ML23135A200

Calculation XX-E-013, Rev. 4, CN002, Post-Fire Safe Shutdown (PFSSD) Analysis

ML23135A200
Person / Time
Site:	Wolf Creek
Issue date:	05/08/2023
From:	Wolf Creek
To:	Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
Shared Package
ML23135A163	List: ML23135A117 ML23135A118 ML23135A119 ML23135A120 ML23135A121 ML23135A122 ML23135A123 ML23135A124 ML23135A125 ML23135A126 ML23135A127 ML23135A128 ML23135A164 ML23135A165 ML23135A166 ML23135A167 ML23135A168 ML23135A169 ML23135A170 ML23135A171 ML23135A173 ML23135A174 ML23135A175 ML23135A176 ML23135A177 ML23135A178 ML23135A179 ML23135A180 ML23135A181 ML23135A182 ML23135A183 ML23135A184 ML23135A185 ML23135A186 ML23135A187 ML23135A188 ML23135A189 ML23135A190 ML23135A192 ML23135A193 ML23135A194 ML23135A195 ML23135A196 ML23135A197 ML23135A198 ML23135A199 ML23135A200 ML23135A201 ML23135A202 ML23135A203 ... further results
References
WO 23-0006
Download: ML23135A200 (1)

Text

FORM APF-0 5D-001 -0' REV 10 -

• Page 1 CALCULATION CHANGE NOTICE CCN NO. XX - E-013 -.~ - o,t;o;z._ *-eN00 ~

/Oft Base Ca.le No. Rev No. Sequence No.

CALCULATION TITLE - Enter this item in CALCULATION TITLE field in EIS :

Post-Fire Safe Shutdown (PFSSD) Analysis

COMPUTER CODE: N/A VERSION: N/A

Administrative? I 0 YES [8) NO I ASSOCIATED CHANGE # = I DCP 14209

ON/A - only if Administrative REGULATORY REVIEWS: Attached

[8l Attached to: DCP 14209 Evaluation#

USAR STATEMENT: Requires a change to the USAR:

t8:l Does not require a change to the USAR

ANY DOCUMENTS YES If yes, Condition Report# I IMPACTED? t8:l NO

Status: ~ CGMWI!r'T'~ Q f.8, fiil If ~ FINAL 0 VOID 0 SUPERSEDED DigsigOrg 2. 8, o. 7 /0/2-1/!S' ORIG BFiaR ~1.>x i{/,/(41.,pt Printed Name Da te Date /4. Wi'Lh11.,s_ ll,ql,*~ (H'3-ORIG Printed Name d(/J-

/2)o.:., ~- i¥-~G4_b Signature Signature ES9280479 QUALIFICATION REQUIRED: ES9280479 QUALIFICATION REQUIRED:

DigsigVer 2. 8, 0.7 I r; /,"t.czjJ 5 VERF ~~ ~- VERF ' {JName /J;f/M//f?altl!J Date 4/2¥(t Date

~ ~ Signature Signature ES9280479 QUALIFICATION REQUIRED: ES9280479 QUALIFICATION REQUIRED: I I\\

DigsigApp 2.8, 0.7.seff 5'""-i-e6 10/,:z,/ ~.:>Jf' r APP.Jeff SYtlir 691'2::t2GB APP /2.v ___ v ~, J Printed Name Date Date~la4~

__,.£,_/_/ )-, -/-_ Prirt7;1 ~ v ~ l__J

-/ /' f.././../ )\\~ Signature '

Signature / / /

~~,,~ N R lft11l ~\\\\\\\\\\llllll/lll/lf//lJ/

~.* #~~~------:to~ Digitally,cENss: *- ~ signed f,6;2~\\ by Brian R Fox

~

• 295 = ~ Date:

\\ i-~*'?:!-=~F:.~--- &'l 18:27:31 -05'00' ~~. /ff_J 2013.09.25

~4111, IONAL 1 ~,,,,,,~

"1r1111111111111111111\\

RPE Certification (For ASME Section Ill Stress Reports/Design Reports, refer to AP 05D-001 for qualification requirements)

FORM APF 05D 001 02 REV 10 - -

Page 2 CALCULATION CHANGE NOTICE - ~r CCN NO. XX-E-013 ~ - doD2-. i

Base Cale No. Rev No. Sequence No.

CALCULATION SUBJECT (Statement Of Problem) - Enter this in SUBJECT field in EIS:

DCP 14209 removes the HMCP breakers from MCC cubicles NG03DBF6 and NG04DBF6, which were added as PFSSD components in CCN XX-E-013-003-CN004 per DCP 13800. These breaker cubicles provide power and control functions for Train A and B Emergency Diesel Generator Room supply fan motors DCGM01A and DCGM01 B, respectively. Due to breaker coordination issues, DCP 14209 will modify the power supply to supply 480 VAC power to the diesel generator room supply fan motors DCGM01A and DCGM01 B directly from new Load Center breakers NG0308 and NG0408, respectively. Breakers NG0308 and NG0408 will supply power to the fan control functions within NG03DBF6 and NG04DBF6, respectively. Therefore, MCC cubicles NG03DBF6 and NG04DBF6 will remain as PFSSD components.

FORM APF-05D-001-02 REV 10 Page 3 CALCULATION DATABASE INPUT ~ C,M:l:?2._ ~

CCN NO. XX-E-0 1 3 - -, C~ OOli

Base Cal e No. Rev No. Seq uence No. / ~ ~

Link systems to the calculation/CCN in EIS.

Systems NG Affected:

Develop relationships between interdependent calculations in EIS.

Additional Calculations None Providing Input to this calculation:

Additional Calculations None Impacted by this calculation:

Develop relationships between t he calculation/CCN and controlled reference documents in EIS.

Additional Controlled None Documents Inputs to this calculation:

Additional Controlled None Documents Impacted by this calculation:

The reference documents listed below are those that cannot be l i nked to t he calculation/CCN and shall be entered in the INDUSTRY REFERENCE field in EIS, e. g. ' ASME Codes, ANSI Standards, letters, etc.

Add i t ional Other DCP 14209, Rev. 0 Reference Documents:

Li nk components to the ca l culation/CCN i n EIS.

Additi o nal Components: None

REFER TO DESKTOP GUIDE FOR PROCESSING CALCULATIONS IN EIS FORM APF-05D-001-0? REV 10 -,

Page 4 LIST OF EFFECTIVE PAGES CCN NO. <fol ~2...,.,,,,.,,,,,n, XX - E - 013 - - iiQ91i *y

Base Cale No. Rev No. Sequence No. IOft/t_

Page CCN Cale. CCN Ca le. CCN Cale. CCN Cale.

No. Page Page Page Page Page Page Page Affected No. Affected No. Affected No. Affected DVR/SCRN/ /DVR/SCRN /DVR/SCRN /DVR / SCRN Other /Other /Other /Other

1 N/A

2 N/A

3 N/A

4 N/A

5 N/A

6 App. 3,

pgs 62,

86, 87,

88 a nd 90

DVR

DVR Design Verification Report (if applicable)

SCRN Regulatory Screening (if applicable)

AD Applicability Determination FORM APF 05D 00 1 02 REV 10...

Page 5 CALCULATION SHEET W-1 OV,::;ul_ ~ CCN NO. XX-E-013 - ~ -, 6H885.A

Base Cale. No. Rev. No. Sequence No

Changes to XX-E-013 are described in the following pages.

The Calculation Main Body is not affected by this change.

Appendix 1 is not affected by this change.

Appendix 2 is not affected by this change.

Changes to Append ix 3 are shown on the following pages.

Appendix 4 is not affected by this change.

Attachment 1 is not affected by this change.

r ~£' 2-is not affected by this change.

1,An a et~,~ IJ~( t

u :;:iei:it.J...is not affected by this change.

FO RM APF 05F-001 -01, RE V. 04 PAGE I OF 5

- CA):XY.l._

DESIGN VERIFICATIO N REPORT DOCUMENT NO. XX-E-013-00J ~ $/"~>> REV. N I A

DOCUMENT TITLE: Post-Fire Safe Shutdown (PFSSD) Analysis

ORIGINATOR: Brian R. Fox

.DESIGN VERIFIED. : SAFETY CLASSIFICATION.:.VERIFICATION METHOD.:

PRELIMINARY SAFETY-RE LA TED ~ DESIGN REVIEW

~ FINAL ~ SPECIAL SCOPE ALTERNATE CALC U LATION

REVISION NON -SAFETY RELATED TESTING

~ INDIVIDUAL VERIFICATION SIGNATURE: ~~MttJ DATE: 9/24/13 QUALIFICATION REQUIRED---

ES9280465 OR ES9280479 TEAM VERIFICATION

Scooe Verified: SIGNATURE: DATE:

TEAM LEADER SIGNATURE: DATE:

QUALIFICATION REQUIRED ES9280465 OR ES9280479

• Team leader sig nature certifies that adequate interfaces and overlaps have occurred.

OVERVIEW (PURPOS E AND SCOPE) :

The purpose of this CCN is to incorporate the changes to the PFSSD Analysis due to relocating the Train A and B Emergency Diesel Generator Room supply fan power supp lies from MCC cubicles NG03DBF6 and NG04BF6 to Load Center Breakers NG0308 and NG0408, respectively.

CRUCIAL AREAS:

1. Ensure the Database Input sheet is complete and accurate.

2. Ensure all changes shown in Appendix 3 are complete and accurate.

3. Determine whether any changes, in addition to Append ix 3, should be made.

ALTERNATE OR INDEP E NDENT ITEMS USED FOR VERIFICATION:

1. CCN XX-E-013-003-CN004 FORM APF 0SF-001-01, REV. 04 PAGE 2 O F 5

DESIGN VERIFICATION REPORT a -c,M:X12... DOCUMENT NO. XX-E - 013 -903 CJ!t+-0~ 4""LJaf~ REV. NI A

COMMENTS: ORIGINATOR'S RESPONSE:

1. p2: A superseded CCN should not be the sole 1. Replaced CCN XX-E-013-002-CN014 w ith CCN reference in line 2 of the Statement of Problem. XX-E-013-003-CN004.

Suggest that the ending of the first sentence be revised to read as follows: "... PFSSD components in CCN XX-E-013-002-CN014 (subsequently superseded by CCN XX - E- 013-003-CN004) per DCP 13800 ".

2. p3: DCP 14209 should be added to the "Additional 2. DCP 14209 added.

Other Reference Documents" section.

3. p4: It is not clear why the affected pages of Append ix 3 3. Changed the affected pages to 62, 86, 87, 88 and are show n as be ing 61, 85, 86 and 89. It seems that 90.

the actual affected pages would be 62, 86, 87, 88, 90.

4. p5: It is generally an error trap to repeat de tailed 4. De leted the 1.st. paragraph.

information in different areas. Suggest that the first paragraph be deleted as it is an exact duplication of what has a lready been stated in the Calculation Subject.

5. p6: Suggest that the first line above the table be 5. Changed to reference only the cu rrent CCN.

revised to not only reference the superseded CCN, but also reference the cur rent superseding CCN.

6. Fina l thought: CN005 to XX-E-013 Rev. 3 appears to 6. It is not the intent to revise portions of CN004 with revise portions of CN004 to XX - E-013 Rev. 3. The CN005. CN005 uses the current information in calculation procedure does not allow CCNs to be the parent calculation plus outstanding CCNs, revised, only superseded. Expla in how or why this is which are required to be considered when acceptable. preparing a new CCN. Both CCNs need to be worked together when revising the parent calculation following implementation in MC20.

CONCLUSIONS:

T he changes accompl ished by CCN XX-E-013-003-CN005 are complete and accurate.

FORM APF 05F-001-0l, REV. 04 PAG E 3 OF 5

DESIGN VERIFICATION REPORT 00'1-C,,/VCJO:ii--DOC UMENT NO. XX-E-013-003 EP.1 669 4#1/tJ/z..y/S-REV. N/A

TABLE A (This table is required for change packages, or when required by a Supervisor.) If the answer to th e question is yes, then provide a de sc riptive answer that explains why you came to this conclusion. If the question is not aoolicable, then provide a descriptiv e explanation detailing why it is not applicable.

1. Were the design inputs correc tly selected and incorporated into th e design?

2. Are assumptions, necessary to perform the design activity,

documented, adequately described and reasonable?

3. Are the appropriate quality and quality assurance requirements specified?

4. Are the applicable codes, standards and regulatory requirements, including issue and addenda, properly identified and are their requirements for design met?

5. Has applicable plant and industr y construction and operating experience been considered?

6. Have the hardware interface design requirements been satisfied?

7. Is the output reasonable compared to input?

8. Are the specified parts, equipment and processes suitable for th e required application?

9. Are the specified materials compatible with each other and the design environmental conditions to which the material will be exposed?

FORM APF 05F-001-0l REV 04, PAGE40F5 DESIGN VERIFICATION REPORT DOC U MENT NO. XX-E-013-093 EN995-d"°JW'./~/..S REV. NIA

TAB LE A (This table is required for change packages, or when required by a Supervisor.) If the answer t o the question is yes, then provide a descriptive answer that explains why you came to this conclusion. If the question is not aoolicable, then orovide a descriptive explanation detailing why it is not aoolicable.

10. Have adequate maintenance features and requirements been specified?

11. Are accessibility and other design provisions adequate for per formance of needed maintenance and repair?

12. Has adequate accessibility been provided to perform the in -

service inspection expected to be required d ur i ng the plant life?

13. Has the d es ign properly considered radiation exposure to the public and plant personnel?

14. Have adequate pre - operationa l and subsequen t period ic test requirements been appropriately specified?

15. Does each document contain th e required signatures and date?

16. If a computer program was us e d in the analysis, has the program been verified?

17. If a component has been added, has a Safety Classification Analysis been completed?

18. Were the commitments provided in the USAR and the Design Criteria documents correctly incorpora t ed into the design documents?

FORM APF 0SF-001-01, REV. 04 PAGE 50F5 DESIGN VERIFICATION REPORT 3/-CA/61::7.2-. DOCUMENT NO. XX-E-013 -903 1'66, ~R~ REV. NIA

TABLE A (This table is required for change packages, or when required by a Supervisor.) If the answer to the question is yes, then provide a descriptive answer that explains why you came to this conclusion. If the question is not a licable, then rovide a descri tive ex lanation detailin wh it is not a licable.

19. Have the appropriate design documents been identified and/or updated?

20. Has warehouse stock been considered for modif i cation or retirement?