NRC Generic Letter 1989-22: Difference between revisions
StriderTol (talk | contribs) (Created page by program invented by StriderTol) |
StriderTol (talk | contribs) (Created page by program invented by StriderTol) |
||
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
| issue date = 10/19/1989 | | issue date = 10/19/1989 | ||
| title = NRC Generic Letter 1989-022: Potential for Increase Roof Loads and Plant Area Flood Runoff Depth at Licensed Nuclear Power Plants Due to Recent Change in Probable Max. Precipitation Criteria Developed by National Weather Service | | title = NRC Generic Letter 1989-022: Potential for Increase Roof Loads and Plant Area Flood Runoff Depth at Licensed Nuclear Power Plants Due to Recent Change in Probable Max. Precipitation Criteria Developed by National Weather Service | ||
| author name = Partlow J | | author name = Partlow J | ||
| author affiliation = NRC/NRR | | author affiliation = NRC/NRR | ||
| addressee name = | | addressee name = | ||
Revision as of 04:41, 14 July 2019
UNITED STATES t BNUCLEAR REGULATORY
COMMISSION
WASHINGTON, D. C. 20555 October 19, 1989 TO: ALL LICENSEES
OF OPERATING
REACTORS AND HOLDERS OF CONSTRUCTION
PERMITS*SUBJECT: POTENTIAL
FOR INCREASED
ROOF LOADS AND PLANT AREA FLOOD RUNOFF DEPTH AT LICENSED NUCLEAR POWER PLANTS DUE TO RECENT CHANGE IN PROBABLE MAXIMUM PRECIPITATION
CRITERIA DEVELOPED
BY THE NATIONAL WEATHER SERVICE (GENERIC LETTER 89-22)This letter is to inform you that the NRC staff has adopted for future plants the latest probable maximum precipitation (PMP) criteria published by the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), National Weather Service (NWS) to establish acceptable design configurations for safety-related nuclear power plant facilities.
The staff has been using the PMP concept in plant flood design for well over 15 years. The criteria appear in Regulatory Guides, ANSI Standards, and Standard Review Plans (NUREG-0800)
and were based primarily on procedures established in the 1940s and 1950s by the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers and National Weather Service (NWS).Since 1977, more recent PMP criteria have been published by the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), National Weather Service.These criteria are to be used to evaluate the degree of licensee compliance with the General Design Criterion 12 App A to 10 CFR Part 50. The new criteria are contained in NOAA/NWS Hydrometerological Reports (HMR) No. 49 (1977), No. 51 (1978), No. 52 (1982), No. 53 (1980) and No. 55 (1984). One of the more significant changes in the new HMRs is that they now provide PMP estimates for drainage areas as small as 1 square mile and for durations as small as 5 minutes. The previous reports generally only provided PMP estimates for areas of 10 square miles or greater and durations of 6 hours6.944444e-5 days <br />0.00167 hours <br />9.920635e-6 weeks <br />2.283e-6 months <br /> or more.There were empirical methods to subdivide the 6 hour6.944444e-5 days <br />0.00167 hours <br />9.920635e-6 weeks <br />2.283e-6 months <br /> duration to smaller increments, but there was never any methodology to estimate PMP for areas less than 10 square miles. Thus, the 10 square mile PMP values were used for site and roof drainage design. Current 1 square mile short duration PMP estimates are larger than those previously used.Staff has revised (Revision
3) Sections 2.4.2, Floods,' and 2.4.2, 'Probable Maximum Floods (PMF) on Streams and Rivers," of the Standard Review Plan (NUREG-0800)
to formally incorporate the latest NWS reports into the licensing 1* Five plants, Byron, Braidwood, Vogtle, South Texas, and River Bend, fully meet the new PMP Criteria and the licensees for these five plants may dis-i letter.91 180273t C
Generic Letter 89- 22 -2 -October 19, 1989 review process. In general, the latest NWS criteria call for higher rainfall intensities over shorter time intervals and smaller areas than have been previously considered.
In some cases, such events could result in higher site flooding levels and greater roof ponding loads than have been used in previous design studies.This information is provided for your review and determination of appropriate action, if any. No submittal is required.Sincerely, Jades G. Partlow Associate Director for Projects Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation Enclosure:
List of Most Recently Issued Generic Letters
Technical Contact:
_____ _ __ _S. Chan, ESGB/NRR 492-0830
LIST OF RECENTLY ISSUED GENERIC LETTERS<_>
Generic Date of T 1 ciiand-Issued To c.. I; , 4_.Letter NO. uu vLL ------ -89-22 89-21 POTENTIAL
FOR INCREASED
ROOF 10/19/89 LOADS AND PLANT AREA FLOOD RUNOFF DEPTH AT LICENSED NUCLEAR POWER PLANTS DUE TO RECENT CHANGE IN PROBABLE MAXIMUM PRECIPITATION
CRITERIA DEVELOPED
BY THE NATIONAL WEATHER SERVICE (GENERIC LETTER 89-22)REQUEST FOR INFORMATION
10/19/89 CONCERNING
STATUS OF IMPLEMENTATION
OF UNRESOLVED
SAFETY ISSUE (USI) REQUIREMENTS
PROTECTED
AREA LONG-TERM
09/26/89 HOUSEKEEPING
89-20 89-19 ALL LICENSEES
OF OPERATING
REACTORS AND HOLDERS OF CONSTRUCTION
PERMITS (EXCEPT BYRON BRAIDWOOD, VOGTLEO SOUTH TEXAS, AND RIVER BEND)ALL HOLDERS OF OPERATING
LICENSES AND CONSTRUCTION
PERMITS FOR NUCLEAR POWER REACTORS ALL FUEL CYCLE FACILITY LICENSEES WHO POSSESS, USE, OR PROCESS FORMULA QUANTITIES
OF STRATEGIC
SPECIAL NUCLEAR MATERIAL ALL LICENSEES
OF OPERATING
REACTORS, APPLICANTS
FOR OPERATING
LICENSES AND HOLDERS OF CONSTRUCTION
PERMITS FOR LIGHT WATER REACTOR NUCLEAR POWER PLANTS ALL HOLDERS OF OPERATING
LICENSES OR CONSTRUCTION
PERMITS FOR NUCLEAR POWER PLANTS REQUEST FOR ACTION RELATED TO 09/20/89 RESOLUTION
OF UNRESOLVED
SAFETY ISSUE A-47 "SAFETY IMPLICATION
OF CONTROL SYSTEMS IN LWR NUCLEAR POWER PLANTS" PURSUANT TO 10 CFR 50.54(f)89-18 RESOLUTION
OF UNRESOLVED
SAFETY ISSUE A-17, "SYSTEMS INTERACTIONS
IN NUCLEAR POWER PLANTS 09/06/89 ACCESSION
NUMBER IS 8909070029
89-17 PLANNED ADMINISTRATIVE
CHANGES TO THE NRC OPERATOR LICENSING
WRITTEN EXAMINA-TION PROCESS -GENERIC LETTER 89-17 09/06/89 ALL HOLDERS OF OPERATING
LICENSES OR CONSTRUCTION
PERMITS FOR PWRS AND BWRS AND ALL LICENSED OPERATORS 89-16 INSTALLATION
WETWELL VENT LETTER 89-16)OF A HARDENED (GENERIC 09/01/89 ALL GE PLANTS
Generic Letter 89- 22-2 -October 19, 1989 review process. In general, the latest NWS criteria call for higher rainfall intensities over shorter time intervals and smaller areas than have been previously considered.
In some cases, such events could result in higher site flooding levels and greater roof ponding loads than have been used in previous design studies.This information action, if any.is provided for No submittal is your review and determination of appropriate required.Sincerely, ORIGINAL SIGNED BY JAMES G. PARTLOW James G. Partlow Associate Director for Projects Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation Enclosure:
List of Most Recently Generic Letters
Technical Contact:
S. Chan, ESGB/NRR 492-0830 DISTRIBUTION:
Central Files NRC PDR I PD4 Reading P. O'Connor F. Hebdon G. Holahan F. Miraglia C. Berlinger J. Partlow 1K It1 VIaWY/ 14;~~I FTPD4JDRSP/PM
- PD4/,DJS/
- A 4/UKIU+rA
/U :AA UI r'qq, :A---___: ------- o---a-h---n--
-r a :C ___ inge :J) -----a_NAME :PO'Connor:bj:FHe n :G olahan olahan :' tw DATE_ :---------
---/---/8- _--/89 _______/89
-- _ _______ -__ _- : ---------DATE :1 /X7)/89 :/2L1/89 :lf /%V /89 V' A% /89 : 8al9 M /§/89 : l 5/89 f OFFICIAL RECORD COPY Document Name: GENERIC LETTER/PD4 DOCUMENT NAME: GENERIC LETTER/PD4 ORIGINATOR
NAME *: P. O'Connor x23026 SECRETARY
NAME: Beverly/Celeste x21340 SUBJECT: GENERIC LETTER 89-XX RE: DESIGN FOR PROBATE NAME E MAXIMUM DATE_ -°\ lokh 1°c\I I\F/Z/7 j 1.2.3.4.5.7.7.P. O'Connor F. Hebdon G. HoIahan3tj-'CA2 G. Holahan F. Miraglia C. Berlinger J. Partlow Secretary
-Dispatch PLEASE DO NOT REMOVE THIS SHEET FROM PACKAGE* CAN THIS DOCUMENT BE DELETED FROM SYSTEM? YES SHOULD THIS DOCUMENT BE ARCHIVED?
YES ---- NO_NO