ML12061A445: Difference between revisions
StriderTol (talk | contribs) (Created page by program invented by StriderTol) |
StriderTol (talk | contribs) (Created page by program invented by StriderTol) |
||
Line 17: | Line 17: | ||
=Text= | =Text= | ||
{{#Wiki_filter:UNITED STATES NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION REGION III 2443 WARRENVILLE ROAD, SUITE 210 LISLE, IL 60532-4352 | {{#Wiki_filter:UNITED STATES | ||
NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION | |||
REGION III | |||
2443 WARRENVILLE ROAD, SUITE 210 | |||
inspection will be performed in accordance with the NRC baseline Inspection Procedure IP 71111.17. | LISLE, IL 60532-4352 | ||
for documents needed for the inspection. | February 28, 2012 | ||
group, i.e., Item (1), will be requested for review in the Regional Office prior to the inspection. | Mr. Michael J. Pacilio | ||
Site Vice-President, Exelon Generation Company, LLC | |||
questions about the inspection or the materials requested, please contact the lead inspector at (630) 829-9797 or via e-mail at mohammad.munir@nrc.gov. This letter does not contain new or amended information collection requirements subject to the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.). | President and Chief Nuclear Officer (CNO), Exelon Nuclear | ||
number 3150-0011. | 4300 Winfield Road | ||
Warrenville IL 60555 | |||
SUBJECT: CLINTON POWER STATION INFORMATION REQUEST FOR AN NRC | |||
TRIENNIAL PERMANENT MODIFICATION AND 10 CFR 50.59 (MOD/50.59) | |||
BASELINE INSPECTION 05000461/2012007(DRS) | |||
Dear Mr. Pacilio: | |||
On June 25, 2012, the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) will begin a Modification | |||
and 10 CFR 50.59 (MOD/50.59) baseline inspection at the Clinton Power Station. This | |||
inspection will be performed in accordance with the NRC baseline Inspection Procedure | |||
IP 71111.17. The on-site portion of the inspection will take place on June 25-29 and July 9-13. | |||
Experience has shown that these baseline inspections are extremely resource intensive, | |||
both for the NRC inspectors and the licensee staff. In order to minimize the inspection impact | |||
on the site and to ensure a productive inspection for both parties, we have enclosed a request | |||
for documents needed for the inspection. These documents have been divided into three | |||
groups. | |||
The first group of information is necessary to ensure that the inspection team is adequately | |||
prepared for the inspection. This information should be made available via compact disc to | |||
the Regional Office no later than May 1, 2012. The inspection team will review this information | |||
by May 14, 2012, and will request specific items that should be available for review by | |||
June 11, 2012. | |||
The second group of requested documents contains additional items that the team will | |||
review, or need access to, during the inspection. Certain documents contained within this | |||
group, i.e., Item (1), will be requested for review in the Regional Office prior to the inspection. | |||
The remaining documents should be available by the first day of the on-site inspection, | |||
June 25, 2012. | |||
The third group lists information necessary to aid the inspection team in tracking issues | |||
identified as a result of the inspection. It is requested that this information be provided to the | |||
lead inspector, as the information is generated during the inspection. It is important that all of | |||
these documents are up to date and complete in order to minimize the number of additional | |||
documents requested during the preparation and/or the on-site portions of the inspection. | |||
M. Pacilio -2- | |||
The lead inspector for this inspection is Mr. Mohammad Munir. We understand that our | |||
regulatory contact for this inspection is Mr. Ron Frantz of your organization. If there are any | |||
questions about the inspection or the materials requested, please contact the lead inspector at | |||
(630) 829-9797 or via e-mail at mohammad.munir@nrc.gov. | |||
This letter does not contain new or amended information collection requirements subject to | |||
the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.). Existing information | |||
collection requirements were approved by the Office of Management and Budget, control | |||
number 3150-0011. The NRC may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required to | |||
respond to, a request for information or an information collection requirement unless the | |||
requesting document displays a currently valid Office of Management and Budget control | |||
number. | |||
In accordance with 10 CFR 2.390 of the NRCs Rules of Practice, a copy of this letter and its | |||
enclosure will be available electronically for public inspection in the NRC Public Document | |||
Room or from the Publicly Available Records (PARS) component of NRCs document system | |||
(ADAMS), accessible from the NRC Web site at http://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/adams.html (the | |||
Public Electronic Reading Room). | |||
Sincerely, | |||
/RA/ | |||
Hironori Peterson, Acting Chief | |||
Engineering Branch 3 | |||
Division of Reactor Safety | |||
Docket No. 50-461 | |||
License No. NPF-62 | |||
Enclosure: MODIFICATION AND 50.59 BASELINE INSPECTION DOCUMENT REQUEST | |||
cc w/encl: Distribution via ListServ' | |||
MODIFICATION AND 50.59 BASELINE INSPECTION DOCUMENT REQUEST | MODIFICATION AND 50.59 BASELINE INSPECTION DOCUMENT REQUEST | ||
Inspection Report: 05000461/2012007(DRS) | |||
: | Inspection Dates: June 25-29, 2012; and July 9-13, 2012 | ||
: | Inspection Procedures: IP 71111- 17, Evaluation of Changes, Tests, or | ||
: IP 71111- 17, | Experiments and Permanent Plant Modifications | ||
: | Lead Inspector: Mohammad Munir, Lead Inspector | ||
(630) 829-9797 | |||
week. | I. Information Requested for In-Office Preparation Week | ||
cover the time frame from the receipt of information for the last Permanent Modification inspection on February 13, 2009, to the present. | The following information is requested by May 1, 2012, or sooner, to facilitate the | ||
calculations and affected procedures. | selection of specific items that will be reviewed during the on-site inspection | ||
week. The team will select specific items from the information requested below | |||
and submit a list to your staff by May 14, 2012. We will request that certain items | |||
be made available to the regional office prior to the inspection by June 11, 2012. | |||
We request that the remaining items selected from the lists be available and | |||
ready for review on the first day of inspection. All requested information should | |||
cover the time frame from the receipt of information for the last Permanent | |||
Modification inspection on February 13, 2009, to the present. If you have any | |||
questions regarding this information, please call the team leader as soon as | |||
possible. | |||
(1) List of permanent plant modifications to systems, structures, or | |||
components that are field work complete. (For the purpose of this | |||
inspection, permanent plant modifications include permanent: plant | |||
changes, design changes, set point changes, equivalency evaluations, | |||
suitability analyses, and commercial grade dedications.) | |||
The list should contain the number of each document, the title, the | |||
revision (or date), and the affected system. In addition to the list, please | |||
provide a description of each modification and a list of associated | |||
calculations and affected procedures. | |||
(2) List of all 10 CFR 50.59 completed evaluations involving: (a) calculations; | |||
(b). procedure revisions; (c) changes to the facility (modifications); | |||
(d) non-routine operating configurations; or (e) departures in methods of | |||
analyses. This list should include 50.59 evaluations for the following: | |||
a. Changes that have been made under the previsions of 10 CFR | |||
50.59 that have been updated in accordance with 10 CFR | |||
50.71(e)(4) since February 13, 2009; | |||
1 Enclosure | |||
MODIFICATION AND 50.59 BASELINE INSPECTION DOCUMENT REQUEST | MODIFICATION AND 50.59 BASELINE INSPECTION DOCUMENT REQUEST | ||
b. Modifications that are field work complete; and | |||
(6) List of corrective action documents (open and closed) that address plant permanent modification or 10 CFR 50.59 issues, concerns, or processes. | c. Changes to calculations (or initiation of new calculations) that | ||
associated with modification and MOD 50.59 change implementation. The list should contain the number, title and revision (or date) of each document, the affected system and corresponding documentation (if applicable), and should be sorted in order of significance, | have been issued. | ||
The list should contain the number and title of each document, a brief | |||
description of the change, and the corresponding number and type of the | |||
affected document (i.e., the modification or procedure to which the | |||
evaluation applies). The list should NOT include any evaluations in which | |||
prior NRC approval was sought and obtained. | |||
(3) List of all 10 CFR 50.59 changes that have been screened out as not | |||
requiring a full evaluation involving: (a) calculations; (b) procedure | |||
revisions; (c) changes to the facility (modifications); (d) non-routine | |||
operating configurations; or (e) departures in methods of analyses. | |||
The list should contain the number and title of each document, a brief | |||
description of the change, and the corresponding number and type of the | |||
affected document (i.e., the modification or procedure to which the | |||
evaluation applies). | |||
(4) List of any modifications, procedure revisions, or UFSAR changes where | |||
it was determined that 10 CFR 50.59 did not apply. | |||
(5) List of calculation changes that have been issued for use. | |||
(6) List of corrective action documents (open and closed) that address plant | |||
permanent modification or 10 CFR 50.59 issues, concerns, or processes. | |||
These documents should also include corrective action documents | |||
associated with modification and MOD 50.59 change implementation. | |||
The list should contain the number, title and revision (or date) of each | |||
document, the affected system and corresponding documentation (if | |||
applicable), and should be sorted in order of significance, | |||
(7) Copies of procedures addressing the following: modifications, design | |||
changes, set point changes, equivalency evaluations or suitability | |||
analyses, commercial grade dedications, post-modification testing, | |||
10 CFR 50.59 evaluation and screenings, and UFSAR updates. | |||
(8) UFSAR updates submitted in accordance with 10 CFR 50.71(e)(4). | |||
Provide copies of the complete submittal. | |||
(9) Copy of the UFSAR change log (or a synopsis of changes). This should | |||
include all of the changes made to the UFSAR that were incorporated in | |||
the last 10 CFR 50.71(e)(4) submittal. | |||
(10) Electronic copy of the UFSAR, if available | |||
2 Enclosure | |||
MODIFICATION AND 50.59 BASELINE INSPECTION DOCUMENT REQUEST | MODIFICATION AND 50.59 BASELINE INSPECTION DOCUMENT REQUEST | ||
(11) Name(s) and phone numbers for the regulatory and technical contacts. | |||
(12) Current management and engineering organizational chart. | |||
c. Original SER and Supplements; | II. Information Requested to be Available Prior to Inspection (Request will be | ||
d. FSAR Question and Answers; | made by May 14, 2012, for availability of documents by June 11, 2012, | ||
e. Quality Assurance Plan; | [Item 1]) or on First Day of Inspection (June 25, 2012), [Items 2, 3 and 4] | ||
f. Technical Specifications; | (1) Copies of all selected items from Section I. This includes copies of | ||
g. Latest IPE/PRA Report; h. Vendor Manuals; and i. The Latest 10 CFR 50.59 FSAR Update Submittal. (3) Please ensure that other supporting documents for the selected items have been located and are readily retrievable as the team will likely be requesting these documents during the inspections. | associated documents such as calculations, post-modification test packages, | ||
b. Procedures affected by the modifications; and | 10 CFR 50.59 evaluations, or screenings, and any corrective action | ||
c. UFSAR change papers generated due to a 10 CFR 50.59 evaluation. (4) Current management and engineering organizational chart. | documents. | ||
(5) Assessment and corrective Actions: a. The most recent modification (MOD)/50.59 Quality Assurance (QA) audit and/or self-assessment; and b. Corrective action documents (e.g., condition reports, including status of corrective actions) generate as a result of the most recent MOD/50.59 Quality Assurance (QA) audit and/or self-assessment. | (2) Copies of these documents do not need to be solely available to the team as | ||
long as the inspectors have easy and unrestrained access to them. | |||
a. Updated Final Safety Analysis Report; | |||
b. Original FSAR Volumes; | |||
c. Original SER and Supplements; | |||
d. FSAR Question and Answers; | |||
e. Quality Assurance Plan; | |||
f. Technical Specifications; | |||
g. Latest IPE/PRA Report; | |||
h. Vendor Manuals; and | |||
i. The Latest 10 CFR 50.59 FSAR Update Submittal. | |||
(3) Please ensure that other supporting documents for the selected items have | |||
been located and are readily retrievable as the team will likely be | |||
requesting these documents during the inspections. Examples of | |||
supporting documents are: | |||
a. Drawings supporting the modifications; | |||
b. Procedures affected by the modifications; and | |||
c. UFSAR change papers generated due to a 10 CFR 50.59 evaluation. | |||
(4) Current management and engineering organizational chart. | |||
(5) Assessment and corrective Actions: | |||
a. The most recent modification (MOD)/50.59 Quality Assurance (QA) | |||
audit and/or self-assessment; and | |||
b. Corrective action documents (e.g., condition reports, including status | |||
of corrective actions) generate as a result of the most recent | |||
MOD/50.59 Quality Assurance (QA) audit and/or self-assessment. | |||
3 Enclosure | |||
MODIFICATION AND 50.59 BASELINE INSPECTION DOCUMENT REQUEST | MODIFICATION AND 50.59 BASELINE INSPECTION DOCUMENT REQUEST | ||
III. Information Requested to be provided throughout the inspection | |||
(1) Copies of any corrective action documents generated as a result of the | |||
teams questions or queries during this inspection. | |||
the inspection or the materials requested, please contact the lead inspector at (630) 829-9797 or via | (2) Copies of the list of questions submitted by the team members and the | ||
e-mail at mohammad.munir@nrc.gov. This letter does not contain new or amended information collection requirements subject to the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.). | status/resolution of the information requested (provide daily during the | ||
requirements were approved by the Office of Management and Budget, control number 3150-0011. | inspection to each team member). | ||
The NRC may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required to respond to, a request for information or an information collection requirement unless the requesting document displays a | If you have questions regarding the information requested, please contact the team | ||
currently valid Office of Management and Budget control number. | leader. | ||
from the Publicly Available Records (PARS) component of | 4 Enclosure | ||
accessible from the NRC Web site at http://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/adams.html (the Public Electronic Reading Room). Sincerely, | |||
/RA/ | M. Pacilio -2- | ||
The lead inspector for this inspection is Mr. Mohammad Munir. We understand that our regulatory | |||
Hironori Peterson, Acting Chief Engineering Branch 3 Division of Reactor Safety | contact for this inspection is Mr. Ron Frantz of your organization. If there are any questions about | ||
the inspection or the materials requested, please contact the lead inspector at (630) 829-9797 or via | |||
e-mail at mohammad.munir@nrc.gov. | |||
DISTRIBUTION | This letter does not contain new or amended information collection requirements subject to the | ||
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.). Existing information collection | |||
requirements were approved by the Office of Management and Budget, control number 3150-0011. | |||
OFFICE RIII | The NRC may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required to respond to, a request for | ||
information or an information collection requirement unless the requesting document displays a | |||
DATE 02/28/12 02/28/12 | currently valid Office of Management and Budget control number. | ||
In accordance with 10 CFR 2.390 of the NRCs Rules of Practice, a copy of this letter and its | |||
enclosure will be available electronically for public inspection in the NRC Public Document Room or | |||
from the Publicly Available Records (PARS) component of NRCs document system (ADAMS), | |||
accessible from the NRC Web site at http://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/adams.html (the Public | |||
Chuck Casto Cynthia Pederson Jennifer Uhle Steven Orth Jared Heck | Electronic Reading Room). | ||
Allan Barker Carole Ariano | Sincerely, | ||
Linda Linn DRSIII DRPIII | /RA/ | ||
Patricia Buckley Tammy Tomczak | Hironori Peterson, Acting Chief | ||
Engineering Branch 3 | |||
Division of Reactor Safety | |||
Docket No. 50-461 | |||
License No. NPF-62 | |||
Enclosure: MODIFICATION AND 50.59 BASELINE INSPECTION DOCUMENT REQUEST | |||
cc w/encl: Distribution via ListServ' | |||
DISTRIBUTION: | |||
See next page | |||
DOCUMENT NAME: Ltr. 022812 CLINTON MOD 50 59 RFI MXM.docx | |||
Publicly Available Non-Publicly Available Sensitive Non-Sensitive | |||
To receive a copy of this document, indicate in the concurrence box "C" = Copy without attach/encl "E" = Copy with attach/encl "N" = No copy | |||
OFFICE RIII RIII | |||
NAME MMunir:ls HPeterson | |||
DATE 02/28/12 02/28/12 | |||
OFFICIAL RECORD COPY | |||
Letter to Mr. Michael Pacilio from Mr. Hironori Peterson dated February 28, 2012. | |||
SUBJECT: CLINTON POWER STATION INFORMATION REQUEST FOR AN NRC | |||
TRIENNIAL PERMANENT MODIFICATIONS AND 10 CFR 50.59 | |||
(MOD/50.59) BASELINE INSPECTION 05000461/2012007(DRS) | |||
DISTRIBUTION: | |||
Breeda Reilly | |||
RidsNrrDorlLpl3-2 Resource | |||
RidsNrrPMClinton Resource | |||
RidsNrrDirsIrib Resource | |||
Chuck Casto | |||
Cynthia Pederson | |||
Jennifer Uhle | |||
Steven Orth | |||
Jared Heck | |||
Allan Barker | |||
Carole Ariano | |||
Linda Linn | |||
DRSIII | |||
DRPIII | |||
Patricia Buckley | |||
Tammy Tomczak | |||
}} | }} |
Revision as of 07:17, 12 November 2019
ML12061A445 | |
Person / Time | |
---|---|
Site: | Clinton |
Issue date: | 02/28/2012 |
From: | Hironori Peterson Engineering Branch 3 |
To: | Pacilio M Exelon Generation Co, Exelon Nuclear |
Mohammad Munir | |
References | |
IR-12-007 | |
Download: ML12061A445 (8) | |
See also: IR 05000461/2012007
Text
UNITED STATES
NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION
REGION III
2443 WARRENVILLE ROAD, SUITE 210
LISLE, IL 60532-4352
February 28, 2012
Mr. Michael J. Pacilio
Site Vice-President, Exelon Generation Company, LLC
President and Chief Nuclear Officer (CNO), Exelon Nuclear
4300 Winfield Road
Warrenville IL 60555
SUBJECT: CLINTON POWER STATION INFORMATION REQUEST FOR AN NRC
TRIENNIAL PERMANENT MODIFICATION AND 10 CFR 50.59 (MOD/50.59)
BASELINE INSPECTION 05000461/2012007(DRS)
Dear Mr. Pacilio:
On June 25, 2012, the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) will begin a Modification
and 10 CFR 50.59 (MOD/50.59) baseline inspection at the Clinton Power Station. This
inspection will be performed in accordance with the NRC baseline Inspection Procedure
IP 71111.17. The on-site portion of the inspection will take place on June 25-29 and July 9-13.
Experience has shown that these baseline inspections are extremely resource intensive,
both for the NRC inspectors and the licensee staff. In order to minimize the inspection impact
on the site and to ensure a productive inspection for both parties, we have enclosed a request
for documents needed for the inspection. These documents have been divided into three
groups.
The first group of information is necessary to ensure that the inspection team is adequately
prepared for the inspection. This information should be made available via compact disc to
the Regional Office no later than May 1, 2012. The inspection team will review this information
by May 14, 2012, and will request specific items that should be available for review by
June 11, 2012.
The second group of requested documents contains additional items that the team will
review, or need access to, during the inspection. Certain documents contained within this
group, i.e., Item (1), will be requested for review in the Regional Office prior to the inspection.
The remaining documents should be available by the first day of the on-site inspection,
June 25, 2012.
The third group lists information necessary to aid the inspection team in tracking issues
identified as a result of the inspection. It is requested that this information be provided to the
lead inspector, as the information is generated during the inspection. It is important that all of
these documents are up to date and complete in order to minimize the number of additional
documents requested during the preparation and/or the on-site portions of the inspection.
M. Pacilio -2-
The lead inspector for this inspection is Mr. Mohammad Munir. We understand that our
regulatory contact for this inspection is Mr. Ron Frantz of your organization. If there are any
questions about the inspection or the materials requested, please contact the lead inspector at
(630) 829-9797 or via e-mail at mohammad.munir@nrc.gov.
This letter does not contain new or amended information collection requirements subject to
the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.). Existing information
collection requirements were approved by the Office of Management and Budget, control
number 3150-0011. The NRC may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required to
respond to, a request for information or an information collection requirement unless the
requesting document displays a currently valid Office of Management and Budget control
number.
In accordance with 10 CFR 2.390 of the NRCs Rules of Practice, a copy of this letter and its
enclosure will be available electronically for public inspection in the NRC Public Document
Room or from the Publicly Available Records (PARS) component of NRCs document system
(ADAMS), accessible from the NRC Web site at http://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/adams.html (the
Public Electronic Reading Room).
Sincerely,
/RA/
Hironori Peterson, Acting Chief
Engineering Branch 3
Division of Reactor Safety
Docket No. 50-461
License No. NPF-62
Enclosure: MODIFICATION AND 50.59 BASELINE INSPECTION DOCUMENT REQUEST
cc w/encl: Distribution via ListServ'
MODIFICATION AND 50.59 BASELINE INSPECTION DOCUMENT REQUEST
Inspection Report: 05000461/2012007(DRS)
Inspection Dates: June 25-29, 2012; and July 9-13, 2012
Inspection Procedures: IP 71111- 17, Evaluation of Changes, Tests, or
Experiments and Permanent Plant Modifications
Lead Inspector: Mohammad Munir, Lead Inspector
(630) 829-9797
I. Information Requested for In-Office Preparation Week
The following information is requested by May 1, 2012, or sooner, to facilitate the
selection of specific items that will be reviewed during the on-site inspection
week. The team will select specific items from the information requested below
and submit a list to your staff by May 14, 2012. We will request that certain items
be made available to the regional office prior to the inspection by June 11, 2012.
We request that the remaining items selected from the lists be available and
ready for review on the first day of inspection. All requested information should
cover the time frame from the receipt of information for the last Permanent
Modification inspection on February 13, 2009, to the present. If you have any
questions regarding this information, please call the team leader as soon as
possible.
(1) List of permanent plant modifications to systems, structures, or
components that are field work complete. (For the purpose of this
inspection, permanent plant modifications include permanent: plant
changes, design changes, set point changes, equivalency evaluations,
suitability analyses, and commercial grade dedications.)
The list should contain the number of each document, the title, the
revision (or date), and the affected system. In addition to the list, please
provide a description of each modification and a list of associated
calculations and affected procedures.
(2) List of all 10 CFR 50.59 completed evaluations involving: (a) calculations;
(b). procedure revisions; (c) changes to the facility (modifications);
(d) non-routine operating configurations; or (e) departures in methods of
analyses. This list should include 50.59 evaluations for the following:
a. Changes that have been made under the previsions of 10 CFR
50.59 that have been updated in accordance with 10 CFR
50.71(e)(4) since February 13, 2009;
1 Enclosure
MODIFICATION AND 50.59 BASELINE INSPECTION DOCUMENT REQUEST
b. Modifications that are field work complete; and
c. Changes to calculations (or initiation of new calculations) that
have been issued.
The list should contain the number and title of each document, a brief
description of the change, and the corresponding number and type of the
affected document (i.e., the modification or procedure to which the
evaluation applies). The list should NOT include any evaluations in which
prior NRC approval was sought and obtained.
(3) List of all 10 CFR 50.59 changes that have been screened out as not
requiring a full evaluation involving: (a) calculations; (b) procedure
revisions; (c) changes to the facility (modifications); (d) non-routine
operating configurations; or (e) departures in methods of analyses.
The list should contain the number and title of each document, a brief
description of the change, and the corresponding number and type of the
affected document (i.e., the modification or procedure to which the
evaluation applies).
(4) List of any modifications, procedure revisions, or UFSAR changes where
it was determined that 10 CFR 50.59 did not apply.
(5) List of calculation changes that have been issued for use.
(6) List of corrective action documents (open and closed) that address plant
permanent modification or 10 CFR 50.59 issues, concerns, or processes.
These documents should also include corrective action documents
associated with modification and MOD 50.59 change implementation.
The list should contain the number, title and revision (or date) of each
document, the affected system and corresponding documentation (if
applicable), and should be sorted in order of significance,
(7) Copies of procedures addressing the following: modifications, design
changes, set point changes, equivalency evaluations or suitability
analyses, commercial grade dedications, post-modification testing,
10 CFR 50.59 evaluation and screenings, and UFSAR updates.
(8) UFSAR updates submitted in accordance with 10 CFR 50.71(e)(4).
Provide copies of the complete submittal.
(9) Copy of the UFSAR change log (or a synopsis of changes). This should
include all of the changes made to the UFSAR that were incorporated in
the last 10 CFR 50.71(e)(4) submittal.
(10) Electronic copy of the UFSAR, if available
2 Enclosure
MODIFICATION AND 50.59 BASELINE INSPECTION DOCUMENT REQUEST
(11) Name(s) and phone numbers for the regulatory and technical contacts.
(12) Current management and engineering organizational chart.
II. Information Requested to be Available Prior to Inspection (Request will be
made by May 14, 2012, for availability of documents by June 11, 2012,
[Item 1]) or on First Day of Inspection (June 25, 2012), [Items 2, 3 and 4]
(1) Copies of all selected items from Section I. This includes copies of
associated documents such as calculations, post-modification test packages,
10 CFR 50.59 evaluations, or screenings, and any corrective action
documents.
(2) Copies of these documents do not need to be solely available to the team as
long as the inspectors have easy and unrestrained access to them.
a. Updated Final Safety Analysis Report;
b. Original FSAR Volumes;
c. Original SER and Supplements;
d. FSAR Question and Answers;
e. Quality Assurance Plan;
f. Technical Specifications;
g. Latest IPE/PRA Report;
h. Vendor Manuals; and
i. The Latest 10 CFR 50.59 FSAR Update Submittal.
(3) Please ensure that other supporting documents for the selected items have
been located and are readily retrievable as the team will likely be
requesting these documents during the inspections. Examples of
supporting documents are:
a. Drawings supporting the modifications;
b. Procedures affected by the modifications; and
c. UFSAR change papers generated due to a 10 CFR 50.59 evaluation.
(4) Current management and engineering organizational chart.
(5) Assessment and corrective Actions:
a. The most recent modification (MOD)/50.59 Quality Assurance (QA)
audit and/or self-assessment; and
b. Corrective action documents (e.g., condition reports, including status
of corrective actions) generate as a result of the most recent
MOD/50.59 Quality Assurance (QA) audit and/or self-assessment.
3 Enclosure
MODIFICATION AND 50.59 BASELINE INSPECTION DOCUMENT REQUEST
III. Information Requested to be provided throughout the inspection
(1) Copies of any corrective action documents generated as a result of the
teams questions or queries during this inspection.
(2) Copies of the list of questions submitted by the team members and the
status/resolution of the information requested (provide daily during the
inspection to each team member).
If you have questions regarding the information requested, please contact the team
leader.
4 Enclosure
M. Pacilio -2-
The lead inspector for this inspection is Mr. Mohammad Munir. We understand that our regulatory
contact for this inspection is Mr. Ron Frantz of your organization. If there are any questions about
the inspection or the materials requested, please contact the lead inspector at (630) 829-9797 or via
e-mail at mohammad.munir@nrc.gov.
This letter does not contain new or amended information collection requirements subject to the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.). Existing information collection
requirements were approved by the Office of Management and Budget, control number 3150-0011.
The NRC may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required to respond to, a request for
information or an information collection requirement unless the requesting document displays a
currently valid Office of Management and Budget control number.
In accordance with 10 CFR 2.390 of the NRCs Rules of Practice, a copy of this letter and its
enclosure will be available electronically for public inspection in the NRC Public Document Room or
from the Publicly Available Records (PARS) component of NRCs document system (ADAMS),
accessible from the NRC Web site at http://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/adams.html (the Public
Electronic Reading Room).
Sincerely,
/RA/
Hironori Peterson, Acting Chief
Engineering Branch 3
Division of Reactor Safety
Docket No. 50-461
License No. NPF-62
Enclosure: MODIFICATION AND 50.59 BASELINE INSPECTION DOCUMENT REQUEST
cc w/encl: Distribution via ListServ'
DISTRIBUTION:
See next page
DOCUMENT NAME: Ltr. 022812 CLINTON MOD 50 59 RFI MXM.docx
Publicly Available Non-Publicly Available Sensitive Non-Sensitive
To receive a copy of this document, indicate in the concurrence box "C" = Copy without attach/encl "E" = Copy with attach/encl "N" = No copy
OFFICE RIII RIII
NAME MMunir:ls HPeterson
DATE 02/28/12 02/28/12
OFFICIAL RECORD COPY
Letter to Mr. Michael Pacilio from Mr. Hironori Peterson dated February 28, 2012.
SUBJECT: CLINTON POWER STATION INFORMATION REQUEST FOR AN NRC
TRIENNIAL PERMANENT MODIFICATIONS AND 10 CFR 50.59
(MOD/50.59) BASELINE INSPECTION 05000461/2012007(DRS)
DISTRIBUTION:
Breeda Reilly
RidsNrrDorlLpl3-2 Resource
RidsNrrPMClinton Resource
RidsNrrDirsIrib Resource
Chuck Casto
Cynthia Pederson
Jennifer Uhle
DRSIII
DRPIII
Patricia Buckley