ML17228A965: Difference between revisions
StriderTol (talk | contribs) (Created page by program invented by StriderTol) |
StriderTol (talk | contribs) (Created page by program invented by StriderTol) |
||
Line 14: | Line 14: | ||
| page count = 6 | | page count = 6 | ||
}} | }} | ||
=Text= | =Text= | ||
{{#Wiki_filter:PRIORI I Y Z REGULRTOR5 | {{#Wiki_filter:PRIORI I Y Z REGULRTOR5 f&515QFYMSSDRhMETYON SYSTEM (RYDS)It ACCESSION NBR:9412280229 DOC.DATE: 94/12/20 NOTARIZED: | ||
f&515QFYMSSDRhMETYON | NO FACIL:50-335 St.Lucie Plant, Unit 1, Florida Power&Light Co.~~~~~~AUTH.NAME AUTHOR AFFILIATION | ||
SYSTEM (RYDS)It ACCESSION NBR:9412280229 | |||
DOC.DATE: 94/12/20 NOTARIZED: | |||
NO FACIL:50-335 | |||
St.Lucie Plant, Unit 1, Florida Power&Light Co.~~~~~~AUTH.NAME AUTHOR AFFILIATION | |||
'OLDBERG,J.H. | 'OLDBERG,J.H. | ||
Florida Power&Light Co.RECIP.NAME | Florida Power&Light Co.RECIP.NAME RECIPIENT AFFILIATION Document Control Branch (Document Control Desk) | ||
RECIPIENT AFFILIATION | |||
Document Control Branch (Document Control Desk)SUBJECT: Responds to violations | ==SUBJECT:== | ||
noted in insp rept 50-335/94-22 | Responds to violations noted in insp rept 50-335/94-22 per 10CFR2.201.Corrective actions:on 940830,normal electrical configuration establ,ished | ||
per 10CFR2.201.Corrective | &lA EDG declared operable.DISTRIBUTION CODE: IE01D COPIES RECEIVED:LTR ENCL SIZE: TITLE: General (50 Dkt)-Insp Rept/Notice of Violation Response NOTES: DOCKET I 05000335 P R 0 RECIPIENT ID CODE/NAME PD2-2 PD INTERNAL: ACRS AEOD/SPD/RAB AEOD/TTC~FXL1."CEMENTER 02 NRR/DRCH/HHFB NUDOCS-ABSTRACT OGC/HDS3 ERNAL: LITCO BRYCEFJ H NRC PDR COPIES LTTR ENCL 1 1 2 2 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1, 1 1 1 1 1 RECIPIENT ID CODE/NAME NORRIS,J AEOD/DEIB AEOD/SPD/RRAB DEDRO NRR/DORS/OEAB NRR/PMAS/IRCB-E OE DIR RGN2 FILE 01 NOAC COPIES LTTR ENCL 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1'1 1 D 0 U M N iNOTE TO ALL"Rl DS" RECIPIEi~: | ||
actions:on | PLEASE HELP US TO REDUCE iVASTE!COYTACT THE DOCL'MEi'T COYTROL DESK.ROOM PI-37 (EXT.SN-20S3)TO ELIM I YATE YOUR YAM E FROi!DIS'!'RIBL"I'IOY. | ||
940830,normal | LISTS FOR DOCUWIEYTS YOU DON"I 5 LED!TOTAL NUMBER OF COPIES REQUIRED: LTTR 20 ENCL 20 Florida Powor 5 Light Company, P.O.Box 14000, Juno Beach, FL 33408-0420 t FPL DEC 2 0 1990 L-94-314 10 CFR 2.201 U.S.Nuclear Regulatory Commission Attn: Document Control Desk Washington, D.C.20555 Re: St.Lucie Unit 1 Docket No.50-335 Reply to Notice of Violation Ins ection Re ort 94-22 Florida Power and Light Company (FPL)has reviewed the subject inspection report and pursuant to 10 CFR 2.201 the response to the notice of violation is attached.Very truly yours, J.H.Goldberg President-Nuclear Division JHG/DAS/JWH Attachment cc: Stewart D.Ebneter, Regional Administrator, USNRC Region II Senior Resident Inspector, USNRC, St.Lucie Plant t 9412280229 94i220 PDR ADOCK 05000335 PDR an FPL Group company St.Lucie Unit 1 Docket No.50-335 Reply to Notice of Violation'ns ection Re ort 94-22 VIOLATION A: 10 CFR 50, Appendix B, Criterion XVI, Corrective Action, as implemented by approved FPL Topical Quality Assurance Report, TQR 16.0 revision 8,"Corrective Action," requires that measures be established to assure that conditions adverse to quality be promptly identified and corrected. | ||
electrical | Contrary to the above, on August 29, 1994, the licensee's corrective action for a previous NRC violation were inadequate in that they failed to prevent operation of the unit with an electrical plant configuration for which Technical Specification required surveillance testing had not been performed. | ||
configuration | |||
establ,ished | |||
&lA EDG declared operable.DISTRIBUTION | |||
CODE: IE01D COPIES RECEIVED:LTR | |||
ENCL SIZE: TITLE: General (50 Dkt)-Insp Rept/Notice | |||
of Violation Response NOTES: DOCKET I 05000335 P R 0 RECIPIENT ID CODE/NAME PD2-2 PD INTERNAL: ACRS AEOD/SPD/RAB | |||
AEOD/TTC~FXL1."CEMENTER 02 NRR/DRCH/HHFB | |||
NUDOCS-ABSTRACT | |||
OGC/HDS3 ERNAL: LITCO BRYCEFJ H NRC PDR COPIES LTTR ENCL 1 1 2 2 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1, 1 1 1 1 1 RECIPIENT ID CODE/NAME NORRIS,J AEOD/DEIB AEOD/SPD/RRAB | |||
DEDRO NRR/DORS/OEAB | |||
NRR/PMAS/IRCB-E | |||
OE DIR RGN2 FILE 01 NOAC COPIES LTTR ENCL 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1'1 1 D 0 U M N iNOTE TO ALL"Rl DS" RECIPIEi~: | |||
PLEASE HELP US TO REDUCE iVASTE!COYTACT THE DOCL'MEi'T | |||
COYTROL DESK.ROOM PI-37 (EXT.SN-20S3)TO ELIM I YATE YOUR YAM E FROi!DIS'!'RIBL"I'IOY. | |||
LISTS FOR DOCUWIEYTS | |||
YOU DON"I 5 LED!TOTAL NUMBER OF COPIES REQUIRED: LTTR 20 ENCL 20 | |||
Florida Powor 5 Light Company, P.O.Box 14000, Juno Beach, FL 33408-0420 | |||
t FPL DEC 2 0 1990 L-94-314 10 CFR 2.201 U.S.Nuclear Regulatory | |||
Commission | |||
Attn: Document Control Desk Washington, D.C.20555 Re: St.Lucie Unit 1 Docket No.50-335 Reply to Notice of Violation Ins ection Re ort 94-22 Florida Power and Light Company (FPL)has reviewed the subject inspection | |||
report and pursuant to 10 CFR 2.201 the response to the notice of violation is attached.Very truly yours, J.H.Goldberg President-Nuclear Division JHG/DAS/JWH | |||
Attachment | |||
cc: Stewart D.Ebneter, Regional Administrator, USNRC Region II Senior Resident Inspector, USNRC, St.Lucie Plant t 9412280229 | |||
94i220 PDR ADOCK 05000335 PDR an FPL Group company | |||
St.Lucie Unit 1 Docket No.50-335 Reply to Notice of Violation'ns | |||
ection Re ort 94-22 VIOLATION A: 10 CFR 50, Appendix B, Criterion XVI, Corrective | |||
Action, as implemented | |||
by approved FPL Topical Quality Assurance Report, TQR 16.0 revision 8,"Corrective | |||
Action," requires that measures be established | |||
to assure that conditions | |||
adverse to quality be promptly identified | |||
and corrected. | |||
Contrary to the above, on August 29, 1994, the licensee's | |||
corrective | |||
action for a previous NRC violation were inadequate | |||
in that they failed to prevent operation of the unit with an electrical | |||
plant configuration | |||
for which Technical Specification | |||
required surveillance | |||
testing had not been performed. | |||
Specifically, the licensee was operating the IC Intake Cooling Water (ICW)Pump powered from the 1A Emergency Diesel Generator (EDG)bus while relying on the 1A EDG to be operable.However, load shed testing of the IC ICW Pump, while aligned to the 1A EDG bus, had not been performed as required by Technical Specifications (TSs)for EDG operability. | Specifically, the licensee was operating the IC Intake Cooling Water (ICW)Pump powered from the 1A Emergency Diesel Generator (EDG)bus while relying on the 1A EDG to be operable.However, load shed testing of the IC ICW Pump, while aligned to the 1A EDG bus, had not been performed as required by Technical Specifications (TSs)for EDG operability. | ||
The licensee had developed a Night Order to alert Unit 1 operators to the limitations | The licensee had developed a Night Order to alert Unit 1 operators to the limitations of the subject electrical lineup.However, the Night Order failed to properly describe that the subject electrical lineup would result in the 1A EDG being inoperable. | ||
of the subject electrical | RESPONSE A: 1.REASON FOR VIOLATION The root cause for this violation was an inadequate technical review of the interim corrective action.2.CORRECTIVE STEPS TAKEN AND THE RESULTS ACHIEVED A.On August 29, 1994, the 1A EDG was declared inoperable due to an electrical plant configuration for which Technical Specification (TS)required surveillance testing had not been performed. | ||
lineup.However, the Night Order failed to properly describe that the subject electrical | B.C.D~On August 30, 1994, the normal electrical configuration was established and the 1A EDG was declared operable.On August 31, 1994, a Night Order was issued.which specified the 1C ICW and 1C CCW pumps should not be aligned to the A side electrically until the TS required surveillance was completed.. | ||
lineup would result in the 1A EDG being inoperable. | |||
RESPONSE A: 1.REASON FOR VIOLATION The root cause for this violation was an inadequate | |||
technical review of the interim corrective | |||
action.2.CORRECTIVE | |||
STEPS TAKEN AND THE RESULTS ACHIEVED A.On August 29, 1994, the 1A EDG was declared inoperable | |||
due to an electrical | |||
plant configuration | |||
for which Technical Specification (TS)required surveillance | |||
testing had not been performed. | |||
B.C.D~On August 30, 1994, the normal electrical | |||
configuration | |||
was established | |||
and the 1A EDG was declared operable.On August 31, 1994, a Night Order was issued.which specified the 1C ICW and 1C CCW pumps should not be aligned to the A side electrically | |||
until the TS required surveillance | |||
was completed.. | |||
If it was required to place the plant in this configuration, then the 1A EDG was to be declared inoperable. | If it was required to place the plant in this configuration, then the 1A EDG was to be declared inoperable. | ||
On September 28, 1994, engineering | On September 28, 1994, engineering evaluation JPN-PSL-SEEP-94-051 concluded that the loading of the 1C ICW pump during the first (0 second)load block would not affect the ability of the EDG to perform its safety function and that all ESF loads would be able to start and accelerate. | ||
evaluation | After the third (6 second)load block the EDG would recover to the originally analyzed loading conditions. | ||
JPN-PSL-SEEP-94-051 | St.Lucie Unit 1 Docket No.50-335 Reply to Notice of Violation Ins ection Re ort 94-22 E.On November 30, 1994, all Technical Specification required testing associated with the Unit 1 electrical configuration in question was satisfactorily completed. | ||
concluded that the loading of the 1C ICW pump during the first (0 second)load block would not affect the ability of the EDG to perform its safety function and that all ESF loads would be able to start and accelerate. | 3.CORRECTIVE STEP TO AVOID FURTHER VIOLATIONS QI 16-PR/PSL-2,"St.Lucie Action Report (STAR)Program," has been changed to require a technical subcommittee review of Technical Specification non-compliance issues to ensure an adequate technical review is conducted and presented to the Facility Review Group (FRG).4, Full compliance was achieved on August 29, 1994 with the completion of Item 2A above.VIOLATION B: Unit 1 TS 6.8.l.a requires that written procedures shall be established and implemented covering the activities recommended in Appendix A of Regulatory Guide 1.33, Revision 2, February 1978.Appendix A, paragraph 1.h includes administrative procedures for log keeping.St.Lucie Administrative Procedure 0010120, revision 63,"Conduct of Operations," Appendix F,"Log Keeping," states that log entries are to be made in a chronological order and that, where this was not possible, entries are to be preceded by the words"Late Entry." Contrary to the above, on August 29, 1994, certain control room log entries were not made in a chronological order and also were not preceded by the words"Late Entry".A Unit 1 Assistant Nuclear Plant Supervisor modified and appended Unit 1 control room log entries made on a previous shift, and the modifications were not annotated in any way.This created a false impression of the activities of the previous shift.RESPONSE B: REASON FOR V10LATION The root cause for this violation was personnel error by Operations Department personnel. | ||
After the third (6 second)load block the EDG would recover to the originally | The individual failed to follow established plant procedures. | ||
analyzed loading conditions. | 2.CORRECTIVE STEPS TAKEN AND THE RESULTS ACHIEVED The chronological control room log was amended to correct the time of occurrence of the entry described above.3.CORRECT1VE STEPS TO AVOID FURTHER VIOLATIONS A.The individual involved was counseled by Operations Management. | ||
St.Lucie Unit 1 Docket No.50-335 Reply to Notice of Violation Ins ection Re ort 94-22 E.On November 30, 1994, all Technical Specification | B., A Night Order was issued reiterating management' expectations regarding chronological log keeping. | ||
required testing associated | t St~Lucie Unit 1 Docket No.50-335 Repl'y to Notice of Violation Ins ection Re ort 94-22 C.St.Lucie Administrative Procedure 0010120, Revision 63,"Conduct of Operations," Appendix F,"Log Keeping," has been revised to incorporate the practice of leaving no blank lines between entries or after a shift's log is complete.4.Full compliance was achieved on September 1, 1994 with the completion of Item 2 above.}} | ||
with the Unit 1 electrical | |||
configuration | |||
in question was satisfactorily | |||
completed. | |||
3.CORRECTIVE | |||
STEP TO AVOID FURTHER VIOLATIONS | |||
QI 16-PR/PSL-2,"St.Lucie Action Report (STAR)Program," has been changed to require a technical subcommittee | |||
review of Technical Specification | |||
non-compliance | |||
issues to ensure an adequate technical review is conducted and presented to the Facility Review Group (FRG).4, Full compliance | |||
was achieved on August 29, 1994 with the completion | |||
of Item 2A above.VIOLATION B: Unit 1 TS 6.8.l.a requires that written procedures | |||
shall be established | |||
and implemented | |||
covering the activities | |||
recommended | |||
in Appendix A of Regulatory | |||
Guide 1.33, Revision 2, February 1978.Appendix A, paragraph 1.h includes administrative | |||
procedures | |||
for log keeping.St.Lucie Administrative | |||
Procedure 0010120, revision 63,"Conduct of Operations," Appendix F,"Log Keeping," states that log entries are to be made in a chronological | |||
order and that, where this was not possible, entries are to be preceded by the words"Late Entry." Contrary to the above, on August 29, 1994, certain control room log entries were not made in a chronological | |||
order and also were not preceded by the words"Late Entry".A Unit 1 Assistant Nuclear Plant Supervisor | |||
modified and appended Unit 1 control room log entries made on a previous shift, and the modifications | |||
were not annotated in any way.This created a false impression | |||
of the activities | |||
of the previous shift.RESPONSE B: REASON FOR V10LATION The root cause for this violation was personnel error by Operations | |||
Department | |||
personnel. | |||
The individual | |||
failed to follow established | |||
plant procedures. | |||
2.CORRECTIVE | |||
STEPS TAKEN AND THE RESULTS ACHIEVED The chronological | |||
control room log was amended to correct the time of occurrence | |||
of the entry described above.3.CORRECT1VE | |||
STEPS TO AVOID FURTHER VIOLATIONS | |||
A.The individual | |||
involved was counseled by Operations | |||
Management. | |||
B., A Night Order was issued reiterating | |||
management' | |||
expectations | |||
regarding chronological | |||
log keeping. | |||
t | |||
St~Lucie Unit 1 Docket No.50-335 Repl'y to Notice of Violation Ins ection Re ort 94-22 C.St.Lucie Administrative | |||
Procedure 0010120, Revision 63,"Conduct of Operations," Appendix F,"Log Keeping," has been revised to incorporate | |||
the practice of leaving no blank lines between entries or after a shift's log is complete.4.Full compliance | |||
was achieved on September 1, 1994 with the completion | |||
of Item 2 above. | |||
}} |
Revision as of 14:47, 17 August 2019
ML17228A965 | |
Person / Time | |
---|---|
Site: | Saint Lucie |
Issue date: | 12/20/1994 |
From: | Goldberg J FLORIDA POWER & LIGHT CO. |
To: | NRC OFFICE OF INFORMATION RESOURCES MANAGEMENT (IRM) |
References | |
L-94-314, NUDOCS 9412280229 | |
Download: ML17228A965 (6) | |
Text
PRIORI I Y Z REGULRTOR5 f&515QFYMSSDRhMETYON SYSTEM (RYDS)It ACCESSION NBR:9412280229 DOC.DATE: 94/12/20 NOTARIZED:
NO FACIL:50-335 St.Lucie Plant, Unit 1, Florida Power&Light Co.~~~~~~AUTH.NAME AUTHOR AFFILIATION
'OLDBERG,J.H.
Florida Power&Light Co.RECIP.NAME RECIPIENT AFFILIATION Document Control Branch (Document Control Desk)
SUBJECT:
Responds to violations noted in insp rept 50-335/94-22 per 10CFR2.201.Corrective actions:on 940830,normal electrical configuration establ,ished
&lA EDG declared operable.DISTRIBUTION CODE: IE01D COPIES RECEIVED:LTR ENCL SIZE: TITLE: General (50 Dkt)-Insp Rept/Notice of Violation Response NOTES: DOCKET I 05000335 P R 0 RECIPIENT ID CODE/NAME PD2-2 PD INTERNAL: ACRS AEOD/SPD/RAB AEOD/TTC~FXL1."CEMENTER 02 NRR/DRCH/HHFB NUDOCS-ABSTRACT OGC/HDS3 ERNAL: LITCO BRYCEFJ H NRC PDR COPIES LTTR ENCL 1 1 2 2 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1, 1 1 1 1 1 RECIPIENT ID CODE/NAME NORRIS,J AEOD/DEIB AEOD/SPD/RRAB DEDRO NRR/DORS/OEAB NRR/PMAS/IRCB-E OE DIR RGN2 FILE 01 NOAC COPIES LTTR ENCL 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1'1 1 D 0 U M N iNOTE TO ALL"Rl DS" RECIPIEi~:
PLEASE HELP US TO REDUCE iVASTE!COYTACT THE DOCL'MEi'T COYTROL DESK.ROOM PI-37 (EXT.SN-20S3)TO ELIM I YATE YOUR YAM E FROi!DIS'!'RIBL"I'IOY.
LISTS FOR DOCUWIEYTS YOU DON"I 5 LED!TOTAL NUMBER OF COPIES REQUIRED: LTTR 20 ENCL 20 Florida Powor 5 Light Company, P.O.Box 14000, Juno Beach, FL 33408-0420 t FPL DEC 2 0 1990 L-94-314 10 CFR 2.201 U.S.Nuclear Regulatory Commission Attn: Document Control Desk Washington, D.C.20555 Re: St.Lucie Unit 1 Docket No.50-335 Reply to Notice of Violation Ins ection Re ort 94-22 Florida Power and Light Company (FPL)has reviewed the subject inspection report and pursuant to 10 CFR 2.201 the response to the notice of violation is attached.Very truly yours, J.H.Goldberg President-Nuclear Division JHG/DAS/JWH Attachment cc: Stewart D.Ebneter, Regional Administrator, USNRC Region II Senior Resident Inspector, USNRC, St.Lucie Plant t 9412280229 94i220 PDR ADOCK 05000335 PDR an FPL Group company St.Lucie Unit 1 Docket No.50-335 Reply to Notice of Violation'ns ection Re ort 94-22 VIOLATION A: 10 CFR 50, Appendix B, Criterion XVI, Corrective Action, as implemented by approved FPL Topical Quality Assurance Report, TQR 16.0 revision 8,"Corrective Action," requires that measures be established to assure that conditions adverse to quality be promptly identified and corrected.
Contrary to the above, on August 29, 1994, the licensee's corrective action for a previous NRC violation were inadequate in that they failed to prevent operation of the unit with an electrical plant configuration for which Technical Specification required surveillance testing had not been performed.
Specifically, the licensee was operating the IC Intake Cooling Water (ICW)Pump powered from the 1A Emergency Diesel Generator (EDG)bus while relying on the 1A EDG to be operable.However, load shed testing of the IC ICW Pump, while aligned to the 1A EDG bus, had not been performed as required by Technical Specifications (TSs)for EDG operability.
The licensee had developed a Night Order to alert Unit 1 operators to the limitations of the subject electrical lineup.However, the Night Order failed to properly describe that the subject electrical lineup would result in the 1A EDG being inoperable.
RESPONSE A: 1.REASON FOR VIOLATION The root cause for this violation was an inadequate technical review of the interim corrective action.2.CORRECTIVE STEPS TAKEN AND THE RESULTS ACHIEVED A.On August 29, 1994, the 1A EDG was declared inoperable due to an electrical plant configuration for which Technical Specification (TS)required surveillance testing had not been performed.
B.C.D~On August 30, 1994, the normal electrical configuration was established and the 1A EDG was declared operable.On August 31, 1994, a Night Order was issued.which specified the 1C ICW and 1C CCW pumps should not be aligned to the A side electrically until the TS required surveillance was completed..
If it was required to place the plant in this configuration, then the 1A EDG was to be declared inoperable.
On September 28, 1994, engineering evaluation JPN-PSL-SEEP-94-051 concluded that the loading of the 1C ICW pump during the first (0 second)load block would not affect the ability of the EDG to perform its safety function and that all ESF loads would be able to start and accelerate.
After the third (6 second)load block the EDG would recover to the originally analyzed loading conditions.
St.Lucie Unit 1 Docket No.50-335 Reply to Notice of Violation Ins ection Re ort 94-22 E.On November 30, 1994, all Technical Specification required testing associated with the Unit 1 electrical configuration in question was satisfactorily completed.
3.CORRECTIVE STEP TO AVOID FURTHER VIOLATIONS QI 16-PR/PSL-2,"St.Lucie Action Report (STAR)Program," has been changed to require a technical subcommittee review of Technical Specification non-compliance issues to ensure an adequate technical review is conducted and presented to the Facility Review Group (FRG).4, Full compliance was achieved on August 29, 1994 with the completion of Item 2A above.VIOLATION B: Unit 1 TS 6.8.l.a requires that written procedures shall be established and implemented covering the activities recommended in Appendix A of Regulatory Guide 1.33, Revision 2, February 1978.Appendix A, paragraph 1.h includes administrative procedures for log keeping.St.Lucie Administrative Procedure 0010120, revision 63,"Conduct of Operations," Appendix F,"Log Keeping," states that log entries are to be made in a chronological order and that, where this was not possible, entries are to be preceded by the words"Late Entry." Contrary to the above, on August 29, 1994, certain control room log entries were not made in a chronological order and also were not preceded by the words"Late Entry".A Unit 1 Assistant Nuclear Plant Supervisor modified and appended Unit 1 control room log entries made on a previous shift, and the modifications were not annotated in any way.This created a false impression of the activities of the previous shift.RESPONSE B: REASON FOR V10LATION The root cause for this violation was personnel error by Operations Department personnel.
The individual failed to follow established plant procedures.
2.CORRECTIVE STEPS TAKEN AND THE RESULTS ACHIEVED The chronological control room log was amended to correct the time of occurrence of the entry described above.3.CORRECT1VE STEPS TO AVOID FURTHER VIOLATIONS A.The individual involved was counseled by Operations Management.
B., A Night Order was issued reiterating management' expectations regarding chronological log keeping.
t St~Lucie Unit 1 Docket No.50-335 Repl'y to Notice of Violation Ins ection Re ort 94-22 C.St.Lucie Administrative Procedure 0010120, Revision 63,"Conduct of Operations," Appendix F,"Log Keeping," has been revised to incorporate the practice of leaving no blank lines between entries or after a shift's log is complete.4.Full compliance was achieved on September 1, 1994 with the completion of Item 2 above.