ML17228A965: Difference between revisions

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
Line 14: Line 14:
| page count = 6
| page count = 6
}}
}}
See also: [[followed by::IR 05000335/1994022]]


=Text=
=Text=
{{#Wiki_filter:PRIORI I Y Z REGULRTOR5
{{#Wiki_filter:PRIORI I Y Z REGULRTOR5 f&515QFYMSSDRhMETYON SYSTEM (RYDS)It ACCESSION NBR:9412280229 DOC.DATE: 94/12/20 NOTARIZED:
f&515QFYMSSDRhMETYON
NO FACIL:50-335 St.Lucie Plant, Unit 1, Florida Power&Light Co.~~~~~~AUTH.NAME AUTHOR AFFILIATION
SYSTEM (RYDS)It ACCESSION NBR:9412280229
DOC.DATE: 94/12/20 NOTARIZED:
NO FACIL:50-335
St.Lucie Plant, Unit 1, Florida Power&Light Co.~~~~~~AUTH.NAME AUTHOR AFFILIATION
'OLDBERG,J.H.
'OLDBERG,J.H.
Florida Power&Light Co.RECIP.NAME
Florida Power&Light Co.RECIP.NAME RECIPIENT AFFILIATION Document Control Branch (Document Control Desk)
RECIPIENT AFFILIATION
 
Document Control Branch (Document Control Desk)SUBJECT: Responds to violations
==SUBJECT:==
noted in insp rept 50-335/94-22
Responds to violations noted in insp rept 50-335/94-22 per 10CFR2.201.Corrective actions:on 940830,normal electrical configuration establ,ished
per 10CFR2.201.Corrective
&lA EDG declared operable.DISTRIBUTION CODE: IE01D COPIES RECEIVED:LTR ENCL SIZE: TITLE: General (50 Dkt)-Insp Rept/Notice of Violation Response NOTES: DOCKET I 05000335 P R 0 RECIPIENT ID CODE/NAME PD2-2 PD INTERNAL: ACRS AEOD/SPD/RAB AEOD/TTC~FXL1."CEMENTER 02 NRR/DRCH/HHFB NUDOCS-ABSTRACT OGC/HDS3 ERNAL: LITCO BRYCEFJ H NRC PDR COPIES LTTR ENCL 1 1 2 2 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1, 1 1 1 1 1 RECIPIENT ID CODE/NAME NORRIS,J AEOD/DEIB AEOD/SPD/RRAB DEDRO NRR/DORS/OEAB NRR/PMAS/IRCB-E OE DIR RGN2 FILE 01 NOAC COPIES LTTR ENCL 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1'1 1 D 0 U M N iNOTE TO ALL"Rl DS" RECIPIEi~:
actions:on
PLEASE HELP US TO REDUCE iVASTE!COYTACT THE DOCL'MEi'T COYTROL DESK.ROOM PI-37 (EXT.SN-20S3)TO ELIM I YATE YOUR YAM E FROi!DIS'!'RIBL"I'IOY.
940830,normal
LISTS FOR DOCUWIEYTS YOU DON"I 5 LED!TOTAL NUMBER OF COPIES REQUIRED: LTTR 20 ENCL 20 Florida Powor 5 Light Company, P.O.Box 14000, Juno Beach, FL 33408-0420 t FPL DEC 2 0 1990 L-94-314 10 CFR 2.201 U.S.Nuclear Regulatory Commission Attn: Document Control Desk Washington, D.C.20555 Re: St.Lucie Unit 1 Docket No.50-335 Reply to Notice of Violation Ins ection Re ort 94-22 Florida Power and Light Company (FPL)has reviewed the subject inspection report and pursuant to 10 CFR 2.201 the response to the notice of violation is attached.Very truly yours, J.H.Goldberg President-Nuclear Division JHG/DAS/JWH Attachment cc: Stewart D.Ebneter, Regional Administrator, USNRC Region II Senior Resident Inspector, USNRC, St.Lucie Plant t 9412280229 94i220 PDR ADOCK 05000335 PDR an FPL Group company St.Lucie Unit 1 Docket No.50-335 Reply to Notice of Violation'ns ection Re ort 94-22 VIOLATION A: 10 CFR 50, Appendix B, Criterion XVI, Corrective Action, as implemented by approved FPL Topical Quality Assurance Report, TQR 16.0 revision 8,"Corrective Action," requires that measures be established to assure that conditions adverse to quality be promptly identified and corrected.
electrical
Contrary to the above, on August 29, 1994, the licensee's corrective action for a previous NRC violation were inadequate in that they failed to prevent operation of the unit with an electrical plant configuration for which Technical Specification required surveillance testing had not been performed.
configuration
establ,ished
&lA EDG declared operable.DISTRIBUTION
CODE: IE01D COPIES RECEIVED:LTR
ENCL SIZE: TITLE: General (50 Dkt)-Insp Rept/Notice
of Violation Response NOTES: DOCKET I 05000335 P R 0 RECIPIENT ID CODE/NAME PD2-2 PD INTERNAL: ACRS AEOD/SPD/RAB
AEOD/TTC~FXL1."CEMENTER 02 NRR/DRCH/HHFB
NUDOCS-ABSTRACT
OGC/HDS3 ERNAL: LITCO BRYCEFJ H NRC PDR COPIES LTTR ENCL 1 1 2 2 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1, 1 1 1 1 1 RECIPIENT ID CODE/NAME NORRIS,J AEOD/DEIB AEOD/SPD/RRAB
DEDRO NRR/DORS/OEAB
NRR/PMAS/IRCB-E
OE DIR RGN2 FILE 01 NOAC COPIES LTTR ENCL 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1'1 1 D 0 U M N iNOTE TO ALL"Rl DS" RECIPIEi~:
PLEASE HELP US TO REDUCE iVASTE!COYTACT THE DOCL'MEi'T
COYTROL DESK.ROOM PI-37 (EXT.SN-20S3)TO ELIM I YATE YOUR YAM E FROi!DIS'!'RIBL"I'IOY.
LISTS FOR DOCUWIEYTS
YOU DON"I 5 LED!TOTAL NUMBER OF COPIES REQUIRED: LTTR 20 ENCL 20  
Florida Powor 5 Light Company, P.O.Box 14000, Juno Beach, FL 33408-0420
t FPL DEC 2 0 1990 L-94-314 10 CFR 2.201 U.S.Nuclear Regulatory
Commission
Attn: Document Control Desk Washington, D.C.20555 Re: St.Lucie Unit 1 Docket No.50-335 Reply to Notice of Violation Ins ection Re ort 94-22 Florida Power and Light Company (FPL)has reviewed the subject inspection
report and pursuant to 10 CFR 2.201 the response to the notice of violation is attached.Very truly yours, J.H.Goldberg President-Nuclear Division JHG/DAS/JWH
Attachment
cc: Stewart D.Ebneter, Regional Administrator, USNRC Region II Senior Resident Inspector, USNRC, St.Lucie Plant t 9412280229
94i220 PDR ADOCK 05000335 PDR an FPL Group company  
St.Lucie Unit 1 Docket No.50-335 Reply to Notice of Violation'ns
ection Re ort 94-22 VIOLATION A: 10 CFR 50, Appendix B, Criterion XVI, Corrective
Action, as implemented
by approved FPL Topical Quality Assurance Report, TQR 16.0 revision 8,"Corrective
Action," requires that measures be established
to assure that conditions
adverse to quality be promptly identified
and corrected.
Contrary to the above, on August 29, 1994, the licensee's
corrective
action for a previous NRC violation were inadequate
in that they failed to prevent operation of the unit with an electrical
plant configuration
for which Technical Specification
required surveillance
testing had not been performed.
Specifically, the licensee was operating the IC Intake Cooling Water (ICW)Pump powered from the 1A Emergency Diesel Generator (EDG)bus while relying on the 1A EDG to be operable.However, load shed testing of the IC ICW Pump, while aligned to the 1A EDG bus, had not been performed as required by Technical Specifications (TSs)for EDG operability.
Specifically, the licensee was operating the IC Intake Cooling Water (ICW)Pump powered from the 1A Emergency Diesel Generator (EDG)bus while relying on the 1A EDG to be operable.However, load shed testing of the IC ICW Pump, while aligned to the 1A EDG bus, had not been performed as required by Technical Specifications (TSs)for EDG operability.
The licensee had developed a Night Order to alert Unit 1 operators to the limitations
The licensee had developed a Night Order to alert Unit 1 operators to the limitations of the subject electrical lineup.However, the Night Order failed to properly describe that the subject electrical lineup would result in the 1A EDG being inoperable.
of the subject electrical
RESPONSE A: 1.REASON FOR VIOLATION The root cause for this violation was an inadequate technical review of the interim corrective action.2.CORRECTIVE STEPS TAKEN AND THE RESULTS ACHIEVED A.On August 29, 1994, the 1A EDG was declared inoperable due to an electrical plant configuration for which Technical Specification (TS)required surveillance testing had not been performed.
lineup.However, the Night Order failed to properly describe that the subject electrical
B.C.D~On August 30, 1994, the normal electrical configuration was established and the 1A EDG was declared operable.On August 31, 1994, a Night Order was issued.which specified the 1C ICW and 1C CCW pumps should not be aligned to the A side electrically until the TS required surveillance was completed..
lineup would result in the 1A EDG being inoperable.
RESPONSE A: 1.REASON FOR VIOLATION The root cause for this violation was an inadequate
technical review of the interim corrective
action.2.CORRECTIVE
STEPS TAKEN AND THE RESULTS ACHIEVED A.On August 29, 1994, the 1A EDG was declared inoperable
due to an electrical
plant configuration
for which Technical Specification (TS)required surveillance
testing had not been performed.
B.C.D~On August 30, 1994, the normal electrical
configuration
was established
and the 1A EDG was declared operable.On August 31, 1994, a Night Order was issued.which specified the 1C ICW and 1C CCW pumps should not be aligned to the A side electrically
until the TS required surveillance
was completed..
If it was required to place the plant in this configuration, then the 1A EDG was to be declared inoperable.
If it was required to place the plant in this configuration, then the 1A EDG was to be declared inoperable.
On September 28, 1994, engineering
On September 28, 1994, engineering evaluation JPN-PSL-SEEP-94-051 concluded that the loading of the 1C ICW pump during the first (0 second)load block would not affect the ability of the EDG to perform its safety function and that all ESF loads would be able to start and accelerate.
evaluation
After the third (6 second)load block the EDG would recover to the originally analyzed loading conditions.
JPN-PSL-SEEP-94-051
St.Lucie Unit 1 Docket No.50-335 Reply to Notice of Violation Ins ection Re ort 94-22 E.On November 30, 1994, all Technical Specification required testing associated with the Unit 1 electrical configuration in question was satisfactorily completed.
concluded that the loading of the 1C ICW pump during the first (0 second)load block would not affect the ability of the EDG to perform its safety function and that all ESF loads would be able to start and accelerate.
3.CORRECTIVE STEP TO AVOID FURTHER VIOLATIONS QI 16-PR/PSL-2,"St.Lucie Action Report (STAR)Program," has been changed to require a technical subcommittee review of Technical Specification non-compliance issues to ensure an adequate technical review is conducted and presented to the Facility Review Group (FRG).4, Full compliance was achieved on August 29, 1994 with the completion of Item 2A above.VIOLATION B: Unit 1 TS 6.8.l.a requires that written procedures shall be established and implemented covering the activities recommended in Appendix A of Regulatory Guide 1.33, Revision 2, February 1978.Appendix A, paragraph 1.h includes administrative procedures for log keeping.St.Lucie Administrative Procedure 0010120, revision 63,"Conduct of Operations," Appendix F,"Log Keeping," states that log entries are to be made in a chronological order and that, where this was not possible, entries are to be preceded by the words"Late Entry." Contrary to the above, on August 29, 1994, certain control room log entries were not made in a chronological order and also were not preceded by the words"Late Entry".A Unit 1 Assistant Nuclear Plant Supervisor modified and appended Unit 1 control room log entries made on a previous shift, and the modifications were not annotated in any way.This created a false impression of the activities of the previous shift.RESPONSE B: REASON FOR V10LATION The root cause for this violation was personnel error by Operations Department personnel.
After the third (6 second)load block the EDG would recover to the originally
The individual failed to follow established plant procedures.
analyzed loading conditions.  
2.CORRECTIVE STEPS TAKEN AND THE RESULTS ACHIEVED The chronological control room log was amended to correct the time of occurrence of the entry described above.3.CORRECT1VE STEPS TO AVOID FURTHER VIOLATIONS A.The individual involved was counseled by Operations Management.
St.Lucie Unit 1 Docket No.50-335 Reply to Notice of Violation Ins ection Re ort 94-22 E.On November 30, 1994, all Technical Specification
B., A Night Order was issued reiterating management' expectations regarding chronological log keeping.
required testing associated
t St~Lucie Unit 1 Docket No.50-335 Repl'y to Notice of Violation Ins ection Re ort 94-22 C.St.Lucie Administrative Procedure 0010120, Revision 63,"Conduct of Operations," Appendix F,"Log Keeping," has been revised to incorporate the practice of leaving no blank lines between entries or after a shift's log is complete.4.Full compliance was achieved on September 1, 1994 with the completion of Item 2 above.}}
with the Unit 1 electrical
configuration
in question was satisfactorily
completed.
3.CORRECTIVE
STEP TO AVOID FURTHER VIOLATIONS
QI 16-PR/PSL-2,"St.Lucie Action Report (STAR)Program," has been changed to require a technical subcommittee
review of Technical Specification
non-compliance
issues to ensure an adequate technical review is conducted and presented to the Facility Review Group (FRG).4, Full compliance
was achieved on August 29, 1994 with the completion
of Item 2A above.VIOLATION B: Unit 1 TS 6.8.l.a requires that written procedures
shall be established
and implemented
covering the activities
recommended
in Appendix A of Regulatory
Guide 1.33, Revision 2, February 1978.Appendix A, paragraph 1.h includes administrative
procedures
for log keeping.St.Lucie Administrative
Procedure 0010120, revision 63,"Conduct of Operations," Appendix F,"Log Keeping," states that log entries are to be made in a chronological
order and that, where this was not possible, entries are to be preceded by the words"Late Entry." Contrary to the above, on August 29, 1994, certain control room log entries were not made in a chronological
order and also were not preceded by the words"Late Entry".A Unit 1 Assistant Nuclear Plant Supervisor
modified and appended Unit 1 control room log entries made on a previous shift, and the modifications
were not annotated in any way.This created a false impression
of the activities
of the previous shift.RESPONSE B: REASON FOR V10LATION The root cause for this violation was personnel error by Operations
Department
personnel.
The individual
failed to follow established
plant procedures.
2.CORRECTIVE
STEPS TAKEN AND THE RESULTS ACHIEVED The chronological
control room log was amended to correct the time of occurrence
of the entry described above.3.CORRECT1VE
STEPS TO AVOID FURTHER VIOLATIONS
A.The individual
involved was counseled by Operations
Management.
B., A Night Order was issued reiterating
management'
expectations
regarding chronological
log keeping.  
t  
St~Lucie Unit 1 Docket No.50-335 Repl'y to Notice of Violation Ins ection Re ort 94-22 C.St.Lucie Administrative
Procedure 0010120, Revision 63,"Conduct of Operations," Appendix F,"Log Keeping," has been revised to incorporate
the practice of leaving no blank lines between entries or after a shift's log is complete.4.Full compliance
was achieved on September 1, 1994 with the completion
of Item 2 above.
}}

Revision as of 14:47, 17 August 2019

Responds to Violations Noted in Insp Rept 50-335/94-22 Per 10CFR2.201.Corrective Actions:On 940830,normal Electrical Configuration Established & 1A EDG Declared Operable
ML17228A965
Person / Time
Site: Saint Lucie NextEra Energy icon.png
Issue date: 12/20/1994
From: Goldberg J
FLORIDA POWER & LIGHT CO.
To:
NRC OFFICE OF INFORMATION RESOURCES MANAGEMENT (IRM)
References
L-94-314, NUDOCS 9412280229
Download: ML17228A965 (6)


Text

PRIORI I Y Z REGULRTOR5 f&515QFYMSSDRhMETYON SYSTEM (RYDS)It ACCESSION NBR:9412280229 DOC.DATE: 94/12/20 NOTARIZED:

NO FACIL:50-335 St.Lucie Plant, Unit 1, Florida Power&Light Co.~~~~~~AUTH.NAME AUTHOR AFFILIATION

'OLDBERG,J.H.

Florida Power&Light Co.RECIP.NAME RECIPIENT AFFILIATION Document Control Branch (Document Control Desk)

SUBJECT:

Responds to violations noted in insp rept 50-335/94-22 per 10CFR2.201.Corrective actions:on 940830,normal electrical configuration establ,ished

&lA EDG declared operable.DISTRIBUTION CODE: IE01D COPIES RECEIVED:LTR ENCL SIZE: TITLE: General (50 Dkt)-Insp Rept/Notice of Violation Response NOTES: DOCKET I 05000335 P R 0 RECIPIENT ID CODE/NAME PD2-2 PD INTERNAL: ACRS AEOD/SPD/RAB AEOD/TTC~FXL1."CEMENTER 02 NRR/DRCH/HHFB NUDOCS-ABSTRACT OGC/HDS3 ERNAL: LITCO BRYCEFJ H NRC PDR COPIES LTTR ENCL 1 1 2 2 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1, 1 1 1 1 1 RECIPIENT ID CODE/NAME NORRIS,J AEOD/DEIB AEOD/SPD/RRAB DEDRO NRR/DORS/OEAB NRR/PMAS/IRCB-E OE DIR RGN2 FILE 01 NOAC COPIES LTTR ENCL 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1'1 1 D 0 U M N iNOTE TO ALL"Rl DS" RECIPIEi~:

PLEASE HELP US TO REDUCE iVASTE!COYTACT THE DOCL'MEi'T COYTROL DESK.ROOM PI-37 (EXT.SN-20S3)TO ELIM I YATE YOUR YAM E FROi!DIS'!'RIBL"I'IOY.

LISTS FOR DOCUWIEYTS YOU DON"I 5 LED!TOTAL NUMBER OF COPIES REQUIRED: LTTR 20 ENCL 20 Florida Powor 5 Light Company, P.O.Box 14000, Juno Beach, FL 33408-0420 t FPL DEC 2 0 1990 L-94-314 10 CFR 2.201 U.S.Nuclear Regulatory Commission Attn: Document Control Desk Washington, D.C.20555 Re: St.Lucie Unit 1 Docket No.50-335 Reply to Notice of Violation Ins ection Re ort 94-22 Florida Power and Light Company (FPL)has reviewed the subject inspection report and pursuant to 10 CFR 2.201 the response to the notice of violation is attached.Very truly yours, J.H.Goldberg President-Nuclear Division JHG/DAS/JWH Attachment cc: Stewart D.Ebneter, Regional Administrator, USNRC Region II Senior Resident Inspector, USNRC, St.Lucie Plant t 9412280229 94i220 PDR ADOCK 05000335 PDR an FPL Group company St.Lucie Unit 1 Docket No.50-335 Reply to Notice of Violation'ns ection Re ort 94-22 VIOLATION A: 10 CFR 50, Appendix B, Criterion XVI, Corrective Action, as implemented by approved FPL Topical Quality Assurance Report, TQR 16.0 revision 8,"Corrective Action," requires that measures be established to assure that conditions adverse to quality be promptly identified and corrected.

Contrary to the above, on August 29, 1994, the licensee's corrective action for a previous NRC violation were inadequate in that they failed to prevent operation of the unit with an electrical plant configuration for which Technical Specification required surveillance testing had not been performed.

Specifically, the licensee was operating the IC Intake Cooling Water (ICW)Pump powered from the 1A Emergency Diesel Generator (EDG)bus while relying on the 1A EDG to be operable.However, load shed testing of the IC ICW Pump, while aligned to the 1A EDG bus, had not been performed as required by Technical Specifications (TSs)for EDG operability.

The licensee had developed a Night Order to alert Unit 1 operators to the limitations of the subject electrical lineup.However, the Night Order failed to properly describe that the subject electrical lineup would result in the 1A EDG being inoperable.

RESPONSE A: 1.REASON FOR VIOLATION The root cause for this violation was an inadequate technical review of the interim corrective action.2.CORRECTIVE STEPS TAKEN AND THE RESULTS ACHIEVED A.On August 29, 1994, the 1A EDG was declared inoperable due to an electrical plant configuration for which Technical Specification (TS)required surveillance testing had not been performed.

B.C.D~On August 30, 1994, the normal electrical configuration was established and the 1A EDG was declared operable.On August 31, 1994, a Night Order was issued.which specified the 1C ICW and 1C CCW pumps should not be aligned to the A side electrically until the TS required surveillance was completed..

If it was required to place the plant in this configuration, then the 1A EDG was to be declared inoperable.

On September 28, 1994, engineering evaluation JPN-PSL-SEEP-94-051 concluded that the loading of the 1C ICW pump during the first (0 second)load block would not affect the ability of the EDG to perform its safety function and that all ESF loads would be able to start and accelerate.

After the third (6 second)load block the EDG would recover to the originally analyzed loading conditions.

St.Lucie Unit 1 Docket No.50-335 Reply to Notice of Violation Ins ection Re ort 94-22 E.On November 30, 1994, all Technical Specification required testing associated with the Unit 1 electrical configuration in question was satisfactorily completed.

3.CORRECTIVE STEP TO AVOID FURTHER VIOLATIONS QI 16-PR/PSL-2,"St.Lucie Action Report (STAR)Program," has been changed to require a technical subcommittee review of Technical Specification non-compliance issues to ensure an adequate technical review is conducted and presented to the Facility Review Group (FRG).4, Full compliance was achieved on August 29, 1994 with the completion of Item 2A above.VIOLATION B: Unit 1 TS 6.8.l.a requires that written procedures shall be established and implemented covering the activities recommended in Appendix A of Regulatory Guide 1.33, Revision 2, February 1978.Appendix A, paragraph 1.h includes administrative procedures for log keeping.St.Lucie Administrative Procedure 0010120, revision 63,"Conduct of Operations," Appendix F,"Log Keeping," states that log entries are to be made in a chronological order and that, where this was not possible, entries are to be preceded by the words"Late Entry." Contrary to the above, on August 29, 1994, certain control room log entries were not made in a chronological order and also were not preceded by the words"Late Entry".A Unit 1 Assistant Nuclear Plant Supervisor modified and appended Unit 1 control room log entries made on a previous shift, and the modifications were not annotated in any way.This created a false impression of the activities of the previous shift.RESPONSE B: REASON FOR V10LATION The root cause for this violation was personnel error by Operations Department personnel.

The individual failed to follow established plant procedures.

2.CORRECTIVE STEPS TAKEN AND THE RESULTS ACHIEVED The chronological control room log was amended to correct the time of occurrence of the entry described above.3.CORRECT1VE STEPS TO AVOID FURTHER VIOLATIONS A.The individual involved was counseled by Operations Management.

B., A Night Order was issued reiterating management' expectations regarding chronological log keeping.

t St~Lucie Unit 1 Docket No.50-335 Repl'y to Notice of Violation Ins ection Re ort 94-22 C.St.Lucie Administrative Procedure 0010120, Revision 63,"Conduct of Operations," Appendix F,"Log Keeping," has been revised to incorporate the practice of leaving no blank lines between entries or after a shift's log is complete.4.Full compliance was achieved on September 1, 1994 with the completion of Item 2 above.