a 8-U a a M611111 my oomon useum.. no Sao IUEUEWKWEUNNUUUUUUUonuUEEU m SB079 9-18 171 WCAP-17678-NP November 2012 Revision 0 A-364 Status: V] N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No.: SE032 Equipment Class: (20) Instrumentation and Control Panels and Cabinets Equipment
==
Description:==
SOURCE RANGE CHANNEL 2 PREAMP Project: WCNOC SWEL Location (Bldg, Elev, Room/Area):
AUX, 2026.00 ft, 1409 Manufacturer/Model:
Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.
Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchorage 1. Is anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50%of SWEL items requiring such verification)?
No 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?Not Applicable Box is in-line with rigid conduit.3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?
- 4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)
- 6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?
Not Applicable Not Applicable Not Applicable Yes WCAP-1 7678-NP November 2012 Revision 0 A-365 Status: N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No.: SE032 Equipment Class: (20) Instrumentation and Control Panels and Cabinets Equipment
==
Description:==
SOURCE RANGE CHANNEL 2 PREAMP Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?
Yes 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and Yes masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
- 9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? Yes 10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of Yes potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?Other Adverse Conditions
- 11. Have you looked for and found no adverse seismic conditions that could Yes adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?
Comments Per OPs via I&C located in 2JJ067 Evaluated by: Hunter Young Date: 11-15-12-7 .Timothy Nealon 11-15-12 WCAP-17678-NP November 2012 Revision 0 A-366 Status: M N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No.: SE032 Equipment Class: (20) Instrumentation and Control Panels and Cabinets Equipment
==
Description:==
SOURCE RANGE CHANNEL 2 PREAMP Photos SE032 9-20 114 SE032 9-20 115 WCAP-17678-NP November 2012 Revision 0 A-367 Status: Y N G-1 Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No.: SE054B Equipment Class: (20) Instrumentation and Control Panels and Cabinets Equipment
==
Description:==
W NUC INSTM NIS 2 Project: WCNOC SWEL Location (Bldg, Elev, Room/Area):
CTRL, 2047.50 ft, 3605 Manufacturer/Model:
Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.
Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchorage 1. Is anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50%of SWEL items requiring such verification)?
Yes 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?
- 4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)
Anchorage documentation brought in field did not reflect as-installed configuration.
Verify whether as-installed configuration which was as-built in field meets CLB anchorage configuration documentation.
Licensing Basis Evaluation:
As-installed configuration verified per NCR ISN21407EW against Dwg C-0008 (Ref. 22).6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes WCAP- 17678-NP November 2012 Revision 0 A-368 Status: Y N F-]Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No.: SE054B Equipment Class: (20) Instrumentation and Control Panels and Cabinets Equipment
==
Description:==
W NUC INSTM NIS 2 potentially adverse seismic conditions?
Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?
Yes 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and Yes masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
- 9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? Yes 10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of Yes potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?Other Adverse Conditions
- 11. Have you looked for and found no adverse seismic conditions that could Unknown adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?
Cabinet internals could not be accessed during at-power walkdowns.
Internals will be inspected during next bus outage.Top of panel is bolted to adjacent panel SDO55A. Verify whether bolting modification reconciled individual equipment qualification.
Licensing Basis Evaluation:
Condition is analyzed per WCNOC Calc XX-FH-009-002. No adverse seismic concern.Comments WCAP-1 7678-NP November 2012 Revision 0 A-369 Status: Y N -U-Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No.: SE054B Equipment Class: (20) Instrumentation and Control Panels and Cabinets Equipment
==
Description:==
W NUC INSTM NIS 2 Evaluated by: Hunter Young Date: 11-15-12 Timothy Nealon 11-15-12 Photos SE054B 9-18 151 SE054B 9-18 152 WCAP- 17678-NP November 2012 Revision 0 A-370 Status: Y N I-U-]Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No.: SE054B Equipment Class: (20) Instrumentation and Control Panels and Cabinets ioment
Description:
W NUC INSTM NIS 2 SE054B 9-18 153 SE054B 9-18 154 WCAP-1 7678-NP November 2012 Revision 0 A-371 Status: Y N -U-Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No.: SE054B Equipment Class: (20) Instrumentation and Control Panels and Cabinets EauiDment DescriDtion:
W NUC INSTM NIS 2 SEO54B 9-18 158 SEO54B 9-18 159 WCAP-! 7678-NP November 2012 Revision 0 A-372 Status: Y N E---Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No.: SE054B Equipment Class: (20) Instrumentation and Control Panels and Cabinets Enuinment Descrintion:
W NUC INSTM NIS 2 i-'U":ts 9-165 IOU 5t'Utl4b:
U-115 1Ifi WCAP-1 7678-NP November 2012 Revision 0 A-373 Status: Y Nr-]Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No.: SENY061A Equipment Class: (20) Instrumentation and Control Panels and Cabinets Equipment
==
Description:==
EXCORE NEUTRON DETECTOR AMPLIFIER Project: WCNOC SWEL Location (Bldg, Elev, Room/Area):
AUX, 2047.50 ft, UNK Manufacturer/Model:
Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.
Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchorage 1. Is anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50%of SWEL items requiring such verification)?
No 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?
- 4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?Yes Yes Yes 5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)
Not Applicable
- 6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?
Yes WCAP-17678-NP November 2012 Revision 0 A-374 Status: Y NF Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No.: SENY061A Equipment Class: (20) Instrumentation and Control Panels and Cabinets Equipment
==
Description:==
EXCORE NEUTRON DETECTOR AMPLIFIER Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?
Yes 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and Yes masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
- 9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? Yes 10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of Yes potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?Other Adverse Conditions
- 11. Have you looked for and found no adverse seismic conditions that could Unknown adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?
Cabinet internals could not be accessed during at-power walkdowns.
Internals will be inspected during next bus outage.Comments Evaluated by: Hunter Young Date: 11-15-12 Timothy Nealon 11-15-12 WCAP-17678-NP November 2012 Revision 0 A-375 Status: Y NF 70 Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No.: SENY061A Equipment Class: (20) Instrumentation and Control Panels and Cabinets Equipment
==
Description:==
EXCORE NEUTRON DETECTOR AMPLIFIER Photos SENY061A 9-19 408 SRENYORIA q-1Q 4"lq SENY061A 9-19 410)t"NYUO 1A 1-1U 411 WCAP-I 7678-NP November 2012 Revision 0 A-376 Status: Y N Fiii Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No.: SENY061A Equipment Class: (20) Instrumentation and Control Panels and Cabinets EauiDment
==
Description:==
EXCORE NEUTRON DETECTOR AMPLIFIER'-ENY061A 9-19 412 WCAP-17678-NP November 2012 Revision 0 A-377 Status: N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No.: SGG04B Equipment Class: (10) Air Handlers Equipment
==
Description:==
SFP PUMP ROOM COOLER B Project: WCNOC SWEL Location (Bldg, Elev, Room/Area):
FB, 2000.00 ft, 6104 Manufacturer/Model:
Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.
Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchoraqe 1. Is anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50%of SWEL items requiring such verification)?
Yes 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?
Yes Yes Yes 4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)
- 6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?
Yes Yes WCAP-17678-NP November 2012 Revision 0 A-378 Status: N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No.: SGG04B Equipment Class: (10) Air Handlers Equipment
==
Description:==
SFP PUMP ROOM COOLER B Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?
Yes 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and Yes masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
- 9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? Yes Noted drain line flush against insulation.
Since insulation does not have enough stiffness and inherently provides a gap, there is no interaction hazard.10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of Yes potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?Other Adverse Conditions
- 11. Have you looked for and found no adverse seismic conditions that could Yes adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?
Comments Evaluated by: Hunter Young Date: 11-15-12 Timothy Nealon 11-15-12 WCAP-17678-NP November 2012 Revision 0 A-379 Status: N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No.: SGG04B Equipment Class: (10) Air Handlers Equipment
==
Description:==
SFP PUMP ROOM COOLER B Photos SGG04B 9-18 225 SGG04B 9-18 226 WCAP-17678-NP November 2012 Revision 0 A-380 Status: [F] N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No.: SGG04B Equipment Class: (10) Air Handlers Eauinment Descriotion:
SFP PUMP ROOI SGG04B 9-18 227 SGG04B 9-18 228 WCAP- 17678-NP November 2012 Revision 0 A-381 Status: Y N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No.: SGK04B Equipment Class: (10) Air Handlers Equipment
==
Description:==
CONTROL ROOM A/C UNITS Project: WCNOC SWEL Location (Bldg, Elev, Room/Area):
AUX, 2047.50 ft, 1501 Manufacturer/Model:
Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.
Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchorage 1. Is anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50%of SWEL items requiring such verification)?
Yes 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?Yes See Note 5 below. No issue.3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?
Yes 4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?Yes 5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)
Cannot visually identify 2 interior anchor bolts on N side of AHU. Bolts may be covered in concrete.
Action required to verify whether the bolts are present.Licensing Basis Evaluation:
Follow-up walkdown performed by WCNOC revealed the interior anchor bolts installed in accordance with configuration documentation.
Photographs (included below) were reviewed by the SWT and confirmed to be acceptable.
No issue.Yes WCAP-1 7678-NP November 2012 Revision 0 A-382 Status: Y N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No.: SGK04B Equipment Class: (10) Air Handlers Equipment
==
Description:==
CONTROL ROOM A/C UNITS 6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of Yes potentially adverse seismic conditions?
Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?
Yes 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and Yes masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
- 9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? Yes 10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of Yes potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?Other Adverse Conditions
- 11. Have you looked for and found no adverse seismic conditions that could Yes adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?
Comments Evaluated by: Hunter Young Date: 11-15-12 Timothy Nealon 11-15-12 WCAP-17678-NP November 2012 Revision 0 A-383 Status: N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No.: SGK04B Equipment Class: (10) Air Handlers Equipment
==
Description:==
CONTROL ROOM A/C UNITS Photos SGK04B 9-19 396 SGK04B 9-19 397 WCAP-17678-NP November 2012 Revision 0 A-384 Status: [-M N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No.: SGKO4B Equipment Class: (10) Air Handlers Equipment
==
Description:==
CONTROL ROOM A/C UNITS Nt(-JIn I ta .M-'IM A.lMM-1m AmmH~Z ,juu4b t-1u 4UU SIjjU41 U-1u 4U1 WCAP- 17678-NP November 2012 Revision 0 A-385 Status: M N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No.: SGK04B Equipment Class: (10) Air Handlers Equipment
==
Description:==
CONTROL ROOM A/C UNITS-I-SGK04B q-19 402 SRKn4R Q-1q 40A SGK04B east inner bolt.'-;.(4KII.H 1I l1U AlIA SGK04B west inner bolt WCAP- 17678-NP November 2012 Revision 0 A-386 Status: Y N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No.: SGK05B Equipment Class: (10) Air Handlers Equipment
==
Description:==
CLASS IE ELEC. EQUIP. A/C UNIT Project: WCNOC SWEL Location (Bldg, Elev, Room/Area):
CTRL, 2016.00 ft, 3415 Manufacturer/Model:
Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.
Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchorage 1. Is anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50%of SWEL items requiring such verification)?
Yes 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?
Noted moderate surface corrosion of north anchor bolt, but no indication of strength loss from condition.
Therefore there is no adverse seismic concern.SWT alerted WCNOC.4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)
- 6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?
Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes WCAP-17678-NP November 2012 Revision 0 A-387 Status: N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No.: SGK05B Equipment Class: (10) Air Handlers Equipment
==
Description:==
CLASS IE ELEC. EQUIP. A/C UNIT Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?
Yes Minor clearance to chiller assembly but rigid in that direction and also not a soft target. No Issue.8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and Yes masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
- 9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? Yes 10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of Yes potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?Other Adverse Conditions
- 11. Have you looked for and found no adverse seismic conditions that could Yes adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?
SWT noted tubing/piping support mounted off of AHU that does not appear to be included in original equipment qualification (possibly from later modification).
Verify whether modification is documented and AHU equipment qualification reconciliation was addressed.
Licensing Basis Evaluation:
SWT inspected WCNOC DCP #09879, which states that the connecting equipment between the more recently installed condenser and the AHU does not invalidate the individual equipment seismic qualifications and that the qualification of the AHU remains valid. Therefore, no adverse seismic concern.Comments WCAP-17678-NP November 2012 Revision 0 A-388 Status: Y N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No.: SGK05B Equipment Class: (10) Air Handlers Equipment
==
Description:==
CLASS IE ELEC. EQUIP. A/C UNIT Evaluated by: Hunter Young Date: 11-15-12 Timothy Nealon 11-15-12 Photos SGK05B 9-18 069 SGK05B 9-18 070 WCAP- 17678-NP November 2012 Revision 0 A-389 Status: F-Y N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No.: Equipment Class: lPnl iinmant Moerrinfinnl SGK05B (10) Air Handlers CLASS IE ELEC. EQUIP. A/C UNIT SGK05B 9-18 071 SGK05B 9-18 072 SGK05B 9-18 074 SGK05B 9-18 073 WCAP- 17678-NP November 2012 Revision 0 A-390 Status: E-l N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist Equipment ID No.: Equipment Class: Equipment
==
Description:==
SGK05B (10) Air Handlers CLASS IE ELEC. EQUIP. A/C UNIT")UmJz~b ti-It uto'Dur.uOts utla WCAP- 17678-NP November 2012 Revision 0 A-391 Status: M N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No.: SGL09B Equipment Class: (10) Air Handlers Equipment
==
Description:==
ROOM COOLER FOR PEM01B Project: WCNOC SWEL Location (Bldg, Elev, Room/Area):
AUX, 1974.00 ft, 1108 Manufacturer/Model:
Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.
Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchorage 1. Is anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50%of SWEL items requiring such verification)?
- 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?
- 4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)
- 6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?
Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes WCAP-17678-NP November 2012 Revision 0 A-392 Status: N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No.: SGL09B Equipment Class: (10) Air Handlers Equipment
==
Description:==
ROOM COOLER FOR PEM01B Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?
Yes 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and Yes masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
- 9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? Yes 10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of Yes potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?Other Adverse Conditions
- 11. Have you looked for and found no adverse seismic conditions that could Yes adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?
Comments Evaluated by: Hunter Young Date: 11-15-12-Timothy Nealon 11-15-12 WCAP-17678-NP November 2012 Revision 0 A-393 Status: M N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No.: SGL09B Equipment Class: (10) Air Handlers Equipment
==
Description:==
ROOM COOLER FOR PEM01B Photos SGL09B 9-19 028 SGL09B 9-19 029 SGL09B 9-19 030 WCAP- 17678-NP November 2012 WCAP- 17678-NP November 2012 Revision 0 A-394 Status: M N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No.: SGL09B Equipment Class: (10) Air Handlers Equipment
==
Description:==
ROOM COOLER FOR PEM01B M SGL09B 9-19 033 SGL09B 9-19 032 WCAP-17678-NP November 2012 Revision 0 A-395 Status: N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No.: SGL10B Equipment Class: (10) Air Handlers Equipment
==
Description:==
RHR PUMP ROOM COOLER Project: WCNOC SWEL Location (Bldg, Elev, Room/Area):
AUX, 1974.00 ft, 1109 Manufacturer/Model:
Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.
Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchorame 1. Is anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% No of SWEL items requiring such verification)?
- 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?
- 4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?Yes Yes Yes 5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)
Not Applicable
- 6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?
Yes WCAP-17678-NP November 2012 Revision 0 A-396 Status: Y N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No.: SGL10B Equipment Class: (10) Air Handlers Equipment
==
Description:==
RHR PUMP ROOM COOLER Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?
Yes Noted scaffolding adjacent to the component.
Scaffolding is adequately braced and supported to wall. Therefore no interaction concern.8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and Yes masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
- 9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? Yes 10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of Yes potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?Other Adverse Conditions
- 11. Have you looked for and found no adverse seismic conditions that could Yes adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?
Comments Evaluated by: Hunter Young Date: 11-15-12 Timothy Nealon 11-15-12 WCAP-17678-NP November 2012 Revision 0 A-397 Status: N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No.: SGL1OB Equipment Class: (10) Air Handlers Equipment
==
Description:==
RHR PUMP ROOM COOLER Photos SGL10B 9-19 150 SGL10B 9-19 151 WCAP-1 7678-NP November 2012 Revision 0 A-398 Status: M-i N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No.: SGL10B Equipment Class: (10) Air Handlers Equipment
==
Description:==
RHR PUMP ROOM COOLER-1 40 64-T SGL10B 9-19 152 SGL10B 9-19 153 WCAP-I 7678-NP November 2012 WCAP-1 7678-NP November 2012 Revision 0 A-399 Status: MI N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No.: SGL1OB Equipment Class: (10) Air Handlers Equipment
==
Description:==
RHR PUMP ROOM COOLER b5OL1UB 9-19 154 WCAP- 17678-NP November 2012 Revision 0 A-400 Status: [-M N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No.: SGL1OB Equipment Class: (10) Air Handlers Equipment
==
Description:==
RHR PUMP ROOM COOLER SGL10B 9-19 156 WCAP-I 7678-Np November 2012 WCAP-17678-NP November 2012 Revision 0 A-401 Status: N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No.: SGL15B Equipment Class: (10) Air Handlers Equipment
==
Description:==
PENETRATION ROOM COOLER Project: WCNOC SWEL Location (Bldg, Elev, Room/Area):
AUX, 2026.00 ft, 1409 Manufacturer/Model:
Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.
Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchorage 1. Is anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50%of SWEL items requiring such verification)?
Yes 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?
Yes Yes Yes 4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)
SWT is able to identify five out of six anchor bolts. The remaining anchor bolt is inaccessible due to concrete walls and the equipment location.
Given that 83% of the anchorage is visibly confirmed and the remaining bolt is inaccessible without excessively dismantling the equipment, the SVVT concluded that anchorage is adequate.6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?
Yes Yes WCAP-17678-NP November 2012 Revision 0 A-402 Status: Y N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No.: SGL15B Equipment Class: (10) Air Handlers Equipment
==
Description:==
PENETRATION ROOM COOLER Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?
Yes 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and Yes masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
- 9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? Yes 10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of Yes potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?Other Adverse Conditions
- 11. Have you looked for and found no adverse seismic conditions that could Yes adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?
Comments Evaluated by: Hunter Young Date: 11-15-12 Timothy Nealon 11-15-12 WCAP- 17678-NP November 2012 Revision 0 A-403 Status: l N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No.: SGL15B Equipment Class: (10) Air Handlers Equipment
==
Description:==
PENETRATION ROOM COOLER SGL1 5B 9-20 082 SGL15B 9-20 083 WCAP-17678-NP November 2012 Revision 0 A-404 Status: Y] N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No.: SGL15B Equipment Class: (10) Air Handlers EauiDment DescriDtion:
PENETRATION ROOM COOLER SGL15B 9-20 086 WCAP-1 7678-NP November 2012 WCAP- 17678-NP November 2012 Revision 0 A-405 Status: Y N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No.: TEG01B Equipment Class: (21) Tanks and Heat Exchangers Equipment
==
Description:==
CCW SURGE TANK B Project: WCNOC SWEL Location (Bldg, Elev, Room/Area):
AUX, 2047.50 ft, 1502 Manufacturer/Model:
Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.
Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchorage 1. Is anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50%of SWEL items requiring such verification)?
Yes 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?Yes 3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?
Yes 4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?Yes 5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)
Yes 6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?
Yes WCAP-17678-NP November 2012 Revision 0 A-406 Status: N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No.: TEG01B Equipment Class: (21) Tanks and Heat Exchangers Equipment
==
Description:==
CCW SURGE TANK B Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?
Yes See Note 11 below regarding scaffolding.
No hazards.8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and Yes masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
- 9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? Yes 10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of Yes potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?Other Adverse Conditions
- 11. Have you looked for and found no adverse seismic conditions that could Yes adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?
SWT observed scaffolding in zone of influence of the tank soft targets (site glass) with no bracing or wall anchorage at top bay (3 bays total). Members appear suitable to withstand moment so as to preclude collapse, but verification is required from scaffolding documentation on site. Also, scaffolding is braced to tank legs. While the tank legs and anchorage appear adequate to withstand relatively light added scaffold lateral load, verification is required to confirm equipment qualification for tank was reconciled.
Licensing Basis Evaluation:
SWT received WCNOC Scaffolding Evaluation (Scaffold Request # 12-SO189, Work Order # 11-345393) that validates scaffold installation in accordance with procedure.
SWT concludes from engineering judgment that scaffolding is acceptable given negligible additional loading due to SSE on rugged tank legs.WCAP-17678-NP November 2012 Revision 0 A-407 Status: N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No.: TEG01B Equipment Class: (21) Tanks and Heat Exchangers Equipment
==
Description:==
CCW SURGE TANK B Comments Evaluated by: Hunter Young Date: 11-15-12 Timothy Nealon 11-15-12 Photos TEGO1 B 9-19 445 WCAP-17678-NP November 2012 Revision 0 A-408 Status: Y] N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No.: TEG01B Equipment Class: (21) Tanks and Heat Exchangers iipment
Description:
CCW SURGE TANK B B ;i TEGO1B 9-19 447 TEG01B 9-19 448 TEGO1B 9-19 449 TEG01B 9-19 450 WCAP-17678-NP November 2012 Revision 0 A-409 Status: M N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No.: TEG01B Equipment Class: (21) Tanks and Heat Exchangers Eauioment Descnotion:
CCW SURGE TANK B I EU01B 9-19 451 WCAP- 17678-NP November 2012 Revision 0 A-410 Status: M N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No.: TJE02B Equipment Class: (21) Tanks and Heat Exchangers Equipment
==
Description:==
EMERGENCY FUEL OIL DAY TANK Project: WCNOC SWEL Location (Bldg, Elev, Room/Area):
DGB, 2032.00 ft, 5201 Manufacturer/Model:
Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.
Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchorage 1. Is anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50%of SWEL items requiring such verification)?
No 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?
- 4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?Yes Yes Yes 5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)
Not Applicable
- 6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?
Yes WCAP- 17678-NP November 2012 Revision 0 A-41 1 Status: N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No.: TJE02B Equipment Class: (21) Tanks and Heat Exchangers Equipment
==
Description:==
EMERGENCY FUEL OIL DAY TANK Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?
Yes 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and Yes masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
- 9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? Yes 10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of Yes potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?Other Adverse Conditions
- 11. Have you looked for and found no adverse seismic conditions that could Yes adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?
Comments Evaluated by: Hunter Young Date: 11-15-12 Timothy Nealon 11-15-12 WCAP-17678-NP November 2012 Revision 0 A-412 Status: M N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No.: TJE02B Equipment Class: (21) Tanks and Heat Exchangers Equipment
==
Description:==
EMERGENCY FUEL OIL DAY TANK Photos TJE02B 9-17 037 TJE02B 9-17 038 WCAP-17678-NP November 2012 Revision 0 A-4 13 Status: M N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No.: TJE02B Equipment Class: (21) Tanks and Heat Exchangers Equipment
==
Description:==
EMERGENCY FUEL OIL DAY T, TJEO2B 9-17 039 TJEO2B 9-17 040 TJE02B 9-17 041 WCAP-17678-NP November 2012 Revision 0 A-414 Status: 7 N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No.: TKA04 Equipment Class: (21) Tanks and Heat Exchangers Equipment
==
Description:==
AFW CTRL/MAIN STEAM ARV ACCUM Project: WCNOC SWEL Location (Bldg, Elev, Room/Area):
AUX, 2000.00 ft, 1305 Manufacturer/Model:
Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.
Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchorage 1. Is anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% No of SWEL items requiring such verification)?
- 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?
- 4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?Yes Yes Yes 5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)
- 6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?
Not Applicable Yes WCAP-17678-NP November 2012 Revision 0 A-415 Status: N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No.: TKA04 Equipment Class: (21) Tanks and Heat Exchangers Equipment
==
Description:==
AFW CTRL/MAIN STEAM ARV ACCUM Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?
Yes 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and Yes masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
- 9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? Yes 10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of Yes potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?Other Adverse Conditions
- 11. Have you looked for and found no adverse seismic conditions that could Yes adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?
Comments Evaluated by: Hunter Young Date: 11-15-12 Timothy Nealon 11-15-12 WCAP- 17678-NP November 2012 Revision 0 A-416 Status: M N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No.: TKA04 Equipment Class: (21) Tanks and Heat Exchangers Equipment
==
Description:==
AFW CTRL/MAIN STEAM ARV ACCUM Photos TKA04 9-19 341 TKA04 9-19 342 WCAP-17678-NP November 2012 Revision 0 A-417 Status: Y] N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No.: TKA04 Equipment Class: (21) Tanks and Heat Exchangers Equipment
==
Description:==
AFW CTRL/MAIN STEAM ARV ACCUM TKA04 9-19 343 TKA04 9-19 346 WCAP- 17678-NP November 2012 WCAP- 17678-NP November 2012 Revision 0 A-418 Status: N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No.: TKJ01B Equipment Class: (21) Tanks and Heat Exchangers Equipment
==
Description:==
DIG B JACKET WATER EXPANSION TANK Project: WCNOC SWEL Location (Bldg, Elev, Room/Area):
DGB, 2032.00 ft, 5201 Manufacturer/Model:
Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.
Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchorage 1. Is anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% Yes of SWEL items requiring such verification)?
- 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?
Yes Yes 4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)
- 6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?
Not Applicable Yes Yes WCAP-17678-NP November 2012 Revision 0 A-419 Status: N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No.: TKJO1B Equipment Class: (21) Tanks and Heat Exchangers Equipment
==
Description:==
DIG B JACKET WATER EXPANSION TANK Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?
Yes 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and Yes masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
- 9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? Yes 10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of Yes potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?Other Adverse Conditions
- 11. Have you looked for and found no adverse seismic conditions that could Yes adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?
Comments Evaluated by: Hunter Young Date: 11-15-12 Timothy Nealon 11-15-12 WCAP-17678-NP November 2012 Revision 0 A-420 Status: f-Yl N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No.: TKJ01B Equipment Class: (21) Tanks and Heat Exchangers Equipment
==
Description:==
DIG B JACKET WATER EXPANSION TANK Photos TKJO1B 9-17 042 TKJO1B 9-17 043 WCAP- 17678-NP November 2012 Revision 0 A-421 Status: M N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No.: Equipment Class: iDment
Description:
TKJO1B (21) Tanks and Heat Exchangers TKJO1B 9-17 044 TKJO1B 9-17 045 WCAP-17678-NP November 2012 Revision 0 A-422 Status: [] N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No.: TKJO1B Equipment Class: (21) Tanks and Heat Exchangers Eauinment Descrintion:
DIG B JACKET WATER EXPANS TKJO1B 9-17 046 TKJ01B 9-17 047 WCAP-1 7678-NP November 2012 Revision 0 A-423 Status: N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No.: TKJ02C Equipment Class: (21) Tanks and Heat Exchangers Equipment
==
Description:==
START AIR TANK DIG Project: WCNOC SWEL Location (Bldg, Elev, Room/Area):
DGB, 2032.00 ft, 5201 Manufacturer/Model:
Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.
Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchorage 1. Is anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50%of SWEL items requiring such verification)?
Yes 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?
Yes Yes Yes 4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)
- 6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?
Yes Yes WCAP-17678-NP November 2012 Revision 0 A-424 Status: N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No.: TKJ02C Equipment Class: (21) Tanks and Heat Exchangers Equipment
==
Description:==
START AIR TANK D/G Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?
Yes Noted 1/4" clearance between skid and flexible drain line of tank. WCNOC Systems indicated pipe has no safety function.
Furthermore, small chatter would not damage the drain line. Therefore there is no adverse seismic concern.8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and Yes masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
- 9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? Yes 10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of Yes potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?Other Adverse Conditions
- 11. Have you looked for and found no adverse seismic conditions that could Yes adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?
Comments Evaluated by: Hunter Young Date: 11-15-12 Timothy Nealon 11-15-12 WCAP-17678-NP November 2012 Revision 0 A-425 Status: M N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No.: TKJ02C Equipment Class: (21) Tanks and Heat Exchangers Equipment
==
Description:==
START AIR TANK D/G Photos WCAP-17678-NP November 2012 Revision 0 A-426 Status: M N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No.: TKJ02C Equipment Class: (21) Tanks and Heat Exchangers I KJUZU U1-1 I Ul10 TKJ02C 9-17 015 TKJ02C 9-17 017 TKJ02C 9-17 018 WCAP-I 7678-NP November 2012 Revision 0 A-427 Status: Ml N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No.: TKJ02C Equipment Class: (21) Tanks and Heat Exchangers Eauioment
==
Description:==
START AIR TANK DIG TKJ02C 9-17 020 TKJ02C 9-17 019 WCAP-17678-NP November 2012 Revision 0 A-428 Status: M N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No.: TKJ02C Equipment Class: (21) Tanks and Heat Exchangers EauiDment
==
Description:==
START AIR TANK DIG WCAP-17678-NP November 2012 Revision 0 A-429 Status: M N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No.: TKJ04B Equipment Class: (21) Tanks and Heat Exchangers Equipment
==
Description:==
DIG B AUX LUBE OIL TANK Project: WCNOC SWEL Location (Bldg, Elev, Room/Area):
DGB, 2032.00 ft, 5201 Manufacturer/Model:
Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.
Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchorage 1. Is anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50%of SWEL items requiring such verification)?
- 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?
- 4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)
- 6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?
Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes WCAP-17678-NP November 2012 Revision 0 A-430 Status: N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No.: TKJ04B Equipment Class: (21) Tanks and Heat Exchangers Equipment
==
Description:==
D/G B AUX LUBE OIL TANK Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?
Yes 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and Yes masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
- 9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? Yes 10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of Yes potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?Other Adverse Conditions
- 11. Have you looked for and found no adverse seismic conditions that could Yes adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?
Comments Evaluated by:: Hunter Young Date: 11-15-12" -- Timothy Nealon 11-15-12 WCAP-17678-NP November 2012 Revision 0 A-431 Status: N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No.: TKJ04B Equipment Class: (21) Tanks and Heat Exchangers Equipment
==
Description:==
DIG B AUX LUBE OIL TANK Photos TKJ04B 9-17 050 TKJ04B 9-17 051 WCAP- 17678-NP November 2012 Revision 0 A-432 Status: N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No.: XNG02 Equipment Class: (4) Transformers Equipment
==
Description:==
CLASS 1E LOAD CENTER TRANSFORMER Project: WCNOC SWEL Location (Bldg, Elev, Room/Area):
CTRL, 2000.00 ft, 3302 Manufacturer/Model:
Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.
Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchorage 1. Is anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50%of SWEL items requiring such verification)?.
No 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?
- 4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?Yes Yes Yes 5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)
Not Applicable
- 6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?
Yes WCAP-17678-NP November 2012 Revision 0 A-433 Status: N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No.: XNG02 Equipment Class: (4) Transformers Equipment
==
Description:==
CLASS 1E LOAD CENTER TRANSFORMER Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?
Yes XNG02 and NGO02 are visually confirmed to be bolted together.
Therefore there is no equipment chattering concern.The SWT also noted a light fixture in close proximity with a partially open S-hook. Given depth of S-hook and that it is not open enough to allow light to fall under SSE excitation, there is no adverse seismic concern.8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and Yes masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
See Note 7 above. No hazard.9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? Yes 10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of Yes potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?Other Adverse Conditions
- 11. Have you looked for and found no adverse seismic conditions that could Yes adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?
SWT observed bolting from XNG02 to adjacent and flush cabinet NGO02.While it was confirmed that adequate bolting was provided to preclude chatter, one bolt hole was noted to be empty without a bolt. Verify whether bolt is required from configuration documentation.
Licensing Basis Evaluation:
The SWT concluded that the presence of bolting is not required to preclude seismic chatter; therefore no adverse seismic condition.
Comments WCAP-17678-NP November 2012 Revision 0 A-434 Status: N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No.: XNG02 Equipment Class: (4) Transformers Equipment
==
Description:==
CLASS 1E LOAD CENTER TRANSFORMER Evaluated by: Hunter Young Date: 11-15-12 Timothy Nealon 11-15-12 Photos XNG02 9-18 046 XNG02 9-18 047 WCAP-1 7678-NP November 2012 Revision 0 A.435 Status: MI N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No.: XNG02 Equipment Class: (4) Transformers Equipment
==
Description:==
CLASS 1E LOAD CENTER TRANSFORMER XNG02 9-18 048 WCAP- 17678-NP November 2012 Revision 0 A-436 Status: r N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No.: XNG02 Equipment Class: (4) Transformers EauiDment DescriDtion:
CLASS 1 E LOADVJ- 15 UDU XNG02 9-18 051 XNG02 9-18 052 XNG02 9-18 053 WCAP- 17678-NP November 2012 Revision 0 A-437 Status: Y- ]N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No.: XNG06 Equipment Class: (4) Transformers Equipment
==
Description:==
FEEDS MCC NG06E Project: WCNOC SWEL Location (Bldg, Elev, Room/Area):
ESW, -9999.00 ft, UNK Manufacturer/Model:
Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.
Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchorage 1. Is anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50%of SWEL items requiring such verification)?
Yes 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?Supplier document indicates base channels are with 8 holes for plug welding.Although plug welds are grinded flush and painted SW- confirmed that holes have been filled and plug welds are present.3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?
- 4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)
The supplier document calls for base channels welded to embeds with 8 no.plug welds. Although plug welds are grinded flush and painted, the SWT confirmed that holes have been filled on the vendor supplied base channels;therefore plug welds are present and the anchorage is acceptable.
- 6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?
Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes WCAP-17678-NP November 2012 Revision 0 A-438 Status: N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No.: XNG06 Equipment Class: (4) Transformers Equipment
==
Description:==
FEEDS MCC NG06E Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?
Yes 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and Yes masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
- 9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? Yes 10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of Yes potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?Other Adverse Conditions
- 11. Have you looked for and found no adverse seismic conditions that could Yes adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?
Comments Evaluated by: Hunter Young Date: 11-15-12 Timothy Nealon 11-15-12 WCAP-17678-NP November 2012 Revision 0 A-439 Status: M N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No.: XNG06 Equipment Class: (4) Transformers Equipment
==
Description:==
FEEDS MCC NG06E Photos XNG06 9-17 123 XNG06 9-17 124 WCAP-17678-NP November 2012 Revision 0 A-440 Status: M N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No.: XNG06 Equipment Class: (4) Transformers Eauioment
==
Description:==
FEEDS MCC NG ANIUMU :-1 f 1UO XNG06 9-17 126 XNG06 9-17 127 XNG06 9-17 128 WCAP-17678-NP November 2012 Revision 0