ML14328A763: Difference between revisions

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
Line 3: Line 3:
| issue date = 03/06/2015
| issue date = 03/06/2015
| title = 2015 Point Beach Nuclear Power Plant Initial License Examination Form ES-201-2
| title = 2015 Point Beach Nuclear Power Plant Initial License Examination Form ES-201-2
| author name = McNeil D R
| author name = Mcneil D
| author affiliation = NRC/RGN-III/DRS/OLB
| author affiliation = NRC/RGN-III/DRS/OLB
| addressee name =  
| addressee name =  

Revision as of 06:12, 21 June 2019

2015 Point Beach Nuclear Power Plant Initial License Examination Form ES-201-2
ML14328A763
Person / Time
Site: Point Beach  NextEra Energy icon.png
Issue date: 03/06/2015
From: Mcneil D
NRC/RGN-III/DRS/OLB
To:
Shared Package
ML14328A659 List:
References
Download: ML14328A763 (1)


Text

ES-201 Examination Outline Quality Checklist Form ES-201-2 Fa c il ity: PB NP 20 1 5 NRC Exam Date o f Exam ina tion: Febru ary 23 , 2015 It e m 1. w R I T T E N 2. s I M u L A T 0 R 3. w I T Initial s Task Description a b* c# ---. a. Verify tha t th e ou tl i ne(s) fi t(s) th e a pp ro pri a t e model, in a cco rd a n ce w ith ES-401. b. A ssess whether the outl in e was syste m atica lly and randomly pr e par e d in a c co rd ance wi th Section D.1 o f ES-40 1 a nd wh e th e r a ll KIA ca tegori es a r e ap p ro priat e l y sa mpled. c. Assess whe th e r t he outline over--e mph asizes a n y syste m s, evol ution s, o r generic t o p i cs. d. Ass es s wh e th er the j u stif i cations for de se l ec ted o r r e j ec t ed KIA st ate ments are appr o priat e. 1"--"f\-

a. U s in g F o rm ES-3 01-5 , ver ify th at th e proposed scenar io se t s cover the requir e d numb e r of no rm al e voluti o ns, in s trument a nd compo n e nt failur es , t ec hn ical s p ec ifi ca ti o ns , b , 1'-' 1 a nd major tr a n s i e nts. *

.. ----*--*--------------------1-'---t---t-----l l b. As sess wh e th e r th e re a r e e nougt1 sce n a ri o se t s (a nd s pare s) t o t es t th e pr ojec t e d nu m b e r and mix o f ap plicants in accor d a n ce with the e xp ec t ed c r e w compos iti o n and rotat i on sche dul e wi th ou t compromisi ng exam integrity , and ens ur e th at eac h applicant can be tested us i ng a t l east on e new or significantly modified scenario , that no sce nario s are duplicated fro m the app li cants' audit t es t(s). and t h at scena rios will not be r epea t ed on subsequ e nt days. c. To th e ex t e nt po s sible, assess wh et h er th e outline(s) conform(s) with th e qualitative a nd qu a ntitative c rit e ria s p ec ifi e d o n Form ES-30 1-4 and descri be d in Appendi x D. a. V e rify th a t th e sys t ems w a lk-thr o u g h o utlin e me e t s th e criteria s p ec ified on Form E S-3 01-2: (1) th e ou tlin e(s) co nt a in(s) th e r eq uired numb e r of cont r o l room a nd in-pl a nt t as ks distributed a m o ng the safety fun c tions a s speci f i e d on th e form (2) ta sk r epe titi o n from tile l as t two NR C exa minations is within the limil<> specified on th e f orm (3) no ta sks are dupli ca ted from th e ap pli ca nts' audit te s t(s) ( 4) the number of n e w or m odi fied task s m eets or exceeds th e minimum s spec ifi ed o n th e f o rm (5) th e number o f a lt e rnat e path , l ow-power , emerge nc y, and RCA t as ks meet the criter i a o n th e form. b. V e rify t h at th e a dmini s tr a ti ve ou tlin e m ee t s th e cri t e ri a spec ifi e d on Form ES-3 01-1: (1) th e ta s k s a r e distribut e d a m o ng th e topi cs as s p ec if i ed o n th e f orm (2) a t l eas t one t as k i s n e w o r s ignific a ntly m od ifi ed (3) no mor e than one t as k i s r e p ea t e d f rom t h e la s ttwo NR C l icensing exam in a ti o n s c. Dete r mine if there are e n ougt 1 different o utl i n e s to test the pr o j ec t e d numb e r and rni x D tCA.r '(\--' o f a p pl i cants a nd ensu r e tha t n o items are d upli ca t ed o n s u bseq u ent da ys. f--l 4. G E N E R A L a. A ssess wlleth e r p l an t-s p e c ifi c pr i or i ti e s (in c lud i ng PRA a nd IPE in sig ht s) a r e covere d \tlc.\ 'f\--*' in th e appropriat e exam se ct i o_n_s_. __________________________________

J:--+--+--r---i l b. Assess w h et h e r th e 10 CFR 55.41/43 and 55.4 5 samp l i n g i s approp ri a t e. tu4 c\t.irt in:p o rt ance ratings (excep t for p l an t-spec ifi c priorities) a r e at __ l_e_a_s_t __ 2_._5_. d. Ch e ck for dup l ication a nd ov e r l a p among exam sectio n s.

"'I"\.; Jw-

-*-,.,, __ e. Check th e ent i r e exam f o_r _b __ a l_a __ n_c_e __ of_c_o_v_e_ra"""'g'-e_. ______________________

-+rtL ___ ------1'--' """ I f. A ssess wh e th er the exam f i t s the app r opr iat e job l eve l (RO or SR O). a. A u tho r Randall Amunds on '\( * .... f J.. ,. _.l. -

FTI\l t ed);J ame/.S ignatur e.. Qate I I T om L a r so n/ 'J .A ;;;_--./_

.. . b. F ac 1 il t y Rev i ewer (*) c. N RC Chief E xa mi ner(#) d. NRC Supe 1 viso r /.h-.u.n*tlikrs-1>>1

lh
:i--/j_j f ""\/ v " 1>eH ./

/ .------------------------.. -----------------------1 N o t e: # l ndepent1en t N RC r e vi e w er ir ubal i tems 1 n Co l umn "c": ch1r;f exam m er concurrence r e qUired. b _ .. ...

  • Not app l icab l e f or N RC-p r epared examina ti o n o utlin es