ML103220270: Difference between revisions

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
 
Line 19: Line 19:


=Text=
=Text=
{{#Wiki_filter:From: Feintuch, Karl Sent: Wednesday, November 17, 2010 12:08 AM To: 'saporito3@gmail.com'' Cc: Mensah, Tanya; Pascarelli, Robert  
{{#Wiki_filter:From:                       Feintuch, Karl Sent:                       Wednesday, November 17, 2010 12:08 AM To:                         'saporito3@gmail.com''
Cc:                         Mensah, Tanya; Pascarelli, Robert


==Subject:==
==Subject:==
ME5012 - Your petition under 10CFR2.206, pertaining to the Duane Arnold Energy Center, Docket 05000331 Attachments: MD 8 11.pdf November 16, 2010 Mr. Thomas Saporito, Petitioner Post Office Box 8413 Jupiter, Florida 33468-8363 saporito3@gmail.com I have been assigned as the Petition Manager for the 10 CFR 2.206 petition that you submitted to the NRC on November 12, 2010, regarding your concerns about an "indication identified in the N2A Recirculation Inlet Safe End to Safe End extension Dissimilar Metal Weld," at the Duane Arnold [Energy Center, (DAEC)] the preliminary assessment of which the licensee of DAEC attributed to "stress corrosion cracking
ME5012 - Your petition under 10CFR2.206, pertaining to the Duane Arnold Energy Center, Docket 05000331 Attachments:               MD 8 11.pdf November 16, 2010 Mr. Thomas Saporito, Petitioner Post Office Box 8413 Jupiter, Florida 33468-8363 saporito3@gmail.com I have been assigned as the Petition Manager for the 10 CFR 2.206 petition that you submitted to the NRC on November 12, 2010, regarding your concerns about an indication identified in the N2A Recirculation Inlet Safe End to Safe End extension Dissimilar Metal Weld, at the Duane Arnold [Energy Center, (DAEC)] the preliminary assessment of which the licensee of DAEC attributed to stress corrosion cracking.
." Section 2.206 of Title 10 of the Code of Federal Regulations describes the petition process - the primary mechanism for the public to request enforcement action by the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) in a public process. This process permits anyone to petition NRC to take enforcement-type action related to NRC licensees or licensed activities. Depending on the results of its evaluation, the NRC could modify, suspend or revoke an NRC-issued license or take any other appropriate enforcement action to resolve a problem. The NRC staff's guidance for the disposition of 2.206 petition requests is in Management Directive 8.11, which is publicly available. The 2.206 process provides a mechanism for any member of the public to request enforcement action against NRC licensees. Therefore, because you specifically requested in your letter that the NRC: (1) take enforcement action against the licensee of the DAEC; (2) issue a confirmatory order requiring the licensee to bring the DAEC to a "cold-shutdown " mode of operation; (3) issue a confirmatory order preventing the licensee from bringing the DAEC to any mode of operation other than "cold shutdown until the licensee completes further testing of its safety-related primary and secondary systems and components; and (4) issue a confirmatory order requiring the licensee to obtain an "independent" evaluation of all relevant systems by a "certified" independent contractor, your petition was referred to the 2.206 process. The 2.206 process is separate from the allegations process which affords individuals who raise safety concerns a degree of protection of their identity. In the 2.206 process, all of the information in your letter will be made public, including your identity. In addition, in accordance with NRC Management Directive 8.11 (which I have attached for your reference), you have the opportunity to address the NRC Petition Review Board (PRB) to further discuss your petition, either in person at the NRC Headquarters in Rockville, MD, or by telephone conference.
Section 2.206 of Title 10 of the Code of Federal Regulations describes the petition process -
I would appreciate if you could advise me by Thursday, November 18, 2010, if you agree to the NRC's processing your request under the 2.206 process. In addition, please advise me if you would like to address the PRB. If you would like to meet in person, I will need to schedule a formal public meeting at the NRC Headquarters. If you would prefer to address the PRB via telephone, I will also work with you to coordinate a date/time during the upcoming weeks. To assist in planning a compatible schedule for all participants at the PRM meeting, please provide your anticipated "windows of opportunity" (that is, periods of time on specific days between now and November 29, 2010) for meeting in person or by telephone. If you have any questions, please contact me by telephone or email.
the primary mechanism for the public to request enforcement action by the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) in a public process. This process permits anyone to petition NRC to take enforcement-type action related to NRC licensees or licensed activities. Depending on the results of its evaluation, the NRC could modify, suspend or revoke an NRC-issued license or take any other appropriate enforcement action to resolve a problem. The NRC staffs guidance for the disposition of 2.206 petition requests is in Management Directive 8.11, which is publicly available.
Thank you, Karl Feintuch Project Manager Plant Licensing Branch 3-1 Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission 301-415-3079 karl.feintuch@nrc.gov E-mail Properties Mail Envelope Properties (26E42474DB238C408C94990815A02F091367627963)  
The 2.206 process provides a mechanism for any member of the public to request enforcement action against NRC licensees. Therefore, because you specifically requested in your letter that the NRC:
(1) take enforcement action against the licensee of the DAEC; (2) issue a confirmatory order requiring the licensee to bring the DAEC to a cold-shutdown mode of operation; (3) issue a confirmatory order preventing the licensee from bringing the DAEC to any mode of operation other than cold shutdown until the licensee completes further testing of its safety-related primary and secondary systems and components; and (4) issue a confirmatory order requiring the licensee to obtain an independent evaluation of all relevant systems by a certified independent contractor, your petition was referred to the 2.206 process. The 2.206 process is separate from the allegations process which affords individuals who raise safety concerns a degree of protection
 
of their identity. In the 2.206 process, all of the information in your letter will be made public, including your identity.
In addition, in accordance with NRC Management Directive 8.11 (which I have attached for your reference), you have the opportunity to address the NRC Petition Review Board (PRB) to further discuss your petition, either in person at the NRC Headquarters in Rockville, MD, or by telephone conference.
I would appreciate if you could advise me by Thursday, November 18, 2010, if you agree to the NRCs processing your request under the 2.206 process. In addition, please advise me if you would like to address the PRB.
If you would like to meet in person, I will need to schedule a formal public meeting at the NRC Headquarters. If you would prefer to address the PRB via telephone, I will also work with you to coordinate a date/time during the upcoming weeks. To assist in planning a compatible schedule for all participants at the PRM meeting, please provide your anticipated windows of opportunity (that is, periods of time on specific days between now and November 29, 2010) for meeting in person or by telephone.
If you have any questions, please contact me by telephone or email.
Thank you, Karl Feintuch Project Manager Plant Licensing Branch 3-1 Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission 301-415-3079 karl.feintuch@nrc.gov E-mail Properties Mail Envelope Properties (26E42474DB238C408C94990815A02F091367627963)


==Subject:==
==Subject:==
ME5012 - Your petition under 10CFR2.206, pertaining to the Duane Arnold Energy Center, Docket 05000331  
ME5012 - Your petition under 10CFR2.206, pertaining to the Duane Arnold Energy Center, Docket 05000331 Sent Date:        11/17/2010 12:07:56 AM Received Date:         11/17/2010 12:07:00 AM From:             Feintuch, Karl Created By:        Karl.Feintuch@nrc.gov Recipients:
 
saporito3@gmail.com' ('saporito3@gmail.com'')
Sent Date:        11/17/2010 12:07:56 AM Received Date:       11/17/2010 12:07:00 AM From:               Feintuch, Karl  
Tracking Status: None
 
Created By:        Karl.Feintuch@nrc.gov  
 
Recipients:
saporito3@gmail.com' ('saporito3@gmail.com'')                Tracking Status: None Tanya.Mensah@nrc.gov (Mensah, Tanya)                Tracking Status: None Robert.Pascarelli@nrc.gov (Pascarelli, Robert)
Tracking Status: None  
 
Post Office:
HQCLSTR01.nrc.gov
 
Files                Size        Date & Time
 
MESSAGE        2875510        11/17/2010 MD 8 11.pdf        2861989
 
Options Expiration Date:
Priority:                        olImportanceNormal ReplyRequested:        False Return Notification:        False


Sensitivity:         olNormal Recipients received:}}
Tanya.Mensah@nrc.gov (Mensah, Tanya)
Tracking Status: None Robert.Pascarelli@nrc.gov (Pascarelli, Robert)
Tracking Status: None Post Office:
HQCLSTR01.nrc.gov Files          Size      Date & Time MESSAGE          2875510      11/17/2010 MD 8 11.pdf      2861989 Options Expiration Date:
Priority:              olImportanceNormal ReplyRequested:        False Return Notification:      False Sensitivity:     olNormal Recipients received:}}

Latest revision as of 05:57, 13 November 2019

ME5012 - 2.206 Petition - First Contact with Petitioner Email
ML103220270
Person / Time
Site: Duane Arnold NextEra Energy icon.png
Issue date: 11/17/2010
From: Feintuch K
Plant Licensing Branch III
To: Saporito T
- No Known Affiliation
Feintuch K, NRR/DORL/LPL3-1, 415-3079
Shared Package
ML103220278 List:
References
TAC ME5012
Download: ML103220270 (2)
v • d • e


Text

From: Feintuch, Karl Sent: Wednesday, November 17, 2010 12:08 AM To: 'saporito3@gmail.com

Cc: Mensah, Tanya; Pascarelli, Robert

Subject:

ME5012 - Your petition under 10CFR2.206, pertaining to the Duane Arnold Energy Center, Docket 05000331 Attachments: MD 8 11.pdf November 16, 2010 Mr. Thomas Saporito, Petitioner Post Office Box 8413 Jupiter, Florida 33468-8363 saporito3@gmail.com I have been assigned as the Petition Manager for the 10 CFR 2.206 petition that you submitted to the NRC on November 12, 2010, regarding your concerns about an indication identified in the N2A Recirculation Inlet Safe End to Safe End extension Dissimilar Metal Weld, at the Duane Arnold [Energy Center, (DAEC)] the preliminary assessment of which the licensee of DAEC attributed to stress corrosion cracking.

Section 2.206 of Title 10 of the Code of Federal Regulations describes the petition process -

the primary mechanism for the public to request enforcement action by the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) in a public process. This process permits anyone to petition NRC to take enforcement-type action related to NRC licensees or licensed activities. Depending on the results of its evaluation, the NRC could modify, suspend or revoke an NRC-issued license or take any other appropriate enforcement action to resolve a problem. The NRC staffs guidance for the disposition of 2.206 petition requests is in Management Directive 8.11, which is publicly available.

The 2.206 process provides a mechanism for any member of the public to request enforcement action against NRC licensees. Therefore, because you specifically requested in your letter that the NRC:

(1) take enforcement action against the licensee of the DAEC; (2) issue a confirmatory order requiring the licensee to bring the DAEC to a cold-shutdown mode of operation; (3) issue a confirmatory order preventing the licensee from bringing the DAEC to any mode of operation other than cold shutdown until the licensee completes further testing of its safety-related primary and secondary systems and components; and (4) issue a confirmatory order requiring the licensee to obtain an independent evaluation of all relevant systems by a certified independent contractor, your petition was referred to the 2.206 process. The 2.206 process is separate from the allegations process which affords individuals who raise safety concerns a degree of protection

of their identity. In the 2.206 process, all of the information in your letter will be made public, including your identity.

In addition, in accordance with NRC Management Directive 8.11 (which I have attached for your reference), you have the opportunity to address the NRC Petition Review Board (PRB) to further discuss your petition, either in person at the NRC Headquarters in Rockville, MD, or by telephone conference.

I would appreciate if you could advise me by Thursday, November 18, 2010, if you agree to the NRCs processing your request under the 2.206 process. In addition, please advise me if you would like to address the PRB.

If you would like to meet in person, I will need to schedule a formal public meeting at the NRC Headquarters. If you would prefer to address the PRB via telephone, I will also work with you to coordinate a date/time during the upcoming weeks. To assist in planning a compatible schedule for all participants at the PRM meeting, please provide your anticipated windows of opportunity (that is, periods of time on specific days between now and November 29, 2010) for meeting in person or by telephone.

If you have any questions, please contact me by telephone or email.

Thank you, Karl Feintuch Project Manager Plant Licensing Branch 3-1 Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission 301-415-3079 karl.feintuch@nrc.gov E-mail Properties Mail Envelope Properties (26E42474DB238C408C94990815A02F091367627963)

Subject:

ME5012 - Your petition under 10CFR2.206, pertaining to the Duane Arnold Energy Center, Docket 05000331 Sent Date: 11/17/2010 12:07:56 AM Received Date: 11/17/2010 12:07:00 AM From: Feintuch, Karl Created By: Karl.Feintuch@nrc.gov Recipients:

saporito3@gmail.com' ('saporito3@gmail.com)

Tracking Status: None

Tanya.Mensah@nrc.gov (Mensah, Tanya)

Tracking Status: None Robert.Pascarelli@nrc.gov (Pascarelli, Robert)

Tracking Status: None Post Office:

HQCLSTR01.nrc.gov Files Size Date & Time MESSAGE 2875510 11/17/2010 MD 8 11.pdf 2861989 Options Expiration Date:

Priority: olImportanceNormal ReplyRequested: False Return Notification: False Sensitivity: olNormal Recipients received:

Retrieved from "https://kanterella.com/w/index.php?title=ML103220270&oldid=2124491"