ML20004C281: Difference between revisions

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(StriderTol Bot change)
(StriderTol Bot change)
 
Line 17: Line 17:


=Text=
=Text=
{{#Wiki_filter:.          .  . _ _ _ - - .
{{#Wiki_filter:Chorus M. H oxe l
l        6    Chorus M. H oxe
6
' e     st     v4e Ns etet E.4rce .r; cno Osrs:r.cr.cn                                                             :
' e st v4e Ns etet E.4rce.r; cno Osrs:r.cr.cn Attachm:nt 3
Attachm:nt 3 Cil                                                                                           . ,
' Cil
* w.wv4 e
* rw W:Wanns r
r rw W:Wanns I v ,me:s January 9, 1974 Mr. A. Braitman, Chief Office of Anti-Trust and Indemnity Directorate of Licensing i               U. S. Atomic Energy Commission Washington, D.C.             20545                                 i Re:       Anti-Trust Filina for Enrico Fermi Unit No. 3 i
w.wv4 I v,me:s e
January 9, 1974 Mr. A. Braitman, Chief Office of Anti-Trust and Indemnity Directorate of Licensing i
U. S. Atomic Energy Commission Washington, D.C.
20545 i
Re:
Anti-Trust Filina for Enrico Fermi Unit No. 3


==Dear Mr. Braitman:==
==Dear Mr. Braitman:==
o l
i o
Enclosed are five copies of Information Request'eu by l
l Enclosed are five copies of Information Request'eu by l
l the Attorney General for Anti-Trust Review of Facility License Applications as prepared for the Enrico' Fermi Unit No. 3. Preparation of this Anti-Trust Filing was initiated in response to a telephone call from your office to W. J. McCarthy, Jr. on October 30, 1973 requesting an early, informal, five-copy filing to assist in reducing the anticipated spring peak in the Department of Justice review process. During prepara-tion of this filing, on December lo, 1973, a letter was sent from J. F. O' Leary, Director of Licensing, to W.
l the Attorney General for Anti-Trust Review of Facility License Applications as prepared for the Enrico' Fermi Unit No. 3.
l
Preparation of this Anti-Trust Filing was initiated in response to a telephone call from your office to W. J. McCarthy, Jr. on October 30, 1973 requesting an early, informal, five-copy filing to assist in reducing the anticipated spring peak in the Department of Justice review process.
During prepara-tion of this filing, on December lo, 1973, a letter was sent from J. F. O' Leary, Director of Licensing, to W.
)
)
G. Meese, President, The Detroit Edison Company, requesting that Anti-Trust Filings be made nine menths                   prior to Obviously, since application for the Construction Permit.
G. Meese, President, The Detroit Edison Company, requesting l
we intend to submit application for the. Unit 3 Construction Permit during April, 1974, it will not be possible                       to ful-fill that request for this particular filing.                     However, we will comply with this request on any future nuclear units.
that Anti-Trust Filings be made nine menths prior to application for the Construction Permit.
The last submittal of this Anti-Trust Information by The Detroit Edison Ccmpany was for the Greenwood Energy Center, Units 2 and 3 (Construction Permit Application submitted June 4, 1973, and docketed September 17, 1973, under Docket Nus. 50-452 and 50-453). There           A have been few summary of changes changes since the Greenwood filing.                                   filing.
Obviously, since we intend to submit application for the. Unit 3 Construction Permit during April, 1974, it will not be possible to ful-fill that request for this particular filing.
However, we will comply with this request on any future nuclear units.
The last submittal of this Anti-Trust Information by The Detroit Edison Ccmpany was for the Greenwood Energy Center, Units 2 and 3 (Construction Permit Application submitted June 4, 1973, and docketed September 17, 1973, under Docket Nus. 50-452 and 50-453).
There have been few changes since the Greenwood filing.
A summary of changes filing.
appears below to facilitate review of the current The introduction and responses to Questions 4, 5, 6, 7, 11, 14, 16, 17, 18 and 19 remain unchanged.
appears below to facilitate review of the current The introduction and responses to Questions 4, 5, 6, 7, 11, 14, 16, 17, 18 and 19 remain unchanged.
l l                                                 ,
l l
l 8106020 %
l 8106020 %


e- -
e-a.'
  . a.'               .
Attactinent 3 d
Attactinent 3 d
e I
I e
4 Mr. A. Braitman
4 Mr. A. Braitman January 9,
* January 9,               .1974 Page Two An actual peak load replaces the forecasted peak load for the summer of 1973. Although the forecasted peak loads for Detroit Edison for the period 1974 through 1983 are still the same, the effect of the higher than anticipated 1973 peak load was to drop the average annual projected growth rate from 7.2% to 6.4% (Table 2). A similar effect shows up in Table 3 which is a projecticn for the combined Detroit Edison and Consumers Power systems.
.1974 Page Two An actual peak load replaces the forecasted peak load for the summer of 1973.
Table 1-2 shows a reduction in " Total owned Capability" of apprcximately 250 MW and a reduction in accredited                                                                                       rating of existing units of an additional 250 MW. Also the addition of Belle River Units 1 and 2 in 1979 and 1980, respectively, allowed for* the slippage of Greenwood 2, Fermi 3, and Greenwood 3, as shown in Tables 1-2 and 1-3.
Although the forecasted peak loads for Detroit Edison for the period 1974 through the effect of the higher than 1983 are still the same, anticipated 1973 peak load was to drop the average annual A
The answer to question 8 contains three changes. The Consumers Power - Detroit Edison - Indiana and Michigan Electric Company agreement now incorporates Amendment No.                                                                                     1973,          5, filed with the Federal Power Commission on December 4, Docket E8538, Notice of Amendment to Agreement dated December 13, 1973. The Consumers Power - Detroit Edison -
projected growth rate from 7.2% to 6.4% (Table 2).
Hydro-Electric Power of Ontario Agreement was amended with an August 13, 1973 filing date and                                                                     was accepted for filing 16, 1973. The third change under Docket E8364 on November is the mention of a letter of termination to the 1973                                                             Fordwhereby          Motor Company from Detroit Edison dated December                                                                           December          19, Detroit 31, agreement with Ford will terminate on midnight, 1974.
similar effect shows up in Table 3 which is a projecticn for the combined Detroit Edison and Consumers Power systems.
l Answers to questions 9, 10 and 13 were changed to reflect l
Table 1-2 shows a reduction in " Total owned Capability" of apprcximately 250 MW and a reduction in accredited rating of existing units of an additional 250 MW.
the new interconnection with the Village ofThe                                                              Sebewaing answer to which went        into service         on               November                                     15, 1973.
Also the addition of Belle River Units 1 and 2 in 1979 and 1980, respectively, allowed for* the slippage of Greenwood 2, Fermi 3, and Greenwood 3, as shown in Tables 1-2 and 1-3.
question 13 was also expanded to include the new inter-connection with Thumb Electric at their Urban Station.
The The answer to question 8 contains three changes.
Consumers Power - Detroit Edison - Indiana and Michigan Electric Company agreement now incorporates Amendment No. 5,
: 1973, filed with the Federal Power Commission on December 4, Docket E8538, Notice of Amendment to Agreement dated December 13, 1973.
The Consumers Power - Detroit Edison -
Hydro-Electric Power of Ontario Agreement was amended with an August 13, 1973 filing date and was accepted for filing 16, 1973.
The third change under Docket E8364 on November is the mention of a letter of termination to the Ford Motor 1973 whereby Company from Detroit Edison dated December 19, Detroit December 31, agreement with Ford will terminate on midnight, 1974.
Answers to questions 9, 10 and 13 were changed to reflect l
l the new interconnection with the Village of Sebewaing which into service on November 15, 1973.
The answer to went question 13 was also expanded to include the new inter-connection with Thumb Electric at their Urban Station.
Answers to questions 15 and 20 were changed to reflect the latest Detroit Edison rates.
Answers to questions 15 and 20 were changed to reflect the latest Detroit Edison rates.
Attachment II,          1982 transmission map was changed to reflect the addition of Belle River Units 1 and 2.
1982 transmission map was changed to reflect Attachment II, the addition of Belle River Units 1 and 2.
l I
l I


u
u L
  '                                                                      Attachment 3 L                             .
Mr. A. Braitman January 9, 1974 Page Three The capacity changes described in Tables 1-2 and 1-3 reflect a change in the scheduled initial operation of Greenwood Unit 3 frem sum.mer 1981 to summer 1962.
Mr. A. Braitman                                                   .
January 9, 1974 Page Three The capacity changes described in Tables 1-2 and 1-3 reflect a change in the scheduled initial operation of Greenwood Unit 3 frem sum.mer 1981 to summer 1962.
Very truly yours, C. M. Heidel
Very truly yours, C. M. Heidel
:mmt Enclosures cc:   G. L. Ball E. M. Bensen R. L. DeMumbrum A. K. Falk P. A. Marquardt J. B. Nims l
:mmt Enclosures cc:
G. L. Ball E. M. Bensen R. L. DeMumbrum A. K. Falk P. A. Marquardt J. B. Nims l
{
{
l
l
                            ,          ,            _}}
'""?
W'
+'vt e-
_}}

Latest revision as of 11:27, 23 December 2024

Forwards Info in Response to Atty General 731030 Request Re Antitrust Review.Introduction & Responses to Questions 4,5, 6,7,11,14,16,17,18 & 19,dtd 730917,remain Unchanged
ML20004C281
Person / Time
Site: Fermi DTE Energy icon.png
Issue date: 01/09/1974
From: Heidel C
DETROIT EDISON CO.
To: Braitman A
US ATOMIC ENERGY COMMISSION (AEC)
Shared Package
ML20004C270 List:
References
NUDOCS 8106020485
Download: ML20004C281 (3)
v • d • e


Text

Chorus M. H oxe l

6

' e st v4e Ns etet E.4rce.r; cno Osrs:r.cr.cn Attachm:nt 3

' Cil

  • rw W:Wanns r

w.wv4 I v,me:s e

January 9, 1974 Mr. A. Braitman, Chief Office of Anti-Trust and Indemnity Directorate of Licensing i

U. S. Atomic Energy Commission Washington, D.C.

20545 i

Re:

Anti-Trust Filina for Enrico Fermi Unit No. 3

Dear Mr. Braitman:

i o

l Enclosed are five copies of Information Request'eu by l

l the Attorney General for Anti-Trust Review of Facility License Applications as prepared for the Enrico' Fermi Unit No. 3.

Preparation of this Anti-Trust Filing was initiated in response to a telephone call from your office to W. J. McCarthy, Jr. on October 30, 1973 requesting an early, informal, five-copy filing to assist in reducing the anticipated spring peak in the Department of Justice review process.

During prepara-tion of this filing, on December lo, 1973, a letter was sent from J. F. O' Leary, Director of Licensing, to W.

)

G. Meese, President, The Detroit Edison Company, requesting l

that Anti-Trust Filings be made nine menths prior to application for the Construction Permit.

Obviously, since we intend to submit application for the. Unit 3 Construction Permit during April, 1974, it will not be possible to ful-fill that request for this particular filing.

However, we will comply with this request on any future nuclear units.

The last submittal of this Anti-Trust Information by The Detroit Edison Ccmpany was for the Greenwood Energy Center, Units 2 and 3 (Construction Permit Application submitted June 4, 1973, and docketed September 17, 1973, under Docket Nus. 50-452 and 50-453).

There have been few changes since the Greenwood filing.

A summary of changes filing.

appears below to facilitate review of the current The introduction and responses to Questions 4, 5, 6, 7, 11, 14, 16, 17, 18 and 19 remain unchanged.

l l

l 8106020 %

e-a.'

Attactinent 3 d

I e

4 Mr. A. Braitman January 9,

.1974 Page Two An actual peak load replaces the forecasted peak load for the summer of 1973.

Although the forecasted peak loads for Detroit Edison for the period 1974 through the effect of the higher than 1983 are still the same, anticipated 1973 peak load was to drop the average annual A

projected growth rate from 7.2% to 6.4% (Table 2).

similar effect shows up in Table 3 which is a projecticn for the combined Detroit Edison and Consumers Power systems.

Table 1-2 shows a reduction in " Total owned Capability" of apprcximately 250 MW and a reduction in accredited rating of existing units of an additional 250 MW.

Also the addition of Belle River Units 1 and 2 in 1979 and 1980, respectively, allowed for* the slippage of Greenwood 2, Fermi 3, and Greenwood 3, as shown in Tables 1-2 and 1-3.

The The answer to question 8 contains three changes.

Consumers Power - Detroit Edison - Indiana and Michigan Electric Company agreement now incorporates Amendment No. 5,

1973, filed with the Federal Power Commission on December 4, Docket E8538, Notice of Amendment to Agreement dated December 13, 1973.

The Consumers Power - Detroit Edison -

Hydro-Electric Power of Ontario Agreement was amended with an August 13, 1973 filing date and was accepted for filing 16, 1973.

The third change under Docket E8364 on November is the mention of a letter of termination to the Ford Motor 1973 whereby Company from Detroit Edison dated December 19, Detroit December 31, agreement with Ford will terminate on midnight, 1974.

Answers to questions 9, 10 and 13 were changed to reflect l

l the new interconnection with the Village of Sebewaing which into service on November 15, 1973.

The answer to went question 13 was also expanded to include the new inter-connection with Thumb Electric at their Urban Station.

Answers to questions 15 and 20 were changed to reflect the latest Detroit Edison rates.

1982 transmission map was changed to reflect Attachment II, the addition of Belle River Units 1 and 2.

l I

u L

Mr. A. Braitman January 9, 1974 Page Three The capacity changes described in Tables 1-2 and 1-3 reflect a change in the scheduled initial operation of Greenwood Unit 3 frem sum.mer 1981 to summer 1962.

Very truly yours, C. M. Heidel

mmt Enclosures cc:

G. L. Ball E. M. Bensen R. L. DeMumbrum A. K. Falk P. A. Marquardt J. B. Nims l

{

l

'""?

W'

+'vt e-

_

Retrieved from "https://kanterella.com/w/index.php?title=ML20004C281&oldid=4674055"