NRC Generic Letter 1989-22: Difference between revisions

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
Line 15: Line 15:
| page count = 5
| page count = 5
}}
}}
{{#Wiki_filter:UNITED STATESt BNUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSIONWASHINGTON, D. C. 20555October 19, 1989TO: ALL LICENSEES OF OPERATING REACTORS AND HOLDERS OF CONSTRUCTIONPERMITS*SUBJECT: POTENTIAL FOR INCREASED ROOF LOADS AND PLANT AREA FLOOD RUNOFF DEPTHAT LICENSED NUCLEAR POWER PLANTS DUE TO RECENT CHANGE IN PROBABLEMAXIMUM PRECIPITATION CRITERIA DEVELOPED BY THE NATIONAL WEATHERSERVICE (GENERIC LETTER 89-22)This letter is to inform you that the NRC staff has adopted for future plantsthe latest probable maximum precipitation (PMP) criteria published by theNational Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), National WeatherService (NWS) to establish acceptable design configurations for safety-relatednuclear power plant facilities. The staff has been using the PMP concept inplant flood design for well over 15 years. The criteria appear in RegulatoryGuides, ANSI Standards, and Standard Review Plans (NUREG-0800) and were basedprimarily on procedures established in the 1940s and 1950s by the U.S. ArmyCorps of Engineers and National Weather Service (NWS).Since 1977, more recent PMP criteria have been published by the NationalOceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), National Weather Service.These criteria are to be used to evaluate the degree of licensee compliancewith the General Design Criterion 12 App A to 10 CFR Part 50. The newcriteria are contained in NOAA/NWS Hydrometerological Reports (HMR) No. 49(1977), No. 51 (1978), No. 52 (1982), No. 53 (1980) and No. 55 (1984). One ofthe more significant changes in the new HMRs is that they now provide PMPestimates for drainage areas as small as 1 square mile and for durations assmall as 5 minutes. The previous reports generally only provided PMP estimatesfor areas of 10 square miles or greater and durations of 6 hours or more.There were empirical methods to subdivide the 6 hour duration to smallerincrements, but there was never any methodology to estimate PMP for areas lessthan 10 square miles. Thus, the 10 square mile PMP values were used for siteand roof drainage design. Current 1 square mile short duration PMP estimatesare larger than those previously used.Staff has revised (Revision 3) Sections 2.4.2, Floods,' and 2.4.2, 'ProbableMaximum Floods (PMF) on Streams and Rivers," of the Standard Review Plan(NUREG-0800) to formally incorporate the latest NWS reports into the licensing1* Five plants, Byron, Braidwood, Vogtle, South Texas, and River Bend, fullymeet the new PMP Criteria and the licensees for these five plants may dis-i letter.91 180273t C  
{{#Wiki_filter:UNITED STATES t BNUCLEAR REGULATORY  
Generic Letter 89- 22 -2 -October 19, 1989review process. In general, the latest NWS criteria call for higher rainfallintensities over shorter time intervals and smaller areas than have beenpreviously considered. In some cases, such events could result in higher siteflooding levels and greater roof ponding loads than have been used in previousdesign studies.This information is provided for your review and determination of appropriateaction, if any. No submittal is required.Sincerely,Jades G. PartlowAssociate Director for ProjectsOffice of Nuclear Reactor RegulationEnclosure:List of Most Recently IssuedGeneric Letters
COMMISSION
WASHINGTON, D. C. 20555 October 19, 1989 TO: ALL LICENSEES  
OF OPERATING  
REACTORS AND HOLDERS OF CONSTRUCTION
PERMITS*SUBJECT: POTENTIAL  
FOR INCREASED  
ROOF LOADS AND PLANT AREA FLOOD RUNOFF DEPTH AT LICENSED NUCLEAR POWER PLANTS DUE TO RECENT CHANGE IN PROBABLE MAXIMUM PRECIPITATION  
CRITERIA DEVELOPED  
BY THE NATIONAL WEATHER SERVICE (GENERIC LETTER 89-22)This letter is to inform you that the NRC staff has adopted for future plants the latest probable maximum precipitation (PMP) criteria published by the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), National Weather Service (NWS) to establish acceptable design configurations for safety-related nuclear power plant facilities.
 
The staff has been using the PMP concept in plant flood design for well over 15 years. The criteria appear in Regulatory Guides, ANSI Standards, and Standard Review Plans (NUREG-0800)  
and were based primarily on procedures established in the 1940s and 1950s by the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers and National Weather Service (NWS).Since 1977, more recent PMP criteria have been published by the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), National Weather Service.These criteria are to be used to evaluate the degree of licensee compliance with the General Design Criterion  
12 App A to 10 CFR Part 50. The new criteria are contained in NOAA/NWS Hydrometerological Reports (HMR) No. 49 (1977), No. 51 (1978), No. 52 (1982), No. 53 (1980) and No. 55 (1984). One of the more significant changes in the new HMRs is that they now provide PMP estimates for drainage areas as small as 1 square mile and for durations as small as 5 minutes. The previous reports generally only provided PMP estimates for areas of 10 square miles or greater and durations of 6 hours or more.There were empirical methods to subdivide the 6 hour duration to smaller increments, but there was never any methodology to estimate PMP for areas less than 10 square miles. Thus, the 10 square mile PMP values were used for site and roof drainage design. Current 1 square mile short duration PMP estimates are larger than those previously used.Staff has revised (Revision  
3) Sections 2.4.2, Floods,' and 2.4.2, 'Probable Maximum Floods (PMF) on Streams and Rivers," of the Standard Review Plan (NUREG-0800)  
to formally incorporate the latest NWS reports into the licensing 1* Five plants, Byron, Braidwood, Vogtle, South Texas, and River Bend, fully meet the new PMP Criteria and the licensees for these five plants may dis-i letter.91 180273t C  
Generic Letter 89- 22 -2 -October 19, 1989 review process. In general, the latest NWS criteria call for higher rainfall intensities over shorter time intervals and smaller areas than have been previously considered.
 
In some cases, such events could result in higher site flooding levels and greater roof ponding loads than have been used in previous design studies.This information is provided for your review and determination of appropriate action, if any. No submittal is required.Sincerely, Jades G. Partlow Associate Director for Projects Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation Enclosure:
List of Most Recently Issued Generic Letters  


===Technical Contact:===
===Technical Contact:===
_____ _ __ _S. Chan, ESGB/NRR492-0830  
_____ _ __ _S. Chan, ESGB/NRR 492-0830  
LIST OF RECENTLY ISSUED GENERIC LETTERS<_>GenericDate ofT 1 ciiand-Issued Toc.. I; , 4_.Letter NO. uu vLL ------ -89-2289-21POTENTIAL FOR INCREASED ROOF 10/19/89LOADS AND PLANT AREA FLOODRUNOFF DEPTH AT LICENSEDNUCLEAR POWER PLANTS DUE TORECENT CHANGE IN PROBABLEMAXIMUM PRECIPITATIONCRITERIA DEVELOPED BY THENATIONAL WEATHER SERVICE(GENERIC LETTER 89-22)REQUEST FOR INFORMATION 10/19/89CONCERNING STATUS OFIMPLEMENTATION OF UNRESOLVEDSAFETY ISSUE (USI) REQUIREMENTSPROTECTED AREA LONG-TERM 09/26/89HOUSEKEEPING89-2089-19ALL LICENSEES OFOPERATING REACTORS ANDHOLDERS OF CONSTRUCTIONPERMITS (EXCEPT BYRONBRAIDWOOD, VOGTLEOSOUTH TEXAS, AND RIVERBEND)ALL HOLDERS OFOPERATING LICENSESAND CONSTRUCTIONPERMITS FOR NUCLEARPOWER REACTORSALL FUEL CYCLEFACILITY LICENSEESWHO POSSESS, USE,OR PROCESS FORMULAQUANTITIES OFSTRATEGIC SPECIALNUCLEAR MATERIALALL LICENSEES OFOPERATING REACTORS,APPLICANTS FOROPERATING LICENSESAND HOLDERS OFCONSTRUCTION PERMITSFOR LIGHT WATERREACTOR NUCLEARPOWER PLANTSALL HOLDERS OFOPERATING LICENSESOR CONSTRUCTIONPERMITS FOR NUCLEARPOWER PLANTSREQUEST FOR ACTION RELATED TO 09/20/89RESOLUTION OF UNRESOLVEDSAFETY ISSUE A-47 "SAFETYIMPLICATION OF CONTROLSYSTEMS IN LWR NUCLEARPOWER PLANTS" PURSUANT TO10 CFR 50.54(f)89-18RESOLUTION OF UNRESOLVEDSAFETY ISSUE A-17, "SYSTEMSINTERACTIONS IN NUCLEARPOWER PLANTS09/06/89ACCESSION NUMBER IS 890907002989-17PLANNED ADMINISTRATIVECHANGES TO THE NRC OPERATORLICENSING WRITTEN EXAMINA-TION PROCESS -GENERICLETTER 89-1709/06/89ALL HOLDERS OFOPERATING LICENSESOR CONSTRUCTIONPERMITS FOR PWRSAND BWRS AND ALLLICENSED OPERATORS89-16INSTALLATIONWETWELL VENTLETTER 89-16)OF A HARDENED(GENERIC09/01/89ALL GE PLANTS  
LIST OF RECENTLY ISSUED GENERIC LETTERS<_>
Generic Letter 89- 22-2 -October 19, 1989review process. In general, the latest NWS criteria call for higher rainfallintensities over shorter time intervals and smaller areas than have beenpreviously considered. In some cases, such events could result in higher siteflooding levels and greater roof ponding loads than have been used in previousdesign studies.This informationaction, if any.is provided forNo submittal isyour review and determination of appropriaterequired.Sincerely,ORIGINAL SIGNED BY JAMES G. PARTLOWJames G. PartlowAssociate Director for ProjectsOffice of Nuclear Reactor RegulationEnclosure:List of Most RecentlyGeneric Letters
Generic Date of T 1 ciiand-Issued To c.. I; , 4_.Letter NO. uu vLL ------ -89-22 89-21 POTENTIAL
FOR INCREASED  
ROOF 10/19/89 LOADS AND PLANT AREA FLOOD RUNOFF DEPTH AT LICENSED NUCLEAR POWER PLANTS DUE TO RECENT CHANGE IN PROBABLE MAXIMUM PRECIPITATION
CRITERIA DEVELOPED  
BY THE NATIONAL WEATHER SERVICE (GENERIC LETTER 89-22)REQUEST FOR INFORMATION  
10/19/89 CONCERNING
STATUS OF IMPLEMENTATION
OF UNRESOLVED
SAFETY ISSUE (USI) REQUIREMENTS
PROTECTED
AREA LONG-TERM  
09/26/89 HOUSEKEEPING
89-20 89-19 ALL LICENSEES  
OF OPERATING
REACTORS AND HOLDERS OF CONSTRUCTION
PERMITS (EXCEPT BYRON BRAIDWOOD, VOGTLEO SOUTH TEXAS, AND RIVER BEND)ALL HOLDERS OF OPERATING
LICENSES AND CONSTRUCTION
PERMITS FOR NUCLEAR POWER REACTORS ALL FUEL CYCLE FACILITY LICENSEES WHO POSSESS, USE, OR PROCESS FORMULA QUANTITIES
OF STRATEGIC
SPECIAL NUCLEAR MATERIAL ALL LICENSEES  
OF OPERATING
REACTORS, APPLICANTS  
FOR OPERATING
LICENSES AND HOLDERS OF CONSTRUCTION
PERMITS FOR LIGHT WATER REACTOR NUCLEAR POWER PLANTS ALL HOLDERS OF OPERATING
LICENSES OR CONSTRUCTION
PERMITS FOR NUCLEAR POWER PLANTS REQUEST FOR ACTION RELATED TO 09/20/89 RESOLUTION
OF UNRESOLVED
SAFETY ISSUE A-47 "SAFETY IMPLICATION
OF CONTROL SYSTEMS IN LWR NUCLEAR POWER PLANTS" PURSUANT TO 10 CFR 50.54(f)89-18 RESOLUTION
OF UNRESOLVED
SAFETY ISSUE A-17, "SYSTEMS INTERACTIONS
IN NUCLEAR POWER PLANTS 09/06/89 ACCESSION
NUMBER IS 8909070029
89-17 PLANNED ADMINISTRATIVE
CHANGES TO THE NRC OPERATOR LICENSING
WRITTEN EXAMINA-TION PROCESS -GENERIC LETTER 89-17 09/06/89 ALL HOLDERS OF OPERATING
LICENSES OR CONSTRUCTION
PERMITS FOR PWRS AND BWRS AND ALL LICENSED OPERATORS 89-16 INSTALLATION
WETWELL VENT LETTER 89-16)OF A HARDENED (GENERIC 09/01/89 ALL GE PLANTS  
Generic Letter 89- 22-2 -October 19, 1989 review process. In general, the latest NWS criteria call for higher rainfall intensities over shorter time intervals and smaller areas than have been previously considered.
 
In some cases, such events could result in higher site flooding levels and greater roof ponding loads than have been used in previous design studies.This information action, if any.is provided for No submittal is your review and determination of appropriate required.Sincerely, ORIGINAL SIGNED BY JAMES G. PARTLOW James G. Partlow Associate Director for Projects Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation Enclosure:
List of Most Recently Generic Letters  


===Technical Contact:===
===Technical Contact:===
S. Chan, ESGB/NRR492-0830DISTRIBUTION:Central FilesNRC PDR IPD4 ReadingP. O'ConnorF. HebdonG. HolahanF. MiragliaC. BerlingerJ. Partlow1K It1 VIaWY/ 14;~~IFTPD4JDRSP/PM :PD4/,DJS/ :A 4/UKIU+rA /U :AA UI r'qq, :A---___: ------- o---a-h---n-- -r a :C ___ inge :J) -----a_NAME :PO'Connor:bj:FHe n :G olahan olahan :' twDATE_ :--------- ---/---/8- _--/89 _______/89 -- _ _______ -__ _- : ---------DATE :1 /X7)/89 :/2L1/89 :lf /%V /89 V' A% /89 : 8al9 M /&sect;/89 : l 5/89fOFFICIAL RECORD COPYDocument Name: GENERIC LETTER/PD4 DOCUMENT NAME:GENERIC LETTER/PD4ORIGINATOR NAME *:P. O'Connor x23026SECRETARY NAME:Beverly/Celeste x21340SUBJECT:GENERIC LETTER 89-XX RE: DESIGN FOR PROBATENAMEE MAXIMUMDATE_ -&deg;\ lokh1&deg;c\I I\F/Z/7 j1.2.3.4.5.7.7.P. O'ConnorF. HebdonG. HoIahan3tj-'CA2G. HolahanF. MiragliaC. BerlingerJ. PartlowSecretary -DispatchPLEASE DO NOT REMOVE THIS SHEET FROM PACKAGE* CAN THIS DOCUMENT BE DELETED FROM SYSTEM? YESSHOULD THIS DOCUMENT BE ARCHIVED? YES ---- NO_NO  
S. Chan, ESGB/NRR 492-0830 DISTRIBUTION:
}}
Central Files NRC PDR I PD4 Reading P. O'Connor F. Hebdon G. Holahan F. Miraglia C. Berlinger J. Partlow 1K It1 VIaWY/ 14;~~I FTPD4JDRSP/PM  
:PD4/,DJS/  
:A 4/UKIU+rA  
/U :AA UI r'qq, :A---___: ------- o---a-h---n--  
-r a :C ___ inge :J) -----a_NAME :PO'Connor:bj:FHe n :G olahan olahan :' tw DATE_ :---------  
---/---/8- _--/89 _______/89  
-- _ _______ -__ _- : ---------DATE :1 /X7)/89 :/2L1/89 :lf /%V /89 V' A% /89 : 8al9 M /&sect;/89 : l 5/89 f OFFICIAL RECORD COPY Document Name: GENERIC LETTER/PD4 DOCUMENT NAME: GENERIC LETTER/PD4 ORIGINATOR
NAME *: P. O'Connor x23026 SECRETARY
NAME: Beverly/Celeste x21340 SUBJECT: GENERIC LETTER 89-XX RE: DESIGN FOR PROBATE NAME E MAXIMUM DATE_ -&deg;\ lokh 1&deg;c\I I\F/Z/7 j 1.2.3.4.5.7.7.P. O'Connor F. Hebdon G. HoIahan3tj-'CA2 G. Holahan F. Miraglia C. Berlinger J. Partlow Secretary
-Dispatch PLEASE DO NOT REMOVE THIS SHEET FROM PACKAGE* CAN THIS DOCUMENT BE DELETED FROM SYSTEM? YES SHOULD THIS DOCUMENT BE ARCHIVED?  
YES ---- NO_NO}}


{{GL-Nav}}
{{GL-Nav}}

Revision as of 12:04, 31 August 2018

NRC Generic Letter 1989-022: Potential for Increase Roof Loads and Plant Area Flood Runoff Depth at Licensed Nuclear Power Plants Due to Recent Change in Probable Max. Precipitation Criteria Developed by National Weather Service
ML031210438
Person / Time
Site: Beaver Valley, Millstone, Hatch, Monticello, Calvert Cliffs, Dresden, Davis Besse, Peach Bottom, Browns Ferry, Salem, Oconee, Mcguire, Nine Mile Point, Palisades, Palo Verde, Perry, Indian Point, Fermi, Kewaunee, Catawba, Harris, Wolf Creek, Saint Lucie, Point Beach, Oyster Creek, Watts Bar, Hope Creek, Grand Gulf, Cooper, Sequoyah, Byron, Pilgrim, Arkansas Nuclear, Braidwood, Susquehanna, Summer, Prairie Island, Columbia, Seabrook, Brunswick, Surry, Limerick, North Anna, Turkey Point, River Bend, Vermont Yankee, Crystal River, Haddam Neck, Ginna, Diablo Canyon, Callaway, Vogtle, Waterford, Duane Arnold, Farley, Robinson, Clinton, South Texas, San Onofre, Cook, Comanche Peak, Yankee Rowe, Maine Yankee, Quad Cities, Humboldt Bay, La Crosse, Big Rock Point, Rancho Seco, Zion, Midland, Bellefonte, Fort Calhoun, FitzPatrick, McGuire, LaSalle, 05000000, Zimmer, Fort Saint Vrain, Washington Public Power Supply System, Shoreham, Satsop, Trojan, Atlantic Nuclear Power Plant, Clinch River, Crane
Issue date: 10/19/1989
From: Partlow J G
Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
To:
References
NUREG-0800 GL-89-022, NUDOCS 8910180273
Download: ML031210438 (5)


UNITED STATES t BNUCLEAR REGULATORY

COMMISSION

WASHINGTON, D. C. 20555 October 19, 1989 TO: ALL LICENSEES

OF OPERATING

REACTORS AND HOLDERS OF CONSTRUCTION

PERMITS*SUBJECT: POTENTIAL

FOR INCREASED

ROOF LOADS AND PLANT AREA FLOOD RUNOFF DEPTH AT LICENSED NUCLEAR POWER PLANTS DUE TO RECENT CHANGE IN PROBABLE MAXIMUM PRECIPITATION

CRITERIA DEVELOPED

BY THE NATIONAL WEATHER SERVICE (GENERIC LETTER 89-22)This letter is to inform you that the NRC staff has adopted for future plants the latest probable maximum precipitation (PMP) criteria published by the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), National Weather Service (NWS) to establish acceptable design configurations for safety-related nuclear power plant facilities.

The staff has been using the PMP concept in plant flood design for well over 15 years. The criteria appear in Regulatory Guides, ANSI Standards, and Standard Review Plans (NUREG-0800)

and were based primarily on procedures established in the 1940s and 1950s by the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers and National Weather Service (NWS).Since 1977, more recent PMP criteria have been published by the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), National Weather Service.These criteria are to be used to evaluate the degree of licensee compliance with the General Design Criterion 12 App A to 10 CFR Part 50. The new criteria are contained in NOAA/NWS Hydrometerological Reports (HMR) No. 49 (1977), No. 51 (1978), No. 52 (1982), No. 53 (1980) and No. 55 (1984). One of the more significant changes in the new HMRs is that they now provide PMP estimates for drainage areas as small as 1 square mile and for durations as small as 5 minutes. The previous reports generally only provided PMP estimates for areas of 10 square miles or greater and durations of 6 hours6.944444e-5 days <br />0.00167 hours <br />9.920635e-6 weeks <br />2.283e-6 months <br /> or more.There were empirical methods to subdivide the 6 hour6.944444e-5 days <br />0.00167 hours <br />9.920635e-6 weeks <br />2.283e-6 months <br /> duration to smaller increments, but there was never any methodology to estimate PMP for areas less than 10 square miles. Thus, the 10 square mile PMP values were used for site and roof drainage design. Current 1 square mile short duration PMP estimates are larger than those previously used.Staff has revised (Revision

3) Sections 2.4.2, Floods,' and 2.4.2, 'Probable Maximum Floods (PMF) on Streams and Rivers," of the Standard Review Plan (NUREG-0800)

to formally incorporate the latest NWS reports into the licensing 1* Five plants, Byron, Braidwood, Vogtle, South Texas, and River Bend, fully meet the new PMP Criteria and the licensees for these five plants may dis-i letter.91 180273t C

Generic Letter 89- 22 -2 -October 19, 1989 review process. In general, the latest NWS criteria call for higher rainfall intensities over shorter time intervals and smaller areas than have been previously considered.

In some cases, such events could result in higher site flooding levels and greater roof ponding loads than have been used in previous design studies.This information is provided for your review and determination of appropriate action, if any. No submittal is required.Sincerely, Jades G. Partlow Associate Director for Projects Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation Enclosure:

List of Most Recently Issued Generic Letters

Technical Contact:

_____ _ __ _S. Chan, ESGB/NRR 492-0830

LIST OF RECENTLY ISSUED GENERIC LETTERS<_>

Generic Date of T 1 ciiand-Issued To c.. I; , 4_.Letter NO. uu vLL ------ -89-22 89-21 POTENTIAL

FOR INCREASED

ROOF 10/19/89 LOADS AND PLANT AREA FLOOD RUNOFF DEPTH AT LICENSED NUCLEAR POWER PLANTS DUE TO RECENT CHANGE IN PROBABLE MAXIMUM PRECIPITATION

CRITERIA DEVELOPED

BY THE NATIONAL WEATHER SERVICE (GENERIC LETTER 89-22)REQUEST FOR INFORMATION

10/19/89 CONCERNING

STATUS OF IMPLEMENTATION

OF UNRESOLVED

SAFETY ISSUE (USI) REQUIREMENTS

PROTECTED

AREA LONG-TERM

09/26/89 HOUSEKEEPING

89-20 89-19 ALL LICENSEES

OF OPERATING

REACTORS AND HOLDERS OF CONSTRUCTION

PERMITS (EXCEPT BYRON BRAIDWOOD, VOGTLEO SOUTH TEXAS, AND RIVER BEND)ALL HOLDERS OF OPERATING

LICENSES AND CONSTRUCTION

PERMITS FOR NUCLEAR POWER REACTORS ALL FUEL CYCLE FACILITY LICENSEES WHO POSSESS, USE, OR PROCESS FORMULA QUANTITIES

OF STRATEGIC

SPECIAL NUCLEAR MATERIAL ALL LICENSEES

OF OPERATING

REACTORS, APPLICANTS

FOR OPERATING

LICENSES AND HOLDERS OF CONSTRUCTION

PERMITS FOR LIGHT WATER REACTOR NUCLEAR POWER PLANTS ALL HOLDERS OF OPERATING

LICENSES OR CONSTRUCTION

PERMITS FOR NUCLEAR POWER PLANTS REQUEST FOR ACTION RELATED TO 09/20/89 RESOLUTION

OF UNRESOLVED

SAFETY ISSUE A-47 "SAFETY IMPLICATION

OF CONTROL SYSTEMS IN LWR NUCLEAR POWER PLANTS" PURSUANT TO 10 CFR 50.54(f)89-18 RESOLUTION

OF UNRESOLVED

SAFETY ISSUE A-17, "SYSTEMS INTERACTIONS

IN NUCLEAR POWER PLANTS 09/06/89 ACCESSION

NUMBER IS 8909070029

89-17 PLANNED ADMINISTRATIVE

CHANGES TO THE NRC OPERATOR LICENSING

WRITTEN EXAMINA-TION PROCESS -GENERIC LETTER 89-17 09/06/89 ALL HOLDERS OF OPERATING

LICENSES OR CONSTRUCTION

PERMITS FOR PWRS AND BWRS AND ALL LICENSED OPERATORS 89-16 INSTALLATION

WETWELL VENT LETTER 89-16)OF A HARDENED (GENERIC 09/01/89 ALL GE PLANTS

Generic Letter 89- 22-2 -October 19, 1989 review process. In general, the latest NWS criteria call for higher rainfall intensities over shorter time intervals and smaller areas than have been previously considered.

In some cases, such events could result in higher site flooding levels and greater roof ponding loads than have been used in previous design studies.This information action, if any.is provided for No submittal is your review and determination of appropriate required.Sincerely, ORIGINAL SIGNED BY JAMES G. PARTLOW James G. Partlow Associate Director for Projects Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation Enclosure:

List of Most Recently Generic Letters

Technical Contact:

S. Chan, ESGB/NRR 492-0830 DISTRIBUTION:

Central Files NRC PDR I PD4 Reading P. O'Connor F. Hebdon G. Holahan F. Miraglia C. Berlinger J. Partlow 1K It1 VIaWY/ 14;~~I FTPD4JDRSP/PM

PD4/,DJS/
A 4/UKIU+rA

/U :AA UI r'qq, :A---___: ------- o---a-h---n--

-r a :C ___ inge :J) -----a_NAME :PO'Connor:bj:FHe n :G olahan olahan :' tw DATE_ :---------

---/---/8- _--/89 _______/89

-- _ _______ -__ _- : ---------DATE :1 /X7)/89 :/2L1/89 :lf /%V /89 V' A% /89 : 8al9 M /§/89 : l 5/89 f OFFICIAL RECORD COPY Document Name: GENERIC LETTER/PD4 DOCUMENT NAME: GENERIC LETTER/PD4 ORIGINATOR

NAME *: P. O'Connor x23026 SECRETARY

NAME: Beverly/Celeste x21340 SUBJECT: GENERIC LETTER 89-XX RE: DESIGN FOR PROBATE NAME E MAXIMUM DATE_ -°\ lokh 1°c\I I\F/Z/7 j 1.2.3.4.5.7.7.P. O'Connor F. Hebdon G. HoIahan3tj-'CA2 G. Holahan F. Miraglia C. Berlinger J. Partlow Secretary

-Dispatch PLEASE DO NOT REMOVE THIS SHEET FROM PACKAGE* CAN THIS DOCUMENT BE DELETED FROM SYSTEM? YES SHOULD THIS DOCUMENT BE ARCHIVED?

YES ---- NO_NO

Template:GL-Nav