ML19332F741

Proposed,Renumbered Tech Spec 3.4.7.11 Re Area Temp Monitoring

ML19332F741
Person / Time
Site:	Summer
Issue date:	12/11/1989
From:	SOUTH CAROLINA ELECTRIC & GAS CO.
To:
Shared Package
ML19332F737	List: ML19332F736 ML19332F741
References
NUDOCS 8912180200
Download: ML19332F741 (6)

Text

._

e . .

1 l

-l ATTACHMENT 1 Marked Up Technical Specification Pages f.Ait Specification Sections Chance Description ,

3/4 7-37 3/4.7.11 Renumbers Section 3/4.7.11 to 3/4.7.9 to agree with -

the related changes contained within Amendment 79 to the Facility i Operating License.

l l

1.

i l

l

~

).

, 8912180200 891211 PDR ADOCK 05000395 P PDC

PLANT SYSTEMS .

i

1 3/4.'.M AREA. TEMPERATURE M0KJTORING LIMITING CONDITION FOR OPERATION

3. 7.M The temperature of each area shown in Table 3.7-7 shall be maintained below the limits indicated in 7able 3.7-7.

APPLICABILITY: Whenever the equipment-in an af fected area is required to be OPERA 8LE.

ACTION:

With one or more'ereas exceeding the temperature 11mit(s) shown in Table 3.7-7:

4. For more than eight hours, prepare and submit a Special Report to the Commission pursuant to Specification 6.9.2 within the next 30 days providing a recora of the amount by which and the cumulative time the temperature in the affected area exceeded its limit and an ,

analysis to demonstrate the continued OPERABILITY of the affected

. equipment,

b. By more than 30*F, in addition to the Special Report required above, within 4 hours4.62963e-5 days <br />0.00111 hours <br />6.613757e-6 weeks <br />1.522e-6 months <br /> either restore the area to below its temperature.

limit or declare the soutpment in the affected area inoperable.

SURVEILLANCE REQUIREMENTS l 4. 7. M The temperature in each of the areas of Table 3.7 7 shall be determined to be within its limit at least once per 12 hours1.388889e-4 days <br />0.00333 hours <br />1.984127e-5 weeks <br />4.566e-6 months <br />.

l .

1 L

r SIM4ER - UNIT 1 3/4 7-37

• -v---v-wwewe _-

c. ..

i.

g,

. m, L_

"i i

4  ;

)

g;,

j 1

l Attachment 2 j

Description of Amendment Request and Safety Evaluation i i

l 1

i ,

1 l

l 1

I L

1.

I l'

l-l l

l~

l l

l 1.

I l

l 1

i'

. m. - ._ _

, . . , . - - ___ .h

m .

' i

• Attachment 2 to Document Control Desk Letter  ;

, . ' ' December 11, 1989 Page 1 of-1 pescription of Amendment Reauest:

1 The amendment is administrative in nature in that it renumbers Section 3/4.7.11 to 3/4.7.9 to agree with related changes contained within Amendment 79 to the Facility Operating License.

Safety Evaluation:

This administrative change is required to correct.an omission / typographical error that occurred during development of Amendment 79. Sections 3/4.7.9 and 3/4.7.10 were deleted due to removal of Fire Protection related sections; however, section 3/4.7.11 was not renumbered to 3/4.7.9 as It should have been.

Pursuant to the above information, this amendment request does not adversely affect or endanger the' health or safety of the general public and does not i involve an unreviewed safety question.

L 1

1 i

l I

1 I/-  ; - , ,

.;

.'4, c

Attachment 3 Description of Amendment Request and No Significant Hazards Evaluation L;.

i

?

5

E:  !

w ..

a. , ,_ Attachment-3 to-Document Control Desk Letter N December 11, 1989

, e

. Page 1 of 1 NO SIGNIFICANT HAZARDS EVALUATION Description of Amendment Request:

The amendment is administ.rative in nature in that it renumbers Section 3/4.7.11 to 3/4.7.9 to agree with related changes contained within Amendment 79 to the Facility Operating License.

No Significant Hazards Evaluation:

The proposed amendment does not involve a significant increase in the probability or consequences of an accident previously evaluated because the administrative change does not affect plant operation in any manner.

The proposed amendment does not create the possibility of a new or different kind of accident than previously evaluated because the proposed change is administrative in nature and no physical alterations of plant configuration -

or changes to setpoints or operating parameters are proposed.

.The proposed amendment does not involve a significant reduction in the margin of safety. The amendment is administrative in nature in that it renumbers Section 3/4.7.11 to 3/4.7.9 to agree with related changes contained within Amendment 79 to the Facility Operating License.

Pursuant to 10CFR50.91, the preceding analyses provides a determination that the proposed change poses no significant hazard as defined by 10CFR50.92, 1

l l'

l^

L